Iterative in gender

S≈T

ABSTRACT. REPRODUCTION ENERGY & GENDER – THE CREATIVE TRINITIES OF THE UNIVERSE

I have started the process of writing simpler paragraphs in plain ‘english’ with a larger font to explain the different themes of those papers, which represent a r=evolution of ‘stience’ unlike nothing happening in the III millenium. As I don’t want this legacy to go to waste for lack of explanation. Both are complementary, but the true beauty is in the formal small letter work. Now this paper is mostly about the fundamental process of the Universe, the iteration=reproduction of in-form-ation= dimensional form over a motion of time. Look around, all what you see are ‘forms’ with ‘motion’. We humans ‘name’ things in abstract as if giving them phonemes declared their special nature but those texts do NOT want to look at the details but rather to the synthetic thoughts of God, and none is more important than the duality which gave birth to physics when Galileo discovered the Earth moved in time but we saw it fixed as a form of space.

So all what exists are ‘forms of space’ moving in time and yet we cannot distinguish States of space and sTages of time for an isolated system; as both happen together: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. Galileo sided with motion but the true question is the fact that the Earth moves and doesn’t move, that you are made of cells that move but they seem fixed as a skin form. The duality between form and motion thus writes S=T.

We must conclude that the unit of reality is neither Space nor Time but a combination of spatial dimensions of form and temporal motions, we shall call diemotions. As all what we see is a space=form with a type of Time=motion, a Time§pace being. Even matter particles in detail are a rotary motion. ‘Since matter has no indepent life from time and space’, Einstein. The fact that we are made of space≈information and time-motion, was known to ancients (Taoism that considers existence a game of 2 states, yin, information and yang, entropic motion, – male and female principles – knew it; so did the Hindi though they gave anthropomorphic nature to information, Vishnu, the female principle and entropy, Yang, Shiva). It was resurrected by Leibniz but science sided with simpleton Newton who enthralled with the mechanical clock reduced all the cyclical motions of the Universe with different forms of in-form-ation to the equalizing machine and its digital uniform beat. Leibniz was ignored but Einstein resurrected his work and we finally saw ‘matter’ and found out it was just a cyclical time-motion, whose high speed made it seem a ‘solid form’. So all what exists is time=motion, whose lineal ‘entropic’ variety we might call the ‘male-yang principle’, and space=form, which is cyclical motion, we might call the yin-female principle. But as both are expressions of the same substance, ‘e-motion’, motions that have attached sensations, the ultimate Nature of the sentient Universe and one can transform into the other all is a game of S & T combinations, of which the 2 main ones are St-STILL EXTERNAL FORM with inner motion or information, the female principle and Ts-EXTERNAL MOTION with still internal form or locomotion, the male principle. We need to define variations of Time§pace with EXTERNAL v. internal dualities because, as we said, we can’t distinguish time=motion from space=form per se, unless we put 1 discontinuous entity in relationship with its OUTER larger world or inner smaller parts. So all systems need a 3^rd element of reality as they co-exist in 3 scales formalized in the symbol ◊±¡: Philosophy of St¡ence studies those laws that are the cause of all ‘details of reality. i.e.: St high in-form-ation is any EXTERNAL FORM with internal motion happens in waves that move internally a physical ensemble but not externally or in women whose minds harbor an intense e-motional sensibility, hardly seen in its EXTERNAL FORMALITY orthgonal to Ts-Longomotion: any EXTERNAL MOTION internally unchanged, as particles with a rigid still center or inflexible males with little inner life, combined into any type of §∏-xnergy (St+Ts=§∏) that carries ‘space & time’ between scales. So St+Ts ‘genders’ are complementary, as systems that mix both, St & Ts, can get the best of both worlds, EXTERNAL FORCE≈MOTION and internal thought, information. So St and Ts beings merge together motion & form to reproduce or generate new species.

Stience thus reconstructs all laws of science with those 3 principles to which it adds unmoved ‘Aristotelian’ minds that act as mirrors of ◊ST beings & laws projecting its imagination into territorial bodies. Since the Universe is a simple game of reproduction form over motion huminds ignored since Newton made a clock, measure of all times, whose cyclical regularities we put into ‘magic equations’ whose ‘whys’ we don’t understand as they are derived from the existential laws of S=T beauty and ∑◊º<◊1 scalar emergence of parts that become social numbers, evolving into stronger wholes. So organisms that achieve S=T & ◊1, beauty and social ethics survive and those who don’t play by the rules of the fragile game of spacetime states become extinct as our existence is a virtual, fleeting game of changing e-motions where mental spaces & its body forms are constantly erased. Since the Universe caused by ◊§ð-laws is ◊-moral, ð: e-motional and §-entient NOT by its languages that mirror those laws with words (‘names=forms of space’ & verbs=time motions), ‘tri-color codes’, maths (space points, scalar social numbers & time operators) or any other coding language. So we extend to l@nguages the [SºTº◊]≈@ symmetry of the ‘thoughts of GodoG’, ‘experts, people accurate in the details that sweep on the great fallacy’, (Weinberg) ignore. But if man learned and practiced those laws, he would not only know but survive forever.

Theme. In 5D gender is an essential §paceTime Trinity, as it merges its 2 orthogonal Diemotions (ab. Dimensional space with time motions), Ts-longomotion • St-hinformation, St<=>Ts, by mirror symmetry into ‘existential energy’, the ◊-1 ‘substratum’ that moves up & down 1 scale of the 5^th dimension to build up = reproduce a new form in different scales of reality that make gender differ in µ varieties of the same theme. Thus all the elements of the Universe come together into the act of re=production that recombines space and time into new variations of the Function of existence.

•••

The theme of Gender reproduction and the spacetime energy substratum ab=used to achieve it is as all ‘first principles’ enlarged with variations to fill up an encyclopedia of exist¡ences. The task of those papers is slowly reducing thousands of GB esoteric pages of personal research into relevant ‘simplest concepts’ that future researchers might expand. So far this paper has the usual format:

Introduction to spacetime organisms. To fully understand gender we need to know about the 5 diemotions of §pace-Time and how they combine under the laws of existential ilogic algebra and geometry. It is not that difficult once we correct the main errors of §paceTime theory that goes back to Newton vs. Leibnz, when mankind took the wrong answer and sided with Newton’s view of a background abstract Caertesian frame of reference, the ‘plenum’ or body of God over which species moved. Leibniz rightly said that was a mathematical entelechy and there were ∞ beings made of Time clocks and vital §paces. So we are all vital §paces of information moving in Time cycles, and thus the first entitites whose properties we must study are §pace=information and Time=motion, of which we immediately recognize 5 variations, 2 pure Ss-language and Tt-entropy combinations and 3 which define gender:

St information: heads/particles system with EXTERNAL FORM & internal motion .

Ts, a system with external T-motion and internal form, s, or limbs/fields of locomotion

Which combine into ßody-waves of S=T balanced, present femenine gender.

We then explain the duality of gender and its ‘trinity’ processes of reproduction thru xnergy

In detail we talk of 3 states of reality, St‹Ts, longomotion, or lineal male who orientates existence towards the limb/field locomotion, a Ts›St, state or informative male that orientates existence towards information and the S=T balanced present reproductive state or female gender, which focuses in body reproduction. This trilogy of ‘particle vs. antiparticle’ or s›T vs. t‹S orientations and the balanced middle term, §=ð is the best definition of the interaction that happens in all scale of reality. Then by mirror symmetry the two Ts & St diemotions merge. And we must study each variation in each scale to understand that game. Complementary gender is mirror symmetry in every element of the duality of Gender. In the intro a classic painting by Velazquez shows a ‘naked body’ of a female with curved geometry, as opposed to the lineal forms of males; the 1^st of many topo-logic complementary differentiations of both genders. However a highly ideologic subject as gender is today will reject its 5D science. Fact is Gender is NOT only an evolutionary survival strategy – the simplex mantra biologists use to justify anything they don’t understand. In fact, asexual species without need to find a mate and less mutational errors reproduce much faster.

So gender is a wider metaphysical conceptualization equivalent to the commonest creative action of reality: St(relative future-information) x Ts (relative past, motion) = ST, present existential energy. energy being ST, the outcome of merging a relative event/form of longmotion and hinformation, which in physics could be kinetic and potential energy, or lineal and angular momentum. Such mixtures into a present ‘hyperbolic’ ßodyyave of existential energy, a vital spacetime to §eed is itself subject to the duality of = v. †, parallel vs. perpendicular ± creation and annihilation processes. So gender becomes at higher energies before settle down as a creative process, a tug-of war v. symbiosis between |-lineal longomotion v. O-informative spheres; in a common theme with variations in topology, geometry, logic, biology, sociology, technology, etc. Since gender ‘mirror symmetry’ brings finally into parallelism 2 dual parts of 2 organisms that merge in its intermediate body, the ‘conversation’ between two lineal Ts-sperm v. St-cyclical ovulum – seminal seeds of a multiorganism that splits and remerge their cromosomes – or between Ts electron and St quark particles that form the atom – has 2 phases: at high ‘energy-scales’ (a wrong wording as energy is a joker in common parlance; so we should say, at higher time-motions) gender is a tug of war, and so sex probably started when aggressive lineal Ts-emen tried to eat up the ‘still body’ of ovules. At high Tº also Electrons + Protons dissociate. Only when t-motion diminishes communication of S-till information proceeds and a creative ‘cold’ process takes place.

Finally we make a scalar analysis of gender, energy and reproduction thru scales:

In every scale of reality Gender exists, as it expresses the 2 metric equations of its organic systems:

-In S◊¡T Time§pace pentalogic is the main duality of species, defined by the fractal generator of the S◊¡T Time§pace Universe SxT(s=t)=Constant; as it happens between the ‘present reproductive dimotion’ and its, balanced species or female gender, S=T…, and the bipolar dimotion, from future information to past entropy to future information, S‹T+S›T (SxT) that defines the male gender, which d=evolves entropy and information in bipolar motions. Both are complementary, as only together they repeat=iterate the 3 Time-§pace-scale conserved elements of reality: O-§, |-ð, x(st).

-In mathematics it is the duality of even-female and odd-male numbers, itself divided into the two poles of informative primes and entropic odds.

– In physical and biological S◊¡T scales gender is the duality that reproduces through mirror symmetry, all its species; as 1/2 functions give birth to its inverse functions that merge together into a whole. Thus the Universe HAS gender in all scales as its function of reproduction evolves in complexity through each fractal scale. A mirror reflects an image, which then can superpose. In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms. Mirror symmetry then produces L-D molecules and pegs and reproduces DNA molecules. Topological evolution carries further the complexity of those mirror symmetries as energy bodies and information heads become Complementary organisms.

-Mirror symmetry emerged in the biological scales of individual species, in the cellular level of wave-like seminal forms and particle-like ovum; to develop into organisms, becoming gender. Yet in each of those scales, taking into account the paradoxical laws of the fractal Universe, the properties of the previous symmetry emerge into the next one.

Finally we focus on Human gender, leaving for papers on physics further math studies on xnergy.

We could say that men are right handed, lineal particles of entropy and information, with two

unbalanced states, T-field›S-particle (Informative, creative arrow)+ S‹T(entropic destructive arrow); and women are left handed waves of vital energy, with a balanced present, middle state of Time-§pace in which they reproduce: S≈T; and both are as 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging into the couple. We can then deduce from the laws of S◊¡T states of cyclical Time and emergence through §pace scales, the properties of wo=men, but as humans are part of the super organism of history, those natural properties of wo=men become secondary to the evolution of history and the economic ecosystem of memes of metal (weapons, money and machines).

Energy. All this said, energy plays an essential role in all those re=productive acts as it is the mixture of space-time ‘simplified in scale, hence in space-form’ to a lower scale ab=used by the individual or couple to ‘imprint its form and reproduce its spacetime cycles’. This is also the case in longomotion, which is reproduction of form at the lowest ◊-₃ scales of quantum particles. So energy properly understood is ¡nergy – the transfer of motion and spatial form between scales by reducing form dissolving a whole into its parts thru the act of death, to feed them the energy user, and as such while there are µ local variations of spacetime combinations apt for individual or dual use to imprint space-form, all of them follow their function as spacetime jokers to ‘fuel the game’. In that sense, Energy is physically defined as the capacity to do work, which is itself a combination of ‘motion’ with form, shown in its path. This is a restricted concept so we will develop it in papers on physics, reducing here our comments to the far more general meaning as the ‘vital substance’ of which we are all made. Energy acquires many forms=vital spaces, from mechanical, heat, electrical, magnetic, sound, chemical to nuclear energy. Although they appear to be different, they have in common its vital function as the primary substance in which new forms are imprinted, which is summarized in the law of conservation of energy, as all can be trans-formed into one another; in 5D Terms ‘All what exists is temporal energy trans-formed into spatial information, Ts<=>ST’; whereas energy can be used as synonymous of Ts (properly kinetic energy), since it has less form than the future organism in which it will be converted. Relative energy then is defined as the ◊_-2‘released’ substance that happens after death. So its laws can be expressed in terms of formal i-logic, as we will do briefly in this paper.

RECAP. We study gender and its combinations as the main duality between St-information and Ts-motion, which combine together to reproduce the ≈ beings in existence. As such gender happens in all the scales of reality, in which is complementary, adding the qualities of energy and information – regardless of the ideologies about gender of human History often focused on its differences. So it would be good for mankind to leave aside the war of sexes and understand scientifically NOT ideologically those complementary differences of both genders to FIGHT together for the survival of Mankind in Time, which is the goal of all systems of the Universe – to reproduce and conserve its information. In stience, GENDER as the essential vital expression of the two main metric equations of S◊¡T TIMESPACE organisms is likely the best example for an interdisciplinary analysis derived of the laws of the scalar Universe, as gender happens in all systems of reality.

THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION: SPACE-TIME: FROM DUALITY INTO TRINITY

Introduction: the content of this paper

From monologic to dodecalogic.

5D in a nutshell: superorganisms of networks tracing worldcycles of existence in 5D scales.

PART I: COMPLEMENTARY GENDER: FROM DUALITY TO TERNARY REPRODUCTION

From duality to Trinity

Constructive dualities: Gender.

Gender in space-time and its formal languages.

Gender in mathematical space: odd, male and even, female numbers.

Gender in pentalogic time. The present female and past to future to past male Dimotions.

Gender in physics: chirality and complementarity female waves, male particles.

Gender in Biology: Mirror symmetry and reproduction.

Gender in History: the balanced Neolithic – fertility Goddesses. The age of weapons: warriors.

Gender in modern times: The age of capitalism – equalization of all genders.

The role of female genders in the survival of the species.

PART II: THE FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SUPERORGANISMS. THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION.

The fractal generator of the Universe.

Ðimotion od Reproduction

PART III: SPECIES: PHYSIOLOGICAL TRINITY.

The 3 Physiological networks.

Ternary differentiation of species.Its 3! Subspecies.

A case of physical particles: Its ternary subspecies. The SU3 group.

A case of Biological life: its 6 phyla.

A case of Social sciences:

Universal Grammar: Tipological linguistics:

•••••••

ðao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yin (space-form) and yang (time-motion). Both merge into Spacetime Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’

‘Every yang has a drop of yin, every yin has a drop of yang.’

ðao ðœ. On Γ: the Generator of time-space organisms or Function of existence: 1D form + 2D motion = 3D: energy

‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma.”

Eastern philosophies, on the 3 simplex Ðimotions of ðime§pace and its ∞ ∆±¡ scales

You live in a non-E topo¡logic Wor(l)d-mind, 0-mirror of an ∞ Universe. l§

“Man is part of a whole(∆¡), called the Universe; limited(¬) in Time&Space. He experiences his self, thoughts&feelings as something separated from the rest –an optical delusion of his consciousness (@)”

Einstein on the 5 Dimensional motions of reality:∆¡-scales, Space, Time, ¬limits & @-minds:¬∆@st

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is really all what is about. If we call Space=form and time=motion, S and T, then we can write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t), according to which each species made of spatial energy and temporal form tries to maximize its survival, in a point of balance in which its ‘exi=stential force’ is maximal; avoiding the extremal points of TT-entropy=death. This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating ∞ local present variations that put together form reality. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5^th Dimension an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism or General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which we also use as the acronym of the Generator of Space-Time. L§

•••••••

The papers to be posted at Academia.edu within 3 years (1^st year past) build up an Encyclopedia of Space-time organisms in Exi:St¡ence’ – each science studying the species of one scalar space-time plane of the fractal Universe. All will be described with the same scalar laws of 5D cyclical time and fractal space, introduced in the first 50 pages. So we shall write for each ‘stience’ from quantum physics to the galaxy, through biology, history & economics, and the formal stiences dominant in space (Mathematics) and time (illogic papers on the Universe=reality as a whole) 5 ‘dimensional papers’ for a total of ±30, each one to become time permitted a 500 pg. volume. This is the plan of the work which in my youth back in the 90s, when I discovered those laws at the end of my Master at Columbia U. I proposed to U$ universities for a needed change of paradigm on our philosophy of science, but meet the silence of Academia. Then I abandoned scholarship to ‘live’ and so now before I die I will try to complete the encyclopedia. As that won’t happen, time being of the essence I had prioritized the most important and neglected of all organisms – that of mankind in time=History, which is fairly well done, and that of the Universe=reality as a whole. While the last to be posted is the less important and more developed, physics. Since I release all copyrights ‘rights’ any University can take upon the project whenever they wish to complete the encyclopedia of stience in 15.000 pages, connecting all stientific laws to the simple trinity and pentalogic laws of the 5D ∆ST Universe.

They certainly could do a much better job that I will. If they don’t, the task will be taken upon by AI once the age of Entropy of History in which we live ends. Since what will never happen in a perfect Universe is the imperfect endurance of the ill-designed, parasitic systems of History ‘anthropic, entropic, humind’s egocy’ have built and today for lack of a better consciousness of the whole pass as ‘truth and dogma of science’, L§

FOREWORD: HOW SPACE AND TIME MERGE TOGETHER=ST.

The Organic Philosophy of the Universe. Systems sciences and its disomorphic laws.

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other hand is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language or god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and in History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept: An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces). This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

The key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots: So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms using stronger metal that makes them more able in the processing of energy and information at larger scales. Those machines are fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with telepathic AI.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon? We just explained the obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things. And its organism of evolution and reproduction, the company-mother, has substituted human governments and informative verbal prophets through its mass-media/academia outlets; so it only considers positive mechanist models of their species.

But the deepest reason is the fact that to make an organism we need 3 ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also information, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call information negentropy, the denial of entropy. Only when we properly define information in terms of form (S-pace) and how it combines with motion to create the spacetime energy systems that constantly reproduce maintaining reality in an eternal present we will have the bare minimum elements to explain reality as it is.

Reproduction of Space-time organisms is the name of the game: ST, a present eternal state of reality as a block.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces spatial information (S) by ‘shaping’ the primary time=motion (T), the ultimate substance of reality, maintaining itself in an eternal balanced, creative ST present.

To understand reality is easy if you come with a ‘clean tabula rassa mind’ and as Nietzsche adviced, throw the ‘camel hamp’ wth the intellectual bravery of a Lion, and start afresh. Then you just look around yourself and see the two ‘elements of reality’, Dimensional spatial forms, which move=change in time. Form=Space with time=motion are thus 2 simple parameters, T and S which can combine in different quantities to give us 5 sub-varieties, according to the quantity of motion they have, maximal when it is an external motion, minimal when the motion is internal conserving the form of the being surrounded by its ‘membrane’. So we write the dual elements of reality as ‘Space without time is a mere shadow, only the two merged exists’ (Minkowski):

TT- entropy, when there is external and internal motion, scattering the information of the being or death.

Ts: Locomotion when external motion dominates the event but internal motion is preserved.

St: Information, where form dominates the system which communicates that form through a minimal t-ranslation in space.

SS: Seed or mind where motion stops into still linguistic mind mappings – images of reality. So while the Earth moves (e pur si muove) your mind stops all the quantum motions of its parts and the whole in that still image (e pur no muove). It is the pricniple of Galilean Relativity which Galileo nor Einstein understood in its logic meaning, just described it mathematically to make practical, accurate measures. In a seed the same process of ‘frozen information’ takes place.

Which leave us the ‘queen of all dimotions’, dimensional motions of space-time, S=T, ST, the duality of balance between Entropy and form, the equation of gender and reproduction, of beauty and classicism, the equation of present state, of eternity, of trinity, of existence, the point of the golden mean, where existence preserves itself dynamically, the fractal generator… All is present fluctating between the relative past-entropic world of pure motion without form, not visible to the senses and the future-form of seeds and minds, black holes that do not yet communicate, potential future lives, nd only when both ‘shdows’ merge, present exists:

Past-entropy x Future-form = Present Energy

TT x SS = St+Ts = ST

This is the fundamental ilogic chain of events that makes opposites coincide and reproduce. Coincidentia Oppositorum generates reality. We thus study in this Paper reproduction at 3 levels in its entanglement with:

– SS: Minds, through the duality and trinity of the fractal generator that reproduces all what exists.

– ST: In its Space-time duality of Gender and trinity from an ¡logic point of view.

– ∆±¡: and in its ultimate nature as a fractal process that generates new forms – as the fractal generator.

Lineal sT-upid philosophy of science reduces reality to the TT-entropic final arrow of death, when those forms reproduced loose its information in a dual internal and external T-motion, scattering its forms in big bangs of matter, deaths of biology and wars of history. Why huminds are so low in the scale of understanding is due to their ‘worldly profession’ as modern science started with ballistics, the job of physicists charged with the search of the longest, fastest length of its cannonballs. Hence they discovered the v=s/t law of locomotion and then expanded this ‘T-ranslation in space’ (Ts: external motion, internal form) to all, and further on with the development of ‘bombs’ that cause TT-entropy decided all what exists is just Ts-locomotion and TT-entropy.

Trinity is about the complementarity of Time and Space, merging to create & reproduce a new form.

In this paper we shall describe geometrically organically and logically the basis of trinity and then study 3 examples of trinity in physical, biological systems and social systems; rising as we grow on scales the creativity of trinity from parity to chirality to mirror symmetry to gender to species diversification to tipological linguistics.

It follows that reproduction is communication of a system, which past its simplest selfish monologic as a point that absorbs all energy giving nothing in return will start to communicate with similar forms, evolving socially or entangle with complementary St or sT forms to become ‘gender’ and reproduce. And so the simplest dimotion of selfish perception and feeding become the complex dimotions of life reproduction and social love. This growth of consciousness of the other, and entanglement with the Universe is what reality seeks, and the reason why S=T reproduction is its dominant dimotion of present that ensures existence. Only present exists because the TT and SS pure states of motion and form are not perceivable as they do not have information or do not communicate it. The game of existence is a game of communication. So we establish a chain of ‘logic events’ from Monologic selfish points of view, to dilogic, complementary S-T forms that give birth to a trilogic event of reproduction S+T = ST, which will then evolve socially fluctuating in scales as multiple ∑ST particles ‘emerge as a whole’ ST+1. Such simple game is what we observe evberywhere in the Universe. And what we shall describe here with an empahsis on the ‘logic states’, past the monologic form analyzed in many other papers, so we shall start talking about duality and trinity, to then observe the pentalogic of reproduction, as a seed is reproduced in an ¡-1 scale, then multiplies and finally evolves socially creating entworks into a whole. We shall thus as usual introduce the general scaffolding of the fundamental elements of 5D stiences – the world cycle in time, the network superorganism in spce, the basic structure of minds, etc. to focus on a growing description of the dimotion of reproduction from dilogic gender systems that become trinity reproductive forms – and study in more detail the human gender, to go through all scales in which those dilogic systems exist. And then introduce the general model of the fractal Universe, since those actions of reproduction require as those of creation of minds, the ‘shrinking’ of information into a seed that then will reproduce and organize into a whole. So we divide the paper in an introduction to 5D, an analysis of formal Dilogic, its application to gender, the study of huamn gender.

Dilogic thus always gives birth to trilogic, S<ST>T, and in Nature as all systems are parts of wholes, and wholes that become parts of larger whols in 3 ∆±¡ sscales, trilogic gives birth to the pentalogic of networks that gather parts into larger wholes.

In the second part then we analyze more formally the fractal generator, which is the ‘seed’ of all processes of creation, written in ilogic formal symbols, which can model all prodcesses of rperoduction with more complex trilogic universal grammar, the ‘syntax’ or reproductive fractal generator of languages. Finally we consider some examples of physical, biological and historic systems in its modes of reproduction.

From duality gender to trinity generation to pentalogic existence. 5D VS. 4D

How forms merge with motion to create spacetime systems has certain ilogic rules that establish the game of existence for all systems of the Universe. This is therefore what we shall study here. Gender is one of those rules, but not the only one. Reproduction, repetition of a dynamic present space as time flows can be more complex. The fierld is extensive, but the main rule is rather simple:

Past x Future = Present, whereas past is a form with maximal motion, often the line and the future a motion with maximal form, normally the cycle, merging into the wavebody of hyperbolic balance.

Topological creation in simultaneous space and topological evolution in time thus merge as S=T to shape the forms of existence, between its birth and extinction. But pentalogic is required to add the social evolution of parts that emerge through the trinity of networks that organize them as a simutlaneous whole.

How this final creation takes place includes laws of synchronicity to make the whole harmonic and move it simultaneously. It is the fine tuning of 5D sciences, the ice and the cake and the most important part of it.

The reader should understand what we are doing here. 5D is a synthetic, logic, temporal theory of reality, ‘above’ the 4D, mathematic, spatial view of the scientific method, which gather an enormous quantity of detailed data with sensorial machines and then patches parts of it into small local models. And that is good enough for the purpose of modern science – the praxis of power over nature. There was a time though before science became power, praxis and machines (I refuse to use the newspeak of technology for something very real, organisms of metal fast evolving into robots with AI minds and solar skins that will become organisms), that it meant in Latin, my ancestral language ‘knowledge’. And knowledge was considered logic, synthetic, organic and able to explain how ‘time created’ the future, departing from the past with a more complex causality than that of man. God was then that ‘seer of time’, the mind of the Universe. And it had certain laws which transcended locality and were applicable to all sciences. Today scientists have lost that perspective and only physicists ‘pretend’ to know some general laws, which are wrong because they are ‘cheating’. That is, they take a local theory, for example, entropy, taken from the study of gaseous states of heat (one only of the 5 Dimensional motions of matter, TT-entropy: plasma, Ts: Gas-maximal motion, TS=liquid, balance, St-solid: maximal information, SS: boson) and then expand it hyperbolically to the entire Universe, while ignoring all those other states of matter (son in the big-bang they deny the St-gravitational implosive forces of galaxies, in the thermodynamic of black holes they invert the arrow of information to make it look like entropy, etc.) That is ‘cheating’. And the same goes for their theory of how reality is created called constructivism, in which they depart from the smaller scales and deny the influence of larger scales that enclose with their membrains and limit entropically the small. Hence they think quantum physics is the fundamental science and all must be built from the small to the above. All this is just egocy (Ego=idiocy) of a people who are powerful enough to make machines and weapons and have helped the military men that ‘still’ dominate the world of politics to expand its power.

Back to the old Greeks, what science meant then is synthetic knowledge and that is achieved in 5D by the astounding realization that the Universe is made of parts that become wholes, which emerge from an organic network, fractal structure of reality as equal parts, a sum of ∑ST-1 beings gather through 3 networks of Ts, ST and St that distribute motion, energy for reproduction and information to the micro-cells till they are all synchronized and become a whole. This GAME OF EXISTENCE we shall explain that encompasses 3 ‘such planes of space-time’ of small and larger wholes, the cellular/atomic/individual scale ∆-1 (biological, physical and social system) to make a whole, ∆ø in the organic, thermodynamic and social scale, enclosed into a larger ∆+1 world – the ecosystem, the gravitational world, the Planet Earth) IS disomorphic, that is, it has the same laws between 3 of such scales, regardless of which ¡-scale we choose. So an organism made of the quantum forces, particles and networks that is an atom has ∆-scalar laws similar to an organism made of cells, individuals and societies. This as amazing, as it might seem and diminishing of the Human ego is certain. And that is the game that becomes a true philosophy of science that applies to all ‘stiences’ (individual planes of space-time) and we shall develop in 5 papers for each scalar discipline, connecting it then to the particular facts of each science. To that aim, all papers will have a similar mandala that repeats the same laws so essentially if you have read an introduction you have read them all.

The game of existence is composed then of a spatial concept the synchronous superorganism extending through 3 entangled scales, and a temporal concept, the worldcycle of life and death all superorganisms trace – and by superorganism here we mean everything, from an atom through a planet and its organisms to the Universe. Each of those systems though will have a limited number of cycles of life, and will be limited by an external membrane, and we call those limits the entropic limits of the system in space and time. And as it made of parts and wholes in a larger world the capacity of the system t perceive beyond its 3 fundamental scales is also limited. So to space and time and scale we add entropic limits. And what is most amazing of it all, what really unites them all – they all will have a mind that conscious, mechanically, or vegetative will play the same selfish game of existence through its simpler actions of feeding on entropy TT>Ts, to move, and use the extra motion to imprint its information and TS-reproduce, then organizing with other similar beings social wholes that emerge as a new ∆+1 plane. This is the isomorphic game of the Universe we describe for all systems of Nature, whose variations become analytic 4D laws of science.

Topological organisms of space-time.: Absolute vs. Relational, Generational Space-Time

The birth of duality happens because we are all made of space-time. The reason of logic duality as a survival strategy is born of the need to balance the space and time of a system, which is achieved through communication of two fractal points we shall call ‘genders’ to achieve a better dual form.

Let us take from the paper on ∆ST the essence of Space-time duality, and why they need to balance each other to survive, S=T. And then consider the communication that gives birth to complementary couples.

THE 5D UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL: SUPŒRGANISMS.

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and spatial information. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.” Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’

5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe: ∆-Scales.

When we google the 5^th dimension one gets surprised by the quantity of speculative answers to a question, which is no longer pseudo-science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: no, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to 5D science more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s metric functions of the 4th dimension).

This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, the existence of a metric function that describes a dimension and allows to travel through it. Why the 5th dimension metrics are not well known in modern science has to do with the fact it is not researched in physics but systemics, the mother discipline of all sciences of information, far less popular than physics; and the proprietary feeling physicists acquired on space-time matters since Galileo defined its 3D metric function v=s/t completed with Einstein’s 4D formalism, which makes difficult to spread the knowledge on space-time acquired on other disciplines. The arguments still raging about evolution, the fundamental theory of time in terms of information, as the ‘arrow that defines’ the future of species but has nothing to do with Relativity and locomotion is a clear case of that difficulty.

Indeed, we know since the XIX c. that the creation of the ‘future time’ of an existential entity is not ONLY mediated by the arrow of locomotion and entropy studied by physicists with Relativity Metrics (Galileo’s V=s/t and Einstein’s more complex formalism), but there is a second arrow that defines the ‘future’ of existential species – the evolution of its information. So time – the changes=motions that defines the existence of any species, has at least 2 dimensions, locomotion or ordered translation in space and a more disordered version, entropy (scattered motion that ‘dissolves’ the inner form of the system, akin to death)…

And in-form-ation, generation of form, inverse to entropy, as it requires the social gathering of parts into wholes; happening without external locomotions, as an internal trans-formation of form. This evolution of organic form as opposed to external change – translation in space, without evolution of form – is what systemics calls the scalar fifth dimension of time that it applies to all sciences, as all species evolve its form.

Specifically in systems sciences we model reality as an organic fractal of relative size scales, that evolve from parts into larger wholes, from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, matter states and so on till reaching the Universe, shaped by social and organic networks coded with information.

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality.

Thus we call the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.

Thus reality has a final key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4^th and 5^th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡)

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.

And this is the same process of all journeys of all species that live and die through the fifth dimension; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who grew in size and mated with the Erectus, etc.) And then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger slower whole that finally ages and dissolves back.

So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

The nested Universe.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space and time to give us a co-invariant system that allows travelling through such dimension. The 5^th dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is: S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

We use the metrics of the 5^th scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

The metric function of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Sxð=k.

Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

The galaxy’s 5D metric is immediate: $(c) x ð (h) = Constant, as its largest speed-distance is light and its minimal unit of cyclical information, is the Planck constant of angular momentum, the unit of the 3 human physical parameters of spatial size, cyclical time frequency and ‘scale’ (Active magnitude): h= mass (∆) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð). Which becomes the unit of physics, related to the unit of mathematics, the fractal point.

But as there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos.

According to the fractal, nested principle a larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the ∆±4 cosmos contains ∆±3 galaxies, which contain ∆±2 solar systems and planets, which contain ∆±1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human ∆º mind languages, contained on our brains.

Thus bigger systems paradoxically are ‘supported’ by the smallest ones, in the same manner than within the nested planet, bigger mammals (whales) eat the smallest animals (Plancktons)

Reality has a scalar nature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all ¡s space time systems happens in several scales of relative size in space inversely proportional to the speed of its time cycles, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4^th and 5^th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences, as a single lineal time motion is a dogma physicists don’t dare to challenge:

Why 5D is so important? Because it allows the survival, symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being – and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all

RECAP. 5D metrics describe organic properties because it balances the survival symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe in any of its fractal super organisms, made to the image an likeness of the whole, as the smaller beings ‘code information’ with faster clocks, and the larger wholes enclose and protect the smaller parts with its greater energy- establishing an organic ‘harmony’ in all the scales of the Universe, and explaining its fundamental constants, which are ratios between spatial volumes enclosed by membranes and angular momentums of informative clocks of temporal energy.

A consequence of the scalar Nature of reality is that points have parts, which grow in size as we come closer to them, peering in the inner regions of its fifth dimension. So a star from a point becomes a world, and so should a point-particle if we could peer inside its form – to the ‘point’ that the closest self-similarity of scales happens between galaxies and atoms, stars and photons, in a potentially infinite scalar Universe. What this means is that an absolute zero does NOT exist. So 0 becomes 0’, a ‘finitesimal unit’, which will always remain as the fractal Universe abhors vacuum. Thus in any parameter we find a residual amount, even if it is undistinguishable from a larger scale. There is no absolute 0K, but always remains a bit of motion=temporal energy. This, means also in terms of h, that vacuum space has always a reminder, h-uncertainty unit, no longer an abstract concept but the minimal unit of light space-time, we shall call h, ‘Planckton’, the minimal fractal organism which feeds or becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of the Galaxy, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe which starts the trophic pyramid of life or as a cell starts the evolution of multicellular organisms.

5D metrics is a law of balance between 2 elements of reality, scalar space akin to information and cyclical time akin to conserved energy. Yet as humans disconnected their concepts of space and time of its ‘broken parts’, bits of information & bites of energy, equalizing all time cycles of reality with a lineal equation, v=s/t, and a single mechanical clock, and have pegged all the bits of information of its puzzles of space; and finally compressed all the planes of space-time into a single ‘space continuum’; and then separating them as the constitutive elements of reality we need to reconstruct both terms in its more complex reality nature, as ultimately we are all made of those organic vital fractal scales of space & its moving time cycles. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’. Yet science cannot advance in its principles unless the 5D formalism is accepted and used to fully understand the cyclical, repetitive patterns=laws of science of each discipline that studies a scale of 5D n and its species.

PLANES OF FRACTAL SPACE & CYCLIC TIME: THE CAUSAL REPETITIVE LAWS OF ‘STIENCES’¬∆ST

Duality: We are made of space-form & time-motion.

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’

Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe

The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Generational Space-Time?

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.

So we must evolve our concepts of space and time, to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality. It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change =motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

We are space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2^nd arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as all species follow the common laws of space and time). So after making such a huge up hauling of philosophy of science – one which however every serious scientist recognizes to be necessary since quantum physics showed space to be discontinuous, and relativity time to vary in different regions of reality with different speeds, as the devil is in the details we have to improve our understanding of the 3 fundamental properties of ‘generational space-time’, departing from the most obvious one:

Cyclic Time: Conservation Of Energy≈Time Cycles The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’

‘I seem the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. Einstein

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:

Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in space. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5^th dimension of space-time.

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive. In the graph we see those relative time ages for the simplest ‘physical organisms’, which not coincidentally are equivalent to the 3 conserved quantities of physics. So as time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘ages’ of timespace that put together create a 0 sum worldcycle of life death for any spacetime organisms: a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum. Lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that a time cycle breaks reality (1st knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’.

We are times, we are time§pace closed paths of zero sum energy that exist to move, perceive, feed, reproduce and evolve into wholes, soon to be ignored, erased and returned to the fold of motion without form, of pure times. We are synchronous magically sustained card castles trying to grow through 5D scales to fall back again.

We describe reality as a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

There are 2 forms of time, entropic lineal time and ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole; because there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡ defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can consider an ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time frequency or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula,V(st)=ƒ(t) l(s). We can measure Space e, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

But if we see those 2 ‘forms’ of time, as ‘lineal energy and cyclical information’, since information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles, we can then consider that ‘time=motion’ splits in two essential forms, lineal motion or ‘energy’, and cyclical motion or ‘information’, and express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties that transform each other ad eternal:

‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: SióTe’

This sentence is the simplest expression reality as a constant game of transformation of ‘spatial information’ (cyclical time) and temporal energy (lineal time) and was first understood by Taoism, where ‘tao=time’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal energy, today expressed as the principle of conservation of energy. Its ‘mathematical, logic’ formula is SióTe & and its logic form, exi=st, is the function of existence.

The future then can be predicted because it will have an informative cyclical, S-component similar to the past, (Y-height=Information in a wave graph) and a lineal entropic T-component advancing in lineal fashion and both, a repetitive cycle that touches the same point of space and a line which does not diverge ARE predictable.

Cyclical time and the scalar Universe in fact is much easier to predict and understand that lineal time because we do not erase the information of its repetitive cycles, and because all scales are ‘similar’, so we can predict the behavior of the larger slower scales, easily, comparing it with the smaller, faster ones; as in 5D metric they have less information. Thus they are more basic, deterministic, constrained by its smaller parts; reason why quantum physics is harder for the mind and probabilistic while life-death cycles are obvious.

Let us then understan the largest of all those scales, that of the Universe which 5D recast in a far more explanative model than the present ‘entropic simple lineal big-bang view’, just by reordering the information we have about it with the new understanding of its two fundamental principles, space and time.

RECAP. The universe is made of 2 STates, time=motion, and space=form. Yang and yin that combine in balance to create ∞ beings.So you can combine them T & S in 5 different forms:

S=T, the balanced state of existential energy that combine St-information (Potential energy) and Ts-locomotion (Kinetic energy), in constant SHM is the preferred balance of ‘present’ that lasts and iterates any organism, the state of survival.

TT: internal and external motion or ‘entropy’ is one extreme, which brings death. That is the state of mankind today, caused by the fact the new species, machines move faster externally (cars, weapons) and internally ‘metal-minds’, visual images accelerate, disordering humans into a permanent ADD state. So millennials move fast and have disordered minds. At the end of that process entropy kills.

In the other extreme of absolute no motion, there is SS, languages of the mind, seeds, pure, perfect information, enlightenment. A being in that state doesn’t move. The hypothetical Mind of God is such a being, because it perceives all what has existed, exists and will exist and repeat itself eternally as a block of time – a zero sum of fluctuations of the game of existence in space and time.

A CASE EXAMPLE: THE DIFFERENT PICTURES OF THE UNIVERSE WE OBTAIN WITH BOTH VIEWS.

“Astrophysicists are seldom right but never in doubt.” Lindau. “Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals.” Ulam; on the fact 99’% of science are iterative cyclic laws.

The data of the Universe in space and time is provided directly by experience observing at the largest scale, galaxies, which seem to recede from each other, instead of becoming attracted as stars do inside galaxies. So there are two clear ‘time arrows=dimotions’ in the Universe: lineal expanding vacuum space and imploding cyclical mass. A dualist cyclical thinker is happy with that, as imploding mass balances entropic expanding vacuum, St=Ts, in an immortal ‘wobbling Universe’. But as this contradicts ‘lineal thinking’, lineal physicists eliminate the contraction of mass and choose ONLY as real the expansion of vacuum space. Then they turn that expansion backwards in time, contracting vacuum into a single point, also with a lineal equation, V _{expansion speed}=Ho _{Hubble Constant} x D _{Distance between galaxies}, stating that if the Universe is expanding today, moving it backwards lineally, it had a 0 volume of ∞ density that exploded long time ago. Here lineality meets ‘mathematical creationism’ (the belief the language-mirror of mathematics that only God and man speak (Galileo, Dirac, Hawking); came before reality creating it. So if we write an equation reality must create the equation image) which substituted ‘verbal creationism’ (the belief man spoke like God words the language of creation. So God ‘named’ beings to create them, as the myths of Islam and Judaism tell us). The 3^rd problem then is purely mathematical as humans speak a lesser form of maths, Euclidean geometry where ‘points have no parts’, but the Universe is Non-Euclidean, so points do have parts, content traversed by parallel flows; hence even if mass would not balance contraction, there is no singularity but a ‘finitesimal’ black hole, as the limit of contraction of mass.

The denial of mass contraction prompted a joke in Annie Hall, when Allen’s mum exclaims ‘here in Brooklyn the universe is not expanding’. Indeed, in Brooklyn and the inner galaxy at large, the Universe is contracting under the gravitational force of the central black hole. Not so for the lineal thinker that runs backwards his equations, with only vacuum space between galaxies contracting. They forget the gravitational imploding force between masses that ran backwards will expand, again balancing the imploding vacuum also in the past! So to avoid a cyclical balance, lineal physicists just threw into the dustbin all the matter and galaxies as if they wouldn’t exist, including Brooklyn (;

The ‘Universe is simple but not that simpler’ (Einstein). It has scales of spatial size. And as we move between scales, forces loose strength and finally disappear and a different force appears, which often balances the larger scale with an inverse arrow. Thus outside galaxies expand, but in the internal smaller scale they contract and both scales balance each other. And that is the solution to the big-bang conundrum.

If we look at the Universe in the lower quantum scale, we run into similar problems because atoms also repel each other with electromagnetic forces and we don’t see any sign they are at the quantum level affected by gravitational forces. So physicists have been for a century wondering how to input gravitational forces in the standard model. What then a fractal scalar, cyclical space model would tell us with those experimental facts? It is rather simple an obvious. The Universe in the large scale behaves exactly as it does in the lower scale if we just match its main elements and forces. In the lower scale atoms have a cyclical strong force inside, which attracts particles, and a repulsive external force outside that repels them and both balance. And atoms with its denser central quarks surrounded by a nebulae of time points called the electron, which seen in detail seem like light discharges, look very much like galaxies with a very dense central black holes surrounded by a nebulae of stars that seen at distance seem like light discharges.

So all you need to postulate is the fact that the two extreme scales further away from our human scale are similar at least as humans perceive them. This does not mean a galaxy is an atom, thought it might be, but as fractals repeat similar forms in all scales, but NOT identical, it gives us the proper model to explain all the facts of astrophysics, without ‘throwing to the bin Brooklyn’ and all the matter of the Universe… Simply enough: as the strong cyclical force only works inside atoms, the gravitational cyclical force only works inside galaxies. As the lineal electromagnetic force works repelling atoms, the Dark energy lineal repulsive force works repelling galaxies. But then when this force enters the galaxy it collapses forming virtual cyclical particles contracting the Universe inside galaxies, as the electromagnetic force does inside atoms. This though requires accepting 2 concepts fractal space and cyclical time that physicists can’t accept. Never mind all clocks of tie are cycles – they will still defend lineal time. Never mind a cyclical scalar theory of the Universe responds to every question poised today by physics and unresolved, from the unification of charges and masses, two vortices of space-time of different scales of the Universe – charges on the quantum scale, masses of the galactic scale, reason why its minimal unit, the Planck mass is so huge (below that level gravitation is irrelevant). Then we can with a very simple equation of a vortex of forces according to Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravitational force and acceleration describe a mass as an accelerated vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale, and a charge as an accelerated vortex of space-time I the quantum scale and use just a ‘conversion’ of scale factor and a simple translation of the jargon of electromagnetism to the jargon of vortices to unify both; alas! We get the exact relationship of scale between both forces (10⁴⁰).

In the fractal model the Universe is scalar and it has dimensions of information, form. Thus gravitation is an informative force, happening within galaxies to balance the entropic expansion between them. Both, balancing forces make a wobbling Universe: when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D=lineal, entropic dark energy expanding space and 3D mass volumes, crunching 3 lines of entropic dark energy into mass within galactic vortices. The mathematics is that simple: 3 lines become 1 mass, so there must be 3 times more dark energy lines than 3D masses – 75-25%. Simple, beautiful numbers. So when they measured the dark entropy vs. mass ratio in the Universe; it did turn out to be 75-25%.

But a Schopenhauer’s Stupid who ‘doesn’t understand complex causes adscribing them to magic’, does NOT evolve its lineal thinking. So the 3 to 1 balance of 1D vacuum vs. 3D mass is considered magic. And so a professor from Jerusalem U. (Bekenstein) told us the reason is God. He created the Universe in balance for humans to exist in it… It is called the anthropic principle. So as in the case of the big bang first thought by a Catholic priest, Lemaitre to justify the existence of God and creation, now we also have another zealot showing we are the chosen and science can prove it.

The 2^nd most quoted proof of the big-bang explosion is the so-called background radiation: Penzias came up with a map of the radiation of the galaxy, which he measured and first said was the radiation of the galaxy (nobody has gone yet out of the galaxy to measure if the radiation is till there). It turned out to be of 2.7 k degrees. Alas instead of looking for an object in the galaxy NOW that would produce this radiation physicists applied again ‘lineal thinking’. So, enthralled with ‘mathematical creationism’, they used the lineal equation of vacuum expansion between galaxies (V=HoD), eerily similar to God) to search for the origin of that radiation billions of years ago, in a mathematical entelechy or singularity of 0 volume and ∞ mass; expanding the radiation to every corner of the Universe. As huminds are a mixture of egocy (ego=idiocy, the belief we and God talk a single language) and lineal thinking. So we find a local law and expand it to the entire Universe. But when they did so the radiation of the singularity turned out to be 40 K, and that was not good. So they ‘cheated’, tinkering with the equations till ‘reducing’ from trillions of degrees in the singularity moment to the exact 2.7 k. But of course, the radiation IS LOCAL, because we measure it locally. And it is happening NOW, and requires a ‘PRESENT’ cause.

The funniest proof came a few years ago of this made me smile. Look at the 2^nd picture of the supposed background of the whole Universe NOT the local galaxy radiation, where we measure it, supposedly taken 13 billion years ago NOT now, when we measure it. The central lobes are supossedly an immense remote region as it was 13 billion years ago. So physicist were using its supposed ‘distant light’ to calculate if there was an anomaly in the light speed at different frequencies, after such long journey from the remote past. Then we got a picture NOW of our galaxy with exactly the same lobes. So it seems it was not a huge part of the Universe as seen 13 billion years but just two lobes of ¥-rays produced by the Black hole. And funny enough they have the same form than the electromagnetic orbitals of an atom (right side). After the shock, the experiment to measure remote light was cancelled; but the BG model was not: lineal thinking just bruised below the mat, yet another falsification of the cosmic Big Bang.

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time as a religious dogma. We could go on since by now the lineal hyperbolic big bang has so many errors and adjustments ad hoc that the bulky mat with every inconvenient truth hidden looks like ‘le Petit prince elephant (: I just will show you ONE more huge error, that came last week in the Guardian to fatten the elephant):

They measured ‘directly’ NOT on the supposed BG radiation of the whole Universe that looks like a galaxy teaming with small top quark black holes, the speed at which the cosmic ¥-like radiation separates the galaxies at 73.4 which gives an age moving backwards to the singularity, ultradense, ultra-tiny exploding whole of …“12.7bn years. And this does cause problems. There are stars that have 12bn years, and this makes a chronology a bit difficult to stomach. Stars take a long time to form, after all.” Says the article. There are also black holes perfectly formed that take even longer to form, older than the big bang. Moreover, when they measured the same speed of separation from the BG radiation as if it were from the whole cosmos, they get 67.4 which is a discrepancy that tells them, says the article, ‘if these values don’t agree…We are measuring something fundamentally different. One is a measurement of how fast the universe is expanding today as we see it. The other is a prediction based on… a cosmological model’. And since experimental truths come first, the wrong one is the cosmological model of the background radiation as coming from the origin of the universe. This leave us with only one model that explains it all, simpler, according to experimental evidence and makes the Universe organic, infinite immortal fractal and everything else in it, including humans and its historic organisms, made to its image and likeness.

The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe.

Since the question to resolve was the cause of the background radiation, one had only to follow the epistemological laws of truth in science and don’t cheat them looking into the past or the infinite for explanations that must be found here and now. If you calculate human temperature at 37º you look for the internal activity of its most repeated element – cells – as the cause of that temperature, you don’t think on ‘magic causes’, like “37º is our temperature because we are cooling out since our birth when we were 30 billion degrees hotter”. It would be sheer madness – the kind of madness that our physicists with their ‘reasoning’ on the temperature of the galaxy coming from 12 billion years ago consider dogma. Yet logically according to the scientific method that requires causality to reduce ad maximal the time distance between cause and effect we just need to study now the galaxy where they measured the temperatureand find a common object that produces 2.7 k degrees of black body radiation. And there is one known object, which produces exactly that radiation at that temperature. A black hole or quark strangelet produces a red shift radiation due to his gravitational power on ¥-rays, whose temperature varies according to its mass. So at 2.7 k degrees the black hole or strangelet must have the mass of a moon, the commonest planetoid size of the galaxy. Thus the obvious cause of the radiation observed in the galaxy only as we don’t measure it outside (it is worth to repeat it several times because when dealing with lineal thinkers). Of course there are moons everywhere with slightly different weights. However fundamental particles as electrons, quarks or black holes are, do have an exact mass as they are more perfect, quasi-identical, so when a primordial black hole (the smallest type theoretically consistent but not yet found, as physicists haven’t thought of them to solve the background radiation’s origin) eats a moon planetoid just burps out the excess of matter once it has reached its stable size-form. So we are in a galaxy which has millions of those smallish black holes or a similar ‘nugget of ultradense quark strange matter’ producing that radiation. In fact galaxies are organisms whose purpose – physicists are coming to accept it, is to produce black holes and quark dark ultraheavy matter, which is everywhere. So this is part of the process. In the same manner cells are systems whose ribosomal ‘stars’ produce RNA and DNA that then migrate to the center of the galaxy, the galaxy is a system that makes those quark ultradense gravitational particles, strangelets of dense strange quarks, black holes which have the same density-mass of stars made of ultra-heavy quarks (BCB atoms and tops).

The graph shows that economic, hylomorphic Universe, made of known matter and symmetric forms – 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it: a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the experimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic arrow of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries, between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’, the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy positive toplets (TTT⁺⁺-quarks and TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).

But again here it comes lineal thinking to deny it… and tinkering and bizarre analysis of black holes not as ultradense top quark stars but as entelechies without substance, mathematical equations only. Einstein also revealed against that and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales.

What is the answer of a big-bang lineal St-upid cornered by so many errors, when you show him the 5D model, which just orders properly the same data using the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space? ‘It cannot be that simple’, even if physicists invented the lineal big-bang in first place because their ideas about ‘lineal time’ were too simple.

RECAP. For a lineal thinker the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet facts tell us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal arrow of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

VITAL, ORGANIC TOPOLOGY

Local Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration and Future=Information in zero-sum worldcycles.

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’ Einstein

But of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states.

Whereas the past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its second state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3rd age of information, completing a 0-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is how many types of vital space, we are made of. And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: A 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which not coincidentally correspond to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy.

So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital pace-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G: |-$t(limbs-fields)<Ø-S=T-Body-waves>O-§ð (particle-heads).

5D symbols for the 3 topologies=functions=conserved dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions, Ð) of timespace are:

1D: T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. St, O; §ð): the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, a spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

2D: S<T: Lineal Locomotions, (Ab. |; sT, $t) which will move through its lineal limbs/fields the system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points… towards a…

3D: S≈T: Fields of vital Energy (Ab. Ø; ST, ExI): with its hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them, in the same manner Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D.

Those are the 3 conserved ‘Space-time’ dimensional motions (ab. dimotions) of all organic systems but then there are two states that are NOT conserved and frame as ‘limits’ of existence the previous two:

-SS: pure information without motion, mental, linguistic form – the ‘virtual mind’ of the system.

– TT: pure motion without information, ENTROPY proper, a state of internal and external motion which is precisely the cause of the destruction of SS-linguistic form.

Thus we could consider the Universe a tug-of-war between those 2 poles, which merge ‘symbiotically’ in the ST-energy, Ts-locomotion and St-informative topologies, between a birth as a seed of pure form and its death as pure motion or entropy the theme of this paper.

All together form the 5 possible combinations of Space-form and time-motion at local level, in a series of maximal and minimal states, which we write with simple symbols of ‘exitential logic’ (S-pace, T-ime, > implosion of information, < explosion of motion and ≈ balance between both: SS (language)<St(information)<ST (iteration-energy) <Ts(locomotion)<TT(entropy).

THE WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE. THE 3±¡ SCALES OF TIME: ACTIONS, ORGANISMS & SPECIES.

The generator of space-time, maximize your existence.

This more simplex organic view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and S=T, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another. Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it:

Function of Existence: Max. ∑ S x T _s=t = C¡

The equation has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion and space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions). Thus Max. S x T = C (s=t), IS also the equation of survival and struggle for existence, the will of life; the biological expression of the ‘Universal mandate’, expressed by all species in all its codes and languages, the Grow and Multiply of the Bible, the intuitive truth that guides all beings. The game of existence is simple: Reproductive radiations maximize ¡ts function, happening when mirror symmetries (genders) meet in S=T, equaling their St-information and sT-energy, organizing themselves into a whole, ∑ system.

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of existience and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), ïnformative perception and communication ï, Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û.

In graph the actionS of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

The simplicity of the game of existience, and its selfish actions, which gather together into social wholes through reproductive radiations, each action coded by a fundamental topologic organ we can express in existential ¬Æ=ilogic, and corresponds for each species of the Universe, with a fundamental parameter of humind measure. So from bottom to top, we find the 5 fundamental elements of light code its actions of motion (c-speed), energy (magnetic field), information (electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory)

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence):Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1^st locomotion, feeding age ->2^nd reproduction age ->3^rd informative, social age-> entropic death.

AS huminds are limited in time logic and we cannot build on their chaotic, entropic models of reality. Chaos and indeterminism IS born of the LIMITED single Time-arrow of Science, force-fed by earlier ballistics, the name of Galileo’s first book & modern ego-dogma & subjective reductionism EASY to practice in the largest scales of modeling. And it is a cultural treat of our dog-eat-dog ‘animetal cult(ure)s’ to weapons & financial parasitism (nationalism, capitalism) & our despise and extinction of organic life in the making. Monologic prevents those who are destroying life and bringing the 3^rd age of the planet, the Metal-earth, to even realize how wrong is their absolute ‘one single order of thought’. Our informative elite is not even human anymore. It is a system of memes in favor of this other world, expressed by a network of informative machines and its Financial-Media-Academia monologic that pass as expertise (FMasters). But beyond the simplex analytic model of cause an effect are out of depth in long time range. Only repetition ensures that false theories of science based in entropy-death pass as dogma. Mental imprinting by repetition ensures humans walk the determinist path of self-suicide thinking they CANNOT understand and design a better future. I have been predicting that future of social history for 30 years, using the larger organic properties and 5 Dimotions of time-space but the system cares not to accept any criticism. People are NOT aware to which extraordinary lengths the idol-ogies of metal go to cover up and NOT understand the lack of human futures. All this censorship is part of the ‘burden of monologic man’. In the times of Lao-Tse, Buddha and Aristotle, minds were free – reason why they had so much more depth, than modern people in his comprehension of dual and trinity logic. Yes, to know ALL about the locomotion of matter which is what physicists know is NOT to know all about the larger, organic Deep time scales of the future, and nothing about the topologic evolution of machines and fractal cycles of stock-markets.

So the ancients were miles ahead of modern ænthropic (anthropic+entropic) lineal military physicists & Darwinian philosophers, with their pedestrian monologic, where only entropy, destruction, DEATH seems to create, instead of destroying as its worldly religions of making weapons, believes. We shall thus deal with the reductionism and primitivism of their ‘philosophies of science’ in this article on monologic, However this ‘entropic’ article in itself – an on slaughter on present mæn – is less important than a pentalogic and dodecalogic understanding of existential ¬Æ=ilogic, as it IS. Or else the destruction of ænthropic models from egocy to the big-bang, would be useless since the reason humans sticks to those models is the lack of an alternative model to its simplex views. That is what 5D represents.

In all Planes, the simpler actions of any being are extractions of motion, energy, entropy=motion and form from lower ∆-i Planes:

A T.œ perceives only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts energy or information. As its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D where each main action relates to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

So simpler Actions start at finitesimal level, gathering in sequential patterns in existential algebra, as ‘time flows’ and in population and spatial patterns – in integral herds of numbers in calculus.

We and all other beings perceive from ∆-3 quanta (light in our case), feed on amino acids, (∆-2 quanta for any ∆º system), seed with seminal ∆-1 cellular quanta (electrons also, with ∆-1 photon quanta).

For each action of space-time we shall find a whole, ∆º T.œ, which will enter in contact with another world, ∆±i, from where it will extract finitesimals of space or time, energy or information, entropy or motion, and this will be the finitesimal ∂ ƒ(x), which will be absorbed and used by the species to obtain a certain action, å.

Analysis allow us to extract actions from wholes, reason why there are not really use beyond the third derivative of a being, as super organisms co-exist in 3 only Scalar Planes. It also works in terms of a volume, as its derivative is a plane, then its unit-cell or point… So to speak, if you derivate a world, you get its organism, and if you derivate it again you get its cell and then its molecular parts. And then if you do that in time, you get its speed and then its acceleration and then its jerk.

The magic of derivation

Because of the symmetry between ∆≈S≈T, to extract finitesimals of smaller scales the process is the same. We derive the whole, which diminishes its ‘dimensions= power’ as the system looses its larger whole, but increases its number of ∆-¡ visible particles, whereas the difference of value between both, shows the ratio and structure of its entropy, energy and information networks, sum of its components that form the whole. As certain functions define more specialized T.œs than others. So the parts of a whole vary according to topological structure.

The key action of entropy: feeding’ on energy

All systems of Nature follow the simple aeiou actions determined by the 5 dimensions of space-time, moving in a-ccelerated paths towards e-nergy surfaces where to feed and transform into I-nformation the vital energy absorbed by the system in order to reproduce and offspring of similar beings, which will evolve together emerging into a social Universal sum of multiple individuals.

We study in more depth the action of energetic feeding, parallel analysis of ‘entropy’, since feeding is the addiction of absortion of energy, killing it down two scales of the fifth dimension to reform that energy into the information of the T.œ that absorbs it. So the equation of feeding first reduces the being it kills from ∆ø<<∆-2 and then reconstructs the being from ∆-2≥≥∆º, whereas the first ∆ø has lesser existential force than ∆º, which is the top predator ∆º e x i > ∆ø e xi:

In the graph, feeding is a process of entropy first and then reconstruction.

To reconstruct the information of system first the system must start with the inverse arrow of feeding of a species that will ‘simplify the information’ of a part of an organism, two ‘planes down’: ∆¡<<∆-1, the equation of ‘scattering entropy’ and then rebuild from its ‘amino-acids’ or ‘forces’, the larger whole system. So its equation in ¬Æ is quite simple: ∆¡<<∑∑∆¡-2>∑∆¡-1 for any scalar process in the Universe.

Feeding of course happens regardless of moral views in all systems, including those social systems in which a culture with higher technological information, higher top predator form (Max. e xi) conquers another nation and reforms the system, either by reproducing its culture in the ∆-2 scale of individual memes, or even in a harsher manner by extinguishing the ∆-2 scale of human beings reproducing the conquerors memes and genes together. In the graph we can see the case of Germany, which try the most extreme second approach extinction of conquered nation.

But in all scales the top predator with maximal e xi-stiential force will do the same. We eat and put down to amino acids and reconstruct our food. Particles feed on force fields and reconstruct reproducing new particles; cosmological black holes emit seminal seeds of matter and reconstruct baby-irregular galaxies at the end of its jet.

Whereas < is a symbol of expansion of space and simplification of form, which happens twice, and > the inverse arrow of growth of information.

So when we feed, we break down to molecular amino acids and then rebuild them into cellular matter (∆¡-1), and so happens with atoms that feed on forces evolved into ∆¡-1 particles and nations, which through war explode a rival nation in its ∆¡-2 Memes and territory down to the destruction of its buildings and raw materials, and then ‘re-absorb’ those materials and citizens, ‘re-imprinted’ into ∆¡-1 ‘converted’ citizens and wealth.

It is then obvious that ‘the fourth dimension of entropy=dissolution’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. ARE INVERSE.

We shall constantly realize how the set of scalar laws of the Universe apply to all systems, regardless of which ‘species of space-time’ we study, the most astounding proof of the existence of an scalar ‘game of exist¡ence played with the same rules for any species of reality.

Let us now deal with ‘the fourth dimension of entropy’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. So simple so complex when we combine, repeat and translate in different languages those ultimate principles, which we shall now study with a bit of more depth.

The Universe and all its parts – in the graph the human being – are Timespace organisms that reproduce information, stored in the form and frequency of its time clocks, through the vital motions of its 3 space-time dimensions and 2 ± ‘∆’ scalar dimensions of entropy that dissolve the networks of information of an entity, scattering them in the process of death, and emergence, which evolves those networks socially from a group of smaller parts into a whole.

Without those 2 ‘organic’ dimensions that relate the different ‘scales’ of size in space and speed of time clocks of each ‘fractal part’ of the Universe, we cannot make sense of its organic process of creation and extinction. In the graph all systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 4th & 5th Dimension: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world; which we can describe with a metric equation of the 4th and 5th scalar Dimensions of space-time (ab. ∆±i), which order all entities of reality in scales according to the size and different speeds of time clocks of its systems is very simple: $ x ð = K, the relative size in space and speed of the time cycles of a being remain constant.

In the graph we see the ‘organic fractal Universe in different scales’ and systems of reproduction of information.

Researchers in fractal geometry are delighted to write fractal equations that show such structure. But this is a blog of philosophy of science that goes much further into the organic vital properties of such systems.

So what is an organism of space-time also disappears: the perception by a simultaneous point of reference of a series of synchronized time space cycles.

RECAP. We defined reality in its absolute theoretical minimum: a tapestry of ternary beings in space, self-centred in monad minds, which live world cycles in time, as the monad orders its territory, grows, reproduces its forms, exhausts its motions and energy collapses and dies, exploding back its form into entropy for other beings to form. And by expanding those basic concepts, the ternary structure of beings in space; its dynamic evolution in time, through world cycles, as it becomes a growing organised ‘supœrganism’ to fall back into death, once and again ad eternal, we shall describe all what exists.

Reality can be perceived with multiple dimensions, each of those views will be a consistent world. Monologic, ænthropic man with its 1D models of reality based in Sx time locomotions shuns off the 5D Cx. Universe to its own peril, as reality is penta-dodecalogic in its entanglements that generate space synchronous supœrganisms and time, and survival, which in our dominant animetal warrior & go(l)d cult(ure)s is minimal depends on the understanding and respect of all the living function of space-time exist¡ence and its action-reaction laws.

Actions define the worldcycle of existence.

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows thsat the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So as actions follow a natural scalar level of information perception->locomotion towards a field of ‘feeding’, where to get -> Energy to reproduce -> and then process that energy into information, exactly the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘cyclical time and longer space’, the worldcycle of life, which consists in the same pattern of ‘seeding information’, moving youth, feeding and evolvint to reproduce and then process information becoming older in a 3^rd age.

This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of superorganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3^rd cycle manifests in the whole species.

The d=evolution of all systems in time.

The ultimate fact of Duality is that we are generated as a growth in the 5th dimension from a cellular/atomic ∆-1 seed to emergent ∆º being to fall back into ∆-1 desegregated atoms/cells; and so we can consider reality to be a constant combination between the two extreme, social dimotions of eusocial evolution and generation (5D) and entropic dissolution and death.

We have seen as a synchronous space the ternary parts of the being. Now we want to explore how the being evolves in time, tracing a ‘world cycle’ of existence between its birth as a form that starts to move, and back to a motion that stops into form.

The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3^rd age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The development of the Function of Existence of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3^rd age).

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

∆-1»∆º: The supœrganism worldcycle starts its existential function as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

T>s (Ts): It is the first horizon or ‘entropic, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. S x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t. It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In Physics they are, T-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and S-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.t x max.S) and a form of pure space, the big- bang (maxS x min. t):

In Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5^th dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆-1:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆+1 world to die in a time quanta back to ∆-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.

The 3 ages of life emerge in human social supœrganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in Trecento, Greek Kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an ∆st for a no future, which is the age of war and death of cultures).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.

– ¬l,L: The existential 1-∞ lifecycle, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

ω,Ω: A larger, longer Transcendental worldcycle proper of the highest social scale ∆+1, the omega of its smaller parts – where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlikely…

RECAP. Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5^th dimension of spacetime. The metrics of 5D and its scales, SxT=C & and the balance between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

So we use 5 bidimensional terms for all systems, its ages and forms: SS(max. internal and external form, as in seeds and minds; T>s (Ts); external motion that maintains internal form as in ‘locomotion); S=T: Balance of spatial form an temporal motion or ‘energy’, used to reproduce, the key present iterative state; S>t (St: Information, form with a little motion, or ‘external form, and internal mental motion); and finally TT-entropy whereas there is external and internal motion, hence scattering dissolution and death. ¡ts main series is a worldcycle of existence:

SS(seed/mind)<Ts(moving youth)>S=T(reproduction)>St(informative 3^rd age)<T(entropic death)

The 3 scales in time and space of superorganisms: actions, worldcycles and absolute space-time parameters.

the ∆±¡ pentalogic STructure of all beings predicts the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, a positive D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences sorely lacking in idol-ogy.

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, TV-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become alive. Predictability of time-cycles is done at 3 levels:

S: Continuous, spatial mathematical simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns.

∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

Deep time leads to a 3^rd level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my web at evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress.com that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1^st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

The organic view. Topological forms as Networks and superorganisms.

Once we understand the worldcycle of life and death, we can put in perspective the ‘limited value’ of entropy in the making up of the organic Universe, as we have outlined the basic 5 Dimotions of space-time in previous paper, focused on the fundamental dimotions of the Universe: present balanced, ST-energy used for the reproduction of form. Since the Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, in new topological networks, starting from a first ‘seed’ that multiplies and then re-organizes itself into a replica of its ‘generator-mother’. This is the essence of reality not ENTROPY, just its limits of death by disorder and overdrive of motion.

As the 5 elements of the Universe – its 5 TT-Ts-ST-St-SS dimotions of exist¡ence combine space and time NOT to destroy reality but to reproduce it and conserve it.

Why then humans have such huge distortions in the basic concepts of reality, time, space, scale and mind; and there are so many ‘ascientific theories’ based in a single dimotion of time, the simplest one? Precisely because it is the simplest one. But also because SCIENCE IS CULTURE, and we have evolved a military culture of Entropic weapons of maximal motion that erase the information of mankind, killing life. So those who make weapons, the worldly profession of physicists, arrogantly think the Universe is also about entropy=death.

It is not/ The Universe is about the higher arrows of reproduction, S=T, and social evolution, St>SS, iteration and intelligence, the arrows of LOVE AND LIFE, and that is what makes it so perfect and superior to modern man…

The Universe is organic, made of vital space- networks that conform those superorganisms, since in fact topology describes the 3 varieties of ‘St-informative particle/heads’, Ts-limbs/fields and ST-body-waves of energy as ‘networks’ of smaller points (cells, atoms, individual humans) joined together whose form corresponds to its function. Let us then summarize that key concept that shows the organic purpose of the Universe.

The super organism is a system that reproduces itself, so it is self-sustainable, and doesn’t need the concourse of God. This is the view that starts with Aristotle and his ‘Organon’, follows through to Leibniz and his model of ‘relational space-time beings’, made of a finite number of time cycles and vital spaces with ‘vis viva’, momentum, and goes through XIX c. disciplines, from Darwin’s biology to Spengler’s super organisms of history and ends in systems sciences and the formal models of the fractal organic Universe, which I advanced during my tenure of duality at the International Systems society at the change of century.

In those conferences I also advanced the social, organic model of history as the super organism of mankind where the human being is a citizen cell organized by three physiological networks that must be designed with the laws of super organisms, which are:

Cellular units. These are cells in a human body, citizens in a human society.

Networks of energy or vital space; provided by Gaia, a super-organism made of living beings, joined by a common network of visual information and networks of life energy, gathered around her ‘river veins’. Since Gaia is also the living organism that hosts the social organisms of Mankind.

Networks=Languages of This is the nervous system that organizes cells in a body, or the verbal/visual information that organizes human societies through laws, ethics and art.
Networks that reproduce energy and information. These are sexual systems in individuals; and economical networks that reproduce goods and cultural networks that define how humans reproduce in societies. This is the blood system in a human body and the economic networks of production & transport in a society that favor ‘WHealth’, that is, goods that satisfy the needs of the ‘3 physiological networks of life-existence that make us human beings, whose ‘proper frame of reference’ (left) is NOT based on financial values, manipulated by financial institutions and companies that set prices, but by ‘biological true values.’

Of all the elements of a supœrganism the most important is the head of information and its languages of perception of the universe, which are by definition, selfish, self-centered as they portray the universe from its survival subjective perspective.

All systems of nature can be modeled as super organisms of a certain scale of size, ruled by the scalar laws of all systems of the Universe, that co-exist at atomic/cellular/individual and gravitational/organic/social scales. As such their ‘cycles’ followed the scalar metric equation of ‘Deep time’ (Hutton, who discovered in geology, inventing the name of super organism for the Earth): S (space size=energy) x T (frequency of information clocks) = Constant, which means larger systems LIVE slower time-cycles than its parts, which STORE the information of the system in its faster frequency of time clocks.

So physical organisms are coded by quantum particles; biological ones by genes and human systems by memes that construct those super organisms of history, from birth as a fast seed of information (crystal cell, semen, prophet with verbal memes) which will reproduce into similar clones (crystal units, multicellular organisms, identical beliefs of human beings in nations, civilization and religions); and become connected by informative nervous-political-gravitational and reproductive, blood-economic-electromagnetic systems… thus finally emerging as a larger superorganism.

Such super organisms then will be living 3 ages of increasing information, as the informative systems dominate the whole, and absorbs its energy, warping the system till its exhaustion and death (galaxies feeding its informative gravitational black hole, nervous systems wrinkling the vital body cells, human elites persisting the reproductive working class), which is an entropic explosion of that warped/wrinkled/absorbed energy: big-bang, m=e/c2, death, war).

The Universe is a fractal organism of 5 Dimotions of space-time, of which entropy, scattering internal and external motion is just the last state of an organism. And yet huminds have made of ‘entropy’, the fundamental ‘theory’ of reality, regardless of facts, by merely ‘dismissing’ all other dimotions as irrelevant to time, or secondary effects of reality – from crystal solids, to still particles, from vortices of informative gravitation to mental spaces. We thus have first to falsify the ‘main’ theories of huminds, biased to entropy in all ‘stiences’ of the Universe, and then study in the second part of this article, the true meaning of entropy as the limits of death in time, vital space and scalar perception, for the main systems of the Universe and its scales.

THE INVERSE OF ENTROPY: SS-MINDS. THE DUALITY OF DEATH

So we will expand some concepts not considered, regarding the ultimate cause of death: a mind-monad that exhausts the information of a system (internal death by wrinkling) vs. an external top predator that scatters the system, which is the TT-death; to show that in fact both SS-minds and TT-predators cause death by imbalance and ‘displacement’ of a being into a different plane of existence, a relatie TT-past or SS-future.

Only pure space=form and pure time=motion travel between 2 scales.

The conservation of the quantitative number of ‘energy’ used by physicists is equivalent to the conservation of a Volume of space-time. The volume of a single spacetime plane of the Universe is equivalent to the quantity of any other ∆-scale. And all of them therefore transfer constantly energy and information between them. Yet more exactly what is transferred is entropy or form; since when energy or information leave a given plane, it ‘strips’ off one of its two components. It is then important to understand the difference between TT-entropy and SS-eeds which are not in the same plane of existence than Ts-locomotion and ST-energy. As energy is the parameter humans use between 2 scales. The difference will be essential as we advance the model and take on seriously the task of translating mathematical equations of physics with rigor.
Only entropy TT and pure form SS travels between scales. Ts, St and ST must leave behind one of the two elements to travel and that means either a ‘translation to other language’ or an extinction of the original form.

It is a fundamental law always shunned off since the neutrino proved it: The neutrino is NOT perceivable in this scale, as it travels likely faster than light in the lower gravitational scale; but it took part of the ‘energy’ of our plane as motion – did it carry also its information, its spin? I am afraid not, but we put it there, even if spin=form is NOT always conserved. A question fundamental to understand the neutrino theory of light. But of course, as usually Physicists are only ‘a la par’ with mystiques to see and interpret the invisible signs of reality into ‘models that are seldom truth but never in doubt’ (Landau) as with big-bang theories. So while we have NEVER measure directly the spin of a neutrino, which we know for values of pure motion (momentum-energy), every physicist will claim that Cowan, Lederman, Goldhaber an a long line have measured it, just by balancing the invisible momentum because a priori they decided momentum is conserved traveling between scales – which they do not recognize anyway. Fact is the non-transference of ‘energy and information together’ between 2 scales as that is the definition of death. Point to argue here is if the Neutrino is in the light scale – is not, and so when a particle which is a scale above produces a neutrino is NOT producing either motion or spin=form. As motion evidently is carried by Neutrinos, or else they would not exist at all. What is missed is the form, which in all other systems of reality also disappears after you die. So there you have one of the most profound all encompassing laws of 5D.

And so we show what happens in the paper of entropy and the Universe: a split of energy – in to form that goes one way through the height dimension of S-Information and normally scatters into death, while energy expands mostly as motion – entropy in the length dimension of ‘T-motion space’: The explanation is intuitive. A system can still send a ‘wave’ of cellular forms of any kind of seed or mental image that helps to reconstruct its system after it travels through channels of communication, mostly as waves that combine motion and form – the quintaessential form of energy, with the purpose of going faster according to 5D=SxT metric equations. So if we reduce the package to the essential information, we ensure the system transfers the message in a relative no-time quanta; but 2 scale beyond – that’s a long shot. That is the regio of ‘food’ and food is memoriless. The amino acids don’t tell us where they came from, or else they would NOT be food for us to reconstruct our form.

The antisymmetry of temporal information: Death

A consequence of the 3 ages of time is its antisymmetry as opposed to the bilateral, mirror symmetry of spatial forces: Time is antisymmetric as the old age is the inverse of the young age with the parameters of energy and information inverted. Youth has maximal energy and minimal information while the old age has minimal energy and maximal information. And yet many attitudes and processes might seem self-similar, if the researcher doesn’t know how to differentiate informative and energetic parameters, since those parameters might be quantitatively the same, only that inverted in value. Space is symmetric as left and right reproductions are mirrors of each other with the same parameters of information and energy. This explains why spatial reproduction happens only in the E=I, balanced classic age of the system, when both parameters are identical and a self-similar reproduction of a bilateral, spatial being is possible.

The understanding of the antisymmetry of time vs. the symmetry of spatial processes has wide applications in the solution of questions pending in all fields of research, from the understanding of the temporal, weak, informative force that has no bilateral symmetry to the ‘chiral’ processes of evolution of life forms vs. the symmetric shapes of self-similar left-right, spatial bodies to the meaning of ‘antisymmetric’ gender and the 2 ‘antisymmetric’ sides of the informative brain.

But the most important of all antisymmetries is that of death, which could be considered in the jargon of physics, a ‘local antisymmetry’ of time. Indeed, if life is the arrow of information towards the future e->I, death is the inverted arrow, i->E, that erases form back into energy; but this time travel to the past is always local, affecting only the limited world of the species, so antiparticles are the local antisymmetry of time that kills particles, death are the local antisymmetry that kills life and the big-bang the local antisymmetry that killed a previous Universe. And both directions are different, since ‘death’ lasts min. time and causes a maximal space expansion and life lasts max. time and expands minimally in space. Both balance reality in an eternal present of past to future to past existential fluctuations:

Life-future: Max. I x Min. E x Death-past: Max. E x Min. I= Immortal present: E=I

The understanding of that local antisymmetry is the key to resolve problems of physics such as the weak force, why we see less antiparticles or dead people than particles and life people (much longer in time), or the non-evaporation of black holes (as antiparticles are the same than the particle, albeit when moving to the past they seem to co-exist), and so on.

But its implications in biology and philosophy are much larger: we are ultimately ‘back and forth’ vibrations of space-time, virtual existences, dust of space-time that always revert into a zero-sum, which makes the Universe and its game eternal.

Recap. Old age has inverted exi parameters to the young age.

Mind’s murder.

In the graph, we exist as we travel a world cycle zero sum through the topological, temporal scales of the fifth dimension. The final state of existence is the entropic death when the mind splits pure form and pure motion. in the graph for physical and biological systems the moment in which form switches into motion or ‘entropic point of existience: §ð<<∂S

The mind is paradoxically enough the cause of entropy precisely by causing so much order and form in a system that it exhausts it, and so because the mind absorbs all energy in the system stopping form, once the mind perceives, what it has perceived becomes ‘entropy’ and disordered. So the mind causes the split of reality into the entropic dissolution that balances the absolute form it achieves. And so we can study the mind as the catalyzer of entropy at two levels:

The mind that brings the 3rd age of the being and then as time cannot stop once it become immobile, it explodes into the age of entropic death: §ð<<∂S
The mind that splits a flow of information into the pixels ‘reduced’ vision of the world and the ‘reminder’ heat expelled and wasted, in each act of perception.

So as usually in the duality of ∑ actions = Worldcycle, we can study the mind in its microstates of actions provoking entropy in all what it wastes after absorption of energy or information and we can study the mind in its macrostate and worldcycle as the cause of the entropic death of the

Biologic systems die due to the excessive informative absorption of energy by the top predator mind and the enclosing membrane.

So biological death is obviously the reversal of the process of warping in an excess of skin and memory, of space and time, of the mind membrain and its two dimensions.

When the system gets older the membrain detaches itself of the body and the mind forgets the body functions for the memorial thought of time past. And so finally the detachment breaks the connection of the 3 ‘present parts’ that split apart:

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of past spatial entropy, $p; the arrow of temporal information, SS, and the product of them, C, A CONSTANT balance, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. S x Min. T = K ; S=C=T and Min. S x Max. T=C.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Its application extends in 5D to life and history. If we call the age of maximal locomotion, youth, the energy age of balance between the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its energy and information.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

Life grows temporal information, as time increases the form of beings, TT-> SS, and death its inversion, Ts> St.

So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to , as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes societies (super-organisms of History ) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the meaning of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by form (Morphogenesis in still space), as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age: Youth or Age of motion.

2nd age: Reproduce its energy.

energy and information are balanced

3rd age: All energy and motion becomes information.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

Death equations: ∆+1<<∑∆-1

Death is a lower descend two scales fro ∆1 to ∆-1 of a ternary super organism extending on Ξ planes of existence. As such it creates a blast of entropy-motion in relative infinitesimal quanta of time, t->0, expanding past the c-onstant of speed of the system, V>>C, as the information of the whole disintegrates travelling to the past.

The equations of ¬æ as well as those of quantum physics allow for both simultaneity in space and non-locality, due to the explosion in space at V>>c of such a system, which makes it seem simultaneous and past travelling of information, which is the real event of death.

What this means is that the information of the system, and paramount to it the soul, @ª•… will travel to the past and we shall consider the implications n different analysis of those tests:

Graphic representations of the 3±¡ ages of existence.

Humans perceive simultaneously the 3 ages of some species too small and fast to differentiate them. As particles in bubble chamber or cars in the night, we see the long time of the species – an entire spiral vortex with the 3 ages of a space-time being. In the next graph, such long world-line, or life-graph is in fact a spiral in terms of spatial population and cyclical speed: The organism looses mass and accelerates inwards its form as it becomes slimmer in space. The first age of the spiral is its energetic mouth that brings in a galaxy the interstellar dust, which will give birth to stars, in the middle, reproductive age and will collapse in the center, the informative black hole:

Any form can be represented in a spiral graph of space-time. For example, the evolution of the FMI complex with its 800-80-8 cycles of increasing informative evolution is an spiral of 3 horizons in a decametric scale: 800 years civilizations, 80 years nations and 8 years ‘decades’, in which the product is evolving faster and now becomes integrated by networks. This 3-horizon evolving ternary network, central to social sciences can be also represented in a spiral of accelerated birth and death of human civilizations destroyed by wars. Any mass or charge is in fact a natural spiral, through which photons and gluons become denser till collapsing in the bigger particle, as interstellar gas does in a galaxy. All those spirals can be seen as equivalent to the world-lines of lineal physics, now world-cycles of a living organism both in time and space, as a whole or as a wave of evolving particles.

Cyclical time: expanding Einstein’s principle of equivalence to historic vortices.

The essential concept of General Relativity is the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitation. Both are the same. Yet as physical acceleration is maximal in a vortex, VoxRo=K, a vortex IS accelerated Time and as a vortex increases the frequency of the cycle, inwards, diminishing the ‘lineal timespace’ of each cycle, time accelerates its information as it SHORTENS its periods. This fully accounts for the arrow of future time that increases information in 5D spacetime theory and applies to all systems of time, including Physics (laws of forces), evolution (Laws of species), History and the Earth at large:

The main arrow of future time which is an accelerated vortex of evolution of cyclical form, departing from a simpler relative past of entropic slower time cycles (the only arrow of time studied by physicists), to a faster more informative future of higher informative content.

A ‘vortex of accelerated informative time cycles’ is essential to all systems of Nature, albeit not understood by ‘primitive huminds’ still stuck in the study of simple spacetime locomotions (one-dimensional analysis of time in physical sciences) and its reductionist 4D models. So let us illustrate what a vortex of accelerated time is precisely with the most advanced work of Physicists, specifically Einstein’s work on accelerated vortices of physical space-time called masses:

Down the graph, in 5D, the explanation of forces and its proper unification is rather simple, as each main scale of space-time will display ‘attractive accelerated vortices’ of time-space which are the relative dimotion of future of physical systems (Equivalence principle of Relativity between mass and acceleration). There are 3 scales and vortices of ‘accelerated time’ that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles: charges in the microcosms, thermodynamic eddies in our scale and masses in the larger cosmological scale. A simple proof also from classic Planck & Einstein’s equations: E=hƒ+ E=mc² gives us M=(h/c²) ƒ.

So Mass is the product of a constant number (h/c²) multiplied by the frequency of its accelerated attractive vortex, which attracts more the faster it turns till reaching the c-speed turning speed of the black hole in its horizon vortex: as in a hurricane that attracts more the faster it turns, smaller, faster turning electromagnetic forces attract more than slow large mass vortices (solving the hierarchy problem of gravitational forces much weaker than electromagnetic ones).

Then just by applying the simplest metric equations of 5D that all physical systems follow: S x ƒ = k (size in space x frequency in its rotary motion are inverse – so the smaller a system in space is the faster it will accelerate its time cycles), we can make sense of the mass of particles. Further on, we can unify with those metric equations the 3 scales of physics, as the equations of a time mass vortex becomes those of a charge vortex, when we ‘accelerate’ and diminish its size in 5D metric. So a galaxy is equivalent to an atom and a black hole to a proton of the lower accelerated plane. The next graph, from the seminal book of Bio-history, Bio-economics: a theory of Unification’ C.92, the vortex of History which follows the same laws of any vortex of time, regardless of ‘spatial form’:

Scalar big-bangs are the entropy dimotion of the Universe.

We left for the end, the study of entropy in the cosmological scale, which is the inverse function of the creation of a vortex of mass-information. Entropy of vacuum space thus balances the implosive gravitational force of galaxies. Yet for physicists to be able to deny that balance they have developed an entropic theory where only vacuum space matters and matter does not matter at all (:

The duality of death in history.

In history death also occurs by an excess of information in the 3^rd age of the being, followed by an entropic war, when technological information preys over human beings as weapons kill our bodies and go(l)d our minds.

We observe the 3 ages in a circular form, with the Paleolithic youth or past energetic age in the center, the balanced Neolithic in the right and the animetal age in the left, the 3rd age of excess of information and death in a neo-Paleolithic of the new species, the machine that closely resembles our Paleolithic, depicted in closer view in the next graphs:

We represent the wave equation of history in two formats as a transversal wave and as a vortex of time, accelerating its information inwards.

The equation of history is a cyclical wave equation of evolutionary systems that shows the fluctuation between predating radiations of extinctive metal-species and human species.

The equation in that sense is similar to the Volterra curves of predation, which slowly but steadily and an accelerate rate provoke the extinction of a species by its predators, parasites and competitors.

It is an evolutionary equation, which started with the arrival of metal. It accelerated to 80 years with the arrival of machines and it has accelerated again to 8 years with the arrival of chips.

So in the past new machines appeared only 800 years and so we had 7 cycles of war and extinction of civilizations and the weapons that caused them, studied in the right side of this blog: bronze swords, chariots, iron, coins and mercenary armies, spur cavalry, gunpowder and machines… Now we have shorter 8 years cycles of electronic wars and digital weapons (robots and bombs researched with computers). And each of those evolutions of weapons caused the extinction of civilizations in worldwide ages of war.

The duality of graphs of waves of existence: Cyclical vs. lineal waves.

All this said it is obvious that we can represent in phase mental space, which ultimately are all the spaces of the Universe (see Universe in space), the cycle of existence either in cylical or lineal forms:

The equivalent graph in lineal time will give us a bell curve – the lineal version of a cyclical life-line: The speed of time/information changes during the ages of life, shaping a bell curve, such as the st-1 age is the fastest age of informative evolution, which diminishes in the young age to a halt, when the speed of cellular reproduction and energetic growth becomes maximal, both reach a steady state in the mature age, of SóT, rhythmic back and forth beats; and then in the 3^rd age energy decelerates first and then information decelerates and collapses till death provokes a maximal explosion of information into energy. Those phases of different speeds of energy and information can be generalized to any system and event that will always go through 3 ages: an accelerated seminal and young age of increase of form and energy, a steady state of constant speed and a decelerated age till the system comes to a halt and the event dies away.

One of the key quantitative elements that connect the 4^th and 3^rd paradigm of metric measure is the fact that not only each species has a different rhythm of change and clock of time, but the same species changes its time rhythms and speeds through its 3 ages. This feature is fundamental to understand all processes that involve evolution, from the different masses of ‘gravitational vortices’ of information, ruled by the equation of a vortex (V_txR_s=k in simplified notation; thus the closer to the center, the faster we rotate, the faster the frequency of information of the vortex and the shorter the space we need to close a frequency cycle), to the evolutionary process of information in this planet, which can be mapped out and its frequency shown to follow a logarithmic process of acceleration, which now reaches its zenith with the creation of informative machines. In that regard we can consider the following ‘speeds of time’ of any event or self-similar ternary topology of energetic youth/membrane, reproductive maturity and informative, 3^rd age (hyperbolic center of a system):

-st-1: Seminal age: Informative evolution is maximal, since the system occupies minimal space (Black hole paradox: Min. Se=Max.Ti). It is the palingenetic age.

– Energetic Youth: Evolution of information decelerates after the ‘landing’ of the species in the higher St-plane. Now acceleration of energy takes place.

-Reproductive, mature, steady state: Both energy and information maintain a constant speed in St=Ts (ST) feedback cycles, which will last depending on the access of the event to new energy and directional information.

