The objective and subjective truth and the sin of the ego.
Science comes from the Latin word ‘scire’, to know, in Old English, ‘Cnawan’, to recognize to identify. While wisdom, comes from Germanic wiesen, to see. Knowledge thus is ultimately a game of mirrors that identify a language of perception and an object. Knowledge is a focused language that makes a portrait of reality.
Consider the case of physicists. The subjective view of physicists and human scientists as a whole is that they seek in science the ‘truth’, the ‘laws’ of ‘Nature’, without much reflection about the definition of ‘truth’, which is always linguistic: a truth is a mirror image in a language of the organic ∆ST spacetime law of the Universe and any of its system, which resemble the system because essentially all systems are space-time structures with a similar syntax, including languages of truth. So what physicists do is a process of measure of physical space-time systems with ‘mechanisms’ developed in the XVI century (clocks to measure time and telescopes and microscopes to measure space) that is creating a different spacetime mind to that of the human ‘world’ and our visual and verbal space-time senses, the digital mind of the machine – they are creating a new mirror-mind, better focused but loosing some essential properties, specially those of causal time – the logic deterministic causality of the actions of species.
This new mind of machines, and its view of the Universe through its languages and instruments is what humans today consider truth, and because they are not self-reflective, it is very difficult to bring them out of the box, and explain this task is closer to that of an enzyman, an enzyme that catalyzes the evolution of machines within the context of an evolving earth than the true understanding of the first principles of reality – the deepest of all truths.
In that deeper view science is about the truth of the Nature of beings, as mirrored by languages humans and its machines use to perceive them. And so what are the languages that mirror reality, how is their quality to ‘perceive’, to ‘see’, and why mirrors bring knowledge are parts of the understanding of science past the first layer of collecting data to be put in the mirror of digital science.
The fight for supremacy between digital and verbal languages in History has had 2 fundamental oppositions – that between ethic laws and money and that between its societies, legalist, humanist societies and capitalists, mechanical one. And then the fight between mechanical models of reality explained only with maths (physical simplex models of the Universe as a mathematical machine) vs. organic models of reality explained with biological verbal models (from the organon of Aristotle, to the Darwin’s theory of evolution).
You can consider this blog, an organic model of history, as part of an organic, fractal Universe, in which verbal, ethic thought based in the social evolution that ensures survival in the Universe, which in human systems is spelt through the messages of love of its prophets of the wor(l)d, another episode of that battle.
Of course we do not deny the power of digital numbers to control and shape the Universe. The point though of a proper understanding of history and economics is to understand that digital languages are ‘equalitarian’ comparing men and machines through a price:
And so they can easily discharge humans; while verbal thought has a syntax where:
man (subject)>Verb(action)>Object (energy of subject)Always comes on top. So the proper way to control societies and make man survive is to put legal control over digital languages, the law above money. And once money is made submissive to the law (through the nationalization of the financial industry) to use the equalitarian mathematical language in the most efficient form to promote the welfare goods humans need to survive.
The easiest way to understand why, the ‘legal, informative system’ must dominate the digital values, the reproductive system of goods, is in terms of the physiological networks of super organisms, where obviously the informative nervous system of the law dominates the reproductive, blood oxygen and hormonal systems, to maximize and control the lethal goods that can kill the organism:
And this of course can only be done in terms of verbal languages, because what digital worshippers do not seem to understand is that the efficiency of numbers is based in the limited information they offer about the subject, reduced to a number, dehumanized. Indeed in verbal terms, words offer much more information to the brain, as they have a ‘tree’ of secondary meanings and values. In numbers though beings are ‘gathered’ as objects with no internal meaning, so we can say 6 for pears, humans or machines. So the necessary internal ‘information’ to consider ‘values’ that favor humanity can only be displayed in verbal terms.
The conclusion is obvious: Social Sciences in as much as try to ‘favor’ mankind and are biased towards humanity CANNOT BE RULED as economists believe and increasingly the rest of society does, by NUMBERS and its language, digital money ABOVE ethic laws and its human subjective values, because social sciences is about favoring mankind and making it survive.
The complex, right way to deal with reality is obviously to use the human verbal language, more complex but as humans are becoming slaves of machines, and its digital language, the opposite is truth: we live in a world where words no longer matter. All must be expressed in numbers, and so money and physics dominate over words and biology. And this has an added consequence.
As machines speak better numbers, a negative selective process is taking place, where Machine>Man, because it speaks better our language:
THE LANGUAGES OF HISTORY AND ECONOMICS: WORDS & MONEY
In the graph the cycles of evolution of money: Money is a language of digital information, which has evolved as all languages increasing its digital purity as a number (logic syntax that matters more than support), it has increased its numbers of bytes, as information machines have been able to reproduce more units of it, it has decreased its size as information evolves diminishing its ‘energy-space’ and increasing its speed, finally valuing all things on earth, including men as objects, substituting and making obsolete the alternative human, verbal ethic language that evolved slower than digital languages and money did.
Money is a language of digital information with support in metal.
Humans have evolved different digital languages, but none has been more successful than money, due to its support in the most complex atomic substances of the Universe – heavy metal.
The informative properties of Gold and silver, the most common forms of money throughout history explains the ‘biological’, ‘scientific’, not abstract nature of money, and its economical relationship with weapons (old cycles of history) and company-mothers of machines (modern cycles of economics).
Thus, in the biological and evolutionary models of ‘bio-economics’ we must understand the duality of money, both as a language of information that carries ‘certain values’, different from other languages (human verbal languages) and as a ‘substance’, informative metal, which sets its properties and affinities with the other ‘dominant’ products of an economic ecosystem, weapons andmachines.
