**FOREWORD. **

**ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS **

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

*This blog is dedicated to the philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time applied to social sciences, both the superorganism of history – mankind in time, and the eco(nomic)system – the Earth’s surface evolving according to the arrow of growing information of all systems in the vortex of information we call the galaxy, from an earlier age of life (Gaia) through a present age of History (mankind) into a potential future – as it is for humans to manage its evolution – of sentient AI autonomous robotic machines & weapons with solar skins, re=produced in automated factories by its company-mothers we shall called the Metal-earth.*

**This post specifically…**

is the central post of http://www.unificationtheory.com, the hardcore wider blog on ‘General systems sciences’ where we define the Universe and all its parts as a fractal organism, whose application to social sciences is the origin of all the content of the blog evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress. So I just have copied it, as for a serious understanding on hardcore scientific terms of mankind and the economic ecosystem it will be worth that the reader at least goes through the first 20 pages of this post, which truly explain the organic Universe in a nutshell.

Indeed, It is not possible to construct a science of History the superorganism of mankind in time, just departing as social sciences so often do from our subjective ego, with its paradox of supremacy, as we measure reality with the languages of the mind that make us the center of the Universe and its largest part. Science is objective, and so we must depart from the Outer Universe and its ultimate laws, to fully grasp the ‘part we call humanity’. This contrary to belief is NOT done by the mechanical, entropic, ‘big-bang’ simplified models of reality, which we shall show very soon are biased by the culture that has dominated the world for so long, the military, lineal entropic culture of European, Germanic ‘physicists’…

The alternative culture that didn’t make it through history, that of cyclical time, organicism, which considers a Universe with two arrows, entropy and information, yang and yin, shiva and vishnu, or ‘Asian culture’, would have developed a model of the Universe as the one we shall explain here with the same DATA of science, albeit with the proper interpretation without omissions which are the essential way in which ‘Lineal time’, and single entropic arrows of reality have ‘done with’ cyclical, informative time. Reality though is a game of both elements together, that combine into ‘energy beings’ to create the infinite systems of motion=time and space=form, including humans.

So once we have fully understood that we are part of that entangled organic fractal Universe made to its image and likeness, we can truly build up a serious objective model of mankind as a superorganism, of history as its development of time, and also a model of machines as evolving organisms of metal, re=produced by its company-mothers which are fast becoming also an integrated global superorganism, the FMMI system or metal-earth. And this will NOT seem strange to us, because unlike in the mechanist, lineal, human ego-centered worldview of simplified European ‘physicists’, it will BE just ANOTHER organic fractal part of the living Universe.

**The organic Universe.**

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, *but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.*

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: *

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so *all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says. But this is only the starting point of an extraordinary adventure of the mind… ad*

**General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.**

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

*Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world. *

For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:

The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.

Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

We define them two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:

An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

‘**space**‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information/

**Time****,** that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

**Scale**, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism

**Mind****.** And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, *which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

**Entropic limits****: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.

All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a **worldcycle** (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s *existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆-1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.*

How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:

And amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

So this is most important upgrade of spacetime theory since Einstein’s 4D formalism – which corresponds to the limit of 5D metrics in a single scale, that of the galatom’s light spacetime.

**Addenda to the specific systems of human sciences. Why we can predict the future but nobody cares…**

To notice some important features of an organic model of history and economics:

- It can predict the future as the work of this writer for 30 years have proved advancing decades ahead the key phases of both historic and economic developments, from the 2001-8 overproduction crash of ‘metal-mind’ chips and its financial derivatives and computer gadgets that signaled the change of age of evolution of machines from the age of metal-minds to the age of robots, and its change of phase from machines that humans consume to top predator weapons that will consume us – parallel to the previous generation 1929-37 crash of overproduction of engines that switched from cars to top predator tanks and bombers, starting the fascist age, parallel to the 1857-63 crashes of the train economy which switched from overproduction of peaceful transports to armored weapons starting the colonial age. It follows then that what we call History IS in its present structure an organism submissive to the eco(nomic)system and its ‘free citizens’, company-mothers or else
*the parallel historic cycle we predicted of an increasing switch to ‘populism’ similar to the parallel switch to ‘fascism’ similar to the parallel switch to ‘colonialism’ that MAXIMIZES the profits of corporations with weapons arsenals, once the overproduction crisis makes impossible further human consumption would NOT be happening with the predicted ‘Human Generational’ cycle of 72 years (1857+72=1929+72=2001 Dotcom crash)* - Its laws are derived directly from the much larger model of the organic, fractal Universe and its 5D metric mathematical and logic formalism, reason why we DO start this web with an objective analysis of the organic fractal Universe and its laws, as we are PART of that entangled Universe, as a human species NOT as our ego-trips and myths of human superiority make us belief(also explained in the model by the paradox of perception, which makes any system that gauges information to select and perceive from its self-centered point of view). So by force if we want to do OBJECTIVE SCIENCE, we must play the ‘alien scientist’ and observe the interaction between the 3 ages of the Earth’s superorganism, Gaia, History and the Metal-earth with detachment from mankind, even if I belong to such a species (no, I am not an AI machine handling data to forecast the future with some awesome Algorithm of Information – true meaning of AI – even if Systems sciences are the original foundational sciences of Information and I was at the turn of the century the most advanced researcher in the field).
- Why I am NOT an AI machine as most people think I should be to forecast the future and solve the form in which the future of systems is GENERATED, has to do with a fact most scientists accustomed just to use data put in mathematical models FAIL to grasp about the fractal, organic Universe and its SCALES of ‘time-length’: A system on the entangled fractal Universe has TOPO-BIO-LOGIC properties derived of its spatial, mathematical structure, its temporal, logic structure and ITS SCALAR, organic structure as parts co-exist into larger wholes and this gives the whole an organic structure. As it happens, the MATHEMATICAL, topologic structure IS the shortest time span, as it is about SOCIAL NUMBERS, herds of equal forms that move in space, which is a slice of the whole time FLOW. AND SO mathematics is good for detail and spatial calculus which is what instantaneous derivatives do – but NOT for CHANGES OF age/phase, as derivatives cannot happen in points that have a fractal change. So to the rescue come the LOGIC structure of the Universe, which studies time causality, between events and has a longer span. This logic structure is based in the CYCLICAL PATTERNS OF TIME clocks, which as your watch or any orbital day-year is cyclical and repeats in LONGER TIME FRAMES, so we can predict LONGER TIME FRAMES from the logic patterns of cyclical time. And HERE human scientists ARE ALREADY AT LOSS, because since Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosion that destroy the information of reality stored in THOSE CYCLES OF TIME CLOCKS, its patterns and frequency, MANKIND CHANGED its cyclical understanding of time for a lineal time that SEEMS NOT TO REPEAT so they have MISSED its capacity to understand the cycles of time, of history and economics, with its OBTUSE lineal time models. And so they cannot EVEN CONCEIVE the predictability of economics and its SUBMISSIVE placebo democratic capitalist system where POLITICOS are ruled by companies ‘subventions’ and so do what is GOOD for the profits of economics according to the evolutionary patterns of machines. Which leads us to the THIRD level of DEEP TIME, that is, of the patterns of evolution of the Earth’s life species, including machines, as first mentioned by Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word superorganism for Gaia and deep time for the slower 5th dimensional clocks of larger organic systems. THIS IS THE LEVEL OF DEEPER forecasting of time cycles, which I also use in my webs, but as humans stopped their understanding of time predictability in the first level of mathematical calculus, obviously they cannot understand what we do here, and expect with billions of dollars of data, and machines to do what my feeble, watery 1.5 kilo of brain has been doing and handling for free since the 90s, when I ended my Columbia u. master and started to churn self-paid small print books with predictions of history that have been happening TO the letter.