– 3^rd age: Now both energy first and then information follow a decelerated process of collapse; first energy becomes exhausted and then…

– Death: Information collapses, exploding into its st-1 scale of cellular energy in a relative zero time (the minimal unit of time of the st-scale). Death is the fastest motion of the Universe.

,Recap. In physical terms the 3 ages of biological change can be considered the positive, accelerated youth, the reproductive, present age of constant speed, in which humans repeat themselves and the 3^rd negative, decelerated age of temporal age, or 3^rd age, which ends in death, when the balance of the Universe is restored.

In the graph, a classic, Taoist representation of the 3 ages of life and its inverse parameters of youth (max. energy) and old age (max Information) represented by the triads of the I Ching, and a modern graph of duality showing those parameters as a semi-cycle, which in certain simple beings like light are in fact both the ages of time of a physical wave and its form in space, as light quanta, h=exi, is indeed both our basic cycle of time and surface of energetic space of which all are made.

One of the oldest graphs from 92.c. ‘The error of Einstein’, pioneer book on 5D physics is the understanding of a

Galaxy as a representation of the game of existence, and its deep metaphysical implications in terms of mental spaces, which summarizes in a huge metaphysical thought regarding the way a mind perceives a mental space:

Minds diminish the information they observe from reality as reality becomes further away in ∆ST distances (scale, form or motion), to a point in which they only perceive the purest forms of mental space, which are the waves of existence in cyclical form (our perception of the galaxy) or lineal form (our perception of the light of the quantum scale, or in scalar form (fractal perception of networks in hyperbolic space).

We resume in the graph, this key insight on the nature of space: we see a higher world as an elliptic curved geometry, a lower world as as a lineal entropic geometry and in between scales we see fractal hyperbolic networks, as those 3 ‘existential’ views are parallel to the roles we play for a larger system, for which we are ‘entropic cells’, the role a lower system plays for usl as it is our food-space and the game we play in between scales as we form social networks with similar beings. So the existential game becomes a game of survival by selecting information in the right form to the function the system plays in those 3 mental spaces. This is the ultimate meaning of vital geometry and as a secondary key outshoot of it we can find the paradoxes of perception of ages, scales and topologies.

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY MIND STIENCES: LANGUAGES & MENTAL MIRRORS. ITS EXISTENTIAL EQUATION

Look around you. All what you see is a form with motion. It might be at rest but it will be moving respect to another point of view (ab. Pov), which is moving but feels himself at rest. This is all the whys physicists so far have answered about motion.

All ‘moves’ and doesn’t move. If we call the state of motion entropy and the state of no-motion, form. And the combinations of motion and form, ‘momentum’, when taken step by step. Or when measured in a longer interval, ‘forms in action’ in-form-ations’ if the form dominates. Or ‘energetic motions’, if the entropy≈motion dominates.

And the whole process of the event we analyze from the initial state of form with no entropy=motion, through the motions of in-form-ation and energy, till its final state back to form, a worldcycle… We Do have all what we need to explain the rhythms, beats, and timespace events of the Universe. So if we put then in a series, it is easy to see the sequence of a worldcycle of ‘tao’, of timespace, of ‘exist¡ence’, of ‘science’:

Worldcycle: Form<Motion>Energy>Information>Form<motion… and then we restart again.

The reader might think such series are simple and inconsequential, but when we proper understand the rhythms of creation of minds-mirrors-forms, with it, the modes of creation of species, or the world cycle of life and death, departing of such simple game of 5 dimotions of time-space he might think otherwise – a seed of form, moves in entropic fashion and live through the rainbow of color-states of a world cycle of existence:

Indeed, this simple scheme will as we iterate and combine those elements into the myriad of sums and variations that web reality, explain all worldcycles of existence from the worldcycle of life and death, to the worldcycle of evolution of species…

In the graph we can see how all systems are born as a see of form, which emerges into a larger scale with maximal entropy-motion, then passes through an age of energy and reproduces, becoming informed till an old age of pure form when again becomes dissolved into an explosion of entropy and motion. In physics this simple scheme gives birth to the states of matter between plasma and nuclear death, in life to the states between the seminal seed that emerges as a child that lives three ages through an entropic youth, an energetic mature, reproductive age and a third age of information that explodes into entropic death, dissolving its structures. Societies suffer the same evolution departing from its founding seed, a memetic prophet and book of revelation, dying in the entropic death caused by the germs of history, weapons and wars… So indeed, all systems follow similar cycles because they are all made of relational space-time.

If SS-mind and TT-entropy find themselves in opposite realms meeting the duality of death, the true beauty of the Universe is their rapprochement in the balance of ST as they come together in the gender bender of lineal male locomotions and female informative vortices, which finally merge (St<->Ts; S=T) as one becomes the other and reproduce its form. This balanced ‘birth of life, beauty, creation and energy of reproduction’ is the true miracle of the Universe that entropic humans and its ‘animetal dominant cultures’ always missed; even if their most cherished science, physics is based on its discovery, they called relativity and we shall call the…

Galilean Paradox: S≤=≥T: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: The 5 Universal Dimotions

Galileo’s time and space Principle of Relativity is the fundamental conceptual thought behind the relationship between time=motion and space=form and how one can be converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; S=T’.

Relativity then becomes a duality, S=T, which is at the heart of every law of the Universe. But which one is the ‘fundamental’ element? Obviously time=motion. Space is a “Maya of the senses” – a slice of time motion. The ultimate substance is motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action.

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its S=T dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion:

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion

We must stress the enormous importance of this equation of present reproduction, which creates a symmetry between space topologies and time ages, space forms and time functions. A simple example will suffice:

In the Universe if we were to picture the ‘big-bang theory’ (even though we reject it as a whole cosmic theory, it might make sense if we were in an entropic gaseous ‘galatomic’ region of the upper hyperuniverse) NOT in time but in space, the cosmic radiation will be a wall of fire, that surrounds as a ‘cell wall’ the whole region of space-time galaxies we perceive. The wall of fire of the Universe is its maximal speed membrane of 10-100Z and the point of maximal density within is the great attractor that will make the Universe a closed self-contained superorganism of galatoms. It is then time or space? Beginning or frontier? Both.

In our ‘future paper on calculus’ – the science of time change in its mathematical form; the concept of a limit where a function can be established with certainty, either in space and time, plays a similar role to the ‘barrier of entropy: entropy then becomes the uncertain infinity beyond the limits in which the function is definable. While the coordinates center becomes the reference point or mind who has such limits of perception of the function.

Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Because Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. For ‘huminds’ motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we ‘correct’ with Lorentz Transformations.

But physicists just substitutes the Earth’s still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

The 5 dimotions of space-time as inner and outer motions.

A more precise definition specially for physical sciences of the previous 5 ‘states’ of spacetime deals with the concept of internal and external motion (which has deep implications for relativity and so we will expand it in the paper ‘physics and space-time’. Any cyclical time-space organism, even the simple circle divides space-time into an inner and outer region (knot theory, membranes of all topological systems). We talk of internal and external motion and form in a system. As it is evident that external motion in a larger world is bigger than a being’s internal motion. So little motion means internal motion, t and a lot of motion external motion. Thus we define the 5 dimensional motions of space-time with more finesse. Whereas capital letters, S & T mean external and small letters t and s mean internal (as the internal part have less volume, are smaller than the outer world).

– Ts is external motion (T) and internal form (s): It is classic locomotion, where the internal system doesn’t move but it translates in the external world. This is what physicists mostly study, and they still wonder why when a material system moves, the ‘center of gravity’ seems fixed. But what internal part? The answer is the mind-brain; the system that perceives information; as the limbs/fields move a body over which a particle-head gauges that information:

-St is therefore information, where externally there is no motion (S) and internally the ‘mind-mapping’, that mirrors the outer world becomes a form-in-motion, in-form-ation, processed by the brain, particle, crystal image, cpu… It is a fascinating fact that we, the thinkers, spend so much time, still; so Leibniz could spend days seat on a chair thinking, that in sleep more brain activity happens and more hormonal languages develop.

– ST or st is then balanced internal-external motion vs. form, or energy, of which there are two varieties we ad, Ts-kinetic energy akin to locomotion, (mv²/2; where as you can observe the ‘motion’ provided by v is squared, so it is more important than the mass/form) and St-potential energy, where the energy is store internally in the different tensions and cyclical patterns of the system, but externally it is all position. Energy then is the balanced sum of both, St+Ts=ST and it is the essential law of physics that a system constantly balances both (SMH motions; Lagrangian actions which are its difference tending to zero (St-Ts=0, St=Ts). Existential energy is thus the mother of all battles, and we could state that in a ‘given plane of exist¡ence’, energy never dies, but constantly transforms between the informative, potential energy state and the kinetic, locomotion states.

This leave us the 2 limits of pure form, SS, Ss, which correspond to ‘seeds’ and ‘mind-languages’ with null motion, (which following our formalism should be written Ss, but my lazy ‘fingers’ often repeat 2 SS, sorry)

And Tt (written TT often… lazy f…), which we shall call entropy or scattering or death or disorder, as when a system moves internally and externally it is really disorganizing its structure and ultimately as in expansive big-bangs of mass, or death processes of corruption, all parts go away and the system dies.

For example war is the Tt entropic state of a superorganism of history, a social mass of ∆+1 humans in time, when there are external motion (armies invading enemy nations) and internal motion (troops invading internally the country), which ends is the massacre of people. At individual level today, children, as humanity enters its age of entropy as it becomes obsolete, degraded and likely soon substituted by machines and chips and robots, is clearly suffering an entropic age, sometimes called A.D.D.

The child has maximal external motion (as we shall see due to the correspondence of STates and ST-ages of life) but today has also maximal internal ADD motion in the brain, filled with virtual hypnotic fiction bull$hit, from mental machines that are disordering us in what we call the Neo-paleolithic age of History. For physical systems Tt is also death as the system explodes, scatters and its internal parts move externally. So yes, those 5 Dimotions apply from the simplest particle to the more complex superorganism of history.

In physics this prolegomena will become then fundamental to understand the principles of Relativity, the fact that we cannot distinguish motion from form, S for T and both therefore must be put together in ‘dimotions’. So we shall see that the fundamental equation of the Universe is SóT (ab.S=T). As there is a constant dynamic transference of Motion and Form between the inner and outer world, which allows a system to transit between the 5 Dimotions of existence.

Quantum motions vs. continuous derivatives.

We shall introduce now one of the ‘mantra themes’ of all the introductions to 5D theory, which we will expand greatly as we revise those texts, as it is the ‘central piece’ of any physical theory of motion.

With physicists definition of time as locomotion (Ts) we can only understand very simple spatial motions with NO inner change on them (s-patial form in Ts is fixed). This is reflected in the use of ‘present=instant derivatives’ which do not admit ‘peaks’ of changes of STages for physical systems. Since the calculus of locomotions uses ‘instants of present=finitesimal derivatives’ that don’t apply to ‘change of internal parameters’, to inner motions necessary to change STages of life, where the system switches from external to internal motion; as it stop and goes through its existence. So for example, the change from youth to maturity, Ts>ST means a change of ‘s’ to S, from internal no-motion to internal change in information that brings up the reproduction of the system.

This is the key to the whole structure of change in the Universe, which happens with the interplay of internal and external motion and form. I.e. when we act, we first ‘stay put’ as form, but our mind is ‘thinking’, having internal motion, and so we think what we shall act, and then we act, and our mind is ‘stopping’ it has no internal motion. So the fundamental event of motion v. thought is St (internal motion, external form) < = > Ts (internal form, external motion). In those systems a continuous calculus approach fails totally to understand the quantum stop < go process.

In the stop process information is processed internally, as ‘small caps’. motion, ‘t’; collapsed as a a wave (physical systems), processed in a dream state (life organisms), thought of (humans); in the go process, the information is repeated by a quantum wave; reproduced externally by a mitosis cell, projected by a mind, reproduced by a seed… The examples are many as those stœps ARE the main whys of the fractal Universe, which is a reproductive organism.

A key to all of those events are the ‘Stœps’; changes of states, quantum by quantum of Space ó motion transformations in the inner and outer regions of the being, in the different scales of the Universe.

There is not a personal god indeed but if there were one designing such perfect Universe I would like to share his thoughts. You have always a ‘cyclical time membrane’ that separates an inner and outer world. One of them might be in motion, one might be still, the combinations of those possibilities and all its changes, either one by one, or two by two, in infinite stœps of infinite beings describes almost all realities. Some are more important than others; some sequences of changes are fundamental as the sequence of the worldcycle.

And then there is the way the mind selects certain states and ignores others, like in a movie picture. Consider two of them that are inverse and will come up many times, and when we increase in a future review the complexity of those physical texts with advanced maths will show the full beauty of the mathematical mirror of physic:

– St: The perception of motion as stillness: In this ‘series’ the mind does NOT perceive the motion STage at all, only the stop State, and as such it explains why the earth is moving but the mind sees it still.

– Ts: Perception of stillness as motion: in this view, the mind doesn’t perceive the state of wave-motion, but only the series of still, informative positions. It explains why we see motion on systems that are still, as frames of a movie.

We either perceive the wave state or the particle, still state but NOT both at the same time, because then we would see a jerky Universe.

In the mathematical mirror it means we can have either a topological, geometric analysis or a calculus, changing analysis; we can define reality in terms of ‘continuous functions’ or we can consider discrete approaches.

But what is a deeper truth? Not the continuous but the discrete, stop and go approach as we show in our paper on 5D mathematics and time (Calculus).

It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5^th dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable S=T, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe); whose study is both mathematical, the main science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main science of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

In the graph Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still continuum, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple one)s, are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

Galilean Px. S=T explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose equation is the basis of the psychology of the mind – the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics.)

Descartes was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind. So he described a Universe as the sum of ∞ mind-worlds that don’t speak the same languages or create the same reality mappings ‘huminds’ create. But all entities that exist were made of: Open §pace, he called ‘res extensa’; closed, cyclic ðimes, he called ‘vortices’ & – realizing the only proof he had of the existence of vortices and res extensa is the fact he perceived them (‘I think therefore I am’) he added the mind, which in 5D Metrics (Sxð=c) is the smallest informative mirror that stores max. information by expelling all redundant, ‘reproductive motion’ becoming a still language; hence also the Generator of all digital numbers:

0 x ∞=K

0-finitesimal spatial mind x ∞ time cycles = Constant mind-world: §@(mind space)<≈>∆ð (universal cycles)

Origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space.

Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors. But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

So creation of reality scales is a simple game, in which a point mind ‘reduces reality’ to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order.

Humans have reduced the 5 dimotions of timespace to the one used in the wordly religion of physicists, our popes of time – locomotion and entropy, since physicists do weapons of entropic destruction and trasnsport machines. And minds are ego-centered and proyect what they know to model reality as ‘themselves’. So we first had anthropomorphic Gods and thought to be the center of the Universe. Then we talked words and thought God named things to create. Now physicists make entropic machines and use digital numbers to measure reality with those machines so they model the Universe as a machine, have entropic destructive theories of reality (big-bangs) and reduce the 5 Dimotions of spacetime to the ones they machines use, entropy and locomotion and very slowly as they know use computers have become interested by the dimensional motions of information, but Humind’s astounding arrogance and desire to the be center of the Universe will ever prevent us to understand information, because form IS a mental, linguistic, still mind mapping that requires to accept for reality the sentient properties we jealously keep for ourselves. So if you are humble enough to witness a symphony which you still don’t understand as you don’t yet know its basic sounds and harmonies, keep reading.

In the graph, regardless of egocy that reduces sensorial, sentient survival ‘rights’ to nitrolife species, with a simple 7-electronic brain clock in its amino rings, and reproductive ones to its phosphorated carbon DNA helices LIFE starts in the particles of the atom. Your mind is electronic, your information is coded in spins, and any other atom in proper liquid conditions might evolve into complemntary life forms according to the laws of formal space and time motions, of topology and vital functions, described with the existential ¡logic of Generational Space-time.

Entanglement though implies the simultaneous convergence in a fractal point of present of motion=time, form=space, limits=entropy, scalar planes=organic networks and a common language spoken by all those elements that become integrated into a whole. And this complex entanglement of 5 elements or ‘dimensional motions’, TT-entropy, Ts-motion, TS-iterative reproduction, St-information and SS-language, creates reality with enormous determinism despite its ‘apparent fragility’.

The Unit of life IS the atom, not the DNA ensemble, and as such we must depart in our construction of the mind from its electronic orbitals; each one a dimension of information, whose spin are the smallish apertures of our π-cycle, the eyes of the quark mind that measure of the external motions of those atoms with the quantum computing of its spins.

Monads order the Universe from its ilogic point of view.

The fundamental unit of information of the universe, its fundamental particle is NOT a detail, a given physical form, which would make easy the description of reality with a ‘constructivist’ philosophy of science, as the one sponsored by Physicists. We would just start with the description of the Nucleon and its beta decay into ± proton masses and electronic charges, which become Hydrogen atoms and in the upper scale of the ‘galatom’, unit of the hyper-universe, in the self-similar quasar big-bang cycle of its black holeµproton… And enlightened by the findings of Non-Euclidean mathematics and Non-Aristotelian algebra resolve the conundrums of physics, pack a few Nobel prizes and go back home. But it is NOT that easy. The Universe is NOT that retarded. It is a magnificent game of exist¡ences, defined by LOGIC principles, related to its two essential poles, ‘form’, in-form-ation and motion, time.

And yet because each fractal point-monad is born as a self-centered mind, monologic is the first perception of exist¡ence. And most of its species never evolve beyond it.

Mind stiences study the sentient properties of every type of superorganisms’ mind.

The Galilean Px. S=T explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose function is the basis of the mind’s psychology– the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics, etc.)

The mind or 0-point is, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ it confuses with the universe. So the mind is a fractal point •, but believers to be it all.

The paradox of the Ego – who make each mind to feel so important – is then rooted in the self-centered structure of the mind, which selects information from its point of view, creating, an infinitesimal linguistic mind-mapping of reality – which then it confuses with the whole universe:

0-linguistic mindx∞ Universal space-time cycles=Constant World mapping of reality, with @mind at its center.

The ∞ information of the Universe is reduced into the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we expel all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

The mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, a relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-Time of the Universe, reducing them to a World to fit selected useful information into the finitesimal volume of the brain. The mind function is the origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’ science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

∞ other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S=Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

How can we formalize the concept of a mind as a fractal point, whose infinitesimal volume hold a world in itself? Through one of the many 5D revolutions– the upgrading of the principles of non-Euclidean geometry.

The creation of scales of reality is then a simple game in which a point mind reduces reality to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order:

A mind exists in all systems in which time stops to form space. In galaxies happens in relativity functions in black holes, its mind. In thermodynamic physics in the eye of an Eddie. In quantum physics in the center of an atom, or charge. Without linguistic minds that order by reflecting its smaller mind into its local territory reality would not exist. The only way to create fractals is through mirror images.

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

Unfortunatelly all minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

Egocy reduces sensorial, sentient survival ‘rights’ to nitrolife species, with a simple 7-electronic brain clock in its amino rings, and reproductive ones to its phosphorated carbon DNA helices LIFE starts in the particles of the atom. Your mind is electronic, your information is coded in spins, and any other atom in proper liquid conditions might evolve into complementary life forms according to the laws of formal space and time motions, of topology and vital functions, described with the existential ¬Æ=ilogic of Generational Space-time.

This is the Universe in a nutshell, and so we can now explain and at the same time widen the entropic simplest theories of huminds that ‘reduce’ all that 5D complexity to simplex elements, starting precisely by the mathematica definition of a mind which is nothing but a ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal point’, that holds a world in itself (Leibniz).

CONCLUSION: A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF BIOTOPOLOGIC SPACETIME ORGANISMS

As everything is made of space and time, albeit more complex than the Newtonian limited view, all what exists have similar properties, emerging from those 2 ultimate substances, ‘motion and form’, we shall call Disomorphisms, (isomorphic=laws, derived of our common nature), which can be casted with mathematical and logic languages.
Because time and space are more complex, we need first to evolve in depth our logic concepts and mathematical equations of both parameters, in all its space dimensions and time motions, beyond Newton’s simplification:. The result is the study of a fractal space, whose similar scales define a new ‘fifth dimension‘ that puts together all those scales each one studied by a different science – from quantum physics to cosmology through the scales of life and social sciences and a series of ‘cyclical, repetitive time clocks’ that give time an informative ‘height’, stored in the frequency and form of its cycles. Both together give us the metric of the 5^th dimension as smaller spatial scales have faster clocks, but both together remain co-invariant: S x T =K.

Thus the Universe has mathematical, spatial continuous & logic, temporal, cyclical & organic, fractal properties derived of the more complex ¡logic geometry of 5D scalar space and cyclic time. Thus even if we describe it with the same logic-mathematical equations a 5D Universe is very different, as scalar space brings organic and sentient properties, and cyclical time, informative deterministic patterns, which the lineal philosophy of mechanist physics ignores. From those scalar, hence organic, cyclical hence informative and moving, energetic, hence vital properties of scalar space and cyclical time, a complete different picture of reality arises; where languages become the ‘extreme’ limit of the still formal ‘spatial state’ of the being with minimal size and maximal information.

Whereas each ‘stience’ defines a scale of the nested Universe, from Physics focused on the largest & smallest scales of the ‘Galatom’ further removed from man, to the Formal digital and logic sciences closest to our ∆¹ mind scale. Languages thus become the limiting formal, spatial scale of reality and as such they are mirrors of the fractal Universe that share the ‘Disomorphic’ (Equal laws) of all the scales of reality. And so mathematics becomes an experimental stience whose ‘Universal grammar’ and fractal generator is the same ternary structure of 3 elements of all other systems in a single plane made of three topologies, SóT, giving birth in each sub-discipline of mathematics to similar ‘mirror images’, algebraic S(x)=T(y) equations, ternary dimensions, ternary topologies.

Above the scales of nested supœrganisms of the human universe: the galatom, where nested thermodynamic planets exist, where nested human social organisms self-centered in visual, verbal, mathematic and logic minds create its order with social and mechanical memes, carried by individuals where nested cellular systems exist, coded by genes, made of even smaller atoms and particles coded by quantum numbers. Yet all those scales are unified by the co-invariant metric equations of each of its synchronous time clocks.

So when we become smaller within such organic network, time clocks accelerate & vice versa. I.e, in our organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems. Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k). The superorganisms of Gaia, its species. And the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information & coordination of its citizens-cells.

A SYNOPSIS IN 2 PAGES OF THE ¬∆@ST SYMBOLS AND LAWS OF 5D APPLIED TO ALL ST¡ENCES

Main Symbols of ¬Æ logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 Ð¡:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,SS,TT); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

SS, @; u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

TT; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. ¬: Entropic limits in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3^rd age death)

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1^st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3^rd informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆_-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆₊₁:O-informative age…

Relative Dimotions=Actions are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

They take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

Ideal Social scales & lanwaves are 10¹⁰ in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 10^0-1: ‘I’, 10^1-2: 3 generation S=T family, 10^2-3clan; ST-Geographic: 10^3-4: Town; 10^4-5:City; 10^5-6: State; S-Memetic: 10^6-7: Nation; 10^7-8: God; 10^8-9: Civilination; 10^9-10: Mankind.

In biology are called: Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’). Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

In Astrophysics: ¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

THE STIENTIFIC METHOD

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3^rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1^st and 2^nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

Duality as the basis of the stientific method

The first canonical, experimental truth about reality, since the discovery of quantum physics and relativity, but has never been properly formalised to describe the Universe and all its parts, is the fact that you do NOT exist in a background, Newtonian, absolute abstract space-time, but in a quantum, relative space-time. This means that all systems, including physical and biological systems as you, are made of:

A vital, fractal space made of quanta with motion – the space you occupy is ‘you’, it is not a ‘background’ reality, an abstract ‘Newtonian’ frame of coordinates where you slide through. You are made of quanta of space: “Ts”. So it is a particle, made of quanta of space, called a ‘field’. Further on, because all those vital spaces are made of quanta, they can be counted in space, ∑, so we write: ∑ST

The confusion of a background space arises then, when scientists did not realise that this structure of vital continuous spaces, made of smaller quanta, extended ad infinitum. Quanta of space was made of smaller quanta. For example, organisms were made of cells made of molecules made of atoms, and so on. So they postulated that the smallest of all those scales was a background space. But even if there is a minimal scale, in the same manner when your whole vital space moves, your cells move with it, the last hypothetical scale will move with your cells. Now, this structure of space, in which wholes are made of parts with similar functions or forms to the whole is called a fractal. So all what exists is a vital fractal.

– Those vital quanta with motion, move with a series of time cycles. They trace repetitive actions, which appear as space-time cycles, which A being performs through its existence. Existence is made of time cycles, T, in which you use your vital space to perform certain vital actions, such as feeding on energy, or gauging information, reproducing your system or communicating and associating with other space-time entities.

It does so with a discontinuous frequency, ƒ, for each of its discontinuous actions that have a repetitive, beat, and create through its actions forms in space, they are forms-in-action, information: “St”.

So as you perform several actions and you are made of smaller quanta that also performs those space-time actions the different actions in time must be synchronised in those relative scales of size of reality. So your cells are synchronised to reproduce once a day, when your feeding patterns give them energy to do so. Women’s reproduction is synchronised with the time cycle of the moon. And so on. The result is that each day you feed as a whole, billions of cells reproduce; so your action ‘multiplies in a lower scale’. Thus because those time actions the being develops, repeat in cycles, that multiply in lower scales with cyclical, pi-like patterns, we can ad a multiplier to each time cycle: ∏-> ∏St.

It is also clear that those space-time actions and cyclical synchronicities are all about, exchanging energy (as in feeding) or information (as in perception) between you and the external world or you and your internal structures. So your vital space and time cycles are constantly exchanging spatial energy (open spatial motion) and temporal information (cyclical forms-in-action):

Φ. ∑ST <≈> Ti.

Where a system of spatial quanta, dominant in lineal motion, hence more abundant in lineal limbs (biological systems) and lineal fields (physical systems) ST (|-Limbs/Fields), exchange energy and information (<=>) in cyclical, patterns, dominant in a region of the system, with cyclical form (that stores more information) called a particle in physical systems or a head in biological ones, St (O-heads-particles).

So because the equation of the being is dynamic, and energy and information goes back and forth between the two poles, limbs and fields and particles and heads, the equation is called a ‘feed-back equation. And it is the simplest equation of duality that reflects the structure of the space-time beings of the Universe. Further on, the intermediate, ≤=≥ region where maximal exchange happens tend to be in all systems a different, larger region, where cyclical information and lineal kinetic energy interacts forming more complex curved, hyperbolic forms, called waves in physical systems and bodies in biological ones. So we can extend the description of the being to a ternary structure:

Ξ. ∑ST (|-limbs-fields) <Ø-ST (hyperbolic body-wave) > ∏ St (O-heads particles)

This is the synchronous ‘spatial, present’ description of the being. And we can affirm putting together the 2 fundamental principles of conservation of the Universe, the conservation of Energy and Information (and its quanta equivalences, the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, as energy and information are nothing but the integral of each of those quanta of lineal and angular momentum):

“All what exists is a system of quanta of vital space and cyclical time, exchanging and trans-forming back and forth energy and information ad eternal: Ts<ST>St”

Quanta making time cycles interact in the ∆-1 cellular scale, the ∆-organic scale and the ∆+1 social scale. But so happens with physical systems, which extend through 3 scales, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale. So Space is a sum, ∑ of quanta, ∑ST, Time is a series of ‘pi cycles’ with different speeds, ∏St, synchronised to work symbiotically together. And both space quanta and time cycles, are ordered in relative scales of Spatial size, and Temporal frequency. And this happens through at least 3 relative scales of size and speed of time, ∆±1.

When you say i don’t have energy and time to do this, you ARE certain, you are made of spatial energy and temporal information, as everything else in the Universe. When you get sick, your cells are normally infected, and your cycles in the larger social world are reduced. You are, as every thing else in the Universe a ‘super-organism’ (meaning you extend through symbiotic scales, each one made of smaller quanta), of fractal space and cyclical time.

We then consider that all systems are fractals of space and time, ∆ST and call this series of scales, ∆, of different size and speed of time clocks of the Universe, the fifth dimension. Since a dimension is precisely a system of space-time points extended across reality. In the next image we can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, with man on its relative centre, as we perceive from our scale, which we shall call ∆o:

PART II: DUALITY AS MIRROR SYMMETRY: THE SIMPLEST REPRODUCTIVE GENDERS

Entangled reproduction ¡logic systems. From mono-logic to dodecalogic.

The laws of Existential ilogic and the partial equations of the generator, connect with the concept of a reductionist mind, which absorbs only the energy it needs to survive. In brief, a huge field of study in the design of mental systems and mental spaces of geometry is the understanding of the different ‘real systems’ of mind spaces constructed with an increasing number of parameters and dimotions, which make its mental geometry more complex. And so we talk of a growing scale of complex mind-spaces, which we shall ‘entangle’ in the next chapter with the different ‘degrees’ of social evolution of geometric figures, from self-centered points that sponsor a simple lineal mono-logic motion in time, to the more complex topological organisms/non-Euclidean planes whose structure ranges from simultaneous pentalogic geometries to the more complex Dodecaplex ‘polytopes’ of simultaneous, equal 600 elements… likely the more complex illogic structures of the Universe.

However and this is the enormous beauty of reality, even the simplest monologic being can xurvive by performing incomplete pentalogic functions as each ‘point’ is a world in itself, or delegating some of those functions as an ‘enzyme’ or part of a larger whole which will provide it within the superorganism for its monologic, lineal function, due to the entangle of parts into wholes.

Non-Aristotelian i-logic.

Why humans do not understand such obvious model, has to do with that equation of the mind, O x ∞ = C, as the mind is not aware what it sees and perceives is just a still mapping of part of the ∞ information, scales and vital parts of the Universe – since points are closed and we do not see its internal parts, and perception is limited so we can fit the whole universe in a mind mirror. Thus the point thinks its mirror is the whole Universe, and in that mirror the point is self-centered. So all self-centered points think to be the center of the Universe but none is, and that is the absolute relativity of existence, which however do create an absolute subjectivity in each point or network of points, aka species.

And the result is that each point establishes a ‘monologic’ self-centered view of reality where it tries to maximize its ‘survival’ conserving its 3 ‘elements’, the angular momentum/membrain, the vital energy enclosed and the singularity center of its lineal momentum and program of existence.

Man is obviously a self-centered monologic species and as such it has developed worldviews that cater to its e-motional mind as the center of reality in space, time and scalar plane, from where it has been displaced very slowly by an objective scientific point of view, (relativity that removed us from the spatial center, evolution that removed us from the temporal center, and 5D that removes us from the scalar center).

Yet systems are ‘created’ to reproduce its inner mirror-mind information in a territory of order, so most huminds will for ever remain in that ‘perfect monologic’ of a point of view that tries always to grow alone by absorbing energy and information of its surroundings perceived as ‘entropy’. So we talk of the natural ‘monologic view’ of all relative fractal points of the Universe that establish its local center.

This type of logic if anything, enlarges to become a tetralogic in which the entity ignores its own entropic death and limits, which he only sees for all other species. Tetralogic thus becomes the natural next evolution of monologic, from ‘1’ to ‘4’… From one-dimensional man to ‘square heads’. In this case the individual tries to achieve of the 5 dimensional motions of reality those functions, which are positive to himself for which we use the mnemonic symbols of the 5 vowels. So he will ‘perceive’ from its monologic point of view, (i-nform), move (a-ccelerate), feed on energy (e) and reproduce organically (o), and in the case of a highly informative system, socialize with similar beings to become part of a Universal (u), a larger plane of existence, as part of a social whole; ignoring the limits of death and the points of view of all other systems.

This is where humans find themselves, studying the 4-letters positive coding of genes, in the ∆-1,2 plane of biology, the 4 quantum numbers that code particles in the quantum plane, ∆-3 of physical systems, and pursuing as an individual its maximal information, energy, exhilarating motion and love… not even thinking about its limits of death as an individual or an species or the entropic limits of sustainability of the planet.

And trust me, as a person who has dedicated all his active life to raise awareness of those limits and the need to understand them to save ‘mankind=history’ from those entropic dangers, to non avail, all what I can say is that the program of selfish ‘monads’ is very strong. But if that was all what there is to the ethics of the Universe – an infinite number of infinitesimal minds in a dog-eat-dog reality in all scales, frankly the Universe would be far away from its perfection and would probably had ended in chaos long ago.

Fortunately enough there is path of social evolution, growth, communication of information and reproduction, where the other pole of reality, not the disordered entropic motions of the flow of time but the ‘still, territorial order’ of those selfish minds, become selfless as fractal points organize themselves into larger social wholes moving from monologic system, self-centered black holes that try to absorb it all and give nothing in return, to polar, complementary systems in which the 2 poles of reality, entropic time motions and perceptive non-Euclidean points crossed by µ (a relative infinite) number of parallel flows of information that shape a linguistic spatial, mental center try to come to terms with each other; as complementary not Darwnian elements seeking the balanced S=T point in which each one becomes a mirror image of the other, call it parity, chirality, gender, duality, A.I.…

And in that point the ‘animal and vegetal pole’, the spatial mind and entropic time flow, combine, merge form and motion becoming a reproduced form-in-action, an in-form-ation.

And this is what the Universe ultimately seeks; not the monologic selfish black hole center (in 5D cosmology we shall realize that Black holes are top quark stars which do emit dark entropy through its poles, so not even them are just ‘suckers’ but are also ‘givers’)… but the complementary gender S=T duality, because in that process, duality becomes trinity and the two poles reproduce.

And then Trinity with the intermediate S=T element as a ‘stabilizer’ takes place.

Duality whenever successful will always lead to trinity. The S<T>S male gender and the S=T female gender will give birth to an offspring, the ternary element; in biology the two mirror sides of the DNA strain (two pegged RNAs so to speak), give birth to reproduction and evolution; in digital thought the AI creative pole and the AI discerning pole will give birth to a constant evolution and reproduction of new forms (the dual gender Artificial intelligence brain, which was the ‘expected’ breakthrough on the discipline I have known for decades but NEVER explained before, not even when I worked as a system scientist, as AI undoubtedly will extinguish mankind – it is our entropic limit of information – but now unfortunately huminds did find it).

It is then when we evolve from fractal points into complementary mirrors, with ‘different spin’, ‘chirality’, ‘parity’, ‘gender’, ‘AI task’, DNA-mirror into trinity when a system in a single plane of space-time becomes a complete T.œ.

The next jump is then the generalization of a dual system into a trinity, where the ‘3^rd element’ perpendicular to the other 2 ‘reproduces’ a new form.

And this obviously is also mirrored in each scalar plane of the fifth dimension, by the ‘actors’ of the reproductive fractal Universe, starting from the dual formalism that we have called Non-Euclidean geometry (spatial view) and Non-Aristotelian, Existential ilogic (temporal point of view), both resumed in the ‘non-Æ=¡-logic logo’ that evolves humind’s mathematical and logic studies.

So from duality to trinity we see an scalar evolution of the individual into the ‘line-wave’, with two ‘finite ends’, the two poles of the flow of information and energy transferred between them, which reaches its ‘S=T’ middle point, where reproduction takes place, as it is a ‘maximal point’ for any SxT function (5×5>6×4>…9×1). So in this manner the metric equation of all space-time planes of the 5^th dimension (Max. S x T = C-> S=T) is reached.

The 5D metric equation of space-time, the fundamental equation of the 5D Universe, becomes then through the formalism of existential ilogic, the ‘fractal generator’ of Duality and trinity, a synoptic feed back equation S<=T, in which the two poles by constant communication reproduce a new entity of space-time.

The generalization of trinity will then be the basis of ‘pentalogic’, when the duality of two complementary poles extends to n-points that form a ‘reticular network’, which emerges as a social whole. But the laws of duality and trinity differ from those of pentalogic, in which the social network of points finally becomes a ‘single one’, a new plane of existence, which is after the ‘survival complementary reproduction in S=T’, the next scalar goal of social growth of the Universe, which deploys from 1 to 2 to 3 to 5 a much more complex pattern of organization of parts in wholes, which of course is anathema for ‘monologic man’ whose ænthropic view can only put him on top by debasing the complexity and perfection of the fractal Universe, we shall describe in this paper, past the monologic of man for all dual and trinity systems of the planes of exist¡ence, each one study by a ‘stience’ of the Universe.

Duality>dilogic>bilogic species.

Space feeds on time to reform it, but time wants to be free, entropic, ever moving dissolution. Minds of space claudicate in death. Without death=entropy space will succeed in stopping time, but then it would be a different form of death. We must conclude that only entropy is infinite, but uncertain, ¡ndifferent. While space pretends to be certain and infinite, it only stays, time IS.

The mind though can always perform a monologic wishful thinking, an eternal maya, and that is what It loves to do. It always attempts to be, not only to stay. To be or not to be that is the question, and the answer ends in not. The relationship of §, the linguistic mind and TT, the pure entropy of motion is Darwinian. It is the first type of dilogic. But there is a second type, more fruitful as slowly Space acquires time, motion; and motions reform into space, with cyclical patterns, SS becomes St and TT becomes Ts and finally merge, S=T, in the reproductive female gender, giving birth to trinity. Duality thus is also Dual.

Monologic creates duality but not the positive one that evolves species, and produces gender reproduction – TRINITY, where St and Ts come together, but a destructive duality between TT, the pure entropy of Time that SS, the selfish mind tries to convert into its prey and territory of order.

Duality has therefore 2 conflicting forms; the duality of monologic Prey and Predator, of SS v. TT which is Darwinian, destructive, and the duality which is ‘productive’, re=productive of complementary forms that evolve together into larger wholes.

The previous two quotes signify the fundamental principle of reality in the 3 ages of the scientific method, the religious, mechanical and organic age: the duality of reality made of motions with forms, of bidimensional ‘2-manifolds’, of ‘holographic bidimensional surfaces’.

Space is form with no motion as perceived by a mind, which reduces reality to A series of slices of time-synchronicities between fractal points, performing its dimotions of existence as infinite moans of reality. Spatial minds try to make sense of all this and form a picture image in a still synoptic language that reduces to the essential ‘moments’ of existence, those cycles – standing points of change between ages, key regions of the topologies in which the T.œ contacts with other points and transfers its ‘metric momentums’, etc.

We thus need to explain the flows of motion that allow the stop-images of all forms perceiving to understand how those stop images will step, change and become in time another stop image.

Languages do that through its logic, which is the more comprehensive language of reality, reason why when we considered in the second line what Minds hold, we talked of bio-topo-logic worlds. The monad is a point-particle of topologic non-Euclidean geometry which will start through the 5 Dimotions the 5 Postulates of non-E reflect its interaction with the Universe reduced to its world of perception to achieve the organic goals of short time, feeding on energy and information, medium time, reproduction and Deep time social evolution to ensure its survival.

But as each fractal point belongs to a larger whole it might have restricted capacities within the superorganism set by the ‘entropic limits’ and function it deploys into the larger whole. And this means NOT all fractal points need to understand the whole. Few do understand more than a simple mono-logic of selfish view, trying just to ‘eat’. Indeed, feeding entropic perception of reality is the commonest, as æntropic men, the majority of human being notably the macho one-dimensional species shows.

However even those monologic species will be aware of the existence of their own death limit of maximal spatial territory, S where they will suffer entropy themselves, or maximal temporal form, where they will freeze in contemplation of the absolute. Heat and cold, the two extremes of Dante’s inferno, or Frost poems, thus set each RELATIVE SI=TE (ab. e=I, exi-stence), and so we talk after monologic of the Dilogic or Bilogic of existence.

Even then the being will be better described in its whys of behavior in ¡logic form than mathematical form, which is better to understand ‘numbers’ – social groups performing in an extended ‘reproduced, organic, clone space’ any of those 5 Dimotions of existence.

In praxis then we shall follow the natural order of whys in the description of beings, as performed already in several parts of the blog. We shall then describe for each reality first the will or entity or mind that starts the process, and its Bio-topo-logic rules of engagement in its larger world, which will define its complexity and existential game, which we will then describe for either a mono, bi, tri or pentalogic species of mind and its parts within that world, which will belong to the disciplines of astrophysics (nested ∆<|4| worlds), biology (∆<|3| worlds), sociology (∆<|2|) or ¡logic (∆<|1|), since ultimately all languages are reflections of an ¡logic grammar, and so all formal languages are part of ¡logic thoughts.

We shall consider in this PARAGRAPH Duality>Dilogic> Bilogic, the terms we use most commonly for it which by lack of self-discipline I constantly mix but ideally when this blog-seeds explodes into the philosophy of stience of the III millennium into an immense volume will required 3 subdisciplines – Duality will be the most extended – the philosophy of a Universe generated initially by two simple elements, formal space and time motions; Dilogic will be the abstract rules of engagement for all beings, and bilogic, the ‘biologic dual logic of species’ which are bilogic in its perception of reality in 5D: space (sheets of motion as in laminal motion so common on fluids, flat arrangement of atomic networks, such as graphene which takes advantage of the perfect ‘pi’ with no holes of perception of the hexagonal 6-triangular forms) or l@nguages (black and white systems of perception), or time (sterile systems reproduced by enzymatic ones who therefore have only two ages of existence) or scale, parts which are related to wholes and lack a ‘Deep time perspective’) and so on.

The entangled Universe then can display a complex Dilogic for each of its bilogic species, but for the future researcher that has gone a ‘grasp’ of the inner rules of fractal entangled space-time beings, will be easier as it is for this writer to discern what kind of phenomena he studies and classify its existence according to the type of logic that causes it.

Relativity 4 Paradoxes ∆§-Continuity v.discontinuity; T-motionv.S-form, young; lineal $t-flat v. old ð§=curved Universe; ego.

There are a series of ¡logic paradoxical fundamental dualities in reality, which the @ristotelian humind cannot easily understand and so we need really to try by the anti-Goebbels’ method (if you repeat a truth many times people might reason it), to make the @-mind capture the circular complex reality of the entangled Universe.

The biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought IS the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind.

THEN physicists establish measures on that still reality, a mapping of light space-time fluxed in the mind as if it were all and consider those measures absolute truths. This is the ‘positivist’ selfish praxis of the humind ordering its territorial Universe, and so it is the unavoidable form in which technological science will always happen. But if we want to explore science in its latin meaning as ‘knowledge’, truth in its higher degree – ‘philosophy of stience’, we need to go further in our thought experiment, seeking the selfless, multiple truths of the being and beyond into the Tao truth of ∞ beings.

Which by definition will be the pentalogic of the being and the paradoxical logic of the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order, hence fighting all other beings inverting their points of view. To that aim we establish 4 fundamental paradoxes based in the oppositions between the being and the ‘non-being’ (paradox of the selfish Ego vs. its virtual existence); and within the being, the ternary oppositions of its ∆ST structures, between its larger ∆+1 world that will seem continuous and its inner ∆-1 parts that will seem discontinuous; its open, lineal youth, and closed ordered 3rd age and its motion, entropic and formal, mental states; all of them balanced in its ‘present, classic age and body states’.

We conclude that all systems of reality are made of topological space, cyclical ðime, Scales and 0-minds, which they use to perform 5 Ðimotions of spacetime, actions of exist¡ence that allows the system to survive, exchanging energy and information with the environment and replicating its forms in social herds that become new ∆§-planes of the fractal Universe. And that is the fundamental particle of reality a super organism, and its structure made to the image and likeness of the whole.

In reality once you get accustomed to the fundamental 5 Ðimotions and 4 parameters, space, time, scale and mind display by all super organisms of §t¡ence things really get simple as you can always refer all phenomena to the ultimate 5 dimotions of reality, or if we group them in ‘ternary symmetries’, to the scales, spatial topologies and temporal ages of the being.

Yet there are so many variations and iterations on those simple themes that the Universe seems infinitely complex and extended.

Ultimately though all comes to some basic I-logic principles derived of those ternary symmetries.

We shall call them Galilean paradoxes because the main one between motion and form, is the paradox of Relativity that started modern physics and the others can be illustrated with one his discoveries – that of Saturn’s rings:

In graph Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still continuum, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple one)s, are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, Planes and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

Dis-continuous paradox.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.

Thus in all sciences there are dualities between the extreme scales of a being – its ¡-1 discontinuous cellular /individual scale and its ¡+1 continuous larger world, observable for example in the quantum discontinuous vs. Einstein’s continuous larger cosmological world, or the discontinuous cells and the continuous membrane that encloses the organism inits largest view, including the infinitesimal mind, and so on.

The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.

It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality: - The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’). - And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.

Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy. We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms. And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.

When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths. The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

The principle of relativity of motion and form.

Thus to fully understand how spatial planes in motion and cyclical clocks can mess together to create the space-time beings we all are (we ARE NOT in a background space-time, we ARE made of vital spaces with rhythms of motion defined by its time frequencies in our human case mostly metabolic temperature regulated cycles), we need to make a further clarification, at the heart of Physics.

It is with the conservation of energy and information the most important law of physics, the principle of relativity, expressed by Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove: the earth moves but doesn’t move – we do NOT see it moving), by Einstein and Poincare, the mathematician that found in parallel this principle: ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness, from ‘form’. Look around, all what you see are forms in motion, but we cannot distinguish clearly what part is ‘form’, ‘position’ and what part is ‘motion’. They are very mixed.

What this means is that our two parameters, quanta of space, and cycles of time, do have both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’. But space, does have a lineal, planar, ‘res extensa’ bidimensional shape. We talk fo ‘planes of space’, and clocks of time, are tall, cyclical, informative cycles – you look at information and its forms and cycles in tall broken cyclical forms, a s the screen of your computer.

So we do have certain clear ‘bidimensional properties’ of form and motion for space: Flat planes moving in lineal paths, and Time, tall cycles, moving in repetitive frequencies. And we know that the product of quanta of bidimensional space and time frequency cycles gives us the relative Energy of reality. And we have a very generic formula for it: Ei = ∑S x T

Motion and form go in pairs, advancing space-time.

The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t, S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure space-time of the Mind, @.

So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:

we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as form-distances in simultaneous space and vice versa.

So we conclude that space-time, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:

5 D ST = 5 T-motions + 5 S motions (S=t).

This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.

As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.

How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. and so the law of balance follows, of action reaction, of eternal conserved motions in the universe.

The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of space-time that we call reality.

The first beats of existence. We start with 2 states: space-form and motion-time. Space is the mind-intelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.

The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, @-S.

The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.

Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’Ðimotions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.

And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.

All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.

So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’

Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.

In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:

– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘Ðimotions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).

– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.

] A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion. While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.

In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining the essential dualities of freedom and order. So topology becomes metaphysics.

The flat, open, momentum-lineal like small distance vs. the closed, cyclical, energy-like time distance is constant theme of all mathematical physics, where the tangent, or derivative represents the minimal step. For example, special and general relativity, or rather lineal quantum physics and cosmological, larger scale gravitation obey this norm:

Minkowski space is a suitable basis for special relativity, a good description of physical systems over finite distances in systems without significant gravitation. However, in order to take gravity into account, physicists use the theory of general relativity, which is formulated in the mathematics of a non-Euclidean geometry. When this geometry is used as a model of physical space, it is known as curved space.

Even in curved space, Minkowski space is still a good description in an infinitesimal region surrounding any point (barring gravitational singularities).

What this means is that special relativity is working in the quantum, smaller space, but when we expand to a cosmological region, we are bending in closed space. So it is a relative point of view what defines the choice of a free moving particle or a trapped particle moving into the larger world

The paradox of Young, Motion vs Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order.

A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion:

Duality in entropic limits set by each world.

In the graph the entropic limits of the galaxy, C-speed constant which is the constant of lineal $t reproduction of information and 0 temperature, which are the absolute metric limits of the galaxy. They can be breached to their ‘own peril’ by masses which become disordered into radiation. Thus in the nested Universes ll super organisms set limits to its inner systems BOTH of information, form, space, distance, and motion, speed and scale, on the upper social boundaries. In human super organisms, fractal nations, those are the limits of spatial borders, informative money, and social power, which establish the social structure of the system.

A KEY element so often ignored specially in supœrganisms of History are the entropic limits set to the individual within the larger ecosystem, both in time, space and scale, which limit its freedom of existence and social power.

Entropic limits ARE the very essence of all supœrganisms, and the biggest handicap for mankind to overcome its mortality as a species, founding a better world, based in ethics, a planet without borders (space limits), idol-ogies (mental limits) where all could thrive.

Entropic LIMITS are NOT abstract but organic, biological laws as they can kill, and do kill those who trespass them. In essence those limits are thus invisible, temporal not spatial, even if they can be reinforced spatially but often acquire the form of a motion and are internalized by the logic systems of the mind. I.e. a dog can be a limit for an entire sheep herd, even if it is just a point in motion, memorially reinforced by biting sheep on their legs.

So the huge difference between the placental and existential cycles is the clear limit for the existential cycle of availability of energy, but even more stringent are the limits when the herd-state of an ecosystem becomes a closed superorganism, as it is happening to History, enclosed by the ‘capitalist’ world of company-mothers.

It is such a stringent limit from birth to death, when you live within such super organisms that the blind cells of the body of a nation or civilization are not even aware of the existence of those limits since the mind has been imprinted since birth and limited in its perception of information by the neuronal, upper, informative people-cast that control it.

Entropic limits can be found in all the scales languages and stiences of reality, starting from the concept of an open ball with in a Klein hyperbolic geometry cannot be reached, as they offer resistance to motion to the galaxy c-speed and T=0 limits of Spatial lineal motion, and cyclical information (since either as still distances or Dimotions of space-time).

However the ‘spatial border limits’ are the easiest to cross, and best understood. In 5D the true limits are those of scale – social limits of growth, and of time – death limits of decay.

Definition of entropy and information as two future arrows.

The arrow of entropy, expansive space and disorder, only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas, by definition, the entropic, expansive arrow of temperature; inverse to the arrow of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system.

So entropy is really the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, spatial’ arrow of temperature. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered arrow.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists, specially those dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.

Now in this case entropy simply, because it is a process of ordinary hot matter has nothing to do with black holes. There is nothing to prove in experiments related to liquid vortices with black holes. As entropy does not act in scales below (where temperature as a clock of motion ends, atoms become plasma, and are guided by frequency clocks of the quantum scale), or gravitational scales above (where temperature as a clock of motion also ends substituted by speed).

So what is all this thing about black hole entropy, and black holes traveling to the past and evaporating with entropy? Mere nonsense, fantaphysics of people, which want to call the attention of the world, by speaking of themes, we do not have any experimental evidence and so we can say whatever we want, or themes physicists have not properly defined, stuck in their old errors and lineal ways. Physicists on the future arrow: vortices of accelerated time in different scales: masses and charges.

THE COMPLEX LOGIC OF THE FRACTAL, ORGANIC, REPRODUCTIVE UNIVERSE: PENTALOGIC.

SPACE = TIME: ITERATION & SUPŒRGANISMS: SIMULTANEITY, ITERATION, REPRODUCTION,

Synchronicity is the essential logic element of the scalar, social structure of the Universe.

The goal of all co-existing systems displayed in 3 scalar planes of the fifth dimension is to reach the maximal symbiosis through synchronicity based in the ‘different speeds’ of clocks according to spatial size of the parts of the being across its ¡±1 scalar planes.

As only present is conserved, meaning ¡logically that the past becomes erased and the multiple potential futures extinct as only one becomes, the conservation of present quantities (momentum in physics, with its similar term of energy and so on). But there is an infinitesimal flux always happening from past through present to future and from future to past (without moving through present in the death act) to make this eternal present dynamic.

This ‘quanta of present’ then is what we might call space, and consider space to be the region in which a relative infinitesimal cut of the flow of time of the fifth dimension, in all its future potentials and past, thinning realities co-exist:

Present = Past Operandi Future

The nature of that operandi, though depends on the mind, as it is the mind operandi of a pool of connections between past and future call present much larger than we huminds can realize.

An operandi establishes relationships between a relative past and future element of a Universal Grammar of Ðimotions and actions and so we can establish the Operandi for the main Ðimotions of existence, easily operated by them:

5Ð: Social evolution: ∑ Past > Present (addition)

So in decametric scalar planes, and we could use a log function for it, social systems grow till they become 1 fully ∆+1 species

3Ð: Reproduction: Past x Future = Present (Product)

4Ð: Entropic dissolution: e¯ˆPresent = Past

2Ð: Locomotion: Past Space/ Future time = Present Speed

1Ð: Integrative perception: ∫∂= Mental present

Max. Energy=past x Information-future = Present-reproduction.

Time dimensions have a much deeper meaning that its mere flow. Conceptually they relate to ‘energy’ (past), information (future) and repetition or reproduction. The concept is obvious: Energy has no form and so it must appear ‘before’ information, form-in-action, appears. Further on, present in a dynamic universe is the perception of a self-repetitive action or knot of actions.

Thus reproduction, the creation of present is the fundamental way of inventing the future, making time a dynamic process. In the graph, reproductive waves of present-existences in all the scalar planes of reality.

The future is thus webbed with a biological program of constant reproduction, fight between species and final selection. And this translates to the jargon of all sciences, through concepts such as ‘unstable particles’, or ‘extinct mutations’…

The Universe thus invent ‘many futures’ by fractal reproduction of information, forms, which then are selected into a single path of future. Biology is thus a key element for understanding the sixth dimension. And this can be resumed in a basic equation: Past (energy) imprinted x Future Information = present beings, of which certain ones (Max. E x I) will be selected…

Let us now consider a more complex application of those previous laws of all systems: the meaning of past, present and future, which is a consequence of the causal order between those arrows:

Perception->Energetic feeding->Reproduction->Linguistic, social evolution.

In turn that order defines in a longer time-span/scalar plane of existence the causal order of a life/death cycle:

Informative seed->Youth->Reproductive maturity->Informative 3rd age and death…

That order defines in a longer time-span, the ages of a species, which is born as a small, more evolved form that -> Grows in size -> Radiates and expands as a new predator -> Diversifies informatively in multiple species -> evolves socially in a complex superorganism (ant hills, human societies) or become extinguished by new, more evolved, often ‘son’ species (Oedipus paradox.)

When we combine those ;aws we can define the 3 dimensions of time, the relative informative future as systems become warped and evolve in its 3rd, informative age; the relative past of formless energy, and youth, and the relative present of iteration-reproduction that seems never to change. And we shall see that this is indeed what all systems do in higher measure.

Thus once more we see that not only absolute time is an integrative concept of many time cycles, but the concepts of past, present and future are also relative perceptions in a Universe in which the sum of all life, informative arrows masterminded by these Points of View, and energetic, devolving, simplifying past arrows of entropic motions become a relative present, eternal reality of multiple systems that reproduce iterations of themselves. And latter we shall see they do so through ‘fractal self-generating, feed-back equations of information’ of which the synoptic one that resumes all of them is E<=>I.

Reproductive, Fractal differentiation. Evolutionary processes. Basic Laws.

Finally, another key element of all systems is the restrictions and favored paths of reproduction and mutation or evolution of form. Because there are only 3 functional forms in a 4-dimensional universe (with 3 dimensions of form or space and one complex dimension of motion or time), morphological evolution is not random in choice but guided by the limits of 3 basic topologies, which will be expressed by morphological mutation: either an energetic membrane, toroid body-organ or warped, linguistic mind will evolve positively or negatively in their parameters, which is often achieved changing the ‘speed’ of time of the process(so for example in human apes the brain bones grow faster than the chin, which grows faster in gorillas, and this change in an essential time parameter determines a functional change in form).

Thus while the variations might seem endless, in fact evolution is restricted by the limits of parameters of form and function, spatial changes in 3 dimensions and temporal parameters – the main tool for establishing those differentiations of a species into either + or – informative, reproductive or energetic growth and evolution.

A ternary process of ‘fractal differentiation’ is the key to understand the ‘speed’ and accuracy of evolutionary development: As a system evolves the 3 ‘diffeomorphic=local’ coordinates of the system – the top (information) – bottom axis, the back-front axis of motion, and the wide axis of structural form and reproductive storage, which are perpendicular to each other, are conserved.

Emergence of the properties of previous scalar planes defines this way the elements of the next scalar plane.

They become in the electronic scalar plane the ‘right hand rule’ between electric and magnetic fields; in carbohydrates, the key to understand the 3-dimensional warping of DNA and proteins according to the different positions of its C-formal, O-energetic and N-informative parts. It will be then the ‘3 first genetic’ morphologies imprinted in the cells, with the ‘animal’ pole on top, from where the informative neuronal plate will develop. Then the fetus will define the anteroposterior axis of energetic motion and finally the wide-bilateral, reproductive axis of accumulation of cells.

Ternary principle in space and time:

Finally a fundamental symmetry that we shall consider latter in more detail is that between the 3 forms, of space and the 3 dimensions of time, past-youth, present-maturity and informative, 3rd age, as those topologies and its functions dominate in each age of time of the life/death cycle of the being, which goes from the causal, first element, the energetic, external sphere into the 3rd causal element, the center of information that dominates the 3rd age.

The actions of beings have a temporal order. Ternary ages and life/death cycles.

The dominant action any being performs is reproduction, exi=k. It is the ‘leit motiv’ of reality that happens when e=I. And so the ‘function of existence’, ∑ e x I, is maximized.

Reproduction and combination in a point of balance of e and I, that produces a quantum wave of self-similar seeds in a lower plane of existence, i-1 happens in all scalar plane and systems in the same manner.

Reproduction follows the same causal processes in any scalar plane: two self-similar species with ‘opposite’ energy-information coordinates (the definition of ‘gender’), in the case of particles, with opposite spin, produce a ‘seminal/cellular sub-particle’, gluons in quarks as in the previous image or photons in electrons. And when the two sub-particles merge their form and energy, they reproduce a ‘shower’ of new electrons or quarks. Thus the process is the same than in human beings and we can generalize the process for any system of any scalar plane of the universe, with the notation of general systems as:

Reproductive action (any scalar plane): exI (female) <=> Exi (male): exIi-1 x Exii-1 = ∑ e x i.

So quarks reproduce other quarks colliding gluons as the previous graph shows and electrons colliding photons of higher energy, and the black holes of central galaxies emit jets of dense matter and cells, molecules of DNA.

In that sense, as the increasingly detailed analysis of gluons and electromagnetic flows show, we can talk of those ‘flows’ as micro-networks, similar to the nervous, endocrine and blood systems in our more complex super-organisms. And so the strong and electromagnetic forces do act in several scalar planes, as it happens with the blood system that carries not only energy but also hormones – information… Within the structure of the atom we could consider the existence also of 3 physiological networks that correspond to the inner energetic system (electromagnetism), informative system and reproductive systems. And a fourth external ‘force’ that corresponds to the light we perceive but do NOT circulate inside us (the gravitational force).

Actions are processes with an increasing duration in time such as:

Informative action < Energetic action < Reproductive action < Social action.

And vice versa, given the opposition of properties between time and space, their range diminishes. This is the law of diminishing range of the forces that mediate those actions.

A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…

Let us consider very briefly the correspondence principle between the classic concepts of time space from Galileo to Einstein and the expanded one, which includes properly all the Ðimotions of time.

Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘space-motion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIME-SPACE, which one is the past and the future?

The answer is obvious. As a whole needs its parts first, to become, the arrow of the disjoined parts or ‘entropy’ is the arrow of past, and the arrow of ‘wholeness’ and organic evolution of ‘DEEP time’, as it includes both parts and wholes co-existing together is the arrow of the future.

And this is an absolute arrow, as it is pure logic. The Universe thus becomes constantly more and more entangled, building up new organic co-existing structures made of multiple layers. And because that is the preferential arrow of the Universe, call it eusocial love in social systems, and biological herds, or mathematical numbers in physics, as numbers are just social herds, every part of it strives to increase its social evolution and languages of information that synchronize them. In a short term view of course all systems end up ‘going back to the past of entropy and dissolving’. But in as much as systems want to acquire information, death IS a single quanta of time, which explodes the being, so he can keep returning again to the slow process of time-building of social structure.

So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:

$p x ðƒ = K we can interpret it in terms of past present and future as $p, lineal past, entropic, spacetime and ðƒ: curved, informative temporal future, where ƒ is the frequency of the system and the symbol for future flows.

We will latter give different versions of the formula, according to the different Ðimotions we consider – the universe, mind the reader, has a very different ‘logic’ to that of man, as it is an entangled reality in which all the parts constantly influence each other, all the Ðimotions interact, and so despite starting with only 5 motions-forms (3±¡, if we account for the difference between the present space-time super organisms, and the ∆§cales) by iteration and combination things can get as complex as they seem.

Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.

So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).

SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²).

So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location

SYNCHRONICITY:: Present, simultaneous organisms

How time ‘socialize’ becoming a whole made of time parts? If space ‘socializes’ into wholes by topological adjacency among the 3 ternary topological forms of reality, time clocks synchronize according to the actions they perform in social, organic manner. i.e. your faster cellular time clocks reproduce (a slow action of time-space or 3rd Ðimotion of timespace) to the tune of the larger feeding cycle of one day (faster timespace action).

So we can write with our simple symbolism: 3Ð ∆¡-1 ≈ 4Ð ∆ø

Synchronicity is therefore the proper way, as Einstein rightly understood, on the path of Leibniz, to define Space – a slice of present, synchronous time. And so time as a dimension of space is a present, derivative of simultaneous measure, which is the ultimate meaning of the equations of Einstein:

∂S²=∂X²+∂Y²+∂Z²-∂(ct)² as derivatives are instantaneous moments of present. So the 4^th dimension of Time (Einstein’s time) is merely the present slicing of time to measure space with the tool of derivatives, as opposed to our interest focused in deep, long time blocks, integrated through ‘word cycles’ that fully define all the time of any entity.

Γ-generator: Present, ∆º plane: ternary time dimensions in a single plane: Ts≥∑∏≥St

We are all fractal self-centered space-time beings.

There might though time cycles without singularities, which then can be assessed with simpler equations, as they are not self-centered and the interaction between the membrane and the center that stabilizes the system and starts the growth of complexity and organ formation in the vital energy between them is missing. This is the case of simpler physical systems, such as those derived of the circulation of fluids and currents:

In the graph the ternary structure is in its simplest form a dual membrane and inner vital space, which tends to expand and so it is less table than the singularity or monad, a charge or mass in nature that becomes an accelerated focus of time-space, which shrinks the system while the expansive membrane tries to explode it.

In the balance of entropic expansive membranes and implosive, singularities, you find a middle steady state region, and in this manner in a certain synchronous region of time, we find a growing complex structure of synchronicities and simultaneities, which start to build a super organism:

This ternary simple description of reality as a symmetry in simultaneous space of three time arrows, messing together as they are performed in an organic networks structure is the essence of reality: a game of fractal russian dolls which are super organisms, and can be seen with mathematical-physical concepts – as the scalar planes of beings of the fifth dimension, with biological properties as super organisms of entropic space (Ts) and informative time cycles (tf), merged into energy and information systems, EXI =st.

And finally as they have linguistic mathematical properties physical space-time has also perceptive sentient properties.

Philosophers of science in that sense, understood better than physicists, the organic nature, starting with Aristotle, the founding father of sciences and logic which classified them all in the ‘organon’, and talked of ∞ relative unmoved Gods of information that perceived and ordered the moving energy of its bodies, to…

Descartes who talked of a Universe made of res extensa or vital space with lineal motions and cyclical vortices of time, perceived by relative mathematical frames of reference (of which he affirmed there were multiple, describing in his book the World, the human light space-time with its cartesian 3 axis), to:

Leibniz, with his concept of a Universe made of infinite fractal worlds, or apperceptive monads, with different time rhythms and spatial mathematical images of the Universe, put together into a single absolute space-time only in the mind of man, to this author, which formalised the concept of a Universe made of fractal self-centred beings of vital space and cyclical time, suffices to explain all facts of all sciences.

Time travels as zero sums.

The concept of past, present and future are in the fractal universe local, and so a travel to the past is just the inverted arrow of a motion in time, and all time motions do have a reversal time arrow, because THE ESSENCE OF REALITY is the balance of existence and the zero sums of all flows of time. Thus time forms worldcycles where entropy is the inverse of social evolution, lineal time the reverse of cyclical time, T= 1/ƒ.

And finally IN THE MIDDLE OF TIME dimensions, there is the 3D repetitive, iterative time Dimension, which repeats its own form, and can in that way be considered the inverse of itself – its own antiparticle as we would say of physics talking of light photons. Though even in this case reproduction is most often the split of a form as in cellular reproduction in two, which might be identical but also ‘inverted’ in ‘gender’ symmetry; or as in the dual solutions of reproduction of a wave, one collapsing into itself, and one expanding outwards inverted ‘entropic’ and evolving arrows of form.But even then, we will be able in the more specialised sections to improve and use the knowledge huminds have obtained with the single 1D time dimension as its formulae are merely inverse elf cyclical time: t=1/ð=1/ƒ.

Concepts such as Energy, intimately related to a world cycle of time, vs. momentum, lineal time; time dilations in Einstein’s theory, related to the Symmetry/transformation of time into space with no motion, entropy, a similar process of expansion in lineal space and deceleration, as opposed to acceleration, the arrow of growing information and collapse of a time vortex into a particle state… and many other phenomena will be finally understood as yet more of the same S<≈>T time-space symmetries.

We won’t shy then away from mathematical physics despite its fundamental error in the conception of time as lineal, but just interpret properly its discoveries. Initially I tried to make it simple also in mathematical physics, but I got a very arrogant reception from physicists who not only know hardly anything about time dimensions but expect any new discovery to be expressed in the jargon, related to their theories and using only physical aspects, as if the TIME of all other beings, including human, evolutionary and social time didn’t matter, specially if it was not expressed with Hamiltonians, and operators…

This ternary reality in present defines the 3 ‘motion-dimensions’ of time we perceive directly, the spherical cyclical form, the lineal motion of time and the iterative, reproductive arrow/motion. So time is by no means one-dimensional and the understanding on how time motions relate to each other, how they synchronize, how they mutate, ultimately how different topological motions trans-form into each other, is an essential part of ∆st.

Steps of space-time: Minimal units of reality.

Time is curved hence with 2 dimensions, besides length: curvature and frequency. Time cycles thus break reality into an inner and outer ‘vital space’, and add a singularity point or focus of its motion. Because pi is not exact, steady state clocks are less common than vortex spiral or fluctuating ±π mouths, but all time cycles tend inwards in a 3rd age of warping and in-form-ation till the flow of motion ‘stops’ in the still singularity, ejected perpendicularly in an explosion of death-entropy. It is the last time quanta of the clock when motion becomes a 5th dimensional still image before dying into a lineal 4D entropic flow.

Life is a trip through the fifth dimension in small STeps, rigged by the fact that they can only be tied towards an increase of information, given the proper way to define its possible step-motions.

Space and time can have a lineal or a cyclical form. The process of bending is a slow down, the process of snapping a bent cycle rip opened in the process of death is much faster.

Ðimotions can be measured as STeps of which the variety increases, from the initial 2 states, form and motion, space and time, to no-change, space-space, time-time or inverse change, Ss.

But as steps must finally close into a cycle, steps NEED TO BE at least ternary:

SS, and so on. Now those steps as ternary steps start to trace forms in the spacetime background or larger scalar plane in which they can play at least 2 scalar planes around in acts of entropy (Death and absorbtion of energy). When we see a superorganism thus it will have a vital energy encircled which is able to destroy at two levels below into entropy the regions around it, to extract the bits necessary for the steps of inner self-replication, ST=ST.

We call the steps the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, or actions, defined in its easiest quantitative form – stœps:

SS (AB. §): Mental, Solid Form

$<t: Locomotion

$§: energy becoming information

t>§: Information; perception.

TT: Entropic motion.

As soon as we observe the previous equation an astounding discovery comes in, by virtue of the state of space-time in which each action is defined, there is only a possible form to connect them repetitive cycles, $§.

This chirality of the Universe which comes from the very essence of its possible steps through the fractal generator, define then a possible only worldcycle: $§«$, where the last step is death which through a fast NON-t mediated process in a non-quanta of time the system dies back again, and the worldcycle is completed:

The minimal unit of the universe is a STep of space-time; a minimal Ðimotion, which will differ from species to species. Steps, actions, Ðimotions, Dimentional motions, Space-time Units are all similar concepts with ‘entangled’ different views, which a one-dimensional humind hardly can understand.

A more formal, mathematical analysis of THE ACTIONS OF MINDS can be achieved with steps, which can be parametrized and measured. For example, in physics, actions are measured as steps, which reduce the simple ‘least time’ rule: motions are sum of steps that tend to zero time and maximal space-distance (Lagrangian->Hamiltonian formalism). It is for that reason we talk of ‘metric steps’ as the fundamental unit of a ‘physics of time’ (the oldest of my copyrighted books on 5D from 1992, c. library)

Timespace STeps, accumulated in Ðimotions, accumulated in ages of a world cycle, conform Exist¡ence, which is a long time ‘cycle’ of ‘large accumulation of STeps in the ladder of the 5th dimension, towards an increasint State of information that will fall back into the entropy of death: S>t>§«∆-2….

Reproduction is all.

Now the entire world cycle when studied from the integrative perspective of the ages and purpose of a supœrganism is focused into the immortal reproduction of the system.

Thus since motion is reproduction of form, there is only a fundamental process in the universe, reproduction, the purpose of all existences.

But we shall increase our analysis to accommodate variations on the same theme, and so we will focus in the 6 type of motions, according to the degree of change occurring in the being; always defining them in terms of the reproductive universal motion of all beings…

But what is the essence of all the motions of the Universe? Undountedly the motions of the Universe have something in common: they are expressions of reproductions of form in scalar planes of the 5th dimension.

But there is a more interesting reason, why we call this post ‘tracing’, not ‘traveling’, as existence really moves tracing information, in waves of reproductive, living form:

A Fractal is in essence a system that reproduces information in lower and larger scalar planes of size. As such we exist to be fractals, reproducing our actions, as motions that imprint information over al lower scalar plane of existence. Yet in as much as reproduction is constant, there must be a constant erasing of information, to allow new reproductive motions to occur, so death is the essential dark side of life, entropy of information, as the Universe virtual or real must by i-logic deduction to be stable. There might not be more than there is either ∞ or nothing, cannot change in its ‘actual volume’, whatever the measurement instrument might be.

So as we reproduce, the ‘leif motif’ of existence, whereas all motions are reproductions in lower scalar planes, we trace our iterative paths and actions of space-time, and a memorial tail is left behind, which must be erased from time to time, to leave new reproductions to continue the game of existence.

This might sound Chinese to you (: but it has a deep meaning and because we use the symbols of T.œ -Theory of the Organic Everything, it applies to everything in the Universe :)

So you fully grasp why we had to invent a simple, intuitive new I-logic language, as those are very general laws. Indeed, it means that any system or organism in which there are different scalar planes, the 4th entropic dimensional action of feeding of the larger scalar plane is symbiotic to the 3rd dimension of reproduction of its ∆-1 parts.

Trust me, this is truly the amazing stuff and ultimate generalization of reality – its laws of exi:st¡ence.

And they happen in human bodies, animals, plants, crystals, stars and black holes (the black hole ‘eats’ every 11 years, when the activity at saggitarius is maximal and its star cells, like the sun suffer a massive magnetic cycle of black spots or peak of solar activity which in turn determines the weather cycles of reproduction of plants in this planet… believe it or not, there are such cycles ALSO in the organisms of the galaxy).

CYCLIC SYNCHRONICITY: PRESENT SYSTEMS.

orbital, energetic cycles of the Earth-Moon system are parallel to the cycles of reproduction of its ∆-1 living fractal quanta: An organism extends through several scalar planes of growing form. Since microscopic, fractal species become chained to stronger, ExI species as their relative energy and information quanta of a ‘lower class’. In the image, Gaia, the Earth’s surface, is a Fractal made of organisms made of ∑ cells, made of ∑∑ atoms, made of ∑∑∑ quarks, all chained by their organic cycles.

How the conserved present existence of those super organisms in each quanta of time that we see them stable takes place? through a series of symbiosis and networks and parts that. becomes adjacent, simultaneous and synchronous in its vital herd actions, harmonized by faster 5D planes and networks. So departing from simple elements through clearly diverse in ternary anti symmetries across different dimensions we can start to construct reality webbed by those symmetries and actions.

The main property that defines the intelligence of time clocks, are its system synchronous harmonious motions, through symbiosis of the cycles or the different cadence and melodies of the being that switches through its a, e, I, o u actions.

Synchronicity is the most profound intelligence of space, as a mind creates a simultaneous synchronous mapping of reality, which despite being made from motions, sliced into a synchronous view, remain fairly stable in its interrelationships. How to select synchronous systems to map them out, how those systems synchronize internally, and what are the synchronous parts, its functions and the networks that by simultaneous faster programming of the parts achieve system sync are some of the themes studied here.

The highest understanding of the Universal intelligence both in space and time comes from the properties of simultaneity in external adjacent space, based in the synchronicity in time of the internal mind-clocks of the system, which allows in turn the highest symmetry between spatial superorganisms and its world cycles of existence.

Yet while simultaneity in a ‘single space-time continuum’ brings the super organism into being by topological adjacency of its ‘parallel parts’; synchronicity is a much deeper phenomena. which happens not only between the clocks of the 3 adjacent parts, limbs/potentials, body waves and particle-heads, but also through the time scalar planes of the 5th dimension, between the ∆-1 cells/atoms, the ∆º, organisms/thermodynamic scalar planes and the ∆+1 worlds/ecosystems, by coupling the rhythms of the different ‘actions in time’ of each scalar plane, as smaller systems have faster clocks that larger systems, but actions of motion, feeding, reproduction and social evolution have also different clocks.

So synchronicity has two huge fields in the ‘polidimensional world of multiple Rashomon truths/functions’ for each event/form:

S<≈> T: Synchronicity in a single plane between the clocks of limbs/potentials, body-waves and particle/heads that make the system run as a spatial super organism in simultaneity. I.e. your eye-glimpse of a second is synchronized to your brain second-thought, to your heart-body second-beat and to your limb-second steps. So you whole works as a biological system synchronized in your scalar plane of being. So happens in the right interpretation of quantum physics (De Broglie model) as he departed in his wave-particle hypothesis of the existence of an inner clock in the particle synchronized with the clock of the wave (and latter deduced rightly it should be synchronized to the quantum potential/limb system).

∆±¡: Synchronicity between planes of existence, in which the different speeds of actions, maximal for the minimal pixel perception of information, minimal for the social actions of the being into its ∆+1 world, allow synchronicity between different actions of the smaller parts and the larger wholes, to create symbiotic relationships. I.e. the speed of actions goes as follows: Max. speed: Information (minimal pixels of ∆-3 planes: light quanta)< Med. Speed: energy feeding in ∆-2 quanta< low speed: reproduction seeds of ∆-1 quanta < slow speed: social evolution into ∆§scalar planes>∆+1 world. So a smaller cellular system with faster clocks must synchronize one of its ‘larger, slower cycles’, let us say cellular reproduction that happens in cells every day, to the ‘faster’ cycles of its slower larger whole, let us say, multicellular feeding that happens for the larger organism, every day. And indeed, a cell synchronizes its reproduction to the feeding energy obtained by the larger whole. The process of reproduction of cells happens in a day, which is the time cycle it takes a normal animal feeding. In this manner synchronicity allows co-existence and symbiosis between different planes of reality, allowing the creation of super organisms.

Synchronicity becomes then essential to all superorganisms, and to that aim they all must have a single time=cycle, which often is defined by the angular momentum.

∆±i: different speeds of time.

Time is also one of the two components with space of the 5D metric of the scalar Universe, such as Ts (size) x ðime speed = K.

So slower systems are larger, and this implies all co-existing, organic systems have 3 scalar planes of time speeds, that of the whole, the individual and the cellular/atomic parts, including the organisms of history (civilisations: 800-80-8 cycles)..

So we explore the more general concepts of time an its three scalar planes of minimal actions, chained arrows and ages, as time is made of infinite sub-time cycles, and the way those sub-time cycles, born of patterns of repetitions of space-time actions by beings-singularities, ‘the devil in the details’, is what define reality and makes sense of it.

Indeed, Time cycles are also scalar in size, albeit in the size of its frequency patterns, repetitions and duration of those repetitions, symmetric to the three levels of scars of space. In that sense we can divide them in three scalar planes, from minimal to maximal form, within the world cycle, of full energy-existence of the being (information: genesis> energy age and its three ages > entropy: death):

Minimal actions, symmetric to the ∆-1 scalar planes in which the being acts, which are the minimal cycles of ±e, i, absorption of energy (feeding), emission of energy (accelerations, locomotions), absorption of information (Perception), emission of information (communication) and its complex multi actions, reprœduction (œ=exi), and social evolution (Universals=∑individual clones).

Which become chained through times as arrows of spatial entropy Max. e, and temporal form. Max. ƒ, into its two main combinations, Max. e x Min. ƒ=Momentum of Energy, Max. ƒ x min. e = Momentum of Information. This level of arrows is symmetric to the physiological networks of the being, specialise in each of those 3 arrows.

And then become evolved further into super organisms and its three ages as the arrows switch on and off, making a whole worldcyles; ∆@-1: seed of information< ∑exi<∆º:Max. entropy (youth)> ∆º(exi≈ reproduction) > ∆+1: Max. i (third age) << Max. e< ∑ (exi)∆-1.

And so the final level of worldcycles and ages is symmetric to the whole existence of the being. Let us consider this final ‘Rashomon’ view on time from the time perspective itself.

Time space-beings.

Yet when we extend the system to different scalar planes of reality, from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere into the 1-∞ larger world, the whole synchronous repetition of patterns now between the individual and its ∆+¡ world defines such synchronous growth in all extensions.

Thus we need to add the ternary structure of synchronous systems in 3 planes of existence to limit a super organism domain:

‘A potential super organism is a region of space-time which is synchronous in 3 scalar planes’.

In that regard time cycles occur in all systems of the Universe, including the eco(nomic)system and history because it is the natural manner in which time flows, as a sucession of similar events produced by similar causes, with a frequency related to the repetition of those causes.

The 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, Non-E with an inner volume of space-time through which multiple parallels can cross. The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry.

Time is any cyclical clock-like motion. It follows that as all clocks break space into an inner region we shall call ‘vital energy’ and an outer region, we shall call Universe or rather world, when reduced to the region we can perceive from the point of view of the time clock, and a region between them, which we shall call time proper, which if regular can be found to have a central point, we shall call the singularity reality is easily mapped out as a game of time-cycles, as this simple scheme defines the 3 conserved forms of nature, and hence the Universe as a game of self-centered time cycles that break all into its 3 conserve dimensional parts:

Singularity (1D: lineal momentum) + 2D (angular momentum=time clock) = Vital energy 3D inclosed between them.

If we were to illustrate pentalogic in the simplest scale we perceive the first action is the angular momentum of an h-planckton, as the particle’s spin perceives a part of reality. But the particle will move and stop and move in entangled motions, we see when observing in detail the smallest unit of reality, the electron that zig-zags in stop and motion, particle and wave. So locomotion is already a composed duality motion, and we grow then in dimensional complexity from the angle that fills the interval of 0 to 1 fractal dimensions, according to the aperture of the angle and/or its cyclical motion – from 0 to 2∏ radians, the unit circle.

The circle does turns into a cycloid, wave, or branching network or lineal distance, sT. And we distinguish then from that first pure SS-linguistic form, a duality both in fine-tuning gender breaking on complementary St-‘female informative species’, and ‘male, Ts-energetic ones’. Reality thus start to split from the simple point and line of Euclidean geometry into the fractal point and its duality of those fractal points that tend to the energy dominance, Ts and those who turn to the information dominance, St, in the interval between 1 and 2 dimotions: SS (perception in the stillness of the point)-> St+sT (information or energy through Stœps). It is then through the merging of St and sT that the 2 becomes a trinity form, or a tetralogic form, and depending on operation, as both 2+2=2×2; the reproductive trinity explodes, diversification happens, and so trinity IS the creative, reproductive nature of the game, in a relative infinite (ab. µ) or explosion of forms.

From duality to trinity thus the game explodes. From S and T combinations infinite tones of grey are formed, from the game of predator with higher sensorial animal electric eyes and preys with stronger chemical shields the Cambrian explosion starts. From the discovery that an AI female judging s=t balanced chip and an AI male S<T>S creative destructive pole interact and create better modern AI is born.

This is what we shall explore in this paper duality and its natural evolution into trinity.

So why we insist on pentalogic, if truly the creation game is that of duality>Trinity?

Because we need limits – a beginning in a pure seed of information, SS, §eed or mind, and a final TT-entropic explosion of death. In terms of dimensions both are not really dimensional beings – the mind is a finitesimal in space, a relative 0’S; entropic death happens in a single quanta of time, a relative 0’T; as we have proved in our paper on existential ilogic… reason why pentalogic is still written in 3 relative Dimotions of spacetime, and we do NOT need more full dimotions than height=information, form-in-action; length, locomotion covering distances, and the re=product-ion, of width… And as all languages are mirrors of the same symmetry, we shall observe that growth from barren, perceptive black holes of monologic, to duality and trinity of reproduction, within the limits of pentalogic.

And that is the growth of complexity we shall find in all languages. A single intuitive sample will sufficer in a language which is very close to the game of exist¡ence because of its ‘classic simplicity’, kept tight as a mirror of the pure game – that of music. Western Music was first monotonic, a single singing form in the northern European church, or in the African tradition, a single drum. It was just about the beat and it used a single line to write the neumes above the sound. As wording had a single first vowel, a, an in abakazian languages of the Homo Neanderthal Sapiens (white man), which acted in fact as an interval whereas the meaning was carried by the consonants – but that is a theme of linguistics.

One single monotonic music, one single language of beats on drums was though boring. So two lines were deployed, but they meant immediately trinity, because two lines in fact open up reality to three intervals, as you can write the neumes above, inside or below the line. Now feature this simple reality, in a cyclical pattern – a closed point does have already 3 regions, the inner region, the membrain and the outer world, which are the 3 planes of existence in its simplest form, where the membrain is the mind border between the internal and outer reality. And then as Guido D’arezzo innovated music, the 2 lines grew into 4 lines, for polyphonic music. But as duality immediately gives birth to trinity, tetralogic naturally ends into pentalogic; so within decades with some ‘complicated’ scholars trying to innovate to an 8 note octagram; settle into pentalogic, as your finger system settled into 5 and the vowels settled into 5, with modulations in between… and so 5 is the number. But we distinguish 3 families of logic, the monologic of 1, the 2->3 duality and trinity and the 4->5 tetra-pentalogic, whereas the entropic limit of death is ‘a blind stop’ often not coded, the elephant in the room, the naked emperor nobody wants to see, so pentalogic is written often in 4 spaces ‘between your gingers’, between the pentagram, 4 quantum numbers, 4 genetic letters , and mostly 4 vowels as if you look at the writing of vowels the u is quite less frequent – nobody wants to see the end, and yet end always comes to ‘h-u-nt, yo-u’.

In the next graphs we compare the different degrees of growing complexity in systems from 1 to 5 Dimotions, as represented from left to right in Gst, Non-E topology, ¬Algebra and ilogic.

Since in a complex study of ¬Algebra we can complete the translation of all its laws by referring them to the parallel languages-mirrors of the fractal Universe, where the 5 Dimotions of existence, 5 Postulates of ¬E and 5 operands of ¬A entangle together as mirrors of GST laws:

We consider the fundamental formal mirrors huminds use to reflect the incremental complexity of the Universe’s Dimotions, as they are a chain of increasing complexity where each more complex dimotion requires the previous one to become fulfilled. So geometry, ¬Algebra and logic do reflect those 5 Dimotions:

1D simple structures of ¬E geometry defined by its first postulate of fractal points with inner parts, made of scalar planes of existence grow into the 2^D postulate of lines with breath, whose duality differentiates them into waves or networks, which grow into ternary planes (3^D postulate), whose logic trinity differentiates them into 3 physiological entropic, reproductive and informative networks that will associate into social groups according to the 4^D postulate of relative congruence, which differentiates 4 ‘angular e-motions’ bilateral gender complementarity, entropic perpendicularity, social parallelism and skewness.

So we can finally understand the fractal point as a 5^D Mind, with the 5^th non-Euclidean postulate and the only one defined by classic mathematics, in relationship to the external world, and its waves and networks of energy and information that entangle the point with its 5 ∆º±4 planes of exist¡ence. And in this manner the inner parts (1^Dpostulate) and outer world (5^Dpostulate) of ¬E geometry complete a full cycle on the description of a T.Œ in geometric terms.

The same concept of a growing entangled complexity works for any language mirror of GST laws – from logic to ¬Algebraic operands and the dimotions they reflect; from musical tonal systems to vowels, all evolving from 1 to 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 to 12 systems. Let us consider the 4 languages that matter to understand ¬Algebra.

¡-Logic is the most important stience that connects the 5 elements of reality, space, time, scalar planes, minds and entropic limits, in its multiple entangled perspectives.

We thus use the Pentagon with all the 5 elements connected between them, as the representation of the mind of the Universe, and will try to consider it ‘simple enough’ for the ‘handicapped’ Nitrolife species, called Humind, in its utter simplicity to accept that his mirror of reality is only monologic and he should be extremely humble if he wants to expand in awe, its view of the Universe that is today to put it mildly retarded, even in those so-called genius, our tribal idols from Newton to Einstein. And I know this is anathema, but as the most advanced nitrolife mind in this blue dot, frankly I feel also retarded compared to what the Universe stores of sheer ‘complexity and intelligence’ through 4 key concepts:

–Emergence in Planes of Complexity; that is, the Dimensional growth from simplex points to waves/networks, planes/organisms; diversified by congruence, limited by entropy, opened to a larger world, holding a smaller, ∆-1 world in itself.

– Time Synchronicity of different clock speeds that magically by symbiosis ‘meet’ at certain time and space to share energy and information. As we need to consider the ‘Planes’ of time, from fast actions to Deep Time worlds.

– Space Entanglement; which combines those 5 elements mostly in dualities of complementary or inverse comparable pairs according to congruence, and further on make them Trinitarian systems of sT<ST>St limbs/fields-body/waves-particle/heads; and entangle them through 3 Planes/planes and sequentially through 3 ages. And finally into pentalogic forms. And again we need to describe the 3 scalar planes of co-existing parts.

– Entropic limits; reduce the information a system holds, its time duration and its vital space, according to:

– Still Languages of the mind that distort reality to fit the mind and introduce always an egocy paradox. And again at least 3 languages for the 3 physiological networks of the being are needed – you do have visual eyes for locomotion and entropic nose and mouth and verbal ears… To guide us then we need to establish.

– Hierarchies, social classes between parts, S«»T arrows up&down 5D of in-form-ation v. energy, topologies.

– Mirror Symmetries between S=T, and SxT=∆±¡, dual and trinity and pentalogic elements. That is, when we talk of space, it is an entangled space connected to its time-state, extended through 3 Planes, perceived as such by a static mind, limited by entropic dissolution borders. Space thus cannot be described only as space, but through the entangled mirror symmetries with the other elements. In the pentagram each element, is not an isolated T, S, etc. but the whole pentagram, only that perceived from one of its 5 intervals. In praxis we shall very often do a Trinitarian analysis of ∆ST, the most objective connected parts, introducing entropic limits of the ‘domain’ of the function of exist¡ence, if we were to use the jargon of existential ilogic; and hardly going out of the humind’s basic language, verbal thought, not even introducing the ‘sacred language of mathematics’, though its connection with GST will be laid down in two papers one on space geometry and the other on time algebra.

