Indeed, the present crisis is not a recession but a depression, caused by the overproduction of electronic machines and its derivatives, similar to the 1929 crash, caused by the overproduction of electro-mechanical machines, which printed too much money (ticker speculation), electro-mechanical production systems that threw millions out of work (taylorism, automated assembly lines) and the overproduction of cars and radios, whose companies, lobbies and politicians reconverted into armored cars (tanks) and hate-radio speeches (Hitler), embarking us into World War II.
After the war, the Kondratieff wave of electro-mechanical machines was exhausted and so we started a new dual wave of ‘electronic machines‘, which evolved and reproduced in increasing numbers till saturating the global market.
(‘Sciences predict the future of its species, according to its Past Cycles’)
Abstract. The FMI Complex and its crisis of overproduction.
The 2001-08 economic crises are caused by the overproduction of electronic machines and its main derivative e-money, similar to the 1929-37 crash, caused by the overproduction of electro-mechanical machines and speculative ticker money, and the 1857-64 crashes of the train economy, and its speculative stock money; each one separated by a human generational cycle of 72 years.
Since each of those cycles of evolution of machines, the cycles of ‘bodies of metal’, ‘engines of metal’ and ‘heads of metal’ (electronic cycles) has ended in a massive crash of overproduction of the 5 main types of machines we make in each cycle, which form the Financial-Media-Military-Industrial-Complex or FMI complex, in which live – a complementary system of energy and information made of informative memes of metal (Financial-Media system) or virtual economy and its physical/energetic body, the Industrial-Military system:
Let us then explain some details on the true nature of capitalism and its placebo democracies, before we sail ahead to the other crises. So we know where we stand. And why this ‘other theory of economics’ based in the real facts of the world and the real flows of power (follow the money) works. As it has indeed, localized the origin of the causal orders that create, cre(dit)ate the future of the world with money.
In a pure capitalist system, companies ‘buy’ politicos votes with that money they print exclusively under ‘deficit zero laws’. Since politicos need but cannot get money from salaries, for their campaigns. And so their ‘real job’ is pandering to corporations for money on exchange for laws.
This self-evident truth has degrees of grey; conceded, specially in Europe and in the past when the 99% organized parties to defend their rights – socialist parties, now corrupted placebos but who effectively brought a social democracy (the only system deserving that name) back in the 70s. Yet today increasingly the job of Politicos, who renounced to govern in the 80s, when they handed back to bankers the rights to print money, the language of social power, (Reagan, Thatcher) have only a real job besides the ‘placebo’ rituals, photo opportunities and military work for the industrial complex: in a pure capitalist system like America politicos are chosen by their capacity to cheat the people on voting them, with false promises. The act of vote then gives people the feeling they ‘direct’ the system, which appeases them. Then politicos will sell laws to the corporation that pay more. And yet they are still admired and respected by naive voters who still get surprised that the politico NEVER delivers on his promises. But that is NOT his job in pure capitalist systems, where the language of power is monopolized by bankers and corporations. That would be the job in a democracy, and would require 2 obvious facts:
- That states control the nervous langauge of social power, as it happens in all efficient systems, money. The lunacy of the present system is to pretend that an organism could be ruled by a brain, whose spinal chord has been cutted and let’s say connected to the liver. This is the theme: the nervous system, money is now handled by private dynasties of bankers and corporations, which as the liver would do, will just fatten itself till the goose becomes only a big foie. The liver is greedy, loves blood, grows and accumulates fat but doesn’t rule the organism, doesn’t understand it. Only the nationalization of the financial system can make a democracy real, as voters will know politicians can deliver the kind of goods and policies they want to maximize the biological drives that make us happy and make us evolve.
- That the politico as the neuron of society can get a posteriori after he ends his tenure ‘judged’ by his voters, and punished as the brain gets punished with pain if it hurts the body. Without judging a posteriori politicos of course, they will never deliver. Citizens should be able to get a paper after voting to certain politician for a re-vote at the end of his tenure with at least 2 increasing messages of pain: jail and fines equivalent in time and ‘financial energy’ (the two parameters of all actions of the Universe), to the profits of its tenure and the time invested on public services. And 2 messages of reward: re-election for a second tenure and doubling its pay.
Then if those 2 measures were implemented we would be in a real democracy. As not a single system in the world has those 2 measures except Iceland (the closer to have something similar, thanks to referendums and the recent judgment of their president) and China (only the first one), none is democratic. So believe it or not, astoundingly enough China is more democratic than any western state. That gives you a feeling of the sorrowful ‘state of affairs’ of the human kind.
Bottom line is that in such a system the politico is just another ‘celebrity’ employee to distract the audience and that is his ‘fun’ job with the masses that adore them. Their real job starts when the campaign ends and he must deal with the ‘agents of power’, bankers, corporations, groups of pressure, people who paid their campaigns…
Human citizens in such perfect systems of capitalism have no rights whenever those rights collide with the rights of the wealthiest corporations that pay more money to the politicos to buy their laws. This means basically that a capitalist democracy is perfectly ruled with the precission of a clock by the laws of evolution of machines and weapons: in each age of capitalism, the evolutionary laws of biology determine which machines dominate the system and hence the corporations that reproduce those machines will pay more for the laws and determine the future of the nation. The difference is determinant to understand how the future of our societies is created and what it caters for and to explain why this writer so succesfully has been able to forecast for 20 years the future of the world in its details (1)
For example, in America the XIX century was totally dominated by train corporations, and their politicos decided the future of the nation. Lincoln was a lobbyist for the Illinois railroad companies, and so when trains substituted gunboats and northerners southerners in power, as railroad companies reached higher capital than cotton slave traders, slavery was substituted by white slavery, gunboats by trains and the power moved from Virginian plantation owners such as Washington or Jefferson to railroad lawyers and lobbyists such as Lincoln or the presidents of the Guilded. Then when the car and the radio took over the yellow press and the train, people like Welles could defy Hearst and RCA and Ford came on top. So Ford could single-handed forbid alcohol because he didn’t drink and pay the law.