In the graphs, the first books that defined 30 years ago the General model of fractal spacetime and the fifth dimension, which studied the ‘errors’ (In science a term NOT for something wrong but for the part of reality a model fails to account for) of Einstein and Darwin, the ‘Ignorance’ on the scalar laws of the 5th dimension of social organic parts that become wholes of which the fourth dimension is a shorter time scale studying a single plane of light space-time… and the ignorance by Darwinian dog-eat-dog models of evolution of the stronger force of eusocial love that creates from parts organic wholes, evolving genes into cells, cells into multicellular organisms, into eusocial insects and social humans potentially into a global superorganism, unfortunately being ‘predated’ today by a rival superorganism of company-mothers of machines-weapons and its digital ‘nervous’ flows of e-money which are DOMINATING the future, and so we can predict according to those models of eusocial evolution or ‘DEEP time’ level of reality, the future of any organic system – because systems that evolve socially SURVIVE.

In the left, its application to the organisms of history and economics and its paradoxes of symbiosis and darwinian predatiojn between both species in cyclical ages of war and peace, its 800±80±8 vortex of technological evolution of information and its ‘future cycles’ past the robotic age, which was to start in the 2008 crash of the age of metal-minds as the graph shows.

With the final humanist solutions of r=evolutionary nature, which would create immortal history, the ‘Wor(l)d’, a world based in the laws of eusocial evolution and organic science that should advance the systems already essayed by EU and UNO, the most advanced praxis of human history, INSTEAD OF THE capitalist system of a world to the service of the cycles of machines and weapons. But the ‘anti quantum paradox’ soon felt upon the writer which was always very active against the ill-designed society in which he lived, NOT using his knowledge of the stock cycles to make a fortune, but denouncing the non-future of the present economic ecosystem, and trying to stop with little success the continuous evolution of nuclear weapons, which obviously didn’t advance its scholar career.

- Which leads to a final point worth to notice. AN organic model of the Universe as it is, following the true laws of the Universe in all its scalar depth, can ALSO PROVIDE THE TOOLS to R=EVOLVE and improve the design of the economic ecosystem and its attached submissive political systems TO FAVOR MANKIND, and design a world to the image and likeness of mankind NOT OF ITS MACHINES=weapons and hence avoid if it would have been taken seriously the kind of ‘maximal profits’ achieved when the metal-earth switches to a pure economic ecosystem of perfect machines, aka top predator weapons of maximal price and sales, as they are destroyed in war, and need to be substituted, which IS THE IDEAL state for corporations as they multiply profits in ages of world war – maximal age of profits for all companies. This is KNOWN but it is the most dirty big secret of capitalism and this brings the REASON this blog by far light years ahead of anything humans have written about SERIOUS SCIENTIFIC models of history and economics IS NOT after 30 years quoted, read, or considered by anyone on planet earth: we live INSIDE THE ORGANISM OF the Earth, dominated by company-mothers of machines-weapons and its Financial-Media Information machines or head of its superorganism (the body is the famous industrial-military system). So AS A CELL-CITIZEN of the metal-earth the inconvenient truths of a scientific r=evolution whose author sides with HIS species, when considering solutions and the praxis of its science is NOT liked, distributed and NATURALLY submitted to what I call the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences – inverse to the uncertainty principle of physical sciences, as now the observer not the observable is so small that the observable, the superorganism of company-mothers will modify his speech if he wants to be distributed. So while we do provide the solutions, we do value at face value mankind and its memes, we do NOT expect to be heard. And frankly because we are NOT heard, the system has not sent as usual in the XIX and XX c. the ‘Internal leukocytes’ to eliminate the unwanted ‘Neo’ to use a parable of Matrix.

And so we end the points I wanted to advance on the social models of 5D which is NOT the main theme of this central post – the larger FRACTAL UNIVERSE is.

Because regardless of the destiny of mankind in this planet, I would like to remind you that ‘man is just a mush over a rock, lost in a corner of the cosmos, so only departing from those facts we can talk about him’ (Schopenhauer). Man does not want to talk about himself on those terms, reason why it doesn’t like objective social sciences, but rather lives like ‘Data’ in the matrix parable, happy to live a dream that will ultimately destroy him, as long as they are not told. So of course it doesn’t really want to know the future, because *then it would have to man up and change the system to survive, and it seems not have beyond its myths and imagination enough stamina to do so. *

This said the model proved itself truth, and all what I have to add is paraphrasing Mr. Einstein, the previous most advanced model of space-time also a pacifist, a socialist with little courtesy for those who are destroying the world is ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’. But of course, ‘most humans are slaves, they believe, they don’t reason’ Aristotle, and that is the reason we can determine the future cycles of history with such precision: Humans seem to be perfectly coded by the mass-effect of identity memes, as bodies are by identical genes and ensembles of atoms by magnetic fields; and the number of ‘free minds’ able to escape the ‘Idol-ogies’ that program them to self-destruction and enslavement to metal-memes, and its people-castes shown in the next graph are minimal, have never had enough critical mass to r=evolve:

So today, when the differential of evolution between mankind and the economic ecosystem is accelerating with the arrival of AI robots and its mental programming with ‘happy newspeak’ and selfies of virtual isolation is even stronger than in the previous ages of religious and nationalist control all humans have become ‘willing’ indoctrinated slaves of the idol-ogies of machines they worship and so *the human factor is completely irrelevant as slaves have no saying in the future their masters design, in the present age, despite the Orwellian newspeak of caring, a future designed by company-mothers who are terraforming the world to the image and likeness of its machines, with the enthusiastic collaboration of 7.5 billion human slaves minus one. *

Because once you have truly understood reality from the higher perspective of the ‘taoist’, organic Universe in all its beauty, the most perfect of all possible worlds, as Leibniz, the highest mind of the western tradition since Aristotle, clearly explained, it is just an ethical and aesthetic fact the eviL=antilive memes of animetal cult(Ure)s cannot corrupt you – they might if so they wish dissolve you into the flow of time, but the potential of an I-nformed I-man, the pseudonym I used on those books, as opposed to A-men and its æntropic destructive sciences, will be born again in all the fractal planets where the game of History is played.