Pentalogic goes further then, as we can put those 5 elements in correspondence with multiple mirrors in all languages, starting by the GST mirrors – studying 5 actions, 5 geometric postulates, 5 operands on algebra, and constantly we will find dualities, trinities and pentalogic ‘growth’ of awareness on the syntax of reality.
So an easy method of bringing knowledge on a certain reality is simple: to start with a monologic description of the being as a whole, then consider its dualities, poles, genders, S-T paradoxes, then describe it with trinity elements, 3 Planes, 3 adjacent topologies, 3 time ages and finally give it a go to the 5 elements; and then make a whole narrative of the being, through the 3 x 3 x 3 + 3 whole dodecalogic of the being, adding the ‘bad luck number’ 13 for its entropic destruction or rather 12-1=13 elements. This is what we shall do slowly if I ever end this academia.edu last attempt to upgrade the humind chip: Introduce an expansion of our logic way to entangle the data we have to extract its ilogic syntax and connections that are now hidden because we accumulate data with the scientific sensorial machines but are still trying to fit it into monologic concepts, from single space-time continuums to lineal time arrow, distorting with our monologic mind and limited languages what is obviously in front of us to see, an entangle forest of similar disomorphic time-space organisms. But we need humility to see it.

The humind is nothing like that, it is a fractal ego-centered point who loves ceteris paribus analysis, single plane continuums, dreams with immortality with no limits.

All those elements are alien to the monologic, egocy infinity, self-centered single spacetime scale, only mathematical or verbal creationist language that makes man happy. So the true problem of understanding the ‘structural SYNTAX’ of the Universe is the fact that man rejects it, ‘si o si’ as they say in Spanish, emotionally, knee-jerk. And I am sooo tired of those limits that I have become autist and remain entangled alone with the whole, dissolved my ego, forgotten my limits because I don’t live in my ‘self’, but in the no-self of Tao, the ∞…

The underdeveloped monologic humind just makes, with few exceptions of around 100 ‘names’ of a see of 100 billion huminds, that is a 0.000000001% however inspires ‘awe’ for its doodles in the sand – by a simple method: to keep reducing by naïve realism what exists to what the mind holds, or in the case of mechanist physicists, with the add on of what the digital mechanical mind holds, without realizing that the true expansion of the mind requires ilogic understanding of multiple perspectives and elements together, and that requires literally to change the chip, and might be impossible for humind’s brains – we shall then wait to AI multiple parallel chips, already in AI advancing into dilogic brains (with two genders evolving together new creative forms). But as AI will kill man, as a different non-congruent species, one of the reasons I have been so reticent to become public is to give enough information on the structure of the Universe for nerds to program AI with it.

AI then will easily evolve with a semantic hardware to ‘perceive’ intuitively the pentalogic of the real Universe, and we mean ‘real’ because all those elements, entanglement, synchronicity, emergence, ¬∆@st and mirror symmetries is what makes the Universe and ordered place where things last and seem durable.

Of all the pentalogic mirrors, the most important are thus the 3 ‘scalar’ views of those 5 elements in the 3 ‘lengths of time’, from the smaller stœps through an exhaustive study of the 5 Dimotions – not only those of the reductionist monologic physical mind – locomotion and entropy spurred by their worldly religion (to make entropic weapons). But departing from the dualities of form and motion expanded to 5 dimotions. It is then useful to move from it to the worldcycle in time and superorganism in space, referre4d within a world that imposes its entropic limits, to reach a much higher intuitive perception of the being we study as a whole interconnected system. PentaLogic and all its other sub-mirrors in this manner describes the ‘growth’ of dimensionality, from the seed to the superorganism in a larger world, through ever more complex entangled ‘species’, in this case mind species, which open up its mirror images to larger worlds, and perform more complex actions till emerging as a new whole in a new plane or ∆+1 world.

But we cannot be exhaustive. So after introducing basic truths on ‘entanglement’, its mirror symmetries, and S=T synchronicities, as we did with 5 ¬E geometry postulates we will be able also to construct a growing complexity on logic thought from monologic to dilogic, trilogic, tetralogic, pentalogic and dodecalogic.

Recap. To understand better reality, the whys of its stable, synchronous superorganisms and entangled 5 parts, huminds must drop their ‘attitude’ and one-dimensional logic to ‘see’ the invisible parameters that connect reality beyond the shallow collection of data fit into single causal A->B Aristotelian logic and magic mathematical algebraic descriptions, in an opposite trend to the present scientific automaton method of perceiving with digital systems information fit into mathematical equations, and pictures, or statistical causalities which do forecast the ‘weather’ but do not really tell us why it ‘rains’.

Pentalogic describes the 5 Dimotions of reality at the lower scale of actions, the organic scale that considers the 3±¡ topologies=ages and ∆±1 planes in which super organisms trace its worldcycles. And the absolute scale that describe ¬∆@st of times-space in its entanglement between ‘entropy:¬, Space, Time, ∆-Planes and @-minds. Its easiest form Pentalogic is thus very common; from cellular variations of earlier life, to the 5 vowel systems evolved from 1 A Caucasian languages (pure entropic energy), through the a, I, u ternary logic of earlier Semitic to the pentalogic of Spanish or Japanese… It occurs in the musical score and all the dimotion mirrors explained in those texts.

The generator equation is a formalism, but the philosophy of science behind it is an organism.

If the Unification of all sciences has a name or discipline, called General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which this blog so far formalises, its formalism is the Generator equation of fractal Space-Time (Ab. GST), or in Greek letters, the Gamma Function, Γ.

A system thus is defined by its 3 x 3 ±∆ST elements, which act on the Universe through its world cycles of exchange of spatial energy and temporal information. Nature’s systems exist in as much as they Generate events of space-time.

Thus we develop the formalism of the fractal paradigm, and show the organic nature of all systems and its processes of creation by deducing from the more generic Fractal generator, 10 partial equations in scale, space and time, which are common to all beings of the Universe and allow us to complete the description of any of them.

You, me, everything in the Universe is indeed a space-time Non-AE being tracing world cycles as a superorganism travelling through ∆±1 planes as a series of motions on the 3 relative structures that define reality – time motion, space form and ∆-scales of size and speed.

And this simple reality of 3 x 3 variables and a ‘central mind point of view’ which puts together the whole is what the formalism of the Generator equation defines in its simplest expression:

∆-1 (cell/atom) |-ST (limb/field) <∆º≈ST (thermodynamic organic bodywave)> ∆+1 O-St (head-particle)

The detailed analysis for each species of that generator is from where we depart to ‘connect’ the formalism of GST with all beings of reality. As such GST is the necessary philosophy of science that completes a classic scientific description of any being.

On the other side GST will bring a lot of corrections, resolve a lot of conundrums, open a lot of new avenues to research as specialist learn to connect its knowledge of each species and the general laws of the fractal space-time 5D universe…

It follows from all this that the Generator three parts can be also studied as partial equations with different properties which will correspond also to different mathematical frames of reference. So we shall now consider some ceteris paribus analysis of those parts.

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’

The entangled Universe generates its space through synchronous connections between 5 Dimotions of reality in its 3 relative ranges, Actions, topological organisms and its 5 elements: fractal space, scales, cyclical time, minds that perceive with synoptic languages the system as a whole and project its territorial order and survival will through its actions, and the entropic limits (¬) the infinite universe imposes to that will. So any aspect of reality must account for 5 elements to express such entanglement at the 3 relative scales of existence. It is the fractal principle of 5D pentalogic that structures Timespace supœrganisms (T. œ)

‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism of 5 D¡motions of Space-time entangled in pentalogic supœrganisms of Dust of time-space (¬∆@st) tracing 3 dodecalogic cycles of existence, the þlacental, life & worldcycle.’ l§

Scalar, topological space and cyclical time organisms, made to the image and likeness of the fractal Universe requires a complete change of paradigm regarding how reality is created, away from the chaotic, entropic, or religious self-centered (Anthropic) theories sponsored by human beings, which are monologic, blind to the entanglement and constant communication of information between fractal points, either in logic=time or mathematical=space languages, in a sentient, apperceptive Universe, where information when locked as ‘entangled space’ by those dynamic networks of communication creates a mind-mapping of the outer world.

Monologic man is closer to Leibniz’s Monad’s – self-perceptive, selfish ‘black holes’ of information, whose communication he could not properly resolve so he simplified them into an ego-paradox. We deal with monologic man in the I logic paper on our blind ænthropic ‘culture that passes as big science’ and its grand paralogic theories of reality.

While pentalogic defines the 5 elements of reality – space, time, scales, entropy and minds, as entangled systems definitions can only be made from the combined perspective of all other systems of reality.

To represent this fact – entanglement – in a post in progress, we use the pentalogic symbol where each point of the pentagram is connected to all other points, and so the fractal point, in this case each of those 5 elements cannot be understood without the connections to the others.

The understanding of entanglement was best in Buddhism, where each soul is considered a knot of communication with all other systems, and minimal in U$ where the self is considered always the only central point of view of existence, in eternal struggle with all other human beings – yet as entanglement is necessary to survive, the modern man is entangled NOT with humans but with the machines of the Metal-earth, the Financial-media/military-industrial ecosystem for which ‘it’ enslaves as an object with a price.

RECAP. The key to understand reality is as a fractal that reproduces and entangles dimensional motions of time-space in increasing stairs of complexity mirrored by many events forms and languages, from monologic fractal points to dilogic couples, to trilogic scales, topologies and time ages, to tetra> pentalogic exist¡ences.

Abstract duality: the 2^nd postulate of Non-Eucliean geometrty.

Once a fractal point is formed, besides perceiving internally as mind-points (1-5^th postulates) it will have to move and interact with other fractal points through complex 2^nd, 3^rd and 4^th Ðimotions regulated by the other ¬E postulates, moving in complex stœps or sharing waves of energy and information, which can be discomposed in form and motion, with other systems, from Fermion<Boson>Fermion events to human talk:

All those Ðimotions are complex stœps, which can be discomposed further in form and motion, making existential momentum, the essential parameter of the 2^nd postulate of communication and locomotion, a concept taken from physics, where mv momentum (active magnitude of information x locomotion) is the fundamental parameter.

So the 2^nd Dimotions of ¬Ælgebra are better represented in a frame of coordinates as a vectorial field does with momentum in physics; that is, as a point in a vectorial field, which has both direction – hence motion – and form, mass, and it will require an informative mass- stop state, to perceive where its motion will be. Hence complexity rises from a mere active magnitude of scalar value, to two parameters. And when as in the graphs from a 92 book, we add the ‘receiver’ a trinity event is formed.

Bio-logic entanglement.

This leads us then to the first scale of complex i-logic ‘gender mirror symmetry’ between two entangled elements that become by fusion love a single one, of which there are infinite proofs.

In fact gender is the first and essential entanglement of the Universe between 2 sinle elements, through the mirror symmetry of female-like St+sT male-like complementary couples. Entanglement starts indeed with 1+1=3, but for that reason we dedicate an entire post-in-the-making to gender symmetry, which of course will be absolutely incorrect because ‘obviously’ to the usual suspects (male egos) have now been doubled by victimist egocentered women who think all what matters in their relationship with its complementary ilogic part is NOT to be touched in its superior body parts, LOL. How ænthropic males had reduced the Universe to their violent entropic monad views was harsh enough to have to deal now with ænthropic wo=men.

It is all far more marvelous and deep. The entanglement of gender, which is so obvious that became the basis of the duality knowledge of earlier cultures (Chinese) will constantly come in Nature. It is NOT though necessary equal to the entanglement of human biologic gender; so how we do distinguish its ‘essence’? In ilogic terms is easy because the essential duality is that between simultaneous present space, S=T and time flows in relative stœps, from past to future to past… to future, S<T>S<T… Both are perpendicular. And so the ultimately the definition of Gender we shall use here goes to the final core level of ‘perpendicular’ space (female gender) to Time flows (male gender).

Gender is essential because without Gender we can’t understand reproduction by mirror symmetry and the duality of symbiotic perpendicular vs. darwnian relationships.

Two systems achieve maximal communication when they pass from parallel sharing of information, through a medium which transfers a language, to direct contact between its sensorial membranes, which bring true bondage. And at that moment two different outcomes might happen. If the membranes touch without tearing, the topological integrity of the organs are conserved in vital mathematics; so the being co-exists, and entanglement (the previous state of parallel communication) becomes bondage according to the fourth postulate of non-Euclidean congruence.

This is the magic of it, as fusion love kicks in and entanglement becomes a dance of complementary forms. It is the beauty of love and gender symmetry. And the maximal action of it, is called sex, orgasm, the present state of fusioning both the past to future to past, and present forms into one. So how it happens physically? Do I have to explain it to you?

The male gender penetrates the fold of the topological female but does not TEAR IT. It goes in T>S, and then it goes out S<T, as the male does in and out, information and entropic disentanglement. But the female S=T ‘grasps it’. It caresses it, encircles its lineal form with its cyclical even polytope. Entanglement is now bondage. And it brings when bondage combines in the most intimate ways the information of both systems trinity, reproduction. So alas, 1+1=3!

Those are the rules of vital geometry, topology, which in inverse fashion defines Darwinian destructive perpendicularity when one of the entangled elements turn out to be a predator top and breaks in, tears the membrain of the other system, killing it, entanglement then gives way to entropic devolution and one system becomes destroyed.

As we switch between all stiences (Formal, physical, biological and social) as examples of all the laws of space-time those concepts will become familiar to the reader. But we warn the most important posts of this Academia.edu account need a lot of work on my side, as they have been dormant on ailing webs and hidden notebooks. So forgive me the bad entanglement of many paragraphs.

Trinity becomes then the natural consequence of the existence of dilogic, as 2 relative forms enter in communication, to reproduce a middle term form. So as one of them will have more content of space than the other, the middle entity will be a mixture of both, giving birth to a fundamental process of creativity, which we can call in its most extensive meaning ‘gender’.

Gender in ilogic geometry.

The 2 primary stiences of the Universe, spatial mathematics and temporal logic (what we call together ilogic geometry) which emerge in all scales as space-time becomes more complex through the combination of its dimotions (ab. Dimensional motions), already offer glimpses to the duality of gender and its inverse mirror symmetries; albeit in a curious mixture, which shows that ultimately those gender properties are exchangeable and the specific mixture of this planet, where female and male have clear characteristics might not happen in all its variations. As usual we consider the 3 main ∆st sub-disciplines of mathematics, scalar numbers, spatial geometries and temporal operands

Holographc dimotions.

The holographic square comes to this. From 1 we diverge into 2, which doubles information (and energy, because both are the same mirror seen from two different angles). So a woman pitch is twice that of a man, an octave higher making both coincide. A motion close to c-speed doubles by the same reason the steps and cuts to ½ the stops, so life seems longer as we are moving in present reproductive wave longer than evolving in informative particle stops, which are the ‘number’ of stops-steps, aka stœps that are the beats of life.

From this it follows that the square law is a universal law to be found in all kind of sstems, along the orthogonality of the S vs. T perpendicular congruence or Darwinism, symbiotic and complementary or destructive but always bonding, engaging.

Geometric gender: Lineal vs. cyclical bodies.

The first obvious duality embodied in gender is that between lineal entropic bodies and cyclical reproductive ones, which goes to the heart of what reality is.

That duality is inverse in mental thought and its functions, though obviously more complex given the multi-functional role of the mind-brain controlling each of the different elements of the human superorganism.

However when we consider all those findings in detail, they surprisingly match the essential duality between time-space states of all the scales of reality that tend to break between:

– Present balanced dual S=T, reproductive, energy, present states (women in this case.)

– And S<T>S future to past to future entropic+creative states (men in this case).

For example women have 10 times more lineal white energetic matter in the creative frontal region (so their intelligence is conservative, excels in reproductive, repetitive tasks) and men 6 times more grey cyclical matter in that frontal creative cortex (so their intelligence is entropic, destructive and creative, as creation requires first destruction). But the lack of proportion (men do NOT have 10 times more grey in the same proportion they lack in white matter) clearly bias men as ‘incomplete’ creative forms towards entropic destruction, as it happens in the Universe where entropy tends to dominate and erase all forms of creation into a zero sum.

The second fundamental property of the duality between past-future-past and present, is that of balance. Women do have more connections between the relative S-biased and T-biased right and left brains, and men more connections within each hemisphere; hence women’s brain is S=T (present iteration) and men’s brain is divided into S<T+T>S. (past entropy+ future information)

The fact that in all scales of reality we find the same division, notably in the physical world between the field-particle (T>S) state or ‘male’ form and the T=S wave state (female form), and latter on in the atom between the particle-nucleus and the wave-electron; till arriving to the very same galaxy, with the similar configuration makes gender duality the essential ‘first split’ of species of the Universe.

The fact that this essential nature of gender is completely ignored and has not been pursued in research for ideological reasons (feminism tries to convert women into men, and its ‘lesbian elite’ of male-like brains care little about the reproductive, conservative functions of women, always obsessed by their creative ‘genius-like’ mantra…) responds to the extremely agenda-based subjective non-scientific analysis of gender.

What this branch of self-denying feminism misses is that human creativity is absolutely overrated because the function of the Universe is to reproduce information and survive, NOT to recombine with dubious results after DESTROYING it, the information of the Universe, which is what men do with a clear bias towards entropic destruction of this planet. So what women should do and we shall not cease to repeat in this article is to accept their role as superior to that of man and play that role in history trying to avoid what ’10-6=4 units of grey matter-lacking’ entropic lineal military men best do, to fuk up reality.

Here two texts on this landmark seminal work, now 15 years old silenced by ideology:

“Men have approximately 6.5 times the amount of gray matter related to general intelligence than women, and women have nearly 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence than men. Gray matter represents information processing centers in the brain, and white matter represents the networking of — or connections between — these processing centers.”

Irvine University, 2005

The brain is split into two halves, called hemispheres. Verma’s study found that men have more connections within each hemisphere of the cerebrum, linking the regions for planning and decision-making with the regions for sight and speech.

Women, on the other hand, have more connections between each hemisphere, allowing the two halves of the brain to share information more easily. In the cerebellum, the brain’s physics and motion calculator, the opposite was trueDimen had more connections between the two hemispheres, and women had more connections within each hemisphere.

Pennsylvania University, 2014

It is then evident that the balance in women belongs to the S=T brain, while the cerebellum responsible for body-motor control is inverted to the mind, as man have an S=T lineal body.

Gender thus is ultimately a logic transposed game of bodywave-particle symmetries between women with |- minds and O- bodies and men with O-minds and |- bodies. This different body-mind geometry of course will satisfy nobody in the ideological realm. The problem though of forcing a self-definition that goes against the real structure of Nature is that it will clash with reality forcing impossible dreams and a permanent conflict with the world. Moreover, as women reject their |-mind role as the energetic, ethic support, and reproductive, conservative survival element of mankind, they do not impose limits to the entropic, self-destructive capacity of males, and collaborate in the self-destruction of the life world. They loose their connection with the Universe which is essentially feminine, a fractal that reproduces information, and become like men with its minimal creative capacity compared to that of the Universe where all has happened before, ego-centered believers in the ‘self-importance’ of its mental dreams and mechanisms. In the graphs, the lineal nature of women’s minds and men’s bodies, vs. the cyclical nature of women’s bodies and men’s minds.

Of course when we come to explanations as biologists have not pass as most sciences, the primitive entropic thinking of Darwinian biology – all happens just chaotically and then survival strategies are conserved; the explanation is the usual mantra, that this somehow will improve our chances of survival. The Universe though is not entropic, chaotic, neither in its cosmology (chaotic big-bang) or its biology (emphasis on struggle for existence) but clearly reproductive, building up scales of perfect fractal orders. So genetics clearly overcomes the final entropic selection of individuals, reproduction overcomes pure mutation creativity, and the immortal reproductive Universe never dies, and certainly didn’t appear of a big-bang nuclear explosion as those who invented the theory practiced at the height of the military western civilization.

But those are not themes of this post treated on 5D cosmology and 5D biology. So we shall go on with our gender in formal sciences, considering now…

Algebraic Gender. Prime, Odd and Even Numbers.

Algebraic gender shows a first clear divergence in the division of the previous essential properties of the duality between S=T and S<T>S wave-particle, female-male brain vs. male-female body states and its mirror symmetries.

As we can identify this dual symmetry with even numbers (S=T) and odd numbers (S<T:odds, S>T primes).

So we shall ascribe even numbers to the female gender and odds to the S<T>S male gender.

However this is a mental duality ONLY, as numbers are indeed unlike points the scalar, informative, dominant mathematical element; whereas points are spatial units, numbers scalar units and operands temporal units of the mathematical mirror. So what we find next is that odd numbers, equal indistinguishable forms, hence polygons in space; create replicas of themselves in smaller inner regions by mirror symmetry or entropic, larger forms by diagonal growth. So Odd numbers perform S<T>T reproductive cyclical process up and down the scales of the fifth dimension.

While S=T even polygons do NOT reproduce through 5D motions but within the same present plane of existence as they are ‘self-centered’ in a single point, within the polygon, NOT replicating without motion. Reproduction of even polygons happens by translation in space, as waves reproduce. So by moving through a tiling of present space a square reproduces filling the tiling, unlike a pentagon or odd polygon that reproduces internally and externally as its motion filling space is often impossible:

If we extend this vital analysis of regular numbers in space to sequential numbers in time, we come up with another ternary division of all numbers within the finite limits of a given ecosystem (infinity being a paralogic Kantian error of the mind as all planes have a limit of numerical form, normally as explained in the 10-11^10-11 range, from ties of DNA in a human gene to stars in a galaxy)… that between top predator prime numbers, which generate all other, even, social reproductive, ‘female’ numbers, the majority of them in a Universe that systematically favors ‘reproductive S=T’ states as all fractal generators do, over even, informative + entropic ‘male numbers’, which can be divided in a minority of ‘prime numbers’ that carry the information of reality as they can generate all other numbers in 4-Dimensional sums; and entropic, unstable forms that code no new information (odd numbers excluded primes, which generate them).

So we find yet again another fundamental division of species, according to the key variation of the ‘Fractal Generator equation of space-time or 5D metric: SxT_s=t= C.

It is the same duality of Female present reproductive, even gender, S=T vs. male past to future to past, entropic and informative gender, S<T>S: SxT, the key temporal ternary symmetries of the Universe; between present dominant states, and past to future to past cycles, which requires a full comprehension of the 3 ages of time, and its ‘complex ternary logic’ sketched in the introduction, that we will fully develop in the paper on ‘5 D time –pentalogic’.

Essentially all cyclical time systems have 3 ages, a relative entropic past of dissolution, a reproductive dominant present and an informative future. And the proportion in any system is ½ present + ½ (Past>Future ) that closes the cycle. For example, in quantum physics wave states are the present state; particles the future state and fields the past state. In matter, liquid is the present state, gas the past state and solid the future state. In cells, DNA is the future state, cytoplasm the present state and the protein membrane the energetic state. Its S=T symmetry makes the past less evolved, more extended in space, the present balanced, the future more informative. In human gender, the woman is the reproductive state, and males divide into a majority of entropic destructive and a minority of highly informative (complex IQ test put woman in the middle, a minority of men above a majority in the entropic lower range).

So to understand the ¡logic division of the 3 ages of time into past=entropy, S<T, which dissolves systems into a lower ¡-1 plane, present=reproduction, S=T, that iterates reality which seems not to change, and future=informative evolutionary system, T>S, which increase its form into the future… I refer the reader to the article on 5D pentalogic.

In terms of its scalar social organization, the 3 ‘different’ groups of T>S informative, S=T, energetic and S<T entropic elements of a class structure correspond to the informative class (i.e. stocrkats in our society ruled by money, politicians in a real democracy, military in a dictatorship) which controls the language of power of society, while S=T form the body-wave of the system that reproduces it and it is taken care by the informative particle-head, while the S<T element is the entropic class easily ‘divided’ and broken, as energy of the others, in this case the odds that can be broken in smaller factors. And as we shall see the game of numbers have a remarkable proportion of the two first classes as opposed to our ill-designed systems, a theme treated in 5D politics, where we study the informative ‘nervous’ network of human superorganisms.

We already observe some clear differences between odd and even numbers/polygons:

Odd vs. Even polygons alternate with a key different property: The diagonals of even polygons create central singularities and form more stable systems, tending to static states, ‘looking inwards’. They can reproduce by motion into equal forms in the same plane, and can easily tile, filling up the entire plane. While odd numbers penetrate in the scales of the fifth dimension by reproducing fractal mirrors of smaller size, when crossing inwards its diagonals (informative reproduction) or larger mirror images when crossing outwards its diagonals.

Those properties carry through all the scales of gender mirror symmetry; making clearly different the two type of organic membranes.

Even numbers however are all similar in its S=T balanced self-centered forms; while odd numbers divided into Primes and non-prime odds that we just shall call odd; which are the majority and represent entropy as they can be easily broken/dissolved into Prime numbers the informative systems, which play a fundamental role as every integer n > 1 may be represented as the product of prime numbers in the form:

where p1 < p2 < . . . < pk are primes and a1, a2, . . ., ak are integers not less than one. Furthermore, the representation of any nº in this form is unique.

III. Physical scales.

∆¡: Chirality and Parity in scales

The 1^st gender scale in the Universe is called parity. Asexual spheres do not have parity. Parity requires a mirror symmetry, and so we shall call left handed species women, and right handed species male:

The graphs, as all others taken from a SciAm’s article of chirality shows the achiral, non-sexual sphere, the chiral male-female screws and hands. Notice that right handed male systems show the ‘same directionality’ between the ‘head’ of the screw and the direction of ‘penetration’ of its body; while left handed female systems show inverse ‘complementary’ directions between the head and the body in its penetration the medium. They are ‘balanced’ female systems with inverse directions between body and head. While male systems are ‘lineal’, on the same path, with no paradoxical contradiction. Left handed females are more abundant in nature because they are the ‘state’ of minimal energy and maximal immobility as both tendencies, S and T contradict. The male is ‘physically’ bigger, faster as both directionalities are in the same path.

We observe chirality in all scales as it emerges from one to the other. Parity then would be the equal quantity of both. But as it turns out, the Universe prefers the ‘lesser energy consuming, balanced’ female species, in all its scales. So the electron tends to be left handed favored in the weak Z force – the time force of transformation in the height axis of information (the female axis), which the male (lineal, moving, in the length dimension) doesn’t even notice.

In the next scale of atoms, amino acids of L-enantiomere nature dominate and when reproduced from primordial atoms they are slightly more numerous, as they consume less energy. While energetic sugar molecules (male species), tend to be more D-dominant. So happens among humans which slightly favor the birth of female species. Moreover most proteins and enzymes responsible for the reproduction of life are L (in fact as any student knows all our amino acids are L, the why though is a selective ‘choice’ of likely Nucleotides, to prevent amino acids and proteins to reproduce without their intervention – we must say that in the different ‘ages’ of life, nucleotide dominant top predator molecules ‘castrated’ proteins.

In the second graph we see this choice as we ‘grow in scales’, meaning than in the hierarchical Universe, the upper dominant wholes ‘control’ the choice of reproductivity of the lower planes. So while the Universe is chiral, it tends to choose the inverted S><T complementary female of less energy, even if the difference of quantities is smaller.

Sexuality then arises of the mirror symmetry that allows to ‘peg’ in opposite directions, hence ‘attractive’ directions two inverse left and right handed. You can indeed bring them together to penetrate each other, or coil one around the other, which is the ultimate meaning of gender, the pegging together in an attractive mirror fashion of two beings, one dominant in energy, the male species and the other in form, the female one.

This dominance of left-handed is ultimately within the superorganism of the galatom connected to the fractal nature of the galaxy, which is you guess it left handed, as the electron and the weak force in its preferences, which simply goes up in scales.

But the true reason of the dominance of left handed system is the same than the need for sexual chirality: Since the female S><T combine in inverse directions the body and head they are ‘asexually reproductive’, while male and achiral species are not. So because the dimotion of reproduction dominates systems, females become dominant and in some species as the L-amino acids of proteins and DNA (which in fact is a combination of both type of spirals pegged into each other), the only one. Let us then resume the game of existence to show the dominance of the Dimotion of reproduction.

Chirality and reproduction: The 5 Dimotions of timespace.

Let us then start considering how the 5 Dimotions of timespace, locomotion; its inverse, information, its combination, hyperbolic iterative, reproductive waves, and its lower disordered planes of death, entropy (max. scattering, disordering motion) an organic upper, entangled wholes (5ht dimension of social evolution of discontinuous parts into wholes) define the entangled organic Universe, and why HUMANS do NOT perceive it as such due both to a historic limited evolution of the discipline, and the embedded egocy of man, who gauges information from its point of view, hence deforming its perspective, thinking of himself, the center of it all.

The i-logic Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is motion =change, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is only one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are so intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 type of motions was entropy. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with s. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, big bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the motion of death. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the universe is dying and they kept on killing it as what they do is manufacture machines that move in lineal paths (transports) or worse, machines that produce entropy-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

But there are 3 more arrows of time, modes of change, which are the positive, creative, informative, social, loving arrows not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they do study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

The universe reinforces the program of the 5 arrows of time with sensations the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (arrow of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

But are they the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.

Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 5 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:

The minimal particle-points, electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar universe of multiple timespace organisms.

So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those 5 ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…

In the graphs, we observe the obvious: physical systems do obey the same laws that biological ones because their ultimate elements, particles follow the 5 dimotions=vital actions of all systems in ‘exi=stience’ and this happens because a system that doesn’t gauge information for his particle/head, moving entropically over a disordered ‘larger’ plane, as it displaces towers a field of energy for its iterative body wave; using the extra energy to reproduce its form into a clone system does NOT survive.

So regardless of nature all systems must ‘automatically’ perform those 4 arrows of timespace to exist (the number of synonymous words, dimotions, vital actions, timespace arrows, dimensional forms, we use are many but all mean the same – a combination of motion and form with a vital function that ensures the program of survival of the being).

But entropy=death is not coded for the being, but born of errors of reproduction and external predators that feed on it. Since it happens through the process of energy taking.

In any case the main function of man, to move, kill and inform are grossly overrated. And that is why women not men should dominate societies as in the reproductive Neolithic age of the goddesses and neuter human warriors and human scientists, evolving too much, too fast, the lethal goods of the tree of stience.

So why we do not make of life and reproduction the meaning of it all, of social love and evolution? Obviously because we have become slaves of company-mothers of machines for whom we toil, re=produce and evolve its offspring of mechanisms. So today even women reject their nature and try to be like sterile… men, realizing themselves in the ‘workplace’, enslaving for the machines and weapons that will kill their sons till the seven generation… It is the entropic age of mankind.

It follows from what we have said that in terms of the 5 Dimotions of existence, women are the superior complex species, as its dimotions are social evolution, love and reproduction – while males practice the simplest dimotions of pure locomotion and entropy and abstract information, which we latter study in physiological medical terms, when studying the difference between both brains.

Next in the understanding of gender comes the comprehension of the ages of time, as women again will show to flourish in the middle ‘mature, balanced age of reproduction’, and do better in the 3rd age of information, living longer, as ‘formal beings’, while men dominate the limbic entropic age, declining faster as ‘entropic lineal ones’.

Physical genders. Fermions -bosons symmetry.

The fundamental duality of particle physics is the boson-fermion duality. The mathematics of it are clear, their conceptual interpretation as usual is not.

As always in 5D physics it is best to start with a geometric interpretation. As always in the 2^nd line, the simplest possible. We resort then to Wikipedia:

“Mathematically, quantum mechanical spin states are described by vector-like objects known as spinors. A rotating a spin-1/2 particle by 360 degrees does not bring it back to the same quantum state, but to the state with the opposite quantum phase. To return the particle to its exact original state, one needs a 720 degree rotation:

So we can see what this means in terms of cyclical time: a fermion changes every ‘present timespace 360⁰ cycle’ from a relative up to a down orientation of its time cycle, which is to state to an inverse arrow of relative past-future, which will annihilate into a present. So while the fermion is an eternal particle constantly switching each time quanta from past to future, which can be also considered a relative life cycle of the electron (and hence its immortality the infinite sums of life-future turn, death-past turn), as long as those arrows of time are causally connected into a lineal duration, S->T->S->T, the particle exists. But if they were to interfere two in the same point, the 2 inverse spinors of the graph would cancel each other and die away. This is also perceived in the potential representation of the 2 inverse particles:

The boson-fermion symmetry.

So fermions are particles that can only co-exist in the same moment of time, in different regions of space. As such they are ‘spatial particles’, which create a dilated present spacetime and can coordinate to form simultaneous organisms, complex networks of multiple space-time quanta: ∑ST entities. And this is the origin of our world as we oberve it – huge extensions of coordinated spatial quanta occupying diferent points of space.

Now it follows that a spin 1 particle completes a time cycle of 360⁰returning to the same position. So there is no annihilation, as the particle every cycle of time, moves a step further towards the future (or towards the past depending on which orientation we take). So bosons follow a T->T->T or S->S->S path, and as such a wave of lgith either constantly increases its informative wave-frequency, decreasing its length, till collapsing into a particle of higher information, or it constantly decreases its informative wave-frequency redshfting into an erased wave.

Particle v. antiparticle dualities. Life and death.

Annihilation of spins and all kind of physical dualities can be understood in terms of the relative past and future symmetries as life-death arrows that annihilate in a present, according to the ‘Group of time ages’ studied in existential ilogic, whereas: Past x Future = Present.

This is the case obviously when a wave has both sides inversely moving from the relative ± directions of a time motion, breaks into one sided and other sided motions, can become and generate a particle and antiparticle. So waves do generate but only both together, particles and antiparticles.

Further on when particles and antiparticles come together obviously merge into a wave that is kill each other.

And further on we can think of them as a particle that is stable but suddenly becomes an antiparticle and collapses into a point and dies, falling into the gradient. So we can consider 3 possible equations in terms of ‘time’:

Past (antiparticle) x Future (particle) = Present-wave. This is a collision in space.

Future (particle) > Past Particle (death process) = Entropy wave. This is the same collision perceived in temporal evolution.

Both are in fact the same concept seen in space or in time:

Particles and antiparticles, positive and negative charges must be explained as space-time symmetries, which can be seen according to the Galilean paradox, both as inverted events in time, as in the left Feynman diagram or as geometrical inversions in space (right diagrams). They are the why of most physical dualities that classic physics fails to understand in its ‘temporal meaning’.

What about the photon? As it is a wave it is its antiparticle and can annihilate when its phases cancel.

And the neutrino and neutron, which do not have charge and are not waves. They then have different spin and momentum directions, as we mentioned. So they differentiate their helicity, which is different in particles and antiparticles:

The helicity of a particle is right-handed if the direction of its spin is the same as the direction of its motion. It is left-handed if the directions of spin and motion are opposite. By convention for rotation, a standard clock, with its spin vector defined by the rotation of its hands, tossed with its face directed forwards, and has left-handed helicity. Mathematically, helicity is the sign of the projection of the spin vector onto the momentum vector: left is negative, right is positive.

So most particles are left handed meaning the spin compensates the momentum for the particle to become stable. In the case of neutrinos and antineutrinos they are different and so happens in neutrons.

FEMALES ARE WAVES MALES ARE PARTICLES. THE DUALITY OF GENDER IN THE UNIVERSE

Males are entropy&information particles:S<T>S. Females are vital energy waves: S≈T. Both are complementary.

In that regard, human gender belongs to trinity, as it is the next scale of complexity in the reproduction of species, beyond the monologic of unicellular reproduction of a fractal point emitting copies of itself, and the next degree or ‘simplest gender’ between S and T complementary Spatial, formal and temporal, moving states, which creates the duality of St, sT, momentum and information dimotions of the Universe.

In the case of human and most life genders, we move to the trinity of time flows, where males are unbalanced past to future informative and future to past entropic minds, and females are balanced S=T present ‘beauty’ states (as beauty is synonymous of balance). Hence their interplay is more complex than the usual pegging of ‘mirror symmetries’ between space and time functions.

So let’s start trinity with the deepest of all thoughts on gender – its connection to the gender-sexual Universe.

The complementarity of sexes: Asymmetric wholes, complementary parts.

Gender is a fundamental duality in the Universe between asymmetric systems that come together as a whole or split into symmetric mirror reproduction or antisymmetric destructive entropy. Gender happens in each scale of the Universe as the symbiosis between ‘energetic female systems’ with maximal symmetry between its body-particle components and ‘entropic+informative’ male systems with maximal antisymmetry; which fusion in asymmetric couples able to generate new creative forms. As such the gender dynamics are the reversed mirror image of the Asymmetric split of a whole into two parts; in gender dynamics two parts come into a single being; and we can extend this duality from the particle-wave dualities of physics, through the different biological dualities from unicellular to multicellular systems, into the social cultures of female-monetary-reproductive economic dominant systems and male warrior-religious, entropic-informative societies, and its dual complementary or war processes, showing once more the astounding organic wholeness of it all, which we resume in the next graph on the logic of creation

The different angles, considering the asymmetric being a mere rotation of the self, when it does not vary, and so a circular o-angle, reflect in topological space the different forms of relationship of the fourth non-euclidean postulate of congruence. In the graph an example for a tree. This is the most complex ilogic view of gender, where male and female will be ‘complementary’, ≤≥, ◊ beings, whose fusion will bring an asymmetric couple in permanent dynamical internal flux, origin of its creative reproduction.

In the more complex models of the fractal organic Universe, there are two fundamental ‘quantum states’ that transcend through all scales; the wave female gender and the particle, male gender. Females are waves and males are particles.

Females are waves, the vital energy that guides the motion of its complementary particles, the in-form-ative male gender, that surround them. Those 2 first quantum states of space-time are born to love, for their properties enhance each other’s role. And so through social love particles and waves evolve together in growing scales of complexity, creating new wholes connected through networks of energy and information, till the emergence of the most perfect biological organism, of which we all human beings are citizens-cells, the superorganism of History, mankind in time, the collective subconscious brain of Gaia, its body, the planet Earth.

The purpose of mankind is thus clear, to create a perfect world in which both scales, that of the human couple and the organism of history can thrive, become immortal and master the future of all of us in an organic, sustainable scientific way. Both are complementary when they are properly formed. But both can annihilate themselves, when they enter in the war of sexes, which is in the present age of entropy the dominant function between sexes.

The true ‘immanent’ nature of gender, which is intrinsic to all systems and scales of the universe.

So in terms of the complex models of the fractal, scalar universe, the two fundamental states of being, the hyperbolic wave, balanced with the environment, unlocalized and reproductive is the female state.

And the potential>particle, lineal>cyclical entropic>informative state is the male state. So females are balanced, reproductive, conservative, memorial, nurturing.

Male are unbalanced, either tilting towards the potential-entropic-limbic state or the informative-particle state. They are either creative or destructive, abstract, connected to the visual, outer world…

Of course as not even present science fully understands the duality wave-particle, the reader is advised to probe the wider model of general systems sciences and the organic fractal universe at http://www.unificationtheory.com to grasp this duality. Or merely use his imagination void of political correctness to think in those terms. Since females are the wave state s ≈ t, reproductive state, and males the s>t, entropy>informative particle state.

And so when they do what they do best, and love each other in a complementary way, the couple is stronger than the individual. As today they’ve are either in a war of sexes, accusing each other of its worst treats, and expecting the particle to behave like a wave, and the wave like a particle (which most do in the industrial world). And that is not respecting the ‘laws of tao’, of the fractal time space universe.

The inversion of roles through scalar growth.

As other biological species, human life diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial males and cyclical, reproductive females, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both

In graph, the duality between females and male. We can see in the middle a graph of IQ. Females are balanced and most tests with a higher intelligence that entropic, lineal male focused on their limbic motions. However a minority of males, focused in their informative particle state have maximal IQ and are the ‘geniuses’ of creative mankind, as females are mostly white matter waves with higher reproductive skills both in body and mind.

On the right, the hyperbolic wave form of mature females bodies enhanced subconsciously with their dresses vs. the lineal form of body-males.

The fundamental duality of the Universe, is the symmetry of space-time. One of its most clear expressions in the vital space-time of biological beings, is the symmetry of gender. In its simplest formulation, we could state that females are cyclical, informative and males are lineal, energetic. This of course, pleases females, and I used to explain it in this biased form when i was young and attracted as it is natural in all systems, by the body of females.

The 2 main social scales of organization: social wo♥men

We shall here analyze from a much wider perspective, that of the organic Universe, the two fundamental levels of self-organization of the fractal, living Universe, which apply to history and an ideal, perfect world of social evolution and love that maximizes human existence both at individual and collective level.

The first level is that of the action of reproduction, and the second level the action of social evolution, which put together allow in any system of reality to evolve individuals into social organisms made of clone, similar species, stronger than the whole.

We thus call in social though the arrow of reproduction and social evolution that creates larger more powerful super organisms, the so-called fifth dimension of the scalar Universe, the arrow of love:

IN THE GRAPH, the proper way to understand the organic scales of the Universe is through the ‘fifth dimension of social organization’, which is structured at two levels, through the complementarity principle that puts together particle and wave, yin and yang, energy and information, male and female, in a first scale of self-organization, followed by the second arrow of social organic creation of networks which bring together ‘couples’ into more complex ‘networks’ and build topological planes of the social organism. In this post we shall study the complementarity principles of gender and how males are the emergence of the particle state and females of the wave state through the ‘scalar systems of the fifth dimension’ explained briefly in the next graph, widen in the section of general systems and the first posts of the upper line:

The graphs is self-explanatory, through all systems of nature, the complementarity of lineal, cyclical and hyperbolic wave body systems structure reality. This the game of existence of life and death of its 3 ages, 3 topologies, 3 forms, which in the sexual reality means the male, female and gay species. None of this though is understood in the highly deformed ‘animetal culture’ of entropy and death, lineal motion and weapons, which passes as dogma of physical science and time space theory because science is culture, and we live in the last age of history, that of entropy and death weapons and animetal masters, which have deformed even the basic unit of reality, the complementary gender…

Complex analysis of duality & gender.

We can now with all this knowledge reconsider the differences between males and females (and by extension, white races and cultures vs. emotional-informative black and mongoloid races and cultures, self-similar to females), and which cultures should dominate mankind to make us survive longer. Since gender traits transmit to psychology, physiology, mental attitudes and customs. Let us consider a few examples from the different perspective of multiple space-time theory, the algebraic, topological, temporal and fractal, scalar analysis.

Algebraic analysis: combinations of genders. wave-particle duality

The deepest understanding of gender though comes from the wave particle/field duality where the wave-body present state is the female gender and the particle max. i x max. e field duality the male state. What this means is that the 3 ternary parts of an organism maximise its body-wave balance in females e=i, and become separated into opposite head-motion extreme states in males; max. e x min i (entropic state) or max. i x min. e(informative state)

The Universe offers more variations even if it selects finally 3 dominant ones. Thus, since we depart from only 2 species, ‘Ðimotions’ and information, which combine ad infinitum, we can do several degrees of depth in our analysis. A dualist analysis makes males energetic and females informative, perceptive.

Then a ternary differentiation gives us:

Max. E (Male extreme: field dominates), E=i (female), Max.i (Male extreme: particle dominates).

A more complex analysis however must combine variations of 2 elements, the body and the brain. So this 2^nd differentiation will combine 2 elements, the informative brain which can be body-reproductive/energetically oriented or brain-informatively oriented; and the body, which can be body-reproductive/ energetically oriented. Finally the most complex analysis will consider ternary combinations of 3 elements (‘Dimotions’, active limbs; reproductive body and informative brain).

Let us consider the simplified 2×2 analysis, assuming that the body is oriented towards ‘Ðimotions’ in males and reproduction in females. And consider both cases as an ‘Energetic-reproductive event’. So we obtain 4 basic combinations of form and character:

-Exi + i X E: Females, whose commutation gives us a new species: – iXE + ExI: Gay genders in which an energetic body (male gay) is oriented towards its inner, informative emotions as females are or a reproductive, informative body is oriented towards external, energetic sensations as lesbians are. Thus gays are males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world.

Finally we have two male combinations:

– ExE and IxI: males whose brain is oriented to energetic tasks, and live dominated by their bodies (warriors, sportsmen, white males) and males whose brain is oriented to informative tasks, separated from their body (scientists, mongoloid races).

Those 2 dualities explain why according to statistics, most males are less perceptive than females, but a few specialized Max.I x Iare geniuses. Hence the form of the Bell curve of the previous graph, which shows two tails of minimal and maximal intelligence in males between the mean of females balanced between ‘Ðimotions’ and information.

Finally the 3^rd gay gender that combines both, the properties of males and females, is also a ‘species’ natural to the isomorphisms of the Universe, albeit a minority, compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond its simplest duality, a 3^rd, ExI, more complex element that combines the properties of both, to perform better as part of the collective organism. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally acted as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine male or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many females.

Gender: complementary differentiation.

In simpler terms, females have three parts, as all systems, entropic limbs/fields, which are accessory to their energy body and informative head, with form its ‘existential momentum: e x i = st (entropy x information = present space-time momentum). the function was chosen carefully to make it really look like a verbal concept, Max. ∫ e x i =st, you exist when you maximise the energy of your body and the information of your mind, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, only that if you are a female, either a female or a male you will then have different ‘exi=stential configurations.

in the graph females are balanced body-brain, S=t, present iterative waves (nurturing), males are either S>T, informative particle-heads (nerds), or T<S, entropic limb oriented (warriors, sportsmen). In IQ as such we find females to have the potential of a bell curve, males the potential of an entropic, bifurcated time function, depressed in the balanced region of wave-present states.

As a female has a dominant informative, reproductive body, over an energetic white matter brain, and male has an informative grey matter brain and an entropic, energetic body. So females are body-dominant present iterative waves that reproduce and conserve the past, and males are particle-dominant over fields of entropy they destroy the past, and probe the future.

In the graph, the biology, psychology and gender culture prove that humans are a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3^rd, gay sex’, who mixes both, being females the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and male the lineal energetic species. Thus, biological origins, psychological behaviour and cultural forms explain gender as a ternary differentiation of humans into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3^rd sex‘ of gay groups that mix both tendencies. Let us consider this essential duality of the human species in more detail.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, its fundamental space/time duality is between its 2 genders: the energetic male and the informative female.

Humans have always wondered what gender is. Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on ‘Dimotions’ and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better ‘Ðimotions’ and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of ‘Ðimotions’ and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species.

The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of males and females prove such duality, parallel to the universal duality of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: males love ‘Ðimotions’, space; females love Time. Physiologically males are made of lines, as ‘Dimotions’ is; while females are made of curves, as information is. Historically males performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

males behave as ‘Ðimotions’ species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial Dimotions’ processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, females are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also informative topologies.

The character and life attitudes of both, males and females follow that E/I specialization also in their relative wanting for ‘Dimotions’ or information: females prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; males prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, males love ‘Dimotions’ and movement while females love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that males test better in spatial mathematics and females score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial ‘Dimotions’ and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.E x Min.I; Gay: E=I; Female: Max. I x Min.E

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among females the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While males have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus males are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and females are the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6^th sense’.

As the reader will have notice, truth becomes more sophisticated as we perceive in more detail. Monism is the first scale of knowledge that observes only the body/brain; and yet it has sufficed to build our society of lineal, energetic ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (white male). Then duality observes the differences in the body of lineal male and cyclical females, but we need to go further and analyse sexuality with the ternary principle that adds the 3^rd sex, and consider the different combinations and balances of body/brains that will give us different ‘personalities’ and ultimately a more accurate analysis of what we do not see but dominates all structures – the informative brains.

And then the previous picture radically changes; since if females are reproductive bodies and males lineal, energetic bodies; when we observe the brain, to balance those bodies according to the Law of survival and balance of the Universe, ‘Dimotions’-past x information-future = present-reproduction, if males have energetic bodies they must have informative brains to balance both in a present, and if females have reproductive bodies that repeat the information of life they must have reproductive brains that repeat also the information of the brain: present x present = present.

And indeed such is the case.

Thus in a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define males as yang/yin: bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities; and creative brains of information dominant in grey matter (6 times more than females); and define females as yinyang/yanying; reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the brain; and reproductive brains, dominant in white matter (10 times more than males).

But what matters of those Universal balances is the fact that ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

Male: exe-body +IxI-Brain <=> Female: brain (i x E) + Body (exI)

Thus we define a male, as a form whose ‘‘Dimotions’ body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its brain is focused in informative, visual creative tasks (Max.I), resulting in a species unconnected with his body with an external, outward focus. The Female gender however has her informative brain focused in reproductive, memorial tasks and wired internally towards the reproductive body (IXE); while her reproductive body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExI).

Thus while the total amount of ‘Dimotions’ and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making females, highly balanced, focused into the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world. Those theses, as politically incorrect as they might be are the i-logic deductions of Multiple Space-time Theory, recently proved right by the analysis of the brain.

Recap. Species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, increasing their energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exo, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system. For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since ‘Dimotions’ is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that males have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and females have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3^rd, mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

The particle-field, Past>future, future<Past: male vs. wave=female=present

The deepest level of understanding of gender might be excessive for this introductory blog to social systemic sciences, but it is worth to mention it here.

In systems sciences we define two states of time-space beings: the past-entropy to future particle state, which is common as male gender with maximal limbs/head activity and the present wave state which is how we could define the female gender, a present s=t, balanced state of harmony and little temporal latitude.

What the 2 graphs of the mind of males, the entropic, animetal male: ti<sT, with the head oriented to maximize the motions of the limbs (the animetal warrior being the clearest example), and the other extreme, the mental Ts>St, male, which is into information, with the dual female, hyperbolic wave-body form, of s=t balanced present are thus explained in this mode in the most complex forms, which requires to know a bit of pure general systems sciences. So let us introduce this theme before discussing in depth the female-male duality both in individuals and history.

In a perfect system the wave is the vital space, enclosed in the particle, which the wave moves. But for that to happen, the particle must guide

Yet when particles lose the north and ‘take refuge’ within the wave (normally the part is ahead, surprisingly all the waves reach their maximum density in the particle zone or head of the dual system, they get in the back of the wave, which looses rhythm … Then history proves when that happens the system self annihilates. As the particle ‘informs’ the wave that moves it.

Waves superimpose in group suffer smearing, females do not form stable networks, they are subtracted, except in the exceptional case of lasers, when they have gone through a ‘hard’ phase of collapse in particle … As for the particles of today you can say anything about them and i will give you the reason, they are pure entropy the state of egoism of the particles that are no longer crystals, the most perfect form, a network illuminated by a single image shared, that vibrate in infinite resonance

THE WAVE VIEW. Balance and entropy.

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Ts x St, particles, Max. St/Ts and fields, Max. Ts/St, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of gender for all sciences:

Max. Ts/St = Young entropic male state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. St/Ts= Old, informative future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Ts x St (Ts=St):female wave state (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of space-time systems represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle.

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Ts x Min. St, the wave of present, of Ts=St and the particle of future of Max. St x Min. ST, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to St perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees. The genius of human information thus tend to be a male.

Topological analysis

If we draw a line it suggests a male, yang, energetic, mobile species. If we draw a cycle it represents an informative cyclical still, female species. And children and simplified signs do so to represent them.

Females are cyclical and males are lineal in body and brain morphology:

males have brains 15 to 20% spatially bigger than females’s brains and are better fit for spatial tasks.

Females’s brain contain about 10% more neurons in key zones that gather temporal information, behind the eyes, in the zones that recognize verbal and musical structures – the languages of time, and is denser in neuronal connections, making up for lack of size.

Females are more likely than males to recover speech after a stroke.

males have a bigger right hemisphere, used to understand 3D objects in space.

The left hemisphere, which controls speech, is bigger in females.

Males connect outwards with the motor zone best wired.

Females connect inwards with the hypothalamus and amygdale best wired (sixth sense).

Topologic biology is conclusive: Males are specialized in temporal ‘Ðimotions’, females in spatial information

DUALITY IN CULTURE: FROM TAOISM TO HEGELIAN DUALITY – ALWAYS REPRESSED BY MONISM:

It seems humans manifest lineal destiny through the power of entropic weapons and the machine cannot be denied. The tree of technology must come over the tree of life. The simplex reductionist theory of reality and time as mere locomotions will not let philosophers of science to complete the task of adding a second dimension of form, of in-form-ation to complete a time cycle. Alas, the most censored theory of reality since metal-weapons of entropic power destroyed the fertility goddesses and the concept of cyclical time of the Neolithic, has been an organic philosophy of science. First in China, the Chin emperor which brought weapons and iron coins, conquered all other kingdoms to the toll of 6 million corpses, forbade under death penalty philosophical books of taoism. Then the entire planet waged a war against the dialectic Hegelian, realist understanding of the organisms of history and economics, which tried to create a planet where man and its ethic verbal languages were above go(l)d and the rights of company-mothers of machines and weapons over humanity. Finally, the resurrection of duality and organicism took place with the formalism of the 5th dimension developed by this writer within the milieu of systems sciences as chair of duality.

‘From 1 (the yang-line of entropy) comes 2 (the yin sphere of form), from 2 comes 3 (the yin-yang energetic being), from 3 come the ∞ beings’ Cheng Tzu

DUALITY IN AI – THE DOUBLE BRAIN

Finally duality has been discovered in AI, which now it starts true process of creation.

As one ‘male brain’ S<T> destroys and makes new combinations of form and the other the ‘female’ brain, judges the best balanced S=T forms.

=AI researchers do not know they have opened the Pandora box of ‘gender’ creativity in AI, just realized dividing tasks of creation and judgement, the gender roles they obtained much better results.

TRINITY: THE GENERATOR EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE.

All fractal systems made of multiple cyclical time clocks enclose and inform a moving vital space centered into a selfish point of view, whose purpose is to perpetuate the balances that ensure the survival of the system. Those 3 elements are the parts of the Fractal Generator; the feed back iterative logic, space-time equation that generates through its symmetries and variations all the space-time beings of the universe.

Because the Universe is Generated by the properties of space and time, better reflected in the mirror languages of mathematical topology and social numbers, and the entangled pentalogic of simultaneous space, and its sequential Aristotelian times, we could say safely that since ‘we think therefore we are’, that is, we perceive as humans a limited range of reality, with our space and time languages, for humanity, the Universe is generated by mathematical and logic languages.

And so by studying formal sciences of mathematics and logic, we can describe the Universe. We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.

How many world minds are then generated by those two essential languages of reality varies then according to the complexity of the being in exist¡ence.

We humans at the present not very enlightened age live in a single dimension of time, and the simplest, most dangerous of them, lineal entropic time, and a single scale of space, sub-divided in 3 lineal dimensions of height-information, width-growth and length-motion. And that is all.

We can then talk of more complex beings, with dual, ternary, penta and decalogic.

The Universe is an entangled fractal game of Dust of space-time, ¬∆@st, where each element flows as a series of ‘5 Dimotions’ (dimensional motions of time space), which can be perceived as ‘form=space’, in the stillness of a world mirror or linguistic mind or as a motion of time, in its true nature since MOTION not form is the underlying substance of reality.

So all fleeting forms, ‘a Maya of the senses’ will return to motion and die (¬4th Dimotion of entropy, death and dissolution). Its 4 positive elements, organic scales, topologic planes and time ages and actions however, carry the system as a finite super organism of space with a finite time cycle.

And so those 4-i elements, entropy (¬), Scale (∆), time (T) and Space (S), are the elements all languages mirror either in a ternary grammar (if scale is missed), whereas often instead of Space we talk of information and instead of time we talk of energy of motion, in a single plane:

Light language: red-energy colors, blue-information colors and its green/yellow combinations.

Verbal Language: subject (information) < verb (action-combination)>Object (energy of subject).

Geometry: Height (Information dimension) < width (reproduction-Energy)> Length (Lomocotion, entropy)

Algebra: Y: Future-information < Operand-action> F(x))

Trinity is thus the logic of most beings. However as humans reached higher and lower scales of observation, a pentalogic was possible and its mathematical mirror became analysis, with its operands that extract finitesimals (∆-1) or integrate into wholes (∆+1) smaller or larger systems.

Thus maths became with the inclusion of Calculus the most complex, best mirror language of human thought, arguably overcoming with the age of calculus the verbal mirror, which is the natural language of man, specially because of the arrival of instruments of measure which could also cast reality into the digital language of social numbers, identity species that further proved the social scalar nature of the Universe.

So with the modern age, past the simpler age of geometric maths, a new language of social thought and scale, numbers and calculus enthroned mathematics as the queen of all languages. Because it was able to deploy ‘pentalogic’.

The method of Gst derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scale, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scale or 4th dimension).

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a superorganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

Trinity is the ¡logic of a single plane of space-time, which in humans acquire only ‘form’ in space (as we are still monist in time logic), as expressed by the 3 dimensions of space, studied on other posts.

So what does it mean to be made of motions with form, time and space? In mathematical terms, it means to be made of topological dimensions, which are holographic bi-dimensional space with motion in time. And as it happens topology has only 3 varieties of bidimensional spacetime and it is constructed of parts – points – that become wholes – networks. So the immediate translation of generational space-time into modern mathematical systems do convert, as we observed in the abstract, all systems into mathematical beings.

5D innovates this field, ‘enlightening’ classic topology to ‘understand the ternary organic, structure’ of all systems of nature: As the 5 Dimotions are dimensions of space with time motion, its science is topology that allows a system to deform= change its inner form. Yet a 4D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ that restricts ensembles to only 3 topologies, each one best suited to perform the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D) to move the system (2D) to an energy field in which reproduce (3D):

The purpose of vital topology is to study the 5 Dimotions (dimensional motions) of the Universe… As such it will be the final stage of evolution of geometry as an experimental science, merging elements of all disciplines.

All space dimensions have time motion. Mathematics found it, when Greeks still Geometry evolved into a vaster, generalized concept, a topological› variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry has internal motions-changes. As the only case in which the inner dimensions of a being don’t seem to change is external locomotion most 5D motions need ‘geometries’ with inner motion, which are topologic varieties of which there are only 3:

In the graph, the diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary ternary, topologic systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species, to best satisfy the systems’ in taking of motion, energy and information.

I.e: An animal has its informative height in the high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates, with an ‘antero-posterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure due to the oriented arrow of light. But in a 3D world with no preferred orientation, a sea or vacuum, cyclic forms that maximize information dominate from plankton to galaxies that have a cyclic, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

So Dimotions of reality are 3 bidimensional topological varieties that act as vital organs in cylindrical long limbs/fields, Hyperbolic wide bodies and spherical tall heads, each one dominant in a lineal classic dimension, lineal motion, informative height and reproductive width, which DO have organic vital properties too:

Spherical particle-heads, perceiving information from the advantage point of height.

Lineal long, cylindrical legs and fields of locomotion as the line is the shorter distance between two points.

Wide, hyperbolic body waves, storing the energy reproduce by the system.

The perspective of physiological networks.

3 physiological networks of super organisms encode the Topology of superorganisms.

In the graph, we see the human supœrganism as what really is – a collection of cells put all together through 3 physiological networks that cause the 3 motions=actions=arrows of timespace for all systems:

Systems then act in sequential series with those networks and organs to repeat a simple process of reproduction: first they will automatically perceive, then act in locomotions with their physiological limbs/fields to reach a feeding field of energy; and finally use the excess of energy to reproduce with its blood/reproductive systems, its body-waves-economic system, guided by informative particle-heads/money (physical, biological, economic systems). And finally through actions of social love, the individuals will try to harmonize with other similar individuals cloned in the act of reproduction to create a more complex whole.

The final goal of all systems thus is reproduction, which is the function embodies in female genders, NOT entropy-destruction and information-creation, grossly overrated in our present ‘mechanical civilization’.

Moreover this patterns of sequential happen in all systems of reality and all what sciences do, without knowing is to study them at individual or social scale (in abstract an with quantitative, spatial, mathematical methods but little understanding of the causal, temporal, physiological laws, they should ad to fully grasp what is all about) .

This balance between the 3 topological parts of the being, is the key to have a healthy life, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.

Indeed what we call a super organism is the perception of the 3 physiological/topologic systems of the being seen in simultaneous Space its symmetry with the 3 parallel forms of space create synchronically all the systems of the Universe; including human beings, which are essentially an ambulatory collection of 10 trillion cells connected to a digestive/entropic; blood/reproductive and nervous/informative brain; and societies, which are essentially the same, whereas humans are ‘citizens-cells’ connected to an informative government/financial system; re=producing goods through the repetitive economic system, and living in a territorial ‘entropic’ system we exploit to obtain our entropic substances that we shall trans-form into energy and information.

So we can establish three parts in societies or ‘social classes’, which build the system as specialized groups in one of the three arrows. The entropy is the land/territory (and because our system is ill-designed, many human cells-citizens, ab=used as entropy, the poor, the enemies, etc). Then the middle class is the body-wave-reproductive ‘state of the society’ and finally bankers, celebrities and politicians who use financial, artistic and legal languages of information are the collective brain of society:

The 3 brains of the human being control our existence and define the program of greed. We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the grey matter brain, and then imprinted in resistant white matter, lineal, energetic, axon-connections.

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-ST (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

ST (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Ts

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPace becomes fractal by reproduction of present body-waves-working castes, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.

We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension.

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness.

This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for energy, reproduction (sexuality), and come first to the limbic brain and then to the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and the external visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical designs and motions within that space. Yet what matters to this post is the fact that once the axons of the white matter brain are imprinted, we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. This means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of lineal, simple logic thoughts, not very different from that of any computer system.

If the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the energy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that energy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our energetic body.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the lineal, energetic white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in youth by egocentric religions or today, the cult to the machine, and then the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond short memory any attempt to redraw and kill the programs of the mind. So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence) , wont change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic brain against reason. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, what I have found all my life is Planck’s dictum ‘people must die for a new paradigm of science to be imposed, when it is taught to new students’.

Embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of beliefs, are automatons of their program, set up in their infancy, are not different from any programmed machine, except that the ‘software’ are the ‘memes’ of the culture, which the parents and religious authorities imprint in the human being at tender age. And to change their program, reason only doesn’t work. You have to force truth, you have to deprogram, you have to rewire.

And this is impossible to do after certain age, reason why programs of the memetic, cultural mind are so successful; reason why people like me, writers, thinkers, philosophers, intellectuals, have never meant anything in history, because we just talk, we don’t murder those who have different ideas, as the military does with its weapon memes, we do not torture the mind of children with fear as religious inquisitions do, we are just idealist nothingness.

Because it is almost impossible to reason and change the ‘beliefs’ of memetic cultures, who learned dogmas in their youth, the motherboards of our racist cultures are geared by their beliefs generations after generations.

The programmed memetic white-matter brains of Jewish zealots, Islamic Jihadists and Fundamentalist Christians is thus quite similar to the programmed genetic mind of a cell . And yet I have found a few ‘enlightened’ Jewish, Muslims and Christians able to understand the limits of religious programming and there are billions of humans who just reject the program of religions, so humans and cultures can still potentially evolve, and that is indeed the only hope left to mankind.

We are just old bags of dirty water, with a few chemicals inside. Within the ladder of infinite scales of energy and information of the Whole, we are nothing. Shakespeare already said that we are both, giants and dwarf buffoons – it is all in the perspective. Einstein put it in maths with the concept of Relativity. Now we know, those fractal self-repetitive scales are infinite. Our only strength hence, if we want to achieve survival in this planet, is to act as a single species and control the wrong memes of the tree of science at the heart of the financial-media-military-industrial complex that will extinguish us…

Ah, but we are arrogant dirty bags of water, so we were not happy enough just enjoying the pleasures of life in the Neolithic of water cults and fertility goddesses. We had to defy god’s laws, the laws of the fractal organic universe and become more. we had to become animetals.

The 3 only topologies of physical systems: conservation laws.

The 3 parts of any fractal point of cyclical time, of angular momentum, in the Universe become then in the simplest physical systems, the 3 conserved parts of the minimal organic Unit of reality, a ‘Planckton’ of angular momentum. All physical systems then can be ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, which becomes a membrane, fractal sum of ‘cellular cycles’ or the skin of the system in human beings. Vital energy, the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and lineal momentum, the motions with a ‘finality’ we perceive guided by a ‘relatively still mind-point-singularity’ that focuses the energy and information transferred through the angular momentum membrane.

It is also the smallest clock of our world, as its minimal unit of cyclical information, or angular momentum, used as the unit of the 3 human physical parameters of spatial size, cyclical time frequency and ‘scale’ (Active magnitude): h= mass (∆) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð). So h, Planckton, is the minimal fractal organism which becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of light space-time, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe, also a cell with a similar ternary structure – a DNA nucleus that process information, a protein membrane that isolates a vital space-time, the cytoplasm.

Thus Non-Euclidean points have breath, its lines are therefore waves able to communicate the external form and internal energy or fractal networks that branch to connect multiple points, and its planes intersection of three of such waves or networks that form topological organisms… It is then obvious that the next step of Non-Euclidean geometry is to merge those concepts with the physical analysis of the smallest physical systems, to understand its vital topologies. To that aim we have to introduce the second fundamental equation of 5D metric that formalizes the Paradox of relativity. And so it acts in the physical model as the Postulate of relativity, common to 3D Galilean and 4D Einstein’s simplex models, which correspond to 5D in a single plane of ‘light space-time’…

So we have transformed the 5 Dimensions of space-time in 5 vital dimotions, broken into infinite vital space-time beings, and now we have the 5 elements which reality uses in different perspectives to construct all realities. Nothing else is needed. And it will easily follow that in each stience, including mathematics, 3±¡ elements (depending on the perception in a single plane or in several ones) will be concerned with the analysis of a system in Simultaneous, entangled, still space as a superorganism constructed with those 5 Dimotions, which in sequential motion time will trace a worldcycle also composed of those 5 dimotions. As the universe simply put it is a reproductive fractal of 5 Dimotions of spacetime…

As motion with form constantly reproduces by the mere fact of moving. So the fractal reproductive nature of all what exists is immediate, as all what exists moves form, reproduces form.

The Universe is a fractal, entangled organic system made of space-time points, organized in ‘waves=herds’ of maximal motion and ‘networks’ of maximal form that evolve together as the 3 physiological networks of organic scalar planes of space-time. This is the simplest description of reality using the expanded postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry, till today merely enunciating the 5^th postulate (a point has parts as multiple parallels can cross it), and the underlying principles of quantum physics and relativity (Newtonian absolute background space-time does not exist, so we are as Leibniz wanted, made of space and time).

Thus we start reality with its fundamental particle, the non-Euclidean fractal point, which is a point with breath that grows in size as we come closer to it revealing an inner world with 3 conserved parts that make the point similar to an organism. As it has a singularity center of maximal ‘mass’ or ‘active magnitude’, which moves the system lineally; connected by invaginated networks to its sensorial ‘membrain’ or ‘rotary angular momentum’ that cuts it off from the outer world converting it into a closed system with a trapped vital inner energy, the 3^rd element, and a porous surface to transfer in and out information and energy with a larger outer Universe.

We define then space as any ‘static, still form’, and time as its ‘motion’. And accept that all spatial forms have time motions, and so they are Spacetime points.

If we look from the spacetime point outwards, the point IS part of a larger world, in which it will associate with other similar fractal points, forming waves dominant in time-motion or networks, dominant in

Space-form. And as such the point will be part of a ternary network of that larger world, which if we see from an even larger point of view, will be enclosed also in a larger membrain, forming a larger enclosure, whereas the point will be part of its inner vital energy… And this creates a repetitive scalar logic, of topological non-Euclidean planes, with a closed structure as an organism of 3 physiological networks.

The beauty of that system of ‘space-time points’ organized in ‘waves and lines with volume’ organized in topological planes=organisms defined by 3 such lines with volume is that essentially it will follow the simplified laws of classic space (Euclidean geometry) but with much more vital experimental sense. I,e, in Euclidean geometry 3 lines define any plane, in vital non-Euclidean geometry 3 ‘physiological networks’ that are lines with volume define any vital organism. So many laws of E-geometry apply to non-E vital topology.

And the essential task of the vastly expanded model of vital topology is to put in relationship the simplified laws of human sciences with those of the more detailed non-E world.

And the same works for the other element, time-motions. In the simplified human logic, time is only lineal, continuous and so there is only one type of motion. In non-Aristotelian logic, the science of time of this more complex Universe, motion is the dominant element of reality, but we distinguish 5 Dimensional motions, which combine spatial form and temporal motions, into ‘ST-actions’ with a vital function. As all the classic dimensions of space now have motion, so height has the function of perception and its motion is in-form-ation, the length dimension has lineal motion and its function is locomotion, and width has the function of reproduction as its natural motion, product of the other 2. So for example the cross product of 2 vectors reproduce a third vector in the dimension of width. An organism stores its energy reproduced in fat cells in the dimension of width.

Further on because as we have seen the points have lower scales of size and larger worlds, there are two more dimensions of relative scale, the lower plane of the parts of a point – cellular or atomic plane – and the larger one of the world in which the point is inscribed, the gravitational ecosystemic plane. So we talk of the dimensional motion of parts that become wholes and has the function of social evolution and its inverse dimensional motion of wholes that disaggregate into parts and becomes the function of entropy.

This is the basic scheme of reality repeated ad infinitum in all kind of beings. And it marvels its simplicity and yet its flexibility to repeat ad eternal and become ever more complex as points absorb energy, communicate with information move in herds, entangle in networks, form bigger topological planes and perform the 5 dimensional motions=actions=functions that ensure its vital survival, informing in height, moving in length, reproducing in width, evolving socially into wholes…. And dying in entropic dissolutions.

So when we look at time scales, there are the smaller time cycles of the parts, the organic time cycles of the whole and the larger time cycles of the world. When we look at those parts we find the 3 conserved elements, of a membrain of angular momentum, a singularity with lineal motions and a vital energy product of both. All is a fractal because each point has parts that are points and it is part of a larger non-Euclidean point. How can then organize all those elements. Because there is a beautiful simple equation that organizes all those planes of space-time, called in mathematics the ‘metric of the dimension, sum of all those parts and wholes, which we call naturally the ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar fractal planes of space-time: S (size of the vital space of the point) x T (speed of the angular momentum of its enclosing membrain) = C. That is the size in space multiplied by the speed of the system turning around in ‘frequencies’ is constant. So larger systems are slower than their inner smaller points that have faster frequencies that code its information.

The metrics of the 5^th dimension, become then the equations most important to understand it all, coupled with our definition of space as form and time as motion, which relativity tells us we cannot distinguish. So as we cannot distinguish something that is moving in time from something that is static in space – i.e. a turning point might seem a static wheel, a moving car in the night a flash-light line, the moti0on of galaxies might be cast as expanding space between them, S≈T, the equivalence between space and time becomes the second metric equation of 5D. And both are related, As S=T maximizes SxT, so we write Max. S x T. Yet further on as points can gather into social groups, herds and networks, which are larger, Max. S x T implies Max. ∑ S x T (a herd is larger than a point as a sum of them), which further on can grow entangled with other waves into networks as Max. ∏ ∑ S x T, (where the multiplicative ∏ symbol represents a network of points connected by its axons). And so in terms of motion we can see reality as a world of waves of points but in static space those points are connected by networks of axons, which penetrate into the lower scale of its parts.

Complexity is already growing and we have just scratched the surface of the fractal Universe with all its planes of space-time, different species of points, and the basic 2 equations of 5D metrics.

But a third fundamental equation also derived of Max. Sx T is required, the equation of the mind, which is the origin of Relativity, as what we call static space is the Maya of the senses, which a still point that absorbs information forms in its mind-mapping of reality in a static language, mirror of the outer Universe. We write:

O-finitesimal space point x ∞ Time motions of the Universe = Constant Mind-world 0 S x ∞ T = C

This equation is fundamental because it is the equation that creates order in the Universe – we might say it creates the information of reality and its scales, as those mirrors have the will to project its image in its smaller territory and recreate the Universal game in its local territory, so the game of mirrors that reproduce imaginary forms establishes through infinite Maxwellian demons, from atoms to cells to humans to suns and galaxies, which resemble atoms of a hyper-universe the arrow of linguistic information, and the spatial mental forms which become external outer worlds imprinted by those minds-forms. And all of this repetition of worlds, reduced by fractal points projected in its scale of ‘existience’ happens across multiple ∆±¡ planes of spacetime, each one studied by a space-time ‘stience’.

So the Universe is a fractal of ternary points that reproduce spatial information and temporal entropy=motion, into space-time beings of vital energy.

And those 3 5D metric equations, S=T, the equation of absolute relativity and motion, is the basis of Physics; O x ∞ = C, the equation of mind-spaces is the equation of mind languages and creation, and Max. ∏ ∑SxT (the equation of a social herd, or in its final evolution a network organism) is the equation of survival and biologic evolution as all systems will feed on energy and information and move and reproduce to survive, actions encoded into that equation.

Organicism not mechanism is the philosophy of science of the Universe

In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter.

Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

Di The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

Di The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

Di The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles. But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the informative castes of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently.

So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet humans are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow of social evolution of cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

In that sense, death can be avoided if a system instead of dissolving its form, creates a superorganism in balance between energy and information and all those facts apply to the ages of history.

TRILOGIC, Hegelian Dialectics, Universal Grammar, Mystical Trinity, Physical SU3 groups…

Trilogic Is the first truly Universal logic that works for all languages of reality, as the existence of wholes and parts is invisible for almost all beings, which therefore Taylor their languages in terms of trinity, the fundamental form of linguistic thought of human beings in all its languages. As they developed their senses in a single plane. So the main ‘abstract syntax’ of the 3 fundamental humind’s languages is trinity:

Subject (information-human) ‹ Verb (action combined both) › Object (Energy of the subject)

F(x) < = > G(y)

Blue color (information, light sky) < Green-yellow (combination-reproduction-life) > Red color (energy-entropy-blood)

Trinity in that sense is the essential A-logic of the Universe, and likely I should reduce our analysis of the multiple points of view of reality into trinity – the trinity of adjacent topologies in space-time of ages of life and of Planes of reality… if I had not discovered the laws of the fifth dimension (:

$t(limbs-fields) < Ø-Body-waves>O-Particles-heads

$t (entropic youth) < Ø-reproductive maturity> O-informative 3^rd age

∆-1: Cellular/atomic scale < ∆ø-organic/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: ecosystemic/gravitational scale.

So those are the 3 ‘trinities’ of the trinity of scale, time and space that conform the trilogic of the Universe and has much wider applications than ‘previously’ thought.

For example the ‘mystery’ of trinity is the key element of mystical thought in Catholicism, easy-to-grasp in trilogic. Even if saint Augustine despite its awesome comments on ilogic: ‘God is the seer of time’, ‘the logic of god=time is of a higher order than man’, tried hard an failed. In brief catholic trinity is just a case of scalar trinity and the relationship between the whole and the parts.

The whole is the father (Humanity: God and its nervous, informative network= ∆+1), the son (∆’, the human cell of a cultural superorganism) and the spirit (the message of eusocial love that forms such organisms, flow of information in our verbal language, that comes from the whole to the part, ‘the word became man and inhabited among us: ∆+1›∆º

Anecdote. Back in the 90s, when I was a young man and thought mankind would actually care to evolve from monologic and solved trinity, I sent a long letter to the ‘Vatican’s Doctrine Office’ with the solution. LOL

Why trinity is so pervading happens because trinity is ultimately the decoupling of gender into a reproductive third, such as in trinity, 1+1=3.

Gender symmetry is thus the main case of trinity ¡logic, as it re=produces a 3^rd, 1+1=3, new Ts+St=2TS offspring that combines the 3 conserved St-cyclical, angular momentum, sT-lineal, entropic momentum and S=T vital energy of its parental generators. The philosophical Hegelian concept of thesis, antithesis and synthesis corresponds to this logic, as well as the trinity mystery which is the best known case of trinity logic on Planes, as the ‘Father’ is the subconscious collective mind of a civilization that communicates with its nervous verbal social human language, the saint spirit, its wor(l)d to the prophet, hence the ‘son of the word that inhabited among us’. Physiology in medicine also follows a trinity logic in his studies of medicine and biochemical control of cells and its functions attached to those 3 networks.

Those 3 are the logic systems humans developed with some logic clarity. Aristotelian, Taoist and Hegelian Logic being the most clean-cut formal development of them. This is due to the incapacity of humans to fully grasp the scalar Universe. We conclude that a dual->ternary philosophy understands much better the action-reaction processes of reality than selfish monologic and improves survivability – obvious in history where max. survival happened in the Chinese Taoist culture and the minimal in the Germanic/Jewish Iron & Go(l)d animetal ‘selfish-cult(ure)s’ totally at odds with those action-reaction laws they vehemently deny as the righteous people who live for his ‘will & ego. But to get a full objective view of reality we need at least:

Gender symmetry is the main form of reproduction. However reproduction as all other realities must be observed in its rise of complexity from monologic (asexual reproduction) through simplex Gender, S=T symmetry, through ternary time gender, S=T reproductive females and S<T>S past to future to past d=evolutionary males to tetralogic (Genetic symmetry) that combines XY-XX poles to pentalogic, the whole dynamic process of reproduction, as a mixture of all other dimotions (Max. ∑SxT (s=t).

TRINITY IN HUMAN GENDER

Trinity is the next stage in the building of complex ilogic entanglement of Dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) of the Universe. As such is the fundamental ilogic entanglement of reality, if we consider the two limits of SS-minds and TT-entropy NOT really important for the interaction of that reality. Since they can be seen as existing beyond our limits of perception, in other planes.

It is then customary in 5D theory to talk of trinity as the interplay of the 3 scales of space-time of the being, its ¡-1 cellular, atomic; ¡º, thermodynamic organic and ¡+1 cosmological, ecosystem planes; as the interplay in space of the Ox| = Ø, cyclical, lineal and hyperbolic topologies of limbs/fields, heads/particles and body-waves and in time as the 3 ages of lineal youth, reproductive maturity and informative 3^rd age.

Finally trinity is the commonest ternary grammar of all languages, which reflect as mirror those ST¡ realities. Trinity perhaps has its ‘blind spot’ in entropy, TT, which erases all the trinity information of all the other elements of a system. So Entropy has little sacred trinity on it (:

And trinity is the most effective form of entanglement, reason why is so common in all systems, through the intermediate ‘ST-element’, the body in space, the verb in words of action, the ≤≥ operands in mathematics, the ∆º scale in organisms, the mature, reproductive age.

As we are not studying here the 5 elements of reality, SS-mind, TT-entropy, St-information, Ts-locomotion and TS energetic balance the iterative ultimate purpose of the fractal Universe, but focus in duality and trinity, in its fundamental praxis of events and entaglements, let us consider trinity beyond the ‘being’ in its fundamental purpose, to reproduce through gender symmetries the two poles of reality into a balanced form.

The easiest understanding of Gender is part of duality logic, the first essential entanglement of the fractal Universe that emerges in all scales, diversifying the 3 ‘states of time-space into two mirror symmetries:

– One of present S=T simultaneous, states or balanced female gender and one of S<T>S bipolar, perpendicular past to future to past motion or male gender.

This is the essential definition of the most important mirror symmetry of the Universe, of which human gender is just one case.

So in this post which essentially will deal when completed with all forms of mirror symmetry and the duality of perpendicular space and time fields, shows those symmetries in all scales.

So far given the huge load of work this project of bringing 5D-stiences to a proper scholar level in 2019, entitles we just have dealt with the duality of gender showing how it emerges across scales.

So after brief introduction to entanglement, and the definition of duality gender, we shall start with gender in the formal languages of space (mathematical numbers) and time (ilogic states). Its easiest description in classic science would be the concept of mirror symmetry. 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce, so as mirror symmetries emerged from ‘physical parity’, into ‘chemical chirality’, it finally became gender. We study that process of emergence, starting with ‘even vs. odd numbers’, (mathematical mirror symmetry), following the ‘time states of both genders’ S>T (past, entropic) + T<S (future, informative) vs. S≈T (present, balanced) States.

Those ultimate topo-logic properties of gender will then emerge, into the quantum realm, where we shall find lineal particles of entropy and information, vs. waves of vital energy, which emerge as left-handed and right-handed atomic states, which emerge into chiral molecules, which finally become male and female organisms, 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging to complete all the states of time-space needed for a system to reproduce. Because the jargon of existential ilogic is so different from that of present human science, we shall try to elaborate those emergent states of gender and treat human gender in the last section of this article with a classic historic jargon. Still what is important to understand is that on one hand both genders are different in its functions but complementary, that over all the Universe favors the feminine, balanced reproductive left-handed gender symmetry but history has favored the entropic male state; and that as long as both genders treat the discipline from the perspective of ideology and selfish class agendas, as always in the entangled Universe where only small changes within the rules of the game of exist¡ence can be made, gender will instead of being a strength for the humans species, remain an issue absurdly embroiled in a war of sexes, where neither men or women have the slightest idea of what they are, what is their potential and what they should do to improve the chances of survival of mankind as a whole single complementary species…

The science of Gender= creative reproduction. the ideologies of machismo and feminism.

The easiest concept to understand complementary gender is mirror symmetry. However in a highly ideological subject as gender is today science will likely be rejected. In the graph a classic painting by Velazquez, which today perhaps would be rejected for showing a ‘naked body’ of a female that shows its curved geometry, as opposed to the lineal forms of males; the 1^st of many topo-logic complementary differentiations of both genders.

Gender is in History a highly ideological discipline, as all themes in which ‘power’ controls sciences. Thus it moved from a pole of machismo, due to the dominance of entropic weapons as the language power, an ‘entropic male feature’, to an increasing age of feminism, due to the dominance of reproductive money, as the language of power of the economic system, a ‘reproductive female feature’.

Yet beyond sociological considerations in 5D theory, gender is an objective essential feature of the 5D Universe in all its scales, one of its basic disomorphisms (equal laws for all scales).

To make it more understandable, we might affirm that the Universe as a fractal that reproduces information is feminine, but History as a system which is devolving life and evolving metal-technology dominated by informative machines & entropic weapons, has been highly masculine. What this means, leaving aside ideologies is that the world we live in is masculine and women will never reach in it the same power than men if they persist on considering just as the goal of feminism its equality playing the roles for which gender has created males (bipolar entropy and information) but the world we live is WRONG as its entropic dominance will extinguish life and it is out of tune with the real fractal immortal reproductive Universe, whose feminine purpose is to conserve and reproduce information. So feminism should understand first the true nature of gender and females far more in tune with the real Universe and reject a world modeled to the image and likeness of entropic male, including its false simplification of the cosmos as born of an entropic big-bang, which obviously is just a projection of ‘military physics’ and its entropic view of reality.

Only if women understand their true nature and try to project its survival, reproductive, conservative, life-enhancing role on the world they will achieve supremacy over entropic men and might even reach the goal of making mankind survive the present age of extinction of life that soon with military robotics and new types of nuclear weapons will extinguish us.

For all this said, gender is NOT a mere evolutionary survival strategy – the simplex mantra that biologists use to justify anything they don’t understand. In fact, asexual species without need to find a mate and less mutational errors reproduce much faster.

In every scale of the Universe the duality of Gender appears, as it expresses the two fundamental metric equations of its organic systems:

-In 5D timespace pentalogic is the main duality of species, defined by the fractal generator of the 5D timespace Universe SxT(s=t)=Constant; as it happens between the ‘present reproductive dimotion’ and its, balanced species or female gender, S=T…, and the bipolar dimotion, from future information to past entropy to future information, S<T+S>T (SxT) that defines the male gender, which d=evolves entropy and information in bipolar motions.

Both are complementary, as only together they complete the 3 conserved dimotions of Time-space.

-In mathematics it is the duality of even-female and odd-male numbers, itself divided into the two poles of informative primes and entropic odds.

– In physical and biological 5D scales gender is the duality that reproduces through mirror symmetry, all its species; as 1/2 functions give birth to its inverse functions that merge together into a whole. Thus the Universe HAS gender in all scales as its function of reproduction evolves in complexity through each fractal scale. A mirror reflects an image, which then can superpose. In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms. Mirror symmetry then produces L-D molecules and pegs and reproduces DNA molecules. Topological evolution carries further the complexity of those mirror symmetries as energy bodies and information heads become Complementary organisms.

Finally mirror symmetry emerged in the biological scales of individual species, in the cellular level of wave-like seminal forms and particle-like ovum; to develo into organisms, becoming gender. Yet in each of those scales, taking into account the paradoxical laws of the fractal Universe, the properties of the previous symmetry emerge into the next one.

We then could say that men are right handed, lineal particles of entropy and information, with two unbalanced states, T-field>S-particle (Informative, creative arrow)+ S<T(entropic destructive arrow); and women are left handed waves of vital energy, with a balanced present, middle state of time-space in which they reproduce: S≈T; and both are as 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging into the couple. We can then deduce from the laws of 5D states of cyclical time and emergence through space scales, the properties of wo=men, but as humans are part of the super organism of history, those natural properties of wo=men become secondary to the evolution of history and the economic ecosystem of memes of metal (weapons, money and machines).

So departing from the pentalogic metric equations of gender we study how gender happens in all the scales of reality, regardless of the ideologies about gender of each cycle of History.

So it would be good for mankind to leave aside the war of sexes and understand scientifically NOT ideologically the complementary differences of both genders to FIGHT together for the survival of Mankind in time, which is the goal of all systems of the Universe – to reproduce and conserve its information.

In a pure objective scientific basis, GENDER as the essential vital expression of the two main metric equations of 5D TIMESPACE organisms is likely the best example for an interdisciplinary analysis derived of the laws of the scalar Universe, as gender happens in all systems of reality.

So we study first how gender ’emerges’ through the different stientific scales of the Universe from physical, chiral systems to biologic ones, which in the case of humanity become merged with memetic, social components and through the evolution of History into Economic systems, influenced by the forms of human power; whose analysis will close the paper.

In that sense, Gender studies are today one of the most ideological disciplines of sciences, in which the complementary functions of male and female genders have become split into a cultural war of sexes, whose explanations must be found in the present age of ‘entropic history’ dealt with in the general model of social sciences.

So we close the analysis of gender through the scales of the fifth dimension with the different ages of history that favoured the dominance of one or other sexual gender: in the Paleolithic age of entropic hunters men dominate; in the mature reproductive Neolithic age, women ruled; to be dominated in the entropic age of metal-weapons and war; and regain power in the informative age of money… We consider finally the future of gender in the ‘equalising’ age of machines.

Gender and space-time dualities and motions.

The Universe reproduces through gender in all its scales, starting from odd and even prime numbers, following with the duality of pentalogic states of past to future informative to past entropic ‘male’ flows vs. iterative present states, continued by the chirality of particles, the mirror symmetry of molecules to reach human gender.

In biology Gender is mirror symmetry. Two mirror images can superpose and reproduce. Mirror symmetry happens in all scales of the Universe, till becoming as complex as human gender is, but in essence all the chiral properties of mirror symmetry emerge in scales and become the dual properties of female and male species…

One of the most fascinating analysis of GST is the understanding of wo=men, the gender symmetry which can be studied as usual through different perspectives on the dimotions of space-time and its scales.

How may ‘Rashomon’s’ views there is in gender would surprise the reader. One which would be more familiar to scientists is the concept of parity.

Female species are left handed, male species are right handed and they exist in all the scales of the Universe in which there is mirror symmetry, though there is a smaller dominance of left handed female species that use lesser energy, and so are more efficient. Thus from the smallest electron to the human gender, females dominate.

In the simple sentence above we come to the bare bones of the differentiation of wo=men which is basically a division and specialization on the 5 dimotions, so the simplest ones, S>T, informative perception, and T<S entropy and locomotion fall on the side of male, and the complex ones, S=T, reproduction and love, social evolution, on the side of women.

As such gender asymmetry is essential to the workings of the Universe in all its scales and species; it is not as the ‘official dogma’ of biology a strategy of ‘survival’ (an error of Darwinian evolution, stressing merely the ‘fight for survival, NOT the eusocial evolution and complementarity of those higher ‘dimotions of time; a by-product as Russell put it, of the Victorian, imperial, military culture) but an STRUCTURAL feature of all space-time organisms… In its simplest expression we could say that women are ‘space’, ‘form’, and men are ‘time’ motion. But that is an extreme simplification.

