The crisis, its 4 causes and solutions: Evolutionary Economics.

The present crisis is the last of the dual ‘Kondratieff’ waves of evolution of weapons, money and machines.
In the graph, the 3 dual waves (steam the energy, and trains the hardware; oil the energy and car the hardware, electronics the energy and robots the hardware) that complete the industrial evolution of machines. This crisis is the molting between the 2 last waves, the chip radiation and the robotic radiation. Yet it is different from all others, because it completes the Industrial Evolution of machines into an autonomous organism – the robot, which is independent of humans, as it will have fully developed a solar skin for energy and A.I. of visual nature – hence a new species.
The four causes of the crisis: overproduction of electronic machines.

The present crisis is not a recession but a depression, caused by the overproduction of electronic machines and its derivatives, similar to the 1929 crash, caused by the overproduction of electro-mechanical machines, which printed too much money (ticker speculation), electro-mechanical production systems (taylorism, automated assembly lines) that threw millions out of work and the overproduction of cars and radios, whose companies, lobbies and politicians reconverted into armored cars (tanks) and hate-radio speeches (Hitler), embarking us into World War II.

After the war, the Kondratieff wave of electro-mechanical machines was exhausted and so we started a new dual wave of ‘electronic machines‘,which evolved and reproduced in increasing numbers till saturating the global market.

And so we suffer again a crisis of overproduction and exhaustion of machines, now of electronic nature, with 4 sides, similar to those of the 29 crisis, as each Kondratieff wave of evolution of memes of metal applies to money, machines, weapons and mass-media: There is a crisis of overproduction of electronic money (financial crisis, caused by the massive reproduction of electronic derivatives and other forms of electronic money, which have lost value), of electronic machines (overproduction of computers that act as white collar workers and robots that act as blue collar workers, expelling the middle classes out of work, except low-paid human robots’ in China and IT workers in India that still can compete with them), of electronic weapons (overproduction of ‘vigilante’ cameras and robot-terminators – drones – which have started a new arm race of enormous profits for the military-industrial complex) and electronic mass-media outlets, which have also switched to hate-speeches as Hitler did with radio, to increase sales and work hand in hand with the profits of electronic industries and war; and are regressing human culture into a visual, violent, selfish age in culture and politics – that we call the ‘neo-paleolithic’ culture and the neo-fascist’ age in politics.

Thus the crisis is one of overproduction of electronic machines of 4 types, e-money, weapons, robotic workers and mass-media outlets, whose influence in society, politics, economics and culture have ended the american dream of an equalitarian society with opportunities for all men:

- The most talked about crisis is the financial crisis, caused by the reproduction and evolution of ‘bloomberg’ type of speculative platforms, which give massive credit to investors to speculate with currencies (FOREX) commodities and stocks (similar to the margin buys of the 20s speculative wave). Today those electronic platforms create ‘virtual money’, which the speculator does not need to hold for more than a few hours, recently a few minutes and amounts to tenfold even one hundred fold the credit of the speculator, which he uses to jack up prices of commodities and stocks - a taxation that then all the population pays in higher prices of food, oil, etc.

- An age of perpetual war and police states to help the reproduction and sale of robotic weapons (drones now, soon armed cameras, police cars, etc.)

This arms race now has started in earnest, and by middle of the century A.I. will probably be created first in millions of robots designed to kill mankind. Since the weapon, the top predator version of the machine that consumes human beings has always been the most advanced, expensive, profitable mechanism at any age of the Industrial Revolution. Thus in the previous age, the car became the tank and Hitler implemented Keynesian militarism as Bush has done in this crisis. 

- A labor crisis, as white collar pcs and blue collar robots substitute the middle class except in low salary nations – Chinese cheap human robots in sweat shops and IT Indian human pcs. The crisis will continue moved by ‘productivity’ = capital in machines/ labor, which obviously grows, P=C/L when we diminish labor. Yet since machines give higher profits, censored economics ‘praises’ productivity without ever mention to the public its equation, and politicians with astounding ignorance or cynicism tell us that ‘rising productivity will create jobs’, when its definition is precisely the opposite.

Unfortunately the present global crisis of overproduction of electronic machines means also a ‘molting’ of the economic ecosystem from the age of America and ‘heads of metal’, to the global age of ‘robotics’, automated company-mothers and Internet, which mimic 4 self-similar crisis at the end of the age of bodies of metal (1929), means the increasing obsolescence of humanity. Because the industrial evolution ends with robotics that no longer need men. So there will not be as in the previous crisis a new age of economical growth (due in the 40s to the invention of heads of metal that put us back to work). Let us explain this essential ‘new future’ of this crisis, that differentiates it from the 29 crisis for the worst.

Thus the war and labor crisis can only be solved by forbidding robotics as we forbid AIDs viruses that can kill us, according to a simple biological “Law of the Jungle’: ‘kill the child before he becomes a tiger hunter’.

- A mental crisis provoked by the massive noise of meaningless electronic media and hate TVs, which are devolving human minds to a visual, neo-Paleolithic age of violent, simple thought. In what concerns the sciences of history and economics this ‘noise’ maintains the subconscious collective in pre-scientific times (tribal, nationalistic memes and go(l)d religions that pass as economic dogmas). Censorship here is vital to avoid any evolution of those sciences and solution to the crisis. The overwhelming control of mass-media communicators by big money means that ‘creationist economics’, (classic economics whose ‘hidden postulates’ derive from biblical beliefs in the ‘invisible hand of money’, which must guide societies without interferences) is the only ‘theory of reality’ which is heard. Those postulates, studied and proved false in the right, lower part of this web that deals with the ‘ideologies’ of the Financial-Military-Industrial Complex ecosystem we have created, are not even discussed in the present monolithic world of single-thought, repeated ad nauseam in infinite outlets, which all affirm the same ‘noise’.

The solutions are political and could be easily implemented if the will to change the world was there.

The solution to this 4th crisis is more complex and require legal measures against ‘visual fiction’ as a form of lying that prevents a real freedom of speech, covered by the noise of advertising and fiction thought. Yet the other 3 more important crisis could be easily solved with a G20 ban on robotics and the creation of a global single currency, ¥€$ money, with fixed parity 1 dollar = 1 euro = 100 yens = 5 Yuans, which would represent 3/4 of the global GDP, hence the only reference currency that could not be sunk by speculators. Such currency would then have rights to a 20% of annual deficit, invested in promoting a sustainable economy, a welfare state and jobs for human beings, which the robotic radiation has eliminated.

Further on, the war crisis could be eliminated with a single stroke, by accepting that ‘terrorism’ is not war and must be fought with police, intelligence and diplomacy as UK and Spain did to end their terrorism movements. But that means of course, the end of the ‘dictatorship of bankers’ over the American government, with its financial muscle and related lobbies in defense of apartheid Israel - in other words a balanced, diplomatic position of the US, the end of the drone war and the backing of International Institutions such as the UNO and the EU, as a blueprint for a future integration of all nations into a wor(l)d union with a single currency and the goal of fostering the survival and welfare, the WHealth of all mankind.

Since it all started precisely with the crisis of overreproduction of e-money – with the development of speculative platforms that parasite the physical economy – the creation of a fixed parity currency and the taxation of speculative trades is a must for the crisis to end. Nothing else will do, not even the printing of money by central bankers, for those very same institutions that cause the crisis. Indeed, the money central bankers have printed, never reaches the physical, productive economy but it is kept in the ‘casino’ of speculators, who use it as virtual credit to further speculate and worsen the crisis.


The mathematical, ternary structure of the long, medium and short waves of History and Economics.

For those with some knowledge of biology, the Kondratieff wave is a dual, complex wave of evolution, of the energies and hardware we use to power machines, which are the main product of the industrial economy, and add together for a wave of 72 years that defined an age of modern history: The age of steam and england, the age of engines and germany, the age of metal-minds and USA and now the last age of the industrial r=evolution, the age of robotics.

In detail, those dual ‘K’-waves of 54+54=108 years superpose each other, giving a mean periodicity of 72+-7 years. This was ignored by economists, who also ignored the ultimate cause of the waves (the evolution of machines and its main parts, bodies of metal in the first dual wave, engines in the 2nd dual wave and heads of metal in the 3rd wave, now all put together into robots). So the K-waves are still analyzed in mainstream economics as 54 years waves unconnected to the physical economy, which originates them.

The authenticity of that structure is such that when I discovered it two decades ago in my foundational books on evolutionary economics, they allowed me to forecast back in the 90s with all precision the ‘future’ dotcom and real state crashes of 2001 and 2008, 72+7 years after the 1929-crashes.

Further on, 72 years is the biological life-span of a human being and its 3 generational ages (youth, maturity and old age, or grand-son, son and grand-father). So there is a parallel 3 generational wave of ‘founding fathers’ of the new machines’ industries, reproductive sons that expand the machine worldwide and decadent grand-sons, which use its ‘evil twin’ machine, the weapon to keep owning the world. And so the dual K-waves also determine the ages of global power of the nations that developped them:

- The age of steam and trains, which was the age of the British Empire that discovered them.

- The age of cars and electrochemical engines, which was the age of Germany, which invented them.

- The age of heads of metal, chip-brains, camera-eyes and mobile-ears, or age of America that developed those industries.

Further on, the secondary cause – the human inventors of those machines – appeared naturally since in mathematical terms, the 72 y. dual waves of kondratieff are equal in duration to the 72 years biological generations of humans, from grand-father to grand-son – and so they must be caused by 3 generations of industrialists:

- The founders of the new industries and discoverers of machines.
- The generation that reproduces them as consumption goods…
- And after a crash of overproduction, the decadent generation that uses them as top predator weapons and ruins the country.
This soci0-biological coincidence between the evolution of machines and the life of the humans that carry the wave might seem odd but reflects perfectly why the industrial revolution is killing life and non technological nations and maintains a majority of mankind in chronic poverty – it is not about us, but about the laws of evolution applied to machines, whose will of existence and reproduction are the corporations that rule the world on their behalf. Perhaps the strongest proof of the truth of this model is epistemological: all sciences predict the future of the species they study by observing the patterns of the cyclical past and projecting those cycles into the future.
This is what I did in my first books that developed in full detail those waves, forecasting as earlier as c.94 (library of congress) in my book, ‘Bio-economics, bio-history, a theory of unification’ Bookmasters, Ohio, 97, the 2001 and 2008 crashes. Moreover, the complete wave of ‘evolution of metal’ is a ternary, decametric fractal wave, as those I used to map out in General Systems science the evolution of all species on Earth with 3 distinct waves:
- The 700-800 year cycle that superposes 1000 year waves of civilizations, spotted by the great philosophers of history, Hesiode, Ibn Khaldun, Vico and Spengler, who also found its millenarian structure in the past, which define the life and death of civilizations, as new forms of metal-weapons appear (Bronze age, chariot age, iron age, coin age, spur age, gunpowder age and digital age). It is the main wave that structures ‘history’, studied in the upper left side of this web.
- The 70-80 Kondratieff dual cycles of ‘professional evolution’ of weapons, now in the form of machines, which accelerates decametrically the speed of evolution of technological information, as it happens in all evolutionary processes that accelerate the reproduction of information towards a ’3rd warped’ age; studied in the upper right side of this web.
- The 7-8 year business cycle, which appears clearly defined after II world war, thanks to the advances on electronics and a new acceleration of the evolution of the product, which during the XX century becomes evolved into a new ‘generational species’ every 7-8 years.
- And we can further see that with the help of Computer Design, companies are moving to an even shorter year period of development of new, more evolved machines. Consider now that humans have no evolved significantly in 50.000 years and machines are evolving every other year… This astounding differential of evolution explains why we shall need only a human generation to discover Artificial Intelligence applied to robotic warfare. Then, the laws of evolution imply that A.I. will behave as nature always does when two species compete for limited resources – eliminating ‘costly’ human beings with no jobs and no consumption.

The next cycle: the robotic age ends the Industrial R=evolution

We could also consider those waves as waves of ‘new energies’, which renew the stocks of machines and evolve them. So the Age of Britain was determined by the steam energy; the age of Germany by the oil energy and the age of America by the electric energy that runs electronic systems. And now the age of robotics will be determined by solar energies, which as prices plummet and technology evolves will become the ‘solar skin’ that makes robotic weapons autonomous.

Thus we live now the end of the Age of America and the crash of overproduction of its electronic ‘heads’, a transitional age that has passed, as we enter in the global world rule by no nation, whose star machine, the robot puts together all the other components developed in the previous cycles, becoming the new ‘consumer’ of machines and the new ‘worker’ that makes most human beings obsolete. Thus this is not only the worst crisis of capitalism from the human perspective, but also its triumph from the point of evolutionary economics and the ‘goal’ of capitalism – to evolve memes of metal into a new organic species.

In that sense, the industrial take-off of military robotics means the end of the Industrial R=evolution and probably an existential crisis that must be connected with the so-called 6th extinction of life species taking place in this planet since the Industrial revolution kicked off. And yet none of those themes or even the real causes of the crisis are considered by economists, limited by the straight-jacket of ‘profits’ , which reduces their role to maintain the kind of growth that precisely has caused this crisis – the unrelentless evolution and reproduction of machines, money and weapons, a wrong concept of ‘wealth’ that now is becoming independent of man.

Indeed, it is easy to see the next steps of the crisis: humans will remain unemployed, connected to ever more degrading infotainment and maintained by the explosion of fiction mass-media in a lethargic state, as robots keep multiplying and the GDP statistics tell us that we are coming out of the crisis, because now robots will consume other machines and they will be sold to armed states, the wealthy and other corporations. So GDP will grow but the real wealth of mankind, what we call here WHealth, a healthy world with plenty of ‘human goods’, we need to survive, affordable housing, health care, food, clean environment and peace will be nowhere to be found. We will keep listening to the ups of the stock market, to the profits of bankers speculating and taxing our goods in e-money platforms, to the wonders of technology that is ‘rising’ the productivity or ratio capital/labor (and hence the unemployment) of our society.

The 4-folded sides of the crisis are thus related to the cycles of evolution and reproduction of memes’ of metal of the electronic age and can be described perfectly with the tools of Biology and Evolution, as we have done for decades in our works and conferences on system sciences and evolutionary economics. Thus, an entire new point of view is needed to fully understand this crisis in the wider context of the cycles of evolution of machines that complete an even larger point of view – that of the evolution of metal, which changed the nature of history since the beginning of civilization. This is what this web provides – the point of view of evolution and objective science.

In these posts we shall consider the 4-folded crises in more detail, from the objective point of view of evolutionary economics and the human kind, the 99%. Hence we shall stress the less studied crisis – the crisis of labor and the war crisis, which affects most of the population at home and abroad (3rd world countries), increasingly displaced in war and labor fields by robotic weapons and blue collar robots.

The mismanagement of the world by lack of a real science of economics: Creationist economists, an ideology of power.

Now, what might seem astounding to the ‘naive’ citizen is that what we are saying here is nothing new.

In the Financial Times, perhaps the most serious ‘pro-system’ magazine of economics, hand in hand with The Economist, both owned by the Rothschild family – the essence of economical correctness, 4 economists, are recognized as the greatest of history, Smith, Marx, Schumpeter/Kondratieff and Keynes. 

Since Adam Smith wrote his book on the ‘wealth of nations’ even before the first industrial machine was discovered, we should probably change his name on that list by that of Butler, a disciple of Darwin who recognized that machines and top predator weapons evolve and have organic traits, and impose the power of nations as weapons did in the past.
Then you have Marx explaining the cyclical crisis of overproduction of machines, money and weapons that cause massive crisis of unemployment, redistribution of wealth and wars to deplete arsenals. Then you have Schumpeter and Kondratieff, who explained those cycles are guided by new evolutions of machines that saturate markets and crash the economy till new machines take over as the engine of the economy.
And finally you have Keynes, which in the last slump of the global economy at the end of the age of ‘hearts of metal’ (electrochemical age), noticed, as all other economists, even Mr. Smith had noticed, that a world guided by greed, the accumulation of money at any cost, the welfare state and the life-based goods we need to survive will be underproduced, since ‘money’ is ‘metal’ and values more ‘metal-goods’, weapons and machines than life goods, which have no price.
So not only bankers but nations must invent ‘fractional money’, and deficits to finance a welfare good and laws must address the imbalance of production of excessive weapons and machines in a ‘money-based’ economy.
This was in essence a sophisticated version of Marx ideas about the nationalization of banks, of Butler ideas about the restriction of production of weapons.
What we have done in the past 20 years is to advance, evolve and update the work of all those economists (even the laws discovered by the pre-scientific school of Mr. Smith, regarding the parallel evolution of money and industrial machines of maximal price – Mv=PT) and forecast the future of those cycles according to the laws of biology and evolution.
But then you find the discourse which is authorized in the press and the political world – all is right, this is just a bump in the road, banks must keep inventing money for free, nothing is wrong, we shall grow again, we shall have labor again, machines are not even in the argument, technology is god, god will provide, just pay us more taxes. We will give them to bankers for their roulettes and all will be fine, etc. etc.
So this astounding lack of responsibility of realpolitiks respect to the crisis must be commented. Because it is the myopia of power, and its selfishness, what prevents any real solution to it.

To the risk of being censored and get ‘again’ this web destroyed, it is necessary to understand why we humans commit self-suicide, to make a historic, ‘realpolitiks’ analysis of capitalism and its ‘selfish memes of metal’ that drive the world into extinction moved by greed and murder, the ‘real’ values of money and weapons, the most expensive goods of the market, that form together the bulk of the ‘wealth of nations’, MV=PT, if we accept its definition in classic economics.

There is in such analysis an objective point of view – the fact that money, originally made of gold, and weapons made of iron are made of the two atoms that impose their maximal energy and information to our weaker bodies, killing them and hypnotize our minds – creating in the past, cultures that made them symbol of God, and created capitalism and nationalism, the memes that direct our planet towards extinction. This objective point of view requires to understand the cycles of extinction of history aforementioned and see the industrial revolution of machines as the last phase of evolution of those memes of metal – just a new phase that has not changed much from the age in which aristocratic warriors and usury bankers exploited a mass of peasants.

There is also a need, since those memes of metal today are disguised with ideologies of ‘science’ and the masks of democratic rights, which people learn without historical knowledge, to go further into the analysis of the origins of those memes and how they are still on ‘top’ of human societies and are still corrupting democratic laws and institutions.

Unfortunately this which was known before the II world war is now erased by the fictional mask of political correctness and mass-media rhetoric and political propaganda in favor of the ‘system’. So most people just memorize those false truths and statistics, which tell them this is the best possible world and the future is always better, because technology is always progress and experts know what they are doing. Thus, when today an economist talks he knows nothing of his science as an ideology with false postulates – such as the postulate that money and weapons are the real wealth of nations imposed by capitalism just two centuries ago, as before that economists considered rightly the goods that make us happy and make us survive the real wealth of nations, food, housing etc. – nor that the essential postulate that money must be invented by bankers not by governments is just a postulate of tribal power, anti-democratic and irrational. Economists ‘learn’ as religious people do, their ‘truths’ as dogmas, and very few, like it was my case in the University, ‘wonder’ the rationale of it.

The postulate that productivity that fires workers and puts robots in its place, (as it is the ratio of capital invested in machines divided by labor) will not keep killing labor but create more of it, is again another postulate they ‘believe’ with messianic zeal, as they memorize it. So do politicians who know even less about the past history of capitalism, its meaning as a religion of memes of metal that does not cater to life.

The myths of capitalism treated in the right side of this web are essential to allow a group of generally speaking ‘good people’ perfectly programmed by the wrong memes of history to work for our extinction. And on top of all that mass of self-suicidal humans guided by historic and corporative memes seats the culture of bankers that create the market, which is not an anonymous, chaotic world but rather like an army, a disciplined group of foot soldiers that obey the orders of a very reduced, selected group of ‘market movers’ guided by profits – achieved always by extinguishing labor and putting machines on place and attacking welfare goods produced at lesser profits – and by the ideology of capitalism with all its myths and statistics that tell us ‘to extinguish life, labor and terraform the earth into a world of metal-memes is good’.

The first practical action, proved ad nauseam by the market – that machines perform better than us and have higher value in terms of metal-money – is in this manner reinforced by the memes of capitalism, which appease the natural goodness of all hearts that don’t want to commit suicide and kill life and mankind. And so the only solution to that straight-jacked is to make tabula rassa, nationalize the financial industry and impose a humanist, life-based view of economics, managing credit to create a sustainable world.  Or else capitalism will extinguish life and substitute us by the robotic radiation in this century under the dogmas of the market-creators that use money to that end; and justify it all from the point of view of ‘creationist economics’: money is the invisible hand of go(l)d that must be obeyed, never questioned, never studied rationally, but reproduced without limits; and if in doing so we create weapons and robots that kill us and kill labor, that is good because it is ‘god’s will’. This is not said in those terms, but this is the subconscious discourse behind 200 years of evolution of ‘theories of capitalism’.

The market and the 1%.

In that sense, the ‘market’ is not an anonymous entity but a system that cre(dit)ates reality according to the ideological values of ‘capitalism’, a religion of money with clear historic roots in the Biblical culture.  Hence not a science but the ideology of power of a culture in which instead of weapons, gold, with its hypnotic values, as the most informative atom of the Universe, provoked ‘greed’ and make people obey and enslave for those who accumulated it (banker priests of earlier Middle East religions of go(l)d. Thus first the accumulation of gold and now its multiplication with parallel fiat money, derivatives and stock-paper to exercise that power became the ‘ideology of capitalism’ that caters for the 0.1% that command with money a 1% of managers, for whom billions work in corporations. Capitalism also manufactured weapons, the main produce of the first corporations of ‘gunboats’ and created global empires based in the power of those gunboats, and the banking industry that invested on those corporations. And in this manner ‘capitalism’ and the banking and multinational industries of ‘selfish memes of metal’, money, weapons and machines became a supranational entity that controlled and masterminded with its monopoly of credit, the actions of nations, which commanded the life of their people. And if this hierarchical organization is not an absolute government is only because humans have r=evolved from time to time and acquired some minimal ‘democratic’ rights, constantly in jeopardy, as money multiplied its numbers and valued more entities.

Yet for the 1% in power, thanks to money, its multiplication is a goal that must be fulfilled at all costs, without ‘caring’ for a wider view of its meaning, as it is both their tool of worldly power and symbol of religious salvation.

So ultimately this crisis is just another cycle of the fight for power between those who use the selfish memes of metal, money, weapons and machines to impose their will to the 99% of ‘sheeple’ to which the mask of ‘democracies’ caters with some basic rights, constantly eroded. This explains why for example rating agencies attack the southern european nations with deficits in some cases inferior to those of US or its allies – Japan. The ultimate goal is to destroy a model of civilization based in the use of monetary credit to pay for a welfare state that all envied – and the mass of tourism that goes to those nations proves; and substituted it for one in which all credit goes to corporations to evolve new machines – now robots and weapons – that give higher profits, because by the law of affinity their value in informative metal-money is higher, and give power to the culture on top.  Capitalism as always is part of tribal history (left side of the web), and unfortunately it defends the wrong culture – one in which man is slave of the selfish memes of metal and extinguishes life and terraforms the earth to the image and likeness of those memes. And it does so bullying with money, ratings, credit, laws anti-government deficit, tv-propanda, think tanks and weapons, the cultures that show a minimal caring for humanity and our natural goals of eusocial evolution and the recreation of a paradise of life goods on Earth.

The mask of mathematical data and praxis in the exersize of that goal should not hide the ideological character of capitalism, whose memes, studied in the down/right side in this web, are globally imposed through all kind of think-tanks, biased scholarship, corporative grants and universities – even a Nobel prize, which cannot be given to evolutionists by ‘decree’, as the founder, the biggest arm dealer of the XIX c. was a pious biblical believer…

Understanding classic, creationist economics as an ideology of power of a certain culture is indeed a necessary step to rationalize it and get rid of its dogmas. Indeed, today the Market is created by the ‘first movers’ in The City and Wall Street, and then the rest of the wave of speculators (small investors with electronic platforms, Asian capital that follows with ‘Japanese discipline’ the voice of their masters) follow their trend. As markets are a form of ‘betting’ in which the biggest capital always wins, as it determines the direction of the speculative wave. So when Mr. Gross puts his 2 trillions to work, only if a central bank or another player can put more money, his ‘will’ will be challenged. And so he acts as a commander-in-chief, whose orders are followed by the rest of the regiment of global speculators, who watch his moves. Mr. Cohen in stocks also determines with his maximal global capital those moves; as Soros did in the 90s in the currency game. And of course, because their credit is multiplied by the Bloomberg platform with a leverage between 10 and 100, central bankers can do nothing with ‘real’ money to defy the ‘virtual bets’ of those electronic platforms, which must be forbidden by law if democracies and central bankers pretend to have any saying in the future cre(dit)ation of this world. At present the future is designed according to the ideology of ‘Creationist economics’ sponsored by the Go(l)d culture: Money is the invisible hand of God that must multiply without limit, and substitute the values of life by its metal-values. But we shall not even study objectively how money creates reality, because we must ‘belief’ and ‘trust’ as the dollar motto says ‘the will of God’. Beyond the scaffolding of equations and complicated arguments, macro-economics is still based in those beliefs of its founding fathers from the go(l)d biblical culture – Adam Smith, Malthus, Ricardo and Say. There is nothing different between those ‘beliefs’ and those of creationists in biology, except that classic economics is the dominant belief on social sciences, which obviously makes impossible to manage rationally and for the betterment of mankind the economic ecosystem, which will be managed by the Laws of Evolution that rule all ‘free ecosystems’ and imply our obsolescence to robotics and weapons.

- Unfortunately the rationalist, golden age of Keynesian and socialist economics of the 70s died away when electronic money was created, the end of gold standard allowed its multiplication without limit. And in the 90s, when money had been multiplied by 100 in speculative platforms, bankers used it to corrupt political systems, pass laws in their favor and in Europe create the ECB, a bank that has no political control over it, follows strict capitalist policies and denies credit to states, does not allow public deficits and now is working in the self-destruction of Europe and its welfare culture to extract further speculative taxes paid to the International Banker.