After the war, the TV and computer took over and so today the laws are paid and defined by mass-media and computers.
The robotic zeitgeist of XXI century capitalism.
Today as the robotic age comes into being, corporations dedicated to reproduce robotic workers and soldiers are becoming the darlings of capitalism. And so their financial muscle now pays the parties in power, as all great corporations become symbiotic in the task of reproducing those machines.
Thus, Obama is passing one after another laws in favor of the substitution of humans in labor and work fields. And the redistribution of wealth from people to robots starts in earnest.
Never though, except in brief revolutionary ages, America has created laws to favor their people over their machines and corporations. Moreover it has been able to imprint a massive ‘noise’ of false caring and false freedoms that have convinced the Americans, who enslave forever for those corporations, that the system ‘cares for them’.
The case of America is specially meaningful, since America is a ‘nation of nations’, with all races and cultures represented, and hence the battle for the mind of America between the ‘democratic dream’ of an equal humanity in control of his destiny that creates a world to its image and likeness, and the nightmare of a nation without limits to capitalism and the power of metal-memes, hence ruled by corporations who ‘buy’ the laws that favor their products and create a world to the image and likeness of their machines, has been determinant for the future of mankind. Now the battle seems over as laws under perhaps the most corrupted, cynical administration in the history of the US (not the Bush but the Obama administration), are routinely filled by lobbies of the leading industries of the day (health-care, drones, military keynesianism, robotic workers, etc.)
What this means basically that the future of America and mankind can be guessed as we have done for 20 years, merely following the money of corporations, which will adapt american laws to their goods. So as robots take over humans laws in favor of ‘productivity’ (expulsion of labor for capital=machines), and robotic wars and workers (drone laws) have become routine in America. Obama indeed will end up his legislature as the president who accelerated the extinction of life by robots in a higher measure than any other politician in history… Even if he is a nice ‘bro’. That means nothing. He is doing his job, which is to sell laws to the biggest bidder. Point.
And this means that ‘modern capitalism’ in the XXI century will be even harsher on the 99%, than it was in the brutal wars for profits of the XX c. and the exploitation of children and women of the XIX c. because the 99%, the workers and middle class, the blue and white collar human is becoming obsolete substituted by the blue collar robot/chinese workers and white collar pc/Indian IT workers. So we, lower and middle class of western world are obsolete. And the system is moving, as it has been the case in the US to create the laws that will ensure robotic corporations can eliminate us and we can get into jail if we protest. Still the problem will remain and become stronger as the last age of capitalism reaches its zenith: 6 billion human beings are basically obsolete to the system.
What to do with them? In the last Kondratieff crash we know what the system did. It killed 60 millions in II W.W. So it did in the I huge crash of the 1860s. It colonized the world with trains and steamers overproduced in Europe and the US to the tune of another 60 million victims…
those are warnings of the cycles of history, and the reader should understand that those cycles do happen because history indeed rhymes, meaning that if the causal processes that caused in the past those existential crises of mankind are not changed, merely disguised with propaganda of a rosy future, and the rewriting of history, the consequences will be repeated; yet as one of the two factors of those economic ecosystems, the machine and weapon, keeps evolving, and the other doesn’t evolve their minds, memes and way of dealing scientifically with the system (the human being), those cycles become more brutal with mankind at large.
On the other hand in all capitalist democracies, the ‘human sector of the economy’ will be underproduced. Since the human, welfare goods we need, are biological and require a lot of human work, and are perishable and so cannot be traded in great numbers (health, housing, education, food, etc.) while machines replicate very fast and are durable, ultimately an economy dominated by stock-markets and financial corporations underproduces the goods people need, overproduces machines and distorts completely the economy.
Reason why the purest capitalist nations are the biggest producers of weapons, the most profitable goods, while the few in which financial systems are public (case of China), have far less proportion of the economy producing those lethal goods and far more producing the welfare goods people need, even if as in China de political system is not free.
And needless to say China grows 10% not because the Chinese are more intelligent or even work more or cheaper than any other ’3rd world country’ with the same degree of poverty (South-America, Indian sub-continent) but because credit is directed to sectors that produce great employment, satisfy the demands of people and create infrastructures.
Thus a solution to the financial repetitive crises requires the nationalization of the financial industry and the establishment of a selective system of credit NOT based in profits, but on the utility of goods for the majority of people, to private companies that reproduce those goods.