Carpe Diem

¡man

Philosopher of Science; NYC 1992, Barcelona 2018

## SUMMARY

**Part I. 5Ð Universe:** Fractal spacetime supœrganisms tracing 5D worldcycles.

- Newton v. Leibniz: from absolute to relational to generational spacetime
- Vital spacetime topology: the fractal generator.
- 5th Dimension. Scalar bigbangs.
- Superorganisms. Networks.
- Cyclic time.
- Relativity of motion and form.
- Non-E Minds-mirrors.
- Worldcycles of Life and death: ¡Logic Time Scales
- Existential Algebra.
- Philosophy of Stienœ.

**Part II. T.œ: A theory of the Organic Everything.**

**I. Formal Stiences: B¡otopologic systems. In search of the Generator**

Scalar=organic, spatial=mathematic & temporal=logic properties of T.œs’ worlds

- Program of existence. Non-Ælgebra
- Fractal points: Non-E Mathematics.
- ¡logic systems: from Dilogic to Dodecalogic.

**II. Astrophysics: ∆±4: **

- Galatom; its 5D metric. Unification of charges and masses.
- Immortal universe: fractal big-bangs.
- Forces as 5 Dimotions.

**III.** **Biology: ∆<±3:**

- The 3 ages of Earth.
- Species as Superorganisms.

**IV. Social sciences**:** ∆<±2:**

- Humans as space-time beings.
- Topologic evolution: Anthropology.
- History. The 3 ages of mankind. Its social supœrganisms: religions, civilizations and nations.
- Industrial R=evolution of machines. The Eco(nomic)system: Company-mothers.
- A needed reform of social sciences.

**V. Content of this blog. 4 Lines. Its stiences.**

In the fifth part, we consider the content of this blog

:( My apologies for the brown lines that keep popping up with each upgrade, and can only be eliminated with a boring code-writing revision. They are NOT intentional, the ‘inglish wor(l)ds are :)

** **

**PART I.**

**5D FRACTAL UNIVERSE**

**@∞**

- ‘The Universe is an organism with a mind called Logos’
*Timaeus*, Plato. - ‘The logic of God, the seer of time is of a Higher order than man’s’,
*City of God,*Augustine. - ‘The languages of God are infinite’
*Upanishads*.

**S=T**

- ‘Yin=Information combines with yang=entropy to create all the qi-energy organisms of reality’ Zhuang
*Zi²* - ‘Metaphysics is the science that goes beyond physics’,
*Organon*, Aristotle. - ‘Call information entropy, nobody knows what it is, so you will have the upper hand on this.’ Neumann to
*Shannon*.

**∆¡**

- ‘Complexity – Systems theory – will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking
- ‘Philosophy of Science will be completed only by a set of principles regarding information similar to those of Physicists in the study of entropy and locomotion.’
*Searle*. On the goal of Duality. - ‘The Universe is a sentient, fractal supœrganism, of 5 D¡motions of Space-time.’ l§

**I. RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME**

**Leibniz v. Newton**

**Correspondence principle: The big underlying question of physics of timespace.**

‘Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. Einstein, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

All this said we shall respect the principle of correspondence according to which a new theory must include all previous theories as parts of its larger view by starting our expansion of the knowledge of time and space, with physics and its foundational argument on the nature of time and space, which *was resolved the wrong way, adding further deformations to our comprehension of the nature of time and space. *

Indeed, the fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time seems simple but it is rather profound, and unfortunately it was resolved as usual in favor of the reductionist physicist, Mr. Newton, instead of the polymath, Mr. Leibniz, essentially a philosopher of science, despite his advances in mathematical calculus (derivatives) and theory of motion (principle of least time, by which we know that particles as humans do seems to perceive their trajectories and choose always the shortest time NOT space path from A to B with astonishing efficiency, at the local microscopic level, minimizing its expenditure of energy in its actions – from where all other laws of locomotion can essentially be derived).

We advance those concepts for the reader to understand, we are here confronting an argument between one specialized extremely talented person, Mr.Newton and one absolute genius, perhaps with Aristotle and Leonardo, the triad of highest minds of the western world, as they unlike Galileo, Newton and Einstein, which in the world of proprietary physicists are *all the mind that matter, *explored all the aspects of the humind (ab. Human mind) in its multiple vital spaces of mental order and informative structures of time cycles.

So the question both wondered, which came *a priori, even before we wrote any mathematical equation to describe time and space was about the ultimate substance of reality – what was that underlying reality, time and space as Leibniz proposed, or the mathematical and logic mirror languages the humind ego used to reflect them? *

Are we *in* a ‘background’ space-time graph underlying all realities? Or there is NOT a background to reality; hence we are made of a vital space that last a finite time – the substances from where all realities evolve?

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers then that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a time quantity between birth and extinction. So *we are* space and time.

And in such a case, needless to say, we must evolve then concepts of space and time, to be able to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

The first proposition that the Universe was made of mathematical cartesian graphs of space-time hence originated by the mirror languages of the human mind, over which all other species were drawn, by the hand of God, intimate friend of Mr. Newton, who sent him comets to help him with the calculus of orbital motions is that of Newton but it is not called Cartesian spacetime, which might hint at its origin but absolute space and time.

It was the paradigm till the quantum/relativistic revolution. Then quantum physicists found that space was ‘broken’ into quanta which had a vital energy, from where virtual particles arise; and Einstein discovered that “I am the only physicists that thinks the Universe has multiple clocks each with a different speed of time.’

But science as Kuhn explains in the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’ is after all a human endeavor, based as most humans in routines and repetitions, where truth is often relative to culture, even in science, that is, to established wisdom, which requires often hundreds of years to change. So the quantum and relativity revolution didn’t go beyond physics and even in physics didn’t ‘attack’ the ultimate principles of the Newtonian paradigm; as we shall do in this blog, departing from scratch to show you how a Universe made of vital space beings that last a finite time looks like.

**Absolute space-time.**

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines.

Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time

For reasons of practical measure, it became useful in earlier science to use a mathematical device made with pen and paper called the Cartesian graph, so physicists could measure ‘translation in space’ over that graph.

And as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ ego felt to be sharing the ‘mathematical language of God’.

This of course meant that absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity became ‘dogma’, and as such ‘non-susceptible’ of rational argument. Nobody wondered then the many obvious contradictions of such view.