Have you ever wonder why everybody talks about money but nobody knows how to define it?…
Indeed, one of the most fascinating facts about Economics is the ignorance of people, including economists about its fundamental element, money. Humans seem obsessed by money; so are economists, the so-called ‘experts’ of this discipline. And yet, nobody has properly defined money in 3000 years of obsession. So we should start this blog on the sciences of economics and history, its species, languages, cycles and organisms seen with the novel perspective of Theory of Information, Systems sciences and complexity with a definition of it:
Languages are systems of information that certain species use to value reality from their point of view. For example, words are the biological language of man. So we use them to value reality from our human perspective and that means life has a maximal value, while in money it has NO value at all:
Money and the law, the 2 network languages of human super organisms of history and economics.
Money is a digital language, which regardless of its specific ‘countable support’, has a function akin to other digital languages of systems, used to compare mathematically and reproduce through exchanges of flows of energy different type of goods.
All systems of nature require to well-function as social organisms 2 languages:
one of pure information, which is subjective, delivered by the ‘brain/informative elements’ of the system to organize the whole; nervous system in biological organisms, gravitational information in galaxies, genetic codes in cells, legal, ethic words in human societies… Such languages are biased in favor of the ‘neuronal brain and organism’ that controls it, being ‘particular in its function.
And a language of reproduction which is objective, hence normally delivered by a digital system, as the equations of mathematics equal being to be compared and exchanged. This is the case of electromagnetic forces in nature that exchange particles, hormonal and oxygen codes in biology and digital money in social super organisms, which regulate the reproductive economic system.
It is then very easy to consider what is wrong with the use of money in human societies, how those 2 languages should be designed in a perfect world=superorganism of history and what is the primacy between the two languages just by considering how THEY EXIST in efficient, survival super organisms of nature, all of them following the same laws of systems and networks:
What is wrong with the world money is used today can be easily inferred of the ‘NON-ESSENTIAL qualities’ of money, which come in the ‘discourse of our wrong-designed parasitic system of money’, where 2 qualities which are irrelevant to it, appears heavily featured in all treatises of money: MONEY AS A SUBSTANCE, gold or precious metal, ‘store of wealth’ and money as DEBT, a standard of payment of obligations (as in the famous Jevons definition of most classic books of economics).
- Money IS NOT A SUBSTANCE, as it is a digital number, which of course must be written in some support, but the support is not important. And as such is not ‘wealth-energy’, but information, language.
- And money IS NOT DEBT, as its function as all languages of information is to start the process of reproduction and exchange of goods and work to produce, in the same manner you act after thinking, but the words IS not what matters, only to kick start the action. So money CANNOT BE USED AS DEBT TO PARASITE AND RETURN to people, as you do not talk expecting someone to return your words, but to bey them and ACT under your command.
As it happens those 2 primitive forms of money, as metal and as debt-usury-slaving substance became imposed by our ‘dear’ animetal people-castes, creating a go(l)d religion of accumulation of metal-wealth and slavery of human lifetime to money, which became the standard origin of our capitalist civilization, as opposed to the Nomisma, rational Greek-Latin view of money as a secondary legal language to reproduce and organize society submissive as it must be to the word. This European view of money, vs. to the Semite, Biblical view of money as substance, debt and wealth, today represented by America and its capitalism, consisting in reproducing as many numbers of money as possible to herd it without any concern for its social value and rights of all humans to reproduce and receive a minimal salary to kick out their demand of welfare goods and work actions, AS NATURE DOES WITH ALL REPRODUCTIVE LANGUAGES TO WHICH ALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE ORGANISM HAVE ACCESS, is the root of most of the eviLs and dysfunctions of our societies.
languages that direct waves of beings are the DETERMINISTIC ARROW OF SOCIAL TIME THAT evolves reality and defines the future of all systems. I.e. your motions are defined by the arrow of verbal thought that guide then your nervous simultaneous cells, and so the future of History is defined by two languages, digital money and verbal thought, its values and grammars.
Because mathematics is a n equalitarian language that compares man = salary = money = object = price, we are constantly compared with objects, through digital languages, and rejected in the basis of our efficiency in works compared to machines and weapons in labor and war fields.
Wor(l)ds however have a different syntax, which is NOT equalitarian as Man, the subject is always considered superior to the verb and object subject < Verb (action) < Object, where the subject, man, is above all other elements So humans by definition are above, in an anthropomorphic way over object and could never be compared and eliminated.
It follows from this that a world ruled by Go(l)d values will systematically degrade and substitute man, as it does in a capitalist system where humans are in permanent chaos=freedom process of entropic destruction, because they are NOT worthy:
Language values selects species by affinity giving maximal value to those made of similar substance. So weapons have max. value in metal-gold and life null. And viceversa. In wor(l)ds weapons have negative value and life maximal. This fact is the basis for a scientific analysis of ethics, which is the survival subconscious value of the wor(l)d that guides subconsciously humanity into survival. For that reason animetal cult(ure)s systematically deny an ethical, organic Universe, choosing absolute freedom=chaos synonymous in science of entropic death Brough by its belief in go(l)d values
In the graph, the key element of memetics are the hidden values of Go(l)d money and the primitive abrahamic go(l)d churches (Judaism>Biblical capitalism>AI software) which are guiding mankind into extinction, with its modern ‘company-mothers’ version of the 3 equations of capitalist profits, with maximal values for weapons and hate media. So all what mankind needs to do is exactly what is doing, believing in the values of go(l)d without trying even to understand them rationally, ‘physically’, according to the organic laws of evolution that guide the equation of the III ages of the planet, Gaia (life-light languages)>History (Man: wor(l)d languages), Metalearth (machines: digital, gold languages), to certainly become extinct this century as all the actions created with credit under those values (creditated), terraform the Earth to the image and likeness of machines.
