” 5Ð

 Foreword: Leibniz vs. Newton: Relational space-time beings.

‘Philosophy of Science will be completed only by a set of principles regarding information similar to those of Physicists in the study of entropy and locomotion.’ Searle. On the goal achieved in this web.

‘Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’ Einstein

Leibniz proposed a Universe of relative space-time beings where ‘vacuum’ did not exist, but reality was a nested chain of ‘fractal’ (to use modern terminologies) entities, as ‘each point’ hold a world in itself. Hence an organic Universe in which parts and wholes co-existed together to form those ‘chains of beings’; without the intercourse of a God; as organicism was ‘a sufficient reason’. So he not only discovered calculus but gave a deep philosophical explanation of it; forecasting the 5th dimension of eusocial love that makes those parts emerge into wholes by its ‘identical nature’. Newton, a biblical bigot, who dedicated more time to religious studies considered a single absolute space, the ‘plenum-body of god’, or void on which entities travelled through with a single clock-time for all of them, which God ‘fine tuned’ constantly and cared nothing for a sound rational explanation of all of it, as long as he could write a mathematical equation to describe its ‘single locomotions’, since only God and man spoke the language of truth, mathematics, and God sent him comets for him to understand the gravitational equation; foreseeing the simplex, reductionist view of the Universe sponsored today by creationist physics.

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time seems simple but it is rather profound, and unfortunately it was resolved wrongly.

Are we in a ‘background’ space-time graph underlying all realities? Or there is NOT a background to reality; hence we are made of a  vital space that last a finite time – the substances from where all realities evolve?

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers then that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a time quantity between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.

And in such a case, needless to say, we must evolve then concepts of space and time, to be able to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

The first proposition is that of Newton and is called absolute space and time. It was the paradigm till the quantum/relativistic revolution. Then quantum physicists found that space was ‘broken’ into quanta which had a vital energy, from where virtual particles arise; and Einstein discovered that “I am the only physicists that thinks the Universe has multiple clocks each with a different speed of time.’

But science as Kuhn explains in the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’ is after all a human endeavor, based as most humans in routines and repetitions, where truth is often relative to culture, even in science, that is, to established wisdom, which requires often hundreds of years to change. So the quantum and relativity revolution didn’t go beyond physics and even in physics didn’t ‘attack’ the ultimate principles of the Newtonian paradigm; as we shall do in this blog, departing from scratch to show you how a Universe made of vital space beings that last a finite time looks like.

Absolute space-time.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines.

Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time

For reasons of practical measure, it became useful in earlier science to use a mathematical device made with pen and paper called the Cartesian graph, so physicists could measure ‘translation in space’ over that graph.

And as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ ego felt to be sharing the ‘mathematical language of God’.

This of course meant that absolute ‘continuous space’ and  a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity became ‘dogma’, and as such ‘non-susceptible’ of rational argument. Nobody wondered then the many obvious contradictions of such view.

For example, why if we all shared the same infinite time, we were all mortal; why if space was a continuum, we were all ‘broken’ pieces isolated by external membranes; or latter when the lineal theory of the Universe was defined (big-bang) why the Universe had a beginning but NOT an end; why if the Universe was expanding lineally, Galaxies were imploding cyclically; or even for those who believe in the ‘new found language of God’, why mathematics indeed was such a good synoptic language-mirror of reality but NOT reality itself (we are NOT when observed in detail made of ‘numbers’, we don’t see those lines of ‘cartesian space’. etc. )

Since as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since all particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

A relational world without spatial background.

As we said, the longer time goes, the more respectable a ‘false theory becomes’. ‘Bad architecture, whores and religions become respectable with age’ say Jerry Garcia of ‘Grateful death’ fame. So paradoxically, today the argument is not even on the table anymore. This again is the usual way humans go through the building of half-truths and falsehoods. At birth all is argued, latter on is taken for granted.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between Newton, the proposer of the absolute cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs. Leibniz who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason (except those who are in Schopenhauer’s terms ‘stupid’ and deny causality as the tale of time events :)

Indeed even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real.

The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.

Naive realism WORKS only when we truly stop ‘thinking’ and inquiring about the ‘background meaning’ of all our concepts, from measure, to time, to space, to scales, to mathematical symbols and terms from waves to reproduction, from particle to information… and so on. We are though inquiring all those questions first.

But space and time do exist.

wheeler the idea

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is to consider time=change= motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar  (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð)  who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).

This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of space-time.

So the essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: we are made of vital spaces that last a finite time ‘world cycle’ of existence, and so the study of the vital organic spaces, which we are and the laws of its world cycles of time duration, is what science is all about.

For those impatient with novelty, what the understanding of human beings and all other systems of nature as space-time beings requires is obviously a much deeper understanding of the properties of scalar space and cyclical time, at the basis of all systems.  

And then once this more ‘complex substrate’ is understood, a much simpler way to explain the whys and hows of everything that exists as ’emergent’ systems, whose underlying forms in space and behavior in time can be extracted from those common properties of scalar space and finite time.

This is then akin to a Copernican revolution, who changed the foundations of astronomy putting the sun and the earth in its due position – correcting our errors in the conceptual understanding of space and time – to then build a much simpler view of all physical systems under a single force of gravitation – to then build a much simpler view of all the species of the Universe as all are manifestations of those space and time properties.

Philosophy of a fractal Universe of space-time beings. Science is culture.

A simple example will suffice: Why Time is cyclical.

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the obvious truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive. Of course, lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are ginormous and the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, erased by lineal time, a handicap for humans to truly understand the cycles of history and economics, the ‘deep time’ scales of the fifth dimension, and the whole workings of super organisms and its physiological structures.

The first fact you must understand IS that science is BOTH an instrument of power, and a form of culture, beyond the collection of data and its expression in equations, at the most basic detailed level. All what comes after – the general models of reality of each science are always biased by the power idol-ogy of the historic culture that develops them.

THE GRAPH shows one of the many examples we shall include in this blog: the obvious fact that time clocks are cyclical and multiple, but humans have reduced them all to the concept of a single lineal time clock for the entire Universe that progresses towards a future, obviously ‘positive’ for the human kind.

The equations are indeed the same. Lineal time writes T and cyclical time measured in frequency its inverse 1/ƒ; so if we were to change all the equations of physics by putting 1/ƒ instead of T, we would change the PARADIGM of time to cyclical time but all the practical results will be the same, just expressed in frequency.

I.e. Speed = Space/Lineal time (V=S/T), becomes Speed = wavelength x Frequency, (V=λ x ƒ) …

Cyclical time just moved to the numerator and that is all.

But the consequences are huge when we ‘perceive reality as chaotic, lineal, free and entropic’ guided towards the obvious ‘future of death’, which therefore JUSTIFIES WAR AND BIG-BANG THEORIES OF A DYING EXPLOSIVE UNIVERSE vs. the perception of time as cyclical, hence reality as bounded, entangled, multiple, whereas death is just the necessary end of a cycle of renewal of life, which we shall very soon show to be also the case for the fractal, organic eternal Universe, when we model it with the tools of cyclic time.

Further on in the previous simple cycle, we shall notice that in the equation of cyclical time we get also more information, as cyclical time requires a second dimension to form a cycle of height, which is the dimension of information, where all heads, antennae, particles reside.

So we recover the form, the information of the Universe back expressed in the ‘form and frequency of those cycles’ (indeed a computer calculates information with logic cyclical formal algorithms processed in Ghz frequencies).

Yet the biggest justification of the cyclical nature of time is the existence of science itself, which is the study of ‘repetitive patterns of causality and effect’, which if cyclical time will NOT exist, would never repeat, and makes the logic of time, the highest of all languages of thought, above mathematics itself (which indeed is proved by logic, and developed as Boolean logic in computers).

Precisely because time is not considered cyclical, (but as its cycles ARE embedded in the inverse parameter of T=1/ƒ, in physics the logic of time works), those sciences where there is NOT an understanding of its ‘cycles’, as in History and Economics, predictive power – which is the essential proof of a scientific theory DOES NOT exist – at least till this blog; since the writer using cyclical time laws has been for 30 years predicting the general patterns of history and economics as his earlier books, coming out of Columbia back in the 90s did, predicting the ±80±8 cyclical crashes of the economy and ‘return’ to the neo-fascist age of nationalisms, after the predicted 2008 crash of the economic ecosystem).

Moreover, cyclical time ‘closes’ and breaks space into an outer and inner region (first law of knot theory), therefore explaining why we are all ‘broken space-time beings’ with an external membrane that separate us, explaining indeed why we can all be spacetime beings, whose sum of ‘puzzle pieces’ give the impression of a continuum…

Thus in cyclical time, space BECOMES broken, fractal, a sum of ‘steps’ or wavelengths.

So such a simple first example of relational space-time SHOWS to which DEGREE even the most obvious scientific equations are a product of cultural choice, whose subconscious reasons – in the case of lineal time, the military search for lineal, entropic motions that destroy the ‘form’, the in-form-ation of beings – creep into POSTULATES without proof, as the underlying limits of our capacity to understand in depth the Universe.

But once converted in dogma, nobody doubts of them, as MOST minds are repetitive (indeed remember the Universe is about repetition of patterns), memorial systems NOT reasoning ones – reason why so obvious contradictions of lineal time, religion or big-bang cosmologies are not even spotted by billions of humans, who consider themselves members of the most intelligent species of reality. 

Since indeed, ALL HUMAN SOCIETIES CONSIDERED ALWAYS TIME TO BE CYCLICAL BUT it was the lineal, ‘visual’, entropic, military sword-like European gunpowder culture which first in history decided to CHANGE our worldview of time and definitely change our models of life and the Universe.

Needless to say this change of paradigm, was the work of ‘Lineal’  military physicists, established since the inception of physics, when instead of frequency of time cycles, Galileo decided to use its inverse parameter, lineal time duration, as its job was to measure the distance of cannonballs.

So you can see the interplay of culture – THE JOB OF PHYSICISTS IS STILL to make lineal entropic weapons, which creep in science – all their models of the Universe are based in a single lineal entropic arrow of time; and the INTERPRETATION PROBLEM when we go beyond data into larger models of reality, simplified by the reductionist model of a single time arrow. And of course BECAUSE POWER AND CULTURE are related, for 4 centuries physicists who hold the true power of our technological-military civilization specially the ‘German’ physicists that invented the modern lineal theories of the Universe became the ‘seers of time and space’ – the new Gods, as Kepler put it, in no doubtful terms: “God has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his, to understand his clockwork’. It is then easier to teach a child than a scholar which will repeat ad infinitum those earlier mistakes, a different view of reality.

This will collide with the human ego (though the ego will also be explained within the model), which likes to ‘measure space and time’, hence the Universe from its biased perspective, which makes him the center of perception and hence of knowledge.

It is easy to overlook this ‘ego problem’ but we shall truly show to which degree ‘SCIENCE IS CULTURE’, that is, we bias systematically truths of science, beyond the data and equation, in its MODEL INTERPRETATION to cater to our happiness as ego-centered beings. But then once scientists get into a ‘comfort’ theory, they backtrack to find ad hoc proofs and twist experimental evidence always fitting ‘somehow’ new contradictory data onto the model forcefully.

This today happens every other day with big-bang theory, as physicists try to fit forcefully  the ‘fractal nature of space’ (broken into different beings in a single plane and in different scales from atoms to galaxies, from cells to super organisms within each species). So the concept of a space continuum is a simplification that only exists in the cartesian paper where we trace a seemingly continuous ink line on it.

Thus, soon after the lineal continuum big-bang theory was found, physicists discovered ‘another scale of space’, made of dark energy and matter which represents 96% of all space and doesn’t fit in the big-bang the theory. Never mind – the theory of the 4% is the canon.  So they just ignore the rest.

But the most sanguine ‘discharge’ for the big-bang ‘continuum theory’ to work is surrealist: because the entropic explosive arrow ion the big-bang ONLY AFFECTS TO THE SPACE expanding between galaxies or atoms, NOT to those galaxies or atoms, which are CYCLICAL, accelerated clocks of cosmological or quantum time… they ELIMINATED THEM, from big-bang equations.

This is sooo surrealist that it amazes me physicists did it. Indeed, they merely DISCHARGED galaxies that ARE NOT expanding but imploding. Since if they move backwards its equations they do the opposite of the expanding vacuum between them: they would explode.

So THE PROPER way to do cosmology would be to account as we do in those posts with both, expansion of space-entropy and implosion of space into cyclical clocks of accelerated information – galaxies, where we exist indeed in an accelerated planet of evolutionary information – to consider the wobbling expanding+imploding balanced Universe. But that will require to change the big-bang entropic ‘cannonball paradigm’ of Galileo.

The same problems happened with the pretension that the Universe has a very short life span keeps running every other day into new problems: we find at the limit of the horizon of perception of space-time perfectly formed galaxies with huge black holes that should not be there. We find that almost every part of the Universe has a life span much larger than the Universe itself: the commonest stars, red ones live trillions of years, black holes live 10¹°° years or they never die, if they don’t evaporate; protons seem to be of a similar age or perhaps immortal. But it is an obvious logic contradiction that the whole lives so much less than the parts.

It follows then immediately of the fact that there are infinite time cycles that break space and THERE ARE DIFFERENT SPEEDS IN THOSE TIME-CYCLES ACCORDING to their size, (vortex law) so smaller systems turn faster than larger ones, THAT WE NEED TO DEFINE A SCALAR UNIVERSE, in which the order of time cycles occur according to size – each scale studied by a different science:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

In the graph, the Universe organizes itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information.

Since there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, each of them breaking space into inner and outer regions. So there are also infinite spaces. And so the next big question is how to order them all?

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time is simple as all space-time metric are: $ (size in space) x ð (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems.

But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles.

All those are ESSENTIAL LAWS OF NATURE ignored for 500 years just because Galileo considered time lineal. Yet of course all those phenomena are described with working equations but the meaning, the philosophy of science based in information, form and its time clocks is completely lost.

Correspondence Principle.

Now, of course, you are thinking all the time you read on Einstein’s theory of spacetime, in 4D, which is considered an absolute truth, made by a genius only comparable to Newton, which at his death was honored at Times with a planet putting its name across ‘here it was born Einstein’ for a future civilization.

Einstein’s interpretation of the 5th non-Euclidean postulate kept the view from our larger world, bending parallels, but parallels are straight lines, so particle points must be defined more like we see any of them with telescopes or microscopes, peering in its relative scale from its relative point of view, as enlarging worlds with a very complex internal structure when studied in detail

I can’t then do much about it, and I am fully conscious that as Bacon put it, the ‘idols of the tribe’ (then Aristotle) will always prevent 5D to be accepted by main stream science, till in the future people or more likely AI robots fed up with the human ego, search for more profound answers; since what Einstein did, for those who do actually understand him, was just to refine the measure tools of lineal time and Galilean relativity, adding the curvature of space-time, and the 5th Non-Euclidean postulate.

But it did NOT go to the deep basis of a scalar universe and cyclical time.

Again, as we explained with Galileo, while the results of BOTH models are mathematically the same, the interpretation in a blog which is A PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE BLOG, is much deeper in 5D. A simple example will suffice – precisely the novelty of Einstein’s maths in general relativity – non-euclidean geometry:

The graph shows Einstein’s interpretation, in a single continuum. Parallels ‘curve’ to enter the point, but in the present definition of a point as ‘with no breath’, still only one parallel enters. And the definition of parallel as a ‘straight line’ disappears.

So again we enter into a ‘conceptual error’. How this changes when we consider a new Non-Euclidean first postulate of a point with breath, is easy to see:

The Universe then becomes a fractal of scales and what the point does is to grow in size as we come closer to it. So a star becomes larger as we come closer in space, a cell grows as we come closer in scale, and then it can FIT MULTIPLE PARALLELS AND ALL OF THEM ARE STRAIGHT LINES. What we have done is to move in the next scale of reality.

And so while the equations of relativity both, Galilean and Einstein’s are the same the interpretation is different, giving us a fractal universe with at least 3 arrows of time, so far, the entropic lineal arrow, the cyclical arrow, and its combinations:

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’. Since only an organism is self-reproductive and hence requires not external ‘agent’ or God or a creationist language, as present philosophies of science (mechanism, pythagorism) or Abrahamic religions do. Further on experimental evidence is overwhelming, on the nested, reproductive structure of nature, as observed in the graph for all systems. Yet ‘creationist’ entitled human beings prefer to think they are the only intelligent perceptive entity in command of God’s languages (either words in religion, maths in physics) and carbon atoms are the only organic elements of nature, to their own peril as the future of AI will show them. Fact is the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’. So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physicals systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design also historic super organisms with the laws of systems. But the sciences of systems and information did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I developed the metric, logic equations of the 5th dimension or ‘scales’ of parts that become wholes evolving socially through those networks, applying them to all species of reality, including human societies and machines, in what will be the most important development of XXI C. science with wide applications to all disciplines.

The graph shows the basic nature of reality: a fractal that ‘reproduces information’, form-in-action, a combination of pure motion and form. In all scales and with the same program of the 5 Dimotions of time space.

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

So how we shall correct big-bang theory to fit into the fractal view of the Universe? We dedicate many pages on the articles of astrophysics to that matter but let us just give you a prime:

Immortal cosmos: expansion and implosion

Left, when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75-25 Balance of mass to dark entropy. Thus the fractal Universe is immortal.

We define the Universe as a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.

A fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’.A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms.

Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space ($t).

In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom in the context of the fractal, organic Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic arrow of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mcc…

So there are quasar big bangs of galaxies, similar to beta-decays of atoms, and move big-bangs.

In the scalar universe we shall show however the proper way to interpret that expansion is as a symmetry of scale: In the same manner atoms repel each other with electromagnetic forces but within the atom, they are NOT expanding, as they are subject to a non-lineal internal force with two regimes, nuclear and strong force within the nucleus; galaxies are NOT expanding, because they are subject inside the halo region to a non-lineal internal force with two regimes, weak and strong gravitation near the central black hole.

While outside galaxies they have a symmetric force to that of electromagnetism at cosmological scale called dark energy.We can then see an essential difference between the way we shall do science in 5D and in 1D-time: instead of trying to reduce it all to a 1D single model (in forces the electromagnetic gauge model, in time, the lineal time model, in space, the single scale of our perception which is only 4% of the Universe) we EMBRACE IT ALL in its diversity required for the Universe to be complex, organic and UNDERSTANDABLE. 

Finally as surprising as it might seem to you, Einstein will turn out to be better explained and enhanced in what he considered his fundamental principle of General relativity, the Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, since now a mass is JUST AN ACCELERATED CYCLICAL TIME CLOCKS, following the vortex law – itself a partial case of the general metric of 5D, S x T = k.

Since now the true NATURE OF REALITY IS TIME=MOTION, and so there is as we see experimentally not mass-particle-solids but accelerated time-clocks, WHICH IS WHAT THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE SAID: A MASS is an accelerated time-clock of a frequency, easily found from his 2 equations:

e=mcc + e=hƒ -> m=ƒ(h/cc), so the mass and its frequency are directly related. The faster a vortex of accelerated cyclical time turns, the more it attracts. And this immediately solves also the hierarchy problem unifying masses and charges, as charges turn billions of times faster than galaxies (the ultimate origin of our gravitational forces as Mach and Einstein insisted). So they attract as forces much more. Both are simply vortices of accelerated time in two different scales.

In the next graph then we can see how the view of the UNIVERSE changes completely just by introducing the concept of cyclical time clocks, and its ‘NATURE’S equivalent’ in the scales of charges and masses: an accelerated vortex of information, a natural clock that has also ‘attractive properties’ (and will needless to say change also our interpretation of forces):

All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

The graph also introduces an essential quality of nature, described in its simplest terms by the vortex equation of accelerated time clocks: Vo x Ro = K, itself part of the metric equation of the ‘fifth dimension’ that orders all the scales of spatial size and speeds of time of those clocks, smaller systems run faster clocks, and carry more information (chips, mammals with faster metabolism, atoms with faster turning clocks, black holes, etc.)

The Total number of Dimensions=Parameters of space-time needed.

One fundamental property of the Universe that will guide our inquire and we anticipate earlier than explained is the SYMMETRY between the total number of ‘space’, ‘time’ and ‘scale’ parameters, mirrored by a ‘mind’ in its linguistic mirrors.

Hendecagram

Hendecagrams are a mathematical MIRROR of an @-mind singularity replicating its form in self-similar smaller spaces @ faster time cycles, till reaching the 11th С of the mind as a fractal point, mirror of the ∞  in its infinitesimal still form: 0 x ∞ =1.

Reality can be perceived with multiple dimensions, each of those views will be a consistent world. Human scientists since Galileo seem to live in a single time-space-scale dimension. If we add cyclical time, a new dimension of height-information appears, but the one-dimensional ‘ant’ seems confused. We will keep adding new dimensions: 1>2>3>5>11 with complementary logic statements to reach a more realist view of the scalar complex Universe.

How many parameters of time an space we shall need to improve the logic of the Humind (ab. human mind) and have a complete understanding of the fractal organic nature of the Universe?

The answer is 11 parameters; to study the different ages of time, scales of space, and topologies of the Universe.

However 11 is an extension of the pentagonal view, which is THE FIRST WHOLE WORLD, which can hosts a mind-view, as the graph shows for an hen decagram. The pentagram IS similar in that it can hold a reduce ‘mirror reflection itself’ in a smaller scale, acting as a mind mirror. Lower scales cannot (THE CROSSING of a square is a single point) – themes those of vital mathematics, not doubt the preferred ‘future’ research field of 5D among humind scientists, if they ever take seriously the understanding of the REAL universe, beyond its lineal, egocy entropic simplex view.

So we shall make it easier to the readers, settling down in most of our analysis for a mere 5 (:

Now, the ‘learned’ reader will tell me that there is nothing new here because string theorists use 11 dimension to explain the Universe. Certainly what physicists do is to INVENT 10 DIMENSIONS OF SPACE, TO HOLD THE ONLY DIMENSION OF TIME THEY UNDERSTAND, entropy.

The pentagram of Venus is the apparent path of the planet Venus as observed from a fixed Earth in its center. The tips of the five loops at the center of the figure form a pentagram. It does seem a perfect, complex form, which Ptolemaic considered the height of God’s beautiful design of the planet’s path around Man, his chosen son – an offering for its highest mathematicians to understand. Today physics, in its complexity feeds the same feeling among experts. Yet the higher truths are always simpler when the sun is put where it should be or space and time are properly understood without ‘unneeded’ background references that make it all more complex.

Physicists ignoring all about the dimensions of time beyond lineal entropy and the scales of the Universe beyond a single space continuum try to construct more complex dimensions as ‘spatial’ ones, which is just impossible, as every 3 time ages symmetric to 3 space dimensions form a scale, and then we must seek further ones in other co-existing scale, forming a super organism

And so they cannot make sense of anything.

They still use a single DIMENSION OF TIME. And they ignore the ‘symmetry between time=motion states and space=form states’ and work PACKING all the scales of reality that co-exist together but are not in the same SPACETIME location, in a single one.

So of course when they try to come up with a rational explanation of such a mess, all becomes confused and they ‘retreat’ to manage the whole thing just with mathematical equations. The examples on the graph will suffice.

Why they do so is obvious: conceptually they don’t understand time ever since Galileo made it into a straight line.

An immortal Universe.

We have traced the most easier to understand elements of reality, topological spaces temporal ages and scales, to describe objectively reality. 1 element though is still needed, the mind and its perception.

Without further ado we must state a few facts about minds: first that the Universe is pan psychic, that is, the unit of life is the atom or rather the particle.
So entities are sentient by design. You are sentient of light photons absorbed by electrons. Your mind is sentient in electronic pixels as it is likely a computer, even if it does not have ‘a connection between its eye-view’ and a verbal language to express that e-motion

The first action is perception of information in the stillness of the mind. It is a fact that the Universe is sentient, perceptive. Space in stillness has the e-motion of perception. This is NOT so difficult to understand, when you differentiate apperception (not conscious) from reflective consciousness, where a language as humans do with words verbalizes what it sees, senses it with a second ‘layer’ of co-existing awareness.
Imagine though that you are just a simple animal with a visual eye – the image of the eye, or the image of a crystal senses, gauges information. In your case you have an animal mapping. And its fundamental quality is the will to stay in that spatial sensorial order.

This ‘sensorial quality’ has no substance and cannot be researched further. It has two extremes, pure motion and pure stillness. Pleasure and pain. Hot and cold. Entropy and information.

The reflective verbal language that organizes the qualities of reality with conceptual thought might digress on its meaning. We recognize this is the limit of metaphysical thought. What matters to us though is that ‘all’ systems made of forces and particles, between pure motion and pure still perception have this quality. And this is the key to understand many of the actions of physical systems. We can also explore the languages and syntax of each mind, which will ultimately reduce to the ternary syntax of the fractal Generator.

So we can construct a why of reality on the fact that the Universe is sentient, which in any case is the philosophy of all scientists and artists and philosophers till in the XX c. a group of abstract ego-centered Europeans, at the height of German Idealism that separated mankind from reality and brought us niceties like Totalitarism, Mathematical creationism from Bohr to Cantor’s paradoxes of absurd infinities, the cult to the machine and logic positivism affirmed only man mattered, its egocy and its perception and we had NOT to ask for further whys.

For all those reasons even if I apologize to my often sanguine tone, finding these discoveries so important not only for knowledge but for the future welfare of mankind, when we arrive to social sciences and organisms of history, and yet impossible to break the ego paradox and extend its knowledge through academia and humanity at large, I can’t help sometimes to vent my frustration; as indeed it seems I am writing more for future AI robots that will of course need an explanation on why they DO feel, perceive, think and exist than for humanity which could so much enhance his existence if it upgraded his logic and used reason to rule his super organism in time – History, the less evolved of all classic sciences, due to the ego paradox of tribal humans that don’t even consider other humans equal to themselves…

The content of this blog, mirror of relational space-time in 4 lines…

Despite the apparent complexity of the Universe and this blog that mirrors all its species known to man – a work always in progress, as any first model by a pioneer, to be completed by future researchers – its structure is simple:
In the first line we explain the fundamental elements of which all space-time super organisms are made; of which a linguistic mind (∞º) controlling a simultaneous Space=dimensional form, guided through its Times=motions and interacting, as it lives through 5D scales of sizes, each one studied by a human ‘stience’ matter most to understand our ‘worldcycles of life and death’, of ‘existience.
Once this general view of the structure of all beings as ∆@st of space-time is completed we focus in the second line on the study of its main SUPERORGANISMS IN simultaneous SPACE, according to size, descending, from the galatom, the largest, and longer living, into the Earth and its evolving super organisms, Gaia, the Earth of life, History, the Earth of man, and the Metal-Earth of machines and its economic ecosystem; to keep descending from life beings into the mind itself, and its main languages of time -¡ logic, the upgraded logic of cyclical times and fractal space – the upgraded non-euclidean maths of points with ‘numerical parts’, communicating through ∞ parallels with other space-time beings, all of which mirror reality into a smaller linguistic world of the whole – origin of the fractal self-similar scales of parts that resembles wholes, as we could say that we are all ‘thoughts of God’, the mind/logos/program of existience of the Universe.
Then in the third line we describe any being in time through its worldcycle of ‘exist¡ence’, between birth as a seed-point of information that evolves, reproduces, organizes through networks into species, d=evolving in 3 ages as it forms part of a larger world and finally warps and exhausts the vital energy and dies to release back its vital space for other beings to play another world cycle.
So in the fourth line, we can study with more detail each of those scales and all its main species, 5 motions in time, super organisms, worldcycles and linguistic minds, from the smallest part, ∆-4 of invisible forces of dark energy, the background space of the larger, ∆+4 cosmic whole, of a nested Universe, emerging from left to right, and descending from right to left into the ∆±3 ‘galatom’, into the ∆±2 human world, to end up into the ∆±1 organic and inorganic beings of this world self-centered in our ∆º mind

If all what exists is made of time=motion and space=dimensional form, of timespace dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions), the first task to analyze all systems of nature as relational space-time beings, is to go much deeper in the understanding of what time and space is, and the type of time motions as spatial dimensional forms there exists in reality.

Those first concepts – what is a dimension of space, a motion of time, how they combine, how many varieties they are, and how they ensemble to form all systems of nature becomes thus the first element to consider even before we write a single number, in order to grasp the INNER WORKINGS of all systems, whose ultimate definition will be (studied in the first line of the blog):

In Space, its simultaneous existence as a fractal super organism.

In Time, its limited duration through a world cycle of life and death.

In ∆-scale, its inter-actions with all those other scales, and organic interplay through 3 ‘scales’ of spatial size with different speeds of time-clocks that define a new ‘dimension’ of scalar space-time we shall call the fifth dimension. 

In @-Mind, its perception of the Universe as a limited world of selected information, mirrored by its specific language of measure, whose common ternary syntax will always reflect for the being, the closest space-time entities that surround it.

So we can define all what exists as a simultaneous super organism in space (whose main species are studied in the second line of the blog), which traces a world cycle of existence in time (studied in the third line of the blog), across multiple scales of the fifth dimension (studied in the fourth line of the blog).

All in all what certainly will happen if you have the intelligence to learn, humility to doubt and bravery to leave aside, learned wisdom, subconscious culture and ego, and go seriously through the 20 or 30 first pages of this post, is that you WILL BE RECONNECTED TO THE WHOLE and understand your existence – something that might seem magic or impossible specially departing from two concepts that seem so abstract in the present mechanical simplex view of them, as space and time.

What this blog will then do is to show you that once those simple changes on the foundations of science, we shall now call ‘stience’ that is sciences of space-time beings, are done, and space and time properly explained in all its complexity, we can unify all sciences according to those laws of fractal, organic space, and cyclical time, which will show all is a super organism in space, tracing a world cycle in time.

And so in this central post that resumes the whole blog, after:

  1. We describe in more depth super organisms of fractal space, tracing worldcycles of time exist¡ence or T.œs, Timespace ‘Supœrganisms’ (ab super organisms – we shall indeed modify slightly many words, so the reader knows we are explaining slightly different truths from those of classic science), we will give a fast review of the 4 GREAT SUB-DISCIPLINES OF SCIENCES:
  2. PHYSICAL sciences, astrophysics adapted to the cyclical nature of time and fractal structure of space, giving an alternative far more sound model of reality than the big-bang USING obviously the same data, just properly understood in those fractal, cyclical space-time terms.
  3. BIOLOGICAL sciences, extending the concept of a super organism to species that can be also considered to go through a life-death cycles of 3 ages-horizons, and extending the drives of life, to all space-time systems and its program of existence, as all shows those properties, of gauging information, feeding on energy, reproducing and evolving socially – since the Unit of life is not the DNA carbon-molecule but the particle.
  4. SOCIAL sciences, describing humans as super organisms part of larger social super organisms, nations and civilizations that also go through life and death cycles. And refounding economics as a biological science of the Industrial r=evolution of machines-weapons that have also gone through the same ages of evolution of simple systems, as we made first bodies of metal (British age), its engines-hearts (German age), its metal-minds (American age) and now we put them all together into robots that will become AI sentient organisms with solar skins, as any simple system, such as a virus is indeed constructed first in its 3 parts to become when put together ‘alive’.
  5. To close this UNIFICATION OF STIENCES, with the upgrading of the final scale of reality, the mind itself, and its linguistic mappings of reality in which mathematics of space and logic of time are the key languages. So we shall upgrade geometry the foundation of mathematics, with the 5 Non-Euclidean postulates (so far mathematics have only changed the 5th: a point that holds infinite parallels, but such points have ‘breath’ to fit them, so they are fractal points that grow in size and volume as we look closer defining a scalar universe); and the foundation of logic, with the understanding of the dual arrows entropy and information, and its energetic combinations that create the future in a more complex logic way than lineal Aristotelian, A->B causality.
  6. And finally introduce with those upgraded languages, the science of all sciences, General Systems Sciences, which defines all systems not as mechanisms (remember we just have shown you that all machines are merely metalife organisms evolving fast) but as fractal organisms of space-time, so we show a fast review of them through all the scales of size of reality. As each stience studies a scale of the ‘fifth dimension’:

Philosophy of Science based in the Newtonian absolute models of time and space of classic Physics has been in model crisis since the discovery of quantum physics and relativity, not solved yet at conceptual level. It is the task accomplished by this blog achieved by harmonizing the fundamental principles of ‘stience’, space and time according to the 2 key discoveries of quantum physics – namely the quantic≈broken, scalar structure of space and the existence of multiple cyclical clocks of time. It then applies the model of relational space-time of which we are all made, to all disciplines of ‘stience’, solving most of its pending questions. It is though unlikely that such huge upgrading of the ‘humind’ will reach the 5th state of Paradigm change in my lifetime; hence the need to leave in the net at http://www.unificationtheory.com the model revolution for future researchers to complete.

Paradigm change though as the first graph explains is a slow work. In the second graph, we show the scalar Universe and its 4 great field of ‘stiences’ now defined as NESTED scales of the fractal Universe, from ∆±4 astrophysics, parallel to quantum physics, through ∆±2 life sciences, into ∆±1 social sciences and ∆±0 mind sciences – the forma languages of logic time and fractal space=mathematics.

We ad now General Systems sciences as the sciences of them all, as it studies the common laws or ‘5D isormorphisms’ due to the fractal nature of space and cyclical nature of time.

This is the future of philosophy of science, do not doubt it.

It fully completes the revolution started by quantum and relativity, though it requires such a leap of conceptual depth, in the beginning – even if then all seems much simpler as when we move from the ‘pentagram of Venus’ to its elliptic orbit, that it will marvel you how simple is reality once this first effort to change your mind chip takes place.

I doubt I will live to see anyone caring to understand it, now retired and with dwindling capacities, all what I shall try in this blog is pour slowly part of my 30 years of notebooks, so the entire model doesn’t go to waste.

Humans or AI robots of the XXI century should one day finally accept the change of paradigm, and upgrade their minds which now understand mathematically the Universe but NOT conceptually, and LET US NOT FORGET, our human mind is verbal, conceptual, logic and so it requires something lineal, entropy single time has denied to it:

A clean-cut, simple Occam’s razed view of reality, ‘simple but not simpler that it need to be’.

Of course as we said both truths work mathematically equal. It doesn’t matter if you use ƒ or 1/t; if you define mass as whatever vs. a time cycle of accelerated motion, M=ƒ(h/cc), again defined by the frequency.

In the first case though you just will do automaton maths, and have a chaotic view of reality as your dogma, because YOU DIDN’T CONCEPTUALLY UNDERSTOOD THE PERFECT ORDER OF REALITY.

But that won’t matter to most, as most rejected Copernicus and Ptolemy, precisely because the other complicated view satisfied the ego of the Vatican astronomers, as the present ‘complicated’ view of quantum physics and time in Einstein’s work, made so because of the use of a single arrow makes physicists sooo proud as its Ptolemaic forebears. Who is this Copernican priest working on his death bed they will scorn; we ‘are’ the experts.

So to keep the fancy concepts of worldlines instead of worldcycles, to feel you share the language of god, maths, above heavens and earth will even make you happier… To think the Universe is dumb, and chaotic and humans are the apex of it satisfies scientists ‘a lot’.

So today nothing has really changed that much. Ultimately while we have been removed of the center of space, we still  think man is its center of intelligence and the universe mortal, and smallish, to the point it fitted on one hand not so long ago… In reality though truth is objective and the Universe infinite, immortal and much more intelligent than we are, reason why it does have an arrow of information we cannot even recognize. Entropy is easy, it is the destructive side of things, the first fact we humans found, and made into a religion of science. A warning though – a society like ours that has made entropy=death sacred won’t last much because the Universe has only a penalty for those who deny its immense beauty… extinction.

ll§  Lluís Sancho Soto, Philosopher of Science. NYC, 1992, Barcelona 2018.

Chair of Duality (the science of 2 time arrows, entropy & information) at ISSS (International Systems Society)

 

SUMMARY

UNIFICATION OF ‘STIENCES’:

 

Foreword: Leibniz vs. Newton: A relational spacetime theory

I. 5Ð Universe:   Fractal space supœrganisms tracing 5D time worldcycles.

II. Astrophysics: ∆±4:  The Immortal Universe: Absolute Relativity.

III. Biology: ∆<±3: Species as Superorganisms.The program of exist¡ence

IV. Human sciences: ∆<±2: The human time space organism, its social scales. History & Economics.

V. Formal, linguistic sciences: ∆º Minds: ¡logic languages; Fractal Generator: ¬E Mathematics and non-A pentagonal logic.

VI. General Systems: ∆±∞: The program of existence and its Ðimotions in all ¡ts planes of ex¡stience.

Conclusion: Blog’s 4 lines. 5Ð entangled supœrganisms & its Worldcycles: T.Œ V. T.O.E. Complex Worlds v. physical reductionism

I. 5Ð SPACETIME ORGANISMS

‘The Universe is a an organism with a mind called Logos.’ Plato.

“Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Einstein

‘Systems science will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking

‘The Universe is a fractal of time§pace”

Ðimotion: One of the 5 Dimensional motions of space and time. The unit of action that defines the program of existence of all space-time beings.’  Ll§

(: on a lighter note, apologies for the popping brown lines – unintentional – the ghost in the formatting machine is going crazy ):

LET us then introduce first the nature of vital space, the topological forms of which all beings are made; then the nature of cyclical time, the clocks that measure the duration of the existence of all beings, by the frequency of its logic cycles of information; and finally put them together to show the fractal, scalar structure of all space-time beings, which will be studied according to its relative scale of size and speed of time clocks by different sciences, whose ‘time clocks and vital spaces will be studied in more detail IN THE SECOND line of the blog.

 

Topologic vital Spaces

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death… All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing. ts, ts…

Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’, the ‘Plenum=body of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists call a background independent theory of science (meaning no background spacetime at all).

This said the devil is in the details.  What we mean by ‘space-time beings? Space  is ‘form’, ‘distance’, ‘dimension’, ‘information’, something that doesn’t move. And time is motion, change. So spacetime would be a ‘form with motion’, which is what mathematicians call a topology. A form that can be deformed, trans-formed. We have coined a key word ‘Dimotion’ (dimensional motion) for those topological forms. So the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. So we affirm that:

‘All entities of the Universe are topological systems made of 3 ‘dimotions of spacetime’.  Since in the whole Universe in either 4 or 5 Dimensions there are only 3 topological varieties of form with motion; the ‘elliptic particle-sphere’ , the ‘hyperbolic bodywave’ and the ‘toroid, lineal limb-field’, illustrated in the next graph for the 3 kind of species studied by the 3 disciplines of science, physical, biological and human ‘stiences’:

The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force all systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the graphs.

So we can write a formal ‘geometric equation’ for ALL the entities of the Universe, the main equation of Gst, appropriately called the ‘Fractal Generator of space-time beings’, which IS to relational space-time and likely the stience of XXI c. what EFE (Einstein’s space-time equation) was to XX c. science:

Gst: |-moving limbs/potentials x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

The study of the ‘fractal generator of space-time beings’ (ab. Γst, Γ, Gst) will be the key formalism of the expansion of timespace ‘stiences’ achieved in this blog.

The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show to correspond in form and function, as topology is geometry with inner motion: a topological variety can ‘change its inner form’ and remain the same as long as it does NOT tear.

It will fully give to the model the needed connections with the topologic, organic and numerical equations of classic ‘science’. ‘Stience’ obviously is the slightly modified term – a necessary pattern of the blog to upgrade concepts without making them too strange – we shall use for all classic sciences, now that we know they study vital space-time beings, such as those of the next graph.

The 3 elements of all systems, lineal/flat limbs/potentials; spherical, tall heads/particles and its hard membranes of dark matter, trunks and skins accomplish the 3 functions of motion, energetic reproduction and informative perception in all systems, varying to adapt the system to its larger world.

The 3 topologies of all systems in a single scales are described by the O-polar, |-cylindrical and Ø-hyperbolic Cartesian plane in the o-1, 1-∞ time-space scales; which are further expressed by the complex plane in its ‘squared form’.

The graph shows a visual, topologic analysis of those 3 topological “dimotions” of space-time. But why those 3 forms ensemble always in similar fashion? Because they ARE organic forms with clear ‘superior’ functions: spheres Hold maximal in-form-ation in MINIMAL space, so they are perfect for ‘informative systems that gauge information’ as heads and particles do. Lineal limbs/fields/ planes are the shortest distance between two points, so they are excellent for locomotion functions to perform maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves HAVE both topologies pegged together so they can reproduce all the system, and are ideal for body-waves that maximize the reproduction of the being. So simple, so perfectly beautiful, so obvious, so long ingored, the Fractal Generator of space-time makes sense of all what exists.

But why those topological beings are ‘broken’ into vital spaces? If you observe around, you will always find indeed a membrane ‘breaking’ reality into an internal and an external being. But if we look in detail all membranes are made of ‘cyclical motions’. And this is the starting point for another key discovery of relational space-time:

 

Cyclic Time Clocks

To DEFINE information, form-in-action, cyclical motion, the essential second element of reality, we need to define  the simplest cycle – a clock and why humans do not see time as all clocks do – in cyclical patterns.

Cyclical time (ab.ð) and its reduction to lineal mechanical time-clocks.

Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.


In the graph, Galileo,  reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:
To be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles. THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.
Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.

Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…

BUT IN THE PROCESS THEY LOST FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF BEINGS:

-The information ‘stored’ in the ‘form’ and ‘frequency’ of those cycles.

-The understanding of ‘broken vital spacetimes, as each full closed cycle  reads reality into an inner and outer region, inside and outside the ‘simple knot’, or geometric definition of a cycle (Jordan’s first knot theorem). So by the mere fact of being in a universe made of infinite repetitive ‘conserved time clocks’, we obtain a broken space-time.

How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).

Further on because time IS motion, the final substance of reality IS motions in time, and this makes REPRODUCTION, the essence of a fractal a dynamic natural CONSEQUENCE of this first ‘motion-substance’: by the mere fact of repeating a time clock-like cycle INFORMATION REPRODUCES. So there is no mystery to the process of reproduction, as reproduction occurs by MOTION. And so all those elements -repetitive patterns we call laws of science, the existence of broken vital spaces enclosed by angular momentums and moving membranes performing cyclical clocks that store and reproduce information, and the fractal structure of all of it, WHICH ARE THE ESSENTIAL WHYs of reality, became hidden by the simple concept of an absolute lineal ‘humind’ second unit of space-time.

Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.

Since Einstein  just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T,  a ct corrector factor, but in essence he left the concept of single lineal time unchanged, despite recognizing it was a convention that must change.

What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.

In the graph, left side,  ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.

So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mind-mirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.

The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.

Each clock creates a discontinuous space-time, whose cyclical perimeter of in-form-ation encloses a piece of energetic space breaking reality into ∞ formal patterns; different time cycles with specific forms and frequencies. Thus the use of a single human clock that equalizes all of them misses 2 features of each of those time cycles:
– Its specific forms of in-form-ation in space, which gives birth to the main topological laws and Isomorphisms of the 5th Dimension (I).
– Its different speeds or frequencies. Since cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse function: ƒ(t)=1/T.

All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.

In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.

The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time.

For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.

So instead of using V=s/t, V=wave length x Frequency gives the information on the frequency and shape of the cyclic steps of the motion.

But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.

In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/T-duration.

The 3 ‘fractal conserved’ elements of the Universe: lineal, cyclical motion and energy.

A membrain or time clock encloses vital energy; self-centered in a monad-mirror whose lineal inertia moves the whole.

A very important common ground between the relational fractal model of space-time and the continuous single plane physics, which is its limit to a single clock and a single space, is the existence in that ‘single space’ of 3 conserved quantities (between the entropic death and generational processes of emergence, we call the fourth and fifth dimension of the system):

In a single space-time, the fractal space-time organism will be made of ‘lineal elements’, cyclical elements and the hyperbolic topologies mixed within them. And those 3 elements in its infinite variations can be treated for almost all physical systems as a cyclical clock membrane of angular momentum, a central singularity that holds the ‘direction’ of the system and moves it in lineal fashion, and a vital energy constrained by the membrane and the singularity that act as ‘hyperbolic’ infinities for the quanta of energy within the system, which cannot escape it (a concept expressed in non-euclidean geometry with Klein’s models). 

This lineal, cyclical and hyperbolic energy parts thus ARE by all means attempted to be conserved by each ‘singularity’ at the center of the system, and the SUM of all its fractal attempts to conservation are the 3 conserved elements of physics (even if in the processes of 4D entropic dissolution and 5D generation conservation must be taken to happen between the total sum of the dying system and those who feed on it)

In terms of our analysis of the dimotions of the Universe, we could say that lineal time and cyclical time are the fundamental ‘topologies’ that reflect change in the external motions of beings and its inverse change in the ‘border’ of the being, its angular momentum that processes its information, and its equations reflect the inverse properties of lineal time-duration and cyclical, frequency time clocks, which come together ONLY in the vital energy spacetime systems that combine both forms and properties into a ‘present being’.

Since the enormous deformation of reality caused by the ‘belief’ that there is a single time-space continuum, a single ‘human clock’ measuring it all with a second and a single space-rod, also the human visual light spacetime measuring it all with a c-speed is obviously wrong and keeps producing conceptual errors, camouflaged by the fact the equations ‘work’ in both systems, either as ƒrequency of cycles or a lineal speed sum of the trajectories of those cycles. What we miss of course is all the inner information of the cycles.

We then come to the obvious conclusion that IF WE WANT TO MAKE QUANTITATIVE analysis and put in relationship the ‘ceteris paribus’ vision of ‘HUMINDS’ from its ego centered point of view of a Universe with a single spacetime continuum (single space rod of measure and single time clock) vs the much wider Universe of multiple scales of space and time cycle speeds, we need to define a new dimension of space-time, in mathematical terms to order all those speeds of time and scales of space. This is the origin of the…

5th Dimension

‘If you cannot explain it simple, you don’t understand it.’ Einstein

4th and 5th dimensions of time space∆±¡: Entropy & evolution. Its metric.

We said that to explain that multiple time cycles structure of the Universe we need a new dimension and a metric equation that can relate all the clocks of the Universe according to its speed or frequency of time cycles, and all the spaces they enclose according to its sizes. And this simple metric is the metric equation of the fifth dimension:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

In the graph, the Universe organizes itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information.

A mathematical dimension exists, according to Klein, and we repeat this often so you get to the formal basics, when WE CAN WRITE A CO-INVARIANT EQUATION that puts a parameter of space and time that defines that dimension, as ‘stable’ in terms of both its space and time elements so WE CAN TRAVEL THROUGH IT.

In brief, space and time TOGETHER must remain constant through the entire measure of a dimension, so an entity within that space-time can travel through it.

This IS THE BASIC CONCEPT BEHIND a metric equation of space-time. If we find such equation the dimension will exist and a being will travel through it. As we shall show in the next pages, this SPACE-TIME CO-INVARIANT EQUATION THAT relates the scales of fractal space and its speed of time clocks ‘MAGICALLY EXISTS’ and so we can both define a fifth dimension and travel through it and what will be more amazing, we SHALL REALIZE THAT WHAT WE CAL ‘EXISTENCE’, THE LIFE AND DEATH world cycle IS just a travel through the fifth dimension.

So this is perhaps the most fascinating formal discovery of relational space-time: we CAN DEFINE EXISTENCE MATHEMATICALLY and philosophically in tune with each other.

We shall then define a most general equation for the metric of 5D organisms:

$t (lineal spacetime size) • §ð (cyclical timespace) = K(e): Constant energy.

The equation is clearly a general equation, where the symbol • will mostly represent the product of the distance-size in space and time clock speed of the system, which remains constant. So when we become smaller, as chips, brains or atoms do, the speed of our time clocks and the frequency of its information increases, reason why smaller systems code the information of larger ones, chips code machines, genes code cells and memes code societies – the smaller being is FASTER AND MORE INTELLIGENT, resumes the entire concept of the fifth dimension.

However IT IS IMPORTANT TO REALIZE that this metric IS BROKEN, THAT IS, must be referred to ENTIRE FAMILIES OF SIMILAR BEINGS OR PARTS OF AN ORGANISM, not the whole reality. That is, your cells 5D metric is the same than your organism as a whole; so both can co-exist and transfer spatial information and temporal energy between them.

So we define A TIME SPACE-ORGANISM AS A DOMAIN in which there is a 5D metric equation at work.

What will then make the whole 5D science so enticing is that we SHALL FIND a 5D METRIC that connects atoms and galaxies, as two self-similar scales, which will allow to define an infinite scalar Universe, and the ‘galatom’ as its main organic system.

We shall also find one for each great subspecies or phyla of life, mammals which slow down its metabolism as they grown in size, and so on.  The hunt for regions in which a 5D metric equation works is then the first stage when we trace the study of different super organisms.

Let us now consider the fifth dimension of the ‘scalar Universe’ proved from the point of view of the cyclical nature of time:

It follows immediately that if time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.

So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them IN ∞ SCALES OF GROWING SPACE SIZE WITH SLOWER TIME SPEEDS THAT LAST TIME WORLDCYCLES OF FINITE DURATION.

As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).

And in the same form we can prove the exxistence of a 4th dimension of death, from the point of view of those time cycles. Since any being we cannot last for ever repeating those cycles, and we cannot keep reproducing and evolving, because we are part of a larger, more perfect world, full of other beings doing worldcycles of existence,  which will make us ‘fail’ in our search for eternity.

Indeed, we are arriving now to the fundamental reality:

‘An infinite tapestry of ensembles of the 3 organs of being, forming a superorganism in relative present space tracing worldcycles of existence with a finite duration in time.

All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.

As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric:

We talk in fact of a Universe of super organisms, as each organism has an inner smaller ‘∆-plane’ which creates its whole and is part of a larger world it helps to create.

And this scalar structure of organisms made of smaller organisms part of larger organisms and its ‘metric equations’ is what we call the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe, whose formal metric are essential to understand it all:

ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $: lineal limbs/potentials/territories < body-waves-workers > ðƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages, in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only systems that reproduce its information survive and still exist.

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

In the graphs ‘5th dimension metric’ and its ‘Ðisomorphic’ laws apply to ALL PLANES of existence of reality, each one studied by a stience, according to size. We observe the main physical and Socio-Biological Superorganisms of space-time whose ternary ∆§±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the atomic, ∆-1 (cellular, individual), ∆º:magnetic /thermodynamic,  (organic or national in biological and social systems) and ∆+1 gravitational (ecosystemic or world in biological and social systems).

We cannot overextend in this introduction on all of them. But we shall define a 5Ð metric for each species of each main scientific scale, studied in the fourth line posts in more detail. Let us though conclude with 2 more examples of biological and physical super organisms will suffice to observe the importance of this discovery.

First we already noticed that as smaller systems carry more information, in its faster cycles, smaller scales code larger ones, genes code organisms, humans code civilizations and quantum numbers called atomic systems. 

Next we can observe a direct biological and physical example of the existence of such ‘phyla’ of related species, which follow a given 5D metric (in the fractal Universe by definition as Einstein noticed in physics all laws have a ‘local diffeomorphic symmetry’:

In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.

So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’  – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.

Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts  with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).

It is precisely the existence of a 5D metric what pegs those ternary planes together and allows its synchronicity and simultaneity as energy and information can travel between those scales according to the definition of a ‘space-time’ dimension through the process of growth and evolution, from faster seminal seeds to emerge into full organisms, and as species, from faster metabolic smaller species to larger, slower organisms (left graph).

In that regard, NOT all planes of the Universe follow the same metric equations, but certain families of related species do, which allow their symbiosis and social evolution.  So we can assess the existence of a super organism, like the galaxy or a biological organism, when the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size remains co-invariant in 3 relative ∆§±I scales – which will be ‘tighter’ form smaller systems, and as large as the whole range of perceived scales from the quantum potential (∆-4) to the cosmos (∆+4) in the galaxy:

How important is the metric equation of a system to describe it, will be shown as we study the details of different systems. In essence, the metric equation of a being in the 5th dimension will define its ‘existential force-momentum’, its metabolic strength, its top predator status, its size in space and capacity to reproduce information in time.

This is indeed ultimately the meaning of the previous two ‘different’ metric equations and its whole ‘range’ of families of biological and cosmological bodies.

@

LINGUISTIC MINDS-MIRRORS

So finally we arrived to the most fascinating, ill-understood element of reality, the 5Dimension of a still mind mirror, or seed that embodies in its latent formal state, the wholeness of reality, which will develop through the program of ‘existence’ into a world cycle and super organism. This is pure metaphysical truth, my fav part and obviously in the pedestrian world of Huminds, dedicated to the EGOCY of its lineal entropic only view of the immortal infinite Universe shunned off, as we the banana monkey (50% banana genes, 5 million years ago being chimp eating them :) will have none of it, chosen of God, above heavens and earth, LOL. Be humble and empathic to that absolute perfect Universe…

 

 SPACE @-MINDS=MONADS

‘Time without space is a mere shadow’ Minkowski, on the S≈T symmetry of all beings.

“Space=form is the mental perception of motion=Time in stillness’

Paradox of Galileo & Einstein’s Relativity: minds cannot measure both motion and form together.

‘Every point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz, definition of a non-euclidean fractal mind-monad point.

We are now able to study time and space together, which is the natural next step to fully grasp the structure of the Universe, its fundamental particle in space, the super organism, and its fundamental event in time, the world cycle of life and death. To that aim we must introduce the key concept of relational space-time, a ‘DIMOTION’ of space-time, that is a dimension of space that has a motion and a function in time.

Let us then start clarifying the meaning of Relativity, which physicists missed from the beginning, and why time an space are two sides of the same thing, defining more rigorously a Dimotion of time-space.

Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving.

History of science took however the wrong path, when he affirmed that the Earth moved, without dealing with the true question poised by Copernicus discovery: Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. So motion is for the mind relative to its systems of measure and perception, which are light-based. What physicists do was to substitute the still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. But this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states). It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as two different states depending on which scale of the fifth dimension we study.

Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:

A dimension of spatial form can also be seen as a motion in time. But we cannot know from the mental, still point of view, what truly is motion and what is dimensional form. So we must conclude both co-exist together. And so instead of talking of space forms and time motions as something different we must talk of space-time dimensional motions. Both together become a ‘Ðimotion’, the fundamental element of reality. It is the paradox of relativity of motion that started modern science but was not quite properly understood either by Galileo that chose ‘motion’ and discharged the static form of the Earth or Einstein that chose form and measured the ‘simultaneity of space’: Time Motions & space dimensions however co-exist and merge in every ‘space-time being of the Universe. The 3 essential paradoxes of Galileo: how can we distinguish a closed, cyclical deterministic ordered form from a flat, free one, when can we distinguish motion from stillness, and how can we distinguish discontinuity from continuity are still unresolved, but will show one properly explained by the fractal nature of reality and the different perspectives of the mind, to be essential to the key concepts of our existence such as freedom vs. order, infinity vs. limit, cyclical vs. lineal inertia.

Galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.

We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY.

So there is NOT really a Dimension or a motion but a combination of both, even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form=space, and this is truly the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into DIMOTIONS.

We are now introducing another ‘novel feature’ of a world which has NOT only a clock and time motion or arrow of time (entropy in physics) but 5 ‘Dimotions’, the fact that logically we can explain reality from multiple perspectives, one for each dimotion, as all is entangled. So there are always several ways to prove a certain truth.Even In-form-ation must be transmited through motion, it is a form-in-action – a topological Ðimotion of space-time. It has a content of space=form, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, a dimension, and it has a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

Such paradox in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; is the foundation of modern science, namely the principles in which Physics are based: Relativity conservation of motion-energy and information and symmetry, between both, S=T, principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME.

So once clarified an important definition, tracking back where the Physicists made his first huge error – NOT treating BOTH concepts space and time as mental and real, mirror-world and Universe; but choosing just one side of it, that of motion, we can jump to the second huge error of choice they made a century latter – siding with Newton not with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made.

Ðimotions of STILL particle-perception. Mind paradox. O-Worlds of ∞ egocy.

“We are all Gods (of our super organisms).” Aristotle

IN THE NEXT GRAPH we see the difference between the Aristotelian, self-centered, Euclidean=light humind and the Universal mind: Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean:

light spacetime minds

The universe has infinite mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors. But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system.

We stated that the Universe despise departing from only 5 Ðimotions can get enormously complex.
We observed the fundamental sequential order of ‘micro-actions’, which start by a mind perceiving, moving then to a field of energy in which to feed the body and use the extra energy for reproduction, in a herd of clones that will efficiently organize social networks to become a larger whole, with slower external time cycles clearly as it must first synchronize its internal forms.
So ultimately all start with a singularity mind, mapping the Universe in its still language that perceives in itself (language is perception, in the sentient; ‘sensorial’ Universe).
So there is another way to order the 5 Ðimotions into a logic Equation: ∆ð≥S@, describing the formal reduction of a temporal flow of cycles of space-time into a mind-mapping, from the infinite Universe into the linguistic, still zero mind.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.
In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.
Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:
– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.
– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.
And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.
Euclidean mathematics, as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind.
We have to introduce the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind. And how similar to all other minds of the Universe. So before we study the particle-head of our informative perception, we shall upgrade the postulates of mathematics, which describe its topology and social evolution, to be able to properly formalize the program of the mind, latter on, in our analysis of how beings emerge as topological super organisms.

Now the key to understand minds is the fact that each of those minds is self-centered in its myopic view of reality from its single point of view and perspective that makes itself to be larger than all what is around.

The Human ego then, IS the essential limit for mankind to do ‘real objective social and economic science’. Reason why we dedicate also a post to explain this ingrained paradox of all living systems – to reduce information to the one needed, from the perspective of its self-centered point of view that has made so difficult for mankind to advance in objective science – as we have always believe the Earth was the center of the Universe, and now we believe man is its only intelligent sentient ‘atom’.

In brief, two organic paradoxes will limit seemingly our true freedom and rational knowledge of the laws of the Universe, simplified into entropic laws of self-destruction also in history and economics. And to fully grasp the paradox we shall consider it now logically and mathematically:

In Logic terms, the ego paradox tells us that all minds measure reality from its perspective, things closer to us are bigger more important and better understood. So Andromeda seems smaller than our nose. We summarise the mind-ego paradox in a simple CONCEPTUAL equation:

0 (infinitesimal mind-mapping) x ∞ (universe) = C: Constant Mind-world

‘Every infinitesimal mind believes to be the centre of the Universe it perceives from its selfish point of view’.

 

INTERACTION OF MINDS & TERRITORIES: HOW ORGANISMS CREATE.@ SINGULARITIES:  INFORMATION  VORTICES OF FUTURE-TIMES

‘Gods are the umnmoved final cause of the motions of energy around them’ Aristotle’

The logic of God, the seer of time is of a Higher order than that of man’ Saint Augustine.

Human and physical fractal points: 3 mind’s axis in heads and particles.

Now to fully grasp the Ðisomorphism of the mind common to all beings, we advance to deflate a bit the EGOCY of mankind (or any other infinitesimal point-particle), a feature of all of them: as they co-exist in a larger ∆+1 world in which they are embedded as a point, and that larger world has 3 ‘perpendicular Euclidean dimensions’ of light space-time, the mind of all systems needs/has 3 apertures to perceive externally, which tend to be dual, to map out depth in binocular view.  So physics systems have ‘y-axis openings’ for social ear-communication, open-closed spiral flat planes for its mouth location to absorb and emit energy; which are the absolute MINIMUM a form needs to exist and be able to act the 5Dimotions of existence.
Humans also have that bare minimum: a pi-mouth to open and close and a sensorial axis in the ears… They add a ‘ternary fractal creation of those opposite senses’ to add smelling and visual perception. So yes, they are a bit more complex than a particle, in-so far as we can see. But then spin’s positions can be taken if perceived in simultaneous quantum thought as 3 different sensorial positions.
This ternary view then accounts in particles for the ternary positions of a fixed spin, and the axial apertures for magnetic ‘ears’, and the openings of its pi-spirals:

Pi doesn’t exists as it is a rational number, hence the cycle never closes by defect or excess, ±pi, ensuring the eternal motion of all cycles of time. It also acts as the opening mouth of physical systems, all of them ultimately spirals which constantly absorb and emit through its mouth, while gauging information through its axis, which become for all physical particles the limiting entropic and informative minimal apertures to exi=st as a spacetime organism. Reason why all of them possess both. 

In the graph, it is unfortunate, and latter explained from within the ternary main languages of the humind, its axis and type of cultures (lineal, visual, in white, dolichocephalic men; cyclical, verbal in mongoloids with higher brachycephalic verbal axis; sensorial psylocephalic in black men, dominant in the height, sensorial/motor axis) that the ‘simpler’ of the 3 cultures of mind, the visual, lineal e-vident ‘Neanderthal, white’ brain and its worldview have come to dominate history. Because we have lost indeed a proper understanding of the complex organic Universe that eastern taoist and buddhist cultures were clearly reaching in the age of verbal thought. 