For example, why if we all shared the same infinite time, we were all mortal; why if space was a continuum, we were all ‘broken’ pieces isolated by external membranes; or latter when the lineal theory of the Universe was defined (big-bang) why the Universe had a beginning but NOT an end; why if the Universe was expanding lineally, Galaxies were imploding cyclically; or even for those who believe in the ‘new found language of God’, why mathematics indeed was such a good synoptic language-mirror of reality but NOT reality itself (we are NOT when observed in detail made of ‘numbers’, we don’t see those lines of ‘cartesian space’. etc. )

Since as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since all particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

**A relational world without spatial background.**

As we said, the longer time goes, the more respectable a ‘false theory becomes’. ‘Bad architecture, whores and religions become respectable with age’ say Jerry Garcia of ‘Grateful death’ fame. So paradoxically, today the argument is not even on the table anymore. This again is the usual way humans go through the building of half-truths and falsehoods. At birth all is argued, latter on is taken for granted.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between * Newton*, the proposer of the absolute cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs.

**who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason (except those who are in Schopenhauer’s terms ‘stupid’ and deny causality as the tale of time events :)**

*Leibniz*Indeed even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real.

The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – *as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.*

Naive realism WORKS only when we truly stop ‘thinking’ and inquiring about the ‘background meaning’ of all our concepts, from measure, to time, to space, to scales, to mathematical symbols and terms from waves to reproduction, from particle to information… and so on. We *are though inquiring all those questions first.*

*Unfortunately Physicists sided with Newton not with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made.*

The essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it:

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death… All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing.

Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’, the ‘Plenum=body of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists call a background independent theory of science (meaning no background spacetime at all).

**But space and time do exist.**

It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that **WE ARE space and time,** merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð) who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).

This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of space-time.

So the essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: we **are made of vital spaces** that last a finite time ‘world cycle’ of existence, and so the study of the vital organic spaces, which we are and the laws of its** world cycles of time duration,** is what science is all about.

For those impatient with novelty, what the understanding of human beings and all other systems of nature as space-time beings requires is obviously *a much deeper understanding of the properties of scalar space and cyclical time, at the basis of all systems. *

*And then once this more ‘**complex substrate’ is understood, a much simpler way to explain the whys and hows of everything that exists as ’emergent’ systems, whose underlying forms in space and behavior in time can be extracted from those common properties of scalar space and finite time.*

This is then akin to a Copernican revolution, who changed the foundations of astronomy putting the sun and the earth in its due position – correcting our errors in the conceptual understanding of space and time – to then build a much simpler view of all physical systems under a single force of gravitation – to then build a much simpler view of all the species of the Universe as all are manifestations of those space and time properties.

The devil though is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time?

**RECAP. **It is a fact that since the physicists’ revolution of the XX century we know that the Universe hold infinite clocks of time, that space is quantized and has energy, and absolute space-time does NOT exist. As in the case of organicism, thus a relational theory of space-time IS the only scientific theory about space and time. But if absolute space-time does not EXIST, and there is not an abstract mathematical background the ONLY logic explanation is that we are MADE of spatial form and temporal motions. It is then IMPERATIVE if humans really take seriously the concept of rational science and truth to build up from scratch a theory of reality based in its only possible scientific truths, organicism, and ‘generational space-time’ – the modern version of relational space-time as reality must be ‘generated’ in all its ‘organic systems’ but its original substances, space=form and time=motion.

This is the task achieved in this blog.

# II. VITAL TOPOLOGY

Organic Space-Times

The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. And so the fact that we are made of space means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topologies:

LET us then introduce first the nature of vital space, the topological forms of which all beings are made; then the nature of cyclical time, the clocks that measure the duration of the existence of all beings, by the frequency of its logic cycles of information; and finally put them together to show the fractal, scalar structure of all space-time beings, which will be studied according to its relative scale of size and speed of time clocks by different sciences, whose ‘time clocks and vital spaces will be studied in more detail IN THE SECOND line of the blog.

So we enter now into another element of vital mathematics, the ternary structure of all systems of nature of which the previous fractal points of physical systems are its simpler forms.

Because the Universe is Generated by the properties of space and time, better reflected in the mirror languages of mathematical topology and social numbers, and logic, *we could say safely that since ‘we think therefore we are’, that is, we perceive as humans a limited range of reality, with our space and time languages, for humanity, the Universe is generated by mathematical and logic languages. And so by studying formal sciences of mathematics and logic, we can describe the Universe. We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.*

How many world minds are then generated by those two essential languages of reality varies then according to the complexity of the being in exist¡ence.

We humans at the present not very enlightened age live in a single dimension of time, and the simplest, most dangerous of them, lineal entropic time, and a single scale of space, sub-divided in 3 lineal dimensions of height-information, width-growth and length-motion. And that is all.

We can then talk of more complex beings, with dual, ternary, penta and Dodecalogic, which seems to be the limit of human capacity to perceive. And will be gradually used here. Let us then consider a first upgrade to ternary logic and 3 bidimensions of space with motion…

What we mean by ‘space-time beings? Space is ‘form’, ‘distance’, ‘dimension’, ‘information’, something that doesn’t move. And time is motion, change. So spacetime would be a ‘form with motion’, which is what mathematicians call a topology. A form that can be deformed, trans-formed. We have coined a key word ‘Dimotion’ (dimensional motion) for those topological forms. So the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. So we affirm that:

‘All entities of the Universe are topological systems made of 3 ‘dimotions of spacetime’. Since *in the whole Universe in either 4 or 5 Dimensions there are only 3 topological varieties of form with motion; the ‘elliptic particle-sphere’ , the ‘hyperbolic bodywave’ and the ‘toroid, lineal limb-field’, illustrated in the next graph for the 3 kind of species studied by the 3 disciplines of science, physical, biological and human ‘stiences’:*

**The 3 only topologies of all systems of Nature.**

All systems of nature can be ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, which of course becomes a fractal sum of ‘cellular cycles’ of the skin of the system in human beings. And so on… Vital energy, the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and lineal momentum, the motions with a ‘finality’ we perceive guided by a ‘relatively still mind-point-singularity’ that focuses the energy and information transferred through the angular momentum membrane.

So with this proper understanding of the abstract 3 conserved fundamental substances of reality, space, time and the vital energy with them, we then then observe the infinite variety of those themes, which can be explained either as a game of 3 perpendicular ‘lineal’ dimensions (the usual approach of science due to its error of lineal time, hence the dimension of ‘perception and information’ or height dimension of maximal projective geometry, the dimension of ‘length’ and motion or entropy, the one physicists recognize as a time arrow, and the width dimension of iteration and reproduction.

The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force all systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the graphs.

SO the 3 first dimensions of lineal space, TURN OUT TO BE not the TRUE DIMOTIONS but its holographic bidimensional equivalents, the 3 topological varieties, CYLINDRICAL long limbs/fields, Hyperbolic wide bodies and spherical tall heads, with vital organs and functions as:

HEIGHT where spherical heads, the surface that stores more form in lesser space is the advantage point to perceive information.