In the graph, the gold culture and its values, follow the paradox of history, as money substitutes rational verbal thought and its ethic values in favor of mankind, giving birth to the paradox of history: max. technological evolution = minimal human evolution;
“Words and numbers are the biological languages of human beings and scientific machines. In the age of Metal-minds, the complexity of the ‘eyes of metal’ and its clocks of time, expressed in digital languages, have substituted our perception of space and time with our eyes and verbal languages. This trend has been directed by the dominant digital language of our age, money, whose ‘metal-values’ favor systematically the evolution of the memes of metal, over the memes of life, which have no price. Since languages ‘select’ the species that better talk them in the economic ecosystem in which we live. Thus we reproduce chips and robots and eliminate humans from labor and war fields in which mathematical skills define survival.
Languages act-react in the Universe
Among the most advanced and respected new sciences, there is a new discipline called Theory of Complexity, specifically a part of that science called Theory of Organisms.
It aims to describe any system of the Universe as an organic ecosystem, made of similar cellular elements, ruled by networks of energy and information.
We can describe both as an accumulation of cellular elements – metal atoms in the robot, carbolife cells in the human being – ruled by two systems of information and energy – electronic information and electric energy in the machine, ionic information and carbolife energy in human beings.
Both can be described as organisms.
Of those three elements of organisms, the cellular species, and the networks of energy and information, we are interested in this book in the networks of information of the species.
Those networks turn out to have systematically a hardware, a cellular support of specialized elements, and a software, a flow of information that moves through that hardware.
The software are the languages of the species.
In our example both species, the robot and the human being, have languages of information, that flow over a hardware – digital languages over silicon in the machine, visual/verbal languages over neurons in the human being.
Those languages are what common people might call the mind of those organisms.
The human mind is made of verbal and visual languages. The mind of the robot is made of digital and visual images.
Both minds exist on a hardware. In the human being, the hardware is the brain and nervous system, which store and let the information flow. in the machine the hardware is the chip and the electronic and magnetic system which let the information flow.
All this means that languages do have a material existence, a material support, which is essential to the workings of the organism.
Why languages are important? The key word is ‘action-reaction’; the second Law of Newton, and one of the fundamental laws of the Universe. Languages provide an easy way for organisms to act and react in the Universe. Without languages, organisms would be blind, and could not protect themselves against harm in the hostile environment in which they exist.
Action-reaction however requires speed. This is indeed the key element to understand the nature and pretended spirituality of languages. Languages are ‘light’, and fast material systems, that flow at great speed within the systems of organisms, carrying a lot of information in a minimal quantity of time. This allows the organism to act-react fast to the environment. Since they are light to be fast, normally men have associated languages and spirituality. Now we know those languages are material. Before we couldn’t see the mechanical waves of sound that are the substance of the verbal language. Nor we could measure the speed of light which is the substance of visual languages. Now we know those speeds are not instantaneous, and those languages have a material support both within our organisms and externally when they communicate with the world.
We know also that languages are fundamental to organisms, because they allow the organism to communicate and interact with the Universe, absorbing energy and information from that Universe.
The quality of languages select species
We contend in this web that languages are in fact the main element of an organism, that determines its survival. All organisms have an organ of energy that we call body, and an organ of information that we call brain, the site of the mind, of the language. We know that the Darwinian Universe selects bodies according to their efficiency to manipulate energy. So the strongest survive. However the Universe also selects minds and systems of information, by their efficiency to manipulate information. And that selection is even more important for the survival of a species, than the selection of bodies.
The main process of selection of species is caused by the evolution of informative brains, and its linguistic minds, the hardware and software of information that rules organisms.
In turn that evolution determines the evolution of bodies, and the survival of those organisms, which have better brains and bodies together.
This fact makes languages even more ‘real’, more ‘material’, more necessary.
The evolutionary process of languages will be proved studying the evolution of species on Earth, which is primarily an evolution of minds of higher complexity, that prey over species of lesser minds. What kind of minds and languages? Light-minds, light-languages, brains able to absorb light and obtain information from that light in order to communicate in the Earth-Sun Universe. Indeed, species with better informative light-languages have always been the rules of the earth.
Plants were the first species to rule on Earth. Yet when animals developed a more complex brain, able to extract from light not only energy as plants did but also information, they became the rules of the earth, and preyed on plants. Then those animals developed to the gigantic size of dinosaurs. Yet the dinosaur despite its size did not survive to the massive reproduction of carnivorous mammals with a highly developed brain and night vision, able to act together as hunting herds, against eggs and small dinosaurs, without parental care.
Forget the rock from the skies. Biologists not physicists are the specialists in life on Earth. They have always affirmed that mammals caused the extinction of dinosaurs. All facts back them. Within one hundred thousand years of the arrival of the first mammals, the last dinosaur died. Only those dinosaurs who escaped into the air, and avoided the ferocious ground mammals – the birds – survived.
The case is fundamental to understand the selective process caused by languages:
We call it the paradox of Goliath: Goliath, the dinosaur, the big computer, are eliminated by David, the mammal, the chip, which is smaller yet it is faster acting-reacting in the Universe, because it has a faster language. So the paradox is that the Universe selects brains which are smaller, and yet have faster languages. This happens because in a small space, a language can take decisions faster. The chip is faster, calculates faster, because electrons take less time to move through a chip than through a vacuum tube. So chips have survived in the economic ecosystem.