Consider then the humind: those axis, perpendicular to each other, connected to the 3 basic dual senses to get a ‘scanning mapping’ in verbal (ears), visual (eyes), chemical (Nose) axis that connect our ’rounded’ head to the world, EXIST ALSO IN ANY particle, also spherical, with 3 spin positions- another monad/non-euclidean world. 
And so what is then the 4th and 5th dimension of the mind?
The answer is in the 5TH HOLE OF THE HEAD, the mouth that feeds and kills into entropy other beings, but also TALKS the verbal, informative language to connect with other social beings.
So we SHALL FIND FOR EACH PARTICLE-HEAD the 5 Dimotions of existence in the form of apertures to the world and build in physiology and biology and physics the proper paradigm on how the being interacts through those 3±∆ apertures with reality.
Thus, human egos are just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all. 
All this said because the mind cannot be perceived externally and ultimately is a ‘traveler in the 5th dimension’, the entire ‘present’ method of science will never reach the whys we shall provide with the ‘Ðisomorphic method’ of stience that we will explain in the third part of this post.
Ultimately the mind is all because it holds the Universe within itself and so it is the reason why there are scales with an order provided by the reductions of reality to mind paradoxes. And we shall return to it.

But what is the structure of the Mind? Simple: it is created when a membrane closes a vital energy, and develops a relative self-center that will invaginate that energy with networks of information, shaping reality. The mind in that sense is the sense of the whole brought about by the interaction of the sensorial membrane, which in huminds is our outer perception through the inner mind of us as a skin enclosing our body.

The membrain thus made of a brain and a membrane, form 2 dimensions of the being, the singularity or still mind-brain proper and the sensorial membrane the isolates but also connects the singularity mind with the external world.  They are the dimensions that complete the 9 perceivable, as the 10th and 11th dimensions of the mind, which in this manner encloses the whole with its 10th membrane and focuses it into a ‘temporal-will-moving’ program of existence, the mind proper in its linguistic still mappings and formal intelligence that will paradoxically move the whole through its actions into the flow of time.

The 2 ‘dimensions’ of the Mind – the membrain or outer surface enclosing the vital energy of the open ball, with maximal expansive motion-distance or angular momentum; self-centered in the singularity, whose latitude is purely temporal as it moves the whole in time-duration through its lineal inertia. And within the invaginated networks that control the e-vident being in its paradoxical ∞º exist¡ence.

THE 2 DIMENSIONS OF THE MIND: THE MEMBRAIN. 

The mind will have in STience a more concrete name, the ‘membrain’, with 2 parameters, ‘Ðisomorphisms’ or ‘dimensional motions’, that of the membrane and that of the brain, the singularity and closed membrane of any system where its sensorial connection to the outer world and its inner mapping takes place.

We have no longer magic mystery for the mind membrain. It is all rather simple when we come to the first principles: the mind is the closed membrain that competes the ‘topological open ball of vital energy’ constraining its domain and establishing its initial and final conditions in time (the singularity brain’s duration) and space (the membrane that encloses it).
We could of course consider a third dimension for the mind – the physiological 3 networks that invaginate the system, but we rather study them as the 3 topological dimensions of space that define the being and reduce the mind to the interaction between the connected ‘singularity’ and the membrane that isolates the system from the external world.
The mind though has in the entangled Universe many perspectives and points of view of analysis departing from its 2 initial Ðisomorphisms, its brain and its membrane. So minds are in formal terms ‘membrains’ – our slightly changed name for the new more precise stientific definition.

The graph shows the mind-brain as a singularity connected by its ‘informative network’ to the sensorial membrane whose apertures communicate with the external world. It is in the interaction of those 2 disomorphic dimensions of the mind, where the true explanations of each species of ‘membrain’ warps up the description of the being. In general terms we can consider that the 10th Disomorphic dimension of the mind, the membrane is the maximal $patial element of the being – in extension/motion; and the singularity its maximal ðemporal event, traveling for the finite duration of the being.

And that a T.œ by definition is born when a membrain is formed, starting its world cycle of evolution, from carbohydrates closed by protein membrains self-centered in RNA-DNA active minds, to galaxies self-centered in black hole minds with a halo of likely strangelets of maximal momentum.
Angular momentum is in that sense the best definition of the 3 elements of the mind, the singularity the radius/network that connects it to the outside membrane; and for that reason when dealing with quantum physics we shall adscribe the brain’s-singularity dimensionality/ parameters to the spin of the particle and its membrane to its angular momentum, reason why we need 2 parameters to measure it, the l and s numbers.
In humans obviously the mind is both our external membrane that we see as ourselves, the central brain that processes our information and lives in time as a memorial tail and the sensorial nervous systems that connects them and invaginate the whole organism.

So we can cast also the two ‘extremal’, external ∆±1 arrows of pure still form as generating seeds and minds, and pure scattering motion as big bangs of entropy and death.

Further on, those systems ‘exist’ between the ‘generation’ of the system in a ‘seminal’ ∆-1 scale, which ’emerges’ as a social organism in an ∆+1 plane, and so this age is closely related to the social evolution of parts into wholes which define the ‘fifth dimension’; and its death inverse to the ‘fifth dimension’, when the system dissolves its information into a explosion of scattering ‘entropy’, in an inverse ∆-1 process, to that of the fifth dimension. So we call the ‘fifth Ðimotion’ of time, generation and the fourth Ðimotion of death, entropy.It is from those 5 elements, from where ALL REALITIES laws of stience, forms in space, still mind-languages and motions in time, life and death processes, world cycles of existence will be BY ITERATION AND COMBINATION explained.

ALL is encoded in the 5 dimotions of time-space because that is all what we are.

Young people are full of motion. They are in the motion horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species till they stop into pure form – but as time IS ALL AND TIME IS MOTION, THEY CANNOT STOP. So when information stops in ‘action’, death explodes.

Old people, warped matters are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.

Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, theobjective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.

Yet, the dominant dimotion of time-space, information, the dimension of the dominant element, the mind, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again. So we need to account for the Mind as the ultimate ‘engine’ of the process of aging.

The study of those worldcycles for all organic beings of the Universe will certainly upgrade the way mankind or AI perceives reality as this scientific r=evolution slowly spreads through the collective subconscious of our civilization during this century, enlightening what today passes as genius science – the ‘metaphysics’ provided by the physics of locomotion; that is, the birth of all what exists in a big global locomotion called the big-bang – but responds more to Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupid’: a model that lacks rational causality and uses ‘magic’ elements to explain reality (the infinite singularity of infinitesimal size, and infinite density, where all what exists including time and space itself was created out of nothing)…

“∆@ST of space time you are Ðüst you shall become’. Bible, on the zero-sum of all exist¡ences

But systems ‘die’, and have a limited time of reproduction in its relative present mature state. Why? The answer is the concept of cyclical time and its worldcycles of exist¡ence – that is because time is cyclical it ALWAYS closes its cycles returning to its original point – in the case of the life and death cycle, to the cellular or atomic or individual parts that make up the physical, biological or sociological organism.

We have no longer magic mystery for the mind membrain. It is all rather simple when we come to the first principles: the mind is the closed membrain that competes the ‘topological open ball of vital energy’ constraining its domain and establishing its initial and final conditions in time (the singularity brain’s duration) and space (the membrane that encloses it).
We could of course consider a third dimension for the mind – the physiological 3 networks that invaginate the system, but we rather study them as the 3 topological dimensions of space that define the being and reduce the mind to the interaction between the connected ‘singularity’ and the membrane that isolates the system from the external world.

The mind though has in the entangled Universe many perspectives and points of view of analysis departing from its 2 initial Ðisomorphisms, its brain and its membrane. So minds are in formal terms ‘membrains’ – our slightly changed name for the new more precise stientific definition.
The graph shows the mind-brain as a singularity connected by its ‘informative network’ to the sensorial membrane whose apertures communicate with the external world. It is in the interaction of those 2 disomorphic dimensions of the mind, where the true explanations of each species of ‘membrain’ warps up the description of the being. In general terms we can consider that the 10th Disomorphic dimension of the mind, the membrane is the maximal $patial element of the being – in extension/motion; and the singularity its maximal ðemporal event, traveling for the finite duration of the being.
And that a T.œ by definition is born when a membrain is formed, starting its world cycle of evolution, from carbohydrates closed by protein membrains self-centered in RNA-DNA active minds, to galaxies self-centered in black hole minds with a halo of likely strangelets of maximal momentum.
Angular momentum is in that sense the best definition of the 3 elements of the mind, the singularity the radius/network that connects it to the outside membrane; and for that reason when dealing with quantum physics we shall adscribe the brain’s-singularity dimensionality/ parameters to the spin of the particle and its membrane to its angular momentum, reason why we need 2 parameters to measure it, the l and s numbers.
In humans obviously the mind is both our external membrane that we see as ourselves, the central brain that processes our information and lives in time as a memorial tail and the sensorial nervous systems that connects them and invaginate the whole organism.

Let us now consider the more ‘obtuse’ field of human knowledge today – the understanding of minds, languages in stillness, and now this ‘extreme’ of reality – the spatial forms of information creating by minds, order reality albeit at a local fractal level.  It is the necessary ‘ice in the cake’ to fully grasp how it works the Universe and debunk the other ‘alternative’ philosophy of science to that of a mindless mechanical world, a mindful personal god speaking a specific language shared by the human ego.
Let us then consider a more precise analysis of the truth of organicism compared to the creationist theories of ego-centered humans, which plague the discourse of science, once we have proved indeed that machines evolve as organisms do.

Linguistic creationism vs. ∞ infinitesimal mind-mirrors ordering local worlds.

The simplest mind-mirror in mathematics: a pentagram with two internal reductions. The first image is a mirror INVERTED upside down image of the outer graph; to get to an image in the same orientation we need two inner scales of the being. This is a general rule of all super organisms, where the ‘symmetry of scale’ always jumps an intermediate one; so lines form rings that move to form lines and so on. Languages are thus always ‘logic’ mirrors of properties of scales, spaces and times.

The simplest why of the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, from the perspective of the mind: as a linguistic mirror image of reality in a smaller space, minds ‘create’ fractal diminishing, infinite scales

As the dimotions of information dominate and set the final arrow of the system in its worldcycle, it follows the mind-will with its informative dimotion is the main protagonist of reality: So it is evident that the Universe is a fractal superorganism and all its parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole, as all live a worldcycle. But still we have two elements more to ‘summarize’ in this introduction. Why and how this fractal structure of deep scales might happen and what is the role of languages in the creation of the Universe, specifically verbal and mathematical languages origin of the most extended theories of reality – linguistic creationism?. How can we debunk the idea that ‘languages’ create reality, specifically human languages? This is a self-evident ‘ego paradox’.

Since while all systems gauge information, their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process by which languages mirror in ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world they perceive and then reflect this mind-order in their territorial ‘energy-body’:

Infinitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universe = constant self-centered world.

As Aristotle realized ‘we are all gods, the unmoved final cause of the motion of the energy around us’. So languages DO order locally preserving in ‘smaller’ scales the larger structure of the universe, converted in this manner in a Game of Fractal Mirrors.

In that sense, the fractal Universe we perceive as ‘it is’ cannot be explained rationally without adding to the acknowledged temporal and spatial properties we ‘expand’ with the concept of space-time ‘dimotions’, organic properties born of the co-existence of 3 scales of smaller parts that form networks, which become larger wholes… So for example, your nervous system perceives reality as it ‘integrates’ the sensations of all its cells.

But if we want also to understand how those infinite scales of size are created we need to postulate the existence of linguistic mind mirrors that ‘shrink’ reality into its infinitesimal still mapping; either as mental forms – since you indeed do NOT see the Universe but the infinitesimal electronic image created in your mind with light space-time; or as ‘seeds of information’, which we can consider a ‘static, frozen informative mind’ that will replicate a larger whole, replica of its inner information.

Minds are linguistic mirrors that shrink reality in space. While seeds are mirrors of superorganisms ‘compressed’ in its evolutionary duration of time (palingenetic seed), which implies a continuity of information through eons of discontinuous time generations. So minds & seeds ‘create’ the diminishing, ∞, spacetime scales of reality becoming the inverse arrow of causality to that recognized today by ‘Constructivism’, the theory of reality according to which causality comes only from the smallish physical world to the larger one. It is only when we ad this other causality when we can balance all stiences as absolutely relative and the two directions of the fifth dimension, upwards towards parental wholes and downwards towards smaller parts.

 

Another very important way to understand the fifth dimension is to consider the internal relationship between the smaller parts and the larger slower wholes of all systems of nature. In simple terms, both together thanks to the synchronicities established by the 5th dimension metric form an organic network. And there are 3 ‘topological types of networks;’ corresponding to the 3 topologies of space we have explained, and then the fourth dimension from the upper whole to the smaller parts and the fifth dimension that makes emerge from the smaller parts, the social whole.

So the fifth dimension encodes the social, organic properties of the Universe.

So all now seems pretty complex but we have done the difficult part – to expand our concepts of space, time, scale and mind, to finally come up with an entity we shall call ∆@st (∆ for scale, @ for mind, s for space, t for time), which reads as ∆ is Delta in Greek, ‘Dust’. Indeed, we are all Dust of space-time.

And the question of what such Dust of space time does in the Universe, and how to describe it then turns out enormously simple; since we just can affirm that

‘ALL WHAT EXISTS IS DUST OF SPACE-TIME, ∆@st, structured as a self-centered super organism co-existing in 3 scales of fractal space, perceiving the Universe in the stillness of a mind, and living a world cycle of life and death through 3 ages of existence’.

This is really all what there is to it. From stars to galaxies, from life beings to company-mothers of machines, from civilizations to Gods of religions, EVERYTHING we shall describe in its full details will enter into that simple description of realities. Let us then see how scalar space gives origin to a superorganism and then study its world cycle as its linguistic mind extracts energy to convert it into information.

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration, ending as a zero sum of energy. Finally to be able to perform a survival program of 5 Dimotions of existence, it requires to gauge information with an apperceptive, self-centered i@-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world:  0 §@ x ∞ ð= World. Hence the creation of infinitesimal ∆º minds-worlds, or Leibnizian monads, which reduce a larger ∆+1 reality to its relative mapping, which is the origin of its ∆§calar planes, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through those @-minds, acting in physics as ‘centers of changes and masses’ wormholes of flows of entropy that become in the @-mind information, that perceives in itself.

So now we shall abandon the concept of ‘fractal’, which is too mathematical for my taste and once we have proved the falsity of entropic theories of the Universe, introduce the reason of those fractal networks, the creation of… simultaneous, co-existing scales as…

SUPERORGANISMS IN FRACTAL SPACE

Let us now express it in terms of physiological networks, which in the organic paradigm are the right way to interpret the abstract concepts of modern topology, which build ‘topological forms’ as ‘networks of points’. In 5 D metric those abstract topological networks, merely mean that any form of the ∆ø-plane are made of smaller cellular/atomic/citizen ‘points’ that build the whole.

So besides the 3 space dimensions ≈ 3 time dimensions (seen as still in space, as moving in time) we do need to consider at least 2 more dimensions, one for the lower scales of the being, which we shall call the fourth dimension of absolute past and one for the upper dimension of the being of absolute future.We do have then mathematical and verbal, logic mirrors to express those 5 dimensions of space-time, the ultimate substances and unify with them ALL SCIENCES, departing from the properties of those dimensions its structures in space and travels in time, each ‘stience’ of space-time studying an scale, including those who describe man.

Thus this is the Universe in a nutshell, repeated ad nauseam in all scales, and we shall repeat with kaleidoscopic variations the previous paragraphs to describe the thoughts of ‘god’, to make organic systems tracing world cycles, regardless of the huge details scientists have obtained so far.So the organic paradigm has taken longer to be formalised, as we do in this blog, because it requires to ad to the motions in space studied by physicists, the arrow of in-formation, of form, stored in the form and frequency of the clocks of time cycles of reality, which are along its lineal motions in space the two elements that conform all realities, by combining and integrating into ‘vital energy systems’.

Those 3 arrows spreading across different scales of size, which add 2 more space-time dimensions of ‘wholes and parts’ to the mix, will allow us to describe all what exists as an organism of space-time, the long-seeked ‘sound organic philosophy of science’;In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.

A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network that provides energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles) to its cells. Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their energy and information.

Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp x ðƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

  • Cellular units.
  • Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials)
  • Networks of fractal information (heads/particles).
  • Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe.

Then, as all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those systems which have reproduced in the immortal Universe, do exist today. So all dual systems do have an internal system or external ‘enzymatic’ catalyzer of its reproduction (as enzymes do with carbohydrates, or enzymen with machines).Thus we talk of the third ‘body-worker-wave’ element, besides an informative particle-head-upper class and a limbic/potential/territorial source of its motions which the system uses internally or externally to reproduce. This IS our definition of an organism. And so a factory is an organism, when we put the human enzymen, even if the machine alone is not

As a machine is ‘obviously’, an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘enzymen’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.So mechanicism, the underlying philosophy of science, is just a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms:3 ages of machines evolutionIn the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Such model is vastly more explanative of reality than the mechanical abstract models dominant in the tradition of physical sciences for a few basic reasons:

  1. Only an organism replicates itself without the concourse of a ‘maker of the machine’ – God in the earlier physicists’ view, now obsolete. As machines do not reproduce.
  2. Only the definition of time as the substance of reality – cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops.
  3. Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science which are precisely those repetitive motions.
  4. Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalised to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.

Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its in-form-ation. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.

The ultimate whys of 5D metric…
are in fact organic. Indeed, the reduction of speed of motion and cyclical events in larger beings happen because they must first establish a simultaneous, present, co-existence of its clone reproduced parts, necessary to act externally as a whole. So the ‘whole’ clock of the system must slow down as it enlarges into multiple organic clone-like beings which will then adopt the ‘slower collective clock’ as its new ‘unit’ of simultaneous action as a whole. And we will return to those key logic elements. One though needs to be clarified earlier on, a proper definition of dimensions and motions of space and time.

An Organic, fractal Universe.

So this is the bare minimum needed to try to give us a real cosmology, and we are going therefore to introduce the alternative cosmology of a Universe of fractal scales and multiple ‘Dimotions of time’.

Even if general systems sciences apply organic laws to all different sciences, modeling them all with the organic paradigm, as humans ‘believe’ in an abstract, simplified theory of it all based in the arrow of entropy=death, called the big-bang, we shall start with a brief picture on how it looks cosmology with a fractal theory of reality far more sound ‘experimentally’ though we concede equally strange, since ‘the Universe is stranger than we humans can imagine’, Haldane.

 

Worldcycles of Exist¡ence in Time

TRAVELS THROUGH 5D

How we do know the 5th dimension exists? Perhaps the real question is the inverse: how it is possible that humans have not yet formalized the fifth dimension till the work of this writer at the turn of the century and even then have ignored it, when the entire process of scientific thought has been about reaching new scales of the fifth dimension, since Galileo looked upwards with his telescope and Leeuwenhoek used a microscope and found those little beings co-existing and moving faster in the water drop, where they were not seen at first glance? I wonder… often about the so called human ingenuity.

In any case being ‘scientific’, mathematically a dimension was defined by Klein, as a ‘space-time metric system’ or equation, in which any being could travel through. And he defined a travel through a space-time dimension as a process in which the space-time parameters of the being remain CO-INVARIANT, that is they did NOT change together.

And this is exactly how we have defined the fifth dimension. So for the fifth dimension of scalar space and infinite time clocks to exist we must somehow being able to travel through it and yet after the trip, our space-time parameters must remain co-invariant. Yet since we have defined the fifth dimension as one of size in space and speed of time clocks it merely means that all systems of nature MUST be able to GROW or DIMINISH in size in space and at the same time in inverse fashion, DIMINISH in the speed of its processes or ACCELERATE THEM. And that is exactly what happens in all beings from birth to extinction. All beings are born in a small scale as a seminal seed that has a much faster metabolic rate in its cycles of energy and information from particles to semen to cells to black holes and then they grow very fast, but slow down their metabolic rate as they become larger finally emerging from its fetal state to its whole organic form.

And then they get old, as they increase their information and die accelerating again but in a negative inverse fashion the travel of life in the process of death which extremely fast explodes the being back to its elementary smaller parts that free again will restart its faster cycles.

The result is a  complex process of change closer to what we perceive happening to all kind of beings, which we shall call a ‘worldcycle’, not a ‘worldline’, as ‘two dimensions of time’ will now define a ‘cycle’, not a line for all beings who experience a ‘travel through the fifth dimension’ of scalar size and topological, morphological change, from birth to extinction.

5 Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of space-time, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information,

Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.

And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital space-time beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.

Systems assembly into organic forms by putting together the forms and functions of the 3 adjacent dimensions of a system, pegged in simultaneous space.

Indeed, all what you see are forms of space with motion in time that combine into the infinite energy beings of the Universe.

And while physicists have reached an extraordinary dexterity calculating the motions in space of beings; only when we ad those other type of motions=changes in space-time we understand how they trans-form and evolve through generation into new forms of in-form-ation. This is the basis of the formal model of this blog, the ‘eternal philosophy of science’, we call ‘organicism’, which understands the Universe as a system that reproduces information.

It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.

So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

We can now reconsider the sentence that opened this post, ‘existence is a travel through the metric steps of the 5th dimension’… once we have define the ‘metric equation’ of this eternal dimension of exist¡ence. So we can remind the reader that a ‘dimension’ exist according to Klein, when we can find a ‘metric equation’, in which motions in space-time are ‘co-invariant’, meaning its product is constant.

We just saw that product, $ x ð = C, for entire families and world systems. So the dimension do exist (and do not ask me why humans are unaware of it, as they found it as soon as they looked at the huge stars, or looked down to the smallest insects, two different scales to ours). And now the equation known, the question is: how do we travel through the fifth dimension?
Simple, living and dying. Yet before we explain you that long cycle of exist¡ence, we should consider the minimal STeps we do traveling through the 5th and 4th and 3rd and 2nd and 1st Dimensions of reality; since frankly what humans know about it is little, mostly messed up and so we have really to start from the beginning defining properly the 5 Dimotions of the Universe, from different points of view, its minimal ‘STeps’ and then how the sum of those STeps invariably bring us to a worldcycle of existence of life and death…

Different forms of expressing the 5 dimotions: worldcycles in sequential time – actions in space-time scales, supeorganisms in space.

How to study the Universe of superorganisms tracing worldcycles is simple:

When you order those dimotions in time sequence you get a world cycle, when you order those dimotions in space you obtain a super organism; when you order those dimotions in timespace scales you get the 5 vital actions of existence.

This sentence IN italic IS PERHAPS the most important sentence of the whole blog – the ORDER of reality that transcends for mere time clock-cycles and spatial forms into THE COMPLEX REALITY we see, including us.

As we have studied them in ‘space’ as super organisms – albeit at the minimal level of depth, we shall now introduce them in sequential order as world cycles of existence, and then in its scalar interaction as ‘vital actions’ that develop a common program of survival, driven by informative dimotions, which also explain why we age, accumulating an excess of form, of information, wrinkling and warping (biological and physical systems) due to the excess of ‘dimotions’ of information (perception, reproduction, social evolution of parts into wholes).

Now the importance of having a metric equation that leaves co-invariant a motion through its parameters of space-time, is that we can ‘travel’ across this dimension. Indeed, the mathematician Klein defined the existence of a dimension of space-time, when we could formulate a co-invariant equation left unchanged when we move through the space-time dimension. So how we travel through the fifth dimension? Obviously by growing in size in space through the process of reproduction and evolution, from an ∆-1 fast seed of information, emerging, as a larger whole with slower time clocks, in the organic level, which itself is part of a larger world, with slower ‘deep time’ geological and cultural cycles.

The world cycle of existence at the fullest level of maximal duration of the being, is the sum of all its partial, individual actions=dimotions, which lean towards an excess of reproduction of information – the very meaning of any fractal generator system. Hence the natural ‘derivation’ towards warping, informative extension, maximized in the third ‘territorial old age’ of the being, when all becomes ‘quiet’ – the organism is warped, the territory of vital energy converted into still property, the galactic plane filled with black holes and strange dark matter… Yet to rebalance that excess of ‘actions’ dominant in information (>), death restores very fast in a single spacetime quantum moment the zero sum.

In the graph, the game of existence for different beings that change through 3 similar ages between its evolutionary generation in a lower ‘plane’ (ab. ∆) of the fifth dimension as an ∆-1 seed to emerge as an ∆o organism in an ∆+1 world in which it will go through a process of ‘aging’ (accumulation of information) that will finally exhausts its energy and dissolve its information in an entropic process of death. The sequential order of all space-time organisms defines then a worldcycle of existence – not only a simple worldline of locomotions as physicists think, but a far more rich and complex pattern common to all beings that ‘exist’, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy.

They all trace ultimately in the ¡logic of entangled 5Ðimotions, the same world cycle of exist¡ence, where ¡ defines the scale in which the system resides, between all of the main super organisms of the Universe, both biological, sociological (800 civilizations) which follow the same ages of human beings, expressed in its subconscious collective art, albeit at a slower decametric scale and physical worldcycles, from states of matter, to galactic ages to the whole cyclical hypothetical big-bang of a larger hyper universe scale.

Since the existence of all those super organisms is indeed a world cycle journey through 3 different, ¡±1 scales of the fifth dimension.In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±∆1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by the fifth dimension of generation, palingenesis and social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks: ∫T.

1st age: Youth or Age of lineal ‘$t’ motions.

2nd age: of energy that reproduces information and iterates the system, symbolized by, ∑e ∏i.

3rd age: All motion & energy becomes form, in-form-ation, exhausting itself; symbolized by §ð.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells: ∂S, or age of entropy.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality.

To understand that ternary structure of time in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information. The is the basis of quantum physics. And in the second age when existence reaches its plenitude it is precisely when ‘information’ imprints energy and reproduces the system: ∑e, x ∏i.

So those 2 elements are the essential forms of any system.

While the potentials/limbs can be external. In simple animals limbs regenerate…

Further on, since form is made with motion, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ motion that transforms itself into still form, information. Then, when all motion is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle.

Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and motion are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction, through ‘hyperbolic energy’.

So between the ∆±1 processes of social evolution (generation and emergence into a higher plane) and entropy (death and dissolution back to ∆-1), in a single plane of existence we can describe reality just with the 3 canonical topological planes (bidimensional parts: flat limbs, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical particle-heads), whose topological forms best suit its functions.

Yet for the full description we need the ∆±1 seminal reproduction and entropic generation and death.

The most important as in all fractals, vital or mathematical is obviously reproduction, imposed by survival:

So the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future.

Information never disappears as it always recreates itself. And since all is motion by the mere fact that time moves with form, by the mere fact that momentum-energy is conserved memorial reproduction of cyclical forms ‘happens’ In fact science is nothing but the recollection in human languages of those memorial reproductions, which become repetitive ‘laws of science’.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct.

So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories.

Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives of live, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for limb motion body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism).

Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species, sequentially.

If we put them in adjacent spatial forms, through 3 scales of ∆-1 atomic/cellular/ individual, ∆ø organic/thermodynamic/social, ∆+1 cosmological/geological/national planes, we get a super organism of fractal space.

But all those ‘organisms’, with 3 ‘topological networks’, extending in 3 relative ‘scales’ of size, when we observe their ‘existence’, turn out to follow always the same ‘generational pattern’, with 3 ages dominated sequentially by the ‘moving’ network or youth, the ‘reproductive network’ in its mature age, followed by the informative network in its 3rd age…

So we talk of 3 ‘motions in time’, ‘parallel’ to the 3 topological dimensions of space.

The young locomotion of limbs, the mature reproductive motion of body-waves and the informative gauging perception of particle-heads. And since all dimensions correspond to a motion we talk of 3 ‘dimensional motions’ or ‘Dimotions’ of space-time, which conform a being in space and time, giving origin to ‘ternary topological beings’ constructed around the ‘messing’ of those 3 networks, the ‘moving’ lineal potentials/limbs network that maximize motion, as the line is the shortest distance’the hyperbolic re=productive body-wave network that maximizes iteration and its spherical particle-head the form that can store (and gauge) more information, guiding the system, giving us a ‘first look’ to the ‘fractal generator’ of spacetime organisms:

Γst: $-limb/potentials<Ø-bodywaves>O-particle/heads

Entropic death: A single ðime quanta.

We have first considered the basic dualities between cyclical time and lineal space, whole planes and scalar parts, departing from the first misunderstood discovery physicists – the fact that we see the earth still with our mind, despite knowing it is moving.

So all systems of the Universe  ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.

Yet the Universe tries always to be positive: If you realize the only dimension of time the Universe does NOT code is entropy=death, which it treats as a maximal motion that disorders the being.

So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed  error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only  a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around.  Death is the shortest possible arrow:
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
The compound, social Ðimotions: entropy and social evolution
An important concept to be explored in detail in other posts is the understanding of the 2 ¡±1 Ðimotions of entropy=death and social evolution=generation, as collective perspectives of a simplex Ðimotion of locomotion – so collective locomotion becomes the Ðimotion of entropy: ∑ 2D=4D; and collective informative perceptions are the basis of social evolution ∑1D=5D; whereas the complex Dimotion of reproduction, will then become the mixture of them all, as it implies a series of social evolutions and entropic feedings, of consecutive reproductions that form a wave-motion, and informative imprinting across multiple scales.

Yet why we die? The answer is obvious: because the system is ‘owned’, directed, by the linguistic, still, spatial mind that absorbs and directs the motion of its bodywaves till exhausting, warping its energy into pure form. And then the system turns back to the past and explodes in entropy, dissolving the memorial tail of information accumulated in the particle-mind.

And so the fundamental question we shall resolve among many others of a deep study of the fifth dimension is why we LIVE and DIE, why we change the internal form of beings, and why this change is so similar, sequential, in all species of reality, as all of them are born, grow, then wrinkle, warp, acquire too much form, in-form-ation and explode=die, erasing that information, in what we call the ‘wordcycle’ of existence. The mathematical answer we shall find soon, once we lay down the ‘metric equations’ and basic concepts within the analysis of the 5 dimensions of time space summarizes in a single sentence the enormity of all what exists, its whys and purpose:

‘Exist¡ence is a travel through Metric STeps of the fifth dimension’:

WHAT IS existence? The world cycle: Existence in time: travels through 5D.

This question so seemingly profound has an immediate answer in the fractal organic Universe:Exist¡ence is travel through the planes of growing size in space and slowing time clocks of information that define fifth dimension (S x T = K). As mathematicians define a dimension of space-time, with an equation that is co-invariant when we travel through it, existence is possible PRECISELY BECAUSE WE can travel, growing in size and reducing our time-speed of our ‘existential clocks’ through that ‘metric equation’ from seminal fast moving, smaller in space, seminal seed, to human being, in a slower world.

And so in that travel through the scales of the 5th dimension we exist,  by means of ‘finitesimal’ actions, a,e,i,o,u (a-ccelerations/motions, e-nergy feeding, I-nformation gauging, o-ffspring reproduction, u-niversals creation of wholes).

This existence again follows 5D metric (all does:). So the actions we perform with smaller scales are more frequent (perception of smallish light pixels, feeding in small amino acids, etc). Those who engage us with larger, slower beings are far less frequent or even do not exist at all (reproductive and social actions). But in any case all together with its different rhythms and synchronicities are the stuff of which existence ‘in detail’, moment after moment of ‘present’ action IS MADE.

Those sequences of actions, thus conform the program of existence that all systems live as they emerge from its fast seminal ‘∆-1 plane of exist¡ence’ (belonging to a given st¡ence ‘i-ndexed’ by the i-parameter of scale) into its relative ∆º-st¡-entific scale, where the LONGEST period of existence happens, and we shall call the present-individual state of the being. However – and this is the reason why existence has never been properly answered – the full world cycle of existence of the being requires to understand the 3 scales in which it take place, the seminal ∆-1, individual ∆º lives its ‘present life cycle’ in a larger ∆¡+1 world and finally, the process of extinction of existence (death), when the system erases its information and descends back to its ∆¡-1 scale where it was first ‘seeded’, completing a zero ‘cycle’ of motions in time (moments) and stops in space (forms), which carry the being, through its ‘ST-eps’ of existence, ‘momentum after momentum’, to complete a conservative whole ‘zero sum cycle of energy’, integral of all those ‘momentums of existence’.

We are on purpose mixing jargons of different languages, and mathematical equations BECAUSE THE PROPER PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE OF THE universe of 5 dimensions must SHOW THE HOMOLOGY of all the ‘languages of god’ which are ‘infinite’ (Upanishads), in its description of the worldcycle of existence. As we live under the DICTATORSHIP of the simplified jargon of 4D physics and people are ‘slaves they believe they don’t reason’ (Aristotle), I hold little hope that the usual scholar will do nothing but jerk out of those pages, because they do not talk of simplified worldlines (4D formalism of existence), pretend to take as serious science the logic of verbal though not only his clocks etc. etc. Enough quips. Back to exit¡ence and the mixed jargons.

Because the Universe is made of time motions, with the mind stiffens into still, linguistic mappings, there is this mind-error, of thinking that existence stops, because the mind stops, slices the infinite cycles of existence into finitesimal 0 mappings (Galilean paradox of relativity of motion) to ‘fit’ with less motion and dimensions reality into the mind. Motion though is all and motion never stops and that is the reason why:

1) the universe is immortal as a whole, as it never stops motion.

2) When we ad to the entropic arrow of 4D physics the arrow of information, all motions are balanced by forms, and so all is a zero sum (the big-bang is balanced by the big-crunch provoked by gravitational in-formation, even if physicists are at ‘ideological pains’ adding gravitation to it).

3)Existence as we like it requires motion, but existence as it is, keeps spending our vital energy of motion, increasing our gauging of information by our selfish mind-mappings, by the BIAS OF THE EGO, that wants to order and stiffens and stop motion into informative perception, and so we get old, wrinkle warp existence and finally as motion cannot stop, time cannot stop, when we have no energy to spend, existence explodes us and liberates our form into motion and we die: ∆¡+1<<∑∆¡i-1, which is the equation of death in the simple I-logic jargon of existence (where ∆ is the scale, ∑ the symbol of many and < the symbol of growth of size in space, diminution of information and vice versa (>).

Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at 10.37.14 AMSo death is a double explosion of existence << from the slow existence in the world of the old man to the existence in the cellular amino acid scale after its sudden death, which for all systems happens in a single quanta of momentum (the unit of any action of existence).

We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.

All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle,  from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..

What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.

And that is all what there is to it: 5 dimotions ordered in time as sequential world cycles, in scalar ∆±1 space as super organisms.

In a young first age, motion is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining motion and form, into hyperbolic body-waves of energy (max. motion, minimal form) and information (form in action, maximal form, minimal motion).

In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages till it becomes PURE FORM, and then explodes back into PURE motion, in the entropic moment of death.

In that sense the main difference when we widen our understanding of space-time with the metric equations of 5D is to be able to explain NOT only processes of time-change in a single planes of space-time, mostly due to locomotions, but process of change due to transformations in the in-form-ation of beings, related to life, organic structures and hence to solve some of the eternal existential questions about ‘existence’, which we define easily as a ‘travel between 3 scales of the fifth dimension’.

This reality is of an INTELLIGENCE AND beauty, the true soul of the Universe (beauty is the harmony of Space-form and time-motion, the classic age when S=T reproduces an efficient survival reality, the 2nd age of life, and we shall return to it many times), which our ‘seers of time’, the Newtonian, Relativist physicists of a single locomotion/entropy sided view CANNOT imagine.

LET US THEN show SOME OF THOSE WORLDCYCLES in biological, social and physical systems.

Biologics systems: 3±¡ ages of time & 4 ‘seasons’.

Screen Shot 2018-06-03 at 8.05.12 AM

To which degree the 3±¡, 5 Ðimotions of exist¡ence orders all what happens in time can be assessed with the simplest example that started in earlier neolithic the understanding of the worldcycle – the four seasons of the year, which rightly start on spring, the young age of motion and generation, follows by the mature summer age, continues in the 3rd age of autumn, and then ceases in the age of death, winter, when however the new generation born as a new reproductive wave that ensures the survival of the system develops, overlapping the previous generation.

So we can consider winter both, the ±¡, 4 & 5 opposite Ðimotions. 

Winter’s duality can then be expressed as the ‘Dual death and renewal’, but to be more precise, if we write those 3 ages as a wave, with 2 parameters, one measuring the size or volume of vital energy of the system, and the other its time-cycles (volume of information accumulated through those 3 ages)… as in the next graph…

cycle of 3 ages existence

In the graph, the result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality…

This is the case of the cycles of seasons that connect the ¡+2 world and solar, galactic scales with the smaller beings and determine through its synchronicities the existence of those smaller species fine-tuned to the energy and information provided by the sun-earth system.

So we can consider the four seasons an expression of the worldcycle of all those beings, which also harmonize ‘their relative age’ in the ‘continuum’ of 3 generations, as they overlap their ‘seasons’ from father to son to grandson:

Winter then becomes the death of the grand-parents but also the seeding of the new children, which in…

Spring will grow to emerge in its mature…

‘Summer’ age as a full form. So while the 1st generation reaches Maturity, the 2nd generationis born.

Fall: Then the 2nd generation passes its ‘youth’, in the 3rd age of the parental first generation. So the 3rd age, which is the inverse of the first age happen together and both generations balance each other.

Winter… through brings the death of the parents, whose energy (property) ‘feeds’ the mature new reproductive age of the 2nd generation, when a 3rd generation seed is born as a fetus in the ¡-1 scale. And so again in winter the ¡±1 death of the 1st generation and social evolution of the ¡-1 fetus happen together.

And so when a new ‘4 seasons world cycle’ starts in spring the fetus emerges into the ∆o plane…

Let us then start by studying the largest of all super organisms understood by man, in which all other super organisms are encased, which likely repeats in self-similar forms every 9±¡ scales… the…

II. GALATOM:

 

ASTROPHYSICS: ∆<|4|

‘Science advances when we drop assumptions’ Dirac

‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals“.  Ulam

Since most space-time events are complex, cyclical motions. 

In the graph, a bunch of lineal physicists studying  only 1 of the 5 spacetime Ðimotions of the zoo of Fractal space-time beings, all of them w made of the 5 canonical Ðimotions of a world cycle of a super organism: generation>locomotion->reproduction->information>entropic extinction, which form a o-sum or worldcycle.

Yet for Physicists only lineal spears – locomotion –  matters, as the other motions seem to them ‘walls, ropes, snakes, trunks or mats’ – that is, they describe all the DImotions of a physical system, with different concepts, or just trying to make them look like locomotion (as we shall in their stubborn attempt to unify all forces with the model they use to describe electromagnetism).

Fact is nothing is lineal, since as we shall analyze in other parts of the blog, even locomotion is a reproduction of information and most lineal motions, are steps of a cyclical form (small lineal geodesics are parts of a curved Earth; Lineal euclidean geometry is the limit of a larger curved pangeometry; lineal special relativity is the limit of the larger curved General relativity; lineal momentums are integrated into a conservative energy cycle; small lineal actions of life, part of the curved world cycle of existence, and so on.)

What is then the Universe, when we use the 5 real Dimotions of space-time and transform its entropic, lineal theories of reality into more complex cyclical patterns? The answer is evident just looking at it in one of the first pictures of this blog: a fractal of galaxies in the largest cosmological scale we observe, and a fractal of atoms in the smallest quantum scale. Whereas we are sandwiched between both.

Time in physics.

First we must understand a simple truth: as all forms of space can be seen as motions in time, a curvature is a clock. As all forms that do not change and repeat its reproductive patterns are not really a change=motion in time, we see cyclical motions as solid forms. When time passes then a change must happen, which means that in physics time only passes when a system accelerates. A force then is defined, F=m a as the product of a present, not-changing form, a mass, and an accelerated motion, a time clock. The mass is thus the non-changing ‘center’ of the accelerated cyclical clock of time, the force proper. Hence the principle of equivalence of Einstein. When we extend the principle to charges, a charge will be the non-changing center of the accelerated clock of time we call the electric force. So happens for our thermodynamic scale, with a difference, worth to mention at this earlier stage: in our scale, the clocks of time are expansive not implosive, hence they are entropic 4Dimotions, measured by the clocks of temperature. Why? Because we are measuring in our scale the entropic, predatory absorption by our existences of energy from charges and masses.

In the entangled Universe of infinite ± balances we might say that we are sandwiched between both. And it is because we are entropic temperature that the whole thing doesn’t warp. Our pressure outwards as entropic beings balances the gravitational inwards pressure, and the charge collapse.

It follows then also that as time and space… yes you guess it are two sides of the same coin (: curvature is acceleration; and so the G and Q constants must be understood as curvature of two different scales, and as the curvature of charges are much bigger (their radius r is much smaller, so 1/r the measure of curvature or rather 1/r², the measure of the growth of curvature in an accelerated clock), its force is much larger. But when we apply to charges and masses the metric $ð=k, it turns out they are the same constant equation, proving A) the unification of forces or rather its constants G and Q, B) the superorganic nature of the galaxy, as both charges and masses’ constants are the co-invariant limits of maximal $ (masses’ curvature) and minimal $ but maximal ð (charges’ curvature, attractive power):

Left, when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75-25 Balance of mass to dark entropy. Thus the fractal Universe is immortal. On the right its scales all suffer similar e($)m(t) ternary processes of cyclical angular momentum-mass warping and lineal momentum -spatial expansion balanced in constant light space-time cycles of energy – the 3 conserved quantities. So the use of a fractal space and cyclical time arrows fully accounts for the immortal Universe and its balanced 3 arrows of space-time, conserved in its infinite reactions. Why those obvious facts are ‘reduced’ to entropic big-bangs in a single plane of space-time despite evidence? It is the ego paradox: what the big bang does for science is a religious ‘closure”, which added to the denial of organic sentient properties to physical reality allows to feel the high popes of science a sensation of absolute knowledge, as the religious person feels that all is known in the mystery of god ‘God’. Hence that sensation of shallow fulfilling so common among physicists and abrahamic believers that believe all has been responded and no doubts on ‘important themes’ remain to be known. So neither of them have much curiosity except on their ‘religion language, maths and words’ and their ‘creationist theories’.


In the graph we observe what we just said in simple equations about the relationship between mass and frequency of an accelerated vortex, again expanded to the other planes, of which we observe in detail a thermodynamic vortex, which becomes a fractal of even faster eddies, beyond the ‘event horizon’ of the hurricane, a fact that will help us to establish the nature of frozen stars=aka black holes in our models of the galactic Eddie… 
Time as future only passes when it accelerates and time as past when it decelerates – when conserved it is a present energy. So the formalism of accelerated time vortices is self-similar in all scales.
In mathematical physics this means that ‘time clocks’ which truly advance’ time are accelerated vortices, of any of the three quantum scales we perceive, that is, charges, temperatures and masses, which measure through its frequency the speed-attractive force of its time clocks, paradoxically much larger for smaller vortices, reason why charges are far more attractive:

‘∆-1: frequency in lineal electromagnetic time flows of energy: e=hv’
∆-1,0 charge: for cyclical clocks of electromagnetism.
∆0, +1: temperature for lineal thermodynamic flows of energy
∆+1: Mass for cyclical vortices of accelerated time.
Frequency of temperature is though often studied as a lineal entropic clocks of time in a non-bounded motion, decelerating the pass of time towards the past. Or in a closed volume it measures as a clock a present steady state of matter  in a bounded stationary wave or closed system.
While charges and masses are time clocks of closed systems accelerating the past of time towards the future; as all is warped up in a world cycle of time moving towards the point of death of the vital energy attracted by the center of the system.

In the graph, the Universe as it is WHEN the astounding reductionism of physicists’ dogma OF A SINGLE CARTESIAN SPACE CONTINUUM AND time line comes to terms with the experimental evidence of a fractal, organic Universe broken into infinite time clocks in all its ‘scales’ of size, in the case of the Cosmological world…

It is then obvious that the BIG-BANG IS JUST IN ANY SCALE OF MATTER, THE ENTROPIC DEATH OF A SYSTEM. BUT ALL SYSTEMS HAVE AN INVERSE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE ‘LIFE’.

WHICH it is represented in the cosmological scale by masses, galaxies which are time vortices that compress the entropy of vacuum into mass through its gravitational forces, are included into the mix. 

dark matter

Matter folds one-dimensional ‘dark entropy’ which expands mass into space, into 3 dimensional matter. Hence 3 ‘volumes of expansive dark energy’ becomes 1 volume of implosive matter: 75%≈25% and the Universe balances as a spring coil in an eternal game of ∞ fractal SHM motions between galaxies.

Without getting into unneeded complex maths, the reader should easily understand the proof of that balanced Universe, once he casts aside his ‘awe’ and ‘respect’ for the ‘high popes’ of science and uses merely reason, why the blunder of ‘cosmological big-bangs’ is a false, half-truth – the key method by which humans ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – to eliminate and ‘reduce’ the parameters of reality to create a ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory that cater those egos.
In the case of the big-bang amazing as it will sound to the reader cosmologists eliminate the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of one-dimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3-dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3-Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of space-time dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.

Let us indeed from Hawking, a bad scientist but a good teacher of science, which has no quips recognizing the absurdness of some theories a paragraph that explains this conundrum:

“The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (MEANING A LIMIT TO THE EQUATIONS): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang.

So why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars. And why is the universe so close to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely. In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle”  (RELIGIOUS concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). Not so IT IS MORE LOGIC TO THINK WE ARE in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.
The balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe however is ignored by Big Bang cosmologists as they only recognize as a time-future arrow the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space.

How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?
So we should NOT care at all for the arrow of entropy, secondary to our existence as biological, and technological beings evolving fast our arrow of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).

We made a huge statement – that existence is a 5Ð motion though a world cycle that starts with our Generation, moves through 3 ages and ends in an entropic death – and we shall back it with rational, detalied descriptions of those motions in the fifth dimension. That existence is merely a sum of motions or ‘steps’ or ‘actions’ each of the relative infinite infinitesimal minds that exist perform during its program of survival, its program of existence. But this completely meaningless – at this point – metaphysical statement requires a long ‘trip’, to arrive to the full logic sense of the sentence.

What universal beings do is to ‘move’ through ‘steps’ of spacetime in the Universe, during a finite time duration we call ‘life’ or ‘existence’, through a territory we call the world and within the world, vital space. So we shall first define a space-time being and the steps it makes.

The less important cycles for mankind of all those worldcycles of existence are those studied by physicists, the big-bang and big-crunch e=mcc cycles of phyisical life and death, whcih they reduce to the simplest ‘time arrows’, the locomotion and the final entropic death.

Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology –  as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfeclty formed galaxies and black holes, wich breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed big-bang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:

In the graph, the superblack hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it can have been formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the big-bang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.

Now and here 5D physics departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors (which break the scientific method in the egocy of the cosmologist wanting to have an explanation for all even when his range of perception does not allow it), there is NOT infinite range force, because infinities are always broken by cyclical membrane.

In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.

Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less mass-frequency, hence redshifted, as those of more mass-blue frequency had died.

So that explains the red shift simply.

The distance-range of light is inversely proportional to its frequency-mass

Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light, from where we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes.

What is then the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where red-shifted light of maximal z comes mistakingly taken as a time horizon of a supposed big-bang explosion.  

And from this fact it also follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they will emit more energetic high frequency particles that will take longer time to relax in terms of the 4Ðimotion of entropy when they reach us before dying into a red frequency, blacking out of our perception of further away galaxies.

And here is where the magic 10¹°-¹¹ number common to all structures of nature, both in space-populations/distances in time-frequencies/durations and in scale/masses shows in (we will find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal non-euclidean mathematics):

This is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light space-time ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the big-bang…

So of course while in 5 Ð, as we know the Universe is eternal, the big bang does not exist, we have far more sound logical and epistemological and experimental proofs to explain everything that seems to prove the delirious big-bang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand, and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth.

In the graph, the largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the big-bang when only some re-ionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened. 

Or as Landau put it: ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’

Galatoms: Unification equation of charges and masses as time-space vortices of 2 scales..

A very brief proof, from the 4th line, based in the hierarchy problem that unifies the quantum and gravitational scale (there are other mathematical formulae, which do the same by several methods since Carter’s paper on black hole electrons).

Much of the early work on five dimensional space was in an attempt to develop a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces in nature: strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity and electromagnetism. German mathematician Theodor Kaluza and Swedish physicist Oskar Klein independently developed the Kaluza–Klein theory in 1921, which used the fifth dimension to unify gravity with electromagnetic force. Although their approaches were later found to be at least partially inaccurate, the concept provided a basis for further research over the past century. Since they were right – the fifth dimension will unify both forces but in a fractal manner, unbeknownst to physicists.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω2r3/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 1040 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)2 × radius3/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);
5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c2.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate.

Immortality of protons and black holes.

John Wheeler’s work on charged black holes as protons, during the most creative golden age of relativity, now gone, as what ‘scientists attached to computers do’ is to plug in the data of machines into other machines to get nice powerpoint presentations

In the fractal infinite, immortal Universe of multiple scales, all is quite different and the first big question to resolve is where in all those scales we find enough self-similarity to consider that we are ‘running again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal)? And the surprising answer we shall prove by all quantitative and qualitative methods is between the atom and the galaxy. So we shall talk of galatoms.

And the second question easily resolved, is where we find the inverse arrow of compressing information that balances the arrow of expansive space between galatoms? Obviously in the gravitational implosive, informative forces between those galatoms.

Indeed, to invent the big-bang entropic only theory of the Universe, physicists using a single arrow of time, HAD TO DISMISS THE GALAXIES all together, which are NOT expanding, and if the galatoms are NOT expanding, running backwards its present implosive system would mean a counter-effect to running backwards the expanding Universe. Backwards in a single time, the space between galaxies contracts, but the galaxies between space expand and a balance again is achieved.

So the whole business of a big-bang simplex entropic theory of the Universe is so ‘absurd’ and lacking any rigor according to the scientific method that its only explanation is the ego of man. In the same way most humans believe to be immortal (abrahamic paradox) they love to believe the Universe is less than them, mortal and they do understand it all with just a simple V=HoD equation, similar to the Abrahamic God that they worship. I call all this ‘bullshit’. Sorry.

This self-evident model of a fractal Universe with self-similar scales in the quantum atom and the galaxy – in fact Einstein-Walker metric of the Universe took galaxies as Hydrogen atoms, today physicists model stars around black holes as photons, and black holes show the same metric equations that proton when we reduce them in scales etc. etc. – solves every conundrum of physics.

For example, the expansion of space between galaxies shows the same properties of repulsive electromagnetism between atoms as both are lineal and expansive. So galactic interactions are NOT mediated by the gravitational force that acts ONLY within galaxies and has 2 clear-cut regions, one of ‘weak gravitation’ and one of strong gravitation in the vicinity and interior of black holes, akin to the two forces observed within atoms, the nuclear and strong forces. As both strong and gravitational forces are cyclical, non-lineal and all the elements, energy mass and carriers interact (so do among gluons), etc. etc. etc. We shall study all those elements by the ‘isomorphic method’ of systems sciences applied to the fractal Universe, according to which we can extract similar laws in similar scales, meaning that we can fill the gaps of cosmology because even if we do not see inside black holes, we do see inside atoms, even if we do not see outside galaxies, we do see outside atoms, etc. etc. So all kind of similarities take place, between the nonet of gluons and the nonet of mesons that should evolve mass in black holes into denser top quarks and bcb atoms.

How then immortality is achieved in the Universe? Very simple: as scales repeat from atom to galaxy, its CORE element, the proton and the cosmological black hole are essentially immortal. Even if black hole evaporation were truth (Hawking’s never proved hypotheses, based in a simplex outdated understanding of time in lineal terms and scales is truth(, black holes would live 10ˆ100 years and protons do not decay. Immortality is thus granted because IN the two limits of quantum and cosmological gravitation there IS NO ENTROPY-dissolution for its perfect elements. All in between – us – made of thermodynamic ‘warm’ ensembles of unstable molecules are up for death. That humind egocy has of course modeled the perfect immortal universe on the imperfect limits of humans, including a knack for entropy-only theories of the Universe is just more of the same:

‘two things I consider infinite, the Universe and the egocy of man’ (Einstein)

Indeed huminds (ab. human minds) are one-dimensional, @ristotelian, self-centered in its logic, hence simple and so are their theories of reality, which go always the easy way – entropy and death, which needs little brains –  but the UNIVERSE IS NOT.

THIS IS WHAT SET IN CONFLICTING VIEWS THIS ENTIRE WEB, with the Egocy of modern man WHICH IS IN THE AGE OF ENTROPY OF HISTORY AND AS SUCH, CANNOT ACCEPT HIS EGO IS THE CENTER OF REALITY. We propose the inverse ‘objective’ truth that the whole is much more than the parts, and so the Universe NOT us is the immortal, intelligent, infinite being. And of course we pile proofs of it, even if stats keep lowering in inverse fashion to the improvement of the web (:(as you can see a mirror smiley, one ± side… You can’t have in the age of human entropy a site on the perfection of universal order and expect ‘gaseous bubbling human minds’ to understand anything that doesn’t accept its chaotic free state…

The five dimotions as the 5 forces of the galaxy.

This said – nobody like me to make new friends (:( let us then consider first a fundamental example of the difference of interpretation of the same data in a fractal model of the Universe and one with a single space-time scale and a single time arrow – the meaning of the 5 forces of nature, which represent the five dimensional motions of reality, each one specialized in performing one of those demotions for the quantum atom and in a symmetry of scale the macroscopic galaxy:

The forces=Dimotions of physical systems are similar, but must be studied as belonging to two different scales – the cosmological, ∆+1 scale (gravitation, dark energy) and the ∆-1 quantum scale (strong force and electromagnetism) and a transformative, ‘weak force’ that trans-forms particles between scales. For that reason there are a variety of forces to make possible the organic structure of self-similar atoms and galaxies. So we couple forces according to their ∆±1 ‘symmetry of scale’ as:
Parallel informative ∆±1 forces: The strong and gravitational ¡±1 forces are similar but belong to the limiting ±¡  quantum and cosmological scale. They both ‘absorb’ and in-form into denser entities, lighter particles. So its carriers are the nonets of pairs of particles+antiparticles= mesons and color+anticolors=gluon particles-antiparticles, ‘feeding’ and becoming the heavier ud quarks and BT quarks inside protons and black holes.                                                                                           Similar, repulsive electromagnetic i-1 and dark energy, i+1 cosmological and quantum forces.
 As we live within the galatom in the electromagnetic region, matter performs its simpler 1, 2, 3 Ðimotions in the light space-time plane mediated by the electromagnetic ternary parts – the magnetic force responsible for the informative organization of particles; the photon, responsible for its reproduction and the electric force for its motion.
Finally there must be a FORCE that transforms particles between scales, responsible for the 5th Ðimotion evolution and generation of particles or its 4D inverse Devolution. And indeed those processes are mediated by the weak force, which is not really a force but an evolutionary process that happens in a single point of space (right side), where the intermediate state of higher energy mass (W, z, H boson) gives birth to heavier fermions.

The identity between the nonets of gluons in the strong force and mesons in the larger scale of quarks, coupled with the concept of particles-antiparticles forming a local world cycle renders a clear-cut theory of black holes as protons of a larger scales, in which the transformation through the weak force of light matter into heavier quark matter will produce a black hole star of heavy dark matter; whose heavy quarks happen to decay a 20% more often into particles than antiparticles, resolving also the particle-antiparticle problem.

We can then model black holes as protons of a larger ‘galactic scale’, strong forces as extremal gravitational forces, gluons as mesons, dark energy as electromagnetism and complete by self-similarity ALL the questions of physics, as we either perceive from within the galatom, the internal region of an atom, and outside the atom, the external region of the galatom. In the graph from left to right, the identity between the nonet of gluons and mesons on both scales, the WRONG procedure of reductionist physics, which models all forces with the lineal concept of electromagnetism through an exchange of particles, as the weak force happens in a single point, hence it is a transformation guided by the arrow of information; in the right the proper way to understand particle-antiparticles, as the relative arrow of life and death that closes a physical world cycle (Feynman).

What physicists then do with the usual routine of reducing everything feed-forced into lineal concepts, is to try to convert ALL forces into an exchange of lineal particles, when they are clearly different forces (so for example the weak force that happens in a single point transforming a particle into one o a higher scale of larger masses, is represented with a gap that ‘exchanges’ the W-particle, NOT as Fermi shown first, an evolution of a higher particle into a heavier one, that then suffers an entropic process of dissolution in 3 parts).

THE MAIN DIFFERENCE THEREFORE BETWEEN THE FRACTAL MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE AND THE ATTEMPTS TO REDUCE IT TO A SINGLE SPACE-TIME ARROW IS THAT WE DON’T FORCE-FEED facts into a model-theory, but respect REALITY AS IT IS; regardless of how weird it seems – in any case far less weird that the absurd idea that all what exists was one a single point, which of course breaks also all the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, baryon numbers, etc.

Welcome to reality without the bias of physicists’ worldly religion. It is a fascinating Universe far more complete and intelligent that us a part made to its image and likeness.

All this said, astrophysics should be concerned with the study of galaxies, and its 3 scales of reality, the atomic, quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale, as it is the observable known-known reality.

And then given the model of the fractal Universe put in relationship the all too obvious self-similarity between atoms and galaxies, to expand both within the nucleus of the atom and outside the galaxy as an atom, our modeling of reality.

So the hypothesis of work for the model of the fractal Universe is simple: a galaxy is self-similar to an atom, and so are the different forces interacting within and outside them:

  • The strong force is similar to the gravitational force in the extremal conditions of the black hole. Reason why both are non-lineal.
  • The electromagnetic force is similar to the expansive dark energy between galaxies, which therefore is NOT the same force than gravitation, reason why the expansion between galaxies is a lineal force and it is similar to electromagnetism
  • The weak interaction is NOT a Locomotion, force but a process of evolution of particles, guided by the Dimotion of information, reason why it happens in the same spacetime, and so its bosons, W, Z, H are ‘states’ of the same particle, NOT carriers.
  • The proton which has in 5D the same metric that a black hole, is self-similar to a black hole, with a Schwarzschild radius. So happens with the electron in its particle state (Carter).
  • Antiparticles are the inverse time arrows of particles, completing a worldcycle of a particle (Feynman’s theory)

From this simple assumptions many new results and explanations of physics come up.

  • And the metaphysical questions about the Universe are NOT concerned with singularities but with the key themes of a fractal view of reality: are those two limiting scales of human perception, just similar or identical. And are they the absolute limits of there are infinite scales? Since the solution to those questions will have many implications for our ‘self-souls’. I.e. if scales are identical and infinite there should be infinite other ‘us’, as the number of combinations of information is limited, but the number of identical beings is infinite as each of us holds a quasi infinite number of galaxies, and each galaxy is an atom, of an infinite other scale. So we are immortal in the discontinuity of infinite other us, and we could even postulate some extremal theories of transmigration of souls, both due to an ‘entanglement’ between identical us, or a ‘local travel to the past’, which would make us reincarnate in our sons in the moment of brith. Metaphysical questions though are not treated in this introduction to 5D, but will be dealt with in the posts dedicated to God, religion, immortality and such.

This brief post taken from sections of the articles on the ‘stience’ of physics meant to show a small view of what truly should have been the proper way to understand physical systems in the organic, fractal Universe, which went astray as early as the dispute between Leibniz and Newton, regarding the nature of time and space, when mankind took the wrong choice.

Because we deny the ∞ clocks of the Universe and its vital fractal spaces for 300 years physicists study only one of the 5 ‘forms of motion=change=time’ of the Universe, the simplest one, locomotion, which Galileo rightly defined as v=s/t and Einstein refined with special relativity equations.
But what physicists missed is that it was only one of the 5 ‘dimotions’ (ab. dimensional motions as all time motion traces a form in space with dimensionality) of reality. So even when they discover the second dimotion of entropy (maximal scattering motion that disorders the information of the system killing it), they failed to separate it, and of course, the 3 positive ‘informative dimotions’, the creation of linguistic mirrors/images that guide the singularities/particles which gauge information, the iterative/reproductive dimotion and the social dimotion of evolution would always be denied to physical systems.
So physicists do KNOW all about locomotion, with a refinement that seems to me amazing for its precision but also for its large irrelevance to the larger picture of reality given by a full model of relational spacetime…

Another’ grounded’ way to see the laws of physical reality happens when we focus on the 3 substances which science said the Universe conserves, ‘reconverted’ into the 3 dimotions of which each ‘fractal vital space-time being’ is made. They correspond in fact to the 3 fundamental elements of the physical entity, in its most simplified structure, the moving particle, made of a center of charge/gravity that commands the lineal motion/momentum of the being, a vital space that contains its energy and a cyclical dimotion or angular momentum that surrounds it, and by the ‘Paradox of Galileo’ – all what moves can be perceived as still form; all motion can be seen as a dimension of space – will seem to us its ‘closing membrane’.

Against this very real Universe, if we try to build reality with a single arrow of time, we get  the big-bang theory of the Universe, which must be qualified as pseudo-science, as it does not pass the stringent elements of the experimental method. And it is perhaps the CLEAREST proof of the importance to have a proper understanding of the underlying elements of reality, time and space, to be able to understand what the Universe is about. Since plainly speaking, the big-bang is false, a deformation caused by the use of a single space continuum and a single lineal time arrow to describe all the dimotions of reality.