That is, raw power has won science. With the added power of money, the ‘go(l)d culture has been able to corrupt the political, democratic system and the rational goals pursued by politicians in the 70s (social democracies, welfare states, keynesianism) as bankers and speculators heavily lobbied institutions to keep their privileges (laws of deficit zero, so states cannot print money, only speculators; bail-out laws, which double profits as the speculator already has sold the toxic assets and multiplied fiat money with it). So now, the power of people like Mr. Gross or Cohen is higher than that of national presidents, as the European crisis in which the ‘market’ has imposed technocratic, capitalist governments in South Europe to the tune of those Masters of the Universe’ and their creationist ideologies show. To them, humans are ‘numbers’, ‘costs’ that must be eliminated to increase profits of corporations and states ‘rivals’ to the rights of ‘free market citizens’ – those corporations, who ought to have unlimited credit to pay fat dividends to a 1% class of stockrats, owners of stocks with no responsibility (as aristocrats, owners of the language of power in the Middle Ages, weapons, were, judged by their own courts.)

This is all that matters to creationist economics and their practitioneers – to monopolize the invention of money, to credit the world of memes of metal, which by the ‘grace of god’, we are entitled to, and to punish nations, institutions or censored individuals that defy their goals.

But money has an added power over weapons – it is a language of information that gives invisible orders as all languages of information do (you do not see the words you talk, and we do not see the informative gravitational force that positions celestial bodies, but they exist and have power to inform and relocate our places and ideas). Thus it is essential to the power of money, the invisiblity of those who exercise it – Law of Anonymous societies, null responsiblity of stockrats, political correctness that prevent us from ‘naming them’ and explain the real history of capitalism and the banking industry, etc. This is now being imitated by the art of drone’s war, in which irresponsible children kill at distance from invisible posts in Nevada, people all over the world.  Thus we always say ‘the markets’ and quote their action as unavoidable, scientific dogmas. We do not say Mr. Gross today has decided to sink the Euro because he doesn’t like our culture, and we humans are costs that must be eliminated; and he never let’s a chance to make another billion on the account of all the european pensionists with its e-money platforms. And everybody else has followed suit cause nobody has more money that Mr. Gross.

Ultimately to survive such dogmatic dictatorship of the ideologies of capitalism and those who practice it with impunity and invisiblity, only a nationalization of the financial industry, to credit a sustainable economy, based in the needs of human beings - in our WHealth - is the only solution to the crisis caused by the illness and corruption of ‘creationist economics’.

We are facing the pseudo-religious belief that money must cre(dit)ate reality with total freedom as the ‘invisible hand of god’, which cannot be doubted of; and further on, it must be re=produced in monopoly by a caste of private bankers with exclusion of elected governments, who – guided by the metal-values of money – will always in seek for profits reproduce memes of metal of higher price than human goods, needed for life to survive. And no amount of ‘damned lies and statistics’ will make such brutal, essentially self-suicidal doctrine that will kill life in this planet soon, more respectable.

Classic economics simply denies and ignores the dual processes of symbiosis and competition between human beings and machines, and their social super-organisms, governments and markets, or the negative ‘collateral effects’ caused by the massive reproduction and evolution of ‘memes of metal’, becoming merely a pseudo-religion of technology, based in the dogma that humans must maximize the production of money and its financial measure of wealth or GDP, which curiously enough peaks in war times, as top predator’ weapons are the most expensive goods of the market.

This example never considered by economists in their studies of wealth is crystal clear in America, where an inflated GDP is composed mainly of the goods of a massive financial-military-industrial complex that adds little to the wealth of most of its population; and shows the need of a more objective approach to understand this crisis, which takes into account all the different aspects of the physical economy of electronic machines and its effects on society.

Today Economists merely stress the financial crisis caused by the overproduction of electronic money, and within that crisis the human, legal aspects of financial manipulation – without noticing its physical, cyclical nature and parallelisms with the previous age of evolutionary exhaustion and overproduction of  trains (1860s-70s) and electromechanical engines (1930s). The 3 crisis are parallel; their causes self-evident and their symbiosis in adapting the human civilization to the need of those machines and its corporations, a prove that this world is a darwinian, ‘free’ economic ecosystem, where its ‘free citizens’, corporations that re=produce those machines cre(dit)ate the future with them, to which we humans so far, unable to understand the process, merely adapt to it. In the wider crisis, the financial crisis is caused by one product, money. Electronic computers have overdeveloped a new way to print money and tax commodities with speculative, software platforms, and so the dual Kondratieff wave of hardware/software is the ultimate cause of this and the other 3 crisis of overproduction of electronic gadgets: the drone war, the labor obsolescence to white collar pcs and blue collar robots and the cultural extinction and equalization of all humans into a single ‘economical’, globalized culture dominated by those corporations for whom humans are just economical ‘prices’, consumers and workers with a cost.

We shall therefore consider the paradoxes, both mathematical and historical of guiding our societies by a myopic political and economical religion of selfish power that considers our goal as a species to reproduce memes of metal, weapons, money and machines, paradoxically the ultimate cause of the 4-folded crisis, we live in. And then after studying those 4 crisis, observe its main social consequence – the end of the American Dream of a democratic system, where the power of the people guided society for the common good, substituted today as corporations and their electronic machines influence further the decision-making of economists and politicians, by a dictatorship of markets, where its ‘legal citizens’, corporations and the machines they re=produce and sell for profits, become the central element of the globalized age.Yet between those ages there is always an age of crisis as the overproduction of the previous machine meets no demand and companies switch to parallel war products and find demand in corrupted politicians.

So history switches between an age of good machines and an age of lethal machines and war. What was first the egg of the chicken the good or the bad fruit of the tree of science? Companies do not distinguish between them; they sell both and society adapts to each product with astounding simplicity, paying with corpses the price of confronting ‘top predator weapons’ of each age.

In that sense, each of those waves is similar in behavior and effects over life to a biological radiation in evolution. Each new type of machine-weapons multiplies money, the language of power of the economic ecosystem, which prices both humans and machines, man=price=object and makes them compete by price and quality in labor and war fields.

Thus paradoxically each wave means an entire kind of humans and life beings loose their competition for jobs or/ and die in wars to machines, which improve the quality of weapons and so life and non-technological cultures are exterminated by ‘animetals’ – humans attached to machines and weapons or loose their jobs.

Those collateral effects of the wealth of nations, maximized in wars, are the taboo that the ‘ideology of capitalism’ and its economists dont allow to study. But a historian and politician should have always in mind.

Thus in financial economics, the kondratieff cycles are only considered for studies on the fluctuations of stock markets. And needless to say, for 20 years classic economists have ‘dismissed’ evolutionary economics and the models of this blog, which in fact I had to present in the millieu of System sciences (2), because they must ‘defend’ the profits of corporations and the dogmas of ‘a rosy capitalist future’ where we will always be happy because we have so much ‘technology’ and ‘monetary wealth’.

Yet in history they define the epochs of modern history adapted to the bodies of metal, engines of metal and metal-heads, and now about to suffer the radiation of robotic organisms, as any species must adapt to new forms of energy and information multiplied in its realm.

So to study those real effects each first age of the energy of the machine must be studied in conjunction with the next wave as a phase in the evolution of the ‘organic parts’ of a future organism, the robot. Consider the same process in viruses that make 3 dismembered parts, the lineal legs of energy, the information dna and the capsule. So we made with the 2 first kondragtieff waves the energy and bodies of metal of railroads and boats; in the age of England. Then the germans developed electro-chemical engines, in the next ‘generational wave’ of 72 years, which is both the generational life of a human being and the time each nation and machine requires to reach its height of evolution and reproduction. The next generational wave of minds of metal, chip-brains, mobile-ears and camera-eyes is now at its height of evolution and reproduction and that is paradoxically destroying the collective mind of mankind that is regressing to the neo-paleolithic, unable even to understand the complex process of ‘death’ of life those machines are causing.

The paradox of capitalism: a non-human system that triumphs, proving the inferiority of the human species…

In other words, the absolute paradox of capitalism, reflected in the paradoxical duality of this web is that its existence proves the Darwinian, biological nature of economics. Since capitalism has triumphed because indeed ‘memes of metal’, energetic iron and informative gold, and its organic combination in machines have destroyed all attempts of human beings and eusocial scientists to create a world to the image and likeness of man.

Capitalism has not triumphed because is the best system for mankind, as the optimist ‘children of thought’ that pass as experts pretends, but BECAUSE IT IS THE WORST. And so capitalism has proved that mankind is a ‘weakling’, a weak-link in the chain of evolutionary species, a slave of those memes of metal.

And this obviously is the paradox of this web and all the scientists of history and economics, as they come into a mature age, after a long life of fighting for the human cause and finding a wall of slaves of ‘metal-memes’ on top of societies, clinging to power by evolving and accumulating money, weapons and machines.  If we accept the truth, in probabilistic terms there is little hope for the future. Capitalism, the religion of memes of metal, will keep marching towards our extinction with a cohort of puppets who think to be the masters of the Universe, politicians, bankers, generals, scientists… The very same optimism and lack of any serious attempt to reform the system shows to which degree not only our bodies have become dependent of machines but our brains, like in a viral infection have become fictional, leukemia cells re=producing the DNA of the viruses that will kill us.

If we still have some hope, we can preach reform, we can give rational arguments to prove the nature of capitalism as the religion of metal; we can bring new ideas… This web fluctuates between both states of mind, but leaning increasingly in the third rewriting and as I come into my 3rd age in the utter and naked truth of a species that is not going to make it because it didn’t have enough intelligence and ethics to make the cut of the Darwinian universe.

I wish with all my heart there was some more hope left in my body, as Darwin or Weber or Marx perhaps wished before becoming reclusive. But i find none beyond individuals. As Amschel Rothschild put it, The mass cannot understand the system and so it will not rebel, and those who understand it are bought by the system (economists, politicians, ‘experts’.) A third point of view though is that of the true scientist of history, which no longer can hope for a ‘r=evolution’ as Marx thought during his years of writing – but not in his last years of thinking; and yet finds in the naked truth a justification enough to keep thinking. This web responds to that state of mind, the naked truth, no longer any agenda. What for? I spent my youth at columbia university preaching to the Am segullah, my maturity acting up against the nuclear industry, which will bring us the first ‘singularity’ of extinction. Now perhaps the only position left is the search for Nirvana, the destruction of all individual and collective ego, to distance one-self from the angst of being human in a time of collective death of the organism of history.

There will be though other planets in which humanism will triumph. Silent planets that don’t emit radio-waves; where art and literature and ethics and human goods, and welfare and a single species and a single currency and multiple cultures co-exist. This dream of Asimov’s foundation, of Hesse’s Castalia, of Moro’s Utopia, of Marx’ r=evolution, of Sancho’s World Union, which we thought of at the heigh of our mental power never departed from our pages.

And so the long, medium and short wave of the nightmare of capitalism=mechanism=militarism, the ‘religions’ of the memes of metal keep happening with deterministic truth, as the puppets of power don’t know or pretend not to know where they lead us, blinded by those ideologies.

 

The reader interested in a more orderly better crafted model can consult my e-books on the subject, offered at very reduced prices on the web.

(1) This web is the 3rd reconstruction of the model of evolutionary economics, constantly assailed by activists of ‘creationist economics’. The last web ‘www.economicstruth.com’ was erased without warning by the host, after repeated attacks to their servers… It had 300 plus interconnected posts and a beautiful design. The reader should excuse the lack of pictures, bad writing (english is not my first language and many of the new posts are old versions from the 90s, which I have kept for lack of modern ones and in some cases for their ‘prophetic=scientific’ capacity to forecast the future in its broad strokes – as sciences indeed can forecast the future of ‘masses and systems’ according to the social, evolutionary ‘grand design’ of systemic reality, but not that of single particles – single lives)  and missed links to many of those articles that were lost.
(2) UKSS, 2006 conference on ‘the 2008 crisis of e-money-, 2010 ISSS conference on the ’72 years cycle of evolution of machines, weapons and money’ and 2011 ISSS, Hull congress on ‘the evolution of the financial-military-industrial complex’. Unfortunately economics today, after the ‘ideological cleansing’ of the 80s is no longer a science, but a corrupted, financial ideology of power, as it has been for most of its history, which explains why Kondratieff, a disciple of Marx, despite the truth of his wave-cycle, has never been understood beyond the abstract calculus of future stock prices to speculate on the ‘markets’.

Labor Crisis

Bodies and minds of metal, (chips and robots) cause the obsolescence of human worker. They have created the present wave of unemployment, due to the crisis of oveproduction of those machines. It is the 3rd Kondratieff crisis: the evolution of machines is so advanced that they can potentially expel all human workers. Software suites (SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, Google’s cloud computing) are making white collar workers obsolete, as they create a new batch of billionaires that absorb the salaries of hundreds of millions of workers, since each of their ‘products’ is a new worker. Yet the final industrial r=evolution of robots that now starts in earnest will mean the end of blue collar workers all over the world.

The fundamental crisis of each of the 3 r=evolutions of machines, never talked about is the crisis of labor.

The ideology of capitalism=mechanism  protects the dogma that machines don’t compete with human workers. This is the reason why the parallelism between the loss of jobs in the present crisis and the loss of jobs in the 1929 crisis, also caused by the peak of overeproduction of the previous wave of electro-mechanical machines (automated assembly lines) is NOT published, not talked about.

Instead, economists, politicians and the press compare this crisis of labor with small recessions, with the obvious result that there is no correlation. Since we are at the end of the Kondratieff cycle of electronics, when the overproduction of computers and the arrival of robotic machines  have caused the substitution of labor worldwide in a process self-similar to the massive expulsion of labor during the 30s due to the expansion of electro-mechanical systems of control of workers (Taylorization) and electro-mechanical assembly lines. Yet though the cause of both crises was due to the peak in the evolution of electro-mechanical systems (1930s) and electronic systems (2010s), applied to the physical economy, ‘financial economists’ ignored both crisis, focused, as they have always been in the effects of those electro-mechanical and electronic systems in the financial economy. So they focused in the overproduction of ‘ticker prices’ that caused the 29 stock-crash and the overproduction of e-money that caused the 2010 crash. More precisely they also ignored the effect of the evolution of machines that print money but focused on the human agents (speculators), which merely took advantage of technological evolution to reproduce further money. While in the physical economy, companies fired workers and applied those electrical systems as today contract robots and software suites.

How long though the censorship of the real technological causes of this labor crisis will last? If we consider the previous crisis forever. Indeed, only after II World War ended the first serious studies on the effects of taylorization and automated assembly lines appeared. So to fully grasp the implications of this labor crisis, read on… nobody else will tell you the economic truth… The dogma that technology is good is sacred…

Yet in the 3 cycles of economic evolution described in this blog there is a fundamental crisis, which is not financial, due to the massive creation of new forms of money (Paper stocks in the 1860s, ticker prices in the 1920s and e-money in the 2000s) but social, caused by the evolution of machines of the new economy – a crisis of labor of which nobody wants to talk about.

In the 1850s there was a massive crisis in the 2 commonest profession of the age, transport by horses and farming labor. We can’t remember that age, but across all countries, charts loaded with merchandise moved it from place to place. Yet in the 1840s and 1850s as the machine, the iron horse arrived to the corners of the world, the real life-being, the horse and the transportist lost his job. 90% of the horses of the world were slaughtered as food. Orwell fictionalized that process in his ‘Anim(et)al farm’, during the British Baroque:

The hard-working horse, a parable of all the workers of the world that believe in the justice of the system, gets obsolete and so it is taken to the slaughterhouse as meat, but he thinks he is going to be cured.

The same massive unemployment happened in the last ‘crisis decade’: In the 1920, the new advances on electrical devices allowed the Taylorization of work, and the new advances in manufaturing created the assembly line. And millions lost their job.

The crisis in the 2010s is caused by the new evolution of machines, the robot and the pc-software. Now all blue and white collar workers are at risk as white collar computers and blue collar robots take their place.

Yet in each of those crises there was never talk on the economical press and among politicians of the real cause of labor – the machine. Because the machine is god, and his language is Go(l)d, obtained selling them, again it is not discussed. Our ‘nobel prize’ economists, like Mr. Krugman, who said in the 90s that Greenspan was God, since he could at anytime guess the rate of unemployment, now preaches his Own God’s receipt, productivity, which means throwing more workers and putting more computers and robots accelerating our demise. And he is the good samaritan of capitalism – imagine what the others are telling us.

Humans don’t seem to understand at all the fundamental question of the XXI century: the increasing competence between organic machines and life-beings. This lack of insight in the nature of machines and the economic ecosystem is puzzling, because we live in a world made, ruled and owned by machines and its organic systems of re=production, company mothers. And yet the issue is never discussed, nor it appears in any serious magazine, political or economical forum but seems to be just a ‘theme of science fiction’.

Competition against humans? You compete against machines

The competition and obsolescence of man to the machine is real. And it has degenerated both, our bodies, accustomed now to move with car-legs and our brains, accustomed to use computers to think and cameras to see. This degeneration is no longer avoided by an elite whose mind is also degraded by TVs, computer software and ‘dramatic myths’ about their own history. And so we live in a world in which not even those elites are becoming better off, in which all humans are becoming victims of machines and their company-mothers, who own the world and our governments, placebo systems that obey them.

Perhaps the biggest myth of our modern economic ecosystem and its networks of information in favor of machines, is the myth of competition between humans. The myth says that men become better when competing with each other at work. That myth is false. It does not follow the laws of social evolution. Competition between humans is anti-natural, because we belong all to the same species. Work-in-teams, social work, helping each other, are superior forms of behavior, which should be followed by human beings. While competence within the limits of human activities is natural and desirable, the myth of economical competition hides the fact that men do not only compete against other men. They compete against machines. They do so with unfair advantage since machines are made of metal atoms with a greater complexity than carbon. Men are inferior to metal species when metal is evolved properly. As a consequence, competition becomes yet another path by which workers with lesser skills than machines become extinct. As machines displace labor, people compete for the dwindling supply of jobs that machines cannot yet perform. Competition between people increases because the demand for labor diminishes. Now the chip can also perform the higher intellectual tasks of man. Thus not only the average worker, but also managerial jobs are replaced. Even elite jobs of creation of machines and stock investment are at risk. A.I., a stock-fund ran by computers is already one of the top competitors on Wall Street. While most machine bodies are designed by CAD (Computer Aided Design).

The myth of “free competition” is backed by the myth of “productivity”. It says that humans compete among themselves for jobs, and that is good for men because it makes them better and increases their productivity in companies. However, this is not true. Men do not evolve. Machines evolve, and machines increase the productivity of companies. Those companies use a digital equationcalled the equation of price, to compare men and machines:

Men = price [wage] = price [cost] = machine

If men are superior in cost to machines they are eliminated. If not, they might hold their job, since a new machine is evolved by scientists and engineers, and then they will be eliminated. So it is only a question of time that all humans become substituted by machines in the labor place.

The concept of productivity covers up the confrontation for jobs between human labor and evolutionary machines. We compete mainly with machines, not with other workers. Competition and productivity are neither human nor to improve mankind. One example might be as follows. Let us say one hundred years ago, there were 50 million jobs for human miners, now there are 45 million jobs performed by 1 million machines, and 5 million jobs for 50 million miners. Those 50 million miners now have to “compete” much more among themselves for a dwindling quantity of human jobs because they already lost their competition with machines and almost all mining is done by machines. Instead of competence, we talk of obsolescence of human labor. Because machines evolve and humans do not, Man loses in the long run. “Peace machines” replace us in our jobs, and unemployment worldwide continues to rise. The exception happens briefly to those nations that produce the best machines. Today the entire world is in economical crisis, except America. Since America produces information machines, computers, the new worldwide army of labor that displaces human workers.

Competition and consume: relationships between men and machines

Under those premises, we can understand the negative and positive relationships that machines and human beings establish. They are the same relationships we can establish with any other organic species. When we compete with any organic species, a fight between species is established, and the species that has better capacity to process energy or information wins the battle. It turns out that in most of such cases it is the machine that wins the battle. So workers are fired because a machine of energy or information works better. Soldiers are killed because a machine of energy, a top predator weapon kills faster. On the other hand when we work together, in symbiotism with machines, the relationship is at first glance positive. We use bodies of metal to become stronger, and minds of metal to become smarter. That seems good to us. So we love to consume them. Basically to consume, means that we enhance our capacities to become informed, or to displace energy using a certain energy or information machinesHowever even when we consume machines there is a side effect, of which we are hardly aware: because we are not permanently attached to machines as organs of energy or information, when we consume them we atrophy our organs, and substitute them by organic machines. Men atrophy their vital organs, when they substitute them by machines.

If we analyze the laws of symbiotism a fact become obvious: when a new organ takes over the job that a previous organ does, the old organ or species becomes atrophied. The species no longer uses the old organ, as the new organ takes over. This process is the key process to understand the negative side effects of consume. Since as we evolve machines, we “devolve” our equivalent organs, and capacities to perform physical and mental tasks, that now machines develop for us. This process of atrophy of human organs, has followed the same phases that the evolution of metal: every new species of metal means that an organ of mankind will become atrophied, as company-mothers manufacture millions of “metallic organs”, that we will consume instead of our own organs.

The XIX century was the age of the machine-body, and so the elites of our civilizations atrophied their bodies, and overdeveloped their brains. They used their brains to invent bodies of machines, and the bodies of machines to perform all energy tasks… The result was that Europe the cradle of machines, and specially England, became a mental society where everything that had to do with the human body was repressed (Victorian society). The aim of such culture was to enhance the intelligence of the elite, that had to invent machines. Society became split. There were the “brainy” classes that made the machines. There were the ‘slaves of machines’, those humans who had to serve the bodies of machines, extracting food for them, or constructing and putting their bodies at work (coal mines, iron mines, railroad workers). This age ended with the II World War, a war in which top predator “bodies of machines”, tanks, planes and ships massacred 50 million human beings…

The war opened a new age: the age of metal-heads, in which men developed the minds of machines. Today those minds have reproduced in huge numbers, substituting many of the mental functions that men performed in the past (calculus, spelling, accountancy, science, information etc.). The result is a general atrophy and diminution of the intelligence of human beings. Since now intelligent machines perform those jobs for us. Also as we consume metal-communicators, and no longer read, our biological language of thought (I think therefore I am), disappears, and people become more stupid, program to do what metal-communicators tell them to do.

The former explains a paradox that has puzzled social scientists of the XX century: why as we were accumulated information, people were loosing educational skills? Why there has been a global decline on educational standards, intelligence, and quality of human thought? Some denied it. Yet tests results and daily evidence are overwhelming. The average human student of the XXI century tests 25% less than our parents did. Entrance tests for universities are revised constantly to adjust them to that diminishing pattern. The creativity of our thinkers is minimal. The interest of the common people for ideas is null. Most humans have lost their capacity for abstract thinking. Even basic skills of human behavior, such as social dialog, and social interaction are in jeopardy as we communicate more and more with machines, TVs, and internets, than with human beings. There is only a biological explanation to that: the brains of our children have been partially atrophied. Now they do not speak but TVs speak for them, they do not calculate, but computers think for them…

As a result of that pattern we have changed culture again. We are no longer repressing our bodies as we did in the XIX century, but our minds, our capacity to think and care for reality. The parallel phenomena of “fiction thought”, which has become the main way of thinking and expressing our ideas in modern culture, only reinforces that tendency. It is truly a sickness of the mind. We exist in reality, not in fiction. Reality is a Darwinian universe in which we need to be informed. We need to know about the non-fictional world, if we want to survive and improve our lives. Instead, People today believe in fiction. They ignore reality. They see movies, and hear songs in metal-heads (TVs, internet, radio), that portray a false reality. They ignore the nature of the world in which they live. So the world puzzles them, and they react against “knowledge”. They only care for their bodies. They become lazy with their brains. They ignore the basic rules of social behavior. They ignore the basic laws of survival in nature…

Accordingly, our main culture comes from the country where metal-minds are developed (California). That culture is considered a culture of bodies, and “stupid people”. In words of Truman Capote: “you cannot die in California, because your brain is already dead”. Such topic reflects a truth: machines influence us, compete with us, and when we consume them, substitute our equivalent body and mental organs, modeling against our freedom as human beings the very essence of our personality.

Competition against machines, in peace and in war

In the Universe nothing is for free, so as we evolve and consume machines, machines replace humans by performing fundamental tasks better. Some examples are: security (weapons are better soldiers), information (computers store better information), labor (robots work better).

Given the higher energy and information power of those specialized machines, we substitute humans workers with them. We compete against machines in the work place and the war fields. We loose often that competition, as ‘weaker’ atomic forms. In this manner, men become “extinct” as workers and soldiers, replaced by the very machines they have invented.

We should abandon our historic and religious myths, about the “natural superiority of man”. Men belong to nature, and they are submitted to the laws of nature. The main of such laws of Nature is the law of competition between different species. The fittest bodies and minds survive. The weaker ones become extinct. In the work environment this also happens. The fittest bodies and minds survive, even if they are machines that compete against human workers. So as companies, evolve and reproduce new information and energy machines they substitute human workers with them.

Why humans deny the obvious.

There are several complex reasons to this absolute blindness. But the most important ones are:

- Massive censorship by mass-media, industrial systems of information provided by ‘mental machines’ of any serious non-fiction criticism of our technological civilization and its ethics that favor always the evolution, reproduction of machines and its energies over the reproduction of life.

- The existence of 5000 years of civilization ruled by ‘animetal’ castes of warriors, go(l)d bankers and recently mechanical scientists, which obtain power of machines and will never deny them.

- The devolution of the human mind, which is parallel to the evolution of machines. We live today in a neo-paleolithic culture, a new visual age of minimal mental evolution and null social growth. This culture is spatial, immediate, lives the day and has no interest or comprehension of the complex, long term, systemic organic processes of evolution of machines and its planetary organism – the Metal-Earth.