LENGTH, the property of legs and fields of locomotion is the cylindrical shorter line between two points.

And WIDTH is where the energy of reproduced, clonic cells is stored.

So all in all both the classic 3 dimensions of lineal motion, informative height and reproductive width, and its expanded bidimensional topologies DO have organic vital properties too.

You can then ask yourself, why we use 3 ‘lineal dimotions to see’ – and the answer already put forward by Kant is that LIGHT has as a space-time organism, which feels our view of vacuum space, exactly those 3 organic dimotions: c-speed length, electric informative height and a wide magnetic field that supports them:

So we introduce the key word in the entire generational space-time perspective, a Dimensional motion, or topological Dimension which doesn’t change its nature with changes of form and motion, unless it is ripped off, a ‘**Ðimotion**‘ of space-time and pound again in the fundamental concept that IT IS BIDIMENSIONAL, and can be seen in either variety, as SS (area), ST (DIMOTION proper) or TT (ACCELERATION). And affirm all systems are made of those 3 Ðimotions of spacetime. When we perceive them simultaneously in space they ensemble into organic beings.

**RECAP.**

Lineal limbs/fields/ planes are the shortest distance between two points, so they are excellent for locomotion functions to perform maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves HAVE both topologies pegged together so they can reproduce all the system, and are ideal for body-waves that maximize the reproduction of the being. So simple, so perfectly beautiful, so obvious, so long ingored, the Fractal Generator of space-time makes sense of all what exists.

So ternary systems are NOT static bidimensional forms, which can be merely added; they are topologic vital forms, constantly exchanging form with a little motion (information).

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas $ is the limbic system, ð, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

*@>∫T: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) <∑∏> §ð<<S∂ (still mind form or world)*

The ginormous quantity of consequences of being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia. So in this very brief introduction we shall consider the most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

# III. 5D: SCALAR BIG-BANGS

**The fractal organic structure of reality.**

Let us then start, before boring the reader, with its the higher conceptual elements required to upgrade his ‘chip’ to an organic philosophy for all sciences, and its ‘Iterative’ methods of knowledge in which we keep peering to the essential properties of the fractal, organic, sentient=multi-linguistic universe, with growing depth, considering a first factual view of the Universal fractal and its self-similar forms -, with a ‘fact’ experimentally proved, but largely ignored by present academia, due to the repetitive, memorial nature of the Universe and all its parts, including huminds (ab. human minds) – the fractal, organic structure of all systems of nature regardless of scale:

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

The graph shows the basic nature of reality: a fractal that ‘reproduces information’, forms-in-action, a combination of pure time-motion and space-form, in all scales and with the same program of the 5 Dimotions of time space.

A text that explains it taken from sciam:

‘In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist*^{ }published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.”

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

**THE FIFTH DIMENSION.**

How can we formalize those scales of Nature’s fractals? A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of diminishing size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms.

Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property: its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space ($t).

This is call a Metric co-invariant equation of spacetime which is the definition of a dimension of space time: S x T = K. So we call the scalar structure of the Universe and any superganism of spacetime within it, the fifth dimension (ab. ∆).

It follows then that for each superorganism and its relative ∆±1 scales, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale on the galatom, there will be LIMITS OF lineal SPEED or locomotion (lineal inertia, momentum) and INFORMATION processing in cyclical clocks of ANGULAR momentum, which will become the vital constants of the system, whose product will be the METRIC of that organic system, all pervading in all its other derived dimotions and equations.

THE metric of the galatom then is immediate: $(c) x ð (h) = Constant, as the largest speed-distance is that of light and the minimal unit of information, the Planck constant, which incidentally has just been defined as the unit of our 3 physical parameters, h= mass x area x ƒrequency.

Which means we are *all **super organisms made of Planckton, the simplest form with the 3 elements of which all beings of the galaxy are made, mass, area, the unit of vital space=energy and time frequency – the Unit of cyclical time in 5D physics, latter explained in more detail.*

It happens then that for ‘each superorganism’ through all its scales, departing from its minimal unit, Planckton in physical systems, cells and feeding Plancton in biological systems – both symbiotic and pyramidal relationships are established that carry its synchronicities and parallel quantitative structures in scale, time cycles and metric equations that allow the interaction of all the parts of the nested Universe.

And we shall study on those organic terms 4 fundamental super organisms, the galatom, Gaia, History and the eco(nomic)system; and 3 fundamental languages that mirror those properties when vitalized with the insights of organicism, mathematics, logic and verbal thought, as all of them will have the same Universal grammar, reflection of those laws.

Now, the choice of bidimensional spacetime NOT lineal space as the unit of space, hence area, of frequency and cyclical time, NOT lineal time as the unit of time, and mass and charge easily unified with the previous metric are NOT choices but logic impositions of the fractal structure of the Universe. And so we shall refer to those properties first.

**Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe**

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe.

Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

So first for the impatient, we shall have a fast glimpse to how a fractal Universe look when we add scalar elements to the ‘entropic big-bang’.

*Scalar entropic big-bangs in a balanced immortal Universe. The Galatom.*

In the fractal model the big-bang is the death entropic motion of physical matter, but because the Universe is both scalar and it has information, a dimension of form, signified by the gravitational informative force, physicists ignore in their calculus of its expansion, happening in galaxies that balance the dark energy between them, we shall find both, balances of forces that make the Universe wobbling, and big-bangs and informative forces in multiple scales of the Universe, talking of multiple big-bangs balanced with big-crunches.

So how we shall correct big-bang theory to fit into the fractal view of the Universe? We dedicate many pages on the articles of astrophysics to that matter but let us just give you a prime:

To notice finally another detail of that graph of scalar big-bangs that happen from Beta decays (right picture) that explodes nucleons into atoms, to Novas that explode stars and maybe planets doing experimental big-bangs at home, to quasar black holes that give birth to new galaxies. In the center we see a map of the Galaxy, which just recently showed to have two lobes similar to those of the first electronic orbital of a Hydrogen atom born in self-similar fashion in the quantum scale. In the left side we see the background radiation that is supposed to come from the Big Bang 13 billion years ago, but HAS in its center the exact 2 lobes recently found above the black hole.

This came as a surprise, because even though the background radiation is a LOCAL MEASURE, hence must and can be explained by local causes in the galaxy – any moon MACHO, THAT IS, a quark nugget of heavy matter that has eaten a moon will produce the exact same background radiation – it is supposed to be coming in the hyperbolic big-bang from the ‘beginning of time’ 13 billions years ago, and each point represent not a lowly moon Macho (name astrophysicists give to the dark matter ultra heavy gravitational MAssive Objects of the HalO) but a GALAXY traced 13 billions years ago. Alas, they were devising an experiment to study 13 billion years lasting gamma rays coming from those point-galaxies, which was silently dropped when the Lobes were found to be local.