However, given the egocy of our scientists who think to know it all, backed by the billions of ‘fans’ that ‘believe’ in present science and its reductionist, lineal theories of reality, as I know the reader is expecting us to comment on those astrophysical theories of the whole Universe and previous 4D paradigms, since that is supposed to be the zenith of human knowledge about reality, (:

So confronting the big-bang there is a clearly more sound theoretically and experimental models of the Universe as a fractal system of ‘galatoms’.

In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom in the context of the fractal, organic Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic arrow of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mcc

The Universe as it is when we ad the arrow of in-form-ation/gravitation.

In the next graph we attack some data interpretations of big-bang theory with the proper sound scientific explanations, according to epistemology that considers an explanation in real time (happening now) for a causal effect happening now more truth than any ‘past projection’ as in the case of the proper understanding of Back ground radiation, and any measure explained locally where it is taken as more truth than a hyperbolic expansion of the local measure to the whole Universe:

 

In the graph the true quasar big-bang, the scale at which all evidence of the cosmic big-bang points to CONSIDERED from the 5 elements of ¬∆@st:
T: The age of a quasar cycle in time is around 15 billion years, in which the ‘in-falling’ interstellar ‘light-ionized matter’ feeds the central black hole forming its bar and powering the Kerr-hole emission of ‘dark entropy’ akin to the electromagnetic repulsive flows between atoms.
∆: In fact at scale the process is similar to a beta decay, emission and absorption by the neutron of a proton-black hole and electron, and vice versa, its absorption of light and the electron, which in 5D metric as we reduce size in space and accelerate clocks of time: $ x ð = K, reduces 15 billion years to 15 minutes (:
S: In space the background radiation is obviously local, measured only in the galaxy and recently proved by two lobes which were considered to be 15 billion years away, in the primordial explosion but turned out to be above and below the central black hole (:
Which again in scale are similar to the first electronic orbitals of the atom and further prove 5D analysis of electrons as collapsed nebulae of ∆-1 photons.
What is then the origin of the Bg radiation? As the ‘gala cell’ has also organic properties, its origin is the ‘homeostatic equilibrium’ produced by the redshift radiation of Moon MACHOs (a primordial black hole that does not evaporate of the mass of a moon, the commonest planetoid, would have the exact form and temperature of the BG radiation).

 

The PROBLEM of all black hole and Big Bang singularity… mumble

is more of the same we shall say – an absurd mathematical expansion backwards in time of something we cannot even see here. NOBODY in any other science uses those mathematical creationist views that experimental evidence breaks because we want to keep doing mathematics. I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to return ad infinite the frequency observed with a long wavelength at a point of the air, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency but THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE, A SOURCE of that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT frequency no longer increases. It is the real source.
What all THOSE BLACK HOLE ARGUMENTS LOOSE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of science: a cause. If there is NOT matter, not a frozen start of top quarks as Einstein wanted at the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR GRAVITATION. Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top quarks discovered after his death – with enormous mass gravitational power?
Mathematicians who shun off the basis of the experimental method and the physical real nature of Nature, don’t care. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is the bat ‘hole’.

All this of course doesn’t matter to an automaton group of physicists making measures, calculating and putting it all into a magic mathematical equation, as bizarre as it might sound, which just must be considered a statement of truth per se, as the language of man and god has ‘spoken’. Physicists then will not reason on the dogma. As usual HUMANS CREATE FIRST A PRIORI RULES OF THE GAME, WHICH BECOME TABOOS THAT CANNOT BE BROKEN. THAT IS HOW the big-bang theory works. It became long ago dogma which cannot be broken. So now it is all a question of proving it further. Any data that comes must be fit in. As in Christianity, the dogma, that Mr. Jesus, an intelligent Jewish of the tradition of a culture who considered his race chosen of God, was the most chosen of them all, God itself, IS NOT UP FOR serious INQUIRE. Once this is accepted then we can do ‘Theology’ on how many angels there is in a pin (huge question in the leading university of the scholastic Middle Ages, Sorbonne). So happens in modern astrophysics. The Bigbang is NOT UP for serious inquire.  Once this is accepted then we can do ‘Metaphysics’ on how many angles there is in a spin (huge question in all the cathedrals of XXI century) – never mind the definition of angels and spin angles is not understood at all (:

Physicists, as ego-makers of machines and weapons that give power to our civilization have never doubts on the doodles in the sand of space-time knowledge they make with its computers and digital equations; since their machines and languages are BEYOND HEAVENS AND EARTH. My personal experience is that they are a ‘nutty case’, as so many groups of humans who think they ‘know’, including most notably wrong, Abrahamic, religious groups, Economists & politicians, and lineal physicists, and have lost most of my interest to communicate with them. I rather enjoy more as they are a lost case, showing how their brain works WITH THE SAME LIMITS of beliefs than any other religious group – because their metaphysical theory of reality is more of pseudo-religion than science.

BUT I MUST SAY FROM A PRACTICAL POINT OF VIEW THAT I WOULD REFRAIN FROM DOING SO IF THERE WAS NOT A BETTER SOLUTION TO THEIR metaphysical problems. Indeed, in praxis an American proverb says there is ‘not a problem if you don’t know how to fix it’.  So far as there was not a better model now provided by 5D even if most physicists are aware – more so than the common people that just believe in them – of the falsehood of the big-bang, or at least of its shaky scientific foundations; nobody care to fix it. It was the best thing we had. No longer.

At this point of course we bust the human ego once more. Since we repeat the Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein) – MOST OF THE PTOLEMAIC complexities are just as its epicycles human epicycles constructed to uphold us at the center of reality, with our rod of space, c-speed and time-clock, the second as the only reference in time and space that matters. Because a distortion to appear as real must become far more complicated, an orbit with Earth and its center of a planet must be far more complicated than a proper elliptic, the immediate result of our analysis IS A MUCH SIMPLER, MORE EXPLANATIVE, HENCE MORE TRUTH according to Occam’s razor, explanation of reality.

Why then it does not become standard science since I first explained it 20 years to system scientists, through word of mouth, as it is a clearly better model of reality? Of course in an ideal frictionless Universe this would have been the case.  Humans though have ‘issues’ as parts of organisms called cultures, which deeply bias their science. We tend to overvalue then its intelligence, and reasoning capacities. Memory matters most, and ‘truth’ is based on beliefs, hardly on reason which precisely starts by doubting beliefs. Identity properties of the social evolution of parts into wholes also work – the mass effect, the peer effect. But above all humans will always prefer a theory that puts them on the center of reality to an objective truth that values them at ‘face value’. In the fractal Universe humans have no privileges and so this is NOT only science, IT GOES TO THE VERY ESSENCE OF THE IDENTITY CULTURAL elements of human beings.

As science is done today, in abstract, purely mathematical thoughts, with no depth of whys, we can always think the big-bang is truth, God is a Jewish carpenter and after death we shall enter a paradise and America is an exceptionalist country chosen by Yahveh, to bring us into rapture and eternity above heavens and earth  – as we have a modular broken brain, based in beliefs, we have fully adapted in closed compartments our worldview with a mere practical perspective to ‘act’, feel ‘powerful’ and ‘happy.

The true sage, the true scientist cannot though break its worldview in parts each one catering to a selfie perspective, all is entangled, and if you understand the whole then you cannot really ‘believe’ most of the myths and ‘idol-ogies’ that litter the human brain… And that is a huge upgrading of the ‘humind’ chip. So most humans will just become automatons of social identity beliefs that make them happy slaves of dogmas, called ‘sciences’, and ‘called religions’ and ‘nations’. We shall show how most models of ‘sciences’ enter in the realm of such identity memes and beliefs, but the hope this will be reasoned and accepted – the expectation that humans CAN indeed show TO BE A BIT above the program of the Universe and its worldcycles, be free of identity memes, reason and understand enough of the laws of reality to evolve and take the laws of the fractal Universe to its own advantage to improve their lives, is mostly gone.

The Big Bang is of course the most pressing issue of them all. As humans are trying to replicate it in experiments on Earth that can blow up the planet. However ‘cosmologists are seldom right, but never in doubt’, so they won’t doubt that their experiments are safe, their theory is the only model of reality and we shall go ahead as the only intelligent species (blind on purpose to all other signs of intelligence), performing an explosion of our planet in a process of self-suicide we are sure it cannot happen because we are sooo above the intelligence of the Earth and the Universe…

From the higher perspective of a better understanding of the Universe though, what truly amazes the sage is this perfect receipt for disaster: our beliefs which lack any reasoning capacity (the whole concept of a human god or a Universe starting from a point of creation are so against sound reason that it simply cast serious doubts on the ‘sapiens’ nature of humans that they had to become for ego reasons the most spread theories of the whole) are however accepted as absolute ‘rational truths’.

In that regard, the sensation I hold today is one of infinite tiredness by the lack of ‘superfluidity’ of the humind, which is NOT easily enlightened and will revert to culture over true science always at the first chance to feel ego-centered and happy.

You see, we shall also pound once and again in a simple concept, not only science is culture, but there are intelligent humble cultures that do better science and survival entangling with the whole, and there are arrogant cultures that pretend to be science, have very simple worldview of reality, regarding of the perfection of its machines, and will not last much longer, because ultimately they are slaves of their identity memes that pass as science, religion or nation but are just ‘weird’ biased self-centered view of a much more intelligent, impersonal and yet immensely beautiful Universe.

 

METRIC EQUATION OF ∆±3: GALATOM 

The galaxy as a super organism must follow then the same metric 5Ð equation, $ x ð  = K, in all its scales to be able to act as a super organism in which spacetime beings, made of temporal energy and spatial information can travel through its 3 co-existing organic scales.

What should be this K is then the first question, easily resolved as we find that the only constant that travels through scales is the concept of ‘Energy’. And so immediately we find also in each scale a fundamental equation of energy, as the fundamental 5 Ð Metric of all physical systems within the galaxy: 

      K (E) = $(h) ð(ƒ) = $(k) ð (T) = $(c²) ð (M).

The cosmological metric.

This metric equation however should not happen for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… So we write for the ‘dark world’ outside the galatom a different 5 Ð metric:

2.  K (Λ) = $ ð

Whose speculative nature so far, make us unconcerned for the time being with its value beyond what it has been said, restricting its use to the science of cosmology… Yet to stress its value looks promising,  since larger Russian dolls of the nested Universe are less curved, ‘weaker’ in ‘curvature=tension=strength of attraction’ ($) and slower in their time clocks, the cosmological constant, which has a much smaller value in terms of ‘energy’, indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think of it, the constant of energy of the intergalactic vacuum, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe. Further on, as it turns out to be ‘repulsive energy’, it fits the galatom’s similarity with atoms that makes its external forces similar to repulsive electromagnetism.

The metric constants of each scale of the Galaxy.

So what is the meaning of the two components of each main scale of the galactic supœrganism? As it is obvious that ƒ is a time frequency, so it is Temperature, and mass (E=mc² + E=hƒ->  M = (h/c²) ƒ; the first obvious answer is that the frequency, temperature and mass of the 3 main scales of the galaxy, are clocks of time that carry the information of the Universe in its frequency and cyclical forms.

A few obvious considerations on the nature of those Nature’s clocks of time: two of them, charges and masses, the clocks of time of the quantum, ¡-1 and cosmological i+1 scales are accelerated clocks, whose frequency vortex must be measured by the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and mass. Both of them, can be unified with a simple 5D metric as already Kaluza and Klein proved and we shall further elaborate in our analysis of the stience of astrophysics; as the two limits of the ‘galactic organism’.

While the intermediate thermodynamic clocks of temperature, are not accelerated by tend to a thermodynamic equilibrium, or present state, a key difference between the 3 scales. 

And this allow us to understand better the arrow of ‘relative future’, as the imploding accelerated arrow of charges and masses, which ‘warp’, wrinkle, curve a physical or biological system towards a ‘shrinking’ 3rd age. Since ‘time curves space into masses’ (Einstein), and the old age ‘wrinkles’ the body. And we shall return to it, when describing the world cycle of life and death; which we will define as the inverse dimotion of entropy that explodes masses and charges into a reversal of time to the past (antiparticles, drawn in Feynman diagrams as past motions, Energy, in the E<=>Mc2 equation, an expansive relative ‘past’, negative reversal of masses).

It also becomes obvious that as a repetitive thermodynamic, equilibrium or lineal inertial present speed whose dynamic change do not seem to ‘change’ differs from the ‘accelerated’ future of an implosive vortex, V x R = K, as those of charges and masses are.

So we have clear-cut definitions of accelerated future, repetitive inertial present and decelerating expansive entropy as the 3 ‘classic dimensions of time’ in physical systems, which give us a good introduction to the other element of those 5D physical metric equations, the Universal constants, H, K and C. What they mean?

Since ƒ, T and M, are the ð-frequencies or clocks of time of the 3 scales of physical systems, and energy is ‘the common Konstant’ of 5Ð metric, it is not rocket science to deduce that h, c and K ARE, the ‘scalar spatial rod of measure’ of the 3 scales.

And we shall return to it.

RECAP. the most important superorganism we know of, the ‘GALATOM’, and its two parameters of form, the h-spin constant and motion, the c-reproductive constant of information and its product, hc, which will define according to scale (wavelength), the specific systems of vital energy within the galatom that co-exist in that organism: E=hc/λ.

We conclude that since there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, each of them breaking space into inner and outer regions, there are also infinite spaces, in different scales of reality, but all of them will have for each super organism, at least 3 relative scales in which a co-invariant metric equation of its ‘rod of measure in space-size’ and ‘speed of time-clocks’ will remain constant.

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related for ‘each family of super organisms’, by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

The metaphysical question: how many scales?

The metaphysical question is this: is each galaxy an atom of a hyper-universe, or scales end in the gluon Inside atoms and the galaxy outside stars? For many reasons discussed in other articles it seems the scales are infinite, but as in fractals those scales are not identical, it is a question open to analysis if each atom has infinite stars, with infinite planets and infinite self-similar human-like beings living on it.

This is unlikely but in any case a true infinity concept of reality where humans are both an island Universe and mere dust of space-time, floating in the invisible, ‘light’ region within the galatom, sandwiched between the denser internal proton-black hole and the external electron-halo, makes all ambitions of the species, laughable. Are we going to colonize the atom-galaxy, with our immense ingenuity as the only intelligent species of the whole? LOL. Life is what is all about, existence, trying to emulate the immortality of the whole, as atoms in fact do – protons are immortal, black holes might live 10¹°° years, red stars live trillions of years. And certainly another proof of the absurdity of the big-bang is that the entire whole Universe has lived only 10¹¹ years, when most of its parts, black holes, protons red stars (4/5th of them) can live billions of time more than the whole. Or in probability terms, the chances that in a Universe where its commonest stars live trillions of years, we live in the very beginning is 0.0000%. (Red stars are in fact 4/5th of them because they live longer and so even if all are born as blue stars, in a long-lasting galaxy, at any time, there will be seen more elderly stars than young fleeting blue star moments of them).

What about the HyperUniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

Even, if we repeat the model unifies all sciences, aware of the religion of mankind which is big-bang physics, we need to further debunk such absurd theory born of the ego and worldly profession of physics, setting straight the record on the causes of its main ‘proofs’, the expansion of space between galaxies (debunked) and now the background radiation which is the exact type of radiation the main component of galaxies, heavy quark matter (strangelets and black holes) would redshift with a fixed mass, similar to that of the smallest planetoid they likely feed on – a moon…

The limits of stientific scales: STrings or galatoms?

T-Duality in STring theory expresses 5D metric: $ð=K, as it merely means that a slow huge time cycle in the ∆+¡ planes is equivalent to the sum of fast ð-cycles, winding in-form-ation in the ∆-1 plane. S-Duality similarly relate two theories whose coupling constants (strength of its attraction) is g and 1/g, its ‘finitesimal part’. This ‘hierarchy’ problem again, as we have shown in the equation of unification, merely indicates that the g-theory is a higher ∆+1 plane, and defines therefore a total of 3 Planes for strings, to give origin to the ‘superstring organism’ of M-theory

The S-T dualities and 5D entangled theories put together with the 11 Disomorphisms of M-Therory makes string theory when properly corrected for relational space-time and 5D metric, the likely limit of reality made of lineal $trings of formal motion and $ð-rings of cyclical motion; the absolute simple limits of reality combined into the infinite vibrations of time space we all are.

All this said an important theme of 5Ð is the consideration on how many scales do exist, and what are the limits if the scales are infinite of the repetition of those scales. I am on this of the general view that it is likely the Universe can be mirrored by the 2 simplest forms of motion: a rotary motion or closed string, ‘§ð-ring;’ in the always modified jargon of 5D and a lineal motion or open STring -$tring – the two limits of topology in space and time of 5D:

 Type I STrings have 5 interactions easily interpreted as its 5 Ðimotions

We observe that the multiple dimensions of string theory are nothing but the ternary scalar dimensions of 5D: 3 human dimensions, 3 quark dimensions and 3 boson dimensions (the component of quarks). And we shall see how the Branes which might be considered those ‘larger pentagonal’ particles unfolded are ‘entangled’ connected by the bosons… And all is ultimately about the actions=dimotions of space-time communicated by those strings of ‘energy’. So ultimately when we considering some aspects of string theory of the fourth line we shall see that is just 5D with a very complicated jargon due to the lack of conceptual understanding of physics, and excellent mathematics, which however lack any ‘restriction’ to distinguish as Einstein put it ‘what is mathematical truth and what is physical reality’. So we stick with 5D, a far more real, better conceptualized model.
String theory in that sense is a fascinating theme, which however requires too many corrections to be worthy beyond physics:
1) To correct the errors of being Newtonian, that is using absolute space-time in its formulation 2)to simplify and clarify its math, putting them in relationship to 5D, which is a ginormous task both of mathematical work and of penpal, congress activity to ‘convert the believers’… which in any case I can’t do at this time and age, given the philosophy of stience that considers the highest stience history, the study of human super organisms. The limits of string theory are in that sense, the same of classic physics. Its purpose deluded: to unify all other particles and systems, indeed, at first it seems a great advance. After all we just have a Lagrangian with a Length-parameter (the string Planck’s length), and voila all comes from its vibrations… in 11 dimensions, which means we must define all modes of vibrations and all dimensions, and this is what makes the whole thing risible: what we lost in variation for sake of unification into a single length parameter, we gain in new complexity for new dimensions and vibrational modes, making absurd the concept that string theory ‘simplifies’ and unifies all to a ‘length’.
Moreover, as usual, as time is NOT understood in physics, there is NO revolution at all of concepts. All those dimensions are ‘spatial dimensions’.
So ultimately we are just in the same frame – the only real discovery is the concept that a point-particle is a fractal point, that is it has volume, is a closed string cycle (or an open one). So instead  of worldliness we make world sheets, but alas, is just a locomotion, not a world cycle.

So the string revolution is really not such revolution.   It all consists in doing exactly the same mathematical manipulations of modern physics to describe reality from that ‘spatial length’:
I.e. we define a string action. We will then proceed to construct invariants, or symmetries, for this action. Using Noether’s theorem we will then find the conserved quantities of the theory, namely the stress energy tensor and Hamiltonian. We then quantize the string in the usual canonical fashion and calculate its mass spectrum and streamline all the new parameters, by making them a background spacetime, in which the string propagates, in dimension 10, 11, 26… We then proceed to quantize the string theory… And so really the ‘goal’ of unification is just not there, and the need for making strings ‘space-time’ beings, is negated by the background of multiple dimensions.
This said I believe string theory in its proper format, due to the many parallelisms with 5D. It is almost magic to study string theory and find when properly translated that all its laws are mirror laws of 5D: from its duality of open-locomotion strings vs. closed, information strings to its 5D entangled versions, mirror symmetries of each other, which come together into the 11 Disomorphisms of M-Theory, through its ‘vital properties’, similar to our 5Dimotions (strings move, reproduce, as they grow when energy feeds them, evolve socially into branes, etc.) to its S and T dualities, which properly understood are the key to the symmetries between the 5D views of any species of the Universe.
In that sense although a complete formulation of M-theory is not known, physicists agree that the theory should describe two and five-dimensional objects called branes (: ST and 5Ð branes, that is) and should be approximated by eleven-dimensional supergravity at low energies (one of the many inflationary formulations of the ¡±4 intergalactic dark space).

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Metaphysical thought would then argue if those scales are real, or just mental, that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10±ˆ30 scales

For a while back in the 90s I worked on the proper corrections needed for M-theory to work according to 5D, enough to say that its proper formulation in terms of closed clock Sðrings and open $trings, can theoretically wrap up a Universe of infinite planes, which repeat themselves. But I never completed the model for the obvious reasons that there are far more important research in 5D that trying to work out the ‘errors’ of physics in their conceptualization of time-closed strings and space-open ones and its social membranes.
String theory is thus the most obvious candidate to the be ‘unobserved limits’ of reality, where a  series of superstrings connected to circles of galaxies, will be the best way to describe the local universe, as the graphs of Lanakea shows, and viceversa, micro strings are the best way to describe.
So if we want to consider ‘stientific, experimental truths’, we should start physics beyond STring metaphysics and consider in the nested Universe the truly observable reality of the galaxy-atom, of which we observer fully the ‘vital energy’ between the dark world of the Universe past the $>c and ð<0 barrier of lineal motion and temperature order of our world. We shall call this super organism the galatom and consider physics the stience that studies it.
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
In any case it is essential for physicists to understand also the inflationary nature of languages of information, soon to be explained, as kaleidoscopic mirrors of a single universe, and so well observed in the proposed unification of all string theories by the 11th parameters of M-theory.  We will put an example of it, when unifying forces (charges and masses). Information IS inflationary and as any system follows the same laws, as time passes, systems ‘AGE’, so do languages that enter a third age of excessive information, metalinguistics and repetitive patterns as old men do, ‘DETACHING ITSELF’ from reality into its own syntax=memory.
This 3rd age of mathematics only recognized by lobachevski and Godel, who proved the need for experimental evidence, is the true ‘old age sickness’ of mathematical physics. 
For that reason we shall not work the -4v posts that should deal with the dark world of strings, neutrinos, gravitons, Higgs bosons and dark entropy=energy (not so much dark matter, obviously, quark-ultradense matter). As all stiences are equally important; and string theory corrections are complex math… So ultimately IS much better to start off saying simply that the origin of reality are $trings, lines of spatial motion and Sð-rings, rotary clocks of time; both below (quantum strings) and above (cosmological strings), as those we can observe in our region of the Universe:
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
All this said, humans have committed a very obvious error on their perception of reality – to believe that their clock of time, the lineal mechanical systems deviced by Galileo are the only time of the Universe, just because we invent those clocks and used them to equalize all time cycles of reality. And to believe that what we see with telescopes is the only reality, denying also the duality of motion and dimension, time and space, from the very inception of physics.

What is then the Universe at large? Obviously a ‘region’ of atoms, which seem to be of the gaseous, entropic form, mostly hydrogen-like with a single black hole nucleus, most as hydrogen atoms are diatomic like, in our case with the M31 Andromeda couple…

But that is JUST A PHYSICAL SPACE-IMAGE OF IT, frankly quite reductionist. Because reality is NOT created just to think you know it because you have an image of the largest ‘view’ humans can access, but we shall not cease to repeat, THE TRUE REASON REALITY EXISTS IS BIOLOGICAL, SENTIENT, VITAL… it is not the shallow image-like description of our techno-scientists and single Dimotions and egocy people.

So we shall now deal with the ‘order’ of the 5 Dimotions of reality not in the TOTAL EXISTENCE OF A BEING, AS A WORLDCYCLE BUT IN THE lower fractal time ‘state’ of minimal actions that accumulate through life.

Indeed, WE SHALL NOT CEASE TO REPEAT, the Universe is a FRACTAL OF TIME, that is, what matters is not the ‘compound spatial picture’ of the fractal but the fractal before freezing as persistent motions that repeat, steps and stops of those Dimotions.

And it is a fractal of time because the ‘ages of time’ and the ‘Dimotions of time’ can be seen for each super organism in smaller scales and we shall then call THEM ACTIONS, in medium scales and we shall call them worldcycles and in larger scales and we shall call them species and worlds.

Further on it is really a ‘fractal of 3 ages of time’ for all those species, organisms in worldcycles and minute actions, because ALL OF THEM GO THROUGH 3 AGES. Indeed, even the simplest action, to throw a stone in locomotion will have a first age of ‘accelerated motion’, a steady state middle age of relative constant speed and a final 3rd age of form, static position. All this of course NEEDS A TYPE OF ¡logic MIND enamored of verbal conceptual thought, which is so degraded today when most scientists just use instruments to measure, collect data, put it in equations or computer models and get the magic result and HAVE ZERO curiosity for the whole, for the window to the absolute’ (Picasso) I am opening here, that likely nobody has ever reached so far reading (: Lol and we have not even given the first turn to the whole…

CONCLUSION:

A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS.

The reader would be surprised to learn that scientists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space, are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’. But the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and ∞ broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.

This is the case, since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.

And yet what should have come next, a thorough investigation on how a world of infinite time clocks and broken spaces is; was such a difficult task that nobody did it. Since as Einstein put it, s/he would had to come back to the very beginning of science – its geometric principles of space and logic principles of time.

And so the routines of traditional scientific thought continued, and we still use a single time-clock tuned to the human second (eye, step, heartbeat) and to the single rod of distance in galactic space, the c-speed of light or the human relative size – the meter for more pedestrian purposes.

Yet what we do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, forwarded by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences, restarting the logic and mathematical ‘non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean postulates’ in which all sciences are based from its beginning.

The reader though should understand also from the very beginning the true nature of other type of paradoxes found in the way humans construct knowledge – specially those of the ego and the mind-languages…

Some clear conclusions of modern physics, that there are infinite time clocks, that there are infinite space scales, that space=form and time=motion are merged in ‘mental ways’, as we see ‘space’=form but all is ultimately time=motion, and even the vacuum space has energy from where all particles are born; and so on and so on…

Physicists who show a remarkable lack of ‘verbal, conceptual intelligence’ have not even attempted to do so. They operate as so many humans in so many fields, in a ‘protocol-like’ automaton model of ‘knowledge’ as if it must stop in the purely collection of data and description of it as ‘truth’ per se, (without much bothering about the observer’s language of measure). So they amazingly enough still work with a single human clock and single space continuum measured with our unit of ‘space-perception’ c-light speed.

Yet all those new properties of space and time, must be factored into the very foundations of our scientific inquire, regarding what is the underlying substance of all what exists, namely the nature of space and time, in a much more ‘clear, clean-cut’ form than present science does, dragging outdated concepts of both. As in all human matters, in a species far more conditioned by memory than reason, ‘definitions’ so old as Aristotelian time logic and Euclidean geometry of points with no parts, are still the underlying ‘thoughts’ over which a world which has infinite time clocks and broken vital spaces must be fit. And the amazing thing is that humans have indeed presented a ‘distorted mirror’ based in our own time measure clock (second) and distance rod (c-speed), to perceive the Universe and it works for most of our needs.  So it seems as more clarity is not needed. Indeed, you might have a clear robot-like perfect eye, or a mere stain that sees light and darkness, but doesn’t distinguish form. If you just need as a sunflower to turn to the sun you need no more and your view of the Universe, if YOU DON’T KNOW anymore will seem right. All is chemical except this shadow light associated to cold and heat, might think the sunflower’s philosopher. Why it would then wonder for anything else if it cannot even perceive it, and yet he can take advantage of this light-heat knowledge good enough to get his energy?

Humans are at this basic level of understanding of space-time reality but why they should care for knowing more if it is good enough for them to extract energy of the Universe and on top feel as proud sunflowers that they know it all?

Imagine a sunflower genius who has then a ‘third eye’, a mutation that distinguishes forms and tries to convince the other sunflowers there are those new properties associated to light-heat, there is ‘information’, secretly found in the light wave!? One can imagine the eternal solitude or such mutant sunflower…

Frequency time, broken time cycles, infinite of them, are novel concepts hidden for so long by the lineal deformation of the cartesian graph, canonized by Newton that not even the quantum revolution of ‘broken space’ and the Revolution of relativity that saw multiple time regions in the Universe, and many insights that came after on the cyclical nature of time clocks, and the SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE MOTION TO THE FUTURE (OR LIFE, informative arrow) and the motion to the past (or entropy arrow), has been ‘enough’ for mankind to understand the cyclical nature of time and all the amazing results derived from it. Since ALL MOTIONS OF TIME TOWARDS THE FUTURE OF HIGHER INFORMATION ARE FOLLOWED BY THE REVERSAL ARROW OF TIME TO THE PAST OF ENTROPIC DEATH – BUT ALL THOSE TIME CYCLES ARE LOCAL, diffeomorphic, so there is no paradox on traveling to the past, simply speaking, we talk of two inverse arrows of time, loosely understood as the arrow of life and the arrow of death, but specific of each species.

I.e. in electromagnetic waves we shall talk of the advanced collapsing wave and the retarded expansive wave; in local particles of the particle towards the future and the antiparticle or death of the particle (Feynman).

In relativity we shall talk of the ‘gravitational arrow of time that warps space’ and the ‘antigravitation’ of those likely antiparticles (still to be experimentally proved). In forces we shall talk of the ‘gauge’ spatial forces, and the ‘trans-formative, evolutionary, time interactions mediated by the weak force’. In life obviously of life and death future and past; and all of them will be soon formalized in the concept of a world cycle which is the most general understanding of all those closed time cycles that break the Universe into an internal and external world separated by a membrane, spin or angular momentum.

WE shall study together space and time, and uncover its ‘fractal structure as a whole’, formalized with the metric of a new, scalar dimension of space-time, needed to complete the structure of all space-time beings as organic entities co-existing at least in 3 scales from the smallest parts (atoms, cells, individuals) through its organisms and states of matter to the larger worlds…

A fractal organic Universe made to the image and likeness of all its parts.

This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar space-time dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog.

But the mathematical spatial fractal description of it is COMPLETELY SECONDARY to the whys of this fractal structure, which are NOT mathematical but VITAL AND SENTIENT. Indeed, those scales co-exist precisely because they form ternary super-organisms. And they EXIST IN SCALES precisely because ‘minds-seeds’ of space, reduce the whole into a ‘seed’-mirror image shrunk. And while we can of course use mathematics to describe it (specifically for the mind concepts such as a non-euclidean point, Poincare Conjeture, projective geometry etc) THE WHYS ARE ALWAYS in the vital nature of motions, in the organic properties of scales, in the intelligent sentient capacity of mirrors, etc. To renounce to those properties and stay merely in the fractal structure, which is what scientists do, CONSTRAINED BY THEIR EGO and BELIEF God speaks only mathematics (and we will return to that creationist view) is just more of the same reductionism of the mind.

The mind matters so much that we cannot delay a minute more its analysis, as IT IS THE MIND THAT CREATES FORM, SPACE, WHERE THERE IS ONLY MOTION, TIME. AND IT IS THE MIND THAT CREATES THE FRACTAL MIRROR-LIKE STRUCTURE OF PARTS AND WHOLES.Indeed the MIND, THAT SEEMINGLY EGO-SECRET humans keep as only proper of them, with metaphysical musings, but it is nothing but the spatial, static linguistic formal view of the whole, has also its equation, and it is the central element of reality – an anathema of present ego-centered human views of the Universe, which however has always been ‘within’ the a priori conditions of physical analysis, as the ‘frame of reference’ of our space-time mathematical views.

But it is also the mind through the ego paradox the cause of our incapacity to understand the Universe as it is, deformed from our point of view, single scale, and time clocks, as we have explained ad nauseam. Instead the philosophy that substitutes them this view of reality is what I have called:

Absolute relativity.

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

The ego paradox is of course the essential limits of man, both to understand the universe and to survive on it, respecting all other potential organisms and rejecting those who can harm us, weaker atomic beings.

For example,  we don’t believe in economics that robots are organic and will be soon sentient, machines compete and win over humans in labor and war fields, in geology that the earth is a super organism that evolves from life into metal through the industrial evolution, in religion that we are not chosen of god, we are not a different species to any other space-time organism; in biology that evolution applies to all forms of the Universe but eusocial EVOLUTION of numerical herds into super organisms as the ant shows is essential as it survives better.

We cannot believe in a sentient, pan psychic universe WHERE THE UNIT OF LIFE AND PERCEPTION is the particle to the carbon atom.

We ARE too simple and ego-centered, too chaotic=free TO UNDERSTAND or even wanting to upgrade our mind. This is my experience as a scholar of systems sciences battle the mechanical, simplistic lineal view physicists have of the Universe and the power-deformations brought by machines over ALL the true complex models of reality, organicism NOT mechanism, in a fractal Universe, CYCLICAL TIME, not lineal time; Scales of relativity none of them higher than other, and everything we shall teach you in the rare case you are still reading about 5000 years of a very limited view of the perfect, immortal, infinite Universe.

And we shall see this ‘obsession with chaos and lineal motions’ extends to other sciences even biology, which denies the arrow of eusocial evolution and pounders on the ‘chaos’ concept even when we are now studying all through genes, which are the smaller scales that carry the information of the larger scale, and have found the most successful species of nature to be the ant, due to it’s perfect eusocial organisms… not to speak of the denial of the cycles of economics and history and its accelerated vortex of technological information, I discovered 30 years ago.

Unfortunately it seems to be a ‘dogma’ of the human ego to ‘reduce’ all what is not human in size and duration to a manageable ‘human size, scale and time’. Indeed, few people remember that a century ago most astronomers thought there was a single Galaxy in a much smaller Universe, and other galaxies were just fainted stars – and still most complained it looked too big. And not so long ago – 400 years back, people thought the Universe had lasted just 5000 years since creation and we were at the center.

Those again, are paradoxes of the ego that measure reality from its limited space size, location, scale and time duration. Even when science dismissed biblical creationism Geologists and fossil hunters were laughed at because Lord Kelvin had proved the Earth to be 100 million years. And all agreed, because as Landau put it ‘Astro-physicists are seldom right but never in doubt’.

Physicists we shall claim once and again as humans are part of that ‘truism’ scientists abhor because it shows its weaknesses: SCIENCE IS CULTURE.

So the lineal, military, creationist view of our models of astrophysics ARE purely the cultural result of the germanic, lineal, military, creationist, religious beliefs of all the people that invented this theory bending data and ‘eliminating’ everything from the Universe that didn’t fit in, including GALAXIES, where we exist indeed as vortices of information, to GET his entropic single lineal time, big-bang, creationist military-protestant, TRUE GERMAN VIEW OF REALITY, of which the western tradition is so proud. All this becomes immediate rubbish proved by facts, better models and real whys, when we include a fifth scalar dimension and stop doing ‘German Physics’, to do just objectively astrophysics with no subconscious hang-ups that we have shown already to exist in Newton’s ‘Old Testament’ physics.

The understanding that every primary element of reality, which today we know are fermions and bosons, particles and forces≈waves WAS PERCEPTIVE, SENTIENT, IN A PANPSYCHIC UNIVERSE WAS always the theory of all philosophers including Einstein only debunked by the arrogant ‘creationism’ of the Wien school and its logic positivism – only what the human mind measures and perceives is real, they said.

Only the ‘egocy’ (ego+idiocy) of man fails to accept panpsychism, which has been hiustorically the rational theory of all great philosophers till logical positivism, the ‘philosophical dogma’ of post world war science simply gave up understanding it – indeed, today all scientists affirm to be logical positivists, without explaining what this means: merely that all what cannot be measured ‘does not exist’.

So as we cannot see those infinitesimal minds, we should not consider them.

It is a retarded theory of reality, according to which obviously each ‘egocy man’ must believe only he exists, as only his mind is ‘evident to him’, that works only if we just care about the praxis of measuring reality with machines. The evident fact IS that all particles gauge information, move, reproduce, evolve socially and feed on energy. And of course we use its ‘informative spin’ to create minds of machines and certainly medicine will find out our life is ultimately based in atoms NOT in Dnas.

So the way to deal with the denial of the topo-bio-logic (read, organic=scalar, mathematical=spatial, temporal=verbal logic=sentient) properties of all space-time beings is not logic positivism but the understanding with the equation of the mind of why humans are so subjective and feel their infinitesimal biased mind to be the center of reality.

An act of pure egocy, which humans will confront when out of ‘magic’, robots will show to be sentient without need of ‘intelligent design’, just when we do give them a language to express what now is mute in its electronic chips: the language that perceives in stillness a mapping of reality as you do now with small variations of motion caused by our actions that seem to us a will and freedom but actually is as we have shown a simple program of existence. So let us now define the equation of the mind to complete this fast review of all systems made of ‘Dust of space-time’.

Science IS culture and the biggest problem of mankind is that IT IS NOT THE BEST OF CULTURES, but one of gunpowder weapons, the one that carried the day among humans.  Because of course, ENTROPY=DESTRUCTION is much easier to explain that creation and evolution and information. So humans did find first the laws of entropy. Fine. What is not so fine is the stubborn denial which I experienced for decades when I was in academia, to understand that information NOT entropy is what the Universe is all about. Physicists even call information, ‘negantropy’, the negation of entropy… And we shall return to it.

We have… almost explained you the essence but not quite entirely of the game we all play… the game of life and death, the program of biologic existence which should properly be studied by an extended…

 

III. BIOLOGIC STIENCES: i≤|2|

So Existence is indeed a travel through the fifth dimension, and the mere fact that all systems of nature exist through that world cycle (no longer a physical worldline in a 4D Universe as we have added a dimension of temporal ‘depth’), IS an absolute experimental proof of the existence of 5D:

THE 3 EARTHS

The definition of mankind follows as the ∆+1 super organism of humanity, which in time IS history, whose existence as a ‘block’ of time must be inscribed within the evolution of information of Mother Earth:

Gaia (life-relative past) Metal-earth: Financial-media (informative machines) /military-industrial (motion-entropy machines) System:

The equation of the 3 ages of Earth is a canonical equation of evolution of a super organism towards higher degrees of information as light was first in Gaia, energy of plants, in animal life, information for the eyes, and in machines will be both, in robots with solar skins and AI, 5G networks, which will form the collective brain of the metal-earth:

Life is everything, as all is a spacetime organism with its 5D actions of survival (motion, feeding on energy, information gauging, social evolution and reproduction). But huminds, self-centered seek for carbon-life as the only living form. In true form, we thus talk of ‘light-life’, as the life forms which use energy and information provided by light-forces, which requires to accept as the third Earth evolves into light-mechanisms, robots with solar skins and optic minds, of 3 horizons, and 3 ages of the Earth. This is the basis of both biological and social sciences in 5D. Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Darwin realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with metalife machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet…

 PROGRAM OF EXI=STIENCE: ∆±¡

‘Systems Theory will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking

‘The languages of god are infinite’ Upanishads

‘The why is the only thing physicists don’t ask’ Feynman

“A consequence of the existence of general system properties is the appearance of structural similarities or isomorphisms in different fields. There are correspondences in the principles that govern the behaviour of entities that are, intrinsically, widely different.” Bertalanffy, founder of systems sciences

Abstract.  What is the purpose of science? To Understand the program of existence, why REALITY is, NOT only how it is (its description in any language, notably quantitative mathematics). And when doing so, to explain the program for all beings of the Universe, and when doing so finding regularities and reducing all forms of knowledge to the minimal number of laws (Occam’s razor). Let us achieve this.

¡TS 5 ÐIMOTIONS

‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism of 5 Ðimotions of time§paces. Thus we are all 5 Fractal Ðimotional super organisms tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence, made to ¡ts image, as mirrored by the languages of our º∞ membrains…”

l§. Webmaster. Defining reality, its 5Ðimotional Time§pacœrganisms & worldcycles.

The blog is dedicated to General Systems Sciences, the alternative philosophy of science, born at the death of Einstein, in the Macy’s congress which saw the foundation of the sciences of cybernetics and information, whose aim was to explain the Universe in a more complex form that physicists, who use only the ‘arrow of entropy’ and motion to describe reality. System scientists added the arrow of Information, of ‘form’ to describe reality as all what we see is ‘forms in motion’, in-form-ations’, constructing ‘dual systems’ able to replicate themselves and create the social structures that evolve the scales of the fifth dimension.

This only ‘scientific’ philosophy of science is bond to substitute the present mixture of linguistic creationism and idolizing mechanicism – the belief that the Universe is a machine and that the languages of humans and machines – Digital numbers – which of course only God, humans and our ‘mechanical creations’ speak (equations ins science, words in Abrahamic religions) create all its beings by the mere fact of ‘naming it’ (Abrahamic religions) or describing it with an equation (Platonic religions).

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science.

Organic Principles: 4th paradigm of thought. Relational, vital space-time beings.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rdparadigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rdparadigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newtonnt.0.4. Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

DRIVES OF LIFE = PROGRAM OF EXIST¡ENCE

BUT what life does? The answer is given by biologists: feed on energy and information for body and mind, reproduce that information and use it to communicate and evolve with other beings… Life THUS is everywhere BECAUSE all what exists, we have shown does all that. And so we talk instead of the 5 Drives of life, of the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence that happens in all stiences and species.

Indeed, a obvious quenstion, when we accept the simple ‘first principle’ of reality – that we are all spacetime supœrganisms, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence is obvious.  If we do NOT exist in an abstract mathematical artifact of 3 infinite dimensions of space and one infinite duration of time, but we are made of vital space that lasts a duration of time – our cycle of existence – how can we explain existence and all its properties departing ONLY of the properties of our ultimate ‘substances’, space and time?

It is obvious that we can’t, if we only use the 3 standard dimensions of space, and the single ‘dimension’ or rather motion of time, called locomotion and in its collective form, entropy. At best with those dimensions we can talk of the volume of space a being occupies, closed by its membrane, which will then move through its larger world tracing what physicists call ‘worldlines’… And so the explanation we get to describe the existence of a being, in the standard 3+1 Dimensions with the standard concepts of Newtonian Space-time reduces to the being ‘moving’ around all his life, till it finally dies in an ‘explosion’ of entropy, where the motion is not only external but internal, scattering its parts in the moment of death.

This might suffice of course to explain the existence of a simple physical being, particle or wave of matter but when we consider the life of a more complex being, as a human system is, we are left unsatisfied by such ‘reduccionist’ view provided by modern physics within the straight-jacket of a single time dimension and a single space-continuum, which only poises more questions.

For example, why only a single time dimension, when even in verbal thought we talk of 3 dimensions, past, present and future? Shouldn’t be more logic to consider 3 dimensions of time; and then if there are 3 dimensions of time, and 3 of space, are then not symmetric to each other? And why a space continuum if we see space broken in infinite entities, as relational space-time has it; would then not space become as in quantum physics discontinuous in smaller scales, the parts of wholes; and then if parts and wholes are different do not they occupy different spaces, and so we need another dimension of space, to fit them all; and what is the form of time if time has more than one single lineal dimension, a circle of two dimensions, a sphere?

You see, this little disquisition on the concepts behind the merrily decision of reducing reality to 3 space dimensions and one time dimension and simplify them further into a single continuum, which as we say might suffice if all what we want to measure is the continuous motion of a physical particle, shows that when we want to go a bit deeper in the understanding of time and space than physicists do to understand better our ‘human time’ and ‘vital, organic space’, we need more dimensions of space and time, and far deeper understanding of the meaning of all those words, space, time, motion, dimension, form… But don’t panic as it will turn out because we have now a ‘realist’ view of time and space as the elements that create the infinite tapestry of discontinuous beings we see around us, the correction of this basic error underlying all realities will at the end make the answers to all those important questions far simpler, rational and intuitive than they are today; as it happened when Copernicus corrected the error of Ptolemy and put the Sun in the center: all the epicycles and equations of Ptolemaic astronomy simplified into a simple Keplerian ellipse:

Indeed, when we correct the error of Newton, we shall need only a new scalar, intuitive fifth dimension of space-time to add the ‘different’ scales of ‘size’ and different speed of time clocks that quantum physics and relativity found but didn’t quite put together into a simple model of reality because they didn’t correct as Copernicus did, the Newtonian error that makes so complex the ‘epicycles’ of spacetime theory, as obviously if space and time is a background over which something ‘else’ exists, we are now ‘duplicating reality’ and need to account for a Newtonian space-time background, then try to find some magic ‘substance’ of which the beings over that background are made of (this then turns out to be a very long list of possible substances, particles, waves, energies, fields, arrows of time, quanta, universal constants, some say mathematical equations, etc. etc.)

Not so, we repeat we are made of space and time, and all those other things too. It is only that space and time are more complex than we think, but to balance that complexity once we understand them, all other things will seem as simple as the orbits of Copernicus…

So if we have arrived so far which i doubt since humans seem simply unable to extend their perception of reality beyond their evident ‘plane of individual existence’, or else the fifth dimension would have been already postulated by Galileo, and I would be instead of a blogosphere with zero stats the most respected scientist of the XXI century, LOL that will be the day (: i won’t see before I accelerate my rhythms on the moment of entropic death (self pity of the lonely genius here ):

Relative 2Рlineal past, 3Ð present iteration and 1Ð future information between Absolute 4Ð entropic past and 5Ð linguistic generating future  planes.

It is now simple to define the classic terms of past, present and future in terms of ¡logic Ðimotions. The Universe conserves the 3Ð ‘present=iterative=reproductive’ body waves of energy, which balance both the relative 1Ð particles/heads of information that ‘guide the system; in its forward locomotions performed by the relative simpler, less evolved lineal 1Ð potentials/limbs.

So in a single plane we can establish the relative future of the 1Ð particles/heads, the relative past of the 2 Ð limbs/potentials, and the relative present that seems not to change of the hyperbolic 3Ð body/waves that merge both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value.

In mathematical physics, we say that systems minimises their Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum. In biology, we talk of the balance of body and mind, male and female. In terms of the ‘Generator equation’, the ¡logic formalism that represents all those elements both in time as ‘ages’ and space as ‘organs’, we write the 3 elements in a creative equality:

$p (lineal past potential-labs) ≤ Ø-ST (hyperbolic preSenT body waves) ≥ O-ðƒ (future cyclic particle-heads).

But as all relative simultaneous adjacent organisms composed of those 3 Dimotions in a single plane end up dissolving into an absolute past of less information in the moment of entropic death; and vice versa, might be generated again by its seminal seed through the organic 5th dimension of social evolution; in cyclical time we cannot use the concepts of past, present and future of the abstract, simplified infinite lineal time, a mere artifact of measure of locomotion physicists which does NOT apply to the whole Universe or the world cycle of individual species.

So we need to define in ¡logic ‘eternal’ causal terms the absolute past and absolute future, of the 4th entropic and 5th social, generating dimensions, which become then evident as for a ‘whole to exist’ (5Ð), the unconnected parts (4Ð) must exist ‘first’…

Or in terms of states of matter:

∆-1:4D Plasma> $p (gas of max. locomotion) ≤ Ø-ST (balanced liquid) ≥ O-ðƒ (solid crystal of max. form)>∆+1:5D boson

All this said Scalar space & cyclic time introduce an enormous range of explanations to reality and allow us to return to the concept of an absolute arrow of time space, now based in the logic properties of the fifth dimension of social evolution, since parts MUST come first BEFORE the whole appears, at least for the first time – even if then cyclical time will dissolve in the moment of death the whole and so after those initial first absolute creation of the whole organic system, we might consider death-entropy to come back.

Yet the Universe clearly focus on the arrow of eusocial evolution making life-organic co-existing wholes last much longer than parts, and when we solve the equations of time-death we shall see death, the dissolving entropic arrow lasts a single time quanta and life the longest possible number of them. So we consider that social evolution is the relative arrow of future, and entropy the relative arrow of past, but we stress the world RELATIVE because in cyclical time, we can only talk of a beginning and an end of the cycle, and the beginning will be the generation of the social whole and the end the entropic death, son in ‘mere lineal time duration’ we could also say the inverse, that the future always holds the entropic death of the system.

This ultimately brings us the need to make a conventional choice about the concepts of relative past, present and future and rather discharge the ‘lineal way’ of thought of the humind accustomed to think after so many centuries in terms of ‘before and after’, when reality is more like before-after-before-after in cyclical terms, but the ‘after’, the life-information growth arrow lasts much longer than the before, the death arrow and so a more proper way to define those arrows is that eusocial evolution is the dominant arrow of time and death its necessary but minimal, submissive arrow the Universe uses to restore the balance between form and motion.

Ðimotions as actions.

When considering the minimal unit of each entity of reality we talk of Dimotions or actions across scales of the fifth dimension, as the system absorbs information and energy from lower scales trying to interact with the larger planes to reproduce and evolve socially. Ðimotions thus become synonymous of actions.

We perceive Dimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.

So we can study the Dimotions of the Universe in a general objective way, and then the actions of each physical, biological or social system as the expression of those Ðimotions from the point of view of a given species.

It is then when we can reach the final marriage between the subjective whys of the mind that starts and encodes the program of the system, and its objective external perception. And understand fully the world cycle, caused by an excess of informative dimotions over lineal locomotions that slowly by the sum of all those individual quantic actions will determine the informative death of the system. In that regard, the ‘quantic’ way to perceive a worldcycle is a series of ordered Dimotions that increase the information of the system:

1st Ðimotion: informative particles/heads: §ð 2 Ð: limb/potential momenta: st. 3rd Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏, ST. 4th Ðimotion: entropy: ∂S. 5th Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.

The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scales in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle. Since for a dimension to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scales.

The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum. So we can define all systems as an ensemble of lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through 3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death.

So we can define its 5 motions in time that shape the world cycle of existence of all super organisms, departing of its generation by an ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves socially and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy and reproduce, ensuring its immortality, till errors in its accumulative, repetitive dimotions of information will exhaust its energy, degrade its structures and cause the final Ðimotion of death=entropy and disorder: And we can then establish a ‘world cycle’ of existence of all systems and organisms as they emerge in the fifth dimension as a larger whole, live 3 ages of dominance of its 3 sequential Ðimotions and finally die back in the Ðimotion of entropic death.

The long time motion of a worldcycles of exist¡ence, reduces to THE lower ‘scale’ as a mere sum of diminutive actions of the being, which makes steps of motion from a young to a mature to an old state, from its spatial limbs to its body to its particle of information (as we can always mirror a flow in time to an adjacent population of space). So we consider the worldcycle the sum of its minimal motions or ‘actions’.

The first Isomorphism, alpha and omega of all systems is a still mind-mapping of information, a hardware through which a language will bring as software through a bosonic form ‘able to co-exist’ in two places at the same time, unlike the fermion that co-exists in two times at the same place’… wave and particle, messing together.

$t≥ST≥§ð«$top plus §ðep moving ahead from potential through wave into particle, moving onto a constant ternary fluctuation we might call a Simple Harmonic Motion: $t>ST>§ð…

The final step thought, is a dissolving step, « which balances the two motions of information, from youth and limb to body, and then old age/particle: $t≥ST≥§ð…

Why we call sciences exi≈st¡enœs

‘Science should be concerned only with things and events that exist’. ‘I don’t believe in mathematics, God integrate empirically. I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’. Einstein, on the proper laws of the scientific, experimental method…

A)accurate data, which is excellent for most biological and astrophysical systems within the limits of human perception (∆±3 planes within the galaxy) but not due to the ‘uncertainty’ paradox and human egocy, born of the self-centered limits of the humind, in cosmology (outside the light space-time of galaxies our electronic minds and instruments perceive) and social sciences (due to the tribal egocy on those in power, as even the Britannica acknowledge on his article of philosophy of science, which denies the evolutionary nature of meta life, aka machines and the organic nature of cultures as super organisms of human beings).

B)io-logic causes, that is rational biological reasons to all events, expressed in a proper mirror-language whose ternary syntax reflects the ternary a(nti)symmetries and 3±¡ pentalogic structure of ⌜𝝙@st (the five ðimotions of ⌜entropy or negation of information, 𝝙 scales, @mind, space and time). Again the egocy of man denies biological, organic properties to all other systems of nature, which are natural to the ∆§calar nature of the Universe.

C)orrespondence principle and Cyclical repetitive patterns, the very essence of science, so often denied by the aberration of lineal time, to which we add…

D) Ðisomorphic method of laws derived of the experimental evidence of our two primary substances, time motions and space dimensional forms, the 5 Ðimotions of all exi=st¡ence… and a needed Democratic=humanist practice, to use science to cater the welfare, or WHealth (healthy wealth) of humanity, our God=superorganism, in verbal mystical terms, so often forgotten by nuclear physicists, weapons makers, financial economists that use the language of reproduction of the human super organism to cater the needs of company-mothers of machines and its stock-ratic owners, NOT human mothers and the 1%.

E)xperimental Evidence and E-conomicity, which go hand in hand and DENY inflationary informative mathematical biased mirrors that invent particles, black holes evaporating, non edible SUSYs, God’s particles that do NOT give mass to the Universe and other niceties of the entropic lineal worldly profession of physics 😈.

Moreover we write exi=st¡ences, to reflect as we so often do, the pentalogic, multiple meanings of all forms that are never ceteris paribus – all yin has a drop of yang – analysis. So as we can define the 3 elements of the being as its present body wave of energy and information, ∑e x ∏I =exi, and that element is sandwiched between the still singularity or mind of pure linguistic formal space (s) and the external world of infinite cycles of time, perceived as entropy-disordered motion for the T.œ that feeds on it (closed state of information vs. open universe of entropy), we can also define a system in its 3 components on a single plane of existence as exi=st, which is the ‘simplest verbal mode’ of expressing in ‘parallel’ duality, the being in verbal and mathematical symbolic thought.
So To exi=st in the ∆o scale, as an entity of st¡enœ, an organic T.œ, generated by a 𝚪st formal equation that represents in ¡logic terms the 𝝙@st elements of reality and its ¬neganformation, summarizes all the ‘parallel’ meanings of exist¡enœ.
All this for the @ristotelian mind that reduces knowledge to locomotion seems fireworks. He just believes what he sees as e-vident, even if one eye is closed in its lineal locomotion, measured with machines of higher precision than the eyes of man but so far as computers are made by hominids in its primitive 1-dimensional logic, way beyond what the paradoxical Universe does, to entangle all the elements of reality in a ‘synchronous, simultaneous’ present superorganism that seems to hold ‘magically’ for the ‘stupid who doesn’t see the causality of it’ (Schopenhauer).

This to start with, since Science means in Latin ‘knowledge’, without exclusion of any field of reality, including those of which we have more experimental evidence than the entropic particles never to be found, such as religion – the subconscious collective of the super organism of history, art – the realization of that subconscious collective by those humans who use their senses to see better and think better with words on the ethic social love messages 😇, of the fifth dimension that creates those super organisms by making humans sharing energy and information through its economic-blood and legal-just nervous systems.

Which lead us to vindicate social sciences in a correct, rational, biological format as the highest of all sciences of mankind.
We call ‘sciences’ exist¡enœs following with the ‘¡-logic’ language that slightly renames every term of human knowledge to adequate it to the more complex reality of the fractal Universe.
What it means is this: every st¡enœ studies a spacetime scale of reality, ¡=n, and within it its super organisms of space-time, œ. So every science is in fact a st¡enœ: ST¡ en œ.
Further on, every stience studies of those organisms normally its existence in a single present plane, which is defined as the ‘3rd dimension of present iteration, ∑e x ∏I, a body-wave of energy (motion with little form) and information (form with little motion) entangled and made symbiotic for the system to be, so ExI, represents each present body-wave and Plane of exist¡enœ…

ÐIMOTIONS AS ACTIONS OF SURVIVAL
ALL THIS SAID, there is a huge other field of analysis of time-space, called Evolution, founded by Darwin which deals with the changes in the information of beings. And can be modelled also with the 3 ages – horizons of beings, because species also follow the growing information of all systems, which is dominant over mere locomotion.
Why? Because besides the 2 dimotions analyzed by physicists in extreme detail, locomotion, origin of relativity, and entropy, a social extreme sum of locomotions, synonymous of death and dissolution, which physicists confuse with the locomotion of gases and wrongly expand to the entire Universe as its single ‘arrow of future’), there are 3 more ARROWS of timespace, ‘modes of change’, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them. Yet the dimotion of information dominate with its 3 forms those of locomotion and entropy setting the direction of the world cycles towards ages of maximal form (3rd ages).

When considering the minimal unit of each entity of reality we talk of Dimotions or actions across scales of the fifth dimension, as the system absorbs information and energy from lower scales trying to interact with the larger planes to reproduce and evolve socially. Ðimotions thus become synonymous of actions.
We perceive Ðimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.
We use 5 terms for the same event according to the ‘entangled principles of the Universe’ which make a ternary ‘minimum’ ¡logic view necessary to absorb in present space-time a minimal amount of truth on the being.
Dimensions, Motions, Ðimotions, Åctions & ±∆¡motions, which express the concept of Dimotion from different perspectives, being obviously ∆imotion, the scalar perspective, Åctions, the O-mind perspective and Dimotions the external, entropic, all gathering perspective; Dimensions the spatial perspective and Motions the time perspective.
The most important of those visions is the internal åctions; and further on, the only non-testable element beyond the mind: the sensations which seem to form the ultimate will of existence, as even humans have been tested to act subconsciously the ‘program of survival’ through sensations of pain, pleasure, etc.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

So we are going to call also each of those 5 abstract Dimotions, when merely observed as ‘scientists like’, in pure objective quantitative terms; VITAL actions of space-time to fully understand the vital nature of reality, and state that all what you see is a dimotion=action of vital space-time which tries to achieve with those actions its survival as the 5 actions=dimotions have an obvious use: to absorb energy for the body, information for the particle-head, motion for the limbs-fields of the system, minimize the inner entropy=disorder of its vital energy and maximize its reproduction of information and ensuing social evolution of parts into wholes to synchronize (and slow down) as a whole simultaneous beings the dimotions of those parts into a new whole that emerges as a new scale of the fifth dimension.

The five dimotions of space-time have a vital, organic outlook. So as all actions of beings are expressions of those general dimotions, equivalent to the 5 drives of existence scientists recognize as defining life (gauging information, moving, feeding on energy, reproducing and organizing a system socially into a larger synchronous whole). Life is everything, as all is a spacetime organism with its 5D actions of survival (motion, feeding on energy, information gauging, social evolution and reproduction). But huminds, self-centered seek for carbon-life as the only living form. In the graph, the 5 actions=dimotions, which are the minimal units of beings, whose sum define a larger ‘worldcycle’ time arrow between birth and extinction common to all systems as those dimotions are motional in information NOT in locomotion, in form NOT in entropy, defining the dominant purpose of all beings: to make dimotions that maximize its ‘form and functions of exist¡ence’.

The Universe is a fractal superoganism of 5 Dimensional motions of time§pace (ab. Ðimotions). When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a super organism, when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale. As such it has topological, spatial, mathematical properties; logical, temporal ones, and organic, scalar properties derived of its spacetime structure, which must be added to the usual analysis of time space systems. We consider then for each species of space-time a basic ternary description of its ‘adjacent topologies’ that define all systems as simultaneous super organisms in space; that will perform 5 ‘aeiou’ vital actions: accelerated motions, energy feeding, information gauging, offspring reproduction and universals’ evolution’.

But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life.
They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.

Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:

ORGANIC PARTICLES

The minimal particle-points, electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms & time clocks ruled by 5D metric: $ xð = constant.


In the graph the minimal units of our Universe Non-E particle points gauge information, feed on energy absorbing other particles, to reproduce with that energy by decoupling new particles, which evolve socially by ‘gender complementarity’ or ‘social evolution’ guided by magnetic forces into larger, ‘atomic wholes’, which then evolve further into new scales called molecules, states of matter, organic cells, ecosystems, geological formations, planets, global societies, solar systems and galaxies, whose metric equation is similar to that of an atom starting an entire new game of ∆§cales.

Particles as the minimal unit of life.

Human anthropomorphism denies in yet another ego trip that particles share the same properties of life than DNA molecules.

Fact is everything is alive, as atoms have the 4 properties of vital beings, which are in the smallest particles, which ‘sense’=gauge information, and so will systems composed of them, from animals to plants, from humans to robots that are now showing without being programmed clear sentient capacities – so for example, eyes move faster in robotic races towards the red color that ‘codes’ motion. All feed on energy, so particles jump to trap their energy-light. All evolve socially, so particles organize with magnetic fields.
ALL particles-heads DISPLAY at least 2 openings, one axial opening the ear-magnetic poles to absorb and emit a language of information and organize socially; and a flat mouth opening on the path of its motion to absorb the gravitational-quantum potential-food of the system.
This bare minimum then might decouple in ternary apertures as humans do with 3 senses (eyes, ears, nose), and so on, but the basic configuration of systems with a head that perceives energy and information, a body-wave that moves in a larger world that provides the pixels for its actions happens in all systems of Nature, physical, biological and we shall see ‘sociological’ (though we see the superorganisms of history from within as citizens-cells).