The Paradox of Goliath is the key to understand the selection of languages: those languages who carry more information in less time survive. Those species who use languages that carry more information in less time survive. So the mammal survived. The chip survived. The sling of David, which was faster, than the sword of Goliath survived. The small ships of the English pirates, faster than the Spanish Galleons survived.
We can follow further that evolution of languages after the mammal to prove our point.
Languages create forms
After the mammal it came the human being, that developed a complex vision of space, his visual and mathematical languages of perception, and a complex vision of time, his verbal understanding of the passing of time. Again those languages gave him more information and a faster capacity to act-react to the environment. So man became top predator.
To that aim he brought about a second fundamental quality of languages.
The capacity that information has to create ‘forms’.
Indeed, the second element that defines the importance of informative networks and their software, languages, is the capacity that languages have as a software flow, to imprint different substances.
Languages, information, is able to jump from substance to substance and create new forms. Here is where the essence of the ‘spirituality’ of languages become material. A language carries information, yet in-form-ation is basically form. If we talk of a primary substance in he Universe, an amorphous substance that we might call energy, made of quantic elements, we can talk of many energies. Gravitational energy made of gravitons, electromagnetic energy made of photons, atomic energy made of atoms, electronic energy made of electrons, water energy made of molecules, a human energy, made of a mass of humans. All those energies are basically an amorphous organism made of quasi-infinite forms, undifferentiated.
Who is going to give that mass a form, an organic structure, able to have direction, to move with a purpose, to have a will, to act-react in the Universe?
The language. Those flows of information which are smaller, and move faster, and go through the mass relocating the cells of the mass till creating a ‘network of information’, a network of form, that shapes the mass with a purpose.
Languages of information, languages of form, in this manner can be applied to a given substance and mold the substance with a purpose. And species with a lot of language, a lot of information can use their language to mold the external universe to the image and resemblance of that information. In this manner they can expand their ‘energy-force’, by molding external energies to its image and resemblance, and use that external energy to its advantage.
Such is the essence of the creative process of languages, by which the form of a language reproduce externally.
There are many of those linguistic processes of reproduction. Genetic information stored in DNA cells reproduces by attaching certain molecules to the DNA in the same form that the DNA has, reproducing the DNA. Factories reproduce machines by enlarging a software form, a plane of a machine, and using its bi-dimensional form to create a 3-dimensional form called a machine. In this manner a software form, an informative language, of lesser size, and faster speed of informative processing, becomes a blow up species, with bigger size, more energy, that imitates the form of the language.
This second quality of languages, of information – to reproduce itself – was fundamental to the expansion and triumph of the mammal with more information, the human being.
It meant that men shaped masses of energy into form through the use of our languages, verbal and visual languages.
What kind of forms we created with those languages?
Two kind of forms.
Verbal languages were the substance humans used to shape with masses of human beings, organisms structured to function and act-react in the Universe. Those organisms made of human cells ruled by verbal networks, were called ‘human societies’.
On the other hand visual languages, were able to create a simple resume of the forms of the Universe, called geometry, which basically reduces all forms of the Universe to two essential forms, the cycle of information and the line of energy, combined into the wave.
Men then imprinted cycles of information and lines of energy into external substances, such as stones, wood, and metal, creating instruments. Some of those instruments called weapons, made with lines of energy imprinted in hard substances, became extremely powerful, and allowed the human mammal to kill all other species on Earth. First the javelin then the bow, finally the sword, made of man, thanks to the creative capacity of languages, to flow over other substances, and form reality, the top predator on Earth.
Through the mathematical design of machine forms with the simple geometry of the cycle and the line, man invented an entire new kind of species, machines, which gave him total power on Earth.
This was the beginning of a new age for man, the age of technology, and the age of a new language, the language of geometry, of mathematics.
Languages had again selected a species. In fact, it seems that Europeans today are descendants in a 90% of their population from the bow men that arrived from Africa in the ±20.000 before Christ.
How shall we call this new species of man, that uses languages imprinted externally over new substances, and controls the Universe in this manner?
I use a word: the animetal, or the Homo Mathematicus, to distinguish him from the Homo Sapiens, or Homo Verbalis, that came first, and used the word to organize and form human beings into substances. The animetal came latter and using mathematics and constructing machines in space with mathematical designs have come to dominate the Homo Verbalis.
Women who are better with words, became with the growing power of the Homo Mathematicus, dominated by males who are better using spatial forms, and created most of the weapons of our society. For a while in History there was actually a balance between the two languages of mankind, and societies ruled by verbal languages [religious societies], were as powerful as societies ruled by digital languages [weapons, monetary flows of information and simple machines].
This period of balance however ends around 1600, when the evolution of mathematical languages reaches a new discontinuum. It is the age of the scientific method, that invents with the language of mathematics a series of new machines that break the balance between verbal societies and mathematical societies. Mathematical machines based in geometrical cycles of information and lines of energy, able to transform in this manner information into energy and vice versa, start to develop at an amazing rate thanks to the press, and the clock, and the vapor machine, and the scientific method of mathematical design. Such method creates an entire new range of new linguistic species: machines designed with mathematical tools, and monetary forms, that act as a social language among human beings.
Again the ecosystem of the Earth changes, and those humans who better understand the language of mathematics, survive and eliminate rival cultures. Northern Europeans are at the head of this new linguistic wave. They conquer the world and reform it to the image and resemblance of their culture.