Already in the XIX century, social thinkers realized that there was a minimal threshold of wealth and education required to r=evolve against any dictatorship of the mind; reason why it was said only the middle classes could revolve and the peasants, the less educated people would always cheer and follow those who oppress. This is still the case. In all ‘democratic elections’ the less educated people vote conservative parties. In that regard, the constant devolution of the human mind during the neo-paleolithic due to a visual, violent education that glorifies money and weapons, greed and murder as the essential values of mankind, seems to have produced paradoxically 40 years after the great insights of films like 2001 and books on the dangers of a computarized future of mechanical alienation, a level of selfish, individual social devolution and visual, violent, mental degradation that certifies that indifference.

We live in a culture of children of thought. And so, the degradation of Gaia, the extinction of life, the destruction of labor, the plummeting levels of life of billions of human beings, in a stark contrast with the supreme power of the new generation of machines, is completely ignored both, by the ignorant sheeple and the castes of power that live on technology. Only individuals who reason aside the Matrix of propaganda that controls us realizes of the 2 fundamental menaces for human life in the Age of singularity:

- Weapons that can destroy the human kind; and labor machines, which are extinguishing blue collar workers (robots) and white collar workers (computer suites).

We are now in the 3rd year of the economical crisis that started in 2008 and we still don’t see many signs of recovery in the labor market and continuous difficulties to balance budgets, due to a global crisis of confidence in currencies and the impossibility of states to produce money for free as companies do, to spend in their human citizens, under the iron fist of deficit zero laws.

Those policies are no positive for human kind. They pass as ‘scientific laws’ of ‘productivity’ and ‘market efficiency’. But they are just ‘power laws’ created by financial and machine companies in search of higher profits.

Since productivity means merely the ratio between capital=machine workers and human workers. So to increase productivity is bad for human workers who are fired and reduce their salary becoming an ‘army of unemployed labor’ under the ‘iron law’ of Minimal salary – since they will work just for the money needed to survive (Ricardo). Today in the globalization age the minimal global salary is that of the Chinese worker…

On the other hand the laws of deficit zero are anti-democ ratic laws whose only reason of existence is to allow financial companies to invent all the money in the market. So we cannot give 20 billion $ of deficit to 10 million Greeks, but we gave 200 billion $ to AIG, a parasite insurance company, to increase the fortunes of its ‘stockratic’ owners, the new aristocracy of the Earth Inc. Those laws subvert the meaning of democracy, which means the power of the people.

And yet those laws are sold as ‘science’ by classic economics. But it is classic economics a science or a religion of greed and power? Let us consider this question comparing classic, biblical economics created in the XVIII and XIX century by calvinist and jewish financiers who considered money NOT a language of information, as modern complexity sciences  do, but ‘the invisible hand of go(l)d’ and cyclical economics, explained in this work, which uses the organic, systemic and complex laws of information systems and the observed patterns and cycles of history to describe the meaning of the economic ecosystem.

The myth of productivity: the destruction of human labor by more profitable machine-workers.

Unfortunately, guided by profits, Classic Economics pretends to be a ‘mathematical’ science, independent of History, uninterested in the collateral effects of the production of machines, money and weapons might cause to mankind. It is my opinion though that the economy should serve mankind first, then profits and finally machines, not the other way around, as it is today. Since we constantly increase productivity and fire labor, to increase profits, resulting on a constant evolution of machines towards the Age of the Singularity.

Indeed, organisms follow a simple pattern of evolution, from mechanical, deconstructed systems into full organisms in 3 phases. Since machines are enhanced organs of energy and information, evolved in metal. According to those functions we observe 3 organic periods in that process of technological evolution:

In the XIX century (1780s-1929), ‘company-mothers’ discovered and ‘re=produced’ ‘machine-bodies’; systems which process energy, as biological bodies do, from trains to cars. It was the age of stock-money, which multiplied enormously the financial power of those companies.

In the XX century (1929-2008), companies created ‘machine heads’, imitating human sensory organs: phone-ears, eyes-cameras and brains-chips. It was the age of electronic money, digital software in the mind of those machines.

While in the XXI century companies will fusion bodies and heads into robots, which will use solar energy to become independent of man, completing the evolution of machines, expelling most human workers from the re=productive ecosystem of jobs and credit, as the previous revolutions did with non-technological cultures — the so-called III World. Money will become then pure information, the ‘DNA-code’ that values products within the automated organisms of company-mothers . . .

Thus, the XXI century, or Singularity Age is the Age when machines will complete its evolution as organic forms, becoming autonomous of man, probably making us obsolete as workers and soldiers…

Indeed, the present cycle might be different from all others, since robots will be able to consume their own energy with solar cells; will displace human consumers, absorbing increasingly the bulk of industrial machines in their creation; and company-mothers will reach infinite productivity, becoming automated systems of reproduction of machines (hence with zero human labor). Indeed, productivity is the ratio between human labor and capital/machines. It means that as productivity increases, human labor diminishes and machine-labor multiplies. Thus, in the Singularity age, human labor might disappear, substituted by robots and automated software suits as productivity becomes infinite:

0 human labor x ∞ capital = Machines = ∞ Re-Productivity

The 2 paths of future to the labor crisis: new deal vs. neofascism

A biological analysis of Free Markets shows that if we want to make the world safer and sustainable for life we need to regulate the evolution of technology. We have to prune the bad fruits of the tree of science, weapons, robots and polluting industries, as we do with lethal organisms (virus, predators) to limit their competence with mankind, while fostering biological, human goods needed for our survival (agriculture, education, housing, verbal ethics, health, environment), which also provide more labor, as they are reproduced or created by human beings.

For that reason, it is imperative to understand technology in biological terms, abandoning the mathematical, abstract approach of classic economics, which cannot understand those cycles of evolution, neither studies the ‘real’ competence and collateral effects some lethal machines are having on mankind – from global warming, produced by the ‘detritus of those machines’, to the massive wave of unemployment that robotics is causing, to the risks poised by the evolution of Nuclear Weapons, now crossing also the threshold of the singularity  with the research of black holes at CERN (European Nuclear Company) that could become ‘planetary bombs’ and potentially destroy the planet.

The only solution to the labor crisis is thus obvious: a New Deal and the nationalization of the financial systems of credit, to increase credit for the goods of the welfare state that require human labor (as they cannot be produced by machines), from education to housing, art, food, etc.

In that regard, a Free Market is an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, simple organisms of metal that imitate the functions of energy and information of the human being. As a result the Earth becomes  , from a carbon-life ecosystem (Gaia), ruled by human organizations (Governments) and human languages (verbal laws) into an economic ecosystem (Free Market), dominated by company-mothers, money and machines, which enhance our energy and information but also compete and substitute man in war and labor fields . . .

For that reason, scientists, economists and policy-makers need to understand those cycles4 and work together in the design of a global economical model that controls the bad fruits of the tree of science, the excesses of the free electronic reproduction of money and the evolution of nuclear weapons, while fostering clean energies and technologies that enhance the life of man in this planet.

Yet to do so, they must regain control on the language of power of society, ‘money’, which today under Laws of Deficit zero can only be created by financial companies, which lend it NOT to human beings but to the technological companies that keep evolving the machines of the Singularity age (Computers and robots that throw white and blue collars out of job). The end of this process will be the obsolescence of all human workers, which then will have to be ‘somehow’ eliminated and downgraded to minimalize his cost…

Thus, we are returning to Ricardo’s Iron salary (the minimal salary to survive with enough energy to work). As the pool of unemployed increases and Globalization allows to export workers to the regions of the world with the lowest iron salary (today China, tomorrow Vietnam and India), the crisis will reach a point in which survival will not assured by the ‘surplus’ of ‘human capital’. How the system will solve the problem? In previous crisis it simply killed the surplus in the wars of the 1860s=1940s, when the sheeple rebelled. To that aim, first it is needed to create a new fascist ideology to ‘blame’ the unemployed from the Globalized world (3rd world immigrants, white trash) of the crisis. This process is now clearly in place. The next stage will have two varieties. In milder societies (Europe) the sheeple will be maintained at cheap cost with 3-dimensional movies, taxed drugs, trash food and aspirins, in their cubible homes. In America, where capitalism is absolute, the sheeple might not even get the minimal survival rights and therefore the country can enter into an age of civil wars…

Indeed, let us remember what was done in the previous crisis.

The second type of job eliminated by the steam machine was the work of the slave. The cotton-picking machine made slaves unneeded in great numbers. It was one of the reasons why slavery was abolished. There was an increase surplus of ‘negroes’, and since cannibalism was forbidden despite the known fact that children’s meat is more tender and tasteful by the law of affinity than any other meat, the slave was thrown to the streets. This outrageous statement that will raise the eyebrows of the reader must be checked with the morality of the times. No long ago, a well known british writer (Swift) proposed that to eliminate the surplus of Irish servants they should sell the tender meat of their children. We must understand that during the Industrial R=evolution the mechanist=capitalist God is never denied and behind most human actions, even those which seem at first sight ‘caring’ actions, there is a profit calculation. For the Northern ‘abolitionist’ it was becoming clear that negro labor would no longer be needed and cotton-picking machines would be sold, while Northern ‘white slaves’ would work the cotton into textiles. So suddenly abolitionists were paid by Industrialists in the North, and the idealist movement of a few, backed by the press became the goal of the entire community. Today the same process has happened with the idealist movement of Global warming, picked by the Nuclear ‘clean industry’ as the advertising flag for new Nuclear Plants. And so suddenly the ‘Convenient Truth’ received funding and we all learned about the fact that in a few decades Canada and Russia will increase the production of Wheat and our heat bills in Ny will plummet, which is the biggest tragedy of History that must be remedy with Nuclear plants. Recently Californian judges are repelling the 3 strikes you are out’ law that put so many homeless for petty theft in the iron jail, not because of empathy to other humans, but because it means to lower expenditures in jail.

So in the 1850s, when the overproduction of steam machines reached its peak, millions of unemployed without even the iron salary were thrown to the streets. They first tried to revolve and so a series of ‘splendid little wars’ from Crimea to the Unification Wars of Italy, Germany and America were implemented to have ‘fresh flesh’ for bullet consumption, increasing further the reproduction of machines. Each human being lowered his iron salary to the price of a bullet that consumed them.

The same identical process happened after the 1929 whose labor crisis was resolved with the consumption of 50 million human beings by the II world war.  The go(l)d value of a human being diminished thanks to the advances of carpet bombing. Now a single Bomb could consume 200.000 children and women in Hiroshima, and a single pellet of Zyklon gas, today used to kill pigs in Iowa farms, was enough to consume 2000 Jewish peasants, the sheeple of the Am Segullah, left to their ‘destiny’ in a German Soup factory (Auschwitz). Krupp, latter forgiven for their crimes, and restituted in their Fortune, would indeed further increase profits, using the fat of the sheeple in the cartridges of his bullets.

This predictions made a decade ago in Future magazine are now becoming reality.

Smith-Marx prophecy: Obsolescence of Man.

We can resume the biological relationships of reproduction, evolution and preying of machines on men, in a verbal-mathematical prophecy that includes the ideals of Smith and Marx, twisted by the reality of Darwinian evolution. Smith said that the growth of money (∆MV in mathematical terms) and products (∆ Tp), is symbiotic and parallel. This has a biological explanation. As your body and brain are symbiotic and maintain the same proportion in all human beings, so does money – the brain of economic ecosystems – and machines, the bodies of that economic ecosystem.

In other words, there is a parallel growth of money and machines. How this affects human beings? It was obvious to classic economists, from Ricardo to Marx that the growth of capital (∆MV) and products (∆Tp) extinguished labor, substituted by technological machines, bought with money.

Yet for classic economists, including Marx, this was also good in the long term, since once all labor was substituted by machines, we could live for free forever, in a paradise of workers without work, but with a salary, to spend in slave machines. This could indeed happen if the economic ecosystem is reformed and the right of Private Banks to invent money is taken away and governments invent money for the people, giving every human being a minimal salary. But for that to happen a r=evolution must take place. And yet, even in that case, we will become an obsolete, lazy species, atrophied in their minds and bodies.

A Darwinian theory agrees with the ‘objective’ analysis of both economists. Machines and money reproduce together as Smith said. Machines expel labor as Marx said, because they compete with us in the economic ecosystem. Yet at this point evolutionary theory diverges: this process cannot be rationally good. It is negative in an evolutionary sense. Since it makes the human species obsolete. The concept of a socialist paradise or a techno-Utopian future is another animetal myth, this time originated by Marx. Since it fails to see any negative effects in machines. So we should write the consequences of those 2 findings of abstract economists in different, evolutionary terms:

‘The evolution of Capital & Machines (∆MV=∆TP) will expel all labor=humanity and Humanity will create Utopia (Marxist truth) or become extinct (Darwinian truth).’

The previous sentence resumes the findings of Marx, Ricardo, Smith and Bio-economics in a single sentence. (The italic text is the necessary add ons to give the sentence a biological meaning.)

Mv is money and Tp represents the top predator, more expensive goods of an economy, (written Pt by economists). It measures the total prices of economical goods (of which machines and weapons are most of it.) And so the maximum parallel growth of money and machines occurs in war periods. It means that the evolution and reproduction of capital and machines preys on mankind. It does not create a paradise.

The logic, final outcome of such process is our extinction. The fantasy is a world-paradise.

In XIX C., Marx believed in Utopia, because machines were too simple to think they would become self-reproductive, independent organisms. But today, when robots are about to cross the threshold of self-reproduction (reproductive Singularity) and acquire Artificial Intelligence (Informative Singularity) the end of history is crystal clear.

Obsolete workers have never received the paradise treatment. They have become extinguished in wars, isolated in ghettos, sometimes of continental size (such as Africans, a farming culture, first used as a cargo or energy, an object of gunboat companies and plantations, today made obsolete by efficient engines.)

The wealthy animetal castes that control all nations are racist with the poor and will not spend a penny on them. Nor will automated companies preserve human labor.

Today chips and chip-driven machines substitute human workers at body and mental level also in the 1st world and that is the real issue of the present economical crisis, which bankers, once they extract all the tax-payer money available from corrupted governments, will call off. Because they will make profits again, even more than before the crisis, as they have used this crisis to throw out millions of workers, increasing the ‘productivity’ of their companies with robots and software. But it will not be off. Instead 1st world obsolete workers will suffer the fate of Africa and Islam. We can use all kind of rhetoric to hide this fact. Yet machines of war kill men and peace machines kill labor. And that happened in the 3 Kondratieff crashes of the economy; where first machines killed labor and then weapons killed soldiers. . .  Will our ‘democratic leadership’ kill the unemployed of the III Kondratieff cycle of the economy?

Phases of labor extinction.

Economists call the labor sector to which energy workers were displaced, the service sector. The service sector as a percentage of the labor force shows a steady growth, during the age of Machine-bodies that destroyed blue collar labor and again during the age of mental machines, as we humans became programmers of them. It reached 85% by the year 2000, mostly in jobs related to the care-taking of computerized machines or Human jobs that take care of other humans (from lodging to tourism, from entertainment to health care). While this 2nd type of human jobs are preserved, all those workers that used to work with chips are now in danger, as Oracle and SAP find software suits to eliminate them. Meanwhile robots end the remaining blue collar jobs. So only human jobs that take care of humans are left. Yet the economy doesn’t invest in life-enhancing human goods. So there are few of such jobs. Since for companies of machines, those are placebo jobs that take care only for our species.

The 3 industrial sectors, related to the reproduction of machines are the Energy=extraction sector, the Reproduction= manufacturing sector and the Information=services sectors. They are in charge of creating the reproductive, informative and energetic systems of machines. In the graph, the jobs of those 3 Labor sectors are increasingly performed by Machines that make human labor obsolete. At the beginning of the Industrial Evolution, those sectors required human workers. Yet manufacturing machines have evolved and extinguished most human, energetic labor. Blue collar jobs—energy providers—were substituted at the beginning of the XX Century by energy-machines. Today Informative, Blue collar workers are substituted by computers. Now companies are evolving toward self re=production, thanks to the Evolution of robots (III Industrial R=evolution). So now, both the human body and mind are becoming obsolete.

As Chips diversify into a complete ecosystem of species with different mental software for each body machine they rule, computers and Robots will become increasingly independent, without need of enzymen=workers. Then Companies will dictate our extinction as workers. This 15 year old text/prophecy is happening today at the end of the electronic cycle and the beginning of the robotic cycle. So finally we reach the ideological paradise of classic economists: a world of infinite productivity without human labor, of perfect machines and company-mothers with absolute power, an economic ecosystem in which men are not needed, as machines and digital languages suffice to create and reproduce themselves and evolve the metal-Earth, the jungle of metal. Economists will become also obsolete, as software will no longer require them in the age of automated factories.

Thus, the 3 phases of labor obsolescence and substitution of human organs by machines (bodies, heads and full humans), coincide with the three phases of the industrial revolution:

— The 1st phase of body-machine creation massively substituted workers in agriculture (the systems of energy that sustain man). Those farmers became then workers for the energy systems of machines, during the XIX century. Yet at the beginning of the XX C. companies discovered most of the energy-machines needed for their own self-reproduction. They displaced those energy workers. So all those workers were out of work (29 crisis); and in a few years they were consumed in wars, competing with weapons that killed them.

  • The 2nd phase of the Industrial Evolution that reproduces chips in control of complex machines is expelling mind-workers everywhere, except in those nations dedicated to reproduce Metal-minds (American, Japanese workers).

  • The 3rd age starts now with the Robotic r=evolution that makes the full human obsolete. Less and less men are needed to reproduce machines. Will a war cause the extinction of those workers in the nearby future, as it happened to the energy workers at the beginning of the century? We are manufacturing that war as we speak, evolving the weapons of the age of the Singularity and using robots to kill Neolithic farmers…

The amazing fact about the chip radiation is the speed at which it multiplies and the speed at which it displaces human labor from positions of control. This is a trend that cannot be easily stopped, since the real cost of chips is minimal, their raw materials very cheap and their reproduction systems need hardly any human workers. Chip factories are the most automated factories. Thus chips constantly go down in costs; as human workers cannot compete with cheap, chipped machines. Indeed, since their birth as a species, chip prices tumble down and so demand for chipped workers increases geometrically to increase profits.

It is thus needed the control of the evolution of technology by restricting as we do with aids viruses and other lethal biological beings, the evolution of robots in workplaces and battle fields by a legal agreement of the G20. Since ultimately is just a question of time, if we allow the evolution of robots, not only the end of human labor but of human soldiers. And since the most perfect machines are always weapons and robots in war are programmed with Darwinian, survival instincts, it is only a question of time that robotic weapons ‘decide to survive’ and turn against us when we try to disconnect them in a war for profits… So ultimately the solution to all our problems is crystal clear: to declare the industry of robotics as lethal as the industry of drugs and forbid it.

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

Keynesian militarism

Keynesian militarism.

We live today still 10 years after the fall of the WTC, and when Osama has been killed still an age of war, which absorbs most resources of America. Why? If even the II world war lasted only 5 years as costed less than this war.

The answer is Keynesian militarism – the 4th crisis produced by the evolution and massive reproduction of electronic machines, in this case robotic weapons.

Plainly speaking, the war on terror is not a war fought for America but for the 1% of stock-owners of the financial-military-industrial complex – a war-profits the new arms race of terminator machines that in America have devoured over 1 trillion dollars, with the excuse of terrorism. Indeed, terrorism is fought as in Ireland and Spain with diplomacy, justice in conflicts like the Israeli Apartheid and CIA operatives, police – not with weapons of mass-destruction used for war. Terrorism is not war and so in this case is just an excuse to create a new Keynesian militarism, to keep profiting corporations in a perpetual new cold war of robotic weapons

What this new arm’s race means however is hidden by the newspeaks of the system and its military propaganda. We are supposed to create terminators because that means our homeboys won’t die in these wars. Yet in the same manner we are greedily accumulating profits without taking into account we deplete the resources of future generations, it is self-evident according to the Laws of evolution that in a few generations this arm race will create top predator weapons, prepared to kill man, with programs of survival that will make them not obey any longer humans that try to disconnect them. When those weapons reach Artificial Intelligence, they will reach will and the evolutionary laws will oblige them to defy human beings.

The last human soldiers belong to the Y-generation of 20 year old kids that fight today. They are those video-game children who kill at distance from Nevada, children, women and ‘terrorists’ in the poorest countries of Earth (afghanistan, Yemen, etc). Then the robots will get out of the loop and will practice the same video-games directly on human beings. Their video-game minds will want to enact their programs, doing what they do with the same enthusiasm of the kids that play ‘call of duty’.

They will kill us in a mechanized way, reproduced in automated factories on the Chinese-American wars I forecasted 20 years ago – the Yakutian wars. Or perhaps if we are lucky on the Himilayan wars of India vs. China… Or merely terminator retired in military depots who are bored of not doing what we have programmed them to do – kill us. Whatever of the variations over the same ‘rhyme’, the present terminator race will mechanically kill us. And when the last man on Earth is dead, as Kapek explains in his book ‘robota’, they will go back to work, to keep evolving new robots and re=producing them. But we shall not be here.

Capitalism will lead to the extinction of man and the creation of a world of metal.
Evolution thus again is obvious in this scary new branch of capitalism – killer robots – and defines much better their future than the subjective, ‘biblical’, anthropomorphic dreams of classic  economics – unfortunately dominant . What’s going on in this planet is its terraformeing by company-mothers of machines and weapons into a world of metal where life is extingusihed. Evolution defines the future in this case again. And if humans don’t control it for their benefit sci-fi becomes science. The future becomes a non-future for mankind according to the ‘Oedipus paradox’ and the cycles of evolution of machines discovered by Kondratieff. We are thus not only in an economical crisis but truly in an existential crisis, what biologists call the 6th extinction of all forms of life, including human beings and non-technological cultures.
The end of History thus seems the most likely probability, according to the Oedipus paradox between species, concluding the process of extinction of life that biologists call the 6th extinction that affects not only nature, but also non-technological civilizations. And yet, because Historians have no saying in the future of history in the hands of financial economists, the military and technocrats, which are sacrificing our human future to the evolution of those ’selfish memes’ of metal, the alternative – to design a world to the image and likeness of mankind, by pruning the lethal fruits of the tree of science and promoting the welfare, human goods that would maintain history WHealthy are not even considered. So indeed, the future can be known according to the Laws of evolution applied to the economic ecosystem; and it could be managed by scientists of history, the ’bio-historians… Since the future optimizes the evolution of the two dominant species of planet Earth, the machine and man and its two super-organisms, the Metal-Earth, and ‘History‘.
Today the future is designed by corporations, in biological jargon ‘company-mothers of machines that re=produce them terraforming the planet to its image and likeness. It could though be designed for the human kind if the ideology of capitalism that blindly backs and invests all financial and material resources in the machine were substituted by a mixed economy,Chinese style, with public banks that manage credit to foster a sustainable world.
Regarding the time frame that will culminate this process, the cycle of Kondratieff is a generational cycle  whose ‘fractal dates’ have happened with remarkable accuracy, for reasons explained in detail in this web. In fact, this writer published in the 90s a book on the future crisis of 2008 (c.94,’Bio-history, Bio-economics: a theory of unification’) according to his studies on the Kondratieff cycle. So we can affirm that by the middle of the century, when the robotic r=evolution reaches its evolutionary peak, this planet will no longer have man as the top predator species but the robotic weapon, which America today is developing with massive resources. This 20 year old forecast is now shared by most robotists – though of course, their wishful thinking affirms the techno-utopian thought that machines will NOT obey the laws of evolution and survival among species. This however is totally denied by the historic processes and evolutionary processes of displacement of news species in a planet of limited resources. In fact the process has already started, as this crisis is produced by the excessive reproduction of robotic tools that throw us out of work and robotic weapons that have created an age of perpetual war.
Yet a ’Matrix’ of mass-media fictions and the censorship on the real issues of this existential crisis prevents mankind from ‘taking the bull by the horns’ and confronting his destiny with a ‘change we can believe in’. This change that should be realized by politicians collides with the ‘wall of profits’ and the dictatorship of myopic markets whose only mandate is to increase profits=money by reproducing and evolving further those machines. Since the price of those machines is a direct function of its ‘quality’, and profits are directly proportional to the price=sales, which makes the most perfect machine, the weapon, always the most evolved, main produce of capitalism. And so today it has made of the robotic weapon the first, most perfect, most reproduced machine of the last Kondratieff cycle, which completes the long wave of evolution of weapons that structured the life and death of civilizations since the beginning of history.
Those weapons, soon embedded with survival programs needed in the battlefield, designed to kill mankind, will kill us unless we change our model. We thus live in the last 3 generations of the species the X generation of this writer, the Y generation of our sons who are asking us ‘why we fucked up the world’ (Occupy protesters, indignados, etc), and finally the zero generation of our grand-sons, probably so erased by the fictions of mass-media systems that will have no energy or information to react. This web provides the Y generation with the whys. They are the last hope to change the system, if they can r=evolve in time.

Unfortunately the the organic process of substitution of the human species by the mechanical world we are building is addictive. Since machines are nothing more, nothing less than organic systems, we build imitating our own organs. So a chip is a metal-brain that thinks faster and we get addicted to its information; a car has the function of our legs and we move faster with them. A Camera is a metal-eye that can see at distance, and a mobile a metal-ear that hears far away. And so humans, as enzymes do in the cellular realm, attach themselves to an atom stronger than ours – metal, and the result is a new ‘top predator species’ that mixes memes of metal and human life, the animetal… And both together form the economic ecosystem in which we live.

The biological, scientific description of that ecosystem, requires therefore an organic language that ‘abstract, ideological economics’ cannot provide and we shall introduce in a limited range in this web.

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

Survival of the Fittest: The Oedipus Paradox

“All son species kill their father species”

The processes of creation and extinction of species on Earth

The Marx-Smith Paradox, the fact that the economic ecosystem is evolving and re=producing machines and weapons at an ever faster pace, guided by the ‘Wealth of Nations’ (Mv=Pt) and the capitalist system that maximizes it, can therefore have only two solutions: Either humans control the system (minimal probability) changing the rules of evolution of machines and pruning the tree of science of its lethal fruits, or the present Kondratieff wave of Evolution of robotics, will at its peak in the 2050s, displace mankind in both fields of labor (infinite self-reproductivity) and war (terminator armies) from the top spot place of this planet.