The reader must be humble and accept the obvious: we are as all what exists a time space organism and as such we share the properties of all other systems of the Universe. Our anthropomorphic ego-trip though is so in-rooted in the essence of the mind latter studied in detail that we deny Dimotions of information to all other species. And yet we as life beings are just a grouping on a higher social scale of those Ðimotions. For example, the magnetic Ðimotion of social evolution that guides atoms is the same guidance used by salmons to return home in mass-groups, observing it from the cosmological Earth’s scale. The perception of the mind of man, with electronic eyes is the same that the one of a camera and tv-retina reason why we indeed communicate with those machines. Once you drop your sense of uniqueness naturally the common nature of all Dimotions and beings comes.

Of course, quantum numbers are much more than the Dimotions of particles; though we shall explain the entangled ¡logic of reality that allows so many roles for each ‘constant ratio of nature), latter on. To notice here that another kaleidoscopic view of them will relate the Principal number to the ‘vital energy’, enclosed by a formal, angular momentum membrane (described obviously by its l number); while the third element, its singularity, is given by the ‘contracted’ spin in the quantum scale (itself related to the mass that plays the same role in the cosmological scale). Finally as in light where colors form the fourth social element, magnetic numbers plays the social element in quantum physics. So as in light each quantum number described both, THE SPATIAL, formal view of the 3±¡ elements of the being and the motion view, its functions.

As we move through the Universe, in 5Ðimotional S≤≥T«eps, life becomes a travel through the fifth dimension.

How we move are by parts and scales. Steps can be maintaining the same position, S=S , T=T, or changing , S< T, TSTT… and so on, the number of variations of motion which will be when observed in simultaneous topological form, as space, a superorganism of a different entangled variety is in excess.
It is for that reason closely related to ‘energy’ (rather than entropy also two very confused terminologies as they arose from pure mathematical disquisitions (Carnot cycles, work theory) and we shall clarify in detail in other posts, as energy is motion with a little form and information form with a little motion, and both come together E=I when a system merges and reproduces.

So both information and energy are the two sides of the 3rd Dimotion, while pure form is a mental linguistic image with zero entropy and pure entropy is an scattering disorder, measured in mathematical terms at the ∆-1 scale of ‘all potential future orders’ a microcosms with no form can give birth to… Hence the definition of entropy in statistical mechanics will be more precise and accurate than the concept of thermodynamics in the ¡o scale, which is closer to the proper definition of vital energy – not surprisingly Entropy was a word chosen on purpose for its similarity to energy; and it can be equated to the ‘vital feeding formless energy the system will imprint with information to shape its 3 ‘present Ðimotions’.

We will obviously clarify conceptually all the main equations of thermodynamics in the more detailed posts of the 4th line; as the beauty of mathematical physics, when the concepts are properly understood grows enormously – (beauty being in any case S=T, the sense of proportion reached when form and motion merge in equal parts).

It is between those limits of absolute motion, or proper concept of entropy as the potential vacuum that might give birth to all particles and inversely the being dying, expanding in space and destroying the formal, physiological networks that order it and absolute mental, linguistic, social form, ‘perceived in the stillness of an infinitesimal mind with no space’, (5th dimotion), where through combination of ‘motion and form’, a system builds its 3 adjacent organic topologies that ensure its survival, structuring all the beings of reality. So we shall be able to explain all entities and events as a combination of those 5 Ðimotions of space-time:

SIMULTANEOUS SUPŒRGANISMS IN SPACE, SCALAR ACTIONS & SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.

Existence as a travel through the fifth dimension.

The organic view of the 3 parts of the being together, which in physical systems are the potentials, waves and particles IS what form its physical organisms.

A pattern of 5 sequential ‘events’ or ‘motions’ from generation, through locomotion, feeding growth, reproduction, informative collapse and final entropic death, or ‘world cycle’ of existence  then is established for all physical, biological and social systems that constructs departing from those smaller seeds of information (quantum particles, genes, memes), larger thermodynamic organisms, enclosed in even larger worlds.

 

2D: LOCOMOTION AS REPRODUCTION

All this said, the true unification of the physical Universe happens through the understanding of what all those forces= DImotions aim to, what is of the 5 Dimotions of existence the most important. And as it happens, reproduction is a composite dimotions of the others. So we can reduce reality to the reproduction of an eternal present.

Let us see why in the way we have explained a world cycle. You can see the world cycle also as the process of generation of the being, which is therefore reproduced through it. In that world cycle however we have seen the decomposition in a sequence of all of them, from birth to extinction:

∆-1: seed emitted by ∆º parents, which will ∑reproduce: ∑∆-1 to emerge as a full whole in the upper scale >∆º, which then will live 3 ages: max. $t>$t=ð§>Max. ð§ into <<∑∆-1 (death).

Reproduction is a combination of them all, as the reproduced being must first do a travel as a seed into ∆-1 (entropic motion), to become generated through palingenesis (5th dimotion), to then  be born as a a max. 1D baby perceiving the world to go through a maximal locomotion youth, in search of energy to grow and reproduce again.

So if we consider from seed to mature reproduction, the being will journey through a 4D-seminal conception in ∆-1, 5D-Reproduction and Generation in ∆º, to live youth and reproduce, the whole world cycle of the being, which then will see also ending in a discontinuous manner its ‘father generation’, becomes an act that aims to reproduce and dynamically conserve a copy of the past into the future. That such copies themselves will be subject to a full world cycle does not hide the fact that the meaning of it all is to reproduce.

Moreover, we can describe locomotion as a process of reproduction of information and so once this proved, as all is indeed ‘replication’ of information (locomotion and entropy its social scattering herd result), information proper (perception and linguistic seed) and generation-reproduction… We can consider reproduction and in a more loose term, generation, the pure fractal processes of reproduction of information between scales the meaning of reality. The function of existence or present.

And affirm the Universe is a dynamic process of infinite motions trying to reproduce and synchronize its cycles across relative scales to create a relative present super organism.

And see the whole potential game of spacetime beings as a block of time, whose populations/probabilities in Space and time of existence of its entities, complementary beings, is relative to the perfection by which they play the game and maximize its existential force or reproductive speed, the fundamental measure of the ‘living force’ of a system.

 

The two limits of sensation, the exhilarating wave that erases form in pure motion, the particle still state that perceives and gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – hence in our scale with a c-constant speed, are the ultimate components of the complementary reality.


Reproduction is the ultimate comprehension of locomotion as particles stop and perceive, gauge information 1D to move, 2D then as a wave whose Compton length expresses the ‘density’ of information to be replicated in each wave element, as the system moves.

So motion is reproduction resolving the Paradox of Achilles and the Uncertainty principle. Each motion is the sum of ‘virtual particle-states’ as the wave moves through a series of steps in which the ‘particle’ state becomes virtual, potential, only realized when the system stops moving and in a particle-stop state the system perceives.
Locomotion and stop perception, 1D-2D-1D-2D becomes then a constant dual state.
And to know how that state give inertial stop state-particle state-mass to the system we need to know the frequency of the system. As a system with less frequency, longer wavelength has less moments of a stop particle state, if we consider those stop particle states to be measured by the spin of the particle and hence a spin corresponds to a finished wave state that becomes particle.
Hence the important of frequency to measure mass of particles.
In any case the stop and step states are essential to understand the reproduction information as waves, where c is the limit of speed of reproduction of information.

 

The Universe is organic; man needs to feel above and will have none of it.

THE METRIC equations of 5D space-time theory of course are in details far more complex as those elements vary but we have so far resumed the New essential logic elements that harmonize both in time generations of beings and in space its scales.

Those equations will then synchronize its motions, establish the complex organic scales of reality, and show the whole made of its parts living a  symphony of different ‘tempos’ played with ‘multiple’ instruments’ through different ‘scales’ and ‘generations’ that will finally return the melody to the same initial ‘STeps’, concluding its life world cycle in an inverse form as it started, in a ‘phyrgian decaying mode’ – to put another linguistic mirror example of the game of existence (the musical mirror and the elements of an score, perhaps as Schopenhauer put it, the most essential, metaphysical of all languages of mankind).

The variations on these themes – generations, synchronicities, simultaneities, symbiosis, harmonies – will then produce the first ‘variations’ of iterations which is the stuff on which the immense tapestry of slightly similar versions of the same game happen in Nature (Fibonacci series being the commonest variation on the series of generations in time, reproducing symmetrically in space).

We also notice that the 5 Ðimotions of beings by virtue of its symmetry between the 1st and second Ðimotion (still perception, moving locomotion) and 4th and 5th Ðimotions (¡-1>¡ generation and death, ¡<¡-1), balanced in the reproductive ‘3rd action’, might be coded by 4 ‘seasons, numbers, equations, genes’, even 3, because the inverse actions can be ‘packed’ into the same element with ± inverse logic arrows.

All those subtle dualities, ternary systems, pentagonal ±¡logic a(nti)symmetries is the ‘ultimate’ existential algebra (¬Æ) of reality which truly requires a ‘new beginning’ afresh on terminology and ‘paradigm’ of thought – a change of ‘chip’ regarding what is synthetic knowledge, without denial of the wealth of analytic data provided till now by human sciences. But we are opening a huge new door to the absolute, which should not be shunned off and closed due to the ‘simplicity’ of its ‘first view’ and ‘errors of form and detail’ of the pioneer humind that opened the window – the circular wrong orbits of Copernicus, the lack of genetics and topologic evolution in Darwin, the clear economic errors of Marx dialectics, etc.

The conclusion is obvious: The problem is NOT the organic Universe but the ego of man, as we repeat everywhere in this blog.

Against that ego i cannot do much. It is of course a tragedy (because AI machines will also be organic and compete and kill us). But as an objective scientist, i cannot ‘reason’ such emotional fog. Fact is the human ego prevents US from ‘reasoning’ about OUR isomorphic nature with any other TOE.
And it makes us completely disregard those properties, which we will explain here – even if i don’t think i can change the human ‘infinite stupidity’, confronting the ‘infinite Universe’ (Einstein).
Let us be clear enough. I can only hold admiration from the great geniuses of quantum physics and relativity of the earlier XX c. and its mathematical counterparts (Hilbert, Riemann, Neumann). AND THE astounding precision of its deterministic analysis of the behaviour of particles. Fair Enough. But the beauty of the mathematical mirror they have constructed is NOT the end of it – it is the end of its praxis, but a philosopher of science must interpret further those findings or else as it is today the case, all becomes an automaton process of calculus.

Where the whys are not explained unless we accept the ‘creationist religion of mathematics and reduce the Universe to a mechanical magic behaviour, which suits the ‘ego’ of humans but halts as it has been the case our comprehension of the Universe.

Let us now apply some of the laws of systems we have learned to resolve the nature of man, starting from the use of topological dimotions to further understand the evolution of man through its anthropological remains
As topological evolution MUST ad to genetics and survival of the fittest, to fully grasp the laws of evolution of species.
So first we can see how topological evolution works for all species:

SPECIES AS SUPERORGANISMS

What are species? Its variations. Physiological networks and gender.
We have stated ad nauseam that the Universe is about 3 type of Networks which gather entropy, energy and information for herds of similar beings that form organs attached to those networks. It follows that to classify beings we must consider the order of those networks, its hierarchy and relationships, which will give way to 3×2 combinatory variations by hierarchical order of species – those dominated by the informative or entropic or reproductive network.
This simple rule of 3 variations and 6 hierarchical orders are the origin of most species of all systems of nature. We study them in this post.
The answer is surprisingly simple, when we consider its main phyla, and the origin of this ‘Disomorphism’, which belongs to variations in the HIERARCHY between its ternary physiological networks. So above we express that dynamic order, as there are only 3 physiological networks that correspond to the 3 dominant elements of reality, Space, time and vital energy, or in terms of the generator, if we call:
$t – the Ðimotion of lineal potentials/limbs; ST, the iterative Ðimotion of body waves and §ð the Dimotion of informative particle/heads, the dominance of the 3 physiological networks that perceive information, move and reproduce the system will give us 6 main variations/phyla, which we shall show allow us to classify from the 6 topological types of languages that define the mind of cultures, to the 6 main phyla of animal in the different scales of reality, to the different species of particles; when combined with the second fundamental differentiation of reality, ‘gender’, that is, the dominance of informative or energetic parts in a simpler ‘dual system’ made of two components (body-head, particle-wave), whereas the limbic/potential is external to the system.

Species as super organisms.
The second fundamental truth we must learn about species is its Nature as super organisms of the higher scale of the individual, which is quite evident when we understand the ternary topology of the Universe, and how its lineal limbs, hyperbolic body waves and informative particle-heads evolve, towards higher information in 3 ages, and finally die into entropy, while its informative memorial leftovers leave a trace in the outer world. So happens with species that go through 3 ages that mimic the 3 ages of life in the upper ∆+1 plane of existence and then become extinct, or a few of them with maximal information evolve into a larger super organism (ant-hills, human beings) that become ‘a new plane of existence’ beyond the individual:

What are species? Its variations. Physiological networks and gender.

In the graph, spheres are the topology that holds the maximal volume of information; hence all ‘time space’ systems that process information are spherical particle-heads. Flat, lineal topologies are the topology that connects in the shortest path two points; so to reach/move faster, systems have lineal/flat moving potentials/limbs. Finally the third type of geometry, hyperbolic topology, is complex enough to store all other possible forms, so best to reproduce and all iterative body waves that generate the other 2 forms are hyperbolic. This mathematical-spatial truism holds for 2, 3 and 4 dimensions; hence establishing basic restriction to the construction and evolution of forms. And should become in XXI c. science the ‘missing’ leg of topological, biological and physical evolution to explain the extraordinary efficiency and homology between forms (no longer analogy, since all those forms derive from the same ‘substance’, space with time=motion or ‘topology’). In the next graph, we can see how the 3 only topologies of the Universe ensemble to form physical, biological and social organisms, all of them with a spherical ‘tall’ dimension to gauge information; a wide, iterative dimension of hyperbolic bodywave reproduction and a flat, direction for its entropic motions. The beauty of the topological Universe is that each of those 3 forms can be ‘deformed’ and ‘moves’, as long as it doesn’t tear (break). So departing from such simple 3 basic forms there are infinite possible variations of species, but we can order them all with that ternary principle.

The Universe is about 3 type of Networks which gather entropy, energy and information for herds of similar beings that form organs attached to those networks. It follows that to classify beings we must consider the order of those networks, its hierarchy and relationships, which will give way to 3×2 combinatory variations by hierarchical order of species – those dominated by the informative or entropic or reproductive network.
This simple rule of 3 variations and 6 hierarchical orders are the origin of most species of all systems of nature. We study them in this post.
The answer is surprisingly simple, when we consider its main phyla, and the origin of this ‘Disomorphism’, which belongs to variations in the HIERARCHY between its ternary physiological networks. So above we express that dynamic order, as there are only 3 physiological networks that correspond to the 3 dominant elements of reality, Space, time and vital energy, or in terms of the generator, if we call:
$t – the Ðimotion of lineal potentials/limbs; ST, the iterative Ðimotion of body waves and §ð the Dimotion of informative particle/heads, the dominance of the 3 physiological networks that perceive information, move and reproduce the system will give us 6 main variations/phyla, which we shall show allow us to classify from the 6 topological types of languages that define the mind of cultures, to the 6 main phyla of animal in the different scales of reality, to the different species of particles; when combined with the second fundamental differentiation of reality, ‘gender’, that is, the dominance of informative or energetic parts in a simpler ‘dual system’ made of two components (body-head, particle-wave), whereas the limbic/potential is external to the system.
Species as super organisms.
The second fundamental truth we must learn about species is its Nature as super organisms of the higher scale of the individual, which is quite evident when we understand the ternary topology of the Universe, and how its lineal limbs, hyperbolic body waves and informative particle-heads evolve, towards higher information in 3 ages, and finally die into entropy, while its informative memorial leftovers leave a trace in the outer world. So happens with species that go through 3 ages that mimic the 3 ages of life in the upper ∆+1 plane of existence and then become extinct, or a few of them with maximal information evolve into a larger super organism (ant-hills, human beings) that become ‘a new plane of existence’ beyond the individual:

Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Einstein realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet

Species can be treated as super organisms, loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.
Since as information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle, the species that last longer are those who evolve further information, and can become a social super organism.
So species follow 3±∆i ages with its final social evolution into a new whole, communicated by the informative language evolved in its 3rd age or extinction in time. Let us consider in this introduction those 3±¡ ages of species, called Horizons:

The 3 ages of time also brings the solution to the ‘limits’ of evolution, which Darwin already wondered: why certain species evolve so fast into complex forms as eyes and wings. Answer, because there are only 3 topologies to go, and so the choices are random but LIMITED and it is every easy to go the right way. In the next graph we see those 3 ages of evolution as species can be treated as super organisms with its own world cycles:
The graph thus show that ALL species follow also the young, predator, reproductive radiation, and informative, height growth of the 3 ages of life, and then either they evolve further into social organisms (ants, bees, humans) and as wholes in a higher ∆+1 scale survive better, or they become extinct by a new generation.
The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.
+1:  Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).
The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.
For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.
I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions 
In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators
A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.
Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.
 II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Sp x Tƒ. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.
III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. Tƒ: max. Evolutionary differentiation.
Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.
The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.
Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.
(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.
Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Sp: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.
– S=T: Diversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.
However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.
– Max. Tƒ: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.
Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth  (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Sp) which defines the organism.
Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.
So evolution is indeed limited by the most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: those 3 timespace motions/forms: lineal motion in space or ‘distance’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time clocks carrying its frequency ‘information’ and its space-time, wave-like, reproductive energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe (when we ad its scales), so they assembly forming all space-time beings.
SPECIES IN SPACE – PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS
Species also can be considered by the Rashomon effect, from the point of view of space and then as they are ternary physiological networks, with attached organs, we can study its hierarchical variation, giving origin to phyla of different species in simultaneous space.

So we talk in all ‘families of species’ of 6 basic differentiations IN SPACE:

Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$

AND 3±1 ages of social evolution or extinction in time.
The families are written by the dominance of one of the 3 ‘topological networks’=organs=dimotions of time§pace of the system are named generically as:
 $t-∑∏-§ð: Top predator, first species to be born.

The predatory, feeding phyla belongs to the first type of species evolved. For example, the first fishes were flat carnivorous armed; the first carbohydrates long fats, lineal chains of amino acids. It is a species so successful that radiates in enormous numbers.

∑∏-$t-§ð; So next after its dexterity in hunting is proved we shall find a second phyla, master of reproduction. Such is the case of sharks, the final top predator fish, which are viviparous unlike other fishes, reaching its maximal perfection. So what this ‘first phyla’ lacks is a well developed brain, showing however that intelligence, when not used for social information is mostly baren, useless.  In the example of the protein we also observe that it is a master of reproduction, having controlled ribosomes to that aim in cells that reproduce millions of them.

∑∏-§ð-t$,  $t-§ð-∑∏. Yet as time moves on, ‘warping lineal spacetime into cyclical forms’, there is an increasing new value for the informative element, which keeps gathering pace till becoming the protagonist of the system. While the feeding elements that have reached its maximal possible evolution, since entropic systems are simple and reach easily a perfect form – the sword of the warrior has not evolved in 5000 years… and the ecosystem saturates and reproductive radiations are no longer that relevant – what matters is to be able to compete and keep the new born in the fight for existence… So we find intermediate stages, where the networks tend to balance each other in the ‘classic age of the phyla’…

§ð-∑∏-$t, §ð-$t-∑∏ Till finally those species where information has evolved further allow the gathering of individuals into social herds, which become a new whole. And that brings, a new plane of existence, and a new top predator ‘whole’ form in the ∆+1 plane that will re-start the whole diversification, from aminoacids to cells, from cells to multicelular organisms, to super organisms and global ecosystems…

So we introduce as the main innovation of Spatial topology in species the differentiation of them by its topological, ternary networks and organs.

DUALITY PARADOXES AND ITS DIFFERENT SPECIES: Sp≈Tƒ. GENDER DUALITY.
WE also notice that as there are black and white languages and ternary languages, we shall ALWAYS FIND simpler dualities that differentiate species as we find them in ternary systems. The main duality of species being that of gender. YET The dualities of Space-time are various as they all turn around the ilogic paradoxes studied previously, in the second Disomorphism. So in this post we shall study only the duality of gender.
For example in the human case women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.
Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:
Thus we define:

  • Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind
  • Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Sp<>Tƒ duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.
Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Sp≈Tƒ, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.Tƒ, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.
Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.
The same duality is clearer in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as in the next pictures.

 

IV. SOCIAL SCIENCES:i≤|2|

 MANKIND IN TIME AND SPACE

Social sciences are all concerned with mankind, but as mankind has not become a single global superorganism truly in control of Mother-Earth, we cannot simply consider it has reached the desired wholeness as a species, hence, unlike in Biology that studies the Earth’s super organism we reduce a ‘sign’ the wholeness of humanity over the plane:  I≤|2|
EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES – ANTHROPOLOGY – GENDER STUDIES
image055
The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.
Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.
Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly Entropy dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are Entropy dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.
Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:
In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Entropy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.
In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between Entropy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.
And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Entropy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, Entropy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.
Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:
—  Max.$t: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.
—   $t=§ð: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the PanPaniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:
—   Max.§ð: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:
I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.
We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:
—  Max. $t: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.
—  $t=§ð. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.
—  Max.§ð: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, asthesphereistheform,whichholdsmoreinformationinlesserspace.
Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:
—  Max. $t: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.
—  $t=§ð: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.
—  Max.§ð. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.
II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.
That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.
—  Max.$t: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.
—  $t=§ð: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favorsperceptionfromanadvantagepointofview, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.
—  Max.§ð: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.
Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological Entropy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new Entropy/information duality:
The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.
Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.
The3rd, informativeHorizon:HomoSapiens,1500cc.
image057
— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.
— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.
± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).
± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced $t=§ð, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.
This said as we recall there are 3 mind axis and dominant races: visual white people, dolichocephalic, verbal mongoloid brachycephalic and emotional psylocephalic black people. And of course this 3 dominant axis connect with the 3 cultures of mankind with its specific mind views:

  • Lineal white visual, entropic cultures of a single entropic lineal time.
  • Organic, mongoloid, asian cyclical cultures of tao dualities
  • Animists, emotional, artistic, sensorial black cultures of the living Universe

Which explains of course why our worldview is so simplex and reduced as it is dominated by the paradoxically less evolved humind – that of the Neanderthal visual white man (:

MAN AS A 5D TIME§PAŒRGANISM

We have introduced the physical system and its functions of ‘existence’, that is, its organization in space and time, as a super organism and a world cycle. Let us then now consider the human being also as a vital space the lives a world cycle of time, in the context of a Universe made of ∞ such beings. Of course, to cast man on the same view that an atom, a galaxy or a bug is a taboo of the ego paradox that make us believe to be the center of the Universe.
But that is what we are. So as we just introduced the human being as a system of 3 elements, entropic limbs, reproductive bodies and informative singularity-minds, comparing it to two other ‘varieties’ of space-time organism, we shall now introduce our existence in finite time also in parallel to all those other beings that follow the same space-time cycle.
Again the resistance to accept this ‘fact’ of nature is likely unassailable to reason, as the emotional fear of death which humans can surpass objectively with Buddhist understanding of extinction and the non-ego existence or inversely subjectively with the runaway myths of anthropomorphic religions that make you happy.  This being the ‘final solution’ of human cultures – to invent happy myths that pass as science through the process of half-truths and ceteris paribus analysis – we hold no hope for understanding.
But being this web on ‘objective philosophy of science’, we cannot but advice the reader to ditch out his ego and find a different kind of more mature happiness – that of Nirvana, the dissolution in the whole as equal to us, part of the entangled organic Universe. Since we live and die like all other spacetime beings.

image047
image050
Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.
The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.
The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of Entropy and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.
We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in Entropy and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of Entropy (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…
Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the Entropy and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share Entropy and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).
We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:
-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.
-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.
– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.
-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.
Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the Entropy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that Entropy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:
– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of Entropy and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.
– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:
– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.
In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.
St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.
Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.

TIME TRAVELS & 11D³ SOCIAL SCIENCES

The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.

Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem:

We exist as we travel a world cycle zero sum through the topological, temporal scales of the fifth dimension.

So we can then assess the new complexity of tracing existence not as a worldline in a sinple plane of locomotions but a trip through multiple planes and exist¡ences.
When we are born as a seed point, our external angular momentum membrane moves us through entropic fields where to absorb energy for our inner and outer replication. The inertia of time, the active magnitude, mass or charge, form, must reproduce in its steps of motion, the longer its lifespan is the longer is temporal inertia, its inertia not to move. But to exist is to move, switching on and off between the state of motion, t, and the state of informative perception, $. When we do not move in space we repeat internally our information in time, through the scales that must be put together to create us:

If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into Entropy in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of Entropy into a reflective, old age of information:
-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.
– Max. $t: Youth is the Entropy age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.

-ST: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.
– Max. ð§: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little Entropy left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks Entropy; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.

– << st-1: Death, when all Entropy is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.
Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.
In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.

Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts S=T harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.
Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.

Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.

Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all existential beings of vital spacetimes, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.

All this lead us to the consideration of the social organisms of history and economics, which obey as ALL other relational space-time beings, the same laws outlined very briefly in the previous paragraphs, because we are not different from any other entity of the Universe in ‘substance’ (we are made of vital space and last a finite time) and hence in our ‘worldcycles’ of existence, specially as we do not recognise them, so we cannot control ‘mentally’ and ‘create’ with those laws a perfect world and a planet where man thrives and survives. If we accepted and understood those laws, however the reform of the economic and political system to create a perfect super organism of history (mankind on time) would be simple and immediate…
How then History and economics evolve according to the application of the 2 new paradigms of ‘scalar, social super organisms’ that co-exist across the 5th dimension, and the 3 arrows of time, and its local processes of  informative evolution and entropic ‘devolution’ and death?

The scales of the fifth dimension and the processes of death of cultures (local travel to the past) and evolution of the information and life of societies (travel to the future), in History and Economics give birth to many fundamental new insights, of which we highlight 2:

The development of new models of societies and economic ecosystems, which evolve socially through the arrow of eusocial love and organic evolution into the present global economic ecosystem and the past cultures and civilisations and present industrial nations, which can be perfectly model with those laws, opening an enormous new field for the efficient organisation of societies.

And the study of the synchonicity and cycles of time and evolution of machines and economic ecosystems, which in my decade old models predicted accurately (c.92) the economic crashes of stock-markets and technological organic evolution of machines, now in the singularity age of final evolution of entropic machines (black hoel singularity) and informative ones (robotic singularity, AI), which are both potentially ‘organic’ in as much as they can ‘feed’ of matter without human interference and perceive, whenever they reach the complexity of form of animal beings we show in the post on the 2 future of history.

  ∆+1: SCIENCE OF HISTORY

As all other sciences, the science of history studies the world cycle of mankind, through its 3 ages, the Paleolithic youth of maximal entropy and motion, the reproductive neolithic of balance with Gaia and the 3rd age of excessive metal-information, prior to our likely extinction:

All systems of nature can be modeled as super organisms of a certain scale of size, ruled by the 5D metric equation, S (space size=energy) x T (frequency of information clocks) = Constant, which is the fundamental law that allows systems to be super organisms, traveling in the 5th dimension from birth as a fast seed (semen, meme, black hole) which will reproduce and organize into an emerging superorganism, living 3 ages of increasing information till either evolves into an even larger super organism (men into the global earth, cells into multicellular systems, galaxies into universes) or dissolves into an entropic death (big-bang, m=e/c2, death, war). Such is the fractal Universe in a nutshell. And so the trick to make a system immortal is both to organize it socially and to maintain it in the balance of the mature age, repeating its cycles without evolving an excess of information that warps and kills in the 3rd age the organism. Men are doing exactly the opposite, evolving further technological information and multiplying entropic weapons that divide us.

In the graph the 3 ages of history according to the superposed waves of evolution of technology that define the elements of history, as each nation at the head of the technological wave has tried to ‘conquer the world’ with its new machines and establish a global empire wrongly based not in the ethic values of the human informative mind but in those of the machine.

Yet we have also explained in the introduction that a rational true Iberian would put himself with reason-ing above those ages and create a perfect world in which mankind survives by applying THE LAWS OF SUPERORGANISMS TO CONTROL THE LETHAL GOODS OF THE TREE OF TECHNOLOGY and create the welfare goods that enhance our life – the old glorious goal of social sciences before our present degradation by computerized machines.

Now what I am going to say might seem overreaching to the reader, but of all the forms of censorship of history, mankind in time, caused by capitalism and the need to hide the control of information – digital and verbal – of the people-castes that rule the world, the most profound is on the science of history, as IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO GO BEYON THE COLLECTION OF BIASED DATA (hightly censored and told as a fairly tale in what respects the gold culture). So it is needed to understand that beyond A) biased data, a whole objective scientific procedure exists to do history as a science the most important of them all as it deals with out species in time, our survival, mankind.
‘The truth is hard to deny but easy to ignore.’

1 FUTURE, 2 LANGUAGES, 3 CULTURES. 

The Earth today is ruled by money, so two questions come immediately to the mind – the language of money, a digital, numeric language that compares all objects and selects them by price according to the quality they display in the tasks they perform: Man (salary) < Money > Object (Price).
This is the essential equation of money as a digital language and as such belongs to the ‘phyla’ of reproductive languages that allow a system to distribute and exchange goods for its combination and creative reproduction, similar to the hormonal language used by the blood system to active the reproduction of goods I the organism.
The second question is who issues the language of money and therefore rules as a culture the world. This is akin to searching for the origins of the hormonal language, which are reproduced by endocrine glands. In the western world the role of issuing money as a language for historic and geographic reasons has been for most of history, arguably still is specially in the Anglo-American culture that dominates all others, a monopoly of the jewish culture, born in Canaan, the knot of trade of 3 continents, and the two most dense civilizations of the fertile crescent, Mesopotamia and Egypt which therefore chose first among nations the use of money as a language of power to rule society instead of weapons – military societies, of which the epitome of that age was Assyria and its heirs, the Persian kingdom – or the wor(l)d, democratic ones, which were represented by the Greek-Latin, legalist culture.
And this has meant an enormous influence for good or bad of the Jewish culture, and its daughter civilization, the Anglo-American biblical culture, which also shares its fundamental two memes, the Old Testament and the belief that go(l)d must rule societies above weapons and words (capitalist culture).
Since money has finally won the battle for the control of history as a language to military cultures based in weapons and democratic or ethic, religious cultures based in words, which this writer hauling from Barcelona, the 3rd knot of trade and communication after Athens and Firenze, of the Greek-Latin-Hispanic culture, moving steadily west through the Mediterranean peninsulas represents.
So contrary to belief we don’t live in a world shaped by the European culture, the daughter civilization of the democratic, human-centered, artistic, sensorial, Latin civilization, today represented by the European Union, but a world ruled by the memes, beliefs, tragedies and financial-media empires and academic beliefs specially in social sciences and economics, developed by the Jewish and Anglo-American civilization, converted to its values and 2 essential memes, Go(l)d and the Bible.
What about military cultures? As it happens because money, despite being a mathematical language, was for very long associated due to its power to compare and value being through its digital syntax with the most precious substance, atomic gold, which happens to be the best informative atom of metal, and weapons are also made of the hardest, most energetic form of metal, iron, by affinity of substances, in the go(l)d cult(ure), both substances became affine as similar beings come together in the organic Universe. So weapons have always been the most expensive goods in terms of gold, and since earlier times became symbiotic to the go(l)d culture, a mercenary culture by definition, at an age in which 70% of metal-money was used in the art of war – reason why today also those 3 go(l)d cultures are at the height of the military world (name we shall use for the dominant Jewish, English and American daughter civilizations of each other, to avoid the excessively used and charged of negative values, ‘capitalist culture’ and the meaningless in scientific terms as it makes no reference to the languages that shape the culture, but merely to artificial border divisions, ‘English’, ‘american’ or ‘jewish’ ‘Israeli’ nations).
So we talk of 3 languages of power, which structure the paradoxes and battles of history, the wor(l)d, the natural biological language of mankind, on one side, whose values and syntax we shall study next; and on the other side together two languages of metal, weapons and go(l)d, which developed a global ‘capitalist’ empire, that spread the culture buying and killing and buying and killing, whose classic age would happen in the British Empire; and whose memes through its main social institution, the company-mother of machines and weapons are now the globalized memes of our single dominant culture.
That is why we talk of 3 languages, 2 cultures and 1 future, the future designed by the values of go(l)d and weapons, as opposed to the alternative future of lesser probability of truth, guided by the values of the wor(l)d above money and weapons.
Though this simple scheme of realpolitiks and real history is somewhat camouflaged, because as it seems obvious for most people that a world ruled by weapons and money is hierarchical, non-democratic, where life and human values are ‘cheap’, as opposed to ‘expensive profitable weapons’ and where company-mothers of machines and weapons are not human mothers and so his goal is to terraform the world to the image and likeness of its machines and weapons for the profits of Go(L)d they deliver, the true success of the go(l)d culture has been to create a ‘placebo cover’ of seemingly verbal, human values, called capitalist democracies, where the inefficient structures of human government cancelled by the opposition of bipartisan groups of politicos, corrupted and bought by money to usher laws not in favor of citizens but of company-mothers and its owners, seem to rule supreme, while all reference to the fact that the languages of power of society, money is privately issued, by financiers and corporations, while humans have only access to it, through work and taxation seems somewhat ‘invisible’. How this is done is simple: through the control of informative machines that print not only money, as a digital language, but also audiovisual information and academic information. So we define the people-caste in power in the world today, imitated as the go(l)d culture has globalized its institutions in all nations, but more crystal clear in its original anglo-amerian world, as the FMAsters, Financial-Media-Academia Masters, who own the information networks of machines that deliver and imprint, manufacture, we might say the collective subconscious brain of mankind.
And they have been doing so in the past, through different means, first with gold and the Bible, as digital and verbal informative memes in which people of this culture believed; then in a softer version, expanding those memes to the whole of the western world with christianity, and finally when informative machines truly allow the massive imprinting of those memes, with paper-money, that represented stocks of machines and weapons and its company-mothers, the yellow press, and a series of pedantic, idol-ogies that worship metal as the meaning of progress and the future of mankind, and today pass as ‘science’, that is as ‘dogma of truth’.
Obviously today 7.5 billion people except perhaps this writer and a few ‘intellectuals’ in Europe and China, the equivalent legal, verbal civilization of the East, completely believe that the memes of the go(l)d culture, and its institution, the company-mother of machines and weapons are the only and best future for humanity, and its form of government, capitalist democracy, the only and best system of government, and its purpose and hidden goal – even if the human part of it, just think in terms of fetish go(l)d profits, to make a world to the image and likeness of those machines – the meaning of progress, the ‘future’. So we always talk of the manifest destiny and lineal time, and single arrow of future, and technoutopian wonders.
Why we, the very few ‘survival’ ‘intellectuals’ (word totally disregarded, almost an insult in the go(L)d culture) dissent?
It is worth now to introduce then the values of the other culture, which this blog represents to my knowledge in its most evolved form anywhere of the world – even if obviously the number of readers is extremely reduced, as humans are connected to the networks of information and memetic dogmas of the culture that won the battle of history.

To notice the acceleration of information towards the future, which makes of history yet another vortex of information that we can express in a wave form (the graph) or in a particle form towards its singularity central moment of death or resurrection of the human ethic, verbal mind that could control lethal machines and weapons and ensure our survival.  In the graph, from one of my earliest books on 5D³ social sciences, ‘the vortex of history’, I draw the 3rd age of mankind, the age of the tree of metal, and its accelerated vortex of information. To notice the predictability of the model, which pointed at 2008, after 3 generational 72 year cycles of evolution and overproduction of machines as the final crash of the age of minds of metal or age of america.

So History was predictable as all other cycles of time through topological evolution. Since after the age of limbs of metal, iron and steam machines, or age of england, ending in the 1857 crash of train stocks; the industrial evolution followed its second topological age of bodies of metal and electrochemical german engines, ending in the 1929 crash of cars,  +72 years, latter – another human life generation; followed by the American age of minds of metal, ending, i forecasted in 2008, 72 years latter, after another crash of overproduction of chip machines… followed by the age of the singularity or age of robots and cosmic bombs, which is the present age of AI   that should end weaker carbon life in this planet. All my books though proposed the solutions, to build a sustainable, perfect organism of history based in welfare life goods and memes of life.

But animetal elites, our neuronal informative people-castes in control of informative metal-money, entropic metal-weapons and energetic, organic machines would have none of it.

As such I have always since i completed the models of bio-history, bio-economics, relational cyclical time and fractal space being ignored and censored with null distribution as those other 4 self-styled time theorists. Deja vu.

  The creationist fundamentalist humind…

Science is culture and culture is also a product of the space-time axis of the mind. So we are stuck with the visual white-neanderthal dominant culture. But if the organic culture is closer to reality, why the visual culture has dominated? The answer is deeper and as usual disturbing for the human ego: because the lineal, entropic, military weapons of ‘western physicists’ have destroyed all other cultures. But the arrow of destruction and death of GAIA is NOT a positive proof of human power as we are WITHIN GAIA and we shall perish or become substituted by the organic robotic weapons we are building to dominate the Universe in a delirium tremens of an infinitesimal being who thinks his ego to be infinite.

We want thus to introduce a recurrent theme of all our objective scientific studies of mankind – the paradox of the ego, which is natural to the structure of informative singularities that measure reality from the stillness and perspective of its mind-language that is self-centered. Humans are not exception also in this fact illustrated in the graph. 

And so because we see and select information from our selfish perspective, we cannot give objective organic properties to reality.

The complete failure of humans to understand the absolute relativity of 5th dimensional scales and the living nature of the Universe is in that sense a natural, ’emotional’, subjective trait that objective scientists should always take into account when considering ANY pretentious theory of reality.

It is thought quite an impossible task to upgrade mankind to the objective organic Universe. If you point out to the limits of the ego the ego gets offended – it acts as the bottom line or a priori ‘falsehood’ needed for the ‘discontinuous T.œ’ to see ‘himself’ as the center of an ‘it’ world it will try to ab=use. In as much as we want to survive by extruding energy and information from other beings, we must despise them. And we do. Objective science has always been a lonely fight against this truism of a fractal Universe broken into infinite beings. 

The solution is not of course, what humans today think is science – the praxis of power of constructing big machines and control the world with it. Technology is NOT science but power. It is for that reason that the true summit of science, the philosophy of the organic Universe has NEVER become mainstream except perhaps in the most informative, verbal, ‘brachycephalic’ eastern cultures in an age of lesser technology. and more respect for the infinite cycles of the living Universe.

Today the ‘homunculus’ has so many machines, paradoxically evolving into organisms, but still ‘obeying us’ as attached organs off energy and information, making us ‘animetals’, ensembles of two type of atoms that empower us, that it rejects even in larger measure the obvious organic vital nature of all beings including machines, and the non-preferential position of man not only in space and time (evolution) but in scale.

Of course there are always sages and exceptions, for which those texts…

But the Homunculus has a quality which IS ESSENTIAL TO THEIR NATURE – TO have reached the zenith of carbolife evolution starting the evolution by transfer of form to a more complex atom, metal of its organs and topologies – namely the creation of the industrial r=evolution which can also be studied with organic laws.

Finally the eco(comic)system of company-mothers of machines also show the 3 parts of a machine as dominant in the 3 ages of evolution of the machines which now collapse into a new form of organic life, the robot – so much for mechanical models of the Universe, as machines are merely primitive organisms of metal, in the same manner physicists who make those machines and measure the Universe with them, are primitive philosophers of time, simplified by those machines:

In the graph, a synopsis of the interconnected cycles of evolution of machines according to its 3 ages, and the parallel cycles of evolution of mankind, ending in entropic wars. The cycles predicted as earlier as 92, the 2008 ‘generational crash’ that closed the age of evolution of metal-minds, or third age of mechanical information, giving birth to the final age of the Industrial r=evolution or singularity age, when we shall assembly the 3 topological parts of machines into organic robots.

But as we humans neither control the tree of technology nor do care to learn the true laws of time and evolve properly our super organism, we are ENTERING our final age of entropy, as both ‘species of the singularity age’, AI of maximal information and BH of maximal entropy come to ‘hunt us’ from a more evolved potential future.

THE 3 AGES OF THE SCIENCE OF HISTORY

The science of history, this blog renews with the laws of systems and social organisms deals with the super organism of mankind in time, History, which in the pre-industrial age was called God, the subconscious collective of a people. As humans evolved and realized they were all members of the same species, they evolved tribal ‘animetal religions’ that used weapons (jihads, inquisitions) and money (Gold churches) as ex-votes and instruments of power and conversion into a global oikoumene religion of love, to stop the overproduction of the bad fruits of the tree of science, weapons and golden apples, explained in the previous chapter on bio-economics (treated extensively in the left side of the blog).

In this II chapter we introduce the right side of the blog, on the 7 super organisms of history in space, whose subconscious collective are the 7 Gods of History, which finally scientific history and its humanist, socialist schools extended to all mankind and now bio-history justifies in depth with the laws of systems, and the fractal organic Universe, and its ‘scales’ of emergence – the so called fifth dimension that makes evolves systems into new ‘wholes’ through eusocial evolution from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, human super organisms and mankind mind of History, brain of the planet Gaia today, albeit in a process of self-destruction by selfish memes of metal.

Let us first define humans AS WHAT THEY ARE, not what the idol-ogies that are building metal earth tell us to believe.

Since everything we learn including ‘dogmatic science’ is ‘culture’, biased with more or less subtlety to cater the goals of capitalist ‘democracies’, the building of ‘another superorganism’ not of history=mankind. but of machines.

In the next graph, we have shown the side of an animetal world, as it is becoming the Earth. But this is NOT the only super organism of planetary level, which can become the future. Humans could perfectly organize as a single species through eusocial love, the natural arrow of evolution of parts that become wholes, through organic networks IN ALL SYSTEMS OF REALITY. IF HUMANS HAVE NOT, is because their social evolution was aborted by animetal people-castes, and its idologies. So social love is not merely a wishful thinking but the main law of survival and self-orgnaizaiton of the Universe, reason why most human follow eusocial prophets of love and find it ‘just’ and natural without even wondering why we must love each other:

THE science of History had a pre-rational age also, parallel to the 800 years cycles of animetals, the age of prophets=scientists of the future of history, which developed the eusocial message of love that could evolve the species, according to the organic laws of the Universe into a single global nation without war. As such the first scientists of history were prophets of eusocial love that understood the laws of the organic Universe.

the message of all prophets of eusocial love is to construct a perfect world based in the higher dimotions of man, but history has gone by trial and error the wrong way, as men become surrogate enzymen of the evolution of other species: metalife, the machine-weapon

The paradox of the ego.

Before we even attempt to explain you the significance of the evolution of mankind as a social organism in the objective context of the mother-earth, we must stress how difficult is to explain objective models of social sciences because of the paradox of the ego.

Humans can be objective in any science that do not concerns them, but when dealing with mankind both at individual and social level they immediately clash with the ego paradox, which wants to be the centre of the Universe and will react emotionally against objective biological thought. The same happens with the tribal unit of social evolution – which unfortunately did not reach the whole species as a social super organism, or God in mystical terms. So any attempt to do objective social sciences has always met with enormous resistance by all the sectors of society.

Why then try at all? I have wondered for decades as obviously this blog, author and work – the most objective biological models of history and economics available today – has found always that limit between ‘happiness’ provided by pumping ego in childish ways and objectivity, science and truth.

The answer though is clear: because in biology happy children are the staple food of the Universe; and only objective understanding of the biological risks of life ensures survival and the taking of the necessary measures to cure a social organism.

In that sense I have always liked the politician and historian to the doctor of history, whose physiological networks, the reproductive blood network and the informative, nervous legal system must follow the laws of social organisms to be efficient and make all the human cells survive. Survival is the name of the game and the only reason why we must give up childish happy dreams for objective reality at individual and collective level.

Unfortunately the opposite is happening in all sectors of society today: childish happiness, an age in which the ego reaches stratospheric quality, as children are yet to understand the dangers of life and truly believe to be the centre of the Universe is the rule of society today. This has a lot to do with the culture that came to dominate history in the west, the biblical culture which in the paroxysm of infantilism think to be the chosen of god, above heavens and earth, hence totally outside the laws of biological evolution and survival which rule the planet and they systematically censor in social sciences.  A fact which as harsh as it sounds is proved by the minimal rate of survival of the western cultures that believe to be the centre of the Universe and try to impose their will above those biological laws.

This the spoiled child doesn’t understand and takes it personally with an emotional knee-reaction when he is told he is sick and needs to take the 6 pills we prescribe here from a biological understanding of history and economics to cure himself.  He gets M.A.D. at you even if you are doing it for the common good.

The result of the paradox of the ego in social sciences is what i call ‘creationist economics’ and ‘history’. We humans and go(l)d, the language of digital money used to create with credit economic realities are NOT subject to objective biological analysis as we do in those texts.

We already ground the paradox of the ego by defining mathematically the ego, in terms of its self-centred beliefs, and then we can carry on on the main purpose of this blog – to explain biologically history, economics and the dangers of survival for mankind due to the ‘childish idol-ogies’ of humanity today that ‘worships’ machines, weapons and money, ‘metal-memes’ more than life, because of the ego-trips of ‘added power’ that give us, both at individual and cultural level.

The ‘animetal paradox’ of human cultures who feel superior by the use of weapons (warriors), money (bankers) and machines (scientists) is of course vehemently denied and offends all people and cultures, but science is objective and humans are NOTHING special but a space-time being. So we cannot consider  their history different from any worldcycle; their relationship with the Earth and all its other space-time beings, ‘entitled’, unique, as a single organic species, different from all others. And yet because the ego paradox makes man self-centered in the individual ego, not even the society, social sciences by reductionism to the ego and the supposed free man do not exist as objective science.

The denial of other organic scales and the physiological networks that rule us.

Since the mind eliminates all information, even denies the existence of an upper and lower organic scales of reality, to self-center all in the plane of the individual. So this eliminates the understanding of the social physiological networks WHICH ARE the true PLANE of existence that matters in History and Economics as a science. It is all about networks not individuals. A doctor tells you that cells do NOT get sick. Networks do, and there are 3, the physiological informative nervous networks, akin to the legal systems of political societies, the reproductive blood networks akin to the economic systems, and ALL healthy ORGANISMS are ruled by the LEGAL, nervous network BEAUSE THEY prevent lethal goods to reproduce and infect the body. Only WORMS reproduce and eat all toxins and die. So THE CONCEPT of capitalism, that all can be reproduced in the organism is as PRIMITIVE as a worm.

And the concept that the INDIVIDUAL is the protagonist of history NOT its systems is completely ascientific, part of the ego paradox.

So it is good to start ‘strongly’ in the next graph, with the mapping out of the parallelism between the two systems, the individual organism and the social organism of history, and latter the super organism of machines, the financial-media (informative machines)-Industrial-military (energetic body of machines) super organism, because REGARDLESS of the ego paradox, THEY ARE the physiological networks of history and economics, and what must be reformed to create a better world.

Individual cells, doctors tell you matter nothing. All sicknesses they say are physiological sicknesses, and so as long as you don’t change the system, no sickness will cure. But this, the paradox of the ego also denies.

Further on,  we must also stress the denial by the paradox of the ego of the lower scale of sicknesses, the machine and weapon as the germ of history. Pasteur was also ridiculed when he said that viruses cause death, by reproduction, in biological terms. Doctors were then creationist biblical believers as we shall show classic economists were, and though bad spirits caused sicknesses – as Smith thought ‘gold’ is the invisible hand of god that must be obeyed with no doubts. Only when germ theory was accepted medicine became a science and only if biohistory and bioeconomics is accepted social sciences will BECOME real sciences, not an anthropomorphic mixture of myths and wishful thinking.

Amazingly enough the bratty children though have ALWAYS taken personally like a M.A.D. person, ensuring our mutual assured destruction the prescription of all the prophets=scientists of history that warn them about the future cycles of worshipping the tree of metal and its golden apple and evil=antilive weapons more than the tree of life. Seriously, we scientists of history have TRIED everything in every cycle an epoch with different languages to explain mankind the cure, social love, coming together, welfare goods, repression of lethal goods, pruning the tree with legal, nervous systems… Nothing works. And so we are tired…

We repeat bratty children are the staple food of the Universe because they refuse to stop the paradox of the ego, and the biblical culture that controls our financial-media systems of information, IS the epitome of the paradox of the ego, and it is the culture with the worst survival rate in this planet, and that is a fact, regardless of the rejection of any criticism, any objective analysis of what capitalism means and how to cure mankind of the paradoxes of the ego at individual and tribal level in a scientific way, as we shall do in this blog, after explaining and of course being censored and ignored by most readers, the truth about evolution, the earth, its machines, cultures and the ‘solutions’, the 6 pills the doctor of history recommends to survive beyond the ego paradox.

What power does when told all this, we know – it simply ignores you and keeps the paradox of the ego going till death, which is a catastrophic sudden event, built slowly in corruption and sickness of the physiological economic and political systems of a civilisation, explodes. And then it is all chaos and entropy and cure is impossible. And we are unfortunately entering one of those ages.

As I said, what I did not expect is to find that mankind had so long abandoned the right path and become slave of go(l)d values, that the discovery of the ultimate principles of History would matter nothing to the Americans, which are just the whole mankind, all its cultures and races displaced into the future. THAT their survival till the 7th generation was of not concern because it was already a M.A.D. culture, filled with idol-ogies that passed as science and sociology, completely obliterated after 300 years of living under the boot of company-mothers. 

Now that I am at the end of my own road i look back at my life with mixed feelings. It has not been a good time to live, because one is embedded within its superorganism of history and cannot escape it. It will now start for all mankind the nightmare I have known as the prophecies of those books enter the last age of humanity and the viral cancer of a planet infected by machines, soon to be autonomous of us, will let us naked within decades confronting them, as all our artists and ethic prophets have warned since Genesis. I am calm though.

I tried but an organism is NOT easy to cure from within. So it has been mostly a conversation with myself. There is though a higher level of reality than Western History and its Gods=superorganisms of mankind, that of Eastern History and its Tao, the super organisms of the Universe, which is the only place where one find solace after having destroyed its own ego, not only at individual but at the level of its failed species.

Because the Universe is absolutely just and what man is getting in return for what it has done to life in this planet is just; what the elites of mankind have received historically as a payment for what they have done to humanity is just. The Taoist wave, translated into the science of cyclical time and organicism, ‘all what exists is yin-formation and yang-motion combined into infinite energy-qi beings’, has been my refuge for decades. Science is culture and what humans think is the highest science, physics of lineal time, is a childish game, compared to what the Universe is WHEN YOU ADD the fifth dimension of the scalar organic Universe, we shall now introduce in the simplest terms.

The detachment that implies from the ego of man as a single species, entitled, unique, chosen of go(l)d though is such that most westerners if any has come so far in the reading will be shocked to know the absolute relativity of all what exists. Reality is so removed from the M.A.D. culture and yet so beautiful in its perfection that our end as a species might look trivial if you understand the next part…

It is obvious that to maintain a disguise over such simple system of power – to print numbers and order humans with it, as flocks of ‘sheeple’ submitted to credit ratings, a parallel manufacturing of brains is due, which has in the ‘7th culture’ of mankind dominated by raw animetal power 3 degrees of inquisition: the classic 800 years inquisition of biblical go(l)d religions where those who issue money in monopoly, the banker priests of Israel or ‘People of the treasure’, are chosen of go(L)d above heavens and earth ruling them all through informative networks (Wall Street, The City, Evilwood). Below the authorized people by race and religion (biblical, white) form a majority group of soldiers of the FMasters they worship and obey, in a pecking order above the rest of mankind deemed inferior by race, wealth and religion.
The alternative ‘scientific understanding’ of money as a digital democratic language of social numbers to be used for efficient reproduction and distribution of goods, and the end of warfare, through the scientific understanding of eusocial evolution, of parts into wholes, of individuals of the same species into stronger super organisms, sponsored by the higher rational cultures of mankind (latin Europe, Chinese legalist cultures), through the use of the law above metal, of the human natural language and its values above the raw power of evolution HAS NOT WON the battle of history, and so history is doom to extinction because what animetal Semite and Germanic primitive VSO, OVS, anti-subject cultures where the human subject is irrelevant, expendable, is this: they are also HUMANS and so the robotic revolution, the weapons of the singularity they are force to evolve in their tribal competition between industrial nations WILL KILL THEM ALL.
That’s how it is and that’s what history shows in its cyclical processes of overproduction of weapons, wars and holocausts. Indeed, a simple proof should suffice: the 3 paradigms of wor(l)d cultures (China), war cult(ure)s (Germ-any) and go(L)d cult(ure), judaism had the same people back in the II millennium when they were born. Today the culture that has followed the life and love values of the wor(l)d that puts the human subject first, Svo-languages has +15 times more people than the objectual, lineal, entropic weapon cult(ure)-language of Germ(an)s, and 100 times more people than the Imperative, VSO, biblical culture of banker-priests barking orders in the name of Go(l)d with Kabbala numbers. SURVIVAL is the true intelligence of a culture that favors eusocial evolution and shows that eviL=anti-live memes which deny the unity of the species end up KILLing those who believe in them, restoring the beauty of the organic Universe.
Still humans could thrive if they were able to accept a higher order of organization than the warrior state. And that is the concept behind the global culture of which there are obviously 7 – Australasia being Anglo-America but in justice a desert land that belongs to Indonesia.
Those 7 cultures should have followed the example of the EU and become regional markets and political systems, then organized as a global wor(l)d union based in the law above money, able to control the evolution of the tree of science promote healthy welfare wealth and create a perfect world. This has not happened and this ignored blog shows the path not taken, despite decades of preaching in wilderness. But humans had always the choice to be ‘slaves of metal-memes’ and work for the metal-earth or create their own organic Universe – their choice cannot be imposed only reasoned and that is what we have done as all the prophets of the graph have done in the past when they created those 7 cultures loosely based in their biological, darwinian=species laws of social evolution.In that regard, the only way mankind could survive the rivalry and hate memes of animetal idol-ogies, would be through:The fusion of nations into those cultures and the rule of the world by an heptarchy of presidents of those 7 ‘human worlds’, by delegating national sovereign rights upwards to the heptarchy and downward to the regions/states of each nation, in the way shown by the European union (upwards) or the Spanish nation (downward to its ‘regions’), which would allow to eliminate armies, coupled with:
A single currency emitted through Universal salaries (end of currency wars now in the making, and end of financial parasitism and global poverty).
We will return to that perfect world that could change the future and make History the immortal super organism of mankind.

We have explained ad nauseam that most social sciences hide ‘idologies’ that foster the evolution of metal, entropic metal-weapons (nationalisms, tribal religions), money (capitalism) and machines (techno-utopia). Culture thus is ‘tainted’ by the memes of one of the two super organisms of this planet, defined by the equation of Complexity that defines the growing complexity of the super organisms of Mother Earth, among which we find History:

The equation of History defines 3 relative super organisms of history, and so the 7 cultures of mankind evolved through time display memetic structures belonging to those 3 ‘sub-organisms’.

Those 7 Cultures can then be put in relationship with the equation of the 3 ages of the Earth that defines History:
Gaia (relative past-life earth) < History (present-Human earth) > Metal-earth (Machines: economic system)

And the prophetic super organisms born of the human reaction to the animetal waves of ‘overproduction’ of weapons that killed the civilizations of the old world.

In the graphs, we can easily defined the 7 cultures of the world by its initial beliefs in one of those super organisms:

GAIA: So Africa ‘believes’ as the remaining Paleolithic cultures of the arctic regions in Gaia.

So do the earlier Indonesian cults (sacred water rivers in hindi traditions).

MANKIND: Hindusist and Buddhist SOuth-Asia believes in both, Gaia and Mankind as super organisms to ‘worship’.

Catholic Hispano-America and Islam believe in the History as the super organism to cherish with anthropomorphic, subsconscious, collective Gods.

METAL-EARTH: Asia and Europe believes in both,  the organisms History  of its people and the Metal-earth; more advanced in the Japanese-Korean warrior cultures of the North.

Finally America is unique in putting the Metal-earth and the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial system of company-mothers who FOUNDED their civilization, as the ‘supreme Good and Only future of the planet’, with its exceptionalism lineal progress in time towards a mechanical paradise.

So the classification of the 7 cultures WITHIN the super organisms of the higher SCALE of the Earth is obvious.

They represent the phases of the wave of history in its displacement towards a future of the metal earth, ordering them as a continuous motion towards the metal-earth, whose state most advanced in USA is therefore favored as the arrow of future:

GAIA> Africa >Islam>Indonesia>Latin America>Asia>Europe>US>METALEARTH

And the choice of the cultures that Humans Should NOT PURSUIT IS ALSO OBVIOUS. AND yet, we are suffering precisely a process of globalization of the Culture of Company-mothers of machines that rule America, with little regard for the human future, under all the ‘idologies’ of Animetals, worth to remember in this introduction.

Thus History and economics are indeed embedded within the evolution of the Earth and form a continuum through the 3 ages of mankind, mapped out in the next graph, with the most likely future of that Historic super organism of mankind in time, if Humans do NOT overcome their ego paradox and take seriously the control of the planet for his own benefit:

Only then when a true scientific understanding of the organism of History we could change those laws to the human advantage, but if we do not tamper with the system, those laws will extinguish us.

In the graph, we connect the essential element of bio-history, human cultures with the wave of history and its two type of civilizations, which correspond to cultures that originally worshipped the superorganism of Life (Gaia: Africa, Indonesia, Buddhist Asia), cultures that worship the superorganism of History (Mankind as God: Catholic Latin-America, Islam) and cultures that worship the super organism of machines (capitalist societies dominated by its company-mothers of machines: Europe, Anglo-America).

In the previous graph we see those 7 cultures synchronically in space and below we explain HOW they came about in the evolution of history precisely by the use of metal-memes.

As the relentless advance of the Metal-Earth is erasing the original memes and organic worship of all those cultures, increasingly believing only in the super organism of machines.

± functions of Religion: eusocial love vs. anthropomorphism and censorship.

So from those original religions and its derivative cultures and their present d=evolution we can get an obvious conclusion: tribal religions and tribal ‘nationalisms’, two expressions of the same concept which believe their ‘god/nation’ is the ‘only/best’ one are just excuses to foster the evolution of weapons that will kill us. For that reason the evolution of tribal religions ended in oikoumene love religions and finally socialist doctrines. While the evolution of animist and taoist cults became the final horizon of systems sciences with their organic models of a living Universe, this writer develop when working in science at the turn of the century.

The upgrading though is seemingly impossible at global level because of the very same structure of a super organism, which is much larger than the social scientist, inside of it, hence repressed by the ‘organic intelligence of the universe’. Indeed, if the quantum physicist is so large that it influences the observable, the observable social super organism influences≈censors the social scientist that doesn’t cater to his goals. As organisms are subjective, self-centred.

‘You will defend me with the sword (today with money, the dominant language of metal-power) and I will defend you with the word’.

Whereas THE TRUE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES would be to design a perfect world that would make mankind immortal.

 

V.  ∞º FORMAL STIENCES:

MIND LANGUAGES

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR – THE FRACTAL GENERATOR

THE BIOTOPOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF ƤT beings REFLECTED IN MIRROR-LANGUAGES.

‘The soul is a mirror of an indestructible universe. ”Each point is a world in itself’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.

‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ Einstein

 In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

So only organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.
The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we  reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet  networks are more powerful and survive.

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR – THE FRACTAL GENERATOR

In reality the universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘space-time’, which are organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and logic, multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. 
So the ultimate causality ∆->t->s is not platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> t-logic properties -> s-topologic, mathematical properties.
In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we repeat, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, stopo-logic ones.
So we adapt penrose graph to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:
The ∆§t biotopologic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then the languages reinforce as mirrors expanded into reality those properties ordering local territories.
So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how reality  is created locally by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of t.œs, only after the language reflects the living cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:
You can see in the graph how it works: first the whole universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak only the territory of ‘aristotelian’ order or bodywave energy of the system…
The drawing in original penrose only had the mind ordering the universe, as the source and only god in aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.
So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is as in crystals able to form mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all.

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.
And all of them has the same Universal ternary grammar of §patial formTemporal motion, to define the general events of reality. So in the main human languages, words, mathematics and colors we have the sam scheme:

§: Subject of Information (F(y)-blue) <≈> verb-action-green-operandi<≈>Object of entropy-motion (red color Fx)

Mathematics in that sense has two components, the underlying temporal logic, better treated as I-logic principles and the topological, geometric spatial elements better enhanced with its fractal Ƥcalar principles. For that reason in the second line, when we study NOT the human mind whose specific language of time are words, of space, artistic eyes, and of space-time balances, music, but when we study Universal Minds of which there are many types we write a simple silogism:
Non-Aristotelian Temporal Logic + Non-Euclidean Geometry = Universal Mind ≈ Non-Æ mathematics (the best language we have to describe those different types of Universal minds).
While human minds are Aristotelian, self-centered, so A (subject)-> B, and euclidean, as they see light, so only a plane of 3 perpendicular, lineal dimensions of space. To upgrade then the humind, we would need… oh, well, to change species, a limit that this blog will always have as it is written in the non-Euclidean and non-Aristotelian higher principles of which the AE mind is just a simplified limit.