However in the XX century, they discover information machines, and design with mathematics, machines and weapons of so much power, that even those human beings, become increasingly obsolete to their machines. Today computers have become predominant, even to some extent over its creators, human beings.
We live indeed in the digital age, and those who do not understand the mathematical language, are brutalized by the system. The language imposes the species who better speak the language [information machines]. So men are discharged and destroyed by the system, as women were brutalized by men with weapons, and Neanderthals were brutalized by humans who spoke, and dinosaurs were extinguished by rats who saw in the night, and moved faster, and attacked in herds.
The vitality of languages; the ages of languages.
We conclude that languages are vital species, as bodies are. They are merely lighter, faster, and as a software form, can jump from object to object, becoming imprinted in other species.
How can we prove that vitality of languages?
Merely studying those languages as vital species, and observing on them the same qualities of vital species.
Languages can reproduce, even faster than bodies do.
Languages require energy and absorb energy to form themselves as vital species do. You need electricity to create electronics, light to create images, sound energy to create words. Languages need less energy than bodies yet they do need energy.
Languages of course process information as living beings do, even in higher measure.
Finally and this is the key prove of the vitality of languages, languages follow the common pattern of the existence of species. They are born, reproduce, evolve, grow, mature, and then go through an age of decadence and die away.
Languages do have an existence which is vital, not spiritual, and can be described with vital terms. Among those vital terms, the most important is the concept of age that explains the creation and extinction of vital beings, including languages. A language as a body goes through an existence in which we can distinguish 3 ages: a young age in which the language is invented and evolved, a mature age, in which the language and the species who speak the language dominate a certain territory, and a third age in which the language becomes extinguished by a new language and species who speak that new language.
Those ages correspond to the youth, reproductive maturity, and third age of a body.
So in this post we will study not only the evolution of languages on Earth, but also when we arrive to the age of history, the evolution of human languages, verbal and visual languages, and their ages, in the human societies those languages have ‘formed’.
Fight between verbal and digital languages: scientific racism.
In the graph, languages select the species that better speaks the language in a given ecosystem. In the economic ecosystem the evolution of a digital metal-mind displaces fast the human being from a world increasingly managed by Algorithms of digital information, A.I. the true meaning of artificial intelligence, which is ‘deconstructed’ in infinite task-oriented programs that convert each machine in a ‘specialised’ workers, potentially eliminating all human minds with lesser digital skills from the world of economics, where GDP measures the productivity of those humans and machines, and will keep growing as the chip radiation makes human minds obsolete, displaced from that ‘mechanical wealth’ as animals are today not sharing our human wealth. It is this process lead by economists, and its gurus of productivity and GDP growth, what is eliminating life from the system without humans even realising they are becoming expendable, as they confuse GDP mechanical wealth with human healthy wealth, WHealth.
The selection of species that talk the most complex languages, that carry more information, has continued throughout history, between two languages, that first men, then machines command: the verbal language and the mathematical language.
The result is what we call the paradox of History, or the paradox of scientific racism, the fact that systematically throughout history species who handle mathematical languages, dominate, control and abuse, species that command verbal languages. The paradox of Scientific Racism has many different versions.
The fundamental one is the Scientific method, that affirms that truth has to be expressed with numbers, not with words, and metal-senses, telescopes, and cameras, are more accurate sensorial systems than human eyes, the artistic senses, which are therefore despised systematically since the scientific method, became dogma of knowledge.
The consequences of scientific racism are multiple. It means basically that since the XVII century, when scientific racism invaded western culture, men which are biologically speaking verbal minds, have been systematically degraded, and substituted by machines, scientific instruments and money, the new valuators of reality, which say what is good and what is bad. And among men, those races who are not ‘spatial’, eye-based in their perception, have been also degraded.
The most obvious human subspecies who masters better verbal languages and have a lesser command of spatial language is the woman. The abuse of males, spatial sub-species, of higher mathematical-eye capacity, over women, temporal sub-species of higher verbal-temporal complexity is a fact of history.
In general eye species, are those born in ‘open landscapes’, northern deserts of ice (Germanic races) and Southern deserts (Semite races). Scientific racism, and the capacity of mathematics to create weapons designed with lineal spatial forms (from swords to missiles) explains how those two races came to dominate western history and finally history as a whole. We talk of the goldiron culture, to the combination of the Jewish-Semite culture and the Germanic-culture, that developed in Holland and England, and finally has spread all over the world, dominating mankind, and creating the present world, in which digital languages, spatial perception, and eye-sensations dominate over verbal language, temporal understanding of the universe, and chemical-feelings.
It is also a machist culture since it is proved that men are better handling space and mathematical languages. While women are better handling memorial time, and verbal languages. Scientific racism thus apply to those two type of human classes. It does also when considering the differences between northern, eye-based, scientific cultures, such as the European culture, or the Northern-Asian cultures, developed in open zones of high visual accuracy, and the southern, South-Neolithic agricultural cultures, based in verbal sounds, music, words, and carbolife products.
The scientific revolution and the process of colonialism and racism in history, do have a clear parallel cause in the processes of linguistic racism, that made the Northern eye-based cultures, to develop scientific machines designed with mathematics. It is then clear that we can talk in history of two ages, the Neolithic, women-based, carbolife-based, southern age of verbal cultures, and verbal religions, and the present age, carried about by northern, eye-based, male-based, machine based cultures of digital languages.