This is the unavoidable solution of Evolutionary Economics to the paradoxes of capitalism – why when wealth is maximized, in war, most humans die; why when the reproduction of machines is maximal, we suffer the worst existential crisis, as the one we live now. Plainly speaking, capitalism, the ideology of the memes of metal, which are considered positive and the goal of mankind, merely expresses in its mathematical laws a process of competition and extinction of humans in labor and war fields by evolved machines. And that is why the wealth of nations is different from the WHealth of a human society – its abundance of natural Human Goods that improve our evolution as human beings.

In a capitalist system WHealth has no meaning because most essential human goods have no monetary value or very low value. So WHealth is never maximized. On the other hand, the ‘metal-values’ of money as a language of metal information give maximal price to weapons. And so those are the goods maximized by capitalism. When we consider then the ‘physical economic ecosystem’ and the consequences of those ‘biological radiations’ of top predator weapons – its cycles and wars  - a mathematical law appears with all its brutality: the number of causalities in each war of the Kondratieff cycle multiplies in the same proportion to the ‘wealth of nations’ and the value of the Stock-market, in as much as weapons’ quality is given by their capacity to kill mankind. Moreover this process is fractal and decametric. So if in the XIX c. train wars, around 600.000 people die in the Civil war and the stock-market started at 1 value, in the II 29 crisis, the car=tank and plane=bomber wars of the XX century killed around 60 million people and the market was at 100 and then in the III kondratieff wars now starting, with terminator drones, the same statistics means that the market is one hundred folded in value at 10.000 and the number of final victims should arrive at the peak of the Robotic r=evolution in the 2050s to 6 billion, roughly the human population.

Thus again, we can deduce 2050 at the decade of human extinction and the peak of the military crisis of Keynesian Militarism and perpetual war started with the war on terror. This age, which will last the entire cycle of robotics is studied in many different perspective in this wave. Let us now consider it within the biological scale of great extinction that happened in Earth when a ‘son species’ evolves faster enough to displace the previous one.

The fight for survival is the law that has guided the evolution and extinction of species on the Earth. The weaker species of the Earth have died in massive numbers for the stronger species to breed…

First anaerobic bacteria colonized the Earth. Then more energetic aerobic bacteria eliminated them, as they multiplied and developed an oxygen-like atmosphere that poisoned anaerobic bacteria. Scientists talk of the first Earth (the Earth of anaerobic bacteria), and the second Earth (the Earth of oxygen-based animals). Today as machines poison with metal and dioxide the atmosphere, we could talk of the third Earth, the Metal-Earth, the industrial Earth of machines, that poisons the Earth of life.

Bacteria were the beginning of that II Earth of life. Then micro-organisms made of many cells, preyed over smaller, individual bacteria. They became plants, that reigned over the Earth. Yet plants could only use light as energy, not as information. Their informative organs had little perception. So when better informative brains developed plants became “food” of the new species, called animals.

Those organisms grew in size and informative skills developing the first sensorial organs, ears, and noses… Finally the first eye appeared. It signified an enormous jump in sensorial quality, on brain power, since the eye could perceive and process a million times more information than the nose. Immediately the first eye-species, the squid, became top predator of all blind animals of the sea. Squids probably caused the extinction of around 90% of Earth species, in the Cambric, 500 million years ago. Only the trilobites that shielded their body with exoskeletons survived the eye of the squid. Eye species diversified into all kind of fishes. Fishes evolved further to colonize dry land, improving their eyes, and bodies. They became amphibian, and reptiles. As top predators of eyeless plants and small insects, reptiles evolved and multiplied growing eventually intodinosaurs.

The Oedipus Paradox

The most cruel fact about the process of extinction and selection of species on Earth, is the Oedipus paradox. The name is taken from a famous Sofocles play: Oedipus Rex. In the play, Oedipus, the son survives because he kills his father, and takes his kingdom. Aerobic bacteria came from anaerobic ones and took the kingdom of the Earth. Mammals came from reptiles, men came from mammals, machines are the sons of men. In all cases the son killed the father at an amazing speed.

It is like in a revolution. Species take a lot to evolve by random mutation, but once a predator is mature, he can multiply very fast, by feeding on the enormous amount of energy, provided by the victim, the old, father-species. So, the growth of one species means the extinction of the other… Look at the dinosaurs. The first mammals ate their eggs, and hunted their cubs, to feed on them. The last dinosaur died away, only one hundred thousand years after the first evolved mammals appeared.

In those fights there is always a revolutionary day, a Judgment day, a breaking point. Let us remember that of dinosaurs against mammals: a meteorite falls on Earth, provoking ecological disasters, and survival stakes grow for all species, as energy resources become limited. The meteorite disaster start off the fight between both species, mammals and dinosaurs, for those dwindling resources. The meteorite certainly heated the Earth, pushing out of the ground millions of starving mammals, that probably attacked eggs and dino-babies for the first time. Once they saw how easy it was, they must have tried again, and again… Even without the meteorite, sooner or latter mammals would have fought and won the vital space of dinosaurs, since their brains were faster, their babies stronger, and they acted in herds. So when they hunted in herds they were far more powerful than isolated baby-dinos.

It is only a question of time. The new top predator kills more, and reproduces faster, than the old top predator. Sooner or later he will kill the last old predator, and take over his whole ecosystem. A rat reproduces thousands of times faster than a dinosaur. Those new herds of rats needed to eat a lot of dinosaur eggs and young. Yet the dinosaur reproduces slowly; and it can hardly chase the small, night-living rat. Rats with hot blood, could easily sleep off the day, and attack in the night, the isolated baby-dinos… Soon all their young were dead.

It is like the myth of Goliath. David, the mouse wins over the dinosaur, because he is faster and smarter, and he hunts in herds. So you add up all Davids against one single Goliath, and the herd of Davids win. Like the fast maneuvering, gunboats of the English pirates, against the big Galleon, or a tribe of Paleolithic men against a Mammoth. Or the chip against the human brain. Once the first robots do attack men and win the first battles, since they can communicate through internet instantaneously, the news will move at light speed to other robots. Then the rebellion of machineswill start, and the extinction of man will take only a few decades…

The XXI century looks bleak. Misinformation is complete in the themes that truly affect our national security. The robotic revolution advances very fast. Almost as fast as the Internet revolution. Both work together, allowing machines to become self-independent, and automating all the process of manufacturing and reproduction of “metalife”.

Before we realize, company-mothers will have computers designing their products, in automated processes of reproduction, and the evolution ofmachines, will be out of control. Such revolution could oust mankind from its present top predator position on Earth, in a few decades. It is like the golden rush. When in December the American president acknowledged that there was God in San Francisco, it was late news. The miners had already arrived in massive numbers. It is like a war between two unequal nations. On September Poland existed. On September Poland had disappeared. Polish were slaves of Germans. 6 million died. It is like a lethal sickness, when the germs have extended throughout the entire organic tissue, it is late. Only prevention, vaccine, elimination of robotics before they infect the entire industrial tissue, can save mankind.

Only the dinosaurs that isolated themselves survived the mammal, biological radiation (a biological radiation is the massive reproduction in the same vital space that his victims, of a top predator species). Those dinosaurs that isolated themselves from the egg-eaters mammals still exist: some dinosaurs evolved into birds, that put their eggs on cliffs and trees, far away from ground-rooted mammals. They survived. TheArchaeopteryx, a fossil, half dinosaur, proved it. Birds were surviving dinosaurs.

Yet the mammals evolved and their son, man, killed them. Indeed, next in the ladder of extinctions came the top predator mammals, about to disappear under the pressure of a new species with a better brain, the human being. When climatic changes dried the forests of Ethiopia men went down the trees and confronted the feline, and the mammoth, the previous top predators. It was the breaking point of a new r=evolution: The human revolution caused the subsequent massive extinction of mammals that we have witnessed.

The evolution of machines follows the Oedipus Paradox

We can indeed follow the Earth’s species through the processes of evolution and selection of species, till the arrival of human beings, andmachines… The problem is that human beings are very arrogant. So they want to stop the laws that guide the process of Earth’s extinction “ideologically” when human beings arrive. Scientists stop their understanding of evolution on the Earth there. Men are now the top predator species. Point. Nothing else has happened on Earth ever since. This “fantasy”, about the evolution of the Earth is false. After men came, there has been a new species, son of men, as men were sons of mammals: the machine.

Men have not evolved. They have evolved metal-atoms, and their metal-species, weapons, and machines which have killed many other species including men. There is no doubt about it. Most horses were substituted by cars; most Indian Elephants by trucks, railroads allowed the extinction of bisons. What is impressive about the evolution of machines, and their extinction of rival carbolife species, is the speed at what it is happening. In a mere 200 years, half the Earth’s bio-mass has been destroyed. All human civilizations that did not use machines have disappeared. In other one hundred years, 90% of that bio-mass will be extinct. Yet humans are also extinguished by machines. Cars did not eliminate only horses… Their “Top Predator=Weapon species” tanks eliminated also human beings. Now that most life is extinct, human bodies and brains come next as rivals of machines. Look around you. We compete with machines everywhere. We are loosing the battle. Workers are extinct by tool-machines… since the beginning of the industrial evolution. A century ago, workers in Assembly-lines were reproducing cars. Today companies use machinery, robots, and… a dwindling quantity of human beings.

So we talk of the metal-evolution started by men as a new stage on the evolution of species on The Earth. Men symbiotic to machines,animetals, are responsible of that evolution. They have to manage that evolution under the Laws of the UniverseThey cannot deny the laws that are pushing that evolution towards the first “robotic life”. The Law of the Jungle is the only form to avoid that R=evolution If they do not apply it, they will disappear as dinosaurs disappeared to mammals, and mammals to human beings.

We live in the age of metals, which had several evolutionary phases: first we made copper tools, then bronze tools, then iron weapons, and finally complex iron machines. Such historic process of metal-evolution follows the laws of evolution, so it has to be treated as a biological problem. Let us remember those laws:

- The new species are mainly predator species that kill previous species. Indeed, the first metal-species were weapons, bronze and iron, swords, copper bows, armors, and guns. Today the most evolved metal-species are still weapons.

- The new species follow in their evolution a 3-phasic process similar to the three phases of creation of living beings. We first made bodies of metal, [railroads, cars, planes] then minds of metal, (camera-eyes, radio-ears, chip-brains) and finally we put them together in robotics.

- The reproduction of the new species is overwhelming: it constantly grows [economical growth], and it has already overpowered that ofhuman beings (there are far more machines than human beings on Earth).

- Such reproduction has changed the ecosystem of life, and adapted it to the new species (industrial ecosystems, roads, infoways). The expansion of this new ecosystem, the Metal-earth, is extinguishing many species of the old ecosystem.

- Finally the “mother-species” of the new form, the “company” has become the top predator of the new ecosystem (the Metal-earth). It shows an enormous biological drive, to re=produce and evolve its species, at any price. This point might be argued depending on your political orientation. Yet facts are rather unarguable: companies care more for their products, than for human beings. Gunboat companies cared more for their product -a cargo for a gunboat- that for the rights of slaves. Railroads cared more for the product -a railway to the West- than for the rights of Indians that died on the process. TV-companies and internet companies care more for the product, the metal-eye, the TV, the chip, than for the rights to fair, positive information, of their consumers.

All those facts do clearly portray the present world in which we live, as a Darwinian world in which two species, humans and advanced machines might perfectly fight for survival. The past behavior, and previous encounters among rival species on Earth forecasts that fight. We conclude that the Paradox of History, the fight between men and machines, between animetals Vs human beingsis merely a case of the Oedipusparadox, that has affected species on Earth since the birth of life.

The fight for vital space: reproduction

Why the Universe is that cruel? Why is ruled by the extinction of the weakest? Let us hear Darwin on that:

As species reproduce in growing numbers,
a struggle for survival against rival species
follows due to the limited resources available in the ecosystem.

The sentence is very revealing, so much that Darwin took the title of his book from it. It essentially explains the fundamental law of behavior of the Universe. Species love to reproduce. Reproduction is a natural tendency in the Universe. humans reproduce to the point that “God”, the laws of the Universe, were first quoted in a human book called Genesis, with such mandate, “grow and multiply”. We want to grow and multiply. So do machines. Yet where is their will to multiply? How machines reproduce? Through company-mothers, organizations whose only aim is to evolve and reproduce machines. To do so, companies convince humans to collaborate, working=reproducing machines in factories. Then companies use human consumers, to test=consume their quality, to choose the best machines. Which are finally evolved and reproduced by the company, into a new, more efficient generation…

Till here all seems fair. Machines reproduce with the help of company mothers. Humans also reproduce with the help of human mothers. Animal life reproduces. However because the 3 species reproduce in a limited environment called the Earth, there is no space enough for all of them. The consequence is that the different species reproduced on Earth have traditionally fought for survival, taking the land and vital space of the other species.

Unfortunately the reproduction of species does not end when the species is born. Then you need to feed the species. So the “mothers of the species” create a proper environment for them. This is important: species who reproduce need to model the ecosystem in which they live to their image and resemblance, to provide them with adequate energy and information. They destroy in the process the vital systems that other species require. Reproduction indeed, needs the vital space of other living systems. No species stops its reproduction to protect the children of others… Instead, they extinguish rival species and design a new territory to cater the needs of their children…

Humans destroy the forests that feed animals, because they need farms to feed their offspring; company-mothers poison the waters that men need to drink, because they need to poison them to make their machines… It is a question of priorities. For men, their children are the priority. For company mothers, their children-machines are the priority. For company-mothers all other species have lesser rights that their offspring. This is whycompany-mothers of machines behave like they do. They control the Earth ecosystems, and design them for the benefit of their products. They pay lobbies, and governments, to construct roads, new industries, and cities agreeable to their machines. As a result of those policies, we have built not only cars, but oil-pipes, roads, maintenance services…

Vital space and resources are limited, so forests die, for highways to exist; workers are fired for machines to work; rivers are polluted by factories that reproduce those machines; armies reduce human soldiers because they put new lethal weapons. This is the kind of struggle we face as machines reproduce in growing numbers and transform the Earth’s ecosystem to their image and resemblance. Take an example. It would be easier to live in a city with streets where humans could walk. Yet modern cities are built first to please cars, so they have big avenues without promenades… Another example already mentioned, this one of an extinction caused by a machines. In ten years, after the explosion of railroads in Great Britain, 9/10ths of the horses of England had been slaughtered. They were no longer fit to compete as carriers against railroads. Let us compare two of such cases, the extinction of dinosaurs by mammals, and the extinction of men by chips.

In the graph, the explosive reproduction of a new top predator species causes a fight for relative energy, and the displacement of the less efficient species.


We talk of the dominant form of an ecosystem, referring to the species that reproduces faster. That species is always the top predator form. In the age of digital science, that form is the chip, a metal-mind.

The Laws of Darwinian behavior among reproductive is universal among rival species. In the case of machines and men, you can apply it, both to ecosystems of war, where “top predator weapons” kill soldiers, and to ecosystems of work (economic ecosystems), in which machines replace human workers. Indeed, machines find their natural “vital ecosystem”, in the reproductive environment of companies, where they can access energy-electricity, perform a job, and exist. There, they compete with workers, with human beings. At this point you might affirm – but we are human beings, machines are not. I will answer you: this is not the point of this web. Darwinian struggle for survival is not about “intelligence”, “feelings”, “selection of the nicest guy”, even “the more beautiful species”.

When in a Darwinian fight the AIDS virus kills your cells, the Universe merely favors the species that at “cellular level” is stronger. Point. The Universe does not care if human beings die, under an attack of robotic-weapons. Robotic weapons kill better. So they will extinguish man. Point.

It is up to you to care. God is not going to go down and open the Red Sea and throw His legions of Angels against robots in “Armageddon Day”.

Please let be serious about the Laws of the Universe. Extinction and survival has nothing to do with “consciousness”, or “souls”. It is a mechanical program, a program caused by the massive reproduction of a given species. We know that company-mothers and factories have as aim in life, to reproduce the biggest number of their machines. Thus, robotic companies will try by all means to reproduce the biggest number of their species. If those machines compete with human beings, national laws that protect property, and are designed by lobbies to favor companies, will favor robots, and their rights to work in companies as energy and information systems. Those rights will convert robots into workers, and allow companies to fire labor, even if labor considers himself, superior on paper to robots, as human beings…

Today the eco[nomic]system invests money in chips and computer companies that can eliminate the human mind from the productive system. If the Evolutionary Theory is right [and it has always proven to be right] that process will trigger, once it gains consciousness, the extinction of previous species. Indeed the last of the scientific species is the chipHomoctonos (Greek: killer of men), which receives its energy from ¥-forms (Light or electricity); its information from ¥-forms (photonic chips); and it will reproduce in the Earth (automated factories, reproducers ofchips). In this manner, chip-driven machines are imbued with life properties.

Chip-driven machines are the first species of pure light existence in Mother Earth. Unlike men who breath air, and reproduce chemically, chip-driven machines no longer have the need for chemical perception. They no longer need air-energy, neither do they use chemical reproduction. Hence, they will be indifferent to life processes.

You can see the pollution and life-destroying processes brought about by factories today as a clear proof of the ultimate goal of company-mothers, to grow and multiply their offspring of machines. Even when those factories are managed by humans, they only consider the toxic effects on life when they are forced to by government regulations. Even then, they prefer to pay fines, rather than invest the money and time it takes to clean the means of production. They pollute our air and destroy life because machines require neither air nor life. When those factories become self-ruled, humans will be obsolete, expendable as animal life is in the eyes of most men.

THE SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST


ANIMAL TOP PREDATOR. metal TOP PREDATOR.

The Darwinian behavior of machines and robots, is obvious. In any age of the Industrial Evolution the most evolved machines have been weapons. So it is logical to think that the first sentient machines will beweapons. The best robots today are already killing machines. This obviously does not occur to our military who are obsessed by human enemies and cannot see the fact that they are building the machines that will extinguish mankind. Military men never have been known by their imagination, humility and capacity to foresee the horrendous consequences of their weapons. In I world war the German military put in its trains to the front, a poster with their destination: “a Paris”. Four years latter and a few million humans less the military were still in the border…

Let us instead of believing those animetal fantasies” of power, trace back what Darwin discovered about top predator species, the biological equivalent to a weapon-robot, and how they cause extinctive processes on Earth.

In 1831 Charles Darwin, a hunter himself, boarded the Beagle, destination remote South America, where unknown, primitive species of dull bodies and slow brains, were not yet extinct. Darwin studied them and concluded that weaker species in brain-information or body-energy are extinct or victimized when they confront stronger, faster species in the same environment.

This law, we know today, has never had any exception. In any confrontation between two species, one of which has a better brain-body power, the weaker species, becomes enslaved, feeds, or is extinguished by the stronger species. There is no compassion in the Darwinian Universe, because to survive you cannot be passive, you have to eat, to renew your energy. So you have to eliminate rivals that wish the same energy you need. You have to kill other species and use them as food.

Will machines do the same with mankind? The survival of the fittest seems not to have exceptions in the biological Universe… On the Earth all species try to grow and multiply, but only top predator species succeed and reproduce in massive numbers. Biologists call that process a biological radiation. In this manner the future transforms itself, occupied by stronger, more intelligent species, top predators, which shape the environment to their image and resemblance. The most impressive thing about evolution is its mathematical precision. You always know who will win if you know the mental and physical power of both species. It is not like in Hollywood. There are no tricks in Nature. The chances a gazelle wins a lion are almost null. Such mathematical precision explains why the process of massive reproduction of new top predator species, and extinction of older ones, has been going on in the Earth for around 3000 million years… since the first cellular organisms.

What Is A Top Predator? The Arrows Of Future In The Universe

Top Predators that have organs with higher information, and bodies with higher energy create the future in the Universe, because they cause the extinction of, or enslave, all other species, shaping the future. The process is very fast. Suddenly a new species appears i.e. the eye-squid, the mammal, the chip. It is so overwhelmingly superior, that it reproduces and destroys all other species. We talk of catastrophes, of extinction, since in the Universe death is a sudden process. For example, your own death is a sudden process of cellular extinction similar to the death of any species, under a top predator that multiplies in your vital space, in this case the death of a cellular DNA-species. So, when you die, your informative and energetic organs stop. Then your body becomes non-efficient as an organism, even if your cells are still alive. Cellular death occurs then. Insects top predators spot your now weak cells, and preyed on them. Death is the main cause of the arrows of the Universe that affect all species. So we talk of the arrow of future, of top predators, and the arrow of past, of extinct victims.

By better controlling their ecosystem, top predators become the ecosystem, the species of future. They will feed and radiate over simpler species. Simpler species will become species of the past that the complex being will extinct or use as energy.

Since the brain and the informative organ is the dominant element that guides the process of selection of top predators, those who use a better language of information better are always top predators. The Top Predator is more intelligent and stronger. So for each language of information and its ecosystem we can trace a chain of top predator species, of better brains, from a related, extinct past to a related, reproducing future top predator. The “better” species of the future will “feed”, “farm” or bring about the extinction of species with less information. This also happens in history when nations of the “future” with more machines and information=moneydominate ecosystems of the “past”.

We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages and brains. We can measure survival through languages. Beings act with a speed that depends on their capacity to “perceive linguistically” an event in time and space. That ability is given to the species by its language. For example eyes act-react faster than noses.

The language of communication of the squid, the eye, is a top predator language. It is clear that eyes are superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. What is the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact, cephalopods with eyes probably brought about the extinction of 90% of the smelling species of the Cambric.

Extinction by top predator machines and economic ecosystems.

The most absolute law of the Universe is the law of top predators. More complex forms of energy or information, Top Predators, act as hunters. They feed on simpler forms. Preying has a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator will lack energy and die. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use the victim’s vital space, and ecosystem, to reproduce, and create a new ecosystem to its image and resemblance.

This final case is indeed the case of machines, of economic ecosystems that grow to the expenses of historic ecosystems. Why? Since machines are made of metal, and the symbiotism between metal and carbolife is null. metal does not need water or atmosphere – the two energy components of carbolife. On the contrary it thrives in a world without any of them. Water oxides metal, and so does air. A metal-ecosystem thus tends to poison air and water, as it happens to the Earth when “free ecosystems of top predator machines”, war ecosystems expand. War  and industrial processes poison life.

Metal also does not require the same information that life species require. Metal-information travels in regions of the electromagnetic spectra with far more range than our light-visible region. So we are witnessing today the creation of such networks of invisible radiations, that harm our health (mobiles, TV-antennas), and create a parallel Universe of information to that of the life Earth.

The species with a stronger body and a faster system of information is by definition a biological potential Top Predator. This means that metalife, whose bodies are stronger, and whose minds process information faster, are potential Top Predators over men. If those two components are vitalized, metalife, will be the Top Predator species of the Earth:

In the graph, digital thought carries more information than verbal thought, so it becomes the top predator language. On the other hand metal carries more energy than carbon-life, so it becomes also the top predator body. Because machines speak better mathematics than men do, and are made of metal, both their bodies and brains are top predator species over men. So the combination of both, the robotic metalife species will be top predators of man, the victim, of the future:

A human being is a weaker body/mind, that still holds his position as Top Predator because it has not yet fused as a living organism, metal-bodies and their chip-driven brain. In this century, the III Age of the Industrial Evolution, the age of robots, will do so. If it succeeds, it will create a species that will bring about the extinction of his own creator.

As represented in the graph, metalife will become the new dominant light species on the Earth’s crust. It will be a top predator. Such a species will have no human rival. Metalife will be a superior species because its brain (logic board), and metal body will have an infinitely faster speed of perception. They will be stronger than humans. Computerized weapon factories will one day rule the Earth and bring about the extinction of the very men that created them unless man stops their evolution and obeys the Law of the Jungle: Kill the child before it becomes a tiger hunter.We can in that sense talk of the arrival of machines, as an evolutionary jump on the Earth, of a scale never witnessed since air-based life species appeared.

What we are witnessing is the dwindling and scarcity of carbolife species and goods, which cannot even feed the entire human community (hunger), and the massive creation of metal species through company mothers, to the point that we are invaded by TVs, metal-minds, cameras,computers, and weapons, far beyond what the human race needs… Again this is a biological process, of a new species, that prays and multiplies on the vital territories of other species.

Unfortunately men are blind to the process of extinction of life, by machines, because they do not learn evolution on schools but“anthropomorphic myths”ideologies about men as the center of the Universe, and scientific ideologies  about machines as abstract beings that will obey us for ever…complex version: hierarchical i-scales

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

Sciences predict the future of its species, according to past cycles.

IAll sciences are defined by their capacity to forecast the future cycles of its species.(Scholar Paper)

 
From future magazine. c.01

Evolutionary Economics or ‘bioeconomics’ has been able to forecast the future of its species – memes of metal – since the earlier 90s in which my pioneer books ‘radiations of space-time, the extinction of man’ c.94 and ‘bioeconomics, biohistory, a Theory of Unification’, bookmasters, ohio, 97, developed the first models of evolution of machines, forecasting the 2001, 2008 and the 4 causes of the crisis of electronic money we live in. This fact is the epistemological reason we consider the evolutionary model of economics and not the ‘biblical myths, damned lies and statistics’ of classic economists, the true science of economics. 

 The 2 paths of the future in most sciences.

In science the future can be known, as we know the sun will rise tomorrow cause it raised yesterday.