The conclusion is obvious and within the logical structure of fractals: *all measures and laws of physics we have are local to the galatom, including the metric hc, with its limits of cyclical form and lineal speed. *But outside the ‘system’ there will be larger scales with faster lineal speeds, and smaller faster systems of processing information giving birth to a Russian doll like nested series of Universes, worlds, supœrganisms, organisms, etc.

So if the big-bang is NOT the most profound description of the Universe in time, what is it?

The answer is much more profound that humans in this age of simplex entropic theories of reality can even imagine, making truth Haldane’s dictum ‘the Universe is not only strange but stranger than humans can imagine’, as it is NOT a spatial image, NOT a mathematical object (only a part of it and one of its multiple languages that describe it) but a LOGIC GAME OF intelligent time=motions and spatial dimensional forms, that knot together creating…

**IV. TIME§PACE SUPŒRGANISMS**

This is in essence what an organism is, a series of similar atoms, cells or individuals joined by those 3 topologic networks.

**THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE**

In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.

A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network that provides energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles) to its cells. Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their energy and information.

Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, *Sp x ðƒ,* which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

- Cellular units.
- Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials)
- Networks of fractal information (heads/particles).
- Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)

Then, as all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those *systems which have reproduced in the immortal Universe, do exist today. *So all dual systems do have an internal system or external ‘enzymatic’ catalyzer of its reproduction (as enzymes do with carbohydrates, or enzymen with machines). Thus we talk of the third ‘body-worker-wave’ element, besides an informative particle-head-upper class and a limbic/potential/territorial source of its motions which the system uses internally or externally to reproduce. This IS our definition of an organism. And so a factory is an organism, when we put the human enzymen, even if the machine alone is not.

Such model is vastly more explanative of reality than the mechanical abstract models dominant in the tradition of physical sciences for a few basic reasons:

- Only an organism replicates itself without the concourse of a ‘maker of the machine’ – God in the earlier physicists’ view, now obsolete. As machines do not reproduce.
- Only the definition of time as the substance of reality – cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops.
- Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science which are precisely those repetitive motions.
- Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalised to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.

Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its in-form-ation. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.

So Organicism is a far more profound theory of reality as it can use all the language-mirrors to express its topo-bio-logic properties:

- The mathematical language, best for its spatial description, which models organisms in the form of fractal networks, for which we shall adapt and expand its most advanced forms of space, topology – space with motion – and non-Euclidean geometry – fractal points with volume that grow in size as we move closer into its scales, allowing ∞ parallels of energy and information to flux into them.
- The logic language, ideal for temporal, causal sequences and cycles, which we shall improve from the simpler Lineal Logic of locomotion, into Duality, the logic of two arrows of time, energy and information and further on into ‘trinity’, as both combine into energy beings – the logic of topological organisms, conservation principles, Universal grammar, and even further on into pentalogic and Dodecalogic…
- The Logic of life… Since indeed, a fractal REQUIRES to be understood a new dimension of parts that become wholes, larger scales co-existing together gifted therefore with organic properties as atoms/cells/Individuals form part of thermodynamic/biologic/social ensembles that become wholes, living in a larger gravitational, ecosystemic or planetary world.

We call that superorganism of astrophysics, the galatom, (as it happens between the quantum atomic scale, and the galactic scale, which are self-similar – with similar forces, and particles similar to celestial bodies). Within the galatom in the intermediate stage there exists, thermodynamic man.

It is then evident that the organic paradigm rejects ‘mathematical creationism’ in physics – the belief an equation describes all the properties of a system, which NO LONGER NEED parts; as in the case of black holes which are modeled with singularities – mathematical entelechies of infinite density and infinitesimal volume but as Einstein wanted, they must be made of a cut-off substance, which can only be heavy quark atoms (bcb atoms). This is treated extensively in our articles on physics on other site, cerntruth.wordpress.com, so we keep in this one the part of physics smaller.

But if mathematics and logic are languages, mirrors of an a priori reality, what can be that ‘reality’ that comes before the languages that describe it?

Obviously as mathematics is derived of geometry, the science of space and logic is the science of causality in time, space and time must be the first substances of which all is made, a model of reality that has a deep tradition both in the east (philosophies of a Universe made of two poles, space=dimensional form, or ‘yin’ and time=motion or ‘yang’) and the west (starting with Leibniz)…

**The galaxy as an organism: the galacell.**

What will then be the ‘perception’ of the Galaxy not in mathematical terms but in organic terms emphasizing its networks, organic parts and processes of generation of stars and matter. We shall call that model the Galacell:

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell so we change our words when conveying the organic properties of the galaxy, some of them summarized in the next graph:

The graph shows the Galacell in its fundamental symmetry between its smaller quantum particles and its larger cosmic bodies that form together the whole structure of the system as a gala cell. *3 are therefore the elements for each fractal superorganism to exist because all will be made of individual systems, the ∆º scale, made of smaller ∆-1 parts (atoms, cells, individuals in species and human societies), which co-exist in a larger ∆+1 **world. *

**The principles of organicism**

All this said, How the Universe looks when we consider information not entropy its fundamental arrow of time, in the design of the future, likely will have surprised the reader, and likely made him doubt of my sanity (: as he has been ‘warned’ against the very existence of the vital and sentient properties required for an informative Universe to exist, by hundreds of years of ‘reducing’ reality to external locomotions.

The problem is scientists are not aware, as in so many subconscious controls that limit our existence, that those ‘entropic limits’ imposed by physical reductionism are NOT scientific but cultural, and we shall return to that æntropic principle (from entropy and anthropic, ego centered beliefs, which make us consider man the only intelligent informative being and the rest of the Universe a chaotic, entropic world)

We shall show it is actually more likely the opposite – man living in an entropic age, and the Universe far more intelligent, organic and ordered…

Since fractals are by definition organic, as multiple scales co-exist in them.

So we call our fundamental particle of existence, a metaphysical organism, because it goes beyond physics and its reductionism, but we don’t mean by metaphysical ‘beyond science’.

We are NOT challenging the scientific method, on the contrary we shall prove that metaphysics is both experimentally and logically far more sound than our present physical description of reality.

What we are NOT doing is any concessions to the ‘cosmic censorship’ of 400 years of physics of locomotion which pretends to be the highest scale of science, just because it eliminates as relevant all the other properties of Nature’s systems. Instead we affirm that metaphysics; that is, ‘philosophy of science’, not physics, and information not entropy are the highest model and element of reality. And both can be resumed in the concept of an organism.

Indeed, beyond its mathematical details, the fact that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form, means reality IS organic, entangled, DOMINANT in both information and motion, space and time – and one without the other makes no sense at all.