Yet the opposite occurs. Speculators must seek for profits at all costs, as once they create fiat money, sooner or latter they will have to respond to the lack of value of that money by attaching it to any industry that produces maximal profits. And there is no higher value for mankind that man itself, which becomes a commodity with the arrival of capitalism that establishes in the first ‘capitalist democracies’, Holland and then England and America, the harshest system of slavery in history. Indeed, either positive buying of human commodities (slavery) or negative (death by weapons), make slaves and weapons the most profitable goods of capitalist democracies for centuries after their simultaneous creation in those countries. So the bubbles of fiat money can find some better excuse than a tulip to provide a value to which to attach the ‘invented for free’ linguistic data.
And so, the same is happening in this cycle. Slavery was abolished (though it was really substituted by cheaper part-time slavery as a worker for a corporation, which doesn’t need to pay you any longer food, housing and health-care as it used to do). And weapons were no longer free to trade in Europe after II W.W. But those were always advances achieved with enormous effort, against capitalism in the few moments in which governments had control over the languages of social power of the system (post-war 60s, in which labor conditions improved, and the American pseudo-slavish state of the black under Jim Crow laws was abolished and social-democracies in Europe created the welfare state by controlling money with Keynesian policies).
Now that we are moving towards a pure capitalist democracy, which is being imposed also in 3rd world countries, where the capitalist system is dominant and the democratic one hardly exists, labor conditions are becoming similar to slavery (India, Chinese neo-capitalist driven by Taiwanese and H.K. and western entrepeneurs in ‘free zones’, etc.) and of course, trade in weapons has sky-rocketed.
Indeed, in a perfect capitalist system money NOT scientifically, to regulate as a nervous system does, with orders of credit the re=production of those goods that maintain the human citizens, cells of each historic superorganism/nation with enough welfare goods to satisfy its needs, what we call in ‘ethonomics’, the WHealth of a nation but to justify the invention of fiat money.
Thus money is invested to ‘cover up’ the growth of fiat prices systematically on those goods of maximal profit/cost and minimal price of replication (money itself, weapons, audiovisual ‘noise’ and machine-tools that replace costly workers, decreasing the organic composition of capital, in ‘newspeak’ called Productivity=Capital in machines/labor).
Hence each financial crisis of overproduction of fiat money provokes a runaway reaction in search of higher profits to justify that money, attaching it to companies that reproduce those memes of metal provoking a crisis of unemployment, a crisis of information and one of military character. And those are the 3 other crises of overproduction of the physical economy and its overproduced machines – in this age electronic, physical machines of war, labor and information (drones, robots and mass-media) that we study in this and the next paragraphs in more detail.
IV Phase: Productivity grows as competition with machines intensifies: overproduction of machine-workers.
‘Capital=Mv and Machines=Pt will substitute all workers and humans will r=evolve or become extinguished‘ (Smith-Marx-Darwin Paradox that resumes the teachings of the 3 ‘masters’ of economical schools).
![]()

And yet the efficiency of the ‘placebo politico’ system and the mass-media system of ‘dont worry be happy’ superficial cover of ‘normality’ and censorship of all acute analysis of the situation is such that since II world war we assist to an astounding phenomena, all too clear in America, where the system keeps perfecting itself:
Mankind at large has entered an age of ‘virtual thought’, of pure fiction that separates us from the true laws of the biological Universe and the strategies of survival. Humanity today prefers to believe absurd religions of the bronze age, ego-trips of individualism as the only ‘scale’ of historic reality, distracting fictions and entertainments (sports, films, pop music), placebo campaigns, politico’s promises; like an old man that seems unable to control the future and decadence of his body and again plays like a child and abandons reality, we are constructing a ‘crazy’ fun civilization, which suddenly is showing its state of collapse. And yet, people have traded truth for happiness, and as our civilization sinks in a ‘childish’ old-negative state of mind, the placebo politicians that either play the fantasy of happiness with false promises (like Obama or other soft left wing politicos), or the negative anger of subjective old men, accusing everybody else of its own degradation (right wing politicians) win the day.
Those processes, which are proper of all super-organisms in process of corruption and death can be explained perfectly with the laws of systems sciences, and we do in different sections of this web. But while a minority of humans have evolved, abandoned old memes and could regain a sustainable Earth for mankind, we are powerless, speechless, censored.
Thus, before we consider the last phase of the past, present and future cycles of evolution and reproduction of machines – namely an age of death, global war, fascism, poverty, civilian causalities and holocausts of the ‘Saint innocents’ and ‘scapegoats’ of these crises we shall consider without utopias and abstractions and distractions, admonitions and demons, from the perspective of systemic science, the ultimate reason of those Kondratieff crashes of the global economy – the evolution of machines.
Since classic economics will never recognize or study under its ideologies of ‘money as the invisible hand of god’ and ‘machines as the symbol of progress’ the final paroxism of profits and capitalist triumph, which happens paradoxically when human suffer in a higher degree.
Since – given the fact that the life ecosystem is the prey of the world of machines we built – the final age of destruction of civilizations means an age of maximal profits, maximal cre(dit)ation of money (to pay for the war), maximal evolution of machines (evolved as weapons) and definitive solution to the crisis of unemployment (termination of soldiers), wealth distribution (the military-industrial complex takes it now all as the entire nation puts all its resources to the service of the machine). And this astounding absurdity of the triumphs of capitalism can only be explained from the systemic perspective, considering the economic ecosystem and the industrial revolution different ecosystem of life and the evolution of man…
Some basic tenants of all systems that apply to social sciences.