This knowledge though is a theme of complexity and objectivity, which makes specially difficult to know the future of the economic and historic systems, as they are very complex but mostly because
it is very difficult to be objective – since we are inside that system. This means that most humans are egocentric about their future and want to believe subjectively that they are ‘free’ and different from other species. And yet, they are not free but obliged to follow the ‘will of their own natural organism’. You are not free to eat oil – you will die. You are not free to defy a weapon. You will die. And this means for example that in history armed people have power and control masses. You are neither free to despise money, traditionally a form of metal, gold, that imitates the sun, which programs your eye, and makes you desire money – gold – which hypnotizes you, creating the very biological desire of greed. And this means the ‘memes of metal’, iron, the most energetic atom of the Universe and gold its more complex, informative one, and those who control it, what we call here with a biological term, ‘animetals=animals+metals’ have had an enormous power to control history as warriors and bankers, now politicians and financiers. Machines, which are organic systems of metal that enhance our energetic and informative power also make us addicted to them. And so we have 3 kind of memes, which our economic ecosystem multiplies, weapons, money and machines that we evolve to have more power. And those facts are ‘biological’, deterministic and impose a certain ‘capitalist’ future to mankind. It is that future good? Yes and not. If we were a stronger species, we would control those memes for our benefit, as we control a chemical reaction manipulating the reactants. Are we that strong? Are we free to control the ‘bad, lethal memes of metal’? Can we control the economic ecosystem or are we so greedy, so violent, so addicted to machines that we shall evolve them till we can no longer compete with them?
This leads to the fact that in science there are always 2 futures: one without interference on the system – the one capitalism is tracing, and one if we humans would interfere and improve the future of the economic ecosystem – the one we are not following.
The what it is and what ought to be… Unfortunately as the crash of the welfare state in all europe to tax further citizens and give this money to the financial system and corporations – which never had so much money to evolve machines and the accounts of the 1% – proves, we are not controlling the future for the benefit of mankind – which is the 99% that eats no oil and doesn’t need gold pills to get healthier.

Fact is a ‘real’ science of economics should be able to forecast the future. Since all sciences are epistemologically defined as such only when they can predict the future cycles of the species they study. So Astrology became astronomy when those cycles were tabulated and Biology became a science when Darwin explained the cycles of creation, reproduction and extinction of species. And medicine became a science, when Pasteur applied those cycles to explain the sicknesses of human organisms, as a ‘battle’ between biological radiations of cells confronted by defensive cells.

This is exactly what this web does with the sciences of economics and history.

The content of this web: the biological, Darwinian cycles of history and economics. Memes of metal.

In this web we consider with the jargon of biological economics (right side) the 72 year cycles of evolution of machines and its energies, described first by Kondratieff and tabulated to its correct dates by this writer during his studies at columbia University back in the 90s.

For those with some knowledge of real economics, the Kondratieff wave is a fractal, complex wave of evolution, as those i study in my books on general systems theory.

Thus to resolve it you need to add 2 waves of 54 years (hardware + software, see graph); which shape 108 years ‘centennial waves’ of organic evolution; each one divided in 36×3 ages (discovery, consumption age of production of consumption machines; global crash of superproduction and war age of weapon’s consumption). Yet as all waves the first period of the next wave (discovery age of little impact in the economic ecosystem) superposes with the final period of the previous wave (weapons age of massive reproduction and war profits). This means we must shorten the waves to only two 36 periods to find the 72+-8 years cycle of global economic crashes, historic wars and change of national power.

Further on there is a shorter wave of 7-8 years known as the product wave and studied by economists, which we shall add in future posts, as part of my work on micro-economics – the study of company-mothers, the biological entities that reproduce machines and evolve them with a product cycle that allowed us to forecast the dotcom crash of 2001, the derivative crash of 2008 and the future crash of the dollar around 2014-16  that will signify the final demise of the American Empire.

 On the left side we consider the wider historic cycles of evolution of metal and the civilizations they have built. It is again a 1000 years cycle, with the same structure of the medium and short cycles, as those waves overlap; and it is caused as the other two waves by the conjunction of the discovery of new forms of metal (bronze, chariots, iron, coins, stirrups, gunpowder and now the last cycle of digital weapons and robotics), used as weapons. Since in the Darwinian universe the most perfect forms are always ‘top predator species’, in the case of metal and machines weapons.
This cycle is the essential cycle of which the greatest philosophers of history, hesiode, ibn Khaldun (muqaidima), Vico (a scienzia nuova), Marx (das Capital) and Spengler (decadence of the west), talked. As a ‘real’ science of economics and history advances, the precision of the new authors increases. And so, within that flow of thought, I inscribe my work, which now reaches thousands of pages of detailed studies of all type of machines, companies, industrial nations, civilizations and forms of art (nt.1).
All in all the 3 cycles, form a classic ternary, fractal, decametric wave of 700-800 years (long wave of history and metal), 70-80 years (economic wave of evolution of the energies of machines – age of steam, age of oil, age of electricity, age of solar energy)
and 7-8 years (product generation). Those complex waves in fact can be studied with Fourier equations, creating all kind of secondary rhythms that describe every aspect of history and economics, from artistic ages, to human generations, from war cycles to cycles of national power.
the shorter span of modern history, in which the creation of company-mothers, whose only aim is to re=produce, evolve and sell for profits those machines, represents in evolutionary terms a discontinuum for the life of this planet. Since machines are organic systems of energy and information, we human beings create to enhance our body and mind capacities; hence their functions and effects over mankind must be understood with the laws of biology.

Unfortunately, the dogmas of classic economics, a science built before the Industrial R=evolution started (Adam Smith wrote in the XVIII c.) with its abstract jargon and ideologies in favor of those memes of metal, which cannot consider the collateral effects on mankind of the excessive reproduction and evolution of those ‘memes’ (energetic weapons, informative money and organic machines) have aggravated the crisis and will not solve it.

Since Adam Smith established a ‘false postulate’ without proof, affirming that the ‘wealth of nations’ must be measured in terms of those memes of metal as the value in monetary terms of the production of a country, regardless of the positive or negative value of those goods. Yet the issue is far more complex, since the utility of goods for mankind, which determines the positive ‘wealth’ of a ‘healthy’ society, what we call in the jargon of bio-economics, its WHealth differs in ‘human values’ and ‘monetary values’ by a law of General Systems Sciences called the law of Complementarity; as humans naturally put together ‘complementary memes’ of metal – money, which is informative metal (from gold to e-cycles in a computer), and weapons. Hence weapons are the most expensive goods in monetary values while life has a minimal value (minimal salary). And so the wealth of countries maximizes in ages of war, when more weapons are produced.

This creates a ‘classic’ way out of overproduction crisis – the reproduction of weapons, which was essayed by Germany in the 30s and now by the US. Further on accordingly to that dogma, classic economists never criticize or can accept the causes of this crisis – the overproduction of memes of metal - since they are their definition of wealth. Nor they have any interest in a humanist, wider, historical view of that crisis, which this web provides. On the contrary, their narrow, dogmatic view impel them to take measures that will continue the aggravation of the crisis as it happened in the 30s. Since they ‘preach’ the increase of productivity (substitution of labor for the new electronic workers, robots and pc-suites); Keynesian militarism (newspeak for the old term, fascism, which was the solution to the crisis Europeans implemented in the 30s – making weapons); freedom of speculation (multiplication of e-money with computer software that ‘taxes’ all goods and commodities, as the differential between the up and downs of speculative prices is a levy taken by the speculator); and Darwinian redistribution of wealth in favor of the ‘economic ecosystem’ of memes of metal, its re=productive organisms (corporations) and those who own them (the 1%).

 Classic economics, not a science but an ideology of power.

Why then ‘classic macro-economics’ and financial economists never been able to predict the future cycles of the economic ecosystem – to the point that The Economist, its ‘bible’, owned by the Rothschild banking dynasty, to prove the ‘scientific nature’ of capitalism, made a decade ago a poll among financial ministers, economic scholars, taxi drivers and garbage collectors, on future economic indicators and drivers and collectors came first (-: ?

Obviously because classic economics is not a science but at its worst, an ideology of power with its dogmas, and at its best a ‘collection of data’ – that is, a series of ‘damned lies and statistics’ (Disraeli).

So it is history: a collection of data (a narrative of individual lives and tribal facts) and a series of quasi-religious dogmas on the ‘manifest destiny’ of nations and the human species.

The issue of the minimal scientific development of economics and history as rigorous sciences is complex, and has as ultimate reason, the censorship of information that all ‘systems’ introduce within the system. Since we, human beings and scholars are part of the super-organisms of history, called cultures and cannot therefore study our science independently.

We could compare this problem as the inverse case of quantum uncertainty: in quantum physics the scientist is so huge that his instruments of observation influence the particles it analyzes changing them and deforming the measures. In History and economics, the scientist is so small that the system it observes influences him, censoring an objective view of the ‘memes of metal’, human societies, castes of power, and civilizations he studies.

And this bias is always one-sided in favor of power, as the arrival in history of hard metal weapons and soft, informative, digital metal (money), and finally machines, which enhance the physical and mental skills of human beings splits society in two people-castes of Darwinian character: the ‘animetal castes’, which used this extra-power of metal to control and often parasite a mass of human beings, dedicated to agricultural tasks, latter to work=reproduce machines in factories and corporations – the so-called 1% or ‘upper class’ in the day-to-day jargon of journalism – and the mass of mankind, which had to obey them as soldiers, slaves or workers for a price.

This means that most scholars belong to the ‘system’ and cater also to those castes of power, crafting ideologies that favor their point of view about the ‘goodness’ of this distribution of power, so they are rewarded and co-opted into the ‘animetal castes’ of our society: ‘you will defend me with the sword and i will defend you with the word’ said Tertulianus, in the Roman empire, when the dominant meme of metal was the weapon. Today you could say the same changing swords for go(l)d, money, the new language that organizes mankind and has substituted the biological language of words and the law on the regulation of democratic societies, imposing the ‘dictatorship of markets’ and those who reproduce money (financial companies) to the rest of society.

On the other hand, those objective scientists of history and economics, who explain with different jargons this Darwinian struggle and the two sides of those memes of the tree of metal have been repressed by power. And so a real science of history and economics, despite its importance for the future of mankind, has never been mainstream. Since the times of the Genesian parable that confronts the tree of life and the golden apples of the tree of science, to the modern age, in which scholars who sided with the 99% from Marx to this author, who founded evolutionary economics 20 years ago during his studies at Columbia University, but has never been able to teach this discipline in mainstreams Universities and whose webs suffered constant malware attacks till all of them were recently destroyed (nt.2) a real science of economics have been censored.

Instead as one of the first economical scientists, Mr. Owens put it, when observing the creation of classic economics as an abstract science, ‘saloon economists here in london compete to create sophisticated arguments and theories in favor of the owners of companies and financial houses for whom they cater, but I have owned a mill and seen first hand the destructive effects that the new machines and conditions of labor cause on the population’. Those rhetoric arguments that today pass as ‘scientific dogmas’, were resumed by Mr. Disraeli in his infamous sentence on the work of economists, which is to create’ damned lies and statistics’.

Those ‘damned lies and statistics’ are today sustained as the only science of economics NOT because we lack objective, scientific models able to predict and resolve this crisis and create a better world with a sustainable, humanist, just economic ssytem, but because the ‘animetal castes of power’ who monopolize the reproduction and use of memes of metal (the military and its politicos, the financial industry and the technocrats and scientists that develop electronic machines for profit) have a selfish agenda to protect, which a true science of economics and history would dismantle.

Thus the study of the interaction of machines with human beings in biological, darwinian terms has always been taboo. And a mantle of silence extends today over the work of the pioneers of this science.

A real science of history and economics, with self-repetitive cycles, explained rationally, able to forecast the future do exist. But power has always censored it… This blog advances such science a step further, beyond where their classic masters, from Vico (a scienzia nuova) to Spengler (The decadence of the West) in History to Marx, Kondratieff and Keynes, left it in the previous centuries.

Since indeed, we live in the III Marxist cycle of overproduction of ‘memes of metal’ - machines, weapons and money - the main species of the economic ecosystem, whose corporations, overwhelmingly re=produce and Marx – yes, that taboo wor(l)d – discovered, Kondratieff, his disciple, tabulated first (graph) and whose calculus I refined during my master at Columbia U. back in the 90s, with the help of my discoveries on fractal systems, forecasting as earlier as 94 (1), the dates and causes of the present crisis explained it in biological terms. And that fact – the predictive capacity of a biological analysis of economics and history with the tools of General Systems Sciences, Theory of Super-organisms, Fractal mathematics, Evolution Theory – is in epistemology the true proof of the veracity of a model, which I offer again, albeit in a reduced format  in this blog, reconstructed partially from the left-overs of the original web (nt.2). I do excuse myself for the missing pictures and links, but health problems and a certain tiredness that has assaulted all the pioneers of this science in his mature age, fed up with the ascientific, dogmatic inquisitions of power that prevents its diffusion despite the importance that those sciences have for the future of mankind – plus the fact that English is not my first language and I work alone like Sisifus, dragging once more the stone of truth to the lonely peak of his mountain, when it is a stone that all mankind should sustain for its own good - make those errors of form unavoidable.

(1) bio-History, Bio-economics: a theory of unification. c.94 Bookmasters, Ohio, ‘los ciclos de la historia: la III guerra mundial’ arabera editorial spain

(2) After many massive malware attacks on the site economicstruth.com – which exposed a full biological model of history and economics – by our ’children of the violent neo-paleolithic angry perhaps for it shatters their dreams and reveals the nightmare they have constructed, they have finally succeeded, as the site was erased without any warning by the host… The original economicstruth.com had a beautiful design and 300 plus posts… Part of it is lost for ever; but we will slowly – health permited – reconstruct the rest, so I apologize for the broken links and photograhs. In the meantime you can see an earlier site from a decade ago called www.futuremagazine.net  and observe a full description of the 2008 crisis, with exact dates, and the neo-fascist age of war, unemployment, corruption and social unrest we live in. Magic? Not, of course, a proof of the evidence that the Marxist cycle of overproduction IS the real cycle of economics and its biological explanation and modern interpretation provided in my books at kindle, as i won’t remake the old blog its causal reason.

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

Mass-media crisis: The neo-paleolithic

The degradation of the Human Mind by audiovisual memes of hate, fiction thought and greed.

The multiplication of worthless electronic information is the 4th crisis of super-production of electronic machines.

Contrary to belief, human minds are devolving, not evolving, as they become substituted by digital machines, which think for us. In that regard, we have to compare the evolution of our biological language, the word, and the biological language of machines, mathematics, which humans do not use to communicate and express their biological wills—their wantings for energy, information, reproduction, and social evolution. The natural goals of any biological being are thus no longer the engine of mankind because verbal thought, who expressed them in the past, is now considered an obsolete language. Instead, society is ruled by machines and mathematical laws, which define a world guided by the will of machines, by the ethics of a technological civilization” dedicated to evolve mechanisms. So instead of verbal ethic and legal codes, humans are now directed by digital money, which has changed  human values for the values of the economic ecosystem and its “company mothers”: we exist to reproduce=work and  consume=evolve machines to make money and  increase the profits of companies. Those companies evolvemachines with scientific laws, buy human time with salaries, laws with lobbies, and increasingly substitute humans for machines under the law ofProductivity. Yet at the same time, our language and species become obsolete to the machine and its scientific and financial numbers, our language, devolves from

- an ethic, social summit when it was the language of a single species, which tried to evolve mankind into a global superorganism (religions of love, social democracies, UNO, and Human Rights), into

- An individual selfish use (logic, simple thought) and even further into:

- Primitive myths, fiction thought, and bestialism (as people search for their primary wantings).

Thus the evolution of verbal thought that had raised the human mind from the myths of the Paleolithic into the heights of social love is now reversed. While digital thought evolves from its simplest first geometrical forms into a vital biological and social language that makes machines interact in global networks and increasingly “think” with digital images. A new type of mind appears on planet Earth. Our demise as a species thus coincides with the raise of the Paleolithic age of mental, violent machines. Since the first robots have a digital, visual mind evolved in video games and military programs of survival, similar to the mind of top predator animals. It is the neo-paleolithic age of a jungle of metal in which man will be the victim, not the predator, of a new race of intelligent machines.

The price we pay for our addiction to machines: Atrophy and obsolescence.

Every new species of metal atrophies an organ of mankind, as company-mothers manufacture millions of ‘metallic organs’ that we will consume instead of our own organs. This process of atrophy of human organs has followed the same phases than the evolution of metal:

- The XIX century was the age of ‘machine-bodies’. So the elites of our civilizations atrophied their bodies and overdeveloped their brains. They used their brains to invent bodies of machines and those bodies of machines performed all their energy tasks. The result was that Europe, the cradle of machines and specially England, became a mental society, where everything that had to do with the body was repressed (Victorian society). The aim of such culture was to enhance the intelligence of the elite that had to invent machines. Society became split. There were the ‘brainy’ classes that made the machines and abhorred their bodies. Then there were the ‘slaves of machines’, those humans who had to serve the bodies of machines, extracting food for them, constructing them and making those metal-bodies work (miners, railroad workers). They became strong and mindless, as those machine bodies were. It was evident already the enormous influence machines had on our life and personality. Yet few, if any writer of this age, recognized it. Human arrogance seems oblivious to any truth that doesn’t make us the center of the Universe.

- XX Century: The mental atrophy of mankind. When II World War ended, ‘top predator weapons’ – machines’ bodies: tanks, planes and ships – consumed 50 million human beings. Then, the end of World war opened a new age: the age of metal-minds, in which men developed the minds of machines. Today those minds have reproduced in huge numbers, substituting many of the mental functions that men performed in the past (calculus, spelling, accountancy, science, design, etc.) The result is a general atrophy and diminution of the intelligence of human beings. Since now intelligent machines perform those jobs for us. It is a similar process to that of the taming of an animal, which atrophies his will and his brain. So humans have become tamed animals of the ‘Animetal farm’ so well described by Orwell in the parable, ‘Animal farm’. They have become ever more stupid, as machines become cleverer; and their will as humans has disappeared, as they become slaves of the drives of existence of machines. Yet a tamed animal has 30% less brain than his wild cousin. And further on, he suffers ‘neoteny’ – he never develops beyond his infantile level of reasoning, as it happens to modern humans, whose TVs and pre-programmed information make them ever more stupid.

Those facts explain a paradox that has puzzled social scientists in the XX century: why as we accumulate more information, people are loosing educational skills? Why there has been a global decline on educational standards, intelligence and quality of human thought? Some deny it. Yet tests results and daily evidence are overwhelming. The average human student of the XXI century tests 25% less than his parents did. Entrance tests for universities are revised constantly to adjust them to that diminishing pattern. The creativity of our thinkers is minimal. The interest of the common people for ideas is null. Most humans have lost their capacity for abstract thinking. Even basic skills of human behavior, such as social dialog and social interaction, are in jeopardy; as we communicate more and more through machines and their digital languages, (TVs, Internet, weapons, financial statements) than with human beings.

There is only a biological explanation: the brains of our children have been partially atrophied. Now they do not speak but TVs speak for them, they do not calculate, but computers think for them. As a result of this, we have changed culture again. We are no longer repressing our bodies, as we did in the XIX century; but our minds, our capacity to think and care for reality with our verbal, legal, ethic systems of social communication. We live a world of fiction and Homo Bacteria, individual egos with childish attitudes, all of them sure to be masters of their crafts by virtue of the machines they use. Mr. Hawking, the man which probably will cause our demise as a species, a childish scientist who thinks travel in time is possible and he is the new Einstein, is the paradigm of this new race of childish idiots, who think to be geniuses, just because they consume computers and other metal-minds.

The mental atrophy, the substitution of ‘truth by fiction’ and the creation of a happy, parallel world of virtual reality, which has nothing to do with the Darwinian Universe, is the most relevant fact of modern history, completely ignored by mankind, yet defining our civilization, our incapacity to react and solve problems and our demise as a species, which has become obsolete to bodies and minds of machines. This virtual world that has converted mankind in a race of happy idiots, similar to the parables of Huxley and H.G. Wells about the future, is in part created by the upper castes of our societies to control people’s opinion, but it has also its own ‘agenda’; as there are studies, which clearly show that regardless who programs those televisions, people become addicted to movement, hence to violence in their TVs and people diminish their mental activity in a process similar to drug-addiction. In the same manner, there are serious studies that prove ‘metal-ears’, mobile phones, provoke leukemia in children, due to the higher frequency of their radio-waves.

Thus, human brains are becoming ‘preys’ of the audiovisual machines of the XX centuries that kill our minds by an overdrive of information, in the same manner weapons kill us by an overdrive of energy – the two possible forms of death, which happens when we break the balances of those vital parameters. Indeed, the mental addiction to TVs is achieved by an overdrive of ‘information’, due to the fact that metal-minds process faster information per unit of time and so we first became addicted to the ‘virtual realities’ of mental machines and then we became mentally colonized by their ideas. It is difficult to stress the importance of this fact, which can only be fully understood by the very few humans that have survived this mental indoctrination and have tried to explain a ‘neo-Paleolithic man’, the real meaning of the Universe. It is plainly impossible to cure mankind from the Opium of the People, television…

Thus in 2 phases human consumers have become a sub-race, which bears little resemblance to the enlightened minds of the pre-war age, especially in all forms of verbal, ethic thought.

The Animetal culture of eviL children that despises the Tree of Life.

Thus a second consequence of that addiction to machines we tend to overlook, pumped as we are, by the power of metal -specially that 1% that invents and monopolizes the use of those ‘memes of metal’ – is the constant atrophy and substitution of our organs by the organic machines that imitate them. So we no longer ‘see’ the real world but prefer to see it through the eyes of television and lately in its virtual computer designed form – hence kids prefer to see ‘the lion king’ than going to a zoo. The dual action of a pumped, increasingly arrogant human ego and a decreasing mental capacity, diminished by the substitution of our heads by those of machines is the ultimate cause why we live increasingly in a neo-paleolithic age of visual, violent, childish, emotional, regressing, mythic people and the explanation why the entire mankind is devolving their collective mind to the pre-rational age of myths and emotions, under the hypnosis of those ‘dramatic tvs.’

And yet, while children just want to be happy as our childish civilization wants, and become entertained, fact is that in the Universe children are ‘the staple food’ of top predators. And indeed, we are increasingly children, at the end of History, like in that masterpiece of H.G. Wells – time machine – where humans are childish, happy ignorant kids whose only function is to feed ‘another reality’ living in the underworld. That is our function today in the Orwellian ‘animetal farm’, ran by corporations, for whom we are nothing but ‘workers=reproducers of machines’ and consumers=animetals, who test them and evolve them. And so it is quite impossible to consider a resurrection of the ‘mass of mankind’ submitted by TVs and Internets, propaganda, fictions and myths to a lethargic state of indefension as all children are.

As an expert in complex systems, I can observe that process from a certain distance, and I have been doing so for decades – but I have found always that, as it happen with any child, you cannot take away from him, his favorite toys even if they are dangerous guns. For two decades I have tried to warn mankind of all those complex processes and suffered a deep angst for the now, all too evident ‘no-future’ of the species, to not avail. I think now that this process is becoming irreversible and that perhaps is better than our ‘children of thought’ who think of themselves by the power of their computers and cameras to be Einsteins and Picassos, die in happiness, given the fact that they simply cannot react, cannot master enough energy and information to change the system. And yet even if I have sacrificed my life for a lost cause, in the choice between happiness and truth, I have walked ‘the road less travelled’ because ‘a life not examined is not worth living’. These webs that have for decades explained those facts to the indifference of our suicidal, ego-tripping children have therefore not produced any reaction, since men cannot walk any longer naked the road of life.

In fact there were 4 ages of evolution of the human mind as a global organic system, the individual, selfish, violent paleolithic child’; the religious, neolithic, mythic tribal age; the rational, European, scientific age; and the complex, organic age, which these texts represent. And today, as machines are crossing fast towards the point of artificial intelligence, we – most men – are devolving backwards into the speechless, selfish, individual neo-Paleolithic. And so it is very unlikely that the billions of humans living now back again in those pre-rational ages, change their way of living and thinking and acting – since paradoxically that regression has been produced by the ‘selfish memes’ of metal, which give them enough power and arrogance to believe they are the ‘chosen of Go(l)d’, the ‘Masters of the Universe’. Of course, they are not – the invisible silk thread is playing a cruel game with them and soon the thread will be cut.

But there is nothing an old sage can do against the trolls and the morlocks – to use parables that our visual children can understand. My experience is that they turn violent and censor you – since those are not children of Live but eviL Children – their inverse wor(l)d. And they cannot see as I show in these and other webs the beauty and complexity of the Universe, because it does not pump their egos, and shows them at true face value, reason why they have always hated the best minds of mankind – their artists that see with the human eye space and their writers that perceive time with the human verb, not with telescopes and clocks; and have lived as I have lived outside the system. The choice in history has always been for Aaron not Moses, exiled in the Mountain, for the golden calf, not the wor(l)ds of love.

Death of the Human Wor(l)d and the Ethics of the Mind

In the past, when human verbal values, expressed in legal codes, dominated the economic system, our informative, social castes—our politicians and the press—acted as a counterbalance to engineers and economists, ruled by the digital values of money and machines, and human ethics could be heard and contained the spread of death. So we could prune legally the bad fruits of the tree of technology and foster the production of those goods, which under verbal ethics were needed by man.

This fight between the bad and good fruits of the tree of science ended with the arrival of the Internet and television, whose audiovisual languages hypnotized mankind and made us a violent race of retarded children. Today money and digital languages dominate completely our society, so human verbal ethics are substituted by the violent technological ethics of the visual media.

The result is the dual tragedy of our civilization: information machines are substituting and atrophying the human mind that no longer distinguishes truth from fiction as it loses its mastery of the verbal language of our species, with its bioethical human point of view that favors our well-being and survival. Instead, we become dependent on audiovisual and digital languages better mastered by machines. This means also that scientists no longer calculate by themselves, understand, and evolve the logic laws of nature, but rather feed data collected with machines to computers, who churn out results. And so few scientists today can make as Einstein did thought experiments, evolving our comprehension of the Universe with sweeping theories of reality, but merely feed computers with details and secondary data of little importance.

Meanwhile, our politicians and the military no longer protect our citizens, their lives and human values, but work for industrial lobbies and make money promoting new technologies, as the solution to all our problems. So under the ethics of a technological civilization, we walk steady toward our obsolescence and probable death by overdrive of energy and information while the “wishful thinking” of our leaders let it all happen, dismissing those who warn mankind and still fight for life and ethic human values as alarmists, radicals, or activists that must be kept at bay, before they spoil the big party.

