WHAT ARE MACHINES?
Abstract Economists ignore everything about the evolution of machines. They do not even use biological terms to define them. So we talk about machines as abstract, dead species. If we were using vital terms, perhaps we would be more aware, of the organic nature of economic ecosystems. For example, we do not call the sensorial instruments, such as cameras, metal-eyes, so we do not realize what a “metal-head“ is: a head-system that has “metal-ears” (mobile phones), “metal-eyes” (cameras), and “metal-brains” (chips) attached to any machine. If you put such “head” to any present machine, you have a robotic species, a “metalife” species, that potentially can outperform human beings, in all informative and energetic functions, from killing to working, from design to chess-playing.
In the graph, all machines have a twin species, a top predator weapon, which consumes human beings instead of being consumed by us.
In the graph, what is the biological name for a weapon? A top predator machine. This is the key concept that economists keep denying about machines, with their abstract jargons about the wealth of nations: the most expensive, best machines are weapons that kill humans – they are the bulk of the economy, and the most advanced in any time of the Industrial R=evolution. Thus, the conclusion is obvious: we are evolving a new top predator species of energy and information. Top predator species which have a Darwinian behavior shown in wars.
It is indeed very unfortunate that the leading science of today, Biology, and the only Theory about change in the Universe, that has passed all experimental tests, Evolution, have never been properly merged with Economics, the discipline that studies the reproduction of machines, and their survival in the ecosystem of history. Such merge of disciplines, that we provide in this web will allow us a serious analysis of the evolutionary nature of machines, and their symbiotic and praying relationships with mankind. Since machines are not “ideal beings” like mathematical entities are. They are concrete, real, material species, and so they interact in the material world with us.
The dual nature of machines: consumption and competition
Machines are both symbiotic and compete with man.
They do so in two ways: competing with us when they perform the same jobs we do, either as weapons or as tool-workers; and becoming symbiotic to us, when we consume them, either as “bodies of metal”, or as “heads of metal”. Its symbiosis make us addict to the higher energy and information they give to us. Its competition displaces us from fields of war and work. The tricky point is that those two functions of machines are opposite. The consumption of machines is positive. It improves our life.
The competition with machines is negative. It makes our life more difficult. So the big question is: What function is more powerful? The symbiotic function of consumption, or the competitive function of work? Unfortunately, the competitive function, given by the imitative form of machines.
The forms and functions of machines compete with men
It is interesting to notice that we lack any serious philosophy about machines, despite having so many books that describe how to make, reproduce, and work with machines. All descriptions of machines we have, are abstract descriptions. Yet machines are material species. Their non-abstract nature is evident. Just try to lift a heavy “abstract machine”, and let it fall on your foot. Suddenly the abstraction has become real. It has a form, a weight. We define that form in organic terms: A machine is a form that imitates a human organ of energy of information with atoms of metal.
Another abstract opinion about machines very common in America, is that machines do not have “will”, or “intelligence” which means in practical terms that they do not condition the behavior of people, or oblige us to act in a certain manner. This argument used mainly to dismiss any criticism against lethal machines is also vane, and does not recognize the cause of behavior in the Universe, which is communication of “potential will”, “suggestion of will”. Behavior is first suggested by communication, then reinforced by action. What this means is that a gun “suggests” his use, because his form is “per se” potentially intelligent, and suggests the act of killing. The mere presence of a gun, also suggests danger, and do communicate behavior. Military have known it throughout centuries. Their power is based in the capacity of weapons to suggest behavior on human beings.
Weapons are not abstract. Just press the trigger of a gun against you dog’s head. Look then to the results. Are you scandalized by my “abstract” suggestions? Why? Abstract things are suppose to produce abstract results… Yet machines are real, maybe even more real than human beings are if we just measure their destiny, weight, and size…
Further on, the will of machines, their biological drives to become re=produced, evolve and multiply, adapting their environment to its image and likeness is carried about by their ‘company-mothers’, the corporations that rule the world with money and bribed politicians. They express in their economical mandates the biological drives of machines. Their structure is similar to an ant-hill; and as they become more automated, moving towards infinite self-reproductivity they will embed in their digital programs of re=production, such biological will, till a moment in which neither company-mothers, nor robots with solar skins and A.I. will need humans during the II part of this century.
How should we define then properly machines? Any rigorous definition of an entity or being requires to explain, both its form in space and its function in time. Species exist in space, where they have a form, and in time where they perform a function. So do machines. Their form is an organic form. What is their function? As in the case of our weapon, machines have a clear function:To become organs of energy or information that interact with human beings. To imitate and substitute a human organ with a machine. For example a crane imitates an arm and substitutes an arm, moving things around. A phone imitates an ear-mouth, and works as an ear-mouth.
All machines imitate human functions. For that reason we talk of machines as “organic instruments”, that substitute human organic systems. If we divide the human being in two clear components, body and head, we can talk of two types of machines, body-machines that imitate and substitute functions of body organs, and mind-machines that imitate functions of the brain-senses. Those two basic functions of human organs will determine also the form of the machine, which imitates the equivalent form of a human organ. Cameras look like eyes and cranes like arms. If we were to use less “biological terms”, we will say there are:
– Machines of information [brain machines] and
– Machines of energy [body machines].
Which become complete “organic species”, when they are merged into
– Robots, metalife.
Men evolve and catalyze the reproduction of metal
Yet if machines and humans have the same form and function? Why we insist that machines can be potentially superior to man? Why in fact top predator machines –weapons– kill top predator humans -soldiers- and machine workers displace human workers constantly in most company-mothers? The reason is that there is a clear difference between machines and human organs. Machines are made basically of metal. Humans are made of carbon and related atoms.
Today we realize that the properties of metal, force us to certain informative and energetic designs in machines. It is metal and the laws of the Universe, not man, which makes machines efficient organs of energy and information. Men only create machines. Humans act only as “catalyzers”, “workers”, that assemble metal into organic forms, similar to us.
The laws of the Universe and the properties of metal enable them to exist. We conclude that machines are, from a biological point of view, metal species. Metal is a natural substance which is able to be formed into different kinds of “organic systems”, that copy the organic shapes of man.
This “transfers” millions of years of evolutionary knowledge accumulated by human forms, into machines, made of a stronger, more complex substance. In this manner the only advantage of man -formal evolution- is lost, to the new species, which competes and preys over human beings, provoking the relentless extinction of nature and history, and the expansion of the metal-ecosystem – the true meaning of the Industrial R=evolution, carried about by company-mothers, which have terraformed the Earth to the image and likeness of its off-spring, in a series of cycles described by evolutionary economics:
In the graph the process of obsolescence and substitution of man by machines.