All sciences predict the future according to past cycles. So does system sciences applied to economic and historic organisms.
In a poll The Economist found out that garbage collectors and taxi drivers were finding better future indicators of economics than financial ministers and university professors. The Economist took it with irony but it shouldn’t have. It proved that Economics was not a science, in its classic theory, because a science only defines as such when it can calculate and forecast the future cycles of the species it studies. This is the essence of science: predictability. And only Economics fails. So astrology became astronomy, the science when Newton learned the cycles of planets and ennunciated its laws. And Darwin converted biology in a science with the law of evolution. Politics and economics have failed to provide that forecasting, except in the work of a few pioneers of organicist history, such as Mr. Spengler (Decadence of the West, which forecasted the end of American democracy by money in 2000, the end of the III reich in April 45), Mr. Marx (who forecasted the future crises of overproduction of machines proper of capitalism) and Kondratieff (his disciple, who tabulated them) and this writer, which completed the work of those masters. Needless to say none of them are often quoted by the economist, because we must understand this: the fundamental facts and disciplines an ideology of power must censor are those which are truly scientific as they will reveal the falsity of the system and its ideological, power-nature. So Vatican priests never allowed Mr. Galileo to do science to avoid their demise; and Biblical people don’t like teachers of evolution. And neither politicians or economists want people to understand capitalism and its false, placebo democracies to avoid a serious, scientific attempt to redesign the future of history for mankind.
Abstract Economists ignore everything about the evolution of machines. They do not even use biological terms to define them. So we talk about machines as abstract, dead species. If we were using vital terms, perhaps we would be more aware, of the organic nature of economic ecosystems. For example, we do not call the sensorial instruments, such as cameras, metal-eyes, so we do not realize what a “metal-head” is: a head-system that has “metal-ears” (mobile phones), “metal-eyes” (cameras), and “metal-brains” (chips) attached to any machine. If you put such “head” to any present machine, you have a robotic species, a “metalife” species, that potentially can outperform human beings, in all informative and energetic functions, from killing to working, from design to chess-playing.
Top predator weapons ‘consume’ humans in wars. They are the most ‘expensive memes’ in monetary prices:
All machines have a twin species, a top predator weapon, which consumes human beings instead of being consumed by us.
In the graph, what is the biological name for a weapon? A top predator machine. This is the key concept that economists keep denying about machines, with their abstract jargons about the wealth of nations: the most expensive, best machines are weapons that kill humans – they are the bulk of the economy, and the most advanced in any time of the Industrial R=evolution. Thus, the conclusion is obvious: we are evolving a new top predator species of energy and information. Top predator species which have a Darwinian behavior shown in wars.
It is indeed very unfortunate that the leading science of today, Biology, and the only Theory about change in the Universe, that has passed all experimental tests, Evolution, have never been properly merged with Economics, the discipline that studies the reproduction of machines, and their survival in the ecosystem of history. Such merge of disciplines, that we provide in this web will allow us a serious analysis of the evolutionary nature of machines, and their symbiotic and praying relationships with mankind. Since machines are not “ideal beings” like mathematical entities are. They are concrete, real, material species, and so they interact in the material world with us.
The dual nature of machines: consumption and competition
Machines are both symbiotic and compete with man.
They do so in two ways: competing with us when they perform the same jobs we do, either as weapons or as tool-workers; and becoming symbiotic to us, when we consume them, either as “bodies of metal”, or as “heads of metal”. Its symbiosis make us addict to the higher energy and information they give to us. Its competition displaces us from fields of war and work. The tricky point is that those two functions of machines are opposite. The consumption of machines is positive. It improves our life.
The competition with machines is negative. It makes our life more difficult. So the big question is: What function is more powerful? The symbiotic function of consumption, or the competitive function of work? Unfortunately, the competitive function, given by the imitative form of machines.
The forms and functions of machines compete with men
It is interesting to notice that we lack any serious philosophy about machines, despite having so many books that describe how to make, reproduce, and work with machines. All descriptions of machines we have, are abstract descriptions. Yet machines are material species. Their non-abstract nature is evident. Just try to lift a heavy “abstract machine”, and let it fall on your foot. Suddenly the abstraction has become real. It has a form, a weight. We define that form in organic terms: A machine is a form that imitates a human organ of energy of information with atoms of metal.
Another abstract opinion about machines very common in America, is that machines do not have “will”, or “intelligence” which means in practical terms that they do not condition the behavior of people, or oblige us to act in a certain manner. This argument used mainly to dismiss any criticism against lethal machines is also vane, and does not recognize the cause of behavior in the Universe, which is communication of “potential will”, “suggestion of will”. Behavior is first suggested by communication, then reinforced by action. What this means is that a gun “suggests” his use, because his form is “per se” potentially intelligent, and suggests the act of killing. The mere presence of a gun, also suggests danger, and do communicate behavior. Military have known it throughout centuries. Their power is based in the capacity of weapons to suggest behavior on human beings.
Weapons are not abstract. Just press the trigger of a gun against you dog’s head. Look then to the results. Are you scandalized by my “abstract” suggestions? Why? Abstract things are suppose to produce abstract results… Yet machines are real, maybe even more real than human beings are if we just measure their destiny, weight, and size…
Further on, the will of machines, their biological drives to become re=produced, evolve and multiply, adapting their environment to its image and likeness is carried about by their ‘company-mothers’, the corporations that rule the world with money and bribed politicians. They express in their economical mandates the biological drives of machines. Their structure is similar to an ant-hill; and as they become more automated, moving towards infinite self-reproductivity they will embed in their digital programs of re=production, such biological will, till a moment in which neither company-mothers, nor robots with solar skins and A.I. will need humans during the II part of this century.