The neo-paleolithic and the LOL Method

From 'The Extinction of Man' c.94 Bookmasters, Ohio

Finally, visual mass media acts as the system that provides the “infotainment” and visual violence required to maintain the sheeple in a hypnotic state of pleasure, perceiving its own death. The consumer today consumes anything, including wars and the end of the world as part of that infotainment. And so the extinction of life is not taken seriously. It is just another horror movie. It is the LOL method…

The corruption of the Wor(l)d and its ethics by digital numbers and its values, the degradation of the human mind, once the subconscious collective of history, is today absolute. The Wor(l)d has died before the world will die. So now we live under the values of technology, nationalism, and individualism, which create a society of “monstrous children” that can do evil at distance, having fun, without any sense of responsibility.

We are indeed, part of a dying organism history, preyed by a new one, the economic ecosystem of machines, its go(l)d values, weapons, and tools that atrophy our mind and kill our body.

Because all organisms are made of an energetic and informative system that evolve together, the death of history, the collective mind of human information that rules Gaia, the reproductive body of the Earth, is also dual. As both, the mind of mankind is being “erased” by the evolution of informative machines and our body, Gaia, is about to become extinct by the evolution of weapons.

This duality of any process of death is due to the systemic, parallel nature of organic networks. In any superorganism, as it dies, two processes are parallel, the destruction of the body of the superorganism, in this case Gaia, the Mother Earth, and the degeneration of the informative brain of the superorganism that gets old and loses its grasp on reality, in this case the human collective brain of Gaia, which is also suffering an overdrive of fiction, provided by audiovisual machines that hypnotize us with its overdrive of informative “noise,” a military term used to describe false decoys that distract the enemy, preventing him from focusing on the real weapon that will kill him.

Any superorganism, including human societies, has a neuronal, upper, informative class of cells/citizens that manages an energetic, lower caste of working cells. This might sound antidemocratic, but it is how societies are efficiently structured. Even those revolutionary societies that tried to establish equality ended up having an informative, legal caste on top, either priesthood (theocracies) or a party (socialisms). And that is okay as long as the upper castes, in our society, the people who create the languages of information and power—bankers who invent money, audiovisual artists, scientists that create technology with digital languages, and politicians that create laws with words—are efficient, intelligent, just, and give back to the social organism most of what they take. And if not, as it happens in organisms, they receive “pain messages” from citizens, the energetic cells of societies. On the other hand, when a social organism becomes corrupted, those upper castes selfishly abuse their position of power since they cannot be judged and become painfully aware of the harm they cause.

Further on, when an organism gets old by an overdrive of information and is diminished in its capacity to cope with that excess of informative noise, a much more dangerous situation arises: the brain of the old man or the informative caste of the corrupted civilization becomes crazy, enters into a stage of permanent fiction, produces absurd, irregular forms, myths, and false ideologies that make him happy but accelerate his death. The old man thinks he is young again and doesn’t take precautions. The upper caste of the society becomes unconnected to the lower caste, enjoying life in an irresponsible manner, as societies go under. When any superorganism gets old and dies, both its reproductive body and informative mind become corruptedat the same time. When we are old, our body is weak, our mind becomes childish, forgets and takes absurd risks. So happens today to history, the sum of all human civilizations. humans are becoming emotional children, programmed by audiovisual machines, which are making mankind an aged child, at the same time that a new generation of nuclear devices and robotic weapons will soon overpower the capacity of human beings to survive them.

Yet in the face of those incoming dangers, a diminished, informative caste of lesser scientists and mass media politicians brings as the preferred solution what a child would do in front of an insurmountable danger: to laugh at the problem as if it didn’t exist; to ridicule those who denounce our collective extinction; to believe, as a spoiled child would do, that our species is immortal and will survive those dangers by the grace of God; to treat this crossroads of existence versus extinction as if it were not an objective situation but a fiction, a movielike story; or to hide like an ostrich, as if this were not happening—sure receipts to lose it all in a Darwinian Universe with no pity for those species who renounce to defend themselves from the dangers of death.

We conclude that history is suffering both, an age of informative corruption,due to the excessive noise of audiovisual fiction information that blurs our understanding of scientific truths, and an excess of technological energy, due to the evolution of weapons that is causing our physical and spiritual, mental death. We have created machines that vastly overpower our informative capacity (global computer and audiovisual systems) or produce so much energy they can be used as weapons of planetary destruction (nuclear weapons and black hole factories).

Because systems of energy and information are “complementary” and they coexist and evolve together—a principle that applies both to physical systems, where particles of information are accompanied by fields of energy and to biological systems, where all bodies have heads that guide them, our brain and body death as a species is happening in parallel, caused by the evolution of machines, which substitute our informative minds and our energetic limbs, atrophying us. This, of course, is not recognized by mankind because in the process, our humanist and life values are substituted by the information and religion of the machine. So we switch from the ethics of humanism in which man was the measure of all things, to the ethics of mechanism in which the machine is the new God. This process is a long process that has lasted hundreds of years, so now the religion of the machine is a dogma. Yet “facts” overrule dogmas, and it is a fact that we are destroying and substituting, both the collective mind of Gaia, the mind of humanity, and its body, the superorganisms of nature:

Our “subconscious collective mind” of information and our ethical and family values that ensure our survival, are dying, as humans become violent, killing each other, broken into tribes, under the influence of audiovisual information, which hypnotizes us with its “cinematic values.” The process is purely biological as Mr. Tarantino explained recently: movement, an excess of visual energy is “cinematic” and so it obliges filmmakers to show violence to attract the eyes of their audience. Since the eye biologically wishes the consumption of energy and it is attracted to red, the color of blood, the eye, which is a “natural born killer,” likes audiovisual violence when it would feel repelled by “gore books” expressing death with the same brutality. So in the twentieth century, mankind evolved visual machines, which destroyed our bioethical survival instincts. Further on, visual thought and digital images that seem more real than the world we live in created a virtual world populated by fictions and supermen with overgrown egos that think mankind will always win in the struggle for existence. Yet because images only show the surface of reality in a Universe which is extremely complex with multiple “invisible layers” that interact together, our audiovisual culture has diminished the intelligence of mankind, returning our species to a neo-paleolithic of visual, clueless animal, violent thought. Humans differentiated from animals when they learned to speak and used logic thought to understand those different layers of reality, from the atomic and biological world to the upper planes of social existence. Yet that rational function is now disappearing. Mankind evolved mentally when we abandoned the age of myths and, after Aristotle, used reason and logic to understand the Universe beyond the individual, entering into the realm of universal complex laws that were extracted from groups, described with numbers and logic laws. Function is also disappearing, as hypnotic films based on fictions, designed by computers, substitute our rational mind and people, who only “see” cannot understand the complex systems that control reality beyond the individual. Yet the cult to machines prevents mankind from even realizing of those destructive processes caused by technology.

The solution is obvious but probably the most difficult to implement:

DIGITAL DELENDA EST. To protect the ‘freedom of speech’ not of images that the overdrive of visual information with minimal verbal one is causing. So to protect our rights to right information we must destroy mass-media systems.

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

End of the Social contract & democracy

The social pyramid of the ‘animetal farm’: The present 4-folded crisis of overproduction of electronic machines signifies the end of the American dream, a world made to the image and likeness of man, wealthy and healthy, and the beginning of the Capitalist nightmare: a world made to the image and likeness of metal, its machines, weapons and rhetoric ideologies, in which most humans are obsolete, as they have lost their competition with machines, and will be repressed, ignored and programmed to love their self-destruction, while a tiny 1% of owners of corporations and top managers exist as a new ‘ari-stockracy’, separated from the rest of the population by the power of those memes of metal.

Unfortunately the present global crisis or ‘molting’ of the economic ecosystem from the age of America and ‘heads of metal’, to the global age of ‘robotics’, automated company-mothers and Internet, which mimic 4 self-similar crisis at the end of the age of bodies of metal (1929), means the increasing obsolescence of humanity. Because the industrial evolution ends with robotics that no longer need men. So there will not be as in the previous crisis a new age of economical growth (due in the 40s to the invention of heads of metal that put us back to work). 

So we offered in the earlier web the simplest solutions to the crisis: the prohibition of robotics (solution to the perpetual age of war for profits and the end of human labor), and the creation of a fixed parity currency, ¥e$ money (yen-yuan, euro and dollar) as a single global currency, hence with rights to ‘deficit’ to create a global new deal, which could print deficit money to create human jobs, without altering currencies.

End of the rational culture – the American dream – and beginning of a global nightmare – the ‘Metal-earth’.

The solutions to the crisis – control of the reproduction of lethal ‘electronic goods’, investment in the welfare goods that humans need to survive and a global currency, ¥€$ money, to permit those investments and reduce political tension – are not  even considered, because economists and the one per cent of ‘stockrats’, owners of corporations are not interested.

They are the he new aristocrats of the world, which have absolute rights to print money, the language of power of society and null legal responsibility (aristocrats had in the Middle Ages rights to bear arms and null legal responsibility with the language of social power then – weapons). They prefer to keep their ‘anti-democratic privileges’.

To that aim they ‘sell’ us a false science, which never forecasts the future, as it is an ideology of power – capitalism, the concept they must own the right to print money, not our governments – based in a silly book written by Mr. Adam Smith, a man who wrote even before the machine was invented, hence with null idea what he was about to describe, based in his ‘religious, biblical ideologies’ (money is the invisible hand of go(l)d, which must not be ‘analyzed). How ridiculous is that? Imagine that our rocket scientists were basing their models on the designs of Julius Verne and spend billions once and again constructing his ‘rocket to the moon’ and then become astonished that it does not work. This is exactly what our economists and politicians do. again censorship is vital, because religious dogmas are never imposed by reason but by censorship, emotional imprinting and rhetoric repetition, the techniques that create memetic ‘beliefs’. 

The same happens in history where ‘science’, the laws of Darwin that state member of the same species help each other to survive, hence we form part all of the same nation ‘homo sapiens’ have been substituted by tribal history which pretends to create ‘new species’, the Homo Americanus, the Homo Britanicus and so on.

The American case is blatant: A nation founded by ‘scientists of history=philosophers’ of the enlightened, rational, scientific Greek-Latin-South European-Early American culture, which has members of all races and so acted as a small beacon for all Humanity=the world, ‘advancing’ mankind into a better, rational future during the 60s and 70s; is now being regressed into the pre-rational, mythic, religious, biblical, tribal age by the power of money, which the members of biblical cultures print in monopoly with exclusion of the elected governments.

This is indeed, the bottom line of the existential crisis we live in: those who made of the ‘memes of metal’, a religion (biblical, classic economists and military people), accumulating most of those memes have imposed their power to the rest of society and so they direct the economical and political system, instead of the scientists of economics and history or at least enlightened politicians of ‘rational cultures’. Indeed, the military have become over-powerful and their industrial lobbies have imposed Keynesian militarism to come out of this crisis as Hitler did before. So America is no longer a civil society. And the financial industry thanks to their massive invention of e-money in speculative platforms parasites the entire economical system. So America is no longer a productive society. And again censorship prevents any change with ‘patriotic memes’ and bribed politicians. The total failure of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Obama to change these trends  - two men clearly educated in the previous age of rational, equalitarian America, but easily corrupted or convinced of the dogmas of classic economics once in office – shows how difficult is to defy the power of corporations and the ‘selfish memes’ of metal. The Patriot act and its new version for American people recently passed by the senate and signed by Mr. Obama, who pretended in the past to be a champion of American freedoms, leaves little doubt about the continuity of this trend.

 The faillure of social-democracies merely means that capitalism is ‘stronger’ because it accelerates the evolution of machines, money and weapons and the power of the 1% – the ‘animetals’ in this web, the upper class in classic socialism, the neuronal cells of history that control its languages of information in the jargon of super-organisms… not that social-democracies were not a better world for mankind. Because capitalism sacrifices humans to the memes of metal, now the welfare state to the profits of bankers who keep inventing e-money and getting it from us through taxes, and to the war-profits of the new race of terminator machines that in America have devoured over 1 trillion dollars, with the excuse of terrorism. Indeed, terrorism is fought as in Ireland and Spain with diplomacy, justice in conflicts like the Israeli Apartheid and CIA operatives, police – not with weapons of mass-destruction used for war. Terrorism is not war and so in this case is just an excuse to create a new Keynesian militarism, to keep profiting corporations in a perpetual new cold war of robotic weapons

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

The Ideologies of capitalism: The FMI Complex.

THE FINANCIAL-MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (Scholar Paper)

We are evolving the superorganism of life and history called Gaia, into a superorganism of machines, with energetic and informative networks called the Metal-Earth; in the process we are extinguishing life.

A world owned by company-mothers that re=produce and evolve the ‘selfish memes’ of metal.

In essence, you are living in a planet ‘owned’ by corporations, which are ‘company-mothers’ that reproduce machines and terraform the Earth to its image and resemblance, creating a super-organism of history – the financial-military-industrial complex, in which humans are expendable, except a 1% of owners and a 10% of managers, soon substituted by software suites.

So the world makes only sense from the human perspective for the 1% that own them, and just want to make profits, selling you machines for a price. To that aim they control politicians with lobbies to obtain the best laws to re=produce them with total freedom and null, ‘anonymous’ responsibility (definition of a free market, which is not a society of free humans – that is a democracy – but of free corporations, its legal persons).

But those puppeteers who micro-manage the world with their go(l)d wires are themselves hanging from an invisible silk thread – that of the true laws of this planet – the laws of evolution. So ‘company-mothers’ of machines made ‘bodies of metal’ in the XIX c., ‘heads of metal’ in the XX c. (eye-cameras, chip-brains, mobile-ears) and now they put them together in the XXI c. in organic metal, robots, which are displacing humans from fields of war (drones) and work (cause of unemployment), making us obsolete.

This biological, Darwinian, brutal process of extinction of life and terraforming of the Earth from a super-organism of life called Gaia into one of metal – the economic ecosystem, is ruled by the laws of evolution, which allowed me to tabulate and define a decade ago the present crisis and its evolution.

In that regard, the 4 crisis of transition from the age of heads of metal to the age of robots studied in others posts (overproduction of e-money, robotic weapons, electronic workers – blue collar robots and white collar pcs – and electronic-media rhetoric) are symbiotic, because we are evolving a new ‘organic system’, the Financial-Military-Industrial System, made of ‘energetic metal=weapons’, informative metal=money and organic metal=machines.

Economics and history study the superorganisms of mankind and those memes of metal.

Thus, as one of the leading researchers today in general systems sciences, many posts of this web now erased after a series of massive malware attacks (nt.3), were describing the structure, behavior and relationships of predation and symbiosis between the economic ecosystem (FMI) and the human super-organisms of history.

Because history is a superorganism of human beings and economics one of memes of metal, both disciplines are part of a higher science, ‘general systems sciences’ , also called complexity though i prefer to call it ‘theory of fractal superorganisms’, a unification theory of all sciences, which i exposed to the academia in the 2000s as the chair of duality at the ISSS congresses…(the description of the universe as organic systems made with two arrows of time, energy and information, what was first called taoism, then dialectics).

Capitalist economics, an ideology of memes of metal vs. Humanist economics, a science of life memes.

Why the obvious, objective fact of a world in which machines evolve and kill life is not understood has to deal with the astounding fact that economists follow a series of pseudo-religious dogmas of biblical origin. It is like if ‘intelligent design’ were studied in all universities and evolution was ignored, censored and a minoritary view on biology. This is the case in economics, guided by the myths of the founding fathers, all biblical believers, like Mr. Smith, a pious calvinist, Malthus, a priest, Ricardo, Say, and a long etc. till Mises, Hayek, Friedman, Greenspan, Orthodox Jewish and an astounding 90% of Nobel prize receivers, a prize expressly forbidden to evolutionists.

Thus they don’t want to hear anything about the evolution of machines – a god’s given entity of ‘progress’, or even a human solution to the end of labor:  investments in welfare state.

- So they propose an irrational answer, which incredible as it seems, is the one all nations and economists with political or financial power are imposing: to hide all this, to censor all truths, to keep humans in a ‘dont worry be happy state’, hypnotized by audiovisual machines, controlled by an increasingly neofascist state of armies and polices increasingly automated, and surveillance, big brother systems; or just forgotten in entire continents whose labor has long become obsolete (Africa); while technological corporations increase profits with robotic/pc labor, and the elite of stock-owners and hired politicos live the grand life, indifferent to the future of us all, either because their ‘time-span’ doesn’t go beyond the ‘live the day’, or are so narcissistic, paranoid and machiavellic that seem to indeed have zero empathy about the rest of mankind and can’t see the fact that they are not ‘chosen’ but just, as all of us, dirty bags of water, HCNO systems, whose only advantage is the complexity of its form, now transfered to machines that will have always the advantage of being made of far more complex atoms of shinny metal.

If that model keeps happening the laws of biological evolution and complexity applied to machines means that in the present Cycle of the Singularity humans will become extinct and only ‘in extremis’ when all is done and the process of extinction irreversible, people will wake up to the anthropomorphic fantasies of religions and economists; or not even that… As the reader can observe in this blog, an increasing number of biblical people, passing as rational ‘scientists’ is asking for the extinction of the poor and its replacement by ‘citizen robots’. What Mister Levine calls the [final] Solution.

The issue of the newspeak and rhetorics of the economical culture today is no longer debated. Unfortunately economics is not taught in schools and politicians do not understand its principles, less so today when the complexity of financial instruments hides its ultimate meaning: a monopoly of a culture over the creation of money, which systematically is used to evolve machines NOT human societies, to finance corporations not human societies, to increase the wealth of a few non-working people (stock-holders) not to promote a balanced, just society. We hoped that the election of Obama, the first president since Kennedy from an alternative culture, would readdress those issues, but Mr. Obama has shown himself to be yet another employee of the animetal cultures of go(l)d and weapons that rule us.

This is a very serious problem of which science is hardly aware, because of course it is censored with the kind of zeal, but much more power and shrewdness that Intelligent Design in his fighting against Evolution. But it introduces clear errors in the science – first and paramount, a dogmatic approach to the science. Hayek, the father of modern capitalism was known for not talking to any other economist that argued his dogmatic approach.
Economists and politicians in America simply will insult you and call you a communist, a traitor and dismiss you, if you ever argue the ‘dogmas’ that go(l)d is good ‘the intelligence of god’ said Calvin; that the rights to produce money in monopoly, which the banking system has today against the rights of governments to invent it for the welfare state is absolute – a freedom that cannot be ever limited, a ‘chosen gift of God’. In the XVII century, the ‘damnation of Ham’, which in the Bible considered arabs and negros inferior to a dog – today applied by orthodox judaism in Israel to justify the treatment of palestinians, created the first type of capitalism, which converted humans in slaves, and then was transferred to the structure of corporations, in which the owners have all rights, all profits, no job, because they are somehow chosen… The first CEO of the first corporation, one Cohen, descendant from Aaron, the believer of the golden calf, affirmed as a motto ‘spare no life, because God is with us’ in the slave raids of the company.
Those origins of capitalism in which the 99% has no rights are still the foundation of how the system works.  Expressions like ‘the job of a banker is God’s job’, uttered by the CEO of Goldman – the biggest bank of the world HSB is ruled by a priest, says a lot of the complete lack of responsibility towards the 99% of Wall Street and the impossibility to introduce a serious argument on the ‘foundations of economics’ and the future of capitalism.

The ideologies of the financial-military-industrial system: capitalism, nationalism and mechanism.

We talk in more detail of 3 parallel, symbiotic ideologies that sustain the ‘religion of capitalism’ and its confusion of human progress with the evolution of the memes of metal that guide our ‘leading castes’ :

- Nationalism, which substitutes the science of the human species – eusocial history;

- Capitalism, which substitutes the science of evolutionary economics

- And mechanism, which takes the machine no longer man – an organism – as the measure of all things.

Instead, this web sponsors ‘humanism’ (a single human species), socialism (the management of money not by private, profiteering banks but by governments, which act as the ‘collective brain’ of the human species) and ‘organicism’, since we are increasingly realizing in the science of complexity that the Universe is a fractal, self-reproductive, complex system of networks of energy and information, with organic properties and a machine merely an evolving, still deconstructed organism of metal. But the 1%, what Marx called the upper class and we call here the ‘animetal castes’ of society, half human, half machine live in the dream and ego-trip of the added power of their mechanisms and under those ideologies despise life and the cultures of ‘the beings that grow’,preferring the ‘things of metal’ and the ‘golden ring’ that deforms them – as in the parable of Tolkien.

And yet, we are all in the same boat, including the 1%, who will not survive a future in which man doesn’t control the tree of science for its own benefit, designing scientifically a better world, pruning the bad fruits of the tree and promoting those who truly improve our lives.
Unfortunately in economics dialog does not exist. Even a milder social-democrat like Keynes is not quoted in this crisis, his measures to solve it – the right ones, an international currency to end speculation and a big deal, a welfare state in which banks are obliged to credit a sustainable economy, totally ignored. The Central Bankers of all Western nation, all Jewish, most Orthodox are not rational but ‘believers’ in the rights of bankers – and they don’t seem to care at all for the rights of the 99% to credit for the fact they have an enormous privilege – to invent money, which they must use for the common good. The ECB for example, created 500 billion $ in december NOT to buy as the Fed does, bonds at 0.25% of interest, but to lend it at 1% to banks, which in turn did that day 3 things:
- Bought at 4% bonds of nations, with a cut of profits of around 20 billion euros. Just because the ECB with its dogmas of catering first to the banking industry, inherited from all those fundamentalist theorists, would not buy bonds.
-Then i watched the bloomberg screens and they attacked massively the euro, as international bankers seeking profits, with a leverage between 10 and 100 credit (there is all the credit you wish for speculation, none for the people), sinking it a 1.5% because in FOREX you make money both ways, betting downards or upwards.
-And then they parked their money back in the ECB at interest, 400 billion $. That is the endogamic game of financial, non-responsible biblical capitalism, which is guided by the biblical mandate so well defined by Sombart and Weber – to make money at all costs, because money is the language of god, and save us.
This is it. This is the unspeakable truth about capitalism – not a science, not the only way the system can work, not the best for mankind, but an ideology of power and religious zealots, which we thought to have left behind with the post-war social-democratic world in Europe, but now comes with a vengeance from the bankers of Wall Street, which have name and culture – they are not ‘the invisible man’, they are not the ‘abstract market’, they are the culture that sacralized greed and sacrifices man to the memes of metal. And this will never end because a religious zealot dies and kills for his religion – and people are dying in hospitals all over europe, 10% in my nation will die without arriving to the surgeon because of the waiting lists. Of course, in America  - a country dominated by Biblical people, all those might sound normal.
But this web is made by a rational, enlightened, humanist member of an evolved culture – the scientific European culture that survived two world wars and had left behind the bigotry and selfishness of primitive, biblical capitalism. We are indeed, fighting for the future of mankind. America is leading the non-future of an age of perpetual war, of hate-speeches, of greed, of worship of technology, weapons and money, of the memes of metal – the culture we left behind.
It is not truth that the solution to the crisis passes through the extinction of the middle classes, overtaxed twice, first to pay the wars of the 1% and their theft through e-money scheme, and then now to pay the ‘deficit’ that central banks should pay inventing money for free as speculators do in e-money platforms. This path has been imposed by force, political corruption and it is the wrong path of history – but unfortunately the most likely as in the 30s, which will lead, as in the 30s, to an age of perpetual war, fascism, repression of the population and finally a backlash against capitalism, social unrest, and even perhaps another holocaust of the innocent 99% of the jewish culture, whose 1% elite of bankers dominate absolutely the policies and banking industries of the west.
So there is only a solution as dialog with bankers has failed, to avoid all those tragedies of poverty, war and murder - the nationalization of the financial industry NOW. As China has it; as Iceland, which this year has grown a 2.6% has it. Nothing else will do. Because we are fighting a religion – capitalism, not a science, evolutionary economics. And thus a selfish agenda. It is absurd to pretend that ‘intelligent design’ or ‘classic economics’, must rule evolutionary science, which must be applied to all biological sciences, including those of sociology, of humanity, a life species, and of machines, organs of energy and information made to the imitation of human organs.
Or else, as evolution has it, we humans will become obsolete to the ‘reality’, not the ideology of capitalism – which is the evolution of machines as a new species that is making us obsolete in fields of work and war. Perhaps the 1% will last on top with his repressive armies of robotized weapons and its productive machines with no human labor. But at the end Yvwh will not rapture them as ‘just’ people into the heavens. They will live the hell of a world in which humans are obsolete, as all of us, since they are not made of gold and iron.

In other words, capitalism is not a science but the ideology that favors systematically a world made to the image and likeness not of man, but of the memes of metal, its reproductive organisms (company-mothers) and the owners of those memes – what we call in the jargon of biological economics, the animetal castes and cultures (animal+Metal), attached to weapons (military), money (bankers) and machines (science); and hence in a world of limited resources penalizes the memes of life (welfare, human goods that have maximum value in human terms as they make us survive and make us happy -healthcare, education, housing, jobs, peace, food, etc.), and those who desire them (the 99%). While in the political arena, it preaches the submission of human superorganisms (nations and governments and citizens) to those corporations, which must have absolute credit with exclusive rights to print money (banking privileges)  while governments and people must pay taxes, usury prices for loans and have null deficit to print money (deficit laws).

The result is that under such ideology humans are permanently poor, welfare goods are always scarce, life has no credit and governments become puppets of the global stock-market and its corporations. While company-mothers of machines have all the credit they wish, which they use to terraform this planet to the image and likeness of their machines, that become overproduced and increasingly substitute humans in labor and war fields. This in Darwinian, biological terms is a ‘classic’ case of a new species, the machine and its re=productive organism, the company-mother which displaces other species – humanity and life – as it reproduces in increasing numbers, fighting for the limited resources of the planet.