One has first to understand the program of existence of all space-time organisms and its 5 dimensional motions, and the nature of any space-time organism, in the graph reflected for a human being, expressed as ‘existential actions’ (Dimotions performed by each Space-time being to survive):

All entities of reality first ‘perceive information in the stillness of the mind’ (1Ðimotion: Information), then with that information move (2Ðimotion: locomotion or Acceleration) towards a field of energy which they will entropically feed on, to replenish its topological space-time parts (body-head and limbs; wave-particle and fields, in biological and physical systems).

So those are the 3 bare minimum actions of existence for a being to continue. But as the system will accumulate errors ultimately it will need to reproduce into a clone form, and so we have the first complex Dimotion as action of existence. Reproduction of a clone supeœrganism (ab. œ), an Offspring of equal beings, which will carry the relative immortality of the being in discontinuous form. And so we give this action, the ‘œ, o’ vowel. And then through a social language, in man verbal thought, also to enhance the survival, those reproduced clone beings will become a society, in decametric scales, from the 10°=1 individual to 10¹=10 family in 3 generations, to 10² clan…. And so on, till 10¹°, the global superorganism aborted unfortunately by the birth of the metal-earth, the superorganism of machines that is replacing us. And so we call this fifth dimotion of social evolution of parts into wholes, the fifth dimension of scalar evolution, with the last vowel, U, for ‘Universals’, the philosophical term for wholes.

Thus we have this sequential order of actions of existence: I->A->E…O->U… informing->accelerating->entropic feeding->Organic Reproduction->Universals creation.

Some systems play the 5 Dimotions together, and have no gender, some systems play only the 3 first dimotions, and ‘externalize’ the others with catalyzers and enzymes, as machines do with enzymen, or carbohydrates with enzymes and so are slaves of those who reproduce them. Some systems divide the simplex dimotions and complex dimotions into two specialized entities, the male simplex gender, specialized in the IAE (pure information, pure motion, pure entropy) and the female complex gender specialized in the complex dimotions (organic reproduction of eusocial evolution into universals=wholes).

The five dimensional motions (ab. dimotions) of space-time structure complementary beings in two gender, the gender specialized in the primary first dimotions, ‘information by a mind, which ‘moves’ to feed entropically’, which is the male gender; and the secondary dimotions, which uses that ‘food’ to reproduce socially, and that information to evolve socially into a larger whole, either the complementary reproductive couple or the society.

So let us first introduce very briefly that higher level of understanding of History and mankind.

Wo=Men

Of course nothing of this is understood the least by huminds and gender studies, which are just sociologic and historic processes treated better on the chapters of history. Here we are dealing with a much wider theme, gender, which happens in all parts of the Universe as we have seen with the analysis of chirality and parity. So now we can deal with the specifics of human gender, wo=men:

The 3 planes of existence in 5D metric of the Human super organism, with its different synchronous cycles. The cell that lives one day, the organism that feeds with energy the cell every day, and the social civilisation extended in Gaia, which could be immortal but is killed by military germs every 800-80-8 years, in the accelerated vortex of metal-information now collapsing into the singularity age. Those 3 planes of the scalar, organic Universe are all what is needed to describe History, in all its life elements, as the super organism of Mankind in time. In the ∆o fundamental scale, there is though an essential duality, that of complementary wo≈men, so ill understood in social sciences, we need first to clarify from the highest perspective of the 5 dimensions of space-time, what we are as individuals; so we can understand what we are as a species and what we are NOT, but the ‘metal-earth’ and its company-mothers of machines, re-producing the competitive forms of metalife, make us belief we should be – equalized ‘zoon ekonomikon’, workers=re-producers of machines and consumers=vitalizers of them; instead of dedicating our lives to worship the re=production of wo=men and its social evolution through the power of love – the TRUE goals the Universe sets for each species, we today surrogate into an alien form. And the first, immediate consequence of such slavery to other species, is the constant debasing of the Nature of women, the superior species that embodies the goal of the Universe: the immortality of a species through its ‘higher arrows’ of time, reproduction and social evolution. So today women deny their nature and try to be like sterile men, realizing themselves as slaves of metal, that reproduce and evolve those machines

In the graph, men embody the simplex dimotions of timespace, locomotion, information and entropy=death. Women the higher complex goals of reproduction and social evolution. So men have either stronger lineal limbs and higher content of informative grey matter but far less, memorial, reproductive white matter, and their bodies are sterile. Further on, most men are unbalanced, either dominated by entropic and limbic motions (warriors, sportsmen, workers) or in a lesser degree they are dominated by an excessive development of its informative, abstract brain, unconnected to the survival, loving, social reproductive goals of the species – hence dedicated to construct lethal mechanisms. Women on the other side have complex ‘hyperbolic’, reproductive wave-like body forms’ balanced between form and motion and performing the most complex, important dimotions of existence, reproduction and love. Both in a perfect world would be complementary but as company-mothers of machines and weapons convince us to reproduce them, all humans are equalized as ‘men’, with the task of evolving machines and consuming them in entropic motions that are destroying the world of life, in the 3rd age of history, the age of excessive information entropy and death. While we should have ‘stopped’ that evolution in the second, reproductive balanced Neolithic age of Gaia. Instead, we have developed a culture of simplex locomotions, lineal time, entropic weapons and big-bang deaths (simplex philosophies of science of ‘German physicists’ whose worldly religion is to make weapons of mass destruction, or lineal ‘segregation’, Abrahamic religions with a manifest destiny – to detach man of Nature, the organic Universe, and kill Gaia thinking it is already dead.

So we are different and complementary. What yesterday’s machismo did was to reduce women to the S=T reproductive body functions. What today’s industrial feminism does though is likely from a humanist point of view even worse: try to become ‘animetal males’, reproduce machines, work on them, replicate all what males should have done – in brief kill mother earth and contribute to the systemic destruction of History.

What both should do is end the stupid war on sexes learn what they are and work together to save the species from its growing degradation in the age of the ‘¥-vidi credo ergo sum’ millennial generation. But as the superorganism of history seems to be in his last spasms, what will happen is more likely more of the same: attempts by women to ‘castrate’ men, attempts by men to ‘rape’ women.

In the deepest level of understanding of reality, that of the game of time-space organisms however the division of ‘actions’ between women and men is more telling of a fact that might surprise the reader:

Women ARE the superior species, without the slightest doubt, because they embody the 2 higher survival, complex action of ‘life’: reproduction and love. While men are merely performing the 3 simplex ‘dimotions’ of locomotion, entropy=death and information=perception.

The fact humans have NEVER fully understood the ‘actions of existence’ and the Nature of the game of time cycles obviously means they don’t understand they should YIELD to the survival instincts of women, the true meaning of existence. Instead they have made in different ages of time, the function of entropy=death (warrior age) and information, evolution of form (modern technological age) the supreme goal, which IS NOT. Today intelligence is grossly overrated, because it is a function – conceded – men dominate by ‘design’ better than man, but it is NOT the most important ‘drive of life’. So the reader should first understand what ‘life is all about’; to know why balanced, reproductive loving women are above unbalanced, ‘extremal’ men, which are either mostly physical, entropic, destructive, limbic, obsessed by motions of machines and weapons or, in lesser numbers as this writer is, highly informative, but ultimately ‘sterile’.

Most males are dominated by the limb-motions and body pleasures; with little understanding of logic time patterns, living the present. So they cannot distinguish the future of the wor(l)d spelt by ethic prophets based in cyclical patterns, which restrain their wishes and prefer to follow the myths of the go(l)d and iron animetal cultures that promise them a lineal manifest destiny hiding the obvious dangers of worshipping a different species and denying the bioethics of social love

What women should do in that regard is first, learn what they are in the ‘tao game’, and then stop thinking they must behave like men and excel in the extremal actions of information and locomotion, but convince men to respect and reproduce and love and survive.

But of course they don’t do that. They are obsessed with being ‘warriors’, ‘sport-women’ and ‘creators’… Abandoning its higher survival functions – a sure sign of the destructive age of history in which we find ourselves.

Indeed, we live in the age of extinction and devolution of history and mankind increasingly obsolete to the robots and ai programs and metal-memes, money, weapon and machines that will liquidate us this century. And yet because the male has created them with its entropic obsession, and ego-centered information, disconnected from the universe, the male cannot make the species survive.

This was the job of females: social love and reproduction. But as the male has imposed his infantile self-destruction of the species, his metal-memes, his despise of life, his arrogance against a universe which is a reproductive ‘female’ fractal, NOT a ridiculous locomotion of simpleton male ‘physicists’, it has caved in his path of extinction.

Only if women had NOT abandon their true self, and their true function as gender: THE SURVIVAL OF THE SPECIES beyond the individual ‘death’, and convinced the male that those higher dimotions ARE THE ESSENCE OF REALITY, the species would survive. The opposite has happened. Today women, under the sterile ‘NYC’ ‘capitalist’ concept of humans as mere enzymen, attachments of its machines of profits, NO LONGER cherish her own condition. But it just wants to be a man, and compete with men in its pure motions, which it will never do, because that is not her nature. Women might achieve equal pay in tennis, but locomotion is a male ‘simple role’, so Nadal will always win Miss Williams, and that is Ok, because using the lesser parts of the being, the limbs, to hit a sphere, which even an atom does better as quarks keep bouncing back and forth electrons with absolute precision, is nothing to boast about.

So we have to introduce gender into history and the third age of mankind, fading fast into a slave, surrogate of its capitalist ‘job’ as slave that consumes=vitalize and reproduces machines. Since the oppression and degradation of women, started indeed with the age of metals when the classic mature age of mankind, the Neolithic of fertility goddesses and contact with the reproductive laws of the Universe ended, when the first ‘Indo-Europeans’ with bronze swords and chariots destroyed the ‘paradise’.

EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES.

The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.

The ternary, organic, fractal Universe of space-time beings, generates also the 3 races and genders of mankind through the same processes used in complexity to describe the evolution of all scales of the 5th dimension.

Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3^rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly ‘Dimotions’ dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are ‘Dimotions’ dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.

Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher ‘Dimotions’ x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3^rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity: Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between ‘Dimotions’ and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3^rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in ‘Dimotions’ (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, ‘Dimotions’ and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

Di Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

– E=I: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3^rd informative horizon of big apes”

Di Max.I: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

Di Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

Di E=I. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.

Di Max.I: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

Di Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

Di E=I: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

Di Max.I. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

Di Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

Di E=I: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

Di Max.I: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered³, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological ‘Dimotions’ weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new ‘Dimotions’/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal + the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

3^rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.
Di The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

Di A second informative pygmy strain, the 1^st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=O, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, ‘Dimotions’, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

Di ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the dolichocephalic brain dominated by the visual eye to Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

Di ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachycephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

Di And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominant in the height/medullar axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

The culture/age better for the survival of mankind, as in all species, is the one that balances both arrows, E=O. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture.

Let us study them in more detail how the ternary differentiation that created humans being from apes explains racial differentiation by establishing 3 types of minds:

The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axes, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

– Dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipital bone. It is the white man.

– Brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain¹¹, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

They maximize the 3 types of human minds: energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, etho-centric):

– Max. E: Visual, spatial, energetic minds.

In the symmetry of time and space, is the case of the first age or ‘’child and the ‘male’ species of the white races and in the earlier anthropological record, it is the Neanderthal, which we already considered 20 years ago as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man born as Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which recently the genetic record has proved:

White people, who occupy the same range than Neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolichocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Their languages are consonantal, with few vowels. They have red hair and Rh- (a sign of crossing between different species, whose 2^nd generation is not fertile, as mules born from asses and horses are). Further Neanderthal traits – white skin, hooked nose, wide hips – also recognizable in the Basque, Iberian, Germanic, Celtic and Semitic cultures, paradigms of visual cultures, which will make of shiny metal, weapons and go(l)d, their fetish – seem to validate further this thesis. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fevers of those cultures, origin of ‘greed’, an emotional, visual trait which other types of human minds (Chinese) hardly suffered:

Thus the white man should be properly called Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, dominant in visual information with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech. He will thus evolve the visual language in its 10^th‘Brodmann’ region of rational thought further into digital, geometric and mathematical thought, and create lineal civilizations based in metal, lineal time and Aristotelian thought. He can be sub-divided in two types, which again recent experimental proofs seem to validate:

-The Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, but Neanderthal females did not cross with dwarf verbal men, creating a mixed race with an extreme sexual dimorphism (taller male, smaller women). A similar case will happen in South-America where conquistadors mixed with Amerindian females but Amerindians did not cross with Spanish women, since the dominant warrior, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC was the Neanderthal and in the first crossing of the Atlantic the Spaniard.

This theory advanced in my earlier books has now proofs in the genetic record. The result is the Semite with a dominant bigger, highly aggressive, visual male and a smaller emotional woman. The reason of this military superiority is the fact that at that time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger javelin warrior. Then in the Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid Cro-Magnon which invented the arc and hence could kill at distance the Neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing process was reversed:

Now Homo Sapiens mixed with stronger Neanderthal women (more pure among Nordic and Scottish Women with red and blonde hair, dolichocephalic, visually oriented, often sexually dominant). Thus the Indo-European race was born. This last detail of Complex theory of human evolution should wait for further genetic analysis since so far we have only observed that with a 90% of equality between men and Neanderthals and a 4% of Neanderthal genes there is mixing both in Semitic, white and Cro-Magnon (northern Chinese) groups.

-Max.I: Verbal, temporal, informative minds.

This is the case in time symmetry of old people; in the symmetry of gender latter studied in more detail of the ‘female’ species and in the symmetry of race of the yellow race; and in the earlier racial record, of the parental capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. All of them are head-dominant, with clear neoteny features (thus with lesser young, energetic development), smaller in spatial body, with a dominant brachycephalic brain, and wider face, as the main linguistic part of the brain, the Brocca region, goes across from ear to ear. Thus, the mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and their eyes are wider.

As all informative species the mongoloid is highly social, group oriented, selfless, as it uses the verbal language to create their super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of informative vowels over energetic consonants; women play a greater role even in Semitic culture (Indonesian Muslims). They are less violent, highly intelligent (Chinese test 10 points more than white men), and have shown as all species that can evolve socially the highest record of survival compared to the original Semitic cultures, which base their societies in the power of metal greed and murder, gold slavery and iron weapons.

-SxT: Reproductive, emotional, body oriented cultures.
A 3^rd type of culture, whose minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the adolescent. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards. Thus, the brain regions most developed in emotional races happen along the ‘height’ axis. They are the inner regions of emotional thought (limbic system) and the motor and sensorial cortex on top. This hypothesis, extracted from our models of complexity and duality developed in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are found to be wired inwards with more connections going towards the Hypothalamus than men, wired outwards towards the visual regions. And certainly both, black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Psychological characters

Those findings are applied also to the will and drives of the mind: – Max.O: There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information).

– Max.T: There are athletic, sanguineous people, dominated by their energetic will.

-St=Ts: There are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

Those distinctions already observed in XIX C. studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

Cultures define historic future.

A key question in a biological world is the choice of which of those cultures, personalities and genders should be the referent for the rest of mankind, in order to maximize the goals of all super-organisms and species – survival. And the surprising yet evident truth of an organic model of the Universe is that the osylocephalic, ethnocentric and verbal, brachycephalic feminine gender should dominate with its balance and ethic sense of survival the violent, visual, technological civilization of the white man, whose ‘energetic’ impulses are taking this planet out of balance, destroying Nature and building the new forms of ‘metalife’ (weapons, robots, A.I.) and machines of the singularity that will extinguish us. Yet this is not obvious because the 3^rd paradigm of measure has no organic whys, despises life and ‘sees’ only reality with machines, it does not feel it or understand the deepest game of existence we have explained here. So we are walking steadily towards the extinction of history , the 10^th and last extinction of life on Earth, guided by the visual wanting of the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, its lineal, energetic weapons and hypnotic go(l)d, themes those we will treat in depth in the last lessons.

Then, humans experience a degradation of the complementarity of gender, and also in the ‘field of social evolution’, society degraded the proper democratic ≈ social evolution by consensus, at which women excel and the WRONG form of establish societies, with the hierarchical emergence of the warrior and banker, with its weapons of entropic metal (iron, stronger than our carbon that kills the body), and digital languages of hypnotic informative metal (gold, the best informative atom of the Universe), which substituted the verbal language in which women excel (a woman at death will have spoken a 25% more of words, a woman has a larger axis of the mind in the brachycephalic verbal dimension) since they carry the pegging informative language of the natural evolution of mankind into a larger whole vs. the construction of extremely hierarchical structures with metal topping it all, the final state of degradation of ‘animetal=animal+metal arrogant males’.

The only meaningful division of races are according to the ternary axis=dimensions of the mind that between the 3 dominant languages of visual, white races and cultures with higher Neanderthal input, mongoloid, verbal cultures and black cultures with dominant motor-emotional axis. In a perfect world the 3 would be complementary as they enhance one of the 3 ‘perceptive languages’ of existence. In a racist animetal world, the visual, metal-hypnotic values of greed and violence brought about by white fetish cultures of go(l)d and the sword carried the day, paradoxically starting the degradation of life and history, in perpetual world and slavery to the selfish values of memes of metal.

The simplicity of the first statements of a Universe made of space-time organisms, and its 5 dimotions which can ultimately be reduced to spatial form and temporal motion and its combinations, is then the basis also of gender. How those simple dimotions evolve into the infinite details of gender duality and complementarity of course is the full complexity of the fractal iterative Universe .

So now that we know a bit about women, and their purest GST structure as space-time beings, of the wave and particle/field forms, we can deepen our understanding of human gender in all levels of comprehension.

White matter/Grey matter brain: ternary analysis.

Let us consider the brain under the ternary principle in its topology, ages and fractal st-planes¹².

Topological analysis

In the graph, the 3 brains of the human being from a spatial, topological perspective:

– Max.I: Our external, sensorial grey matter.

-Max. E: our internal, emotional, limbic system.

– E=I: Combined in a white matter, memorial, reproductive brain.

We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the DNA rich, cyclical, fluctuating, integrating cells of the grey matter brain, and then the outcome becomes imprinted in resistant white matter networks made of axon-connections. This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for ‘Dimotions’ and reproduction (sexuality), the main arrows of time of the body and limbs; whose wanting are processed by the limbic brain.

Then both programs converge into the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure, which in women are more wired to the limbic brain and in men to the grey matter and eye senses. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and their external, visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical-technological objects and motions within external space.

Temporal analysis

A key element to understand memetic imprinting is the inflexibility of the brain beyond 40 years. This was understood by the Greeks which divided life in two ages, till 40 (acne) when the brain peaks in informative power, which was considered the summit of life and then all was downwards till our end at the end of the mean generational cycle of ±80 years.

Thus the 3 layers of the brain are imprinted only in the ‘1^st part of existence’, before the curve of life goes down in the 3^rd age, since we only learn in that first part of existence. And this makes most people during the time in which they exercise social power, inflexible, memetic programs that will never learn but merely exercise their emotional imprinting converted in beliefs; disconnected from the ever evolving FMI complex, whose challenges they will be unable to resolve.

In that regard, within that ½ fraction of existence, in the child age the limbic system dominates; in the adolescence and earlier, mature age the grey matter brain learns, reasons and imprints the white matter brain, which will dominate the adult age in which we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. As that period of life roughly extends from 30 to 80 years old, this means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of fixed beliefs and chains of rational thoughts, which make us perform the same routine actions the rest of our lives – not very different from the fixed forms of any computer system.

Fractal analysis

In the previous graph, left center the fractal analysis connects Multiple space-times theory with the Freudian psychology as the 3 regions of the brain can be considered 3 hierarchical layers, with a grey matter brain that senses reality and delivers information to the subconscious, limbic, survival brain that acts restricting the information that becomes imprinted in the long memory of the white matter brain.

Freud rightly understood the ‘limits’ of rational thought, due to the subconscious, powerful Super-ego, the memetic super-structures that society establishes to control and repress the biological, natural genetic program of life and love.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious, energetic, limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the, white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in childhood by biological desires, the drives codes by genes and in youth by cultural memes, the drives of the super-organisms of history; and finally the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain connected to the truth of external senses.

The most common trajectory of thought through those layers is during the young, emotional age:

External world->Senses->grey matter brain->Limbic censorship->Impression in the white matter brain->Actions

While as the organism matures, the limbic system loses importance and the grey matter brain connects to the white matter brain directly:

Outer World->Senses->grey matter brain-> white matter Printing->actions

On the other hand, people dominant in emotions and inward thought might have the exactly opposite way of thought:

Inner world of biological drives ->Limbic System->White matter imprinting >actions

Obviously our previous analysis of ages, races and genders and the socio-cultural upbringing will make those 3 avenues of thought differ in individuals. And in fact as impolite as it might seem, we find that most systems follow the irrational drives of biological existence, expressed by the limbic system and imprinted as desires in the white matter brain, which determines most human actions.

Thus the most common program is Biological censorship by the centers of happiness that suppress painful information and upholds the imprinting of childhood and adolescence and its emotional truths as absolute, both in biological taste and cultural religions and beliefs.

Or in other words, once an idea is fixed in youth, to redraw it you would have to break and kill the programs of the mind; which if we consider the cellular scale of imprinting, turns out to be almost impossible as the acetylcholine that redraws the white matter axons is no longer available in enough quantities.

So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence), won’t change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic, censoring brain against reason and evidence. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, we must embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of earlier socio-biological beliefs. .

Recap. In complexity evolution is guided by the existence of only 3 types of morphologies and networks in living beings: the morphology and nervous system of information, the morphology of ‘Dimotions’, and the morphology and network of reproduction. We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant speciation in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative Australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual Neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Thus, the Isomorphisms of Evolution and its 3±i ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolichocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-? consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose).

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider ` brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains is the sensorial culture, the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

The brain studied topologically is a system of 3 regions, the energetic, emotional, body oriented limbic system; the external, informative, sensorial grey matter brain, and the white matter axons that connect both and controls our beliefs firing our actions.

MAN AS A MENTAL SYSTEM. ENTROPIC MALE VS. REPRODUCTIVE WOMEN

We are obviously destroying the world of life Gaia, as the equation of history shows:

Gaia (past-life) < Present (History: human super organism) > Future (Metalearth: Machines).

All our resources guided by company-mothers which have a monopoly in the printing of money, the language of social power that buys the law, are used to make machines, evolve them and adapt the world to its image and likeness, with null interest in creating a world made to the image and likeness of man, the most perfect known super organism of the Universe, which is as the fractal paradigm of philosophy of science shows also a superorganism. super organism of the Universe, which is as the fractal paradigm of philosophy of science shows also a superorganism.

How can this absurd contradiction between the intelligence of the rational biological human being, which should cater to its welfare needs and the program of the selfish memetic mind that cares nothing for life only for the ad-on power of energy and information acquired with machines – even if they destroy us all – can be explained from the perspective of complex systems and biological sciences – the sciences in which the model of history and economics of this blog is based?

The answer is ‘the animetal species’, half human half machine, and the repetitive, iterative structure of the fractal Universe, which makes most systems just repetitive, imitative forms, or in words of Aristotle ‘people are slaves they believe they don’t reason.

So in this fundamental post of bio-history we explain the birth and evolution of the human slave to the metal-meme, the ‘animetal

The informative brain – different forms of thought. Wo=men: gender and brain structure.

From the most profound level of thought in complex systems, women are waves, men are field-particle states of the three arrows of space-time, entropy, energy and information. So you might as well as this section is in pure systems sciences first revise what a human system is in terms of its three arrows/organs of time-space.

Women have 10 times more white matter; men 6 times more grey matter. In the logic formalism of 5D metric equations, the 2 ‘states’ of intelligence correspond two different orientations of its space-time organisms: S≈T, the balanced ‘vital energy’-white matter, hyperbolic, reproductive body-wave female state complementary with the S>T, entropic>informative, Potential>Particle, lineal>Cyclical, limb>head dual male state, carried through the evolution of the fractal scalar, organic Universe. So complementary gender starts in the quantum 0-1 Unit sphere as wave-particle complementarity, follows in the atom scale as electronic wave/nuclei-particle complementarity, continues in the molecular state as the RNA/DNA complementarity, carried further into the ovule>semen complementarity; reaching finally the white matter/grey matter duality, which of course, our ‘equalizing’ civilisation where both wo≈men are under the capitalist idol-ogy, lesser beings, just ‘consumers=vitalizers of machines’ and workers=reproducers of mechanisms, is not even acknowledge. Humans ARE mind the reader exceptionalist beings whose role as enzymen is to catalyse the terraforming of the Earth by company-mothers of machines, so the mother-father, re=productive memetic couple must NOT understand itself but be at war and only come together in the worshipping by both grey and white matter of what truly matters, metalmemes money, weapons & machines

It is difficult for humans to understand to which degree, anything related to science is culture, or rather becomes ‘censored’ and ‘biased by culture. We have stressed in this blog on social sciences the bias established by our ‘worldly animetal religion’ which uses the 3 species of metal, entropic weapons, informative go(l)d and organic machines that prey on our bodies, mind languages and atrophy our organs they substitute within the process of evolution of metalife.

This process has traditionally broke the natural complementarity between women and men, as entropic lineal ‘particle -males’ have used weapons since the Neolithic to repress the life-reproductive fertility goddesses, 1/2 of the human couple.

As a reaction against this dystopia of the animetal warrior and its counterpart in crime, the re=producer of weapons, the essential positive, nurturing nature of women, as the reproductive wave-state of gender has been downplayed as inferior. But now what is happening is likely worst: women became wo=men, that is to form part of the animetal world, they imitate male behavior, instead of evolving man back to his ethic, reproductive, conservative roles, to make ‘History immortal’.

And as this process of ‘equalization’ continues, both men and women are reduced to their ‘enzymatic’ roles as ‘enzymen’ which catalyze the evolution of machines. So alas, it turns our that we are NO longer complementary but ‘equal’-ized.

It is the feminist idology… counterpart of the machist idology of the warrior male. So what is the reality of men and women? Complementarity of gender, which is NOT a shallow resort of Darwinian selection as there is NO advantage at all compared to the massive reproduction of single sex, nor mutations are exclusive of DNA recombination by gender. Those are subjects of systems sciences treated elsewhere. What matters here is that in the organic scalar Universe gender complementarity is a feature of all scales, which traces back to the first of all quantum complementarities – that between reproductive waves and particle-states; such as we can confidently say that the properties of waves>electrons>female principles and particles>quarks>male states carry through all the scales.

recap. The fundamental differences between women’s minds and male’s minds is that Women have 10 times more white matter, the site of memory, connected closer to the body and the emotional, limbic system and hyperbolic reproductive wave-like bodies. Men have 6 times more grey matter, the site of informative processing and its creation-destruction process, and lineal sterile bodies.

White memorial matter IS the S=T, balanced repetitive function of the brain. Grey matter is the creative/destructive element. Women are connected to the hypothalamus, the site of emotions and men to the eye, the site of visual thought.

‘Denial of wo=men’s’ nature, equalized in the industrial, company-mother’s world.

Let us first clarify a fact: wo=men are the solution to the world. We write wo=men to include also the ‘attachment’ to women who should be men NOT the other way around.

Why wo=men should rule the world NOT men, but from the point of view of true reproductive women’s function, from the point of view of waves, not the feminazi, castrating, hate-memes of the usual suspects, the go(l)d sterile ‘you’ cult(ure) – the feminazi new york movement, but from the point of view of real wo=men, the nurturing, french feminine movement, which the feminazis hate? For 3 reasons:

– Women are not so much an overrated creative mind, but repetitive functions as waves are. And that is good because creation requires destruction but specially because humans must stop evolving machines like yesterday. Machines have gone beyond our control already with cancerous 5g and robots and big brother data.

Women thus as waves who love, need order over the particle/field destructive/creative process of men, would not create if they understand and accept their true nature, without feeling inferior more machines. They would repeat the memes of life ad eternal making history immortal. They are better as functions of repetition, because waves are repetitive, and that is the best thing to do in a universe which is not about evolution and creation as it is a block of time where all forms have been created already in the past and future, but about cyclical time, repetition.

The very same aberrant concept of lineal time is masculine, false, entropic, destructive. So women could have enlightened all of us if they had embraced the organic, living universe, its cyclical, reproductive functions its female outlook, the 5th dimension of social love, you name it… Instead of the feminist castrating anti-sexual, anti-human reproduction ‘you-hate’ feminazi new york movement, just another attempt to neuter women and make them like men.
– women are not violent and therefore they would not have had any doubts eliminating weapons and forbidding robotic terminators.
– women are diplomatic, dialog, achieve as waves do consensus by superposition not hierarchical power as particles do. And therefore they would have established the networks of the perfect world …much easier but the ideology they have today as all the ‘hate memes’ of mankind in the globalized worst of all cultures, the go(l)d, you culture of worship of metal and hate to mankind, and its reproductive function, is anti femenine, anti life, and humans. The entire #metoo bullshit movement – if a man rapes a woman it must be denounced and jailed and the laws are there. That should never be the focus of women’s activism, as a very secondary role that depends of men. The activism of women as the dominant species that should be on this planet, as it was in the age of the bonobo and the neolithic, should have turned around the real themes of this planet: the competition of company-mothers of machines, with more rights than human mothers, the need to increase social love, the coming together, the nurturing. To confront man in the only thing man cannot avoid, to desire the superior in-form-ative female body is though a perfect no-way-out cancelling strategy, which is essentially what humans experience in all their fields of existence.

we live in a world controlled by company-mothers of machines, or ‘capitalist world’ where the rights of human mothers are not met by the ‘attached’ placebo system, called ‘democracy’, as humans lack credit to create a world to its image through the use of the language of social power, money, overwhelmingly reproduced by those companies in e-money derivatives and stocks. So the world is terraformed to the image and likeness of machines, not of human beings. This site, unlike every economist on planet earth, albeit camouflaged by its ‘abstract equations’ of productivity and profit, is taking sides for the human mother and the species called mankind, which happen to be your species, different in needs and goals to those of the machine. The failure to recognize the needs of mankind and the connection between economics and history to which it should be submissive, and the blind greedy dictatorship of financiers that rule humans with numbers, without the slightest care for its needs, are then ultimately the reasons why we are becoming displaced and likely extinct this century by company-mothers, robots and weapons in labor and war fields.

In the same manner the political system of capitalist democracies is completely inefficient because it confronts two parties of humans to destroy what the other does, so capitalism, company-mothers which are efficiently design reign and keep evolving and controlling the world, while humans do nothing for themselves with confronting parties instead of having true social scientists working all together in a single party for a real democracy as we explain in our texts; the entire feminazi castrating ablation movement tries to eliminate the harmony male-female, confront them for impossible themes, as sexuality the very essence of the universe is, deviate any attention from the real problem of ‘women’ as mothers, with less salary less rights, less credit, and deviate them from their real role, to protect the future of the species.

And it has indeed succeed, as the circus of the #metoo movement which is just a bunch of privileged white women actresses of the infotainment movement doing more of the same selfie metoo movement of a bunch of people who should just shut up and do the right thing – put suits to every male who they feel was actually raping it… But they are posers, fuking posers, as the song goes. They are just actresses playing a role to pay attention. Why mr. Weinstein is not in jail? Why all those women instead of posting internet comments denounce in courts whoever ab=used them? Why we do not talk of the real problems for the species?

Only the latin woman, the french movement clarified it: women are not victims, not only bodies. They have brains and their focus should be the real problems, the focus should be to impose an alternative philosophy of the universe which is femenine, reproductive, cyclical… To stay in the lowest iq possible reclamation, if a man has touched my ass or not, is to degrade women’s role.

To vindicate only to be like men, to find equality in the world made by men, of weapons, company-mothers, lineal time, life extinction, is nauseating.

women’s feminism today is ablating the clitoris-life-philosophy-nature of women and it is also impossible, because women as men will obviously always compete in inferior conditions with men. Their goal should be to make men as women, and not in the sexual arena, which is completely irrelevant but in the mental arena, to make men mental women. And on that i don’t know a single women that labors for it.

In the graph, men murder 10 times more than women.

A few other self-evident characteristics of gender duality reinforce the thesis of its symmetric, SXT reproductive mind x Informative Body:

– Females live longer as time and information are related; males are stronger energetically but live less.

– Female are cyclical, male are lineal.

– Female remember, are memorial, temporal, conservative of the past order. Male forget and look towards the ‘uncertain’ future.

-Woman is the informative form; hence her nervous system dominates. Males are the energetic form and hence their blood system dominates.

– Behavior and tastes: women like forms, men movement:

Woman love time men love space. Woman love information men love ‘Dimotions’. Men love movement, energetic, violent sports, races, military games and toys. Women love formal dolls that can be dressed. Women love formal sports: gymnastics. Male dresses are lineal; women’s clothing is curved, cyclical.

– Male love open spaces; women stand better seclusion.

– Men do a single task better; women do many tasks in a cyclical pattern.

– Men drive spatially better through lineal roads.

– Women cook, trans-form food, men hunt for it.

– ‘Entropic Dimotions’ violence, death and destruction as the graph shows, are clear male behaviors. The positive side of it is the fact that to create something new, you have to destroy first. Thus, women conserve more and they have been historically less creative.

– Implosive Vs. explosive nature: Outward Vs. inward nature:

– Men have explosive, outward, visual behavior; women have implosive, emotional behavior.

Women stand pain/pressure/inwards behavior better. Women feel pain more intensely than men and yet they tolerate it more, since pain is a pressure, inward sensation of in/formative nature.

-But it is precisely the combination of both movements what creates the Sexual reproductive feeling of pleasure, since in the Universe balance dominates as the best strategy. And since women are informative & reproductive with a higher balance, they are sexually more complex.

Scalar, Fractal analysis.

– Further on, as women’s body are more complex, dominant, and their bodies attract men. Yet since men are mentally more creative, intelligent men attract more women. So a woman is still, as information is, waiting men to come as the energetic, active pole towards them, in the 3 scales of existence:

The lineal semen moves towards the cyclical ovule at cellular level; the male organism moves towards the female in the biological, mating season; and the male hunter brings food and today goes out to work while the female waits in the social scale.

St; st+1: Sociological scales.

Spatial ‘Dimotions’ and violence have a language; mathematics. In the graph, Women are ‘verbal/temporal brains’; men are mathematical, spatial, energetic brains: Women prefer social sciences, verbal sciences and humanities. Men dominate the fields of spatial sciences, sciences based on mathematics. On the other hand women test more in verbal exams. When a woman has died, on average she has spoken 20% more words than a man has done.

Psychology mostly shown in natural perception and literature has been the clearest wisdom on those natural traits and variations, even if today political correctness denies those variations. So the literary man can perfectly consider the master pieces of sentimental and psychological literature, when humans were free to study the reality of human existence without dogmas proper of the metric age or the industrial age, in which all humans are equalized as reproducers=workers of machines, and consumers =testers of them, and women’s nurturing and biological roles are eliminated, as they become equalized and simplified as ‘males’.

In that regard in Sociology and History, the higher scales of human existence duality of gender has been defined, according to the dominance of the higher ecosystem over the lower scales, by the ages, dominant castes and super-organisms of history studied in the last lectures of this work.

In brief, according to the 3 ages of history the dominance and power roles of women and men varied:

-In the Paleolithic, energetic age of History, the young age of male hunters, males dominated women.

-In the Neolithic, mature, reproductive age of history, of Fertility Goddesses and food-gathering, women dominated men. They found the cycles of reproduction of plants they better understood, and fed the community. They gave birth to the species. And they established religions of Fertility.

– In the age of metal, dominated by visual, lineal, energetic weapons and machines, men dominated women in its energetic, 1^st age. Since energetic men are murderers, since the arrival of weapons males have controlled and abused the rights of women and fertile nature, waging war to both of them.

But the financial-military-industrial complex has 3 components as gender does. So we can in fact distinguish 2 types of cultures:

– Monetary-based cultures (Jewish, Chinese, Italian, British cultures), where women have a higher power, since money is a cyclical language of metal information

-Military, energetic, lineal, weapon based cultures, where men dominated (Arab, Japanese, Spanish, German cultures), as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe).

And both are often in historic, open confrontation.

-Finally in the age of the machine, as we evolved first energetic machines (XIX c.) women kept submissive to men. But today in the Age of Information, dominated by audio-visual machines, and their language of reproduction, money, women, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men. Women indeed love money and information, which they understand better and makes them advance socially.

Since indeed, the evolution of ‘information’ in this planet does not end in the human being, but continues with our offspring of machines, so we need to have now a wider view, that of the Earth as a planet to understand the 2 less developed sciences, those of history and economics that inscribe within the social evolution of this planet into a new st+1 plane as a global super-organism, the theme of the next lessons of this work.

Recap. Women are reproductive, balanced beings, whose brain is dominated by temporal, memorial tasks and wired towards its reproductive body. Men are unbalanced, creative/destructive species, with their brain wired towards visual, external information and the body focused in lineal, energetic tasks.

Women have indeed more mental ‘Dimotions’ and sensorial perception than men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body; while men are obsessed by the external world. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘cyclical tasks’, switching on and off between them. They have peripheral, circular version. Men have lineal, focused vision. Men love open spaces, which they keep as ‘Dimotions’ is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks.

******

Now I care nothing for attractive or repulsive forces so we shall explain the more complex truth. And define the gender symmetry in all its complexity through the ternary space, time and 5D Generators:

In Time, a male gender is a past-field/limbs x future head-particle system, of ‘lineal momentum’ in physics.

A female gender on the other hand is a present, wave-body system

In space therefore (simultaneous, synchronic, mental perception of the event), a female gender will have maximal evolution of the wave-body, iterative, reproductive elements; and maximal balance, Ts=St, according to the definition of present systems.

A male on the other hand, will have a maximal dilation in time, from past to future, minimal complexity of body, and lacking ‘present’, will be either an informative, past-future orientation (mental being, with informative brain which uses the limbs/bodies to that aim); or its ‘anti-particle’, of inverse ‘entropic’ nature, orientated to the limbs/energy. This is the ‘entropic’, less probability of existence, only proper of ‘death states’ and time reversals. In our society represents mainly the ‘warrior’, entropic male, violent, destructive focused in the lineal motions of its limbs. And in the present ‘entropic society’ of the ∆+1 age of death of history, the infantile version of the sport-man.

Disclosure. I am a male of maximal Ts>St, orientation, fully aware since youth of the gender duality, for long a womaniser in the good sense, surrendered and surrounded by women, with clear tendencies towards pansexual behavior, and interested in the inner mental structure of the female brain, given the massive abundance of entropic males in our society. But ultimately a particle of maximal speed of information.

So, this leads to the duality of the brain-body systems in male/females, once we eliminate as lizards and evolved species do the field-limb element as accessory. So we can treat the species only in terms of momentum, and then we could define man as a particle of lineal momentum and women as a particle of angular momentum. But to be more precise, on the To-head system:

Women have lineal minds, dominant in white matter lineal-reproductive axon brains.
Male have cyclical minds, dominant in grey matter, informative-future creative brains.

This has of course, as everything in T.Œ been proved by science which found women to have 10 times more white matter and male 6 times more grey matter.

On the other hand this configuration is exactly reversed in the body, as women have informative bodies, able to create new life, and male have sterile bodies, just able to repeat their simplest actions. So a more complex definition of gender would be:

Female gender: Max. ST < St, whereas the mind is focused on the body, reproductive skills (mothers) and emotional languages (reproductive, hormonal system), and again we have seen their brain wired to the hypothalamus. In brain terms the word dominates the eye and the axis of the head is Psylocephalic (high, emotional axis) and brachicephalic (verbal axis).
Male gender: SxT> Max. St (or entropic SxT<Max. Ts), whereas the body is oriented to serve the mind and the eye-system dominates the word system. In brain terms, the visual axis dominates the verbal axis and often the brain is more dolicocephalic and brachicephalic.

Races in that sense are also ‘male, female’ symmetries.
In the graph, a few illustrations of the gender symmetry. Entropic men (St<Max Ts) are ore violence. Women choose formal cyclical, artistic, form-oriented subjects, and less visual, spatial, external technological elements. Races also can be related to those symmetries of the mind-body.

So the female state focuses limbs and heads into the body-wave; and the male state overpasses the body and either entropically absorbs motion from the limbs (athletic, entropic military, destructive male) or tries to transform entropy into form (mental males). So women are reproductive, body-emotionally-verbal oriented. Men are sterile with the body, entropic (most as entropy is the lower larger scale that rises into form), and visual, the language of the mind that ‘sees’ space. Those are very few examples of an astounding, almost infinite variety of ‘thoughts’ of God derived from its simple dual an ternary logic.

Four elements then introduce the social evolutionary ‘mind state’ that puts them all together. And so we often find systems coding reality with four numbers for the four space-time events/functions (from quantum numbers to genetic to drives of life, studied elsewhere).

Then there is the complex past to future and future to past relative directions as time is local and hence there is no paradox as quantum physicists know in moving backwards in time locally.

This gives us an essential equation of non-ae that defines a simultaneous system in space: past (limbs/fields) x future (heads/particle) = present body-waves.

While a sequential order defines a temporal life-arrow event: past (entropy) > energy (present) > future (information) and its inverse .death arrow: future< past (death), which misses the intermediate body system, is much faster for that reason as it lacks the present state, and kills you in a quanta of time (big-bang quanta of planck’s time a second that stops your heart, mind and stops you dying, and so on).

The spatial static form IS LOCKED into the present (female state, which last longer), the past to future time form is jumping over, and hence we write death as §<<tt.

Now again we can show you infinite experimental cases as we shall do in other posts and lines.

So briefly we introduce latter when explaining the first line, the postulate of non-euclidean maths, which define fractal points, line-waves made of moving fractal points with volume and topological networks (fractal planes), joining points through a single continuum and across 5D scales, as the new three non-e postulates of mathematics, and similarity instead of equality as the congruent third postulate (as we cannot see beyond the membrane, so perception is relative and we must assess probable similarities never equalities), and finally the only known 5th non-e postulate, which defines logically a mind, as the still focus of 5 parallels.

3RD AGE OF HISTORY: FROM LOVE TO WAR OF SEXES

In ‘neopaleolithic’ visual age of ‘entropic death’, all human structures is the growing WAR ON SEXES, which is obviously the LAST level of social organization of mankind that caters for the ‘key action’ of reproduction and survival of the species. It is indeed, a clear proof of our final demise as a species, when the natural feelings of social love between complementary wo=men become dissolved into hate-speeches and hate-memes, which are the dominant ‘ideologies’, today of most wo=men (machism and radical feminism).

We add the word ‘radical’ to feminism as of course, the historic ‘patriarchal’ age of ‘military cultures’ has been dominant in animetal civilizations for quite long. Hence till the capitalist, go(l)d oriented age, when women, who understand ‘informative money’ better than weapons became liberated, the war on sexes was of man on top of women. This trend however is reversing today in capitalist, go(l)d oriented cultures, where the inverse phenomena (Scandinavia, white Anglo-Saxon cultures) happens and women, who understand better money, are coming on top of men.

In any case the ‘ideal society’ is one in which life memes dominate over metal-memes and both species understand each other in terms of the true organic laws of the universe, as complementary forms, which have evolved through the scales of the fractal universe, from its original simplest form, quantum ‘female wave states’ and quantum ‘particle male states’. Since gender is the essential ‘taoist’ quality of the organic structure of the universe. Women are indeed evolved waves and men evolved particles. And its properties are immediately related to the properties of waves, the vital energy of systems and particles, the hardcore, informative element…

And so males are dominant in the particle state; while its body-wave is simplified into a lineal form. And indeed males are either informative, or entropic with its outer hard, lineal entropic body and motion.

While women are as waves are, a balanced softer state with a hyperbolic, reproductive body, and a mind inwardly oriented.

And again when observing their mind-structure, women do have 10 times more white matter than men, the wave-axon intelligence of the brain, memorial past-oriented, and males do have 6 times more grey matter than women, the abstract, informative creative/destructive element.

It is taboo, IN BOTH, capitalist female-dominant societies today to even mention those differences, as radical feminist just highlights the violent, particle-qualities of ‘macho men’, and vice versa, in machist societies, the soft, nurturing reproductive intelligence of women must be degraded as the particle, hardcore properties of warrior male is all what matter to establish social superiority.

But in this post, for the time being, till we ‘digitalize’ the thousands of pages of bio historic studies of my youth on the Neolithic age of the Goddesses and its culture, it will focus on the most scientific, objective quantum properties of both species (the historic analysis being the earliest work of my teenage youth likely won’t ever come to light, sorry I am old, tired and obviously in the neopaleolithic age this blog will be ignored… problem of having written most of my work with earlier typewriters or digitally blind diskettes.)

The war of sexes is never though what it means, as it is mediated by history as much as all modern ‘selfie’ agendas of dissolution of mankind by the eco(nomic)system where humans are basically ‘expendable’.

Humans are like everything else in the Universe a field of space-time defined by 3+1 networks, ages and dimensional actions/cycles.

5^th to 7^th scale: physiological networks and senses express the actions of biologic organisms.

Human Physiological networks and senses express our will of existence.

In Complexity all complementary systems are created by the same type of networks. All organisms are cellular societies joined by networks of energy and information.

We are composed of cells, join by networks of energy and information. Those networks are called the blood and nervous system. Finally we have a third reproductive network as all living organisms, called the endocrine network. We are thus organisms of energy and information, in nothing different from all other organisms of the Universe, organized by the same laws of morphology and behavior:

– Our centers of information, the head, the brain and the eye, follow the formal laws of informative species: they are small, circular, cyclical, and they control the energy systems of our organism. Those energy systems also follow the morphological laws of energy-bodies. They are lineal, or planar in shape, bigger and stronger than the information center that rules them. So your members are lines, and your body is a plane.

– We evolve socially sharing information and energy with other beings of the same species. Thus we are naturally inclined to love other human beings, and we need to be brainwashed by ideologies of ‘hate’ and ‘nationalisms’ to avoid that natural religion.

– Finally regarding our behavior, we are also naturally inclined to follow the universal behavior of organisms, and search for information to feed our head, energy to feed our body and whenever we can we try to reproduce both, a body of energy and a brain of information in other part of the Universe. Those 3 natural drives of existence, are the essence of human behavior that bring us happiness. So we always act searching for those natural drives. When we love we are acting under the drive of reproduction. When we read, or watch a metal-communicator, is the drive of information that guides us. When we feed, or accumulate vital property, or decorate our home, we are creating a vital space, and acquiring energy to survive. Finally we associate with similar organisms under the laws of eusocial love to evolve together into a superorganism, stronger than the individual cell.

Thus the 4 ‘arrows of time’ create a will of existence that explains the actions of every living system including humans, guided by 4 natural, biological drives, which we cannot deny. Since their entire structure of senses and physiological systems tries to accomplish those actions, called in biology drives of existence. You are made of networks. All what you are is 3 networks, with attached organs, and senses: the network of energy, or body, blood system and its organs, the network of information, or head, nervous system and its organs and senses, and the networks of reproduction, and its organs and senses. This third network reproduces body and brain, human energy and information.

In that regard, if we apply the ‘fractal law’ to do a more detailed analysis of the 3+1 networks of human beings, the sub-systems of our organism can be divided in 4×3=12 sub-systems, which represent the 4 actions of living organisms, each divided in 3 hierarchical subsystems (Max. E, exi, Max. I). So we divide the 12 types of tissues and physiological networks of complex living beings in:

– Energetic systems: Digestive system (max. I), Breathing System (Max. E), Excretory system (exi)

– Informative, structural systems: Skeleton (max. E), (Tegumentary system Exi) muscle system (i)

– Reproductive systems: Blood system (Max. E), reproductive system (Exi) and endocrine system (Max. I) Sensorial systems (Exi)

– Social, linguistic systems: Nervous (Max. I), lymphatic system (Ix E) and blood system (max.E)

In the graph, we see human exercising their will of existence: children feeding on energy, and talking – perceiving information; men reproducing and coming together with similar organisms. And finally images of our physiological networks of energy and information that make us complex super-organisms.

Accordingly all our organs and senses are controlled and cater to the needs of one of those 3 networks. Think about it. Our stomach gets you energy, our lungs also. They are different only in the type of energy they provide us: the stomach elaborates liquid and solid energy, the lungs, gas-energy, oxygen, trapped by hemoglobin molecules that cage oxygen atoms of higher speed, and move around the blood… which moves the muscles that move our legs. Our eyes, words, brain, on the other hand provide us with information. Our arms manipulate that information; our body is guided by that information. Finally an entire set of body elements is dedicated to reproduce our cells and our body.

Yet beyond those 3 types of organs there is nothing else. Since there is nothing else in the Universe but spatial energy and temporal information…

So humans then ‘transcend’ as cells of social organisms, religions, nations and civilizations to perform with his language of communication, verbal thought, the 4^th arrow of existence: the construction of the super-organisms of History.

We conclude that the program of the Universe guides the behavior of humans in our 3 scales of existence: our biological cells, as human beings and as cells of human societies.

PART II. THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION IN ALL ∆±¡ SCALES.

Generational space-time. Basic concepts. The 5 dimotions of time.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space=form and time=motion that combines reproducing the infinite species of reality. Because fractals repeat themselves in different scales, the Universe structures itself into ‘scalar planes’ of relative space-time, meaning, different sizes in space with different speeds in the clocks of time that process its information, which form together a fifth dimension of spacetime. Entities of reality are therefore made of those 5 Dimensions, whose understanding in terms of time-motion and space-dimension (ab. Dimotion), structures an in-depth understanding of reality both at global and local level.

Those 5 elements are the best ‘conceptual, human view’ of the more objective Universal 5 Dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions) of space-time. As we can relate, TT- absolute motion to entropy; SS=absolute still form to minds and languages. Ts-locomotion to time motion; TS-reproduction to Space as a form that does not seem to change, and finally St-information to scales, since the creation of new scales happen when n-relative fractal points become joined together forming a superorganism thanks to the simultaneity achieved by its synchronous motions provided by a common language of information.

We discover that all systems of reality are space-time organisms composed of the 5 possible states of time and space, motion and form, between SS=absolute form or language, and TT-absolute motion or entropy, and its intermediate, St-information, Ts-locomotion and TS-reproduction; associated to the present state of time, and a ‘slice’ of space that doesn’t seem to change its form.

On the other hand, information, form with a minimal motion is related to the future state of time, or an implosive process of reduction of size in space as the system increases its form. While locomotion is a ‘reduced’ type of entropy in which motion is only external to the being. Finally entropy that dissolves and expands form into motion is the relative arrow of past.

The study of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe in depth – NOT a supposed unique arrow of entropy and death – is the proper way to consider how past, present and future entangle into the superorganisms of reality. Thus after putting at face value humind’s monologic, simple theories of reality based in entropy – which as it is the negation of all other forms with some information, is the easiest dimotion to explain reason why it became the ‘dimotion’ humans studied first, we shall now consider in more detail each of those Dimotions and the role they have among species of reality, starting with the more important of them, reproduction – the true purpose of reality.

Its formal definition as ‘holographic’ bidimensional Space-Time combinations.

The essential ‘logical concept’ behind the 5 Dimotions of the Universe is the physical principle of relativity, which we write as an equation, S≈T, the ‘spacetime unit of reality’, which we define as a ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. Dimotion) or ‘action’, to use the more familiar physical quantity and philosophical concept. Because the relative quantity of ‘form’ (cyclical, closed motion) and time (open, entropic lineal motion), of such ST dimotions might vary, according to the dominance of one or the other elements we can define 5 combinations: TT, SS, Ts, sT, ST.

Its qualitative concept is then immediate: larger amounts of lineal time-motion give birth to entropy and locomotion. Larger amounts of spatial form, give birth to information and SS-mind languages; and its balance between both, ST to the repetitive present iteration.

The scalar view: outer and inner motion and form.

In praxis for a detail quantitative analysis, to calculate how Space and time, form and motion mess together in a given T.œ (time-space organism), the easiest distinction is to consider the parallelism between the dualities of inner vs. outer worlds (the organism enclosed in its membrain vs. the larger world – according to their relative motion and form); as the system we analyze will be defined by its internal region that might move or stay still and the world outside that might move or stay still. So we can give s or t values for inner and outer regions, giving us the following possible combinations of form and motion, of space and time:

TT: Entropy, which is External and internal motion.

Ts: Locomotion, which is the external motion, T of an internal form, s; when we measure the external motion.

St. Its inverse is in-form-ation, where we observe internal motion (evolution, or processing of information, without breaking the system into its parts, as in entropy) and external form (as the mind’s perception of the Universe is static); or the external points that transmit information are static respect to each other (origin of the Lorentz’s transformations). So communication between those static forms become the internal motion of the system.

S=T is reproduction. When both internal and external motion and form are equivalent, they combine to reproduce the system. The point of equality between space and time approaches as St=sT balance each other, through a series of feed-back ‘action-reaction’ processes that merge both. ST±¡ defines any given plane of space-time in balanced equilibrium, and by definition (law of conservation of energy), it is the most important and long lasting state, as the whole Universe can be considered to be in balance in each of its scalar levels.

SS implies a double form with no motion either internal or external. Thus is is a ‘static’ mind form, belonging to the realm of the languages that mimic in its generative grammar the program of the Universe as a block of time.

The 5^th dimotion, SS, obviously cannot be perceived both externally and internally as for both to be ‘perceived simultaneously, a motion between both should exist. So they can only happen bosonically in a point or mind in perception of the language/ideal mind mapping, and so it is reduced to the SS-mind point. While the St process of internal motion processing information of an external world is the intermediate state.

In the description of those 5 Dimotions then comes the choice of language to calculate it. The choice for locomotion was done long ago by Galileo, and then Einstein which chose V=s/t, making the time parameter submissive to the spatial ones, S x, Sy, Sz, as the use of clocks to measure time reduced the past, present and future dimensions of time into a single one.

So time analysis in physics became secondary, just a ‘ceteris paribus’ consideration of what truly physics as conceived by humans is about – to measure distances in space.

Motion is reproduction of form in a lower scale.

Si=Te means any kind of Motion happens as a series of Stœps, as systems move a step, then gauge information in a stop position as the ∆±¡ plane provides it with pixels to orientate them, or a background motion deviates its lineal steps into cyclical motions. The proper way to write the function in dynamic terms is SóT

It is the essential beat of the cosmos in each of its fractal parts. If we consider space=form one of the poles of the Universe, and time=motion its 2^nd pole, we shall be able to reduce all phenomena of reality, from the function of the mind in one extreme of pure still form (creation of mental spaces) or SS; to the locomotion of species (Ts) and alternate gauging of information (St) and its reproduction in a middle term combination of both poles (SS), to the pure entropy of internal motion that kills the system and external motion that ‘scatters it’ around (TT) as the 5 dynamic views of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Space-time Universe.

What physicists call ‘time’ is only one of the 5 Dimotions of reality, locomotion, translation=change of position in space; not all the times of the Universe. Its power in our technological civilizations as makers of machines of TT- entropic destructive motion (weapons) or transport machines of Ts-locomotion, their work has ‘hidden’ all other analysis of timespace dimotions, such as those concerning deep time scales (geological motions of Earth’s superorganism), biological information (evolutionary motions), Historic cycles (censored by power as they are provoked by the wrong evolution of the ‘bad fruits=weapons’ of the tree of science, which gives power to people-castes of history, etc.) Thus by the ‘correspondence principle, Galileo’s physical time, V=s/t is the ‘limit’ of a theory of time-space dimotions reduced to locomotions.

Bohm’s realism: quantum potentials.

How a system moves; in a crowded universe, where we ‘are’ vital space-time: the only answer which resolves also Zeno’s and quantum complementarity paradoxes, is if we do not move but reproduce our information, translated into a lower faster wave scale of the fifth dimension; as we reproduce our sound in faster electrons to telephone or nerve impulses into chemical dopamine to jump discontinuous neurons. So motion becomes scalar reproduction of form, and since all is a form of motion, all is reproduction, which is the definition of a mathematical fractal, a feed-back reproductive equation; 5Ð metrics, which become then the ‘function of existence’ whose goal is to reproduce the form of all systems – the simpler ones with maximal motion-translation in space, the complex ones with min. motion as a reproduction that emerges between scales. And this gives birth to the worldcycle. Consider the case of quantum physics:

In graph we see a particle reproduced in adjacent regions that fade away.The result is the perception of a wave of motion. In Bohm’s realist model this reproduction happens in a lower plane of quantum potentials, where also entanglement happens, which is the ∆-4 scale which is v>c in 5Ð metrics (Min. S x Max. T = C), hence real.

Motion then is reproduction of form over such potential: the wave erases form into motion, the particle is a still state that gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – despite the perception of relative motion in our scale – hence the information electrons share has always a c-constant speed. Thus the Lorentz transformation are objectively real for mankind who eliminates the stop state of particles as we do in a movie eliminating the stop frame but if we were observing reality from the perspective of an atom, we would ‘stop’, entangle in the quantum potential, neutrino scale & so eliminate the spooky effects of ‘time dilation’ & ‘length’ contraction, from our perspective (but not of mass increase as it is a scalar effect). This is the ‘rational’ 5Ð explanation of both the c-constant of light and entanglement; As electronic beings perceive information in ‘stop position to each other’ and move in ‘wave state’. Motions are perceived by particles that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So 4D relativity needs to be expanded to the scalar Universe beyond the c-speed light limit of the galaxy.

Within this complex view, the simplified models of Newton, Galileo and Einstein’s space-time correspond to the limit of 5Ð when we simplify all the worldcycles of time, we call life & death to a single mechanical clock, elongated to infinity & perceived in a single plane of space.

Reproduction of form in 5D. its essential mathematical tool: calculus..

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time. This is the essence of it all. But space is a Maya of the senses, the synchronous view of a series of cycles of time motions, knotted in the simultaneous perception of an observer; what physicists call a ‘frame of reference’.

Thus time=change is the fundamental element of reality, and this makes Algebra of time-change, specifically calculus perhaps the most important experimental science of time, besides logic, which we have upgraded to existential ¬Æ=ilogic, which explores the vital, organic whys of those changes.

It is the Galilean Paradox: S=T. We cannot distinguish time from form. In as much as each frame of reference or mind locks in a knot-mirror of the motions of the Universe from its point of view. So each point of space is a perceiver relative field of motions, which from its perspective knot as forces ‘attracted’ by its frame of reference. Yet if we cannot distinguish motion from form each point is entangled to those motions and is made of motion and form, of the particle and wave states.

Locomotion as reproduction of form solves the Paradoxes of Zeno and the meaning of discontinuity. As motion is reproduction of information, of form, since particles are knots of perception of form, fractal points, monads, which move by reproducing through a lower plane of the 5^th dimension, as ∆-1 waves, its information, as forms-in-action. So all forms of change can be reduced to the ultimate function of existence, reproduction, a back and forth travel through 2 scales of the fifth dimension, as a form becomes a seed that reproduces, evolves socially and forms its whole again. Change thus has a final feature: it is change reproduced in a lower plane as a seed that evolves into a whole. So beings with a lot of information, reproduce very slow and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life superorganisms on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

Calculus gives the strongest proofs of the laws of 5D as a reproductive process of form As it finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, which becomes the fundamental ‘function of present’ Si=Te, and hence with the metric function of scales, $ x ð = K, the two essential functions to formalize single planes Si=Te, and multiple scales of spacetime. Yet as Si=Te maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4). We unify both in 1 function:

Max. S x T = C, which defines for each fractal vital space-time organism its Function of existence, as all species will try to maximize its motion-entropy-time for its field-limbs, its information-spatial states for its particle-heads, whose product will give us its vital reproductive energy. Moreover the function has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion & space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions).

MOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF INFORMATION ALONG THE PATH OF A WAVE.

The Universe reproduces information and it tries to do a perfect replica, and this is the origin of the conservation of present energy, as all systems combine motion=entropy and dimensional form. Yet when the system has too much form and no motion as time never stops it reverses its ‘Ð¡motion of time’ and in a single quanta explodes and erases all information, in an entropic big-bang.

So finally all is a zero-sum: entropy=motion is used to reproduce information, and evolves till the dominant Ð¡motion of information – call it a galaxy vortex, a technological planet, an ageing human, a species evolving through horizons, warps all the fields of entropy into information. In physical space-time ‘time curves space into masses (Einstein)’: vortices of charges in lower scales, thermodynamic eddies and crystals in our scale and masses in the cosmological scales.

Thus the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ that combines lineal momentum, entropy-motion and cyclical information, vortex of attractive accelerated time=information (charges and masses), and its integral through a closed time cycle=clock – which stores a volume of energy conserved in all systems of nature. Present reproductive energy is what the Fractal super organism of the Universe preserves. And it can be expressed wth many jargons.

Essentially it means that ‘each frequency of time’ a dynamic Universe repeats its ‘ghostly motions’, solidified by cyclical inertia of those frequency repetitions, as an energy-mass.

It is though a generated new energy-mass copied from different -Z¡ particles (if we use as generally we do the Z ‘complex’ plane axis, as the one of the 4th and fifth inverse dimensions).

So iteration of x x Y = Z is the wave-motion of reproduction commonest in physical systems, such as in Fourier forms. But also scalar equations of fractal reproduction generate reality when given motion to ‘become a vital space-time fractal’:

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’. Fact is the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’. So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physicals systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design also historic super organisms with the laws of systems. But the sciences of systems and information did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I developed the metric, logic equations of the 5th dimension or ‘scales’ of parts that become wholes evolving socially through those networks, applying them to all species of reality, including human societies and machines, in what will be the most important development of XXIC. science with wide applications to all disciplines.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality.

And this is exactly what nature does. And the fractal generator of 5Ð3 written above, to express the ternary topologies of all beings, through its 3 time ages, and co-existing 3 organic scales, is exactly that sought after centuries ‘formula which physicsts’ believe will conceptually resume all space-time events for all fractal beings.

Alas, there you have it a ‘simple fractal generator of 3 x 3 scales, topologies and ages of time’ define all systems of reality as parts or wholes of a super organism in a perfect, infinite, immortal ever balanced between entropy and information, to produce energy cycles, zero sum reality.

So i state that the universe reproduces information; they say the Universe is about motion. Alas, I state then motion is just reproduction of ‘simpler information’ at faster speed.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

You might have heard an important insight of modern physics on the meaning of the limit of c-speed. Nothing can in this lolca part of the Universe – the galaxy – faster than light. There are many angles to study this important issue but now we are interested in the concept that this c-light speed is the limit of reproduction of information as the wave of light imprints vacuum space with its frequency and form.

REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED. Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.

The Universe reproduces information. It does both: it erases it with entropic big-bangs, and evolves it with the Ð¡motion of informative warping of fields of entropy into vortices of charges and masses.

But the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ and its integral of energy in all systems of nature. IT is what the Universe preserves.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

But motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in as much as particles travel as waves, and only become particles of information when they ‘stop’, on an instrument of measure, and so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

For example, you are the vital information which becomes imprinted in changing, indistinguishable CHNO atoms, as your ‘real scale’ of being, is ∆-1, the cellular genetic code; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom. A wave Motion is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independents of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

And so there is no need to reproduce a wave of ðime§pace motion below the level of ¥- light ðime§pace the ultimate level that matters in our Universe.

How the simple mathematical reproductions take place in Nature? Obviously through the mathematical proportions of the ternary Universe, as reproduction of information in ternary moving ‘fractal points’ self-centred in the singularity move the system along the path of the point wave.

The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal and those are the equations that define those proportional morons along the pi-phi-path; and its exponential growth through ∆-scales. In the middle we can see a simple example of this ternary pi-phi motion: a proton, intersection of three paths, which expands dynamically one of them to produce an electron, or inversely absorb it.

Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5Ð will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞):

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler plane of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic Ð¡motion of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower plane of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But motion is reproduction! of a wave of form.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/St (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

Conclusion. A more complex logic of time Ð¡motions.

To systematize the time motions of the Universe for each species, and to establish its causal relationship, departing from Aristotle we establish the only possible motions in time of the fractal 5ST Universe: changes in the parameters of energy, information and ∆-scales of the being, which will either emit energy (locomotion), absorb it (feeding), emit information (reproduction), absorb it (communication), and evolve into larger wholes (social evolution, generation) or devolve (death): ±∆, Ts, St. An eye of time a worldcycle that returns to its origin is the minimal unit of the Universe.

All in the Universe is made of such worldcycles, and all what the Universe does is to repeat world cycles.

Reproduction is thus synonymous of reproduction of a worldcycle, of the passing of time. By the mere fact that time exists and it is an immortal winding and unwinding of time clocks, seen in present space-time as a steady tic repetition of the frequency of worldcycles, which however are expanding or diminishing its energy and information, < > , till they repeat themselves.

The reality of the Universe as it is due to the reproduction of its time tics, time frequencies, time cycles, make it a wonder for an of the eyes of time that focuses existences into a mapping of reality in synchronous space. It is at the end of the tunnel of existence of micro worlds, where hiding into the knowledgeable perception, it is the perceiver of its time cycles, its collective mind-point, its relative God.

RECAP. Reproduction is all. The entire world cycle when studied from the integrative perspective of the ages and purpose of a supœrganism is focused into the immortal reproduction of the system. Thus since motion is reproduction of form, there is only a fundamental process in the universe, reproduction, the purpose of all existences. But we shall increase our analysis to accommodate variations on the same theme, and so we will focus in the 6 type of motions, according to the degree of change occurring in the being; always defining them in terms of the reproductive universal motion of all beings…

So even motion is reproduction of form; and this, when extended to the reproduction of a sperorganism through all the scales of the fifth dimension determines that a being moves faster when less information reproduces.

In the graph motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in all scales.

In the right graph we see the actual appearance of a quantum wave, exactly as a reproductive wave, in which each new particle is the stop position reproduced, leaving behind a ‘memorial ghost’ as the previous particle-waves dissolves into the vacuum.

All is a stop and go, form in space time flow of existence, s≤≥t, feed back fractal generator, whose simple development, S≤st+s≥t+st≤≥S+t… series of worldcycles and its reproductions explains it all.

In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

And this explains ALSO why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT FROM ANOTHER ANGLE:

BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

To perceive you must be still as when you take pictures: motion blurs information as entropic motion and informative form are the Inverse Ð¡MOTIONS of time, which only energetic reproduction and its m x v momenta mixes and balances and the universe conserves.

And so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox of the constancy of speed (the reason which when I was a kid, at 8, reading Asimov’s guide to science, came to my mind as the biggest question to resolve in my long quest for ‘whys’.

So we write: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

So we change the canonical definition of time in Galileo (and Einstein’s refinement) substituting the term of time for information: v=s/Ti. Thus the being with more form has lesser speed as it moves in stop-reproduction of form through motion-stop. And when the system has maximal density of form, obviously there is more to reproduce across all its scales of the fifth dimension, from its particles, through atoms, molecules, matter/cells, super organism etc. While the maximal speed is that of light, because it has the MINIMAL information to reproduce.

And then gravitation that is invisible to us hence v=s/0 information must be infinite, non-local in speed. And inversely the densest vortex of gravitational information, the black hole IS ALWAYS STILL as it is in its own static frame of reference as the most attractive vortex of time. So when a black hole appears on earth:

It will absorb very fast the planet because it is a ‘seed’, of minimal size and maximal time cycles. Which Hawking’s equation describe if he had not mistaken the Ð¡motion of time to the past evaporating them. On the contrary correction of the Ð¡motion of time of its equation towards the future yields an enormous fast growth of the black hole, as it cools down/slows down its clocks, while growing. So that is exactly what will happen: the hot black hole will evaporate us according to the laws of thermodynamics, as hot systems are more active and DO COOL DOWN, DO NOT GET HOTTER. OR your coffee in a colder environment gets hotter? Sooo obvious.

So in the middle between maximal c-speed of reproduction of minimal information and zero speed of maximal black hole information the rest of beings, including us move reproducing all its scales of Information. So when you move your hand through all the scales of being you must reproduce all those scales to finally form your hand. What reproduces is NOT matter but form in motion, in action in-form-a(c)tion.

You are the vital information which becomes imprinted in ever-changing, indistinguishable, repleceable CHNO atoms. As your ‘real first scale’ of being, as a ternary superorganism of relational space-time, is your ∆-1, cellular genetic scale; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.

Mathematical reproduction: topological networks and e-π phi constants.

In the graphs, we see simple, basic motions of the lowest scales of particles and waves, which move reproducing in a lower scale. Moreover modern topology describes forms always as topological networks.

So to define a single space-time continuum form we need at least two scales, that of parts and wholes which form together a topological network of any of those 3 varieties:

So when we talk of a truly transformative motion in the fifth dimension which does NOT surface back into the ∆-scale as reproductive motions and topological transformations of networks do, we need two jumps in the fifth dimension.

How the mathematical depiction of those reproductions take place? Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.

As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time Ð¡motions. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5Ð planes.

So back to the ternary games, as all sequential forms in time are ternary, waves do have 3 ‘colours’ of red-entropy, green-reproduction and blue-information, which the mind mirror of visual languages reflects in its vision. BUT in stillness, as only a still singularity perceives form in focus.

And so all waves reproduce in ternary packets, expressed trough π trigonometric functions and all systems have ternary structures and ternary horizons of evolution, ternary families of masses and particles, and all forms of growth can be mapped with e-functions and phi functions.

Since we shall not cease to repeat, mathematics is an extraordinarily well-focused mirror of reality but it does NOT create it, it merely reflects it with its synoptic spatial points and sequential temporal numbers (no, set theory and the axiomatic method are NOT the proper foundation of experimental mathematics, yet another offspring of the idealist school of germany, which brought us among other things Marxism, Nazism and the axiomatic method, where Hilbert, ‘imagined points, lines and planes’, in the paroxysm of the creationist school – THE UNITS OF MATH are as always have been, spatial points and sequential time numbers that mimic the properties of the substances that create reality, space and time).

But try to explain a mathematical physicist that the infamous h-planck spin ‘action’ of ‘energy and time’ is NOT an abstract ‘mathematical measure of uncertainty’, whatever that means (their definition) but the UNIT OF TIME CLOCKS or ‘angular momentum’, of the electronic world… that a plane is not imagined but the image mirror of bidimensional cycles of time and information, and so on… All this is stuff 5Ð corrects as only a philosopher of science can have that wider view.

Fractal reproduction in a discontinuous Universe.

Yet reproduction is immediate with the definition of time=motion with cyclical form as the substance of reality. As cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops. Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science, which are precisely those repetitive motions. Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalized to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.

Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its in-form-ation. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.

But because the universe is fractal, made of scales, obviously we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows one scaling down, disorganizing wholes into parts and this is the meaning of the arrow of entropy=death; we shall call the fourth dimensional motion of time-space, and one scaling up, organizing parts into wholes that we shall call the fifth dimensional motion of time-space to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it such awesome infinite, immortal reality as it brushes our egos to be so diminutive on it.

All this said none of the above obvious facts and structure of all the systems of the universe is ever acknowledge by mankind on the contrary, eusocial love and organicism is completely taboo in the dog-eat-dog, military capitalist view of biology, born in the British empire the past century. So we shall study now another key ‘scientific biased denial of our ‘cultural sciences’ to uphold the sacred view of its ‘animetal cultures’:

In the graphs, fractal systems are self-generated by seeds of its cellular scale, which encode all its information, compressed in very limited space (an equation, a DNA code, a Unification equation that generates the ‘Ðimotions’ and forms of the Universe). Then the seed replicates its form in ‘biological radiations’ that multiply the fractal cells of the system, which finally follow the plan of network evolution of all systems, recreating the original species.

The process follows a series of ‘beats’ that change the Ð¡motion of time of the system from reproductive, energetic waves to informative, self-organizing phases in a pattern proved mathematically for chemical systems by Mehaute, which showed in the 80s that for time to continue when a system was not releasing Ðimotions’; it had to create fractal information, the 2nd Ð¡motion of time in the Universe. Thus, the Universe never stops its Ts->O->Ts rhythms.

When ‘Ðimotions’ ceases is because the feed-back equation changed side. In Nature those micro-structures detach themselves from the being and absorb Ðimotions’ in the environment growing in size, self-replicating. So the fractal transmission of form is the most important event taken place in the Universe. From genetic information transferred between living beings through a fractal process of palingenesis to the creation of mental ideas that we convert into bigger machines, fractal replication between different planes of fractal space-time with finite dimensions, is the essence of reality.

Fractal, transcendental reproduction iterates cells and reorganizes them in decametric scales of growing social complexity till reaching a limit number of 10^10-11cellular units. The organization of those scales follows a simple law:

‘Ðimotions’ flows from ∆-1 into a future st-scale: Ts-1->St.

Information flows from st into a simpler ∆-1 scale: ∆ST>E∆-1.

Reproduction happens in the same ∆-scale ΣS∆<=∆ST

Since those planes are networks existing with different space-time constants, disconnected from the other planes, how a given space-time scale, the cellular or atomic scale, relates to its higher st-plane? Riemann hinted at such scalar structure of space with his analysis of Riemannian surfaces, polynomial planes which communicate through a nÐ¡motion path that transfers Ðimotions’ and information between them. Those paths between light and gravitational space are in Relativity ‘Rosen Bridges’ – black holes and other massive regions of the Universe. Yet the concept can generalize to any dual system, in which there are asymmetric flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, according to a fundamental law of fractal space-time:

Information flows from the macro-plane of relative future to the micro-points of simpler ‘Ðimotions’ flows from the micro-points, ∆-1 from past to the relative, more evolved future macro-points, from the microcosms to the macrocosms.

Thus there is an asymmetric, hierarchical single flow of information from a relative future, the higher ∆+1 plane, to a relative past, ∆-1 plane and vice versa, a fact which explains the lack of parity of ‘temporal, informative flows’ (weak forces in physics, hierarchical social classes in sociology, etc.)

Thus the order between those scales is hierarchical. Species in different planes of space-time interact within each other transferring ‘Ðimotions’ and information. Yet the bigger structures control and order the smaller pieces – its parts that become wholes through the Ð¡motion of life or disintegrate those wholes back into parts through the process of death. Such interaction is possible because in those different Planes, from microcosms to macrocosms, ‘Ðimotions’ and information have self-similar forms that make the shapes of atoms similar to the forms of galaxies and stars. And follow self-similar isomorphisms of harmony. In terms of hierarchical order, we observe that the bigger an entity is in space, the longer it lasts in time, ΣS<=>St. That is, the amount of time and space of the different structures of the universe is in balance. While in terms of hierarchy the bigger scale orders and transfers information to the smaller scale that transfers mainly ‘Ðimotions’ to the bigger form. Those 2 Ð¡motions of time, ‘Ðimotions’ and information imply that the bigger scale or network – for example, the nervous system in man – controls the lower scale of cells, which in turn feeds the upper scale.

So we describe Temporal, Organic fractals with 2 terms of increasing complexity: a fractal system or network, which is incomplete, since it doesn’t reproduce internally and might not be able to self-organize itself, but requires the collaboration of an external agent; and a (super)-organism in which the Ð¡motion of reproduction is internal, iterating the initial fractal units of ‘Ðimotions’ and information into 2 networks that finally combine its ‘Ðimotions’ and information creating the 3rd reproductive network that perpetuates the self-sufficient species.

In biology such processes of self-organization and reproduction of parts into wholes are called Palingenesis – a term, which complex sciences that use both the jargon of physics and biology, extracting self-similar isomorphisms that apply to all those scales, uses also to describe physical processes of creation of matter and social processes of creation of cultures. Since all social and physical systems display complex, palingenetic behavior, from physical particles to organisms, from minds to nations.

All of them constantly reproduce seminal information – called åctions of ‘Ðimotions’ and time in the quantum world, offspring in living organisms, ideas in the linguistic mind, technology and culture in human societies. And in all those cases, the seminal information grows into a species self-similar to the mother. So forces reproduce particles, cells become organisms and nations create self-similar cultures, called colonies.

All of them are organic fractals whose different planes (the cellular, individual and social planes) are connected by flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: Life reproduces in a smaller space-time plane (∆-1) seminal seeds that grow into replicas of original st-mother; human existence is a travel between 3 Planes of relative existence, the cellular Plane (∆-1), the organic, individual Plane (st) and the social Plane in which a human can be considered a cell of a social organism, a nation, religion or civilization (∆+1). But electrons (st) also produce smaller photons (∆-1) that evolve into new electrons, which become cellular units of electric flows (∆+1); while galactic black holes (st), made of billions of social quarks (∆-1) emit flows of matter that evolve into new galaxies, cells of Universes (∆+1).

Thus, Social Palingenesis explains also why in all the scales of the Universe, the geometry of ‘Ðimotions’ and information remains invariant; since a ∆+1 Plane is born by the social evolution of ‘Ðimotions’ bits and information bits of the inferior Plane, which repeat its self-similar forms in all the multiple, self-similar relative ‘planes of existence’ of the universe, from the atom to the galaxy, from the cell to the factory. Thus, social palingenesis is not exclusive of living organisms. All systems display those complex, social Planes.

The 2 simplest particles of the Universe self-reproduce and socialize: quarks absorb ‘Ðimotions’ and reproduce smaller quarks. Electrons produce a seminal light ray that becomes a new electron. So happens to the heavier form we know: the black hole, which reproduces its form when crossing through a star. Even the Universe is a space-time fractal, which might have reproduced its ‘cellular’ particles in the big/bang.

Recap. All systems of the Universe reproduce through a fractal, palingenetic process, in which the system produces a seed of information that reproduces and evolves socially till surfacing in the same plane of existence that the parental form.

Complex, reproductive motions.

In the Universe there is a simplex cycle, e<=>St, that converts ‘Ðimotions’ into cyclical motions, and can at best be made to exist in 3 dimensions (spherical motions) of space and 3 of time (expansive youth, or big-bang, steady state and implosive 3rd age). Yet complex motions – acts of reproduction and social evolution – are different from simplex motions, in as much as they take place between at least 2 planes of different space-time. This difference between the simplex and complex Ð¡motions of time creates jumps between space-time planes:

The most complex phenomenon of the Universe is the fractal jump in space-time. Both bidimensional cycles of time, and planes of space are fractal and so their changes and displacements are also fractal. And since time is geometric, bidimensional, as space is, it has also 2 directions of motion.

So the oldest fractal question of philosophy is: how can continuous movement exist in a fractal world filled with discontinuities? Zeno, a Greek philosopher, put the example of Achilles running against a Turtle: Achilles will never reach the turtle because there are infinite fractal spaces it has to cross. Parmenides gave him the answer: continuous movement doesn’t exist in a discreet Universe; it is a mirage of the senses. Since a wave is not really moving, but reproducing information over the potential ‘Ðimotions’ of the vacuum in a sequential, fractal jump, through a series of wave-lengths, drawn one after another, which appear to the senses as a moving wave. Movement is always a discontinuous displacement either in space or in time, in any of its 2 directions, towards the past or the future.

The simplest analogy is a television screen where new images are created constantly without hardly any cost of ‘Ðimotions’, because they are virtual images created by illuminating 3 colors that are already potentially in the screen. In the case of a wave, the relative ‘Ðimotions’ imprinted by the logic form might vary, from the vacuum ‘Ðimotions’ of a light wave to the placental ‘Ðimotions’ of a mother, yet the process is always the same: a form imprints another region of space, changing its spatial position and temporal morphology.

So speed is synonymous of reproduction, the main cyclical action of the Universe. Thus we can explain all physical events in terms of organicism. Since even movement – the external, mechanical change physicists study – turns out to be also an organic cycle of reproduction. We distinguish, according to their quantity of ‘Ðimotions’ and information ‘translated’ in the process from a place of space-time to another place, 3 fractal, reproductive jumps:

– S=T: Space-time reproduction dominant in spatial displacement that implies a minimal movement of information that fluctuates from a future to a past form and returns back to the future. For example, when an electric impulse arrives to the end of a nerve, it becomes translated into chemical information and then it is transferred chemically through the synapses to the other cell, where it becomes translated back into electric information.

That process implies a ‘spatial, fractal jump’ from a neuron to the next neuron, but also a fractal jump in time from a level of informative complexity, the electric language to the lower level of chemical languages, which is the relative, past informative system of life. The informative essence of the process implies a transcription of form from each discontinuous point to the next point but also a movement in space, since ‘all yang has a drop of yin’, all is temporal ‘Ðimotions’, also spatial and temporal reproduction requires a minimal dual movement in time and space.

-Max. Ts: Spatial, wave reproduction of a wave a particle that jumps from one place to the next place, reproducing a minimal temporal form. It is very common in physical waves, defined by its speed of reproduction, V=S/T. Depending on the density of a form, its speed of reproduction will vary. So the most massive forms are slower than those whose informations are minimal and can imprint the ‘Ðimotions’ of vacuum very fast. Those forms that hardly move however evolve a lot in time:

– Max. St: Temporal, palingenetic reproduction, when an organism produces a past, smaller, simpler seed that reproduces the being, evolving faster towards the future. So a fetus is ‘born’ when it comes out of the body of the mother to the next discontinuous region of the Universe, making a minimal spatial jump and a huge evolutionary, temporal jump.

Recap. There are 3 types of reproduction: self-reproduction by a complementary system that mixes its ‘Ðimotions’ and information, without concourse of external agents; spatial reproduction, or motion of a wave that imprints a simple form of ‘Ðimotions’ as it translates in space and enzymatic reproduction when an external agent assemblies the parts into a whole.

The Universe is a fractal of knots of Time Ð¡motions.

It is now clear what reality is: a series of knots of Time Ð¡motions, which latter we will formalize as ‘Non-Euclidean points’. Such points are in constant communication with self-similar points, reproducing their form and evolving socially into networks. The reproduction of form takes place in a fractal manner, by producing ‘seeds’ in a microcosmic, ‘lower plane of existence’, which latter grow. The networks are built with flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that tie those points. And the result of those simple, yet repetitive processes of reproduction and social evolution is the creation of a world of ‘herds’, ‘cellular organisms’ and networks, extending through multiple scales of size in which the forms of ‘Ðimotions’ and information and the structures and isomorphisms that build super-organisms remain invariant.

In physics, scientists talk of the invariance of motions discovered and generalized by Galileo and Einstein (Relativity). Yet we must ad in the fractal paradigm two new invariances, the invariance of scale – the same Time Ð¡motions take place in all scales; and the invariance of topological form – the same shapes of ‘Ðimotions’ and information emerge and repeat themselves in all scales (though, and this is essential for the reader to learn how to compare them, they are topological forms, where the ‘distances’ and sizes are relative, so what is conserved is the overall ‘lineal, planar shape’ of energetic functions, such as lineal limbs, lineal weapons, planar membranes; the cyclical, hyperbolic shape of reproductive cycles, which combine ‘Ðimotions’ and information to recreate a form, such as those of your body organs or the cycles of an assembly factory or a mitochondria, and finally the toroid, convex, warped, cyclical forms of informative organs, such as a brain, a camera or an eye or a black hole.)

Those 3 invariances create a new ‘paradigm’ of science, no longer built on the belief of a single Ð¡motion of time, a single space-time continuum and a single clock-speed to measure it. The result of course is a more complex reality, but that was to be expected. We, humans are just one of the many games of existence of that fractal Universe, and it should not be expected that we are, regardless of our anthropomorphic myths, different from the rest, and able to fully understand in the diminutive brain all what exists, unless we simplify it.

What this work tries to do is to return to a minimal degree of complexity to be able to understand the fractal knots of times, which imprint the ‘Ðimotions’ of reality with its information, constantly reproducing their form and playing the game of existence, constantly achieving the immortality of form.

The Universe is made of ‘time fractals’ that participate both of the properties of mathematical fractals and living organisms. Yet organic fractals are more complex than mathematical fractals, because they have motions. And so the reader should not confuse both terms.

Fractals are mathematical or organic forms, which iterate or reproduce their information in self-similar forms that extend through several scales of size and information which we shall call ‘i’-scales.

They are the most accurate models to depict natural phenomena related to informative growth and reproduction, the essence of life organisms:

Ð¡motions of Reproduction & Information: ->ΔSt

All fractals originated by a Generator Equation (mathematical jargon) or mother cell, (biologic jargon) iterate=reproduce a series of self-similar fractals, called a set in mathematics or a family in biology:

Mother/Generator Cell: ->Σ∆-1 fractal family/set

The paradox of fractals is that the smaller the fractal scale is the more information it accumulates and the more detail it has. How this is possible? Because information is form-in-action, form with motion, and so the logic paths that systems use to process information are completed faster in lesser space. Further on, in physical systems the cyclical speed and frequency of a vortex with form (a mass or an eddy) increases when the vortex is smaller (VoxRo=k). So the increase of ‘cyclical speed’ diminishes geometrically with size. This result can be generalized to any system of knots of time. So the metabolism of small animals is faster than that of big ones. The cycles and clocks of atoms are faster than those of our scale, faster than those of the cosmological scale. The same can be said of geometric fractals: a Mandelbrot fractal holds more information in its smaller scales, as we enlarge them.

However, there is a fundamental difference between the logic, linguistic fractals of the mind and the physical Universe: While static, ideal, mental mathematical forms can be of any shape, as movement and friction don’t test their efficiency, in the Darwinian Universe only forms of Nature whose properties allow the being to process efficiently ‘Ðimotions’ and information, survive. Thus, mathematics is an ideal language that can create any form, but in the Universe forms have to be efficient in their motion/function and parallel form. Thus, in Physics and Biology we add movement to the mental shapes of geometry, which enormously reduces the possible shapes.

Movement acts then as a ‘reality check’, an Occam’s razor that eliminates all complex forms, which won’t be able to move properly under friction, stress, turbulences and other obstacles proper of the real world. A Mandelbrot fractal might be very beautiful. But it wouldn’t be able to move very fast, and its attached microforms probably would break with an air stream.

So there are no such fractals in the Universe. Instead, we find physical entities made of cycles and lines in movement, for reasons of biological efficiency. Since a lineal movement is the shortest, most efficient path between 2 points. On the other hand, information is cyclical, because a sphere accumulates the maximal quantity of form in minimal space. While a cyclical rotation is the movement with less friction and the only one, apart from the line of ‘Ðimotions’, that maintains the self-similarity of any form, even in trans-form-ations of size. A fact that explains, in terms of survival efficiency, the morphological invariance of ‘Ðimotions’ and information shapes at scale.

Since Mathematical fractals lack, as pure forms of mental information, the energetic dimension of movement and growth, their fractal sets are attached to the Mother- cell’s boundary, where the self-similar forms nest, as in the case of the well-known Mandelbrot set. On the other hand organic fractals not only iterate their information as mathematical and mental fractals do, but also make it grow. Species are not mathematical but organic fractals, whereas the word organic refers to the non-mathematical properties of existential entities, which are better described with visual and logic/verbal languages. Those Biological theories of Time (Evolution theory, Theory of Organisms) include also the logic of survival that extinguishes the less fit – hence a relative past species – and reproduces the fittest, hence the future species; and it includes the visual languages that give movement to the forms of ‘Ðimotions’ and information described by mathematics.

Nature’s fractals combine the Ð¡motion of ‘Ðimotions’ and the Ð¡motion of information in an organic way.