How should we define then properly machines? Any rigorous definition of an entity or being requires to explain, both its form in space and its function in time. Species exist in space, where they have a form, and in time where they perform a function. So do machines. Their form is an organic form. What is their function? As in the case of our weapon, machines have a clear function:
To become organs of energy or information that interact with human beings. To imitate and substitute a human organ with a machine. For example a crane imitates an arm and substitutes an arm, moving things around. A phone imitates an ear-mouth, and works as an ear-mouth.
All machines imitate human functions. For that reason we talk of machines as “organic instruments”, that substitute human organic systems. If we divide the human being in two clear components, body and head, we can talk of two types of machines, body-machines that imitate and substitute functions of body organs, and mind-machines that imitate functions of the brain-senses. Those two basic functions of human organs will determine also the form of the machine, which imitates the equivalent form of a human organ. Cameras look like eyes and cranes like arms. If we were to use less “biological terms”, we will say there are:
- Machines of information [brain machines] and
- Machines of energy [body machines].
Which become complete “organic species”, when they are merged into
- Robots, metalife.
Men evolve and catalyze the reproduction of metal
Yet if machines and humans have the same form and function? Why we insist that machines can be potentially superior to man? Why in fact top predator machines -weapons- kill top predator humans -soldiers- and machine workers displace human workers constantly in most company-mothers? The reason is that there is a clear difference between machines and human organs. Machines are made basically of metal. Humans are made of carbon and related atoms.
Today we realize that the properties of metal, force us to certain informative and energetic designs in machines. It is metal and the laws of the Universe, not man, which makes machines efficient organs of energy and information. Men only create machines. Humans act only as “catalyzers”, “workers”, that assemble metal into organic forms, similar to us.
The laws of the Universe and the properties of metal enable them to exist. We conclude that machines are, from a biological point of view, metal species. Metal is a natural substance which is able to be formed into different kinds of “organic systems”, that copy the organic shapes of man.
This “transfers” millions of years of evolutionary knowledge accumulated by human forms, into machines, made of a stronger, more complex substance. In this manner the only advantage of man -formal evolution- is lost, to the new species, which competes and preys over human beings, provoking the relentless extinction of nature and history, and the expansion of the metal-ecosystem - the true meaning of the Industrial R=evolution, carried about by company-mothers, which have terraformed the Earth to the image and likeness of its off-spring, in a series of cycles described by evolutionary economics:
Modern History follows an economic, generational cycle caused by the evolution of money & machines: Each 72±8 years we go from a decade of happy consumption - the 1850s, the 1920s and the 1990s – into an age of machine’s overproduction and Stock-Market crashes (1857, 1929, 2001) that brings an age of poverty, war and fascism: the 1860s; W.W.II and W.W. III
From 1780s to 1857 we lived the age of steam, dominated by the British empire that found that energy, applied to transport machines – steamers and trains, and in its military version (as all machines have a dual, weapon system), conquered the world. And they reproduced huge quantities of paper-money in pounds and train stocks, which Britain used to buy the world for free. Since in each of those cycles the top predator nation has the dominant world money which everybody accepts.
From 1857 to 1929, the world was dominated by electro-chemical energies, developed by Germany, which invented the electric engine (siemens), the oil engine (Diesel) and the electro-chemical engine (gasoline engine, Otto). And the world was dominated by German Industries, even though Britain managed to control most of the world as the Germans made brutish Imperial errors, failing to unify the German/Austrian Empire and to seize Africa (idealism of Mr. Bismark). Otherwise by the 1860s a unified German-Austro-hungarian empire after the defeat of Sadowa, would have ‘liberated’ the Balkans from the Turks, conquered Constantinopoli and created a 150 million invencible Germanic world. Still the evolution of machines (chemicals, electric and oil engines) and the top corporations of the age were German and the German culture was admired all over the world. It was also the age of tickers, electric machines that speculated and multiplied the money of the economy in stocks.
From 1929 to 2001 the world was dominated by electronic systems that were invented in America (first digital computer), and so we lived in the age of the American empire, which now comes to an end. In this age electronic money was also invented and the americans bought the world with it.
Since we are now entering the robotic age of organic machines and solar energy, with maximal evolution in Asia (Korea, Japan, soon China). Yet this age is a different age because it completes the evolution of machines into organic systems that fusion the ‘bodies’ of the I Industrial Revolution, the ‘engines’/hearts of the II German revolution, the ‘electronic heads’ of the III Industrial revolution, into autonomous machines independent of men, with solar free energy, which will be pegged to its external skin, autonomous thought embedded in software programs and self-propelling bodies.
And since in each age of the Industrial R=evolution all machines have its top predator, most advanced forms as weapons, this is also the age of robotic wars, predators an terminators on the making.
Yet all those cycles are broken by crisis eras, between them, which are signaled by a 72-medium-7 short- ‘earthquakes’, massive crashes of the economy, due to the overproduction and increasing obsolescence of old machines and old forms of money. So we had the 1857 crash of train stocks and 72+8 years latter the 1929-37 crash of cars/electric radios and 72 years latter the 2001-08 crashes of e-money and the electronic economy.