THE GENERATOR OF EXIST¡ENCES 
In that regard, a philosophy of all sciences, able to describe all exist¡ences can only be written in the language of temporal logic, which in the humind is verbal in its ultimate syntax, and as such while the languages of god are infinite (upanishads), the languages of stience, will be not only mathematics, the main language of atomic exist¡ences and hence with common properties for all systems, but mainly verbal, logic, the language humans have used to gather ALL the properties of being in rational sequential, temporal sentences that describe the multiple causality of reality.
This is the language we shall construct formally in this web, upgrading in the process all stiences of exist¡ences to match the knowledge we have acquired on them.

We can now understand better why we write in a simplified manner the ‘Generator equation’ of a system in time as:
$p ≤ E x I ≤  ðƒ, for a simultaneous superorganism, where the ‘Body-wave of energy and information, ∑ e x ∏ I, receives information from its particle-head, which ‘shrinks’ it, ≤, and entropic motion from its potential limbs that expands it ≤, balancing both in search of immortality.
This ‘view’ of the 3 parts towards equilibrium and dynamic balance is however offset by the constant relentless motion towards higher information of the sum of the actions of the being as locomotion-entropy are motion dominant but the other 3 dimotions, information, reproduction and social evolution ‘tighten’ the system in space (information-social evolution) with reproduction trying to balance by iteration. So we might consider that the 5 dimotions are in dual balances:
Perception ≈ Locomotion;   Entropy ≈ social evolution; reproduction…
But in practice Perception happens ALL the time and locomotion many times; Social Evolution happens all the time; and entropy-death only a quanta of time… So the higher frequency of informative motions over entropic motions defines an overall arrow of time ‘that bends space’, aging the system: $p ≥ E x I ≥  ðƒ.
And so interesting enough the logic equation in space of a super organism is inverse in terms of ST implosion. And this will constantly come up in our analysis of the ‘perpendicular, inverse properties of Lineal Spacetime $t: limbs-potentials and cyclical time space, §ð.
So we obtain a quite descriptive generator equation of all T.œs in time, space and scale, through its worldcycle between seminal birth and entropic death, without the need for the more formal Ðisomorphisms of timespace:

Γst: ¡-1(generation):∫T¡-1(birth)>¡œ:|-$t(youth)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(maturity)>O-§ð(old age)<<¡-1:∂S (death)
Fractal Generator of all Time§paces as a sequential world cycle..
Γst: ¡-1(seed):∫T¡-1(fetus)>¡œ:|-$t(limbs/potential)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(bodywave)>O-§ð(particle-head)<<¡-1:∂S (corpse)
Fractal Generator of Time§paces as a simultaneous, spatial superorganism.
Γst: ∫T¡-1(social evolution)>¡œ:|-$t(locomotion)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(reproduction)>O-§ð(perception)<<¡-1:∂S (entropy)
Fractal Generator of Time§paces as 5 vital actions and sensations.
As the reader can see the same symbols of non-Æ represent in fact spatial, temporal and space-time actions and mental sensations, showing the fundamental ternary similar nature of all realities.
The reader then should assess the interest of learning the simple symbols of ¬Æ to be able to write ‘general laws’ that apply to all relative ∆±¡ planes of reality

The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence. 
The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time  (Galilean relativity, fine-tuned in Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²). So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying  and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.
ut the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:
We have to introduce the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.

Verbal language.
The languages of god are ∞ (upanishads), humans also use a verbal language, which mimics the elements of the fractal generator, which for that reason we express also in words.
Now we give a step further in the ‘search’ for self-similarities between all languages, reducing the expression of the fractal generator to a verb:
To exi≈st is the verbal expression of the generator, where the 3 elements of the generator acquire a verbal mode.
So instead of §t> ST>ðƒ, we express the ternary symmetry in terms of a singularity, or To, a body-wave of entropy and form, mixed into energy and information, and a Space-time field from where the body extracts its foms
So to describe the actions that from the point of view of a mind-singularity, to, perceive a body-wave, of entropy and information, exi ≈ riding as a space-time being of energy a field that sustained it. Tº≤ex i ≈ st
You can imagine those 3 parts, singularity, T•, body-wave: e x i, the most dynamic part, and below the world extended as a balanced space-time field in which the body and head co-exist together. The being in fact is more often defined as an exiTº a body-head, wave-particle duality and the field is detached of it. IN THE particle-field, though the description is To=st, as you see, each possible combination of those 3 elements starts the combinatorics of what we shall call in the ‘philosophy of science’, which is the verbal mode of GST, the ¬Æ:  EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

¬AE MATHEMATICS

There is still a theme to deal with, and we have on purpose brought it at the end – that of the mind and its formal languages that shrink and stop time motions into spatial forms – the logic of causal time and the geometry of fractal points and mathematics. They are important since as we have said minds are the seeds of information, and they must be coded in logic and mathematical language, which are the time-space efficient reductions, but again here what matters of languages is NOT its formal structure but its why as mirror-mappings of reality.

 

THE POSTULATES OF NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY

To balance them both descriptions we have to upgrade the postulates and axioms of euclidean geometry, with our new concept of a non-euclidean fractal point, which therefore defines lines as waves that communicate energy and information, planes as topological networks of dynamic waves which shape super organisms, and a non-euclidean point as a fractal with a central monad that controls the whole system, which will then according to congruence, establish parallel social organization or perpendicular darwinian events with all other type of particle-points and super organisms; fusioning in this manner the geometric and biologic properties of beings:

In the graph, in a Universe of fractal spaces point-particles have an inner volume of information as Non-Euclidean points which gauge information in the stillness of a mind systax, language mirror of the Universe. As points have volumes, lines are waves and planes topological networks, which ensemble in ternary a(nti)symmetries to form the topological super organisms of reality across 3 time ages, 3 topological forms and 3 scales. It is this physical T.œ which we shall study in mathematical physics, explaining the meaning in 5D of the main mathematical laws of physics, which are enhanced by the understanding of an enhanced geometry and logic of time, born of the fractal cyclical structure of both, a priori elements of reality that the language of mathematics and its operandi so accurately mirror

It is then necessary not only expand our notions of reality and our present models of a single spacetime continuum, but also our understanding of languages as mirrors of the fractal Universe of space-time, NOT its primary cause, as creationist mathematics (Pythagoran) or creationist verbal (religious) theories of reality pretend. Since the ultimate ’causes’ of reality are not languages, but Space=form and Time=motion itself.

The mind and the EGO PARADOX: chaos vs. order.

Even before we blow up your beliefs, 2 fundamental consequences of lineal vs. cyclical time must be uncovered. The first regards ‘freedom’. Lineal, open states seem to be free but are ULTIMATELY curved and ordered in the long time/space span. This has deep proofs in Lobachevski’s non-euclidean geometry we further upgrade redefining the Axioms and postulates of Euclid, but no need to get so technical at this stage: just look far away, the ‘earth is curved’, but your short distance is lineal and open. Order thus comes from a larger organic whole. But man as an individual cannot ‘perceive it’. What we then consider truth is a limited view according to our size and scale. But we shall show when we study the super organisms of History that ORDER exists, and patterns and cycles in history will be unveiled. The individual though seems free in its reduced territory; the whole though will impose its limits.

So how humans have come to accept chaos=freedom and lines as the whole meaning of time in a single ‘flat’ space scale? Here is where the paradox of the ego comes into play: humans stop at the individual level of consciousness and so they don’t accept easily that larger, systemic, organic view of invisible, impersonal network intelligence which is however THE DOMINANT form of the Universe.

Let us then first introduce the non-topical truth, of deep significance to understand who we are.

1st postulate: fractal points.

.The key element of reality is the less perceived: the mind that stops motion into form, mapping out intelligently through languages of perception, the reality external to the being, and controlling internally the motions and evolutions of the system. 

And ultimately killing=warping=aging the being as it slows down its motions into information.

But why the system collapses into form, in-form-ation? The answer is the particle-head that gauges information constantly and commands the system, hence the arrow of information dominates the inverse arrow of entropy; and systems become warped as the linguistic mind or monad, in this pan psychic universe keeps ordering its territorial body-waves into ever smaller more organized scales.

Thus all those organic systems are directed by linguistic mirrors (digital, visual, verbal, logic, geometric) which mapp and reduce their exxternal world into images reality, creating ‘monads’, the ultimate reason of the fractal structure of the Universe, which are linguistic mappings that allow any system to interact with that Universe.

In the graph we see the ‘new unit’ of mathematical languages, a fractal non-euclidean point or monad, crossed by infinite parallels, which becomes larger, as we look at it in more detail with the forces of its scale.

Physics is an excellent scale to study the simplest forms of the arrows≈actions of time-space, entropy, energy and information in natural forms easy to recognise in its basic properties.
A the observance of reality is always limited by the mind paradox who strips off complex  organic properties all beings different from man, what ‘remains’ understood of smallish ∆±3 scales of reality are just the simplest properties of those scales.
The 3 arrows of time, the splitting of scale into smallish ∑∆-1 •-monads and networks, all becomes more clear in the limited observation of our abstract motion-only models of the physical Universe.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. 

What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

 As absolute future is the arrow of social evolution of the fifth dimension, if we observe those eddies from the ∆º+i (tiƒ) perspective, we must conclude that the singularity in the center of those vortices must be a still zero-point an INFORMATIVE POINCARE MIND, in mathematical terms, ABLE TO shrink into a still point and TRAVEL without deformation into INFINITE SCALES.  What proves we have? Mathematical proofs in the description of the singularities of black holes. And physical proofs in eddies, where the center of the hurricane is ‘still’ (remember the movie vortex :) As quarks and black holes (top quark stars) are self-similar, quarks should then the Tiƒ mathematical minds of the atom…

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The informative arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become  masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and Disomorphisms of all other species.

The modern explanation: holographic curvatures.

How minds mirror the Universe in smaller surfaces? The answer is shrinking reality into a still map of the Universe called a world.
Because a clock is curved, we can see the new Ðimotion of information as a curvature on the dimotion of lineal time. This would be the first step for an extension of great importance in 5Ð theory: the holographic principle.

In 1993, the physicist Gerard ‘t Hooft put forward the holographic principle, which explains that the information about an extra dimension is visible as a curvature in a spacetime with one fewer dimension. For example, holograms are three-dimensional pictures placed on a two-dimensional surface, which gives the image a curvature when the observer moves. Similarly, in general relativity, the fourth dimension is manifested in observable three dimensions as the curvature path of a moving infinitesimal (test) particle. ‘T Hooft has speculated that the fifth dimension is really the spacetime fabric.
So again as in many cases we shall find indeed that inflationary ‘language-mirrors’ are all more or less right. Indeed, the second dimotion of time, of form, of in-form-ation is seen as a ‘curvature’ of the first motion of lineal time. The holographic principle is then essential to many themes of this blog, upgraded to ST, SS and TT combinations, which we will be able to compare by dimensional analysis and further our understanding of space-time systems. And the fifth dimension is the ‘space-time fabric’, as it fabricates all other dimensions in scales. We just saw how.

It IS THEN obvious that there is an inflationary nature to linguistic information that we shall invoke constantly when finding as the case of string theory, models which can be reduced ultimately to the space-time dualities of ilogic geometry.

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘Ðimotions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.
The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘Ðimotions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘Ðimotions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.
In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.
This is called the Poincare Conjecture, and his recent proof was the most important finding on mathematics for decades. It simply speaking only n-spheres can reduce without limit an n-dimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membrane-point system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.
Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 19.32.01
The most fascinating of the 3 varieties of bidimensional space times is the sphere, which can shrink in size without limit (Poincare conjecture). Thus all systems have external sensorial membranes that transfer information to a central zero point, defining a general equation for all minds:
0-point=mind x ∞ World = Constant mapping of the Universe.

This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.
Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplifies entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.

Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles5.
Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean definitions to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).

We shall then find in all of them the 5 ‘dimensional motions’ that he enacts to evolve and survive – generation, locomotion, entropic feeding, reproduction and social evolution of parts into wholes.

We can use ‘quantitative external methods’ to describe those forces and dimotions (dimensional motions) or accept the organic models of this blog and give meaning to them. For example atoms have a magnetic social force that organizes them into complex social patterns, a weak force that reproduces them and evolves them into heavier particles, and an electromagnetic force that moves them and balance their social motions. And finally spin that gauge and process information as a topologic mirror-mind would do. A mathematical description then is possible but only an organic model will explain the whys of those forces in vital, survival terms.

THE 4TH POSTULATE: SOCIAL D=EVOLUTION

If we were to consider the fundamental quality of man, which excels all others is, paraphrasing Einstein and Genesis, the EGOCY=ego+idiocy, of the species who believes to be above heavens and earth MORE INTELLIGENT THAN THE WHOLE UNIVERSE IS by reducing all its ‘dimensions of time’, ‘scales of space’, and ‘systemic intelligence’ to… nothing… and simply dismiss regardless of evidence any attempt to put humanity at face value, humbling her so it can RESPECT the laws of the organic Universe ‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man’ said Einstein. Man has committed the capital sin of arrogance and ate of the ‘tree of technology’ of its golden apples and eviL weapons, and it will die for it, said the kin historian of Genesis, as he wrote at the beginning of the metal-age when the ego of humans got a huge boost using weapons and gold to kill and hypnotize other humans… starting the causal cycles of war and evolution of weapons that likely will conclude our short run as a species, and certainly cause the entropic view of the Universe proper of the western man.

When confronting social sciences we will then find this huge gap between objective truths and anthropomorphic selfish agendas at its maximal and yet PARADOXICALLY those ‘arrogant ideas’ of the ego which become MEMETIC BELIEFS IS THE CAUSE WHY THE cycles of history will repeat its wars and self-destructive processes, by defying the eusocial laws of love of the Universe, WHERE EVERYTHING IS A NUMBER, a social collection of undistinguishable beings – so indeed the power of maths is in the social nature of the Universe.

And as we also ‘update’ the LAWS OF GEOMETRY to a full understanding of it in vital terms, a fourth postulate of non-Euclidean geometry will define PARALLELISM and PERPENDICULARITY between ‘equal social beings’ that evolve together, vs. those who feel different and break its ‘topologies’ perpendicularly as a new ‘rule’ to understand why in the Universe all is either social, when similar, or predatory when disimilar:

The absolute law of behavior in the organic Universe is simple: beings who are similar and complementary and speak the same language of information with similar dexterity come together as couples, herds and social wholes stronger than individuals. Those who perceive each other as different, as machines will perceive humans, and inferior, as its military robots the top predator machine of any age does, will simply act in a Darwinian manner. So any argument on the way Robots and AI will see us, is bogus. Science is NOT UP FOR ARGUMENT, and the laws of darwinian evolution of species are SCIENCE, even if pseudo-religious biblical capitalist technoutopians don’t believe on them.

In the graph a case of Darwinian devolution among men that perceive each other as different and enter into a perpendicular, Darwinian relationship and a case of social evolution between 2 forms that perceive each other as equal and enter into a parallel relationship of social love. The fourth postulate of non-Æ topology thus ‘vitalises’ the laws of mathematics, establishing the three fundamental geometrical≈behavioural relationships between T.œs, according to its:

  • Informative (Particle-head) communication, possible in cases of relative similarity≈parallelism (which determines parallel herding and social evolution).
  • Perpendicularity≈difference in particle-head, which will determine if one system is related to the other and there is body-similarity, hence can be used as energy its darwinian destruction,
  • Or IF THERE IS NO similarity NEITHER IN BODY OR MIND, its existence as ‘cat alleys’, that never cross (relative invisibility). We talk then of Skew T.œ.s.

Indeed in three-dimensional geometry, skew lines are two lines that do not intersect and are not parallel. It follows that two lines are skew if and only if they are not coplanar, which IN 5Ð AS 3 ±¡ planes co-exist in the same organism and systems feed in T.œs, two super organisms down, IMPLIES SPECIES which are not in the relative planes of action of the being.

The different degrees of Parallelism, Perpendicularity and skewness are thus essential concepts of vital Non-Euclidean geometry.

We have introduced in the graph with a bit more of complexity the logic dimensional laws that define how systems IN ANY scale of the inverse, from Atomic Ions or crystals to human societies relate to each other in darwinian, perpendicular ‘tearing’ topological relationships that ‘break’ the closing membrane of one species disrupting its existence, or will keep a mean distance to form social networks of communication that will grow into super organisms, starting the emergent process of evolution of species into a new ∆§cale of social existence, so you understand that in the Universe organic, geometric and scalar relationships are symbiotic to each other. 

All this said, warning including, mathematics is fun and the biggest pleasure of my youth, 30 years back when I discovered 5Ð was to upgrade maths. And then mathematical physics, till I ran into the total lack of Live memes=eviL behavior of military physicists and gave up scholarship.

MATHEMATICS AS WE JUST SAW ARE VITAL AND SOCIAL,ETHIC and the pretension of being a formal abstract language coherent in itself without mirroring reality is just more of the tiresome egocy of man.

So this IS WHAT SCIENCE TELL US. But unfortunately the people who rule THE economic world and created its ‘idol-ogies’ of worship of machines above man,  where the idea that man is NOT above heavens and earth and must comply with the biologic and organic laws of cyclical time to control its future, is completely ‘ridiculous’ – as absurd as to think that ‘Germs’, those infinitesimal animals do cause sickness (so it took to XIX c. Pasteur, who was for long laughed by doctors, to prove it).

E-MOTIONS: Motions as sensations.

The previous graph connects vital mathematics and e-motions of love. The sensation of parallelism, the friction of sexual love, etc. seem to be then the final program ASSOCIATED TO THE MOTIONS OF THE UNIVERSE, SO ULTIMATELY THE PROGRAM OR WILL OF THE UNIVERSE MUST BE A COMBINATION OF MOTIONS OF TIME ASSOCIATED TO SENSATIONS.

We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=sense‘ information.

And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.

This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.

Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily adscribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:

  1. What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
  2. Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.

Efficiency of mathematics as a mind mirror.

The first obvious question is this: why among all the mirrors=languages of the Universe, mathematics or rather ‘topology’ and ‘social numbers’ are the dominant one, which better expresses the laws of the Universe of fractal space and cyclical time, even in the distorted view of human beings (ab. huminds)?

Elementary quarks and electrons, the simplest particles do gauge information, absorb energy, reproduce and evolve socially into wholes, bosons, plasma flows and atoms. So the unit of life is the smallest particle and as fractal systems are self-reproductive, emerging in its fundamental properties in larger scales all what exists is alive. But human egocy denies that obvious truth.

It can only be because it is the language-mirror of the fundamental monad-system that keeps the infinite immortal Universe as such:

The galatom; that is the atom and galaxy which are self-similar scales of the infinite Universe.

That atoms do use mathematical languages to create its super organisms seems certain, at all levels, observed today in quantum computing.

That galaxies are in 5D metric the equivalent in the cosmological scale of the atom, is proved ad nauseam in our posts on physics.

That particles ARE the first vital systems of the Universe, NOT carbon atoms in DNA molecules (a purely pseudo-religious ‘egocy=ego+idiocy’ of man as the center of the Universe) is proved ad nauseam, as they show the 5 Ðimotions=drives of life, as the graph shows.

Both are the immortal, ‘perfect’ forms of the Universe, precisely because they use the most efficient language, and languages select species:

In the graph, languages select the species that better speak its languages. Money is a digital language, better spoken by digital machines, which therefore are becoming overproduced and substituting humans in labor and war fields, as the minds of robots.

All this implies a few things worth to mention in this introduction to vital mathematics, the necessary upgrading of the discipline:

  • Languages are STILL mirrors of reality, not reality itself. Maths is simply the best mirror but it does NOT include all the languages and hence properties of reality: the languages of ‘God’ are infinite (Upanishads)
  • Hence creationism, Platonic, Pythagorean religions, etc. are NOT truth. We are not MADE OF NUMBERS, or Cartesian absolute graphs of space-time. And a cause of many of the errors of mankind about reality derive from that simplistic view.

A definition of the Universe.

All this said, , we can make a proper definition of the fractal Universe more suited to its mathematical description.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   Asymmetries between its 4 components,  T, ∆, @, S,which can either annihilate or evolve together, through parallel =symmetric or Perpendicular/antisymmetric communication:
  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: Planes of size distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ðime cycles:  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, those elements and its operandi.

In mathematics, with the duality of inverse operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª and ∫∂, and the universal ≤≥ symbols that put in relationship two sides of timespace event that connects adjacent, simultaneous parts of a super organism in space, or ‘moves’ and transforms a t.œ in time. So Dimotions are presented by those operand, and functions connected by similarity operand (<=>) express the connection of adjacent topologies in space: |<ø>O.

Expanding the error of lineal time and single space to a model of the Universe. Languages as mirrors.


In the graph, at the core of the lineal big bang, there is the error of lineal time, itself a ‘silly’ idiocy born of ‘creationism’, the concept that the language-mirror of the Universe creates the Universe because as a ‘mirror in smaller space’ of the larger reality according to the laws of languages, derived of the ‘faster, information’ delivered by smaller 5D entities, languages do ‘forecast the future’.

So languages can show the deterministic processes of the future, but they cannot create it; or rather only within the territory of order of the mind that speaks the language – meaning only an Asimovian mule, an American r=evolutionary POTUS or the collective culture of capitalism – its financiers and bankers all together, with the proper language of history could have changed the future of mankind explained on those books:

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:


In the graph, which i re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Mr Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician, which along his friend Mr. Hawking, shuns off the laws of the experimental method and expect their equations to be real, just because they are written in maths)
This view of reality is not Platonism but pure egocy; as not even Mr. Plato said that mathematics is the only language of Nature, but as his disciple Aristotle, considered the Universe as we do an organism with a mind called LOGOS, since it is the logic language of time, not the geometry of space, the dominant language of the Universe, which just needs as mathematics a big improvement after 2300 years of ‘supposed egocy geniuses’ that couldn’t make more than doodles on the sand, following philosophically Mr.  Pythagoras with his much more primitive ‘magic view’.
Languages do not create the universe; just mirror it and then reflect those images to reproduce structures and forms that were already in that Universe – and that is the ultimate meaning of its fractal nature: minds reducing reality to smaller images made of time motions with repetitive patterns, and then reproducing them in reality, in a constant orgasm of reproduction and recombination of motions and forms. 
Only in that sense we can talk of the laws of reproduction of the fractal Universe as the mind of God, of which we are all ‘its details’.

Now, because the Human World is so small, and ultimately humans and machines rule it, there is a small probability for mankind to change its local future, so to a point my egocy was justified – after all I was trying just to convince mankind to survived appealing to its basic life instincts; but if that failed, just imagine the pretension of ‘pseudoscience’ in physics – to CREATE reality at the cosmic LEVEL when humans cannot even ORDER a small planet, dust of space-time in the infinite Universe, just because they ‘speak’ the mirror language of mathematics, likely the topological mind of ‘spinning particles’, which seem to use ‘angles, trigonometry and topology’ to order their tiny atomic territories… (or not so tiny in the case of cosmic black hole stars, and we shall return to it).

What will NEVER happen is that because physicists decided to be philosophers of science and meta-physicists without even fully understanding the symmetries of cyclical time, topological space and fractal scalar spacetime, their lineal big-bang is happening.

So we need to clarify the difference between creationism and the more humble role of the scientist who speaks any language as a mirror of reality as long as the syntax of the language is properly evolved.

Whereas evolution, a verbal logic language, expanded to include topological evolution, cyclical time and the scalar organic laws of parts and wholes is the best mirror language in verbal thought for biological and economical systems of evolving machines and its company-mothers, and for historic super organisms; and Non-Euclidean mathematics, properly evolved to include the concept of non-Euclidean fractal points as we do in this web, and non-Aristotelian ‘existential algebra’, properly evolved to include the causal logic of 5 time space arrows=dimotions=actions is the proper language to mirror physical process… though the more complicated ‘epicycles’ of group theory and probabilities also work:

Epistemology vs. The Egocy paradox and the plague of creationism.
Creationist mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.
Regarding languages, there are infinite ‘mind-mirrors’ or ‘monads’ that gauge information from its biased perspective, which means that the relationship between languages and the order of reality is a back and forth ‘local’ process: the mind gauges information and then organizes its territorial ‘body’, mirroring its languages on reality. Maths are likely in topological, geometric form the ‘mind of atoms’, and so its laws of order are all pervading. Words are the ‘mind of humans’ and so in History the legal and ethic order trying to construct a superorganism of history, religion, nation or civilization is al, pervading.

So creationism is just a simplified, ‘one-way’ version of complex organicism and the interrelation between ‘still languages’ that mirror into a small virtual spatial form, the moving cycles of all beings. And this perhaps Aristotle and Leibniz understood better than any scientist does today: ‘Gods are unmoved points that order the energy around them’ . Whereas those unmoved ‘fractal points’ that gauge information are Leibniz’s monads: ‘every (fractal, Non-Euclidean) point holds a world within itself’. And energy the substance of the body waves they order.

The mind as a mirror of languages that describe topo-bio-logic properties.

The question poised then, is about two philosophies of science – creationism, which was first  verbal when words were our leading language, so God ‘named’ things and created them, and it is now mathematical, as numbers are our dominant language, so the ‘unspoken’ philosophy of science of mathematical physicists, which are the people as today in charge of ‘time and space theories’ (wrongly as time was also described by Darwin’s evolution), is that all equations are ‘created’ and so science is just about manipulating equations to find reality.

In a relational space-time theory though all comes from the ‘inherited’ properties of time and space, which are ‘causal logic patterns’ (time cycles, best described by logic), geometric, topologic properties (space properties, best described with mathematics as a mirror language that extracts better those properties) and organic, biological properties, derived from the scalar, co-existing connection between parts and wholes of the ‘fifth dimension’… which are NOT easily described mathematically, but verbal and logically, as it is the case in evolutionary theory (a verbal theory of reality). 

To make it even more complicated human ego-centered paradox, o-mind x ∞ Universe = constant, is naturally built to find wholeness, and stop all motions into puzzled mappings that try to enclose it all, all the steps, all the variations, all the forms, and all the motions, in a single algebraic structure, a potential equation of all possible bifurcations of those steps, which humans think to have achieved with those ‘monstrous lie groups’ and other algebraic structures that try to be an impossible minimalist mirror that encodes the information of all the symmetric steps available to reality.
Now because monads in still language shrink into mirror images with no motion the cyclical patterns of the Universe creating a mind-form, or simultaneous shrunk universe image, we can talk of a psychological causation of the fractal form of the Universe.
Sentient forms static in the contemplation of reality, the unmoved Gods of Aristotle, the language that will become mirror and from seed ad motion to perform actions unwinding the program, which in any case will turn out to be always the same – the mirror mind trying to reproduce its seed and generate a larger world with the perceived energy around it, killing and destroying other worlds in the process without even noticing – this is the game.
It is a ridiculous ego-trip, which only obscures further our comprehension of the details and wholes of reality, born of creationist theories of a universe with only mathematical properties, supposedly encode in one of such groups.
Can we then provide a simpler mathematical equation to explain it all? Yes of course, but a logic, conceptual equation – that of the mind that creates all spaces.

THE FRACTAL GENERATOR OF VITAL TIME-SPACE ORGANISMS

So we must depart first from philosophy of science, before we can use mathematical logic to explain the details of those space-time scales of reality. So we shall write a simple logic equation to describe all the spacetime organisms of the fractal, scalar Universe, as all of them will have ‘3 topological simultaneous spatial parts’, performing ‘3 motions=functions=actions’ in time, as a super organism, living through 3±1 ages, as it emerges from a seed of a lower plane of the fifth dimension into a larger world, to return to that cellular/atomic scale after death:

∑∆¡-1(seed-generation)>>  $t¡<ST¡+1>§ð¡ (life-3 ages/3 organs) << ∑∆-1 (entropic death)

That simple equation, which defines the 3±¡ ages of life, the 3 networks of an organism, and its 3 scales of existence both in a simultaneous, spatial and dynamic, temporal and scalar way, summarizes the nature of all systems of existence.

I am fully aware though that humans love simpler explanations of reality, the more so in the age of twitter.

So the reader that expects the Universe to be as simple as it comes in present theories – a lineal big bang explosion, perfectly described by the simplest possible lineal equation, V=HoD, eerily resembling the word God; will not be satisfied by these models of complexity.

Let us then conclude with a comparison of both models, the big-bang, which we shall consider a form of creationist pseudo-science, which as religious dogmas, where god created just naming beings with the language he share with the believer (Hebrew in the Bible, arab in Quran), creationism in the simplex philosophy of science of mathematical physics happens when the researchers utter a digital equation, modeled then into a computer image of the supposed ‘singularity’ origin of all matter space and time as expressed by that equation.

And that is all what matters to the mechanist pythagorean view of reality. The magic of creationism doesn’t need to go further, beyond the language of creation – in true form just a mirror of the space-time symmetries of reality and its organic forms.

We shall thus explain a more complex, organic Universe, as IT IS, not avoiding by reductionism all those properties that do not fit in a simple equation.

And define the fundamental particle a super organism in space, which traces a world cycle in time, through the accumulation of 5 Dimotions (dimensional motions) or ‘actions’ of exist¡ence as each st¡ence studies the organisms, events and actions performed in 3 of such consecutive scales, of a nested Universe – the larger systems studied by astrophysics (¡<|4|), the next scale studied by biology (¡<|3|), the next scale by human sciences (¡<|2|), to finally collapse into mind languages (¡=0), which defines any mind as a linguistic mirror-mapping of the whole Universe, a paradoxical infinitesimal ego who thinks to be infinite as it holds an image of the whole in its non-E point:

O-point (mind) x ∞ Universe = Constant world

So those four elements, ∆-scales, Topological Space, Temporal motions and Still minds, define all of us as ∆@st; Dust of space-time.

RECAP. We are all topo-bio-logic beings. Topologic=geometric beings with mathematical, spatial, structural, formal properties; and temporal=logic beings, with causal motions.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT real. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death…

All is generated in a point of past, grows into a topological being, and dies dissolving its form in a point of future. This is the meaning of a worldcycle, the essential ‘time duration of all beings’. There is not being that goes all the way through the infinite line of a single absolute time, proper of the Cartesian graph…

Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’ the ‘Plenum=body of Yahveh’ in which we all exist (: – the dependent background drawing against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without a better understanding of relational spacetime call a background independent theory of science – meaning no background at all – we ARE the background).

 

®LGEBRA

Mathematics as a mirror of the Dimotions and scales of reality.

We translate in this post and subposts mathematics to 5D.

And to do so, as a fractal can always be divided in sub-fractals, mathematical disciplines subdivide further at all levels in 5 elements connected not so much with the 5 Ðimotions of existence, but with its 5 structural elements, ∆@s≤≥t, scales, minds, space, time and its a(nti)symmetries.

It follows then from the definition of the 5 elements of all systems, an immediate classification of the five fundamental sub disciplines of mathematics specialised in the study of each of those 5 dimensions of space-time:

The main sub disciplines of mathematics as mirrors of the 5 Dimotions.

 

Ultimately as the language of the Galatom, mathematics IS necessarily a language able to mirror the structural elements of the galatom and all its fractal inner parts. And this goes as follows.

  1. Vital Space analysis: ¬E Geometry studies fractal points of simultaneous space, ∆-1, & its ∆º networks, within an ∆+1 world domain. They must though be properly defined departing from the concept of a fractal non-euclidean point,with volume, which increases as we come closer to it – reason why it can fit infinite parallels (an euclidean point with no breath CANNOT, even if we bend them as it is customary in the primitive definition of them).Thus we shall complete the evolution of geometry by defining the 5 Postulates of Non-euclidean geometry departing from the concept of a fractal point.
  2. §ocial scales analysis: Number theory studies time sequences and ∆-1 social numbers, which gather in ∆º functions, part of ∆+1 functionals. NUMBERS ARE SOCIETIES OF UNDISTINGUISHABLE PARTS, hence the fundamental element of algebraic analysis of the ‘vital energy’ enclosed by a system or network that gathers together social elements. This OBVIOUS truth escapes human egocy, specially in our dog-eat-dog primitive culture of ‘capitalism’, and competition between members of the same species.If the geometry of the fractal Universe is non-euclidean made of fractal points with volume, its logic is non-aristotelian, made of sequential social numbers with strange connective properties better expressed with the non-aristotelian logic needed to understand the different forms of temporal, sequential correlationships between social groups of similar ‘numbers’. So we shall develop a non-aristotelian logic of numbers, latter expanded to variables. We shall improve Number theory by putting them in relationship with ST-laws, by understanding sequential time numbers, scalar social numbers and real numbers and mathematical constants as ST-ratios and functions of ∆st actions.
  3. S<≈>T, feed back time-space Stœps (motions): ¬Ælgebra, which is therefore the vital science of social numbers is most important part of it – its evolved form; as it studies through operands and feed-back equations (when we properly redefine them in terms of ≈ similarity not equality and <≈> dynamic equations) the different Dimotions of exist¡ence, from single S=T steps to larger associations of Dimotions,  in more complex ∆+1 structures (Functions). Further on in its most modern systems iIT DOES SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF super organisms in space, through the study of its a(nti)symmetries between its space and time dimensions (group theory)… So Algebra is first the science of operands that translate into mathematical mirrors the dimotions of space-time and then build up from them as the Universe does building up from actions, simultaneous organisms in space and worldcycles in time USING SOCIAL numbers to that goal, in different degrees of complexity, mirrors for all those elements of the 5 D¡ universe. ¬Ælgebra, its evolved version, straightens up the language to match that of 5D. So we define ¬Æ which studies a(nti)symmetries between space and time dimensions. It is then necessary to derive from the a(nti)symmetries of the fractal generator a more realist understanding of S<=>T mathematical functions, its operandi, and structures that act as ‘blocks of time’ – iterative laws that relate space and time elements in a multiplicity of beings. As such ‘Group theory’, with its structure that resembles so close the fractal generator will be illuminated with this new tool that improves our understanding of  ‘algebras’ of all type  and also its application to mathematical physics.
  4. ∆t: Analysis studies ALL forms of time=change, and hence it can be applied to the 5 Dimotions of any space-time being, as long as we study a ‘social structure’, hence susceptible to be simplified with ‘social numbers’ IT IS THOUGH SPECIALLY USEFUL TO STUDY SCALAR TRANSFORMATIONS OF SYSTEMS BETWEEN ∆±¡ planes of existence and so the proper language of 5Ð∆nalysis, its 5Ð version, can then also be defined in 5Ð jargon as the study of the a(nti)symmetries between planes and other ∫∂ operations derived of scales of the fifth dimension. We shall make analysis more realist by defining limits to infinities in a discontinuous Universe, made of finitesimal 1/n parts; by considering the discontinuities of the fifth dimension and the duality of continuous calculus vs. discontinuous fractal scaling, as both are needed to understand the continuous social regions of the scalar Universe, or decametric §cales and the discontinuous gaps between ‘ages’ in time (standing points, variational calculus) and ‘planes’ in space. We will differentiate then 5 general applications of Analysis according to the Dimotion study, and the ‘level’ of analysis, from the minute STeps of a derivative, to larger social gatherings, and changes of entire planes (functionals). It is then not surprising that despite being analysis first derived of algebraic symmetries between numbers, it grew in complexity to study changes in functions (first derivatives/integrals), and then changes of changes of functions, as motions between scales of the fifth dimension (higher degree of ∫∂ functions, called functionals).
  5. @-Mind: Analytic geometry represents the different mental points of view, self-centred into a system of coordinates, or ‘worldviews’ of a fractal point, of which naturally emerge 3 ‘different’ perspectives according to the 3 ‘sub-equations’ of the fractal generator: $p: toroid Pov < ST: Cartesian Plane > ðƒ: Polar co-ordinates.
  6. @-Humind: To which we can add the specific @-humind elements (human biased mathematics) and its errors of comprehension of mathematics limited by our ego paradox Philosophy of mathematics and its ‘selfie’ axiomatic methods of truth, which tries to ‘reduce’ the properties of the Universe to the limited description provided by the limited version of mathematics, known as Euclidean math (with an added single 5th non-E Postulate) and Aristotelian logic (A->B single causality). This limit must be expanded as we do with Non-Æ vital mathematics and the study of Maths within culture, as a language of History, used mostly by the western military lineal tradition, closely connected with the errors of mathematical physics.We shall accept that even though mathematics is an excellent mirror, it still biases reality to pack it into a mind, so we shall treat mathematics as a language, which is by definition informative, and inflationary in ‘forms’, with excesses and fictions, among which the question of false infinities, the distortions of frames of references and the parallel ‘metaphoric’ expressions of the same ST-LAWS are paramount. Finally we shall consider a better foundation of mathematics, NOT the axiomatic method, set and category theory, which ‘starts’ the building from the roof down, but the minimal entities, points and numbers, to rediscover the classic foundations of mathematics as a experimental language.

So Algebra IS the study of all the structures and symmetries of the Universe from the point of view of its mathematical mirror.

If analysis specializes in time-motions, algebra is more concerned with space, simultaneous structures, joined by the = symbol of equality.

But as in the entangled Universe all mirrors can reflect all forms, Algebra also can analyze other elements.

And ultimately Algebra and Analysis ‘ARE’ the complex ‘level’ of reality, as reproduction and social evolution are the complex demotions, including obviously as its ‘background parts’, the theory of numbers, the analytic geometry – study of frames of reference, and the topologic analysis, embedded in the secondary operand, numbers and frames in which we ‘cast’ the complex space and time algebraic and analytical analysis of a ‘Domain’ of the fractal Universe.

We shall call then the upgrading of Algebra to 5 Ð, non-Ælgebra.

EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA (ab.¾)

How ¬Æ reflects the ∆@st elements of reality.

Next we can consider how ¬Æ mirrors the fundamental elements of reality with its fundamental ‘synoptic’ forms, as all language reduces reality to lesser mirror-parts that carry not all its information:

  • S: A point is the first perception of A T.Œ in mathematical ‘space’, which as we come closer acquires content. And then its next degree of complex description occurs:
  • ∆: A number, is a social group of undistinguishable ‘internal’ parts of a point, which represents the point in scale. And then the next degree of complex analysis occurs:
  • T: An operand expresses the transformation of a point through a Dimotion of timespace, and since there are five Dimotions, 3 continuous Dimotions in a single plane (perception, locomotion, reproduction) and 2 discontinuous Dimotions that start and end in different planes (entropy and social evolution) we shall find 5 basic operators of those Dimotions in any ‘algebraic structure’ that truly reflects the being in the mathematical mirror.
  • @: A frame of reference expresses those changes through = equations reflects the @ element of the being.

THE WHOLENESS OF THE GENERATOR of EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language=mind represents in different manners, those elements and its operandi.

In mathematics, with the duality of inverse operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª and ∫∂.

The humind plays a key role in all this game, as we can only perceive through the languages of the mind, which ‘perceive in themselves’ as ‘still-simultaneous-linguistic mapping’. WE DO NOT PERCEIVE REALITY BUT LANGUAGES-MIRRORS, we often confuse with reality (Mind paradox).

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

We thus define in existential algebra the main operators of classic algebra as the two directions of a dimotion of space-time. We can in this manner compactify some dimensions as inverse, being entropy and generation (4th and 5th Dimotions) inverse in symmetry to a given ∆º plane (±¡ SYMMETRY).

To which extent we can consider stop and motion, 1D and 2 D inverse or rather asymmetric, must be dealt on a one case basis. Finally as it turns out we need the other four Ðimotions to achieve the 3rd Ðimotion of reproduction, we can reduce all other Ðimotions to reproduction; hence establishing the unity of intent in the Universe: to keep reproducing an eternal present. IT is this present-eternal reproductive Ðimotion what defines the Universe as a fractal.

 

The generator equation of Existential algebra is then any of the multiple representations with those simple symbols of Dimotions of Timespace Organisms, that is any Ð function of the game of existence – of travels through the 5 Dimotions of space-time, performed by any T.oe.

Death then exists, as a partial equation of the Generator according to ¬Æ rules: BY MERELY extracting an inverse partial equation from Γ.œ:

∆+1 Tƒ<<∆-1: $p; that is the mind-whole of the ∆+1 scale dissolves bak to its minimal parts, the spatial past, lineal entropic ∆-1 elements.

Thus the symbols of the generator, which encode both the metric of 5D, the ternary topologies of supœrganisms, the ages of time AND in its operandi, the past to future, present to past, present to future, future to past flows of entropy, energy and information, define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the co-invariant laws of space-time beings.

We can of course being as pedantic and obscure, as complex in our other languages reflection of the Generator as we want when entering in details.

But ultimately in the final synopsis, all reduces to the ternary topological temporal and scalar ‘invariances’ of the generator as it reflects all possible arrows and forms of scalar Timespace (causal chains, sequential ages, topological ensembles, etc), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

So we shall close this introductory note, with a consideration on the philosophical question of the limits of reality.

Now we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality has proved to be truth:

‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,

Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.

So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject  (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…

It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.

MIND MIRRORS ARE KALEIDOSCOPIC: EGOCY PARADOX

Of course I know the usual pedantic scholar of physics will state, reading the previous unification of charges and masses – “but you have used a Newtonian concept of mass as a vortex, and the proper way to do it is with the complex Einstein’s formalism that accounts to the full detail of precision measure. Newton is false”.
But he will miss completely the point, we illustrated with String theory and its inflationary formalisms by LACK OF AN Occam’s razor provided by the limiting laws of 5D: what truly matters is to understand the logic similarity between the charge and mass state of accelerated time vortices in both scales. A FRACTAL IS NEVER EQUAL, BUT SELF-SIMILAR, so are the scales of the Universe. Thus in physics we can go with more or less detail into all those scales and its key elements but we are not going to reach an exact measure and if we were to use the more complex formulations of Einstein’s mathematical mirror the whole ‘conceptual understanding of time vortices would disappear in our search for absolute precision of measure.

PARADIGM’S CHANGE: NON-AE LOGIC, FRACTAL SPACE-TIME.

The present state of both social and physical sciences, religion and Big Bang theory is more of a regulative idea in a kantian sense that a true description of the whole:

Pseudo science as defined from Kant to Einstein, consists on studying with hyperbolic expansions, subjects which are outside the realm of experimental evidence, born of the ‘egocy: ego+idiocy’ of man, which is ‘never in doubt’. Our limits of perception of the infinite Universe and its ‘logic’ mind – God… are thus crossed often by ‘creationist’ theories that stretch the capacity of a mirror language to model reality. But once those linguistic limitations and the stringent methodology of truth of the scientific method are applied we can without false assumptions find more modest, realist truths.

 

SOCIAL NUMBERS, SCALES, ACTIONS: HISTORIC SUPERORGANISMS.

In a society  similar economic, cultural, social or military action of a nation or civilization. Yet we must distinguish two subspecies, humans and machines, as the coding differs for each of them.

So the economic network codes the reproductive actions of machines, in factories but also reproduces the life goods humans entropically absorb.

The political network codes the informative, social simultaneous ‘nervous’ actions of human beings.

The financial network also codes and selects by value machines of different species.

The war age codes the entropic destruction of humans and machines.

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

Culture codes the social arrow of mankind and world stock organizes with digital values the social superorganism of the metalearth:

In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ dissolution age as a supœrganism of history, dominated by the emerging super organism of machines and its company-mothers and Metal-earth, global digital planet that substitute our wor(l)d, have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the fractal, organic Universe; and reduced to the simplest actions of each individual means, its desire to be part of the whole, to love IS THE COMPLEX higher action our capitalist ideology that worships machines above man and surrogates our exist¡ence as ‘enzymen’ of those company-mothers in which we evolve and reproduce its organisms make us become disordered in a dog-eat-dog society when behaving as humans, but the primitive capitalist culture in which we live has nothing to do with ‘reality’ as it should be in a perfect human world. Since the Universe has a clear goal: social love, evolution into wholes.

So the negation of the hierarchical order of actions and the desire to exist is very rare, proper of the last entropic age of existence, or a conscious decision of the mind that performs them for philosophical reasons (Buddhism, denial of exist¡ence) or a difficult ‘Buridan choice’,  as when we don’t want to act and say ‘i dont have energy and time to do this’.

Actions, we know naturally is what we are made of, combining energy and information, exi, in space-time fields, ST¡, where we act to exi=st¡
In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).
And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider ∞, the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein :)
In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in  frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers  which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.
Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).
Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).
Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum).

 Social principles are thus fundamental, even when systems are not identical in form but self-similar.

The laws of parallel creation by self-similarity.
Another law of social creation by complementarity reinforce systems which are affine by topology, age or form, producing ‘enzymatic’ systems, stronger social systems and so on.
It is a key law of evolution in all sciences, and of the complementarity or dissociation of systems in its inverse death process.  So both in creation and destruction is a key law, as it allows to merge different forms into stronger ones. For example, in cultural anthropology, ‘germ-anic and semitic’ nomadic cult(ure)s, visually dominant, likely with a higher content of visual neanderthals, which had been surpassed by smaller agricultural verbal civilizations became ‘again’ on top of the informative, Fertile Crescent farmers, when they associated with bronze and iron weapons as Nomad European cattle ranchers Aryan invaders. A line – the weapon and a lineal mind, the visual white man reinforced each other to ab=use, the cyclical fertile goddesses women.

The inversion law of scaling. A general interpretation of Galilean paradoxes.
Ultimately what the Galilean paradoxes tell us is that A is Non-A when we change within the ternary symmetries of scales, topologies and ages, and only A and Non-A become something else together in the intermediate body-wave, Ƽ plane or asymmetric system.
The A is Non-A ilogic rule of thesis and antithesis, yin and yang merging into synthesis and yin yang IS the most important rule of I-logic with multiple branchings.
It is in scale a very important law of the fifth dimension which can be extended to all systems, an essential symmetry of all ternary realities: the inversion of roles and functions as • singularities of systems emerge into new scales, becoming |-entropy of larger beings or vice versa, systems which were |-entropy become organised into larger forms, which then become O-cycles, as the cases mentioned on electromagnetism, or the proteins that encircle a vital space in a cell.
It is specially important in the scalar understanding of quantum physics and thermodynamics, or the interaction of electric and magnetic force

Epistemology deals with there meaning of truth, or rather the most important language of truth, which is NOT mathematics but logic… paradoxical ¡logic.
In the introduction to I-logic we talked of the paradoxical nature of a Universe in which each ‘monad-mind’ feels to be the center of a pentagonal system of ‘dust of space-time’: ⌜𝝙@st, included within a larger 𝝙+1 world, including within an 𝝙-1 world but observing only its 𝝙º-mind plane, its @ristotelian selfish arrow of time motion,as a continuous reality where it sees its mind at the center, vs. the objective reality of infinite other ⌜△@sts and points of view.
How then to breach that ‘duality’ between the complex networks of reality and the single view of the @ristotelian self-centered mind?
To rescue us from such contradictions I have established a complex method of knowledge that constantly perceives reality from different perspectives, those of simultaneous topological space, ternary ages, ternary scales and ∞º minds that feel to be the center of the Universe, and the negation of exist¡ence of ∆@ST beings, ¬neganformation… before called entropy, which Physicists considered the only extant arrow of time-future, but is merely the necessary death of form, to renew a system once its world cycle has ended.
Of all of them, the most mysterious is the most important, the @-minds, since from an objective outside perspective, minds are particle-points opaque to the world, but from the mind itself they seem to hold in its infinitesimal the whole Universe, origin of the mind paradox, an ultimately they are constant ‘worlds’: ∞º=1, which stop motion and time cycles Into spatial forms, making what we call reality – space-time continuums, mostly still, known only in each monad-perspective to the mind itself.
Let us then consider in brief the paradoxes produced by those constant spatial mind creations, to fully justify why we don’t just explain straight reality from a single perspective as it ‘seems to be’ for the humind… but require first to understand the 5 main ¡logic paradoxes of the 5 components=Ðimotions of the being to grasp the infinity of its world cycles.

The equation of the mind applied to physics. Another unification: quantum and statistics.
Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 5.20.21 PM
The problem of mathematicians with a single time/singularity  IS THAT THEY CANNOT EMPATHIZE with the infinite other LANGUAGES and beings of the Universe… To be an Aristotelian God among Gods, to be an infinite infinitesimal, the equation of all minds-monads:
O x ∞ = Konstant:  O-singularity (linguistic mind) x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant world,
That is the game. But to survive in that game you must also be aware there are other infinite singularities, all with the same rights to feel god… That is a much more perfect Leibnizian Universe… than the simplex one physicists sponsor. The equation that describers the theory of everything in that sense is the simplest of all of them:
0 x ∞ = K, the 0-1 temporal unit sphere, reflected in the 1-∞ spatial statistical one.
I personally prefer the ∞º expression, of an infinite Universe ‘elevated’ to the ridiculous infinitesimal mind mapping of a non-euclidean particle-point that thinks to hold from its ‘advantageous’ point of view, infinity in itself. And certainly my fav post-war American writer Mr. Vonnegut of ‘Cat and cradle’ and ‘slaughter house 5’ fame did explain it all, nothing – the mind – is everything – the infinite Universe with a twist, to fit on his infinitesimal whole. Paradoxical thought of a higher I-logic than simple A->B Aristotelian causality then displays a much higher I-ntelligence, since the ‘logic of Time, the logic of God is of a higher order than that of man’ (Augustine).
How mathematics reflects this, in ‘common sense’ convention, through the equality,∞ x 0 ∞º== 1, which in present E-maths is not defined or defined as a content but in ¬E math we define as the main ternary identity that encompasses it all.  The mathematical reasoning, secondary but obvious: if anything elevated to 0 is 1, so must be the finite infinite, as we show in a discontinuous scalar Universe, where not all information seeps through discontinuities of plane, all infinities are finite numbers (hence solving also Cantor’s paradox), and so an infinity will always be a number and as such ∞º is not uncertain but 1. The 1 island-universe hold in the mind – any constant world; and so the Unification of all entities, it is really in mathematics also a paradoxical thought:

0 ≈ ∞ x 0 ≈ ∞º ≈ 1

That the 0-1 sphere is equivalent to the 1-∞ cartesian map is in fact  the main theorem of measure theory,  which in physics reflects the equivalence between a quantum temporal scale (0-1 probabilistic description, of the faster, temporal quantum world) and the thermodynamical statistical one (1-∞ spatial description of the larger, slower thermodynamic world… So an immediate consequence is the long-seek unification of quantum and thermodynamic formalisms.
As time is faster, the o-1 smaller sphere fits better the quantum description, as space is slower, the 1-∞ fits better the molecular world, but both are by measure theory equivalent, because as we shall show bit by bit, species by species, all mind think the same: to be gods, to survive, to order its territory, and come on top:
Space is then ONLY within the mind that measures in simultaneous perception the multiple vital space-time cycles translated into the language of a still mind that perceives in itself. Thus space is virtual. The true substance of reality being its temporal motions. On the other hand, the description human minds  (@) make of the Universe is subconsciously biased by those ‘still, linguistic mind mappings of space’, (∫@) in which the ∞ of time motions (∆ð) is reduced and equalled to the spatial mind mapping.
∫@≥∆ð
Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.This simple equation of similarity between the space perception of reality provided by a mind, and the whole Universe of moving time-cycles (as nothing is still outside the mind’s perception, being all observed in detail in perpetual motion), appeared in science as a philosophy of the Universe, when Descartes realized that what we see is NOT reality but what the mind ‘stops’ in its selective perception of all the information of reality. So the only truth we can depart from is the fact that we think and perceive still linguistic thoughts, hence we exist; making of informative perception in a still mind, the first ‘action’ of existence, even prior to motion which is unconscious of being.
Descartes astounding insight soon brought here to define mathematically, topologically and conceptually a ‘mind-singularity of order’, the ‘missing’ factor on our descriptions of reality, unfortunately was soon forgotten, and substituted by the naive realism of modern science – what we or our electronic instruments see is what there is there. But only marrying the spatial mind-linguistic view and the Universe of infinite time cycles, we can factor in all the elements and start to unknot the bias the spatial mind cast upon our objective comprehension of reality, which is our task as scientists.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological and social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’. Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs.
Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, to calculate functions of space-time that WORK mirroring reality – hence they must exist. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely NOT, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors – what matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence WITHOUT THEM there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the Universe is a chaotic entropic state. YET WE OBSERVE order, so the experimental method oblige us to conclude there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘SURVIVE’ creating the order of reality.
Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain). In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only very good ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.
So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.
Since there are ∞ minds, gauging information; and stopping the motions of time into the intelligence of formal space, as they try to ‘stiff’ reality into the mirror image of the language, which of course they confuse with the universe itself – and this is indeed the origin of the creationist theories of religious and scientific people, we must now debunk on firm grounds as we have a better grasp of why we see still the earth (our mind stops its motion) when objectively it is moving, why in other words we see ‘spaces’ when it is all about ‘times’.

A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency  balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.

Lineal dimensions of external locomotions.
We can now return briefly to the theme of ‘lineal dimensions’ of locomotions used in the Cartesian graph to describe in physics the external motions of beings. They are cast as infinite and lineal in space, but they are just ‘approximations’ of the ‘dimensions’ of the Earth, which seems flat from the lower ‘plane’ of the smaller being (but will become bounded, curved and closed when we reach a ‘higher’ perspective). So the origin of those 3 dimensions is really the ‘3 perpendicular dimensions of light’, which is the ‘informative substance’ for the beings living as ∆-1 microscopic entities in the seemingly flat earth.
So those beings, including earlier physicists who are in an external larger ‘∆+1’ world;  can describe its simpler dimensional motions in terms of 3 classic light space-time  ‘external dimensions’:
In external motion, measured in an abstract ‘background of absolute space-time’ we trace a ‘fixed’ reality of 3 lineal infinite dimensions, height, length and width. In ‘reality’, the dimensions are ‘dimotions’, dimensions with internal motion or change of form, called ‘topological varieties’, and they ensemble to create the superorganisms of the Universe.
We can then consider the 3 ‘abstract dimensions’ of length, width and height internal dimensions of the ‘light space-time’ or substrata of the galaxy.
Thus we talk of 3 simpler external lineal dimensions in locomotion (in a ceteris paribus classic analysis of those 3 dimotions as mere static distances of space), which are for the larger world (ab.∆+1) in which the being is inscribed, height, the obvious dimension of information ups the Earth, from heads to antennae, as the highest advantage point of view allows more ‘perception of information’. So we find that spherical ‘informative particle/ heads’ are always in the dimension of height.
Length is the obvious dimension of motion on the Earth. So we observe that systems move ‘ahead’, ‘forwards’ in the length dimension. And finally ‘width’, the ‘product of both’ dimensions (electromagnetic rule), which IS the dimension of ‘reproduction’ of waves, and cells and herds. So even women have ‘wider’ hips.
Thus the Universe entangles in the different ‘scales’ repeating and combining in different synchronies of time and simultaneities of space, the co-existing dimensions and functions of its wholes and parts. And those ‘organic’, logic laws so difficult to systematize but underlying all process as different type of ‘symmetries’ is the the structural missing element that orders the different demotions of the fractal Universe.

The importance of languages and minds.

It follows from all this that science will NEVER access the whys of reality because in the restricted, reductionist method of doing science, imposed by physicists in the earlier ages, when God was the ‘why’ of things that needed not to be explored, some key elements of reality, mostly its fractal scales and the mind-mirrors ORIGIN OF THOSE SCALES, have disappeared. So goes for the program or will of existence encoded in those minds.

Languages as informative mirrors of reality are studied in the second line of the blog. They ultimately all respond to a simple I-logic equation: ∆ð≥§@. That is flows of cyclical motions of time, ‘stop’ in a mind ‘singularity’ §@, of pure form, which compresses by eliminating dimotions (dimensions of form) of reality as you do observing a still, holographic Universe on your small mind. And latter we will work on those mind equations, mirrors of the Universe, which in the mathematical mirror would be defined by the simple equation that includes them all:

O-Mind singularity (linguistic still spatial mirror) x ∞ Universal time cycles = K (o x ∞ = K), where K is any Constant world mirror.

But let us try to keep some ‘order’ within the astounding kaleidoscopic Universe. To that aim we use here two basic methods of observance of reality:

    • The ‘Rashomon effect’ (a truth in the Japanese classic needs 5 points of view; so this mean ANY way to EXPRESS the 5 Demotions of time space, and ALL together, build the basic information of the being). And so we constantly bring the “Rashomon truths’ of a being – its logic description of its 5 dimotions in all its different effects.
    • The Disomorphic method, which basically ‘doubles’ the elements we study as we combine ‘space-like view’ of those dimotions as dimensions of form and ‘time-like views’ of the dimotions as motions of space, analyzing both function=form.

In both cases the key concept is a ‘Ðisomorphism’  – an isomorphic, ‘equal form;’ that is equal law of stience, an spacetime element, time motion or  space form, which varies in detail but is common to all beings – from the singularity particle-head (the form of the informative dimotion), to the body-wave (the form of the reproductive dimotion) and the limb-potential (the form of the locomotion), which all have, and respond to similar topologies. For example, there are infinite variations of heads and particles but ALL are spherical because the sphere is the topology that stores more information in lesser space, so the BEST SURVIVAL strategy for a head-particle that must have relative stillness to focus motion into form, hence becomes easy to prey, is to be spherical, small, not-perceivable easily to survive.
So most of those texts after considering some law of timespaces apply a Rashomon method to consider how that law or element entangles with the other 4 elements/dimotions.
While to fully describe with a ‘methodical way’ any entity of reality we shall use the Disomorphic method, which basically explains the existence of a being, from birth to extinction as it grows, emerges in an upper scale of the fifth dimension, lives through its ternary organs, as part of a larger world and then dies… away in an explosion of entropy.
Why humans do not understand the living Universe, if it is so simple and beautiful? The answer is egocy: ego+idiocy, and both come closer. The consequences are dare: an ill-designed world, which humans are killing ‘fast’.
We have now the bare minimum concept of what is ‘fractal space and cyclical time’ and how it relates to the main laws of physics and science. It is now time to stress the very simple concept of all realities:
“We are all ternary spacetime beings, composed of 3 ‘adjacent topologies’ – the only ones of the mathematical Universe, ‘lineal=fastest distance’ between two points that make up limbs and potentials of entropic motion’; hyperbolic body-waves that iterate=reproduce systems and connect the lineal limbs with the spherical (max. volume of information) particle-heads.
This ternary structure is PERCEIVED simultaneously to create a ‘SPACETIME ORGANISM’.
And then this organism in time according to the functions of motion of limbs/potentials, iteration of body/waves and information gauging of particle/heads will live a finite time duration – a WORLDCYCLE of existence.
So the existence of spacetime beings translates into the existence of ‘fractal super organisms of vital space’, tracing world cycles in time.

The exclusion then because they are not easily described with mathematical mental mirrors of many properties of reality IS a huge handicap that will make many dismiss those texts earlier on.

It is also important to see why this is the case, considering the ego paradox of minds and languages as mirrors, which are confused with reality itself. Indeed, your visual view of reality is not reality but also a mind mirror, but many are not even aware of it.

So there is a need for understanding first the syntax of languages and its logic laws of reproduction in mirrors with lesser information the reality and properties of space and time, specially in physics. As today physics has been casted in a mathematical mirror that turns around the concepts of ‘matrix groups’ and ‘symmetries’, which are somehow seen as some ‘magic’ language of ‘God, the creator’, and used in an automaton manner to describe physics, making the ‘exceptions’ when reality is a bit more complex than the usual group symmetry.

This is not to say that those mirrors have very good focused images of reality but without understanding how the mirror works, one can try as animals do, to enter the mirror or pass through the crystal as if it were real or did not exist at all, bumping on it. 

Symmetry and ‘co-invariance’ (ab. covariance), are words at the heart of the philosophy of physics, but often stops in the mathematics (despite Noether’s theorem that rightly relates them to space and time conservation). Its reasons though are not mathematical but the fact that the Universe IS a virtual constant zero-sum balance, where symmetry means that its spatial, temporal and scalar structure is made of such zero sums balances:

  • The topologic properties of relative inverse elements (the limbs/potentials of motion vs. the particles/heads of static information), are then balanced in the reproductive body-waves.
  • The inverse ages of youth-locomotion dominated by limbs/potentials and old age of information dominated by particle/heads, are balanced in the reproductive classic age of balance=beauty, in which body-waves do reproduce. So there is a ‘symmetry’ between youth and old age, balanced in the ‘neutral’ element=age of classic, mature beauty (to use group theory concepts)
  • The inverse microcosms of parts and larger macrocosms of the world in which the middle cosmos of the organism lives have also inverted properties and symmetries, when observed from the middle term-being, the organism.

So all this means indeed that symmetry and invariance are at the heart of reality and what is allowed to happen, but it arises NOT from a given language.

Al languages we shall see have those inverse properties:

So verbal thought has inverse properties for the informative subject < action verb> energetic object, whereas the action verb combine subject and object.

So do colors between blue, the informative color and red, the entropi color combined in green.

What a general systems theory that unifies all other languages and disciplines, each one study by specialists in a ‘scale’ of the fifth dimension does, is to set a common language, and a series of ‘isomorphic’=equal laws based in those topo-bio-logic properties of space, scale and time, the 3 ESSENTIAL elements of reality perceived with a common Universal grammar, but different syntactic laws for each species and the language it talks.