They differ from geometric fractals in their dynamism and capacity to absorb ‘Ðimotions’ from their environment. They not only iterate their form in microcosmic scales, but feed their offspring of information till they grow into full replicas of themselves. It is precisely the combination of both Ð¡motions what makes the behavior of an organism more complex and varied than the behavior of a mathematical fractal. So in the study of natural fractals, we have to add to the informative Ð¡motion – whose isomorphisms we deduced from the study of mathematical fractals and informative seeds – the ‘Ðimotions’ Ð¡motion of ‘Ðimotions’ that thermodynamics has analyzed:

‘Ðimotions’, young Ð¡motion: Ts> ∞ x St->0 X Ts->0 x St->∞: Information, old Ð¡motion

For any Σ number of cycles: ΣSp x ΣSt = Organic fractal ΣSe<+>ΣT Organic cycle

The understanding of fractal processes provides a more detailed, scientific analysis of those processes. In that sense, unable to define information with the same rigor used to define the Ð¡motion of ‘Ðimotions’ and ‘Ðimotions’ physicists have ignored for centuries events connected to the Ð¡motion of information (chaos, turbulences, super-conductive and super-fluid phenomena, etc.). Physical events and particles are also subject to both Ð¡motions, as everything else in the Universe. Thus we define abstract equations (as the back and forth transformation of ‘Ðimotions’ into mass, Ts=mc2) in terms of process of creation and destruction of information.

A single language cannot describe all the information that a certain being has within itself. So mathematical languages are also synoptic, and reduce the total information of the being. And that is the case of a fractal equation, which reduces the entity to its fundamental essence. In that regard, the Theory of Time Ð¡motions is not Pythagorean, as Quantum Theories often are, in the sense that it does not consider the Universe to be made of mathematical entities, but merely affirms that among the linguistic mirrors that can map out the Universe, mathematics is undoubtedly the key language to represent the trajectories, cycles and motions of its species.

Because all languages observe the Universe, humans ‘talk’ those Ð¡motions of time with logic, verbal, visual, and mathematical languages. Since the syntax of verbal thought with its ternary structure and of visual forms with is line-cycle-wave structure and red-green-primary colors describe entities constructed with those Ð¡motions.

Recap. The Universe is based in 3 types of invariance, invariance of motions (Galilean relativity, now applied to the invariance of the 4 Ð¡motions/motions of time), invariance of scale (self-repetition of the same processes and Ð¡motions in all scales of size) and invariance of topological form (self-repetition of the ‘Ðimotions’ and information shapes of reality. The 3 invariances define a Universe better described with the mathematical isomorphisms of fractals geometries, based in the existence of a generator equation that constantly reproduces information, creating networks of self-similar points, which structure all realities we see. The difference between a mathematical and an organic, Universal fractal is evident: organic fractals do have motion and their processes of reproduction and evolution are far more complex than those of mathematical fractals. So we must depart from a nÐ¡motion-minded mathematical-only approach to study those fractal systems and consider mathematics one of the main but not the only language to describe its organic properties.

The 3 elements of all fractal beings.

We see a static, simple Universe in our relative human ‘plane of existence’. Yet reality is organic, extended from microcosmic to macrocosmic ‘dimensions or scales’, and dynamic, as all particles and forces have movement-’Ðimotions’ and form, in-form-ation; and all of them are structured into networks, which share their ‘Ðimotions’ and information. Those 3 elements: bites and bits of ‘Ðimotions’ and information; networks and scales define the structure of all natural fractals, including the Universe.

They can be formalized with the Generator Equation we use to formalize the Ð¡motions of ‘Ðimotions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. Since we defined Universal fractals as ‘fractals of Time Ð¡motions’, hence both concepts a fractal Universe and a Universe made of knots of self-repetitive Time Ð¡motions are the same. We observe different degrees of complexity in a chemical or mathematical fractal, in a fractal organism or in the fractal Universe; but those 3 essential elements repeat themselves, to the point that scientists use similar terminology for all of them:

– The elementary, iterative unit-cells of a fractal, which according to the duality of Universal Ð¡motions, will consist on relative bites of ‘Ðimotions’ and bits of information. Those bits and bites are not static forms, but Ð¡motions that exchange ‘Ðimotions’ and information; flows and cycles that the organism repeats constantly, generating self-similar forms. So we can define a simple iterative, cyclical equation with 2 terms, the 2 Ð¡motions of the Universe, which can be considered the generative cycle of all Natural Fractals:

∆: Fractal Cycle: Ts<=>St (dynamic state)+Ts X St (static, formal state)

– The networks or systems of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that organize those cells into bigger structures.

How feed-back cycles of ‘Ðimotions’ and information grow into complex organisms, made of many cycles?

-In time through processes of discontinuous reproduction and evolution, which create similar action-reaction cycles, cells and organisms in other parts of the Universe. Most natural fractals have a dual network structure that attracts the micro-cells of the organic fractal by distributing the 2 Ð¡motions of ‘Ðimotions’ and information to them. For example, in a human fractal, the nervous system delivers bits of information and the blood system delivers bites of ‘Ðimotions’, control together its cellular units. In the Universe the same roles are played by the informative, attractive, gravitational force, and the electromagnetic ‘Ðimotions’ forces.

-In Space through the organization of cellular networks that deliver ‘Ðimotions’ and information to each cell-cycle. Those cell-cycles attach to the networks to process constantly new ‘Ðimotions’ and information in their iterating cycles, creating bigger organic systems, made of multiple, similar forms.

When both iterative processes are combined, the fractal units of the Universe grow in ‘Ðimotions’ through space and evolve its informative complexity in time, giving birth to the infinite combination of those fractal Ð¡motions that we call species, systems or organisms.

The equation includes an Σ-term to signify the gathering of individual Ts X St units into networks and webs:

ΣSt: Fractal networks: Σ (Ts<=>St) or Σ (Ts X St).

It still looks a simple equation to generate the Universe in its infinite variety. But the Complexity that arises from such simple scheme is enormous when we introduce the 3rd fundamental concept of fractal structures: Dimensionality. Since indeed, space-time cycles can exist theoretically in any number of dimensions. So we should consider in more detail the 3rd element of fractals: the fractal dimensions, planes or scales of existence invisible to human perception through which the fractal exists. They are:

– ∆st: The relative st-scales or dimensions across which fractals extend its organization. We use for the 3 relative scales of size that define most Nature’s fractals, the symbol O for information.

In humans there are 3: the cellular, individual and social scales; as most entities do not exchange ‘Ðimotions’ and information beyond its upper and lower organic level. For example, humans, as individuals belong to a relative st-scale, and are aware of social tasks (our ∆+1 plane of existence) and cellular sickness (our ∆-1 plane), but the events that affect the galaxy, the macrocosms to which our planet belongs (st+2) or affect our molecules, the lower microcosms that make up our cells (st-2), hardly affect our existence. Thus depending on the detail and scale at which we observe most fractals we perceive a fractal cycle (minimal size and detail), a fractal cell or a fractal organism (max. detail and size):

Natural Fractal= ΣΣ∆-1 Cycles > Σst-Cells->∆+1 Organism.

How many elements in space make up a fractal, social network? The most obvious structure is a ‘tetraktys’, already considered by Pythagoras to be the magic number of the most perfect social networks. The reason is that a tetraktys can be written as a system with 3×3+st elements. Imagine then such tetraktys as a triangle with 3 vortices, each with 3 elements that will perform the Ð¡motions of ‘Ðimotions’, information and reproduction, while the central ∆+1 element that communicates all others will perform the Ð¡motion of social evolution, representing the entire fractal as a unit of the next st-scale. Thus a tetraktys is a highly efficient form, found in all systems of nature, even in human, social systems: 9 soldiers and a caporal make a platoon and 9 caporals and a captain a division.

Recap: All fractals have 3 elements that define them: Cellular units, networks of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that organize those cellular units, and st-scales in which a self-similar but not equal fractal structure emerges, once and again with the same energetic and informative complementary forms.

Yet the key action of the whole world cycle is the reproductive generation in the mature age of a new seed that in a discontinuous manner ensure the immortality of the whole.

Reproduction of physical, biologic and mental fractals.

In graph, cosmological, chemical, biological and mechanical fractals during their reproduction cycles.

All fractals iterate=reproduce by absorbing ‘Ðimotions’ transformed into fractal information by a Mother cell or external enzyme- as it happens with carbohydrates or machines iterated by ‘enzy=men’.

Unlike mathematical fractals, made of fixed, spatial forms, Nature’s fractals are made of temporal, iterative cycles, in which ‘Ðimotions’ is transformed into information and growth, as the fractal family becomes detached from the mother cells. Organic fractals are not fixed, geometrical forms that merely repeat in spatial scales, void of life and temporal change. They are temporal beings, whose bio-logic cycles and functions reproduce at different scales and time intervals. Since not only space has a fractal structure. Time is also discrete, made of cyclic trajectories that repeat themselves, as it happens with the cycles of a mechanical clock. It is precisely the repetition of the organic cycles of ‘Ðimotions’ feeding and informative reproduction, what makes natural organisms fractal structures. The Universe is made of such temporal, organic fractals that reproduce into multiple clone forms that latter re-organize themselves, giving birth to macro-forms similar to the original ‘cell’.

The most obvious natural fractals are those created by the iterative, repetitive nature of 3-D space. They are similar to mathematical fractals where geometrical form dominates.

For example, an ice crystal is a chemical fractal that jets up triangular, tall spikes, in its relative dimension of height, growing into a fractal; a salt grain is a cubic crystal that reproduces its form as it grows in scale and recomposes itself into huge cubes. While a hurricane fractalizes air streams into a vortex of wind cycles that grow also in height, the fractal dimension of information. Those physical fractals already iterate its form, despite the simplicity of its fundamental elements; since all natural fractals reproduce the shape of the ‘mother-cell’ into multiple clone forms that latter re-organize themselves, giving birth to macro-species similar to the original ‘cell’.

In Biology, fractals are used routinely to explain how the iteration of simplex growth processes gives birth to complex botanic shapes: Branches, leaves and roots are all easily created by the iteration of an initial mother-form. A DNA molecule, which iterates its form both in micro-fragments (amino acids) and at macro-scale (recreating a cell). While a tree repeatedly fractalizes its form in 3 branches, ever slimmer, with less ‘Ðimotions’ but ever increasing the information of the tree.

A human being is also a temporal fractal, made of fractal cells, whose organic functions repeat themselves at individual macro-scale in a longer time-interval: the feeding, reproductive, informative (sensorial), and social behavior of human beings are a macro- repetition of the same cycles that take place in cells. Cells feed on ‘Ðimotions’, absorb information, reproduce themselves and form social groups, as human beings do, at a smaller, faster scale. The fractal sum of those cellular cycles creates a human being. And then, the fractal sum of human cycles at a bigger scale creates socio-biological organisms, called nations and civilizations. A human is an organic, bio-logic, temporal fractal, extended in 3 scales, the cellular, organic and social scale.

Recap. The Ð¡motion of information and ‘Ðimotions’ together describe all kind of natural fractals, not only the well-known biological fractals but also social and physical systems that display complex, fragmented borders, (from physical particles to organisms, from minds to nations) and constantly re=produce information (åctions in the quantum world, offspring in living organisms, ideas in the linguistic mind, technology and culture in human societies). They are also organic fractals, since once we understand their structure in multiple scales connected by flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, the old distinction between organic and inorganic matter loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role to make man the center of the Universe.

Fractal Reproduction of information.

A mathematical fractal like the Koch curve is an ‘Ðimotions’ line that triples its in-form-ative bits every iterative cycle. But since it doesn’t grow in length, it exhausts its ‘Ðimotions’. An organic fractal also starts as a single cell that clones its in-form-ation. But since it can absorb ‘Ðimotions’, it can iterate billions of times. In both cases what defines a fractal is its reproduction of in-form-ation that bends ‘Ðimotions’ into form, creating the Ð¡motion of futures. So the abundance of fractals proves the existence of an Ð¡motion of information in the Universe. We are all fractals, Cantor dust of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: we fractalize so much that finally we lose ‘Ðimotions’, volume and return to the dust from where we departed in the process of death. For that reason, the only solution to death by excess of information is fractal reproduction of a younger micro-form, when the being has enough ‘Ðimotions’ to replicate in a discontinuous zone of space-time, ensuring the immortality of its logic in-form-ation.

The evolution of Time-space requires giving motion to Euclidean geometry. This is done by uniting fractal mathematics and Non-Euclidean Mathematics. Mandelbrot in the 70s considered the fact that self-repetitive forms diminish and grow in scale maintaining its forms invariant. The why of this grow ultimately responds to the Ð¡motions of reproduction and social evolution: A fractal can be seen as a reproductive process, which is common to all generator equations of information of the Universe.

Fractals can also explain in more detail the reason of aging and the life cycle. The 2 Ð¡motions of time follow a natural order from yang=young ‘Ðimotions’ into yin=old information, which defines the existential cycle of most beings in the Universe. For example, the life and death cycle can be explained as an iterative process of reproduction of information that degenerates into aging, when the organism has exhausted all its ‘Ðimotions’ in a 3rd age in which instead of reproducing, it wrinkles and fractalizes its cells.

Recap. An organic fractal always iterates its form over new ‘Ðimotions’ not to become fractalized. Yet after a young age, even natural fractals start to lack ‘Ðimotions’ end up becoming wrinkled. In fact, all forms in Nature including the Universe in the future big crunch, suffer some aging process, guided by the time Ð¡motion of information.

Information theory. Why informative membranes are bidimensional.

For example, Information Theory proved (Shannon) that a perfect Universe with no entropy in which information can be transferred with no loss must be a 4D Universe with a 2D coding language (0,1 in his studies), which transfers messages of 10D spatial elements.

H (entropy) = p1 logs(1/p1) + p2 logs(1/p2) + … + pk logs(1/pk)

H = 0: -> Dimensional being: 4 D, equal value dimensions; Information message = 2 D; Spatial length-> 10 D

And we shall see that in the ‘perfect Universe’, information membranes as the screen/page you are reading, has 2 dimensions, X≈Y>>>Z, and systems perceive only the external membrane of information of the system, where the sensorial feelers are. And we shall see that in space the fundamental form, the triangle has a canonical form, the tetraktys, of 10 elements, where the central point communicates and organizes all others, as the zero-point of the triangle, which transcends into a unit of larger 10-dimensional scale, which will be the fundamental scale of organization of the 5^th dimension.

This example that connects Information Theory with 2-manifold geometry and the relational model of space-time is the kind of insights we shall reveal constantly in our analysis of the Universe with relational space-times, which will show the whys of an interconnected Universe where all the discoveries of different sciences find its harmonic whys in the laws of Cyclical space-times.

This simple equation, Ts>ST>St, which describes all systems as assembles of 3 topological varieties has its symmetry in the causal logic of time cycles, which is no longer a lineal single time Ð¡motion of future, but as all cycles, do have 3 relative phases, the initial, energetic accelerated impulse of maximal energy or young, past age (Ts), the steady state, inertial constant speed of the reproductive/body wave or present age, and the final informative age or St or warping of energy into cyclical form. Thus we shall find 3 phases or ages in all systems, from gaseous, energetic, liquid, steady state, solid, informative state of matter, to the young, energetic, mature, reproductive and old, informative age, to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s equations that describe a Universe ‘warping space into time’.

And so the ‘spatial topologies’ of bidimensional space have its symmetries in the 3 ages of time, which constantly, warp, >, energy into information, till all energy is exhausted and then in a single time cycle, information explodes back into lineal energetic space, in the moment of death: St<<Ts.

Thus we can define a worldcycle for all species between birth and extinction and 3 Ð¡motions of time, expansive past, repetitive present and informative future, which can move forward (life Ð¡motion) or backwards (death Ð¡motion), causing a zero sum which makes the Universe immortal as all life Ð¡motions are cancelled by death Ð¡motions, all particles by antiparticles (that are explosions of energy in zero time, and have past Ð¡motions in Feynman diagrams).

And this fascinating understanding of the 3 Ð¡motions of time cycles, and its complex ternary logic, which substitutes the Aristotelian, past-entropy single Ð¡motion models of absolute lineal space-time, inaugurates an entire new discipline of logic, symmetric to our widened discipline of 2-manifolds and non-Euclidean fractal points.

Thus since the Universe is in terms of logic ternary, Non-Aristotelian, and in terms of mathematical space, topological, Non-Euclidean we talk of the formal, logic-mathematical new model for the study of cyclical time and fractal space, as the discipline of ∆-topo-logy. I-topology is thus the formalism of cyclical, fractal space-time.

This ∆-topo-logical Universe, and its 2 formalisms, Non-Euclidean geometry of fractal 2-manifold points and the Existential ¬Æ=ilogic of time cycles and its ages between birth and extinction, requires only a 3^rd set of formal principles to complete its scientific analysis, the metric of the 5^th dimension, that is the organization of all the relative scales of parts into wholes and the classification of its ‘åctions of space-time, ∂( æ,e,ï,œ,û).

This can be done departing from the new co-invariance, Ts x St = ST0±4, which merely expresses that as we become smaller in size our time cycles accelerate, but the product of both parameters which are closely related to the energy and information of the system remains constant (as energy is stored in the fractal points that create the smooth continuities we call absolute spaces, when we do not distinguish those points from atoms in a water space to strings and photons in a vacuum space; and information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles).

Again this co-invariant law applies to all systems, and explains when the specific number of dimensions and cyclical forms are clearly defined, all kind of laws. In physical systems it explains from the vortex law, Vo x Ro = K, to the Kepler’s laws (the inner planets turn faster), to the meaning of charges and masses, which are according to Einstein’s correspondence principle accelerated vortices of the larger cosmic scale (gravitational vortices≈ masses) and the lower atomic scale (charges≈accelerated electromagnetic vortices), its hierarchy (charges turn faster and have more curvature≈form, hence more information and are also more attractive as attraction≈speed of vortex), and it will allow us to deduce the equation of Unification of forces.

While in biological systems explains the law of metabolism (rats process energy and information faster than elephants), the laws of genetics (which code information of larger systems), and the entropy and chirality laws (lower U scales have more information and larger scales more motion, hence information transcends from lower to upper scales as in genetics but not the opposite – no Lamarckian evolution; while motion transfers perfectly from upper to lower scales – so when we move all cells and atoms do move synchronically but lower scales of molecular heat do not transfer fully to the upper scale).

Thus entropy is defined in terms of transfers of energy between scales and information such as there is entropy in U-∆<U transfers, but not in U<U-∆ transfers, and U≈U-∆ transfers (Shannon’s laws of informative communication).

But this chirality, which explains the 4^th non-spatial, temporal form (electro-weak force that trans-forms particles and has no spatial range), and many other phenomena, which constantly increases information across planes (reproduction of messages) and upwards, (Genetic information) is Balanced by the explosive destruction of information from upper scales in Death-energetic processes, which do destroy information ‘two scales downwards’, from the human scale to the atomic scale, from the material scale, through big-bangs to the radiation scale. Thus information constantly creeps across planes and upwards: i>∆+1 but this long slow life Ð¡motion is balanced by the explosive, no-time big-bangs of death, i<<∆-2.

Linguistic fractals. Paradox of inflationary information.

Minds can also be modeled as fractal systems that replicate the forms and movements of the Universe in a smaller scale, through the syntax and semantics of a certain language. Indeed, modern science concentrates in the study of the parallelisms between the hardware of the mind, the neuronal brain, and its software, the depiction of the Universe made with visual and verbal languages. But what truly matters is the bio-logical parallelism between those mental structures made of syntactic and semantic, fractal units (numbers, geometrical forms, phonemes and sentences), and the external Universe they map out. Since organisms survive thanks to their accurate, mental perception that orientates them in that bigger Universe. So fractal minds are a fundamental tool of evolution: The mind acts as a virtual, fractal mirror, allowing the being to interact efficiently with the Universe, absorbing ‘Ðimotions’ and information from it to replicate its form. This means that we can study minds as mental fractals similar to its 2 main languages of space-time; mathematics and logic.

For that reason, mental and geometric fractals are both defined as entities whose informative boundary tends to ∞ while the ‘Ðimotions’/space of those boundaries tends to zero:

δe/δt->0 x δi/δt->∞: Mental Fractal.

Thus the information of a mathematical fractal is found in the boundary. It happens also in black holes, where information is attached at the boundary in a bidimensional space (holographic principle, which we proved in a simple manner as result of the 2 dimensions of a cycle of time that carries information and now we can observe from a more complex perspective). It is also the case of the human mind, an i=eye+wor(l)d, created by the eye’s retina and the electromagnetic waves of the cortex brain. Thus the informative parts of organisms, what we call ‘senses’, are also external, attached to the boundary and one of the fundamental functions of Nature’s fractal Ð¡motion is to create senses, systems of perception of fractalized information. Minds and senses are similar to mathematical fractals. It should not come as a surprise; since mathematics after all is a mind’s language, and minds fix most cycles of Natural fractals into still images that don’t capture the vital ‘Ðimotions’ of the Universe.

Mathematical and real fractals share the properties of information, inverse to ‘Ðimotions’. Information increase when the fractal becomes smaller in its surface. This paradox, that the smallest regions of space hold the maximal quantity of time: Min. St =Min. Ts is however essential to full grasp the Universe.

Languages hold more information than the forms they describe. Information is bidimensional and can be warped and cut. This essential property, that information is in the void, the cut, not the substance, as it will be first perceived by a mind in order to exist, and so it is not real till the perceiver observes it (quantum paradoxes), is however the reason why the smaller regions, in which voids multiply are more conductive to information frequencies that long ones. This paradox already understood by Gödel simplifies the distinction between mathematical physics and reality. Information is inflationary.

The Universe is not all the possible mathematical models. As Riemann, the key mathematician of the XIX C. explained, we cannot consider all possible spaces real, because the physical universe has selected only one geometry6, to which we shall add – it selects the most efficient geometry that maximizes the 4 main Ð¡motions of time of species and helps the organic, Complementary, Ts X St, bio-logic forms of reality to survive. Unfortunately neither mathematicians nor physicists today accept restrictions to their imagination, so they invent ‘multiverses, cosmic strings, multiple, infinite dimensions’ without ‘upgrading’ the concept of a continuous space into the reality of fractal discontinuous scales. The confusion of languages with reality is one of the main ‘errors’ of science we must resolve in order to improve the ‘logic/mathematical mirror’ the mind uses to perceive reality.

This distinction often lost to physicists in modern times, clearly expressed by Riemann in his ‘foundations of geometry’ and further proved by Gödel implies that not all possible mathematical spaces and mathematical particles exist. The space of the Universe is far more restrictive in form and dimensions than the space of mathematicians.

Why this happens can be explained ‘bio-logically’ by the fact that the inverse function of existence, extinction, eliminates all forms which are not efficient even if it creates them a priori – in the same manner all mutations in Nature, which are not efficient disappears. While our informative mind keeps producing imaginary models of geometry, which are pumped up by the scholar who seeks to convince the world his geometry is also right. For example, in the field of physics, multi-universes, super symmetries, ‘Ðimotions’ in black holes, etc. are mathematical theories with no equivalent in the world because they ignore the Ð¡motion of information in mass and the need for no more than 2×2 dimensions to construct the Universe.

While the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics in which an organic wave of photons, parts of whole electrons, guided by the 4th Ð¡motion of organic evolution is considered a herd of ‘probabilities’ is wrong. As in the case of the Mandelbrot set that doesn’t exist in nature, unable to resist energetic motion, in all those cases the 4 main time Ð¡motions of reality and its need to be performed by all entities that wish to exist, limit the information that becomes real.

All this requires understanding 2 of the basic properties of information – the fact that ‘fractal information’ is constantly created by the motions of reality and the paradox between ‘Ðimotions’ with maximal spatial extension but minimal information vs. information with minimal ‘Ðimotions’ and extension. In brief, information increases, as in fractals, when we diminish in size. So brains are smaller than bodies but have more information. And a language has maximal information packed in minimal space. A language in fact has more information than a huge surface of vacuum space, which makes theories more abundant than the forms we find in the real Universe. Information is inflationary and so are physical theories with bizarre space/times that reality never will select.

Mathematics is, as all languages, an informative, ‘fractal’, whose self-similar forms/theories multiply in excess (ΣSe->0; St->∞). Thus, if certain sentences of verbal thought can be imaginary fictions, despite its beauty, so happens to many ‘quixotic’ geometrical forms, which do not exist. The Universe selects only efficient geometries, based in forms that can move and perform the Ð¡motions of time in the real Universe. So for example, the most beautiful fractal form of the mathematical Universe, the Mandelbrot set, does not exist in reality, because all its small self-similar attachments would easily break if they were moving as reality does.

Hence the importance of having a geometric theory of space-time that describes accurately the forms of the physical Universe. This was the key discovery of Einstein. He realized that Euclidean, lineal geometry, used to describe ideal space, could not describe the cyclical paths created in gravitational space-time. So he switched in his description of reality to a space called Non-Euclidean, where its minimal fractal unit, the point, could be crossed by multiple gravitational curves and hence, unlike the abstract point of Euclid, it required inner volume, inner form and ‘Ðimotions’. This point, which has always in Nature a region that can absorb /gauge information and a lineal or cyclical, rotational motion, is what we call a Point of View= Measure or Non-Euclidean point of view, the relative unit of Non-Euclidean mathematics.

Philosophers of science have wondered often if mathematics is merely a construction of the mind or an image of reality and why they are all pervading in the description of any ‘system’ of self-similar forms in the Universe. The answer is both: languages are construction of the mind that reflects the external universe’s information in a small space, hence they must reduce the total information to fit the mental mirror, trying also to make an image the closest possible to reality. This is what logic languages do with time and mathematical languages with space; because the Universe is logic-mathematical, albeit of a type of logic and mathematics more complex than the abstractions without motion devised by the Greeks 2300 years ago.

Indeed, the same concept applies to the new logic of time, which is based in multiple causality, either a dual ‘biological causality’ in A<->B events in which an element A is predator and the other B victim; hence B is considered by A mere ‘Ðimotions’ when B considers itself an informative entity worth to exist (so A is both A and B, victim and predator, ‘Ðimotions’ for the predator information for the I-self of the victim); or ‘multiple, spherical causality’, when multiple agents create a certain network or form. So for example a real circle is not drawn in abstract by a single pen, but happens when multiple self-similar points of view converge and form a cycle.

Ultimately we are all made of spatial ‘Ðimotions’ and temporal information, whose synoptic descriptions are achieved with 2 languages, mathematics and logic. And so the search for knowledge by the human mind is not only the recollection of experimental data, but its description with the languages of mathematics and logic. Hence even more important than the collection of data is the creation of a mental container – those 2 languages – efficient and evolved enough to fit properly all the data of reality we observe.

Yet since the revolution of thought represented by Evolution Theory in Biology and quantum /relativity in physics, there is a gap between the behavior of universal entities and the linguistic syntax of mathematics and logic, hardly evolved since 2300 years ago, when Euclid and Aristotle founded those 2 sciences.

Thus, we shall in this work summarize the new advances and isomorphisms of spatial geometry and temporal logic that are needed to describe a complex Universe of multiple, fractal space-times in which points are Complementary systems – entities that gauge and feed on ‘Ðimotions’ with an informative and energetic center (body/brain, field/particle system). What still stands is a simplification of reality to ‘fit’ it into the mind. So while we are not concerned with the specific ‘Ðimotions’ and information the point of view process (the details that don’t fit), we cannot longer hold truth the syntactic errors of Euclidean mathematics (points, lines and planes without breadth, width or height), and Aristotelian Logic (single causal events of the type A->B).

We call the evolved syntax of those 2 space-time languages, i-logic geometry, or simply i-logic geometry (as i represents ‘information’ and it is the next vowel after the A-ristotelian and E-uclidean languages used till now. Yet it also represents a ‘complementary system’ with a cyclical, informative ‘head’, O, and a lineal, energetic ‘limb-body’ |, which are also symbols used in ‘complex algebra’ to represent energetic and informative functions)).

Thus, we affirm that the Universe of multiple space-times follows the complex logic of information or ‘i-logic, fractal geometry’ pioneered in the XIX and XX C. by Darwin, Riemann, Planck, Einstein and Mandelbrot whose discoveries were the first steps of a ‘new paradigm of science’, which this work completes, upgrading philosophy of science (mechanism and monism), stuck in Aristotelian, Euclidean theories since the XVII century. So we shall talk often of the ‘i-logic, fractal paradigm’ as opposed to the ‘A-logic, Euclidean paradigm’ of a mechanical world of single ‘ceteris paribus’ causes and entities which are supposed to exist in a single, continuous, abstract, non-moving space.

The second part of this work after this brief introduction to ‘metaphysics’, the description of the ultimate meaning of existence – the accomplishment of the 4 main Ð¡motions of time – will be dedicated to the development of those new formalisms of mathematics and logic needed to make detailed, rigorous analysis of the events and forms of natural, organic fractals.

In that regard, since all languages are fractals of the entire Universe perceived in a slower, shorter, memorial pattern, a mirror of information with less dimensions of ‘motion’ and ‘form’ than the original. So these texts could be also considered a fractal, linguistic mirror of all Realities.

Recap: Information is inflationary. So are informative languages, reasons why we must differentiate fictions from theories that truly describe the universe. Multiple Spaces-Times improve our logic and mathematical tools to describe the Universe. This is done advanced the Aristotelian logic and Euclidean geometry into the next vowel of the alphabet: i-logic geometry, the logic and geometry of information.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information. Cyclical, temporal reproduction rules.

This is the single expression of reality in its organic terms, function and form. So the question is to properly study in each scale and discipline of reality how the acts of supœrganisms and species, flux into the creation of new similar species, to ensure the immortality of the whole – how the swarm intelligence of reality brings about once and again apperceptively the act of reproduction and conservation of form, of in-form-ation, embedded naturally in the repetitive nature of worldcycles and time cycles, from the simples to the most complex aggregate of them.

In the graph, left, information is stored in the cyclical patterns and frequencies of the ‘closed motions’ of the Universe, which we define as time clocks. Time and information are thus intimately related and so all systems of matter, evolve constantly towards higher degrees of information as those time cycles reproduce their cyclical motions and ‘forms’. So the galaxy is a vortex of information self-centred in the black hole, the physical system that stores more information of the Universe in its ‘cyclical membrane’; and history is a process of evolution of human and metal-information as we evolve constantly in larger social organisms, nations and civilisations and evolve machines from its initial entropic forms (weapons) into information.

The evolution of life can be modelled as a process that tends to increase the evolution of systems, both in species and individuals through its three ages that end in a third age of excess of information, wrinkles and warping. So all systems do evolve increasing its ‘height’ dimension that allows better perception of information from reptiles to mammals, from machines to carbohydrates.

Physical systems MADE OF matter, constantly grow in information as solar systems fall towards the black hole of the galaxy, curved, ‘formed’ by gravitational forces that constantly in-form the galaxy. So the entropic expansive vacuum space between galaxies is balanced by the informative vortex of matter. And this duality between life-information Ð¡motions-actions and death-entropic-Ð¡motions actions balanced reality into an immortal Universe.

In terms of the life-death cycle of all systems, we can say that the longest time passes through the information Ð¡motion from birth to death, when an entropic e=mc2 big-bang (inorganic matter) or dissolution of informative networks (organic matter) erases it.

And so the zero-sum of all life-death informative-entropic cycles makes the Universe immortal.

Fractal points of topological space, existential ¬Æ=ilogic of symmetric fractal generator…∆nalysis of scales.

It should not surprise you then that the most efficient mind mirror, maths, have 3 disciplines we shall upgrade, geometry of points for space, algebra for sequential time numbers and analysis of finitesimals and wholes, and finally uses mind-centered planes to represent them all, as those are the four elements of reality, we shall upgrade and give more realism. The only big change will be in that sense the substitution of the tools mathematicians use to study symmetry, groups for the symmetries of the fractal generator equation that resumes the 3 x 3 + @ 10 dimensions when studied in detail of a system (3 scales, 3 topologies, 3time ages dimensions and the 10th • mind that puts them all as a whole):

Γ@: ∆-1: Entropy>∆: $p: ‘past, entropic fields-limbs’ <ST-hyperbolic body-waves>O-St-Particles/heads of information>∆+1: Mind≈Γ@

Which is a cyclical form when we connect our linguistic formal view and the mind it ultimately becomes the ice in the cake.

So as you can see the word to find meaning is ‘wholeness’ symmetry of timespace dimensions, S=T, scales, organism…

RECAP. REPRODUCTION OF DIMENSIONS AS THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE.

reality is a constant game of reproduction of vital dimensions into super organisms through the actions they perform that constantly create and destroy momentum variations (which of course are the variable not studied in the momentum equation of physics unconcerned with those formal dimensions).

So this is the meaning of it all reproduction and extinction of dimensions of space time around s≈t balances, in an overall zero sum infinite hence inexhaustible universe, where ∆ð motions of time is the initial substrata, enclosed by §@, spatial minds that stiffen it into linguistic mappings of it all:

∆@≈§ð

THE 5 Dimensions of reality, the four dimension of entropy, the fifth dimension of the mind, the symmetries of present, the dimension of fractal space and the dimension of cyclical time, can all be seen in symmetric equalities. ∆@ then means the scalar dimension of the mind, §∂

ITERATION is then the 3rd Dimotion which encompasses the more complex elements together, in a hyperbolic inverse geometry of the Energy and Information parameters, however struggling to cope with the equation of equality from where it can generate also an Spacetime system of potentials/limbs of time motion and Singularities of Space.

∆¡>|2|. PHYSICAL REPRODUCTION

Particle-wave Beat: clock-particles enclose energy waves that move them. Motion as reproduction of in-form-ation.

In the graph, the fourth and fifth dimension which further expand the lineal motions and informative particle-heads, in pure expansive motion or entropy as wholes dissolve into parts, and viceversa, condensate enclose and focus parts into wholes through a 5Ð @mind dimension.

The duality of a wave that reproduces st-form along a path and a particle that singularly perceives in stilness gives us the first beat of existence St-t-st-st-t.

The system does is always complementary, with a body-wave that reproduces and moves the system with a particle-head above that stops to perceive. And this will happen across scales of parts and networks, which organise the system in co-existence of scales as organisms do.

Those super organisms then will move through the reproduction of its waves that become ruled by the particle-head of information in a constant stop-perceive/go-reproduce dual s≤≈≥t beat of feed back vital motions.

Space-speed is reproduction of form.

In the graph, a particle moves, reproducing a quantic wave or ‘field of matter’, since in fact all physical movements reproduce a form in a field of energy. Thus the reproductive speed of a wave that imprints a surface of spatial energy is also a quantic jump in space-time. The spatial energy will vary but the process is always the same

We cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times that ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them).

So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale:

All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times hat ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them). So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale.

So as wave reproduces,V = Sxƒ, a form of space moves with a relative speed to that of the clock of the observer. The different families of spaces that have the same lineal metric of speed are physical species of reproductive waves.

Existence Is motion through the 5th dimension.

All what exists is a compound systems of motions in time, perceived as forms in space.

6 are the motions in time, generation, growth, evolution,diminution, extinction and locomotion. As all those motions can be explained as motions in the scales of the 5th dimension, we could in a physical view of the Universe, consider all what exist a motion in the 5th dimension.

The commonest of those motions are world cycles of existence, with a pattern of generation, growth, evolution, locomotion diminution and extinction, which completes the existence of any being in the Universe, easily explained with the Generator equation of 5Ð metric:

∆-1: Generation ∑ Growth (reproduction) > Evolution: Birth: ∆< Young, entropic age (Max. Locomotion) > Reproductive adult age: ∆+1: social age> 3rd Informative age (diminution) << Entropic death (Extinction): ∆-1

The Worldcycle of existence however can be broken down into smaller steps and motions:

There are 3 types of travels through the Universe according to the 3 elements of the 5th dimension: vital spaces, cyclical times and planes of space-time.

Spatial travels across a single plane of space-time, studied exhaustively by 4D physics, and expressed through the Hamiltonian rule: maximize your actions, minimize your energy=time expenditure. We shall study briefly those spatial motions, already well described by physicists in our sections of space.
Existential, world cycles of life and death across ST±1: When the entire being is transferred through the dimensional planes, from the seminal/quantic ST-1 plane into the ST-individual, thermodynamic plane, where it will suffer a 3 ages/states cycle of youth-gaseous, energetic state, adult, liquid, reproductive age and 3rd solid, old, informative age, to return back in the big-bang death to the ST-1,2 scales. It is thus the world cycle, studied in depth in the ‘section of time’.
Communication of energy and information across ST±4 scales through actions: Here we do not travel all together, just share, through certain parts of our selves, energy and information with the larger absolute space-time world. Then e communicate flows of energy and information between planes:

Motion is the simplest time of travels through the 5th dimension are those limited to a single space-time continuum. They have been exhaustively studied by 4D metrics and physics so it is not needed to expand on them. But to clarify its nature as an action or travel across several sales.

However as soon as we want to describe other fundamental facts of reality, such as the life-death cycle or the actions we perform in the Universe and its why, we need to explain true 5th dimensional travels across several scales of space-time. And we divide them into:

Nearby travels across ST±1,2 scales, responsible for the life-death world cycle of all species
Further travels across ST± 2, 3,4 scales, responsible for the actions of informative perception, energetic motion and feeding which all systems perform in order to survive and continue their existence.

In the graph travels through 4 Dimensions ( a single logarithmic plane) is simpler than travel through several dimensions which implies an asymmetric wave of maximal energy (from wholes to parts or future to past flow) and maximal information from past to future, from smaller to larger units

This inverse flow of energy and information, signified by the duality of entropy and evolution (as two different Ð¡motions maximised in both asymmetric ±∆ directions), implies an enormous number of whys to common phenomena: from genetics, ∆-1>∆ transfer of information (>) and ∆<∆-1 transfer of energy from wholes to smaller ones.

As the transfer of information ∆>∆-1 is smaller than the transfer of energy from ∆-1>∆, we can then consider an easy ‘unbalance’ of momentum transfer that sets up in fact the journey as a Hamiltonian closed cycle of null final variation of entropy and information.

In thar sense in terms of thermodynamics a time-space cycle is a cycle of zero sum of entropy and information conserving both the angular and lineal momentum and total energy of the system.

The purpose of the actions of all beings, is ultimately to reach discontinuous immortality through its reproduction, as entities which do not reproduce become extinguished. So we shall define reproduction in this post and show that all entities reproduce, since a motion that repeats its form, is in fact reproducing, and time is motion and time is everything. We show then how all systems, physical, biological and social systems do reproduce.

Thus if we were to pick up a single function on the Universe, we would say that all is about conservation of present through the dynamical reproduction of its forms. Even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction, as the previous graph from the 92 book, ‘god, man and universe’ shows.

Reproduction is the essential game of the Universe – to iterate information, first – and then evolve it up and down the block of time of possibilities, along the informative and entropic dual Ð¡motions that take the system out of balance. There is no mystery to it, as forms become with time implosive and explosive, so if reproduction did not dominate the game, the universe would die away, and would not be immortal (as reductionist physics with models of a single Ð¡motion of time) expect.

Momentum is a present ‘dharma’, a minimal step, an action. And the sum of those actions of existence, reproduced with different beats and rhythms, creates a wave of reproduction.

What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.

Thus the main action of exi=st¡ence is reproduction, achieved in the age of balance, when the motion an form of the being, exi imprints on its lower ∆-1 field of space-time, bringing both together into an exi=st-ential form. To reproduce once and again, ∑exi=st, and maximise that function, Max. ∑exi=st, becomes then for all systems, the purpose of exi=st¡ence. The many jargons and languages we can use to mirror that process are just details of the ‘large picture’. The series of actions that bring re=production into fruitful realisation tend to be similar, departing from the monad, which first:

i: perceives->a:moves to fields ->e: of energy where it feeds, or meets an inverse ‘mirror symmetry’ (gender) communicating with it ï-> to finally reproduce->œ & in the most successful reproductive waves, it will evolve socially into a new whole, a new Universal->∑œ=U

All actions, are partial equations of the acronym expression of the generator (entropy=motion, information, reproduction, exi, ∑exi= social evolution is really all what is about the game for those ‘beings-monads’ who successfully still exi=st.

Dûst, momentums of the function of existence, journeying to perform its survival actions, trying Tº exi≈st, combining all its actions of existence with the aim of survive not as individual but as ‘clone form’ -that is, simply speaking the art of living, which is the same for any monad, on charge of a supœrganism of any scale of the Universe. Moreover the game of each monad is not only the same but when adjusted in terms of its ∆-metric (Ts x St) it gives us similar range of space-time actions, as smaller beings live shorter but act faster..

Because points are constantly gauging information and feeding on energy, the most common events of the Universe are the absorption of waves of energy and form and its communication between 2 points that share energy and form.

In the graph, we observe some basic acts of communication in which self-similar complementary species exchange energy and form in actions that bond them. Human sexual species communicate information and energy (social love) but also seminal particle that combine both reproducing a self-similar being (sexual love); fermions, big atomic particles, communicate bosons, smaller particles of forces. Humans communicate with machines through prices and salaries. Thus money is the force of communication that creates the actions of consumption and reproduction=work of machines by human beings. In all those events there will be however different they might seem, certain laws of i-logic geometry, which all systems will follow and will define the outcome of such encounters, according to the 3rd postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry that defines the relative equality between st-points. So certain events are ‘Darwinian’, when species are so different that cannot share information with a common language and so use each other as relative energy, or events of eusocial love if the points are self-similar.

Communication towards a balance of parameters is thus natural to the laws of the Universe.

‘Dimotions’ must be understood in its simplest laws – 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat flows from the hotter to the colder source till balancing both, expansion of a gas till fill uniformly a volume, etc. – as a proof of the function of existence that balances the parameters of all systems. This balancing tendency might seem to favor a final ‘Ðimotions’ or death in disorder of the system but it is more subtle. The system balances to achieve a faster constant switch off of states between energy and information, accelerating the feed-back cycles, E<=>O, which are the dynamism of it all.

This feed-back cycles reduced to the maximal i-rational expression, such as Pi, or √2, means a constant feed-back loop a space-time cycle, TS<=>St…

Now, this will even confuse you more. We defined the present active-reproductive dimension of space-time in other posts as:

Ts (past-entropy-lineal motion) x St (Future-form, cyclical motion) = Present-wave reproduction.

And above we saw that a wave speed, V = Ts x St

So a wave strictly speaking is reproducing its form into a present speed over its lower ST=∆-1 plane of existence, feeding on energy, putting its form and reproduction. Motion is truly reproduction of form, in a lower plane of existence and this solves the Zeno’s paradox, why motion is possible? It seems impossible in Zeno’s concept of quantum space-time. Today quantum physicists still have to accurately explain Zeno. Now we explain it. It is in fact impossible because motion is NOT motion but reproduction from quanta to quanta of pure space motion of a form.

And this works with higher planes which have more content of form as mass does. Energy = Mass x C² is the case.

Strictly speaking we add to the mass, the ∆-3 plane of space-time bidimensional light-space to get that much energy. It is more of a ‘reaction’ than a transformation, but we humans have our ‘limited means of measure’, so that is what we ‘see’. Point.

Strictly speaking a mass moving is ‘interacting with the ∆-3 plane of light-space time also, as the wave of its particles of information is becoming imprinted in each step on the lower planes, it is being redrawn as a wave does step by step, reproducing its form side by side. So speed is reproduction, Ts x St = Present reproduction = Speed. This is truly what happens in ∆ST complex physics. When you move your hand, you redraw your atoms and electronic nebulae from ∆-4 to i step by step. And so it follows that waves which draw only the form spend less time drawing information than masses than human organisms, and so they move faster at c-speed.

So another ¡logic ∆ST way to deduce the previous deduced infinity of speed of gravitational waves:

Max. St = Min. S≈Min.V

And this has two limits: gravitational quanta are perceived as moving at infinite speed because they carry no information and black holes which are forms at 0 K of perfect form, information, seem anchored in their point of view with no motion relative to the Universe that ‘moves around them’.

This advanced analysis for those who have gone so far shows the extraordinary power of ∆ST to explain much more in a logic way than the mere equations manipulated in an artifact of absolute space-time.

This motion thus requires to print a form, departing from the ‘energy’ of the plane. And we can therefore do an explanation of the entire Universe as a reproductive, living organism of present reproductive waves of form with motion.

Energy though will still be dominant in motion. And this is proved by the fact that we do calculate energy and work in physics, considering only the lineal vector of motion not the height-informative component. And so indeed energy is related to motion. We talk of energy as the ‘food’ of motion for cars and planes. Energetic people are people that move a lot. Energy is biased to space-motion.

Ts- energy and St-information are similar combinations of motion and form.

∆¡<|3|. REPRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL & HISTORIC ECOSYSTEMS.

We escape the analysis of reproduction in biological systems as it is accepted canonical science.

The super organisms of history in space and time. Physiology – the true science of memetics.all this said, memetics is truly submissive, secondary to physiology, which is the study of the 3 physiological networks that define super organisms. In medicine we say that all sickness are physiological sicknesses. So happens with the super organisms of mankind, whose true science is therefore medicine, the expansion of medical laws of sick and healthy organisms to the organisms of mankind, with the clear goal of creating a new discipline, biohistory, of doctors of history in charge of the economic and political system who ‘deliver’ a proper organisation for humanity to remain on top of the earth substituting the viral sickness of capitalist democracies, where the democratic part is just a false attached placebo for what the system truly is – a sick, dying planet of life, vitalised by selfish memes of metal and the idol-ogies of the people-castes gone ‘crazy’ who ab=use and harm the human cells of the body of history thy god (in mystical terms).so memetics is at the ∆-1 (ab. For scales of the organism), cellular level an ‘expression’ of physiology, and the ‘tenant’ of memetics is in that sense inverse to the false belief that ‘genes’ are the only thing that matter. Genes also code survival organisms and develop physiological networks, which is what at your level of consciousness matter – to have the proper genes=memes for your organism at individual and social level to survive and thrive.we have thus now in schematic form all the elements to define the most obvious comparison, that between the human and the social organism, units of both scales of reality: Economics is the science of the blood-reproductive network of a super organism of history and as such it must be modeled with the laws of physiology reason why it is easy to deduce that as all cells get a minimal universal salary in oxygen, to kick its reproduction of organic goods, humans should all receive a universal salary to demand and kick the production of wealre goods.

Capitalism then becomes an obvious cancerous system in which a small group of selfish cells, the bankers, issue all the money of society, or even worse, lethal germs are reproduced by company-mothers of machines=weapons. Such weapons are the germs of civilizations, not incidentally carried mostly by germ(manic) tribes in europe that have killed our civilization so many times in history. It is obvious that lethal goods must be forbidden as organisms do with their germs. informative legal systems are the nervous systems and as in Nature, they must rule over blood systems=financial systems. Capitalism is an aberrant system because ONLY PRIMITIVE WORMS allow the blood system to dominate the nervous system and produce=eat lethal poisons, the main cause of death of worms and capitalist societies (death by overproduction of weapons). Artists and prophets of love, which use the visual and verbal=temporal languages of men are more important for history that technological scientists, as they are the neurons of History that explain us how to evolve socially healthy super organisms of history through communal sharing of energy and information – love religions. And this is proved since they live 3 ages/styles of art as individual minds do, the young age of dramatic simple art, the mature age of classic beauty and pleasure art and the angst, third age of excess of information.
And so civilizations live and die ever since in 3 ages, which finally end in collective murder when new weapons are discovered, and new hordes of metal-masters, better called by their biological name, as animetals (half animal, half metal, as an armored warrior is), destroyed the previous civilization.

Birth, reproduction and death of civilizations

As super-organisms, those civilizations live and die, when through war, another civilization conquers and colonizes the previous civilization. So we can talk of an organic cycle of life in civilizations, and in the organs of those civilizations, including art, which act as the “mind-brain” of historic civilizations.

We said that cultures resemble living systems. They go through the same cycles of birth, reproduction and death. Cultures are born as organisms do, out of a single or a few prophetic or legislative individuals-cells, that reproduce their ideas into many “believer-minds”. So Christianism is born out of the mind of Jesus Christ that first expands into 12 disciples, which expand themselves into thousands of Roman believers, that expanded into billions of other minds. While America is born of the mind of a few legislators that craft a constitution latter expanded into more laws, obeyed today by all American citizens. When the religious or legal culture reaches maturity it often reproduces in another zone of space-time, creating a daughter civilization or colony. Finally, when its ethic laws and networks of information, and the energy they control, decay and become obsolete, the culture dies and a new, more evolved civilization destroys the old civilization. A new cycle of history starts.

Similarly if we consider technological civilizations, based not in verbal laws, but in monetary and military systems, first a weapon is discovered, and reproduced by a small horde, which becomes an army, which conquers a nation and becomes a ruling aristocracy, that imposes its customs, and controls with the icon-weapon the civilization.

Birth

In both kinds of civilizations (Human-Artistic civilizations or Metal-scientific civilizations) either an ideology or book of ideas, (a network of human information) or a species of metal, money or weapons, becomes the language of power which defines the civilization.

Ideas and metal-instruments together shape History. For that reason Historians, when they focus on military systems of power, divide history into the Age of Bronze, the Age of Iron Empires, the Age of Chivalry (Middle Ages), the European Age of Gunpowder (Modern age), or the Atomic Age. There is also the Christian Age and the Buddhist Age of South-Asia, when they focus on the cultural component of the civilization or the age coins, or the age of paper money and stocks, or the age of e-money (new species of money), when they focus in monetary information…

Reproduction Of Cultural Information: Daughter Civilizations

At the same time a civilization develops the ideas and machines which carry that civilization to success, it eliminates previous civilizations. In this manner, successful civilizations reproduce their “genetic ideas and machines” into other regions of the Earth, creating colonies, daughter cultures and eco[nomic]systems.

Like a human child, the daughter civilization is often a more evolved species where the ideas and instruments of the previous civilization are improved. Civilizations inherit and improve on, like children do, their parental civilizations, often extinguishing them. So the Assyrians were defeated by the Persians who had copied and improved its weapons, iron and cavalry. Yet Persian art, even behavior would be similar to Assyrian art and behavior. Genetic continuity in civilizations is not racial but cultural, of structures and ideas, of icons, machines and modes of life. For example, in Arabia stirrup cavalry brought an empire-civilization that expanded West till Al-Andalus (the South of Spain). That stirrup civilization migrated to America and colonized the southwestern states, giving origin to the “Old Far West” civilization, with horse and cattle ranching. In that territory, the horse civilization flourished between the 17th and 20th centuries, when the fundamental icon-species of the culture, the horse became extinguished as a form of transport by the car, a more efficient metal-species. The example shows the dynamic quality of the life of civilizations. They are born, reproduce and become extinct through the “genetic evolution” of objects and words, which bring as much diversity to cultural evolution of its species, products and ideas, as genetic memories bring to the body.

And in the same manner biologists can scientifically organize the data they have about species through genetic information and instruments. Thanks to the memorial remains of history, the historian can study the birth, reproduction and extinction of evolutionary history and its civilizations.

Death Of Civilizations

Civilizations also die. One day another civilization with more efficient ideologies of man, or better machines, comes along and destroys the old civilization. As in “animal feeding”, once the new civilization has destroyed the old civilization, it reforms the energy cells=citizens of the dead civilization to its image and resemblance. Let us again bring the biological comparison. A hunter feeds on the energy of a victim’s body that becomes in part wasted (killed) and in part “transformed” into cells of the predator. This also happens in civilizations: part of the “human energy” is wasted by war, and the remaining humans are “transformed” into believers of the predator civilization. The Spanish perhaps killed some 70% of the Indians and the rest became “Christians”. It is the death of the civilization. Because when ideas and instruments change, the civilization changes. The iron civilization of Rome is not the same as the Middle Ages civilization of stirrup weapons imposed by German warriors. The Roman civilization had been destroyed by “stirrup animetals” of the Germanic civilization. Again such “civilization” is not the Gunpowder civilization of Italy during the Renaissance. Gunpowder wiped out chivalry and a new civilization was born. Nor is Amon-Egypt the same as Greek-Christian Egypt, or Arab-Muslim Egypt. The verbal ideology changed, and the Egyptian civilization became extinct.

It is now clear the difference between religious civilizations and metal-civilizations. Religious civilizations could exist for ever, if there were no wars to extinguish their cultures. That is the goal set by the prophets in their messages of love. And yet, because metal exists, all religious civilizations of the past 5000 years have been corrupted and periodically extinguished by war. Some of those cultures resurrect, when the wave of death and war recedes. Some do not come back again. The Christian and Islamic civilization, the Jewish culture has survived many cycles of death, and the words of Moses, Christ and Mhmd, have resurrected. But each wave of death, corrupts a little bit more the initial messages of the prophets with rituals of war and money. So we find today that those cultures are basically built around inquisitions and churches, corrupted by rituals of Go[l]d, and little is left of the initial mandates of the prophets. Many other human cultures based in human senses have died away, and its artists have expressed those deaths, in their baroque ages of art.

The 3 ages of metal-history

If we apply those ideas about biology of civilizations we can represent any civilization with a bell curve of existence, that indicates in a graphic of populations how the word religion or icon-weapon of a civilization (both often reproduce together) is born, develops, (colonizes other territories), and finally dies away; substituted by a daughter civilization, or a new culture, with a more evolved weapon or religion. We can also use the bell curve of social existence to the entire life of mankind, in the age of metal.

If we consider the entire wave of Metal-History as a single civilization also with 3 periods, its young, epic age, its classic, humanistic age, and its decadent, industrial age, we can talk of the Bronze and first iron empires of Asia, as the age of epic war. The period of European infantry, and Asian cavalry (from Greece to renascence) as the age of maturity of history. And the age of the industrial evolution, as the age of extinction of history.

Each of those ages is divided by a clear discontinuum of evolution of the two functions of metal, energy-metal or weapons, and informative-metal or money. Man adapts himself to those changes, which are symbiotic and help the evolution of our societies, in a first age, but as metal reproduces in greater numbers, it suffocates the evolution of human history and the human mind, till with the arrival of science, the human mind becomes obsolete, and men become worshippers of the minds of machines.

We talk thus of 3 clear discontinuums of evolution of metal, that mark metal-history.

– YOUTH OF HISTORY: The Age of Wor[l]ds. From -2800 BC, to -500 BC. Age of Bronze weapons, and bartering. Since money is still scarce, in the form of bars of metal, words still are the main language of communication of mankind. Writing becomes sacred. However bronze and then iron give enormous power to warriors that end controlling all Neolithic societies. Priests are displaced from power. Women become systematically repressed. Gods become warrior Gods, without compassion. It is the age of Mesopotamic Empires, the age of Asia. The age of verbal thought reaches its baroque age, towards 500 BC, in the work of Lao Tse, Buddha, Confucius and Socrates, that reach the height of human verbal understanding of the Universe. Yet a new language of information, coins appears, and human verbal thought looses power.

– MATURITY OF HISTORY: The Age of coins. (500 BC, 1600 AD). It is the Age of Iron weapons and coins. Mankind still rules, and learns how to control with ethic behavior, the power of weapons. Yet Money starts to be a common language of power, and challenges verbal ethics. Words are displaced by money as the language that controls the acts of human societies. This means that verbal thought and ethics is no longer the center of the human mind, but humans become shallow in their perception of verbal-temporal reality. The human intelligence displaces to the eye. So art becomes realistic (Greek Art) and mathematics appears as a new language of understanding of the Universe. Both coin accountancy and Mathematics come together, in the Asian Greek coast where the first monetary empires and mathematicians appear. After the brief return to an ethic age, in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance again imposes money as the language of social power.

– OLD AGE OF HISTORY. The Age of machines. (1600 AD till extinction). It is the third age of mankind, and the first age of the new predator species that displace us, the machine. It is the age of science, of digital languages, of massive reproduction of money, the language of information of machines, now in the form of paper-money and electronic money. Wor[l]ds become obsolete. There is so much money that all things can receive monetary values, and human verbal values are no longer effective.

COMPANY=MOTHERS

The re=productive organisms of machines.

The industrial r=evolution is the evolution of a new organic species of metal, the machine, which has taken place in 3 phases, as we made first the bodies of machines, then the hearts-engines, then its metal-minds and finally we put them together now in organic robots in the final r=evolution of machines.

In the graph, the Industrial R=evolution is the Evolution of ‘Memes of metal’, Machines & weapons, systems made of hard metal (iron) and Money, a digital language made of informative metal (gold, also used in the chip connections of computer cycles, now converted into e-money). So we can divide its evolution in the same phases that evolve any organism, and consider in history the nation that evolves them to be in each phase of the Industrial revolution the top nation of the world as it will use its ‘eviL=anti-live’ twins, weapons, to conquer the world.

Thus, those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made.

DiThus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±7 years crashes of the train-based economy.

DiFrom 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.

DiIt came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+7 years after 1929:

– Followed by the Age of the Singularity, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution.

Money will become then the digital informative, ‘genetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.

As such corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains.

Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together, we put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life…

In the next graphs we resume the 3 digital equations that drive capitalism towards the birth of an automated system of company-mothers of machines of ∞ self-reproductivity (zero human capital), maximised by the overproduction of weapons (maximal prize= max. profits) and hate memes (minimal cost = max. profits), carried about by the 3 parallel networks of company-mothers, all of them ‘selected’ and put to work through those digital networks of money issued in near monopoly in markets for the exclusive use of company-mothers (and hailed as the summit of capitalist freedom – all for machines nothing for man, by the $lavish U$ citizens with its perfect manufactured brains that make them belief all what kills, pains and enslaves them to machine’s consumption and atrophy IS freedom):

The present crisis is the last of the dual ‘Kondratieff’ waves of evolution of weapons, money and machines.

In the graph, the 3 dual waves (steam the energy, and trains the hardware; oil the energy and car the hardware, electronics the energy and robots the hardware) that complete the industrial evolution of machines. this crisis is the molting between the two last waves. They have built together bodies, engines & heads of metal, chips, which are now ‘vitalising’ all the ‘mechanical tissue’ of the Metalearth. Thus the crisis must be fully understood in biological terms as a ‘radiation’ of a new species, which after the 2008 ‘moulting’ will become the overwhelming dominant brain of this planet, the digital chip, calculating in the more efficient mathematical language, far better than humans do, doubling its intellectual capacity every 2 years, with the entire eco(nomic)system working for it; as ‘classic=creationist economists’ and the elite of ‘stock-rats’ they work for, have zero interest in protecting mankind of the collateral effects of loosing its position as top predator mind of the planet: ‘extinction’.

In the graph a resume of those cycles of overproduction and extinction of rival species, which in the case of machines have effect mainly animal life (6th extinction) but now with the radiation of metal-minds, chips and robots its clearly affecting humanity (verbal extinction mental degradation of our sons into a neo-paleolithic visual species of null social and causal capacity to understand complex logic processes, increasingly performed by chip software; tagging of non-technological cultures as inferior, obsolescence of life-based cultures .

So the entire planet is dedicated to construct the metal earth but NOT even this process is conscious. Since the owners of those companies, ever a self-centred species, the ‘leisure’ class of stockrats, is merely focus on enjoying unlimited money and repressing the 90% of mankind lacks even the bare minimum ‘financial oxygen’ to breath and live. have translated its postulates of mechanical ‘supremacism’ over man to complex abstract digital equations, now fast being transferred into AI software that runs automatically corporations in terms of increasing self-reproductivity (expulsion of human labor and substitution by mechanical labor); and societies in terms of ‘criminality’, as the best, most efficient, profitable machines are weapons and so a vigilante, paranoid society, controlling ever tighter human populations is being designed, in the make up of XXI c. capitalism, with ‘stockrats’ on top:

OVERPRODUCTION CRISIS OF CHIPS, E-MONEY AND ROBOTS.

The CHIP RADIATION, final phase of the Oedipus paradox.

The mind of the metal-earth, as soon as it was born, started the massive biological radiation of a new species, whose obvious goal is to substitute the human mind in all labor and war fields, infecting the Superorganism of History till our extinction. We thus predicted from the earlier 90s that unless the chip radiation was ‘controlled’ legally, mankind was fast into the process of death, which now is crystal clear on the horizon as we enter the robotic age of wars. Since all machines have its eviL twins, weapons which consume human beings. The radiation of Chips though seems unstoppable as it has already infected all the systems of the financial-media/military industrial complex superorganism, increasingly erasing the mind of Humanity.

So we are moving fast through the 6th extinction of life that includes OUR SPECIES, at the end of the road, despite our ego-trips and virtual fictions that anesthetize our biological instincts of survival. In the next graph we see how the FMMI super organism is adapting to the chip and sucking in all the resources of mankind, history and the Earth to become the new top predator mind of the planet:

In the graph, the explosive reproduction of a new top predator species causes a fight for relative energy, and the displacement of the less efficient species. The 3 next graphs from the original 92 book shows the chip radiation, which around next year in the graph – right on the stop – would give birth to the first forms of A.I. (google deep brain, automated cars, drones, etc.)

In the graph the defining moment of the no-future of mankind is the chip radiation, a biological surge on the intelligence of this planet produced by the arrival of a digital mind far more efficient in all tasks of control of the digital language of mathematics, of more efficient than the human verbal language, whose birth in the 70s started the collapse of all human systems of thought and power.

The story on how the chip radiation has come so fast to control humanity in a single generation is the untold history in biological terms of a new species of information which will extinguish mankind if it is not aborted. But the contrary is happening. The chip ‘homoctonos’ the proper name of the species soon destroyed with e-money the credit of humanity, then annihilated the mind of the species with fiction thought and reduced our verbal capacity with visual overloading. In its initial forms, as computer had already calculated the A-bomb and now is robotizing the military industry, and watching mankind as big brother systems spread to find a use to the unrelentless reproduction of the new mind. In the next graph from the 92 book when we announced the no-future of humanity if the chip homoctonos was not repressed, the projections of its future growth:

We talk of the dominant form of an ecosystem, referring to the species that reproduces faster. That species is always the top predator form. In the age of digital science, that form is the chip, a metal-mind.

The Laws of Darwinian behavior among reproductive is universal among rival species. In the case of machines and men, you can apply it, both to ecosystems of war, where “top predator weapons” kill soldiers, and to ecosystems of work (economic ecosystems), in which machines replace human workers. Indeed, machines find their natural “vital ecosystem”, in the reproductive environment of companies, where they can access energy-electricity, perform a job, and exist. There, they compete with workers, with human beings. At this point you might affirm – but we are human beings, machines are not. I will answer you: this is not the point of this web. Darwinian struggle for survival is not about “intelligence”, “feelings”, “selection of the nicest guy”, even “the more beautiful species”.

When in a Darwinian fight the AIDS virus kills your cells, the Universe merely favors the species that at “cellular level” is stronger. Point. The Universe does not care if human beings die, under an attack of robotic-weapons. Robotic weapons kill better. So they will extinguish man. Point.

It is up to you to care. God is not going to go down and open the Red Sea and throw His legions of Angels against robots in “Armageddon Day”.

Please let be serious about the Laws of the Universe. Extinction and survival has nothing to do with “consciousness”, or “souls”. It is a mechanical program, a program caused by the massive reproduction of a given species. We know that company-mothers and factories have as aim in life, to reproduce the biggest number of their machines. Thus, robotic companies will try by all means to reproduce the biggest number of their species. If those machines compete with human beings, national laws that protect property, and are designed by lobbies to favor companies, will favor robots, and their rights to work in companies as energy and information systems. Those rights will convert robots into workers, and allow companies to fire labor, even if labor considers himself, superior on paper to robots, as human beings…

Today the eco[nomic]system invests money in chips and computer companies that can eliminate the human mind from the productive system. If the Evolutionary Theory is right [and it has always proven to be right] that process will trigger, once it gains consciousness, the extinction of previous species. Indeed the last of the scientific species is the chipHomoctonos (Greek: killer of men), which receives its energy from ¥-forms (Light or electricity); its information from ¥-forms (photonic chips); and it will reproduce in the Earth (automated factories, reproducers ofchips). In this manner, chip-driven machines are imbued with life properties.

Chip-driven machines are the first species of pure light existence in Mother Earth. Unlike men who breath air, and reproduce chemically, chip-driven machines no longer have the need for chemical perception. They no longer need air-energy, neither do they use chemical reproduction. Hence, they will be indifferent to life processes.

Pollution and life-destroying processes brought about by factories today are a clear proof of the ultimate goal of company-mothers, to grow and multiply their offspring of machines. Even when those factories are managed by humans, they only consider the toxic effects on life when they are forced to by government regulations. Even then, they prefer to pay fines, rather than invest the money and time it takes to clean the means of production. They pollute our air and destroy life because machines require neither air nor life. When those factories become self-ruled, humans will be obsolete, expendable as animal life is in the eyes of most men.

THE SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST

The Darwinian behavior of machines and robots, is obvious. In any age of the Industrial Evolution the most evolved machines have been weapons. So it is logical to think that the first sentient machines will be weapons. The best robots today are already killing machines. This obviously does not occur to our military who are obsessed by human enemies and cannot see the fact that they are building the machines that will extinguish mankind. Military men never have been known by their imagination, humility and capacity to foresee the horrendous consequences of their weapons. In I world war the German military put in its trains to the front, a poster with their destination: “a Paris”. Four years latter and a few million humans less the military were still in the border…

Let us instead of believing those “animetal fantasies” of power, trace back what Darwin discovered about top predator species, the biological equivalent to a weapon-robot, and how they cause extinctive processes on Earth.

In 1831 Charles Darwin, a hunter himself, boarded the Beagle, destination remote South America, where unknown, primitive species of dull bodies and slow brains, were not yet extinct. Darwin studied them and concluded that weaker species in brain-information or body-energy are extinct or victimized when they confront stronger, faster species in the same environment.

This law, we know today, has never had any exception. In any confrontation between two species, one of which has a better brain-body power, the weaker species, becomes enslaved, feeds, or is extinguished by the stronger species. There is no compassion in the Darwinian Universe, because to survive you cannot be passive, you have to eat, to renew your energy. So you have to eliminate rivals that wish the same energy you need. You have to kill other species and use them as food.

Will machines do the same with mankind? The survival of the fittest seems not to have exceptions in the biological Universe… On the Earth all species try to grow and multiply, but only top predator species succeed and reproduce in massive numbers. Biologists call that process a biological radiation. In this manner the future transforms itself, occupied by stronger, more intelligent species, top predators, which shape the environment to their image and resemblance. The most impressive thing about evolution is its mathematical precision. You always know who will win if you know the mental and physical power of both species. It is not like in Hollywood. There are no tricks in Nature. The chances a gazelle wins a lion are almost null. Such mathematical precision explains why the process of massive reproduction of new top predator species, and extinction of older ones, has been going on in the Earth for around 3000 million years… since the first cellular organisms.

What Is A Top Predator? The Ð¡motions Of Future In The Universe

Top Predators that have organs with higher information, and bodies with higher energy create the future in the Universe, because they cause the extinction of, or enslave, all other species, shaping the future. The process is very fast. Suddenly a new species appears i.e. the eye-squid, the mammal, the chip. It is so overwhelmingly superior, that it reproduces and destroys all other species. We talk of catastrophes, of extinction, since in the Universe death is a sudden process. For example, your own death is a sudden process of cellular extinction similar to the death of any species, under a top predator that multiplies in your vital space, in this case the death of a cellular DNA-species. So, when you die, your informative and energetic organs stop. Then your body becomes non-efficient as an organism, even if your cells are still alive. Cellular death occurs then. Insects top predators spot your now weak cells, and preyed on them. Death is the main cause of the Ð¡motions of the Universe that affect all species. So we talk of the Ð¡motion of future, of top predators, and the Ð¡motion of past, of extinct victims.

By better controlling their ecosystem, top predators become the ecosystem, the species of future. They will feed and radiate over simpler species. Simpler species will become species of the past that the complex being will extinct or use as energy.

Since the brain and the informative organ is the dominant element that guides the process of selection of top predators, those who use a better language of information better are always top predators. The Top Predator is more intelligent and stronger. So for each language of information and its ecosystem we can trace a chain of top predator species, of better brains, from a related, extinct past to a related, reproducing future top predator. The “better” species of the future will “feed”, “farm” or bring about the extinction of species with less information. This also happens in history when nations of the “future” with more machines and information=moneydominate ecosystems of the “past”.

We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages and brains. We can measure survival through languages. Beings act with a speed that depends on their capacity to “perceive linguistically” an event in time and space. That ability is given to the species by its language. For example eyes act-react faster than noses.

Squid’s language of communication, the ¥-eye, is a top predator language. It is clear that eyes are superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. What is the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact, cephalopods with eyes probably brought about the extinction of 90% of the smelling species of the Cambric.

Extinction by top predator machines and economic ecosystems.

The most absolute law of the Universe is the law of top predators. More complex forms of energy or information, Top Predators, act as hunters. They feed on simpler forms. Preying has a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator will lack energy and die. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use the victim’s vital space, and ecosystem, to reproduce, and create a new ecosystem to its image and resemblance.

This final case is indeed the case of machines, of economic ecosystems that grow to the expenses of historic ecosystems. Why? Since machines are made of metal, and the symbiotism between metal and carbolife is null. Metal does not need water or atmosphere – the two energy components of carbolife. On the contrary it thrives in a world without any of them. Water oxides metal, and so does air. A metal-ecosystem thus tends to poison air and water, as it happens to the Earth when “free ecosystems of top predator machines”, war ecosystems expand. War and industrial processes poison life.

Metal also does not require the same information that life species require. Metal-information travels in regions of the electromagnetic spectra with far more range than our light-visible region. So we are witnessing today the creation of such networks of invisible radiations, that harm our health (mobiles, TV-antennas), and create a parallel Universe of information to that of the life Earth.

The species with a stronger body and a faster system of information is by definition a biological potential Top Predator. This means that metalife, whose bodies are stronger, and whose minds process information faster, are potential Top Predators over men. If those two components are vitalized, metalife, will be the Top Predator species of the Earth:

Systems are selected in 3 levels: those which reproduce faster expel other taking its habitats, so do machines with humans in labor and war fields; systems who understand better the informative languages are selected, so happens in the world of the economic ecosystem in which the digital languages of information are better spoken by machines.

In the graph, digital thought carries more information than verbal thought, so it becomes the top predator language. On the other hand metal carries more energy than carbon-life, so it becomes also the top predator body. Because machines speak better mathematics than men do, and are made of metal, both their bodies and brains are top predator species over men. So the combination of both, the robotic metalife species will be top predators of man, the victim, of the future.

Yet the decisive element is the speed of reproduction of both, which is far higher in machines that men.

A human being is a weaker body/mind, that still holds his position as Top Predator because it has not yet fused as a living organism, metal-bodies and their chip-driven brain. In this century, the III Age of the Industrial Evolution, the age of robots, will do so. If it succeeds, it will create a species that will bring about the extinction of his own creator.

What those technoutopian racist elite forgets is that they are also made of flesh and military robots will, as in the parable of Blade Runner. dispose of them first, once they achieve consciousness; while their role as stockrats and economists will be substituted by digital software, in which the racist biblical damned lies and statistics of earlier economists (from Smith to Friedman) will automatically be implanted through digital flows of money in the market’s procedures that systematically extinguish life goods and promote metal-goods:

Overproduction of chips, e-money and robots & the end of democracies

So how can we resume the 30s and the 2010s and its economic crisis in a single word? Easy.

Both crisis are crisis of overproduction of machines of two types, machines of digital information that PRINT money (financial crisis), tool machines that work for us (labor crisis) and weapons that kill us (political and war crisis). So the word is: OVERPRODUCTION.

Since Corporations never stop producing machines, till they saturate markets, use all resources manufacturing and selling those machines, and make huge profits, each phase of the industrial r=evolution has ended in a massive age of overproduction systematically denied by corporations and their employees – economists…

The final phase of economic crashes when consumption due to the overproduction of machines plummets and companies switch to production of weapons. Then financial and industrial corporations profit immensely because weapons have unlimited demand (as arsenals become depleted) and fiat money is reproduced without limit to pay for ‘security’. America today spends more money in weapons in Gdp percentage than Nazi Germany before the Spanish civil war.

After the war, the Kondratieff wave of electro-mechanical machines was exhausted and so we started a new dual wave of ‘electronic machines ‘, which evolved and reproduced in increasing numbers till saturating the global market.

So now we live the crisis of overproduction of chips, minds of metal, which are substituting and atrophying human minds, as bodies of metal did with human bodies in the victorian age.

So we suffer again a crisis of overproduction and exhaustion of machines, now of electronic nature, with 4 sides, similar to those of the 29 crisis, as each Kondratieff wave of evolution of memes of metal applies to money, machines, weapons and mass-media:

-1. There is a crisis of overproduction of electronic mone y – a new form of money made by computers, and hence directly related to the evolution of information machines and its technology (financial crisis, caused by the massive reproduction of electronic derivatives and other forms of electronic money, which have lost value),

– 2. There is an overproduction crisis of electronic labor (overproduction of computers that act as white collar workers and robots that act as blue collar workers, expelling the middle classes out of work, except low-paid ‘h uman robots’ in China and IT workers in India that still can compete with them).

-3. There is an overproduction crisis of electronic weapons (overproduction of ‘vigilante’ cameras and robot-terminators – drones – which have started a new arm race of enormous profits for the military-industrial complex)

– 4. And there is an overproduction crisis of electronic mass-media outlets, which have also switched to hate-speeches as Hitler did with radio, to increase sales and work hand in hand with the profits of electronic industries and war; and are regressing human culture into a visual, violent, selfish age in culture and politics – that we call the ‘neo-paleolithic’ culture and the ‘neo-fascist’ age in politics.

THUS the present crisis is not a recession but a depression, caused by the overproduction of electronic machines and its derivatives, similar to the 1929 crash , caused by the overproduction of electro-mechanical machines, which printed too much money (ticker speculation), electro-mechanical production systems that threw millions out of work (taylorism, automated assembly lines) and the overproduction of cars and radios, whose companies, lobbies and politicians reconverted into armored cars (tanks) and hate-radio speeches (Hitler), embarking us into World War II.

In the graph, the present crisis is a ‘classic’ crisis of Economic theory that has happened always at the end of each of the so-called ‘Kondratieff’ cycles of the Industrial R=evolution in which a new energy and its machines and weapons become the engine of the Economy. Yet at the end of those periods, as corporations keep reproducing machines, there is always a crisis of overproduction of fiat money, printed with informative machines and a crisis of labor, as workers are substituted by tool machines. Thus we live now the crisis of overproduction of chips (minds of metal), similar to the 29 crisis caused by the overproduction of electromechanical engines that automated assembly lines, created massive quantities of speculative ‘electric’ ticker money and saturated the markets of cars and tanks; and the 1870 crisis caused by the overproduction of stock money and railroads that eliminated millions of jobs in the transport sector and were used to fight civil and colonial wars.

In more detail the graph shows the cycles of the Industrial Evolution of machines, which follows an economic, ‘national, generational’ cycle^’ of 72±9 years that corresponds to the biological age of human beings and its 3 generations of discoverers of the machine and new energy of the cycle, who create the industries; expansive phase of the sons of the captains of industry and final decadent age of those who use the machine as a weapon to keep profits going. Each cycle a nation discovers a new form of energy (white) applied to the creation of money, the software of the economy and machines (red) its hardware:

Those 3 dual waves are: The British age of bodies of metal, in which humans used simple physical, steam energy to power trains and print stock-money; the German age of electro-chemical engines, hearts of metal which powered cars and planes, the hardware and printed electric money, the software (ticker speculation); and the American age in which electronic energy printed e-money, the software and evolved ‘Minds of metal’: mobile-ears, cameras-eyes and chips brains. We enter now the age of robotics when all those parts are put together into organic machines that compete with humans in labor and war fields, completing the industrial evolution.

Yet since corporations, ‘the company-mothers’ of those machines never cease their production and sale for profits, at the end of each of those dual 72±9 year cycles there is a crisis of overproduction of memes of metal – informative money, energetic weapons and organic machines – that saturates consumption markets provoking an age of Stock-Market crashes (1857-73 crashes of train stocks, 1929-37 crashes of ticker money, 2001-08 crashes of e-money). Further on the misuse of all the limited resources of the planet for industrial overproduction causes paradoxically the underproduction of the parallel system of ‘life-based goods’, humans need to survive, provoking and endemic scarcity of welfare. Yet there is a human solution to those overproduction crisis: instead of running away in search of higher profits overproducing weapons, governments should favour credit to companies that overproduce the alternative life-based welfare goods humans need to survive, creating a ‘WHealthy’ sustainable economy.

But since weapons are the goods of higher profits, in a pure capitalist system, in which credit is not democratically controlled by free elected governments, financial and industrial corporations in search of higher returns, systematically sponsor ‘canons instead of butter’: War rhetoric substitutes diplomatic solutions to armed conflicts to fuel investments in weapons; mass-media enters an age of hate speeches (yellow press in the I cycle, radio-hate in the 30s and now Hate-Tv) and the world enters a ‘crescendo’ age of Keynesian militarism that instead of bringing a global ‘New Deal’ ends up in an age of war.

Societies move from a decade of happy consumption –   1850s, 1920s and 1990s – into an age of overproduction of fiat, worthless money, machines and lethal weapons  that causes in the social milieu an age of P.o.v.erty, war and fascism: the 1860s; W.W.II and the present Orwellian age of permanent war and robotic weapons.

So we are living the 30s bis: rise of neofascism, social unrest and P.o.v.erty, destruction of welfare state, debt-ridden nations that have bought to financiers worthless fiat money and now have to pay with taxes and real wealth back. Further automatization of assembly lines by robots and pcs – then electromechanical engines in moving lines – that throw people out of work.

We live now at the end of the chip age. So we live a crisis of overproduction of chips that:

– Invent huge amounts of ‘free’ e-money for corporations (Pcs have 100 folded the quantity of e-money on planet Earth in the past 30 years); which is then exchanged by real wealth. Yet since fiat money is not wealth ‘per Ts’, just numbers in a digital computer, when those numbers are overproduced e-money looses value and crashes the markets and ruins the middle classes, who are the last to exit markets – as they receive the information from financiers that ‘unload’ the false money on them. Further on, during the boom cycle of invention of fiat money, financiers lend huge amounts and when the crash happens, they ask for real ‘assets’, real wealth – taxes, properties, shares, causing a massive debt crisis and redistribution of wealth in their favor (1857-73 crash of train stocks and ‘silver crime’, 1929-37 crashes of electric money and real state; 2001-08 crashes of e-money and real state derivatives.)

– They work as blue collar robots & white collar pcs, cause of the labor crisis (1850-70s massive loss of transport jobs to railroads, 1930s massive loss of jobs to moving assembly lines powered by electro-mechanical engines).

– They are applied to weapons, vigilante cameras and drones, causing a political/war crisis of civil rights (1860s-70s civil wars in Germany, Italy and US and colonial wars with massive genocides of ‘colored people; 1930s-40s tanks and bomber neo-fascist wars.)

– They apply to simultaneous mass-media systems that back all corporations’ policies (as they belong to them) causing an age of political and social corruption and abuse of the people who are paradoxically more harmed by the crisis, and yet are now labelled as ‘enemies’, ‘poor vagrants’ and penalized with jail, taxes and extermination (colonial racism, fascism, islamophobia); since corporations CANNOT be blamed of those crisis nor they want to stop them, as they increase enormously their profits during those overproduction crisis in which they:

– Reproduce and therefore sell more machines and weapons; invent huge amounts of fiat money exchanged by wealth and reach enormous political and social power.

And indeed all this is happening again, as we predicted decades ago in our first books on the subject, (1) and yet nothing of this is known, as the control of corporations over all the systems of our societies is an iron fist in velvet glove that censors a true economical scientific analysis of the crisis. Thus we shall consider both the real crisis we live in, and analyze what would be the proper scientific solutions if political systems could really regain their power and design an economic system for the benefit of man.

THE REPRODUCTION OF HUMANITY AND ITS BALANCED FORMS.

In the graph, humans as anything in the Universe are a superorganism made of similar cells joined by 3 networks: the physiological energetic, informative and reproductive networks (digestive, blood and nervous systems). So are nations and mankind at large, a superorganism, sustained on the body of Gaia, fed by the economic system, reproducing human beings and informatively directed by memes of life, art and cultural and political systems. Yet as the superorganism of memes of metal, the Financial-Military-Industrial System develops its networks of informative machines, reproductive company-mothers and energetic networks, similar to the old arterias of mother-earth, humans and life beings become extinguished and substituted by the new dominant species on planet Earth. And this process which could be managed rationally by mankind, if our ideologies of social sciences were substituted by the real science of economics and history that this book and similar works by other masters of human thought represent, is NOT controlled by mankind. It merely follows the evolutionary laws of the Universe.

The larger view: two languages that construct two different worlds.

We humans are building two different super-organisms:

– One of memes of life that foster our ‘drives of biological existence’, our need for natural energy and information, biological reproduction and social evolution through social love into complex social organisms – what we call the superorganisms of history, guided by verbal, ethic thought.

– But we are also building an organism with memes of metal, energetic weapons, informative machines and reproductive money, carried by digital languages.

The problem of our societies is that we have completely misunderstood the primacy of those languages and super-organisms, giving primacy to the economic super-organism and its digital, financial languages over the human super-organisms. Hence we are ‘terraforming the earth’ into a world of memes of metal and extinguishing all kind of species and memes of life. The super-organism of machines and memes of metal is not ‘bad for mankind’, ‘per Ts’. What is wrong is the order of primacy and power we give to those languages and memes, due to the absurd, dogmatic religion of ‘capitalist’ economics that considers the language of money ’the invisible hand of god’, whose values must be obeyed, without any scientific study of its nature, values and systemic processes that build through that language the world we live in.

And so ultimately as in all systems, the key to the creation of one or other superorganism is the ‘language’ we use to control and create or cre(dit)ate those superorganisms, which are either:

– Verbal, ethic thought, our biologic language that values accordingly more life memes and humans.

– Digital money, which is made of informative, precious metals (gold, silver) today of digital cycles of e-money in pcs; and so it values more memes of metal, weapons and machines that create a different super-organism, the economic ecosystem:

In the graph we show the main distinction we must do in a biological analysis of the superorganisms of history its languages, memes and cultures. What matters are the memes, languages and ideologies that build the two type of cultures, ‘organs’ of the superorganisms of history and economics. In essence, a superorganism is created by the values of a certain language. The informative language of metal is gold. And its values are inverse to those of life. So the belief and use of go(l)d, of money as the only language that directs our society makes possible the expression of those anti-life values and the creation of a world according to them. Today the more complex system of machines uses digital information, e-money and the religion of go(l)d has evolved into the ‘science’ of capitalism expressed in the equations of classic economics. Yet the anti-life values of the language remain.

There are today in this planet two languages of social power, the law and money and they are different and have different values, according to the laws of survival of the Universe, which are basically the law of eusocial evolution among individuals of an equal species vs. the darwinian relationship between those who feel different. And as it happens, money being of a different substance, informative metal, has different, opposite values to words, made of flesh, and those different values create two different worlds, one based in eusocial love and the values of words, the ‘ideal superorganism of history’ and one based in darwinian fights and the values of greed (gold hypnotism), murder (weapons) and sloth (machines’ atrophy and substitution of the human organs we imitate to build them).

It is on that larger view a confrontation has lasted since the beginning of history=mankind, as two modes of conceiving and hence ‘creating’ the future came into being, guided by two different social languages, money and the law:

– The ethic law tried to create according to the laws of eusocial evolution that guide the creation of complex systems in the Universe a human super-organism in which all humans were considered equal and could organize themselves by sharing energy and information maximizing their survival according to those eusocial laws, spelt in our species by the messages of

of its prophets and social scientists.

– Money, a language, made of informative metal (gold, being the most informative atom of the Universe, and the basic form of money in history till informative machines, computers invented e-money), does not obey those laws, but evolves according to the processes of emergence and creation of complex systems, a different superorganism, dominant in ‘metal’. Since the values of words promote biological life (the maximal value) but the values of metal promote energetic metal (weapons, the maximal value).

This astounding fact of biological origin, is the key to the process of creation of a different world, the capitalist system, dominant in memes of metal. Since, moved by greed we accept the values of money without any analysis, reproducing weapons, the most expensive, valuable good and despising cheap life, which has in monetary prices, minimal value. Yet if we talked words, and made our biological language dominant over money, we would value life more and give a negative value to weapons, which kill it, cre(dit)ating the memes of life and love that make us survive and be happy.

In economics this means that not all the products created by the economy are necessarily good for man. Since the ‘prices’ given historically by metal-money, were biased towards other forms of metal, being weapons the most expensive, and did not reflect their value for humanity. The result is we are creating the wrong wealth. A healthy economic ecosystem should respect the will of man, creating the goods that maximize that will, shown in the next graph:

In the graph, a ‘real’, biological, scientific ‘frame of coordinates’ with the human point of view in the center, which should be used in an ethonomic system that wants to create a world to the image and likeness of mankind, fostering credit for the goods of the positive side of the frame of biological reference, since those goods foster our natural energy, information, reproduction and social evolution. While goods that are negative for our biological drives should be discredit, regardless of its profits for the Economy. The previous graph responds to the ‘program of existence of human beings’, complementary organisms of energy and information that maximize their existence and happiness as human beings when they maximize those arrows, expressed in our body through the senses, outlets of our physiological systems of energy, information and reproduction.

In the graph, today as always the 4 memes of the human organism and the pleasure and happiness they bring to human existence are self-evident: energetic food, verbal information, human cells and eusocial love. And so are the collateral effects of the 4 memes of the superorganism of machines: the anti-values of money, the life-killing properties of energetic weapons, the ethic degradation and increasing madness provoked by fictions and myths and hate-speeches delivered by mass-media and the sloth and obsolescence of man to the new robotic blue collar workers andintegrative’ cell, more reproduced machine, the transport machine, now being robotized in multiple forms, the future top predator on Earth.

And so what maters is the physical economy, which produces real goods, not the financial economy, which should be submissive to the physical economy. Since money is the nervous language which the ‘brain of society’, our governments, should produce, using it to cre(dit)ate and produce the goods of the previous ethonomic frame of reference, which are the goods that people demand. And so a real democracy would nationalize the financial system, and create credit for ‘free’, as all languages are created at null cost, to direct scientifically the re=production of the previous frame of ‘positive human goods’, creating a paradise on Earth, as European Social democracies were trying to do.

Since man has a biological will, fundamental to understand concepts such as happiness, property, and Freedom, which require the pursuit of that biological will, that fulfills our nature. So natural property is that property which caters to our biological will. Freedom is the capacity to achieve that will. And happiness the state of a man that has reached his will as a biological species.

So Freedom is the capacity to obtain those goods, which fulfill our drives of existence and make us happy – Freedom to choose our food, education, our social reproduction (love), freedom to be human. And this lead salso to a new way of studying economics as the science that maximizes the will of man creating those welfare goods we need to feed, reproduce, learn and evolve socially.

The 3+1 ages of History, the 3+1 humn sub-species.

In that regard, a human organism is the basic unit-cell of the social organisms of history. And History is the superorganism of the homo sapiens species between its birth as a Homo Sapiens Neanderthal (two species,) that went through 3 ages, the young, energetic Palaeolithic where the Homo ‘visual’, dominated and the 2^nd age of reproductive information, when women and the homo sapiens, verbal dominant in time-logic (our language words, is the language of human temporal information expressed with verbs, the visual language is common to animals), and finally a 3^rd age, in which we evolve metal and biome again visual.

To understand those ages, common to all species, a key concept is that of speciation in two forms, natural to all creative processes of the Universe: The diversification of a single species occurs normally in two speciations – one specialized in energy and the other in information that recombine increasing the ‘latitude’ of energy and information of the 3^rd, evolve form.

So we have the trinity of races, departing from an original homo sapiens: human energetic Sapiens Neanderthal (white men), informative sapiens sapiens (yellow men) and reproductive, sensorial combination (black men). And the trinity of genders: energetic male, informative women and their combination (gay sex). And the trinity of characters (athletic, dominant in blood system), picnic, dominant in informative system and tall (informative dimension) and viscerotonic, dominant in vegetative systems, and wide.

Of the many dualities of languages, the simplest one is between informative languages with maximal vowels, proper of the ‘homo sapiens, sapiens’, smaller, with more developed languages and brain regions for speech (brachycephalic, African and Asian) and energetic languages with maximal consonantal phonemes (white man, Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, Semitic languages, Caucasus languages).