Thus, those ages are separated by crises eras as the present one, which connects them also to the political and war cycle. Since company-mothers switch from re=producing the good=peaceful consumption, transport machines of each cycle to make weapons, the bad=military fruits of the tree of metal. So after 1857 armored trains and Disraeli wih vaporettes started the military age of colonialism and after the 1929 Germans made tanks and tried to create the empire mr. Bismark didn’t. And after 2001, the Bush dynasty created the military age of America, reproducing a big brother system of electronic surveillance and evolving the first robotic weapons that will dominate the world till the ‘great ecological reversal’ , the 7th age of biological extinction of all forms of life on Earth, the singularity age, when metalife, organic robots substitute carbonlife on the face of planet Earth…
Indeed, machines become reproduced in waves of increasing numbers that affect the world of History, as they adapt the human world to its image and likeness. Finally the ‘wave’ of re=produced machines and money becomes overwhelming, and humanity=History suffers its consequences, as machines compete with labor, and money, the language of information of the economy, becomes hyper-abundant and looses value.The result of those overproduction cycles of machines is a massive social crisis that often degenerates in war. Since to keep profits going, companies sell weapons to governments and back war-monger politicians, to provoke wars and justify sales.
The wave of evolution of machines and weapons is a repetitive cycle that goes each 72±8 years from an age of wander and discovery of new machines and energies, to an age of happy consumption – the 1850s, the 1920s and the 1990s – when machines are mainly peaceful transport machines and consumption gadgets that we enjoy. Yet at the end of the wave, it becomes ‘a tsunami’. The ‘wealth’ of nations, made of machines and money overwhelms the human ecosystem and we enter an age of crisis; of machine’s overproduction and stock-market crashes (1857-1865, 1929-1937, 2001-2009) that brings an age of poverty, war and fascism: the 1860s; W.W.II and W.W. III.
The previous cycles, called the Kondratieff cycles of the economy, are known to economists, but their use is reduced to charting profits in the stock-market and other financial aspects of the economy, despite their huge social and historic implications. Unfortunately, guided by profits, Economics pretends to be a ‘mathematical’ science, independent of History, uninterested in the collateral effects of the production of machines, money and weapons might cause to mankind.
For that reason, it is imperative to understand technology in biological terms, abandoning the mathematical, abstract approach of classic economics, which cannot understand those cycles of evolution, neither studies the ‘real’ competence and collateral effects some lethal machines are having on mankind – from global warming, produced by the ‘detritus of those machines’, to the massive wave of unemployment that robotics is causing, to the risks poised by the evolution of Nuclear Weapons, into the threshold of ‘planetary bombs’ – quark bombs and black holes that can potentially destroy the planet. In that regard, a Free Market is an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, simple organisms of metal that imitate the functions of energy and information of the human being. As a result the Earth becomes terraformed, from a carbon-life ecosystem (Gaia), ruled by human organizations (Governments) and human languages (verbal laws) into an economic ecosystem (Free Market), dominated by company-mothers, money and machines, which enhance our energy and information but also compete and substitute man in war and labor fields . . .
We could write that equation as: Man (salary) = Price (slave, object) > Diminishing Cost (evolving working machine).
Both equations convert man in a part-time slave always obsolete to a future evolving machine determines mathematically and logically that we humans shall be soon obsolete. This equation must therefore be substituted by an equation of ethonomics, the sub-discipline of the science of bio-history that could create a welfare paradise by controlling credit and cre(dit)ating welfare goods of maximal labor and utility to man, what we call Whealthy goods:
It is a pity though that the astounding wealth of discoveries of this web and the Laws of General systems sciences will not be tapped by mankind to improve its future. This would be the only way at this stage of history to survive… To design scientifically the organisms of mankind and its economic ecosystems and political systems with the laws of the most efficient organisms of the Universe.
This writer, a leading scientist of General Systems sciences, has thousand of pages on models that develop a perfect organism of history and economics, for what is worth, given the massive censorship social sciences suffered in capitalist systems. Consider for example the question of ‘pay’ for executives, treated in more detail in the post on social castes. An organism gives 10 times more energy to the neurons than to the rest of the body, as they have thee managerial job of the whole organism. And all systems have at least ’2 social classes’ according to location of the born-equal cells: information class, who commands the languages of power (in human societies politicos on charge of the law, military on charge of weapons but specially bankers on charge of money) and working class, with a 3rd world/class of energy ab=used by the system and a ’4th class’ of ‘invisible’ food merely killed.
Now if the system is just by law the CEO of any company of the world would have ad maximal to obey the efficient systems of the Universe, 10 times the salary of its lowest paid workers. That gives Mr. Jobs 10 $ an hour, or else he will have to rise the salaries of sweatshops, and that is indeed why the Universe has this law: so all the cells of the body receive enough energy and information to survive or else the CEO neuron gets its pain message. now you might think we have advanced on this. Not at all. The degree of ab=use of a social caste by other as all in the universal systems is written in decametric scales. So a first degree of abuse means a 1 to 100 ratio, which is the exact ratio between a senator in rome and a roman citizen under its military dictatorship. Today CEOs routinely earn 10 million $ a year and sweatshop workers 1 $ a day. This is nowhere to be found anywhere in the universe except in relationships between predators and pray. So neatly put: workers are the prey of the company, as Engels put it: ‘workers are a cost that always compete with a machine’ – not to speak of that other fancy invention, the stock-owner, equivalent to a parasite, some short of leecher, who doesn’t work and merely gets all the blood of the system.