We will prove you however, that we have chosen the wrong culture, the culture of ‘animetals’, of warriors and traders and scientists who need weapons, money and metal-senses, to survive and organize societies, degrading in that process of dependence of machines the human will. Why? Because man is not very apt in the use of mathematical languages. Machines are much better. So as scientists evolved machines, which carried more information than verbal humans, machines became the dominant elements of our civilization and men became secondary. Machines were evolved in the Industrial evolution, and today we live in a society that worships machines, and makes them the center of life, reproduced by workers, and evolved by scientists, that find in that cult to the machine the leit motiv of human existence.
The same opposition of languages and the final dominance of digital numbers over words, meant the end of human ethics based in verbal communication, love and social evolution, substituted by the ethics of machines – money and weapons – that despised man. So digital forms of power – weapons and money – have become controllers of societies substituting verbal forms of power – religion and political laws. Finally money and science have dominated laws and religion, to such extent that most people today do not understand or respect the meaning of religions, and verbal, ethic laws. Both have opposed because they are rival languages, not because digital sciences are more truth than verbal ethics – as we shall see when analyzing the basic laws of the Universe. Indeed the Universe is not only mathematical but specially a behavioral game based in Theory of evolution, which itself is a game of social love among members of a species, that fight against all other species. This is what religions expressed in other terms such as good, what profits the social man, the species, and bad, what is a danger to social man; through the message of love all other men, a biological message of survival of the species. However as digital languages, the scientific method and the worshipping of machines imposed love to machines and weapons, men hated each other, and ‘cultures of animetals’ that loved machines and money more than men appeared. The scientific racist culture of the Germanic world, the Jewish gold culture of money, the Calvinist gold culture, the culture of economists and company-mothers – all of them despised men and considered that weapons machines and digital languages evolved history.
That traditional opposition of languages took also place between financial systems, a digital language of information that values reality with numbers, and political laws, a verbal language of information that values reality with words. Again digital languages have won that battle and today laws are bought by lobbies of company-mothers which pay them with money.
So throughout history we find that confrontation between monetary cultures and legal cultures. For example the Greek world based in monetary languages of information confronted the Roman world based in verbal laws. The Jewish culture based in money confronted also the Roman world. Then the Roman world won, thanks to better military organization based in the verbal solidarity of warrior armies.
When that fight ended, and who won is obvious:
During a millennia till the Capitalist revolution of the XVI century verbal religions dominated human societies. Yet after company-mothers were invented, paper money arrived and reproduced in great numbers, and weapons developed thanks to gunpowder in industrial systems of murder, the fight tilted against laws, ethics, human senses and arts, and love=social evolution among men. Now murder, war, animetal castes, money, company-mothers and machines would rule societies. And human ethics and aesthetics would die away.
Problem is that machines speak better digital languages than human beings. So we have to forecast the decadence, and probable extinction of human beings, by machines, as they take over the process of reproduction, creation (creditation through money of reality), and military power. The first robots are just the beginning of the digital era in which men become submissive to machines. A fact that might be denied by human arrogance and anthropocentrism, which precisely only increases the speed of the process – since denial of the destruction of human languages and history by machines, prevents the human race from taking the necessary measures against the evolution of mathematics, money and machines.
In this web we study the process from the perspective of the evolution and decadence of human languages. In other posts we have studied the other aspects of the process: the creation of machines, the extinction of human cultures by armies of machines, the reproduction and evolution of money and its substitution of human systems of power, the decadence of religions of verbal ethics, substituted by go(l)d religions, that made of Gold the god of mankind (Judaism, Calvinism, modern Economics); the arrival of science and his denial of human senses, etc.
Here we will consider in more detail the human languages, and his ages of growth, and final decadence in the XX century, as machines and his languages have substituted human languages, and its higher forms – art, and religion.
Indeed, languages, we say, are the software that runs over an energy hardware, which in history have been human masses, modeled by verbal languages and visual arts, and objects modeled by mathematical languages.
Those 2 are the languages that seem to have dominated history.
It follows that the masses of humans that we call civilizations, and the objects that we call machines, have followed the 3 ages of formal languages, and gone through a youth, maturity and extinction, as the languages that formed them lived and died.
The verbal languages of man, that controlled through laws and religious ethics, human masses, that build entire civilizations based on verbal mandates, have lived and died.
So have done their civilizations. The last to die was communism based in the verbal languages of Marx..
The digital languages of mathematics that controlled through money and machines designed through geometrical forms, entire civilizations based in trade and weapons, have lived and died. The last to die was the European civilization based in gunpowder weapons, extinct by the arrival of new ‘digital species’ of weapons, atomic bombs.
We can say that verbal thought is the software of civilizations based in a hardware that understands verbal thought, the human being, called the believer, the citizen.
While mathematics is the software-language, of a kind of civilizations that we shall call a metal-civilizations. Mathematics allows to design machines of metal – first weapons, today scientific machines – and financial systems of information based in metal-money [copper, gold, silver, today electronic money in the mind of computers]. Those metal-civilizations also live and die, when new machines and forms of money substitute them.
Thus we can consider that Social organism of History use two languages, and two dominant species that handle better those languages: digital languages, and metal species such as machines and money; and verbal languages, and human beings, that believe on them.
If we now take the simile of the Organism and explain Historic organisms, civilizations and nations, economic systems, and cultures, with that simile, we could say that there are two kind of organisms on History:
– Cultural organisms in which human beings are cells, of a collective verbal mind of laws and ethics mandates, the nervous system of information of those cells. So there is the body of Islam, the body of Christianism, made of human cells, of believers, which are the ‘temple of the language’, of the word of god…
Those civilizations live and die, as their languages, and ideologies go through 3 ages, of youth, reproductive expansion, and cultural decadence of the ideology and language.