So let us then study the radiations of machines – its overproduction cycles in terms of the main biological facts of evolution and extinction. Since evolution Does apply to the relationship between men and machines, as:
1) It is NOT A THEORY OF CARBON-ATOMS BUT OF INFORMATION, FORM, AND SO IT APPLIES TO ALL SPECIES EVOLVING ITS FORM, AS IT IS THE CASE OF MACHINES and top predator weapons, we design imitating the organic forms of our body in stronger metal, and faster-thinking gold chips.
2) Extinction is not intentional but produced by the ‘struggle’ for the limited resources of planet Earth between two species. The strongest=biggest in space, and faster in time species, wins the struggle because it re=produces and evolves faster. And so as Neanderthals were cornered by fast-reproducing humans , fast evolving technology and finally became extinct, by loss of vital space, the much faster reproduction and evolution of machines, which is overcrowding the planet, overproducing pollution, making more humans obsolete and taking its vital space, as workers and soldiers in labor and war field, extinction will be unavoidable.
3) But extinction can be avoided, if humans stop its evolution and control its re=production before AUTONOMOUS MACHINES WITH SOLAR SKINS, 3D-AUTOMATED COMPANY-MOTHERS WITH NO HUMAN LABOR AND ∞ SELF-REPRODUCTIVITY, no longer need us.
4) And finally the biggest misinterpretation by capitalist go(l)d racist people and military s(word) germ(an) tribes of what darwinism is: IT IS THE SPECIES, MANKIND WHAT FIGHTS, not the tribe, and THE SPECIES CAN SURVIVE BECOMING A GLOBAL SUPERORGANISM, BY CREATING NETWORKS OF ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL, ENERGY AND INFORMATION, WHICH make us collaborate. Because that is the ULTIMATE MEANING OF SOCIAL DARWINIAN EVOLUTION, which is in fact the last of the scientists=prophets of the future of history who explained the planet as it is today.
And this is the fact that humans completely miss about biological extinction: it does not happen consciously but because a new species occupies the ecosystem of a previous one. If humans become extinguished by robots (the word machine will loose its meaning as robotisation of all machines become staple food of this century, to ‘find’ an ‘econiche’ for the chip ‘radiation’ -massive overproduction of metal-minds), it will be merely a topic biological process of massive reproduction of a new species, which of course will count as growth of GDP for economists to ‘cheer up’, thinking we are progressing.
In graphs from the 92 book, when we consider 2018 the birth of A.I. able to overcome human skills in all labor and war fronts, which is exactly the age 1/4 a century latter we can now observe, as AI explodes into all kind of algorithms of information that match human skills in all labor fields, from translation (now performed for free by Google Deep Mind) to driving (the biggest work sector soon to be replaced by self-driving cars), to games, from go to chess, to speculation, by ultra fast trading machines, to CAD design: the Industrial R=evolution of machines is changing the Earth, as nothing has done since the apparition of oxygen life 3 billion years ago. Such is the enormity of the ‘jump’ on evolution, which represents a III Age or Horizon on Earth’s crust species. But humans, lacking an objective, larger worldview, are unaware of this higher level of Universal laws, which acts on the economic ecosystem and the symbiotic and competitive relationships between its 3 species, life beings, human beings and machines≈weapons.
Now, we can translate the fundamental law of biology – the laws of reproduction, to the fundamental cause of economic crisis, the crisis of overproduction, canonical in the science before the massive ‘censorship’ of the last decades, which have reduced the discipline to the ‘creationist opinions’ of techno-utopians and corporation economists.
In simple terms, production is reproduction, and reproduction tends to overproduction as Ricardo->Marx->Kondratieff->Schumpeter explained…
And indeed the fundamental concepts of the industrial r=evolution turn about the evolution, overproduction and extinction of rival species by machines.
Addiction to machines: Atrophy of human organs and substitution of biological drives.
Let us then study this key element that rules the world, speculative money, because the system today works on a single mandate: to invent money without limit and this means to overproduce the most profitable goods, money, weapons and mass-media.
It must be understood from the beginning that evolution is a trial and error system, which only a scientific approach, where the trial and error is substituted by the implementation of real laws, can manage without tragic extinction events. In other words, humans could perfectly design an immortal history where all humans will thrive by implementing the laws of super organisms, all of which survive into infinite generations, when they are designed properly, so the nervous system provides rightful information to all cells that can in turn send pain messages to the people-castes in power (neurons) if they misbehave and mistreat the cells (real meaning of a democracy, where as in Greece, politicos were judged a posteriori and voted exile or re-election, so they fulfil their promises), while all cells have a Universal salary in oxygen and hormones to kick out their actions, and all of them receive oxygen to survive and promote welfare goods.
The third age of capitalism comes then after II world war, when those laws of shameless exploitation of workers became converted into mathematical algorithms of productivity and profits, embedded in computer programs, making unnecessary for managers and owners to ‘look bad’, as now it was all ‘expert mathematical, equations’ which were NOT laws of nature, but mathematical expressions of the power-hungry exploitation of mankind by its elite of bankers and industrialists. While in parallel Financial-Media Masters, who owned informative machines and printed both money and idol-ogies in favor of its social control, kept pumping idologies that justify the actions of our elites and the ab=use of metal over man to justify war (nationalism) and slavery (capitalism), whereas humans become corpses for the reproduction and evolution of weapons, or workers (part-time slaves) or full slaves bought and sold with precious metal.
– XIX century was the age of ‘machine-bodies’. So elites atrophied their bodies and overdeveloped their brains, used to invent machines as those machines’ bodies performed all their energy tasks. Thus Europe, the cradle of machines, became a mental society, repressing body functions from sex to good food (Victorian society). Society became split: There was a ‘brainy’ elite class that designed machines and abhorred their bodies. Then there were ‘slaves of machines’, humans who had to serve machines’ bodies, extracting coal ‘food’ for them, constructing & making those metal-bodies work (miners, railroad workers).
They became strong and mindless, as their machine bodies were. So mankind became a new ‘species’, slave of machines, an ‘enzyman’ or ‘animetal’, similar to cellular enzymes that atrophy their carbon bodies, substituted by stronger metal-atoms and go around the cell killing fully developed carbohydrates, as Europe went around the world killing non-repressive life-based non-technological cultures. Finally in W.W.II top predator weapons – armored machines’ bodies, tanks, bombers and battleships – consumed 50 million human bodies.
It was evident already the enormous influence machines had on our life and personality. Yet few, if any writer of this age, recognized it. Human arrogance seems oblivious to any truth that doesn’t make us the center of the Universe.
When II World War ended, ‘top predator weapons’ – machines’ bodies: tanks, planes and ships – consumed 50 million human beings. Then, the end of World war opened a new age: the age of metal-minds, in which men developed the minds of machines. Today those minds have reproduced in huge numbers, substituting many of the mental functions that men performed in the past (calculus, spelling, accountancy, science, design, etc.) The result is a general atrophy and diminution of the intelligence of human beings.