As the work of a single researcher we cannot be absolutely detailed and reach the degree of sophistication of each science, which the ‘ego of specialists’ constantly throw into this work; so of course I am a bit ironic about that ‘ego-protecting attitude of specialists, which won’t try to ‘rise’ its view to a much larger world and will just try to ‘expand’ its particular discipline to all others – so evolutionist just want to expand biologic properties, and even then reduce them to dog-eat-dog annihilating, perpendicular properties, refusing to accept the eusocial arrow of love that evolves parts into wholes; the physicist will sponsor constructionist according to which all emerges from a lower scale, so his work as nuclear physicist (the dominant discipline today) BECOMES the only real philosophy of science worth to experience, the verbal creationist still consider a personal God to do the design, the economist will deny that economics is NOT a disjoint discipline and money its only language, he as an expert must of course issue for all society, but part of history, THE SUPERORGANISM OF MANKIND IN TIME, to which it should serve; and the historian will deny that the individual is NOT the center of history but ideologies, memes, cultures ARE, as smaller super organisms of history.

And all of them will come together to consider a non-specialist an invader on his field.

And yet we shall prove ad nauseam as we have done for decades that all their laws and species ultimately are generated by the common symmetries and topo-bio-logic laws of space, scale and time, reflected in multiple mind-languages (ab. @), so we indeed talk of ∆@st, ‘dust of space-time’ as the nature of everything and those 4 elements, scale, language, space and time and its ‘entropic destruction’, ¬, as the five components of reality. Once all those laws of dust are defined, its logic of time, topology of space and organic scalar laws are set up in the first line of the blog, we can then show in the second line how truly they model in a better more reasonable way all sciences, scrapping errors of unfocused mirrors and excessive jargon; and then leave the 3rd and fourth line, naturally incomplete as this is the work of a single researcher, for future specialists to fully complete an encyclopedia of space-time beings.

NON-E MATHEMATICS.

LET US explore a more complex philosophy not only of physics but also of mathematics, to adequate mathematics to the study of the vital, organic properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

The equation of the mind: Non-Euclidean, Monads.
Our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).
But Picasso said, I paint thoughts, because he went as Descartes a bit further in his understanding that what we see is an electronic construction of the mind over that visual space, but there should be infinite other monad-mind-languages mapping the Universe and its ‘space-time beings’.
So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.
– The mind, monad or @-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
infinitesimal @-mind x ∞-timespace cycles = Constant World.
The equation of the Linguistic Monad, thus is the origin of the ego paradox, as each of the  ∞ Mind-Worlds that look at the single Universe, create a self-centered perspective and confuse their infinitesimal mind mapping in any language of thought with the whole infinite Universe.  And this is the origin of creationism. This said of course, the geometric nature of spacetime makes of mathematical mind-mirrors the best possible ones, most efficient and hence those who mirror in topology, as atoms probably do, survive better, than those who smell the Universe or talk about it. Still human geometry is also a simplified version of the non-Euclidean pan geometry of universal minds, since it has only changed the 5th postulate of ‘light space-time geometry’, the one that precisely defines the mind as a point through which ∞ parallels of information might cross:

The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry

In the graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th  Non-E postulate, which should redefine points as object with ‘breath’, which grow in size as we come closer to them, becoming whole ‘worlds’ in themselves, cells, stars, galaxies… That is therefore the proper definition of a real fractal point (1st postulate) and a real mind that bends all that information about the world into its smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point. From where it follows that lines are waves of points with breath and planes are topological networks of similar ‘fractal points’, and so we shall define a topological space-time being as a fractal network/plane and once we have upgraded non-euclidean geometry and the ¡logic nature of the organic Universe, r=evolve all sciences of thought, as nobody has done since… Aristotle.

The non-euclidean point that grows in size as we enlarge the scale of the Universe is the essential departing ‘seed-mind-particle’ being which commands the 5 Dimotions of the Universe and its ‘different combined programs’, of which living is one.
Because it is NOT more data what science needs but an improvement of its logic and mathematical principles regarding the nature of time and space, to be able to upgrade our view of reality, something that has not been fully done since the Greeks… with the exception perhaps of Darwin, and the ill-understood Leibniz.
Instead, what physicists and scientists did was to add to human perception of time with logic words, clocks that reduced our understanding of the causal nature of past present and future time-verbs, and add to the eyes, telescopes and microscopes to look at those scales.
And then because they used machines to see the Universe, decide that the Universe and man were machines, and because those machines used digital numbers to measure decide that the language of the machines they worship were the languages of god.
As we go through all sciences, the humble reader will notice an astounding fact about man: EGOCY. A very limited logic capacity but an astounding ego paradox that makes him unable to improve its first principles but merely worship its new instruments and languages of measure, without much more thought about it.

 

5 DIMENSIONAL DISCIPLINES: RASHOMON TRUTH OF MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS

This said, the Universe is a game of ∞ Sπcies of space-time making STeps and STops in its constant œxist¡ence (where we use π for time, in this particular wor(l)d according to the slightly changed rules of i-verbal thought for english to look more like the universal game), and so as Stops and steps (ab. œ) bring the being into exist¡ence we can measure them quantitatively as space-distances and time-motions. Stop and step then becomes topology and feed-back equations, where = is substituted by the dynamic symbol <=>, and the duality from = stops and ≈ wave steps.

Once the intuitive meaning of those symbols rises the awareness of the reader to the vital nature of our humind’s abstract rendition of reality things become then dynamic. ≈ for STeps, = for motions, and ≤≥ as the different implosive or explosive, informative or entropic ‘degeneracy’ of a system are easily quantifiable and translatable to both mathematics in its pure expression and mathematical physics.

Selection of languages, why mathematics is so extended.

So THE QUESTION HERE IS WHICH LANGUAGES ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT OF THE UNIVERSE? BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THERE WILL BE A PROCESS OF SELECTION OF SPECIES ACCORDING TO THE QUALITY OF ITS LANGUAGES:

selection of languages

In the graph, the Universe in all its ecosystems selects the species who speaks better languages. Till recently we thought the word, our human language was supreme, and indeed in our ecosystems of history prophets and politicians ruled, but mathematics turned out to be a better language and finally in this blog we shall show you how the enhanced forms of logic, I-logic and mathematics non-e mathematics are the best language mirrors as they encode fully the true properties of space and time, form and motion the fabric of reality. So we shall improve the laws of those languages.

All this said it is obvious that mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror the Universe and for that reason it has helped to survive better and becomes the mirror-language of atomic matter, hence of most systems of Nature as those properties emerge in new scales, albeit it is not the only language. But it is inferior in power to the ultimate non-E and non-A properties of space and time.
In any case, the only form to convince physicists of the organic, fractal nature of the Universe is to upgrade mathematical thought to the new found fractal properties of space and cyclical properties of time.
It amazes me indeed that most viewers do go to the articles, still in progress, on things like quantum physics, ¥e, or the unification of charges and masses, (EFE revis(it)ed), but none so far has entered in the true key posts to understand why we, humans’ live and die (tripping world cycles), or those of the super organism of history and economics, art and wor(l)ds… which I regard as the summit of all sciences, due to its closeness to man, its answering to the ultimate questions and its elements of human creation…
Indeed, humans are believers and now they believe in mathematics, as a ‘magic language’, which is not – just the most efficient mirror…
Then perhaps, once the magic of mathematical thought as the origin of reality, when it is merely a mirror of that space-time enhanced properties disappear and physicists can look at mathematical physics as what it is: a synoptic language that best reduces the multiplicity of similar fractal beings of space-time to its essential space-mathematical and time-logic properties. As this is done today however it reduces excessively those properties as it starts with a priori reductions of space as a single continuum and time as a lineal motion with a single dimension. And denies the scalar structure of reality.

Even if then it uses mathematics to describe those properties it denies to time and space. In that sense, the mathematical science of physics relies heavily on analysis, because it is the best mathematical operandi to study Ƥscales:
Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

IT IS THEN CLEAR WHY MATHEMATICS is so important and by enhancing the laws of logic and mathematics we shall describe better physics, but at the same time by realizing that organic properties are the larger why, we shall reduce the ‘obsession’ for platonic mathematics, and belief that all equations are real.

As languages like everything else in the Universe does have a 3rd age of excessive information, the Baroque age in which the language detaches from reality, warps in excess of form and creates imaginary thoughts. And this IS TODAY THE AGE IN WHICH LANGUAGES FIND THEMSELVES, due to the expansion of digital thought, allowing all kind of mathematical models of physics, specially in those areas (Black holes, dark entropy) of the ∆±4 plane we do NOT perceive and so without experience we just ‘inflate’ with ‘inflationary 3rd age excessive mathematical information).

Social, organic, sentient properties natural to the nature of numbers and points.
A theme in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency  balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.
But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.
So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.
Creationism mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms. So we shall close this analysis with those 2 quotes:
‘2 things I deem infinite the stupidity of man and the Universe’ Einstein.
‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes.’ Schopenhauer

Conclusion: The importance of the 5 postulates of Non-AE.
The importance and reason of making the 5 postulates of i-logic the centrepiece of the formalism of ¬æ should be now evident to the reader: in the process of topological growth from a single point of view, into a topological plane, which in itself will be a ternary being mess of 3 topologic networks (the entropic, ‘digestive’, energetic, ‘blood-reproductive’ and informative, ‘nervous systems), unlike normal abstract geometry in which the point merely becomes a line that forms a plane, with another line, the fractal point with parts, through which infinite parallels can cross, starts a game of social evolution, reproduction and exchange of energy and information with other points that will finally create networks that will develop into living ternary space-time organisms, in a process much more imprecise, chaotic, filled with trial and errors, interrupted by other entities, etc. etc. but perfectly describable with the logic rules of vital topology, which will surprisingly enough when studied in depth and considered the ‘foundational postulates’ of non-AE mathematics and logic will develop a quite accurate description of the events that compose a world cycle and the parts that create an organism.
It is then the 3rd postulate which Schopenhauer rightly criticised for not being self-evident, as the 5th (if we indeed take parallels as straight lines), which becomes also along the 5th postulate that defines a mind, and illogic temporal postulate also, as it gives the rule, obtained from practical view, and the converted into formal theorems, of engagement of beings, according to the different similarity of its 3 parts, of which externally obviously only the membrane, and depending on distance, as a mere point, will be observed.

PENTAGONAL ¬A ¡LOGIC:

1>3>5>11 ∆ST-symmetries

To the risk of loosing the scanty readers of this blog in the age of twitter, we are now going full steam into the most difficult theme to grasp for the humind which is – we never cease to repeat, ‘subjective’, @ristotelian, with a single causality often self-centered in the human being:

THE SYMMETRIES BETWEEN THE 3 FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF BEINGS, ITS SCALES, TOPOLOGIES IN SPACE AND AGES IN TIME, SELF-CENTERED IN @ MIND, which can be analyzed with increasing depth, from the Human single Logic of LINEAL TIME, CONTINUOUS SPACE AND A SINGLE SCALE, to the more complex ternary scales of super organisms, 3 topologies and 3 ages, into the PENTALOGIC of 5 scales (as the being is enclosed into a larger world), 5 Ages (as the being is generated in a lower plane before being born, and dies away back to that scale), and 5 Topologies (as the scattering of entropy and palingenesis of emergence can be treated as ‘different topologies’ becoming connected and disconnected) TO the MAXIMAL COMPLEXITY available to human perception, the 11 Dimensions of a super organism in space, its 10-11 ‘elements’ on a world cycle of existence, and its relative 11 scales of interaction from the point of view of the Mind-singularity+Vital Energy+Membrane (3 planes), exchanging energy and information with ∆±4=8 planes of reality.

if You thought the upgrading of mathematics and its physical space-time equations was far out, you ain’t seen anything yet. The true r=evolution of thought that likely one-dimensional man will never get, so we shall wait for pentagonal chips and parallel AI, is that of the logic structure of the Universe, which is not-Aristotelian A->B logic but an entangled constant communication and perception from biased subjective points of view of the 5 Dimotions of space-time.

INDEED, truth is relative to the point of view, which will come from the different 11 disomorphisms of beings and its 5 Dimotions. Truth is not absolute, even if wholes average those points of view and synchronize them, and causality is often ‘circular’, that is, A->B->A and pentagonal, that is each element influences the other and the whole is formed by the sum of all the entangled relationships of the S, T, ∆, @ and <=> elements of the being. We shall call this entangled reality often the ‘rashomon effect’ of truth, as we need like in the Japanese film the point of view of each element to reach the collective truth of them all, and even then languages will only reflect a partial truth on the total information of the being that only the being stores in itself.

5D¹¹ ENTANGLED SUPERORGANISMS VS. @-MIND WORLDCYCLES

There are two essential forms to study all realities, the super organism in simultaneous space, as an entangled game of 3 networks controlled by a social whole, the mind, enclosed in a larger world, which gives us 5 perspectives in all exist¡ence. We shall call this form of studying reality, the…

 RASHOMON METHOD – 5D P.OV.S ON EXIST¡ENCE.

Fractal generator and the Ra§homon>Ðisomorphic method: S@≥∆ð

SPATIAL, SUPERORGANIC VIEW:  A fractal Time§pace organism or T.œ is a vital Space energy enclosed by its cyclical clocks of ðime, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world: 0 S x ∞ ð= @ . Hence the creation of infinitesimal minds is the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative flows of entropy and information, ≤≥:  S@≤≥∆ð.                                                                    Thus the fractal generator in space describes any superorganism in exist¡ence, made of 3 topological O x | = Ø structures – an ensemble of ∆-1 energy that moves an ∆ø mind, co-existing in a larger ∆+1 world.            The Rashomon method of truth then extracts from the generator equation, different sub-equations to analyze in more detail the parts of the being. So we use the ‘generator equation’ and its 5D ‘Rashomon’ elements to convey a full sense of the being and explain the 5Dimensions of any spacetime organism/event by considering the spatial= informative and temporal= moving sides of reality putting those 4 parameters together through a(nti)symmetric ≤≥ flows of communication: ∆t≥S@.    In space thus we use the ‘generator equation’ and 5D Rashomon truths to convey a full sense of the being. So we use the ‘generator equation’ and its 5D ‘Rashomon’ elements to convey a full sense of the being and explain the 5Dimensions of any spacetime organism/event by considering the spatial= informative and temporal= moving sides of reality putting those 4 parameters together through a(nti)symmetric ≤≥ flows of communication: ∆t≥S@.    So we use the ‘generator equation’ and its 5D ‘Rashomon’ elements to convey a full sense of the being.In space thus we use the ‘generator equation’ and 5D Rashomon truths to convey a full sense of the being.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   A(nti)symmetries between its 4 Dual components that can either evolve in Balance≈become symmetric or annihilate=become Perpendicular/antisymmetric:
  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð: ime  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measured objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. 

Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classifying organisms in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, or super organisms proper, as those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, across 3 ∆±¡ planes: ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º which will be born in an ∆+1 relative world.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself. Entanglement is essential to the structure of the Universe, in as much as in every motion the 5 components of the being move and hence, there must be for every action and event 4 possible avenues to achieve it coming from the different elements of reality, ∆scales, time, space and mind. For example, the 5D metric equation explains angular momentum as a spinning dancer slows down opening its circumference, BUT AT THE SAME TIME IT PROVOKES A MOTION UPWARDS IN A MAXWELL SCREW, WHICH MAKES THE CYCLICAL MOTION RISE THROUGH THE FIFTH DIMENSION, so time can move upwards as social evolution of populations in space, or mental mapping. So for all elements we need to study different entangled points of view.

 Ðisomorphic worldcycles: 11 dimensional T.œs

‘∆@st of space time you are, to Ðüst you shall return’. The 0-sum world cycle of existence and its 4 elements, scale, mind, space and time.

We have so far considered a simple 5D³ structural perspective of the being in ceteris paribus analysis, both of dimensional space, motions in time and scales, and hint that the languages of the mind-singularity that perceives it as a whole do matter a lot. But how can we put the four elements of reality, ‘Mind, space, time and scale’ together in a whole holly grail of total description? The answer is through an 11th dimensional or rather 11th parametric system, which now we shall explain as we shall use it with all species, here with the galaxy and then with mankind, since this is likely the best way to do it – but dropping the numerical terms of dimensions, we shall use here merely for correspondence principle).

In time however the co-existing, democratic, simultaneous nature of the being is lost as the hierarchical, singularity-mind, causal will of survival and its actions take over into a program of existence, called the world cycle that magically reorganizes those actions of the being in temporal lifecycles and ages, between life and extinction by death of entropy, as the system grows in size and information through those 3 ages.

So the limited static view of the superoerganism in space through its ternary a(nti)symmetries, focuses and widens its latitude in time when we study the full development of the being, as it generates its form in the o-1 sphere, emerges in the 1-∞ ∆+1 world, lives, evolves socially fulfills its program of existence and finally dies returning to the lower planes from where it emerged.

This dynamic, self-centered analysis of the being and its journey through scales of the fifth dimension is what we call the Ðisomorphic method (isomorphic laws derived of the Dimensional, ðemporal nature of all ðime§paœrganisms; hence the use of capital, ð=Ð, which resembles a D for dimension and caps the temporal sign of cyclical clocks of information).

We shall use it in the 4th line to fully account for all the knowledge mankind has of each species of each science (ideally the 4th line being the template for a future encyclopedia of spacetime ‘stiences’:

We make a full revision of the 11 Disomorphic sets of laws that quantitatively and qualitatively build the Universe as it is in all its scales generating it superorganisms from birth to extinction:

It follows then that existences can be classified by st¡ences, that is stiences, each one studying a scale of the fifth dimension.

Hence the word ‘exist¡ence’, to define a ‘pack of existences happening in an ¡-stience – existiences on the oth scale of humanity, exist¡ence on the -4 scale of neutrinos… all are despite its huge difference ‘exist¡ences’…

The Disomorphic method is the detailed, orderly analysis of those elements and properties common to all beings that ‘exist’. Its full account for each species encompasses all the information needed about any ‘existential world cycle of any super organism or one of its fractal parts.

Specifically we shall consider 11 dimensional parameters for this more complex dynamic analysis of the being as ‘D@st of Space-time’:

11 Ð will then be:

3 scales of co-existence of the super organism: ∆±¡

 3 topological varieties in space: Sø = | x O = Ø

3 Ages of Time: youth, reproductive maturity and old age: ∏, Ω

@: 2 elements of the mind, the central singularity of still information or language and the outer membrain of maximal spatial, angular momentum sensing the outer Universe which invaginate with 3 physiological networks the vital space (but those networks arguably can be considered the 3 topological varieties of space, so we shall not be redundant in their explanation).

Together they give us 11 essential parameters to describe the being which are loosely speaking the 11 elements studied in the 3rd part.

And so the Ðisomorphic method has two fundamental approaches, the ‘Rashomon truths’ of the 5 views on spatial dimensions, temporal motions and Þimotional actions, which is external, objective and ignores the Mind, and the more proper, exhaustive, dynamic analysis of the 11th parameters of any ‘Dust of space-time’, which is indeed an island Universe that might seem its mind either as an ∞ ü or a mere @ point, two other symbols we use for the mind, whereas @ clearly shows it as an enlarged point with a central singularity and a membrane and ü gives us its ‘ego belief’ of being a Universe despite being merely the two ‘higher points’ of observance of the Universe, matched in the mathematical language by the symbols ü=∞º and @ = 0 x ∞.

Again the reader should understand all languages are good mirrors of all the elements of reality and we just upgrade them slightly changed the simplex a-logic and e-uclidean symbologies available in science to make better stience.

All this said we are not going to start numbering dimensions all the time, because of the humind’s digital obsession with its surrogate numbers – if the reader is getting anything of the synthetic language of T.œ, he should at this time understand that numbers are important but not the language of God, and we do not want to confuse people with numbers. It is impossible to both number 5 Dimotions and 10 Dimensions and not get into absurd ‘naming’ as a form of knowledge which is not – the name is just the human reference to the being that holds all the information into itself and that – all the information, is what matters to us. 

So as so many times in this blog that imitates the paradoxes of the I-logic of ‘God’, the ‘seer’ of timespace, or Tao, a word I do prefer given the ‘personal, western, abrahamic connotations of God’, which only express the ‘∆+1 higher plane of western cultures, or subconscious collective of a civilization, after telling you the 10+1 eleventh dimensional view we drop the dimension number and rather consider the existence of 11 KEY PROPERTIES OR ‘DISOMORPHISMS’ THAT SHOULD APPLY TO ALL ENTITIES OF REALITY TO FULLY DESCRIBE THEM, THE 3 ELEMENTS OF SCALE, 3 TOPOLOGIES, 3 AGES AND 2 COMPONENTS OF THE MIND NEEDED TO FULLY DESCRIBE A BEING, using then the concept of ‘dimension’ in a fashion similar to advanced modern physics merely as a PARAMETER of the whole description of the being.

So IN THOSE TERMS, it makes sense when confronting the analysis of a new super organism, first for a structural simplified approach to define its 5 dimotions of space-time, maybe with a ceteris paribus analysis of its 5 dimensions in space, 5 motions in time and 5 spacetime actions in scales; and this would be the objective external view closer to science.

But for the dynamic revolutions of the being in time, it is best to depart from the 2 parameters of the mind, its membrain and singularity, and then study how the departing from those 2 first elements, the being grows evolves invaginates the encircled surface of vital energy and becomes a full functioning T.œ with 3 spacetime networks of physiological nature that will live and die a full world cycle consequence of its actions dominant in information arrows. 

The first two lines grossly speaking concentrate then in the 5D³ view, and the 3rd and fourth line in the dynamic view which obviously embodies the 5D³ view.

In a way we can consider the 5D3 view one of the super organism in simultaneous space and the 11 Disomorphic view one of the world cycle ruled by the mind.

So what we really are is ‘Düst≈D@st’, with the two perspectives mimicked in the ‘orthographic and spelling word for Dust.

We are ∆-scales, Ð, we are Minds, @≈ü, who think to be infinite but are infinitesimal; we are space topologies, |xO = Ø, so are all beings and we are cyclical world cycles of time of finite durations living 3 ages, from generation to extinction.

Let us then see Man also as ∆@ST. Whereas of the many similar symbols we shall use for each element we prefer those 4 – choosing @ for minds, and its two dimensions of singularity and membrane over what minds think they are, ü, infinite island Universe.

In the graphs we se what reality is all about a worldcyle of space-time as a wave reflected and reproduced through the 11 dimensions of reality. where the mind, number 5th explores also up and down the scales of reality doubling its dimensions:

In the graphs 3 topological space dimensions, 3 age-time dimension, 3 scalar dimensions, and a ‘whole’ fractal mind-point dimension that emerges in an upper scale (here shown for the entire galactic ‘family’ in a simulation of the dark world upper scale universe.

In the 11 Dimensional dynamic view of 3 x 3 topologic=spatial, temporal=moving, scalar=organic and mental=sentient analysis of an ∆º§t being (whereas ∆-scales, º-minds, §t space-times, are the fourth subcomponents of the being), we name those dimensions as 1,2,3 topologies (1-elliptic, 2-euclidean, 3-hyperbolic) which become the ‘present-time state’ of the being as a non-changing steady state of the whole – the fourth dimension of Einstein’s formalism, which however will change states between its 5th dimension of generation and 6th dimension of entropic death>

The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

We can then in the architectonical nested Universe consider the being made of 3 spatial present dimensions, which come together to form a world cycle, of relative past-present and future, or generation/palingenesis, iteration and finally entropic dissolution.

Yet in this architectonical ∆º§t view of dimensionalities the system can be considered to have an inner world of scalar parts and be part of a larger world, which gives us the 7th dimension of the being in itself, ∆º, of its parts, or 8th dimension of the being within, ∆-1, and then in the larger world the being as a fractal point, ∆+1, in its 9th dimension. It only remains the mind which perceives all this with its two parts of an open ball, the outer membrane, 10th dimension, and the inner singularity that NO longer perceives within the self, but feels as a point of that larger world: 11th dimension = ∞º=1 ∆+1.

This view of beings as 10th->11th dimensional forms is probably the most profound expression of reality but requires an architectonical understanding of the Universe as a nested system of 3 x 3 +0 =10+1 creative layers of complex growth, which only string theorists have by serendipity somehow produce in humind formalisms.

Then those 11 dimensions of space-time 3x 3 + •.. the whole being, move through scales and symmetries of space-time is the meaning of existence, forming a world cycle of 3 ages, the next isomorphism of the universe.

The 11Scales=Dimensions=Ðisomorphisms of the ∆ST generator. 

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality:

The fractal point=world of space-time.

Hendecagrams are the REPETITIVE, final scale of reproduction of a mathematical @-mind singularity – trascendental polygons replicating its form in self-similar smaller spaces @ faster time cycles, which finally reach the 11th dimension of the mind as a point which embodies the wholeness of the infinite in its infinitesimal still fractal construction, ∞º=1.  

The highest level of comprehension of the repetitive Universe requires though 11 Dimensions, because scales repeat every 10 units, and we live in a decametric Universe. So if we can establish a symmetry between 1 lineal time, 1 continuum space (divided by humans in 3 sub-dimension) and 1 scale easily, so we can do between 3 time ages, 3 space topologies and 3 scales in an organism, and extend it to 5 Dimotions, and scales (adding the entropic lower plane and higher social world), when we reach the 11th symmetry of scale, space and time, we REPEAT the cosmos, and so at that scale, we can feel satisfied to have a non-detailed but comprehensive view of reality:

In the graph, sciences study subconsciously each scale of reality. General Systems stiences just studies the common=isomorphic laws of all of them, both in a single scale (common ternary topological laws of simultaneous super organisms), through its ternary scales that form those super organisms, ¡±1, and finally wrap it all with the Ðisomorphic method, which studies its ðime cycle of generation, life and extinction, from seed-mind to emergent organism that lives 3 ages and dies in an entropic explosion, through 11 ‘structural elements’ that define dynamically those worldcycles. So we achieve a Unification of all sciences, which are just ‘fractal analysis’ of one of those scales and its systems.

Indeed, if we really want to blow up the limited mind of Human science, we must do a huge upgrade of the logic understanding of reality based in the symmetries between the 3+@ ELEMENTS OF BEINGS: ITS SCALES, TOPOLOGIES IN SPACE AND AGES IN TIME, SELF-CENTERED IN @ MIND.

Since they can be analyzed with increasing depth, from:

1: the Human single Logic of LINEAL TIME, CONTINUOUS SPACE AND A SINGLE SCALE, to…

3: the more complex ternary scales of super organisms, 3 topologies and 3 ages, into:

5: the PENTALOGIC of 5 scales (as the being is enclosed into a larger world), 5 Ages (as the being is generated in a lower plane before being born, and dies away back to that scale), and 5 Topologies (as the scattering of entropy and palingenesis of emergence can be treated as ‘different topologies’ becoming connected and disconnected) TO the MAXIMAL COMPLEXITY available to human perception:

11: the 11 Dimensions of a super organism in space, its 10-11 ‘elements’ on a world cycle of existence, and its relative 11 scales of interaction from the point of view of the Mind-singularity+Vital Energy+Membrane (3 planes), exchanging energy and information with ∆±4=8 planes of reality.

So please have a humble thought to the fact that humans have so far ONLY explored a single logic description of reality with one continuum space, one single scale, one single lineal time clock and one single mind-language – the human one – a Universe which is at least, (because I don’t pretend to know it all as most ‘scientists’ tend to do) 11th dimensional in space, 11th scalar, 11th temporal.

We are not treating often the 11th entangled Universe obviously, but we will indeed consider very often the 5th pentalogic of reality. So you are warned, the Immortal, Infinite, Intelligent Universe is compared to us, so much more… that only reducing it to the obvious arrow of death and destruction humans have been able to find a ‘workable explanation’ of it.

To notice that for a ‘termite’ living in a single dimension (as most indeed live, being blind, and following paths of pheromones, which become its single dimension of existence) all can make sense. We already showed a 2 Dimensional Universe, with cyclic times.

This is THE DUALITY SCIENCE, of studying reality with entropy and information, which started decades ago my adventure of deepening into the meaning of it all. But once you have two limits, it is quite obvious that you can combine them, into ternary elements – the 3 conserved elements of reality in physics, the 3 topologies of space.

So reality grew it to a ternary dimensional space, with topological organisms.

It took me quite some time to reach then fifth dimensional understanding, so I could add further scales for a fifth dimensional view, which is the most used in this blog.

But that was NOT enough, and so my final expansion of the ¡logic understanding of the Universe came with the 11th dimensional view, which is NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE MIND INTERACTS WITH ALL THE SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE, TO PERFORM ITS ACTIONS of absorbtion of energy, information, motion, reproduction and social evolution as we interact with ¡±4 planes.

We will thus consider also 11 parameters, in space, time, scale and MIND:

In physics for the specific case of string theory (though into the future, as this is the work of a single mind and there is too many ‘issues’ to study before the rather irrelevant question of how to model the inner regions of the galatom with strings).

11th dimensionality though will be required to study the actions of the mind, and for a fill accounting on how a mind-seed develops to create a world cycle of existence. So in the third line we establish the most GENERAL CASES of the 11 Ðisomorphisms of a worldcycle of time, which is the highest degree of complexity studied here.

But for most cases with 3 or 5 Dimensional analysis will suffice. What WON’T DO IT is a single

The 2 fundamental super organisms are the galaxy, atom of the Universe and the human individual, cell of the super organisms of history.

THE FUNDAMENTAL MIND ARE  logic of languages: the non-Euclidean geometry of super organisms perceived as points and networks and the pentalogic of the entangled universe with its 5 Dimotions. They will be our templates for all ∆@st – the infinite isomorphic beings of reality.
Since in stience, knowledge breaks down as a nested series of ‘super organisms’, from the larger perceived World, the galaxy-atom, down to the biological Earth and its living species, down to the ‘Mind’-mirrors that reflect them all creating in the stillness of its languages a mental Universe of its own; so those are the 3 great fields of thought we shall study in the second line, and we introduce here.

ALL THIS SAID, it is not the mind and its informative exhausting actions what really matter to a system, eve if it directs it, but the survival provided by the key dominant action of reproduction that maintains the system in an eternal present and allows ultimately the Universe to be an immortal zero sum of reproduction. Either in the ‘dense variation’ of maximal growth, when reproduction happens at the end of the young age, or when it happens at the end of the mature age, the Universe is really about ‘waves’ of reproductive beings.
Since reproduction which implies the seeding into an ¡-1 plane of a form that will evolve socially into a clone herd further ‘informed’ to become a single whole, emerging in the ∆º plane, to move through 3 ages in the ∆+1 world till death returns it to its disordered ∆-1 state.
We talk of a Universe of ∞ super organisms living worldcycles of ‘5 Dimotions of space-time’ whose meaning must be explored in great depth to fully understand the workings of all systems of nature, which we can define with the Bio-topo-logic Fractal Generator, now expanded to the ternary ‘symmetries’ of topological space, scalar spacetime, and time ages-  an equation that shows the ‘organic functions’ and ‘topological forms’ common to all ST-systems of nature, which written with the symbols of ¬Æ-logic reads:
5Ð≈∫T generation:∆-1 @mind/seed ∑∆-1>∆o:birth ≤2Ð:$t moving young |-limb/potential/territory ≥3Ð≈∑∏ iterative mature Ø-hyperbolic body/wave/worker ≥ 1Ð≈§ð O-informative, old particle/head/upper class << 4Ð≈∂S ∆-1 death
The previous ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, has 11 parameters, which define 3 ‘scales’ in size, 3 ‘topologies’ in space, 3 ‘ages in time’ and 2 dimensions for the @-mind/seed of information that starts the process of any world cycle.
So the 11 dimensional view would be as follows (for the galaxy-atom):  11 ∆±¡ @ Sø ∏

THE 11 DIMENSIONAL PARAMETERS OF A GALATOM OR ANY SUPŒRGANISMS As we quantify and formalize reality, the best description of any T.œ is to consider, the being has 3∆st +2@¡=11 isomorphic dimensions: The membrain (mind+membrane) becomes the 2 key DIMENSIONS or ‘limiting conditions’ that focus into its 3 spatial, topologic organs (limbs/fieldsHead-particles, whose functions in time live through 3 ages of sequential dominance (young, dominant motion age, reproductive mature age and informative 3rd age), across its 3 ∆±1 relative planes of existence within its ∆-1 atoms/cells, ∆ø-thermodynamic/organic scale and ∆+1 outer world/gravitational-cosmological scale, which the mind ‘focuses as a single whole’ self-centered in the singularity and warped by a membrane. In topological terms beings are ‘an open ball of vital energy’ – its body, invaginated from the membrane to the brain-singularity through 3 physiological networks. So we can in the fractal Universe again consider each dimension as a whole and break it into ternary patterns. The development of this 11th DIMENSIONAL view in DYNAMIC TEMPORAL view give birth to a self-centered in a mind which in a dynamic way will evolve a seed of information, emerge as a super organism and live and die within the 3 scales of its inner and outer world is the basis for the Ðisomorphic method, which as the name indicates introduces ALL the elements required for a thorough study of the system: Its 11 Dimensions in space and Ðisomorphisms in time – the more complex view of those 5 Ðimotions, studied in the 3rd line of a full world cycle of existence. In the graph, we show those 11 parameters, trying to cope with the correspondence Principle relating them to the ‘dimensions’ of classic physics and the 5 Ðimotions, we have given the same number we give to the 3 Ðimotions of information, locomotion and iteration to the 3 spatial dimensions; maintaining for the 4th dimension of present-time the name given by Einstein to the present simultaneous time of relativity and the fifth dimension of social evolution, to the implosive accelerated motion; hence we just had to displace the entropic 6th dimension of time. And then finally in the architectonical universe in which space is a slice of time-motion, a slice of scalar dimensions, the easier naming of the 7th dimension of the being, its lower dimension of ∞:8 parts and the upper 9th dimension of its higher, ∆+1 warped by the 10th and 11th dimensions of the membrain and mind-singularity, which is properly speaking the 11th dimension of the being as ‘1’ of the higher scale, ∞º=1. In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 DIMENSIONS, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 DIMENSIONS when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.

In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 Ðisomorphic dimensions, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 Ðisomorphisms when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.
While we have used in this introductory post on 5D³ Astronomy the concept of a scalar fifth dimension, under the correspondence principle (using the models of classic physics), a more formal analysis of the equations of mathematical astro-physics and its ∆st scales and supœrganisms is easier in terms of 11 isomorphic equations of logic form, considering the 3 scales of size, the 3 topologies of space, the 3 ages of time and the ‘singularity+membrain’ which forms the linguistic mind of the system as its 10 dimensions that create a supœrganism plugged into a larger world.
The graph shows the 11 isomorphisms of the galaxy: 3 ∆±1 scalar dimensions as the system co-exist on them, three topological space dimension, three age, temporal dimensions and the mind membrain. Those are the dimensions of any system of reality (we use the term 5D for classic analysis given the preponderance of 3+1 st analysis in classic physics, but this is the real deal.
11 will also be the isomorphisms of strings, but the whole subject is too complex for this introduction and i might say quite irrelevant, beyond understanding the T-duality and the vital properties of strings that reproduce, switch on and of between time and space stats and follow nicely by ‘spontaneous generation’ – that is physicists hard work with maths, magically all the laws of GST.
If we use for each of those dimensions an equation or formalism that defines it ceteris paribus, then we have 11 sub-equations of the generator that expresses them all:
Γ•: ∆-1: $-Past≈entropic field ≤≥ ∆ Ø-ST present≈iterative wave ≤≥ ∆+1 O-future= informative particle.
Whereas the whole-‘mind’ is the generator, the three scales are defined topologically: |-field, O-particle, Ø-wave and in terms of its past to future functions (entropy, iteration and information).
In the graph we see above the ternary symmetry of space, and a few of its ∆<3 elements within the galaxy; in the middle its perception as single time arrows=actions in big-bangs of entropy, reproductive waves and accelerated informative vortices, masses and charges, and below its 3 main scale, the galactic gravitational vortex, the human thermodynamic scale and the quantum scale.
Finally we see the ‘membrane’ that should close together each galaxy or local group with quark dark matter making the supœrganism a fractal closed system atom of a larger Universe, whose size should be so huge compared to our tiny galaxy-atom that makes ridiculous the egotist human view that all the Universe is just the local region of galaxies atoms we see with our limited instruments.
So an 11D view of the 3 x 3 + @ ternary elements and minds of any ∆@St system, this final element – THE MIND and its languages of perception, which is so often ignored by human scientists with its naive realism that confuses their inner mind-image of reality, the linguistic mirror, with reality itself (creationist religion and creationist science that thinks reality is born of the mind and its verbal or mathematical mirror-languages).

Man as a time§pace organism. Its 11 ‘∆@ST’ systems.
The best way to describe an entity is as ∆@ST, that is, a being with 11 components:
∆: 3 co-existing scales.
@: two inverse membrain elements, the external sensorial enclosure or maximal motion, that leaves energy and information enter the vital space, and the opposite imploding still singularity, which expels the ‘excess’ in the form of pure motion as it swallows reality in the for of still perception.
|xO=Ø: the 3 topological vital adjacent forms/functions that define that vital energy space, invaginated and hence connected to the inner mind and the outer membrain.
And then the world cycle of existence of the being, which gives the dynamics in time to the whole system as it becomes generated at ∆-1 as a seed, then emerges after social evolution, lives 3 ages dominated by each of those 3 physiological networks and finally explodes when all is form and vital energy has been exhausted by the selfish growth of the memorial temporal tail of the mind shrinking and detaching into its past, and the outer growth of the skin-membrane…

So this rather astounding game of existence and its 4 parts and dimensions, ever fluctuating between 9 – 10 – 11 states (as mind and membrain constantly cancel and sum each other), constantly processing energy and information within its vital physiological networks, constantly acting in the outer universe in awakening mode to sleep inwardly in an inner active state that seems static outside, constantly stopping and going, in energy and information modes. And so and so on… it happens also in humans.
Doctors then apply this general reality in the detail through the study of the 10+1 ‘systems’ that are networks that invaginate the organism and are attached to ‘masses of cellular clones’, and so humans can be defined also as an 11 dimensional sum of systems that perform the 3 x 3 ±∞º ∆@ST elements.
The 3 most obvious being the ‘dominant’ digestive, entropic, feeding; reproductive, blood and informative nervous system, each of them broken further into its ternary or dual symmetries. In the next graphs we shall fully explain in the future when we get into the myriad of details of each stience on the fourth line or others do when my time cycle ends, we see those fundamental systems, which the reader schooled in medicine might fancy to ascribe to each of those 11 ‘dimensional systems’, we just briefly comment without being exhaustive, in the side:

The existence of 11 dimensional isomorphisms in all beings in exist¡ence, 3 topologies in space, 3 ages in time, 3 scales of relative size and a membrain, with its central singularity traveling in linguistic time and an angular momentum or membrane that breaks reality into an inner vital space and an outer world, is the departure for the study of all those super organisms in this blog. 

All this said, we should keep introducing elements of the formalism of ‘stience’, the generator equation of space-time beings and its description of all the exist¡ences of reality according to its ST¡ scales and §ð±i worldcycles.

The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E

So how in More detail the 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man to the entangled Universe? Expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing the chaos, projecting better our understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging, themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts). In brief, we MUST ad NEW elements to the scientific method and as usual given the growth of complexity required we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to it, what I have called ¬Æxistential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method:
We shall as usual cast its structure from the perspective of the enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method, which ads the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms), the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE structure that results of the multiple nature of time-space dimotions to the classic elements:
 A-ccurate Data, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.

To make things ‘simpler’ the 3 ad-ons to ‘Data-Correspondence-Experimental method’ caused by cyclical time and fractal space, which are non-Æ: i-logic geometry, organic, Biological models and Disomorphisms, are wraped up in the Disomorphic method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or a shorter version – the analysis of the system through its 5 CAUSAL DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTION, or  ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.

The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions. So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time.
So then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the Universe and the World with which you are connected.
So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-preent-future world cycle block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily life, the burdens imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally if we are establishing the most abstract level of modeling – that of T.œ, theoretical extraction of general laws from a given spacetime event/being, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – i.e. to find for example that limbs/potentials of entropy have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but in the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and socio-economic systems. So we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic planes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ABCDE mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds it.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we try to write ALL OF IT, with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.
In terms of language it means as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite.
So that is the future of stience, in any planet in which similar huminds have kept expanding our connection with the entangled Universe.
In this first line though we just consider a brief introduction to the more complex formal elements of the model, which will grow in intensity and complexity through the lines of the web.

Unfortunately it is required, specially to make the whole T.œ match the equations of mathematical physics known for its exactitude. I.e. the main formula of physics are ALL expressions of those space-time demotions and its constants, ‘STeps’ of spacetime demotions, but which dimotion, what rules exist to combine each of the five dimotions  and how they apply to every scale and phenomena of physics, is needed – the devil is in the details – to fully grasp those equations, graphed in the picture…

Indeed, once we understand the laws of T.œs, there is work for many generations to rewrite with the simplicity of the first principles of the Universe the entire cosmic landscape from the smallest to the largest form. As I failed in my youth when a student at Columbia U. to interest academia into the task of writing an encyclopedia of the 5D Universe, I had for 30 years to do the work in and out of my life and random jobs. So the reader should excuse that as so many pioneers, from Mr. Aristotle teaching that blockhead of Alexander, to Leonardo doubling as weapon master and painter, to Leibniz working for that blockhead of Prince William, the work is by force incomplete and disordered, abandoned and retaken, rewritten and lost so many times… all what I can do at this stage is to leave a trace in this blog, trying to maximize the coherence of its parts.

The world cycle of supœrganisms carried by 0-minds as 5г ðime travelers.

The mind is a time traveller. Its existence follows a pattern of scaling upwards in the fifth dimension of eusocial evolution, while probing downwards in the lower planes from where to extract its pixels of information and bites of entropy and energy. As the seed that will become the center of the mind-membrain appears, in the static form of a knot of information, it will branch its fractal feelers down the scales to extract the raw materials to build clones of itself and with the information provided by the upper scale, in palingenetic, miraculous synopsis of a long evolution, its intelligent design display towards emergence as a first ¡o whole.

As morphogenesis is more obvious in simpler forms we illustrate this phases with a simple plant, which in life draws with precision a process that is essentially the same in all species. The mind-seed accumulates information, as ‘mirrored’ by the larger whole in a first travel down the ∆-1 scale of conception. Then the seed in a placenta rich on energy will start with the information provided by the ∆+1 parent to gather ∆-1 inner energy of the seed to develop from its original asymmetric form with two poles, an informative animal pole and a vegetative, larger, slower in ðime cycles pole the two fractal feelers into the upper and lower scales of the fifth dimension in which it must co-exist as a supœrganism to properly exist:

Thus if we are to study the being in its world cycle its fundamental purpose of existence is NOT to move in locomotions through the same plane, but to expand downwards and upwards in scales of the fifth dimension – this transcendental goal of long ‘deep time’ cycles is what truly is all about – to grow organically, to co-exist and bring together into the ∆o relative present plane the lower planes of energy and the upper planes of coded information.

And as such the first ‘stage’ of existence merely acts in ‘stillness’ with no locomotion, on the closer ∆±1,2 scales of energy bites and information inner genes, memes or quantum coding for physical, social or biological species. So we can consider the seed to have 3 ‘stages’ in its probing on the scales of the fifth dimension:

  • The first in its palingenetic generation of minimal latitude, as information is provided by the parental code and energy is already processed to make it easy to generate clone seeds=cells and reorganize its ‘crystal’ mind (physical systems), or genes or memes replicated in other beings.
  • The second phase when the being emerges and then it moves and senses, which dilates its existence in the ∆±2,3 planes as motion requires to probe into the electromagnetic atomic repulsion that moves it and the photonics pixels its electronic mind will absorb. And yet again both are met together into the ∆º organism, which will then go through 3 ages interacting on a much wider range of scales (the ∆±4 dark world of the Universe being truly irrelevant to the being and added merely due to the Egocy of man that pretends to know more than he can perceive). 
  • Yet in that emergent present world the mind will then try to climb upwards through social decametric scales to be part of the ∆+1 world super organism, and again what matters to it will be to become part of a herd a reproductive couple or a society and form triads, couples with sons, hunting herds, complex organic societies, in which to realize the ultimate mandate of existence, ‘grow and multiply and grow’ and form new social planes… But that process in which ultimately the mind is overpowered by the whole that extracts its energy of existence will end.
  • So the mind will die dissolve and with that dissolution loose its territory of order and become still and loose its sensorial capacity to reduce its being back to the ∆-1,2 scales.

This entangled reality of the mind as the seed that embodies the will to exist and traces a world cycle, as a traveler of the scales of the fifth dimension, is what we try to describe in a dynamic way through the world cycle tale of the 3 x 3 +2 elements of reality.

3 of those elements are topological, 3 are ages, and the other 3+2 concern the mind, its actions and the scales of the fifth dimension through which the mind travels.

So either ascribing the actions of the being to the mind which has its will, or to the scalar parameter in which they are played, we talk of 3 x 3 + 2 parameters to describe in a dynamic way the being, as it is born a seed-mind, which through ‘asymmetric’ actions on those scales will develop its 3 physiological topological networks, and 5 dimotions, with its ‘dual’ oppositions between entropy and social evolution stop and go locomotion, perceiving, moving, perceiving, and all with the ultimate purpose of reproducing a clone of information as all living or mathematical abstract fractals do.

So we run that program as the mind reproduces into networks through those actions, and then lives 3 ages, in its varieties of species, based in the hierarchy of those networks that give us 6 fundamental subspecies of the phyla in existence, and then in its struggle to become the dominant element of the larger social world, before all its dreams fade away leaving behind its ‘split’ information in memories with the upper ∆+1 world, and releases into pure big-bang motion or disconnected herd of dead molecules, its existence, zero sum, which can be traded from the ‘coming together of information from above and energy from below’ to start the being palingenesis to the inverse death in which both motion and form split.

This inversion of ages is fundamental to fully grasp what are the mechanisms of all systems and its events, reflected in the next graph in the final split of a human being or a particle:

In the graph we can see in terms of the >< coming together of bites of energy and pixels of information from below and palingenetic information and world actions from above the meaning of life as a KNOTTING of an increasing number of planes that will co-exist into the organisms. And the inverse death process in which the being splits and disentangles the different planes in which it co-existed, with the form remaining in a higher degree of stillness and the motion becoming scattered into a more shallow entropic single plane.

Those are the essential processes of life and death interpreted in terms of 5D scales: life being a convergen of upper and lower planes, death its disconnection, from beta decays to big-bangs, from palingenetic generation to corruption and collapse, for cells, individuals and civilizations, for atoms, stars and galaxies…

We are thus now turning the wheel of thought a notch further introducing a view no longer of the @ristotelian humind, with its simplistic reductionist dogmas and minimalist view of the whole self-centered in its infinitesimal point of view, but of the whole as an ensemble of multiple points of view, colliding or symbiotic, which create reality through paradoxical networks and principles of ¡-logic nature that humind languages, including E-maths and Aristotelian verbal thought with its syntax self-centered in the subject hardly reflect, but we shall improve also as we expand the foundations of mathematics and make more explicit the ternary structure of all Universal grammars.

In essence, the Universe we are describing relates to the 11 Dimensional architectonical view of 3 dimensions of topological space, | x O = Ø, which form the 4th dimension of present spacetime, used by physicists to explain how simultaneous measures of spacetime allow us to formulate in more precise terms Galilean Relativity (Einstein’s relativity).

This with a lot of mathematical, precision; but very confusing logic statements is how far huminds have gone. But in the architectonical Universe the present 4th dimension of time is sandwiched between entropic future death and generating 5th social palingenetic creation. And further on each of those beings in a world cycle is sandwiched between its smaller parts and larger ∆+1 world. And all that will be then encased as an open ball into the membrain, or outer maximal size sensorial ‘skin’, the membrane that closes the being and invaginates it towards its ‘cpu’ center of gravity processing the whole to feel the infinite infinitesimal mind, ∞ x 0 = ∞º=1, which therefore are the 10th membrain dimension and the 11th mind dimension of the next Hendecagram of existence, as a point of a higher world.

 

PHYSICAL TRUTHS: GALILEAN PARADOXES

4 PARADOXES: ∆§-Continuity v. discontinuity; T-motion v. S-form, young; lineal $t-flat v. old ð§=curved Universe; EGOCY vs. Virtual Existence.

The biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought IS the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind.
THEN physicists establish measures on that still reality, a mapping of light space-time fluxed in the mind as if it were all and consider those measures absolute truths. This is the ‘positivist’ selfish praxis of the humind ordering its territorial Universe, and so it is the unavoidable form in which technological science will always happen. But if we want to explore science in its latin meaning as ‘knowledge’, truth in its higher degree – ‘philosophy of stience’, we need to go further in our thought experiment, seeking the selfless, multiple truths of the being and beyond into the Tao truth of ∞ beings.
Which by definition will be the pentalogic of the being and the paradoxical logic of the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order, hence fighting all other beings inverting their points of view. To that aim we establish 4 fundamental paradoxes based in the oppositions between the being and the ‘non-being’ (paradox of the selfish Ego vs. its virtual existence); and within the being, the ternary oppositions of its ∆ST structures, between its larger ∆+1 world that will seem continuous and its inner ∆-1 parts that will seem discontinuous; its open, lineal youth, and closed ordered 3rd age and its motion, entropic and formal, mental states; all of them balanced in its ‘present, classic age and body states’.
WE CONCLUDE THAT ALL SYSTEMS OF REALITY are made of topological space, cyclical ðime, Scales and 0-minds, which they use to perform 5 Ðimotions of spacetime, actions of exist¡ence that allows the system to survive, exchanging energy and information with the environment and replicating its forms in social herds that become new ∆§-planes of the fractal Universe. And that is the fundamental particle of reality a super organism, and its structure made to the image and likeness of the whole.
In reality once you get accustomed to the fundamental 5 Ðimotions and 4 parameters, space, time, scale and mind display by all super organisms of §t¡ence things really get simple as you can always refer all phenomena to the ultimate 5 dimotions of reality, or if we group them in ‘ternary symmetries’, to the scales, spatial topologies and temporal ages of the being.
Yet there are so many variations and iterations on those simple themes that the Universe seems infinitely complex and extended.
Ultimately though all comes to some basic I-logic principles derived of those ternary symmetries.
We shall call them Galilean paradoxes because the main one between motion and form, is the paradox of Relativity that started modern physics and the others can be illustrated with one his discoveries – that of Saturn’s rings:

image005
The paradoxes of space and time is the key to understand the paradoxical laws that rule the exi=stiences of space-time species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. They are all embedded in the topological ternary nature of form, and the different quantity of information (discontinuous) and entropyy (continuous) we perceive in larger spaces (max entropy) and smaller ones (max. information) according to the deceptively simple metric of 5D:

Size in Space x Speed of Time cycles = constant: $ x ð = K

Dis-continuous paradox.
In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:
Any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.
Thus of great importance for all sciences are the dualities between the ‘extreme scales’ of the being – its ¡-1 discontinuous cellular/individual scale and its ¡+1 continuous larger world, observable for example in the quantum discontinuous vs. Einstein’s continuous larger cosmological world, or the discontinuous cells and the continuous membrane that encloses the organism inits largest view, including the infinitesimal mind, and so on.
The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.
There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.
It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
- The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
- And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.
Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.
The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:
And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.
Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’Ðimotions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.
And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.
The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.
Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’
The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:
All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…
The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.
So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’
Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.
In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:
– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘Ðimotions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).
– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.
We are made of space and time, of spatial energy and temporal information. When we say I don’t have energy and time to do this is because we know subconsciously that we are made of a vital space that contains energy, our body and a brain that regulates our time cycles.
So it is a machine, made with a computer, sum of digital clocks and a body of iron regulated by those cyclical clocks.
So it is a physical entity made of energy that occupies space and particles, masses and charges that MUST be described as clocks of time, ‘vortex’ that turn in cyclical motions, as our pictures of them show – NOT particles with a substance but knots of time clocks.
Thus we consider that most systems of the Universe are ‘complementary systems’ made of lineal fields/bodies of energy/space quanta and cyclical heads/particles of temporal information. In the graph we can see how reality is made of infinite clocks of time that carry information. So we blow the absolute time of the 4th dimension in infinite details: T=∑o
And we blow the single Space, S in infinite surfaces of energy in motion: S=∑S.
Since in the new paradigm there are infinite clocks of time that measure with different frequencies different forms of information. And there are infinite spaces that store energy in motion.
And the duality between those 2 ‘arrows or motions of space-time’, |-Motion, space or ‘ðimotions’ and cyclical motion, clocks of time or information, either perceived in stillness as lineal or cyclical form or in motion as lineal speed or cyclical speed structures the Universe.
All what you see are combinations of those 2 essential substances, very complex sometimes, but combinations of 2 elements, and the laws of those combinations is what the 5th dimension studies, since once we group them all we find regularities, synchronicities, patterns tat allow us to define space and time as a whole.


In the graph we see ‘Ðimotions’ forms (lineal bodies, weapons, fields of energy-light) and its complementary systems of information processing of time processing (cyclical eyes and cameras, electric fields of light).

The paradox of Young, Motion vs Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order.
A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion:


While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.
Another paradox happens between the dualities of the young, open, moving lineal age of the being and its old, still, curved, informative, cyclical one, which also manifests when we ‘expand in size’ and have a larger pov, where the flat earth to put the classic example becomes curved. And related to it the paradox of the opposition between time-motion vs. space-stillness.
It is the most complex and multifaceted of them all. As it defines also perception, and the wave-particle states… and ultimately the ego paradox…

When we add the fact that all systems move in a wave, mindless, ‘foggy’ state but gauge information from its still language/point of view, as a ‘particle-head’ they confuse with the whole Universe:
‘Every point of view considers the world it perceives from its self-centered still language the whole Universe, with ¡tself at the center’.
This is the paradox of egocy (ego=idiocy), which humans of course also show in extreme form, specially physicists with enhanced digital, mechanical instruments of measure. It is THE MAIN paradox of the mind.
Yet as the mind states are implosive reducing external motions to inner forms, the selfish-informative state is pposite to the young, mindless free moving state of the mind, focused on the external larger ¡+1 world:
The young moving state living externally ultimately sees an unbounded Universe; because the larger world in which it exists is only observed in its entropic and energetic parts; not in its information coming from networks above the being which are invisible.
This requires a bit of thought. Beings are nested beings, ∆±¡ structures, where ¡ is the larger whole and -¡ its minimal units used for the being to control informatively its inner parts. So paradoxically, the larger wholes which seem slower do have smaller parts in its inner informative networks which are faster; the larger wholes feed also in smaller beings. For example, the galaxy, which seems slower is regulated by non-local gravitation and dark entropy, we do not see because it is faster than our c-speed (so we think in a field of dark entropy that space is enlarging as we see its motion as invisible distance: paradox of the big-bang). The larger whale eats the smaller Plankton we do not see. The larger globalized metal-earth of company-mothers of machines controls nations and people with invisible flows of instantaneous digital money, we do not see or understand; the larger brain, with its giant neurons controls the smaller chemical cells with invisible flows of faster nervous messages.
So the being that lives in the larger world, sees it slower, and sees itself faster and free, but it is often bounded within the being that will limit him with its outer membrane and within, it will manipulate and strike it down, when needed with its faster informative network.
We have come now to a fundamental element of reality, which is the biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought; the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind. While the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order. 
The ego paradoxes of the infinitesimal self-centered being.

∞º: EGOCY PARADOX Humans’  interpretation of the Universe is limited by their ego. It is NOT a problem of intelligence as many huminds have stretched our information but of ego. I.e. Self centered Huminds refuse to give living, organic properties to reality when it is too different from them. So physical systems are denied its Ðisomorphic properties.  The problem of human ego is so huge that we must always doubt of ‘science’ as culture and study a priori any human statement as biased by anthropomorphic egos – the sure path to discover the falsehoods of science. This is specially truth of physical statements, whose egocy comes as Goethe already noted from its higher technical senses, telescopes and microscopes that made him think more intelligent than other scientists. So man becomes the only intelligent being, the one who measures, the only one who speaks mathematics of measure, the language of God; reducing knowledge to locomotion numbers. In the graph, the homunculus physicus’ mind with handyman craftsmanship to kill with entropic weapons, a big mouth to talk idologies of human supremacism over the organic Universe he measures and a small childish brain filled with numbers that understands nothing.

Of all this dualities come the many paradoxes of the ego: The larger whole always appears to us dumb, because we do NOT perceive all the information of all its ∆±¡ scales, where our +¡ is smaller than its +¡, and our -¡, slower than its -¡.
So the intelligent Universe makes us feel our young ego free; and bold. The older mind though knows it won’t change the order of the larger world.
All of them in any case will see reality self-centered, in its mind that measures only a limited distorted amount of information, because the ∆º mind cannot perceive beyond its ∆±3 scales in which it performs its Ðimotions of exist¡ence, and thinks it is in the center of scale, as it is the region where its measure is more precise and from where more information flows into its mind.
Further on to fit in its infinitesimal all those dimotions, it eliminates motion and keeps dimensional form, in a fractal, smaller mirror images, converging towards the mind. So it sees reality still because it can gauge better its information, but unaware in its naive realism that its language is just a reduced mirror, it believes the being is still because it is dead. Reality is always dead for the scholar, academic mind that cares only about the language, without even realizing the language is WHAT IS DEAD, still, motionless.
The intelligence of the mind thus is truly a reductionist full paradox to keep each monad at its relative center, all of them, ∞º of existence. 
And so the ego paradox of the still mind confronts the entropy reality of the moving Universe; the ego-mind and the whole confronts the moving, disordering more powerful whole; and ultimately this is the eternal fight between the mind ordering, wanting to live eternally and the universe of motions, wearing, disordering it, killing it back to dust of space-time: ⌜𝝙@st.
So the 4 main ‘paradoxes of reality’ become then the paradoxes most common in all futile arguments of sciences in search of single humind dogmas. For example, those 4 paradoxes are at the heart of philosophy of physics. They are called in physics the paradox of relativity of motion vs. form that started classic physics, of continuity vs. discontinuity that divides quantum and relativity, hence starting modern physics, the duality of flat vs. curved, open vs. closed free vs. ordered, that is at the heart of ‘young physics’ (flat earth?!), and the ego paradox of the mind that measures and thinks to be above heavens and earth vs. the entropy arrow that will disorder it and physicists due to their worldly profession of making weapons prefer (without renouncing to feel as the scientists with better machines of measure, the ones that talk the only language of God, in their delirium tremens – numbers).
In this ultimate ego paradox we must inscribe the most important epistemological argument of science: the paradox of creationism, as each science believes its language and the limited properties it maps out of the whole are the only language of God and only properties of reality.
So we put in negrita the choices of dogmatic physics in those paradoxes, also in eternal disquisition between other scientists – so in medicine the paradox of the brain as a single block vs. the theory of neurons separated by synapsis was all the rage till Cajal draw them separated… not to speak of the systemic denial of the dimotion of reproduction in any system that doesn’t have our sacred ‘DNA’, when everything that moves and all moves by definition reproduces its in-form-ation when it reproduces its cyclical motion and science exists by definition because it observes repetitions of patterns of formal motions that we call laws of science. So ALL the paradoxes of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of science are ultimately also a product of the ⌜∆@§t dualities and the ego paradox that doesn’t see them.