– Economic organisms in which human beings are secondary to metal machines, company-mothers of those machines, money and weapons, shaped by digital languages. In those civilizations the ‘social cells’ are ‘animetals’, men associated to weapons, machines and money, which rule with them the society through monetary values [prices/wages/costs], through violence [weapons, warriors], or through digital knowledge [machines, scientists].
Again those civilizations live and die according to the ages of their icon machine. So there was for example the Greek-Roman civilization based in iron swords, erased by the hordes of cavalry warriors that destroyed the legions.
The end of verbal and artistic cultures.
Further on when we analyze the life and death of verbal and mathematical civilizations based in human masses, and machines, we observe that in the past centuries the first kind of social organisms, based in verbal languages, and other ‘artistic forms’ [visual arts that reinforce the power of verbal castes, with paintings, buildings and temples], have been substituted by social organisms based in monetary languages, and scientific, mathematical knowledge, and the machines money reproduces and science evolves.
So we have to conclude that in the process of evolution of the Earth, from the plant to the animal that perceives light information, to the man that perceives and stores temporal information with words, there is a new stair, the digital age of mathematical languages, and information machines such as computers, or robots that use digital languages to communicate.
This has caused a general third age for all cultures based in words. We call that age the ‘baroque age of human societies‘, since those societies are based in human beings, human values, verbal values. Now they are submissive to digital societies based in machines of information and the peculiar values of money. To deny this is to deny modern history.
Thus at the end of the book we study that ‘third age for the human species and his languages, his visual and verbal arts, an age of extinction and substitution of human languages by digital languages, and human workers/soldiers/citizens, by machines.
Such are the fact that this book studies in detail, through the analysis of the linguistic species of the Earth, and the verbal/visual cultures and civilizations of history, extinguished rhythmically by ‘digital machines’, weapons constructed with geometric forms…
A process of extinction that unfortunately today seems to accelerate as new digital machines dominate our information, and energy to a degree never witnessed before in any civilization.
We live indeed in the human baroque, the last age of human languages. And the ‘epic age’ of digital thought, of machines, numbers and mathematics. When everybody believes in the goodness superiority and wonderful nature of the language that prey on us; and its ‘artistic forms’, televisions, digital, geometrical architecture, painting, and computer-made music, art…
We can say that the human mind is today slave of the digital mind of machines, but as all slaves accept even cherish their slavery, very few people, very few artists do realize of the process. Men are so naive, so idiotic, that as cattle follows the peasant to the slaughter house, men cherish the extinction of their collective minds, by the minds of machines, their arts and languages, as a symbol of ‘Progress’, and scorn, despise, insult, and reject all those intelligent human beings, who warn mankind of his extinction by the new race. So we laugh at religion, we ignore human art, figurative painting, ethic behavior, we no longer read books, or remember poetry, we don’t see movies about human beings, and feelings, even women prefer to become like ‘animetal men’ attached to machines, we love films on machines, violent films, films made by computers, we evolve those machines… We are in other words the most absurd species of this universe, since even the smallest insect, the most stupid Gazelle runs when it sees an enemy species.
Only man welcomes TVs and computers, robots and weapons to their home, and throws away the books, artists of human senses, and needed human goods it requires to survive. Only man forgets that information, knowledge, art, words, ethics, are fundamental elements of the languages and systems of information that define the survival of species.
Of all those idol-ogies the most important is scientific racism, the belief that the world is a machine and its language is the digital language, because God speak mathematics, and so we must talk ‘money’ instead of words in society as the ruling language, issued by expert bankers of go(l)d churches, we must see through digital machines instead of using our human senses, and of course, we must worship a mechanical Universe not an organic one made to the image and likeness of mankind.
So in our digital culture, God speaks mathematics not words,and so we must be ruled by financial experts, give orders and speak through digital languages and use weapons and money to control the world Human senses and life becomes then irrelevant.
Since as Fromm said ‘a technological civilization is ruled by the principle that if a machine can be done it must be done even if it can kill us all’
BECAUSE WHAT WE CALL SOCIAL SCIENCES ARE ANIMETAL RAW POWER CULT(URE)S
Everything you believe about the world in the ‘larger picture’, since the ‘beginning’ of civilization, is biased by the ‘Anti-quantum paradox’ of a predatory elite of financiers, warriors and industrialists that PUT ALWAYS above humans and life, the metal instruments of power they ab=use to come on top of society, and over this material realpolitiks, pseudo-religious of metal-power, called ‘social sciences’ have built its memes, from tribal nationalisms and religions to FOSTER the reproduction and ab=use of members of the same species with weapons to Capitalist subversion of the natural order of LANGUAGES in systems, where the informative, nervous, ethic, verbal, legal language of man MUST BE ABOVE AND REGULATE the blood, reproductive financial language, as IT HAPPENS IN ALL evolved SPECIES beyond the worm, poisoned for that reason by lethal goods as our society is.
All science is culture. For example, human physics is limited by culture – by the worldly profession of physicists, which has been traditionally to make weapons of mass destruction, with maximal lineal reach. So they only accept lineal time, and an entropic dying Universe, regardless of the obvious existence of vortices of temporal information such as the galaxy in which the Earth with evolves information is inscribed.
What we mean then by ‘science is culture’ must be understood in the highest level of understanding of any ‘science’ – not OBVIOUSLY in the gathering of basic data – which cannot be cheated, and there science is science, but in the B-C-D elements of the scientific method, MODELING, CYCLICAL PATTERNS and Humanist ‘democratic’ use of science for the common good. Or in other terms ‘macro-science’.