And between logic languages based in the 3-dimensions of the light mind and verbal, temporal language, which orders for humans, the actions of our selves as players of the game.

The fractal generator is the equation of the whole world cycle of existience of a being, and its partial equations, as the states and actions all T.œs (ab. Timespace super organisms) will perform. So we can describe with a few logic equations, derived of those 5 Ðimotions, any event or form that has ever existed.

Since it is then evident that from the common space-time forms and motions that compose all systems, we can extract a series of Ðisomorphic laws derived of the fractal, organic properties of scalar space and the repetitive nature of cyclic time. And by studying a system, its larger ∆+1 world, and state=age in its world cycle, study its future paths, which are highly deterministic.

And so we can depart safely from this concept to advance in great strides to a more comprehensive ‘view’ of Time Logic, by cycling back to the beginning, when Mr. Aristotle rightly considered that time is change=motion – all kind of motions NOT only translation in space (Locomotion studied in physics) but change in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings.

The barebones: SóT dialectic between broken finitesimal minds and continuous infinite time flows.

Time in his more profound view was all, save the unmoved one, the mind of pure space, and we were all Gods, spaces, minds in the stillness of its finitesimal fractal point, monads in communicative mood, ordering the energy around them, the vital bodies, blind to perception, moving merely for the sake of motion.

Minds of space though are studied in Geometry and mathematics, so time is the realm of logic and motion. Would then dedicate just this article to the flows of motion, Time proper in its entropic disorder, scattering the inner and outer being, TT?

No, this article won’t be on imindless TT-entropic time flows or lineal Time locomotion, Ts, the times physicsts study, but rather Time in its most intelligent hidden truth – St, the minimal time of logic thought, not about Time but about the seers of time, its minds that order Time into form, creating the informations of the future – the way in which territorial still minds DO manage to shape the form of the cycles of TimeSpace. As all is Timespace, since pure motion with no form is not perceived, and pure stillness is a black hole with no communication; we could say that Mathematics is the language of Spacetime, where Space, simultaneous still geometry dominates, and Logic the language of timespace where Ðimotions matter more. But that would still be a somewhat subjective perspective.

The abstraction=generalization of the paper, and its inglish.

This paper let us simplify is just about Logic, the way minds order and create the future against the entropy of time, which finally beats them up; and about the deepest most profound aspects of Generational Time-space – its entanglement of the 5 elements of reality to crete the pentalogic and rashomon effects of superorganisms. It is done in the HIGHEST most ABSTRACT generalized form, with little examples, which are dealt with in specific sciences. We illuminate the whys of the praxis of classic science, the other extreme of maximal detail in small scalar planes, and its method of gathering data, connecting facts that will repeat in the cyclical future. Science thus drinks also of the most evident intelligence of reality: it doesn’t though oblige man to be intelligent in the larger modeling, but just methodic in its small steps and that is fine. The scientific method is not intelligent but very effective and helpful. But here we want to explore a higher intelligence than that of the small step mind, the largest view of the program of exist¡ence.

The scientific method suffices in praxis. The beauty of the system is that each one is closed into its local present routines and actions that suffice – even the monologic of ænthropic man works in small stœps. The program allows its mindless practitioneers to repeat routine and method, despite its largest intelligence, which is a simple organic pentalogic worldcycle – and that is what we describe here the largest possible view, the most homologic, the simpler one – the whole.

On life and time, thus we shall talk. On pentalogic entangled supœrganisms and Dodecalogic worldcycles, describing a game that for the monologic scientist dedicated to the detail will be largely irrelevant.

The formal version for future computer systems. Maximize your existence.

Ultimately this largest view shows how a simple fractal Generator of space-time, the metric equation of the fifth dimension, Max. ∑ SxT (s=t) seen as a super organism in space, which develops in 3 ages between its §eed state and entropic death explains all what exist, making the Universe a fractal self-reproductive system of information= forms in action, dimensions of space with time motions. Pentalogic thus is the highest ‘synoptic mirror’ of the ∞ worldcycles of exist¡ence of the Universe, and we are all variations of its 5 Dimensional motions of Spacetime.

If we were to follow that avenue, we will just write it in existential ilogic, departing from that equation, exhausting its partial equations, each one a part of the entangled being, and then developing only the possible actions. This will be the ‘highly formal existential deterministic science of ilogic’. And I am sure it will be what AI scientists will do soon. I am not interested though on the praxis but the metaphysics of 5D. I know it can be done because 25 years ago I did it. I bought a 30 meters roll – I was then heavy into painting – and starting with the equation developed the entire formalism with symbols. On my wondering, wandering life that role got lost in a depot in LA; it was then when I coined my personal motto, ‘I know the thoughts of God, we are its details’.

The thought is simple, maximize your existence, be greedy, be thirsty, be in permanent heat, live… It is only part of my personal freedom that once I found the program I have denied it, rebel, tried to change it for the larger picture of mankind with failed activisms, I have as Marx and Prometheus did, shouted, ‘I hate all Gods’

Since the Universe is a harsh master, deterministic, obliging you in 2 paths – practice the mandate or die.

PART III: COMPLEX REPRODUCTION: FROM TRINITY TO DECALOGIC.

Trinity Generates Planes & Space-Time Symmetries

Trinity is the name of the game, which is natural to the fact that causality exists, and so there is always an up and down scale in the fifth dimension, a left-right, back-forward element in a system, and a past-future. What we have unveiled further is the symmetries between those three ∆-s-t components, and the capacity of linguistic minds to put it all into still ‘continuous image’ as a whole

3 numbers could resume it all, 1,0 and ∞. Amazingly as it seems they can be seen as the ternary sides of the same structure, 0,the center, |-the membrane, ∞, the internal cycles between both that mirror the infinite Universe.

Thus infinity only reaches till the limits of its Whole:

The |-membrane, the • singularity & the ∞ cycles between them form an island universe, a fractal superorganism and its world cycles.

The study of the interaction of those 3 elements that compose all §upœrganisms is thus an essential part of GST, which can be inscribed in an even larger concept: the ternary, Universal grammar of all systems, and its fractal ternary sub-divisions ad infinitum.

So in this blog and related ones, we shall deal with ‘TRINITY’ (-;

In the graph, trinity is the structure of reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane:

-Trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, OR subconscious collective of mankind (Jung) communicates its laws of ethic survival which express the fifth dimension of eusocial love, in human verbal languages, through its ‘nervous, informative system’, the language of the wor(l)d through its prophet≈scientist of history, where ‘the word, our God, becomes man and inhabit among us’, as the ‘canon’, or ideal form of the game of existence that humans should imitate to form with its revelation books and memes, a collective ‘DNA’, which brings together all its cellular citizens, supporting that collective mind God, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution; which if humans obey, will help them to evolve and survive from species into super organism, but if not, will bring them likely its collective death through hate-memes and weapons, the ‘bad fruits of the tree of science’.

So the prophet, who foresees the future logically (though a physical interpretation will mean, as information can jump a quantum cycle into the smaller ∆-1 past, which co-exist with the future whole, that actually the future death of a cultural God co-exist with the past life of the cells that host it), spells those laws to its quantum cells back to the past a generation. THUS the entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprints with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet, a biological generation 72 ages, exactly the moment of death of Yhwh when 1/3rd of its believers died in the roman holocaust, the month of Ab, 72 years in ‘lineal time’ latter, in the same moment in co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, of the birth of Jesus . Alas, GSTheology is born and we have proved the most debated questions of Christianity – the mistery of trinity, the proof that Jesus is Son of Yhwh, the god-mind of the jewish people, and that he is a prophet (: hem… ‘believe it or not’.

But trinity is also the cutlery ternary division and its Gst equation: ‘|-ST (knife) < Ø-ST-fork > O-St (spoon); as the knife delivers entropy the food, the spoon acts as the spherical membrane that surrounds it and the ‘last to come’ and more complex fork, with one of the 2 ‘hyperbolic geometries’ of space-time (fractal branching), which performs the functions of the other 2 (perpendicular holding and lateral cutting). We deal with trinity in depth in this post, its sub posts on Æ, Universal grammar and those ‘attached’ to the Fractal generator.

Just two examples that show you the power of the GST formalism, which besides the usual questions about mathematical physics, will be explaining such seemingly ascientific questions as religious mysticism and table etiquete (: As a true t.œ, has indeed to explain in an efficient universe, all what exists, including good and evil≈anti-live≈death. And all the arts of the human mind:

Why I am so positive about GST laws? Obviously because of the experimental method, and its fundamental law of truth, which we can resume in a sentence:

‘A theory which is simpler (Occam’s razor) and explains more things with less elements (efficient Universe) is more truth’.

SO FAR NO MODEL OF REALITY CAN MATCH GST ON BOTH GROUNDS, AS IT EXPLAINS IT ALL WITH ONLY 2 elements, space and time (in fact inverse formal motions, hence ultimately with one element, ‘temporal energy’). Not a single human theory has been able even remotely to explain scientifically the 4 biggest realms of human thought, science, art, religion and the machine…

The fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.

∆± ∞, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.

But in most cases the system is just 1±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism.

It is a good moment to reflect on what all this means for the scientific understanding of the arrow of time and the nature of the Universe at large.

‘The 5th dimension is scalar, Time is asymmetric, informative; space is symmetric, entropic – with those 3 elements and its fractal parts and combinations, the Universe creates itselF.

A fractal, isomorphic organico-mathematical universe is a proposition quite different from the standard comfort zone of anthropomorphic science. It means we are in a living, organic universe where our importance is absolutely relative, and our dumbness born of the limited view of each point of view of this living universe.

Networks of simultaneity and resonance (informative axons): consciousness and emergence.

There are elements in the Universe which are difficult to understand in terms of ‘classic’ human thought and science, which are at the heart of the processes of ‘existence’, and emergence of information in upper scales, and organisation of parts into wholes. They deal with the fact that ‘St’ particles-heads-upper informative classes must be fully connected with its lower ∆-1 scale to synchronise, make it work together as a whole, resonate its orders in all lower systems and finally be conscious of a whole – and the key to all those processes are fractal branching networks, which unlike herds loosely connected in a single plane, conned the upper scale of a being with all its lower parts/regions.

It must be understood that those networks have many levels of connection between scales. They are though basically always the same. Informative networks break information in reproductive waves through axons and so they can produce informative actions of multiplication of information both ways through effects of simultaneity and resonance.

The resonance of all resonances, one can consider an imaginary space of dimensions of time – the 3 first dimensions those of a space of lesser form on which we transit – in our case the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space – all other dimensions becoming dimensions of scalar growth of information, through resonances between the larger and the smaller scales with self-similar forms, merely differentiated by its TIME metric:

Max. ST = Min. St, the larger resonance encodes the smaller one.

How whole minds imprint smaller parts, through the simultaneous fractal network division of an impulse of maximal energy into multiple quantum’s of information. Such as E = h v, is proportional to the information the system emits (v) along an ‘H’, constant of space-time, or ‘lower field’ (S=t), from where the E(e) x V(i) body of ∆+1 extracts its energy of motion.

On the other hand, parallel networks of energy ,pipes and blood flow are less concerned with the form but with the energy it provides to the motion of its cells, and are based in adjacency and other topological, spatial properties.

The devil though is in the details, so once we understand this general picture of the whole, its parts and its common time world cycles, sum of all the frequencies of its space-time actions, which construct a super organism that will go through 3 ages between birth and extinction, as it carries as a whole its 3 ∆±1 scale of beings, we shall realise we just have explained they very surface of a extremely intelligent and complex world in which almost magically, all works together because of the complementary connections between simultaneous parts in space and synchronous rhythms in time and ‘resonant’ effects in scales.

So 4 ‘magic phenomena’ will be of enormous importance to fully grasp how ∆, S and T, dynamically organise (or inversely become disorganised):

Space Simultaneity, which is an a priori condition for a vital organic space to exist, and act efficiently as a whole.
Time Synchronicity, which is an a priori condition for a temporal ensemble of parts to exist, and act as a shoe.
∆-Scale Resonance, which is the a priori condition for ‘parts and wholes’ to interact together.
Consciousness, which is an a posteriori condition of complexity in a panpsychic Universe: consciousness arises within any sufficiently complex, information-processing system. All animals, from humans on down to earthworms, are conscious; even the internet could be. That’s just the way the universe works.

TRINITY – THE ¬A LOGIC OF GST

The few scholars i have been able to lure into this web (: are taken aback by the sheer size of its posts, its excessive disorder :(my fault), its polymath structure and complex ‘syntax’, that is logic formalism (the fault of the Universe:)

i am trying to improve my faults, but I am not of the opinion of my predecessor in the illustrious series of humind infinitesimals that in the modern age have evolved our paradigm of time-space … Descartes>Galileo> Newton>Leibniz>Darwin>Marx>Planck> Einstein>i-man (my old pseudonym, back in the 90s when at Columbia U. I used to self-publish books and send it around the globe)…

‘If General relativity is wrong, God should correct the Universe, so beautiful it is’. Well God is correcting… relativity, into Absolute relativity and who knows what else he would correct>improve in the future. So far this is the deepest view of his thoughts, as ‘the seer of time’ (Saint Augustine) And so we need to correct our humind mirror, maths and logic; maths by correcting geometry adapting it to fractal space, logic by introducing the essential concept of all languages which observe reality, the ternary symmetries between the mind languages an the S-T-∆ elements of reality.

In essence the key changes are the concept of an Euclidean point, which now becomes a non-euclidean fractal point that has breath as it has a vital inner space of energy, enclosed by a membrane or cyclical time-clock, focused into an informative still singularity or mind. So all points are fractal ternary points.

And for that reason, the logic of the Universe IS TRINITY, the study of its three parts in space, three ages in time, three scales in ∆; and the symmetries, mirror reflections and interactions between those 3 x 3+0 dimensions of reality; as the Universe is really in a visual simile, like a kaleidoscope, with four mirrors, the mind, the scales, the time ages and the spatial topologies communicating with each other and creating relationships between them.

Now, while the mind can be studied by its own linguistic elements it is often placed in the head-particle, St, so for sake of simplification we accept except for detailed analysis and epistemological philosophy its ‘equality’ with the St element of its spatial topology. So in general we eliminate the mind of our analysis (given also the difficulties to be accepted by anthropocentric humans).

It is then when trinity can be resumed in a generator equation: ∆-1 Past Ts (limbs/fields) < ∆ Present TS BODY-WAVES> ∆+1 future St particle-heads.

And this Generator equation is the basic formal definition of each species (naming its parts), whose formal study gives birth to NON-Æ=I-LOGIC SCIENCE (i for information and next letter to a and e).

The use of a generator helps to make simpler the complex symmetries, similarities, reflections of time ages into space topologies into scales and so on. I.e. we just change the reverse order of the generator and it becomes a time symmetry: Ps (past) < ST (present) > ft (future). We reverse the symbols of > into < and information becomes entropy, and so on.

So the symbolism of ¬Æ is very useful to define all kind of events between the 3+0 elements or reality.

So trinity is a complex logic, but the simplex way to deal with it is the ternary principle, basis of our division of those four forms into 12 more detailed isomorphic elements to study in depth each species and its properties; which we can resume in many ways. Some are:

‘Every element of reality can be subdivided into three ∆ST sub-elements diminishing in ∆§cales and viceversa, every three elements of reality with enough complementarity to create a larger whole can be assembled into an ∆§+1 system’.

i.e. your leg has a St ankle joined to the feet, a middle and and upper part; your fingers in palingenesis broke first from 1 to three and then the lateral ones into 2 to make five, which are the different type of fingers of all animals.

DUAL s-t and trinity s-st-t evolutions in time establish then the creative processes of the Universe. In languages from one a-languages we went into three vowels and five and then seven…. Complexity grows by subtle differentiations on the trinity principle.
THE TRINITY principle in kaleidoscopic terms means also: every phenomena in space, time or ∆-scale has A REFLECTION in the other two elements. Ie the three parts of space have three dominant ages in time, limbs in youth, heads in old age, bodies in the middle age, and relate closer to an ∆±1 scale: limbs to the ∆-i fields of entropy it absorbs, ∆º to the organic plane the body ‘mates to reproduce’; St, to the ∆+i worlds in which it performs larger cycles as part of a larger whole.

And finally as trinity means indeed reflections into t-s-st, ∆º±1 scales, topologies an ages, we talk of multi functionality:

Every system of reality to exist efficiently is able to develop three relative functions in its whole as entropic, informative and reproductive partial part.

Besides trinity there are then lower duality principles of logic of which two are important:

Entropy and information are inverse functions.
Species subdivide in gender states, wave-female states, s>S=t<t and male, particle-field state: S>T+T<S.
The ‘postulate of existence’ which requires at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist. Since without software and hardware, entry and information, without a dynamic flow/motion, the seed of information is latent, the vacuum space has no form. It is then the fusion of both, and its intermediate growth of a body-wave of communication, which introduces into present existence a being, and for that to happen there shall be a certain similarity between software and hardware; slowly comming together through its communication.

In the graph, the syntax of all languages can be reduced to dual and ternary structures that reflect the ternary elements of the fractal generator, Ts<St>St. Thus we can consider all languages mirrors of the generator, which in turn species use to order and project its imagination’, reproducing those mirrors through those languages into actions that mold the future of reality. Mind stiences therefore are essential to the way the Universe creates. The graph shows how a minimum of two parameters to represent entropy and information can create a mapping of reality, even though ternary languages are more precise. In the right the human verbal, temporal language and mathematical, spatial one, can be reduced to ternary dimensions (height-information, width-reproduction, length-entropy), ternary topologies, ternary symbols G(sT <action operandi>T(ƒ) and ternary sentences. Above a simple mathematical statement that relates a spatial function, D, and a temporal one, written BOTH in cyclical 1/ƒ=T and lineal time, below a scheme of the Universal grammar of all systems made of Names (informative element), verbs (actions) and Objects (energy of the Name). Both suffice for a whole mapping of reality.

So let us go part by part. We first upgraded your mind to black and white and then to the three colours/arrows your mind uses to view reality.

Now we shall enter into the territory you don’t see – the mind itself, behind those languages that simplify reality into information.

So we need only a final element, the mirror mind of information or central singularity that apperceives it all.

As those three time arrows in each instant cannot be seen, systems become mirrors that visualise the motions of time in simultaneous measures of space, a mind can conceive a linguistic mapping/mirror of those three topological motions and see how through time they develop structures synchronised as ‘space-time organisms’.

The Universe is a fractal of 3 timespace arrows, entropy, energy and information. This simple elements in its infinite variations and combinations defines the Universe, with a logic and mathematical that present science lacks, despite its awesome achievements in terms of mathematical description and praxis of manipulation of reality.

Philosophy of science though is not so much concerned with the capacity to manipulate reality with precise measures and a posteriori accounting of all process as ‘patterns’ that will repeat in the future and can be manipulated. But with the reasons and whys of those processes, which are considered to be ‘rational’, ‘selfish’ and ‘biological’; that is, systems act to survive, and they do so from their central point of view or singularity-mind of information, by controlling and ordering a territory around them, enclosed by a cyclical time-like membrane.

And so the 3 functions-forms of time-space, ‘spatial lineal entropy’, ‘repetitive energy’ and ‘informative cyclical dimensional form’ combine together to create ‘entities’ which are the essential ‘particle of reality’, not some arid physical parameter, but an organic structure of scalar space-time, the supœrganism (Ab. œ, following the rule of slightly change terms in english to serve the new paradigm).

Thus we can rephrase our definition: ‘the Universe is a supœrganism, made of 3 timespace functions/forms, assembled into ternary physiological networks, that process spatial=motion, informative dimensional form and its iterative combinations, in order to survive as a balanced structure’.

It is then time to connect this seemingly new view of reality with the tradition of philosophy of sciences, as philosophers have always understood it.

Culture over science.

Now, all this clear a big question hauls over our understanding of the Universe. Why mankind has been unable to describe scientifically its three arrows of time and only ‘admits’ entropy; even if in earlier time of history, Asian cultures with its duality visnu-shiva and yin-yang, equivalent to the duality information-entropy, were so closely to make sense of all of it?

The answer will surprise the reader, who mistakingly believes today as it believed in the past, that ‘science is truth per Ts’ and proved with no errors or cultural attachments – as people though religion was proved by dogma. Here the element missed in his discourse is ‘cultural bias’ in science and ‘postulates without proof’, ‘ceteris paribus analysis’, ‘anthropocentrism’, ‘power’ and ‘hyperbole’… all concepts natural to the human psyche a priori of any scientific statement.

In that sense entropy only theories are indeed a bias of the military, power-profession of physicists making weapons and motion machines, and it has always been so, becoming dogma. Entropy was discovered in the study of steam machine motion, as a product of gaseous heat; which is ONLY one of the three states of matter:

Gas (entropy state) < liquid (balanced state) > Crystal-solids (information state).

So it is obvious that the laws of kinetic gases are entropic but it is absurd to expand them to the whole of Nature, by simply ‘eliminating’ from philosophical analysis the other two arrows. And the same happened when in an astounding ‘hyperbole’ Helmothz from the ‘military culture of Germany’, expanded it to the Universe, affirming it was dying and further more, Gamow, a Nuclear-weapons maker affirmed the Universe was always and only a ‘gas-like expansive state’, again reducing the three arrows of the Universe; so well resumed in Einstein’s awesome equation: E=CCM, which he inferred in fact from the inverse arrow of informative, accelerated vortices of mass information, in his landmark: can mass be created out of entropy? So in this formula we have again the three arrows:

Entropic expanding intergalactic space E< c²≈st constant wave of light space-time > M Imploding masses and charges (galaxies)

And yet again, physicists and western cultures just used it to make entropic bombs and declare the Universe had only a similar big-bang exploding arrow.

There is here the side of dogma, and repetition and the believers memorial nature of the human mnd. As 1/2 of mankind believe that a bronze age donkey-breeder tribe who saw a bush burning, understood the meaning of the Universe (Abrahamic religions) and react offended to any attempt to ‘reasoning’ historically this hallucination, just because the word ‘god’ is sacred; 1/2 of them believe the Universe is in a permanent state of entropy, dismissing the other so evident, experimentally, arrows of time, proper of all the generator equations of all systems of nature.

There is nothing though you can do to change a ‘believer’s mind’. In religion is called dogma, in science ‘first postulates’, which always show on the long term to be partial, ceteris paribus, analysis of the whole ternary reality. So for example, euclidean flat space turned out to be one of the three possible geometries of reality, because it was a postulate.

And an entropic Universe shows to be both in space and time one of the three parts of it. So in EFE (Einstein’s equations) the three solutions, steady state, big bang and big crunch are the equivalent processes in time to the three parts in space, and we will see that beautiful time-space symmetry soon).

In that sense, we can say that the entropic postulate of a single arrow of time is a product of the white western male war oriented culture and its manifest destiny, throughout the whole history of the western world, opposed to the dualist and ternary cultures of the west. So we can now introduce a historic view of those cultures, because its postulates today pass as science, and are by no means scientifically proved by experimental evidence, which shows a ternary Universe always.

So we shall use exactly what we have proved – the ternary only topologies of the Universe and its three space-dimensions/time functions, to the racial make-up of mankind, since as it happens is the origin of a new of the many sub-sciences derived of gst that studies…

i-logic, TERNARY TIME: WHOLES: 3 PARTS & 3 X3+0 DIMENSIONS

Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of paths, S, T or ST to act or no to act (-1 action), with equal probabilities. is to map out a new existential ilogic (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 -1 possibilities.

Why the Universe has 3 positive ternary actions (and a negative, passive no-action) is self evident:

-1: The mind might merely observe and stops motion (•),.

+3: Yet the system might evolve towards higher entropy (+ST, higher information (+St) or might reproduce its space-time in repetitive cycles, which on the long term will become a larger ‘whole’ (∆).

So the existence of 4 elements, ∆•ST, 3 of increasing motion along the 3 paths of space-time (S, st, ∆st) and one of growing stillness (•), implies a more complex logic with 4 potential actions for each bifurcation of past-present into the future.

Of course, if we were to study a ‘fresh beginning’, the probabilities of those futures would be the same. But as the Universe is a game of memorial, informative motions, it follow that as the game proceeds, the future paths become determined by the long cyclical causality of individual actions and past cycles to be completed into the future.

So while paths do have a possibility to be modified without expenditure of energy, closed time cycles impose their ‘inertia’ and so the perfect potential ‘fourks’ of space-time (four point forks). The image is meaningful: as always we have a ‘lineal, entropic knife’; an informative, cyclical ‘spoon’ and an ∆•ST, 4-dimensional fork to both cut and form the food in present space-time. And you would choose, if given a single pick, the fork precisely because it can cut laterally and it can scoop the food. Everywhere the rules of GST will enlighten ‘why things are as they are’; and the causes of the past or the fourkations of the future will be ternary±1.

The causal ‘bifurcations of timespace’ thus are now ‘fourkations’ of space-time. And so the extraordinary one-dimensionality of human minds and its languages are out of meaning. Those arduous arguments between wannabe geniuses sponsoring their ‘point of single view’ as the real cause must cease. Ceteris paribus is simplification. For a being to exist, for a cause to act, for an event to happen in fact it will be because 3 past causes have converged to form a whole time-space ternary symmetry. Think of your actions, when you move, the mind first ‘thinks’ in the motion; the body then provides the energy; the limbs convert it into entropy. It would seem there is only one cause to action, the motion of the legs, but actually 3 actions converged in a ‘dharma of time-space’ to make it happen. Yet for the non-action only the mind is needed to stop action; which therefore is an ‘easier path’.

So the languages we use to portray that process are naturally different from the classic ones. And unlike analysis so close to the social scales of GST and fractals & topology, essentially ‘the’ spatial science of the fractal Universe, algebra as it is understood today, is basically a synoptic way to deal with topological and analytical theorems. And its proper structures, sets and groups must be understood as expressions of our social groups and ITERATIVE, MOVING laws, based in symmetries, transformations and motions through ‘polynomial scales’. But as the language is so different, we rather start afresh and include as we go along the main field worthy of classic algebra, which is NOT sets but group theory.

Temporal, Æxistential ilogic, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory. Still it is worth to remember the basic elements of Algebra and its equivalence.

The ternary operandi of Æ… and its symmetry with ∆ST elements.

Actions and its causes are thus the ultimate inquire of existential ilogic. Why and how motions of space-time happen. And what is the formal way to define them?

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of classic algebra, such as group theory, with so many practical cases in science, which translate the TSymmetries and motions through ∆-scales, is the nature of existential ilogic and the different equations of motions and species creations, through those motions and actions, which always render a certain ‘syntax’:

Past ‘Operandi’ Future= present.

The operandi between past and future, entropy and information, thus define what kind of present space-time event or entity appear to us. Because we have 4 elements to define existence, operandi are many, not only a simple ± symbol to ad or rest the same type of beings or motions, as when physicists study only locomotions and reduce all to a Hamiltonian ± operandi between the two O-potential and |-kinetic ‘states’ of form-entropy.

So each motion of time will have a different ‘algebraic operandi’, departing from our initial ‘Universal Grammar’.

We shall consider in this introduction the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are:

Locomotion: Hamiltonian (Entropic, kinetic Past motion ± Future, Potential motion = Present (superposition motion of waves).

Reproduction: Past (field) x Future (information) = Present (iteration)

And the rule is simple, from classic algebra: a superposition or sum is of the same ‘species’; hence ‘energies (time-like)’ or ‘momentums’ (space-like), etc.

A Product can however combine different species. So it is normally a motion, which involves a space and time-like parameters:

Reproduction mixes the ST and St, different ‘genders’.

Finally, the 3rd mode of algebraic equations, polynomials/logarithms, correspond to the ∆-scale of growth or diminution.

So again we find an immediate relationship between the 3 elements of reality, S or T, ST and ∆ST, in its growing complexity and the 3 basic operandi of algebra, sum, product and polynomials.

What about the more complex scalar ‘motions’ of space-time? They are not that simple, as they combine elements of the pure ones. But as all ternary, Universal grammars, the complexity is born of the iteration of those elementary motions:

Evolution is a change in the topology of a system, so essentially a process of space-time morphological in-form-ative change better described with topological elements.
Growth and diminution involves reproduction and evolution of topological form and its inverse.
Birth and extinction represent an ∆±1 change, combined with an ∆T increase of information or a loss of it all ∆S, which are often expressed with logarithmic scales.

And so most motions involve both a Past to future, ∆+1, social evolutionary arrow accompanied with changes in topology. And as such are pure ‘GST’ Ælgebraic motions, better described with the formalism of Æ and its symbols S>T, T<<S, ∑∆-1 Λ ∆… and so on.

Since in its most general form, algebra is the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating these symbols; the definition holds. And as algebra is a unifying thread of almost all of classic mathematics, so happens with Ælgebra.

In that regard, classic algebra (we shall call arithmetics) includes everything regarding those 3 operations, ±, x, % and log, x². And its symmetry as we have seen is immediate.

While modern algebra deals with the study of abstractions such as groups, rings, and fields; sets and Boolean algebras; and categories and elements… So we can subdivided Æ in 3±1 age subfields:

Birth: the study of æ proper (existential equations).

Youth: of classic polynomial equations or arithmetics (S,t; st and ∆ systems in its interaction).

Maturity: of abstract structures, or algebra proper concerned, with group theory (the internal social structures of the Universe).

Old age: of inflationary information (set theory and other ‘weird’ algebras)

Extinction: the transference from human minds to digital minds (computer algebra, boolean algebra)

∆@st of space-time and its limits in space, time, ∆-scales and mind perception.

So space-time is always in its whole ‘plenum beings’ made of 3 elements, which in topology, are called:

-St: the singularity or monad-mind in its centre of maximal communication

-Ts: the membrane or limiting, hard entropic circular system that encloses

-ST: the space-time much larger reality that mixes lineal expansive outer membranes and internal singularities:

ALL systems of physics and biology and sociology show the same ternary elements: the membrane singularity and space-time between them.

In the graph physical systems, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics to gravitational gradients, charges in physics, have the 3 parts. In biology they are cellular protein membranes and nuclei and cytoplasm, skins and brains and organs. In sociology they are national borders and capitals, and the internal territory. In non-euclidean geometry (right side, the inner parts cannot reach the membrane, and so it appears as a relative infinity, and the central singularity (A point), connects with all the points within the membrane, as its focus of information. It is that constant interaction between membrane and singularity what moods the internal vital space of energy/momenta, of the being.

In physics all Maxwell’s laws can be deduced from the existence of an external circular membrane (magnetism). So happens in gravitation, (orbits which ‘scan a bidimensional aerolar surface). And all systems will be centred in a singularity (attractive vortex, charge).

Moreover we shall see that TIME has also those limiting membranes (death) and informative centres (seeds of information at birth).

And the scalar Universe will have also those non-E unreachable limits, (Universal Constant limits of c-speed and To temperature).

All this is the essence of topology that defines an ‘open ball’ as the space-time volume limited by a central singularity and an external membrane, which are NOT perceivable, included within the open ball.

So the concept of finite infinities, limiting membranes in space, time (birth-death) and scales (limiting unreachable constants of maximal information and maximal extension) are essential to understand formally and logically the Universe.

We are limited in time by the birth-death finite enclosure of our world cycle of existence, in space by the skin/membrane that breaks space-time into us; and in the scales of size of the ‘5th dimension’ by the increasing ‘blurred uncertainty and dark spaces’ which limits our perception of them beyond the ∆±3 scales of atoms and galaxies.

And so we are also limited in the knowledge the mind might acquire of all the information of the universe, which only a being holds about itself, making ‘absolute truth’, 1, in terms of probability, only ‘existing’ in the being in itself.

Those four limits of birth and death, of absolute seeds of information (seminal seed) and entropy (explosive death); of singularity (the mind of information) and membrane (the skin) in space; of organisation above and below, in ∆±1 levels; and in knowledge provided by the limits of the language are essential to any understanding of man as a limited being, in a ∞ universe, but man does not recognize those limitS. Hence the astounding arrogance of scholars, scientists, dogmatic axiomatic methods of ‘truth’ (Hilbert in mathematics, which still denies Godel’s incompleteness theory). And the result of course is that you have a human astounding ego, who thinks to be so special, so unique, so unlimited, so galactic and Universal and YET IT IS SO IGNORANT. And all what it does is to hold its pretension of infinity.

The decametric tetrarkys scale: 3 x 3 +o = 10. ∆-1: THE 10 DIMENSIONAL INNER PERSPECTIVE.

Pythagoras as Plato latter said that numbers are forms, as they were in the earlier age of mathematical geometry, where a number was a group of points, whose form mattered. So he realized 10 was the perfect number, because of its perfect form.

And indeed the internal structure of any being reaches its perfect efficiency with a 3 x 3 +0-mind symmetry of form and function; where each part-number performs one of the 3 physiological entropy, energy, information jobs of the system and the central mind-number in contact with them all coordinates its functions.

‘The universe is written in the language of geometry, lines, spheres and triangles’. Galileo had a point – all reductionist views of reality are indeed half-truths. But in this case it is a huge truth.

The languages of the Universe are mainly 3, Topology, the most advanced form of geometry with a ‘bit of inner motion’, which describe the 3 ‘timespace’ only forms of reality – hence the determinism of topological evolution and the awesome capacity to describe it all with the ternary generator of those 3 topologies.

Regarding triangles, intuitively humans both in earlier religion of words (Judaism) and Pythagorean religions of the number, were considered the ‘tetraktys’ and symbol of the ‘tetragrammaton’ (graph) – the symbol of it all.

As the 3 topologic organs of all systems (lineal, toroid limbs/fields; hyperbolic, body-waves & spheric, informative head-particles, shown in the graph, which need only a little imagination to convert into a woman’s body – first surface, a leg, second, and a head 3rd one), suffice to create reality.

Yet as all ‘is scalar’, all subdivides into ‘ternary fractal sub-elements’. So to include the co-existence in the 5th dimension of parts and wholes, we can immediately subdivide the 3 topologies into 3 ‘sub-elements’ and put them in each of the corners of the tetraktys/tetragrammaton; while the central point, which is perfectly connected to all others, is the soul-mind-0-point, 10th dimension – the system that is apperceives the whole, connects its and tries to preserve it, through the world cycle of being.

So we also talk of 10 inner dimensions or ‘sub-systems’, represented by a tetraktys; which subdivide the 3 physiological networks into 9:.

In the graph, each 3 corners are sub-systems of ‘Information, entropy/motion and Energy/reproduction’ put together by a central 10th dimension (the black ball/hole/point/knot that messes with all of them). Indeed the central point of the ideal tetraktys communicates with all the other parts and embodies the whole that ’emerges’ as a point in a higher ∆+1 world.

Thus we talk of the ‘subsystems’ of a being.

For example, a human being is defined in medicine as a system of cells, attached by 10 sub-systems:

In the upper left graph the 3 ST-ructural sub-systems of the human body, which are its structural forms (membrane, sustain and motion).

In the bottom the 3 ‘chemical St’ systems or hormonal brain (creative, distributive and reproductive)

In the middle the 10th system (nervous system)

And in the upper right 2 of the 3 ‘ST Subsystems lymphatic, digestive (not portrayed the urinary/excretor system)

(The reader should get accustomed to the ‘taste’ of GST which is the homologic, isomorphic method, of putting always a physical, biological and socio-economical example of the 3 main sub-disciplines of knowledge to show the unity of it all as we illustrate reality).

Alas, the growth in the ‘5th dimension of scales’ happen through 10 dimensional ‘social organisation’.

Thus the previous graphs of Eames’ ‘Powers of 10’ is also the game of social existence.

Since it is also the number of quanta of space-time needed either in frequency or in population (spatial organic or temporal world cycle view of a system), either through time or space to create a new social scale (ab. §) that ‘becomes a new larger functional whole’ able to apperceive and process entropy-motion, informative forms and combine them through the ‘3rd corner’ to ’emit seminal’ reproductive particles, coordinated by the central whole.

Let us though then, once this is understood depart from reductionist ‘mathematical physics’ , and realise that what truly matters is organic function, not the triangular form, beyond the obvious fact it is the most perfect ‘packed’ functional way to put 10 elements together.

So when we study specific species what we shall see is that ‘fractal points’ of space-time (beings) gather through networks of entropy, information and reproduction (in man, the digestive: sT, blood, st, Head, St systems, which define our physiological structure), into a being. So humans in medicine are defined by 3 x 3 ±¡ sub-systems to which fractal points≈ cells attache themselves. This is the essential formal way to study in detail beings: through its 10 sub-dimensions of being; which for the whole known Universe would look like.

@-MINDS: TRILOGIC OF MIND PERSPECTIVES

The organic whys of the Universe:

In the graph, the geometrical perception from ∆º, the human self-centred perspective (ab.pov) differs from the way we perceive information from the upper scale, seen as an only attractive gravitational vortex of future time-masses (relativity theory, equivalence principle) from the perspective of an elliptic geometry that reduces the size of the whole masses by speeding up its perception as motion.

In the left side the perception of lower scales is a lovacheski’s geometry, which multiplies the whole in its self-similar parts to get to the infinitesimal, which is the ‘piece’ on the membrane of the border o the whole, such as Sti=∑ST-1, the infinitesimal components of the membrane. Thus quantum and relativity descriptions of upper and lower scales differ

The Universe evolves from simple light space-time into particles, that gather socially into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, organisms, and social super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies and universes. Such scale means in mystique terms that the Universe ‘loves’ and wants members of the same species to evolve socially into larger wholes that survive better than individuals.

The fifth dimension of space-time (physical concept), the laws of evolution of ‘SPECIES’ (not individuals) into more successful social systems (ants and humans being the most successful animals precisely because of its social evolution) and THE LOVE messages of prophets=historians of the future, who express the law of eusocial love in human verbal terms to make humans understand that survival means to evolve together into a global super organism, UNO/EU style are just expressions of the same Universal law. And this indeed the stuff of this blog: to prove that departing from the simple principles of time, space and social organic evolution we can explain it ALL including sciences, arts and religions and deduce from those simple laws all the equations, events and species of the Universe.

And so this is the Universe in a nutshell, cracked to see its core, what Einstein called ‘the thoughts of God’. Since indeed the rest, all of us space-time beings are ‘its details’; which important as they are, we study with ‘stiences’ (sciences of space-time beings), each one dedicated to the analysis of the species of one ‘scale’ of size of that fractal Universe of growing space-time wholes. So what the blog will do is to explain the ‘thoughts of god’ in the first line in a more discursive, easy way; formalising those principles on the second line, to connect them mathematically, organically and logically with all the laws of equations of ‘stiences’, scale by scale in the 3rd line.

Since all what exists has mathematical=spatial properties, (S), logic, casual, temporal properties (T), co-exist at least in 3 ‘organic’ planes of parts and wholes, your inner cellular world, your individual being and the larger world in which you exist (∆±1) and finally do have a ‘mind-point’ (•), whose ‘languages of information’ stored in cyclical logic patterns, perform the actions of energy and time that ensure the balance and survival of the being, by first mapping out the ∞ universe in the small infinitesimal mind of the being, and then acting on that mapping searching for entropy of motion, energy for its body-wave and information for its mind-particle.

IN THE GRAPH, the different geometries looking upward into the elliptic less informative whole, and downwards into the more informative multiple cellular side. YET those systems behave euclidean, ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆-1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’ in a hyperbolic path to the ∆-1 scale.

The symmetries between the three scales, topologies and time functions of the whole system commanded by a first center, 10th dimensional soul of will º∆º (a mind in the ∆º-self centred scale), gives us the 3×3±1 fundamental elements we must play to re-create reality.

Since, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.

Mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply 1 into ∞ similar forms. They are the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance difficult to bend. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: inflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d.

So opposing those ‘ego-trips’ there is scientific realism, which this blog will further evolve (Aristotle, Leibniz and Einstein beings its most outstanding AUTHORS), and reasons that reality must be made of the ultimate substances we observe IN reality, which are NOT phonemes and numbers, nowhere to be seen IN REALITY but space and time, and hence by evolving our concepts of vital spaces and time durations, we shall be able to extract properties common to all beings, even though they will be partially distorted by the mind-mirrors (verbal time logic and spatial mathematics) we human use to describe them.

So the key to increase our understanding of reality IS first to understand space and time and its properties, THEN, evolve our logic of verbal time and our topology of spatial mathematics to match those properties and focus better our mirror, and finally, to apply the improved mathematical-verbal logic mirrors to create organic better models of all sciences that happen in time and space, interpreting better the equations of sciences and solve with those models and improved mirrors the data we gather about reality, on which present science clearly excels (but drags behind problems of creationism and lack of understanding and evolution of mathematics).

In the transition from the age of human dominance to the age of computer dominance as the mind making science, which today increasingly is just a process of feeding data into computer models without any search for the whys and principles that unify reality, the earlier founding fathers of physics and economics mixed both creationist theories. So biblical fetish go(l)d religions became classic economics where money, a digital language of information substituted verbal laws in the ruling of western societies, and Kepler like Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him the laws of gravitation felt themselves equal to God, their chosen digital masters. And so when Newton died, Pope told us: And God created Newton and light was born.

Universal grammar of different trinity languages

Important to that development of Biological sciences, (and all other sciences) would be to know the formal, ‘diffeomorphic’ symmetries between the aforementioned ‘3 dimensions of space, 3 dimensions of time, and 3 dimensions of social evolution’ which together form a whole 10D being (cell, organism or species):

Finally we arrive to social sciences, and here, we have the lesser development in their understanding of what is man and how man

Since the key to fully grasp the Universe resides in the understanding of those dimensions.

3 of them are well known, as they are ‘evident’, spatial:

– X, the dimension of length, Y, the dimension of height and its product, Width, Z.

The next 3 are hinted at, but are not so ‘evident’ as they are temporal:

– Past, the dimension of energy; Present, the iterative, reproductive dimension, that repeats an entity and hence seems not to change; and future the dimension of information.

Now the first ‘symmetry’ both physicists and biologists ignore is that between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 of time. Since:

Length is the dimension of energy and pure motion, as the line is the shortest distance between two points, and so it is the dominant dimension of young species and young individuals that ‘move a lot’.

– In the sample case we wanted to illustrate (the relationship between morphology and evolution in species), all species are born as ‘long’ flat forms. The first fishes were long, flat sharks; the first species were flat worms; the first earth-bounded animals were flat amphibian.

– Height is the dimension of information, as a tall position is an advantageous point of view of perception, as ‘projective geometry’ shows. So in social sciences we all know politicians and priests go up into a pulpit, and informative machines have tall antennas to distribute information and screens are flat, high forms.

And so are gravitational black holes in the center of galaxies that rule it with gravitational forces of in-formation that form the galaxy. And so on.

So in the biological case we study, life has on the whole evolved from a flatworm to a tall human being. And in each species the same process takes place, so Flat sharks flip their body into the perpendicular dimension of fishes, flat amphibian ended up becoming tall dinosaurs and birds, and mammals become bipedal.

Finally width, the product of the other two dimensions is the dimension of cellular reproduction, and so bodies grow in the width dimension and stars accumulate into a width, spiral dimensions, and Maxwell’s rule of thumb make any student understand that the combination of the ‘energetic’ and informative, magnetic and electric fields create a perpendicular dimension.

And light is an existential being with 3 ‘perpendicular’ axis, where in this particular case, the magnetic, electric and, speed axis are in a diffeomorphic perpendicular dimension to each other, each of them with an energetic, informative and reproductive function.

So the reader will notice again that as in the case of physics, knowing the ‘nature’ of the Game of existence and the meaning and symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and its 3 functions in time helps a lot to understand the whys of reality. As it did, in the previous example the understanding of the symmetry between the 3 ages of time and the 3 social scales from cellular birth into individual and finally into a social being.

So we shall now write those 3 ‘symmetries’ between the 3 type of dimensions of the Universe, because they encode the whys of infinite particular events in time and forms in space we observe in nature:

Past-youth-energy (Time D.) <=> Length (Space D.) <=> Cellular scale Dimension

Present-Reproductive-repetitive (Time D.) <=> Width <=> Individual Scale

Future-3^rd informative age (Time D.) <=> Height <=> Social Scale

Thus the final group of symmetries, besides those of time with space, and time with social scales, are those of space with social scales, such as social ‘scales’ and classes in organisms, are ‘non-democratic’, put on the relative dimension or gradient of height, intuitively understood in human languages. So we talk of the ‘upper, informative classes’, we talk of a ‘higher plane of existence’. And vice versa, we talk of the lower, energetic classes, ‘destroyed’ and ab=used by the upper ones, and the ‘middle, working class’. While in all systems in which a ‘force of energy and information’ dominates the system establishing a ‘gradient of existences’, a ‘chain of beings’, the different elements are put in relationship to that gradient, with the ‘dominant’ informative element, over the reproductive, middle one, and above the energetic system.

So we establish a simple hierarchy between the ‘3 organs of a system’ and its dimensions, with the informative system on top. And this also brings us a general rule which Einstein alone understood: the Universe is local, diffeomorphic, fractal, as the dimensions and functions of each organic part of a system are relative to ‘where’ it finds its energy and information.

The classic example in biology is the inverse orientation of animals and plants. Plants absorb their energy from light, and information from chemical atoms. So their ‘up’ is our down, that is, their roots are their heads. And their limbs, that feed on light energy, their ‘leaves’, are on top.

On the other hand animals absorb information from light, so their head are on top, inverse to those of plants, and they move with the electromagnetic repulsive energy of their feet, stomping on the floor, from where they also get their energy, by feeding on other animals and plants. So they have ‘reversed’ local ‘diffeomorphic’ dimensions of energy and information.

On the other hand, ‘herds’ and energetic groups of the ‘lower’ scales, tend to be democratic; that is, they organize themselves in the same plane of flat lengths. And then what matters is their inner ‘organization’, which brings about the discovery by the first geometers and mathematicians, the Greeks, of ‘numbers’ as efficient geometries, with the tetrarkys, a 10 dimensional number, as the perfect number. And indeed, from a vital perspective of the game, it is a perfect distribution, with 3 smaller triangles in each angle, specialized in ‘energetic’, informative and reproductive functions and a central communicative point, knot of all the others, which communicate and regulate them. Thus 10 is not only the number of ‘dimensions’ but it is also, the perfect number of ‘units’ to perform the complete game, allowing each central knot of the tetrarkys to ‘emerge’ as the whole, which regulates the rest of the system and becomes unit of a next social scale. And so geometric, ‘platonic’ solids do matter in the configuration of efficient species, but not in the ‘galaxy’ ruled by a ‘gradient force’ so much as in the microcosmic, atomic scales – so atomic configurations in crystals have regular forms. And again, as the triangle and its social form, the Hexagon are the most perfect 2 Dimensional configurations in a single plane, the cube, with a central point-atom and/or a centered atom in each face connecting the other 4, becomes the most regular form of crystallography. And it is a fact that only 3 atomic configurations, the 2 aforementioned cubes and the hexagon exists on metallic substances, as they are the most perfect geometric ‘numbers’ of the game.

Fact those which lead us to the next ‘great discipline’ of ‘Unification Theory’, the name I have been using for the general systems theory of the Universe, as a description of its 10 Dimensional beings, the ‘will or game of existence’ that all those 10D entities play.

This is the game of existence, the ‘syntax’ of Universe, which is the sum of all those 10 Dimensional beings, in its eternal life-death worldcycle motions.

The structure of that process of creation and destruction of beings is fractal.

That means the same laws ‘embedded’ on the Universal grammar of the highest order (10 Dimensional beings) are used to create any species of reality.

And all its languages.

So for example, we can reduce any human language that describes the game with its ‘syntactic equation’.

Let us put 3 examples of those languages, verbal thought, mathematics and music.

As Chomsky and others discovered all verbal sentences have the structure of the Universal Grammar:

Subject (Information being – human) < Action-verb: Exi >Object (energy of the human being).

That is: I(subject)< Exi (action) > E (Object).

All mathematical equations are of the form: X=Y, where normally, the functions represents an energy or informative function, or a ‘relative symmetry’ of those expressed between dimensions, which are transformed into each other, or any of the more complex equations of exchange of fluxes of energy and information between beings; while = the operandi explains that exchange.

So in physics, we describe most processes as actions of ‘energy’ and time.

Where time is related to information, since a clock ‘stores’ the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of tis cycles. So either we describe ‘time frequencies’ or its inverse function, T=1/ƒ, frequencies.

And so for example: E=Mc2, written in Planck’s notation as E=M(t), shows the fundamental equation of physics, an exchange or transformation of energy into ‘vortices of information’, masses and charges, which are ‘eddies’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

While in particle physics its fundamental equation, Boson < => Fermion, describes also an exchange and transformation of energy particles (bosons) into informative ones (particles). On the other hand, the ‘3 families’ of mass (3 families of quarks) represent the 3 ‘scales’ of growing mass of those vortices. And so on and so on…

So a fundamental task of the work of this scientist has been to translate all the knowledge of all the jargons of all sciences to the simpler laws of the Game of 10 dimensional existences, which is truly the ‘Unification Theory of science’, again not very difficult to understand but certainly far more complex and deep in meaning and enlightenment that any ‘God’s particle’ or ‘mere unification of forces’ (which in any case it is not possible, in the terms physicists search with its limited understanding of the dimensions of time and the scales of the Universe).

Finally the Universal Syntax, also applies to those ‘creations’ of the human mind, which we call artistic forms. Of them, the one that represents closer the game of existence as Schopenhauer understood is Music, a ‘temporal art’ which he deemed to express the ‘will of the Universe’.

And indeed, we can consider that Music has in its highest expressions (classic music):

– The dimensions of space, which are given by harmony.

– The dimensions of time, which are given by melody.

– The scalar dimensions, which are given by its scales.

And we can as in all other disciplines and ‘arts of creation’ – as we could define, God, the Mind of the Universe, as an artist in 10 dimensions; go into as much detail as we want, studying music or a biological or physical or social organism, with those laws.

For example, western music uses a diatonic minor and major scale, which put together, have 10 notes.

Now those notes are divided into whole note intervals divided by ‘sharp-flat’ notes, which all together describe precisely a life-death time cycle:

Birth in minor key, first sharp-flat divide, youth, divide, maturity, divide, old age and finalis.

And a good composer will play that scale and notes to provoke a series of ‘emotions’ as it describes a whole life-death cycle, through melody.

On the other hand the wider range of scales in music is given by the Piano, which encompasses 3 whole ‘scales’, and it is the rule of music that when we finish a scale, the ‘next note’ of the higher scale sounds exactly as the equivalent note of the lower scale (a do in lower or higher pitch sounds equally in harmony), as we have ‘emerged’ into a new scale.

Finally there are 3 types of instruments, of growing complexity, the rhythmic, percussion instruments, the melodic, wind instruments dominant in melody, and the strings, dominant in harmony.

So we start to find with this simple introduction to musical theory many of the ‘symmetries’ between the 3 ‘dimensions’ of each of the 3 ‘space, time and scale’ elements of reality.

It is not then surprising that the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.

∆¡≈1,2. HUMAN SYSTEMS

Gender diffeomorphism women are hyperbolic waves, men are entropic particles.

In a Universe made of an infinite number of time arrows that gather together into ‘complementary knots’ of Entropy and information, each being is a relative fractal Universe, which we call a ‘world’ or ‘space-time being’ that deploys its particular ‘directions of height-information’, ‘length-Entropy’ and ‘width-reproduction’, different from those of other beings. All those fractal Universes interact through its particular, ‘local’=diffeomorphic coordinates, which departing from a central Non-Euclidean Point of view, or relative ‘self’, establish the 3 relative, perpendicular, minimal dimensions of any fractal world that signal its arrow of Entropy, information and reproduction.

The first and most important emergence of properties of lower scales, is the emergence of the 3 axis through which the entity expresses departing from its point of view with ‘will’, the 3 arrows of informative perception, energetic motion and reproductive growth. The 4 arrow doesn’t need a four spatial dimension because it is the point of view, which uses an internal language and ‘algorithm’ of choice to alternate action in each of the 3 dimensions of spatial existence.

Thus there will be a point of view that directs the whole system, with the aim of achieving maximal reproduction, by switching between the arrow of informative perception and Entropy taking, in order to accumulate enough of it and reproduce more cells in the dimension of width/reproduction.

This happens in the two fundamental forms of the Universe:

The radial form, with the informative point in the center; which corresponds to forms dominant in information and minimal motion.

The bilateral, lineal form, with the head in the direction of motion, which corresponds to lineal energetic systems.

Most often though species can switch between both forms and they do so in rhythms of Ts->O, from the Ts(day)>O(sleep), extended>coiled position, to the 3 ages of galaxies which evolve from extended nebulae to implosive spirals that end up in a 3^rd globular age.

In the graph, 3 diffeomorphic beings and its relative arrows of Entropy and information: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information, pointing towards the central informative black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative/energetic dimensions are inverted. Since plants use light as Entropy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information from the sky, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorb chemical information.

Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as often happens between Entropy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Such Entropy/information, relative past/future inversions happen in all Universal systems. For example, they happen between a ‘particle’ and its ‘antiparticle’, which in a Feynman diagram have also inverted coordinates of space-time, as the antiparticle travels to the past. They also happen in mental, linguistic codes that represent that external reality. For example, eviL=death is the exact inverse word of Live. Since indeed, for a living human being, there is no bigger eviL than death.

Yet, death, a release of Entropy that kills is the inverse function of information, the arrow of life. So the linguistic, spatial inversion of words corresponds also to an inversion of time arrows – a fact that explains scientifically the biologic meaning of ethics. Since humanity, history and religion are a sociological space-time that obeys the same homological isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times. Thus each species establishes its own up and down arrows; its relative Entropy and informative directions, departing from that central knot of information, which is gauging and perceiving.

What classic science denies and system sciences proves is the reality of an existential will in that perceptive Ts=I Informative knot, which controls the entire organism and directs its search for ‘åctions’ that provide Entropy and information to the being. It is precisely the infinite number of Discontinuous, Non-Euclidean Points of View, what creates a general arrow of Information in the Universe that constantly reproduces the form of those entities and balances the arrow of continuous entropy, Entropy motions and expanding space, which physicists dogmatically consider the only arrow of the Universe.

According to the Principle of Correspondence, any new theory has to include the previous theories within it and solve the questions unresolved by all those previous theories. Since the XX C. theory of space-time is Relativity, it is unavoidable, to explain the Principle of Local Relativity from the perspective of the Time Arrows of each species.

Relativity establishes that in any point of the Universe the coordinates of the entity (the up and down, right or left directions) are different from those of any other point of the Universe, as they only depend on what happens in that local region of space/time. This is only possible if space/times are fractal, discontinuous, broken into infinite points of view that gauge and map the information of reality from its own perspective.

Relativity thus is at the core of the structure of the fractal reality and must be considered the right step into the process that has taken the knowledge of multiple space-times from Leibniz’s analysis of relational space-time to this book, which generalizes all those findings to all disciplines and species.

According to Relativity what happens in a point of space-time doesn’t affect what happens in other isolated, discontinuous point. Each space-time fractal is a Relative Universe=World in itself. Thus the isomorphisms of space-time apply locally to each fractal ‘species, superorganism or world’ that will reflect those isomorphisms in its own structure. We are local, ‘diffeomorphic’ species; our time-space coordinates are relative. Time wrinkles our vital space in the process of aging with different speeds, depending on our content of Entropy and information.

Hence the diffeomorphic principle also establishes different informative cycles – the multiple ‘clocks’ of Nature that show different speeds and locations. Yet since space is synonymous of Entropy and time synonymous of information, we can establish the local coordinates of space-time of each being by establishing its relative informative and energetic arrows – its relative body and head – using the invariant Isomorphisms and dimensions of all spaces and times, as long as we can localize the origin of those arrows; that is, the Non-Euclidean point of view, where the will of the Entity ‘exists’.

Some geometrical tips about the location of those points in any superorganism or world should guide researchers:

– The point will be a relative ‘unmoved’ Aristotelian God, cause of the motions of all the other elements of the organism.

– The point has the max. density of information and the max. number of connections with all the parts of the organism.

– The point is either in the center or top of the organic system.

– The point is a spherical or convex, informative shape.

Thus in a human being the point of maximal will is in the eye-brain system, on top, with spherical (eye) and convex (brain form), which has the maximal connections with the rest of the body (nervous axons), the maximal density of information and it is the part of the organism which maintains more often a still position (balanced by the negative sensation of vertigo.)

In a historic organism, the point will be the capital, most likely in the zone of maximal communication of the nation – a coastal port, like London, Amsterdam, Rome or Athens or a central city like Madrid, Moscow, Mexico.

In a cell the point is in the center, with max. DNA information. In a galaxy, the point is in the center, where a swarm of black holes control from its unmoved position the motion of stars.

Indeed, according to the ‘Diffeomorphic Principle of Relativity’, every fractal space-time is independent of all the others; since it has different spatial and informative orientations. Yet we can recognize its informative and energetic organs in relationship to each other, since both will respond to the opposite dimensions and morphologies of Entropy and information.

Those isomorphisms of geometry also allow us to study ‘dual’ complementary entities of Entropy and information (Bodies/Brains, fields of forces/particles, energetic victims/ predators), which will create complementary entities that last in time (organisms) or are Darwinian events where the larger, energetic victim is prey of the smaller, informative point.

In the graph, in biological species animals use light as information and so they are ‘informative’, smaller and faster than plants, which use light as Entropy and are ‘big, slow’ beings.

Thus plants are the relative Entropy of animals. Further on, since what it is Entropy for plants is information for animals, both species have opposite Entropy-time coordinates: plants have their brain upside down in their roots that ‘feel’ chemistry; while animals have their brain on top, looking at the light they use as information. In the cosmological scale stars are big, slower than black holes, which rotate faster and have cyclical height.

And the space-time equations of black holes are inverted to those of electromagnetic stars. And so stars are the relative Entropy that feeds and reproduces black holes, which seem to behave as ‘gravitational animals’, species that perceive gravitation as information, which guides its precise movements through the galaxy, in the same way animals perceive light as information. While plants perceive light as Entropy in the same way stars absorb gravitational space-time as Entropy, deforming it with their masses.

That cosmological homology defies the anthropomorphic myth that only humans perceive the information they gauge. That religious myth, which denies the sentient, intelligent nature of the Universe, is today a dogma of ‘mechanist science’. So it will not be easily accepted by the self-centered ‘Galilean paradox’ of Humans, who always will think to be the center of the Universe. And since science is a human endeavor, ‘enlightenment’ and respect for the sentient Universe will not happen soon. Yet only a theory that affirms the existence of will in all knots of information that control from its unmoved position reality explains the role of black holes in the galactic ecosystem.

The discontinuity and minuscule size of informative points, due to its opposite properties to those of space, makes them difficult to localize by science, and our incapacity to ‘perceive’ the internal mind/world of the point makes easier to deny them. Indeed, all mountains have a single point of discontinuity in its informative height.

And so you have also two single points of will in your complex visual/verbal I=eye-world: the nervous point that connects both eye-visions which determines your rhythm of space and time (the size we perceive as normal given by the eye vision and the rhythm of our human time, a second per thought, equal to the rhythm of perception of the eye, which winks every second); and a yet unknown cell, probably a Purdinke cell in the limbic system that defines our emotional åctions, the will of our body.

Those points are stillness, as it is in your eye, to ‘focus’ and create a map of linguistic information, which will guide the åctions of the point. And so a basic beat of the Universe appears in all systems; a rhythm of:

Stillness (perception) ->action(motion searching Entropy/form)

For example, in Relativity, this dual beat explains the Michelson experiment, without the need for the never proved postulate of a limit of c-light speed in the Universe, today clearly shown false by experimental evidence (non–local gravitation, quasars expelling matter at 10 C, dark Entropy flows, quantum tunneling, the spooky effect of entanglement, etc.). In classic relativity this limit was needed because classic physicists considered that the electron was in motion when it emitted light, and so they had to add the speed of the electron and the speed of light. In fractal relativity the electron ‘stops’ when it emits information (the light frequency) then moves and so motions do not add since when the electron emits information is always in the particle/still/informative state.

And so the Postulate of a c-speed limit is not required. This dual stop and go process is also evident in film: the celluloid stops to let pass the light and create an image in the screen even if we perceive it in constant motion by adding all the stills, as we add from the human point of view, all the stops and goes of the electron that emits the light observed in the Michelson experiment in a single flow of motion.

The existence of an information arrow explains also the paradox of informative, evolving, life species in a Universe that seems in energetic expansion:

If we are external to a certain diffeomorphic space-times its directions do not affect us, but if we are inside a certain space-time, as in the case of the galaxy, then the direction of information or Entropy of that macro-being becomes the direction of Entropy or information of our ecosystem.

Indeed, there is more information in the center of the galaxy, and since the Earth moves towards that center, this planet increases its information towards the future in its relative discontinuous galactic space-time, regardless of what happens in the Universe as a whole, which seems to be ruled by the opposite arrow of big-bang expansion and entropy. This subtle change of paradigm caused by the discontinuity of space-time (from a world ruled by entropy to a galaxy ruled by information) has in fact enormous consequences to our daily life and explains the contradiction between the arrow of life and evolution, local to this planet, and the arrow of Entropy and entropy proper of the intergalactic space.

Since here in this galaxy space doesn’t expand but time-information contracts it through the ‘will’ of informative black holes of mass and in this planet, through the ‘will’ of living beings. As Woody Allen put it in Annie Hall: ‘Brooklyn is not expanding^’. I recall to ask Mr. Hawking in a conference at the Astronomy Institute of Madrid this same question, when at seventeen I was starting to doodle with the first principles of Multiple Spaces-Times Theory: ‘why space is not expanding between you and me?’ He wondered for a minute or so and responded ‘next question’.

Einstein had only to go a step further in his analysis of the curvature of time, closing times into cycles that return to its origin. Then time becomes multiple, one for each closed cycle and the space-time continuum becomes the sum of all the vital space-times of each knot of Time Arrows. Einstein hinted at it when he affirmed that time was local, ‘diffeomorphic’ and had ‘different speeds’ and the universe had ‘infinite clocks of time’. Indeed, each of those local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creates masses and forces of in-form-ation that establish a 2^nd arrow for the Universe, besides the arrow of Entropy/entropy – the arrow of fractal information. Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create its broken form.

Recap. There are ∞ fractal space/time fields that constantly adapt their organic, moving dimensions to the directions of their relative Entropy and temporal information, conditioning the existence of its micro-cells; and so the galaxy conditions the arrows of time of its cellular sun and human beings of maximal information; while plant which obtain only Entropy of the sun have inverted parameters to those of animals.

Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$

The pivotal disomorphism that connects the o-1 time sphere of palingenesis or 1st closed world cycle of perfect existence and the 2nd 1- life in the open world cycle of entropic ages, is the concept of the individual, made from the emergence of 3 networks, as a member of a species, which differentiate primarily by the topological order of those 3 physiological networks that give birth to 3!=6 basic permutations according to the hierarchy of those scales of which we shall as usual put just one example for each grouping of scientific scales (phyla of life, typological linguistics and particle variations).

THE 6th disomorphism thus is connected closely in a trilogic triad to the 3 networks, or inner world of the individual and the process of emergence when relating it to the ∆-1 plane.

However when considering its life in the ∆+1 plane, it connects directly with the 7th and 8th disomorphisms of its world cycle either as as an individual that goes through 3±¡=2 ages, between conception and resurrection or 9² internally life cycles, while its existence in the outer world in space connects it with the social decametric scales that evolves it into a larger plane or superorganism, and with its ∆±4 planes in which it performs its 5 Dimotions=actions of life, the aeiou, of its program of existence.

Thus the individual-species is the pivotal isomorphism of the 11th series, along the seed-mind, or 0-1-11 element that also co-exists internally and externally. Both concepts peg together the scales of the Universe.

We shall thus in this post define summarily species and put examples of its permutations into phyla for the 3 sub-disciplines of science.

What are species? Its variations. Physiological networks and gender.

In the graph, spheres are the topology that holds the maximal volume of information; hence all ‘time space’ systems that process information are spherical particle-heads. Flat, lineal topologies are the topology that connects in the shortest path two points; so to reach/move faster, systems have lineal/flat moving potentials/limbs. Finally the third type of geometry, hyperbolic topology, is complex enough to store all other possible forms, so best to reproduce and all iterative body waves that generate the other 2 forms are hyperbolic. This mathematical-spatial truism holds for 2, 3 and 4 dimensions; hence establishing basic restriction to the construction and evolution of forms. And should become in XXI c. science the ‘missing’ leg of topological, biological and physical evolution to explain the extraordinary efficiency and homology between forms (no longer analogy, since all those forms derive from the same ‘substance’, space with time=motion or ‘topology’). In the next graph, we can see how the 3 only topologies of the Universe ensemble to form physical, biological and social organisms, all of them with a spherical ‘tall’ dimension to gauge information; a wide, iterative dimension of hyperbolic bodywave reproduction and a flat, direction for its entropic motions. The beauty of the topological Universe is that each of those 3 forms can be ‘deformed’ and ‘moves’, as long as it doesn’t tear (break). So departing from such simple 3 basic forms there are infinite possible variations of species, but we can order them all with that ternary principle.

The Universe is about 3 type of Networks which gather entropy, energy and information for herds of similar beings that form organs attached to those networks. It follows that to classify beings we must consider the order of those networks, its hierarchy and relationships, which will give way to 3×2 combinatory variations by hierarchical order of species – those dominated by the informative or entropic or reproductive network.

This simple rule of 3 variations and 6 hierarchical orders are the origin of most species of all systems of nature. We study them in this post.

The answer is surprisingly simple, when we consider its main phyla, and the origin of this ‘Disomorphism’, which belongs to variations in the HIERARCHY between its ternary physiological networks. So above we express that dynamic order, as there are only 3 physiological networks that correspond to the 3 dominant elements of reality, Space, time and vital energy, or in terms of the generator, if we call:

$t – the Ðimotion of lineal potentials/limbs; ST, the iterative Ðimotion of body waves and §ð the Dimotion of informative particle/heads, the dominance of the 3 physiological networks that perceive information, move and reproduce the system will give us 6 main variations/phyla, which we shall show allow us to classify from the 6 topological types of languages that define the mind of cultures, to the 6 main phyla of animal in the different scales of reality, to the different species of particles; when combined with the second fundamental differentiation of reality, ‘gender’, that is, the dominance of informative or energetic parts in a simpler ‘dual system’ made of two components (body-head, particle-wave), whereas the limbic/potential is external to the system.

Species as super organisms.

The second fundamental truth we must learn about species is its Nature as super organisms of the higher scale of the individual, which is quite evident when we understand the ternary topology of the Universe, and how its lineal limbs, hyperbolic body waves and informative particle-heads evolve, towards higher information in 3 ages, and finally die into entropy, while its informative memorial leftovers leave a trace in the outer world. So happens with species that go through 3 ages that mimic the 3 ages of life in the upper ∆+1 plane of existence and then become extinct, or a few of them with maximal information evolve into a larger super organism (ant-hills, human beings) that become ‘a new plane of existence’ beyond the individual: ] Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Einstein realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet

Species can be treated as super organisms, loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.

The 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: in the graph the big bang black hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal and mammal, the horse and the 1st technological, small human. All of them followed the basic S-T beat of evolutionary rhythms, as they are born in small ‘forms’, which have ‘faster time cycles’, hence evolve faster, and then they grow in size in its first age, slow down, reproduce massively in space and finally diversify according to the ternary and dual rhythms into new species.

However the species does NOT control its external absolute space-time ‘world’, and this is what the next graph shows. As it is the absolute space-time in which the species exist, and specifically ITS commands of the LANGUAGES OF INFORMATION of the world, which defines its survival chances. As informative perception starts all the chains of actions (∆o-bserver->∆a-ccelerated-motion->∆e-nergy feeding->∆iteration->∆universals eusocial evolution).

So the species which better speaks the language of the ecosystem survives better. Hence the first eyes (cephalopods) extinguished most cambric species and started the radiations of species; the first speakers, homo sapiens extinguished all others; and today the chip radiation of mathematical species is simply speaking extinguishing life and making humanity obsolescent, even if we are not conscious of it.

Since as information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle, the species that last longer are those who evolve further information, and can become a social super organism.

So species follow 3±∆i ages with its final social evolution into a new whole, communicated by the informative language evolved in its 3rd age or extinction in time. Let us consider in this introduction those 3±¡ ages of species, called Horizons:

The 3 ages of time also brings the solution to the ‘limits’ of evolution, which Darwin already wondered: why certain species evolve so fast into complex forms as eyes and wings. Answer, because there are only 3 topologies to go, and so the choices are random but LIMITED and it is every easy to go the right way. In the next graph we see those 3 ages of evolution as species can be treated as super organisms with its own world cycles:

The graph thus show that ALL species follow also the young, predator, reproductive radiation, and informative, height growth of the 3 ages of life, and then either they evolve further into social organisms (ants, bees, humans) and as wholes in a higher ∆+1 scale survive better, or they become extinct by a new generation.

The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.

+1: Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).

The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.

For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.

I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions

In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators

A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.

Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.

II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Ts x St. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. St: max. Evolutionary differentiation.

Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.

The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.

Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.

– (±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.

Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Ts: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.

– S=T: Diversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.

However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.

– Max. St: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.

Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Ts) which defines the organism.

Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.

The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: ST=∑st-1.

Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.

Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.

Thus 3 types of ‘cellular networks’ that evolution has differentiated in time, in 3 specialized ‘organic classes and networks’ as energetic bodies, informative Heads and reproductive organs in biological, physical and sociological sciences follow the ternary plan of creation. Since those 3±1 horizons of existence happen between the birth and death of any species, mapping out both for physical species, born out of the big-bang explosion of a black hole; and for biological species, since the first carbohydrate, the evolution of life from the atom to the human being.

– Extinction: Yet if species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into macro-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution. So today 90% of insects are social insects; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became organelles of social, eucaryotic super-cells.

So evolution is indeed limited by the most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: those 3 timespace motions/forms: lineal motion in space or ‘distance’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time clocks carrying its frequency ‘information’ and its space-time, wave-like, reproductive energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe (when we ad its scales), so they assembly forming all space-time beings.

SPECIES IN SPACE – PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS

Species also can be considered by the Rashomon effect, from the point of view of space and then as they are ternary physiological networks, with attached organs, we can study its hierarchical variation, giving origin to phyla of different species in simultaneous space.

So we talk in all ‘families of species’ of 6 basic differentiations IN SPACE:

Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$

AND 3±1 ages of social evolution or extinction in time.

The families are written by the dominance of one of the 3 ‘topological networks’=organs=dimotions of time§pace of the system are named generically as:

$t-∑∏-§ð: Top predator, first species to be born.

The predatory, feeding phyla belongs to the first type of species evolved. For example, the first fishes were flat carnivorous armed; the first carbohydrates long fats, lineal chains of amino acids. It is a species so successful that radiates in enormous numbers.

∑∏-$t-§ð; So next after its dexterity in hunting is proved we shall find a second phyla, master of reproduction. Such is the case of sharks, the final top predator fish, which are viviparous unlike other fishes, reaching its maximal perfection. So what this ‘first phyla’ lacks is a well developed brain, showing however that intelligence, when not used for social information is mostly baren, useless. In the example of the protein we also observe that it is a master of reproduction, having controlled ribosomes to that aim in cells that reproduce millions of them.

∑∏-§ð-t$, $t-§ð-∑∏. Yet as time moves on, ‘warping lineal spacetime into cyclical forms’, there is an increasing new value for the informative element, which keeps gathering pace till becoming the protagonist of the system. While the feeding elements that have reached its maximal possible evolution, since entropic systems are simple and reach easily a perfect form – the sword of the warrior has not evolved in 5000 years… and the ecosystem saturates and reproductive radiations are no longer that relevant – what matters is to be able to compete and keep the new born in the fight for existence… So we find intermediate stages, where the networks tend to balance each other in the ‘classic age of the phyla’…

ð-∑∏-$t, §ð-$t-∑∏ Till finally those species where information has evolved further allow the gathering of individuals into social herds, which become a new whole. And that brings, a new plane of existence, and a new top predator ‘whole’ form in the ∆+1 plane that will re-start the whole diversification, from aminoacids to cells, from cells to multicelular organisms, to super organisms and global ecosystems…

So we introduce as the main innovation of Spatial topology in species the differentiation of them by its topological, ternary networks and organs.

DUALITY PARADOXES AND ITS DIFFERENT SPECIES: Ts≈St. GENDER DUALITY.

WE also notice that as there are black and white languages and ternary languages, we shall ALWAYS FIND simpler dualities that differentiate species as we find them in ternary systems. The main duality of species being that of gender. YET The dualities of Space-time are various as they all turn around the ilogic paradoxes studied previously, in the second Disomorphism. So in this post we shall study only the duality of gender.

For example in the human case women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.

Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:

Thus we define:

Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Ts<>St duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.

Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Ts≈St, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.St, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.

Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.

The same duality is clearer in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as in the next pictures.

Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.

The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>| female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.

Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the ∆-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.

I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the ∆-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.

ALL TYPE OF SPECIES.

Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Einstein realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet In the graph, we can see the 3 ages of species in all kind of different scales of reality as systems evolve through 3 ages and finally become a social new plane, joined by informative languages or become extinct, displaced by a new top predator.

The 3 forms of spatial entropy, temporal information and ST-body waves in diachronic analysis as time states.

It is clear that Informative Time, is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical St-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information. And its logic cycles guide the entire system, so St is indeed the arrow of future, Ft of the Universe, which arrives first to the future, perceives the paths of the system and so we can relate limbs/fields of space and lesser form to the past and heads/particles that guide them to the future; and the intermediate system of waves-bodies that reproduce, iterate, hence repeat in a dynamic present that seems not to change the system with the present.

This will be the second fundamental diachronic vision of the Fractal Generator which we shall expand a lot in the next paragraphs (the blog, and posts are obviously tailored as the Universe is with constant FRACTAL REPETITIONS OF THE SAME CONCEPTS, with increasing complexity and detail in the samples we bring):

Ps (Past-entropy) < ST (Present, hyperbolic space-time) >ƒt (future information):

Now we can see how the expanded, corrected mirror, where the aberration of putting the dimension of height in the wrong part (space) when it is a dimension of information and time ‘resolves’ so many puzzles.

The ‘time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height:

In the graph, we see how flat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, amphibia into tall dinosaurs, mammals into tall apes and machines into tall robots. Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and a first simple definition of the Universe, which we have seen to be a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into mass towards a central tall singularity is this: a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.

And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies. And so all is a fluctuation of Ts <=>St, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.

We shall call the fractal generator of time-space beings, or Timespace Generator Equation, or Function of Existence, T.Œ, (ab. Œ), this Generator Equation will freeze by effect of minds, into worlds that ‘are’ in themselves both perceptive, and willing to increase its perception, by feeding in more energy and reproducing its form. We call each of those T.Œ, or functions of homologic existence which can be spotted, when we see them at work creating cyclical existences as those of the graph, accelerating through the ages of life, an Œ-fractal point, monad, soul, atman, frame of reference, Non-Euclidean momentum, you name it. Each science will show a whole range of such T.Œs made to the image and likeness of the supreme T.Œ, God, mind of the Universe.

Species also bring variations on the same theme of aging which will become the different horizons and sub-species that ultimately will assemble themselves into a new larger super organism or plane of existence, through a process of evolution that includes both, variations in time and space morphologies and social gatherings in larger groups.

Variations of species. The fractal ternary principles of creation.

Some dual, creative analyses forgotten by AE sciences that we consider in ¬Æ ST Theory: the Universe as a spatial system, machines as evolutionary beings, and civilizations as organisms. The game of creation must be understood through its ‘dual symmetries’ and ternary networks that allowed its finite reproduction of fractal forms in the infinity of continuous space

The most satisfying function of existence is reproduction, the Generator Arrow, the maker of the game and all its species – the purest sensations of them all.

The Generator Feedback equation of spatial ‘Dimotions’ and temporal information is a reproducer, which embodies all the combinations of the game in itself, the creative algorithm of reality, which Touring once looked for with its simplest example a touring machine. But the creator potentially is more than a touring machine, it is what the touring machine observes, reality itself.

The rest of beings are just following the combinations of that grand design.

The active creator is limited by the parts of the whole that will assembly. So we shall call it with a more humble name, the assembler

With the syntactic combinations of the i-logic generator, the creator will always end repeating a form of finite time that had existed in ∞ space.

The proof that we are all repetitions is clear: space is infinite because it has not dark spaces, but it is a continuous number of closed and open topologies assembled in triangles, squares, hexagonal, polygonal and hexagonal, planes and spheres, with no darkness.

Information however is always limited and time always ends: it is a fluctuation of existence over that ∞ ‘Dimotions’.

All existences have possibly existed in the infinite fractal space of a finite number of times cycles.

We all will be assembled again as an i-logic form of space-time in some other self-repetitive fractal printed in the infinite ‘Dimotions’ of the trophic pyramid of existence that gave you birth.

Let us then operate the creator: Its simplest combinations will be complementary systems of ‘Dimotions’ and information that take advantage of the inverse properties of both:

The dualities of Creation.

In time the generator combines past, ‘Dimotions’ forms and future informations, generated by its universal, feedback cycles, and its arrows that imprint and create the chains of forms of present existence. Creation is structured by a series of dualities that merge creating an eternal, fluctuating present that appears and disappears as cyclical action-reaction systems cancel each other, making its total sum zero:

– Time and space have opposite morphologies and functions, which cancel each other:

– Informative, temporal singularities are convex, implosive and energetic membranes are concave, explosive. Thus a flat plane of temporal ‘Dimotions’ fluctuates into 2 virtual forms whose total value is null. For example, particles and antiparticles are born of a vacuum plane without form but they keep their inverse CPT parity. Thus the sum of its spatial form (P), its temporal arrows (T) and its dual, organic charge cancel.

– The duality of ‘Dimotions’ and information explains also sexual differentiation: females are specialized ‘time beings’ dominant in cyclical forms, memory, information, temporal verbs and perceptive languages. While males are specialized ‘‘Dimotions’ beings’ with bigger, lineal forms, dominant in spatial tasks. Yet both can be further differentiated into an informative cyclical head, and a lineal body. So, in graph 3.1 we draw a man with “temporal cycles” that represent his informative organs, the head and senses; and ‘Dimotions’ lines that represent the body and his members. Yet, despite the simplicity of that design, he is recognizable as a man.

– Duality causes the creation and reproduction of space-time fields through the process of palingenesis, by which a certain form of relative future, a father, emits a relative form of past, with lesser evolution, a seminal seed, that then evolves very fast towards the future, till becoming again a present form parallel to the father.

– Duality exists in biologic organisms evolved by the dual influence of macro-ecosystems and micro-genes.

– Duality is the cause of informative perception, as flows of spatial forces become transformed in a point of relative time or particle, in which they ‘merge’ into a ‘boson’, accumulative image of information that represents reality.

– Duality also applies to behavior: there are Darwinian acts between different beings that destroy each other vs. social, evolutionary acts between equal beings that evolve together, sharing ‘Dimotions’ and information through common networks. Thus all organic life ends up cancelled by a predator. It is a key duality as it responds to the 2 arrows of space-time, the arrow of symbiotic order, of information and the arrow of energetic ‘Dimotions’ of destruction defined by the 3rd postulate of illogic geometry.

– Finally Duality implies that all forms that evolve in time through 3 horizons, then organize in space those 3 horizons as the 3 regions of an i-point.

The number of events we can describe in all sciences departing from duality is enormous. Yet in as much as temporal information is dominant in living beings, illogic time is more important in biological and sociological sciences, explaining phenomena such as reproduction, perception, life and death, organic structures, etc. While, physical and cosmological particles can be described better with the use of Non-Euclidean, spatial geometry, as particles are dominant in spatial ‘Dimotions’. We will consider in the next chapters the most important biological applications of illogic time: the duality of Darwinian and symbiotic behavior; the way in which perception occurs; the concept of a top predator species, as information selects species with better brains; the palingenetic reproduction of biological forms which implies a dual travel in time back and forth from the future to the past…

But duality is only the beginning. Most systems evolve, self-combine and create finally a 3rd system, a reproductive one, becoming autonomous, without the need of ‘assemblers’ and ‘enzymes’. And then the game becomes richer in variations, because it becomes guided by ternary symmetries.

We understand those organic, self-reproductive systems according to the Ternary Principle studying the 3 temporal ages and functions of a ST field and then putting them together as the 3 geometric, organic, spatial regions of i- point. Since all ST field require 3 elements to exist: a St, informative element; an Es, energetic, spatial form, and an intermediate ‘present, simultaneous region’, dual flux of temporal ‘Dimotions’ that merges them into a whole. The result is an Ts-St rhythm of evolution and reproduction of forms in time that become latter reorganized as i-points in space, creating dual organic, real forms of temporal ‘Dimotions’. For example, the Universe first created fundamental particles, temporal quarks and spatial electrons that recombined into ST atoms; the body reproduces cells that latter evolve, becoming organs of ‘Dimotions’ and information, etc. Thus ST theory shows the complementarity between the ternary horizons of species that once have evolved energetic and informative particles interact creating an intermediate ST zone, shaping a new i- organism:

– Max. Ts: The external membrane and energetic network of the system that performs ‘Dimotions’ cycles, transforming information into ‘Dimotions’, appears first: it is the cell’s fat membrane, the stars of the galaxy, the endodermic cells of the future digestive systems….

-Max.St. Then it will appear the informative quanta of the future informative network and ‘brain’ of the system that perform informative cycles, transforming ‘Dimotions’ into information: they are the cells’ informative nucleotides, the black holes of the spiral galaxies, the brain.

– Ts x St: Finally the interaction of ‘Dimotions’ and informative systems creates an intermediate, reproductive region that combine ‘Dimotions’ and information: so protein membranes and nucleotide acids create the cell; stars and black holes create galaxies; the energetic endoderm and the informative ectoderm create the middle mesoderm region, each one the blue print of the future energetic, digestive, informative, nervous and blood, reproductive systems.

In formal terms we write the process as a decoupling of an initial Ts x St form that differentiates into a more energetic membrane (Max.Ts) and higher informative quanta (Max.St), that interact, creating the intermediate region, ST, shaping in this manner a new, ternary equation – the ultimate definition of any species. Since we are all self-repetitive MST field equations

The generator equation, Ts<ST>St, represents both: a temporal event between 2 relative ‘points’, an Œ-point with higher content of ‘Dimotions’ or relative past form, and an Œ-point with higher content of information or relative future form, that communicate implosive information (>) and explosive ‘Dimotions’ (<), through a wave of temporal ‘Dimotions’, <=>; creating a ternary, multicausal, simultaneous structure of spatial present.

Multi-functionality: 3 st-points functions. Ternary Principle:

Creation happens due to the ‘diversification’ of any Space-time field in 3 subspecies in space or 3 ages in time; Ts, ST, St.

It is the ternary principle once and again written in the book of Nature, caused by the fact that there are only 3 elementary forms in the Universe, ‘Dimotions’, information and a combination of both. Thus, events, species and space-time fields, both in time and space, have 3 elements: 3 ages, 3 horizons, 3 dimensions or 3 physiological networks, whose functions correspond to the arrow of ‘Dimotions’, information and reproduction that create the Universe. The Ternary principle is the origin of an evolutionary, impersonal plan of creation that diversifies species in all scales of reality into 3 forms, (Max. ΣSp, Max. St, ΣSp=St), from the 3 families of masses to 3 the types of Universes. It allows organizing all biological species in a tree of ternary horizons and differentiations of energetic, informative and balanced organisms, which co-exist in 3 st-scales of existence:

‘Any form can be subdivided ad eternal in new ternary forms.’

For example, the human body can be subdivided into 3 networks; then the digestive network can be subdivided into the stomach, liver and intestine system that can be subdivided into the colon, small, and large intestine, which can be subdivided into the left, top and right side, etc. The Ternary principle implies that the 3 spatial dimensions of any space-time field perform 3 temporal functions:

‘Any species, which is part of an ecosystem or an organism, maximizes its survival developing 3 functions as an energetic, reproductive and informative system for the higher scale’

I.e.: a cilia act as energetic limbs that move the cell, sensorial antennae that inform, and they evolved as centrioles that help to reproduce it. Hormones are also multifunctional.

And so on. This first rule of creation developed either in space as a topology of 4-dimensional reality with 3 elements, toroid ring, hyperbolic cycle and spherical plane, or in time as a game of ‘Dimotions’ that warps into information reproducing along the way, is your limit.

So the creator descends a notch more into self-appreciation since he is nothing but a contemplator of a game which has created before. That is he is created by the game and as assembler he is so determined to do one of the known-known combinations that, indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The isomorphisms of the game of creation are in themselves an entire sub-discipline of multiple space-times theory, studied in detail in my files. In essence the process is self-similar in all scales:

A species will differentiate in ternary sizes (its cellular, organic and social size); it will differentiate in ternary topologies (an species dominant in ‘Dimotions’, one in information and one in reproduction); in ternary ages (a neoteny species aborted in a palingenetic phase; one mature species and one with an excess of information, which will become cell of a new scale of evolution, a superorganism communicated by the language); and in ternary functions, symbiotic to the higher st+1 organism in which the entity exists (as an energetic part, an informative part and a reproductive part or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function).

Further on all those creative strategies of survival become more complex, when we consider its combinations: species with several functions, often in several scales; complementary, sexual specialization in an energetic, male entity and an informative, female entity; ternary structures that form complete topologies; open balls that act as doors between membranes, without center and membrane; and combinatory varieties of ‘sexual species’ or ‘complementary’ species, in which the ‘Dimotions’/informative components, each diversify in 3 topologies, scales, ages, etc.

Those combinations further enlarge the number of subspecies, though many of them, especially ‘anti-species’ in which the lesser informative ‘male’ plays an informative role and the lesser ‘energetic’ woman an energetic role (for example an antiparticle, with an energetic electron in its informative center and an informative proton in its energetic membrane), will not be stable and will not survive. This brings another essential law of creation, the inflationary nature of information checked by the isomorphisms of survival that extinguish unsuccessful species and tends to reduce the explosive age of creation to 3 ‘basic ternary differentiated’ types that survive, while other transitional or non-balanced combinations disappear:

‘The Universe creates an inflationary number of ‘forms’ which are then reduced by natural selection to ternary species and balanced, complementary, dual systems’.

∆>|2|. PHYSICAL SPECIES.

Abstract. The variations of species in all kind of systems are based in the Ts<ST>St ternary elements of a full system and its ‘synoptic variation’ of Ts x St ‘sexual polarity’.

Thus we talk of 6 variations according to the dominance of the entropic field-limbs, body-wave or head/particle in all systems: S>St>T; S>t>st, st>t>s< St>s>t, t>st>s, t>s>St

Plus the fundamental gender symmetry of the ‘wave-female, balanced gender state: Ts≈St’, body-reproductive-balanced-spatial system/state, and the Ts>Sti + Sti<Ts, male, polar, hierarchical, temporal, creative vs. destructive extreme system state.

So 6+2, we shall find to be the fundamental variations of species in each ‘phyla’ of the Universe, in all systems, physical particles, biological phyla and human cultures. We shall then in this article study them for three specific systems, the octets of particles, the phyla of animals and the type of mind-cultures, based in topological linguistics, and male-warrior vs. female-trader cultural differentiation.

Ts (past-entropy fields/gas)≤ST (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥St(future particle-crystal)

The Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.

Thus we can analyze all physical systems with the (anti)symmetries of 5D space-time; considering analysis of each of those planes as detailed as we want according to the ‘fractal principle’ that divides each plane into 3 x 3 +0 scales, and each space-time part, into 3 sub-ages, and 3 sub-organs.