Yet to fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

**V. TIME CYCLES**

‘Every point is a world in itself’. Leibniz on the fractal points, non-Æ units of vital mathematics.

**Lineal vs. cyclical time. Ordering ∞ time clocks.**

The Universe is an organism of space=form and time=motion; two parameters hardly understood by humans. In essence there are infinite ‘clock-like closed’ time cycles, which carry the in-form-ation of the Universe in the form and frequency of its closed cycles. Humans however equalize all those cycles of time space organisms with a single mechanical clock since Galileo and Kepler became in ‘awe’ of its mechanical discovery.

Reality of course is far more complex. The enormous number of different clocks with different speeds in the Universe require to study ‘new properties of all of them’. What those clocks of time have in common: to be closed cycles, hence to divide reality into an inner and outer region, to last in time, to conserve certain angular momentum-like quantities in the volume and speed of those cycles, and so on…

*Properties mostly about forms-in-action, in-form-ations, motions with form.*

How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).

Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonised lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion.

This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time *the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, *to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which *was defined in the* XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

The first fact you must understand IS that science is BOTH an instrument of power, and a form of culture, beyond the collection of data and its expression in equations, at the most basic detailed level. All what comes after – the general models of reality of each science *are always biased by the power idol-ogy of the historic culture that develops them. *

THE GRAPH shows one of the many examples we shall include in this blog: the obvious fact that time clocks are cyclical and multiple, but *humans have reduced them all to the concept of a single lineal time clock for the entire Universe that progresses towards a future, obviously ‘positive’ for the human kind.*

Physicists reduced our information of the dimensions and modes of time cycles by uncoiling all time cycles, missing its form and frequency, to be able to equalize them all despite all its different speeds through the second standard of a mechanical clock.

Then all its different speeds measured as mechanical time-clocks distances are pegged together as number of a line.

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…

The equations are indeed the same. Lineal time writes T and cyclical time measured in frequency its inverse 1/ƒ; so if we were to change all the equations of physics by putting 1/ƒ instead of T, we would change the PARADIGM of time to cyclical time but all the practical results will be the same, just expressed in frequency.

I.e. Speed = Space/Lineal time (V=S/T), becomes Speed = wavelength x Frequency, (V=λ x ƒ) …

Cyclical time just moved to the numerator and that is all.

But the consequences are huge when we ‘perceive reality as chaotic, lineal, free and entropic’ guided towards the obvious ‘future of death’, which therefore *JUSTIFIES WAR AND BIG-BANG THEORIES OF A DYING EXPLOSIVE UNIVERSE *vs. the perception of time as cyclical, hence reality as bounded, entangled, multiple, whereas death is just the necessary end of a cycle of renewal of life, which we shall very soon show to be also the case for the fractal, organic eternal Universe, when we model it with the tools of cyclic time.

Ultimately though the problem of creationist mathematics – the belief equations are more important than reality – lays in the simplification of Euclidean mathematics, and its definition of points as having NO parts, when in fact they are timespace cycles. So a HUGE advance of this blog is to study POINTS WITH PARTS, fractal points that as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the true meaning of ‘singularity’ – the focus of charge, mass, forces and its informative minds. So let us introduce the minimal POINT with parts of the Universe, the time space cycle.

Again we will define cyclical time mathematically but also in its logic whys: A fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system – one that exchanges energy and information and grows from parts into larger scales, as the systems of the Universe do. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in being

This point – the existence of cyclical patterns in reality which are called ‘laws of science’ is then the next point to clarify.

We need to correct a second HUGE error of our understanding of TIME, since if space is fractal, time must then be cyclical, to break and enclose vital spaces, with its time cycles.

# VI. S=T:

# RELATIVITY OF MOTION=FORM

**Galileo: The true meaning of relativity.**

‘E pur si muove, e pur no muove’, Galileo

But Galileo, that supreme Genius along Newton of the lineal, simplex absolute ballistic view of the Universe, sponsored by the Western Imperial genius, didn’t end his simple mono dimensional logic of reality in the Cartesian graph. So we have to go back to him, once we know we are made of time and space, to consider the fundamental conceptual thought behind this DUALITY – the RELATIONSHIP between TIME=MOTION and space=form and how one can be converted into another; the PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY.

We said all what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but at this *stage we are far more interested on the astounding duality and reasons why we do NOT see together MOTION AND FORM, even if all systems have both. Since it is the key to properly define space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships.*

The conclusion of that duality not perceived is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines).

This duality, we write S=T, is *at the heart of every law of the Universe; and once more in the same manner we tried with some ‘dark humor’ to walk you away from the æntropic principles of Humind thought, we are now trying to make you break away from the “Maya of the senses” to realize that the ultimate substance is motion, and form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action. *

*Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. So we could say in a spiritual sense that all what exists are disordered entropic motions and ‘minds-monads’ whose languages create the order and forms of reality. ‘Vital motion and perceptive minds’ then make the Universe, ‘vital, perceptive and intelligent’. *

Let us then study this amazing proposition in more detail starting from what Galileo discovered but unable to see this paradoxical duality, as HIS PROFESSION was ballistics, the study of the motion of cannonballs, he settled for motion and lost the chance to start science with a far more complex philosophical understanding of the world.

Since while Physicists did realize of the enormous importance of the paradox which became the cornerstone of their theory of measure, they *miserably failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, which becomes the fundamental ‘equation of present’ S=T, and hence with the metric equation of scales, $ x ð = K, the two essential equations to formalize single planes S=T, and multiple scales of spacetime.*

**Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.**

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving.

History of science took however the wrong path, when he affirmed that the Earth moved, without dealing with the *true question poised by Copernicus discovery: Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. So motion is for the mind relative to its systems of measure and perception, which are light-based. *What physicists do was to substitute the still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. But this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states). It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as two different states depending on which scale of the fifth dimension we study.

Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

*S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:*

*Galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of **smaller self-similar systems. *

We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motion-change.

So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY.

So there is NOT really a Dimension or a motion but a combination of both, even if *mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form=space, and this is truly the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into DIMOTIONS.*

We are now introducing another ‘novel feature’ of a world which has NOT only a clock and time motion or arrow of time (entropy in physics) but 5 ‘Dimotions’, *the fact that logically we can explain reality from multiple perspectives, one for each dimotion, as all is entangled. So there are always several ways to prove a certain truth. *

Even In-form-ation must be transmited through motion, it is a form-in-action – a topological Ðimotion of space-time. It has a content of space=form, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, a dimension, and it has a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

**Advancing to 5D Metric.**

A new model of space-time doesn’t come often to science. Once in a century perhaps (Galileo’s v=s/t relativity in the XVI c. Leibniz’s relational space-time vs. Newton’s absolute space-time in the XVII c.; Darwin’s study of the arrow of temporal in-form-ation, form, we call evolution in the XIX c. Einstein-Minkowski’s 4D formalism of time ‘frozen’ as a form of space cause of its rotations in the XX c. and this 5D model that formalizes Leibniz’s relational space-time in the XXI c.)