So, ‘macro-economics’ , the philosophy of economics IS culture as opposed to micro-economics (the science of re=production of machines).
AND IN PHYSICS, the Philosophy of the Universe as an entropic dying system (theory of time arrows) IS culture, DISGUISED of science with faulty interpretations of scanty data.
Contrary to belief, creationism is the essential form of ‘thought’ of the human ego, which always measure reality from its point of view and considers itself the center of creation.
Yet if humans cannot evolve beyond the self-centered homunculus, man up, grow up, stop being a child who thinks to be the center of the Universe and objectively defend himself from evolution of metal with the tools of science, there is no future for mankind. The shallow rejection with ‘ad hominem’ or don’t worry be happy, live the day, short-sighted views of the facts of history and metal-evolution won’t do. It seems though in the age of M.A.D.ness suffice to 99.999% of humans. To an extend I can understand this for the mass of mankind, oppressed by the system. But people on top of the pyramid of capitalism, which refuses the slightest empathy to mankind; or journalists like those of The Guardian who self-censors truth for wishful opinion are simply beyond my comprehension – not to speak of the ginormous number of scholars dedicated to defend a system against humanity.
How can an ethic, intelligent social scholar survive in that millieu? The answer seems to be solitude, an essential quality of the true masters of the science of History throughout ages, from Socrates murdered by a Placebo Democracy to Orwell or Trotsky, cheated and murdered by a false humanist one (Stalinism), which paradoxically wrote its most mature work, as this writer is doing in this blog, after failing to r=evolve mankind with his activism, since at the end of the day, objective pure science of history as it is, implies to understand the unity of the species for good or for bad – as a single organism, in which the blind working cells of the body obey those of the neuronal people-castes, scholars and journalists that ‘defend with the word’, the money, weapons and machines of its ‘animetal elites’.
In that regard, the age of Orwellian newspeak and political and economical correctness which merely pretends to cover with make-up, the corpse of a degraded increasingly obsolete humanity, where THE CAPITALIST DICTATORSHIP OF BANKERS issuing money only for machines and financiers, must pass as the ONLY POSSIBLE SYSTEM is in place.
It is harsh to accept but it seems a truism of our present age that humans ARE SO COWARD, so childish, so degraded in ethics and intelligence that they prefer to be data on the film parable of matrix, conscious that they are living a facebook life that challenge themselves as individuals and species to create a perfect world. Indeed, the people on top of capitalism, are so few, ultimately so powerless as they don’t run the military systems, the measures to cure the world so simple, so well-tested by nature, the survival SO close in hand, with a little effort and caring, empathy and intelligence that what it is truly amazing IS THAT we are going under. 7.5 billion humans are in Kamikaze mood and denial and that is a bizarre, surrealist show to see, epic and tragic in its utter absurdity. But it is happening because the people on top of the social pyramid cares nothing for the future of its own sons till the 7th generation – will do NOTHING to challenge the routines of its memetic imprinting, enslaved by the systems their ancestors build and now run with increasing automatism our slide into obsolescence. All they care is to deny all this is happening, while it is so obviously happening.
Behind this process there will always be the ego paradox, THE belief HUMANS HAVE on their immortality as individuals and species, of being the center of the Universe, some unique carbon life species – never mind there are infinite planets like this one, probably all running parallel ‘alt-histories’ – that is SO SPECIAL and daring to G.Bush (not the president but the slightly less intelligent God Bush that burned in the Bronze Age, enlightening the mind of a jewish goat-keeper, to whom we must owe reverential thought as a sage, mouth of the creator), that it cannot die. It doesn’t matter the evidence of war and holocaust cycles and its ’cause belli’, the belief death does NOT exist for human species is the ultimate reasoning. Of course robots are evolving into terminators. Labor is disappearing. Our children are becoming retarded selfie, arrested 5 year old kids. Cars are eating our ethanol food. Nature is dying. Their shit is heating the planet. Everything we said is truth – but somehow at the end there will be a ‘rapture’ a solution different from the solution of those cycles – war and extinction of life.
The obvious conclusion is that as the process of degradation of human societies increases its tempo, humans become less free in thought and action, closer to the robots that are going to displace them, as it is happening now in Amazon, where the last workers of logistics are warped up with wrists that guide its motions as robots do, and soon will be also substituted by them. THE GUARDIAN though will have pundits NONE OF WHICH will even insinuate that there are simple legal solutions and our extinction is not needed to provide the essential newspeak of the day: we shall live like idle children in a paradise of infotainment because the Earth will also become an exception and suddenly stop its processes of darwinian evolution, our elites will become empathic and enlightened, war will end and the billions of robotic armies stored in our arsenals will have no use beyond providing huge profits to its company-mothers.
So we must add a fourth ‘element’ to EVOLUTION as it is, SYSTEMS SCIENCES as the Solution, and the Block of time, of mankind as a social organism, whose ages if information is NOT controlled are determined by the laws of ‘aging’ and ‘death’ by excess of information proper of all organisms (hence its predictability) – the NEWSPEAK THAT PASSES AS SOCIAL SCIENCE and merely is a very sophisticated, increasingly complex camouflage, a make up of the corpse of mankind to keep all humans inhibited of any reaction to the process that must pass as automatic, unavoidable and the only path or else IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH YOU ARE COMMITING A THOUGHTCRIME, as I did in the Guardian.
So let us do more thoughtcrimes against the ‘Guardians’ of political and economic correctness by daring to defend a ‘real’ future for the human kind, focusing now in the real social sciences of humanity – the biological description of our social super organisms and the ‘cure’ to the sickness of humanity.