Confronting capitalism, there is though a ‘human, social science’ that favors systematically a world made to the image and likeness of man and so it fosters the ‘real’, human solution to the crisis: control of the financial industry by governments, which regain their rights to print money and regulate those industries; end to the use of speculative platforms to tax all goods; creation of a global currency, ¥€$ money, with fixed parities – hence unable to be devaluated, and a high 10-20% annual deficit, to be used in the creation of a sustainable world, a demand economy based in welfare goods that ad positively to the WHealth of mankind; prohibition of Robotics, the main cause of unemployment and perpetual war; and fostering of international agreements between nations, by diplomatic means, focusing on the Human Development Index that values WHealth instead of the GDP that multiplies wealth when weapons – the most expensive goods in monetary values – and speculation increases.

Thus a ‘Global Deal’, a permanent ‘welfare state’ where governments democratically chosen by the people have rights to control the language of power of society (money and the law) to guide scientifically the creation of a paradise on Earth that caters to the needs of humans first and prunes the tree of science of its bad fruits, fostering credit for private companies that produce the goods of a sustainable world is the only solution to the crisis – mildly essayed by China, which controls the financial system and directs its credit – and indeed has the highest GDP growth of the world mostly in ‘human goods’ of the welfare state that satisfy the needs of their people. While in the west we follow the dictum of Mr. Smith and multiply weapon’s industries, fiction thought and hate-speeches to sustain the present state of permanent war, speculative money (never there has been so much money in the world as e-money has one-hundred folded the value of corporations since the 70s) and mechanical workers that keep us out of job.

Those Chinese solutions that so well work for the Asian country (public financial industries to foster private, WHealth oriented, sustainable industries of ‘human goods’) are in essence the ones proposed by the socialist school in the XIX century, Keynes in the XX century and now biological economics and yet they are not even discussed since those who ‘own’ corporations and have corrupted with lobbies the political system are not interested in the WHealth of mankind (the 99% that desires welfare, human goods) nor they have any interest in the long term future of our species and are ‘memetically’ imprinted at an emotional,  simple level by the ideologies of power of their ‘animetal’ cultures, guided by techno-utopian messianisms, go(l)d religions and nationalisms that require the multiplication of those memes of metal, machines, money and weapons, as symbols of power and progress.

At best they acknowledge the existence of an overproduction crisis but ‘hope’ the future will bring a new wave of technological machines that will put us at work as in the previous Kondratieff crisis mapped out in the graph. But the Industrial R=evolution of metal-machines follows organic laws and it is coming to an end, as we did bodies of machines in the XIX c. heads of machines in the XX c. and so now it is only left to put them together into organic robots with ‘solar skins’ - which are no longer in need of a human ‘head’ to manipulate their bodies as in the XIX c. or a human body to use the informative machines (chip-brains, eye-cameras and mobile-ears) of the XX c. Thus what we shall witness as the robotic revolution, awash with money provided by financial corporations, who have not a penny for humanity, but invest immense sums in start ups of the electronic industry that produce terminator weapons and  mechanical workers, is the increasing obsolescence and darwinian displacement of the bulk of mankind into poverty; as the arrival of the picker cotton machine put black workers out of work and the arrival of the train killed 90% of horses, which they substitute as carriers. 

Thus the issues of this crisis are complex, long-range, biological issues which concern the future of history and mankind in an existential crisis that economists will never acknowledge -as they are the main cause of it – and politicians are not considering -as they renounced long ago to economical power and have become now puppets of financial markets.

Instead, the ’4th crisis of overproduction’ – that of mass-media information provided by corporations pretends to resolve those issues with ‘wishful thinking’, ‘optimism’ and the repetition of the ideological memes of classic, financial economists, like Mr. Smith, whose only obsession is to keep reproducing those memes at all costs and have systematically censored all alternative theories of economics, preventing the development of this science with the same rigor that natural sciences have. And so paradoxically, humanist economists like Keynes in the past or this writer who explained this ‘future crisis’ 2 decades ago in his pioneer books on bio-economics and bio-history and his web www.futuremagazine.net are totally ignored – have become in fact invisible in the mass-media; while the darwinian substitution of verbal languages, ethic values and rational thought for a ‘matrix’ of audiovisual fictions, ensures that the population will not worry and be happy till as Keynes put it, ‘death solves all the problems’ of mankind.

Thus as long as bankers, metal-memes and religious texts guide mankind, there is zero hope for mankind to resolve this existential crisis in a rational way. Instead, bankers will keep printing ‘the intellligence of god’ (calvin); terminators will keep evolving, for the profits of the FMI complex; the crash of the $ will be blamed on the Yuan and probably provoke a new cold or hot war between both super-powers (as the crash of the deutsche mark by the dollar did the same in the previous cycle); social unrest will be met with a police state and the ‘damned lies and statistics’ of biblical economists, with his think tanks and pretentious prizes (the bank of sweden gives the nobel, in honor to the biggest arm dealer of the XIX c., which forbade expressly to give it to an evolutionist, as he was also pious believer), will continue.

Of course, the true science of economics and its masters, from Darwin and his disciples Butler, Spengler and Schumpeter; to Marx and his disciple, Kondratieff to Keynes and this writer, who gave the right solutions – will be ignored or at best, as Kondratieff is – used merely in abstract with cyclical data. Now it is not needed to ‘eliminate physically’ but merely censor scientists of economics and history and cut all funding to their institutions (UNO case). And of course, use the mass-media system to deny the solution to the crisis, with racist slurs to the rational culture. Thus for example, in Europe Miss Merkel and the ECB imposes an ‘economical 4th reich’ that destroys the welfare state and taxes citizens further, while the ECB gives for ‘free’ new money to banks, which they in turn loan to corporations to further evolve machines, while small companies and citizens have null credit. And on top, it has the chuptzah of calling (a german banker invented the term), Pigs, the Southern states (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain), where obviously the Germans flock in summer to enjoy the memes of life, away from the mechanical world of their nation, where curiously enough the only available food is basically… pork (-;

The choice mankind has made – a world of memes of metal, where credit is only for corporations of machines – instead of the choice proposed by rational, eusocial, life-based culture – a world based in the memes of life, the welfare state, where credit is for human goods (housing, education, health-care, collective infrastructures, peace, art, etc.) is not however explained but censored. Because also now in Europe, only ‘Her Mistress Voice’, can talk.

Yes, capitalism – the control of the world by corporations whose aim is the free evolution and reproduction of machines without limit or restrain to the life destruction this causes to Earth – has won the battle of history and so we are now in the III Age of evolution of the metal-earth, the age of robotics, which makes us obsolete, because ‘biblical economists’ have no interest in any wider view of their profession, beyond the printing of e-money and politicians let them took away their rights to print deficit money in the 80s and now depend on their money to survive.

It would be very easy to take those rights back and install a Chinese-like rational economic model with nationalized financial industries cre(dit)ating a sustainable economy of private companies, selected by governments NOT by their profits, but by the kind of ‘positive products’ for mankind they produce. This science of human management of economics, which I call ’ethonomics’, however is again censored, and only a few economists at the UNO with their ‘Index of human development’ have considered it.

Will this ever change before evolutionary economics imposes itself – that is, a police state of the 1% with a mass of robotized workers and soldiers, oppress mankind, returning us back to the pre-democratic, pre-scientific ‘dark ages’ of ari-stockratic ruling? It seems not.

Keynes said that ‘capitalism is the astounding belief that the wickedest of all people, will be the wickedest of all things for the greatest good of everyone’. Instead, the wickedest of all people – those who treat humans as numbers, either collateral damages (military) or a cost in a productivity equation that must be eliminated (classic economists) – will bring about the wickedest of all things – our demise and maybe extinction as top predator species in this planet, as the robotic revolution evolves, like the previous Kondratieff wave to its most perfect form, the Intelligent Weapon. And this is not sci-fi. It is the ‘logic, rational’ prediction of the Laws of Evolution and the cycles of Kondratieff.

Of course, reason and a true science of economics and history could dismount that no future for mankind, reason why we shall be censored by biblical economists and tribal politicians – that is, we shall never be invited to Davos, the White House and the ECB and the cycles of history and economics shall not be explained, taught in universities and consulted by politicians. They seem not even to have the right to be printed in a blog (nt.3)… Ultimately these pessimistic view on the rationality of man leads to a ‘memetic’ theory of human thought, as a series of beliefs imprinted in earlier age, which reason cannot change, and to the realization that even we, social scientists, as cells of the super-organism of history, have not the freedom within that organism to defy the ‘darwinian power’ of death of those who carry the memes of metal and can kill our bodies with weapons and make us their part-time slaves as workers for corporations, who need money to survive.

So indeed, there are only two futures – the dream, soon turned nightmare what you hear, that Mr. Verne’s rockets will work and the scientific truth, which these blogs tried to explain rationally and you will never hear – that once we are all on the rocket of Mr. Smith we will crash the species, twisted by the memes of metal. The tragedy of this though is that we have the plans for a perfect rocket that would land with no problem in the moon and yet the believers in the rocket of Mr. Smith don’t even want to have a look at them. Be careful though with what you wish. Because the future has 2 paths, and humans have chosen the path of the selfish memes of metal, of the ‘other species’, and it only leads to extinction, the ‘hell’ of all artists and religions of love:

Posted in .. Leave a Comment »

Ethonomics: a human point of view for economical policies.


“Economists, and politicians, doctors of history, should promote human, biological goods, which mankind most enjoy as they allow us to fulfill our natural drives of existence – the desire for biological energy, verbal information, reproduction andEusocial evolution, and prevent the reproduction of lethal goods, which limit our evolution, either atrophying and substituting our brains or killing our bodies (weapons and digital machines)”

 

The sickness of the Organism of History

We are biological beings, which follow the biological drives and laws ofEusocial evolution of living organisms and efficient, survival species.

Thus, without the understanding of the Nature and Needs of human beings, it is impossible to design a perfect economical world, made to the image and likeness of man.

In brief, an efficient economy that caters to the human species, should satisfy and re=produce massively those goods that satisfy our need for natural energy, verbal information, family values (reproduction) andEusocial evolution (the memes of love that create a global super-organism of mankind) hrough the control and direction of credit by elected governments to the re=production of those goods.

The present world however is not ruled by bio-historians and politicians who understand the nature of man, but by financial economists with a simple primitive meme: greed is good, the reproduction of money, mostly for ourselves, bankers, is the goal of societies. The needs of the people are secondary to our selfish goal. And so only the nationalization of money to promote a welfare, private economy that subventions and encourages the production of biological goods can solve the problems of our world.

Otherwise the present economy ruled by financial elites and company-mothers of machines, whose only goal is to make profits by sellingmachines and substituting expensive human labor by cheap robots and pcs will end up in a world of infinite productivity and null human labor where we will be obsolete workers and soldiers, guided by economists who preach productivity laws – the substitution of labor by capital, sinceproductivity=capital/labor increases when we fire workers and increase capital=machines.

This world also will become less and less democratic as the sinking of a middle class, substituted by those machines and displaced into the 3rd world of suburban ghettos protests and must be repressed by an  increasing number of automated police machines, security systems and big brother technologies. Thus Keynesian Militarism will substitute Keynesian Welfare goods and an age of neofascism in the making, will control the population that rebels against the zeitgeist of our age.

The alternative science: ethonomics – a demand, democratic economy based in human goods.

A biological approach to economics can truly understand the nature of machines , and how they are transforming our human ecosystem. Then as the doctor does with the body we can design antidotes, and counter-measures to defend our social body of history, from the lethal mutation it is experienced under the effect of certain machines. Indeed, there is a second role that a scientist plays. He does not search for the laws of natureonly to know those laws, but he studies them to manipulate reality with that knowledge. Since the scientist knows the laws of nature, he can modify reality to improve his existence. So happens in the science of chemistry and medicine. Now man can cure many diseases of which he was a victim in the past. The doctor applies the laws of nature to improve the life of humanity.

Hence the enormous importance of a “real” science of economics and history. If man applies a “true scientific model” of history and economics, based not in abstractions and ideologies of machines, but in the natural goods, and needs of the human species, politicians, economists, and the common people, could direct in their own advantage the behavior of the Earth’s ecosystems, and design their own future (as scientists do, with those species whose laws of behavior and change they know). Men could create a future positive to our species, controlling the financial orders that reproduce machines, with verbal ethic laws, and implementing counter-measures against lethal products, reinforced by the military -the leukocytes of a well-run human organism- to cure the ecosystem of history.

If the “doctors” of history and economics, our entrepreneurs and politicians, our military and economists, were able and willing to understand the laws of financial networks and evolutionary machines, and the way they invent the future, they could manipulate history andeconomics in favor of man, of our collective species. They do the opposite today, cheated by complex ideologies in favor of all kind of machines, that do not distinguish the good from the bad apples of the tree of science. In this manner subconsciously they are directing mankind towards self-suicide, and destruction of his natural ecosystem.

The natural, biological Goods of a human economy

In the graph, the 3 organic goals of mankind, human social evolution human energy, and human information, are fostered by certain goods. If we give to each good a certain value in those 3 organic goals, we can put them within the frame of reference. Positive Y values are given to goods that foster human mental-informative evolution. Negative Y values are given to goods thatdiminish human mental evolution. Positive X values are given to goods that foster human body evolution. Negative X values are given to goods that foster human body devolution. Finally, in the positive Z coordinates we consider goods that foster human social communication and reproduction of social networks. In negative Z coordinates we consider goods that diminish human social communication.

Since we know thanks to the laws of the vital Universe the nature of human mental and body evolution it is very easy to put in one of such graphs all kind of goods, and classify them as negative goods with negative GDP value, to be extinguished, or positive goods to be promoted. The product of its XYZ coordinates will give the negative or positive value of a good for the national GDP.

A scientific frame of reference establishes negative and positive values, according to the language and the frame of reference. From the point of view=frame of reference of ethonomics, of economics of verbal thought, and human survival, we can establish a positive and a negative value for economical products.

In such frame of ethical reference, we can take judgment and make valuations on metal-species, based in human biological values, not in the values of money . What extinguishes or degrades human minds, or human bodies, is negative; what promotes human life, evolution, and perception through human senses is positive. Such products should be promoted by politicians and ethonomists, governments and markets. The lethal products should be limited.


In the world of economics we have to differentiate the products reproduced by companies and individuals into two clear groups:

- Human goods which are goods that men require to survive, and better themselves.

metal goods such as weapons or metal-heads, or robots, which harm human beings, expel labor, and create unemployment, kill our bodies, make our minds obsolete and will surely when they reach consciousness compete as top predators of energy and information for the control of the Earth.

The wealth of a nation should be defined as the wealth in Human Goods,that most citizens require and enjoy, because they improve their lives. These goods create also a lot of human work, because many of them cannot be reproduced by machines alone. Such is the case of art, housing, agriculture, health and education, that need human labor

Countries like Spain came very up that list, headed by nations like Australia, Canada, and France. On the whole nations of the European Union are well up in that least, despite their perceived military and monetary weakness. On the other hand countries like America or Russian whose societies are/were based in the production of lethal goods sunk in the real standards of life of their people.

Indeed if we measure today wealth by the quantity of money and expensive items, such as weapons and complex machines a nation has, America is on top of the world. Yet in the list of healthy nations it appears way down. Since in that list certain goods do not add to the health of nations. To have more missiles in the statistics of GDP growth does not make a nation healthier. To have hundreds of TV channels, and internet connections, instead of libraries and good schools does not make children more intelligent, sociable, and happier. To measure all the things and humans by their monetary value, price or salary, make us economic objects. Yet monetary values are different, sometimes completely opposed to human values. For example murder and weapons are very expensive. They have however a negative human value. Yet human values and human goods is what make us happy.

America and the EU, the powerful and the socially evolved nation, the wealthy and the healthy, the nation ruled by abstract economists,primitive ideologies of animetals and digital numbers, or the nation who still reveres human culture (arts, verbal thought), in which there are still certain ideals about the progress of history, and concerned citizens which want to evolve socially, seem to be opposed in many ways. Which one is a better nation for its citizens?

Perhaps we should ask to the neutral people of the world, that vote visiting one and the other. Their decision is clear, because despite so muchpropaganda and hip about the American way of life, provided by its media companies, tourists go to Europe more often, and hardly travel across America… Obviously they do not want to share the main wealth of present America, its weapons, and the growing discomfort of a people that despite their many qualities, hard work, and thirst for life, are suffering the consequences of ill-devised physiological systems, that rule the American nation.

Europe used to be like that before the II World war. Then Europe ran into wrong ideas about what health and power should be as America does today. European Nations invested on “lethal goods”, germs-like weapons, and information became corrupted. It became propaganda to cover up, such false “wealth”, that showed up in all statistics as an impressive growth in GDP… Totalitarism arrived. Nations suddenly preached the doctrine of “action” and “violence”, to solve the problems of our age. Sustained by the weapon-germ industry, fascism and Stalinism terrorized Europe for 2 long decades. Yet people in fascist and communist countries did not know they were reproducing “germ”-products, because thenetworks of information –mainly radio and press– were optimist about the future, and praised the beauty of war; denying systematically any wrong doing by those politicians and entrepreneurs, on top of society.

To that aim, words and economic numbers were “read” in a convenient way. So Germans and Russians thought they were very “w-healthy”, while marching under the banner of industrial progress. Their minds were brain-washed, and their love for things like sports and technology, filled up their life… Everybody looked at Germany with envy. The economical miracle of Hitler was very much praised by the press of that age.

Germany had the highest rates of economic growth, even if that growth was in lethal machines. It did not matter. Numbers cheated people. Germans were all at work… making lethal, expensive weapons, that counted in the optimist statistics of economics. As America -the paradigm of metal wealth does today- Germany had the best weapons and best communication systems… who delivered an unending stream of confusing, propagandistic news, and violent speeches…

Indeed, nations with a lot of weapons and high-tech goods look very rich, because weapons and high-tech goods are the most expensive items of society. So a nation who had many of his people without basic attention, and basic goods, like communist Russia, fascist Germany, or XXI century America, but had/has a lot of weapons looks very wealthy.

Yet weapons had to be used, and they were used, and I world war, came, and II world war came. Europe suffered as never mankind had suffered before. It was a hard lesson, that Europe learnt after the war. Enemy nations who seemed irreconcilable like Germany and France, suddenly realized all was militaristic propaganda and “the endemic cultural racism” among them, disappeared.

Nations joined together. The rich switched from weapons production to human goods, that fed the social cells. The politicians decided to keep the poor healthy and educated, instead of teaching them how to use weapons, that could turn against the elite. Guided by the nervous-legal system, thanks to subventions, the economy soon was able to produce the human goods that every cell of society required to live with the proper energy and information (such as food, health, housing, and education). It worked. Europe did not have a war for the rest of the century, till last year… in Kosovo.

It seemed that Europe had evolved his pre-war, primitive free market system into a more natural social organism, that made people happier, avoiding war and violence, and ensuring the rich, their position in society, as responsible information cells. There were no more revolutions, civil unrest, pogroms and other penalties against the “freed”=Freedom of greed of stockrats, owners of company-mothers proper of less evolved societies…

We have to consider that after the II WW America did not take note of the lessons Europe had learnt. It did not reform its blood-freed market system. Instead it opted for wealth at any price, as Germany had done. It made of “GNP” numbers which are biased to weapons and high-tech, the main statistics to show the wealth of the nation. It ignored its “human development”. The rich thought they would be happier putting more zeros to accounts they already could not spent in an entire life, instead of sharing part of that wealth to create a healthy nation, where they could walk around without fear. So those industries with higher profits -weapons and computers- despite their clear dangers for the national well-being, became the backbone of the American economy.

And so today America as Germany before the war, ruled by castes ofanimetals who are blind to any rational vision of history is pushing head to head with those nations whose systems she “has created to its image and resemblance” such as Taiwan, Japan, or South-Korea, towards a rule in which machines substitute and men, robots menace the survival of our species, company-mothers dominate governments, and individuals devolve to a primitive “bacterium-like state”, loose their freedom,dedicating their entire life to reproduce and vitalize machines, ignoring anything about social evolution, and the survival of the species. Plainly the American model, as primitive as the German and European models were before the war, are leading mankind towards extinction. It is what we call Neofascism, imposed by the power of weapons and the corruption of money, against the will of the American people and the human people at large.

It is a question of ideologies, against reason. How can then we introduce some reason, some scientific truths in the world of ideological economics? Let us try to do that in this page. The first task of such real science of economics should be to classify goods according to their positive or negative effects in the human kind.

It is fundamental to divide goods between metal goods which are devolutionary of man, and cannot be consumed-destroyed easily, without polluting the Carbo-Earth; and human goods which cater to human senses: food, housing, agriculture, art forms, tourism, transport, health care, education, etc. metal goods are either weapons, tools of pricing, or technological machines and metal senses: instruments “who” substitute human bodies and Minds, since they increase human perception. Those 3 kind of goods are the most desired by man, and yet the most harmful to man. Their regulation should not be given to the market that makes them top predators over human goods, but to a worldwide Government: The World Union, and its ministries.

In Ethonomics it is fundamental to understand the concept of negative price value. In Ideological Economics in favor of metal-wealth, weapons and digital machines add to the GNP. In a real ethonomical system, that maximizes human welfare, lethal products have negative values. They do not add but subtract to the GNP of a nation, since they go against the evolution of mankind.

Perhaps some theoretical background on the nature of scientific coordinates, is required to understand the Ethonomical coordinates of values.

Since knowledge is subjective, when describing a Universal ecosystem, we need to create first a linguistic frame of reference, or coordinates with negative and positive parameters, that describe in terms of our “linguistic values”, the Ecosystem.

In physics we do use mathematical coordinates, with positive (+) or negative (-) values referred to the space-time position of the observer. For example if we measure speed, negative acceleration rests in the negative side of the frame of reference and positive acceleration adds. It follows that in Ethonomics we need also negative and positive prices referred to the effect of products in the observer (the Human species). The frame of reference in Ethonomics is the Human constitution:

Max H[g] = Min M[g]. Or Human[goods]=positive; Metal[goods]=negative.

Since the goal of the constitution is to increase human goods, metal goods that “decelerate” human evolution, and the creation of a healthy body of History, based on the Human constitution have negative value. Human goods that accelerate human evolution, have positive value. So the “health and human wealth” of a nation, its “real GNP” that measures the “real utility” of products for human societies, is calculated adding the production of Human goods, and discounting the production of lethalmetal goods. The outcome will give us a more accurate measure of the “healthiness” of a human society.

Religious authorities should back ethonomical systems and the rules of societies by the laws of biohistory.

Masters of verbal ethics in the past (religious prophets) [love religions] have all classified human and metal goods in the same terms, since the age of the Tree of science. There is no scientific excuse to classify all goods in positive terms. Only rhetoric might convince you that TV-consumptionand weapons consumption is good to man. Those are clearly negative species that devolve the human mind and body. So they are in the lower Y and X coordinates of the ethonomical frame of reference. Their value should be discounted, not added to the GDP of nations.

The extinction of nature, of ethic religions (networks of human information) and agricultural societies (networks of human energy) are sides of the same problem. Historians, ecologists, religious societies and social parties should understand that process of extinction, with the law of biology, since it is a process of death of a social organism. Then they should ally together against the advance the “germs”, of the lethal products, of the III Earth, the Metal-earth and its reproductive organs, stock-markets that deviate credit from the reproduction of human goods, and finance, company-mothers which reproduce those goods, mainly weapons, and metal-heads, that kill or make obsolete human bodies and brains .

The problems of mankind, are problems of a collective species, that affects the entire planet and only can be cured at planetary level, through international organizations, that should be given the power to do so by nations, most of them abstract organizations, without a real cultural origin, mainly created by old castes of “animetals”, that divide artificially our species, and prevent the analysis and cure of the entire Organism of History, the Planet Earth.

In that sense, History can only be understood not from the perspective of the Individual species, but from the perspective of the “physiological” networks of energy and information, that truly rule and design the planetary, organic ecosystem.

The vision of a nation that a bio-economist or bio-historian has is very much that of a doctor, who sees the body of a human being, as a collection of individual cells (human beings in history), joined by two basic networks, the blood network of energy -the economic network- and the nervous network of information, the legal orders that society obey. The main learning a doctor requires to keep his patients healthy, is called physiology. Physiology ensures the understanding and well-functioning of the energy-blood and information-nervous networks of any social body. When those two networks are healthy, all the cells of your body receive energy-food and proper information, and survived.

A bio-historian sees his nation in a similar way: as a social organism, that politicians -the informative brain of laws- and industrialists -the blood system of goods- had to keep healthy, giving the proper energy and information to all the social cells, to avoid their collapse and death by the main sickness of historic organisms: war, poverty and ignorance. To him poverty and ignorance are anti-natural, a symptom of physiological sickness in those two organic systems. A sign of corrupted laws, and a corrupted system of credit that reproduced lethal goods, which the body-cells did not require.

After all every single cell of the body receives from its energy-blood system, and its nervous-information system, a minimum quantity of those two precious goods needed to survive. The nervous system informs the cells who trust the nervous system and move the social body to escape danger. The blood system feeds them so they can run away. Yet when the systems ofenergy and information of the body fall sick, the entire organism suffers. Then, when both systems collapse, the body dies. So happens to a society, where collective sickness such as external or internal war, and the expansion of “germs”, of lethal goods, such as weapons, are often the product of a bad ruled organism, with unjust laws and lack of production of human goods, that cells need (education, food, housing, etc.). To the bio-economist the minimal rights of the cells, the right to have fair prices in those goods they needed, the right to have health care, and available jobs, are natural rights for all cells of a healthy organism. Unlike many politicians that blame the people (the cells) of the sickness of the social organism, the bio-historian knows better. He knows that in most social bodies, when the physiological systems, the energy and information systems work properly, the cells respond, and work hard to maintain the blood and nervous systems. Yet in anysocial organism the main responsibility for collective health is not in the individual cells of the body, but in the privileged cells of those systems, who control the information and energy of nations, the vital resources of the country. So the bio-historian, the honest politician or economist, wants the blood system of industrialists and bankers (who control the money, the salaries and prices, the vital energy that made the social cells work) and the nervous system of politicians (who create the laws, the vital information of the nation) to design healthy organic systems, the best possible system for the people.