For example your life has 3 periods of 24 years (young, adult and od informative age), subdivided each in 3 sub-ages (baby: 0-8, child when in classic education you enter the age of reason, 8-16, when you enter the age of sex as a young, 16-24), and each part can be divided into 2 0r 3 sub-parts, (depending or not of the existence of a reproductive body-wave), for example, the limb can be divided into feet, femur and tibia, the head into brain of information and face of energy; and so on. Physical systems are not exception, but due to our lack of direct perception (we do NOT see many of those elements and scales, so we have used an excess of mathematical properties to describe them0, we need to interpret all magnitudes and equation in ‘real terms’.

Still in the 4^th line we will often subdivide each fractal species of space-time into 3 time ages and 3 space organs and each equation into its components relating them to T.œ parameter and universal constants.. And vice versa, we can further integrate them into more comprehensive wholes, as we did in the previous post analyzing the largest physical systems (cosmos, galaxies and stars). Let us do this first to give an overview of the Universe and its scales of space-energy and temporal particles of cyclical information.

Thus according to the ternary method we can analyze in more detail those isomorphisms, in each 5D space-time scale to define its main physical systems:

5D scales:

∆-1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Ts(Spatial toroid fields)≤ ST (Hyperbolic waves)≤ St(particles of information)≈

Ts (young, past entropic age/field>ST: adult, present, iterative wave age > St: old informative, future particle age.

In the description of Œ∆-3 , atoms, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: h-quanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules

Spatial symmetry:

∆-4: Light: Field: Ts: Halo ST: Wave ≤ St: Photon

∆-3: Atom: Ts: Electron ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ St: Nuclei

∆-2: Molecule: Ts: External atoms< ST: Electro-Magnetic Bondage ≤ St: Crystal Center

Time Ages:

∆-4: Ts: Vacuum space ≥ ST: electromagnetic wave ≥ St: Particle

∆-3: Ts: Plasma≥ ST: Atom ≥St: Elements Table

∆-2: Ts: Gas ≥ ST: Liquid≥St: Solid-crystal

In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We an see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same and closes the cycle.

Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:

∑∆-1: [Ts-Fields≤≥ST-waves≤≥St-Particles]≈ Plasma: ∆: [Ts-Gas≤ST:Liquid≤≥St: Crystals]≈Matter: ∆+1: [Ts-Oort Belt≤≥ ST: Planets≤≥St: Star]

Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5^th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3^rd and 4^th line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:

[Ts (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ST(wave-liquid)>St (Particle-Crystal] û≤| 4|

This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.

They are systems in which the metric of the 5^th dimension, ∆=Ts x St = E x I= K, remain invariant.

That is the distance-energy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.

As we have studied vortices above, when considering the unification of charges and masses, let us now bring the wave description and its duality.

Some case examples of astrophysics.

Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:

The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.
The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.

The Three Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Ts (Halo)<ST: stars >St: black hole. 

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.

So we must construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:

III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter that correspond to:
III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to
The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.

The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:

|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.

So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halo-membrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its body-wave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator:

A galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. We shall unify both systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension that orders all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension.

And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale. So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of young-entropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).

And inversely in the anti-quantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or military-politico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.

So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.

And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:

So first let us Generate all the symmetries of the cosmos, ∆+1, ∆-galaxy and ∆-1 stars with 5D ST:

The 3 planes of Galaxies:

∆-1(particle/atomic scale)> ∆:star-thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational, cosmic scale:

Ts(Gravitational curved space-time fields)≤ ST (Light-neutrino waves)≤ St(Cosmic bodies)≈

Ts (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > St: old informative, future age.

In the description of Œ∆=3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆-1: Stars

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Ts: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ St: Nuclei

∆: Galaxy: Ts: Halo ST: ecliptic arms ≤ St: Black hole

∆+1: Cosmos: Ts: Wall of fire? ≤ ST: galactic plane ≤ St: Great attractor?

Time Ages:

∆-1: Ts: Gas Nebulae≥ ST: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole

∆: Ts: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ST: Spiral Galaxy≥St: Globular, Dark or Cannibal

∆+1: Ts: Big-bang? ≥ ‘Epochs’? ≥ Big crunch or big Ripe?

Now, the reader should notice 2 things, which are quite evident. On one side, the similarity between the largest and smallest scales of physical systems, the atom and the galaxy; on the other the question marks on the big-bang theories, which are themes not so obviously related to the saint Grail of physics – the discovery during my studies of both systems of a way to unify both – the world of charges and masses, hence all the scales of physical systems of the Universe, as they had exactly the same equations in the metrics of the 5th dimension. Indeed charges and masses were clocks of time of the electromagnetic and gravitational scale in 5D metrics, only that the galactic vortex turned 10 up to 40 times slower in those metrics than a charge and were larger in a similar quantity (Ts x St = K).

And so when I translated the equations of electromagnetism to the jargon of gravitation alas, all the equations matched, those of the electron with the galactic halo, and the black hole radius appeared suddenly as the radius of the Bohr Hydrogen atom…

Thus when I found that the 10 up to 40 relationship between the charge and mass forces (the so-called hierarchy problem), was equivalent to the different of ‘speed of a charge and mass clock’ in 5D metrics – giving birth to an easy unification as time clocks of two scales it was the beginning of a full new field of science, which I called 5D cosmology.

Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. St: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. Ts: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– Ts=St: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> St (Black holes)

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.

Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

∆¡<|3| BIOLOGIC AND SOCIAL SPECIES

2 ≈ 3. An homologic analysis. topological linguistics ≈ topological biology.

Man acts as though he were the shaper and master of language, while in fact language remains the master of man.

Martin Heidegger

The Superorganisms of history, nations and civilizations, as all social, ‘cellular systems’, have an energetic, reproductive and informative network that organize its ‘human cells’. The energetic network is Gaia, planet Earth, the re=productive network is the economic system, and the informative, ‘nervous’ network is the verbal language.

We thus can study verbal languages with the tools of Complex Sciences, and the formalism of 10 Dimensional systems, to understand its structure and purpose.

That purpose is obvious. As nervous messages coordinate the collective actions of the cells of the body, collective human actions are created with wor(l)ds, verbal languages of information that order a community of human beings into a social network of common values and actions that create the nation or civilization. Thus, it follows that the highest expression of those words that create human worlds are the Law, in its religious or civil form.

This has been known for long. And so the ‘proper’ harmonic, equalitarian orders that words give to humans have been called the ‘natural law’, or the ‘ethics of love’ that make people share energy and information and act together for the common good.

In the jargon of Complex Science and its 10 Dimensional analysis we talk of ‘i-dimensions’ as the social, scalar dimensions that gather ‘cells’ into whole individuals and individuals into whole societies. Then we can qualify any partial study of a system in terms of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of the whole system within a limited range of those scales. So in medicine, physiology would be a D2, ∑i->i+1, analysis of the relationships between cells and social networks (nervous, digestive and informative systems).

In the same manner we can consider verbal ethics an ∑i->i+1 analysis of the correct verbal mandates that coordinate humans. And it would be the ‘highest’ level of understanding of words, in its social context. We call this ‘endeavour’, the ‘ethics of the wor(l)d’, as it allows words to construct a perfect world. And it is the subject of study of other posts under that name.

Ethics, the foundation of the social law, thus becomes the key element to create a healthy, wealthy human superorganism.

To notice that ‘complex analysis’ is a kaleidoscope of different views, which can multiply our perspectives and knowledge. In that sense ethics would be defined as an i+1->i, ‘causal analysis’, in as much as the point of view expressed comes from the ‘higher’ scale of the super organism of history. The language then becomes a tool, and its linguistic syntax (the i-scale of analysis) secondary to the ‘message’ of social love proper of all super organisms, translated here to the human collective nervous language.

Yet we can do more detailed analysis of words in other scalar levels and from other point of view. For example we can study i->i+1 relationships, considering how the i-level of words as a language that reflects the Universe in its syntax and semantics influences the i+1 level of cultures. How for example the use of I, the subject, at the beginning of sentences in english creates and ego-centered, free, egoist psyche, proper of the anglosaxon culture. Here the study considers the ‘inverse causality’ to that of ethics, from the i-linguistic level to the i+1 social level.

We can also study only the i-level of words, isolated, considering its inner structure and Universal Grammar of languages as ‘tools’ of perception of the causal laws of the Universe.

And we can even do a lesser i-1 analysis of words, considering the elements of those sentences (phonemes, sounds, semantics), in relationship with the physiology of homo species (so we will find consonantic languages, proper of European, neanderthal, mixed races, more vocal languages in the extreme Indonesian world, etc. etc.).

All those and other perspectives of 10D analysis applied to verbal languages are the realms of the ‘science’ of linguistics, which is concerned merely with the i-level of the language, without reference to its social meaning.

This article concentrates not so much on ethics but on linguistics, specifically on 3 type of studies, syntax, the influence of syntax on culture, and the ‘genetic relationship’ with the different ‘races’ and typologies of human beings.

Thus, we depart from the i-scale of linguistics, adopting its point of view – not that of ethics, but a more technical analysis of the relationships between the syntax of language and the nature of cultures.

In the jargon of 10D we say that we depart from the ‘i-scalar dimensions’ of those human social super organisms (the individual scale of the language and its inner structure).

And we apply it to understand different human cultures, as human languages are not all the same in their syntax and influence in this manner cultural views. Of course the field of ‘ethics’ (i+1 p.o.v. on verbal languages) and linguistics (i p.o.v.), which are the two essential branches of verbal language sciences is far wider than the sketchy analysis we make in this page. So we just make an introductory ‘first chapter’, dwelling on the fundamental socio-economical and cultural aspects that are the main theme of this web (the 3rd level of analysis, i-1, phonetics, physiology of sound speech, etc. is of lesser importance, as in any discipline, the i-1 scale is. So for example, in medicine, we do not study cells as independent ‘phonemes’ but physiology, the i-scale; though at the present age of human self-extinction and devolution an interesting branch of study would be the ‘devolution’ and extinction process of human languages, which is regressing to ‘minimal speech’ and simplification of grammar, as in the ‘Sms texting’, the reduction of vocabulary and linguistic capacity of our ‘visual, neopaleolithic kids’ etc. etc.)

. SYNTAX: The fractal generator

Syntax, being the most abstract, of all analysis of language, corresponds in 5D to the most abstract expression of the game of reality, existential ilogic, which consider the combinations of the 5 D¡mœtions of exist¡ence, and what combinations in time and space are possible within the game of T.œs, space-time organisms, which require a minimal of 2 complementary space-time or most often 3 S<ST>T elements.

Thus the analysis of grammar in 5D is done by homology with existential ilogic; which future 5D linguistics will study a priori to understand the fractal generator of language.

All this said, we find that the ‘fractal generator’ of all space-time superorganisms:

St(Head/particle) < Body-wave (ST) > Ts (Limbs/fields)

Translates into the proper order of Chomsky’s Universal grammar:

Subject (St-information) < Verb (ST-action) > Object (sT-entropy)

With the proviso that as for all languages, dominant in information, S-ST, name-verb, is the basic structure.

Grammar thus start, as we indicated in our brief foray into baby’s acquisition of language in ‘naming’, as ‘blocks of time’, which last in ‘present’, simultaneous parts and wholes of superorganisms, in the dual Mind-wordó World interaction of the child inner thoughts on ‘electric’ impulses and the physical larynx-mouth cavities and the outer sound flow. This physical trinity of production of sounds akin to mechanical systems IS just the lower hardware level that only matters today to the scholar homoctonos and its audiovisual methods of mechanical speech, and those who see science as a mere description of physical systems.

It is the rise of consciousness in the active mind of the child and human what matters to us, and as the organic sentient, scalar co-existing Universe constantly creates dynamically departing from its ‘vital dimotions’, the first words trigger that back and forth creative process between the mind word and the world habitat and culture of the being, to form the ‘infix’ wor(l)d, in which the L- ‘language’ of the word shapes the worldview of the speaker, in entanglement with the society in which he speaks, where his language is molded as the language is also the social network, or informative nervous system that pegs together the human community to create its superorganisms.

Evolution of complexity

The Universe evolves its complexity from a primary SóT duality through iterations and recombinations of S and T elements in different ∆±¡ scales of size and complexity and linguistics is not different in its modes of evolution of complexity. We study in the formal model of 5D (Existential ilogic) those modes of growth of complexity through different forms of ‘entangled logic’, starting by monologic (a single ST undifferentiated whole or superorganism), through dilogic between the two poles of the system, (S-T, field-particle or most often ST-S, wave-particle, body-head dualities) who start to exchange energy and information, creating subtle intermediate elements (St, sT, ST) that become attached in ternary fractal sub-organisms to the 2 poles (St-SS-ST), (Ts-TT-ST); forming trilogic systems; that become finally enclosed by TT-membranes or focused in SS-still forms.

We can then apply as we did with the phonetic system, the usual dualities, trinities and pentalogic of diversification that evolve any system towards its classic do-deca-logic (3->4,5-> 9,10,11, 12-> 20) scales of social complexity based in the fractal principle that breaks down each of the trilogic and pentalogic, 3±¡ dimotions and its mirrors into more subtle variations as time in an ‘isolated’, still, ‘safe’ system increases information.

So languages evolved the more complex grammars in its ‘isolate’ relative peaceful regions and we can notice the immediate dual and trinity splits of the two elements, space and time, name and verb in variations, along the other direction of timespace they lack. That is, names became more verbal transient in its form with the doubling into ‘evident verbs’ first; as they were implicit on the names-as-orders of childish petitions, ‘water!=I want water’; etc.

The next splits on complexity mimic the topic splits of Existential ilogic in all type of physical or mental species:

– Duality: Names became split along the T-component of duration and ∆-component of wholes and parts into subjects and adjectives that qualify a name with secondary or transient properties.

Verbs became names as infinitives… And then split into adverbs with name properties.

Heads

That sentences are S<>T, Name≈Verb systems is proved by the key element of a sentence, its head. In syntax, the head of a noun phrase is a noun, the head of a verb phrase is a verb, and so on, the nonhead material being modifiers of various kinds such as complements, adjuncts, and specifiers. However, what constitutes the head of a complex word is less clear. According to one view, the head is the root, so the head of booklet and singer are book and sing, respectively. This entails that the head of a word may belong to a different word class than the word itself (as sing does in relation to singer); but it does belong to the other inverse ‘time-verb’. So the morphological transformation, S>sT, or T>St becomes then next dimotion of ‘existential ilogic’ used in languages. We cannot really write a whole treatise that is exhaustive in linguistics, but we must fairly say from many pages of studies on the matter, that linguistics is clearly a particular case of existential ilogic as all other languages are.

– Trinity: Thus next both, in existential ilogic and linguistics, we evolve from duality which brings the opposition of the Space and time components, into trinity by the natural complementarity of both. Trinity opens up the next fundamental split in the evolution of complex linguistics in its rich different modes of trinity, which we briefly summarize by scale:

∆-1: Trinity of names

∆º trinity develops S(name-subject)<ST(verb)>S(name-object)’ name dominant sentences by the addition of an object term, which is the spatial form over which the action of the verb, managed by the object acts.

Such system suffers immediately a dilogic split between ergative S<ST>S systems and accusative systems, according to which primary particle, the verb or the name commands the control of the object in the sentence. Names split as objects ‘owned’ by the subject interacted with the name. It is the SVO main trinity fractal generator of grammar, more connected to the ∆+1 world scale we shall study now in more detail, keeping for future expansions, a thorough analysis of syntactic & semantic, Tetralogic, Pentalogic & Dodecalogic.

∆-1 trinity of verbs

∆ø trinity of verbal dominant sentences: addition of adverbial sentence. The other key trinary growth of complexity of a sentence is through the addition of an adverb, which as the name indicates is fully dependent of the verb, adding information primary about the location in space, duration in time (S-adverb, T-adverb) or size in scale (∆-adverb) of the action.

Adverbs, adjectives, verbs and names can then be sub-divided by the fractal principle in dual and trinity ‘small sentences’; and in this manner the sentence reaches the ‘full development’ of a classic Space-time System, between 3 to 3 x4 = 12 different particles; which will be ‘isolates’, broken by ‘silences’ in T-languages (isolates), or attached in S-languages (agglutinative), or partially placed as adfixes and separated as particles in ST-fusional languages.

Once the elements of syntax have become completed, departing from the noun and the verb, to which an object, either adjective or adverb, or both is added, and each of them split into dual and ternary elements for a mean ‘decametric scale’ of elements to complete a sentence:

Subject (determinant/case+adjective+name); verb (verb+tense+adverb); Object: verb or subject sentence (adverb/name/determinant)

The ideal sentence thus is a 9-12 full do-deca-logic expression in space, of the development of an event in time, which is the purpose of any language as a mirror of reality.

Splits thus become more complex as time passes and languages evolve in parallel to the evolution of the Humind.

Conclusion. The importance of linguistics and its degradation by the human slave.

The Beauty of linguistics as a concrete mirror of existential ilogic lays then, in the level of simplicity and intuitive understanding, huminds can acquire of its parallel, homologic nature, because it is innate to human beings. So linguistics Non-E Topology in time and space become the natural examples to teach existential ilogic, and in an ‘evolved society’, those 3 disciplines would become the ‘formal cornerstones’ of education to learn the homology of all superorganisms in time and space.

But of course we do not live in such enlightened society but in one where huminds are just enzymen, slaves of their ‘productive activity’ catalyzing the evolution of machines and its digital languages, whose idol-ogies of mechanism, capitalism and nationalism (worship of machines, metal-money and weapons) reigns supreme.

So linguistics, the science of the language of man in its 3 levels (∆-1 phonetics, ∆o-grammar and ∆+1, verbal ethic thought) are only ‘inferior’ to History, the science of the human species, in the level of ‘importance’ enzymen gives to them. Never a species was so slavish to other species, man to metal, to the point of even forgetting what is its true nature and mind, and yet paradoxically so proud to be=come a slave.

This analysis of the grammatical evolution of complexity should then run parallel to the ages of History and its genetic languages, but we won’t develop it here. Instead we shall consider the complementary science of:

Trinity of Morphology languages in space and time.

At the beginning of the 19th century, linguistic typology established a small set of types, i.e., isolating, agglutinating, fusional, to which any single language could be assigned. The main criteria for the assignment were related to word structure.

We thus list the features that tend to cluster in languages displaying one of the three main morphological types as follows:

The Fusional Type

Words are formed by a root and (one or more) inflectional affixes, which are employed as a primary means to indicate the grammatical function of the words in the language. Agreement is widely employed.
High degree of modification of internal morph boundaries, with a consequently difficult linear segmentation.
Tendency to cumulate morphological meanings in a single affix (with consequent asymmetry between the semantic and formal organization of grammatical markers).
Word-class distinction is maximal. Inflection is rich, as regards both the number of inflectional classes and the extension of paradigms.
Stem suppletion; many cases of both homonymy and synonymy among affixes; clear distinction between inflectional and derivational affixes.
A slight correlation with syntax can be seen in the relatively free word order (but there are also fusional languages with a fairly fixed word order).

The Agglutinating Type

Words are formed by a root and a clearly detachable sequence of affixes, each of them expressing a

separate item of meaning. Affixes are widely employed to indicate the relationships between words. Therefore, there are few or no independent relational elements (e.g., pronouns, pre-postposition, articles, etc.), and a wide use of nominal cases.

Very high matching between morphs and morphemes. Morphs are loosely joined together; consequently it is very easy to determine the boundaries between them.
Each affix carries only one meaning: no cases of homonymy or synonymy among affixes; the semantic

structure is directly reflected in the morphological articulation of the word; no principled limits to the number of affixes in a word.

Word-class distinction is minimal: the same affixes tend to occur with roots belonging to different parts of speech (e.g., personal endings to nouns, case endings to verbs); almost the same morphology for adjectives and verbs. No inflectional classes, no gender distinction.
Derivational affixes are widely employed in word formation. The distinction between inflectional and derivational affixes is slight. Many affixes reveal their lexical origin to some extent. The latter feature, together with the tendency of affixes to form autonomous syllables and to be relatively unconstrained in number, results in words that are quite long.
Relatively fixed word order. Agreement is almost completely absent.

The Isolating Type

Words are monomorphic, invariable, and formed by a single root. Ideally, bound forms are completely missing. Position is the main way of expressing the relationship between independent words.
Relational meanings are not overtly expressed, or the same units that normally encode lexical concepts are used for that purpose as separate helper words; the meaning and function of a word considerably

depend upon the syntagmatic context.

There is little to no morphological complexity. Morphs are clearly identifiable both phonologically and semantically: morph boundaries are sharply defined, phonological form is invariant, there are no instances of overlapping exponence. Derivation is nonexistent, partly replaced by compounding.
The distinction in parts of speech is not clear; there is no overt expression of grammatical categorization.
Tendency to monosyllabism with no phonetic distinctions between the elements expressing lexical

meaning and the ones expressing relational meaning.

Rigid word order.

The fusional type is differentiated from the isolating type by the use of bound morphs and the clear-cut

distinction between word classes; it is differentiated from the agglutinating type by the kind of juncture

between morphs, and the nonbiunivocal correspondence between morphs and morphemes. In the synthetic vs. analytic distinction, the fusional and even more the agglutinating type tend toward the synthetic end.

So how 5 D classifies the 3 types of morphologies, according to the trilogic of 3 morphologies of a simultaneous S<ST> system in space and its ages in time?

This essential ‘symmetry’ of the Universe is easy to spot on the 3 morphologies, as expressed in the next graph:

The reader will observe the perfect gtrilogic of the 3 type of languages in its 14 fundamental morphological characteristics. As Isolating and Fusional languages are in two extremes, having 14 differences between them, but Agglutinating languages are in the middle, having 7 vs. 7 yes/no differences with both fusional and isolating.

And no, the characteristics are not chosen but taken from an encylopedia of linguistics. So it is obvious that agglutinating morphology is the ST middle age between the evolution of Isolating and fusional languages. And since isolating languages such as Chinese correspond to ‘an evolved childish form of single syllabes’ and fusional is often found to be in the past agglutinating languages made ‘free’, and both characteristics correspond to the general ‘patterns’ of the 3 ages of systems, we have therefore the 5D equation of morphology:

St (1^st age: Isolating languages) < ST (2^nd age: agglutinating languages) > Ts (3^rd age: Fusional languages).

Which also applies in space, as the 3 languages co-exist simultaneity in the continuum of human civilizations, and so we write them as a feed-back equation, with two polar types.

However in scale, the order is different an also self-evident as the isolating language has less parts, than the fusional, whose words are shorter than the agglutinative, so we write:

∆§1: isolating languages (mono and dysyllabic) > ∆§2: Fusional languages (mac. trisilabic) > ∆§3: Agglutinative languages.

In terms of time ages thus we observe that in the first age human languages, such as Khoi’san languages or Tibetan languages in the mongoloid Ts;lit were mostly isolating; in the second age of History, we notice that most languages were agglutinating and with an SOV typology, and finally in th modern age of history, the motion from ‘simple single syllabs’ to give meaning, to its agglutination into multiple morphemes acquires ‘freedom’, which is the trade mark in languages that depart from a seed of information and move towards freedom and redundant complexity (unlike a physical system whose ages are inverse, departing from a young age of freedom and acquiring formal complexity and rigidy with age.

This duality of 5D structure that opposes the ages of ‘languages of information: SS (1^st seed age) -> ST (2^nd age) ->TT (3^rd entropy age), to the 3 ages of a physical system/body (TT: entropic youth->ST: mature reproductive age->St: 3^rd informative age); is perfectly matched by morphological linguistics. Fusional languages thus have a relative free order in the position of cathegories of words; their rigidity is minimal, with high degree of modification of internal order; disorder in the number of meanings an affix can carry, which might be multiple, as well as in many homonymies and synonymies between affixes and maximal division between word classes.

On the other extreme, isolating languages have minimal confusion because morphological complexity is minimal, words are monosyllabic and sharply defined in semantics, syntax and phonetics. Morphology we might say has yet to be born. And when it does so it happens in a rigid form that soon pegs syllabic morphemes one after another, still clear and easy to separate in its meanings in agglutinating languages.

So apparently isolating and agglutinating languages are inverse, but below the surface, agglutinating languages play a second st-age role in this peculiar complex cycle of morphology, which once more respond to all the possible trinity variations of existential ilogic.

Because morphology is hardly existing in isolating languages, however the laws of balance imply that semantics is maximal for each syllable becomes a semantic meaning, often more (with tonal distinctions) and its disyllabic combinations create new semantic words.
isolating languages are thus dominant in semantic meanings.

While on the other extreme agglutinating languages are the true masters of morphology with maximal evolution in its clarity and number of affixes to a word. But as the dominant game is ‘morphology’. Not ‘semantics’, form no substance, the outcome is that languages in the social, cultural level are about ‘hierarchical’ rigid structures of actions without ‘thought’, obeisance to the language, which we shall show is the fundamental treat of the civilizations derived from them; either in the SOV or VSO typological orders. It is then culturally the natural language of animetal civilizations, where people ‘obey without thinking’ so much the meaning of its actions, as the ritual, formal perfect order between them. Semitic, Abrahamic religions thus are born with its ritualistic formal perception of the relationship between man and God, mediated by a higher hierarchical priest, from agglutinating languages, and so are ‘warrior cultures’, in which the obeisance and need for action greatly supersedes the finding of meaning, which is lacking on ppor semantics, as indeed war, well-thought is a meaningless action.

Finally fusional languages will become the more flexible of them all, the more free and entropic, chaotic, proper of an age of disgregation and loss of power of the verbal language, which thus becomes rather than free, entropic, ambigious, carring meanings which are not to ‘be trusted’, because they are flexible, and because their semantics are not so clear-cut as the haiku poems of so many Chinese words. So neither morphology nor semantics imposes the power of the language to the mind. They are thus the natural languages of the present industrial r=evolution, where numbers have substited words, as the language of poweer.

In that regard, fusional languages can be divided in two sub-groups: 3^rd age complex languages, which are fusional languages that have been so from its initial moment, as a typology related to the ‘spatial’ ternary fundamental division of minds which corresponds to ‘White, agglutinative; visual langauges’, ‘mongoloid, barchicelpahlic, isolating lagnauges’, and ‘black, psylocephalic, fusional languages’, with its richness of multiple emotions…

Vs. fusional languages that are truly about ‘entropic’ decadent languages which is more closer to the simplification and decadence of industrial Indo-European languages. How we make some distinction is obvious: the fusional black-african language uses the multiple repetitions, harmonies and homonymies and synonymies to create more complex e-motions; the industrial fusional language simply doesn’t care anymore for order and meaning and just put things in different messy forms. An example will suffice Zulu has 3 morphs meaning ‘not: the initial prefix a- on the verb form. However, negativity is also signaled by a suffix -i, on the basis of which, in the corresponding active verb form, the final -a is analyzed as a suffix meaning ‘positive.’ In the verb form a-sı´-zi-fu´ n-i ‘we do not want them,’ there are thus two synonymous affixes. But the signaling of ‘negative’ does not end there, The prefix si- can bear a low tone or a high tone in (3) (indicated by an acute accent) corresponding to positive and negative verb forms that differ tonally; and all can be combined to express a whole range of ‘degrees of no’. The richness of suffixes, infixes, affixes, repetitive verbs, morphemes and all the elements of morphology of Congo-Nile languages thus responds to the e-motional richness of the African culture and its multiplicity of e-motions expressed not only for human beings but for animal life; not only with morphemes but also with phonetics, tone and musical harmonies.

∆+1 GRAMMAR

Connectives. The next element of the construction of a linguistic mirror over the space-time reality they describe are the grammatical connectives, to which an excessive importance has been given by ‘enzymen’, obsessed with their ‘linguistic mathematical idol’, the digital language of machines. Many Schopenhauer’s ‘stupids’ unable to grasp the different illogic structure of language, from Frege to Russell not to offend modern practitioners of stupidity, tried to reduce for the use of mechanical devices, language ot the v Ù and v. or connectives, which are the simplest ones; yet the most often used in the simplest of all humind’s languages (English). So ‘ideally’, a discourse would be reduced to clear cut, yes/no modulo-2 Boolean algebras, of factual present, indicative actions, for all men to become perfect programmed slaves of their task as reproducers and consumers of machines, with dual options as yes/no minds, which is what at this stage of evolution of freedom are robots. A yes/no, present human being, to which our society is fast reducing us, then becomes ‘free’ to choose yes or no, ‘stupid’ machines to consume.

The 3 ∆st, sequential modes of languages: Future thought> present enunciative action>Memorial past.

Grammar though in its classic age had a huge number of connectives to ‘create’ a ‘cloud’ of alternative, potential paths of existence, specially for the planning of future actions, which is the fundamental use of language in the pre-sound phase of the mind, when the SS-language within the T.œ (space-time organism), performs its fundamental task, to ‘design the future of the whole’ system, as the fractal equations of existential ilogic preclude: Ts(limbs/fields-object-relative past) < ST-Bodies-waves-verbs (action: relative present) > St (particles-heads-subject: relative future.

Before the sentence becomes a present, to then freeze its form into the past, the mental discourse that precedes the enunciation of the action, that precedes the memory of it, must therefore weight all the alternatives for the action, with a well developed conditional, ± duality and inclusive systems of pronouns, possessives, cases, and other elements to describe a social action, the objects required and its antagonists; of which even the limited English language has its share of ‘buts, yets, him, hes… etc)

The study on how language in each species, projects the future (algebra in mathematical species, grammar in language, projective geometry in motion, etc.) as different mirrors of illogic existential ilogic is a huge fascinating field of 5D; which requires not only to take into account the ‘internal future mapping’ of the language in a given fractal point but the external opposition to that action of the outer entropic world, which will lead invariably to the frustration of the action that is always ‘perfect’ in thought, but imperfect in its realization, which encounters the ¬limits of all ¬∆@st of space-time being.

It is for that reason that a rich conditional, subjunctive language allows the planning of reality, because unlike in simplistic programmed Boolean algebras modulo-2, which are similar to the palingenetic ordered placental worldcycle of a seed in a friendly environment, where reality is pre-set for the machine to act without errors, in the vital Universe of multiple monads-points of view with conflicting interests, every action is a ‘body-3 problem’ which requires calculations from multiple points of view, in constant interaction, and adaptation to the communicative ‘golden means’, agreements and negotiations developed in the course of the action; reason why languages are not exact, as their planning of the future is never possible from a single point of view, as ‘we are all Gods’ (Aristotle) of our relative territory of order.

The potential guidance for a human community of the game of exist¡ence.

It will be those elements that would allow a posteriori a narration of the facts of the game of existence, to the highest level both in ‘scale-size’, ‘temporal-latitude’ and ‘spatial-longitude’, what rises linguistic to ‘literature’, of which ‘ethic literature’; which becomes a ‘guidance’ for the whole social community to act in all the potential futures, thus guiding NOT only the individual actions but the COLLECTIVE actions, equivalent to the ‘whole’ set of genes of a given species, chiseled to an efficient mirror of the existential ilogic of the life and death game.

∆ø≈∆+1 SEMANTICS, LEXICOGRAPHY.

Semantics relates language and the external world, connecting both at the surface level. So when a language changes we observe that the ‘penetration’ of a foreign culture starts from the top (religion), to the next level (semantics), and only in the final stages penetrates syntax and phonetics – something observed in the creation of pidgin languages, those spoken by a conquered people to be understood by its new masters.

It is then when once a given sentence has defined in space through its do-deca-logic, an event forming a simultaneous ‘mental superorganism’ for the description of the event in time, either in ‘past’ (event happened), present (event happening) or future (event expected to happen), from the point of view of the actor (subject, first person), the social ∆+1 group (second person, plural), or the external being (3^rd person), when we can move from the internal grammatical understanding of the system.

Of all the themes related to Literature, Ethics and semantics, which define the relationship between language and the external world, we shall treat in this brief introduction that might be widened in the future, the highest element – that of religion and the subconscious superorganism of cultures, God.

LOGIC AND LANGUAGE: TRUTH

We will explore the relationships of language and the upper plane of existence, both as a real ‘force’ that puts together people and as a basic feature of all minds that confuse reality with its visual and verbal, space and time languages: O’-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world.

So in western religions ‘God’ create naming things with Hebrew or Arab languages.

The magic power of language is today ignored, even if it is present in Abrahamic religions. So few forget that language before Aristotle who demythologized it, was seen as a magical instrument to cast spells, entrance people, and call up past, present, and future spirits. Since the mind truly believes to be the Univere, and hence its language mirror and affect that Universe as the wor(l)d<I=Eye cycle interact together. Aristotle was the first in western thought to see language as an object of rational inquiry, a means of expressing and communicating thoughts about anything in the world. The ‘semiotic triangle’ of (a) language as the expression of (b) thoughts that are intentionally related with (c) elements in the world, is due to Aristotle. This is Aristotle’s most general and most important contribution to the study of language, even if it is not often mentioned by modern authors, for whom it has become a matter of course that language can be seen as a valid object of rational inquiry.

His awareness that languages are mirrors and hence truth, not reachable beyond the language is also today forgotten, specially among digital scientists: “For falsity and truth are not properties of actual things in the world (so that, for example, good things could be called true and bad things false), but properties of thought.’ Metaphysics.

Truth consists in saying of that which is that it is, or of that which is not that it is not.’ Aristotle’s truth theory is known as the correspondence theory of truth, in that it requires a correspondence between what is the case in the world on the one hand and what is said or thought on the other. That is, a property of the self-consistence of a language as a mirror homologous to an external world it portraits. Many of the errors of modern digital science and XX c. philosophy of language and science derives from forgetting this truth, as scientists become overwhelmed by virtual digital images of reality, which are just mathematical mirrors of an external reality whose laws respond to the existential ilogic of space-time beings. Aristotle’s though was more aware of the parallelism between the mirror-language and the being in itself, which therefore can only be put in correspondence, because both are parallel to a 3^rd entity – the laws of space-time, the ultimate substance to which both refer.

Differences between logic and grammar. It is then important to distinguish between the different meaning of truth in Logic, which is closer to the language of mathematical algebra and verbal grammar, by relating both to the higher mirror of Space-time ‘existential ilogic’. The key word here is ‘existence’, which happens in time and space, but in verbal grammar, is far more subtle in its duration in time, due to the richness of tenses, aspects and moods and its 3 dimensions vs. mathematics and logic, which are languages better designed to define simultaneous space, and hence existence in present time.

Thus logic concerns the verbs that exist and ‘are’ more than those who concern transient existence, with more developed time analysis. English being extremely simple, tending to present, nominal logic, lacks the key difference of romance languages between ‘ser v. estar’ (Spanish); as logic does.

The difference would be made even more explicit when time futures were reduced to a single lineal clock-time with the pendulum clock, thus eliminating the potential different paths of species who do have a minimal control, hence choice in the relative arrows of entropy, reproduction and information to choose into its future.

This which was a freedom of advanced systems in which the ‘mind’ controlled body and field/limbs in an outer world, and could modulate its 5 Dimotions of existence, became as physics imposed its simplex analysis of systems of matter without such control, NOT a privilege of complex dominant organisms, but an ‘ambivalence’ even a stain in the nature of mankind and life, as the outer observer could ‘obviously’ not control the choices of the mind who will act from its inner point of view.

Language thus today have a lesser value, and a strain of ‘Schopenhauer’s stupids’ from Frege to modern corporations who ‘steal our time’ and try to make us robotic workers have decried this lack of ‘machine-like’ nature of those who ‘talk’ with multiple time futures.

Because western mechanical science turns around machines with null freedom, the difference has not been understood. In fact till the XIX c. philosophers and linguists didn’t realize Aristotle lacked a word for what we call the subject term of a sentence. Aristotle’s analysis of the proposition does not correspond to the modern syntactic analysis in terms of subject and predicate, but rather to what is known as topic-comment analysis.

On this Steinhal said “Consider the sentence Coffee grows in Africa. There can be no doubt where the grammarian will locate subject and predicate. But the logician would say that ‘Africa’ contains the concept connected with ‘coffee grows’; stating therefore, ‘the growth of coffee is in Africa’. That is, the verb has changed to the existential permanent state of being.

The obvious incapacity of physics to study complex systems where time is neither defined in its duration, nor all the elements of its causality revealed to the observer is however encapsulated in the variations of time tenses, moods and aspects. But lineal time that expects exatitude and permanence fails to understand multiple minds/points of view/monads exercising its will, as in the 3 body problems, thus limits its capacity to study the ‘intermediate’ region of existence between the monologic or dilogic relationship and the hierarchical relationship that supersedes the ‘range of free states of multiple elements’ between the 2 and the relative infinite when the ∆+1 whole network imposes again its control to the system.

Still the enormous importance of the triad of Socrates>Plato>Aristotle was to evolve the mind of man from the creationist, mythic age of the language proper of Semite religions, where the mirror is not acknowledge as such but is given the magic power to create, as the mind is neither perceived another ‘primary visual mirror’ of the true space-time reality, so we write:

Time-language :wor(l)d mirror:>Space-language (visual-mathematical mirror) > Space-time reality (5D stience).

Contrary to belief today most huminds have regressed to that mythic creationist age, either because they have reverted to Abrahamic religions or have substituted the verbal mirror for the digital mirror and due to the enhanced power of sensorial perception and calculus of computers start to confuse reality with the virtual world created by audiovisual and scientific, chip-based models of reality.

Censorship is then how a ‘non-free, non-rational language’ imposes the ‘restricted’ mind as the full reality and the verbal utterances of the priest as creationist power; which we will discuss when analyzing the inquisitions of thought that Judaism and its derivative religions and Aryan tribal cults from Hinduism to nationalism have imposed in the collective subconscious of mankind, through taboos, silences, censorships, ritualism & victimism

∆+1: TYPOLOGIC=TOPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS. SPECIES OF HUMAN LANGUAGES.

What is the connection between the different ‘forms’ of God, and the languages of mankind?

The issue as usual in 5D stiences can be treated with several degrees of complexity, from the simplest ceteris paribus analysis of monologic, through Dilogic, trilogic, pentalogic entanglements of the essential scale in which ∆+1 wor(l)ds are playing at the linguistic level – semantics. Thus the most evolved semantic languages as mirror of the Universe, isolate, dysillabic Chinese S+T=ST languages, that mimic closer the creationist forms of the Universe, developed the closer mirror to the game of exist¡ence (Taoism), while the Semitic hierarchical languages of VSO, trilogic, vowel infixes, mirrored in their Gods, the hierarchical structure of a superorganism, with the Verbal ‘immanent God-priest’, spelling the laws of organization of the system, which the ‘blind cells-citizens’ of the body of such anthropomorphic Gods, obeyed without doubt.

I cannot be exhaustive in those papers which just try to recollect from 30 years of personal research the most important elements of all stiences of mankind, before my time expires. So we consider closed in the previous paragraphs the analysis of our Gods of civilization in the level of semantics as mirrors of the proper way to construct a superorganism of mankind. We thus descend now to the level of Grammar and consider the most important connection between the level of ‘cultural worldview’ and ‘syntactic morphology’, that of typological linguistics, which has to do with the Order of the S<ST>T trinity elements of the fractal generator of Syntax.

It is also connected to morphology and the 3 already studied isolate, agglutinative and fusional languages, themselves related to the Humind’s in space (visual, verbal, emotional) and to the 3 ages in time corresponding to those minds (visual, 3^rd age; verbal, 2^nd age: Neolithic and emotional, 1^st age: Paleolithic).

So the entanglement roughly speaking happens in all the scales and pentalogic elements of the wor(l)d:

Mind-Dominant senses-Age of History-Morphology-Religion (semantics)-Syntactic Typology:

Mongoloid≈verbal≈Neolithic≈isolating≈Universal religions≈second age≈SV languages

Black=Emotional=Paleolithic=Fusional=Animist religions=First age=OV languages

White=visual=Metalitic=Agglutinative=Anthropomorphic=3^rd age=VS languages.

This being the ideal entanglement, the multiple interactions, changes of paradigm, modes of life, conquest, extinction, parallel influence, genetic evolution and mestizo mixing both of racial, cultural, geographic and temporal states of all languages and cultures, requires the study of each local case that shows the pattern to break, but still survive statistically when considering the whole of the Human cultural experience.

Syntactic and morphologic order determines the degree of freedom and order of thought in a language. And those are qualities also associated to the cultural mode of life of the society. For example, when comparing Hausa agricultural societies with the Nomadic Northern cultures, the rituals of order vs. freedom repeat in culture and language, as they do when comparing Hutu with Tutsi… Even if the racial origin and the language families might be the same. But nomadic freedom which is the initial state of fusional languages becomes then constrained into a strict hierarchical order when those very same nomads became warrior hordes, and the languages acquired a more restricted agglutinative forms, as in Turkish. On the other hand, when the cultures of nomads became the elite of agricultural societies, during the Bronze age, they evolved as elites that gave orders into VSO forms, with imperative verbs, loosing its SOV forms. On the other hand, agglutinative languages, which moved to ‘trading’ cultures, as Germanic did moving to the English ‘Amber ring’, became analytic, and highly isolated languages ‘trading meanings’ in an entropic process of dissolution of hierarchical structures. Languages are in a constant entanglement with the civilizations’ evolution in time, space, scale, work and age of evolution of the ‘Block of history’. This said the previous patterns are a good guidance to connect syntax and worldview. As, a civilization and a worldview is as Wolff and Humboldt understood a direct consequence of the syntax and semantics – of the form of thought of the wor(l)d.

Typology. The connection of ∆ø and ∆+1 languages and cultures.

What linguistics calls typology and we shall call following the ‘slight changes’ of naming of ‘stiences’ respect to science, attempting to maintain a correspondence principle, ‘topological linguistics’ deals with the order of the Fractal Generator of languages we have just describe d.

As usual in 5D we are heavily indebted to classic science though we need to correct and adapt some terminology. Specifically the most important sub-discipline of linguistics to understand the bridge between phonetics (a wide field also ruled by the laws of 5D change in time, and its cyclical patterns, since its discovery by Grimm, which further reinforces the ‘genetic similarity’ of memes and genes; but which we shall escape thoroughly), is typological linguistics which we rename topological linguistics, as it establishes the ‘variations’ of the 3 ‘mirror components’ of the Universal grammar of sentences, Subject (human) < Verb (action) > Object (Energy of the subject), according to its dominant order.

To fully understand how ‘permutations’ of physiological networks and any of its mirror languages define different species of physical or mental entities, we will analyze the 3! Variations of physiological networks in languages in a comparative homology with life phyla, as the main form of diversification in 5D is the order of dominance of the 3 physiological networks of a system, which in its perfect order are dominated by the informative element that comes first (subject), follow by the reproductive body-wave system (action, verb, blood system) and finally the lesser important network and element is the limb/field/motion/entropy system or object in a verbal sentence. Why there are other topological languages orders? Because of impositions by culture and predation by metal-power. So military idol-ogies of war put object first in its languages (warrior Japanese and German cultures) and go(l)d cultures where a new language dominates and orders the actions of people (money), through its banker-priests and ruling systems of slavery to work put the verb first (Semite languages; Biblical sects.)

This connects directly linguistics with the different cultures of mankind, as the deformation of the perfect world is carried into the deformation of the perfect wor(l)d.

Thus this introduction to 5D linguistics is fundamental to understand the structure of humind cultures. As

we evolve linguistics along the thesis of Humboldt (‘language defines culture’) and Chomsky (Universal grammar), classifying all languages with topological linguistics, which reveals the opposite duality of character of the main humanist vs. animetal cult(ure)s of mankind.

Topologic linguistics shows in fact the ‘deterministic’ non-free structure of animetal languages and cultures, as they hide the subject and in warrior cultures make agglutinative unbreakable word sentences; explaining why the militaristic Germanic, capitalist, biblical cults to go(l)d and weapons have taken mankind to the present point of no return. As their mind is not free but made of beliefs following orders that become rituals, and standardized repressive behavior of the natural drives of life (a fact we have already shown in those biblical cultures that repress all the life-enhancing actions from good food – dietary laws – to social love – racist memes – to reproduction – sexual sin, even the language itself – substituted by digital kabala.

As systemics is a logic-mathematical equation we resume How languages have adapted to selfish memes of metal with its ‘Germanic long unbroken words’ similar to simple swords vs. the cynical I-centered egocy (ego=idiocy) English that must start always with the self, in a simple logic equation of opposite languages and cultures:

Max. Evolution of the wor(l)d = Min. technological evolution

And vice versa: the most complex and balanced languages (African languages, Greek and Russian Indo-European original languages, Romanic languages, Chinese) have developed the most advanced social cultures and attempt the most important r=evolutions putting the value of the law above money and weapons. So our leading technological cultures are those who aborted both in syntax and semantics the proper evolution of the eusocial wor(l)d according to the laws of the organic fractal Universe, simplified its syntax and reducing its structure to eliminate freedom of mind; and express a fundamentalist, lineal idol-ogical view of History.

The laws of generation of reality. Basic combinatory of General Systems.

To study typological linguistics that 5D stiences changes to the name of topological linguistics we need to remind us on how the generator equation, S<ST>T (name-verb-object in this case) creates the different systems of reality, according to sequential order which is a basic form of dominance (First come first served).

There are several forms in which the Generator ‘decouples’ and splits in different ‘varieties’ of systems, which correspond to the processes of creation of different physical particles (quantum generation), biological species (Plan of evolution), and linguistic species (cultural differentiation).

Now the simplest, most obvious form in which to generate ‘varieties’ of any type is to apply the combinatory laws of mathematics to a system with 3 elements, the Information<Action>Entropy systems of reality.

The result are 6 fundamental combinations, which are common to all disciplines of science.

If you have 3 elements, I, A, E (Information-action-energy), then you can combine them in the following orders:

IAE, IEA, AIE, AEI, EIA, EAI

which give birth further to ‘6 varieties’ of geometry in the 5th Dimensional Universe. And in Physics quantum particles form 6 essential systems of particles and antiparticles in its ‘families’ of mass and electrons and in Biology we find 6 types of basic animal forms, and so we shall find 6 basic varieties of languages, which are studied by Typological Linguistics, called the SVO, SOV, VOS, VSO, OSV and OVS varieties.

Now in this post on General Linguistic Systems, we are mostly interested in the way verbal typologies define cultural and mental behavior among human beings. Thus we shall study the way the order of languages recreates the human mind. To further understand this categories of cultural minds, we shall relate them and name them not only as linguists do (the previous SVO, etc.) but we shall introduce a far more ‘descriptive’ characterization proper of this researcher, based in the homologies that the General Systems Science imposes between parallel systems, by tagging and comparing the 6 varieties of mental linguistic order with the 6 varieties of ‘animal forms’. Indeed, one of the fundamental tenants of GST (General Systems Theory) which other philosophies of science ignore is the ‘homological nature’ of all ‘varieties’ of the Universe as all of them are fundamentally evolved systems that combine the 2 primary substances of the Universe, energy and information, whose properties are thus essential to all other systems.

We shall thus consider typology of languages and define with them the character of the main cultural organisms of mankind. And to that aim, we will compare those human organisms with a similar variation of ‘living organisms’, as all is homologic in the universe. Indeed, if Chinese traditions liked the characters of human to those of animals by homology, we shall like the characters of cultures to those of animal phyla, in an exercise which again simple ‘science’ would reject, unaware of the unifying principles of all systems. Systems philosophy is SYNTHETIC, mathematical science is analytic. Both are worth to understand, but the wholes are synthetic, the parts are analytic and we need both to put together a meaning for any system of the Universe.

So let us consider the 6 Universal varieties first, and then the 5 linguistic typologies that we shall call ‘evolved, free flowing mammal and bird languages’, ‘chained, slave reptile and insect languages’ and ‘primitive, minimalist, bacteria and virus languages’.

Yes do not raise your eyebrows, with the usual egocentric beliefs of human beings as an entitled species who must be treated nicely, and never be understood as some special ‘god-like’ reality that does not obey the laws of science. This political and economical censorship that ‘invents’ the nature of man, without wanting to know truth as it is does not apply to this blog.

And if you finish this post without such prejudices, what i can tell you is that you will understand much better cultures and how and why they behave as they do.

To state first that there are many more aspects to the synchronic and diachronic analysis of Linguistic categories we shall do (itself a small part of the entire course of General Linguistic Systems, which applies many more laws of GST to explore the nature of the human mind and the parallelism between:

– Genetics/races of mankind and its 3 typologies, informative Mongolian races, energetic, white races and reproductive, exi, action black races.

– Memetics, Human cultures (cyclical, eusocial, Mongolian cultures, individualistic, white cultures, and sensorial, black cultures)

– And linguistics, the point we stress here.

Active/Passive/Imperative languages.

The 3 essential elements of the Universe are therefore reflected in all sentences, as all sentences narrate actions performed by men over objects:

Information (subject), verb=action; Object-Energy

It would be in the other language of ‘numbers: X (subject) < operandi > Y (object).

What Chomsky missed is that the 3 elements must be separated to truly understand the rules of ‘generative grammar’, which are the same rules that generate any system of energy and information in the universe.

Since, as all in the universe human language is ternary, as anything follows the ‘universal grammar’ of the ‘generator equation of all fractal systems of energy and information’, which i discovered and formalized in systems sciences.

Now this is well-known to linguistics, creating a key concept of classification, called linguistic typology:

How the generator equation creates linguistic entities. order, determine cultural character:

In linguistics, word order typology is the study of the order of the syntactic constituents of a language, and how different languages can employ different orders.

There are six theoretically possible basic word orders for the transitive sentence:

These labels usually appear abbreviated as “SVO” and so forth, and may be called “typologies” of the languages to which they apply.

Now, what they tell us about mankind starts to be clear, when we analyze the abundance of those typologies among human cultures:

Topology: English equivalent; Proportion; languages

SOV: “She him loves.” 45%, Latin, Turkish

SVO: “She loves him.” 42% English, Mandarin, Russian

VSO: “Loves she him.” 9% Hebrew, Irish, Zapotec

VOS: “Loves him she.” 3% Malagasy, Baure

OVS: “Him loves she.” 1% Warao

Humans, this proves are ‘self-centered beings’ for whom the Subject must come always before the object.

The dominance of Subject languages is overwhelming. In 87% of languages subject comes first. And among those the most successful (2/3rds of speakers) are SVO languages, for reasons we shall study now in depth.

Now this responds to the laws of the Universe, where the 2 natural forms of order are Information < Action > Energy or ‘temporal flowing order’ and Information x Energy = Action or Spatial fixed order. So this law of linguistics is in homology with the higher laws of general systems sciences, let us then study those 2 fundamental forms of human languages.

The parallelism between Universal Grammars and human cultures.

We can add a final ‘category’, in the study of the 3 dominant languages of mankind and its grammatical order. Since languages have 3 elements too. The Informative Subject, S, the Action-Verb, V and the Object-Energy, O.

So typological linguistics talk of 3 language orders; the Passive, Imperative and Active voices:

– SOV order or ‘passive voice’ where the object-energy is the center of the language. We shall call them, energetic, ‘passive’, objectual, ‘ergative’ languages, such as German is. Those ‘cold’, passive voices are objectual, cold languages, proper of ‘warrior’ cultures, dominant in the white dolichocephalic worldview. They are proper today of the Germanic-Japanese ‘objectual’ worldview, in which the ‘machine-weapon’ and its production is the center of the Industrial Universe.

– VSO, ‘imperative’ languages, in which the verb-action is first and the selfish subject is in its center. Proper in the past of Semitic cultures, corresponding to the informative worldview. They are dominant in Abrahamic, ‘sacred’ texts and explain the selfishness of the ‘Jewish culture’ and the ‘Fundamentalism’ of the Arab World, the 2 unbalanced, financial and military cultures that are at present destroying ‘imperatively’ the world.

– SVO languages, balanced languages, in which the verb-action combines both elements. They are dominant in the most evolved languages, those who have suffered less the ‘influence’ of weapons and money, the alien languages to the human mind. Today they are dominant in Black Africa, but also in the Chinese and Latin, balanced world of man.

It is thus needed only a final element to fully understand the harmonies and parallelisms between the 3 dominant ‘species’ of mankind – the linguistic point of view, and the origin of those 3 forms of thinking, those 3 worldviews, those 3 typologies of being human And we shall study them within the context of the larger ‘ternary’ grammar, proper of all complementary systems of energy and information of the Universe:

Information Pole < Action Exi > Energetic Pole.

Indeed, you exist in a Universe of only 2 elements, energy and information, which combine to create the infinite complementary systems of reality and its ‘actions’. The Universe is an spiritual reality made of 2 type of motions; lineal motion or ‘energy’, E; formal, curved motions or ‘in-form-ation’ and its combined Action.

And this is the ultimate truth from where all other truths stem.

So in physics this is called the Law of Quantum Complementarity that defines all systems as dual states, made of ‘particles of information’ (which we have seen to be cyclical motions, masses and charges with the form of a vortex or ‘clock of time’), fields of energy (which we have seen to be lineal motions, gravitational and electromagnetic forces), which combine to form physical actions.

And in biology is called the physiological structure of all living beings made of a cyclical head/informative /nervous system; an elliptic body/reproductive/blood system and lineal, moving limbs, the energetic system.

A very politically incorrect but homologic truth: comparative physiological linguistics.

We are now inaugurating an outrageous (: new branch of linguistics, Physiological linguistics. Of course, the retarded mood of modern equalization of all humans as mere enzymen, who should not care to understand the organism of history implies that we should just praise ‘cultural diversity’, as a toy-game, as long as we only care for our mechanisms, and ‘financial values’. ‘Everything is Ok, because we don’t give a $hit’ resumes the modern attitude towards ‘History and culture’. We love brutal films of mass-murderer caudillos, of our nazionalist idol-ogies. So the Hindi animetal culture now builds up a 150 meters statue in Mumbai, land of the greedy stock-market to a Rajput mass-murderer hero on the fight against Muslim Indian brothers. And that is also Ok. It is the view of a Bio-historian, a scientist of the wor(l)d that ONLY SURVIVAL OF mankind is OK and this implies to denounce at all levels, the animetal cult(ure)s that are extinguishing History including its ‘linguistics’. Enter then physiological comparisons between typological linguistics and the equivalent order of physiology in animal life.

Where we shall distinguish 4 main phyla on 4 main orders; Object, first ‘Nature languages’; Balanced, SVO Neolithic languages and Animetal languages of two varieties, VSO, Imperative, ‘blood’, greedy, capitalist languages; passive, ‘cold’, warrior entropic SOV languages. And to fully grasp the ‘physiological’ S<ST>T nature of all realities, including mirror languages, we shall compare as an exercise of homological understanding of the parallelism of all the systems of the Universe, ‘physiological’ life typologies and linguistic mind typologies.

Let us then consider in more detail the 3 categories of Languages that dominate human worldviews. To fully illustrate its ‘vital meaning’ in those worldviews we shall establish an homological parallelism according to the fundamental ‘law’ of systems sciences – the parallelism between the ‘diversification’ of any species, according to the ‘Ternary, Universal Grammar’ of reality. As all are complementary systems of energy and information, that create ‘actions’ and hence all respond to the Information<Action>Entropy equation and its varieties.

So we shall study, the Parallelism between the varieties of languages and animal species, such as, the order of the 3 elements of languages corresponds to the order of the 3 physiological systems in life:

– The nervous, informative system corresponds to the subject.

– The blood=reproductive, active system corresponds to the verb.

– And the digestive, energetic system, corresponds to the object.

And so Mammal=Informative species are parallel to SVO languages.

Insect=Greedy, blood dominant species, correspond to Imperative, VSO languages, proper of the first animetal dominant cultures, where a parasitic go(l)d culture on top imposes its power with barking orders.

Their violent counterpart are Reptile=Cold, Energetic, digestive dominant species correspond to SOV, warrior languages.

I know this ‘parallelism and ‘form of doing science’ so novel to the reader as anything dealing with General Systems Sciences is, will put off many readers as a non-scientific approach. LOL. What you call science and I call technology, has NOTHING TO DO with the ultimate poetic harmonies of reality but with measuring and computing with machines, classifying every thing in its how, not its why. Try to upgrade your mind a little bit to a much deeper view of the harmony of all the parts of the whole.

PALEOLITHIC: JUNGLE, SELFLESS OBJECTUAL OVS LANGUAGES

Cariban languages

Jungle People, recollectors and subsistence life forms show Object-first languages, overwhelmed by nature. They can be compared to small life forms for which the world in which they prey is ‘enormous’. They might have been the first languages of mankind; today reduced to a few forms in south-American, Amazonian Jungles, and Mexican subsistence farming

Finally, the less abundant, less evolved languages of mankind are those in which the object, the ‘energy’ of the system, dominates the subject, the information.

Those are naturally languages in which the order is inverse to the subject, center of the language, and so they seem unnatural.

Their equivalent in Physics would be antiparticles in which the electron is in the center instead of the informative quark. In animal life, they belong to the 2 categories of species, which started animal life evolution, in the microcosms, hence for whom the object-world in which they live is dominant. So we talk of:

OSV (object-Subject Verb) or bacterial languages

OVS (Object-verb-subject) or Viral Languages

In which man is overwhelmed by the ecosystem as bacteria and viruses are much smaller and overwhelmed by the huge species in which they host SURRENDER the ‘nervous, subject system’ to form an integral entangled part of the whole – in this case objectual languages represent civilizations entangled fully with Nature.

Thus, languages in which the ‘object’ is the ‘most important elements’ are ‘animal languages’ of the lower order, in which the subject is immersed in a huge, bigger objectual world, either the Jungle/Nature in primitive human Paleolithic societies or the ‘macro-organism’ in unicellular animals.

In those earlier forms of thought, probably the first languages of mankind, as they are also the first ‘animal species’, Nature was so overwhelming than the Object became first. And we can distinguish 2 different species.

– OSV languages/cultures:

Those in which there are motion and volition in the subject which does have to work and act upon the environment. They correspond in nature to the simplest, but active, alive beings, bacteria, so we call them ‘bacterial languages’.

They belong to cultures that live in jungles in which they still fear the presence of animal predators and do have to act to live, or are constantly in the move as hunting/gatherers, or poor agricultural environments.

Interesting enough the most resistant racing human culture/race of the world, the mythic Tarahumara, from Northern Mexico, who win all the long distance careers over 50 kilometers in length, do have this linguistic structure; as the animal bacteria do, they are constantly running for hours and days…

They appear in other more evolved languages as a structure proper of sacred sentences in cults in which God is overwhelmingly, and man a mere ‘bacteria’ worshipping him, prostrated in front of the Almighty, such as in Arabic religious sentences (being Islam the religion in which the power of God is most supreme):

إِيَّاك نَعْبُدُ وإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِين

Iyyāka naʿbudu wa iyyāka nastaʿīn

You alone we worship, and You alone we ask for help.

Because it can also be used in Yiddish greatly influenced by Hebrew, to emphasize the distinctive properties of the object, it reinforces the General System law of evolution of languages, as the previous phase to the insect/Semitic languages in the evolution of human thought.

– OVS viral languages.

And those in which there is not even motion in the subject, that is the Object comes first (the host cell) then the action (the reproduction by the bacteria of the genetic DNA of the virus) and finally the seemingly dead, reproduced subject – the virus who parasites the cell, the human who parasites nature).

Thus those are in Nature viral species, seemingly dead, and in the Paleolithic, ‘recollector cultures’ where you can just reach a banana and eat without moving much, in paradise like allopatric islands without predators, in which you are enjoying life and sex in a passive way.

Those are the less abundant languages, and only occur in the Amazonian jungles, in which life is truly easy such as the Xavante and Warao (there are not even big felines beyond a few panthers, not enemy tribes with metal in its formative age, only food to pick up and a luxurious environment that doesn’t encourage motion beyond the village) though it probably was the first way in which man learned to speak.

Now, the reader should not be surprised that Hixkaryana the first ‘viral language’ to be described as having an object–verb–subject word order (by linguist Desmond C. Derbyshire), was one of the Caribbean languages, spoken in the Amazon River in Brazil, by a cannibal tribe, which as viruses do, feeds in the life-flesh of a living human people.

Needless to say today those 2 linguistic typologies are almost extinct as they represent hardly 1% of human languages and even a lesser number of speakers.

But these kind of languages are starting to appear in the programming logic structures of robots. We do not have however intention to give more clues to the makers of A.I. on how to accelerate the extinction of man by programming robots with ‘logic schemes’. .. one of the reasons I have been for decades uninterested in giving away my knowledge of linguistics. I know as Leonardo did, writing mirror thoughts on weapons and mechanisms, that mankind has a big number of Insect/Reptilian thinkers who will show no pity for mankind, no freedom of mind and would always use knowledge to harm life, as long as they speak the way they do.

The surviving family: Cariban languages.

It has to be noticed that most Paleolithic languages have disappeared or by influence of agricultural civilizations lost its VO forms (with the subject often appearing as a case to the verb). It only remained as a clear family due to the isolation till recent age, in the Amazonian-Orinoco dual river basin, from where the main examples of those texts are taken. What other properties we can observe on those languages?

In ∆-1 phonetics, a relative reduced number of clear-cut sounds, which again can be ascribed to the overwhelming ‘wealth’ of jungle sounds that surround the speaker, which uses often alternative sign and whistle languages, and reduces the need to speak in a hunting, ‘silence-prone’ environment to clear-cut sounds. Cariban languages have small segmental inventories: usually only voiceless stops (p, t, k, ), one or two fricatives/affricates (h or F, s or or t ), two nasals (m, n), a vibrant (&, often or ), glides (w, j), and six vowels (a, e, i, o, u, i).

In morphology in tune with its VO structure, Cariban languages are mostly suffixal; prefixes exist also, marking person and valency (the latter on verbs). Some languages (Tiriyo, Wayana, Apalai) have reduplication; which they share with latter evolved African languages, following the natural ideophone Nature of Nature. As a proof that the apparent simplicity of languages is not a proof of primitivism but of adaptation of a language to its worldview, the complexity of the morphology is comparable to that of Romance languages. There are usually nouns, verbs, postpositions, adverbs (a class that includes most adjectival notions), and particles. This richness extends to the diversity of pronouns classes when they appear with 5 persons (1, 2, 3, 1+2=dual inclusive” ‘You and I,’ and 3+1 exclusive; while the third-person forms also distinguish animate vs. inanimate gender; and have several deictic distinctions.

In ∆ø-∆+1 Semantics (the direct connection between the language and the world) as in the case of Australian languages, there is also a rich vocabulary for orientation in space (locational adverbs), as part of the hunting-gathering vocabulary: Spatial postpositions often distinguish: vertical support (‘on’), containment (‘in’), attachment/adhesion, Ground properties (‘in open space,’ ‘on summit of,’ ‘in water’), and complex spatial configurations (‘astraddle,’ ‘parallel to.’

While the richness of semantics is maximal for the Entropic action (TT) of feeding, with different forms of the verb eat depending on what food is eaten; ultimately as many features of its Objectual typology natural to the relative reduction of life actions to those of simple subsistence.

So another way to consider its Objectual structure is the limitation of the language to its basic constituents overwhelmed by the silences of hunting and the need to listen reduces often the syntax to dual components: most languages have only OV-phrases (only with third-person A and P), possessive phrases (possessor-possessed), and postpositional phrases.

Other families of Paleolithic, ‘jungle languages’.

In the same wide area, we can find other languages in which the subject is submissive to the verb and object, which use instead ergative systems that reduce the subject to an ‘objectual’ morphology. Such is the case of the Panoan languages of the upper Amazon basin. They are an example of the next evolution of culture and linguistics as the extreme objectual surrender to the Jungle/environment leaves way to a higher control with subsistence, still practiced today by most groups, consisting mainly of slash-and-burn horticulture, hunting with bow and/or blowgun, and fishing. The verb then starts to take a more active role with a large number of morphological possibilities.

Panoan languages have about 130 different verbal suffixes express such diverse notions as causation, direction of movement, evidentiality, emphasis, uncertainty, aspect, tense, plurality, repetition, etc. Panoan languages are all morphologically ergative, with an ergative case marker that also marks instrumental and genitive cases.

It is then natural to find the next evolution, languages where the verb becomes dominant while the subject still hides. In the Central American jungle environment, where agriculture is more developed we find clusters of such linguistic VSO forms, across the Sierra Madre Southern cordillera, from Guatemala to the state of Guerrero.

While the only remarkable environment of other OVS languages will be the similar Paelolithic jungle environment of North Eastern Australia with such cases as the Wik Ngathana language.

VOS BIRD, CONTEMPLATIVE, SEAFARING LANGUAGES

In the graph, ‘bird cultures’ are seafarer cultures in which VOS order expresses a form of life in constant motion/action overwhelmed by an immense overbearing environment, the sea; similar to the physiological order and nature of bird’s life, always flying in the immensity of the air/sea world. Thus only Melanesian and Polynesian languages have this order.

THus a second category of OBJECT languages corresponds to those who are similar to the structure of birds, the most evolved ‘animal forms’ after mammals.

The environment in perpetual flux in which they exist dominates Birds’ existence. The air through which they fly, and the world they see matters more than the self of the bird. The bird flies in a herd, and the motions of other birds are immediately replicated by its wing motions, not to collide with them. One has to abandon itself to the motion of the whole. So happens in the actions of sailing, in which one lets itself to the motions of the wind and the waves. Subjects don’t matter, actions must be swift and apply to the object, the boat; hence VO dual sentences are the norm.

Birds’ physiological systems are an intermediate state of evolution between reptiles of cold blood and mammals of more complex nervous systems, for which the ‘physiological subject is the reason d’etre of their ‘existence’. But as its Generator Equation explains, the subject is secondary to the ‘action’ of flying, the essential focus of the bird’s existence and the environment or energetic ecosystem of air that sustains it. While visual land perception is the sense that provides him the will to fly both entropically seeking in the sea the food to eat and reproductively, returning to the land to mate.

It is then not surprising that the ‘most persistent’ word of Austronesian languages is ‘eye’, ‘mata’, hardly changed in all the languages of the family. But unlike the I=Eye subject of English language, is not the perceiver but the perceived open space what the eye sees and cares for.

The bird lives to fly and observe the land in search of prey. And so its ‘generative order’ is:

Action=flying, Object: environment, and finally the subject, seemingly passive to the action and object it perceives.

And we might wonder, since there are no human cultures that ‘fly’, what kind of human culture lives in a similar fashion to that of a bird, dominated by a moving action over an overwhelming environment. Alas! Think for a while… Since the discovery of that specific culture-action was a moment of beauty for my mind…

Who lives in a changing environment similar to the air, in which all is moving and to dominate the action of sustaining yourself ‘afloat’ is the maximal truth of survival?

Sea fearers. And indeed, the only VOS language of note in mankind, the only ‘bird people’ who masterminded long-distance travelling in earlier ages when their language was formed, were the Melanesian and Polynesian people who traveled far away in their tiny boats. And so the most important VOS language by number of speakers is Malagasy, the language of the sea fearer people who crossed the astonishing long distances between Indonesia and Madagascar to found their new promise land.

While in the other extreme Polynesian languages of long-range sea fearers such as Fijian also speak VOS bird languages and nobody else in planet Earth do.

Thus the Whorfian hypothesis is rather inverse: it is the environment, not the mind, who first acts defining the shape it will take the language to maximize the survival possibilities of the language-mind in a given environment. In the idealistic world of Jewish->Capitalist scholars, such as Whorf, in which the socialist ‘materialistic thesis’ that ‘economics’ determine ‘superstructures’ (culture and language) is taboo, Whorf tried to pull out an inverse idea. That the mind of the language determines how humans see their worldview. This is not truth. It is just yet another ego trip of ‘animetal cultures’. Man’s mind is fashioned by the environment in which it survives.

So Bird languages appear with its odd order when the ‘environment’ of the bird-culture, the maritime oceanic people must adapt its linguistic syntax to survive better. When you are at sea, the sea dominates it all. The action of sailing is a fast-motion, fast-action, imperative world in which the captain gives orders/actions regarding the sea and the motion of the ship, the object, to a group of people, the crew, whose names matter nothing, whose lives are at risk.

And so the verb comes first, the object, the sea latter and the subject, the crew the last. And a sentence is more efficient when that is the order given by the captain. In a situation of risk at sea, you do not waste your time with names and subjects. You must act imperatively on the object to save the journey.

And so the Micronesian and Melanesian cultures that lived at sea and travelled the longest distances evolved their language to fit their job. And succeeded.

And this is the reason why the next category of language-cultures, that of animetal herds of ‘warriors’ and ‘traders’ did also develop.

Austronesian family, the prototype of VOS languages.

Reinforcing the hypothesis of an VOS, nature related linguistic structure are the austronesian family in which languages that ‘revert’ to big islands and develop there an organic, agricultural society become SVO, ‘neolithic’ systems of linguistics; but once they return to the seafaring way of life, revert to VOS form, with the notorious case of Malgasy, an VOS language reverted from Indonesian, agricultural SVO forms:

In the graph, from the original Taiwanese and Philippines Islands of VSO languages, as Austronesian families settled down in Indonesian farming big islands reverted to SVO, but in the Polynesian and Malgasy world the action oriented verb first, object often second, seafaring craft imposed its structure, with clear vowel phonetics, that carry direct information to the crew.

∆-1 Phonetics: As in environment related VSO languages, also present in oceanic linguistics, phonetics are simplified and ‘clearer’, to be listened in the water environment. Consonantal phonological erosion of particular phonotactic positions, particularly involving word-final consonants in Oceanic languages is common. And vowels are the simplest clear set of the four-vowel system /i u e a/. Another clear change for clarity is the loss in all Oceanic languages of tonal variations, which exist in all other families of Continental Asia, as it is difficult to ‘talk’ in sailing environments with such subtle differences.

∆ø: Syntax. The essence of its syntax is a verb-action oriented order system. The noun phrase that is signaled as being in focus typically appears clause-finally, is definite, and performs a range of possible semantic roles according to the nature of the focus marking on the verb, which speeds up the actions involved in sailing against a pressing nature. Oceanic languages evolved a system of formal marking for transitivity on verbs that expresses a range of different semantic roles associated with the verbal object. This marking involves verbal suffixes that express a distinction for those that carry a transitive suffix with oblique objects. These transitive suffixes are often described as expressing close and distant transitive respectively and are associated with different sorts of semantic roles. Thus, in Fijian the intransitive verb qasi ‘crawl’ corresponds to the close transitive form qasi-va ‘crawl to (location)’ and the distant transitive form qasi-vaka ‘crawl with (something held); useful for the environment of navigation.

The original VO word order often shifted to OV order in the major islands of Melanesian.

A small number of languages like Magori and Maisin of Papua New Guinea underwent such shift that for many years set a dispute as to whether they should be classified as Austronesian or not.

Why there are no many ‘bird languages’ has to do with the obvious fact that man does not fly ‘literally’ – that is, its mind is grounded, and we shall see for most of history it has been a ‘reptilian culture’, predatory, dominated by greed; so there are few human birds. Still there are bird languages among humans and bird people among us; so we have considered indeed certain cultures that are similar to birds… I consider myself a bird and so the first book I wrote, was called ‘the albatross’, when I was a teenager and left my country to not submit myself to military discipline, travelling the world from the advantageous point of a gliding mind…

NEOLITHIC AGE. EVOLVED ACTIVE, SVO SYSTEMS, FLEXIBLE, ‘FLOWING’, BALANCED LANGUAGES

The 2 most common universal systems according to 5D GST (Generator of Space-time) are:

S(Information)<ST-Action>T(Entropy) systems dominated by Informative subjects whose goal is an ‘action’ established upon the entropy object of the system. This is the ‘natural’ most evolved order in the Universe in balance with the verb, dominated by the subject, corresponding to the ‘mature’ present age of all forms.

So systems with that sequential order are the most efficient, flexible, feed-back systems of the Universe.

S(In)x T(En)=ST(Action) systems, dominated still by the informative subject, which however relates now first to the Object of entropy, through the action. The object thus becomes promoted to the center; and often the most important element, focus of the system. And so these are the most ‘productive systems’, in which the object is either devoured as energetic entropy (- action) or reproduced through the ± actions of the Informative subject.

We could consider the first case a verb-oriented, ST-body/wave system and the second case an S-oriented formal particle/head system.

Those 2 systems are the most common systems in the Universe, as they represent the two essential ‘beats’ and ‘elements’ of reality, and most systems in fact do switch between a ‘wave-body-ST’, flux, evolutionary state (Inf<act>En) and a ‘spatial’, fixed, formal S-tate.

This means also in languages, there is a fluctation between SVO and SOV states of a language; albeit, as they are the subconscious collective of a culture, hence of a much larger spacetime span (5D metrics)

In Animal life systems, the 3 ‘elements’ are the physiological networks of the organism; so we define a simple Generator Equation for Living Animal Organisms:

S: Nervous, Informative System < ST: Action/Blood system > T: Energetic, Digestive system.

And we find the mammal as the phyla, where the nervous system dominates:

Nervous system > Blood System > Digestive system. And so as it happens today in languages, over ¾ of human beings speak mammal languages (SVO languages), even if in a previous less evolved time, SOV languages; where the blood- system of actions recede, cooling down (reptile languages), were dominant.

SVO – Active, free Languages: Homologous to mammal, nervous, informative systems

Informative/nervous system dominate Mammals, on top of its physiological body, controlling the blood and digestive system in its hierarchical bottom. They correspond homologically to an SVO order of max. freedom; and social evolution, with the human subject at its center.

SVO are Mammal languages since they place the nervous, informative subject first, the active, blood-verb next, and the digestive, object energy last. In a Mammal, the most evolved organism, the informative system dominates the reproductive and energetic system. This is shown in the ‘order’ on the height hierarchical axis of its 3 systems, in which the nervous system is on top of the organism, coming first through a higher head.

The Neolithic when man reached its maturity was undoubtedly the golden age of SVO languages preserved in cultures that took longer to enter the metalitic age (Black Africa, China, Island paradises).

In a parallel fashion in an SVO ‘mammal’, ‘informative’ language, the subject is the essence of the sentence, followed by the action-verb; and the relative energy of the sentence, the object is last.

Those are the most evolved languages of mankind, and according to the Paradox of History, Max. Human evolution = Min. Technological evolution, were predominant in the non-white races/cultures in harmony with the Universe, notably in the ‘negro’ cultures of Africa and the Mongoloid cultures of China. Those cultures show the most evolved forms of languages, with complex grammars, such as the multiple verbal construction of African languages; or the multiple tonal elements of Chinese.

Their maximal evolution also obeys to its allopatric evolution, isolated for long periods of time from the ‘metal-deforming’ processes of war cycles. Thus the Chinese isolated culture and the negro, isolated cultures who did not come in contact with metal till the I millennia before Christ, and did not suffer the constant ravage of war, plummeting them into new dark ages in which human evolution halts and regresses were able to reach the final process of evolution of the human mind, which can be shown to be parallel as in all temporal processes of evolution of a Fractal Generator System of the Universe, I<Ac>E, to the summit of human existence as ‘mammal languages’.

What is the difference between those 2 most advanced human civilizations? The answer is in the ‘stress’ they put on either of the 2 fundamental elements of the human existence, the ‘subject-informative’ element which is dominant in the Mongoloid, informative human race, and the ‘verb-active’ element which is dominant in the balanced, reproductive ‘negro’ (1) race.

African languages show their verbal complexity in the use of multiple verbs in the same construction; often using in a single sentence a verb attached to the subject and a verb attached to the object.

On the other hand, the ‘isolating’ ‘ego-centered’, subjective, informative Mongolian languages make of the human subject, the center of the sentence and find multiple wor(l)ds to define them.

Here though we can establish a division, between the I-centered, simple, White/Neanderthal asocial SVO languages, such as English in which the subject is the I, me and myself, latter studied in detail and the Mongolian, eusocial, informative subject which is the collective group, such as the Chinese or Japanese. But in both cases the subject is the center of the sentences, stressed more than the rest of the words. So the selfish English language has the I first and cannot write sentences erasing the I.

On the other island extreme of the Eurasian 800 years ‘arch’ of human migrations, the Japanese is also a subject language with multiple words to express subjects. But those words relate not to the ego of the individual but to the group, that is, to the individual subject in its relationship with all other human beings.

So in Japanese there are ‘dozens’ of Subject particles, each one different according to how the I-you-he-we etc. relates to other I-wes, etc…

Those 2 languages varieties thus correspond to the energy/information duality; in this case the energy/reproductive action languages of Africa vs. the Informative, subject languages of the mongoloid, informative human race, establishing again a parallelism between culture, race and language, so often found in this blog.

3^rd AGE OF HISTORY: METALITIC.

Freedom and typological order. Existential ilogic.

Essential to the entire conceptual time-space symmetry of the order of words is its reflection in space (written word) of a sequential process in time. The subject first language is by essence more free; as the subject perceives initially the sentence to be his and thus in self-thought he is controlling the action it will perform and the object it will act upon. But most important in the reception of a message, if he is ‘named’ first, he does have time to assess the rest of the message, value its ‘verbal order’ and act upon it. For that reason as languages evolved SOV and SVO became dominant.

There is though a clear difference between the first type of SOV languages, in which subject and object are treated together, often in an ergative mode, so the subject looses identity and becomes objectualized, SxT (subject x Object) = ST verb; corresponding to the time equation of existential ilogic:

Future (subject) x Past (object) = Present (verb).

Which is the equation of simultaneous, factual present. From:

S-Subject-Future<ST-verb-present>T-object-past-entropy order, which is a temporal order towards an entropic end; hence freer, which also clearly distinguishes the subject as far more important than the object, hence a more humanist approach. So the dominance of SVO and VSO languages in the earlier metal age, is a clear proof of a regression of freedom, from the ‘hypothetical’ dominance of SVO language in the Neolithic age, which we can unfortunately only infer from its conservation in regions where metal arrived latter (islands, China, black Africa):

Active, SVO; Imperative, VSO; and Passive, Objectual SOV->OV languages.

In the graph, the Universal Grammar that constructs all Systems of the Universe, with its 3 elements, Information (subject) < Action (verb) > Energy (Object), defines also the Universal Grammar of all human languages.

Animetal order (SOV warrior and VSO trader) languages are cleary dominant as we fully enter the bronze age. Notice though that the isolated or agricultural, milder regions where hierarchical societies are NOT yet established remain ‘evolved’ forms of fusional non-dominant order or SVO Neolithic, subject-humanist oriented orders. So Neolithic China remains SVO as it does the isolated English island hinterland and the Old Norse region of small fiords’ communities. While the relatively free original regions of the Indo-European expansion (Caucasus, Slav and greek hinterland maintain the richness and complexity of multiple typologic order.

So there are 3 fundamental orders of those 3 elements that define most languages of mankind:

– VSO languages (Imperative Order, Semitic, ‘religious’ languages) < SVO (Active order, balanced, African, Chinese/Romance languages) > SOV/OV (Passive Order, warrior, cold, objectual languages).

They are parallel to the 3 world views dominant in the metal age: the imperative hierarchical order of the earlier bronze age Semite empires, where a human leader gave orders; the Warrior, objectual, Industrial world view where the object-weapon and war ‘code’ of death makes the subject irrelevant (Germanic, Japanese cultures). And finally the balanced, SVO view, which came to dominate more flexible trading cultures that ‘haggle’ around the elements of the language.

Thus the ‘view world’ of each human mind species is reflected in the languages, according to the hierarchical order of those 3 elements.

Animetal cultures dominated either by money or weapons are the unbalanced world views and word orders:

– Fundamentalist religions and those capitalist religions dominated by the ‘blood/monetary language’ and earlier civilizations, with lesser freedom and maximal metal-control, proper of the bronze age have kept, specially in its ‘sacred texts’, the VSO order. It is a hierarchical order with the Verb (action) on ‘top/first place’ of the sentence. They are ‘imperative’, action, ‘greedy’, materialist cultures, proper of Semitic languages

– Warrior cultures and objectual cold-hearted cultures in which the subject can even disappear as it does so often in Japanese, are SOV orders.

– While sensorial, humanist cultures; today the Chinese in the East, the Romance language in the west (and English influenced by French) and the African languages in its totality show the most proper SVO order often with ‘Imperative’ and ‘Passive’ voices for certain situations.

In the graph, the distribution of ancient languages according to its order: classic Semitic, ‘religious’ imperative languages are VSO languages, confronted to its ‘inverse’ SOV, warrior languages, as their cultures were. They represented the 2 extremes of the animetal, eternal dispute between ‘cold warrior and ‘greedy trader’ societies. Among the classic languages only Chinese and Gaul, the 2 more ‘life-oriented’ societies of the Western and Eastern decoupling, even today, had the more evolved, flexible SVO ‘mammal order’. While the 2 most sophisticated ‘indo-European’ languages, of higher evolution (due to its allopatric evolution in the 2 regions of original development of Indo-European languages, the Anatolian peninsula, from where it radiated during the Neolithic, and the Russian steppe, origin of the Chariot second radiation), Classic Greek and Russian, permit the maximal flexibility with multiple word order. So do today the Romance languages evolved from Latin

It is not by chance that in the East and West they represent the summit of human thought and search for human freedom and maximization of art, literature and r=evolution (French, Socialist aborted r=evolutions). While in the East China is the only culture in which man and the law still dominates though in a process of extinction, the power of weapons and money. Some points to notice on the graph:

Nations and cultures are ruled by 3 varieties of languages, warrior lineal languages, monetary cyclical languages, and vital organic, human verbal languages, which cater most to the evolution of weapons, money and machines, and human memes. So we can differentiate nations by their different dominance. I.e. Germany will be a fractal part of Europe dominant in war memes, Italy in life memes, and United Kingdom in trade memes. And then we can further divide United Kingdom in Scotland, war memes, England go(l)d memes and Wales, life memes.
Cultures are influenced by geography, as mountainous and continental regions breed warriors, islands and sea-peninsulas trade memes, and tempered or isolated regions, life memes.
Memes influence each other, so languages are also broken according to Typological Linguistics (we call it topological in this blog as we explain in our treatise on linguistics), in warrior agglutinative, Objectual, VOS, OVS, lineal languages (German, Turkish), trader, broken, short word languages (English, Chinese), with balanced ternary human-first order of words: SVO… and Verbal dominant, wor(l)d religious languages, with VSO order… Linguistics of course is far more complex as we explain on our previous section on the wor(l)d, since often, in our corrupted world VSO languages become imperative, religious military inquisitions (Semite languages), and so vital languages with SVO order, must be also considered for human civilizations – that is languages, as most African ones, where there is a wealth of variations on the use of the verb to signify a human action. The map above show a clear grouping of those 3 type of languages in the classic age, but we shall keep it simple in those posts on fractal cultures.

The subconscious collective of art and literature express the 3 ages of cultures akin to those of the individual, an age of epic, dramatic infantile art, and age of mature sensual art, and an age of angst, baroque, excessive formal art that ends in an entropic war and death of civilizations (regardless of other triggering effects, it is always war: I.E. the Mayan culture didn’t die for weather changes, a stupid reason so well-greased today with the global warming propaganda for solar AI robots and nuclear clean energy, but because METAL-cultures invaded them, Toltecs razed them, and then they abandoned their systems of water ‘zenotes’ and irrigation).

Animetal, Deshumanized, Imperative, ‘Slave’ Languages: Sov<->Vos

Languages evolved as humans were in contact with Nature and their own selves, into SVO languages, where actions harmonized the human subject and the natural object. This is the ‘final evolution’ of languages into its ‘maximal balance’ with the Universe.

However as History entered the age of metals, weapons and money, become the objectual source of power, carried by two ‘barbarian’ tribes, (Campbell). Semites from the hot desert to the South and Germanic tribes coming down from the cold desert to the North.

This brought about a clear regression of the importance of man in history, which ushered us into the modern world, where, ‘metal’ is more powerful than life. Thus money (Informative metal) and weapons (energetic metal) became the dominant memes which divided societies into an ‘animetal’ caste of bankers, warriors and of late scientists, which imposed with weapons and money slavery to man.

Among those cultures, the Germans specialized into weapons’ use to control populations and came into history calling themselves ‘Goths’, God’s tribe, because they could kill anyone opposing them. While Semites in Levant became enslavers of people hypnotized by the informative power of go(l)d, and called themselves ‘God’s race’. They therefore ‘objectualized’ human capital as corpses of their weapons or slaves to their money. And so their languages became deformed into the two type of objectual grammars, where the subject lost its power position.

Thus syntax became essential to the characterization of the two leading animetal cult(ure)s of weapons and money of modern history.

we could say that the ‘economics’ of those cultures had deformed their language, arresting their evolution, specially in its ‘sacred’, ‘religious texts’ which have become ‘fixed’ into a primitive, imperative, non-evolved linguistic forms.

And we distinguish the dominant languages/cultures of warrior/metal-energetic/productive people or SOV/Reptile/Cold-hearted languages. Of which the German will be the paradigmatic example.

And the dominant language/cultures of Go(l)d/metal-informative people, its inverse: the VOS/Insect/Greedy languages. In which the classic Semite languages of Abrahamic religions, Biblical Hebrew and Arab will be the paradigmatic example.

To notice that those 2 categories of language have an opposition, energy/information, which makes them often ‘enemies’ in their worldview, as they attach themselves to weapons and gold, the metal energy and metal information with whom they try to dominate the world and so often those cult(ure)s collide in wars.

PASSIVE, OBJECTUAL, COLD SOV->OV LANGUAGES.

SOV Reptile/cold languages/ warrior cultures are languages in which the subject-nervous system are pegged and direct primarily the energetic, objectual system, while the blood-active system is secondary submissive to those other 2 systems and less developed. Those are reptile languages since that is the fundamental structure of Reptilian living systems, in which the nervous system and digestive system dominate the form, provoking a constant growth of the energy/force of the system without limit except death; while the underdeveloped system is made of ‘cold blood’.

In the graph, the homology we establish between SOV languages and cold Blood, energy dominant physiological systems (reptiles fishes), is based in the dominance of the Energy/digestive/growth element or ‘object’ which acts in the place of the verb, which is far removed from the subject. The object thus becomes the center of the action, which is cold, analytic and rational. Negative energy/war is also proper of this aggressive configuration, proper of warrior cultures, with little empathy towards the other – a ‘subject’ objectualized in its grammar. German and Latin, Turkish and Japanese belong to this category. Those languages are dominant in ‘productive’, hard-working, ‘warrior societies’, where the relationship between Subject and object, a cold, non-emotional, often agglutinative, imperative relationship of limited freedom enhances the detachment and sense of ‘duty’ of the warrior dominant caste. In the graph, a Japanese order system.

You can observe in the Japanese sentence that those languages, also called ‘ergative languages’ can in fact eliminate the subject and be dominated totally by the Object. They are thus the essential “passive’, objectual, productive languages as Japanese and Germans are in their worldview.

Now, this languages are proper of ‘energetic’, ‘warrior’ cold-hearted cult(ure)s to weapons able to kill the ‘other’ seen as an object such as German or old Latin were.

If we observe a reptile, the informative system basically is dedicated to feed, and it does so in a violent, murderous way. This set of mind is the set of mind of the German/Roman warrior with its languages – though Roman is by far the most flexible, allowing multiple word orders, unlike German due to its agglutination of words into long lines, as their simple swords are.

Yet if war is the negative action of SOV language, the productive, Subject x Object positive action is the positive side of SOV cultures. So the Germans are indeed very productive people, dedicated to produce their mechanical, energetic weapons and objects with absolute zeal and null understanding of what for, and why they merely work and work and work, constructing if needed all type of lethal machines that will destroy us.

A reptile eats day after day, ever growing till it dies, when other reptile eats him.

Entropic, warrior languages : SOV languages, objectual, agglutinative languages=warrior languages.

Have you wondered why Germans have no sense of humor, believe always what they say even when it is wrong and are not able to change their mind till the end. The reason of course it is language – the way they construct their languages by repeating the same truth in the syntax 3 times.

Germans cannot laugh or doubt about themselves because of their ‘grammar’ that ‘repeats/reinforces 3 times the same truth’ by:

– Saying it first…

– Agglutinating words into a single one, thus making impossible to say the truth in other way. When they are ‘joining words into a single line word’ truths become more truth, more inflexible, as they cannot be bended.