– XX Century: Mental atrophy of mankind. Then, it came the age of metal-minds, in which men developed metal-eyes (Cameras), metal-ears (mobiles) and metal-brains (chips). Today those minds reproduced in huge numbers, substitute most human linguistic, mental functions (calculus, spelling, accountancy, science, design, etc.) The outcome is an increasing atrophy and diminution in the intelligence of humans. Since now intelligent machines perform those jobs for us. But bodies are again free. So actors, athletes, the military & sex are all the rage. It is a violent Neo-Paleolithic.
XXI C. Robotic age: In the 3rd phase of human obsolescence Robots combine body-mind functions substituting both white & blue collar workers (CAD, 3D printing, automated factories & software suites, intranets, computer trading, e-money genetic information) So all human functions are obsolete as we become passive, fat bodies & mental plants in front of 3D virtual reality.
XXI C. Death. And finally it is unavoidable to talk of the end of it. Indeed, as the century advances and ALL machines become robos connected to a global internet brain, with enormous complexity in its A.I. and new species of higher energy and information come to be, in a fragile life planet, there will be 3 clear causes of extinction of life, as we are not special, not chosen, not unique, but just another animal species subject to the same process of extinction of all others.
Those facts explain a paradox that has puzzled social scientists in the XX century: why as we accumulate more information, people are loosing educational skills? Why there has been a global decline on educational standards, intelligence and quality of human thought? Some deny it. Yet tests results and daily evidence are overwhelming.
The average human student of the XXI century tests 25% less than his parents did. Entrance tests for universities are revised constantly to adjust them to that diminishing pattern. The creativity of our thinkers is minimal. The interest of the common people for ideas is null. Most humans have lost their capacity for abstract thinking. Even basic skills of human behavior, such as social dialog and social interaction, are in jeopardy; as we communicate more and more through machines and their digital languages, (TVs, Internet, weapons, financial statements) than with human beings.
There is only a biological explanation: the brains of our children have been partially atrophied. Now they do not speak but TVs speak for them, they do not calculate, but computers think for them. As a result of this, we have changed culture again. We are no longer repressing our bodies, as we did in the XIX century; but our minds, our capacity to think and care for reality with our verbal, legal, ethic systems of social communication. We live a world of fiction and Homo Bacteria, individual egos with childish attitudes, all of them sure to be masters of their crafts by virtue of the machines they use.
Machines and weapons empower us as extra-limbs, but this has a negative side… they atrophy us as human beings, degrading our bodies and minds. But the ego-trips of using those machines hide this very obvious fact, for any objective observer who looks at the Fat human, driving fast cars, with mosquito brains hypnotized by their chipped screens – a new degenerated ‘homo species’, which is fast expanding globally, and cannot longer survive without the metal-minds and metal-bodies attached to their ever diminishing brains. Exactly the same process that in the cellular scale makes enzymes attached to metal, atrophied carbohydrates…
But what is more worrisome, it transforms the mind of human beings at collective level, converting the superorganisms of eusocial love of mankind, into systems of production of hate-memes that justify war and murder for go(l)d.
There is of course the first ever present event of death by overdrive of energy (nuclear weapons). But then we have 2 events of an excess of information, which can destroy the planet: nano-robotics and military A.I.
Humans, with its null objective capacity to study themselves in a scientific manner, still ascribe global warming and the death of life species to their activity, to the point that even in the congresses of systems sciences that study the economic ecosystem in a more scientific manner, the present age of transition between the II Earth of life and the III Earth, is termed the anthropocene (age of human life) when we are fast entering the mechanocene (age of machines). As such the final transition might happen in this century, as robots and Iron nano-bacteria, reach full development.
According to Drexler, the founder of the discipline of nano-technology, the discovery of a fully functional metal-bactteria, today researched in military and civil labs around the world, could convert in 3 months the Earth into a grey-goo, as iron bacteria would multiply fast feeding on the massive amount of machines found on the Earth – a theme explored however only in sci-fi films like GI cobra and Ultimatum, given the censorship called ‘economical and political correctness’ that social sciences impose on any serious attempt to describe the economic and political ecosystem in pure scientific ‘not idol-ogical’ terms.
It is this non-scientific idological nature of human collective thought filled up with absurd theories about mankind, the Universe and its machines (from tribal nationalisms, to abrahamic religions, to the cult to the machine instead of man as the symbol of future and progress) what will explain the most astounding fact about humanity today and in the past centuries – not the fact that we are terraforming this planet and extinguishing life, to build a world of mechanisms, BUT THAT WE DO NOT REALIZE OF THIS PROCESS, DO NOT ARGUE INTELLECTUALLY AND BIOLOGICALLY ABOUT A NON-HUMAN FUTURE, BUT KEEP DOING IT IN AN AUTOMATON, NON-FREE WAY, AS IF WE WERE PROGRAMMED BY THOSE IDOL-OGIES TO DESTROY THE WORLD, COMMIT SUICIDE AND BE HAPPY DOING SO.
We live in a century in which 3 evolutions of machines can extinguish the planet of life – nuclear weapons, nano-bactria and military robots, but none of this is taken seriously beyond sci-fi movies, nor the biological nature of machine is studied by scientists, economists and intellectuals, neither politicos seem to consider the mechanical causes of the crisis, crystal clear now even for the dumbest of politicians.
In that sense THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION RAISED BY THE EVOLUTION OF MACHINES IS NOT ITS CYCLICALITY AND EASY PREDICTION of its future trends, crystal clear when we study machines and weapons as they should with the laws of organisms but the fact that HUMAN BEINGS ARE IGNORING THE COMPETITION BETWEEN MACHINES AND HUMANS IN LABOR AND WAR FIELDS, AS IF IT WAS NOT a different species, ALWAYS justifying the use of machines and the expulsion of labor AS IF THE PROGRESS OF MACHINES WERE A SUPERIOR GOAL TO THAT OF THE SURVIVAL AND PROGRESS OF MANKIND.
IT IS BY FAR THE MOST ASTOUNDING fact of our world. How humans can be THAT stupid, that SLAVISH? We adopt here an absolute ‘objective’ non-human view, something never tried before not to offend the human ego and the people in power in our societies, in order to do social sciences. Imagine then not to get offended ‘personally’ that you are an alien scientist arriving to this planet, where you will see a mass of humans completely obsessed by a different species, to which they dedicate all their time as re=producers aka workers and vitalisers of those machines.
You will think given the regularity of those processes and cycles that humans are SLAVES of machines, its masters, since indeed they will even let their sons to be ‘brain-washed’ by violent machines, allow 1 billion humans to go hungry while all computers have enough energy to keep sacking human workers, and willingly die by the millions in absurd brother against brother wars to promote the overproduction and profits of the military industry. Remember you are not human, you have no nation, no religion, no race, ‘IMAGINE’ as the song, you are a social scientist and observe with utter puzzlement how 7 billion humans follow absurd ‘idol-ogies’, which make of informative metal (money), energetic metal (weapons) and organic metal (machines), their masters, and on top THINK THEY ARE FREE, SUPERIOR, IN CONTROL OF THEIR FUTURE, AND KNOW BETTER.