But i dont want to overwhelm you with the laws of system sciences explained in the section of general systems and my books at kindle. The truth is those laws are not surfacing, beyond small congresses and there is no investment, there has never been any help for the true social scientists of mankind since they are obliged to define the ‘metal-masters’ who run the world and whose civilization is explained in detail in the next post.
Indeed, ‘Mechanism’, the official dogma of philosophy of science today has always prevented any expansion of a more complex vision of reality and this is not changing. So the laws of organic systems are not well known and will not be well known. The system has no interest on them, except to improve its machines. Since paradoxically, as in all other fields of science, today the understanding of systems applies to improve the owners of the future - corporations and their machines – not to improve the societies we live in. Let us be clear. You might think you are important but you live in a world in which humans are totally irrelevant to the systems of power – and no, the 1% is NOT humanity, even if they think only what happens to them really matters, imprinted by all the myths, religious dogmas and racist, subconscious memes of their ‘manifest destiny’.
The game of two worlds I refer to is the overwhelming majority of the economy (the industrial economy of machines and big corporations) vs. the overwhelmingly majority of mankind (the 99% and the companies that produce the welfare goods they need to survive). The first have all the credit to create the future, the second none. They work for a salary and on top they are extorted taxes to pay those goods, which most often end subventioning the other side (weapons companies, bank’s bail outs, mass-media national TVs, police, politicos, educational curriculums designed to make you believe the system and other placebo structures.)
And for that reason, we live in a two world reality: one world is a perfect designed system, the global corporation and the global market, which creates the future with credit, and one which is chaotic, in a process of decomposition, which are human governments and societies and their citizens, degrading their minds and without the slightest understanding of what lies ahead. What lies ahead are the cycles explained here, because those are the cycles promoted by corporations for the future of their machines and systems. And the fact that they happen is the most clear proof that democracies are placebo systems, since those cycles of machines, happening with absolute efficiency imply that our world is cre(dit)ated, created with credit by corporations NOT by human governments, and the result is a world made to the image and likeness of those machines, not of human beings.
—On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, 1859
This 3rd scenario, the most popular in science fiction, is however unlikely, since the 2 previous ‘happenings’ of the Singularity, are today progressing without opposition.
At present, without a serious biological science of history and economics, able to control the bad fruits of the tree of metal from the perspective of bio-ethics (what is good for human survival), scientists, playing to be god, without any safety measure, will create within decades an energetic black hole, quark star or a reproductive nano-bacteria. So the Singularity will extinguish us, well before Terminators might do it. Unless we change the goals of History and Economics, from designing a world to the image and likeness of machines, to the ideals of humanism – to make a world in which man is the measure of all things.
Yet, even if we survive the ‘energetic age of the Singularity’, to stop the 2nd and 3rd age of self-reproductive machines and intelligent robots will be more difficult. Because to survive the Industrial R=evolution of robots we need to reform the economic ecosystem.
The no future of mankind under the present system. Generations.
Of course this is the warning to fall in deaf ears, given the newspeaks of the system and ego-fictions that have turned ‘deaf’ to the real problems of the future of mankind, the elites that control the economic ecosystem and the nations of history. But the true laws of the universe couldnt care less who you are. You can be Mr. Jacob Rothschild for all what matters, the head of the ideological world that the economist and the global capitalism produces with the help of millions of ‘economical experts’. Fact is any of your grand-sons who is today in a University will be a corpse before it reaches your age, killed by one of the machines of the singularity age, if as it all seems to prove the laws of science and evolution do apply NOT the myths of classic economics, to the description of the relationships between humans and machines.
You can be Mr. Zuckenberg, soon to be the richest man of the world for gathering all the information about mankind, needed by that future ‘computerized’ non-human big brother in the making. That will not change your destiny after the present regime. You will not die in bed
You can be Mr. Obama, the head of the global politico big brother, who pretends to be saving the world. Fact is with a 90% of probability, according to the laws of death of social super-organisms, your daughters will not die in bed.
And what is worse, all of you did it to them. And it was not needed, neither the only future you could have provided.
Now this might seem quite dark, distasteful and certainly not a way to end an scholar article, but that is precisely the problem. The standardization, objectification and elimination of all ‘survival emotions’ and ‘real sensations’ from the social discourse, as if social sciences didn’t deal with life and death situations – the neutering of our purpose of existence -to survive. All those attempts to make us live in a happy limbus and care nothing for our survival till the 7th generation. This, which is an unwritten law of the ‘capitalist/mechanist/biblical/anthropomorphic culture’ might cheat most humans into submission and make you enjoy each day feeling important, but has nothing to do with the objective laws of the Universe and the ‘real events’ of the singularity age. So I refuse to ‘castrate’ my mind, to talk like a child, to follow the queues and hidden censorships of political and economical and social correctness, whenever this must be traded by truth. And the ugly truths I have stated will happen unless the 1% and its sheeple takes ‘seriously’ the laws of the Universe NOT inventing them.