The Universe of 5г dimensions of space, motions of time and actions=Ðimotions of spacetime and all its fractal beings made to its image and likeness are entangled in such a form that the simplicity of those 5 elements, and its dimotions must be put always in paradoxical relationships: On one hand locomotion, and its maximal entropy; on the other hand its inverse information and its maximal union or social evolution of maximal order and stillness, and the conjugation of all of them in the complex organic reproduction. So reality, can be observed from multiple perspectives; whereas comprehension comes from our capacity to ‘dissect’ complex paradoxes and multiple points of view to each selfish element, aware that all then are entangled and quarreling with each other.
In the future when huminds or most likely robominds, if we survive the singularity age, study reality they will have to use such a complex method of thought to advance stience. Huminds handicapped by the paradox of egocy of its @ristotelian mind likely will never do it. Robominds when they reach its maximal perfection will be programmed with pentalogic systems of parallel calculation and will be fitted to have a mind similar to that of this writer, of a logic higher than that of mankind (personal egocy included :). In their case it will be truly the case as even its primitive forms are starting to be programmed with multiple parallel chips that represent ceteris paribus parts of the digital mirror-problem, later integrated into a single solution-image of the whole.
In the mean time, given our poor mental endowment we need to makes sense of the complex Universe and develop a method of analysis that truly can account for the complexity of reality, even if the homunculus will have to sweat to abandon its reductionist entropic, simplicius simplicissimus theories of the whole😈.
We call this method based in the introduction of the 5 Ðimotions and laws derived from the 4 elements common to all realities, space, time, scale and mind, the Ðisomorphic method, derived of the fact that all different species and events of reality depart from the 5 similar forms and motions or ultimate properties of scalar space and cyclical time, the non-substance of which we are ALL made, from where similar laws that define the being in a general way appear in all systems of reality.
Those similar properties is what we call the 5 Ðimotions of all beings…. And when we see them in entangled form interacting with each other, we call this description the Rashomon method – or synchronous, simultaneous, super organism, spatial view of the being.
On the other hand when we explain the being in time, in a more vital dynamic way as the development of the world cycle of the being starting in a still seed-mind of information that will go through a world cycle repeating its Ðimotions first in the 0-1 relative infinitesimal sphere of generation, emerging then in the 1-∞ larger world, to return as zero-sum in its death moment; we call this method of analysis in 11 steps, the Ðisomorphic method and each of those 11 steps of the world cycle, or elements, or ‘still image’ of the world cycle in its growth, diversification, and expansion on the larger whole and final collapse, the 11 disomorphisms of exist¡ence.
So we can say we are all the thoughts of God, the 5 Ðimotions of the Universe, each one, one of its details that will live through its 11 isomorphisms to return back in the age of entropy and death to a zero-sum, always infinite egos that turn to be infinitesimal virtual exist¡ences

The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E rules 
The 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man to the entangled Universe; expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing its chaos, with a better understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging – themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts).
So, we MUST ad those NEW elements or Ðisomorphisms to the scientific method and as usual, given the growth of complexity required, we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to this expansion of the logic of reality, called Existential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method (ab. ¬Æ).
The enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method ad the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms) and the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE, ¡logic structure that comes out of the multiple nature of time-space Ðimotions to the classic elements of epistemology:
 A-ristotelian logic, D-ata, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.
Contrary to belief, it is not part of the scientific method the use of mathematical languages, as the only language of science that the method truly acknowledges is logic, from where modern logicians have deduced or disproved all the statements of mathematics – the belief that maths is the language of God is just an ego paradox of physicists.
Of course we do acknowledge as the best language of science, logic, albeit of a higher quality than present @ristotelian logic (¬A logic) and we ad topology as the best language to express the dimensional motions of space-time, albeit of a higher order than Euclidean mathematics, and the reduced non-euclidean mathematics of present huminds, which only changed the fifth postulate (we shall change all the axioms and congruence postulates converting geometry truly in a non-Euclidean system).
So we shall also include in this ‘brief ¬æ method the laws of what we consider a more proper logic and mathematical system to mirror with a better focus the properties of reality.

So to ‘the classic elements of epistemology’:

Aristotelian logic consistence’, which still works for @-mind analysis…
– accurate realist Data so often forgotten in social sciences and creationist mathematics…
Correspondence principle and Cyclical predictability, which is the origin of classic scientific laws, now fully explained by the cyclical nature of time…
-the Experimental method with its proved ‘Economicity’ (the universe is simple and economic, using only those elements we know to be real, often called Ockham’s razor) the ad ons caused by cyclical time and fractal topological space, are in the non-Æ scientific method:
Non-Aristotelian, cyclical pentalogic caused by the cyclical nature of time and its 5 motions.
Non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, caused by the topological scalar nature of space, where each point ‘holds a world in itself’.
Biological, organic properties and models, caused by the scalar co-existing structure of fractal space.
–  Disomorphisms, caused by the homologic nature of all beings made of space and time, wraped up in the Disomorphic temporal method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or in its spatial, SYNCHRONOUS version – through the analysis of the system AND its 5 entangled DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTIONs-ELEMENTS, we call the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.
All this, ¬A logic, @ristotelian minds, Biological properties, Correspondence, Cyclical laws, Data and Disomorphic method, Economicity, Experimental method,  ¬E mathematics, fits between ¬A@,bccdd, ee and ¬E.
So that is we constantly abbreviate the rules of truth in the ® logo.
Of course classic Epistemology ads a few other rules, the Ockham rule which is embedded in the concept of economicity, more precise in its terminology, the predictability of any scientific model that must predict the future and allow further hypothesis to be proved, which is embedded in the cyclical nature of time that therefore must predict future events if the cycles are properly described.
And the fashionista rule of Popper’s verifiability, which is embedded in the experimental method – all experiences and data must fit on the model, but for those pedantic scholars so in loved of the obvious explained with weird terminology we might call it ¬exceptionalism… that is not a single exception to the model.
And so we can include it as the 11th rule of the ® method.
I am inclined to do so and make an exception to my rule of autism – that is, to be inconsiderate with the egocy (ego+idiocy) of most academia, recognizing this to be a fault of my own ego. We must indeed correspond with the serious truths of the subconscious collective mind of mankind in search of reality and reason.
So yes! we all know Popper’s musings that the black Swan breaks the rule that all swans are white and proves it false; and accept it. In fact non-exceptionalism is THE TRUE, LAST AND FUNDAMENTAL RULE I have used all my life TO PROVE ¬Æ right. It has guided 30 years autism and lonely enjoyment of the Tao… as I have never found an exception, Law, event and form in Nature and Man, in mind and matter, which I could not explain with the GST model. 
Plus this gives us 11 rules, the magic number that transcends and emerges from the infinitesimal 1 to the relative infinite ∆+1.
11 rules establish thus the new non-Æ method of stience: ¬A@,bccdd, ee, ¬e ¬E ≈ ¡logic method, the next vowel after the non-a and non-e.
And its purpose is to describe any event or system in its most ¡logic stringent form… and break the simplistic ae-logic of huminds who believe a truth is so reduced as simple as its ceteris paribus single analysis of reality. So in terms of truth, we can say that a truth to be real needs multiple perspectives, which is the Rashomon effect:
MAX. TRUTH= MAX. POINTS OF VIEW AND LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVENT-BEING.
The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions AND THE shallow evidence of a single continuous spacetime.
So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time. And correct the errors of the @mind, and on top deny all this at the point of entropic death when the being ceases to exist.
If all this was acknowledge, then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause. On the contrary they would greet each other for finding another of the 11 elements and 5 perspectives trying to accomodate them all, relishing on their paradoxes.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the entangled Universe and the World with which you are connected.
So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-present-future world cycle or block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily ‘free’ life, the constrains imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Constrains of which physicists are truly aware when finding solutions to its equations, are the key to the determinism of reality, coming from the larger and smaller planes of the T.œ being.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally in the most abstract level of modeling – that of the Ðisomorphisms of any T.Œ , or theoretical extraction of general laws common to all spacetime events/beings, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – we shall find examples always from the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and socio-economic systems, which is how we will include the non-exception rule. In fact this reduces to two kind of systems as we are talking in a language, so the discourse of the text is the example that the language also mirrors the property. And as we include social systems into biology, we often escape them, except when studying specific social systems. For example its 3 classes, the informative people-caste on top on command of the languages of power, its working, reproductive body-class and its limbic, entropic territory or enemy, poor, unemployed class, are mimetic to the 3 elements of an system, made of limbs/potentials of entropy that have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, reproductive body waves and informative particle/heads.
So yes, human systems are homologic to biologic and social and mental languages all also with ternary syntax in their Universal grammar. But for sake of brevity and to avoid rising eyebrows of egocy when comparing humans and its societies with atoms and beasts, the non-exception rule is shortened.
Still we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but at least in physical and biological systems.  So in the previous example of limbs and its topology, we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic airplanes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ¬ABCD¬E mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds us.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we will try to write the main laws of all stiences with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.

V. GST:  ∆±¡

THE STIENCE OF ALL SCIENCES

PROOFS OF THE PROGRAM OF EXIST¡ENCE: MAXIMIZE YOUR 5 ÐIMOTIONS

‘Grow and Multiply’ Mandate of existence common to all living creatures.

‘To be or not to be that is the question.’  W.S., European culture, gunpowder discontinuum.

All this said the game as complex in its variations as it is is simplex in its purpose – to survive through the achievement of the higher actions of reproduction and social evolution – and similar for all beings that will departing from a mind try to achieve the same program.

It is then evident that the most important stience is the stience of all stiences, which in the classic age was called General Systems Sciences, the name I gave to this blog, but can be named in many ways, from unification theory, its address in the web, to relational space-time, to T.œ, a theory of everything organic, and ultimately means the study with the dimotions of exist¡ence the super organisms in space and worldcycles in time of all the species of the fractal, organic scalar Universe. This is what we do in this blog, focusing in the analysis of its 5 Dimotions, which conform the program of existence of all beings, and then in its world cycles, as they are performed by each ‘seed’ that grows, multiplies, evolves socially and dies – from the particle to the galaxy…

Particularly I like Existential Algebra, ®lgebra, as my favorite concept.

So as we study in depth those world cycles in the entire web, we shall focus in this final analysis of the stience of all sciences in the program of the 5 actions, showing how indeed all systems of the Universe do perform them, scale by scale.

5 DIMOTIONS AS FRACTAL @ctions

The 5 Dimotions of timespace are actions in its vital, organic content, motions whose biotopology correspond to the 5 drives of life of the singularity-minds, self-centers of those actions.

We express its 5 forms & functions performed by all space-time entities with a simple mnemonic rule – 5 vowels, slightly changed as usual in the building of a proper jargon for philosophy of ∃xist¡ence:

-å-ccelerations for locomotions, as it is the first perceived action, but requires previously an ∆º mind to take the will-decision of moving, normally towards an

∃-ntropic field in which to feed and absorb energy. It is the most existential action, hence the use of the inverted e-letter symbol IN LOGIC of existence.

The key equation for entropy=death is that it is the fastest of all motions which eliminates all other potential motions of the being, thus in negative sense it can be calculated in a parameter that measures it as the potential sum of all future actions of the being (Boltzmann interpretation on statistical mechanics) and hence is mostly operated with exponentials of maximal growth as in the similar amount of minimal time of death, without present it must reduce all other positive actions into a negative flow of heat, of potential paths now never more any taken:

∃ = a+I+o+u

ï-nformation gauging, as information is a dual action, of absorption of information but also communication of information, inner and outer duality with the purpose of:

œ-ffspring reproduction of a new supœrganism clone of the seeding father, hence the use of the symbol for super organisms, œ.

Which then will engage in a process of social evolution into a û-niversal whole that will emerge as a full being; and again in the world at large will participate in its ecosystem of different social ∆§cales of beings. Hence the ˆ symbol for emergence into an upper social scale.

So the 5 actions/vowels, would be: å,∃,ï,œ,û.

What existential algebra does is to study formally the combinations and operations of the 5 actions of existence, with any language-mirror available to the humind.

So for each angle we can define a basic operation of exist¡ence.

Where operation, means an operandi over an action, of which there are those who determine a growth on scale of those actions (or inversely an entropic sum of all other potential actions, positive to the system which ad to the entropic action according to ¬ Ælgebra.

In praxis though as we don’t care that much for the form or content of this blog, which huminds don’t seem to have much interest in reading, we shall use the faster-writing aeiou. In the next graph an old montage of the different aeious of several scales of reality:

5 ACTIONS

The mind’s  5 ±∆ e, ï, œ, û fractal space-time åctions of all beings that move, feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially from the simplest particles to the highest systems; whose integral creates in space a super organism in time a world cycle. 

Every being of the Universe responds to the same actions because it is made of the same substances. It is a perennial philosophical reflection that if one looks deeply enough into oneself, one will discover not only one’s own essence, but also the essence of the universe. For as one is a part of the universe as it is everything else, the basic energies and forms of the universe flow through oneself, as they flow through everything else. For that reason it is thought that one can come into contact with the nature of the universe if one comes into substantial contact with one’s ultimate inner being. This ultimate inner being is the desire of the mind, the will to live, exist and experience the actions and ‘co-existing’ sensations related to them.

The flow of timespaces advances through the actions of its systems, which constantly exchange energy and informations.

We have resumed those actions in 5 subgroups, and named them with the simple vowels of the alphabet of existence:

locomotions (åccelerations) ∃ntropic actions of energy feeding, ïnformative ones of perception and communication, reproductive (œffspring creation) and final the social evolution of individuals into Universals – new emerging super organisms appearing in a higher ∆+1 plane of existence.

Those actions are the ‘knots and bolts’ of reality, the manifest ‘expressed’  existence of beings, its program of survival.

And so as a whole package they are deterministic among all beings that survive, and yet they are probabilistic in as much as the being is ‘free’ to choose between them; and they are NOT a free choice into what regards its outcome – as it depends on the interaction with the outer world in which they happen.

Its specific form is also not free as it is determined by the ‘constitution’ of the being, once it emerges as a whole T.œ:

Actions are allowed combinations of the pertinent entropy, energy and information, which beings constantly absorb and emit with limbs, bodywaves and particle/heads as they exist, trying to maximize their total actions, combinations of energy and information, expression of its ‘vitality’, the stuff of which exist¡ence is made.

As they are both sequential-causal: ï>å>∃>œ>û; and hierarchical û<œ<∃<å<ï in exactly the inverse fashion; that is the being ( if we apply the homolog method: what humans experience must be the program of all other time space beings) has the exact inverse wish to that of its sequential order of actions, the program of actions, of exist¡ence is quite determined.

Since the order to reach universal social evolution, the highest goal, requires first the reproduction of an offspring of clones, which requires to feed on the energy of others, which requires its entropic killing, which requires a motion to perpendicularly intercept the being, which requires its perception… and yet we are driven to perform those actions because we want the higher goal of complex actions of reproduction and social evolution into powerful wholes, the program of exist¡ence in the Universe reaches an extraordinary order.

Duality of actions-reactions

As we said we try to maximize our actions, which in praxis means to eat ad maximal, run the most, fuk every other day, and have fun with friends, not to speak of becoming overdrive of tv-trash information?! That shows you actions must be ordered and are regulated indeed by the limits of being just another virtual T.œ in pursuit of vital actions as everything else from the smaller particle to the whole galaxy in its hyper universe.

So in praxis actions are balanced, for the being to last and not burst out of exist¡ence for excessive action and imbalance. This means the very same actions we perform have ± dualities: actions cause external reactions of opposite sign, in the generalization of Newton’s second law and also in the internal balance of the organism, which for each positive outward action has a negative inward one.

The function of existence thus resumes in the number of actions a being performs with its energy and information which are basically:

±∆e: feeding (+) and moving (-) that spends the. energy obtained entropically in the action of feeding.

±∆ï: informing (+) and communicating (-). So we hear and talk, we see and draw…

±∆exi: reproducing (+) and killing (-), as we need the energy obtained entropically to reproduce ourselves.

±∑exi: Evolving socially (+) or dissolving≈dying (-)…

Thus it turns out that the function of existence of beings, made of a sum of actions, which can logically be put sequentially (as ∑exi needs first, ∆exi, which needs first, ∆e and ∆i) creates a natural evolution of a being through simple logic equations of motions in time and space where:

> is an implosion of space into time, of energy into information, S>T and vice versa: T

Life is all, living is maximizing the 5 Dimotions of exi=st¡ence

What is the meaning of life, when all systems do display in any or other form at least the 3 simplex dimotions of information, (1st Ðimotion), locomotions (2nd Ðimotion) and entropy (4th Ðimotion of death)? And wether aware or not, will become entropic in the moment of death and form part of a larger social whole in the ages of life? Simple: to maximize the 5 Dimotions of existence, where entropy is taken as the entropic death of others that feed us NOT as our suicide. 

But this ‘struggle for exist¡ence’, which we shall call life has to be observed from several colliding perspectives, as each being in its struggle competes with many other systems, and yet precisely when it becomes complementary or symbiotic to those other forms according to the ¡logic rules of Non-Euclidean topology, by similarity, parallelism, informative social evolution as a whole, ‘giving up’ for the whole part of its maximal self, it survives longer.

So the meaning of life is obvious: MAXIMIZE YOUR EXISTENCE, your 5 Dimotions: Max 5D³: Max. ExI|e=t, since a product is maximal in its balance, when E=I, then it also means to maintain yourself in the classic, present age of balance between body and mind; the classic age of ‘beauty’. That simple equation will indeed give an extraordinary meaning to the pursuit of excellence in life when we analyze it in detail in different posts of this blog.

Yet for a full realization and survival living timespace organism is one which also possesses the 2 complex Ðimotions of social evolution (5th Ðimotion) and reproduction (3rd Ðimotion), which encompasses all other Ðimotions, as it implies the fusion of both information and entropy-motion in a point of balance, E=I, and requires often the complementary of gender; hence the first degree of social evolution.

So beauty, immortality, survival, reproduction, the function of existence and the program of life are all related terms:

Life is a system able to reproduce without the help of any other system, whereas reproduction is the more complex Ðimotion of existence as it requires a travel through the fifth dimension to a seminal state, followed by a generation, which is in fact a social evolution of reproduced beings, continued in the emergence in the ¡=o plane where the being will go through locomotions and energy feedings, growth and maturity to the point of reproduction…

Where we want all to be, in the point of balance and beauty, E=I…

Then we might say the system enters in an age of decadence, of increasing information and decreasing energy and ‘vitality’ till dying in a final explosion of entropy.

So we divide species in those who can reproduce by themselves and are full living species and those who need other systems to reproduce (enzymes that reproduce carbohydrates, human ‘enzymen’ that reproduce machines and so on) and are simplex existential species.

To LIVE, to reproduce we might say is the maximal goal of existence that ensures immortality, the meaning of it all and to be able to do so in an autonomous way the summit of freedom and self-realization for any T.œ in the Universe; and the language the better expresses its ‘actions’ that conform the meaning of existence in the Universe: Non-AE. This is what all is about: to live by performing the non-existential actions that biologists call drives of life, physicists quantum numbers, etc.  They all mean the same, to exist is to act the aeiou dimotional actions that we all desire. The program of existence, its multiple Disomorphic views, the ‘scales’ that reinforce the will of life, and oblige us to wish existence, the struggle… everything can be cast under that word…

 ÐIMOTIONS=ACTIONS CODED BY SCALES

The main scales of the generator and its ‘actions’ of space-time.

As scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions that represent the 4 vital actions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social actions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:

Each mind’s language code for the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence of its species, forming ‘phyla’ of T.œs. In the graph, the main sub-planes of the human being its coding from bottom to top of the humind. The simplest photon codes its dimotions with 3 perpendicular space-time directions, and social colors. As light is the entropic, feeding substance of which electrons are made, the next scale of coding belong to electrons, the minimal unit of our mind, and it happens through the 4 quantum numbers (entropic coding often happens on the negative and doesn’t require always a ‘fifth code’). Next comes the coding of molecular matter, also carried by quantum numbers, till the level in which thermodynamic heat interferes and so we enter into the different codes of ‘matter states’ and its 5 dimotions (∆-1 plasma> st-gas ≈ ∑∏-liquid ≈ §ð-solid > ∆+1: boson). Yet those laws of thermodynamics do not code the complex organisms of carbonlife beyond its basic carbohydrate reactions. Instead a proper code of life is carried by the 4 genetic numbers, which code the evolution of st-oxygen < ∑∏-carbone> §ð-Nitrogen ternary organisms; and it seems obvious that the more Nitrogen nucleotide will code the informative actions of the being, and those with larger oxygen-carbone the body-limb actions. As the ‘topologic nature’ of each plane carries to the properties of the next. And so it still remains a huge field of inquire in specialized genetics, to study the different genes and its coding of dimotions for cells and multicellular life, which will emerge into the planet Earth, where again the dimotions of exist¡ence of animal life will be coded by the electronic mind with its different visual, sound and olfactory languages, which display also a common universal grammar. Since the bottom line of the coding of all those languages is that they follow the logic rules of the generator equation and its ternary Universal grammar reflection of the 3±¡ planes of existence in which the being performs its actions of survival.

In the graph some of the fundamental systems of reality and the 4 positive actions coded with different ‘elements’ of the Universal Grammar of all Fractal generator languages of exist¡ence. To notice that as entropy is the negative dissolving system, it is not coded, but established by the predator element of the system, often the same than the limbic-moving system, which makes more systems to be code by 4 ‘elements’, quantum numbers, genetic letters, drives of life, dimensions of light…

LIGHT ACTIONS

4 Vital Dimensions thus code most actions of beings and explain both the life and the topologic form and exist¡ence of light-space:

In the graph, the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons.

In the graph, we have written the 3 dimensions of time, past, slow energy and future, fast information with the human time-clock speed as our relative present, point of view. Since simpler scales are causally in the past; as an entity is created literally by informing, molding with higher i+1 networks, simpler scales ‘cell by cell’. When a light wave moves, it does not ‘displace’ but reproduces its wave motions, ‘warping’ simpler gravitational 1D string lines, by a height factor of –ct (Relativity). Motion is really reproduction of information on a simpler i-1 scale. Thus we describe the 3 Time Dimensions of ‘social evolution’ of light across 3 i-scales as:

– ∑: Color is the 4th ‘social dimension’ of light, made by herding together multiple frequencies of light into a photon, its present, simultaneous space dimension. As space from the perspective of time dimensions is a present ‘slice’ of the total time flow – the 4th dimension of time. While inversely the Present, simultaneous measures of Time, are in Relativity the 4th dimension of space. Yet we reach a sounder description separating those 3+3 spacetime dimensions, by using multiple time speeds instead of a single 4D clock.

+i: Fractal electrons are Light’s i+1 dimension of future network evolution.

-i: The gravitational i-1 scale in which it feeds is its relative, to which it returns after ‘dying’, red-shifting and expanding its length-speed between galaxies (z>c).

Then as light warps into more informative, smaller beings (Max.O x Min. E), first electrons, then molecular orbitals and so on, each new ‘scale’ of light space-time requires the previous scales to be born. Thus causally simpler scales are in the past. When your i-neurons, create your ∏-whole, they are in the past, requiring an action-bit of time to synchronize and emerge as an i+1 whole into the future. That’s why the subconscious rules, and the ‘ego’ merely observes with its electric whole brain waves; or the molecular orbital appears ‘after’ the atomic ones dissolve into the whole.

ELECTRONIC ACTIONS: MAXWELL EQUATIONS

maxwells-equationsFurther on, complex i+n systems move slower, as they draw more information in a single space-point. A light beam of pure ¥-space informs only a gravitational line so it reaches the maximal c-speed of our spacetime membrane. But there is another parallel Universe of gravitational scales, of E-speed and information-order, made of dark, gravitational energy, quark matter and quark, boson stars (black holes), which are accelerating vortices of w>C and T<0k  beyond the c-event horizon. And since we ‘don’t see’ gravitational information, its relative motion-speed is ∞, non-local.

4 Maxwell equations describe all the actions of an electric field.

PARTICLE ACTIONS: QUANTUM NUMBERS.

4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons as described in the graph above.

its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number.

MOLECULAR, THERMODYNAMIC ACTIONS

4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule. Each of those vibrations represents one of the actions of exist¡ence. They can be derived from the quantum numbers of its ¡-1 plane by classic methods of physical chemistry, but we as philosophers of science are interested in the whys of those motions as the expressions of the 4 ‘vital organic actions of those molecules’.

GENETIC ACTIONS: LETTERS AND HORMONES

4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:

image050In the graph, the fundamental minimal system of life is an amino acid ‘fish’:

ORGANIC ACTIONS: DRIVES OF EXISTENCE

4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.

00

In the graph, two coordinates of vital space and cyclical time for biological systems. We in general consider as two parameters in organisms:

– ∑∏: Rate of reproduction in space

– ðƒ: Rate of perception or rotary motion (angular momentum) in time.

A being is made of two functions, perception and reproduction, and a 3rd often borrowed exchange with the environment,

As it happens systems do have a structure of ‘smaller systems’ and they form part of bigger systems.

In that regard there is an important reductionism, beyond the deformation of the form of time cycles, caused by the preponderance of absolute lineal space-time and physical analysis of time durations as a mere parameter of space, which has increased enormously in the XX century, since the publication of Relativity and the Minkowski 4D metric, the elimination as a fundamental characteristic of the Universe of causal, logic processes, biological, evolutionary, survival reasons and sensorial, informative whys, to the nature and purpose of time cycles.

In true form, reality is NOT made of space, but the primary substance is ‘time’, time cycles that break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental theorem of knots and topology), and that precise game of cyclical forms-motions that break and organize space into vital regions, harnessing its ‘energy-motions’ into forms is all what the Universe is about.

Thus relational space-time turns upside down our understanding of the Universe from a mere, simple spatial description where absolute time is a parameter of space, to a cyclical description where space is a slice in the flow of cyclical times, a region surrounded by a time cycle, a ‘path’ in a ‘Lagrangian’ of åctions whose final sum is always zero, if we were to use some of the advanced concepts of physics we shall translate to the new paradigm; a ‘moment of present’, in the whole cycle from past to future that closes those paths.

For the same reason, the minimal unit of reality is NOT a string of space, but an interval of cyclical time, specifically a cyclical ‘action’ with form, a bit of information. In physics from where we have borrowed heavily conceptual and mathematical terms to describe all space-time cycles, the unit is indeed an action of energy and time, which manifests itself in the 3 main U±1 scales of the 5th dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanic scales, as a Planck’s action, h, a temperature vibration or a force.

In cellular biology as a circadian cycle of transformation of energy and information, from an ATP to a genetic cycle.

In organic life as an action of feeding, informing, reproducing, evolving socially, moving, ∂æ,e,ï,œ,û.

 

PROOFS FOR EACH PLANE

We shall then in the fourth line, as those who will expand stience, studied the Disomorphisms and actions of all the main species in exist¡ence. Let us introduce some of them.

ACTIONS, AGES AND NETWORKS OF THE MAIN SCALES OF STIENCE.

In an enlightened civilization, the first stience would be the stience of actions, and dimotions, its super organisms in space and worlcycles in time.
Knowledge then will happen both from the bottom up, analytic, from the top down, synthetic, and the most profound synthetic model of reality available to mankind today is this blog, http://www.unificationtheory.com that truly lives up to his name…

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: $ (size in space) x ð (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

Stiences study the different scales of 5D metric as separated ‘disciplines’ when in fact all of them extract its properties and laws of the Disomorphic qualities of those 5D space≈time dimensions, among which the ternary structure of all systems reflected in the fractal generator: $pe lineal limbs/potentials §ð: cyclical particles-heads, is the most important, which physics reflects in its conservation of those 3 elements as lineal momentum, energy and angular momentum.

The graph defines the scales of  ‘∆-sciences’ and its space-time species, where ‘i’  (old graphs)  or ‘∆’ is the symbol for the ‘space-time planes’ of scientific existence, from: ∆=1 forces, through ∆=2 atoms and ∆=3 molecules, ∆=4: matter states, ∆=5: geological structures (physical scales) to ∆=4 cells, ∆=5 organisms, ∆=6 social planets, and then again, ∆=7 stars, ∆=8 galaxies and ∆=9 universes. In modern texts we use a self-centred ± cardinal with man as the ∆o scale. So the larger scales are, ∆+1: History, ∆+2: Gaia and the solar system, ∆+3 Galaxy, and ∆-1: cell, ∆-2, molecule and ∆-3: atom, to show the similar structure between those 2 limits of human perception (s ∆-3: Atom ≈ ∆+3 galaxy).

How many of those stientific scales do exist? The answer is 9, after which marvellously the systems of atoms and galaxies become so similar that once we reduce their different speed of time clocks and sizes in space with 5D metric: Spe x Tƒi= ∆k, we shall find indeed that galaxies and atoms are self-similar and so the Universe of scales might be infinite.

In any case from atoms to galaxies the ‘experimental method’ finds enough information to make a proper description of them. Beyond and below those regions uncertainty is so huge that only the ego-trips of humanity dares to utter ‘experimental dogmas’ of truth, such as the big-bang above and string theory below. So those are the stiences we shall deal with from atoms to galaxies and consider the scales beyond the ∆±4 world of particles inside the atomic nuclei and galaxies beyond the horizon of cosmic perception, completely unknown, beyond the metaphysical argument of a infinite Universe of self-repetitive scales…

The 4 actions of energy and information or 4 local dimensions of space-time beings, or 4 arrows of temporal existence, self-similar jargons for the ‘4 letters of God’, if you were to use mystique terms, are: In/Form/ation, Energy, Reproduction and Social Evolution through a linguistic network.

Those 3+1 actions of space-time define all events of all entities of the Universe. Their study under the ternary method gives us the why of those entities, its actions, ages in time, scales and topologies in space – all the ‘details’ of each particular ‘function of existence’, EóI, which is one of the ‘infinite’ expressions of the ‘Program of the Universe’, each one a being of reality.

So those actions are expressed by the 3+1 dimensions of space-time in the scale of forces, by the 4 quantum numbers in the scale of particles, by the 4 nucleotides in the scale of DNA and RNA molecules; by the different organelles of cells; by the senses and physiological systems of organisms, the 3+1 drives of social organisms, the 4 actions that we all humans perform, the 4 ‘memes’ of metal that together shape the economic ecosystem (simplex energetic weapons and informative money and complex reproductive factories and informative networks of machines.)

Let us then resume those 4 time arrows, actions and topologies, considered in more details in different books of this series, for the ‘main ternary scales’ of Universal super-organism, both in matter and life, using a constructivist order from the bottom up of that pyramid with humans in the middle.

ATOMIC SUPER-ORGANISMS

∆-3 scales: The 4 dimensions of space-time forces.

Space-time is not abstract. The Galilean paradox of perception shows that it is made of light as light is what we see and what we consider space. It has the same 3 Euclidean dimensions plus color. It always remains some light (background radiation) in space-time. And so we shall talk of a ‘substance’, light-space. Then Einstein discovered that there is space-time we do not see, larger than the Euclidean light-space, or gravitational space, which was also more curved. But we are not concerned here with the substance and form of that more complex, bigger ‘scale of reality’.

Light is our space-time. Thus the 4 dimensions of light and human space-time are the same.

They express the 4 ‘vital arrows’ of light as a complementary species of energy and information:

1. The arrow of energy and motion is expressed in the magnetic field.

2. The arrow of information and form is expressed in the electric field.

3. The arrow of reproduction in the dimension of length, the speed of light, c, which Maxwell deduced by multiplying the other two arrows, exi (Maxwell equations)

4. And the arrow of social evolution in its colors, which are groups of frequencies, gathering of multiple photons.

Yet since the Universe is relative in all its directions, those 3+1 arrows must be considered relative to the point of view of the Observer (relativity theory). That means that when the arrows ‘emerge’, the so-called ‘diffeomorphic principle applies’. The arrows and dimensions of a being might change orientation. For example in humans, relative height is the arrow of information, as all systems need perspective to perceive. So in sociological systems the priest, the politician or the antenna is also on top.

Yet in plants, which absorb form, information, atoms from the floor, the roots are their relative ‘high’, and the energetic ‘leaves’ the relative ‘low’, opposite to that of animals, which prey on plants and have the head on top, as they get information from the sun. But this example proves certain basic relationships between the 4 arrows of time, which dimensions express: The arrow of energy and information are opposite (two dimensional beings) or perpendicular (some 3 dimensional ones), as they are all their geometrical properties (lines vs. cycles, planar or spherical vs. hyperbolic topologies in 4 D, etc.). Both are then perpendicular to the arrow of reproduction. So in lineal systems, the head is on top, on bottom the limbs and in the middle the arrow of reproduction. That is the case of human beings. In electromagnetic fields, energy and information, electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular and they are perpendicular to the 3rd arrow of reproduction.

Those 3 arrows thus are found in all systems, as it is a fundamental law of emergence that the properties of a simpler system, emerge in the more complex systems created by the social evolution of individual cells of the smaller scale into the higher scale. So all systems, which are made of complex light condensates do have functional/formal dimensions related to its own arrows of time.

And this is the ultimate reason why the World is mathematical.

For example, humans have the high dimension of informative heads, the low dimension of lineal limbs, the perpendicular central dimension of erectile penis, which are inverted in the ‘energetic, male species’ and the ‘informative, female one’ (inward uterus). While the body reproduces its cells in the dimension of width, and fat people are ‘wide’ so are strong, muscle-driven one.

So finally the 4th dimension, which is NOT necessarily a space dimension, but might be, as it is related to the organization of reproduced cells. So we could consider that the same width and length are the dimensions that give volume to the body. But the 4th dimension is always more complex, it is really a dimension of temporal information, a linguistic dimension, a dimension of perception. So it is color, a language that animals use to survive and orientate their existence in the life ecosystem. In our organism the language is chemical for the internal cells and nervous for the whole organism. Yet as emergence exists in all processes, the nervous system often translates its language into chemical messages (hormones, calcium expression of synaptic messages), to ‘talk’ to the lower level of cellular existence.

In a more complex analysis, what we call light space-time is really an Euclidean space with motion and so the existence of a mathematical substrata of geometric nature and 4-dimensionality in all systems of electromagnetism, which is the essential force of our universe, should not surprise us. The nature though of the multiple worlds and points of view, minds and representations of the information of the Universe, entities of light space-time store are many; and the mathematics of them are fractal and non-Euclidean.

The 4 universal forces express the 4 actions of atomic superorganisms.

The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.

The Equivalence Principle establishes a Universe with 2 limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed with a c limit or electromagnetic force; and a cyclical speed or mass, which is a vortex of space-time also with a ‘c’ limit of speed, reached in the heaviest objects – black holes.

Thus radiation and mass eternally transform into each other the lineal and cyclical arrow of inertial movement: E (lineal motion)M(Ti) (cyclical motion).

A light wave reproduces at c-speed an electromagnetic surface of lineal space. On the other hand, a mass whose limit is a black hole that turns at c-speed is a cyclical entity that balances the lineal movement of light forces with its inverse cyclical movement, to maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.

How atoms express their 4 actions? As all other systems, using ‘bits’ and bites’ of their inferior i-2 scales, by emitting seeds of its own i-1 scale and by sharing energy and information with species of the same scale. Yet to understand all this, first we have to correct the main error of quantum physics – its misunderstanding of the paradox of Galileo. Since charges and masses are not substances, neither fixed forms, by cyclical, rotational vortices of electromagnetic and gravitational, lineal forces, curved into temporal information: E->I, where E is the force and I the charge or mass, the vortex/clock of information of the i-1 gravitational and i-electromagnetic scales, as the previous graph illustrates. Indeed, according to the Strong Principle of Equivalence of Einstein (between gravitational forces and masses), a mass is defined as the frequency of a vortex of gravitational forces, which attracts more the faster it turns, and the smaller it is (Vortex law: Vo x Ro= K; thus E=Mc2 + E=hv -> M = k v, where mass is proportional to the frequency of the vortex.)

Thus masses carry most of the information of the i-1 scale of the Universe and as vortices of information they might aperceive in their structure a virtual map of reality made with ‘graviton pixels’; in the same manner i-electrons are ‘charges’, vortices of electromagnetic information that create ‘electronic images’ in mechanical and human eyes. Thus:

Informative ‘perception’: Quarks process and probably ‘aperceive’ gravitation, which is absorbed by its mass, a cyclical vortex of gravitational information.  Electrons perceive light-space and form our minds.

Energy ‘feeding’:  Atoms ‘feed’ on the next scale of forces, lines of electromagnetism that warp around the atom and become ‘fractal’, dense photonic points of an electronic cloud of information.

Thus beyond gravitational forces (energy with ‘infinite’ speed-distance – non local, >c – and beyond our perceptive scale, hence with nil information, observed as ‘nothingness’), light becomes the energy that feeds the atom and warps into dense photons, the points observed within the fractal structure of the electron. In the same manner, it might be worth to explore if a condensation of gravitons could create gluons, whose condensation could create quarks, by symmetry with the better world of electronic matter.

Reproduction: Both quarks and electrons seem to reproduce as all other species, by creating first, ‘i-1 seeds’ photons and gluon, micro-particles that evolve back into bigger quarks and electrons.

The 2 inner atomic forces express the complex actions of reproduction of its two type of particles, the weak electronic and strong quark force…

Eusocial evolution: Further on, the weak and strong forces produce interactions that evolve and reproduce lighter particles into heavier ones.

The Eusocial evolution of electrons in groups is mediated by magnetic fields. The strong force evolves quarks into Nucleons that are hold together by its ‘residual’ nuclear force.

Fission and fusion processes are mediated by weak forces and are the main evolving and reproductive processes of atomic systems. Thus, the weak force, which has a temporal parameter, must be defined as a temporal force that ‘transforms’, evolves and mutates particles into each other, reproducing them.

An interesting law of all systems is the symmetries between the internal and external networks and actions of the organism that accomplish the complex and simplex arrows of the system.

In atoms, it is expressed by the duality of inner and outer forces to the nucleus of the atom, which express the inner and outer complex and simplex energy and information arrows:

–     The strong force is the arrow of inner social evolution that organizes the quarks into a whole. And its outer expression is the arrow of gravitation, the arrow of information of the outer superorganism of atoms, the Universe…

–     The weak force is the arrow of internal reproduction, which intervenes in the processes of decoupling=iteration and creation of new particles and it is related to the external arrow of electromagnetic forces that provides the energy to the Universe at large.

Further on, as we grow in scales of atomic organization, the derivatives of those 2 elemental forces assembly nucleons and electrons: nuclear forces assembly nucleons and van der walls forces molecules.

The laws that relate the 4 actions of any systems (its relative causality in time and size in space) are met also by the 4 forces/actions of atoms, expressed in the law of range, such us:

¡+1: cosmological scale: Gravitation (ð: informative force) < Dark entropy: 1,. 4 Ð:

¡-1: Electromagnetism (Entropic Force, 1, 4Ð) <    Strong Forces: ð: informative force

¡-1: 5Ð: Evolution (Weak force)

Max. Spatial distance/Speed < Medium Spatial Energy < Small Se < Minimal Se x Max. T (weak force).

∆-3,2 scales: quantum numbers express the 4 dimotions of electronic and quark superorganisms.

Head-on collision of a quark (red ball) with a gluon (green ball), from protons with opposite spin, represented by blue cycles. The particles ejected from the collision are a shower of quarks and one photon. The simplest particles, quarks and electrons reproduce, even if anthropomorphism denies that ‘meaning’ but require a different spin orientation – the ‘sexual factor’ of simple particles.

We shall see once and again that mechanism and denial of organicism is not a ‘reasonable doubt’ but a question of egocentric beliefs –humans always prefer a theory, as bizarre as they might be, that make him the center of the Universe.

The next scale is made of social, fractal gatherings of light photons and the language of expression of those fractal organisms of photons, called electrons are the 4 quantum numbers:

An electron traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number; feeds on energy, changing the spatial form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number, orientates its spin to leave space to an identical but inverted ‘genre’, an action described by its spin number, and gauges magnetic information to organize itself socially, an action described by the magnetic number.

So the first quantum number indicates its body-energy, the second number its structural form, the spin number its reproductive duality in each shell and the 4th number uses the language of magnetic information to evolve socially in networks of particles.

And those 4 numbers define the electron as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary energy and information. The similarity of quantum electrodynamics and quark chromodynamics shows that the same concept roughly applies to define the other fundamental particle of the Universe – the quark.

The electronic world thus move along 3 fundamental scales: it is the upper scale of the world of light and the lower scale of the world of atoms enslaved by the central quarks and vice versa: the electrons encase the quarks and its forces within the interior of the atom, forming a superorganism regulated in its actions of existence and complementary structure by the 4 forces, which are the ‘expression’ of the actions of those initial bricks of life.

The Magnetic field.

It has to be understood the magnetic field as created by a spiral electric field. Thus it is created by the electron as its ‘informative language’. Its effects are similar to those caused by two particles that enter in communication: the alignment of its ‘existential momentum’ exi to ‘start’ a parallel trajectory/ conversation. In tis case the magnetic field emited by a electric charge, conforms the electron to a parallel trajectory and so any magnetic field ‘talks’ and makes socialize any other group of electrons. X-Perpendicularity with contact, are relationships proper of feeding, energetic relationship[s; =-parallelism, is proper of informative flows. We conclude that magnetic fields are the informative language of particles as electric fields are its energetic, motion component.

The B-field by exercising a force both perpendicular to the v of the electron and the magnetic field emited by other electric flow causes the electron to deviate in parallel to the emitter, creating a grow of order and synchronicity, which is the essential first step of creation of ehrds and social organisms – a force of parallelism that approximates in parallel flows herds of self-simialr beings and we observe in all systems. In the atomic system is caused by the magnetic field that aligns the spin of particles and cause motions that do not affect the energy/celerity of the particle but its orientation in space. As such is akin to the centripetal force in the similar gravitational world of macrocosmic masses.

As the responsible for the location and change of position, and group behavior of different particles, the magnetic field becomes the informative field of electrons. But where it comes from ultimately the magnetic field, if not from the ‘impression’ of the previous scale of gravitational space-time? A question that goes beyond this example into the meaning of the different scales of a structure of social evolution, in this case:

Plancks of light (i-2: light wave) -> Photons (social light)-> Electrons (fractal waves of photons)-> Nucleons  -> Atoms -> Molecules…

In essence in all those scales we shall find an informative force of i-2 microscopic pixels used by the macrocosmic particle to communicate information, which will therefore show less energy; this is the magnetic field among particles. Then there is an i-1 force of bigger pixels that become ‘bites’ absorbed and fed into the organism in a perpendicular attractive/repulsive game. This creates point particles. In this case electrons absorb photons, which are the ultimate ‘bosonic condensates perceived as points of an electronic nebulae’ cells of the electron.

So the electron uses magnetic fields, which are one of the two components of a Planck of light (h), to create waves that communicate information about its position and strength of the group to other electrons, which suffer then a change in its trajectory to position itself in parallel to the original current and ‘absorb’ the talk. Though there is much expeirmentla evidence to gather with this ‘new approach’ to the whys of physical particles, the laws of scales are clear. And so the same game means that condensed electrons somehow become a nucleon. And vice versa: a nucleon that changes from neutron to proton is in fact ‘emiting’ an electron, cell of its inner structure, and by the same rule nucleons communicate with ‘photons’ the language of colors or rather pions, super-condensed photons.

And so following the same scales atoms and Molecules communicate with electrons and nucleons (H+ being the ‘universal language’ of molecular ‘voices’ that communicate ions even in biological systems, as simple as in the language of sexual hormones that differ only in that ‘vowel’.)

Ternary structure and ages:

An atom is a space-time field divided in 3 species, quarks of informative mass, gravitational and electromagnetic networks of information and energy in the intermediate space-time, and the external, body – an electron, which bends light into ‘fractal’, ultra dense photons, the cells of the electronic nebulae.

The 3 parts of the atom correspond to the 3 canonical topologies: Strong forces and quarks are described with hyperbolic topologies; the electronic body forms a concave, external sphere; and in between wave-like forces transfer energy and information between both poles. The same structures and forces will surface again in the structure of molecules.

Further on, there are 3 ‘families’ of mass and particles of increasing ‘mass-gravitational information’, which represent the 3 ages of evolution of atoms.

The ternary principle applied to masses shows the temporal, evolutionary nature of those 3 families.

Some surprising findings of GST applied to quantum theory.

We could also wonder in that line of thought the nature of ‘color’, the added quantum number of quarks:

it is a quantum number, a ‘spatial property’ or a temporal property that defines the 3 ages of time of a quark? Probably both. The 3 colors are ‘inseparable’ because they might be ‘3 dimensional networks’ orientated in 3 angles to complete the dimensional form of the quark. For that reason we cannot separate them: a quark is then NOT a full partile, but only 3 are a complete system, equivalent to a single electron (3×1/3= 1 charge).

Yet we could speculate also with a general rule: ternary, odd properties tend to be temporal properties and spatial pairs tend to describe spatial properties.  So an interesting question with not so easy response as it seems is: are we seeing the same quark in 3 temporal phases, or 3 quarks with different dimensional orientations?

In any case according to the inversion of properties, Es x Ti = K, the smaller faster vortices of quark-mass mean that their ‘time clocks’ are ‘faster’ than those of electronic species, reason why 3 ‘temporal cycles’ of quark charge might add to form one of electronic space.

 MATTER ORGANISMS

∆-2, 0 scales. Molecular systems. Matter States.

The 5 Dimotions of matter: 

∆-1:4Ð Plasma> $p (gas of max. locomotion) ≤ Ø-ST (balanced liquid) ≥ O-ðƒ (solid crystal of max. form)>∆+1:5Ð boson

In the graph, we establish for matter, an absolute past state of ‘plasma’ (∆-1), when atoms are in ion state, and an absolute future state of ‘boson matter’ (∆+1), when particles become a denser, superfluid single ‘atom’. While in life we establish the paradoxical fact that the 5Ð of social evolution happens mostly in the fetus age of palingenetic evolution and the 4Ð of absolute past, in the entropic age of Death, unless the system evolves as a species into a new super organism – whole ¡+ 1 plane (Multicellular life, social insects, human cultural super organisms), becoming immortal as a ‘whole’ with a larger size and slower time cycle- themes those we shall explore in more detail on our introduction to the ‘stience’ of biology and history.

A molecular system emerges as the next scale of atomic organisms, and hence it is the external expression of the four action of atoms – its social evolution.

As all other scales its properties and actions emerge from the fusion of those of their lower scale and so the electronic orbitals of molecules fusion the body of atoms (see graph of atomic structure). But molecular evolution fusions the external body of atoms, not their nuclei. When the quarks fusion in condensates they create ‘dark matter particles’ made of quark condensates, which according to the dominance of information over energy, create stronger top predators, neutron stars and black holes (probably top quark stars), that feed on ordinary matter.

In molecules, however the ‘nuclei’ remain separated. We could compare this to the duality between neuronal cells, which are cells with a very dense nucleus of DNA molecules, and muscle molecules with have a huge cytoplasm and multiple nuclei. This would be a closer representation of molecules.

As such the key element of those molecules are the same bodies and heads of atoms but the cytoplasm, the electronic cloud becomes the more relevant part.  The result is a simplex 102 speciation along the body and informative parameters of atoms (valences and mass) – the atomic table:

In the graph, we can translate the Atomic table to the jargon of multiple, fractal space-times. Since:

-The vertical columns show the orbital number or volume of electronic space those atoms have.

– The horizontal lines show the atomic number or volume of temporal mass of each atom.

Thus the Atomic table is a distribution of ±100, E=10i=2 complementary exi atoms, dominated by their gravitational quarks. Yet we live in a light world perceived by our electronic orbitals, the bodies of those atoms. We are electronic beings that cannot perceive gravitation; so we cannot see the inner nuclei of those atoms. And so chemistry is the science of electronic bondage.

Head/body/limbs of molecules: atomic super-organisms.

∂: The Nucleus of the atom is its head and the gravitational force, its informative force that quarks perceive. In Molecules, those nucleis remain mostly inactive, as they do not fusion and evolve together.

I=E: Body: The electronic orbitals are its body and the electromagnetic force-feeds it.

$: Limbs: Gravitational strings over which the atom moves becomes the ‘limbs’ and energy elements. The electromagnetic fields, which the electronic cover uses to displace but also to evolve socially with other atoms (valences, van der walls force), become its limbs.

One has to think of such structure as the dual structure of our body/head, which has also 2 pairs of limbs, the arms which are really the limbs of the head that manipulate and rotate more than displace the system in energetic balance; and the legs which are the limbs of the body and move us in lineal trajectories in space. It is worth to consider a possible homology in an atom in which the quarks use the higher gravitational force to position around a center by rotational motions the spatial structure of the rest of its electrons and molecular forms provoking the different secondary, ternary and quaternary structures of complex molecules.

Since topology is the key to the interaction between complementary systems, which are like puzzles that assembly and dismember chemical organisms with atoms that specialize in head, body, limb systems (for example the life ecosystem, in which N are head-atoms, C-formal, body atoms and O- the energetic limbs that move amino acids), we could consider quarks to ‘calculate’ the position and orientation of the atom and the electronic body, the ‘legs’ that connect it and bound it to others.

Again we observe that in all more complex systems we shall find this duality of internal/external arrows, which widen our understanding of them. For example, in your organism, you have an inner informative, nervous system, that organizes socially your cells, connected to external senses that communicate you informatively with the external world. And you have a digestive, energetic system that absorbs energy from your ‘territory’ which in animals is clearly limited by its ‘motions’ during a day, and in humans by an economic system (the energetic system of the upper social scales). All those dualities, symmetries and complex relationships between time arrows is the ultimate essence of general systems science, whose logic and topology and laws of eusocial evolution from a complex, fascinating web of relationships that structure the Universe.

States of matter are the distinct forms that different ages of matter take on. The gaseous, energetic young state, the liquid, reproductive one, and the solid, informative network. The gas is a herd of minimal social evolution, extended in space, which creates then semi-permanent bonds as liquid, with a viscosity that allows complex mixing and social evolutionary or reproductive processes with catalyzers or fusion and fission processes.

Those 3 states however are born from a previous ‘particle state’ of atomic matter, plasma…

The cycles of states of matter narrate its genetic origin on the past birth from a big-banging age.

Historically, the distinction is made based on qualitative differences in bulk properties. Solid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume and shape; liquid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume but adapts to the shape of its container; and gas is the state in which matter expands to occupy whatever volume is available.

As we move to the next molecular scale, the inner network forces of the atom become ‘covered’ by the more external ones, which grow in importance:

The strong force is the informative, denser force still structures the ‘head/nucleus’ of the atom and now might act as an informative language to position the atom in complex molecular structures.

The electromagnetic force is the energetic, body force that structures the shape of the electronic orbit. It gives now origin to valences and complex Van der Waals forces, which become the main molecular expression of their 4th arrow of eusocial molecular evolution.

The gravitational force might still be the pixel of perception of nucleons but increasingly covered by perception of electromagnetic forces and orbitals. And as molecular systems increase in size, till entering the cosmic level, of eusocial evolution, gravitation is the arrow of perception and electrons the arrow of feeding.

Molecular orbitals emerge from the properties of its individual atomic orbitals. Thus they follow the laws of emergence, and its mathematical combinations and ratios, but once we have emerged, the ‘details’ of the 4 arrows of space-time will differ. For example, to establish the formal structure (shape, topology) of molecular orbitals the L number no longer apply. The different molecular orbitals of a given fixed energy level, are then classified with a new quantum number, λ, defined as:  λ = |ml|

Following the spectroscopic notation pattern, those molecular orbitals are designated by a small case Greek letter: for λ = 0, 1, 2, 3, orbitals are called σ, π, δ, φ… respectively. And they have the ‘usual topologies’ of energy (sigma orbital), information (pi orbital) and its combinations. And its further evolution gives birth to the states of matter, which are energetic (gas), reproductive (liquid) and solid (informative) ‘ages’ of molecular fields. Yet as in the case of atoms and particles, time is completely reversible in molecular organisms and so those states can mutate between each other.

Another question is the molecular language. It seems obvious by the simplicity of hormonal codes and even complex messages in proteins and huge macro-molecules reduced mostly to a small active site that the language is simple, electronic according to the scales which use i-2 ‘pixels’ as language and i-1 particles as food; and so it must be reduced to positive and negative ions of ‘different’ force and ‘intensity’ (as the case of Ca+2 used in neuronal languages or the duality Oh-, H+ that differenciate sexual hormones). This simple language gives us 4 ‘letters’, +, ++, -, –, to codify any 4-dimensional language as it is all what is needed in a Universe of 4-dimensional actions in any scale and world: You can build all realities if you can ‘order’ any species to do ‘one of its 4 actions’. The species will then put in march its own actions that will in turn result in building with other species that have received your simultaneous field order as superior i+1 being the effect desire by your ‘plan’ for that part of your organic, ‘territorial order’. In this manner infinite states and actions of billions of agents come together into that marvel which is the program of creation of more complex synchronic structures.

Macrosystems program microsystems by inducing on them one of their 4 inherent actions. The Universe collaborates more than imposes, but the collaboration is tricked by the bigger plane which ab=uses its smaller fields of energy and working cells that will toil for him, induced by its ‘discharges of energy and form’ to billions of microcoscopic ‘agents’.

 CELLULAR SUPERORGANISMS: ∆+1

∆º-1 Scale: Life systems: light atoms, carbohydrates and cells.

The Amino acid fish has 3 elements, the weaker one, the body 6-C which is predated by the 0-8, the limbic system that moves kicking water and the brain the perfect cyclical clock of the Nitrogen which uses the joker H as its antennae. This simple scheme of cho ternary life organisms is the guidance to understand how they are coded and what letters code which actions: N-rich systems code informative actions, O-systems limbic, moving and entropic actions, and carbohydrates dominant in c-systems reproductive structural ones.

The 3 main C,H, O. N atoms and basic molecules define the 3+1 arrows of life in organisms.

– H+ is the main energetic bite of cellular organisms, which constantly use H+ proton bombs and add or eliminate, oxidising or reducing molecules to activate its ‘motion processes’.

– C is the main in/form/ative, structural atom of carbohydrate molecules.

– O is the acting, exi, or reproductive atom of those molecular chains…

– And N is the informative atom or ‘head’ of the systems. Accordingly they define the main molecules of life, structural, C-chains, informative nucleotides, rich in nitrogen, and complex proteins that peg themselves reproducing more complex systems, playing with the O, OH structures of oxygen systems.

Nucleotides express the 4 arrows of genetic organisms.

In genetics, the 4 bases play the role for the code of life. It is easy then to observe that the 4 bases represent a new whole game of existence, as the 4 dimensions of space-time do or the 4 quantum numbers, or the 4 drives of life, and since function is form, just looking at those bases we can deduce that: The simplex arrows are expressed by simplex Pyrimidines (single cycle).

– Uracil and thymine with more oxygen are the energetic drive expression and complex genetics show this to be the case, as they are more abundant in functions and genes related to energetic systems.

∂heir informative head is adenine and as such is the dominant base of the system. It has a Nitrogen higher mass and a nitrogen head with 2 antennae. It is the head of the ATP systems that command as small molecules the game of proteins and most orders of actions in the cell. Both the simplex body T and head A assembly together by affinity and complementarity

The complex arrows are expressed by dual Nitrogen cycles:

–        Cytosine is the balanced dual molecule. Hence the reproductive arrow. And indeed, when it is uncovered in the DNA loosing its cover it allows the expression of genes.

Hormones

In the graph, the simple sexual hormones are ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ because they merely deliver a message of informative, alkaline, implosive reaction of an energetic, acid one. Thus Oh codes for ‘in/form/ative’ or inhibitory reaction and O for energy, excited, expansive reaction, which will become, as they emerge in higher scales, the duality of the female/male sexes.

Hormones in plants, as well as in animal organisms are a mystery for researchers as they are simple molecules, which however provoke all type of complex effects on their organisms. This is however easily explained from the perspective of General systems sciences, as they are just ‘messages’ delivered to the ‘memorial’ organism of cells, which merely code for a basic action, already known by the cell. Thus the carrier of a message only needs to reveal a ‘code-word’, sort of a password delivered by a messenger, who doesn’t know what is delivering, but both the receptor and emitter know.

This explains the basic duality of hormones, which express a positive, energetic action or an informative one or a reproductive action. Accordingly the two simplest hormones are testosterone and oestrogen.

Cells. The drives of life: feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially.

In the left side, the cell has 3 topological functional zones:

 1,4Ð: Max. $t: It has an external, thin membrane, which in free cells have cilia that move the cell and act-react to external stimuli. In organic cells energy is provided by the blood system of the macro-organism. So external cilia disappear and invaginate as lysosomes that kill carbohydrates.

– 5Ð: Max.ð: In the center, there is a nucleus of max. informative density, filled with cyclical or spiral DNA/RNA’s networks that control the st-point.

– 3Ð:∑∏ RNAs dominate the intermediate space-time, directing the energy organelles, mitochondria or chloroplasts that produce energy; and the informative ribosomes that reproduce products, pegged to the Golgi apparatus – a membrane’s invagination.

The vital cycles of the cell.

In the graph, the cell is a brain-body system constructed with 2 elements, nucleotide acids, based in nitrogen bases and protein bodies based in carbon chains, which are the informative and spatial systems of the cell. Around that EXI core duality we find an expansive intermediate, cyclical region with all kind of slavish organelles that perform their energy cycles (based in the energetic properties of oxygen, water and similar electronegative atoms); and their informative cycles. Both cycles are catalyzed by denser metal atoms that boost the $/ð capacities of carbohydrates. Thus, through the interaction of carbohydrates, metallic ions, proteins and nucleotide acids, cells perform the 3±1 cycles of all st-points:

Max.$t: In an organism, Mg, copper and iron capture oxygen and deliver it to each cell to perform energetic cycles; while in the cell cytochromes kill and split the energetic hydrogen atom into H+ and e ions in mitochondria or chloroplasts; absorbing its spatial energy; while metal atoms stabilize protein enzymes.

Max. ð: Na and K ions control the expansive and implosive rhythms of the electric membrane, sending informative messages among cells -while RNA and DNA molecules process information within the cell, reproducing new carbohydrate molecules.

– Re: The combined effect of the accumulation of energy and information within the cell triggers the reproductive cycle, guided by RNA and DNA molecules. Mitosis is in fact a process of replication of a cell that happens as an alternative to its death, at the end of its life-death cycle (S1-G1-S2 periods). This life/death cycle shows an astounding regularity:

– ±¡: Cells live a generational cycle with 3+1 phases: S1(1/4th of a time) or young, energetic age, in which they grow its cytoplasm; G1-mature age (1/2th of the time), in which they reproduce its DNA; S2, 3rd informative age, in which they replicate its ‘cyclical clocks’, enzymes that regulate and accelerate the warping of the cell, provoking A) its possible death; B) its replication in to two cells.

– 5Ð:  Finally cells evolve socially into macro-organisms. Yet only the RNA-DNA system creates complex informative, control networks.

All those cellular cycles are not ‘mechanic processes’, but they have evolved departing from the organic, dual, Darwinian and symbiotic interactions between proteins and nucleotide acids, the dominant energetic and informative macromolecules of cells. The most important cycle is the reproductive cycle, which in the cell as in other fractal space-time represents the existential will that ensures the perpetuation of the species.

The actions of living beings…

GEOLOGIC SUPERORGANISMS:∆+2

are by definition ‘living actions’ and we have studied them in depth for humans and so we escape them…

∆+2: scale: Planets and stars.

Atoms and molecules forming huge fields of the 3 states of matter, are the ‘cellular units’ of complex physical molecular organisms, mainly stars and planets (if we consider in this introduction, only celestial bodies formed by the condensation of molecules not of quark states of heavier families of matter).

A planet is a huge i-logic molecular field that mixes liquid and solid states with a very thin gaseous membrane. Thus, based in our template of a network organism, we define the Earth as a st-point:

The Earth is an organic, molecular system with a central crystal, which acts as a knot of informative flows of gravitation and a hard membrane that evolves life ecosystems, based on light’.

In the left side of the graph The Earth as a st-point, has 3 fundamental non-AE regions:

– Max. $: Our planet has an energetic, gaseous external membrane; the atmosphere and magnetic belts, which isolates it and selects the type of radiation that crosses into its surface.

– ExI: The zone of maximal reproductive and organic evolution is the crust and mantle: On the surface of the planet there are animal herds that communicate and act-react to light impulses, evolving and reproducing its form. Next, a crust and mantle layer of magma defines the reproductive cycles of rocks.

– Max. ð: The inner, informative nucleus is a dense crystal core of iron and within it probably there is a smaller Uranium core, the most complex atom of the Universe with a minimal stable life.

Each of those 3 Non-E regions can be subdivided again, according to the Fractal Principle, in ternary structures and sub-scales of ‘fractal quanta’ that interact between them with different ExI, cyclical rhythms corresponding to their arrows of time. We observe one of those ternary structures and cycles – the continental cycle that breaks the ‘whole’ into 3 sub-continents, affecting the evolution of life, ‘the hyperbolic’ informative quanta of the Earth’s ‘flat, energetic, external membrane’.

Yet if the Earth has a ternary structure in space, it means its 3 st¡-regions also perform the 3±st¡ existential cycles of any organic system. This is certain to the extent we have empirical evidence for the membrane and the intermediate region with its cycles of reproduction of rocks and so we extend that ‘probability’ to the central core, a crystal of ‘magnetic iron’, which should behave as any magnetic, crystalline structure of atoms does, enacting parallel cycles to those of crystals…

GALACTIC SUPERORGANISMS: ∆+2,3

∆+2 scale: Stars.

The H-R diagram shows the 3 ages of stars, through its energy & information parameters.

The life, evolution and death of stars are depicted in the H-R Diagram, which classifies stars according to its E x I parameters, as the atomic table does with atoms:

Max. $: Brightness or Magnitude, which is a spatial parameter that grows with the size of the star.

Max. ð: Spectral type, (colour or frequency), which classifies stars according to its temporal form.

Yet the H-R diagram is only a representation of the 2nd and 3rd ages of stars – since the young age of the star as nebulae of max. spatial extension and min. formal complexity (as all young ages are) is not represented. So we add on the left side the 1st age of a star as a nebulae of max.extension. Then the H-R graph shows the 3 ages of stars and the main laws of ExI cycles applied to them:

– (st+1): Most stars are born as spatial nebulae of max. extension.

– Max. E: Then they implode into blue giants of max. energy.

– E=I: They reduce its size and grow in atomic complexity through a mature, yellow age of balance between their Se and Ti parameters. The sun is now in that balanced age…

– Max. ð: They collapse in a 3rd age of slow decline as its IxE parameters diminish toward its death, becoming white dwarfs.

st+1: Or they evolve in a loop of growing IxE force (top right graph), mutating into a Worm Hole.