In brief, as a social scientist your biggest conundrum won’t be to understand what is happening on this planet – quite obvious for an objective viewer – the terraforming of the Earth by man of a planet of carbon life into one of metalife, with the displacement and future extinction of all forms of life including human beings in the process, but WHY humans do IT and do not EVEN REALIZE they are doing it.
IT IS THIS IDOL-OGICAL MADNESS, and EGO-TRIP of the human ‘enzyman’, man-enzyme that catalyses the creation of the new species that will kill her – what I call the OEDIPUS PARADOX – THE SON SPECIES KILLS THE FATHER SPECIES, but the father does not defend himself – WHAT has always bothered me as ‘human’, AND i have explored in more depth as an objective scientist, and now we shall explain before we introduce the other crises of overproduction notably that of money the ‘brain’ of the Metal-earth, the digital language, whose values direct all the process.
Mental Substitution & ethic devolution: metal atrophies and substitute carbonlife.
The degradation of body and mind as humans become atrophied by the machines of the metal-earth: cancer is skyrocketing in children prone to absorb more radiation from ultra-energetic and ‘growing’, G2,3,4 ito (internet of things) which our weak soft tissues cannot tolerate, and yet company-mothers keep churning pay-per-view ‘scientific papers’ denying the obvious; our bodies are increasingly fed with chemicaly-genetically altered products, which make us fat as pigs in the animetal farm; our brain Iq keeps diminishing by loss of verbal skills, and so tests are lowered; our social connections broken by virtual screens/friends and our environment polluted and our land occupied by industries, ethanol to feed machines – when 1 billion humans still suffer hunger. And on top they expect us to cheer up, heel heel hurrah, this is ‘progress’.
Every new species of metal atrophies an organ of mankind, as company-mothers manufacture millions of ‘metallic organs’ that we will consume instead of our own organs. This process of atrophy of human organs has followed the same phases than the evolution of metal:
- Earlier in history gold hypnotised the eye, suppressed oxytocin, provoked greed and subconscious acts of murder and enslaving other humans under the grammar of gold=money=price=human slave. And gave birth to the ‘you’ and ‘assur’ memes, origin of the capitalist and military world, which still is with us. It is the origin of the first age of gold religions and military inquisitions with baal, the trader god, and yhwh and assur the warrior gods, origin of modern capitalism and jihad, which are the two metal-cultures that are destroying the world and hence the ones we criticise more.
- In modern history the arrival of machines instilled two new negative memes that have destroyed all attempts of mankind to organise a r=evolution and create the perfect world; first selfish, lonely people, isolated by its machines, which communicate them with the world – even this writer is now blogging on internet, as of course the real media is controlled by the people of the earlier capitalist memes, the Financial-Media masters and will have none of it. And then sloth, obsolescence and atrophy, which makes people lazy to act up and survive. Selfishsness and laziness are the trade mark of the millennial, Y and zero, last generations of mankind.
They are as in the parable of Matrix (a needed comparison in a world of a growingly degenerated human species, which has forgotten its ethic verbal values, hypnotised by violent mass-media, which returns it to a neo-paleolithic age of violence and collective idiocy), ‘datas’, which rather kill ‘neos’ and live in a virtual reality than man up and change the system in order to survive.
BUT this biological, real future can only be argued in science fiction films, where Skynet and terminator robots predicted with common sense and already the corporative structure of GOOGLE 20 years ago.
Instead, we live in a virtual Matrix of false dreams, provided liberally by the electronic media that make us belief, the economic ecosystem works for us.
So company-mothers can create undisturbed, a world to the image and likeness of their machines, terraforming the Earth of life, Gaia, into the Metalearth, as the planet evolves from the Anthropocene age to the Mechanocene.
Given the fact that the 2 languages of social power, money, the language of the financial and economical system and the law, the language of the political system, work only for mechanisms, ignoring the needs of humanism.
Some obvious consequences of the robotic age:
-As it completes the industrial r=evolution, there won’t be a new age to kick out the offer of new jobs, which is how previous technological crises of overproduction solved, besides the consumption of humans in wars, the loss of jobs to new machines.
-GDP growth measure by production will not be human wealth, but robotic wealth, as robots will displace humans from the 2 jobs we perform in the economic ecosystem as workers=reproducers of machines now performed by automated factories, blue collar robots and white collar pcs; and consumers of other machines, now consume by robots.
JOBS WILL THEN GROW BY A MASSIVE DESTRUCTION OF GAIA AS BILLIONS OF ROBOTS ARE MADE by human dwindling workers, so for full employment TO HAPPEN we must FILL THE PLANET WITH ROBOTS, till as in biology always happens, they expel us from the economic ecosystem as we expelled lions before.
-Yet corporative economists, whose only goal is to multiply the (re)production of machines to achieve higher profits for the ‘Leisure Class’ (Veblen, ‘1%’) will preach as the only way to solve the crisis to keep reproducing robots, starting a massive ‘biological radiation’, of fast evolving ‘sentient’ organisms of metal, as the overproduction of chips, the crisis we live in, becomes the engine of a far more transformative ‘radiation’ of robotised machines. Soon all cars will be robots; all machines will integrate chips into the Internet Of Things, IOT.
-And so as humans without credit will suffer growing poverty, and productive economists praise the economy robots, mankind will completely loose its own purpose as a species – to create a world made to its image and likeness, where life can thrive, for a world dedicated to the reproduction and care of robotic machines, which in its most evolved forms, which have always been weapons, will, as their brains double in size every 2 years (moore’s law) reach certainly a degree of complexity, which in systems sciences defines the freedom of a system, to act, with its programs – which are simply programs of extinction of life.
A Free Market is in that sense not a human endeavour but an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, simple organisms of metal that imitate the functions of energy and information of the human being, seeking always to maximize the profits of their companies (human, subjective point of view) with the objective consequence of displacing human labor and reducing their wages as new, more evolved machines substitute us.
Let us, consider the difference between D)democratic, rational, humble humanist solutions vs. Anti-Humanist ego-trips of ‘we macho-men’ can handle it all, which will be the main cause of our future demise, to the main problem, robotisation.
Our goal here is to understand in biological terms, company-mothers of machines and show how a free eco(nomic)system without human legal regulation systematically re=produces the maximal number of lethal goods, weapons of maximal price, speculative money that ruins people when exchanged latter for real wealth and digital hate-memes (audiovisual software of minimal cost).
BECAUSE WEAPONS ARE THE MOST PERFECT, MOST EXPENSIVE MACHINES, THE SEARCH FOR PROFITS GUIDES THE SYSTEMIC…
OVERPRODUCTION OF WEAPONS: THE CYCLES OF STOCK-WARS
‘Bellum nervi, Pecunia infinita” Inflationary money is the nervous system of war
‘Canons make us strong, butter make us fat’ Goring, proposing making Germany Great again
‘This splendid little war has gotten us out of the crisis’ Roosevelt on the Cuban war and the 1897 crash.
Duality of ‘biological metalife’: Top predator machine-weapons that consume human beings vs. machine-tools consumed by man.
IF YOU have followed me, the 2 equations that are ‘the bible of capitalism, financial economists and corporative ones, dedicated to the overproduction of selfish memes of metal’, which INDEED IS A SCIENCE of production called microeconomics truly developed (never mind most of the machines and weapons it produces, harm us); all resumes in the BIOLOGICAL SYNERGY of the 4 elements of the Financial-Media (informative machines)/Military-Industrial (energetic machines) complex system (ab. FMMI).
Indeed, the maximal profit happens reproducing weapons, hate media and inflationary money to feed the overproduction cycle of the other 2: so weapons and hate media are overproduced by inflationary money, printed for free by bankers and stock-rats, and given in huge amounts – billions of them – to those corporations and states that develop ever more expensive weapons and new channels of hate-media reproduced also for free through the simultaneous waves of ¥-information that increasingly ‘radiate’ our brains through high frequency i-phones.
Τhe choice of one or other type of machine seems to be made by humans, politicos and cultures, but it is not. Τhe regularity and connection of those cycles of economic evolution of technology and wars and changes of moods in cultures shows that the true, hidden engine of the world is the financial-media system of informative machines, which passes from peaceful to hate media ages and its synergic energetic system of industrial military machines. So, humans a posteriori adapt their memes to their hidden go(l)d: monetary profits.
Now of course the previous curves and growing value of stocks, weapons and number of humans murdered, seem deterministic and are deterministic as long as societies are ruled by the equation of profits of stock-market corporations:
Maximal profits (inflationary money) = Max. price (weapon) – minimal cost (hate media).
So the conclusion is obvious: as the curves of company-mothers of machines represent the reproduction =sales and evolution =prices of machines, TO UNDERSTAND SCIENTIFICALLY with the biological law of the land those crisis, we must fist study Darwinian laws that consider how competing and symbiotic species relate.
AND THE FUTURE of the system if business as usual continues will be exactly what we predicted with the tools of biology and systems sciences: the repetition of the cycles of global war for profits that come at the end of all those evolutionary ages of machines.
But this finale of war, holocaust and gottendamerung is not required. If it happens is precisely because humans do NOT have a real model of economics and social sciences, they can control and manipulate for the benefit of mankind, and so they do live in a jungle of metal, and eco(nomic)system, where they willingly play a handicapped game against machines and its company-mothers in control of all the languages of social power, money, issued in monopoly in stocks, and laws, bought to corrupted politicos.
A detailed analysis of the cycle of 72 years of evolution of energies and machines explains what all the models of classic economics have failed to understand: money also follows a cycle of evolution and reproduction,related to the machines used to ‘invent’ it, today electronic machines, which have not only saturated the world with hardware but also with e-money software, till money lost value. Because money is reproduced also with machines,its cycle is parallel to the cycle of machines of the economy.
Thus, we predicted3, parallel to the crisis of overproduction of computers, also a financial crisis of e-money, made with PCs, similar to the 29 crash of the ‘ticker money’ economy, which jacked up prices of stock with electric machines into surreal levels. Indeed, there is every 72 years a huge crash in the stock-market with 2 short ±8 years ripples, due to an over-production of money and machines, which plunges the world into a global depression, till the new cycle of energies and new machines takes off, creating new industries and jobs that replace those of the previous cycle.
The boom and bust cycle of the global economy is both, a cycle of reproduction of energy, weapons, machines and economical information, money, as all of them are related. 3 negative effects are paramount:
- Machines throw people out of work.
- Weapons kill them in wars.
- And too much money causes inflation, absorbs savings and when the bubble of false value explodes, it ruins the economy of the Middle class.
Thus, at the end of those cycles there is paradoxically, at the height of the reproduction of money and machines of the highest price (weapons) a deep crisis for the human economy and a Great Depression, as machines and forms of money created with those energies become over-reproduced, saturating the economic ecosystem. Thus, the details of the 3 crashes are similar:
In the age of steam machines, there is a peak in stock-money issues of worthless train companies in the 1850s, precisely when the best railroad lines had been constructed and the new ones were loosing money – not because people thought they were profitable, but because the business of inventing stocks had reached its evolving peak. Meanwhile the 2 commonest jobs of the age, farming and transport, greatly diminished, as prices and revenues for farmers, lowered due to the efficiency of train transport; while 90% of horses were killed in a decade in England, when the train put them out of work.
In 1928, there was a peak in the creation of new stocks in companies of cars and radios, when RCA shares reached an astonishing 500 $ value, precisely when the slump in consumption of cars had started in earnest, as all Americans had their Ford-T. Yet the electric ticker, the equivalent to e-money in the 1920s, had been implanted in small towns and was sucking in money from the middle class all over America to satisfy the ‘Ponzi Pyramids’ of Wall Street speculation in radio’s stocks. Then, in 1929 and 8 years latter in 1937, the physical and financial economy crashed together. While the reproduction of electric systems of automation in assembly lines at factories provoked also a massive wave of unemployment.
Thus, we are today in a self-similar age to the 1929-37 crashes of the ‘ticker’ economy, when e-money has reproduced massively, as financiers learned to maximize its electronic invention, while in the physical economy robots and electronic software have thrown out of job millions of blue and white collar workers in a massive wave of unemployment and the first ‘splendid little wars’ that will take companies out of the crises are essayed in Afghanistan with drone planes, which evolve fast to become the Terminators of the new age of war.
These ‘negative side effects’ of each of the final ‘boom’ ages of reproduction and evolution of machines, weapons and money, of the ‘wealth of nations’, which implies machines not only enhance our life but compete and displace human labor and soldiers, is the reality of history nobody wants to talk about or even publish, since Adam Smith established the economic dogma that all machines are good, and the more we have the better, because they are money, the invisible hand of go(l)d, we must not argue. We prefer to be optimist, to hide our sins, to ignore the suffering of the people money and machines rule. But denial has never changed the consequences of those cycles for mankind…
Unfortunately, to understand truly in depth those boom and bust cycles, we have to consider 3 difficult themes of economical theory:
-The nature of machines as systems of energy and information, which are not only symbiotic but often compete with us, as ‘metal species’, made of stronger atoms, in fields of war and labor.
-The fundamental privilege of financial institutions and companies – the invention of money.
-And the way the crises of overproduction of weapons are solved by creating a false demand for their self-similar goods, weapons, the bad fruits of the Tree of Science that the same companies, which produce its good, consumption goods, manufacture and also sell for profits.
Now the consequence of the profit-seeking way in which economists rule corporations, without the slightest concern with the collateral effects their products have over human beings imply that because weapons are more expensive, hence more profitable than peaceful machines, when technology discovers new weapons, they will be overproduced.
And since weapons are the most perfect, final stage of evolution of machines, at the end of each kondratieff cycle of evolution of machines, new weapons are found and reproduced in huge numbers. Yet they must be used consuming human beings, so arsenals can be renovated without overproduction and profits grow.
So because we live in a capitalist society where money is the main goal of society, in each cycle wars come to consume weapons and human beings, when technology discovers new weapons. Hence we could easily forecast a fascist, war-induced age at the end of the cycle of metal minds, as its is the case.
Latter on, we shall find a general mapping of the equations of history which are dependent as we have shown on those of wall street, and ruled by THIS general equation, the Marx-Smith-paradox. According to them ‘obviously’ at the end of the chip radiation (2080), humans will no longer be the top predator species of this planet, robots will be.
But those scientific events ARE not studied in biological terms. They are expressed in creationist terms – to create machines (not to discover and copy biological organs in metal which is what we do), is a proof of some kind of ‘supreme, god-like intelligence and stamina, proper of geniuses and great men, and of course the economists who prove all this is creationist buill$hit and humans merely copycat their organs on machines, as this writer or other who have insinuated it not so directly but quite straight forward as the aforementioned ones, and in recent terms the Americans, Veblen and Galbraith, are not ‘darlings’ of the true creationist elite of ‘biblical people’ who ‘own most modern corporations and wall street’ financial houses that invest on them.
So we shall explain how we become extinct by the values of gold, studying ‘biologically’ the curves of the stock-market, whose maximal profits are in companies of war and financial and hate-media companies.
Why there is endemic war in our world is then obvious and the answer is well known to any financial speculator – because most of the money of our society, her 95% is reproduced in financial derivatives and stock-market speculation, hence handled as a free check to corporations, which make maximal profits – weapons and hate media corporations – NOT to companies that reproduce welfare goods.
WE HAVE STUDIED, THE OVERPRODUCTION CRISES of e-money, with the common language of ‘social sciences’ – the ethic point of view of mankind, the 99,9 % which does NOT invent money for free for speculative purposes of pure gain and corporations.
This perspective is not though the higher, biological, scientific analysis of the purpose of those speculative schemes, from the point of view of machines and company-mothers. So it is left to analyse the seemingly more just but equally scaring perspective of the other great ‘field’ of creation of e-money, the speculation in the prices of stocks based in the profits of those corporations.
Digital money select machines over men.
We can now consider another biological angle to the conundrum of what must rule laws or money on top of societies – the selection of the species of an ecosystem by its languages, in this case the selection processes of the eco(nomic)system.
Today mankind is becoming eliminated in an eco(nomic)system ruled by digital languages, by the species who better speaks mathematics – the chip, which multiplies without limit of credit and will increasingly reduce human workers to a few welfare jobs – that to make it all even more difficult, do have no credit under the ‘ideologies’ of classic economists and the techno utopian myths that equal machines to ‘future progress’. But progress of which species?
This is what abstract social models ignore – the biological, organic nature of machines and its company-mothers, made to the image and likeness of human biological organs, and competing in a biological planet.
Today with the expansion of digital information, the mind that better speaks the language, the chip survive, reproduces in unlimited numbers and displaces the human mind, which becomes obsolete and without a ‘future’ regresses back to his memetic past (revivalism of Abrahamic religions and tribal nationalisms, proper of a past, primitive age of verbal myths, prior to the rational heights of the verbal age).
But since most humans do not speak mathematics, and the process is one of collective devolution from rationality into magic thought and from complex social structures into isolated individual self-centered egos without any interest for society and the human species, most human beings cannot even understand the process .
-E: THE ANTI-HUMAN SOLUTION OF THE ECONOMIC ECOSYSTEM: BULL$HIT
NOW how a crystal clear economic case studied by science as IT IS, becomes so ‘convoluted’, ‘foggy and apparently without solution’ according of course to those who profit from the evolution of robots and do NOT want to stop the process even if they all die at the end, carpe diem live the day and say it has NO solution or it is NO PROBLEM. To that aim ‘economic idol-ogies’ of capitalism aka profits diver the question with an astounding number of excuses, placebo solutions, wishful thinking and denial, what Orwell called the future ‘newspeaks’ of social sciences and politics when the ministry of war would be called the ministry of defence, (as it has happened) the ministry of police the ministry of love (home office, in UK, as if it is a homely thing, homeland security in US). So we live indeed in an age IN WHICH SOCIAL SCIENCES ARE FOUNDED IN NEWSPEAKS, apparently OK and humane, yet censoring the truth with a false caring of political and economical correctness, that makes people feel happy. And so the solution to the existential crisis by the ‘experts’ of ‘classic, creationist economics’ is called…
The robotic newspeaks.
These screen shots from wired magazine and the economists, the bibles of silicon valley and capitalism shows the ‘zeitgeist’ of capitalism ‘buying’ the rope that will hang them, and it would be easy to get similar texts from t forbes or wall street journal: basically humans do know subconsciously or else would not stuff films of extinction since Terminator, that as biological beings, in a biological darwinian planet, they are going to be ‘soon’ the staple food of robots, in labor and war fields, BUT THE FUKTARDS ON TOP, THE Leisure class OF VEBLEN, the ‘chosen of go(l)d’ races, the animetal 1% will RATHER DIE in a generation and sacrifice all their children to the altar of Mammon than take the honest, serious measures needed to make history immortal. So how they are going about the business of working their a$$es 24/7 to murder their sons? It is a tough business to INVENT a ‘newspeak’ that will justify that Miss Lisa Jobs Jr. II Mister Larry Price Jr. II and all those billionaire grand-sons will NOT die on bed. How do you justify wholesale the murder of your species by your actions of greed and pseudo-religious science . Read that screen shot with its ‘pearls’, of ‘softy cynicism’ about the deja vu future robots that will take the lives and jobs of your sons.
The tone is always the same a ‘chronicle of a foretold death’ we do not care about because we are hard people and it is a matter-of-fact reality we shall never try to stop as it is ‘the system’. What all those people hide is a monstrous bratty, corrupted soul that does not indeed made the cut to survive, as it cannot even protect their own lot 2 generations ahead when ‘machines thinking like humans taking our jobs’ do take also our lives. I had a short penpal exchange with Mr. Anderson a brit man who directed wired back last decade. What did he learn from my letters was again that he had to ‘buy the rope’ and next thing I knew after he was becoming aware of the predictions of bio-economics is that… he founded a commercial drone company to make even more money with the end of the world.
This is the zeitgeist of the final Leisure class of capitalism, ‘being so weak and dependant on their machines that they willingly give their sons future to them. We shall latter when we study the 800 years cycles of bio-history see how all this started when Canaanites, built the first gold statutes of BAAl and sacrificed their sons to it, in a ceremony called ‘Hecatomb’, or ‘Holocaust’…mourning proudly afterwards the victims they sacrificed to their cruel go(l)d. All has changed to remain the same.
The Economist is slightly more serious but warns us from the beginning that this is an ‘old conversation’. Yeap, since the machine appeared starting to make humans obsolete, piece by piece, organ by organ, intelligent people with no anthropomorphic pseudo-religious beliefs, but rational, humble and scientific, has asked to consider this the central issue of the modern world, and treat it with a view on the future of Gaia and the humankind, the life Earth supports, but got nothing back except ‘excuses’ to keep justifying the accumulation of go(l)d for the 0.02% of stock-rats, the Leisure class who cares nothing for the future as long as carpe diem lasts.
All this said is obvious audiovisual media and its happy lies have created a new age of newspeaks in favor of robotics; with many different ‘human caring alibis to justify’ our extinction in labor and war fields.
From techno-utopian messianism a la ‘Egon tesla’, with supposed advantages for our security of a world watched by drones, ran with automated cars that will ‘drive safer’…
And the development of solar energy, which IS THE FINAL no-no event that will become the solar skin of robots making them also autonomous in terms of ‘energy’ as CLEAN along with NUCLEAR ENERGY. So we have Al Gore and James LOVELOCK, yes, the guy who found the concept of Gaia, now old and married to a young brit greedy girl, Sandy, who controls his opinions and wants only to ‘talk of clean nukes’, both lobbyist for the industry (no political correctness here, in the age of newspeaks the number of corrupted ‘former’ good ecologists keeps growing – witness Miss Stein, the Jewish candidate to American green party presidency, defending its military investments in Raethon, maker of drones and bombs, cause it has high profits; ah Miss Stein of the go(l)d church of the selected, walk your talk. We all know weapons are more expensive-profitable, but me, who knows those cycles since 1992 HAVE NEVER DONE a penny on stocks, in fact, ruined a few ‘rich people’ who asked me advices on account of those books, advising them to invest in agricultural companies :)
To the myth that company-mothers of machines exist to ‘serve the human consumer’ – without hardly any rent, a fact it is hardly mentioned – trough cheaper robotised companies of distribution, such as Amazon (never mind the millions of jobs in small shops lost to internet sales)…
To the praise of ‘collaborative economics’ (which consists on having people work underwaged as taxi drivers for uber o hotel managers for airbnb, or scholar writers for wikipedia, so a few owners get its commissions, and the professionals of those sectors get sacked)…
To the denial of any future real freedom and intelligence in those machines – which is merely a question of complexity of its programs and all robotists in private acknowledge it will happen this century…
Indeed the absolute taboo on social sciences is to use evolutionary theory to explain both history and economics as we do in this blog. Instead, we just transvestite pseudo-religious myths of human superiority as the chosen race, with all kind of pumping ego-trips and deny the obvious; we live in a biological planet and machines made copying our organs are just metalife, life made of stronger and more intelligent atoms (iron is the strongest energy atom and gold the most informative), put together into robotic bodies and golden chips, the final stage of evolution of iron weapons and gold-money. Biological economics is crystal clear and yet it is nowhere to be seen, given the fact that economists are overwhelmingly hauling from the tradition of biblical chosen of go(l)d beliefs, so we will talk of ‘creationist economics’ as the mantra that rules with those techno-utopian, profit seeking dogmas planet earth – NOT a science, which is what bio-economics is, but a religious idol-ogy disguised with ‘numbers’.
To the systemic propaganda of A few ‘sci-fi’ sectors in which robots will save lives (I.e. nano-robots as surgeons, drones as rescuers of mountain avalanches – never mind nano-bacteria that can poison the planet within months, drones watching us, or used by individual and state terrorism to anonymously murder).
-And of course the ultimate mantra: that if we humans reproduce billions of robots, those able to design them will have jobs (increasingly a task managed by computers, given the complexity of its A.I. – algorithms of information).
Consider the ‘German’ example, which has low unemployment, because it has started the industrial r=evolution 4.0 – here another catchy name – by provoking a massive wave of unemployment and poverty in the rest of the Euro zone that buys cheaper better done germanic machines, which also get all the credit they need from the ECB that on the other hand charges an usury cut to states that need credit to produce welfare goods. So the answer is obvious: only a few nations that make them will get full employment in a world mechanised by robots. While the rest of mankind becomes expendable. And even in that case as the overproduction of chips and robots continues the terraforming of the world in a system made to its image and likeness, will make the world alien to life.
-But the ultimate newspeak is pure, blatant censorship of any serious discussion at political and legal level of the world we are creating with all kind of infantile, pseudo-religious arguments pumping up the human egos, which in fact allow any argument about the future of the economic ecosystem, only in fiction. So the truth of the future cannot be discussed in Davos or Wall Street or the White House but only on science fiction films.
While sci-fi economics and techno-utopian newspeaks in favor of the Industrial revolution 4.0 are the staple food of our scifi economists and lobbying politicians – witness the recent childish letter of Mr. Obama, a well-known lobbyist for Silicon and Wall Street defending the automation of all cars ‘for safety, so old people can drive’ in a Pittsburg magazine – the center of Melon research center on robotics that plans to revitalise the car industry.
-All this ‘enveloped’ in a false determinism, as if the robotisation of the planet, were the only choice of future for mankind, because ‘corporative economics’ is the ‘only science’ of economics, and we cannot change it – all corporative economists, the only ones that can talk agree- this future, because ‘progress’ (of the metal-kind) cannot be stopped… once all other alternative designs of a sustainable world are censored. So the dialog between the 2 possible futures mankind can choose, disappears and only those who preach technoutopian messianisms have exposure – from mr. kurzweil, the robotist who affirms the singularity age will merge human and mechanical consciousness, to mr. Elon accusing the press of ‘murdering people’, because they criticise their ultra-expensive cars for the 0.0% not yet ready for perfect driving.
While those who expose a rational, ‘objective’ view of the economic ecosystem, and its dangers are derisively called Apocalyptos – meaning that those who bring the destruction of the planet are good-intentioned scientists and ‘experts’, while those who want us rationally against the process and want to stop it are actually the bad guys. Fact is most people profiting from this systemic destruction of the planet of life – robotists, bankers, stockrats owners of corporations an its managers, the military industry of ultra expensive robots, the voices of hate media and the celebrity circus of fictions, the corrupted politicos that gave up their responsibility, which is to direct mankind as its collective brain, to just panhandling money to corporations on exchange of favorable laws, etc. etc. DO know intuitively that all what we are saying here is right, but prefer to look at the other side and ‘live the day’.
And this indeed at this stage the duality of our future:
- On one hand, bankers, corporations and economists, after the cleaning of humanist economics preach that the future of mankind IS not their evolution and the creation of a world awash with welfare goods, but the systemic use of all resources for corporations, robotic machines and ‘technological progress’, so the 0.1% who owns those corporations and pay them, or the financiers that monopolise the printing of e-money, have all resources.