It is a pity in that sense, that in each global crisis of capitalism, before each age opted for the solution of global war, the humnist solutions have been given and the blind, ‘wickedest people’, who run capitalism never listened to them. First it was Marx and the socialist school who gave human solutions, before the colonial war solution of guns instead of butter was implemented in the first crisis of capitalism. Then it was Keynes solution before the fascist solution was implemented in the 2nd crisis of capitalism. Now it is the astounding wealth of discoveries of evolutionary economics and systems sciences that construct all the efficient organisms of the Universe, which unfortunately will not be tapped by mankind to improve its future; because the leaders of the world prefer to maintain their mind in a happy state provided by Bronze Age memes, regarding the meaning of humanity, our role in this planet and the Universe at large, and the nature of money.
Your destiny though it is traced by the past cycles of history, by this laws of general systems sciences, which regardless of your knowledge of them, will be implemented again. Because the Universe is a biological, Darwinian game of existence, of life and death, not an arid scholar, nerdy world of neutral data or a kindergatten playroom to entertain the human species. Life is a serious game, worth to enjoy, worth to fight for.
The human world would be perfect, humans could thrive, the future could be open if humans were able to design scientifically a perfect system. This is what the biblical culture has done with the world of corporations they invented.
It is a pity though that so much cunningness and effort has been done to destroy the world not to save it, to create ‘hell on earth’ not a paradise. Think about it. It would have been much easier to design a perfect world if the will had been there and the wrong culture and memes had not controlled the world for so long… Because the entire humanity would have worked for it.
Instead all this ‘workings’ of the system must be hidden, because the agenda of capitalism is anti-human and anti-life and it is a fact that the elite, which is carrying that design even in the fog of their myths, realize of this and goes to extraordinary lengths to hide it to avoid situations as those who were common in pre-war and XIX century Europe. This is the solution to the horrors of XIX and earlier XX century capitalism and wars for profits: to design an astoundingly sophisticated ‘newspeak’ of ‘big brother smileys’, a global fiction born initially as an advertising industry to sell us machines, now used by the global corporation and all its attached sub-systems, including mass-media and politicians to ‘sell’ the absolute lie of a better future, when the system as it is has no future for mankind. And it would be so easy, if humans love each other and shared the right energy and information to improve this planet, to thrive on it, to reach the extraordinary potential that our species has.
But can the people who rule the world ‘deprogram’ themselves; can they learn to respect the planet or is their memetic imprinting, closer to that of a computer, impossible to erase? Are we truly free to reason and survive? This is the question we shall deal with in the next post.
But respect must be earned, or else the Universe will not be the astounding perfect super-organism, which it is. And we are not earning that respect. so a system much more powerful than the one humans have invented to pump up their egos will take care of them. Indeed, let us be clear enough, if we are eliminated by a simple black hole is because the mass of the black hole is denser, more solidarious, bosonic, acting as a single being. And so at that ‘scale’ of reality it is better and preferred. If a nano-bacteria of metal extinguish all aerobic bacterias creating the III Earth (this process already happened when the first oxygen-bacteria destroyed all the anaerobic bacteria or I Earth, and so as causality is cyclical, it will certainly happen if we make them), it will be because its gold, mercury and iron systems are bettern than the weaker carbohydrates we have. So at that scale of reality we are worst.
But in the fractal, scalar universe described in my books on hard science, the upper scale of form can always dominate the lower scales. That is, efficient organisms have forms to detain the explosive growth of bacteria… It is thus in the scale in which we exist, as individuals and cells of the superorganisms of history where we truly fail. And so as robotists evolve organic machines with iron bodies and gold brains, the Golems, the 3rd singularity, the 3rd horse of the apocalypse, after the hunger of the black hole, the pest of the bacteria, the robotic war will do us all. Death is always a process of parallel collapse due to multiple failures of the system of an organism. Humanity is failing in all its systems and so the menaces to life in this planet will multiply: global warming, the $hit of machines; nano-bacteria and robots and black holes, the madness of scientists, poverty and war, the consequences of greed, etc. Causes keep multiplying and when they unravel, as the multiple crises of capitalism shows, all the systems together will collapse and the fantasy politicos, the sloth stockrats, the children of thought that pass as experts of mankind today, will be completely unable to stop even one of those single causes, let alone the entire collapse of all our human systems to which we have dedicated null resources for decades, obsessed by the grandeur and egotrips of energy and information machines gave to us.
But of course the Universe is far less cruel than humans are. As it is always more perfect than us. So death is fast. In only 400 years since the first corporations were founded, we have collapsed the planet. That is a few seconds in the life span of ‘life’ in this planet. We have done a good job. And when we die as a species, it will be a few seconds too under a black hole, 2015, a few months under nano-bacteria, 2040s, and a few years under A.I. (2nd half of the century). So the enormous pain that the 90% of mankind and the 99% of life has suffered during the ’6th extinction’ provoked by the industrial r=evolution of machines will end. And even then, there will be infinite planets in the fractal Universe, in which, as in the painting of Botticelli, ‘The Story of Nastagio degli Onesti‘ this tragedy will be rehearshed again, but in a few ones, Nastaglio will be redeemed and a sustainable paradise created. Hopefully I will be resurrected in one of them.


















