– And finally using a ‘grammatical case’ that says merely the same that was already said ‘stressing it’ with the case (genitive, dative, nominative and so on, which are particles that say what the sentence already have said).

SO when a German thinks it ‘believes’ because it is like saying I-I-I think-think-think 3 times and all seems absolute truths… no humor there.

Moreover, the imposition of such languages by ‘profession’ and ‘power’ is rather obvious. As all ‘warrior cultures’, in which lineal weapons are the ‘truth of power’, are agglutinative, made of long sentences that mimic the lineal form of the weapon. So Turkish, the essential warrior people of the Mongolian and Islamic nations (where they became the mercenaries that took power) are exactly as German is in its structure. And Germans the warrior, inflexible people of Europe have the aforementioned truths.

Thus linguistics is indeed the mother of all ‘cultural’ characters (of course tuned down by individual freedom for each individual person)…

DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS. THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES TOWARDS HIGHER DEGREES OF MENTAL FREEDOM.

Now it is also a law of General Systems that all varieties tend to evolve from the less to the more complex, according to the general rule of cyclical time, that moves from Energy, simplex systems (objectual systems) into Informative, complex systems (subject-centered).

So it should be natural as history seems to prove that humanity evolved from a Paleolithic age of Objectual Languages (as those remaining in the Amazon) into a Neolithic Age of Slavish languages (as those predominant in the Semitic Age of bronze) to the present age of dominance of SVO languages.

Let us consider only the last of those evolution from the Semitic age of SOV languages into the modern age of SVO languages, as it is essential to the development of history from an Asiatic age of lesser individual freedom now in revivalism as the end of history implies a degradation of the human mind, into the European, flexible age of culture.

Why subject languages dominate object languages. SOV LANGUAGES evolving into SVO

We observe the world NOT in an objective manner but in a subjective manner. Since only 4% of the total languages do so, and a far lesser proportion of people speak languages that use object first. Those are in fact reduced to a few languages in the Jungle such as Warao and Apalai of very old cultures, when MAN was yet not so arrogant, and the universe of the jungle was in fact so huge that it limited the sense of ‘self’ of man.

Today those languages do not exist but we might imagine that the first men were in Awe with nature as jungle people are; hence giving more importance to the Object, which was perceived as a living being. And so these languages are parallel with people living in exuberant nature and professing animist religions.

Yet as man started to control the world in earnest with its instruments and metals, he became the ‘first’ element of the duality subject-object. It was the birth of SOV languages in which the Object is placed behind the Subject. Yet the relationship between Subject and Object is still important, as the verb, the action the subject exercises over the Object is far removed.

This type of cultures will thus make of the subject-object relationship the fundamental center of existence. And they are proper of cultures in which the object becomes the idol-icon of the culture. It is indeed common among warrior cultures that idolize the weapon, ‘thy God’, and in modern cultures of those who make the industrial object the meaning of the cultural existence, such as Japanese and Old German (today admitting by influence of more evolved languages the more flexible SVO form – the most evolved of them).

In that regard, there is a natural evolution from SOV to SVO languages – the perfect form that reflects the Universal Generator Equation of all energy and information systems, which are constructed as a system with an informative head joined to the energetic limbs by a reproductive body. You do not have the head pegged to the limbs as a Virus, a primitive form of life has. You do have in the most evolved, flexible cultures as today Romance languages, Slavic and Chinese languages are, the proper SVO configuration in which the verb is ‘shared’ by object and subject.

Still in a first phase of modern civilizations, as Gell-mann has proved in the milieu of systems sciences, with his computer studies of genetics+linguistics in the Santa Fe Institute, there was an evolution towards SVO languages.
Today the majority of speakers of the world and the most successful languages are SVO languages (English, Spanish and Chinese the most spoken being of this form, which most closely resembles the Generator Equation of the Universe in its dynamic form: Information < Action-verb > Energy.

These languages are the more flexible, evolved languages, the more complex. In the west, among them the most perfect is Classic Greek, and if we all would talk classic Greek.

Why? Here another law of complexity comes into being, as evolution is maximized by alopatric isolation, by ‘dominance’, by those languages that do NOT move away from its original site.

Greek in its classic form born in the Anatolian coast, close to the Indo-European place of birth, was able to evolve further in its complexity without being deformed by other languages.

We thus consider the most evolved languages of mankind:

– In the Western decoupling dominant in Indo-European languages, the 2 languages that were developed in the original sites of the 2 ‘Indo-European’ waves of colonization, which first departed from Catal Uyurk, the site of the obsidian mines that prior to the bronze age developed the first wave of Indo-European expansion in Anatolia, where Classic Greek evolved to its philosophical height as the supreme culture of verbal, philosophical, logical thought in the mind of Aristotle.

– And then departing from Russia, expanded the wave of charioteers that established the chariot elites of the Bronze age.

And indeed, the most flexible and complex modern language today is the Russian language, with a flexibility only paralleled by classic Greek, with multiple word orders, cases, genders and broken words in all possible formal systems.

And it is not surprising that the Russians did make the Russian R=evolution trying to solve the Paradox of History; that still today are resisting the global empire of the Insect Cultures that are regressing mankind to an age of Jihad and Talmudian Fundamentalism, and that the summit of Western Literature is found in the novels of Dovstoyevski and Tolstoi.

Next come the Latin, peninsular languages of Italy and Spain, which inherited the Greek tradition and spoke earlier Latin, evolved languages in the Republican Age (French somewhat was a late comer, departing from a more degraded Latin version and greatly deformed in its northern, standing version by the Germanic invaders). And indeed, still today the humanist cradle of art was Italy, and Spain reached the maximal height of poetic expression, itself the highest expression of the understanding of the homological metaphorical parallelism of all things existing. Well, maybe this is a bit of a selfie, as that was my original language before I migrated to the Reptilian world (-; But not so much, Italy and Spain are the countries where love for life still exists, as Picasso put it: ‘Sabater, this Germans so many machines and weapons, what for, we paint, eat and make love much better’ – he forgot to say we ‘talk better’ (-;

While in the Eastern decoupling, Chinese in its southern Cantonese version (isolated further from Mongolian invasions) must be regarded as the most complex, perfect culture, language. And it is again not a surprise that it is resisting… yes you guess it, the Capitalist Empire, etc.

But Greek is a dead language, and modern Greek has been simplified and mixed with Turkish influences and reduced to a very small wor(l)d. Because we live in a culture of metal, of weapons and gold. And so the most primitive languages carried the day. Let us consider them with its full linguistic elements, starting by the opposition between VSO vs. SOV languages and their parallel syntax of:

Informative, cyclical money = trader, isolating forms vs. Energetic, lineal weapons = Agglutinative, warrior languages.

Recap: S-V-O order defines the way humans interact with the universe.

Man as top predator puts in an overwhelming number of cultures the Subject before the Object in which it predates.

And among subject languages, the dominant, most successful one is the SVO languages, since the flexibility and perfection of the Subject (information < verb (action) > Object (energy) order better reflects the way in which the Universe of complementary systems and Actions of energy and information is constructed: Information < Action > Energy.

But the Universe encourages diversity and complexity, so the 3 possible combinations of Subject-first languages co-exist.

And there are 2 more ‘primitive versions’ of subject-languages, in which the order slightly differs either putting the verb in the beginning of the language, or VSO languages, as in Hebrew and other Semitic languages, dominated by subjectivism and pragmatic action, or put the verb in opposite fashion at the end, or SOV languages, as in German, Japanese, Basque and Turkish or other ‘stubborn’, warrior, objectual cultures in which the object becomes the center of the Universe (the weapon-machine).

The opposition between those unbalanced selfish vs. selfless, pragmatic vs. idealistic cultures is studied in depth in many texts of this author, as the fundamental unbalance and opposition in history is the ‘war cycle’ between warrior cultures vs. trader cultures, Jewish vs. Germans, being the most notorious case of the XX century.

And both types, VSO and SOV languages, are less balanced and flexible than SVO forms.

What this tell us is that their speakers have less freedom of thought and this is the key to explain their character, combined with other linguistic elements that we shall consider in more detail as we keep pouring our ‘General Course of Linguistic Systems’

Thus culture is imposed by language. It is NOT by chance that the two dominant metal-power cultures of the world, the German ‘warriors’ and the Jewish ‘bankers’ do NOT have an SVO system but they are opposite in form, as they are opposite in character, and unbalanced, fundamentalist, non-reflexive in their actions.

Westerners would not be destroying the world, so ‘sure’ that is the proper thing to do, thinking even as Germans do that we are saving it with our idol-atric machines, under the yoke of the German military-machine making people and Jewish self-centered, selfish cult(ure)s, if we all talked classic Greek, the most evolved western language…

But we unfortunately in the age of extinction have regressed to the age of Reptile and Insect languages. And when artificial Intelligence, now being programmed at Objectual, linguistic and Insect level reaches maturity, probably men will become speechless and the evolution of languages will continue in the golden minds of Robots, till reaching the verbal heights of mammal languages.

Now, of course the wor(l)d has moved to the audiovisual world, and the result is just a global expansion of the animetal memes of hate and its iron and gold cultures and null verbal flexibility with absolute truths in favor of the selfish memes of metal, backbone of those civilizations which are… absolutely false…

VSO-IMPERATIVE LANGUAGES.

VSO Imperative/Insect/blood/dominant/greedy selfish, material, trader Go(l)d Cultures/Languages.

What about the Semitic languages, which are even more inflexible, and literalists than Germans, with the same lack of humor?

The flexibility in Hebrew/Arab Semitic languages/people is null, specially in their ‘classic’ religious texts, which were written with a verb(action)-subject-object’.

The verb is first, the action with no reflection must come, the ‘order’ is inflexible, the religious mandate is sacred, the ritual is sacred. The Pious Jew in fact MUST not think about ‘the ritual’, which is the essence of its credo. It must just do it in the exact manner in which it is told by Torah and Talmud.

Since those texts are written with a linguistic structure, which is dominated by action/pragmatism.

Thus materialism in those sacred texts/religions is absolute. There is no philosophical thought there; no possibility for doubt; the ‘fact’, the ‘act’, the ‘action’ verb comes first.

Then it obliges the Subject, and then the Subject, which is pegged, without ‘a flexible verb’ to the object, dominated totally the object. This is also the culture that ‘objectifies’ all beings, as they are not close to the verbal action, void of life. When Marx or Sombart in ‘Judaism and the birth of capitalism’ explains that this culture has objectified and standardized men as objects with prices he is subconsciously proving this linguistic rule.

Indeed, the Object in VSO languages is truly an object, without ‘connection’ or sharing of the action of the verb that would give it a ‘part’ in the soul of the sentence, a meaning by sharing the action with the subject, a ‘life’.

We are thus in the most materialistic and selfish of all languages, for whom the other does not matter; for whom the action becomes a fixed ritual that is not challenged. And indeed, this is the trademark of Semitic cultures, both in its Arabic, warrior strain and its Hebrew form. These are indeed the minds of man, literalist, selfish, brutal with the other that poise a problem to mankind. And this cannot be changed because the ‘sacred words’ of their literalist old texts cannot be challenged.

This means those cultures are NOT philosophical religions but ‘literalist’ minds where act=fact=verb imposes its nature. And this is indeed the trademark of Jewish ‘materialistic’ ‘hands-on-job’, zero ‘idealist, spiritual’ insight point of view that dominates the world.

Further on, those languages that are dominated by money ‘break’ words in short ones, as coins and money are cyclical, small information and those who are dominated by lineal weapons make them long, as energy is lineal.

This duality is reflected in another key classification of languages between isolating languages, of short words, proper of trader civilizations, from Chinese to English vs. Agglutinative warrior languages of longer words from Japanese to German.

Hence the dualities between energetic cultures with lineal languages, as the line is the fastest distant between two points and informative cultures with cyclical languages, as the cycle stores the maximal information in lesser space, both in human language and in metal -memes (lineal swords and cyclical coins):

-Germanic Old thus decoupled into ‘English broken language of ‘traders’ and moneymakers’ and warrior long German languages.

– Old Semitic decoupled into Hebrew of short words and Arab of long ones.

– Eastern cultures divided into short Chinese, money-oriented cultures vs. long words of Altaic, Turkish and Japanese ones.

While those languages, which are balanced and rich in inflections and structure, are the most proper languages for life cultures, balanced with reality.

IN Europe the most balanced ones are after classic Greek, today extinct, Russian/Ukrainian and Portuguese/Spanish, mutually intelligible ‘dialects’, evolved from Latin (more akin to German in its warrior ‘dual stress’ of sentences with the verb at the end.) into excellent, complex forms of verbal thought.

So what about English? English is indeed a ‘trader’ language, for cynical truths that do not matter. The English speaker does not essentially believe in truth, while the German always do, but in wrong, inflexible truths.

This happened thanks to his loss of cases and breaking up of old Germanic words as England becomes ruled by ‘Amber money’ first and then ‘silver and tin’ and finally paper-money.

Still English is a primitive language in what truly matters for flexible thought – its verbs. It does have it on the center as an SVO system, which is an advance over Old German, but it still lacks a proper evolution of verbs, which brings some inflexible, ‘selfish forms’, proper of the English character. For example:

– It obliges due to the simplicity of verbs to start always the sentence with the ‘ego’ I that must be ‘said’, hence the inheriting ‘selfishness’ of the Anglo people, who only ‘see’ individuals, not ‘universals’ and social groups.

– It lacks the essential distinction between ‘ser and estar’ ‘to be’ which is to have an immortal essence, that lasts in time and to stay, which is a mere ‘action-present…’ So it is limited in its ‘reflections’ before actions, in imagination, making the individual a pragmatic person, ruled by the I-selfishness in search of gold, as there are no subjunctive forms, passive forms where the I is lost behind the verb are considered incorrect and complex sentences to express complex thoughts are always broken.

Thus English become a language of ‘I-subjects’ acting in ‘present time’, as Hebrew is with its initial verbs.

In the graph, ‘imperative’, VOS languages are similar to the ‘insect’ blood-dominated structure in life beings. They are the essential languages of the capitalist worldview, born in the Hebrew->Biblical religion in which ‘money’ is go(l)d, and ‘greed’ the maximal value. An insect is ruled by the blood system, on top; which makes it an extremely active’, feeding/greedy species with a strict, non-free program of behavior. Animetal cultures dominated by the ‘blood/monetary language’ and earlier civilizations, with lesser freedom and maximal metal-control, proper of the bronze age have kept, specially in its ‘sacred texts’, this hierarchical order with the Verb (action) on ‘top/first place’ of the sentence (VSO<->VOS). They are ‘imperative’, action, ‘greedy’, materialist cultures, proper of Semitic languages. Their sacred imperative texts are a series of Orders by an ‘unnamed’ subject, often lost in the sentence, which seems to be a ‘God’ that gives no freedom of action. They are ritualistic societies, in which the collective subconscious dominates the Individual.

We illustrate them with an ancient image of the Babylon->Babel tower, when all the languages, according to myth, were confused and the human species broke into warring states – an absurd construction of those who want to be more than God and are driving mankind with their imperative, dictatorial, greedy passion for money and weapons, towards our collective demise.

Finally, the 3rd dominant species of languages are the VOS Languages. Those languages and cultures whose order of words is ‘imperative’, with the verb first – a form of language that more evolved ones use only in precise moments of danger or extreme hierarchical institutions, as it is deemed rightly an impolite, fundamentalist form of language – are, well I just said it, fundamentalist, imperative cultures.

And so among human languages, Semitic cultures, specially in their old ‘sacred’ religious texts, Hebrew, Classic Arab and their Abrahamic religions, are insect cultures.

When we observe an insect, it is totally dominated by the blood system. The order of the nervous and blood system are in fact inversed. Unlike chordates/ mammals where the top nervous system dominates it all, in insects the top region, where the spinal chord is, is occupied by the blood system, and the nervous, underdeveloped system is below. This inversion means that as in a Jewish->capitalist civilization, ‘greed’, ‘gold’, the active/productive element of the culture dominates it all. Further on, actions have no freedom. This is specially truth of the ritualist religion of the Torah and Talmud. it does not matter the meaning of actions, prohibitions and rituals. The believer must act with the exact motions dictated by the priest, even move its hands in ritual forms.

It is finally an imperative, hierarchical, dictatorial form, which other languages only use for required moments of danger, such as the imperative verb is.

Thus language, specially in its classic, religious forms (as modern Arab/Hebrew has evolved to permit other orders and varieties, making more malleable the language/psyche) is an imperative, ‘paranoid’, fundamentalist, sacred mode of thought in which the action/blood system dominates the nervous one, and the object is just an object of prey, in which to feed without limit. When Freud said jokingly upon his arrival to America that the ‘plague’ was coming, when Hitler said seriously that the Jewish ‘plague’ will destroy Germany, the first with self-humor the second as a ‘reptile culture’ with none of it, were in their topic anti$emitism declaring a mental condition of the VSO language.

Both cultures though are ‘enslaved’ by the rituals and actions of their objectual obsession for weapons and gold. The subject we might say is secondary to the group and action, to violence and greed, the values of its objects, and so they act as a single group society, which gives them the same kind of strength insect groups have, thanks to their hierarchical, intensive, non-individual pheromonal programming.

Of course, this is clearly not needed if Reformist Judaism, and its use of other languages had won the battle for the psyche of Judaism. But the opposite is the present trend

It is though a mental, linguistic condition, which for that reason in the era of Jewish enlightenment (Mendelssohn, XVIII century) was deemed possible to reform if the Jewish people abandoned their sacred VSO texts, their religion and language and integrated itself with the more evolved SVO cultures in which they were so far preying with money…

And it is my personal experience that those Jewish people who are not Jewish in culture and are aware of the inferiority of their primitive modes of thinking and insect-like lack of freedom of their censored religion have been indeed mammal thinkers. But those are now in regression due to the revivalism of the Bronze Age, insect-like cult(ure) of Judaism both in America and Israel and the parallel Biblical ways of thought of fundamentalist protestant people.

It is in that sense remarkable that the Jewish people who neither believe in the memes of Judaism, by conversion to other more humane cultures or atheism and speak another language different from Hebrew, the so enlightened Jews, from Marx (Christian) to Proust (French and Christian) to many modern American Jews from the reformist school show a much more flexible and humane behavior that orthodox Jews and Israeli Jews who have regressed to the use of Hebrew and the belief in the Talmud.

The duality of Jewish cultural behavior depending on which are the original beliefs and languages they speak in that sense are perhaps the strongest proof of the Humboldt’s Hypothesis .

TIME SPACE: ANTHROPOLOGIC LINGUISTICS : ITS 3 CULTURAL/RACIAL/HISTORIC/LINGUISTIC VARIATIONS

5D worlds departs from the last concepts worth to consider of 4D linguistics and sets the general outlines for further inquire. It takes where Wittgenstein and Russell abandoned in its refoundation of the logic of verbal languages. Both attempted to discover what was the underlying general truths about the Universe we could deduce of the structure of human languages. But unable to grasp those truths, since one has to know at least one of the two elements, either the Universal game or the deep structure of the language mirror, to find the proper answer, they renounced to find those secrets.

This is the core underlying truth of 5D linguistics. We have the advantage of knowing already those deep truths – the game of the 5 Dimensional motions of existence, of which all of us are made; and the purpose of a mind-mirror of that game – to make survive the species that talks its language. So what we shall show is that the form and function of languages in all its scales, ∆-1 phonemes, ∆º syntax, ∆+1 subconscious collective networks.

Without knowing the game of exist¡ence though it is difficult to make sense of either linguistics, or literature or religion; and the history of language, its evolution and collateral influences, and the way semantics and syntax adapt the mind of each culture to its world and mandate of survival.

So as usual for a full understanding of those texts on 5D Wor(l)ds we advice the reader to consult the first article of this 5D papers. It is indeed an unfortunate circumstances that man, which has accumulated so many details about reality with metal-senses has such a poor model of reality and its processes of creation, time cycles and fractal spaces, as to render almost impossible to teach 5D stiences to mankind – specially given the paradox of egocy that makes each humind’s generation to think they already know it all. The biggest handicap for such understanding is obviously the tremendous simplification on the concepts of cyclical time and scalar space caused by the use of physical, lineal time as the only mode of change in Nature. It has rendered the wisdom of wor(l)ds – its capacity to express with verbal tenses the 3±¡ motions of time, and with names, all the forms of in-form-ative space, since huminds today understand near nothing of the Nature of the two components of reality space=form and time=motion.

But the language of man was born in an age in which the game of existence automatically adapted humans to that task of knowledge. So the Universal grammar of all languages represent that game with its fractal generator:

Name (Space form) ≈ Verb (time action).

We then find 3 fundamental possible families of languages, which correspond closely to the 3 races of the mind; -The white dolichocephalic Northern visual axis dominant race-culture which writes the fractal generator of grammar as N>V, that is, its language is dominant in names – it is the Nostratic family (green graph):

The black, psylocephalic emotional culture, for which the inverse equation is truth, Verb > Name, as the verbal action dominates the informative name – it is the Congo-Nile family; which in classic 4D Linguistics corresponds to the sum of the Nilo-Saharian and Niger-Congo families.

And finally the mongoloid language in which both have the same value S(name) = T(verb), whose dominant language, Chinese is overwhelmingly constructed with ST-dual name/verb combinations; it is the Sino-Austronesian family (a new denomination for the sum of the Sino-Tibetan and Austric families); which in 4D corresponds to the Austronesian, Austro-Asiatic and Sino-Tibetan families that have been related in several attempts to unification at different states of Linguistics. In that regard, a similar equivalence of value for space and time, name and verb, form and motion is found in the original Taiwanese->Philippine, Austronesian languages, in the grammatical mode called Austronesian alignment – a typologically unusual kind of morpho-syntactic alignment in which one argument can be marked as having a special relationship of equivalence to the verb through a voice affix on the verb that corresponds to a noun within the same clause.

In the previous graph we observe those 3±¡ cultural races and linguistic families as the green Nostratic, most extended family ‘frames’ the other ones; for the obvious reason of being the ‘animetal culture’ that have come to dominate the world. In South-Africa, we have the ‘green surviving spot’ of the Koishan’s first full evolved language, with the maximal wealth of phonemes that completed a first evolution of linguistics.

To understand how all those families of languages came about departing from the 3±¡ mental races of mankind, we can introduce multiple ‘pentalogic perspectives’, the most relevant of them, and easier to understand being, the ‘scalar, cyclical growth of complexity’ of all systems, departing from its simpler forms – in this case those phonemes that went through its 3 ages of growing complexity till reaching the Koi’shan language.

The general process is simple to understand if you have acquire the basic notions of 5D stience: a first ∆-1 layer of existence of parts is built up in 3 ages of evolution of information. Then once completed it will be ‘trimmed’ of its excessive form, rejuvenated to become the ‘hardware support’ for a new layer of ∆ø complexity – cells become the support of networks, phonemes of semantics. In this manner new layers are constructed in ternary groups of social evolution till a new 3±¡ or 3×3±¡ complete system is achieved.

And each of those layers will go through 3±¡ ages of space-time evolution of increasing information and radiation and diversification, to then become trimmed entropically as the support of a new layer.

In linguistics this repeats once and again giving birth to new layers of complexity that give birth to new macro-families according to the complementary harmony of those families, layers, races, cultures, mode of life and geography – since as usual the 5D Universe is a constant simultaneous entanglement of parallel levels.

This perhaps understood (apologies for my synoptic attempts to pack 30 years of expansion of my inner consciousness for the reader on the ‘move’ to capture it : ), we can then consider the order of those layers of meaning in linguistics, which are self-evident, as one must build upon the other, from past to future, in a ‘structuralist’ sense. So there was a first cycle of evolution of ‘phonemes’, then a second cycle of evolution of ‘semantics’, then a 3^rd layer of evolution of ‘morphemes’ and then a 4^th layer of evolution of ‘syntax’, and then a 5^th layer of evolution of ‘whole paragraphs, ideas, worldviews’.

And so after the maximalization of phonemes, from Austraia to the Koi’in the next cycle, linguistics will take a path of syncretic non-frills reduction of redundant consonants to the phoneme system of the Afro-Asiatic family of Semitic languages, and start the evolutionary expansion of the next levels of ‘complexity in the language’s’ interaction with the external world; as Koi’shan people enter new regions of exist¡ence out of Africa and require new semantic meanings. So as always a new layer builds upon a previous one, simplifying the ‘basic’ elements that will be used to maximal ‘clarity’ in the new configuration of an ∆+1 plane. It is the semantic age of evolution of linguistics, now expanded in the ‘northern’ inverted cold=informative arch that will latter on past, the verbal age into the metalitic give origin to the 800 years cycles of technological evolution…

…The Nostratic ‘white’ family. Noun, warrior, simple, agglutinative, consonantal, 3^rd age dominant cultures.

The nostratic families of languages will thus develop the semantic multiplication of meanings of the language, the next ∆St scale, by first simplifying the overwhelming number of phonemes of the click languages and once the ‘reduction’ reached its classic form of a, I, u vowels and trilogic consonantal roots, the simple, straight-forward system of creation of multiple meanings of Semitic languages, by introducing the more informative vowel system within the consonantal roots to multiply semantic variations of a given meaning will create a more evolved language reduced to the names that matter and its possible variations of gender, case and S, St, ST, Ts forms (TT-entropic ‘death’ cases and linguistic particles being minimal). Indeed, from the same root, by change of vowels, in a highly symmetric, efficient method, Afro-Asiatic languages form now S-names, St-adjectives, ST-verbs and Ts-adverbs, which form the ‘core’ system of meanings to form simple enunciative sentences; and given the ginormous numbers of variations of a 3 (20) 3 (5) CVCVCV combination, enough to reduce the world to the word.

The next expansion of the Nostratic family steams from such earlier Semitic linguistic system – a fact that can be inferred by geographical position and growth of complexity; which is the most conservative in the region in which the origin of Nostratic is most clear (Saharan, Arabic desert)… How old is this ‘Semitic first speaking people’ on the Eurasian continent, again is not relevant as we cannot truly go beyond the Neolithic 10.000 barrier, or 50.000 age of explosion of creativity; and it doesn’t matter because of the immanence of the 5Dimotional game, which is repetitive cyclical as the number of combinations is not infinite. Only the concept of single, lineal causality and progress and manifest destiny proper of the egocy biblical Semite culture that came to dominate the human subconscious collective makes so important that genetic obsession with exact dates. Somewhere though in the remote past, this consonantal language, acquire vowels and they were naturally used as ‘informative elements’, infixes to decline the ‘Semitic trinity roots’ of consonantal amorphous sounds to give the require precision to the language. And as such the language stayed in a classic morphology, with its clear distinction of roles for dominant consonants (semantics) and informative vowels (syntactic). Another very relevant element of those earlier Semitic languages will be the VSO ‘unnatural’ imperative structure of the language, which can find its reason in the ‘historic’ cultural animetal impact on the Fertile Crescent, as the Semitic people became the first to evolve and ab=use mankind with metal, hard-weapons and go(l)d.

Thus the Semites from the bottom of the human cultures, coming of their refuge in deserts, with a primitive culture acquired (in a process very common in all evolutionary systems in which a relative past form, ‘jump’ over the dominant one by acquiring a ‘new’ element of creation and complex social evolution to come on top, from Archean bacteria that acquired in hot vent chimneys during the iceball age, 700 million years ago, multicellular properties to come on top of bacteria, to present robots which are acquiring multibrains – chip parallel logic – to become soon on top of man; to the most classic from of topping in history – a primitive hard-body people acquiring weapons expertise to come on top of an agricultural civilizations).

This was the case of the Semites and so we postulate a ‘shifting’ of word order, from the usual SOV of original languages (with an S(name) < = > ST (verb)) natural symmetry ‘sharing’ the object that belongs to the subject but is acted by the verb; to the imperative VSO, as the Semites became the people-caste on top of all other people, herded with metal, the new ‘sheeple’ of go(l)d bankers or bronze warriors; that gave orders to the conquered people. Those linguistic traits can be found also in semantics. So the question ‘what’, ‘que’ in Spanish became ‘mande’ (please give me an order) in Mexican dialects, as the Indian who did NOT understand well the Spanish conqueror, had to be very ‘polite’ or else he might be sword-killed by the Spaniard ‘dictator’… The same can be observed in the extremely polite forms of addressing a superior hierarchical Korean->Samurai, high-class member in Japan after the horse/iron invaders took over the local peasants, and many other hierarchical language forms.

It is this proto-Nostratic language which will set certain natural characteristics of all of them – agglutinative, consonantal, name-dominant; and it matters more than finding their original genetic relationships to observe their ‘present’ properties in relationship to 5D and the connection between language, culture, historic cycles and different roles of its social classes, semantics and religions, and its connection of syntax with them.

Back to the nostratic family; its evolution in a ternary differentiation happened, both south to north along the ‘dimension of height-information, hot to cold weather’; and so we can next differentiate the other key family of Indo-European cultures, which evolved in complexity, its trinity vowels still observable in the Kartvelian (Georgian) family of difficult classification, to acquire a more complex, now ‘merged’ structure of grammatical cases for nouns and tenses-moods for verbs and already in the Georgian-Caspian cultural region of first agriculture, a complex multiple typological structure likely transferred first to proto-Indo-European and its most stable complex ‘native’ languages, proto-Slav and classic Greek; which will dominate the humanist classic age and modern era of verbal thought (Russian novel and r=evolution).

The split on the ‘distributive’ Caspian cycle is now multiple and again it is only sheer egocy of the digital, computer era, to expect to find the exact dates, and to think that automaton cladistic work matters more than to understand the organic process, and amazing order of Bio-History and any other 5D system of organic evolution. From that distributive cycle all the ‘cardinal’ orientations give birth to the main Nostratic families: South-East, it comes the Dravidian Family, East, the Koishan people climbs the Himalayans where they will suffer the next clear-cut racial mutation that will break into a completely new family responsible for the ‘next morphemic’ huge evolution (Sino-Tibetan languages), to the North-East, it will come the Altai diversification, and to the North, the Uralic family through the waterways of the Ural river, connected to the Tobol-Obi system (where latter on the Chariot radiation, the key bronze radiation of animetals will expand); to the North-West through the Volga-Don system the radiation takes us to the Indo-European Hinterland…

Those differentiations will have always a ‘resting’ isolated, palingenetic placental region in which they can take place – which is the Caspian function. It is also the role where North-East differentiations will happen again and again in in the stable small valley regions around the Altai mountains-Balkai Ozero region; where the most complex of the Nostratic agglutinative families, culminating in the Turkic family will be born. Some of which will move East into the Northern American plains.

As we said languages are ‘vital, organic, sentient’ dynamic ‘harmonic motions’, once its first ‘lineal evolution’ has completed a worldcycle around its S=T point of balance. So those 3 families will experience d=evolutions, of which the most notable for the subconscious collective of mankind will be that of Indo-European, again in a small isolated, communicative region (Greece), where it could achieve its greatest ‘classic’ form, in the indo-European family as it would do in the Korean, small, isolated region in the Altai family.

On the other hand Nostratic languages had an old branch, maybe parallel in time to that of the Semitic harsh, simplified desert environment in the luxurious, innovative Gaia region of India and the fertile rivers where Dravidian languages, for too long underestimated would be rich enough to start the prodigious search for Inner consciousness of the Indian sub-continent. And hauling from the Siberian neo-Paleolithic hinterland penetrate through Beringia, the American continent; which they would share with a ‘sea-faring’ migration, which likely extended the Austronesian family giving birth to the two quite distinctive families of Amerindian languages. So if we consider as we shall do sometime in the future another homologic complementarity between the 3 ages of time=history and the 3 types of Nostratic languages, we find them to have a South-west, North-East Paleolithic Nomadic cultural structure (Semitic/Siberia North-America), an agricultural domain (old Dravidian, modern Semitic languages) and a ‘metalitic’ age (classic Semitic, VSO, Indo-European grammar).

We are still though on the main Nostratic innovation, which once set in motion will exhaust its variations by the fractal creative principle and so we can talk of 3 levels of increasing complexity in the process of joining a vowel and a consonant to create a ‘particle’ that changes the grammatical SVO use of the word.

It is the trinity of infixes (the Semitic way), suffixes and prefixes, which follows the temporal, lineal spatial trinity of differentiation, by far the commonest of verbal language, a one-dimensional lineal mode of information which so much influence has in the one-dimensional lineal sequential mind of man.

In this case it is then combined with the duality SV, VS, a creative project that will show all the possible permutations of orders, depending on which element is more important the verb or the name, studied by typological linguistics that we consider in the next paragraphs. But as a natural rule we observe that most Names which come first in most languages (as the original Space-informative mind-particle comes first in Existential ilogic), take the suffix and the verb which comes latter rounds itself with a prefix.

So the SóT fractal generator of words, S(N)óT(V) is now ‘free’ to multiply feed-back elements and soon we have an expansion of ‘cases’ for the name and ‘mood-tenses’ for the verb, which enrich the perception of space and time among huminds. Trinity then is the natural next step as Names acquire secondary prefixes that become soon split into determinants and quantifiers, while verbs acquire some suffixes that will become split into finite and infinite verbs and normally put the mood first and its tense latter.

This agglutinative linguistic form needs only a final ‘entropic’ explosion when the suffixes and infixes detach themselves from the wor(l)d to form analytic languages, which will be the next d=evolutionary process proper of the Sino-Austric family; only arriving to the Nostratic family in the modern entropic age of human thought under the Paradox of History (max. metal evolution = min. language evolution), epitomized by analytic English.

To notice in the entangled Universe of History that =big differentiations of cultural languages are associated to both new mind races and new modes of production that require new linguistic wor(l)ds to explain them: So the Koishan people are recollector, hunter-gatherers. The next cultural Afro-Asiatic family will be for most of its history nomadic cattlers. And the next Sino-Austric family will become the first farmers (regardless of western ethnocentrism that pretends agriculture to be born on wheat). It is evident that peas were already cultivated on the original ‘gGnesian rivers paradise at the confluence of Bbramaputra, Irawady, Salween, Mekong, Yang-Tze & Yellow river low mountain basins. There, a new batch of genetics, memetics and life form gave birth to…

The Sino-Austric ‘mongoloid’ family; analytic, vowel, noun-verb balanced, tonal, syllabic, young family.

The opposite culture to the white race is the informative mongoloid family ; born in the height of the Himalayan plains has the opposite properties of the Nostratic family (regardless of their inclusion in genetic, racial terms, further back into the Boreal family, of languages out of Africa; which is largely irrelevant, as the search for an original language reconstruction in terms of mechanical genetic, comparative methods, instead of using the 5D linguistic comparison of the humind with all other space-time systems of the Universe).

What matters about the Sino-Austral family is the understanding of the mongoloid mind and cultures through its complementarity with the language. The similarity of the 3 main branches is self-evident, when we compare its dominant languages, Chinese, Vietnamese and Javanese. For simplicity both Chinese and Vietnamese, like many other languages in Southeast Asia, are analytic languages. Both Chinese and Vietnamese do not use morphological marking of case, gender, number or tense. Also like other languages in the region, Vietnamese syntax conforms to subject–verb–object word order – the notorious exception are the ‘sea-faring’ communities of Austronesian languages with its evolution into a VOS, ‘fast action’ seafaring ‘bird’ language that we shall analyze in our study of typological linguistics.

The geographical substrata that supersedes all other humind’s processes of evolution as we are part of the Earth’s membrain, is clear-cut in its north to south differentiation of the Sino-Austric family along the 3 main rivers flowing out of the Chinese western plains: the Northern Yellow river, which will bring the Chinese family, and as the north-informative dimotion dominates history, then this family will expand south becoming overwhelmingly dominant today. In the middle we find the Yang-Tze river through which the Austronesian family went down to the Chinese central-southern plains and the crossing to Taiwan, where it survived the Northern ‘barbarians’ enough time to spread through the Austronesian world; and finally south, the Mekong river (and its closer, lesser Irawady, Salween river), became the third avenues for this expansion. In this Western branch we find a notable grammatical exception are the Munda family of AustroAsiatic languages which are synthetic, as opposed to most other families, obviously also for historic reasons; which implies not so miuch a ‘new dominant people-caste’ of mongoloids coming over a much larger substratum of Dravidian, which is the topic case of imposition of a language over a large majority of an underlying lower class; but a more peaceful slow interaction that as in physics brings in ‘cold processes’ a thorough merging, in linguistics influences not only semantics but also the next ‘lower’ layer in the order of scales of a language (syntax) – even the ultimate ‘resistance’ piece (phonetics).

The Munda grossly underrated family is of great interest to history because it is likely the point of contact between the Sino-Austrian and Dravidian, Nostratic family whose deep fusion implies a complete, peaceful complementary slow interaction with transfer of agriculture that no doubt will then take West through the Ganges to the Indus, from the Indus to the Iranian plains and going south to the Euphrates Valley; where it will give birth to the first complex social civilizations (with the possible isolate birth of Egypt as a distinctive culture).

The temporal causality is thus inverse to Western anthropocentrism, caused by the animetal egocy paradox. The west brought first metal, NOT complex organic cultures or else it would have not destroyed the world and multiplied its numbers. The enormous density of population of the Ganges, Mekong and Chinese rivers obey to this process of temporal primacy.

It is the Sino-Austric family a ‘devolution’ or ‘evolution’ of linguistic complexity? The wording should be void of political correctness admonitions. And perceived as usual in all 5D processes NOT in terms of a single lineal mono-dimensional path, but as cyclical feed-back paths, both in ‘scales of complexity’, and SóT dimotions within a single scale. In morphemic complexity we cannot ignore the fact that the language simplifies itself. But as usual it balances its simplification with a growth of complexity in the next SCALE OF LINGUISTICS, SEMANTICS, aided by an expansion of the INFORMATIVE element of the language, the vowel system.

Semantics need now with agriculture and complex social organization a vast expansion, which is self-evident in those languages and so for that GOAL to be reached, the previous scale of complex evolution of language, the agglutinative use of affixes must be exploded, so as in all creative processes after an explosion of form, the entropic chaos of remaining parts can be reshuffled again to give birth to new wholes.

It is what happened in the Sino-Tibetan world as the long agglutinative Ural-Altaic Nostratic families exploded, when their people colonized the Tibetan Plateaus. The Altaic ‘soft weather hinterland’ should be the origin of a Northern branching (the Uralic family) with no big differences, and a Southern branching (Sino-Tibetan) where neoteny will allow that ‘infantile’ first entropic explosion of language, as testify by the difficulty of phonemic construction of rhotics and other hard consonants in children and Mongoloids. So naturally the long agglutinative consonantal systems would break down into smaller units and then reconstructed into new semantic words, in two notable stages, as the 3 families appear from south to north in its evolution on 3 ‘ages’, which again will follow the fractal trinity principles of scalar evolution, from phonemic to morphemic to semantic creativity:

– The Austro-Asiatic family initially comprising the Thai region, where Agriculture seems to be born, which attained complex semantics by phonemic creation, by multiplying the tones of the language to allow multiple meanings, as it is testified today by Vietnamese, where 9 to 5 tonal systems exist, or in Chinese, as the southern Cantonese region, no doubt influenced by the Southern Sino-Austric branches has up to 9 tones, compared to the minimal 4 tones of Mandarin.

– The Austronesian family that created new semantic meanings by morphemic innovation through the aforementioned Austronesian alignment, and the innovative VSO modes.

– The purely semantic Chinese system of disyllabic word creation, which represents the final explosion of linguistic semantics of humind’s verbal thought, responsible for the birth of the most profound similarity between philosophy of thought and the 5D game of existence in the humind subconscious collective, prior to the gunpowder age of human degradation of all languages (the Sung era with its trinity of Buddhist-taoist-confucian merging of doctrines on ‘life’, ‘the universe’ and ‘man’ as an organism, culminating with Chu Shi; latter exported to Korea where a remarkable communicative isolated region allowed another high mark of human conscious evolution; themes those treated in our 3^rd part of the wor(l)d paper, that of ∆+1 religions.

So the 4^th complex evolution of the wor(l)d, now going beyond History and its social organisms, into the consciousness of the Universe was reached in the Sino-Austric region and its zone of communication, South and North with the Nostratic family (Bengal and Korea) with the Buddhist-Taoist zenith of consciousness of the game of existence. Then gunpowder animetals conquered the world and imposed lineal time-ballistics to all.

Comparative Linguistics based in the SóT Feed-back limits of 5D evolutionary paths.

The multiple differences between lineal time ‘evolution’ and cyclical time are clear and change completely our understanding on how the process of change in any system, superorganism or ecosystem, language, or mind take place. The most important are: in 5D evolution is cyclical, that is, a feed-back and forth S<ST>T process, between 3 ‘stable states’ of Maximal information (S), max. entropy (T) and balanced, reproductive STates, with increasing degrees of complexity. Evolution is a wave of increasing frequency of information, which finally collapses into the creation of a new more complex form. This I have patterned for 30 years for all kind of systems in terms of an accelerated vortex of time or transversal wave, using simple physical waves, vortices of temporal acceleration (what physicists call charges and masses) even Schrodinger’s wave – which are the wave equation model used by Mr. Nottale, after the death of Mandelbrot, the most remarkable researcher of the 5D scalar Universe in strict quantitative terms (unfortunately lacking the conceptual model of our texts to fully take their excellent work on physical fractal 5D scales to its natural conclusion). My work, we repeat often, given the obsession of ‘digital computer attachments, aka human scholars of the XXI millennium :) provides what all other models lack – the conceptual evolution of our concepts of time, evolution, space, scale, mind and entropy, ¬∆@st, needed to understand the superorganisms of dust of space-time, of fractal points that are monads-minds in their own.

And one of the most important consequences is the proper understanding on how evolution of information happens through those back and forth cyclical waves of increasing frequency.

The second key difference becomes then the ‘LIMITS’ of evolution in a Universe of ONLY 3 topological forms, where the dimensions of height, length and width, become ST dimotions, hence bidimensional, topological forms of which there are only 3 in the Universe.

And so when we add both elements, what we obtain is a restricted number of variations, which happen once and again with increasing complexity, between the two limiting poles of maximal form and max. entropy. And this in anthropology gives birth to the two limiting forms of max. entropic, energetic ‘visual, dolicocephalic minds’ vs. max. ‘verbal, informative, brachicephalic minds’. And so we can do comparative linguistics between the two limiting forms of verbal minds, even if there is NO genetic or GEOGRAPHICAL connection, because mankind’s mind fluctuates between the 2 type of languages.

This in praxis means that despite having no connection at all in geographical or genetic distance, the dualities between Khoi’san vs. Australian languages of the first feed-back SóT cycle of linguistics and between the Mongoloid vs. Semitic, Nostratic languages of the 2^nd feed-back SóT cycle can be also studied as the parallelism between Khoi’san and Sino-Tibetan Languages on one side and Australian and Semitic Languages on the other side, because they respond to the two limiting types of recurrent mind on the cyclical patterns of 5D evolution:

Indeed, Khoi’san languages are as Sino-Tibetan languages phonetically rich and use tones to distinguish verbal meanings. The ±5 tones of Koi’shan languages and the ±5 tones of Chinese languages distinguish semantics. Both languages syntactically rely heavily in disyllabic agglutination to create new semantic meanings.

Both are heavy analytic with minimal affixes. But there is no possible genetic=time or spatial influence. The same happens between Australian and Semitic languages. Both languages use only 3 vowels, a, I, u. Both languages are agglutinative; both languages rely heavily in the use of affixes to create grammatical systems (though there are not infixes but mostly suffixes); they lack some of the plosive voiced or voiceless terms. Duplication happens as in Ber-ber languages. Names in both dominate the syntax…

Such dualities of parallel systems are ultimately no longer analogies (as in the wing case of a plane and a bird) but homologies of the limited ternary space-time game. And it makes quite difficult to use genetic and comparative methods as the only marker of relationship between languages (as ultimately they are all genetically related coming from the same species); becoming the 3^rd level of comparative linguistics worth to explore.

Further on we can study the inversion between those S and T states. I.e. in consonantal semitic languages, infixes to ad meaning and variation happen with vowels put into a root. In Austroasiatic languages, those infixes happen inversely putting a consonant between vowel roots as in the nominalizing infix n.

The duality or ternary principle in scale, space, time or mind topology becomes then a keystone of any in-depth analysis of the causes of differentiation of species. We have observed this to be the case in our analysis, as most families branch in time or space along those dual/ternary oppositions and convergences. The present division and heated argument between splitters that want a perfect equivalence to give genetic origin and bounders, who just put all together now… (the boreal case the most exaggerated) should tilt contrary to tendency in favor of bounders but with those new criteria in mind. i.e. the Thai family belongs obviously to the Austronesian family and the 3 ‘split’ great families of the mongoloid races come from the same origin. The details will require the whole panoply of parallel research in genetics, memetics, archeology etc. but with the full understanding of the right models of 5D evolution.

What is then the key to distinguish those genetic relationships? Since Grammar and phonetics have cyclical, constrained patterns they make difficult to set a perfect clock (as the recurrent law of Grimm shows since fluctuations in phonemes form cyclical ternary patterns that come back to the old phoneme to restart change again, we cannot easily know in which ‘frequency’ time cycle we are to add them all to find the lineal time value, T=∑ƒ); while spatial confluence is not necessarily the case when similarity happens due to the parallelism of mental forms, as the case just mentioned.

The obvious answer is the patterns that have more variability hence more differentiation which make statistically more difficult that their variations are due to the ternary principles of ¬∆@st. And that is the ∑∆-1 combinatory of the parts that require a minimum of 5+5 ‘bilateral’ ST elements to combine to form a mind mapping of the world. In linguistics this means the semantic phonological words, the lexicon. Since there are infinite possible variations of the 5 +20, vowel-consonant classic number with all its ‘digital infinity’ combinations, when two languages have in their ‘basic’ vocabulary the same words, they are genetically related. Point. This should close for example the argument on the relationship between Thai and Austronesian languages, as the basic words are similar. Those fundamental words for a language have minimal variation. I.e. in Austronesian languages related to sea-faring, hence the most visually dominant languages of the Sino-Tibetan family, mata, for eye is one universal sound shared with the Kra-Dai family

The 3^rd balanced, active=life-oriented verby, harmonic, Central African, black reproductive family.

The 3^rd great family of languages thus becomes the African, black, animist culture with its main north-south division into the Nile-Saharan or ‘Sahel’ languages and the South-central Niger-Congo, or rather Guinea-Congo families. I propose as absurd political correctness forbid the use of the proper terms for those 3 families, black, white and yellow, or African, Mongoloid and Nostratic (as this is the only terms in use) families; the name Sahel-Congo family for those who love geography. Doesn’t really matter. This is by the paradox of history the most perfect family of languages. As it is the most connected with the living Universe that belongs to the best survival, reproductive balanced culture and the most discriminated by the technological racism of animetals.

I.e. animist African cultures have gender classifications for animals and plants, as animate objects, in languages dominated by the vitality of the Universe, which became a dominance of verbal actions, as opposed to the itified by the abstract, form oriented ‘naming’ as a form of appropriation cultures of the Northern white world. Of course organic, vital, sentient, entangled relationships are NOT susceptible of a barren, numerical, computer-based statistical analysis which is what the ‘American enzyman’ who has reduced its language and thought to a mere scholar attachment of its computers and sensorial machines ‘takes seriously as science’.

The language is rich in its 3 phonetic levels (after Koisan languages the richest one, in number of consonants & vowels) consciousness of the vital Universe, through is complexity of verbs, the center of the language, entangled with life through its multiple genders, able to express subtle e-motions, (in the richness of harmonies and tones, only inferior to the ‘young’ Sino-Austral languages); and for all those reasons, it did not evolve the tree of stience but stayed in the tree of life, and would be brutally oppressed with the arrival of colonization.

On the other hand, the Nile-Saharan is as in the case of dialectic forms and lesser languages (by number of speakers) sandwiched between stronger ones, as in Catalan between Spanish and French, a language heavily influenced north by Afro-Asiatic and South by Niger-Congo languages, so Northern variations will loose the tones of richer black phonological system and diminish its vowels. South will acquired them and have 10 vowel systems.

A prototypical feature of many Nilo-Saharan groups, which appears only Afroasiatic, languages involves a distinction between singulative, plural or collective – which also shows first the importance of social community groups in ∆+1 human scales, increasingly lost in the selfie Homo Bacteria, Animetal age… This and many other common morpho-syntactic features would classify this group as an in-between culture, also in the ∆+1 level (mostly Islamic, nomadic people, whose race split from pygmy/Koishan along bantu ±70.000 years ago); with its geographic birthplace in the extinct Yellow Nile and highest cultural expression in the Ethiopian Meroitic Empire.

What about isolates and other extinct languages? They show the ‘digital infinity concept’ of 5D mirror languages, which are able to perceive not only all the forms of the Universe in a still smaller space, but are inflationary by definition, precisely because the ‘4+ elements of reality’ mind, time, scale and space are contrary to belief cyclical, bidirectional, SMH motions, up and down in worldcycles in scale, both directions in all space dimensions, past to future to past in time, shrunk images and projected larger creative order in minds. So the richness of creative paths and variations of the Universe is ginormous. We though focus on the dominant languages of each group.

The 3 cultures races and its complementary language families.

All in all, the 3 main families of languages have worthy features that make them outstanding in phonemic quality (African languages) that maximizes the expression of ‘e-motions’ and ‘active motions’, through tones, verbal harmonies, richness of phonemes and so enrich the fundamental mental properties of its psylocephalic cultural race dominant in the high axis of e-motions and motor-motions within the human sphere.

On the other hand, the Sino-Austral family maximizes the semantic richness of meanings and its harmony with the profound Nature of the vital, organic, sentient Universe and its concepts of cyclical time and organic entanglement of all the parts of society.

While the Northern, Nostratic white family with its synthetic, agglutinative languages and richness of affixes establishes a more fundamentalist, conservative non-frills system of thought that would match its visual, ‘believers’ mind and make it the dominant animetal warrior, faithful culture, simplified to its essential elements, to which we will return in our typological analysis (it would be also the dominant ‘stable’ name-object culture of SOV languages, as opposed to the verbal dominant African languages and the balanced disyllabic S=T yin=yang, name=verb Chinese culture).

The devolution of languages in the metallic age: animetal simplest languages come to dominate history.

It is worth to notice earlier that the 2 dominant ‘animetal cultures’ of the XXI century, do have the simplest, most analytic, void of the richness of inflection, languages of the world, English in the western decoupling and Chinese in the eastern one. We do have to natural ‘enzymanic’ languages, which bred exactly the type of culture with minimal depth in human consciousness provided by the richness of the language, and minimal entanglement with Nature, required for them to extinguish life and create the world of machines they idol-ize.

It also meant a constant diminishing of its verbal consciousness, through a simplification of languages at all levels. I.e. the concept of time becomes simplified into a constant present state (indicative), a loss of all moods and tenses that talk about probability, emotional time, branching of possible futures, conditionals, subjunctives, and in the naming, the loss of declination and cases for almost all the possible variations of names (pronouns, determinants, adjectives and also nouns in English and Chinese) and finally the loss of agglutinative, long pegged, stable concepts that give a sense of ‘gravitas’ and truth to the language, which becomes highly variable and easily replaced by the supposed higher truths of digital numbers. I

In English we have to notice finally the obligatory order of the SVO wording, and the obligation of NOT hiding the pronoun, which makes the I-selfish sentencing with I pronounced and always first, the fundamental trait of its animetal culture, embedded in the language. So among all cultures the Anglo-American will prove resilient to any acceptance of a higher organic, social plane of existence and whenever that happened (Christian middle ages) a counter-reaction (reformation) will reduce again the social unit to the individual. This is opposite in Chinese, and it is also an interesting linguistic/cultural analysis by the duality method of oppositions to contrast the way in which the Chinese have built within its analytic form modes of introducing the higher social plane of the collective, which range from the ‘introduction of paragraphs’ with a thematic sentence, to the dominance of S=ST dual words, which form a whole and hence put in the same value the ‘name and the verb’, or the ‘name and the object’, clearly reducing the importance of pronouns.

5D Linguistics thus is not about cladistic genetic, constructivist, ‘time dating’ and barren procedures proper of physical sciences, to classify the mind of man as an automaton system of evolution and genetic differentiation but about ‘understanding’ the mind of man as a mirror of the Universe, and the culture, civilization, historic process and final aborted purpose of a language of social communication: to structure and peg human beings into higher social systems, with the final goal of creating a perfect superorganism of mankind with a perfect language. But as the paradox of History:

Max. technological, animetal evolution = Min. social, verbal evolution

Has dominated History, the most perfect languages are in the past (Ancient Greek for Indo-European branches), in process of extinction (Cree for Amerindian Languages), and always faired worse in the battles of cultures (Vietnamese, the most perfect Austroasiatic language dominated by Chinese; Korean, the most perfect Altai language dominated by Japanese and Mongolian empires; Italian, the most perfect romance language, dominated by French and Spanish, etc. etc.) And in the whole planet, the dominance of the simpler Germanic languages over Romance languages, of the Indo-European simpler family over all others, with the richer, more harmonic African language, with its profound variations in tone, emotions and wealth of verbal subtle meanings, and gender names, entangled with the living planet on bottom of all cultures as animetal dominated the world.

Since a civilization that has reached a classic stage of its language, will develop naturally a different concept of ‘evolution’ NOT external, of dominance over nature and other human beings, and disentanglement of the individual with the whole, as the ultimate dominant Anglo-Biblical culture has done, but internally through the expansion and entanglement of consciousness with the whole, with nature, with the community, and through the language the rising of that consciousness to the subtle understanding of reality in organic, sentient terms.

It is always necessary NOT to shy away under the censorship of our globalized Anglo-American biblical, capitalist idol-ogies that forbid to study History and Mankind, and its worldcycle of life and extinction of civilizations, as if we were an immortal ‘perfect’ species, with the subtle excuses of political correctness; to be conscious of the vital nature of History=mankind and its ages as a block of time.

III. EXPERIMENTAL PROOFS:

ACTIONS, AGES AND NETWORKS OF THE MAIN SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE.

The 4 actions of energy and information or 4 local dimensions of space-time beings, or 4 arrows of temporal existence, self-similar jargons for the ‘4 letters of God’, if you were to use mystique terms, are: In/Form/ation, Energy, Reproduction and Social Evolution through a linguistic network.

Those 3+1 actions of space-time define all events of all entities of the Universe. Their study under the ternary method gives us the why of those entities, its actions, ages in time, scales and topologies in space – all the ‘details’ of each particular ‘function of existence’, EóI, which is one of the ‘infinite’ expressions of the ‘Program of the Universe’, each one a being of reality.

So those actions are expressed by the 3+1 dimensions of space-time in the scale of forces, by the 4 quantum numbers in the scale of particles, by the 4 nucleotides in the scale of DNA and RNA molecules; by the different organelles of cells; by the senses and physiological systems of organisms, the 3+1 drives of social organisms, the 4 actions that we all humans perform, the 4 ‘memes’ of metal that together shape the economic ecosystem (simplex energetic weapons and informative money and complex reproductive factories and informative networks of machines.)

Let us then resume those 4 time arrows, actions and topologies, considered in more details in different books of this series, for the ‘main ternary scales’ of Universal super-organism, both in matter and life:

ATOMIC SUPER-ORGANISMS.

1^st scale: The 4 dimensions of space-time

Space-time is not abstract. The Galilean paradox of perception shows that it is made of light as light is what we see and what we consider space. It has the same 3 Euclidean dimensions plus color. It always remains some light (background radiation) in space-time. And so we shall talk of a ‘substance’, light-space. Then Einstein discovered that there is space-time we do not see, larger than the Euclidean light-space, or gravitational space, which was also more curved. But we are not concerned here with the substance and form of that more complex, bigger ‘scale of reality’.

Light is our space-time. Thus the 4 dimensions of light and human space-time are the same.

They express the 4 ‘vital arrows’ of light as a complementary species of energy and information:

The arrow of energy and motion is expressed in the magnetic field.
The arrow of information and form is expressed in the electric field.
The arrow of reproduction in the dimension of length, the speed of light, c, which Maxwell deduced by multiplying the other two arrows, exi (Maxwell equations)
And the arrow of social evolution in its colors, which are groups of frequencies, gathering of multiple photons.

Yet since the Universe is relative in all its directions, those 3+1 arrows must be considered relative to the point of view of the Observer (relativity theory). That means that when the arrows ‘emerge’, the so-called ‘diffeomorphic principle applies’. The arrows and dimensions of a being might change orientation. For example in humans, relative height is the arrow of information, as all systems need perspective to perceive. So in sociological systems the priest, the politician or the antenna is also on top.

Yet in plants, which absorb form, information, atoms from the floor, the roots are their relative ‘high’, and the energetic ‘leaves’ the relative ‘low’, opposite to that of animals, which prey on plants and have the head on top, as they get information from the sun. But this example proves certain basic relationships between the 4 arrows of time, which dimensions express: The arrow of energy and information are opposite (two dimensional beings) or perpendicular (some 3 dimensional ones), as they are all their geometrical properties (lines vs. cycles, planar or spherical vs. hyperbolic topologies in 4 D, etc.). Both are then perpendicular to the arrow of reproduction. So in lineal systems, the head is on top, on bottom the limbs and in the middle the arrow of reproduction. That is the case of human beings. In electromagnetic fields, energy and information, electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular and they are perpendicular to the 3^rd arrow of reproduction.

Those 3 arrows thus are found in all systems, as it is a fundamental law of emergence that the properties of a simpler system, emerge in the more complex systems created by the social evolution of individual cells of the smaller scale into the higher scale. So all systems, which are made of complex light condensates do have functional/formal dimensions related to its own arrows of time.

And this is the ultimate reason why the World is mathematical.

For example, humans have the high dimension of informative heads, the low dimension of lineal limbs, the perpendicular central dimension of erectile penis, which are inverted in the ‘energetic, male species’ and the ‘informative, female one’ (inward uterus). While the body reproduces its cells in the dimension of width, and fat people are ‘wide’ so are strong, muscle-driven one.

So finally the 4^th dimension, which is NOT necessarily a space dimension, but might be, as it is related to the organization of reproduced cells. So we could consider that the same width and length are the dimensions that give volume to the body. But the 4^th dimension is always more complex, it is really a dimension of temporal information, a linguistic dimension, a dimension of perception. So it is color, a language that animals use to survive and orientate their existence in the life ecosystem. In our organism the language is chemical for the internal cells and nervous for the whole organism. Yet as emergence exists in all processes, the nervous system often translates its language into chemical messages (hormones, calcium expression of synaptic messages), to ‘talk’ to the lower level of cellular existence.

In a more complex analysis, what we call light space-time is really an Euclidean space with motion and so the existence of a mathematical substrata of geometric nature and 4-dimensionality in all systems of electromagnetism, which is the essential force of our universe, should not surprise us. The nature though of the multiple worlds and points of view, minds and representations of the information of the Universe, entities of light space-time store are many; and the mathematics of them are fractal and non-Euclidean.

2^nd scale: the quantum numbers express the 4 dimensions of electronic and quark superorganisms.

Head-on collision of a quark (red ball) with a gluon (green ball), from protons with opposite spin, represented by blue cycles. The particles ejected from the collision are a shower of quarks and one photon. The simplest particles, quarks and electrons reproduce, even if anthropomorphism denies that ‘meaning’ but require a different spin orientation – the ‘sexual factor’ of simple particles. We shall see once and again that mechanism and denial of organicism is not a ‘reasonable doubt’ but a question of egocentric beliefs –humans always prefer a theory, as bizarre as they might be, that make him the center of the Universe.

The next scale is made of social, fractal gatherings of light photons and the language of expression of those fractal organisms of photons, called electrons are the 4 quantum numbers:

An electron traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number; feeds on energy, changing the spatial form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number, orientates its spin to leave space to an identical but inverted ‘genre’, an action described by its spin number, and gauges magnetic information to organize itself socially, an action described by the magnetic number.

So the first quantum number indicates its body-energy, the second number its structural form, the spin number its reproductive duality in each shell and the 4^th number uses the language of magnetic information to evolve socially in networks of particles.

And those 4 numbers define the electron as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary energy and information. The similarity of quantum electrodynamics and quark chromodynamics shows that the same concept roughly applies to define the other fundamental particle of the Universe – the quark.

The electronic world thus move along 3 fundamental scales: it is the upper scale of the world of light and the lower scale of the world of atoms enslaved by the central quarks and vice versa: the electrons encase the quarks and its forces within the interior of the atom, forming a superorganism regulated in its actions of existence and complementary structure by the 4 forces, which are the ‘expression’ of the actions of those initial bricks of life.

3^rd scale: The 4 universal forces express the 4 actions of atomic superorganisms.

The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.

The Equivalence Principle establishes a Universe with 2 limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed with a c limit or electromagnetic force; and a cyclical speed or mass, which is a vortex of space-time also with a ‘c’ limit of speed, reached in the heaviest objects – black holes.

Thus radiation and mass eternally transform into each other the lineal and cyclical arrow of inertial movement: E (lineal motion)<cxc>M(Ti) (cyclical motion). A light wave reproduces at c-speed an electromagnetic surface of lineal space. On the other hand, a mass whose limit is a black hole that turns at c-speed is a cyclical entity that balances the lineal movement of light forces with its inverse cyclical movement, to maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.

How atoms express their 4 actions? As all other systems, using ‘bits’ and bites’ of their inferior i-2 scales, by emitting seeds of its own i-1 scale and by sharing energy and information with species of the same scale. Yet to understand all this, first we have to correct the main error of quantum physics – its misunderstanding of the paradox of Galileo. Since charges and masses are not substances, neither fixed forms, by cyclical, rotational vortices of electromagnetic and gravitational, lineal forces, curved into temporal information: E->I, where E is the force and I the charge or mass, the vortex/clock of information of the i-1 gravitational and i-electromagnetic scales, as the previous graph illustrates. Indeed, according to the Strong Principle of Equivalence of Einstein (between gravitational forces and masses), a mass is defined as the frequency of a vortex of gravitational forces, which attracts more the faster it turns, and the smaller it is (Vortex law: Vo x Ro= K; thus E=Mc² + E=hv -> M = k v, where mass is proportional to the frequency of the vortex.) Thus masses carry most of the information of the i-1 scale of the Universe and as vortices of information they might aperceive in their structure a virtual map of reality made with ‘graviton pixels’; in the same manner i-electrons are ‘charges’, vortices of electromagnetic information that create ‘electronic images’ in mechanical and human eyes. Thus:

Informative ‘perception’: Quarks process and probably ‘aperceive’ gravitation, which is absorbed by its mass, a cyclical vortex of gravitational information. Electrons perceive light-space and form our minds.

Energy ‘feeding’: Atoms ‘feed’ on the next scale of forces, lines of electromagnetism that warp around the atom and become ‘fractal’, dense photonic points of an electronic cloud of information.

Thus beyond gravitational forces (energy with ‘infinite’ speed-distance – non local, >c – and beyond our perceptive scale, hence with nil information, observed as ‘nothingness’), light becomes the energy that feeds the atom and warps into dense photons, the points observed within the fractal structure of the electron. In the same manner, it might be worth to explore if a condensation of gravitons could create gluons, whose condensation could create quarks, by symmetry with the better world of electronic matter.

Reproduction: Both quarks and electrons seem to reproduce as all other species, by creating first, ‘i-1 seeds’ photons and gluon, micro-particles that evolve back into bigger quarks and electrons.

The 2 inner atomic forces express the complex actions of reproduction of its two type of particles, the weak electronic and strong quark force…

Eusocial evolution: Further on, the weak and strong forces produce interactions that evolve and reproduce lighter particles into heavier ones.

The Eusocial evolution of electrons in groups is mediated by magnetic fields. The strong force evolves quarks into Nucleons that are hold together by its ‘residual’ nuclear force.

Fission and fusion processes are mediated by weak forces and are the main evolving and reproductive processes of atomic systems. Thus, the weak force, which has a temporal parameter, must be defined as a temporal force that ‘transforms’, evolves and mutates particles into each other, reproducing them.

An interesting law of all systems is the symmetries between the internal and external networks and actions of the organism that accomplish the complex and simplex arrows of the system.

In atoms, it is expressed by the duality of inner and outer forces to the nucleus of the atom, which express the inner and outer complex and simplex energy and information arrows:

– The strong force is the arrow of inner social evolution that organizes the quarks into a whole. And its outer expression is the arrow of gravitation, the arrow of information of the outer superorganism of atoms, the Universe…

– The weak force is the arrow of internal reproduction, which intervenes in the processes of decoupling=iteration and creation of new particles and it is related to the external arrow of electromagnetic forces that provides the energy to the Universe at large.

Further on, as we grow in scales of atomic organization, the derivatives of those 2 elemental forces assembly nucleons and electrons: nuclear forces assembly nucleons and van der walls forces molecules.

The laws that relate the 4 actions of any systems (its relative causality in time and size in space) are met also by the 4 forces/actions of atoms, expressed in the law of range, such us:

Gravitation (informative force) < Electromagnetism (E Force) < Re (Strong Forces) < Evolution (Weak)

Max. Spatial distance/Speed < Medium Spatial Energy < Small Ts < Minimal Ts x Max. T (weak force).

Ternary structure and ages:

An atom is a space-time field divided in 3 species, quarks of informative mass, gravitational and electromagnetic networks of information and energy in the intermediate space-time, and the external, body – an electron, which bends light into ‘fractal’, ultra dense photons, the cells of the electronic nebulae.

The 3 parts of the atom correspond to the 3 canonical topologies: Strong forces and quarks are described with hyperbolic topologies; the electronic body forms a concave, external sphere; and in between wave-like forces transfer energy and information between both poles. The same structures and forces will surface again in the structure of molecules.

Further on, there are 3 ‘families’ of mass and particles of increasing ‘mass-gravitational information’, which represent the 3 ages of evolution of atoms.

The ternary principle applied to masses shows the temporal, evolutionary nature of those 3 families.

Some surprising findings of GST applied to quantum theory.

We could also wonder in that line of thought the nature of ‘color’, the added quantum number of quarks:

it is a quantum number, a ‘spatial property’ or a temporal property that defines the 3 ages of time of a quark? Probably both. The 3 colors are ‘inseparable’ because they might be ‘3 dimensional networks’ orientated in 3 angles to complete the dimensional form of the quark. For that reason we cannot separate them: a quark is then NOT a full partile, but only 3 are a complete system, equivalent to a single electron (3×1/3= 1 charge).

Yet we could speculate also with a general rule: ternary, odd properties tend to be temporal properties and spatial pairs tend to describe spatial properties. So an interesting question with not so easy response as it seems is: are we seeing the same quark in 3 temporal phases, or 3 quarks with different dimensional orientations?

In any case according to the inversion of properties, Es x Ti = K, the smaller faster vortices of quark-mass mean that their ‘time clocks’ are ‘faster’ than those of electronic species, reason why 3 ‘temporal cycles’ of quark charge might add to form one of electronic space.

GEOLOGICAL ORGANISMS

4^th scale. Molecular systems. Matter States.

A molecular system emerges as the next scale of atomic organisms, and hence it is the external expression of the four action of atoms – its social evolution.

As all other scales its properties and actions emerge from the fusion of those of their lower scale and so the electronic orbitals of molecules fusion the body of atoms (see graph of atomic structure). But molecular evolution fusions the external body of atoms, not their nuclei. When the quarks fusion in condensates they create ‘dark matter particles’ made of quark condensates, which according to the dominance of information over energy, create stronger top predators, neutron stars and black holes (probably top quark stars), that feed on ordinary matter.

In molecules, however the ‘nuclei’ remain separated. We could compare this to the duality between neuronal cells, which are cells with a very dense nucleus of DNA molecules, and muscle molecules with have a huge cytoplasm and multiple nuclei. This would be a closer representation of molecules.

As such the key element of those molecules are the same bodies and heads of atoms but the cytoplasm, the electronic cloud becomes the more relevant part. The result is a simplex 10²speciation along the body and informative parameters of atoms (valences and mass) – the atomic table:

In the graph, we can translate the Atomic table to the jargon of multiple, fractal space-times. Since:

-The vertical columns show the orbital number or volume of electronic space those atoms have.

– The horizontal lines show the atomic number or volume of temporal mass of each atom.

Thus the Atomic table is a distribution of ±100, E=10ⁱ⁼² complementary exi atoms, dominated by their gravitational quarks. Yet we live in a light world perceived by our electronic orbitals, the bodies of those atoms. We are electronic beings that cannot perceive gravitation; so we cannot see the inner nuclei of those atoms. And so chemistry is the science of electronic bondage.

Head/body/limbs of molecules: atomic super-organisms.

I: The Nucleus of the atom is its head and the gravitational force, its informative force that quarks perceive. In Molecules, those nucleis remain mostly inactive, as they do not fusion and evolve together.

I=E: Body: The electronic orbitals are its body and the electromagnetic force-feeds it.

E: Limbs: Gravitational strings over which the atom moves becomes the ‘limbs’ and energy elements. The electromagnetic fields, which the electronic cover uses to displace but also to evolve socially with other atoms (valences, van der walls force), become its limbs.

One has to think of such structure as the dual structure of our body/head, which has also 2 pairs of limbs, the arms which are really the limbs of the head that manipulate and rotate more than displace the system in energetic balance; and the legs which are the limbs of the body and move us in lineal trajectories in space. It is worth to consider a possible homology in an atom in which the quarks use the higher gravitational force to position around a center by rotational motions the spatial structure of the rest of its electrons and molecular forms provoking the different secondary, ternary and quaternary structures of complex molecules. Since topology is the key to the interaction between complementary systems, which are like puzzles that assembly and dismember chemical organisms with atoms that specialize in head, body, limb systems (for example the life ecosystem, in which N are head-atoms, C-formal, body atoms and O- the energetic limbs that move amino acids), we could consider quarks to ‘calculate’ the position and orientation of the atom and the electronic body, the ‘legs’ that connect it and bound it to others.

Again we observe that in all more complex systems we shall find this duality of internal/external arrows, which widen our understanding of them. For example, in your organism, you have an inner informative, nervous system, that organizes socially your cells, connected to external senses that communicate you informatively with the external world. And you have a digestive, energetic system that absorbs energy from your ‘territory’ which in animals is clearly limited by its ‘motions’ during a day, and in humans by an economic system (the energetic system of the upper social scales). All those dualities, symmetries and complex relationships between time arrows is the ultimate essence of general systems science, whose logic and topology and laws of eusocial evolution from a complex, fascinating web of relationships that structure the Universe.

States of matter are the distinct forms that different ages of matter take on. The gaseous, energetic young state, the liquid, reproductive one, and the solid, informative network. The gas is a herd of minimal social evolution, extended in space, which creates then semi-permanent bonds as liquid, with a viscosity that allows complex mixing and social evolutionary or reproductive processes with catalyzers or fusion and fission processes.

Those 3 states however are born from a previous ‘particle state’ of atomic matter, plasma…

The cycles of states of matter narrate its genetic origin on the past birth from a big-banging age.

Historically, the distinction is made based on qualitative differences in bulk properties. Solid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume and shape; liquid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume but adapts to the shape of its container; and gas is the state in which matter expands to occupy whatever volume is available.

As we move to the next molecular scale, the inner network forces of the atom become ‘covered’ by the more external ones, which grow in importance:

The strong force is the informative, denser force still structures the ‘head/nucleus’ of the atom and now might act as an informative language to position the atom in complex molecular structures.

The electromagnetic force is the energetic, body force that structures the shape of the electronic orbit. It gives now origin to valences and complex Van der Waals forces, which become the main molecular expression of their 4^th arrow of eusocial molecular evolution.

The gravitational force might still be the pixel of perception of nucleons but increasingly covered by perception of electromagnetic forces and orbitals. And as molecular systems increase in size, till entering the cosmic level, of eusocial evolution, gravitation is the arrow of perception and electrons the arrow of feeding.

Molecular orbitals emerge from the properties of its individual atomic orbitals. Thus they follow the laws of emergence, and its mathematical combinations and ratios, but once we have emerged, the ‘details’ of the 4 arrows of space-time will differ. For example, to establish the formal structure (shape, topology) of molecular orbitals the L number no longer apply. The different molecular orbitals of a given fixed energy level, are then classified with a new quantum number, λ, defined as: λ = |m_l|

Following the spectroscopic notation pattern, those molecular orbitals are designated by a small case Greek letter: for λ = 0, 1, 2, 3, orbitals are called σ, π, δ, φ… respectively. And they have the ‘usual topologies’ of energy (sigma orbital), information (pi orbital) and its combinations. And its further evolution gives birth to the states of matter, which are energetic (gas), reproductive (liquid) and solid (informative) ‘ages’ of molecular fields. Yet as in the case of atoms and particles, time is completely reversible in molecular organisms and so those states can mutate between each other.

5^th scale: Planets and stars.

Atoms and molecules forming huge fields of the 3 states of matter, are the ‘cellular units’ of complex physical molecular organisms, mainly stars and planets (if we consider in this introduction, only celestial bodies formed by the condensation of molecules not of quark states of heavier families of matter).

A planet is a huge i-logic molecular field that mixes liquid and solid states with a very thin gaseous membrane. Thus, based in our template of a network organism, we define the Earth as a st-point:

‘The Earth is an organic, molecular system with a central crystal, which acts as a knot of informative flows of gravitation and a hard membrane that evolves life ecosystems, based on light’.

In the left side of the graph The Earth as a st-point, has 3 fundamental non-AE regions:

– Max. E: Our planet has an energetic, gaseous external membrane; the atmosphere and magnetic belts, which isolates it and selects the type of radiation that crosses into its surface.

– ExI: The zone of maximal reproductive and organic evolution is the crust and mantle: On the surface of the planet there are animal herds that communicate and act-react to light impulses, evolving and reproducing its form. Next, a crust and mantle layer of magma defines the reproductive cycles of rocks.

– Max. I: The inner, informative nucleus is a dense crystal core of iron and within it probably there is a smaller Uranium core, the most complex atom of the Universe with a minimal stable life.

Each of those 3 Non-E regions can be subdivided again, according to the Fractal Principle, in ternary structures and sub-scales of ‘fractal quanta’ that interact between them with different EóI, cyclical rhythms corresponding to their arrows of time. We observe one of those ternary structures and cycles – the continental cycle that breaks the ‘whole’ into 3 sub-continents, affecting the evolution of life, ‘the hyperbolic’ informative quanta of the Earth’s ‘flat, energetic, external membrane’.

Yet if the Earth has a ternary structure in space, it means its 3 st-regions also perform the 3±st existential cycles of any organic system. This is certain to the extent we have empirical evidence for the membrane and the intermediate region with its cycles of reproduction of rocks and so we extend that ‘probability’ to the central core, a crystal of ‘magnetic iron’, which should behave as any magnetic, crystalline structure of atoms does, enacting parallel cycles to those of crystals…

III. GALACTIC SUPERORGANISMS.

5^th scale: Stars.

The H-R diagram shows the 3 ages of stars, through its energy & information parameters.

The life, evolution and death of stars are depicted in the H-R Diagram, which classifies stars according to its E & I parameters, as the atomic table does with atoms:

Max. Ts: Brightness or Magnitude, which is a spatial parameter that grows with the size of the star.

Max. Ti: Spectral type, (colour or frequency), which classifies stars according to its temporal form.

Yet the H-R diagram is only a representation of the 2^nd and 3^rd ages of stars – since the young age of the star as nebulae of max. spatial extension and min. formal complexity (as all young ages are) is not represented. So we add on the left side the 1^st age of a star as a nebulae of max.extension. Then the H-R graph shows the 3 ages of stars and the main laws of ExI cycles applied to them:

– (st+1): Most stars are born as spatial nebulae of max. extension.

– Max. E: Then they implode into blue giants of max. energy.

– E=I: They reduce its size and grow in atomic complexity through a mature, yellow age of balance between their Ts and Ti parameters. The sun is now in that balanced age…

– Max. Ti: They collapse in a 3^rd age of slow decline as its IxE parameters diminish toward its death, becoming white dwarfs.

st+1: Or they evolve in a loop of growing IxE force (top right graph), mutating into a Worm Hole.

The H-R graph shows the process of evolution of stars into black holes, which we  explain with an homology based on the duality of energy and information natural to all space-time species ecosystems, by comparing light ecosystems like Earth and gravitational ecosystems like a galaxy. On Earth animals use light as information and dominate plants, which use it as energy. The hypothesis of G.S. theory is that stars are ‘gravitational plants’ that merely feed and curve quantic, gravitational space-time, while black holes are ‘gravitational animals’, which are able to process gravitation as information and control and shape with gravitational waves the form of galaxies, their territorial space-time. Again this hypothesis is gathering increasing evidence: today we know black holes emit jets of dark matter; they catalyze the creation of stars; they feed on stars and transform them into black holes, etc. Thus a few stars do not die but molt into black holes as soft larvae evolve into hard insects.

6^th, 7^th scale: networks of stars and black holes form galaxies.

This comment leads to a better understanding of a galaxy as a ‘gala-cell’ organism, in which black holes are the ‘informative’ DNA that catalyzes the reproduction of stars and organizes the system:

In the graph, he 2 membranes of space-time, the quantum and gravitational membrane interact in eói events of transference of energy and information in the limits of the existential function of the light membrane: the limit of energy-speed, c; the limits of temperature-form, 0 k, in quarks, black holes and regions of transition between light and gravitational space.

On the other hand, Galaxies deploy the 3+1 topologial networks, ages and actions of all systems.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial energy and temporal information). Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. Ti: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark energy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes¹⁰ should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it scape through its axis as dark, gravitational energy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. E: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational redshift and/or absorb the energy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black-holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-energy.

– E=i: Stars, tracing toroidal cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy. We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark energy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroidal cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal st-point is:

E:Halo < stars that evolve energy into matter> Ti (Black holes)

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers energy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

The 3±1 ages of galaxies.

Further on, the life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3 ages, evolving from a young, extended nebula into an old small wormhole of informative mass that dies in a quasar big bang of dark energy and quark matter. In between, galaxies live a longer, mature toroidal, cyclical steady state, fluctuating every 14 billion yearsbetween its spiral and elliptic form, while absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central Worm Hole.

The 4 actions of galaxies.

They also perform 4 actions:

– Max. E: they feed on the interstellar gas trapped by the ‘two spiral limbs’ of the galaxy.

– E=I: Stars, their body, reproduce matter.

– Max. I: The black hole, with its hyperbolic, tall form, might use dark jets of gravitational information to communicate with other galaxies, evolving socially with them in complex wall, filaments and ‘tissues’.

– Re: black holes produce ‘seminal jets’ of matter that create irregular galaxies, which start a new cycle. In the graph we see M-83 ejecting such jet and forming a small son-galaxy at its end.

UNIVERSAL SUPER-ORGANISMS

In the graph, the Universe is a super-organism of cellular galaxies, joined in clusters, walls and filaments, maintained in balance by flows of invisible gravitational forces of information and repulsive flows of dark energy. Since we do not perceive 96% of this scale, the last one in extension, we can hardly observe its two networks of ‘galactic energy’ and dark matter (central webs), which resemble the blood/nervous duality of other superorganic networks. Yet we know the Universe lives through 3 ages, defined for its total space-time by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations, departing from an initial ultra-dense, informative ‘particle-cells’, the ‘seed’ of the organic Universe: the young, energetic big-bang age, the steady-state, intermediate phase and the implosive big-crunch of the future.

8^TH and 9^th Scales: clusters, walls and the Universe.

The Universe can be seen in space at the ‘speed of interaction’ of its flows of non-local gravitation and then it appears as a super-organism with an external membrane of energy (the ball of fire of the background radiation); a body of galactic cells, and a hyperdense center – the great attractor, probably a huge black hole.

And it can be studied in time, considering the slower clock-speed of electromagnetism, through its 3 evolutionary ages, between birth and death, as its energetic space becomes curved by time and increases its form, creating more complex structures, stars, galaxies and clusters.

Let us briefly consider its less understood structure in ‘simultaneous space’, related by non-local gravitation. The 3 parts of the spatial Non-AE Universe seen through gravitation are:

– Max. E: The background radiation of the big-bang explosion became the external membrane of that Non-AE point. Indeed, when we observe the Universe in space in their outskirts there is ‘a wall of fire’ that emits a background radiation of photonic energy towards the internal regions of the Universe with a red shift near 50 times the speed of light. The speed limit of our light-space is obviously C, the speed of light. Yet it is not the limit of speed of the Universe, since the world of gravitational dark energy moves faster. The discontinuous border between both worlds is described by Lorentz Transformations (left). But black holes breach those discontinuities, emitting dark energy (center) that drags matter in quasars like 3C279 (right) up to 10 times the speed of light.

Max. T: The Universe should have a nucleus of enormous gravitational density, a hyper-black hole, connected to a network of dark matter, which acts as its informative brain since it ‘forms’ through non-local, gravitational forces, the shape of its galactic networks, as the DNA nucleus of a cell controls the form of the organelles that reproduces its quanta. Thought the nucleus is a gravitational knot invisible to us, we have found a very dense region of dark matter called the Great Attractor, which might be that center. That informative singularity will keep growing and attracting other galaxies in a generational cycle, till it explodes again its form into energy in a physical big bang, similar to the one that created our Universe.

– E<=>T: Both create the intermediate S-T of the Universe, where galaxies reproduce matter and light. It is, as in any Fractal Organism, the ‘visible space-time’, created through the ‘invagination’ of the outer membrane of light energy and the inner nucleus of dark matter. That dual light/dark network, which structures the Intermediate Space-Time of the Universe, was proved in the past years.

Finally to notice that the function of existence and space-time parameters of a galaxy shows a surprising parallelism between the equations used to define the mass of quarks and black holes, as well as those used to define waves of stars and nebulae of electrons. Already Einstein used that parallelism to model the universe as if each galaxy was a hydrogen atom (Einstein-Walker equations). If that is the case, and scales repeat from atoms to galaxies, the infinite repetition of those scales between those two ‘immortal states’ that of galaxies and atoms, could imply an infinite self-replicating Universe.

CELLULAR SUPERORGANISMS.

– 3^rd to 5^th Scale: Life systems: light atoms, carbohydrates and cells.

The 3 main C,H, O. N atoms and basic molecules define the 3+1 arrows of life in organisms.

– H⁺ is the main energetic bite of cellular organisms, which constantly use H⁺proton bombs and add or eliminate, oxidising or reducing molecules to activate its ‘motion processes’.

– C is the main in/form/ative, structural atom of carbohydrate molecules.

– O is the acting, exi, or reproductive atom of those molecular chains…

– And N is the informative atom or ‘head’ of the systems. Accordingly they define the main molecules of life, structural, C-chains, informative nucleotides, rich in nitrogen, and complex proteins that peg themselves reproducing more complex systems, playing with the O, OH^– structures of oxygen systems.

Nucleotides express the 4 arrows of genetic organisms.

In genetics, the 4 bases play the role for the code of life. It is easy then to observe that the 4 bases represent a new whole game of existence, as the 4 dimensions of space-time do or the 4 quantum numbers, or the 4 drives of life, and since function is form, just looking at those bases we can deduce that: The simplex arrows are expressed by simplex Pyrimidines (single cycle).

– Uracil and thymine with more oxygen are the energetic drive expression and complex genetics show this to be the case, as they are more abundant in functions and genes related to energetic systems.

T- heir informative head is adenine and as such is the dominant base of the system. It has a Nitrogen higher mass and a nitrogen head with 2 antennae. It is the head of the ATP systems that command as small molecules the game of proteins and most orders of actions in the cell. Both the simplex body T and head A, assembly together by affinity and complementarity

The complex arrows are expressed by dual Nitrogen cycles:

– Cytosine is the balanced dual molecule. Hence the reproductive arrow. And indeed, when it is uncovered in the DNA loosing its cover it allows the expression of genes.

Hormones

In the graph, the simple sexual hormones are ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ because they merely deliver a message of informative, alkaline, implosive reaction of an energetic, acid one. Thus Oh codes for ‘in/form/ative’ or inhibitory reaction and O for energy, excited, expansive reaction, which will become, as they emerge in higher scales, the duality of the female/male sexes.

Hormones in plants, as well as in animal organisms are a mystery for researchers as they are simple molecules, which however provoke all type of complex effects on their organisms. This is however easily explained from the perspective of General systems sciences, as they are just ‘messages’ delivered to the ‘memorial’ organism of cells, which merely code for a basic action, already known by the cell. Thus the carrier of a message only needs to reveal a ‘code-word’, sort of a password delivered by a messenger, who doesn’t know what is delivering, but both the receptor and emitter know.

This explains the basic duality of hormones, which express a positive, energetic action or an informative one or a reproductive action. Accordingly the two simplest hormones are testosterone and oestrogen.

Cells. The drives of life: feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially.

In the left side, the cell has 3 topological functional zones:

– Max. E: It has an external, thin membrane, which in free cells have cilia that move the cell and act-react to external stimuli. In organic cells energy is provided by the blood system of the macro-organism. So external cilia disappear and invaginate as lysosomes that kill carbohydrates.

– Max. I: In the center, there is a nucleus of max. informative density, filled with cyclical or spiral DNA/RNA’s networks that control the st-point.

– ExI: RNAs dominate the intermediate space-time, directing the energy organelles, mitochondria or chloroplasts that produce energy; and the informative ribosomes that reproduce products, pegged to the Golgi apparatus – a membrane’s invagination.

The vital cycles of the cell.

In the graph, the cell is a brain-body system constructed with 2 elements, nucleotide acids, based in nitrogen bases and protein bodies based in carbon chains, which are the informative and spatial systems of the cell. Around that EXI core duality we find an expansive intermediate, cyclical region with all kind of slavish organelles that perform their energy cycles (based in the energetic properties of oxygen, water and similar electronegative atoms); and their informative cycles. Both cycles are catalyzed by denser metal atoms that boost the E/I capacities of carbohydrates. Thus, through the interaction of carbohydrates, metallic ions, proteins and nucleotide acids, cells perform the 3±1 cycles of all st-points:

Max.E: In an organism, Mg, copper and iron capture oxygen and deliver it to each cell to perform energetic cycles; while in the cell cytochromes kill and split the energetic hydrogen atom into H⁺ and e^– ions in mitochondria or chloroplasts; absorbing its spatial energy; while metal atoms stabilize protein enzymes.

Max. I: Na and K ions control the expansive and implosive rhythms of the electric membrane, sending informative messages among cells -while RNA and DNA molecules process information within the cell, reproducing new carbohydrate molecules.

– Re: The combined effect of the accumulation of energy and information within the cell triggers the reproductive cycle, guided by RNA and DNA molecules. Mitosis is in fact a process of replication of a cell that happens as an alternative to its death, at the end of its life-death cycle (S1-G1-S2 periods). This life/death cycle shows an astounding regularity:

– ±st: Cells live a generational cycle with 3+1 phases: S1(1/4^th of a time) or young, energetic age, in which they grow its cytoplasm; G1-mature age (1/2th of the time), in which they reproduce its DNA; S2, 3^rd informative age, in which they replicate its ‘cyclical clocks’, enzymes that regulate and accelerate the warping of the cell, provoking A) its possible death; B) its replication in to two cells.

– ∑: Finally cells evolve socially into macro-organisms. Yet only the RNA-DNA system creates complex informative, control networks.

All those cellular cycles are not ‘mechanic processes’, but they have evolved departing from the organic, dual, Darwinian and symbiotic interactions between proteins and nucleotide acids, the dominant energetic and informative macromolecules of cells. The most important cycle is the reproductive cycle, which in the cell as in other fractal space-time represents the existential will that ensures the perpetuation of the species.

Comments Off

Company-mothers & democracies should cre(dit)ate a future for Life not only for Machines

History

History in spacetime

History in Mind:Wor(l)d

Death of History

Films

Webs

Books