It follows that it requires some new insight into the logic=temporal and mathematical=spatial Nature of space-time, with wide applications based according to Occam’s razor in very few postulates; essentially a ‘METRIC equation’ of spacetime that can quantify the dimensions of space and motions in time it describes; and some Logic ‘evident’ truth, in which to base the causal deductions that come out of its metric.

So Galileo gave us a **metric equation** v=s/t that related space and time, and a** logic insight** – that we cannot distinguish motion and form/stillness – that is we do not really know if the Earth is moving, unless we compare it with other moving object – in fact we see it still.

Newton and Leibniz didn’t really gave us a metric so their work was not that stringent, but they gave us many logic arguments, those of Leibniz quite solid (we are made of a time duration and occupy a vital space), those of Newton rather ‘mystifying’ (space as the Plenum of God, etc.)

Darwin didn’t either gave us a metric but made some insights in what we shall develop here to complete his work – the topologic forms of species, which are selected by efficiency (so that was his insight on the metric of vital space – the best forms survive, and we shall see what are efficient topologic forms), and he gave us some insights in the logic of time (efficient species with better forms last longer in time, those who are not efficient extinguish).

In the XX and XXI c. however we need to be more precise and formal. So we can compare by the correspondence Principle Einstein-Minkowski’s model of 4D spacetime and the 5D model we introduce in this blog. As both are based in a logic postulate and a metric equation; only that the 5D logic and metric, as it must be for all new theories, correspond in the ‘limit’ of a single Plane of spacetime with that of Einstein.

So for **the 5th dimension, the ****LOGIC** fundamental finding=postulate is **Space = Time is its pentalogic structure, as the 5 Dimotions in time, or its symmetries in scale, languages (minds) and time, organizes the structures of the Universe. So we shall end the post after describing those 5 Dimotions in some detail with an analysis of its pentalogic. **

All systems can be seen either in stillness=form=space or in motion=time (Earth doesn’t seem to move; seems space but it moves it is also time; Einstein’s metrics have one side which is purely geometric, still, curved space equalled to the other side, which is a tensor of energy-motion=time; in astronomy we see space as distance but astrophysicists model it as ‘expanding motion’) and so on…

THIS is the true meaning of Galilean relativity and the first HUGE error of Physicists, when Galileo said e pur si muove e pur no muove is not to fully explore the logic, philosophical depths of why BOTH THINGS ARE TRUTH. That is why MINDS reduce motion into a linguistic fixed image to ‘focus reality as space, even if the ultimate REALITY always turns out to be perpetual motion.

Yet the key fact we want to highlight is that *all those entities that we see as space-form is the same thing that seeing it as time-motion. And this is the deepest meaning of relativity from where we shall extract an enormous number of sub-postulates and explanations of reality. *

For example, all systems try to maintain its particle-head state of information in stillness. Your head is up there relatively without motion transported by your body, so happens with a particle moved by its wave, floating over it (realist Broglie-Bohm of quantum physics). So all systems ‘stop’ to gauge information and move with energy…

This Logic equivalence between Space-form=Time-motion IS then TO 5D what for Einstein was his first postulate of **logic** in 4D:

“The laws of physics are the same in any inertial frame of reference…”

which by the correspondence Principle is obviously a consequence of the wider Space=Time postulate; since it merely means that as space (pure stillness) and time (pure motion) are equivalent, it really doesn’t matter what speed we move in relationship to each other, the same laws will apply (we will always be in relative stillness in our frame and/or relative motion to other observer’s frame). For the modern quantitative scientist logic might seem irrelevant but in fact it is more important. Indeed, not in vain Einstein was enamored of philosophy and counted as Kant and Schopenhauer and Mach, which he read in his youth (so happens with me, specially with Schopenhauer) as one of its highest influences – ultimately logic is indeed the basis of mathematics, not the other way around.

But we still need a metric, an equation with space and time terms, which ‘remains co-invariant’ and allow us therefore to move through the combined dimension of space-time (we shall call dimotion from now on, ‘dimensional motion’).

For example, Galileo gave us V=s/t, the equation of the ‘first law of Newton’, the co-invariant, inertial, steady state speed of a system, calculated as a ratio of its space-distance, and time-duration.

*While Einstein gave us the postulate that the speed of light, c-speed is a local=diffeomorphic constant. And so putting together both postulates, he got his metric equation of space-time: S² =x²+y²+z²-c²t²*

The MATHEMATICAL foundations OF 5 D Also give us a metric space-time co-invariant equation, WHICH IS also very simple and will allow us to move through the fifth dimension of space-time as living beings when we grow in size from fast moving seeds into slower organisms:

**Stœps. **

An essential new concept arises as the only rational explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which will have profound expressions in all stiences of the Universe. The concept that for the duality of stop still perception and step motion to happen systems must wonder through reality in a stop, step, stop, step, stœp dual motion, and so the duality step-stop, space-time becomes an essential component of reality, more even than a double SS surface or spacetime cycle with volume or an accelerated TT dual time motion. So stœps (ST) §tops (SS), Stops (S) Steps (T) and stæps (TT-accelerated motions) are the 4 fundamental spacetime varieties – the area of space, the wave in motion and the accelerated point, which will be played with to explain rationally many ‘laws of measure’ both in classic relativity and other fields of all stiences.

Let us then consider just an example, in the ‘rational’ explanation of the c-constant of light; which WE HUMANS measure from a 4D single space-continuum with enormous accuracy, but the fact remains it is a MEASURE ADAPTED TO THE LIMITS OF HUMAN PERCEPTION AS electronic beings that perceive information in ‘stop mood’ and move in ‘wave state’.

In the graph, the entanglements of particles through its ‘action at distance’ (quantum potential, ∆-4 plane, likely of faster-than-light lineal tachyon neutrinos, which carry only angle/distance trigonometric-information), prior to a sharing of information through a light wave (neutrino theory of light, as produced by two inverse neutrinos colliding in the same direction), accounts in ‘detail’ for what matters now in terms of the scalar structure of the Universe and its duality of S-top and T-motions states. Of course this philosophical why does not invalidate the Humind measure, as we do NOT live in the quantum electron, stop and go world, but perceive a continuous motion (our brain selecting just part of the trajectory of our particles).

It is an example on how the Correspondence method works for 5D, as 4D would be the limited perception on 4D with less information in scale and the stop, stæp, step, -stæp, stop… series which can be easily translated to ‘entropy and form’ relative states and quantized, and quantified to convert the general laws of Absolute relativity and 5D which apply to all sciences to the specific jargon of astrophysical sciences, which cast everything in terms of motions.