- On the other hand, the 99%, the scholars of humanities and the few humanist economists and non-corrupted politicians, which still remain, mostly isolated, without credit would like to build a world with the help of ethic laws, to preserve life, Gaia and the human species on top. But since credit and mass-media information is in the side of financial and industrial corporations they are loosing.
For that reason this blog, which is NOT really about the economic ecosystem of machines but about mankind, our past, present and future, and those who love it, and want to preserve our species, against those cult(ure)s that are so slavish that cannot even ‘see’ where they are leading us, goes well beyond the theme of evolutionary economics. Indeed, take it as a final ‘elegy’ on what humans could be potentially, and a final Judgment on what those who govern and control our ideas are doing with the Wor(l)d of man they so much love to despise… and the sheeple that blindly, with a strange masochism, prefers to follow them for pure laziness, routine and fear to change – what an irony!, the sheeple votes ‘conservative, techno-utopian parties’ that preach the conservation of human values, while destroying with its fast pace of mechanical evolution all what is human.
In the graph, Mankind has only 2 paths of future, let the corporate tigers eliminate the human child – our future generations – with its robotic machines and weapons, while force-feeding the ‘citizens, believers in such anti-human system’, with a growing load of fiction bull$hit in favor of the ‘Final Solution’ – telling us to loose jobs and lives to the progress of the robot is Ok, because there will be, besides the murder of our children some nice little collateral effects such as self-driving cars, ultra-expensive robotic surgeons, and drones to fight absurd wars that could be solved with diplomacy, humane treatment and investments in welfare and education of the 3rd world…
Or take the bull by the horns, as ‘forcados’, (strong people) do, tame the machine and survive. The law of the jungle is not my dictum but the biological law of this planet, and since evolution is both deterministic (no gazelle has ever killed a lion), and predictable, there is no other way around, except not meeting the mechanical tiger in the future by not evolving them.
Stop bull$hit, ban robots legally.
NOW THE MANTRA OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE KILLING THE WORLD IS ALWAYS THE SAME: 1) WE CANT HELP IT, AND 2) IT WONT HAPPEN.
Both things are false. evolutionary science is predictable and no gazelle has ever killed a lion. So it did happen as complexity will bring consciousness to military robots, and weapons have always been the most advanced machines at each age.
Thus this leaves us with the question of mankind stopping the robotists, go(l)d seekers, and animetal cultures that are doing.
And this is the only solution and it has happened before.
It is a blatant lie that the system cannot be reformed and technology halted, spread by the Leisure class who do nothing to improve reality except preventing any reform, living the day, carpe diem, while it last, as MACHINES MAKE MONEY. A simple sample will suffice:
In the XVI c. Spain and Japan were the leading producers of the most advanced weapon of the day, muskets… The spaniards and those who followed suit in Europe soon with gunboats, decided to further evolve them to increase their power and build racist empires against non-technological nations they exterminated wholesale in many parts of the world. But the Japanese decided they didn’t want to live in a world in permanent war where human values of love, honor and zen were trashed by snipers with long distance range. So they merely ban legally their manufacturing and melted them all into buddhist bells. And for 300 years lived the golden edo age their intellectuals today miss. So only when Perry bombed with 300 years more advanced technology the islands they had to build their own gunpowder empire and murder die by the millions in those wars.
However now, in Davos ‘finally!’ after 30 years of talking about this *but never invited to halls of power, they talk about the obvious, when IT IS HAPPENING. But do you think they state the obvious: to FORBID LEGALLY THE ROBOTIC INDUSTRY, in a G20 meeting, to avoid our demise? IT COULD BE DONE, as easy as we forbid Aids factories ebola viruses spread, and in many nations free weapons. THE LAW, embeds the ethic natural survival values of man and can perfectly forbid as China did the robotisation of the world. None though states it. All are for the go(l)d profits and the pleasures of war. All affirm is unavoidable. IT IS NOT TRUTH. If MAN GOES under, it will be BECAUSE IT IGNORES COMPLETELY the Nature of the Universe, it denies it laws and it does NOT want to survive, as a slave to its ‘subconscious’, lower selfish instincts. But civilisations such as China or in the West the roman empire and its followers in the modern world (the French r=evolution and EU revolution prior to the ecb private bank) show the law can control, improve and create a perfect world.
OF COURSE, WHAT THEY DO ON THOSE PLACES IS ‘THIN AIR SPEECHES’ about how wonderful will be a world in which the super organism of mankind is atrophied, parasited and dependent on the super organism of the metal-earth, and at best the ‘good ones’ tell us we shall be force-fed with robotic waiters, converted in fat cows running on automated cars, while watching hate-media fun gore movies on tvs, closed in a world of polluted cancerous waves of electromagnetic machines, constructing the birth of the metal-earth, waiting for slaughterhouse day.
Because and this is the huge truth never recognised by scholars, paid by corporative groups, we do NOT live in a rational world ruled by social scientists, but in a world ruled by ‘religious, creationist’ quack doctors of economics, who believe ‘Go(l)d’ is the language of God, its invisible hand which we must obey at all costs. Indeed, classic economics is NOT A SCIENCE. IT HAS NO PREDICTIVE POWER, IT DOES NOT DEFINE SCIENTIFICALLY ITS ELEMENTS, an is based in postulates of religious origins such as the search for go(l)d, for profits at all costs. So how do you expect the world not to go under if we are ruled by quack doctors and shamans, that make the patient worse, when they try to cure it with its ‘myths and fetishe go(l)d’?
1 The 72 years Generational Cycle is the mean biological cycle of human beings. It was first used to study patterns in American History by Strauss and Howe: ‘Generations’ W. Morrow 1991.
2 Kondratieff analyzed the Industrial Revolution in Russia, concluding that for 50 years the train was the engine of its development; thus establishing a 50 year cycle of economical activity that bears his name. However in 3rd World countries machines arrive latter, when they have already evolved in the Industrial World. So the Russian cycle of steam was shorter than the World’s cycle. When we make an exhaustive analysis of the cycle in the Western World, where those machines were discovered, we find a longer 72 years generational cycle.
3 The relationships between the economic, technological, political, cultural, r=evolutionary and war cycles of modern History, were studied by this author exhaustively in his pioneer, scholar books, published in Europe, ‘The cycles of History and Economics’; and in America, ‘Bio-economics, Bio-History: A theory of Unification’ © 94, 97. They forecast the end of the 1929-2001 economic cycle, which would be followed by a period of economical crisis, stock-crashes and World Wars. The English version of those books is now available under the title, ‘go(l)d & eviL: economic crises’ at www.goldandevil.com.
4 Any mathematical cycle has ‘real causes’ and so does the 72 year cycle of stock-crashes, origin of the present worldwide economical downturn. Yet only by knowing those causes we can act on the cycle; hence the enormous importance of knowing the causes not the consequences, the reasons not the effects of those cycles, if we want to change history…