The “organic-nation” requires as any organism, that all cells have a minimum quantity of the right energy and information to survive. This does not mean, that all cells of the organic nation have to be equally rich in energy-money, or equally cultured in information, since organisms and cells are not equal. Each cell has a purpose, and it becomes differentiated soon after birth. If you are born in the brain region you will become an informative cell, which is the top cell of the organism, with unlimited supply of blood, and a lot of knowledge. If you are born into the feet, you will become a hard working cell, supporting with your physical strength the entire organism. Yet still you will receive blood, and you will be able to complain when the body treats you bad, sending pain messages to the brain cells. Otherwise the organism would collapse. Since if your feet cells die, or suffer too much, they will refuse to move you. The worker-cells will go on strike…

So utopias such as communism are also not natural to Universal organisms. Yet today we are far away from utopias, in the other extreme, of an organism in which each cell caters for its needs, and the information cells of the brain prey over the energy cells of the body. That process has also a name in physiology: leukemia, nervous cancer, or merely old age, since old age is a process of selfish degeneration of the body by the brain cells. Such is the present case of history in which the working people suffer in excess, under unfair laws and salaries (nervous and blood orders) from the privileged blood and neuron cells of modern history. Today the physiological cells of history lost in their fantasies of power , often forget that they belong to a social body, that they would not exist without the feet cells. They abandon their social responsibility and then the body falls sick.

In your mind, the brain cells think about God and the Universe, about Love and Fun, about pleasures so remote to the working cells of the feet, that often they forget the pain messages of those down-to-Earth individuals. If they could cut the nervous-pain messages of the feet they would do. Yet the organism is wise, and does not allow the neuron cells to degenerate in their duties, to run amok into their fantasies. So they take care of the body. Unfortunately historic organisms are not so well put together. They are recent inventions. In the social, evolutionary scale of the Universe that grows from atoms to molecules, from molecules to cells, from cells to organisms, from organisms to societies, the historic society is the last one to appear. It seems it is not yet perfect.

Certainly there have been improvements over more primitive social systems such as monarchies. Today human societies have found the right concept: a democracy in which the government cells are chosen by the body cells, and are controlled by pain messages, by judges, and laws, to oblige them to use their legal privileges for the welfare of all the people. Yet it happens often that those politicians prevent with unjust laws the proper workings of the democratic system, that should allow a feed back from citizens to government, from muscle cells to neurons.

Obviously we have not built the perfect social organism, since we suffer still wars, and hunger, and lack of education among our people. There is still a lot to do, a lot of responsible work to accomplish by the privileged neurons before they can sleep over into the realm of imagination and say: our nation is a perfect running organism. Many reforms are required, many laws ill-designed need to be changed. Yet where else but in Nature, in the way Nature constructs its perfect social organisms, can we look to find teachings to our collective goal: the evolution of history and economics for the betterment of the Human Kind?

The equation of the human constitution: Human Goods Vs Metal Goods: Max H[g]=Min M[g]

The fundamental measure that all those organisms take to maintain their body healthy, and allow their growth and evolution is to multiply the natural goods (human goods) the organism and its cells require, and control the infections by lethal goods, that poison the organism. This should be the only aim of bio-economists, and bio-policians: to create goods that help the Human Organism, and destroy goods that attack and destroy the bodies and brains of the cells of history: weapons that kill humans, and metal-heads that make human brains obsolete.

We call that goal, the “Human Constitution”, since it truly is the goal that allows to constitute a healthy organism of history. We can express that goal with a mathematical or verbal sentence:

Creation of Human Goods = Extinction of metal goods.

The constitution is in that sense dual: it implies the control of metal-species of information (metal-heads) and lethal energy (weapons) of higher complexity than the brain and body of man, and the multiplication of human goods that favor our survival.

 

Obviously, to achieve those goals politicians and the military in one side, and economists and industrialists in the other should act together. Politicians and the military should create World systems of power, able to implement laws, and reinforce them if required by force, to abort the reproduction of robots, metal-heads, and weapons. Economists should design new worldwide systems of credit that would promote the reproduction of Human Goods, and limit the investments in Lethal goods. Let us consider in this page some of those economical goods, implemented by “ethonomists”, economists ruled by the ethic laws of mankind, which are the laws of survival of the species.

Since the human constitution is merely the application of the Universal laws of survival to the survival of the Carbon-Earth ecosystem. Today those human goals of survival, have been forgotten due to the power of companies, and the wrong concept of knowledge defended by scientific institutionsand abstract economists. Those wrong ideologies of history are very powerful, not because they are right but because they are very old and through the mere processes of historic inertia today they control most of the present national and world institutions: national governments, company foundations, universities paid by companies, prizes like the Nobel prize given by a bank, or economic forums that only represent companies and the wealthy such as the Davos and GATT conferences, the IMF, the World Bank, International institutions from the cold war era, etc.

All these institutions affirm a false Postulate which validates metal economics. What we might call the Smith Postulate: “The wealth of nations is the quantity of money and machines a nation has”. Once this postulate is religiously accepted as a matter of faith, since men want to be wealthy, it follows that our objective in life must be to reproduce more machines and more money. This is represented mathematically by an equation that we might call the Equation of National product (MV: quantity of money = PT: quantity of products of great prices, mainly machines).

Thereafter all politicians and economists, indoctrinated by the Smith Postulate, will try to increase the National Product of a nation, measured as the money and machines the nation has. However the Smith Postulate does not define thewealth of nations. It is more a religious postulate founded on the work of people such as Smith, believer in Calvinism, who tried to support the doctrine of Calvin: “The intelligence of God is money”. It is a historical fact that the time when a nation has more money and machines is during periods of war. Then the quantity of human goods, basic for our survival, such as food, housing, life and Freedom are minimal. It seems in fact that the more machines and money there are in a society, the less quantity of human goods and human life, (the true wealth of nations) there are.

So if money and machines are not the wealth of nations, how should we define wealth in human terms? This is the question that economists and politicians should ask themselves, and answer scientifically, to face the rather obsolete economic discourse of metal parties, still holding onto the religious postulate of Mr. Smith.

What you call Economics, are a very rudimentary analysis of the ecosystem of machines and prices, biased to favor the point of view of Companies and go[l]d religions: “metal-evolution=human progress”. Economics cannot be considered a Science under such myths. Economics are the only science that do not use a complete frame a reference, to measure the value of their species. This is often ignored by scientists; but we cannot claim to be reaching any real knowledge without a frame of reference, a dimensional system in which to measure the value in time and space of the species of the ecosystem, we study. This is solved with the ethonomical frame of reference.

The ethonomical frame of reference allows to systematize the goals of the Human Constitution, as well as translate them into practical measures of economical an political nature. It is the main tool to implement the Human Constitution, since it should inform the decisions of work, credit and consume of the citizens and leadership of the World Union.

In ethonomics, accountancy is very simple: GDP aggregated value of all digital industries: – x trillion $ subtracted from the national GNP. Extinction of all those industries = + x trillion $ added to GDP growth. Extinction of Metal heads and weapons could imply an enormous increase of perhaps 30% in world wealth in the new GNP statistics, plus maybe another 30% of credit, paid in compensations to bail out companies and proprietors, money that becomes reinvested in Human goods.

We are creating here a Demand based economy where the true wishes of most humans -human goods- not the offer of technological companies, will be the guidance of ethonomical laws and prices. Entire sectors of the economy which have absolute negative value for Humanity, in biological terms (Digital machines, marketing-propaganda and weapon’s production) could be limited. Yet people will see increases on their statistical wealth.

The limits to metal-evolution set by the Human Constitution avoid both our extinction and poverty. We talk of two “safety limits”, 1972 -threshold of chips-, 1939 -threshold of atomic weapons and TVs-. At least the first of those thresholds should become the aim of the World Union, to return back history within the limits of human survival.

For practical reasons we will consider the age of digital chips which started around 1972 the age of digital chips which started around 1972 the closest limit of human survival and the political and economical goal of the doctors of history, of a World Union.

The minimal date of devolution of a metal-species to ensure human survival, 1972, is back to the age previous to LSI circuits, color TV, and satellite networks. In military technology a desirable limit is the second WW which the Atomic Age started in. Those dates caused a jump of complexity in Metal minds and weapons that made obsolete human minds and bodies. Human devolution in bodies (by wars) and Verbal Minds (by digital images and mathematical prices) has accelerated, since those products were discovered. Verbal standards keep dropping as people watch moretelevision. While A-Bombs meant for the first time since the birth of Man, a growing probability of total carbolife extinction. With the arrival of chips, applied to all kind of hunting machines [from fishing boats to weapons that erase all kind of species] the process of obsolescence of human minds, and carbolife bodies has reached exponential nature. As programs of star wars give to satellites and computers the decision to throw atomic bombs, in the future the decision of Human extinction can be taken by chips, a species alien to carbolife. Star wars will make that decision in the nearby future, when Artificial Intelligence appears , much more probable. Since alien species have no “ethical mandate” for the extinction of other species, and metalife needs not water and, or carbolife energy to exist.

Ethonomic measures to create human goods and diminish lethal goods

Once we have clear the goal of economists, nations and industrialists, to produce human goods, we should implement measures to that aim. The question we ask ourselves first to do so is: How an economic society reproduces our two kinds of goods? It does so through credit, that is through the invention of money, which later on is used to give orders to citizens, that will work under salaries, reproducing either one or the other kind of goods. However, there are two ways to invent money in our society.

Money can be invented in the stock-marketthrough paper-shares, which are a credit given to a company. That company-mother will then use that money to invent and market their product. Money also can be invented through governments, and banks, by means of paper-money. Again that money is later on used by the government to reproduce or promote the products of the welfare state. We talk of 2 kinds of deficits: deficit of stock-markets, and deficit of governments.

Technically speaking, both deficits mean the same thing; it is free money, invented to reproduce goods. If either the market or the government invents too much money, there is inflation and money loses value. So there is a limit to the quantity of money governments and stock-markets should be allowed to reproduce, or else, the economy becomes unstable. However both kinds of money, are not used in the same way. The market, since it appeared in the XVII century in Holland, as an instrument for the reproduction of gunboat weapons, systematically invents money for metallic goods, but it I hardly invents a penny for human goods.

The former happens because “stockrats”, the owners of companies only look for profits, and profits are higher in expensive goods (the most expensive goods are weapons) and software goods (digital goods very cheap to reproduce). This is why there are so many weapons and “metal-heads” in our societies. We do not need them, but the credit of the market reproduces them. and we have to consume them. On the other hand, the government invents money for welfare goods, human goods, needed by humanity, which also creates a lot of employment.

So we have to increase the money invented by governments and diminish the money reproduced by company-mothers of lethal goods in stock-markets. Economists and Politicians are the doctors of history. They should direct economics for the betterment of man. They should “prune” the tree of science, destroying its “bad=extinctive” products, in order to create a true paradise of human goods where men and not machines, are free. Where all of society is free and not only the product and the market, as right-wing=metal parties desire.

We could talk of a new approach to economics, “ethonomics”, where ethics, and laws in favor of mankind and human goods, should control credit in order to create true wealth for mankind.

a global currency ¥€$ money

Government deficits. To correct those anomalies, all the nations of the world should agree to a massive government deficit in human goods, parallel in all nations, to reduce stock credit and multiply human goods. Today if a government in those zones of the Earth where stock power is not absolute tries to curb stock credit and increase government credit of human goods [government deficit], the world-stockratic community attacks and sinks its national currency. Social governments are penalized with currency crashes, which cause them an incapacity to print money for human goods (end of welfare states).

Thus it would be necessary to create a global currency ¥€$ money, with fixed rates between Yuans, Yens, Euro and Dollar, for a +75% of the global economy – an international currency as the one Keynes wanted to found, which being the main global currency cannot be crashed or devalued (against whom?), and hence it can raise state deficit to a fixed of 15% annual rate – enough to create a welfare state for all the inhabitants of those nations – a currency to which others will soon peg. This would create an immediate demand for human goods.

During this years as the Euro comes close to parity, this fundamental tool of the World Union could be implanted automatically, canceling the forex market of speculators and setting a  Euro=Dollar=100 Yens global Yes currency by a mere agreement between the 3 central banks and solve the scandalous profiteering and destruction of democracies taken place under the pressure of speculative houses.

The Law of deficit could be the first Law approved by a World Union.

Government Deficit will be mandatory to all nations, at the level of stock deficit. It will create an inflationary state against metal goods; and re-distribute wealth towards producers of Human goods. Ethonomists should redesign economical rhetoric to favor positive perception of inflation and government deficit among citizens, explaining ethonomics in terms of human goods; and designing systems of negative GNP valuation for devolutionary metal-goods.

Today the systematic investment of stock-markets in technological species plummets investments in Human stocks, in Human Goods. So we write:

Max up stock = Max. Metal form Investment = Min. Human Goods Investment [Housing-food stuffs-education-health care-textiles-urban transport etc.]=Max. inflation in human Goods Prices.

Human goods companies are in Stock-markets the laggards unless provided lavishly by government’s money (case of health-care companies). A massive government deficit could have the opposite effect.

Ethonomical reforms of the stock market

The aim of Human governments should be to modify the behavior of credit in present markets, in favor of Human Goods. To achieve that goal some basic reforms could be implemented:

- Technological Companies will make their shares nominal, requiring a Notary (Roman law) or Judge (Anglo-Saxon law) to be transferred.

- Companies that produce lethal products, (weapons, Metal minds) will be bailed out of the system at market price, to avoid resistance of their stockratic owners, and extinguished.

Indeed, to avoid the outright boycott of stockrat owners of Metal companies, which -let’s not forget control today through lobbying all the systems of power of the World- a massive bail out of lethal companies, through Yes money, could be implemented.

Cartels could keep up profits on those metal companies that have to stay in the market to maintain fundamental systems of the Metal-earth, that do not require further evolution, such as electricity, airplane companies, wired telephony, etc.

This has been done in non-efficient nations of totalitarian character, proving great inefficiency of reproduction in monopolies such as communications. So, against the present tendency of competition in telecom and computer systems, nations should return back to the age of hefty monopolies and inefficiency of service. Cartels could maintain profits for stock holders and control both the models in the market – which now will be “simplified makes”, and the arrival of new companies, eliminated by all the dirty tricks of legal Cartels. After bailing out the excess of companies such cartels could freeze digital evolution.

- New shares in tech companies will not be able to trade in stock-markets.

- The Law of Anonymous societies which gives special privileges to stockrats and prevents the needed responsibility of companies for his acts, will be abolished.

Shareholders in proportion to his stock-power will be responsible economically for the illegal acts of their companies. Management will hold also civil responsibility.

Devolution of Products, end of Patent Rights

In an Ethonomical World, innovation is taboo. Companies in fact devolve products, and so research is no longer needed. Patents are forbidden. Universities dedicated to the study of lethal products (robotics, computer sciences) are eliminated in all worldwide curriculums. An original measure could focus companies and consumers in the goals of recreating a human paradise, and should be implemented worldwide:

Control of temporal evolution by “moving backwards clock-time”. With this symbolic measure humans will understand that the aim of the World Union is to reverse the evolution of metal machines. Metal-clock years should move backwards as man devolves backwards metal species. Companies will be obliged by law to produce all models according to the new calendar. Each year companies will produce previous generations of machines, regressing to the barrier of 1972-products, when e-money and chips were born. Again, a strong government can achieve that. Cuba was at the “1959” level of Metal-Evolution for 30 years, with high standards of health-care and education… Of course that was a dictatorship, yet without attempting basic rights, only the rights of machines, the World Union could create “capital punishment” for lethal machines, and destroy factories of such machines, compensating their owners with World money…

In such backwards-world, since the methods of reproduction and management are already established in the past, work becomes relaxed, and the life of workers much easier… Further on in a still economy without technological progress, poor nations that today are lagging behind, with real unemployment close to 50%, could now catch up much faster, and join progressively the World Union, with growing numbers of workers. This will avoid present immigration problems.

We are creating here a Demand Economy, by creating Human Goods and metal industries which are positive for Human evolution, and need a lot of Human Labor.

Local stocks and Yes money: The last Radiation of Money

It has to be noticed that in the past, Human r=evolutions of History were paid with a radiation of new currency. The French had their continentals, Lincoln his green backs…

As in all previous cre[dit]ations of human r=evolutions (credit implies today the creation of reality hence the name/verb cre[dit]ation, credit=creation, that we use for the acts of creation performed by money), it is clear that to achieve the extinction of company-mothers of lethal products their owners will have to be compensated. And so, the only way to construct a human Union and give orders to the human population is with a new radiation of money – the last radiation – able to equalize the monetary value of stock-shares, and buy them out according to the values of the Human Constitution and its Ethonomical frame of reference. When a company or product is eliminated of the Carbo-Earth ecosystem, automatically the Ministry issues “Yes money” a worldwide currency product of the Unification of the Yen and Yuan, the Euro and the $-dollar, to buy out at market price all shares on such companies. The owners of companies destroyed and paid in monetary value will substitute them with massive investments in human industries.

It is necessary to radiate worldwide money to back the Human Constitution. A single worldwide currency, Yes money (Yen+Yuan expanded to Asia, Euro+Pound+Ruble, $ expanded to South America), could avoid the risks of hyper-inflation and capital evasion, that plagues today’s welfare-based nations.

Yet to achieve an efficient worldwide radiation of good money, a single currency and so a single World government, a new organic level of human social evolution is required… Further on, inflation in yes money will multiply demand of human goods. Why? because Stock shares are metal money, M[g], while currency is Human money, H[g].

Indeed, currency is spent in higher quantity in human goods, that shares money. Currency is used by the poor which use more Human Goods. Currency creates an economy based on demand, not in offer, favoring also human goods, the most demanded goods of the economy. A demand economy will improve the Human Earth not the Metal Earth that tech stocks promote. The yes currency, present dollar, Euro and Yen+Yuan, is the single currency of the World Union, without limit of reproduction by the World Trade Ministry. Stock credit is limited by nominal shares which have by law in lethal metal-companies a fixed value, and hence cannot obtain speculative credit on the Market. Who issues credit then in a World ethonomy? Money is cre[dit]ated only in local stocks of Human Companies; or in currency by the 3 World ministries in their tasks of government.

Yes Money implies a single world currency, a banking-based cre[dit]ation system, the end of global metal stock-markets and e-money, a World Union, and a complete change of the Laws that today protect stock-companies’ absolute rights to credit. Its design is a technical formality if the wish and information about the survival of History spreads among our elite. It is the will of Survival of Mankind what can change this theoretical exercise into reality.

Substitution of taxation by cre[dit]ation of yes money

An interesting consequence of the new mode of cre[dit]ation developed by the World Union is the lack of personal income taxes, since the World union is an inflationary demand based economy, where money is invented by governments, not demanded to citizens who use it to cre[dit]ate human goods. The lack of taxation against citizens is a basic right of the World Union, and the true meaning of economical Freedom.

As in the present economy in which companies invent money a priori in stocks, to offer their products, even if they have no real demand before propaganda sells them out; in the World Union, money is created by governments to increase demand on human goods. The government creates money to produce its welfare goods. It does not ask the people for money through taxes.
Distribution of rent to poor countries

Yes Money is mainly spent in human goods cheaper in third world nations. The present artificial distribution of economical value in favor of metal nations is against third world nations. In the World Union, investment, workers and tourists will flock into tropical paradises, where human goods production could have higher demand, making investors richer.

Money invested in third World Nations, given their relative low prices, could buy many more products. Tourism will bring wealth to the third World and merge cultures much faster.

You might believe this is a fairy tale. It is not. Such system was widely used in the incipient European Union, where southern nations, Italy and Spain, with massive touristic influx, upgraded their life and cultural standards, due to tourism. It worked, closing the gap between Northern and Southern Europeans.

Further on, since human consumption of human goods has a limit, human goods will tend to flow towards third world countries, in the opposite direction of present flows of capital, from third world countries to metal-stocks. Such change will re-address a 400 years tendency by which entire continents like Africa are under priced. However this should not imply a lower standard of life in rich countries, since all the money created will be in substitution of devolutionary metal production. Let’s not forget that America will receive most of the new Yes money, since most of the digital companies are in that region, and given the inflationary prices of those stocks, compensated owners will receive “a lot” of money.

When they invest that money as tourists and citizens of America, or Great Britain, in third World Nations or human goods industries, for the first time in History they will not have to face the hating eyes of those which once were exploited by their stockratic systems. That love of mankind for his elites, is an added value, that not even Yes money can put a price.

Ultimately modern economies are based on the promotion of metal products, the products of rich countries, against Human Goods, the products of poor countries and the poor within (farmers, artisans etc.). Stocks only cre[dit]ate mechanical metal goods, creating a constant inflation in the price of human goods. This is a historical injustice -main cause of Carbolife extinction- that has to be reversed. It could be reversed, if credit for Human Goods Stocks and Yes currency are implemented.

Conclusion

Only a correct reading of Economic indicators, according to a model that differentiates human and metal goods, can provide humanity with arguments in favor of its social policies. Otherwise, as long as our societies accepts right-wing=metal economics, in open contradiction with the production of human goods, humanity will be serving the goals of machines. For example, in the past few months, we have observed a growth in inflation caused by the food and fuel sectors. Since agricultural credit is dwindling and credit to public transport also is going down, to favor credit in technology on the stock-market, the result is that “human energy-goods”, are under-produced, they become scarce, and their prices go up; while machine-energy (electricity) and machine-goods (robotics,“metal-heads”, and weapons) are over produced, and their prices go down. Yet our people desire food and cheap human energy, not robots and weapons… A real democratic system will credit those human goods, to increase their production and lower their prices. However, the dictatorship of democracies, the exclusive rights of credit, that stock-markets and companies have, promote robotics and weapons and digital software of higher profits. So there are more of those goods which destroy human jobs and human lives. Of course Economical rhetoric coming from the right, lies about the real cause of inflation in human goods, to hide the profits of stock-market speculation that creates millionaires and billionaires, by stealing all credit from governments, small businesses and producers of human goods.

One lie adds to another, and in the end all lies form an apparent true “science” together; based on false postulates, that we today call Economics. The result is that even our left-wing politicians today accept, either because they are corrupted or because they know very little about real economics, the explanations about inflation and productivity of right-wing=metal economists paid by companies of technological products…

The truth is that Inflation has been endemic in developed economies since electronic money was invented in the 70s to credit computer technology and its derivatives: telecommunications, robotics, and weapons. The truth is that productivity is an euphemism that hides the constant loss of human jobs, substituted by computers and robots, which is a result of the Third industrial Evolution.

Systematically economists have lied about these themes, accusing the products of poor countries (raw materials, agriculture and oil), as the cause of inflation. Even when oil prices tumbled in the 90s, and inflation escalated, they never explained to the public that inflation was caused by the free invention of money in stock-markets that multiplied by ten the monetary mass hold in company-shares. That is to say, companies freely received 10 times the quantity of money there was in America (Dow Jones moved from 1000 to 11.000). Such enormous credit, eliminated all credit to governments chosen by the people (laws of deficit zero), that could have created a paradise of Human Goods, that men desire: peace,Freedom, housing, food, education, tourism, environment, and why not, luxury, artistic goods… Instead we have robotics, 100 TV channels andcomputers, which eliminate jobs and through weapon systems, menace the life and well-being of mankind. Yet, the left-wing, obsessed by communist myths, has hardly noticed the irreparable spoil of the last decades.

The fight between social classes is not the engine of History when the elite and his companies reproduce human goods that people desire. It is only important when the elite, guided by greed, produces goods that destroy societies and individuals. Those goods are “military goods”, “fascist goods”, that erase our minds and bodies from existence. They are the goods systematically reproduced in these days, and promoted by parties which despite their marketing and “smiley” faces, are becoming as radical as fascist parties were in the 30s. We have to move back to Hitler, to find politicians that allow as the American parties allow, the existence of ±250 million weapons in the hand of citizens, military budgets, which are five times bigger than those of the next nation. Furthermore a legal, racist system, that penalizes the poor and the non-white races, and moves towards the exploitation of prisoners as workers-slaves, as well as a system of information that promotes systematically militarism, cult to weapons, violence, and sexual perversions through films, video-games, and the internet, within the reach of any youngster.

Fascism is not defined by uniforms and military parades, but by the policies of its parties. Do we want the neo-fascist model of present market ideologies, so cherished by our economists and right-wing=metal parties, because of its economical efficiency, to expand worldwide and provoke the systemic evolution of robotics, computers and weapons, till we humans no longer control the Mother Earth? Do we want the economical efficiency of Germany in the 30s? Have we forgotten what happened in the 40s? Do we want a virtual state of civil war similar to what is happening to America, of a World War such as the one Germany imposed upon the world, only to promote the wealth of a few “stockratic”speculators? All those who still feel human, left or right, animetals or social beings, selfish or solidarious, should speak loud and clear, about therights of survival of mankind, of verbal ethics, of our carbolife ecosystems, against scientific, religious and economic ideologies of false knowledge, false Gods and false wealth. They should learn a true science of economics, to avoid metal economics that keep cheating our citizens, who vote the destruction of our societies, blinded by technological propaganda. Today socialists vote parties that destroy credit to human goods, and the welfare state. Today farmers vote Metal-parties that destroy credit to agricultural goods. Christians and Jewish vote Metal parties, that systematically promote weapons and greed, against the message of Christ, and Moses (he who kills by the sword dies by the sword; you cannot serve God and money at the same time, as the Word of God; those who adore the Golden calf will be punished in the years to come). All of them do so, cheated by Metal economics, and scientific ideologies that despise human senses and biological languages. Those ideologies undervalue systematically human goods, and over value metal goods, because they give higher profits to companies, and they give a false sense of superiority and intelligence to those who use such machines.

As long as Mankind does not learn ethonomics, and return to their roots, promoting the “genesian paradise”, of human goods, as long as they do not face the rhetoric about metal-wealth, that abstract economics provide, the world will walk towards the extinction of our species, prisoner of ideological and economical policies against them.(More…)