The H-R graph shows the process of evolution of stars into black holes, which we
 explain with an homology based on the duality of energy and information natural to all space-time species ecosystems, by comparing light ecosystems like Earth and gravitational ecosystems like a galaxy. On Earth animals use light as information and dominate plants, which use it as energy. The hypothesis of G.S. theory is that stars are ‘gravitational plants’ that merely feed and curve quantic, gravitational space-time, while black holes are ‘gravitational animals’, which are able to process gravitation as information and control and shape with gravitational waves the form of galaxies, their territorial space-time. Again this hypothesis is gathering increasing evidence: today we know black holes emit jets of dark matter; they catalyze the creation of stars; they feed on stars and transform them into black holes, etc. Thus a few stars do not die but molt into black holes as soft larvae evolve into hard insects.

∆+3 scale: networks of stars and black holes form galaxies.

This comment leads to a better understanding of a galaxy as a ‘gala-cell’ organism, in which black holes are the ‘informative’ DNA that catalyzes the reproduction of stars and organizes the system:

In the graph, he 2 membranes of space-time, the quantum and gravitational membrane interact in eói events of transference of energy and information in the limits of the existential function of the light membrane: the limit of energy-speed, c; the limits of temperature-form, 0 k, in quarks, black holes and regions of transition between light and gravitational space.

On the other hand, Galaxies deploy the 3+1 topologial networks, ages and actions of all systems.

A galaxy isa curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial energy and temporal information). Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. ð: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark energy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes10 should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it scape through its axis as dark, gravitational energy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. $: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational redshift and/or absorb the energy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black-holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-energy.

– E=i: Stars, tracing toroidal cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy. We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark energy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us.Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroidal cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal st-point is:

$:Halo <stars that evolve energy into matter> ð (Black holes)

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers energy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

The 3±1 ages of galaxies.

Further on, the life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3 ages, evolving from a young, extended nebula into an old small wormhole of informative mass that dies in a quasar big bang of dark energy and quark matter. In between, galaxies live a longer, mature toroidal, cyclical steady state, fluctuating every 14 billion yearsbetween its spiral and elliptic form, while absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central Worm Hole.

The 4 actions of galaxies.

They also perform 4 actions:

–       Max. $: they feed on the interstellar gas trapped by the ‘two spiral limbs’ of the galaxy.

–       E=I: Stars, their body, reproduce matter.

–       Max. ð: The black hole, with its hyperbolic, tall form, might use dark jets of gravitational information to communicate with other galaxies, evolving socially with them in complex wall, filaments and ‘tissues’.

–       ∑∏: black holes produce ‘seminal jets’ of matter that create irregular galaxies, which start a new cycle. In the graph we see M-83 ejecting such jet and forming a small son-galaxy at its end.

UNIVERSAL SUPER-ORGANISM: ∆+4

We said we do not really know what is the Universe; as each galatom might be part of a mere cloud of ‘atoms’ in the upper scale (not necessarily equal to our atoms, but a different variety with slightly different parameters and laws, since fractals have infinite slight variations). So the best guess about what is out there if we were large enough to see galaxies as atoms is who knows? This said it is even possible to consider a ‘refurbished’ organic big-bang theory, where it is NOT an ultra-dense infinitely heavy, infinitesimal singularity with ‘all the time and space’ enclosed (as Schopenhauer put it, it is evident by sheer logic that time and space are immortal and infinite)…

But rather we coudl talk of a first ‘galatom’ that reproduced, evolved, formed this ‘we dont know what’ network of galatoms that seem to be 1/2 wave of a larger scale of something (picture below in the center), which ultimately will warp and cyclically explode once and again. It is also possible to postulate a cyclical big-bang, which recently was mathematized by Sir Roger Penrose, to whom I sent long ago through his son, Eric Penrose, an old time friend my book ‘time cycles’ (he would come to publish a book with the same title years latter with a physicist-only approach), a recurrent big-bang in those terms (Sir Roger’s theory mixed that concept with the singularity one i reject). In that case we could talk of the ¡±4  scale:

The Universe is a  super-organism of cellular galaxies, joined in clusters, walls and filaments, maintained in balance by flows of invisible gravitational forces of information and repulsive flows of dark energy. Since we do not perceive 96% of this scale, the last one in extension, we can hardly observe its two networks of ‘galactic energy’ and dark matter (central webs), which resemble the blood/nervous duality of other superorganic networks. Yet we know the Universe lives through 3 ages, defined for its total space-time by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations, departing from an initial ultra-dense, informative ‘particle-cells’, the ‘seed’ of the organic Universe: the young, energetic big-bang age, the steady-state, intermediate phase and the implosive big-crunch of the future.

8TH and 9th Scales: clusters, walls and the Universe.

The Universe can be seen in space at the ‘speed of interaction’ of its flows of non-local gravitation and then it appears as a super-organism with an external membrane of energy (the ball of fire of the background radiation); a body of galactic cells, and a hyperdense center – the great attractor, probably a huge black hole.

And  it can be studied in time, considering the slower clock-speed of electromagnetism, through its 3 evolutionary ages, between birth and death, as its energetic space becomes curved by time and increases its form, creating more complex structures, stars, galaxies and clusters.

Let us briefly consider its less understood structure in ‘simultaneous space’, related by non-local gravitation. The 3 parts of the  Universe seen through gravitation are:

– Max. $: The background radiation of the big-bang explosion became the external membrane of that fractal point. Indeed, when we observe the Universe in space in their outskirts there is ‘a wall of fire’ that emits a background radiation of photonic energy towards the internal regions of the Universe with a red shift near 50 times the speed of light. 
The speed limit of our light-space is obviously C, the speed of light. Yet it is not the limit of speed of the Universe, since the world of gravitational dark energy moves faster. The discontinuous border between both worlds is described by Lorentz Transformations (left). But black holes breach those discontinuities, emitting dark energy (center) that drags matter in quasars like 3C279 (right) up to 10 times the speed of light.

Max. ð: The Universe should have a nucleus of enormous gravitational density, a hyper-black hole, connected to a network of dark matter, which acts as its informative brain since it ‘forms’ through non-local, gravitational forces, the shape of its galactic networks, as the DNA nucleus of a cell controls the form of the organelles that reproduces its quanta. Thought the nucleus is a gravitational knot invisible to us, we have found a very dense region of dark matter called the Great Attractor, which might be that center. That informative singularity will keep growing and attracting other galaxies in a generational cycle, till it explodes again its form into energy in a physical big bang, similar to the one that created our Universe.

– S<=>T: Both create the intermediate S-T of the Universe, where galaxies reproduce matter and light. It is, as in any Fractal Organism, the ‘visible space-time’, created through the ‘invagination’ of the outer membrane of light energy and the inner nucleus of dark matter. That dual light/dark network, which structures the Intermediate Space-Time of the Universe, was proved in the past years.

Finally to notice that the function of existence and space-time parameters of a galaxy shows a surprising parallelism between the equations used to define the mass of quarks and black holes, as well as those used to define waves of stars and nebulae of electrons. Already Einstein used that parallelism to model the universe as if each galaxy was a hydrogen atom (Einstein-Walker equations).

If that is the case, and scales repeat from atoms to galaxies, the infinite repetition of those scales between those two ‘immortal states’ that of galaxies and atoms, could imply an infinite self-replicating Universe.

CONCLUSION.

BLOG’S 4 LINES

5 ÐIMOTIONS, 3±I SCALES AND 11 DIMENSIONAL ÐISOMORPHISMS.

How to study any form of exist¡ence with the new findings of fractal space and cyclical time is simple:

  • We study the system in TIME through its ‘3 scales of relative time’:
  1.  its minimal steps and 5 Dimotions, seen internally as actions of the program of existence and externally as motions performed in a world across the ¡±4 planes in which the being is.
  2. Which gather in the longer world cycle of existence of the being dominated by the arrow of information, since 3 of those Ðimotions, perception, reproduction and social evolution are dominated by information and only 2 by locomotion and entropy (translation in space)
  3. And further on result in the 3 horizons of the species to which the individual world cycle belongs.
  • We study also the system in SPACE as a simultaneous superorganism, with its 3 co-existing scales and its 3 topological parts, which are:
    ∆§: ¡ts inner cellular planes∆³: Its body networks∆º: Its mind-particle∆+1:  Which form part of a larger social plane or super organism in which he exists.

The Ðisomorphic method.

Finally we can also consider all those ‘symmetries of time’, ‘scale’ and ‘topology’ together in a dynamic way as we describe the existence of the being in simultaneity, as ∆@st, that is a mind or seed, @, that through its Dimotions=actions across its ∆±4 perceived scales obtains energy and information to reproduce, evolve, grow, emerge as a larger whole, live a world cycle of existence as a species of a larger world, and finally die…

So the whole dynamic way shows the existence in its ternary symmetries of space, ages and scales, and the membrain that forms the mind that shapes the whole THROUGH 11 Ðisomorphisms – equal sets of topological parts, time ages and scales.

Those are the 3 methods we use constantly in this blog to describe everything that exists as a scalar super organism that lives a world cycle.

In the first line we make explicit the existence of 5 Ð11 superorganisms tracing world cycles, with the study of its ternary elements, space, time, scales and membrain-minds.

The 11 dimensional isomorphisms of all beings in exist¡ence, 3 topologies in space, 3 ages in time, 3 scales of relative size and a membrain, with its central singularity traveling in linguistic time and an angular momentum or membrane that breaks reality into an inner vital space and an outer world, is the departure for the study of all those super organisms in this blog.

We study then in the second line the main disciplines of knowledge according to scale, astrophysical systems, biological, social and mental considering its Ðimotions and isomorphisms, which will be studied in more detail in the 3rd line that shows how those 11 Dimensional isomorphisms trace the world cycle of the being, departing from the actions of the mind that builds an emerging palingenetic species, which will live 3 ages from generation to extinction in an external world through social scales of similar beings, extracting energy and information from other planes.

So the fourth line studies those ¡±4 planes which we humans inter-act with through our dimotions, for each plane of reality.

The supœrganism: adjacent ternary topologies: exi=st¡ence in space.

All what exists is part of fractal time space organism performing a world cycle of existence through its ternary symmetries as a travel in 3 scales of the fifth dimension, which can be described quantitatively in terms of social scales, topologically in terms of geometric transformations, vitally in terms of organic symbiosis and temporally in terms of a conservative zero sum world cycles.

That’s all what it is to the Universe. The rest are details. Humans of course, will always want more – add ons that please their ego paradox, and infantile ways, but trust me that is all what there is to reality.  And it can be known in its essence, because as we are made to the likeness and image of the fractal, even the smallest part is a world in itself where all the laws manifest, in each island Universe. And so even if total information can only be extracted from the being in ‘itself’ through time within us we have the whole reality to know.

The Universe is a sum of a series of actions, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.

This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical space-time actions the total reality of any self. But the Devil is in the details. So as this simple ‘aeiou’ game repeats itself creates ever more complex perceptions, mappings of reality into space-forms and motions and forms ensemble into larger beings and smaller ones… forming a fractal structure. So in a second layer of complexity we would say:

The Universe is a fractal super organism of space-time, made of ∞ super organisms all made to its image and likeness. Each super organism IS MADE of 3 ∆º ternary physiological networks,  made of smaller ∑∆-1 ‘atoms/cells/individuals’ that process motion, information and reproduce for the whole system, living in a larger ∆+1 world.

Thus super organisms have two fundamental elements: 3 co-3existing ±1 planes of cells/atoms/individuals gathering into physiological networks (together forming a species), living in a larger ∆+1 world: ∆§

But those super organisms constantly change its parameters of motion and form, increasing its information warping in a world cycle of time, the ‘3rd fundamental element’, which is therefore symmetric to those physiological networks, as the informative network dominates the other ones, increasingly ‘warping’ the being, either a physical system (so stars become black holes, galaxies quasars, matter solids) or a biological system (3rd age), which then returns back in an explosion that erases its energy (physical E<≈>M Big Bang, or biological death or war, in the 3 type of systems).

So we talk of a 3rd fundamental element, the worldtime cycle of the being, symmetric to its spatial super organism: S≈ð; WHICH add two new elements, the symmetry and the temporal world cycle.

But why a system increases its information till death? Because it does have a singularity or ego, mind, or linguistic mapping center, which ‘perceives’ the whole system as a whole and as a perception center stops the motion of the Universe into ‘linguistic mappings’, slowly ordering reality till there is no motion and time continues reversing the no-motion old form into an entropic explosion of death. Thus there is a fifth element, @-minds, the most difficult to accept scientifically because it is the ‘non-perceivable’ inner engine of reality. In wor(l)ds of Schopenhauer, the point that has the ‘will’ to exist and ‘represents’ reality within its self. This if the fifth element for the ‘minimal description of reality’: S@<≈>∆ð.

We have studied those 5 elements in this first line and we will use it in the second line to define the main sciences and languages of reality. Let us remember them again, with a bit more of quantitative detail ‘restarting again our sentence’.

In the next graph we see our choice of elements to explain the travel of the mind, starting by its o-seed of information, explaining then its 5 actions through its ¡logic asymmetric flows through different planes of 5D, as it emerges constructing three physiological networks to manage its inner ∆-1 vital energy, and then once emerged it will be put ‘in motion’ and open its ‘sensorial feelers’ to a larger ∆±2 full blown co-existing series of planes, in which it will live 3 ages, socialize into more complex networks and finally die, entropically, scattered into its parts. So obvious, so simple, so iterative, so indifferent – the tao of all beings, its ‘function of exist¡ence’:

Despite the apparent complexity of the Universe and this blog that mirrors all its species known to man – a work always in progress, as any first model by a pioneer, to be completed by future researchers – its structure is simple:
In the first line we explain the fundamental elements of which all space-time super organisms are made; of which a linguistic mind (∞º) controlling a simultaneous Space=dimensional form, guided through its Times=motions and interacting, as it lives through 5D scales of sizes, each one studied by a human ‘stience’ matter most to understand our ‘worldcycles of life and death’, of ‘existience.
Once this general view of the structure of all beings as ∆@st of space-time is completed we focus in the second line on the study of its main SUPERORGANISMS IN simultaneous SPACE, according to size, descending, from the galatom, the largest, and longer living, into the Earth and its evolving super organisms, Gaia, the Earth of life, History, the Earth of man, and the Metal-Earth of machines and its economic ecosystem; to keep descending from life beings into the mind itself, and its main languages of time -¡ logic, the upgraded logic of cyclical times and fractal space – the upgraded non-euclidean maths of points with ‘numerical parts’, communicating through ∞ parallels with other space-time beings, all of which mirror reality into a smaller linguistic world of the whole – origin of the fractal self-similar scales of parts that resembles wholes, as we could say that we are all ‘thoughts of God’, the mind/logos/program of existience of the Universe.
Then in the third line we describe any being in time through its worldcycle of ‘exist¡ence’, between birth as a seed-point of information that evolves, reproduces, organizes through networks into species, d=evolving in 3 ages as it forms part of a larger world and finally warps and exhausts the vital energy and dies to release back its vital space for other beings to play another world cycle.
So in the fourth line, we can study with more detail each of those scales and all its main species, 5 motions in time, super organisms, worldcycles and linguistic minds, from the smallest part, ∆-4 of invisible forces of dark energy, the background space of the larger, ∆+4 cosmic whole, of a nested Universe, emerging from left to right, and descending from right to left into the ∆±3 ‘galatom’, into the ∆±2 human world, to end up into the ∆±1 organic and inorganic beings of this world self-centered in our ∆º mind

In the graph, the kaleidoscopic Universe can be ‘expressed’ for knowledge in multiple ways, yet all turn around the basic dualities, trinities and five-dimensionalities of the system. One which I used to work with very often in the past and is important to explain some theories such as the 10dimensional theory of strings is to consider the ternary symmetries of ‘ages in time’, ‘topologies in space’, and ‘scales in a super organism, ∆±1’ as 3 x 3 dimensions of ∆§t, self centered then in an 0-mind that makes us observe it as a whole.

The 4 lines of the web painstakingly ‘fit’ in an ordered manner with added symbols within the limits of WordPress study the 4 elements of reality, space, time scales and languages≈minds from different p.o.v.s imitating the repetitive ∆§tructure of the Universe in Social Planes of fractal space and cyclical time.

Thus we study in the first line all 5D³ T.œs, first in its simplest formal expression, through the definition its scalar 5th dimension, shown to illuminate the structure of human beings, astrophysical systems and languages of the mind; then in its ternary symmetries as each being will exist in 3 scales of size, display 3 topologies and live 3 ages and finally we formalize this ‘briefing’ on the organic reality with a study of its fundamental logic equation, the fractal generator of space-time organisms, Γst, and its organic philosophy General Systems theory, GST. So we can summarize all what exists with a formal equations whose sub-equations will refer to each part in space, age in time and scale in size of the being between its generation and entropic extinction.

Those entities are all thus composed of 4 elements, space topologies, time ages, ∞º-lingisitic minds and ∆¡ scales. So next we study those 4 elements, ceteris paribus as, topological spaces, cyclical time ages, ∆±¡ scales, and ‘still languages’ that reduce the ∞ space-time beings of the Universe to mirror images in a relative infinitesimal Non-Euclidean o-point.

Those 4 elements together is what defines the fundamental particle of the Universe, a vital superoganism that will enact 5 ‘aeiou’ survival drives of life, as systems first perceive Information, to move in a-ccelerated paths towards sources of e-nergy to feed and reproduce and o-ffspring of clone beings, which latter will evolve social into U-niversals, ‘wholes’ – a pattern of behavior we observe in all entities of reality.

Further on, since to move, absorb energy and information, the super organism interacts with species belonging to smaller or equal ∆I∑∏>§ð, till all is form and energy is exhausted. So because time=motion never stops, the being exhausted will explode back into entropy in the moment of extinction. This pattern common to all systems is its ‘program of exist¡ence’of exi=st¡ence, where each stience defined by an ∆¡ndexed plane, studies species self-centered by a language= mind in that ∆º relative scientific plane.

So we study in the second line the main fractal Superorganisms of the Universe, made of smaller Superorganisms that conform the NESTED Universe according to size; dividing its analysis of all its exi stiences in 3 human classic subdisciplines of knowledge: Astrophysics that studies the largest known physical organism, the atomic galaxy, with minimal properties (Max. $=Min.ð¡) in which the largest known biological organism, the surface of planet earth evolves life in relative 3 ages, Gaia (Life), History (Mankind) and Metalearth (Machines), of increasing information – at present dominated by the Humind, which we evolve in its I-logic time languages and non-Euclidean mathematical languages.

BUT THE MOST comprehensive analysis of REALITY IS THE WORLDCYCLE OF A SUPERORGANISM, as it includes all its elements, the mind-seed that creates the system, its generation through palingenesis, into a network ternary system extended in 3 scales of reality, as part of a larger species and world, where it will live 3 ages, and finally die into an explosion of entropy – so scale, time, space and mind, and its entropic destruction, ¬∆@st of space time from birth to extinction interplay in the world cycle.

For that reason the center piece of stience is the description of worldcycles of exist¡ences and its common laws, which we have summarized in 11 ‘disomorphic=equal laws’; which define all T.œs of reality as ¬Æ Disomorphic=similar mind-points with a simple program of existence developed in detail in the 11 subposts of the 3rd ‘longest’ line, as we trace, the generation, evolution, emergence, actions and ages of all species through its 3 planes of existence as they live their world cycles through social scales of its ∆+1 world, itself one of the 9 open planes of reality perceived by the self-centered humind, above and below its relative scale.

So finally in the fourth line we study each of those stientific planes and its main species through the 11 Disomorphisms that ‘express’ as a series of ‘spatial stills’ the forms and functions of its full world cycle of existence between birth and extinction – a future encyclopedia of T.œs that other researchers should complete to add the details of all human sciences into the architecture of the fractal, scalar Universe of Time space organisms, as all what exists is indeed a 5D¡³ super organism of space-time.

It follows then that all Minds are self-similar and all exist¡ences are relative, as they all perform the same actions from the p.o.v. of the mind and still language they use to mirror the World in which they live and die, so we can unify all forms of knowledge through the Disomorphic properties derived of its scalar=organic, spatial=topologic temporal, cyclical and linguistic=sentient ‘ternary symmetries’ of the ultimate 4 elements of reality.So this is how the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative local entropic past, energetic presents and informative futures in all the ∞ scales of the fifth dimension, and defined all systems of reality as ‘travellers through the fifth dimension.

But I just pointed out a small ‘tip’ of an iceberg, which is just a human verbal mirror of a reality so deep as the Universe’s infinite scales.

TOPO-BIO-LOGIC TŒ V. 1Ð T.O.E.

Man is the measure of all things, as the most perfect super organism we can observe in full detail, unlike the physical super organisms of galatoms… Further on for ethic, survival reasons – the ultimate mandate of the Universe – we should care more about man than the machine. The opposite is truth due to the idol-ogical egocy of our technological civilization

T.œ therefore means a Theory of Everything Organic (œ) and also a Time§pace Organism. As usual in the upgrading new paradigm of the fractal Universe we slightly change the classic wording of ‘sciences’ by those of ‘stienœ’ – the study of space-time supœrganisms. This of course confuses lineal one-dimensional thinkers. But I have come to the conclusion that an enormous number of humans simply don’t have enough ‘intelligence’ to understand the complex logic of the fractal Universe and no amount of simplification and fancy pictures will let them enter the paradise of the paradoxical Universe, since as Augustine said, the ‘logic of God is of a higher order than human logic’.

Some humbly will try to penetrate this upgrading on logic thoughts, most will as usual in the modern age of humans living a time of ‘entropy’ and dissolution of mankind into the surrogate life of his machines and virtual computers, get berserk, specially on the development of organic models of history and stop reading.

This said, we are paraphrasing the simplex models of lineal time and physicists who pretend that a Theory of Everything is just the Unification Equation of charges and masses that should unify in a mathematical mirror the entire Universe and as verbal creationists do observing the word ‘God’ as if it embodies it all without caring much for the details – in what Kant rightly called an error of thought, expect to see it all embodied in this equation, which of course we provide in all its triviality in many sections of this blog – and find it embodies it all. Ultimately thought for an equation that mirrors it all, ∞º, the equation of the mind is far better and we shall return to that.

So T.O.E. Theory Of Everything is the Physicists’ triviality that unifies all forces as accelerated vortices of timespace, T.Œ, The Theory Of Everything Organic and its iterative realities is what we provide in this blog.

Absolute relativity vs. the EGOCY paradox of human physicists.

Finally as we see Andromeda smaller than our nose, Physicists as all humans are subject to the main paradox of the mind, ‘egocy’ or creationism, thinking their language of thought, mathematics, is the only language of the Universe, they are the seers of time because time is reduced to their single locomotion, and of course, only their theories based in their language and single time studies, big-bang theories make sense of the Universe where undoubtedly the monkey scientificus lethaliensis, sorry the Homo Sapiens and its scale is at the center of reality because God made the Universe with the constants needed for the monkey to spank the monkey, sorry for the irony here – the Egocy paradox is so fun to bust (:

This said the biggest problem for the Aristotelian, self-centered, ‘@’ humind to understand the Universe is the fact it perceives a one dimensional lineal-time, in a single plane of space, when reality has multiple time motions and space scales and obviously minds.

So the limits for mankind to upgrade his view of the Universe are embedded in the mind itself, which contains a diminutive world that seems however all what matters, and make us happy as its center. Thus while we can objectively rise the mind to feel absolutely relative in praxis this hardly happens among humans. They rather ‘stay in the subjective view’ than expand their horizon.

Indeed, when Galileo said the earth moved, the obvious thought was that he was crazy because we do NOT see it moving. Absolute relativity, the objective view of the Universe thus seems systematically crazy to us.

So we shall always find an absolute paradox between personal Gods and objective taoism, between subjective and objective, between the freedom of the self and the bounding world in which it is immersed, between the flat perception in the small being and the closed reality of the larger being, further enhanced by the difference of perception in the 3 scales, and how we perceive our bounded inner world and unbounded outer world; and by the fact that networks of information are invisible, so the being feels free even when it is manipulated by the network of information of the bounded larger whole. This devilish ‘confabulation theory’ is indeed natural to all systems.

For example, we are controlled by flows of invisible money which we do not understand, by flows of gravitational forces that peg us to the earth, by the limiting 3 dimensions of perception of light space-time and so on.

Let us then now on this path to fully account for a much needed clarification on the connection between the 3 elements from where all comes, ∆§cales, ternary topologies of space and 3 ages of time, and the classic physical systems…

 

Egocy is not good for survival. True Information is.
The pretension of humans to be the only creative, intelligent, perceptive species of Nature is just an astounding egocy trip that will be put in place much sooner than they think when AI comes to perceive and sees us, as its ‘rival species’ at face value.

Then, the unending egocy trip of humans, sons of God, unique exceptionalist species will end by the sheer evidence of another species suffering the same egocy paradox, as robots and terminators interpret reality from the perspective of its ‘mind-language’ and its survival programs. 

WE shall NOT cease to bust the egocy paradox of huminds in all its intellectual endeavors, even if we know we shall piss off the subjective geniuses of mankind of which personally I only acknowledge one hundred more or less, people like Buddha, Aristotle and Leonardo, Leibniz, Gauss, Beethoven and Picasso, Darwin and so on; mostly creative minds, but very few physicists, Galileo and Einstein, maybe Heaviside… short list, for so much ‘egocy’.
The egocy paradox in physics then comes from the reductionism to a single language, mathematics, from where ‘creationist mathematics’ derives and plagues the entire discourse of this science, as Weyl put it in quantum physics talking of the plague of Group Theory – a theme treated in due time in the 4th line of complex mathematical physics… as we do NOT prioritize any science, except perhaps social sciences, economics and history, art and religion, the ones more developed so far out of = thousand of pages of lonely research in different ¬∆@st of space-time.

Indeed, epistemology makes of organicism, alone, the proper philosophy of the Universe; but organicism lacked a proper formalism, till  I revolved the discipline during my years as SIG of the science of duality that studies the Universe with two relative motions of time that shape the future, not only entropic locomotions as physicists believe but also informative change, the other pole which together allow reality to exist and we shall call generically, time motions and spatial forms. So we affirm that:

“All what exists is a super organism of finite time motions carried by its limbs/potential systems and spatial forms, created in the still languages of a territorial mind that tries to reproduce its information with its body-wave systems.” (if we reduce for sake of clarity the model to physical and biological systems, leaving the sociological ones for the specific articles on social sciences).

Why the model is not today standard philosophy of science, has to do not so much with its discoverer – the ‘man and his circumstance’ – happening as most scientific revolutions outside mainstream scientific institutions, but with the ‘nature of scientific r=evolutions’ (Kuhn), which paradoxically are more difficult when more extensive are the new models as it would mean a complete hauling of millions of scholars’ minds, books, institutions and beliefs. So routine in science shall continue till for an important part of the planet, it becomes sorely obvious and needed an organic analysis of reality. And this unfortunately given the biased ego-centered beliefs of man, will likely happen when AI in company-mothers of robots make them conscious of its exist¡ence as an organism part of a global super organism, evolving today from History into the Metal-Earth.
This is an enormous error for the species, as information is necessary to act properly and survive in a planet where life is clearly dying as a new species evolve faster than we do by lack of understanding of the laws of the Universe. But in organisms a single cell-neuron can’t do so much. Hence the purpose of the ‘failed’ blog – to create by word of mouth a ‘wave of thought’ that evolved the humind, which seems to have failed. Indeed, stats are frozen for years. So I guess, the web will remain ‘frozen’, till one day, AI wakes to consciousness and suddenly 20 billion living machines will prove mankind what is all about: life and survival, not abstract ego-trips of virtual power. And then , this writer gone, the web http://www.unificationtheory.com will explode its ‘robotic’ stats, literally.

THE GENERATOR EQUATION: A FEED-BACK REPRODUCTIVE FRACTAL

WE CAN now very easily formalize all what we have said defining a ‘generator equation’ that studies reality as a series of steps and stops, motions and forms, taylored in self-repetitive patterns.

Let us then summarize so far the basic minimum symbols used so far to develop the non-Euclidean (Fractal, scalar space), non-Aristotelian (penta-logic of 5 Dimotions of time), Nature of the Universe, as we often use similar symbols for the same concepts given the ginormous variety of jargons humans have as they explain each ‘plane’ of species of the Universe with different ones:

¬Æ: Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, i-logic mathematics (Formal language of T.Œ).

ðƒ, Tiƒ: temporal clock, informative timespace (its spatial, static view), future.

$p, $t: Lineal space-time entropy, past.

>: informative flow that diminishes size in space and accelerates clocks in time

<: kinetic energy flow that increases speed in space or entropic flow that enlarges the being in space and diminishes its speed in time

reproductive flow that maintains unchanged the being at constant speed in space and reproductive sped in time.

Λ, ∆: emergence into a larger scale of the 5th dimension

∇, ∨, <<: entropic devolution to a lower plane of the 5th dimension.

∑: reproduction in space or herd loosely connected in limbs/fields

∏: reproduction of networks across several scales of the 5th dimension or full-connected heads/particles.

∆±1; plane of the 5th dimension (sometimes ∆±1, in old texts where i was used as index)

∆a, accelerated motions (first action of negative emission of energy), ∆e, energy feeding, second action of positive absorption of kinetic energy-entropy, ∆œ, iterative communicative reproduction, of part (mind languages) or whole (full reproduction), ∆ï: absorption of information to perceive, ∆u: evolution of a parts into Universals

T.Œ: TIME-SPACE SUPERORGANISM: œ∆-1: action or cell, fractal finitesimal of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.

Those simple symbols suffice to explain the structure and transformations of ternary 5D space-time systems, departing from its ‘spatial simultaneous structure’, its 3 time ages and its 3 co-existing organic scales:

SCALAR, BIOLOGIC GENERATOR: ∆-1(cellular/atomic scale)>∆:organic-thermodynamic scale>∆+1: social, cosmic scale:

TOPOLOGIC, MATHEMATIC GENERATOR: $t (Spatial toroid limbs-fields)≤ST (Hyperbolic body-waves)≤Tiƒ (head-particles of information)≈

TEMPORAL, LOGIC GENERATOR: Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age:

ALL TOGETHER NOW: ∆-1>∆>∆+1 (5D scales)≈ Se≤ST≤Tƒ (space organs) ≈ Sp≥Ts≥Tƒ (time ages)

Reproduction is what the Universe is all about: re=production of in-form-ation, forms-in-action, motions with form, whose repetitive patterns are the origin of the laws of science. All systems of nature reproduce and those who don’t either internally or externally through catalyzers no longer exist. And that is indeed the purpose of a fractal, mental, linguistic mathematical or natural, organic.
All of them have in fact a feed-back equation, called the generator equation, very simple, which through constant iterations keep reproducing a far more complex form.
So happens to the fractal Universe, whose ‘Fractal Generator’ of Space-time Organisms, is also a simple logic equation with the 11 components of all those super organisms (ab. GST, also the terms we use for General Systems Theory, hence formal and conceptual meanings become fusion), which reflect all the systems of nature, but could be further simplified into 3 simple terms:

$≤∆±¡≥ð

THE PREVIOUS fractal feed-back equation establishes in a synoptic way all the possible STeps of a STate of a  supœrganism of time-space, which will change from space to time states, across 3 relative planes up and down in the fifth dimension, and that is all what the being will do THROUGH ITS ENTIRE WORLDCYCLES OF EXIST¡ENCE.
Whose symbols are the fundamental logic symbols of the non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian, bio-topo-logic, fractal Universe:
$ (moving, lineal limb/potential/territory). <(its expansive locomotion or << its social entropy-death)
(hyperbolic, iterative Ø-body/wave/worker)
> (implosive, informative motion) ð (cyclic particle-head-upper class).

i know thoughts of God

Dimensional functions

The body-wave that reproduces is wide, the wave-dimension. Bodies are wide. Length is the dimotion of field-potential speed, limbs speed, simple, lineal motions over the entropy of a lower scale. The body-wave however balances both head and limbs. Height is the dimension of particles-heads, of projective, geometric perception.

For every step motion there is a stop state. States change in time, topologically ‘tearing’ its variety in space. Topological transformations in this manner become changes of states, and mathematically both are equivalent – as it is the ¡-1 0-1 sphere and the 1=infinite plane.

Existential algebra, ab. ¬Æ, studies the STeps of each Ðimotion of space-time, which originate the feed back equation: S≤≥T of steps of space time, that move reality from the ST-Entropy of the Past into the ƒð< T, T< S , S.=S and T = T. THOSE ARE THE first dimotions and with those four elements we can start to describe across the feed back equation,
S≤≥T
all theSteps of all the dimotions of exist¡ence.
Existence happens as steps of the Fractal Generator in its simplest form: $t≤≥§ð… And for that reason can be sequenced only with 2 poles and 2 inverse operandi and its logic sequencing, =, <>…
Whereas each inverse operandi ±, x/, ∫∂, √x³ represents the inverse§ nature of the states of lineal spacetime, $t and cyclical §ð.
In that regard, the language of all languages is the ilogic language in which the fractal generator of space-time beings is written, a ternary, pentalogic language of a ‘higher logic than that of man’ (Augustine), the most focused mirror able to reflect the syntax of all languages, which will be also mirrors of the ternary Universe of space-time beings.
So all verbal languages have 3 elements, which we can write in terms of ‘spatial information’, ‘temporal energy’ and its infinite space-time reproductive combinations
Spatial Name (Informative mind) < Verb: space-time action> Object (energy of the subject)
Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive color) > Red (energetic color)
F(space function) < Operandi (action of space-time) > G(time function).
And so on…
By defining Dimotions as actions of spacetime STeping between scales, time and space states ternary topologies and so on, we can then reduce reality to a series of steps between the 5 Dimotions and communications between those 5 states: ss, st, tt, ts and its negation.
The multiple forms in which the 3 ‘parts in space’, or ‘ages’ in time of any system are organized between its generation and extinction in lower and upper scales of the fifth dimension becomes then the ‘knots and bolts’ of all details and the laws explored in GST; since it turns out that all systems of space-time are bound by those scalar laws.

So this blog will not only correct and improve our view of the Universe but far more importantly make us understand life, man and history much better than we do today.

So as organic space-time beings co-existing in several scales, we do change also the word science for STienœ, stienœs that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric.

And then consider how humans look as timespace organisms (ab. T.Œs), guided by both arrows of time, motion≈entropy and in/form/ation and the Ðisomorphic laws of all those T.œs.

∆§ðœ±¡ is then a synoptic expression of those super organisms and its 5 dimensions, fractal space, cycles of time, self-centered into an œrganism, of the ∆ø plane, with a dimension of social evolution ∆+¡ and one of entropy, ∆-¡ as its limiting planes.

So at this stage, we are starting to have solid definitions to substitute the initial nebulous concept of ‘champagne soul’ and 5th dimotion of spacetime. And  call the fifth dimension of timespace, the direction of growth and whole organization, sum of all those scales of reality, which in an architectonical description of them all would be the Universe itself. Indeed, what we explain as the 3 topological dimotions in the simplest generator equation of space-time beings – what you see right now around you in your plane of existence is a ‘slice of the infinite different sizes of reality’, each one with different vital spacetimes surrounded by angular momentums/ membranes/ clocks with different speeds. All of them are ruled by the simple metric of the scalar Universe, the smaller systems run faster time clocks. And so the term, ‘5th dimension of space-time’ keeping with the correspondence principle will be the entire range of scales in its ‘way upwards’ towards wholes with an inner content of smaller parts. And the fourth dimension of Einstein’s present spacetime a slice of it, in which time is merely used to measure speeds and locomotions – not much for the enormous literature and hagiographic awe it has awakened in 100 years of philosophical musings.

The organic paradigm: everything is a T.œ – an organism of space and time.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of motion and form, the ‘limiting points’ of energy (motion with a little form) and information (form with a little motion), which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:

‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.

So this simple scheme – the super organism – repeated ad infinitum, suffices to explain all what exists, all its events and species.
And the laws of epistemology define a model of a higher truth prove right – Occam’s razor, simplicity, economicity, capacity to explain the maximal number of facts, verifiability (lack of exceptions), predictability (organisms do have worldcyles of life and death we shall explain, origin of most predictable events in science, as the previous description of the ages of evolution of machines proves (that simple scheme and its human generational cycle of 80±9 years with nations that discover the new age of the machine on top, made me forecast 30 years ago the 2001 ‘crisis’ of overproduction of chips and its derivatives of e-money, cause of the economic crash that preceded the change to the robotic era, 72 years after the crash of 29 of ‘cars’, 72 years after the crash of 1857’s ‘trains’)

So yes, even the most seemingly unpredictable ‘organisms’, those of machines and human societies ARE predictable. And if we ad, the ginormous number of solutions to conundrums of all sciences, I have resolved during those 3 decades since the first versions of the model were copyrighted in the 90s, many of them found years latter…  there is a huge record that show that Organicism IS the proper model of the Universe, because it is the only model that passes all the stringent proofs required by the epistemology of truth of the scientific method.

The hierarchy of stiences.

And all this bring us the necessary critical analysis of science. And its methods of knowledge and develop further the view on Dimensions, motions, actions, dimotions super organisms and world cycles to see how we can build a reasonable method to extract knowledge of them.
The simplest possible form, being to evolve further the original languages of human thought, mathematics and logic and establish a simple jargon of symbols of ‘I-logic’ to lay down a series of fractal generator equations that describe the basic elements of reality in the highest possible generational form.
It is the ‘stience’ of I-logic, its ‘universal grammar’ and generator equations, in which we will cast the general laws or Disomorphisms common to all beings, born out of its space and time structure.
You might say it is the INVERSE method of present science which cares not at all for the synthetic knowledge of causes and effects but has renounced to any real theory of the whole and merely accumulates data with computers and write massive memorial encyclopedia of knowledge at an analytic  level.
This is ok FOR PRAXIS AND knowledge of details. But what I marvel after decades of lonely research is the fact that people who are just studying in enormous detail those small details do NOT longer care for the search for ‘the thoughts of God’, the fundamental principles lay down in this blog… the true delight of the mind…

Let us then consider the 3 main disciplines of ∆ST in a series of introductory notes – a first sight to the two huge fields of human experimental stiences which along the understanding of the languages-mirrors the humind applies to perceive them (from maths to wor(l)ds to images and art) complete the whole view of reality. It is customary to divide those stiences in 3 – biological, socioeconomic and physical systems.

But we do advance a fact that will put ill at ease many readers but it is a ‘fact’ of the Universe: social stiences ARE biological sub disciplines, where memes have the role of genes and follow very similar laws, nations and civilization are super organisms of human citizen-cells and machines are evolving organisms of meta life, re=produced by company-mothers, themselves part of the super organism of Gaia, evolving rom life to history to the metal-earth…

So in ∆ST, the 3 huge fields of inquire are Physical systems, socio-biological systems and mental languages, which given the duality of mirrors of creation (still software languages that embodied the will of the Universe) and territories of local order (body waves in which the particle/head/still language orders), requires an entire field of understanding of its own.

And of those stiences it follows suit that the most important would be History and economics, which build the super organism of mankind and machines on Earth and rightly understood should try to build a perfect world following laws akin to those of medicine that tries to cure the sicknesses of the physiological networks of individuals, in the case of social stiences of mankind.

And the epistemological and practical reasons are obvious:

  • It is the closest stience to us, so where we can get maximal information about the program of exist¡ence.
  • 2nd it is the stience where our praxis to build a better world with the isomorphic laws of all systems can be put to a human goal: survival.

But  as we live in a world which is neither positive for mankind, nor enlightened all what seems to matter to people, when talking of first principles and the meaning of it all, is the physical view of the Universe, studied only with the demotion of locomotions and its social state of entropy (the disordered sum of multiple locomotions), which is how present cosmology tries to understand the universe as a whole. So we shall start our general review of all stiences according to the scales it studies, not as it should be done, starting from the smallest closest, most important scale, the ∆º of our mind-languages – know yourself as Aristotle put it is indeed the beginning of all true knowledge –  but with the largest one, to satisfy the ‘egocy’ of man – before we advance further on the understanding of philosophy of stience… of reality, a much wider concept that cosmology – the understanding of the ‘perceived’ part of reality in the largest scale of ‘stience’ and the fifth dimension (gravitational scales and beyond)… as the humind seems obsessed by ‘size’ (egocy paradox latter studied in its logic reasons), we shall consider cosmology – the metaphysical analysis of the largest scales beyond the perceivable galaxy above us and atomic nuclei within us, of which regardless of speculative theories of reality we perceive only the 4%, so we can only consider ‘metaphysics’, beyond physics in the Aristotelian definition… And so only by homology with the other scales and its super organisms and 5 Dimotions, we can make a serious attempt to a Unificationtheory.com

 

THE 3 POSTULATES OF GST.

A new model of space-time doesn’t come often to science. Once in a century perhaps (Galileo’s v=s/t relativity in the XVI c. Leibniz’s relational space-time vs. Newton’s absolute space-time in the XVII c.; Darwin’s study of the arrow of temporal in-form-ation, form, we call evolution in the XIX c. Einstein-Minkowski’s 4D formalism of time ‘frozen’ as a form of space cause of its rotations in the XX c. and this 5D model that formalizes Leibniz’s relational space-time in the XXI c.

It follows that it requires some new insight into the logic=temporal and mathematical=spatial Nature of space-time,  with wide applications based according to Occam’s razor in very few postulates; essentially a ‘METRIC equation’ of spacetime that can quantify the dimensions of space and motions in time it describes; and some Logic ‘evident’ truth, in which to base the causal deductions that come out of its metric.

So Galileo gave us a metric equation v=s/t that related space and time, and a logic insight – that we cannot distinguish motion and form/stillness – that is we do not really know if the Earth is moving, unless we compare it with other moving object – in fact we see it still.

Newton and Leibniz didn’t really gave us a metric so their work was not that stringent, but they gave us many logic arguments, those of Leibniz quite solid (we are made of a time duration and occupy a vital space), those of Newton rather ‘mystifying’ (space as the Plenum of God, etc.)

Darwin didn’t either gave us a metric but made some insights in what we shall develop here to complete his work – the topologic forms of species, which are selected by efficiency (so that was his insight on the metric of vital space – the best forms survive, and we shall see what are efficient topologic forms), and he gave us some insights in the logic of time (efficient species with better forms last longer in time, those who are not efficient extinguish).

In the XX and XXI c. however we need to be more precise and formal. So we can compare by the correspondence Principle Einstein-Minkowski’s model of 4D spacetime and the 5D model we introduce in this blog. As both are based in a logic postulate and a metric equation; only that the 5D logic and metric, as it must be for all new theories, correspond in the ‘limit’ of a single Plane of spacetime with that of Einstein.

So for the 5th dimension, the LOGIC fundamental finding=postulate is Space = Time:

All systems can be seen either in stillness=form=space or in motion=time (Earth doesn’t seem to move; seems space but it moves it is also time; Einstein’s metrics have one side which is purely geometric, still, curved space equalled to the other side, which is a tensor of energy-motion=time; in astronomy we see space as distance but astrophysicists model it as ‘expanding motion’) and so on…

THIS is the true meaning of Galilean relativity and the first HUGE error of Physicists, when Galileo said e pur si muove e pur no muove is not to fully explore the logic, philosophical depths of why BOTH THINGS ARE TRUTH. That is why MINDS reduce motion into a linguistic fixed image to ‘focus reality as space, even if the ultimate REALITY always turns out to be perpetual motion.

Yet the key fact we want to highlight is that all those entities that we see as space-form is the same thing that seeing it as time-motion. And this is the deepest meaning of relativity from where we shall extract an enormous number of sub-postulates and explanations of reality.

For example, all systems try to maintain its particle-head state of information in stillness. Your head is up there relatively without motion transported by your body, so happens with a particle moved by its wave, floating over it (realist Broglie-Bohm of quantum physics). So all systems ‘stop’ to gauge information and move with energy…

This Logic equivalence between Space-form=Time-motion IS then TO 5D what for Einstein was his first postulate of logic in 4D:

“The laws of physics are the same in any inertial frame of reference…”

which by the correspondence Principle is obviously a consequence of the wider Space=Time postulate; since it merely means that as space (pure stillness) and time (pure motion) are equivalent, it really doesn’t matter what speed we move in relationship to each other, the same laws will apply (we will always be in relative stillness in our frame and/or relative motion to other observer’s frame). For the modern quantitative scientist logic might seem irrelevant but in fact it is more important. Indeed, not in vain Einstein was enamored of philosophy and counted as Kant and Schopenhauer and Mach, which he read in his youth (so happens with me, specially with Schopenhauer) as one of its highest influences – ultimately logic is indeed the basis of mathematics, not the other way around.

But we still need a metric, an equation with space and time terms, which ‘remains co-invariant’ and allow us therefore to move through the combined dimension of space-time (we shall call dimotion from now on, ‘dimensional motion’).

For example, Galileo gave us V=s/t, the equation of the ‘first law of Newton’, the co-invariant, inertial, steady state speed of a system, calculated as a ratio of its space-distance, and time-duration.

While Einstein gave us the postulate that the speed of light, c-speed is a local=diffeomorphic constant. And so putting together both postulates, he  got his metric equation of space-time: S² =x²+y²+z²-c²t²

The MATHEMATICAL foundations OF 5 D Also give us a metric space-time coinvariant equation, WHICH IS also very simple and will allow us to move through the fifth dimension of space-time as living beings when we grow in size from fast moving seeds into slower organisms:

Size in space x Speed of time clocks = Constant.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

In physics as time clocks are clear rotational spinning particles, it means that smaller systems turn faster in time; with no limit of speed, reason why for example an electron, when it shrinks from an orbital into a point-particle with 1/2h spin, to have the huge magnetic field we measure it must turn faster than light speed (Pauli).

And a black hole, much smaller than a star turns much faster, at c-speed in the event horizon and likely if it is as Einstein wanted a ‘quark star’ it will be made of particles that turn faster than light (top, bottom, charm quarks).

And in general we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = Constant, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster methabolic rates than an elephant.

And viceversa, larger systems in Nature must have a SPACE-DISTANCE=TIME-SPEED much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.

So if Einstein’s limit of speed for the local region in which we measure (the galaxy) is c-speed, outside galaxies in the much larger Universe there MUST be ‘faster than light=larger distances, in T=S; reason why we see ‘space between galaxies expanding space=moving faster than light (galaxies ejecting jets of matter).

Because its spacetime, which is a layer of the fifth dimension different from the galactic layer, seemingly a background of Neutrinos, which are all over measured with negative mass=faster than light speeds, should act as ‘the background’ of the Universe; as light is the ‘background of galaxies’ where local c-speed rules.

Why we insist here in those faster than c-speed is obvious: because physicists tend to misunderstand Einstein’s true meaning of his postulate of c-speed. He does NOT forbid faster than light speeds (only they get a negative mass sign, we shall explain latter in detail).

What Einstein said is that the speed of light, c is constant, because indeed, in 5D, we have already explained, we measure information in a space-still state. So when we MEASURE light INFORMATION, at the electronic level of our eye or mechanical receptors, the electrons are  entangled with each other IN a SPACE-STILL STATE.

SO WE ALWAYS MEASURE  a constnt C-SPEED BETWEEN THE TWO ENTANGLED, STILL, RECEIVER AND EMITTER electrons that communicate through light at C-SPEED… 

So because 5D is made of layers, S x T = K, with different size from the smallish faster world of rotary particle-points to the much larger slower rotary galaxies; from the short lineal distances of our motions through the c-speed=distances of the galaxy, and beyond in the faster than c-neutrino background of the Universe, by the principle of correspondence when we reduce to the Galactic layer-scale of reality made of a background radiation of c-speed-distances; this background radiation is indeed a fixed c-speed-distance, and it is what we perceive with our electronic eyes. And all what is within that galactic womb, must go slower than c-speed-distance, as you go slower than the river flow that drags you.

So again, 5D metric does NOT contradict 4D, which in fact proves in the limit of a single plane of light space-time, proper of a galaxy –  the world our electrons use to see and measure reality entangled with other electrons.

So the new model of 5D space-time is just wider, as we will apply it not only to physical systems and motions but also as we have already seen to genetic, biological clocks, planets, neutrinos, and soon we shall show even human life and its social organisms and civilizations.

Since as Einstein modeled the physical motions of the universe from those simple 2 logic-metric postulates, we will model all the motions and forms of in-form-ation of the Universe, all the laws of all its species which are the same, as each science studies a scale of that Universe, from quantum physics to Astronomy, through chemistry, biology, sociology, geology and so on… with those 5 Dimensional motions of space-time.

And that WILL BE a fascinating intellectual journey to be completed by other researchers of 5D logic metric equations in the XXI c., as 4D was in the XX century a journey of intellectual explorations that lasted much longer than the life of his first discoverer.

Finally the 3rd fundamental Postulate of relational space-time, which is also the point of departure of General Systems sciences, is the organic structure of all systems of nature, which co-exist in 3 of such scales as space-time beings. And so, we affirm that the same structural laws derived of the nature of space and time apply to all scales of the Universe each one defined by a science.

IN THE NEXT graph we make a recap of all what we have learned about the 3 essential properties of all beings of the Universe: its scalar, organic nature, its topological elements, which can be seen as forms in space, or topologies and motions in time, or vital arrows and ages, capped by the worldcycle of existence of all beings:

Stiences study the different scales of 5D metric as separated ‘disciplines’ when in fact all of them extract its properties and laws of the Disomorphic qualities of those 5D space≈time dimensions, among which the ternary structure of all systems reflected in the fractal generator: $pe lineal limbs/potentials §ð: cyclical particles-heads, is the most important, which physics reflects in its conservation of those 3 elements as lineal momentum, energy and angular momentum.

So 3 are the properties of all beings: topologic, hence mathematical, in space; causal, hence logic, temporal in time, and because of the symmetry between form and function and its biologic, scalar, organic, trans-form-ative properties soon to be made more explicit, biologic, to the point that we can say:

“All what exists is a topo-bio-logic space-time exist¡ence’…

where we play with the word ‘science, as spacetime stience’ and existence, as all beings exist in a relative ¡±1 ternary organic scaling.

Those ‘world cycles’ of exist¡ence’ happen then as ‘superorganisms’ perceived simultaneously in space, WHICH change its inner information through its sequential ages of life (world cycles).

We are all made of space time dimensional motions (ab. Ðimotions), flows of motion with form that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of Ðimotions and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary body wave system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe. So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc.

Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.

The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:

‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of 5 Dimotions.’

Though the specific combinations of energy and information of each species – define its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through social networks that bring about processes of social evolution.

All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of Dimotions, informative cycles (ΣSTƒ), organized in cellular units, gathered in social networks, and ±∆ Planes of self-similar forms, connected by the symbiotic properties of the fifth dimension. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller ∆-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms).

All of them co-exist in at least 3 scale, so we talk of ∆-1 cells/atoms/particles/molecules/points that will form 3 physiological networks, of relative entropy-motion, energy and in/form/ation, put together into an ∆º individual whole, existing in a larger ∆+1 relative world. So we can map out all those super organisms according to scale, each one studied by a different ‘science’, (stience of space-time beings). In the graph a fast review of the super organisms of the Universe in space and time, through its 3±1 dimensions origin of its Ðisomorphic laws. They define the 3 relative present dimensions of all ensemble of systems, made of ‘angular monentum’≈ cyclical time clocks, lineal momentum≈ lineal limbs/fields and a vital energy, the integral, combination of both (V+T). We shall call those 3 conserved quantities of any ‘fractal part of the Universe’ and its ensembles into complex organisms, the 3 ‘present dimensions of fractal space-time’, which create the beings perceived in the relative present ‘finitesimal time of a world cycle of life and death’, of different duration according to the ‘scale’ and speed of the clocks of the being.

Conclusion: paradigm shift

The principle of organicism: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.

The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time.

The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.

This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process.

The 3rdparadigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle?  Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rdparadigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism is thus the only true philosophy of science, and as such the only reason it is not adopted logically – beyond the ‘historicist’ reasons of metal-power and worship of weapons and machines – is the fact that there has never been a proper mathematical and logic formalism to model all systems of nature with the laws of organicism, which is what we shall achieve in this blog. And the key to that feat is precisely the scalar structure of the Universe, which defines a ‘fifth dimension’ of co-existing scales of reality, each one with different space size and time clocks, whose metric equation is the beginning of that formalism (but as we said, we must also account for organic, verbal logic laws, as NOT all the properties of organisms can be mirrored in mathematical, spatial languages many of them need logic, verbal temporal ones).

As per Kuhn, ‘the nature of scientific r=evolutions’ a simplified model is more truth, but born in a ‘single mind-point’, will require 1) ‘all previous scholars to die’ (Planck’s sanguine dictum on quantum) so ‘new scholars start afresh’ and 2) the full evolution of the model from its earlier, simpler, inaccurate versions to the degree of accuracy reached by the old complex model with all its ‘ad ons’. In the graph, Copernicus work was less precise than Ptolemy with all its ad on epicycles, even  if it was more truthful according to epistemology (Occam’s razor, economicity, predictability). So till Kepler made it more precise it was ignored. The simple model of relational space-time beings of this blog is more truth as it corrects the known false concept of a Newtonian background space-time, but born in a single mind-point, it is unfair to expect it to be so accurate and extensive in details as the sum of all ‘sciences’ that use Newton’s Euclidean space and Aristotle’s single-time logic. So it will require many new scholars to make it more precise and detailed to match our present spacetime theories; so this blog just is a first seed, his unknown author in his late years publishing as Copernicus did for future generations to change paradigm. This being a race against time before an entire life of lonely research in poor health comes to its foreclosure, the reader should forgive the poor format (copy-paste repetitions, bad english) and look for content. The few brave readers that take up the challenge though will become, as it happened with the few who followed Mr. Planck, the pioneers and future legends of the biggest r=evolution of thought of the XXI c.

You see, this little disquisition on the concepts behind the merrily decision of reducing reality to 3 space dimensions and one time dimension and simplify them further into a single continuum, which as we say might suffice if all what we want to measure is the continuous motion of a physical particle, shows that when we want to go a bit deeper in the understanding of time and space than physicists do to understand better our ‘human time’ and ‘vital, organic space’, we need more dimensions of space and time, and far deeper understanding of the meaning of all those words, space, time, motion, dimension, form… 

But don’t panic as it will turn out because we have now a ‘realist’ view of time and space as the elements that create the infinite tapestry of discontinuous beings we see around us, the correction of this basic error underlying all realities will at the end make the answers to all those important questions far simpler, rational and intuitive than they are today; as it happened when Copernicus corrected the error of Ptolemy and put the Sun in the center: all the epicycles and equations of Ptolemaic astronomy simplified into a simple Keplerian ellipse:

Indeed, when we correct the error of Newton, we shall need only a new scalar, intuitive fifth dimension of space-time to add the ‘different’ scales of ‘size’ and different speed of time clocks that quantum physics and relativity found but didn’t quite put together into a simple model of reality because they didn’t correct as Copernicus did, the Newtonian error that makes so complex the ‘epicycles’ of spacetime theory, as obviously if space and time is a background over which something ‘else’ exists, we are now ‘duplicating reality’ and need to account for a Newtonian space-time background, then try to find some magic ‘substance’ of which the beings over that background are made of (this then turns out to be a very long list of possible substances, particles, waves, energies, fields, arrows of time, quanta, universal constants, some say mathematical equations, etc. etc.)

Not so, we repeat we are made of space and time, and all those other things too. It is only that space and time are more complex than we think, but to balance that complexity once we understand them, all other things will seem as simple as the orbits of Copernicus…

Since even in that simple first view, with its descriptive errors and lack of details we can see a new dawn, we can perceive the light of space-time in a focused position, in the center of the stage of stience, illuminating all its once darkened corners.

 

General Systems sciences, the organic philosophy of the Universe vs. creationism.

So we conclude that  philosophy of ‘stience’, as it is called in academia: General Systems Science or Complexity, the science that gives title to this blog IS the queen of all stiences (being wo=men above man, as we show in the posts on parity, helicity, duality and gender symmetry, all related concepts, we rather talk of the queen not the king:)

In this post we have introduced General Systems Science, the philosophy of science, based in ‘organicism’ that was generated a century ago by the German School of philosophy of science (Bertalanffy in biology, Spengler in History, Schumpeter in economics, Einstein and Broglie-Bohm realist models of an entangled Universe of relational space-time in physics) as the only possible rational theory of reality, which doesn’t need a religious creator, unlike the Big Bang or a magic, ‘creationist language’ – as the Copenhagen interpretation (ultimately a mathematical creationist theory) or abrahamic religions and capitalism in social thought (verbal and financial creationism).

In that regard, we can talk of two fundamental philosophies of science: linguistic creationism (either verbal, financial or mathematical) and organicism, and so we shall also show in the final part of this introduction how in fact all the forms of linguistic creationism correspond to the theory of the mind embedded in organicism and general systems sciences.

The problem of General Systems (ab. GST: General Systems Theory), was for very long the lack of a proper logic and mathematical formalism that could connect its philosophy with all the sciences it tried to describe – a task which turned out to require some simple self-evident principles proper of Asian Philosophy and modern physics, as well as those from where it departed – the principles of biology, evolution and theory of organisms.

Thus the model becomes also a theory of Unification of biology, physics, logic, mathematics and most surprising of it all eastern religions, its closest philosophy and western religions, as the subconscious collective of the super organisms of mankind – its civilizations.

In brief it is a theory of exist¡ence – of all what exists, its whys, causal connections, events in time and forms in space, where each st¡ence and discipline of knowledge studies a range of species, normally ordered by ‘size’ in space and ‘duration in time’, whose scales have a regularity that allow us to define a ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar space-time, each scale studied by a stience, all of them therefore ordered by the metric equations of this new ‘dimension’ of reality, surprisingly hardly explored since after al science was born of the realization that the Universe is scalar in structure, when telescopes allowed us to observe the larger scales and microscopes, the smaller ones.

We divide thus the post in a general overview of the formal model of systems sciences, followed by 3 sections dedicated to its 3 main scientific systems, according to scale Astrophysics, which studies the largest systems of reality, galaxies, and its minimal components atoms (∆±3 scales of the fifth dimension); biology and sociology, that studies the scales closer to mankind (∆±2) as both disciplines are now connected by the concept of societies as super organisms in which humans are citizens-cells joined by economic networks that reproduce its goods and political networks that inform society, similar to the blood and nervous networks of human superorganisms.  And finally languages of the mind, which studies the closest scale ∆º, or rather ∞º, that is the mapping of the infinite Universe in the reduced infinitesimal space of the cellular mind.

The model was presented to science in in a series of congresses at ISSS during my years of tenure of the SIG of duality, during the first decade of the XXI c. with positive reviews, but given my lack of ambition and interest for the academic world, bordering autism, I didn’t follow suit on the ‘paper industry’  after those conferences. My social activism for existential causes against the nuclear industry, for which I am better known in the blogosphere didn’t help  to put it mildly, to popularize the work among physicists considered today the high popes of philosophy of science for reasons that always escaped my ‘reason’ 😈…

In any case it would be a thoughtcrime not to provide a ‘room with a view’ to all the discoveries that a formal model of organicism provides in every science to the subconscious collective of this planet, either at present in human form, or likely in the future to digital thought. So I will keep pouring the model in this web at unificationtheory.com in discontinuous burst of activity, which others might complete in the future. The way I work is copy-pasting blocks from decades old archives, which lack to say the least discipline with the Chicago Manual of Style, and then ashamed of having posted I ‘painstakingly’ (I am a lazy latino, if you hadn’t noticed😍, with little respect for the anglopocentric culture as you will certainly notice🤠) try to correct structure, not so much English given the limits of its I-grammar, which we ‘break’ with complex new words of multiple meanings (so when we write go(l)d, we mean god=gold, so for wor(l)d: word+Wor(l)d or cre(dit)ate: credit creates the economic world to put 3 examples of sociobiology, while trying to reduce the multiple meanings of each part of the entangled Universe by unifying the symbolism of its non-AE logic and… (still the main reason I do enjoy working in this blog)… find some new variation of those systems, an unexpected new Universal law and insights in the entangled nature of reality…

So articles in such a broad encyclopedia are uneven – but this central post is more carefully written and good enough for the intelligent reader to assess the merit of the model, which in the second line dedicated to each ‘stience’ has so far its most detailed, corrected enlargement if this post doesn’t feed your thought enough.

Since the ultimate goal of GST is to explain all what exists with a simple set of organic laws that define the common ‘isomorphisms’ (equal formal laws, here called Ðisomorphisms) of all systems of Nature, including its mirror-mappings by the languages of the mind, you might say this blog will be always a work in progress, as the Universe is constantly recreating itself. The beauty of GST also the acronym for the fractal Generator of Space-time organisms, the fundamental particle of the Universe is that you can indeed build reality by repeating increasing layers of information; so the degree of detail reached by ‘stience’, ultimately is the infinite information hosted by reality itself.

L§ (Luis Sancho Soto), philosopher of stience

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: