**Summary**

**1. **5D Fractal Space-Time beings.

**2****.** T.Œ. The organic paradigm: Unification of all sciences

**3.** Existential Ælgebra; Fractal Generator: ∆ST; function of existence & 10 isomorphisms

**4th line**: Complex ¬Ælgebraic description of st-iences & species with the Generator and its 10 isomorphisms.

** 5D FRACΤAL SPACE-ΤIME BEINGS: ∆SΤ±∞ **

**0|. **** ****Cyclical Clocks of Information vs. lineal, entropic motions.**

* In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration. *

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles.

Some key properties of cyclical time self-evident in the graph, which will have enormous importance in the understanding of the existence of all space-time beings are:

- Multiple, finite, fractal, closed number of time clocks and space regions: as all cycles enclose an internal and external regions, separated by the cycle (first theorem of topology and knot theory). Cyclical time is therefore in accordance with the quantum nature of space, found by quantum physics.
- Different speeds of time in different regions of the Universe, as all cycles have different finite size, so the particle that traces them will close the cycle in different durations. Cyclical time is therefore in correspondence with Einstein’s relativity which found the Universe to have regions with different time speed.
- Storage of information, which is ‘form’, and cyclical motion, stored in those clock-cycles. So information is the still perception or form of a time cycle.

Why then we have taken so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion? Because physicists canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions . Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.*

The biggest scientific error is the idea of lineal time brought about by the ‘lineal perception’ of space our eyes of light provide (Euclidean space), by our anthropomorphic desire to be different, and as we are not to evolve and die in cyclical patterns but must have an exceptional, manifest destiny of lineal progress towards ‘God’ and immortality, and by the machines we use to measure time and mathematical, abstract Cartesian graphs with lineal coordinates in which we plot the rhythms of a human mechanism called a clock.

*All those ideologies that are the subconscious collective belief of the father of physics are still with us making our philosophy of science, a bastard mixture of objective truths and western pseudo-religious, anthropomorphic ego-trips.*

Departing from those ‘a priori’ ‘idol-ogies’ of egocentric superiority, humans have constructed this interpreted world of science, which fulfills its main purpose – to help the eye-hand to construct mechanisms, but does not explain what the Universe is.

This is what we shall try to do in this section. To explain what humans are a priori negated to understand by the pre-conditions of their brain, their history and their task in this planet (to construct objects): the organic, living, cyclical, vital nature of the Universe and the similarity of all its entities.

**01. Holographic Principle: fractal beings of vital space & cyclic times. **

*In the graph, we are networks of vital space, made of space quanta, surrounded by time cycles, membranes of finite volume, performing further time cycles in larger networks, as part of bigger wholes. The interaction of those 2 elements, vital space, lineal motion, entropic, kinetic energy, res extensa, similar concepts abbreviated in the symbol ‘Spe’, and cyclical, tall time clocks, membranes, closed paths, which carry the information of the Universe, structure all systems made of fractal ‘space-time’ that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.*

Let us then before we go further and analyse the second principle of GST, the organic, fractal nature of the Universe, clarify the *first extraordinary discovery of this science: the **relationship between energy and space and time and information, two sides of the same coin, such as space and information are the ‘fixed, still perception’, of moving, lineal energy and cyclical time clocks.*

We ARE space-time beings, and space-time is a fractal structured extended across multiple scales of social networks, growing and diminishing in size. This is what reality is, and while its initial components, space, time and its fractal scales, grouped in a new ‘5th dimension’ of scalar size are more complex than the old paradigm of a single space-time shallow continuum, once we grasp the unicity of all beings, made of those scales of space and time cycles, as when copernicus put the sun in the centre, it will be evident that most laws of science become simplified, similar expressions of the laws that explain the interaction of cycles of time and planes of space.

Thus the first principle to consider is how the geometry of bidimensional time cycles and bidimensional networks of space-points mess up to create all the beings of the Universe. It is the holographic principle…

Now the key to this understanding of the fractal Universe is to understand that what you call space-time is not an abstract concept. That space is equivalent to energy, to res extensa to vital space with motion, and time clocks are equivalent to cyclical forms with more in-form-ation.

So once you understand that the Universe is like a puzzle with its fractal pieces of space and its clocks of time, and that space is vital, moving energetic space and time is cyclical, informative, accumulating information in its cycles and frequency hertzs. And you accept the fact that all is made of tiny pieces of vital space performing cyclical time motions and actions, as you do at your ∆-1 tiny cellular level, or as an individual performing ∆+1 big cyclical motions in your society, once we get this clear enough and then study properly the time of space-time motions of beings, and how they come together into herds and organisms, through those motions and cycles of behaviour, and exchanges of energy and information, you will if your ego is humble enough understand yourself truly as part of a whole, the fractal universe.

And so the first step is to understand the equivalence between vital spaces and quanta of energy/entropy and time clocks and information cycles, and how together construct the beings of reality, including yourself.

But what is ultimately the meaning of Spatial entropy and temporal Information, Spe and Tiƒ, the 2 parameters that combine in the Universe to form content space-time beings? Sp x Tiƒ = ∆±1

We saw how simple was the answer for physical systems: a bit of information and a bit of motion, combined into infinite species. Let us generalise the concept for the whole puzzle of space-time beings including human ones.

To that aim we shall first explain the Holographic Principle, discovered in the study of black holes, at the heart of modern physics today – the fact that information is bidimensional, as the screen you are looking at.

This geometric generator redistributes the 4 dimensions we know to exist in this scale of reality, in 2 dimensions of vital space, creating flat planes of space, with maximal extension (made of small cells, points, atoms, any ‘set of similar beings) and 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and rhythm to form the simplest possible time cycle, which carries information in the form and frequency of this cycles.

Now this should be evident to you, temporal information has the dimensions of height and form (cyclical patterns seen with a mind as slow fixed forms, like the way you see a fast spinning wheel as a solid disk). So you are watching a tall bidimensional screen or book, your eyes see bidimensional forms, and your informative eye, head or the antenna or camera that absorbs information, with its logic cycles of time, its computer clocks measured in cyclical frequencies, Hertzs, are all on top, are all made of closed time cycles and forms.

*So the first refocusing of the mirror of mathematical sciences is to give the dimension of height to time, which now has 2 dimensions and it is no longer a line of duration but a cycle of tall form, which rises as time passes, the flat sheets of space, into tall space-time beings.*

In this manner, because a basic rule of maths is that only beings with the same number of dimensions can be combined and transformed into each other, we can combine topological ‘formal motions’ (forms allowed to vary through internal motions of its surfaces), and this is the most ‘evident’ definition on how fractal space-time systems and its feed-back Sp <≈>Tƒ equation works in a single ‘plane of space-time’, as it ‘composes its forms through the holographic principle:

*In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.*

Each of those pictures shows a network of space-quanta, informed by ‘cyclical time motions’ , which runs the logic forms of the system: human heads run lineal limbs-bodies; Tall, spherical black holes control with informative gravitation the plane of energetic stars. If we consider the entire existence of life, evolving from its first flat worms to the tall man, the same topological arrow towards more information becomes evident. Above, we can see human eyes and mechanical eyes, human limbs and energetic, entropic weapons, which share the same topologies.

Each of those Sp and Tiƒ elements is bidimensional and each bidimension is made of smaller points that form a flat plane of space or a tall, cyclical time event, made of discontinuous instants or neuronal points. Space is communicated synchronically in a flat membrane. Time is communicated in a cyclical sequential form.

Entities in the Universe are made of cyclical heads-particles, knots of space-time cycles of information that gauge and mirror, perceive in stillness, a focus of information, which they will then try to conserve by reflecting that mirror into fractal reproductions of its self, in this manner a first point of information is created, tif, then a territory or wave-body of order, St and finally a being with 3 parts, a limb/field of energy, a body-wave that iterates the information of the tif, particle-head appears, and a fractal super organism of space-time is born:

*Spe (limb/fields)<St(body waves)>Tiƒ (particle-heads):*

Space-time combines both into holographic 4-dimensional beings.

And we can affirm putting together the 2 fundamental principles of conservation of the Universe, the conservation of Energy and Information (and its quanta equivalences, the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, as energy and information are nothing but the integral of each of those quanta of lineal and angular momentum):

“All what exists is a system of quanta of vital space and cyclical time, exchanging and trans-forming back and forth energy and information ad eternal: Spe<ST(exi)>Tiƒ”

So the Fractal Generator classifies all different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator:

Since Nature ‘*pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous*, spatial organisms.

The topological description: |xo=Ø, considers those 3 elements.

This simple self-repetitive structure in its repetition and interaction for n-particles across ∆±n scales causes thee existence of a super organism, as a self-centred, point of view. It will be used to describe the natural symmetries of all physical systems, though it will only have such a topology in the pure informative states as ‘seeds’ of information, or ‘minds of perception’.

Now we can make a philosophical recess to understand how deep and important is the new paradigm for the worldview man has the Universe and its unending quest for objective science, away from the human belief of man as the centre of the Universe, because indeed, all what we have said tell us that we humans are NOT the centre of anything, but just another fractal of space-time, and that is a huge attack on the ego and the myths but obviously a much more objective, scientific view of reality. It is in that sense the 4th paradigm of knowledge, away from religious myths, from self-centred men as the only species, from the earth as the only centre and scale.

** ****∆±∞: General Systems Sciences**

The Universe is a fractal of space-time actions. This simple truth originates all its complexity. Planck discovered the Universe is made of quanta of a substance he called ‘action’ made of energy akin to lineal motion, locomotion and time, akin to cyclical motion, repetition of a cyclical form of in-form-ation. In his equations, Action = Energy x Time, in relativity where time was a simultaneous present moment, we see it as a bit of information, Action = Energy x Time. So we are made of motion and form, energy and time cycles, and we reproduce through time cycles forms in motion, informations. We are all just waves of reproductive information, and when we are reproduced in herds, they assembly into a larger puzzle or fractal of self-similar forms, we call a fractal super organism, and this is the game of reality, of existences of worldcycles of energy and information, of space and time, E x I st , assembled into networks, and supeorganisms, a vital biological fractal game of reproductive creation:

*In the graph, the fractal, network structure of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.*

Humans are an arrogant species with an egocentric point of view. Since I presume I talk to a human, if this affirmation offends you, leave the blog now, because it will get worse, as knowledge, science is in the inverse objective function of human subjectivity. In brief, humans do not have a ‘scientific mind’, even those who think they do. In fact, ‘scientists’ are the most difficult egos to convert into objective rational thought, *because they think they are already there, and they understand it all. *

Yet human science is like a toddler, who has learned the first words of the language, which it reveres – the kid thinks the language has extraordinary powers to create reality as the first humans thought God created by speaking words, and the first scientists by speaking numbers. It should not be discouraging. After all we learned the first steps of science 2300 years ago with the arrival of Aristotelian Logic, and started to have instruments of measure, reliable to observe the Universe only 400 years ago with the experiments of Galileo, with mechanical clocks and telescopes.

We learned that space is made of quantum of energy and time has infinite clocks with different speeds only 100 years ago, with the arrival of quantum theory and relativity.

Those were the first doodles in the sand. But humans once they make a new doodle think the picture is complete. They step backwards, observe the doodle and spend one hundred years more commenting on how enormous was the arstist, how perfect the doodle, mirror of the Universe, even if its nothing but a doodle.

S was human knowledge after Einstein and Planck made their doodles, slightly better than those of Galileo, halted for one hundred years. It remained a lot to be done for the doodle to look like a good image of the Universe.

As to understand the whole Universe, we had to put together all the sciences, species and laws of Nature, into that single mirror-image. And the doodle of physicists was too simplex to do that. Now we have a doodle that looks a bit more like an image, and it is a beautiful one.

The integration of all sciences is the goal of General Systems Sciences or Complexity. At Macy’s the year of Einstein’s death, the highest minds of mankind came together and realized that physics had its limits and lacked despite its exhaustive understanding of Entropy and motion (as that was its purpose since its inception by Galileo) a full comprehension of information, the other element of which the Universe is made.

Τhus we can talk of 2 philosophies of Sciences:

- Simplex physics, dedicated to study the Universe with ‘lineal entropy’ as the only arrow that models the future, which served well its purpose till the XX century, specially in a civilisation, which was based in energetic, lineal weapons and steam machines, whose main characteristic was to deliver lineal motion and ‘speed’, and
- Complex Systems Sciences, which ads a second arrow of future, information, all too evident in all life processes, which increase information through 3 ages of increasing ‘form’; in physical gravitational systems, the force that in-forms the Universe, increasing the form and density of matter in galactic vortices, as we accelerate inwards towards the central black hole vortex; and in sociological systems as history increases its social and technological evolution. Τherefore an arrow, also common to
*all sciences and species, dominant in biological evolution and mankind, as we are the final informative stage of evolution of life in this planet, itself a cosmic ‘particle’ evolving inwards within the galactic vortex of information.*

So it is evident that for humans, in this biological planet inside a vortex of physical gravitation, within a technological civilisation, information mattered as much as energy, and the laws that related both parameters to create the future were a huge field of scientific inquire, grossly neglected by the dominance of ‘entropy physics’ in the age of the machine of energy. So they founded the closely related sciences of cybernetics (Wiener), information and General Systems theory (Bertalanffy).

Further on, cybernetics and systems sciences, realised that by including information in the mix – the dominant element of biological systems, it was possible to model the universe and all its parts with the concept of an organism.

So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive, rational, non-deist theory of reality the fathers of information sciences, considered 2 key elements of reality:

*Duality:*all ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists) were dual and should have two elements, able to transform into each other ad eternal: Entropy or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and in/form/ation carried in the form and frequency of clocks of time (implosive, cyclical vortex like motions).

Such complementary duality between two poles, one of energy (i.e. bodies, waves, working class) and one of information (i.e. heads, particles, ruling class in control of the languages of social information, money & laws), were all pervading in all physical, biological and social systems, in which those poles exchange symbiotically energy and information, creating a ‘system’, which was a world in itself – a whole, part of a much larger reality. And so a more complex organic understanding of reality was possible.

*Scalar, Fractal, organic structure.*Since all those systems were constructed in an organic way, not only as complementary systems of energy and information, but also as systems in which its parts and wholes spread through different scales of size in space, each one with a different clocks of time. So smaller being had faster motions – metabolic rates in biology; chips speed in mechanism; rotary, gravitational power in cosmic bodies.- Thus the purpose of systems sciences was to formalise logically and mathematically, those insights that greatly widened the restricted view of reality sponsored by physicists based in a single scale of reality, the space-time continuum, and a single arrow of future – entropy.

** The principle of conservation of energy and information.**

Such was the state of affairs on general systems at the eve of a new millennium in which sciences of information had become dominant in all systems, due to the logarithmic evolution of integrated logic circuits (chips) applied to the processing of all forms of data. And the scalar nature of reality had found a mathematical model in the concept of self-similar fractals.

However despite that growing awareness of information as the key element in all systems, a formalism which included it as a primary element of reality was lacking for a simple reason: a 400 years tradition of using the simpler principle of conservation of energy and all its related analysis dating back to Galileo, to the point that information became known as negantropy, the negation of entropy among physicists who shied away from a complete overhauling of philosophy of sciences as we shall do in this blog, where we will consider by the correspondence principle, simplex physics, a ceteris paribus analysis of the Universe, with a single arrow of relative future, *of the 2 arrows which constantly give all systems a **choice in the path the system chooses to advance time, either increasing its energy or its information, whose properties we shall show are inverse.*

So general systems sciences is defined as the philosophy of science which includes simplex physics, as a ceteris paribus case, whose principle of conservation of energy is extended to conservation of information and its principle of lineal inertia ads a principle of cyclical inertia, caused by the ‘existence of infinite closed time clocks’ in the universe, from vortices of charges in the smaller scales, to larger mass vortices and galaxies in the larger scales, which carry its information in the frequency and form of its closed trajectories.

What will be then the formalism of a Universe, constructed with both arrows of future in equal footing? A more realist description as all systems seem to be constructed with both elements in a complementary combinations – heads and bodies in biological systems, particles of information and waves of energy in physical systems, machines and chips in economical systems, linguistic classes in control of the languages of social power, law and money, and working energy class in social systems.

So as a first step to construct that formalism and study all those systems with its common laws (called in G.S.T. ab. general systems theory), we shall expand the principle of conservation of energy, to include information, and define an equation for all systems of the Universe, using both arrows:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: *Spe < = > Τiƒ”*

Τhis equation, Spe<≈>Τiƒ is the complex way to define a Universe made of infinite systems of space-time.

We call it in GST, the fractal generator of Nature’s systems by combining and transforming energy and information can describe the infinite systems we observe in the Universe, *which always have both parameters. *

*Since only when we add both energy and information, we can obtain a truly descriptive equation of all scientific systems made of *spatial energy and informative time, the ‘2 elements of which all beings of the Universe are made’.

For example, all physical systems are ruled by the complementarity principle of quantum physics, which states they have ‘both’, a wave that reproduces over a field of energy, and a particle that stores most of the form, of the information of the system; all biologic systems have a head of information and a body moved by its limbs of energy, all social systems have an upper class that controls the languages of information of societies and a working body that re=produces the system with the energy of the society; and now we realise all machines are becoming robots, with information systems that control them.

So the duality of energy and information and its ternary combinations, both in space (3 topologies of the Universe) and time (3 ages of life, horizons of species and geological processes, 3 states of matter, etc.), are the essential ‘fractal’ components that organise the parts of beings into wholes:

*In the graph, repeated ad nauseam in the Universe and this blog, the 3 canonical topologies (form with motion, hence ‘space with time’, ‘in-form-ation with energy’), which ensemble in infinite different beings composing the ‘systems of nature’, which also evolve in time in 3 relative ages of dominance of the limbs/fields of energy (young age), reproductive balanced ST body-wave age, and final 3rd age of excessive information, dominated by the particle-head. *

**The Universe is a 5D fractal space-time super organism. S****ocial evolution: Metric equations of the scalar 5th dimension.**

Further on, a fractal Universe requires a dimension of scales of size, as it is evident that there co-exist in such Universe from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy a series of beings, which are similar. And so we talk of a fifth dimension of scalar size, which is philosophically a dimension of social evolution, of ‘absolute time’ as points reproduce its fractal form, organise themselves into networks and create new growing scales of the fifth dimension:

Each of those scales of reality is made of smaller quanta, which have a peculiar property: their cyclical motions run faster the smaller they are, but the product of both (Spe & Tiƒ) remains invariant, creating a metric equation that defines the 5th dimension:

**Γ.** *Spe x Tiƒ = ∆ST*

This simple equation that shows the product of the time clocks of a system and its size to be invariant (hence allowing travels through the 5th dimension, as when you are conceived as a seminal cell with smaller size and faster time clocks and grow=travel in the 5th dimension till you emerge larger and slower), *is poised to become the most important equation of XXI century science, which will correspond with all the main equations of all the different sciences, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.*

Thus clearly, the Universe is made of scales of relative size and speed of time in its clocks, which carry the information of each of its ‘fractal world-systems’

Τhere is an overwhelming evidence of those 3 ‘fundamental properties’ of the fractal Universe:

-Its ‘scales’ of size, which we order into a 5th dimension of space-time (∆, proved in all sciences by telescopes and microscopes).

– The different speed of its cyclical time-like vortices that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles – proved in physics by relativity and the law of vortices that accelerate the smaller they are – Vo x Ro =K, (and will allow us to find the Unification Equation of masses and charges -2 clock like vortices of the smaller quantum, faster, more attractive scale, and the slower, larger, weaker, gravitational one), in biology by genetics, which code the information of organisms with its higher content of information, in computer sciences by the Moore law that makes smaller chips faster chips.

It is then clear that the formalism of general systems sciences must be based in the concept of a scalar Universe, with an evident organisation in parts smaller than wholes, which all together form a 5th dimension of scalar space-time. *And so the metric formalism of this scalar dimension, of which every microscopic and macroscopic detail is a proof of existence, will become the formalism of GST, searched for so long.*

Indeed, organicism was an old goal of serious philosophy of science. Since scientists knew that the mechanist view of physics was too simple and rather theological. Indeed, as Leibniz put it to Newton, a mechanical model of the cosmos, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. While an organism, which is a system that co-exists in several scales of size, from smaller cellular/atomic scales, to individual thermodynamic/organic scales, to social, gravitational/ecosystemic scales, can easily reproduce by emitting seminal seeds of information in a lower scale, which then organise back, emerging again into the whole system, and further on can evolve socially into larger scales. In this manner the Universe becomes a self-reproductive organism of information, and each of its parts becomes also a self-organising system made to the image and likeness of the whole – with no need of a mechanical clock to put it in motion, as Newton and Kepler thought.

Such view of the Universe and all its parts was called the organic view, and the aim of the science was considered to find a formalism of mathematical and logic nature, able to translate this more evolved philosophy of science in a model that without renouncing to the precision of simplex physical models, had the complexity required to explain not only the ‘how’ but also the why of all sciences and it species.

**The function of existence.**

In the graph, we can see the function of existence of human beings across its ∆ST symmetries. Above the 3 scales of human existence, and the human function in space with its 3 topological networks, and its development in time, as the system emerges into a higher social plane, forms part of a culture, goes through 3 ages and dies back into the lower scale of beings.

*In the lower graph we show man, a space-time being made of lineal energy and cyclical, temporal information, assembled in 3 parts, through cellular networks specialised in energy feeding, informative perception and reproduction, and the 3 ages of life between birth in a lower seminal scale and extinction. We write below the logic formalism that describes with simple equations of 5D space-time the organic parts in space and temporal ages of the human super-organism, the same equations we shall use to describe all systems of the Universe.*

Finally, in the bottom, we see the decomposition of the worldcycle of existence of a human being into a sum of infinite actions, which together form THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, the fundamental ‘detailed’ equation of each species of the Universe.

If the how of science is established by the topological structure in space of the 3 arrows of time and its 3 sub-organs, which construct all systems of nature, the why is the Algebra of Existence, which studies the function of space-time actions, which entities perform to ‘exist’, and survive in the universe of energy and information. In the next graph we observe those elements on the human function of existence, which resumes all what reality is about – the creation of fractal ternary beings with the 3 topologies of space, which perform during its 3 ages of time, each one dominated by one of those topological energetic/digestive, reproductive/blood and informative/neuronal networks, a series of actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, reproduced whenever is possible in other region of space-time, or evolved socially into bigger wholes, with a single purpose to survive, to exist:

*What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.*

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in 3 structural concepts that lay at the bottom of reality: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞.

So we add the concept of a scalar Universe to complete our new principle of conservation of energy and information:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, co-existing in 3 organic scales of size, ∆±1 in which it reproduces by emitting a seminal seed in the lower scale, ∆-1, which will iterate and organise itself emerging as a new whole that ensures the immortalilty of its ‘logic form’: Γ= (Spe x Tiƒ)∆±1′

For that reason because the equation of any Universal system or ‘superoganism’, Γ, generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

**This blog**

In this blog I shall try to pour all the work I have done on the study of this equation, since it seems to be a fundamental step in the development of general systems sciences, which has lacked a proper logic and mathematical formalism for so long.

It will be a work in progress, whose quality will constantly improve. As i am in poor health, the technique requires to pour first huge unpolished blocks, so the basics of GSΤ is conserved (first 2 lines completed in a rough manner by 2016), and then polishing them, while advancing in the 3rd and 4th, far more detailed analysis of all sciences and species with the isomorphic laws they obey, as ultimately all of them are systems of scalar space-time: ∆SΤ. So this central post makes a fast overview of those 4 lines, starting by a more precise definition of cyclical time, fractal space and the metric of the 5th dimension.

Let us then consider its fundamental 3 elements, cyclical time, lineal space, and the 5th dimension of scales of size in space and speed of time clocks that order all the finite space-time beings of the Universe, from a more formal point of view.

Luis Sancho, General Systems Scientist.

**2. ****¬Æ: Formalism of General Systems.**

** ****i-Logic time and Non-E geometry: Evolution of Mind’s Languages. **

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ *Leibniz,* On the Fractal, organic Point, the Fundamental particle.

All this said we can introduce now the next step of the upgrading of philosophy of science needed to fully understand the fractal Universe: to improve the main human language, which we use to mirror the space-time beings of reality, what we shall call from here on non-Æ, i-logic mathematics, which comes after Aristotelian logic and Euclidean mathematics:

*In the graph, the upgrading of physical systems, to fully describe all its mathematical, logic and organic properties, requires to set the foundation of physics in more solid grounds that the ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ of Mr. Hilbert, referring those lines, points and planes to real Universal entities (1st, 2nd, 3rd postulates of non-e mathematics). And expand the temporal logic of the Universe to include the 3 arrows of relative, finite past, present and future of all systems of nature. Finally the 2 postulates of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, of congruence, which can only be of relative similarity, as we never have the full information about a system, (3rd postulate) and continuity (which is false and not required in pan geometry, as all networks of points communicated by waves of energy and information, leave discontinuous dark spaces not crossed by those networks), must be clarified. Finally the 5th postulate of Non-E Geometry, the only one properly defined till date, which allows infinite parallels of energy and information to cross a fractal point, defines the structure of a logic mind-mapping, constructed with those flows of information, and hence the equation of any monad mind on the Universe: O (infinitesimal point) x ∞ (cycles of energy and information of the Universe) = ∆: constant mapping of a certain scale of the 5th dimension.*

Logic mathematics is the language we humans use in science to describe the Universe. As such it is only natural that its 3 ‘linguistic mirrors’ or sub-disciplines, correspond to the 3 ‘elements’ of the fractal Universe:

- Geometry and the 3 topological varieties corresponds to space and its 3 canonical, organic parts.
- Analysis to the 5th Dimension and its scales of infinitesimal, derived points and integral wholes.
- And algebra corresponds to the temporal analysis of the structures of the fractal Universe, resumed in its generator.

So an immediate task to upgrade human sciences to the fractal paradigm is to study its formalism, through a natural upgrading of the foundations of those 3 disciplines to match the 3 elements of the fractal, organic Universe.

**The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality**

NOW ALL THIS i-logic geometry IS completely NEW. Why?

Because humans do not have a basic picture of the 3 components of the Universe. We do believe in a certain mathematical structure called a continuum simple space-time. So our view of the first elements of the Universe, is very reductionist and simplistic, and so the mathematical mirror the ancients took of it, is also simplistic. And when in the XX century they found a much more complex Universe, of multiple scales of space, and multiple cyclical time vortices – particles, charges, masses, molecular clocks, galactic clocks, etc.as the initial mirror of mathematics was a distorted one, things got messy and remain so.

So the cartesian single space-time continuum is a geometric simplification, which despite the revolution of non-Euclidean mathematics, quantum physics and relativity is still with us.

It is based in a geometry called Axiomatic, which came after we found out that points were fractal points that could be crossed by ∞ parallels (5th non euclidean postulate) and so the definitions of Euclid were not good. Yet instead of defining as we shall do a fractal point, XX c. mathematicians left them undefined. So terms like points, lines, and planes still do not much its universal, referential reality.

In essence mathematicians scared of the non-Euclidean revolution, which was incomplete, invalidated the postulates of Euclid but didn’t find the new, real ones.

So instead, Hilbert, a mathematician said that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’. So they must be undefined in relationship with the real Universe and what was an act of absolute arrogance, he implied that the human mind invented mathematics, the only language of the Universe, so somehow we invented the universe – no joke, today this means that physicists invent an equation that describes an imaginary particle, or evaporating black hole, or string theory and will affirm dogmatically without experimental evidence that it is real. While quantum physicists believe the Universe is made of mathematical symbols, which is exactly what religious people think, when they say that God created the Universe talking with words – so Allah created the Universe ‘naming’ it. And finally since mathematics are imagined, they require not evidence: only logic coherence not experimental evidence justify mathematics. And this is a dogma, even if Godel proved that mathematics without experimental evidence is not coherent.

This axiom is therefore not truth. Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, dealing with the structure of space and the logic of time, and so we need to evolve and defined its undefined elements. Only then the revolution started by Lobachevski aiming to substitute Euclid’s points with no breath, will make sense and mathematics will become again a proper mirror to look at the Universe – or rather we will understand why the mathematical mirror is so good.

So what is a point?: A unit of fractal space, which a mirror mind will see with less or more information the closer it is to the point. Hence while from far away it seems a point with no breadth, as we come closer it can fit infinite parallels. And so a line has also width, in detail carrying information and motion; and a plane is discontinuous, made of points joined by waves, which leave dark spaces between them. We thus talk of fractal points, waves and networks as the 3 units of i-logic mathematics.

Points then become defined as fractal points that grow in size, planes as networks of space points with wave-like motions in time, which become bidimensional, from far away, as we do not see the height of those points. And 3-dimensional systems, become the merging of perpendicular networks, which have more content of energy, when they are flat and extended, and more content of information when they are high and cyclical.

So for example in a previous graph, we can see 2 fractal space-time beings made of ‘mathematical topologies’: a field of space-time light, with a flat bidimensional magnetic field of energy and a tall informative perpendicular field of electricity merging into a light ray, which reproduces along the c-speed axis.

Yet we can see the final stage of evolution of light space-time, which evolved into particles, atoms, molecules, cells and human organisms, and surprisingly enough, in the same manner the probability of finding the particle-head or photon of a light system is maximal in the top of the electric wave, the informative head of a human being is also in the dimension of informative height? Why, because geometrically, that is the point of maximal perception for both the photon and the human. And in both cases motion goes along the lineal direction of length, and in both cases energy is stored in the width dimension of the body and magnetic field.

Now, we are talking (-: It is indeed the most astounding truth of the Paradigm of relational space-time, first expressed by Leibniz – *a Universe made of fractal space-time beings – that the properties of space-time and its mathematical topologies, perceptive, informative geometries, and ternary structures are carried and emerge in each new scale of social evolution of the Universe.*

So while we have criticised the mathematical only view of earlier scientists, as we upgrade logic mathematics, in fact the Universe will become even more mathematical and logic that it was before, only that as Saint Augustine put it, the ‘logic of god, the mind of the Universe, is of a higher kind that our (Aristotelian) Logic’.

**The evolved formalism of i-logic mathematics: Upgrading Geometry.**

Now, we shall be less literary and start with very solid conceptual elements, namely describing the essence of the fractal paradigm.

And to that aim we shall bring, in the simplest possible form, the fundamental formalism of the Fractal Paradigm, ‘non-euclidean, non-aristotelian i-logic, o-rganic mathematics’.

We call it i-logic because in time, it is more complex, with multiple clocks and i comes after the A of Aristotle (the logic built with a single time clock and a single causal arrow) and we call it organic because in space is more complex, with multiple co-existing spaces, smaller parts that become wholes and O comes after the E of Euclid (geometry with a single continuous space made of points with no breath). But in brief, we shall just talk of Non-Æ, or i-logic mathematics.

So we shall now explain and complete at a very elemental level far more developed in the ∆±∞ posts on i-logic mathematics, the formal language of the fractal paradigm, what truly Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian space-time languages are.

Mind the reader, this is NOT so new. Again, the great revolution of physics in the XX century happened when Einstein realized that a point was a ‘fractal point with volume’, since multiple parallels cross it. So it could not be Euclidean – with no breath, abstract, dimensionless.

Now Einstein found that the Universe was non-euclidean, that is, points did have breath because they could fit many parallels of energy and information. And so they are ‘fractal points’ that grow in size when we come closer to it. But they forgot to change the first postulate of Euclid, and left points undefined, so this simple change of mathematics will open completely the world of science to the fractal paradigm. Let us see how:

**Fractal point with breadth and the networks and social organisms they make, connected together.**

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

*Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel*

*E*uclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

*Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:*

**. ____________**

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

*A point external to a line is crossed by *∞ *parallel forces.*

* Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points: ***===========** **o**

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

*So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. *The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

**Its ternary parts.**

We shall consider first a simple description of a fractal being, departing from an even simpler concept, that of the relativity of all scales and the perception of all beings either as points or as whole super organisms: from far away all systems are points with no volume (so-called in mathematics euclidean), but as we come closer points become whole organic systems, with energy and information parts. We call those points, fractal points, or using terminology of mathematics, Non-euclidean points through which multiple parallels can cross as they do have now a volume.

this is both, the mathematical unit of the real universe and its organic element, whereas mathematics is merely the simplified, spatial description of it, and the fractal, organic paradigm its necessary, added bio-logical functions. We thus compete with the fractal (math)/organic (biology) duality of all systems all the information about functions that a mere formal description lacks. We add the organic why to the mathematical how, and so we can then see the unity of all systems, which will show the same functions and similar forms and parts of any ‘organic fractal, non-euclidean point’:

*Above, from a distance (above) all beings seem to be just ‘Euclidean points’ (with no breath) connected by lines. This is the simplest description of a fractal, topological network. But when seeing closer, each point is an enclosed sphere, and each line, a flow of energy and information that connects the point creating with other points and waves of energy and information a topological ‘plane’, which in turn becomes a fractal point of a larger scale.*

*In the graph we see a sea urchin a fetus, a charge-point surrounded by a magnetic membrane, a black hole point surrounded by an event horizon, an atom, a tomato, a planet a cell and a boson state of matter. All of them can be studied analysing its 3 parts, forms and functions, and considering how they form part of larger social networks. *

So we redefine the fundamental particle-point of the Universe in the lower ‘minimalist’ description of reality, and consider it a fractal super organism, in the upper, more detailed description of its internal information, parts and functions. Once we do so, we shall observe in awe, that all what exists is truly a ‘fractal point’, or ‘super organism’, reproducing, evolving socially into larger networks, dissolving them in the moment of death, when it ‘closes its time world cycle’.

A Non-Euclidean point-particle has the particularity that it can be crossed by ∞ parallel waves of energy and information. But seen from far away distances it seems a point with no breath. Only when we come closer to the fractal point it becomes a full system with 3 components: a vital inner space with energetic motions, an external enclosure, made of cyclical time paths that acts as a membrane that separates the system from the outer world, and a central ‘frame of reference’, mind or point of view (the point proper) that gauges energy and information, moves and tries to reproduce the point. Since the essence of the fractal paradigm is the vital, re=productive structure of all its systems. As fractals are basically reproductive, iterative equations that repeat its forms and motion in lower and higher scales of reality.

**The definitions of points as fractal particles, lines as waves of ExI and planes as ****topological networks**

Now when this was found out to be the case, mathematicians and physicists shied away from definitions. So in a landmark book, Hillbert, father of modern abstract mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, not defining them, because obviously the definitions of Euclid no longer worked, points did have breath, and so lines were waves of points with breath, and so they were discontinuous and planes had to be defined as networks of points communicated by lines. This are the 3 canonical definitions of i-logic mathematics that restore the realism and organicism to mathematics, beyond the axiomatic method of the idealist Hilbert’s Hegelian school of science.

Indeed, we do have to define points, lines planes, relative equality and parallels. And so now we shall consider that the structure of geometry is fractal, made of points with volumes sharing energy and information through waves that become then topological networks. And consider as it was already proved by Godel and lobacjevski, that mathematics is a realist science, since its truth cannot be as Hilbert wanted obtained by merely considering its internal logic, but needed external, realist, experimental tests.

Einstein’s curved space-time.

And we do correct the interpretation of Einstein’s Non-euclidean geometry of gravitational forces, which also is not logic.

Since when he discovered that multiple parallels cross a point of the ‘lower scale’ of gravitational space, over which light transits, he should have just widened those points to fit all its parallels.

Yet He instead of widening a point-particle enlarging it to become a star or atom or any other scale of the fractal paradigm, maintained the point-size of the particle-star-galaxy etc.

An then to fit the parallels he ‘bend the straight lines into curves’ to crowd the point with no breath, as the focus of the parallels. This is not proper. A point with no breath even if you curve parallels with no width, can only fit one. And a parallel is a straight line, so if you curve it is not a parallel anymore.

So the rational solution to the conundrum of the non-euclidean structure of space-time, crossed by multiple parallels is obvious:

We exist in it a fractal space-time that can be enlarged as we perceive it in more detail. Then those gravitational points become a star in a galaxy or a complex atom in a molecular network, and multiple lines which become waves of energy and information can traverse it.

**2nd postulate. A vital Universe of fractal points, waves of energy and information and topological networks. **

The fractal paradigm requires a new more evolved complete ¬Æ mathematical concept of ‘points’ as fractal points that grow in size when we get more information of them (1st Postulate of ¬Æ mathematics) of lines as waves of energy and information transmitted by such points with volume that create the networks between points. So for example in quantum physics we talk of a fundamental equation:

*Fermion (particle-point) < Boson (wave of energy and information > Fermion (particle point)*

This equation, which is the fundamental equation of Forces and particles turns out to be just the description *of the first and second postulate of illogic mathematics, applied to the fractal scales of ∆-3 space-time, or physical scale.*

Yet if we change the elements:

Cell (particle-point) <blood vessel + nervous axon (wave of energy and information) > Cell (particle point)

We are describing again the 1st and 2nd postulate of i-logic mathematics, applied to the ∆-1 scale of cells (whereas ∆0 is the relative human scale). And so if we consider

Head (particle-point) < Verbal wave of information > Head (particle point), we are applying those postulates to the ∆-human relative scale, and describe the fundamental event of social communication that starts the evolution of memetic super organisms of history, societies.

Topological networks. Discontinuous planes of points communicating energy and information.

What is the fundamental law of time cycles? The *persistence of presents, constant points of repetition, perceived in simultaneity in time as a present organism of space, or in simultaneity of information, as a network of relative infinite speed, in which parts become a present wholes by communicating through a relative new scale of the fifth dimension, which is instantaneous.*

Equal beings thus become telepathic, instantaneous in its network creation of information. In algebraic, physical terms, we can model this as a flow of information travelling very fast in time past quanta directions, in which it therefore maintains a present, as each quantum past jump is balanced by the time to move. In such a modelling, which is preferred in physics of time, the simultaneity of the cells of a plane of existence happens because past x future =present. Hence the use of informative and entropic, time and space motions with inverse parameter.

In that sense we must understand how points which are equal through simultaneity, create a network, across a new ‘instantaneous dimension of space-time’.

It is for physicists very important to localise this ‘force of instantaneous non local action at distance’ but for gst is more important to understand its logic meaning and structural meaning in the contraction of simultaneous planes of existence, in which all points feel a whole by communicating instantaneous through the virtual, fractal form.

Such form does not have ‘any drag’ in its motion as its mirror space are perfectly fluid to information coming from beings like itself. It is then perfect in the reflexibility of the points and we say information becomes superfluid acts at distance and instantaneously.

Of course when we enter into details and study nervous or gravitational or financial networks, which act as instantaneous, present communicative networks of information in biological, physical and social scales we can put constants, reality, concrete form and matter to those networks and laws of present simultaneity.

In physics the concept is akin to bosons, and so we observe how the network creates the impression that space does not exist as communication is instantaneous. It is the key to understand the existence of a super organism, which will always have:

- A slow wave of energy communication
- An instantaneous present wave of information communication
- Both will form the networks Max. tif, Max. E that shape the organism.

Multiple point-particles communicated by waves can form a network, a social plane, a ‘number with form’, of which we shall see certain numbers, pairs, decametric scales are more efficient and more abundant in nature, because they can better distribute energy and information flows and combine them into new reproduced fractals – the 3 functions of all fractal systems: to gauge information, to absorb/feed on energy and reproduce both.

So a triangular tetraktys, where the 3 corners of the fractal form specialise into absorbing energy, information and combing it and reproduce it, with a 10th central unit, communicating them as a whole, becomes the most perfect pythagorean form of the Universe. And that central point then becomes the ‘unit-whole’ of the 10 scale that forms another 100 scale of the tetraktys. The Mongol army was tailored in 10s, so was the legion and captain of 10 sergeants. 10¹º-¹¹ is the most common mathematical structure of nature, regarding perfect social beings – the number of stars in a galaxy, of ties in a DNA human molecule, of people on Earth, now that is almost saturated (7 billion), of cells in the first small mammals, and the common number to transcend scales of physics – for example the difference between the quanta of atoms, H-planck measured as energy and the quanta of the next molecular, thermodynamic scale, Boltzmann constant.

So while the fractal Universe constantly creates different fractal structures, certain organisations are more efficient and survive better, because the fractal is a vital fractal, of vital geometry, of vital points absorbing energy and information, creating logic paths, repeating actions, reproducing into networks. Even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, gauge energy and information, share it, in networks, form larger systems. Reproduce when absorbing more energy into new quarks and electrons and all this can be described with i-logic mathematics and coded with quantum numbers. Since now that we realise mathematics is organic and fractal, there is NO PHILOSOPHICAL CONUNDRUM, talking of physical systems as vital, organic systems. And we shall indeed show a fractal generator equation to describe them all.

Thus we define any system as an ∆-superorganism made of smaller, similar ∆-1 super-organisms. And each ∆-scale of superorganisms & its ecosystems are studied by a human science but all of them follow the same Invariances & emergence Laws & Galilean Paradoxes of 5D Metric formalized with the tools of Existential Algebra & Non-AE=i-logic Geometry.

We unify all Natural Systems as superorganisms using a single template definition, since they differ only by the i-scale or ecosystem in which they exist or the specific types of energy & information their networks are made of:

‘A super-organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.’:

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language of information and force of energy and we can define any network-organism, which will be a ‘part’ of a whole world-plane or ecosystem, composed of several species that occupy different ‘vital spaces’ but interact through the same language of energy & information:

An world-plane or ecosystem (name a specific world-plane) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies).

I.e.: The ‘world-plane of ‘zoology’ includes all beings of relative size, i=6, that use light as information, called ‘animals’. The world-plane 8, a galaxy, includes as parts, all celestial bodies of size i=7 related by gravitational networks, etc.:

**∆-3:** An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

**∆-2:** A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and coded by networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

**∆-1:** A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

**∆=o:** A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

**∆+1:** An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).

**∆+1:** A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.

**∆+1:** An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

**∆+3**: A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy.

**∆+4:** A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

Now this is the ‘Non-Euclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.

What about its non-aristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”?

This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scales of non-euclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single time-duration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.

But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is one-dimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its in-form-ative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.

But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.

The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clock-like vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.

General Systems sciences therefore is the formalism of the ‘alternative, far more advanced philosophy of science’ to that of Newtonian physics, with its concept of a single background absolute space-time in which entities like-mechanisms, whose ultimate substances are ignored, move in simple lineal motions.

In general systems sciences, as Leibniz affirmed, and then quantum and relativity proved, we do not exist in a background, abstract space-time mathematical plane, but we ARE MADE OF clock-like bits of information of different speeds (time relativity) and fractal, moving quanta of spatial energy, which are complementary systems (quantum theory), co-existing across 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension. So all systems can be described with the same laws, derived from the properties of spatial energy, temporal information and the metric of the 5th dimension, which together give birth to a set of 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic’=equal laws, which describe the ‘existence’ of all beings. For that reason we call also the Fractal Generator, the Function of Existence.

As we all beings follow a ‘world cycle’ of existence, made of a series of actions of absorption and emission and reproduction of energy and information, which might vary in quality and quantity but are essentially the same process for all beings of Nature. So in Gst, we go much further than a simple shallow, external description of the motions of beings, as physicists do, fully exploring all the whys of reality, with all the languages available to human thought, in a jump of understanding that should start a new age of knowledge, once the model is fully related to the details and specific laws and jargons of each science.

It must be understood that if the formalism of GSΤ is verified as all seems to prove by the laws of the scientific method, it represents a remarkable change in our scientific look of the Universe, unlike anything that has happened since Einstein and Darwin and Copernicus, made previous extreme revolutions of human thought, regarding the nature of time and the cycles of existence of its beings. A change of paradigm of course does take time, but it is unavoidable that humans and its growingly organic machines, do that jump of awareness about the full properties of the Universe, which go well beyond the reductionist view of putting on it a mirror with a single motion of time, entropy or energy, as physicists do.

**5. How 5D Metric orders all space sizes and time cycles. **

**The principle of organicism. The scalar fifth dimension.**

*In the graph centred in human beings, both from a physical and biological perspectives, we see the 3 main scales of the scalar Universe and its 5th organic dimension:*

*-A larger ∆+1 gravitational/ecosystemic scale, an organic, ∆-individual, thermodynamic scale and an ∆-1 lower cellular-atomic scale. How they are organised? Simple: smaller systems run their cycles of information faster. So they can compete with larger systems and form organic structures in which the lower system provides information encoded in its faster clocks and the larger systems coordinates the motion of all those parts into a whole. So quantum numbers of particles code atoms and molecules; genes code biological systems, and memes and gravitational black holes code the larger informative biological and physical systems: civilisations and galaxies.*

The duality of energy and information, despite the stubbornness of physicists to include information as a separate element to energy and its ignorance of the relationship between time clocks and information, ‘form’, which we will develop in depth in this blog, is easy to grasp, as it is natural to all biological systems and humans are biological beings. So we shall find that philosophy, from the age of taoism, those 2 parameters, yang and yin closely resemble the properties of energy and information, to the modern age of dialectics, and its thesis and antithesis, has constantly made use of it.

But organicism, the other key element of general systems sciences, despite being at the center of modern science, was not so clear to most researchers. Since a clear definition of an organism was lacking. Biologists in that sense define organisms by its ‘drives of existence’, as systems that process energy and information (feeding, perceiving), reproduce their informative and energetic organs in other region of space-time and evolve socially into larger groups. General systems therefore must demonstrate and formalize this definition, in a manner that can be applied to all systems and sciences regardless of the human jargon, used in each discipline. But the task becomes simpler when we realise that for all those drives of existence, all what is needed is a scalar structure in which smaller parts transmit and receive energy and information from larger wholes, co-existing together as organisms do, in several scales of space-time, connected by those flows of energy and information.

In brief we need to formalise with the two arrows of future, energy and information, the 5 drives of existence of life:

- ±∆E: +e: feeding, increase of energy, -e: locomotion, emission of energy.
- ±∆I: -i: communication, emission of information; +i: perception, absorption of information.
- ExI: reproduction of the energy and informative systems in other region of space-time, as when a wave moves reproducing its form and energy, or a particle decouples into new particles, (physical systems) or a body reproduces, by emitting a seed of information into a lower scale of the 5th dimension.
- ∑œ=U: social evolution, when an offspring of similar existential organisms, œ, evolve socially into a whole; particles that evolve into atoms that evolve into molecules, which evolve into matter states and cells, which evolve into cosmic bodies and organisms, which evolve into galaxies and global societies.

What is then the unit of life in the Universe? At which scale we can observe systems gauging information, feeding on fields of energy, reproducing seminally, and evolving socially? Humans, forever anthropomorphic children, who want to be the center of the Universe, stubbornly want to ‘start’ life in the Universe, in *their scale of size, form of in-form-ation and ‘unique chosen species’, so it is a canonical lie that life starts in a certain molecule, which happens to be in humans called DNA.*

Yet DNA is made of atoms made of particles that gauge information, feed on energy fields, iterate with seminal ‘seeds’ of light and evolve socially into all kind of molecules. So it is a fact, despite systemic denial by human egos that the 2 fundamental particles of the Universe, the quark and the electron have life properties, and we must start our analysis of the organic Universe, in the quark and electron, as we shall do in this blog. You can believe in magic and think that alas, the carbon 6th magic number makes is chosen of god, to be=come alone and only ‘it’, the blocking part of life. In fact, we shall see that it is the nitrogen, the ‘head’ of carbohydrates, whose perfect vibrational clocks code the information of life atoms, but life is not a property of certain atoms and its molecules. What DNA does is to achieve a high degree of complexity in the scale of atoms, with great easiness, due to its light weight that makes its vibrations very intense. So we might just say that CNO atoms easily grow in complexity while other forms of life, such as metalife – organic robots – take longer and might require a simpler catalyser, we shall call in our model of the economic ecosystem, ‘enzyman’.

Now a warning, the laws of GST and the metric formalism of 5D applies to all systems including history and its social organisms, nations and civilisations, a fact understood only by the highest minds of the discipline, Khaldun, Spengler, Toynbee, in their study of societies as organisms and its daughter civilisations. So, your ego-trips of subjective anthropomorphism as the only form of life, as the only free system, whose evolution stops in the individual, as the only intelligent being, will be shuttered and substituted by hardcore, objective scientificism, which contrary to belief hardly exists in most sciences, shrewdly introducing deist and anthropomorphic views in their theories. Only organicism will show to be self-sufficient, to explain reality without hidden deist or anthropomorphic agendas, once the burden that dragged GST for so long – the lack of a proper mathematical formalism that connected its ideas with the hard equations and proofs of each discipline of classic science, now provided by 5D metrics.

Still the duality of cyclical time and lineal space, requires a third element to fully grasp the structure of the Universe which is even more shocking for the common human view. Τhe absolute relativity of a Universe in which not only all locations in space are relative, all cycles of time and its speeds are relative but one, in which the scale in which we exist also is relative and matters little to ensure the importance of a certain, atom, human or star.

*In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein. Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.*

In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of self-similar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of space-time. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.

Let us then prove the fractal paradigm, the true evolution of cosmology, with the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

**Fractal Universe: Whole of wholes.**

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist* published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Sloan survey and others organised even since show the Universe is mathematically very similar to a fractal, as galaxies form discontinuous systems of networks.

In the present zeitgeist of physics, which considers only mathematical properties for all physical systems those discoveries seek for a mathematical equation that ‘scales’ the form of ‘time vortices’ – spiral systems that grow information towards the center of a material system – in all the scales of size of the Universe, from the smaller atomic vortex to the largest galaxy and beyond.

For systems science, the alternative philosophy of science to mechanism that insists the universe has organic properties and can be modelled as an organic system co-existing in several scales of organisation the interest of the fractal structure of matter and many other biological systems is on the ‘meaning’ and consequences of a world, which constantly reproduces its systems into clonic systems, from particles that decouple into new particles, and organise into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, cosmic bodies, societies, super organisms and galaxies.

It is this hardly explored multiple language organic Universe the one we shall build in this blog.

Unfortunately beyond what obsesses the Pythagorean believers – the exact mathematical equation of the fractal in terms of space size, which says nothing about the organic structure of the universe – astrophysicists don’t go further into their models of the fractal, organic Universe. In the photograph we can see that really what calls attention is the network structure of the universe similar to any other fractal organism, and that is what matters to the organic paradigm. We shall indeed in the section dedicated to astrophysics study galaxies as organic networks similar in a larger scale to the structure of cells, with ‘DNA-informative black holes’ that regulate its structure and mitochondria stars that reproduce the energy of the system, made of 2 networks of electromagnetic energy and gravitational information. ‘Networks of similar space-quanta’ regulated by energy and information becomes then the simples definition of a super organism, the fundamental particle of the organic paradigm.

Networks thus evolve into wholes whose functions of informative gauging, energy feeding, reproduction and social organisation define the structure of super organisms, as the parts make emerge at least in its functions, not always in its form, the system in a higher scale. Abstract scientists though limit their inquire to a spatial mathematical ‘measure’ without any concern with the more important dynamic functions of those forms.

We show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-times, both in its relative ‘scales of spatial size’ (ab. Spe) and the relative speed of its clocks of temporal information (Tiƒ), which together conform the 5th Dimension of Fractal space-time, essential to understand the structure of the Universe.

On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new scale of the 5th dimension’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung. And further below a scheme which explains the concept behind the 5th dimension and its importance for all sciences; as each of them merely studies one of the relative scales of size of the universe. So what general systems means is a unification of the laws of all sciences under the more complex concept of an organic fractal universe, whose common laws are extracted of the understanding of the fractal, quantum structure of space and energy, and the cyclical nature of its time clocks, with different speeds for each of those scales – the so called isomorphic laws of systems sciences.

Hence the 2 names of this site, generalsystems and unificationtheory.com.

Now the fractal network structure of the Universe should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to redesign science, and the idea scared scholars, given the enormous development reached by the scientific discourse with the biased, unfocused mental mirror of a Universe constructed with the formalism of a single space-time continuum; that is a short of background cartesian space-time, an abstraction of pen and paper mathematics, where we draw, with a single time clock, a mechanical artefact invented by man, not found in measure, and a single space-continuum perceived at the human scale of size…

This way of seeing reality might be obvious, but it is not certainly truth and since we use it to model the fractal Universe and all its parts, and scales of size, and different time rhythms, and beats, from those of fast atoms to slow galaxies, to circadian life rhythms, what humans get is a quite messy, chaotic vision of the whole, the Universal order, embedded in the fractal structure of the cosmos, and all its parts, which as the images show, from lungs to rivers to human cellular structures and brains, are all made to its image and likeness of the Universal fractal.

This puzzles humans who have an extreme attachment to the ‘visual view’ they have of reality, which packs all the information and scales of that fractal into the continuous scale of our vision, and all the clocks and different rhythms to the second beat of our heart, eye glimpse, mind thought and the machines we have created to measure with that ‘human time rhythm’ all other rhythms of the Universe.

But a fractal universe is absolutely relative. There is not a preferential size in space – an atom is not simpler or more complex than a man and a galaxy, it simply belongs to a different scale, but when we grow in size and detail, we observe an enormous complexity. And there is not a preferential rhythm of time, not we can deform all time rhythms but simplifying them with the human steady state second rhythm.

Because a fractal is indeed a completely different entity to that of our present scientific world of absolute space and single time ‘motion’, we truly need to make a huge change in the foundations of science to describe the new paradigm.

A complex theory includes all the simplex one.

Paradoxically while the simplex paradigm of mechanist science cannot explain the organic world, the fractal, organic paradigm includes within it by the principle of correspondence all the other models of the Universe.

For example, we mentioned that time in physics is lineal and in GST, cyclical, but while a line cannot conceive a cycle that needs a second dimension, for a cycle a line is a small step of the cycle when seeing in close range. The quantum mathematical only theory cannot explain the whys of its processes, but the organic paradigm, includes both, the how of quantum numbers and the why of its organic purpose. Each science can only explain the species of its scale; only the 5th dimension can explain all sciences with the same laws. The mechanist science only can explain machines, the fractal organic paradigm considers machines just simplex organisms of metal, in its first stages of evolution. And so on.

This said the reader should understand first the 3 common features of all systems, organisms and species of the Universe, its fractal structure in space, cyclical, finite duration in time between birth and extinction and co-existence in different scales of the 5th dimension.

**All together now: 5D Fractal cyclical space-time beings & its Networks: Nature’s super organisms.**

It is evident that in any system, which is made of topological networks of fractal points, we must talk at least of two scales of the 5th dimension, the ∆-1 scale of points (atoms/cells) that form the whole ∆-scale creating the systems observed in the graph. Thus by the mere fact that all flat planes of reality are networks of points, they imply the fifth dimension.

So the natural form in which beings are built, is as 4Dimensional 2 Sp x 2 Tƒ space-time systems, *in a single plane, which corresponds to the classic 4D relativity description, albeit with the proper redistribution of the dimension of height that becomes a dimension of the cyclical radius of the time clock.*

But given the fractal structure of the Universe, any being will become a fifth dimensional species,extending across at least a lower network of fractal points: ∑∆-1 ≈∆.

And since that being will be part of a larger world, we must always consider at least an ∆+1 world of which the being is a mere part. So we define all beings as 5th dimensional beings extending across 3 scales of the 5th dimension, perceived as holographies of bidimensional space and cyclical time in a single plane of space-time.

It is thus obvious that such fractal structures cannot be described only with lineal time and continuum space; but require a new i-logic fractal geometry of waves of energy and information, and curvesd paths that connect points, into discontinuous topological planes.

And so a realist description of the Universe requires a more complex philosophy and mathematics that we develop in this blog under the generic name of GST, General Systems Theory, or T.Œ (an Organic Theory of Everything, which is the philosophical meaning of the fractal Universe, as opposed of Physicists’ T.O.E. just a ‘theory of everything’ :)

So we can define all beings with the 3 structural principles of 5D fractal space membranes and multiple time-clocks:

‘All what exists is a fractal organism of temporal information and spatial energy, extended across 3 relative scales of size:

∆-1 Spe < ∆-ST> ∆+1 Tiƒ”

This is the briefest way to state that all systems are made of energy and information, extending in 3 cellular/atomic, individual/organic and cosmological/social scales. So you are made of cells part of an organism, part of a society – an animal will be part of an ecosystem, a star made of atoms, part of a galaxy and so on.

And because you are made of energy and information, you do have lineal, energetic limbs that move you, (Ab. Spe), cyclical heads of information that guide you (ab. Tif) and a body that occupies most of your space-time that mixes both.

But a fractal physical system does have a lineal field that moves it, a particle-head that guides it and a wave-body that reproduces its form.

So what we need first is to show that actually things as different as a light ray with a particle-photon, a wave and a field, the simplest fractal of nature we know and something as complex as a human being are made of the same ‘species of spatial energy and temporal information’, lines and cycles, as the | and O used by computers to model it.

The curved pangeometry of fractal space, cyclical time and the 5th dimension, shows in different systems of the Universe.

All including humans are fractal super-organisms, made of time cycles that enclose a vital space, centered into a point of view. We are not in an absolute space-time frame of reference as Newton thought. But we are made of vital spaces, enclosed by time cycles. Eastern philosophers, earlier civilizations and philosophers of science – Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz was always understood. This reality observed in Nature’s physical and biological systems – because it is an immediate experienced fact*.*

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist*^{ }published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

** Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe**

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe.

Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

In Fractal mathematics the equation that generates the fractal is called a generator ‘feed-back’ equation. They are symbolic equations, which express operations that repeat themselves ad infinitum, generating new solutions, accumulated in time or space.

For example, Mandelbrot’s set, the most famous fractal is a simple iterative equation defined in the complex plane, which generates points in that plane with infinitesimal detail. So as we run the equation z(n+1)=z(n)²+c the points plotted in the plane form an image:

The equation thus is really simple. It has in fact *as all equations, only 3 terms, so we can write a general ‘Grammar’ of all linguistic mirrors and equations that reflect the Universe, Spe <≈> Tiƒ. *

*And this is a good beginning to ‘see’ the fractal space-time Universe, as if all languages have only 3 components, must be because they reflect a Universe of 3 ‘colours’. Indeed, space has 3 ‘dimensions’, colours are 3, equations have an F(x), Operandi and G(Y) element.*

* The Universal Grammar of all languages is Subject < Verb > Object. *

*In Eastern philosophy Yin=vishnu=information=female principle x Yang=energy=shiva=male combine to give birth to ∞forms. And so on. *

And then by combinations and iterations of those elements, we get more complex mathematical equations, colours, forms in 3 dimensions and sentences. It is also evident, then that a Fractal Generator does not need to be a numerical equation.

*The Universe can be mirrored with different languages. God does NOT speak only mathematics, as physicists often think (Platonic theory of the world) but ‘God speaks infinite languages’ (Upanishads), each one a ternary mirror of the 3 elements of reality, the element of vital space, the element of temporal form, and its infinite combinations.*

And the equations of an iterative fractal are called ‘Generators’, which are very simple in its synoptic, logic or mathematical definition. But by sheer repetition of its cyclical patterns, become extremely complex as those cycles of the whole, distribute its energy and in-form-ation on lower scales, reproducing ever more complex patterns in smaller surfaces. So for example the Mandelbrot’s famous fractal is generated by a simplex z²+c equation.

**A reminder of the main symbols of Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles.**

Now, if we add the Galilean Paradox of Relativity between motion and form we can consider the 4 fundamental elements of those graphs: still space and entropy (kinetic lineal energy, expansive space) and time cycles and information bits (still cycles of form).

*We need to differentiate between still continuous perception by the mind of space, (ab. |, Sp) ‘lineal kinetic or entropic motions or lineal momentums’; ‘Spe’ and its .*

*And between cyclical motions, clocks of time, ( ab.O, Ti) and its still perception by the mind or information (Tiƒ)*

Now once we have focused the mirror of the 4 canonical dimensions and explain the holographic principle, we can be a bit ore precise with the details of the ‘geometrical fractal generator’, which defines the basic topological properties of space-time beings (but NOT all the properties they have):

This means that all systems, including physical and biological systems as you, are made of:

- A vital, fractal space made of quanta with motion – the space you occupy is ‘you’, it is not a ‘background’ reality, an abstract ‘Newtonian’ frame of coordinates where you slide through. You
*are made of quanta of space with motion:***“Spe”**. So it is a particle, made of quanta of space with energy (capacity to move), called a ‘field’. Further on, because all those vital spaces are made of quanta, they can be counted in space,**∑**, so we write: ∑Spe.

The confusion of a background space arises then, when scientists did not realise that this structure of vital continuous spaces, made of smaller quanta, extended ad infinitum. Quanta of space was made of smaller quanta. For example, organisms were made of cells made of molecules made of atoms, and so on. So they postulated that the smallest of all those scales was a background space. But even if there is a minimal scale, in the same manner when your whole vital space moves, your cells move with it, the last hypothetical scale will move with your cells. Now, this structure of space, in which wholes are made of parts with similar functions or forms to the whole is called a fractal. So all what exists is a vital fractal.

- Now those vital quanta with motion, move with a series of time cycles. That is they trace repetitive actions, which appear as space-time cycles, which the being performs through its existence. So existence is
*made of time cycles, T, in which you use your vital space to perform certain vital actions, such as feeding on energy, or gauging information, reproducing your system or communicating and associating with other space-time entities.*

And you do so with a discontinuous frequency, ƒ, for each of those actions that have a certain repetitive, discontinuous beat, and create through its actions forms in space, they are forms-in-action, information: **“Tiƒ”**.

*So as you perform several actions and you are made of smaller quanta that also performs those space-time actions the different actions in time must* be synchronised in those relative scales of size of reality. So your cells are synchronised to reproduce once a day, when your feeding patterns give them energy to do so.

Women’s reproduction is synchronised with the time cycle of the moon. And so on. The result is that each day you feed as a whole, billions of cells reproduce; so your action ‘multiplies in a lower scale’. Thus because those time actions the being develops, repeat in cycles, that multiply in lower scales with cyclical, pi-like patterns, we can ad a multiplier to each time cycle: ∏-> ∏Tiƒ.

It is also clear that those space-time actions and cyclical synchronicities are all about, exchanging energy (as in feeding) or information (as in perception) between you and the external world or you and your internal structures. So your vital space and time cycles are constantly exchanging spatial energy (open spatial motion) and temporal information (cyclical forms-in-action):

∑Spe <≈> Tiƒ.

Where a system of spatial quanta, dominant in lineal motion, hence more abundant in lineal limbs (biological systems) and lineal fields (physical systems) Spe (|-Limbs/Fields), exchange energy and information (<=>) in cyclical, patterns, dominant in a region of the system, with cyclical form (that stores more information) called a particle in physical systems or a head in biological ones, Tiƒ (O-heads-particles).

So because the equation of the being is dynamic, and energy and information goes back and forth between the two poles, limbs and fields and particles and heads, the equation is called a ‘feed-back equation. And it is the simplest equation of duality that reflects the structure of the space-time beings of the Universe.

Further on, the intermediate, ≤=≥ region where maximal exchange happens tend to be in all systems a different, larger region, where cyclical information and lineal kinetic energy interacts forming more complex curved, hyperbolic forms, called waves in physical systems and bodies in biological ones. So we can extend the description of the being to a ternary structure:

Ξ.* ∑Spe (|-limbs-fields with maximal energy)<Ø-STexi (hyperbolic body-wave)>∏ Tiƒ (O-heads particles of max. Information)*

This is the synchronous ‘spatial, present’ description of the being.

**Organic Truths exist. ****The 5th dimension of scales.**

So far, what we have explained is a ‘single scale of size’ of space-time, and its 4 dimensions. And this is *not enough to explain the fundamental quality of a fractal, to be made of scales of different size, which however seem similar in their patterns, as the previous Mandelbrot image shows. *

This is truly how reality is, since science appeared with the discovery of telescopes to look at larger scales and microscopes to look at smaller scales. Further on that is how fractals reproduce their form, by iterating in smaller mirror images the larger form, reproduced in a myriad of similar smaller forms which store all the information of the larger form. And this is also how nature reproduces its systems: you emit a smaller seed of information, and this seminal form then reproduces into many clones and reorganises itself. But in all scales of nature, we shall see the same system of organic iteration happens, once and again.

Crystals create a first small atomic cell that reproduces its information and reorders huge quantities of atom to form again a bigger crystal. Quarks and electrons emit a flow of quanta called ‘forces’ which fast evolve from gluons and ¥-rays into a new particle. All this thus must be formalised giving our Space-time Generator ‘scalar depth’, to be able to explain the fundamental *vital property of Nature’s fractals of space-time: to reproduce its information in other scales of space-time.*

Fractal points, considered as Space quanta, organise into larger synchronous super organisms, forming a chain of beings from the smallest atom to the largest World.

In the graph, all systems of the Universe are scalar super organisms This fact makes man again curiously enough the centre of scientific knowledge; as the most perfect creation we can observe to compare by homology all other organisms of an infinitely sentient pantheist Universe. Thus ultimately absolute relativity means man is just another super organism of vital spaces and time cycles that follow the laws of all living, organic, bio-topologic systems of reality.

The Super-organism, ∆±1 co-extended in 3 Universal Planes, following the same isomorphic laws that all systems of space and time is thus the fundamental entity of reality, which unifies in form and function all other systems.

In the graph, we are all scalar space-time systems, but the human ego wants to be self-centred in its i-ndividual point of view.

** 5 D metric: fractal spaces and cyclical time clocks: co-invariance of size & time speed: Sp x Tƒ = ∆**

Now in a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time.

Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower. This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: S x T = ∆±n and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

*Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed: *Sp x Tƒ = K.*

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

**Complex Algebra & Analysis: Fractal generator of space-time beings****. **

How vital spaces and cyclical times – 2 simplex elements, lineal, kinetic motions of space and time cycles that bend those motions into closed cyclical forms of information – can generate the immense variety of realities we see around us?

By sheer repetition, combination and pegging of those ‘formal motions’ of time and space. So we can ‘reduce’ those iterations with synoptic, logic languages and mathematical equations to its 3 elements and ‘rules of combination’, in the ‘Fractal Model of the space-time Universe’. We shall extract the ultimate properties of time and space, and the rules of combination, and put them into the minimalist possible mirror of the mind that reflects them, called a ‘Fractal Generator equation’. And so then, how running this equation forwards we can generate with the rules of engagement al what exists in the Universe, including man.

**Philosophical implications of Gst.**

It is a good moment to reflect on what all this means for the scientific understanding of the arrow of time and the nature of the Universe at large.

A fractal, isomorphic organico-mathematical universe is a proposition quite different from the standard comfort zone of anthropomorphic science. It means we are in a living, organic universe where our importance is absolutely relative, and our dumbness born of the limited view of each point of view of this living universe.

*In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe: *

*Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:*

|-Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

*As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:*

- Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Spe

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPACE BECOMES FRACTAL BY REPRODUCTION OF PRESENT BODY-WAVES-WORKING CASTES, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension:

In the next graph we can see a graph with the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws:

*In the graph the main scales of the Universe perceived by human beings – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales. *

*Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestive-energetic, reproductive-hormonal and nervous/informative systems, which sub-divide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 sub-systems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0-integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆-1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells. *

*As such we **shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension. *

*Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness. *

So let us introduce the fundamental particle of this universe – the…

**4. ****THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE: Max. ExI**

What is all about? The survival of a point of view, which maps in stillness a world of information and tries to imprint its universe with mirror images of its self, clone images that become cells of a superorganism. Order is repetition of information, in present body-waves that maximise, ExI, the parts of a point of view. We can describe all this in a simple formalism known as the function of existence, whose development in 3 phases, of max. E, youth-past-gaseous-entropic state, max. i, future, old-informative-solid state/ age, and Max. E xI (e=i) balances steady liquid state form a world cycle.

Let us then study after we have analysed the topology of the Universe its ‘existential algebra’, which is the origin of the algebraic equations of sciences.

**O-points: minds and its languages ****of information≈Perception. **** Eyes of time: Monads≈**** still minds. **

What is the ultimate essence of information and the reality depicted with it? The existence of points of view able to process and map out the Universe with information. A sentient universe in which information is constantly focused on what Descartes called minds, Aristotle, unmoved Gods, Leibniz, Monads, *is an a priori category, which no scientist can renounce to if he wants to describe not only the external how but also the internal why of all systems of reality. *

This much wider vision of time and the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Hegel, the last serious formulation of the Spatial entropy x Temporal information=Space-time arrows Fractal Generator (thesis-antithesis=Synthesis) .

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

**The rational explanation of the Galilean paradox.**

Moreover still minds perceiving by locking information wholes as linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

*So Descartes*, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, *said that all what exists was made of:*

*– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.*

*– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’*.

And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: *Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.*

*– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’,* to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

**O x ∞ = ∆±1: The equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in a single Universe.**

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

**The function of existence: Max. e xi (s=t)**

In the graph, the function of existence in 3 ages, with its maximal point of balance in the wave-female, s=t, max. ExI state, between the field, of maximal entropy and the particle of maximal information, which combine into the 2 ‘male states of max. entropy (particle disintegrating its information) and maximal information (particle transforming the field-limbs motion into informative perception). Both together provide also a gender interpretation of the states of the being and its complementarity wave-particle, female-male, body-head elements which prey on the limb/field of energy as they travel through its ages and trace a whole world cycle -already provided by the bagua of earlier taoism, the first analysis of existential algebra in human sciences:

In the simplest description of the Universe, we can talk of the use of existential algebra, which studies in detail the space-time actions of all points of view that first gauge information, create a still mapping of the Universe, and then try to imprint a territorial field of energy with the perceived form, enacting its imagination, as an act of survival of its self, which becomes the body of its organism, which will through a series of isomorphic actions of absorption of energy and information, trace a world cycle, step by step of present repetition of its wave-body actions and informative perception, e>i, on its field-particle state, till finally it becomes so unbalanced, as the wave is present but the particle-field male state is E>I integrative and diminish the energy of the system, hence defining an overall arrow:

Female Present-wave-body state: S=T + Past>Future, field>particle male state = ∆I: Life arrow + Death arrow: Big bang, I<E (Particle dissolves in field)=0

It is this world cycle of existence that develops in 3 phases the Max. E x Max. I function, (Max. Youth, Max. I: 3rd age> Max. E xI (E=i) adult state), what we see developing around the Universe, in the 3 ages of life, 3 forms of space, female/male dualities, waves and particle-fields, 3 arrows of time, 3 organs of space.

THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE IS THE ULTIMATE KNOTS AND BOLTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ITS STUDY BY EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA THE HIGHEST FORMALISM OF STIENCES. Alll what we do all beings is really performing parts and wholes of those functions, its cycles and derivative actions.

** **

**A ternary being.**

Of all what we have said, one thing matters, to portray the super organism and its 3 regions, the boundary, Max. S, the brain, Max. T and the vital intermediate space-time world between both:

In the graph, all laws of electromagnetism resumes on those images: the existence of two perpendicular forms-motions, ith different speeds, the max. S, being the boundary, the central point, invisible, with no motion, though in reality a vortex,faster than the other parts, and the vital space, st between them.

*We are all self-centered, fractal organisms of vital space, tracing world cycles.*

So now we must deal with the consequences for knowledge of the ego paradox, which is mainly our belief that only human minds are intelligent and so its languages.

And so we must fully grasp the fact that we humans are not *that* important in the fractal Universe, but just a ‘fractal organism’ in one of its many relative scales, and our ‘intelligence’, that is, the languages of information we use to perceive the Universe, mainly logic words to perceive time, mathematical geometry to perceive space, are also not ‘special’, and they do not create the Universe or are the ‘languages of god’ as religious people and pythagorean physicists believe.

Since the main problem to objectively grasp, the nature of reality as a fractal, organic system is that subconscious bias of all humans of all ages and all disciplines of reason or belief, against Nature, due to our ego-trips that make us happy only when we are the centre of the Universe as individuals and species.

*In the graph, the centers of organisms, are the selfs, i-worlds, eyes mind of time, create the universe, by seeing from a single perspective cartesian space-time of simultaneous communication with all the points of the body-space o the point of time a wave of simultaneous networks of fractal existence, which is what we call a space, which must therefore be still and simultaneous to each other’s point, but only from the perpendicular point of space in the relative future-past which can move both systems in relative present time.*

**The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.**

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like Newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

*œ**-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping*

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

So the human mind-language is a mapping made with light of the Universe,and uses the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light to simplify all the information of reality.

This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

*In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. In posts on i-logic geometry we develop a pangeometry of all possible non-Euclidean minds of the Universe. We conclude that each mind is a monad, a fractal point crossed by an enormous numbers of rays of information, which create a specific mind, mirror of the Universe, with less volume of information and more stillness to fit in the point. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons. *

*So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).*

In the graph, we see how light constructs our view with 3 simple lineal motions, the electric, magnetic and c-speed axis, reason why we see light as a fixed space (relativity and constancy of c-speed). Yet other beings can map out reality with other pixels, atomic smells, gravitational forces, digital numbers. So we need to expand our notions of mathematical points, lines and planes, as they might be constructed with different pixels. What all those mappings of reality will have then in common will be not linguistic units (call it numbers, words, atoms, colours, etc.) but the ‘reference of all of them’, which is the Universe itself, the whole, and its fundamental components, which are spatial energetic motions, and cyclical, temporal forms of information, stored in their cyclical clocks.

We are still talking of 2 ‘elements’, which can be well-defined geometrically, but also mapped out with other languages. As they are richer in meaning. For example, motion in physics is associated to open lines – the shortest distance between two points, with entropy an expansive motion, with energy, a measure of motion along the axis of application of a force. And form, information, is associated to clocks, which carry it in the frequency and form of its cycles, to vortices of masses and charges, which act as accelerated inward clocks of Nature.

So it is better to start a description of the Universe, departing of the ‘elements’ of the Universe, in its essential duality, cyclical time clocks of information and lineal motions of entropic energy, and then establish a logic, formal equation that relates both and defines all systems as made of those 2 components:

‘All what exists is a system made of quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information that transform each other ad eternal: Spe<=>Τiƒ’

And then consider that each mind and language will try to mirror this Universal grammar, above each world view, with more or less focus and distortion. So verbal systems tend to have a Grammar of subject (information) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (energy of subject), to mirror those ternary systems, and euclidean light space mathematics will also use a geometric 3 dimensional view, where length corresponds to the speed-reproduction of the wave, height to the electric-informative field, and width, to the magnetic energetic field, or a 3 algebraic equation, G(x) operandi F(Y), akin to the ternary structure of words. And colours will be 3, blue associated to information, red to energy and green to reproductive combinations.

So the philosopher of science, or rather of languages of knowledge has a much wider view of reality, than the physicist, which is a believer in mathematics only, as the generator element of reality that comes even above or at the same level than the Universe.

In the next graph we see that duality: on the left Mr. Penrose’s pythagorean view that consider the mind of man that ‘imagines’ mathematics, the language and the Universe in equal footing, interacting together. It is an anthropomorphic, arrogant view. In philosophy of science, all languages are lesser mirrors that cannot perceive the entire Universe. So the causality is far less equalitarian. Τhere is out there a Universe, which hosts all the information about itself (Haldane), and a series of beings within it, mirroring with different languages that Universe, among which humans exist with its varieties, of which we do acknowledge mathematics and logic, of space and time, to be the best mirrors, but not perfect enough.

So our first task is to improve both mirrors, by looking at the more complex structure of fractal space, and the more complex causality of cyclical time, the primary elements of the Universe, incorporating those discoveries to the grammar of mathematics, giving birth to i-logic mathematics, the formalism of all systems.

In the graph, human anthropomorphism in science peaked in the german, idealist school of Hilbert when mathematics not only remained ‘Galileo’s language of god’ but became invented by the human brain, who became ‘God’. One of the biggest limits of human knowledge is precisely the null understanding of the relationships between languages and reality, and how languages evolve as everything else from a first ‘epic’ age of maximal simplicity when they seem magic truths – so writing first conveyed the feeling it was absolute truth and the pharaoh said it has been written.

Mirrors were considered magic holding the soul of the observer, because they were so ‘exact’, and mathematics a very recent language still holds this magic, mirror image. Only the true connoisseurs know of its imperfections, describing, *only a part of all the properties of the being. Yet what makes of mathematical physics such ‘naive religion’, is the denial that there is anything worth to know outside the ‘reduced’ image of the mirror.*

So three are the first tasks to upgrade and improve our scientific view of the Universe:

- Τo improve the mirror of logic mathematics by completing the r=evolution of mathematical logic started by Lobachevski, Riemann and Mandelbrot (Non-Euclidean, Fractal mathematics) in geometry and by the Asian philosophies of duality (taoism and buddhism) and the western philosophers of science, such as Hegel in logic (ternary causal logic), beyond the single, lineal causality of Aristotle.
- Τo bring the organic and mental not purely mathematical properties of all beings, better described with verbal and biological languages into the folding of science.
- And to do so, by relating human languages to the higher reality of a Universe made of only 2 elements, lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, broken into infinite pieces that assembly then into space-time beings – all what exists including human beings, ordered across ‘multiple scales of size’ which define the fractal 5th dimension of the Universe.

So it is obvious that unlike the idealist school of science that dominates today,where we depart from ‘Hilbert’s’ imaginary points, lines and planes (from the human mind), which becomes the only language that creates the Universe; in an act of hidden anthropomorphic deism, we will depart from the 3 structural elements of the Universe, cyclical time clocks of information, fractal quanta of spatial energy and its organisation in 5d scales of space-time, and then establish the laws of this universal ternary structure, from where we will extract the grammar of human mathematical and bio-logical languages, and then finally explain all the systems of the Universe with the mirror of those enhanced human mathematical and bio-logical languages, themselves enhanced mirrors that look at the ultimate reality, the Universe of fractal space-time.

Let us then start by defining the multiple time clocks, quanta of space and scales of space-time of reality, comparing as we go through this description, the real universe with the idealist, lineal, deformed view of our earlier founding fathers of physics, with its deist myths, mechanical deformation and lineal, simplex thoughts.

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists. It is far easier to construct a simpler model apt for measures with a single mechanical time-clock and a single Cartesian graph of space, self-centered in the human ‘light space-time’ (we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

*‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.*

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believers to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’*.*

In the opening montage of cyclical systems of space time, we can see how all what exists is a fractal system made of vital space, with kinetic motions, encoded and informed by accelerated clocks of time, self-centered in a relative point of view or frame of reference that holds together the system. In the graph we can indeed see a small sample of fractal systems, in which a central first point of view, once it is born, reproduces in waves of clone forms, which then reorganize into an static form with a classic order – a fractal which seen from THE SELF-centered perspective is a form of consciousness growing and dying as it performs a world cycle of existence.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

*The ego is as Buddha and Descartes understood a Maya of the senses*

Thus now we can respond why we perceive reality both as motion and stillness. The answer is in the ternary structure of all beings, self-centered by a mental point of view.

**Anthropomorphism: Denial of the overwhelming scientific proofs of the fractal, organic Universe.**

This obvious organisation of the Universe into scales, however has not been developed into the philosophy of science that corresponds to the experimental evidence of 400 years of studying those scales with telescopes and microscopes, because of the ascientific errors of mankind, which we group in two types: anthropomorphic errors (anthropomorphism, mechanism), and errors of mathematical abstraction (continuity, abstract points, abstract motion):

- Anthropomorphism: we deny organic qualities to anything that is not similar to us.

- Mechanism, as physicists first designed very simple deconstructed machines, which seem in our egocentered view, ‘not discoveries’ but inventions. So Kepler who used a simple clock of time, said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find a mind so intelligent as Him to understand his clock-work’. This arrogance is important to realise why we like a mechanical interpretations of nature, as it puts us above it, as ‘the only organic being’. So mechanism is anthropomorphism and deism, as it requires a god to put in motion the machine, which was OK for pious Newton and Kepler, who believed in Yhwh sending them comets to give them the laws of gravitation, but more humble, intelligent thinkers as Leibniz, laughed at it rightly. Only an organic self-reproductive, self-organizign Universe IS a scientific model of it. And obviously as we now build robots imitating the forms and functions of organisms, we come to realise all machines are simple, not-evolved organisms of metal-atoms, as we are of carbon-atoms.

- Continuity: we took 400 years to realise that all is discontinuous quanta, when observed in detail from neurons, which were thought to form a continuous brain before Cajal’s beautiful pictures, to energy, the substance of the vital space occupied by those points of the fractal networks of the Universe, which only became quantised a century ago, to time clocks, which were a continuous line duration, despite the obvious cyclical nature of all of them, hence ‘breaking space’ into an inner and outer region, and its multiplicity from logic cycles of computers, to circadian cycles of life, to orbital cycles of stars, each one with a different speed or time ‘frequency’,
*the true measure of time quanta: Tƒ=1/T. But*only Einstein realized that ‘there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’ and this has not yet been properly introduced in science. So any system of time clocks or space extension can be quantised into frequency cycles and ‘atoms, particles, cells’ quanta of a relative scale of reality.

- Interpretation of Mathematics, as an abstract, idealist language, which is not. Mathematics is a realist science. In fact the science whose disciplines better reflect the fractal, organic nature of the Universe. And this is the key to convert the present paradigm into an organic view of reality. In brief, mathematics has 3 disciplines and the 3 are organic analysis of the fractal structure of space-time beings across scales of size: Arithmetics->Algebra is based in numbers, but a number is the social repetition of undistinguishable elements; which as Pythagoras realized do have a geometric quantum structure, being the tetraktys, the most perfect organisation, whose organic reasons we shall soon reveal.

Numbers are forms said Plato, because they are essential topological structures of a fractal network. So both geometry or rather topology, and algebra describes those fractal networks, its forms and functions and the way they related to each other. While Analysis studies how finitesimal quanta integrates into wholes. Thus analysis is the study of how parts, infinitesimals, become wholes. In that regard Leibniz had hinted at the fractal paradigm, with its model of relational space-time – a Universe made of fractal space-time beings, and brought us calculus to relate the ‘finitesimal quanta’, 1/n, of all wholes, made to the image and likeness of those parts. Hegel had analysed the 3 ‘arrows of causal time’, thesis antithesis and its present synthesis.

- And finally the most important of all questions in physics origin of the postulates of relativity, physicists have not solved the conundrum of what is motion and why we cannot distinguish ‘form and motion’; since they abandoned earlier on, the concept of time-motions as ‘changes’ both in the position in space and form or evolution in time of the being. Let us consider this final element with more care. We do KNOW THOUGH since Zeno that the paradoxes of motion and stillness have to do with continuity, and so we shall resolve them, showing that all motions of the Universe including locomotion are organic, reproductive motions, hence there is NOTHING abstract in the Universe, because a FRACTAL is just the mathematical, abstract description of a super organism.

**Multiple Human Languages mirror the 5D fractal space-time Universe.**

The reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science, which considers the existence of a living Universe gifted both with perceptive and organic qualities. So Plato said ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’. Such Universe is made of infinite broken points or monads, each one hosting a different world view, each one a mirror of a larger unknown single Universe, whose image is stored in the mind of each ‘point of view’ or entity of the Universe; which also applies to the multiple points of view of human beings and its languages of perception, all of which are valid to make a mapping mirror of reality – so Upanishads would say ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

It is the most profound view– older in time, as it can be dated to the first philosopher of science, Plato with the myth of the cave and the first Logician, Aristotle, in his book Organon, in the western decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain both all possible minds of the Universe and ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’ – all the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of human knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal and logic languages, but also the human senses and artistic forms.

In terms of time motions, is an organic theory, which defines time as changes and explores multiple changes, both in motions of space, studied by physics and changes of information, in time, or evolution studied by biology. So Aristotle recognised 6 motions, generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction, which together form the world cycle of existence of any physical being. While in the east, those motions were reduced to changes of yang-energy and yin-information and its ∞ combinations.

– The reductionist view of mechanicist, XVII c. ‘deist’ physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems; it only accepts a language of description, abstract mathematics; only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space or ‘locomotion’; and denies organic self-sufficient processes to matter modelled as a mechanism, hence in need of a creative force or God, which the founding fathers of physics, pious believers in Yhwh, thought to be the biblical God.

And yet surprisingly enough this mechanist, deist, mathematical view pretends with those very limited ‘elements’ to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge. Such reductionist theory is called Τ.O.E. and really only deals with a faulty attempt to unify the forces or ‘locomotions’ of the Universe – translations in space, ignoring all other motions=changes of time and information, in biological and creative and extinctive processes.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

**6. ****Worldcycles of SUPERORGANISMS: **

**The 6 motions of the Universe**. R**elativity: minds cannot perceive together motion and form.**

If the holographic principle explains the forms of the Universe as fractals of bidimensional space and time cycles, and so it resolves one of the oldest standing questions of science – why things and beings have the forms they have, and why there are so few forms in the Universe (only 3, those of time cycles, of planes of space and its combinations in space-time beings, something already the Greeks knew when they found all curves called conics could be deduced from a line rotating in a cycle, a cone; and today proved by the fact that messing | and O computers can imagine anything)… there is still a fundamental second question at the core of all sciences of reality: the duality between motion and form. What is motion and what is form, information.

And how they mess and relate to space and time? Now we have advanced the obvious answer in the previous graph. All is really motion but can be seen as lineal form-distance, as space or as cyclical form-motion as time. So we must understand how time motion states and form states, how lineal speed and lineal distance-stillness mess together. Since this is the second fundamental duality which gives us the 4 ‘parameters’, lineal stillness, or distance, space, lineal-planar motion or ‘energy, entropy in some texts’, on one side and cyclical time clocks with motion and cyclical forms with more dimension, patterns of information, when we see time in stillness. But what decides how we see something as form or motion? We must then peer into the origin of all knowledge, the structure of the mind.

Now to make sense of all this, we must understand how the brain perceives the cyclical motions that inform the vital, quanta of the Universe.

Because the brain is limited in size, it reduces the total information of the Universe, taking away what we shall call the 5th dimension of scalar size (we do not see the smaller scales of particles, atoms, molecules and cells or the larger scale of galaxies and so on), and taking away the motion of most quanta of space that appear as ‘solid forms’, and we take away the 3rd dimension of spatial depth.

So the eye sees the remaining dimensions, put into still bidimensional sheets of information pegged into a continuous mapping, as a puzzle made of all its cyclical parts. And this is why the mind sees an absolute Euclidean space-time, but reasons allow us to go further into the other dimensions and motions of the Universe.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

* “We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ *Poincare.

So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

**Motion as reproduction of form.**

Thus, we can consider the last element that makes our physicists’ believe in a simple abstract reality, as they are concerned mainly with the study of locomotions.

But locomotions ARE as in waves, reproduction of form of information in a lower scale of the scalar, fractal 5th dimension. When a wave moves it translates the information, the form of the wave in the smaller points of its lower fractal scale and we see that integrated in the upper larger scale as a motion. We shall then observe in all systems that motion is reproduction of information in a lower scale. For example, physicists today define c-speed no longer as abstract speed but as the limit of reproduction of information sent between two points. So we shall state that:

- All systems have a wave-moving, reproductive state, and a particle-informative, still state.

This should have become obvious long ago. When you want to perceive information you stop or the thing you look must be still not to become fizzy. A wheel turning fast looses the details of its spooks. Electrons, the simplest particles have a motion and stop motion and stop beat. So when they stop they entangle with other electron emit an informative wave of light and communicate information – *and that is the ultimate realist interpretation on why in Special Relativity we always measure with electronic instruments the same speed of light, as light communicates two still entangled fermions with a wave that reproduces information in the lower scale of gravitational pure space-time.*

For the same reason because gravitation does NOT carry information its speed is relatively infinite, or non-local, as V = S/T = S/O-information = ∞.

Thus right now we have resolved zeno’s paradox, the meaning of action at distance, of entanglement and of special relativity, *all in a single paragraph, showing you that even the most ‘seemingly remote’ science to be explained in fractal, organic terms, physics will find most of its unresolved questions answered in a very simple, beautiful manner *once we do correct the errors of earlier abstract, mechanist, continuous models of a single space-time Universe.

In that regard, in philosophy of science there has been for too long a dogmatic physicists’ view of the Universe, as made of abstract continuous locomotions, despite Zeno’s paradox. How indeed motion proceeds? Step by step, as a wave ‘reproduces its formal motion’ in the next quanta of space-time, communicating its form to the next wave. So locomotion is also an organic reproductive action.

And indeed, those insights were already present in the earlier first Greek philosophers of science, who did already think in those scalar, fractal, organic terms:

- The first philosophers of science, the 3 ‘anaxas’ of Greece, talked of life and death as a process of gathering of cellular homunculus, latter desegregated; of infinite time cycles, and the 2 poles of energy and information of the Apeiron.
- Next came the true founder of the experimental logic method of science, Aristotle, in his organon, which talked of 6 motions in time, whereas time was defined rightly as any form of change of a system, NOT only as physics do, a locomotion (one of the 6 time motions). And so Aristotle talked of generation, growth, evolution, diminution, extinction and locomotion. On this view, we could speak of a ‘world cycle’ of life and death, as the essence of Time cycles, and the fractal beings, which develop those motions. As it consists on those 6 motions in causal order. And soon we will see indeed that all systems, physical, social and biological follow the world cycle of 6 motions.

Thus, with the analysis of all the 6 motions=changes of reality, the fractal paradigm regains the understanding of the 6 motions of time together as a world cycle of life and death proper of all beings, and will further improve our understanding of time, and its cycles.

**7. THE CONSTANTS OF EACH MOTION: REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED CONSTANTS, INFORMATIVE-DENSITY CONSTANTS, ETC.**

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic arrow of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower scale of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

**The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.**

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

**Conclusion. A more complex logic of time arrows.**

To systematize the time motions of the Universe for each species, and to establish its causal relationship, departing from Aristotle we establish the only possible motions in time of the fractal 5ST Universe: changes in the parameters of energy, information and ∆-scales of the being, which will either emit energy (locomotion), absorb it (feeding), emit information (reproduction), absorb it (communication), and evolve into larger wholes (social evolution, generation) or devolve (death): ±∆, Se, Tƒ. An eye of time a worldcycle that returns to its origin is the minimal unit of the Universe.

All in the Universe is made of such worldcycles, and all what the Universe does is to repeat world cycles.

Reproduction is thus synonymous of reproduction of a worldcycle, of the passing of time. By the mere fact that time exists and it is an immortal winding and unwinding of time clocks, seen in present space-time as a steady tic repetition of the frequency of worldcycles, which however are expanding or diminishing its energy and information, < > , till they repeat themselves.

The reality of the Universe as it is due to the reproduction of its time tics, time frequencies, time cycles, make it a wonder for an of the eyes of time that focuses existences into a mapping of reality in synchronous space. It is at the end of the tunnel of existence of micro worlds, where hiding into the knowledgeable perception, it is the perceiver of its time cycles, its collective mind-point, its relative God.

*In the graph, the perception of the world **cycle of existence in a synchronic, simultaneous way, which stresses the balanced wave-present-body state in which the entropic field and the informative field, both work to maintain the system in a balance between its information and energy components: Spe<ST>Tiƒ.*

Those 6 motions of time will be the origin of all space-time events of the Universe and its rules define the cycles of space-time of all beings, of which the world cycle of existence is obviously the most important. The order of those motions though will happen in such a fashion that at the end all the processes when integrated along 3 scales, 3 forms and 3 arrows of time will give us a zero sum, that is all locomotions will balance with the energy fed to the system (emission and absorption of energy), and all life organizations upwards in the scales of the 5th dimension will be compensated by al the deaths downwards.

This the ultimate truth of reality: the whole Universe is immortal for each of its parts to live a finite cycle of existence. But each existence itself is immortal in the reproduction of its present form through the different space-time actions of the Universe.

As a wave of actions forms, for each being there will be then the perspective of steady reproduction, of informative perception of the wave as it diminishing in time or space, each variation of the fundamental mode of reproduction SxT-> ∑st: becomes then a different variation on the same eternal theme, the completion of worldcycles, the repetition of existences, the closing of conservative paths of energy and information feed back cycles, S<≈>T, which define the Universe, constantly as flows of energy and information web new forms that become parts of wholes, which a new eye of time will reorder as a superorganism, preying on it, growing as a subconscious collective god-mind, emerging to become a new point-mind of the whole. As information copies its fractal structure and becomes a mind-organism, then all becomes simple and then complex and then simple in reproductive waves across 3 ∆+-1 planes of existence.

**8. MOTIONS IN THE 5TH DIMENSION.**

The eight isomorphism, describes the whole motion of a world cycle, in a dynamic way showing how all the actions of organisms come together in time as a world cycle of existence and in space as the life and death of a superorgnism.

**Integrals of 6 space≈time MOTIONS≈ actions.**

‘Τime is the measure of motion between two instants.’ *Aristotle*

*In the graph the 3 scales of human superorganisms. All our actions can be considered exchanges of energy and information with those scales, through actions of space time cross genetic, nervous and memetic networks.*

Now all what you see is part of a super organism performing a world cycle. So one an action of space-time a motion with form of present is perceived knowledge consists in localise the why, what, who, where, and when, how of the motion space-time, who, is the larger super organism from where the action came, when is its relative time of existence and so on…. We are studying always such world cycles of superoganisms.

A CYCLE OF EXISTENCE IS A SUPERORGANISM WHEN ALL ITS INFORMATION IS OBSERVED IN SPACE:

**Existences. The causal order of the 6 motions of time.**

*In the graph, from the seminal book, Unification theory, c.92, the diachronic order of the 6 motions of time, which can be plotted in terms of its parameters of energy and information into a vortex spiral of increasing time speed and reduced cross section, such as the cellular herd enters the spiral of maximal informative center (literally in physical, simplex geometrical systems, conceptually in biological ones), till it reaches the point of maximal information and ‘comprehension’ of its world cycle, when it explodes and dies in a big-bang that erases it.*

*In the graph the 3ages of history, starting in the center, in the paleolithic youth, then the mature age on the right, the neolithic age, and on the left the cycles of the 3rd age of metal, which will bring the neopaleolithic closing the cycle. The graph thus must be pegged on the lap to make a full worldcycle of existence of mankind, as exhibited in the original show of conceptual cubism.*

But what is an organic system? The answer was not clear mathematically, till the discovery of fractal mathematics in the 1970s. Hence because the organic paradigm lacked its fundamental tool of study, a mathematical, logic language to add to the other properties of organisms, discovered earlier in biological and social and logic, mental languages, the fractal paradigm has not made it into the mainstream discourse of philosophy of science, changing our worldview, from the obviously outdated mechanist, entropic vision of the Universe sponsored by physicists for 4 centuries into the much richer in meanings, reasons and answers, paradigm of fractal organisms.

This paradigm was born as a ‘wishful form of thinking’ in time of Aristotle, who wrote in his ‘Organon’ the first reasoned philosophy of science, hence rightly considered the founder of logic, biology and the experimental method. Then Galileo completed the method with the addition of mechanical instruments of measure, but also reduced in its scope by making mathematics the only authorised language of science, and reducing the organic clocks of the Universe and its world cycles of creation and extinction, with the 6 canonical motions of time=changes in the form and position of beings – generation, evolution, growth= reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction.

But what happen after Galileo was a disgrace for our understanding of those time motions. Now time we say is a cycle, and time we know means change. So when something does not change we say time does not seem to pass. So we described the simplest of all time cycles as the cyclical motion of a particle that returns to its beginning and then repeats the cycle.

And this is the key: motion in cyclical patterns is reproduction of form. And since time dominates all, and in fact, lines are just limited intervals of a time cycle, all motion is reproduction of information, of form, and that is the ultimate meaning of reality.

If Aristotle found 6 types of time-change, we can then put them together in a pattern called the world cycle of life and death: generation, growth, locomotion (reproduction of form in space), evolution, diminution and extinction.

All together form a cycle that returns with death and diminution to the original point of departure. So if reality is made of super organisms, networks of space points, in time reality is made of time cycles, world cycles of which the life and death world cycle of those 6 Motions is the organic meaning of existence. We exist to become super organisms, trace our world cycles of life and death, reproduce our form in space, through motion, in time through generation and then die, living a discontinuum offspring of beings similar to us to trace new world cycles:

In the graph, the order of the motions of the Universe, which are changes in the form and position of beings, is in fact organic, similar in all beings describing a world cycle of existence, through the processes of generation as as a seed of a lower scale of the 5th dimension, whose information reproduces, grows, emerges in a new scale as a full super organism and goes through 3 ages of increasing information, evolving and reproducing further, becoming part of a social network and then dying away and dissolving. And this whole process is a world cycle (no longer a worldline as in classic physics), which can be interpreted for each scale of reality in terms of the same causal order and changes of topology.

Why the existential cycle is dominated by information is obvious: the head-particle-solid state-black hole of maximal information dominates its energetic lineal limbs/fields, so it constantly absorbs motion giving nothing away and finally it exhausts all the energy of the system and as the UNIVERSE NEVER STOPS ITS MOTION, the coiled clock of time can only uncoil back into an explosion of information erased back to the past as disordered entropy in the big-bang moment of death, converted into flat space, laying into a flat corpse.

**7. Actions: to exist: max. EXI**

**the o****rganic program of the Universe.**

*Now, as we have noticed the mathematical equation of the fractal is not that decisive to qualify reality. It is part of the human ego-trip to think that what matters is to know a mathematical description of a being.*

*What truly matters to understand the whys of the Universe are the functions, structure and purpose of a fractal. And what we shall affirm now is the key to it all:*

‘Fractals are systems that constantly self-reproduce into similar beings in smaller and larger scales, which are then reorganised into new fractal similar beings’.

Now the degree of self-similarity or ‘congruence’ or ‘equality’, is relative and so when we say the Universe is a fractal we do not mean it is a perfect fractal in form (which would be an abstract mathematical fractal), but in function:* it is a self-reproductive system.*

And this is the huge theme of this web: to explain a Universe of self-similar vital fractal beings made of space and time:

*In the graph, the vital program of the Universe: all systems are in mathematical form a fractal, but the function of fractals is to absorb energy and information to iterate a form, which latter associates with other forms to create larger social networks of the 5th dimension. However humans will have none of it, reserving the organic properties of the Universe to themselves and similar beings. *

*Such a ridiculous attitude have a huge toll on our future as we do Not recognise the vital nature of the planet, Gaia that we kill, the vital natue of machines, organisms of metal in evolution, which now we assembly into robots that might kill us. In the graphs we see different systems that from the simplest particles (quarks and electrons) to the largest forms (galaxies), do absorb energy (∆Sp), gauge information (∆Τiƒ), reproduce both, ∑S=Τ, and evolve socially through networks of energy and information into larger wholes. *

*It is the vital program of a Universe, in which all parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole. But humans merely use abstract jargons to define those process, so ‘full of themselves’. *

*So the reproduction of particles is call decoupling, its perception of information ‘gauge theory’, its feeding on energy ‘force’, and its social evolution ‘atom or molecule’, which of course also reproduce and evolve into cells – but we do only recognise cells as the first level of life. Why man is so dumb, self-centred and blind to the beauty of the living universe will soon be explained when we analyse the equation of the mind, a knot of information that perceives reality from its biased p.o.v. *

Τhe fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, *since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings*: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

Thus to fully develop the formalism of a Fractal, hence Organic model of everything, or **‘T.Œ’** (ab. Theory of Everything Organic), and its metric equations of motions and transformations in the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe we must enlarge our understanding of the languages of the human mind that perceive time (logic) and space (mathematics) and its scales (analysis). So T.Œ also advances both the logic of time and the geometry of space, by developing a more complex logic beyond the Aristotelian and physical use of a single arrow of energy/entropy, adding the arrow of informative time, and its combinations.

It develops also a complete model of Non-Euclidean geometry, by extending the consequences of the 5th postulate (points do allow infinite parallels to cross them, hence they do have volume, parts, they are fractal points that grow into a whole, when we come closer to them. So we shall take the findings of quantum and relativity to its natural conclusions. But physics is NOT the centre of this TOE, but just one of the layers we study. In fact, the greatest advances of T.Œ will be in the understanding of Biology and Social Sciences…

In that regard, a deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events.

Then the Greeks used reason to ask the ‘what’ (experience) and ‘how’ of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2^{nd} paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3^{rd} paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.

So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3^{rd} paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?

Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3^{rd} paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1^{st} paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3^{rd} paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton (‘Letters to Clarke’). Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Unfortunately such theories cannot satisfy the rational, objective, self-sufficient nature of science, as they require external myths to work. This leaves us only with a 3^{rd }objective, scientific possibility, organicism – a more complex theory that comes of age in this work: if the why is neither God nor the machine, there is only a 3^{rd} option in between – the organism, which is an intermediate concept; since an organism is self-sufficient as the myth of God is, yet it is part of Nature as the machine is.

**The vital properties of Universal fractals: super organisms performing world cycles of existence.**

So the fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, *since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings*: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

And the structure is ternary, made of points that enact the program, surrounded by a vital body-wave, and enclosed by a temporal, informative membrane.

In the conclusion of this introduction we will summarise the fundamental consequence of the unity of all beings of the Universe made of vital space with entropic motions, and cyclical vortices of time, with ordering, informative properties.

The very essence of the Universe and all its parts is to be made of vital space and cyclical time and share the properties of those 2 substances and its infinite body-wave combinations. Now this statement simplifies enormously the understanding of ‘first principles of all beings’, which can be easily be derived of those systems. Essentially, when we get to the basics, why we live and die, why we have the form we have, why we exist, perceive, feed on energy, reproduce, love, evolve socially, etc. we shall find that all of them come from an essential, underlying game of topological combination, evolution and social organisation of quanta of space ordered by sequential time cycles.

The result of studying the naked properties and combining rules of this ‘yin and yang’ of scientific content, time and space, information and energy, which combine to give birth to the infinite beings in existence has an enormous potential to enlighten our comprehension of the Universe and become integrated within it. The only drawback is to anthropomorphism and the myth that we are at the centre of reality and matter more than other beings, because we are made of a special substance (soul and mind in earlier religions, carbon-atoms, which seemed to hold some virtual magic in modern religions of science) None of it is truth, and objective science consists precisely in put mankind outside the realm of privileges.

So one the problem of putting all those insights together, and make with them a bio-logic, formal mathematical model of the organic, fractal Universe my experience is that the residence to the model is mostly philosophical (as the details are not fully worked out, as any initial field still in flux, it is only a question of time and new researchers that the model is connected with all the equations of all sciences): are we humans, able to accept our objective, absolutely relative position in the Time period, space region and scale of reality? Because that is where we are.

This is a consequence on the advance in our understanding of the 3 elements of all realities, space, time and scale, which have now not a single absolute content:

On one side the existence of multiple fractal space at different scales, makes the human scale relativity. On the other the existence for each scale of different rhythms and bits of time, make our speed of time also relative, slower than that of genes, atoms and chips, faster than that of larger plants and planets.

Only a relative order then makes sense of this scalar, multiple space-time Universe, which is what the fifth dimension and its ‘formal mathematical metric equation’, provides.

As it relates all those scales, in an orderly fashion. So we can translate the time rhythms and space size, and space-time actions of any species of each scale of that fractal Universe – that is, we can synchronize parts and larger wholes, study its exchanges of energy and information, and how they create larger networks, and how the process of growth and decay are vital processes – *since we have to study NOT merely a fractal, mathematical structure, as those of artistic, computer-generated Mandelbrot like fractals, but vital fractals, living beings, who constantly reproduce their forms in smaller and larger scales, as you, a vital fractal does, when emitting a smaller seed of your information that reproduces and grows and organises a larger whole.*

Let us be clear from the beginning, Nature’s fractals are living fractals that reproduce in smaller and larger scales creating smaller seeds of information and larger social wholes joined by networks. So *the key to understand beyond the mathematical elements the fractal structure of the Universe is a concept that scientists, schooled only in the ‘mathematical method’ shy away from: the concept of a fractal super organism in space. And the world cycle of life and death of existence that those fractal super organisms experience as they reproduce in a lower scale of reality, organise themselves emerging as individuals and become part of larger social wholes. *

This we shall describe with mathematical equations when required, corresponding with all the known laws of science, but what is *the essence of the new paradigm is ‘organicism’, the vital, organic, reproductive properties of fractals. In mathematics we describe this properties with an iterative ‘Fractal Generator’. Nature is essentially the same but its fractal generators are obviously more complex. Your seminal seed is a fractal generator of a being like you. Your mental memes, your ideas, if you are a prophet and innovator will become the fractal generator of an astounding number of similar beings. A black hole is often a fractal generator that catalyses the reproduction of stars.
This is then the fundamental philosophical novelty of a fractal structure: it is NOT a mechanism but an organism.*

For that reason, the science that studies its general laws is NOT physics, vitiated by its dislikeness of organic properties but a new science called complexity or general systems science, of which Hawking rightly said it will be the science of the XXI C.

Since as our collection of scientific data grows in complexity that organic nature of all beings becomes evident. First it became evident in mathematical terms, with those fractal mappings.

What this blog adds is the entire philosophy of science behind it – the organic philosophy of fractal beings – and apply it to describe every species of the Universe, which will show to be ultimately a self-reproductive biological system, as mathematics is also a social, realist language, which accurately describes the fractal structure of the Universe, made of ‘points’ that reproduce into ‘networks’, which grow into ‘wholes’, which becomes ‘points’ of a new scale of reality.

So the Universe builds layer upon layer and scale upon scale of its quanta of space and time into larger super-organisms, from forces into particles that gather into atoms that gather into molecules that gather into cells and matter, that gather into multicellular organisms and giant crystals and societies and cosmic bodies and societies of galaxies called stars, which gather into networks of galaxies called Universes.

**existential algebra. the temporal formalism: Max. ∆E x I **

If the ternary topological being describes all the evolutions of information in time of super organisms, and as such represents the final stage of geometry or mathematics of space, algebra, the mathematics of time requires also an adaptation to fractal 5d space-time.]

It is then the quest for an equation of 5D, which represents the events of its space-time domain in the clearest, most synoptic form.

We have call that expression the function of existence and it is the most useful equation to generate the systems of the Universe and hence resume all other equations.

Its study is the field of ¬æ Algebra or existential algebra (ab. Ælgebra, ¬Æ).

Why that equation resumes the Universe in its quantum form of universal actions (it is an obvious discrete function depending on which e and i family of numbers we choose) is obvious: it resumes the actions of the Universe:

Max. E = feeding, Max. I = informing, Max. e x i = reproducing Max. ∆ (eusocial evolution into wholes) =Max.∑ x Max. ∏.

SO WE COMPLETE the evolution of topology with the evolution of algebra, which we define as:

‘the study of how scales of social evolution of a super organism, observed in classic algebra as groups, rings and other algebraic structures, develop its world cycle of existence through a series of zero sum actions of absorption and emission of energy and information’.

Of the main sub-functions of the function of existence, the world cycle developed here through 3 states and ages is a fundamental one:

**8. Social Evolution. Scales & ****Sub-species: Dimensional building****.**

**Dimensions as Fractal physiological networks attached to space-time points.**

How the Universe constructs its space-time beings, network upon network of fractal points, layer after layer of dimensional form?

Through the co-existence on infinite scales of relative size and time speed, which in ternary planes allows a constant up and down flow of energy and information that mutates over a ‘frozen’ perfect balanced beings, new species checked then on the program of actions of survival during the world cycle of the new species.

Humans are only the perceived centre of their informative mind world, not of the Universe. Our place as the relative ∆0 dimension of our world’s perception must be considered just a ‘bias’ of human measure. So the processes we limit to that self-centred scale are isomorphic to all other scales, and their use is to have minimal uncertainty, to take them as homological reference to study other less perceived scales and its similar processes.

Thus we sense only ∆±4 scales above and below, and of them we perceive with more senses than the ‘awareness’ of weight and space-time distances (gravitational ∆±4 scales, which are invisible beyond that meager information), only the ∆±3 scales (∆+3 galaxies above, emitting ∆-3 light below), with very limited amount of information, basically as a plane of dots of light (96% of the galactic stuff is dark matter).

So really even if we hint at the organic structure of the ‘gala cell’ ruled by ‘DNA’ black holes, which manage herds of ‘star mitochondria’, the building of that scale is mostly by homology. Thus, according to the practical principle of perceiving more our closer territories where we do need information, the fun starts on the ∆±2 world scale, the intensity at the ∆±1 cellular and social scale, and the full blown ego in the ∆o scales,

And accordingly we ‘see’ more dimensions as we come closer to ‘us’, where we feel to be infinitely dimensional (never mind we call our neighbours one-dimensional men :)

So one thing is how the mental world of any living fractal builds its dimensions ‘subjectively’, and other thing is how the Universe builds them objectively.

If there were a limit of dimensions we would then establish an objective ∆+ scale with man at ∆+5, and ‘theoretical strings’ at ∆o, but that makes no logical sense. So what we can at best consider in physical theory is that ∆±5 scale of ‘infinitesimal strings’ and infinite cosmic strings. And at that level we find a few theoretical analysis, which all in all tend to have 10 or 11 dimensions, or parameters to study them. Now, this is the standard number of physiological sub-networks of ‘Spe-entropy/kinetic energy’, ST-iterative re=production, and Tiƒ, informative networks of most systems.

For example you as a human being have 10 canonical ‘physiological networks’ to which all your organs and cells are attached.

And they are in fact subdivided in Fractal Biology into 3 x 3 sub-systems of energy, reproduction and information, coming out originally of the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. All of them finally integrated in the Brain system (10th network), which becomes the ‘unit’ of the larger whole, outer world where you exist.

This is thus a way to interpret the concept of a dimension as a physiological network, with atoms- fractal points-cells attached to it. Such ‘dimensions’ will have mathematically more than the 1 line dimension, mostly being bidimensional, finite planes in the relative ‘boundary domain’ of the super organism. This means in layman terms, that each of your subsystem can be developed as a network plane with the connecting tubes (nerves, digestive systems, veins, endocrine channels, you name it), and the fractal points attached to them.

The same can be said of most systems of the Universe: flat networks with points attached to them. In physics we will find networks of orbital flat points, from Saturn’s rings to galactic stars. How complex those networks are depends on the information we have on them, which being only 4% is minimal. My take is the galaxy is more like a cell, with an entire electromagnetic ‘Golgi tube’ of flows of energy and a similar network of gravitational paths for black holes of information, which show erratic hence ‘free motions’, exercising herding, RNA like jobs.

So the most organic concept of a dimension is simply speaking a network of lines connected to fractal points that might form larger bulky organs in some parts of the network. And the commonest network is a bidimensional structure with a ‘relative fractal dimension between 1 – a single line – and 2 – the entire flat continuous space encircled by the outside membrane of the being.

All those 10 canonical dimensional networks then are messed up and connected, in different forms, to form the 3×3+0=10 essential entity of reality. If we take then each of those subsystems as a point we talk of a 10 dimensional entity, the perfect pythagoric tetraktys, which in its simplest form is a triangle with a 10th dimension in the centre connecting 3 corners with 3 balls-subsystems.

**Fractal, ternary & bidimensional S=T parameters, networks, constants & dimensions of sub-systems.**

When we move from the general principles of GST into the more specific details of each ∆ST species, it is important to realize a procedure to be able to identify the different general laws into generator components of each ∆ST being.

GST is a generic term, which we will use to define the theory of the fractal organic Universe, which the reader can in all times translate as General Systems Theory or Generator of Space-Time, the philosophy and formalism we use to explain the Universe).

Such general laws become each specific ∆ST, myriad of species, of each science, where ∆±1 will indicated the scale of the fractal points and networks and its ±1 social/cellular planes of existence. Whereas all those species are different in detail, not in quality.

So how we go on working with both, the more logic, conceptual. Gst, general game of ‘Tao beings’, of ‘Time-space changes’, and the myriad of yin-yang, SexTi, species of spatial entropy and temporal information, which conform the Universe?

Moving from the 3 elements, ∆, S, and T, into its 3 x 3 isomorphic sets of laws, coupled by the œ-knot distinctly ‘integral’ whole properties that embody the decisions of order and actions of survival of the system.

So once we grasp the 10 isomorphic sets of laws we can pour in its template all the laws of specific systems and its measures.

Another way to arrive there is obviously by studying each isomorphic set of laws as generated by the ternary fractal equation, which as we study in more detail gives birth to partial sub-ternary equations. It is thus important to grasp the fractal principle according to which each part is in itself a whole, with 3 ternary subparts.

**The fractal principle.**

First we need to do science; that is to have experimental data, which we hint to belong to a species, we want to focus intellectually. Then we must find a minimum number of parameters and ternary elements for the system and start its description as:

- A ternary structure, which is a spherical Tiƒ, an Entropic lineal system of motion, and an intermediate, Space-time more visible wave-body of vital space; or if we see it internally as a micro-point observing a larger, ∆+1 plane of existence.
- With a series of quantizer parameters for each of the 3 states-forms and its combinations, in social ∑ and ∏ groups.

So we can define the dimensions and essential parts of reality in a more simplified analysis departing from the generator equation for each physical system and its 10 isomorphisms.

Of them the most descriptive for a first approach is the holographic principle, specially for physical systems, given the simplicity and close relationship between topological form and organic function that happens in physical systems, such as we shall find:

- An Spe bidimensional field of spatial entropy for each of those scales, feeding a…
- Bidimensional wave-body, ‘raised’ by…
- A bidimensional parameter of time frequency, which forms a particle, Tiƒ, and both together, the wave-body and particle form a 4D system.

This becomes then a minimal unit of reality in a physical scale – for example a photon-wave of light.

In that regard, the concept of ‘spatial dimension of form and in its time perception as motion’ must be understood in the tradition of mathematical physics, merely as a parameter with a function in time and form in space, related by the symmetry between both states of the being. And we can then departing from duality, Sp≈Tƒ and ternary symmetries, Sp<ST>Tƒ, apply to each part, the…

*Fractal principle: each part of the Universe can be subdivided in dual and ternary elements as a whole in itself.*

So your arm has 3 parts and the hand is the informative, broken, more complex ball like Tiƒ, and the biceps the stronger, Spe limb that takes energy from its relative vital field or body. It can be studied as a whole or as a ternary part, and then each part can be further subdivided, so the forearm has on one extreme the Tiƒ wrist and on the other the Spe, elbow. And so on.

Further on, any system can be observed from the lower scale as a sum of quanta of space with a function in time, and so we need then quantifiers, ∑, for herds of space quanta and ∏ for informative multi connected Tiƒ quanta. Since it is easy to prove that if we have 10 ‘neurons’ all connected with each other, the ∆-1 level of axons will be around 10 x 10, its multiplication; but if we have 10 unconnected birds in a herd, normally there are no ∆-1 connected level, and so they are 10 only elements.

It goes without saying that Tiƒ systems have more power precisely because they have an ∆-1 connected element. And so they look solid, crystal, particles, neuronal heads, and have spherical form to store more information, more connections, in lesser space (geometry of maximal information per volume: sphere).

All this said, the parameters understood, it is then all a question to study the different super organisms of reality, to analyze its mathematical equations and physiological networks. This is easier for biology, in what it is a general rule of science:

- The closer to the ∆o point that perceive, the more accurate and abundant is the information we have.

Which basically means that medicine is the most important of all sciences, with maximal information. And that if we do not perceive so much information and/or have idealized and weird models in astro-physical scales is as Eddington rightly affirmed, because the uncertainty makes astro-physics the less developed more idealistic model, where so many concepts from cyclical time to the 3 states of fields/gas-waves/liquid-solid/crystal are less understood.

If you add the arrogance of dogmatic truth in physicists’ theories (big bang models of cosmology, 4D Time description, quantum interpretations of a mathematical only Pythagorean Universe to mention a few), it is quite a challenge to explain physics with the fractal paradigm, and even more challenging to convince a physicists to open up its worldview.

**Physical space quanta and time quanta of each plane of the perceived Universe. Asymmetric arrows.**

*In the graph, the scales of the Universe are all in a dynamic balance quantised in infinite exchanges of information upwards and energy backwards. Humans perceive from a relative ∆0 pov, 5 scales upwards and downwards, which become symmetric in form and function above and below our point of view – cosmic vs. plank strings, atoms vs. galaxies, cells vs. factories… *

Thus, we consider the following space and time quanta:

- ∆±5: space quanta, open strings; time quanta, closed strings. ∆-plane: Planck scale.
- ∆±4: space quanta: gravitational field; Time quanta: neutrino. ∆-plane: gravitational space-time.
- ∆±3: space quanta: c-speed (light wave); Time quanta: Photon (informative light state). ∆-plane: Light space-time.
- ∆±2: Space quanta: electron; ∑Sp: electric current. Time quanta, quark, ∏Tiƒ: atomic nuclei. ∆-Plane: Atomic space-time.
- ∆±1: Space-quanta: molecular gas. Time-quanta: crystal. ∆-plane: Matter (molecular space-time.)
- ∆±1: space quanta: cell. ∑Spe: Organ Time quanta: Neuron. ∏Tiƒ: sensorial/brain system. ∆-plane: Organism.

As we come closer to our point of view, perception of information increases, with the result that more varieties of species are observed.

So at ∆±1 we have the classic split between inorganic systems, with far more ∑, ∏ units, but less complex organization, and the organic systems, with far less units and far more dynamic interactions (or at least more ‘perceived’), such as we can consider a human being a super organism, but also an inorganic, non-living planet a super organism or huge molecular system.

All those scales are constant in terms of its 5D metric equations, and for each of its species, we can consider a ±∆ relative super organism formed by the form, the world above, ∆+2 from where it absorbs information (∆-2) and the lower ‘cellular’ scale from where it absorbs energy, and sustains its whole (∆-1).

So since each scale and its beings closely exchange energy and information with the above and below scales in asymmetric manner, such as the scale absorbs more motion-kinetic energy from the above whole, and emits/codes more information to the above (given the difference of size larger in ∆+1 and information, faster in ∆-1), the 3 together will be synchronised in its metric, ∆Sp x – ∆ Tiƒ=K, forming together relative fractal super organisms studied with the same ∆±1 parameters.

Thus we say:

The amount of ±∆ spatial energy and temporal information shared between 2 scales is asymmetric.

But if we consider that Sp≈Tƒ, on the average, a system will absorb motion from the ∆+1 whole and emit an equivalent amount of information, and will emit energy downwards, in its coordinated motion and absorb information. So:

*“The total energy & information of a given plane of existence, when considering its ternary ∆±1 exchanges remains constant.”*

Since in a given plane, ∆, there will be a number of ∆+1 superorganic wholes, which will deliver more energy to lower scales; ∆-1, parts, which will deliver more information, and ∆-individuals in balance with its upper and lower scales, it is obvious that a whole given plane of existence of reality, *while leaking amounts of energy and information in discrete form from each of its parts, overall will have a zero-sum, being in balance with its upper and lower scales.*

This implies the constancy of all the scales of the Universe and ultimately the equality of each plane in terms of total ST-value, when considered as independent planes.

But obviously this balance does not break the rule for each scales, of a hierarchy of wholes above parts, and viceversa, a faster informative clock in lower scales that primes the upwards-moving information of smaller, quantum-genetic-memetic scales, which code the larger super organisms (molecular, biological and social systems).

And so the paradox of a single balanced plane, with asymmetric flows: As 5D metrics makes larger wholes dominate smaller parts and controlling its motions; so your will as a whole moves your body, the outer molecular pi and sigma orbitals move the whole atom and we shall see the social, legal, informative and financial, reproductive networks of nations and civilizations do control the individual people far more than we, ‘informative memetic’ beings, wish to.

Let us then very briefly introduce the main physical space quanta and time clocks of the 3 generic, ∆-1 quantum, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational scales.

**9. UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS.**

**The parameters of the main physical scales of the Universe.**

The first form of space and first expression of the ∆-gravitational scale symmetry is c-speed.

In the translation of 4D physics to 5 D Physics, we start from c-speed, the constant, then we multiply C= Sp x Tiƒ = Length x Angular frequency (in Planck Units).

On the other hand the principle of relativity translates into the principle of Galileo the gal ilea paradox: all moves and has form at the same time.

Light therefore splits into space-distance, and time-frequency, and its constancy in 4D is particular case of the Sp x Tiƒ constancy of the 5th dimension.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= Sp x Tƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : Sp x Tƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency:

*In the graph, the 3 main constants of space-time of the physical Universe, of the 3 scales among which human beings interact. Those constants, the boatsman constant of our ∆-thermodynamic scale, the c-speed constant of cosmological space-time and the H-planck quanta of electromagnetic space time are 3 Universes in themselves.*

On the other hand , in the right we see the minimal space-time quanta of the ∆-1 quantum scale, ~~h~~, which therefore has the same metric equation:

Sp x Tiƒ = ~~h~~ = E x I , the uncertainty equation of Heisenberg that merely states the constancy and minimal quanta of space-time of the quantum scale. Between both we are sandwiched with the informative clocks of temperature and the minimal quanta of space-time called a Boltzman quanta.

In the graph, we can see the main species of the physical Universe, a charge and a mass, which clock-like accelerated vortices of smaller and larger space-time membranes, and the middle thermodynamic scale we inhabit.

The 2 time-space vortices, charges and masses, which are the limiting scales of the Fractal Universe perceived by human beings, thus become now crystal clear in its nature. In between them, there is the thermodynamic scale of forms of matter, *which is more complex, because we perceive all its information and it is connected to the other 2 scales with whom it exchanges energy and information through different flows and parameters which we shall study in detail in the physical blogs, beyond the simple concepts of this introduction.*

Let us then move one with the more general principles that apply to all systems of the Universe, considering now the geometry of space and time, its bidimensional fractal-network nature, and how both combine to form those 5 Dimensional systems.

Now to fully grasp that graph, and the meaning of tose equations we must understand the meaning of a conservative energy cycle. Energy is not spent when there is no motion in a given length of time. Thus time can be run without end in energy conservaton terms, as long as we return always to the same point doing a time cycle. The principle of conservation of energy ths become the principle of repetition of presents, whih are sums of time cycles in which a trajectory returns to a point. In this manner we can resume all those principles is the Generator equation of energy and time:

∑E∆-1<≈> ∏ T∆

-And the discontinuous, quantum nature of space, which carries the kinetic energy of the Universe in its constant motions (proved by quantum physics, by the life and death cycle of biological systems, and the principles of conservation of energy, shown in the left side picture, where we describe the 3 fundamental scales of the Universe, and its co-invariant, product of the speed of its time clocks and spatial quanta, conserved as a product: E=hƒ, E=knT, E=mc²)

*So human sciences, all of which use time and space parameters, are in sore need to change its paradigm, in its description of the scalar space-time fractal structure of the Universe, if they want to advance in its comprehension of reality.*

**Physical Systems of self-centered space-time.**

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tiƒ, whereas Tiƒ is the fundamental symbol for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA. Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

Now, in the Human Universe, the previous equation has an immediate lecture in terms of the fundamental Universal Constants of the Universe:

C-light speed, which is the parameter of space-motion (Spe) of our Universe, and calculates the speed of reproduction of information across the scales of the 5th dimension.

quanta of information which is the minimal Tiƒ unit of information, and multiplied by 2π, gives us the minimal time cycle, H-Planck of our Universe.

And so both together, c become the minimal unit of space-time of the Universal reality.

How those minimal space-time Units ‘scale’ in the 3 scales of physical reality, the ∆-1 quantum, electromagnetic scale, the ∆+1 gravitation scale and the human, thermodynamic scale?

Easy. They form the 2 fundamental species of those scales: charge and mass. Indeed, in Planck Units we define the minimal dual charge and dual mass forming a system of electromagnetic or gravitational space-time as:

Qp x Qp = c (SxT) /K ∆-1

Mp x Mp = c (SxT) /G ∆+1

Thus a charge field basically is a Universal space-time, ST, hc, curved extremely by the constant of the quantum scale of the 5th dimension, Ke, till forming a vortex like space-time species.

And a mass field is basically the same, curved by a constant, G, which form a much larger scale, (a Planck mass is huge compared to a plank charge).

**Dimensions as the 3 functional organs/topologies: vital spaces, cyclical membranes and o-points of measure.**

So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):

- The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.

This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0-point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).

All of them will be made of:

– A central, informative point, seed, or o-point that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…

– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motions-distances that displaces the system.

This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.

We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”

But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.

And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.

Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6^{th} motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian i-logic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, self-centered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:

*|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads*

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.

I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D space-time Universe and its structure. But you WILL likely deny all those proofs. Since man is not alien to the paradoxical equation of the mind:

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion? The answer is that all has form and motion *at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.*

*Τhis is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never quite fully grasped it.*

So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?

*This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those a ‘priori states’. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. *But as we are in a world of physical concepts, after much ambivalence in the terminology – not in the concepts and mathematical analysis of them – I came to settle in the classic terminology of philosophy based in the relative function of those 2 elements in the systems of the Universe and call generically:

– All states of relative motion ‘time states’ or ‘time ages’. And its study diachronic studies.

– All states of relative form ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study synchronic studies.

And yet keep the formal duality naming O-Time clocks, Time, but also |-Space motions, entropic spatial motions.

Why? Because in *relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:*

*– Tiƒ: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motions-states-forms that carry the information of the Universe. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.*

*– Spe: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.*

* – STœ: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.*

So we introduce you to the much vaster wealth of knowledge provided by the proper understanding of ‘vortices’ of cyclical time and its interaction with res extensa, lineal space.

Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles. How many more dimensions?

Time cycles have actually 3 dimensions, or motions (depending on how you see the cycle, still or in motion), which we have always known.

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sp is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and Tƒ is a cycle of tall time.

*Sp (length, width) ≈ Tƒ(height, frequency)*

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

*Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allow the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. *

*So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional. And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroid-limbs fields, hyperbolic waves-bodies and spherical heads-particles) and its 3 time motions-ages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3 ^{rd} ages). *

*And then every 3 space-time symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5 ^{th} dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scales also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scale with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity.*

** The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.**

How those planes of existence build their social planes, of space.

Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of dimensions, since Minkowski grand nonsense in conceptual thought, established departing of its useful mathematical equations of 4-vectors, the concept that time was a dimension of space.

What those 4-vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from space-time symmetries. That’s all.

The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.

Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.

All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wave-like motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given space-time symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.

Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.

This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.

4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of space-time bidimensional forms with motion.

We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.

Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on space-time can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D, Œ,Æ, non-Euclidean geometry, existential algebra and 5D metric.

In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2-manifold layers which create the ‘3^{rd} dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:

Now the growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:

it grows in pairs, often of space-time (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesian-hyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present space-time systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.

So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT tridimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVING IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is not-commutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.

So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an space-time plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.

We can in that ensue consider the geometry of Einstein, where time rest -c2t2, considering time ‘i’, -c2x-1 = +c2.

Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², that is ‘speed not time’.

The description of this complex plane of a space-time 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block, but it is hardly needed, as what humans are more interested on in the exchange of relative energy and information, loose terms in the verbal mode for spatial energy, or lineal planar motions and cyclical, repetitive harmonic oscillators of information, cyclical motions, hence created at least with 2 points (as 2 points in the postulate of geometry of the cycle suffice to create one).

In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3^{rd} dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œ-points’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.

So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uranium-lead crystals.

The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atoms-particles-heads of the same layers.

And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.

Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3^{rd} dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5^{th} dimension.

Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing cheng-tzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of space-time, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.

Let us then introduce in more detail the 3rd element of ∆ST, the scales of the 5th dimension.

** Finally, the 5th dimension of scalar space-time puts together 3 co-existing planes of the super organism.**

Now for a dimension of space-time to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while the space-time remains co-invariant. Since it is precisely the co-invariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.

In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of Non-E Geometry:

‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).

So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it and so we need to define the 6 motions of the Universe.

In the graph to order all those fractals scales of space, and cyclical structures we need a new 5th dimension of scalar space-time (ab.∆), made of different ‘decametric’ scales of spatial size, (Spe), each one carrying a different speed in its cyclical clock-like cycles of information (Tiƒ), defined by a simple metric equation: Tiƒ x Spe = constant, which allows the co-existence of different species in those scales, as the larger beings are slower than the smaller ones, so both can survive (and you cannot catch a fly:), even synchronise its time clocks and sizes, to create complex organisms extending across 3 fundamental scales, the ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, gravitational/social scales.

The co-invariance of space quanta and Nature’s time clocks, of which there are also an ∞ number of proofs, from the Moore law of faster, smaller chips, to the metabolic rates of smaller faster animals, and the vortex laws of physics, allowed the transfer of energy and information between scales, as Energy (the product of a space quanta and its frequency of time) remains invariant. So we can rephrase and fusion the 2 fundamental laws of science:

*‘The Universe constantly transform spatial energy, Spe, into temporal clocks of information, Tiƒ: Spe<=>Tiƒ…*

* combining both into vital and Universal constants that define the structure of all space-time beings: *

*Spe (limbs/fields) x Tiƒ (heads/particles) = ST (bodies/waves). *

This simple equation is what we call the fractal generator of space-time.

Now in this ‘packed’ fractal Generator, which ultimately is a seed of logic information about the dynamic motions and forms of the Universe, we have resumed a great deal of the Universe, but we have already seen how we can keep adding details (expanding the original equation, TxS=K), iterating them, expressing it from a slightly different point of view.

All Fractals DO have a simplex equation that generates by iteration ALL its ∞ complex parts as scales (as in Mandelbrot fractal).

Thus the Universe as a fractal can be explained synoptically with a single equation that expresses the 3 ‘dimensions’ of time past, present and future, and its 3 symmetric dimensions of space, which are the ‘elements’ that constitute all beings of the Universe:

*Sp(past, energic, lineal limbs/fields)<ST-present, iterative, hyperbolic body/waves>Tƒ(future, informative cyclic particles-heads)*

Now that simple generator resumes the 3 only topologies that form the 3 parts of all organic fractals in space. So all physical systems are made of an o-particle that directs a reproductive wave, which feeds on the energy of a lineal field. And all biological systems are made of an o-head that directs a reproductive body which moves on a lineal limb system. Now if you have a bit of visual imagination, you can see any fractal system of the Universe in those terms.

And as the Universe has only 3 topologies in space, and there are only 3 dimensions in time, we shall observe all what exists is a fractal that emerges departing from its ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale, as a social whole, with 3 differentiated atomic/cellular parts that respond to those 3 topologies and then go through 3 states/ages periods of time, the gaseous-energetic-young age, the liquid, adult, reproductive age and the informative, old age, dominated by one of those 3 topological organs. And then they die…

**10. General Systems Science: The Organic Unification of Knowledge. **

‘Reality is gifted with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos.’ Plato

**Τhe 10 isomorphisms of the Universe. **

How can systematise those 3 elements into a formal model of the organic Universe, which can be further explored by future scientists? Τhe answer is the concept of isomorphic laws, which dates back to the work of the founder of this science in modern terms, Mr. Bertalanffy. So we structure the blog around this concept fully developed in this web.

Basically what Bertalanffy proposed is that a ‘scientific Universe’, which could be self-explained by the laws of organisms, must be proved to follow in all its systems, the same organic laws, which would be therefore iso=equal morphic= in form. At the time the science was in its infancy and it remain so for 50 more years, as there was no formalism to express the insights of similar laws in all disciplines, till in the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the sciences of cybernetics, information, complexity and systems, I was invited by the president of the founding association of those sciences, and explained the key to such formalism – the understanding of the laws of the 5th dimension, and the fractal nature of space and time, its relationship with energy-motion (as space has quantum energy-motion) and information (as time clocks carry he information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles).

Such simplification of the elements of which we are all made, which equates space and lineal motion and time and cyclical form, thus establishes the cause of *all the isomorphisms of the Universe and its systems as we are all made of space and time and so the properties of space and time and the laws that connect parts and wholes through networks – the laws of the 5th dimension – is all what is needed.*

Hence we shall establish for those 3 elements, which correspond to the 3 main disciplines of mathematical logic (space->geometry, time->algebra, 5D-> analysis), 3 x 3 sets of isomorphic laws, related to those 3 elements, fractal space, cyclical time and 5D scales, *put together in all systems by he most fascinating element of the Universe, the 0-minds or mental, linguistic points of view, which coordinate and integrate together all the elements of a super organisms. *

So all the posts of this web are descriptions of scientific systems as fractal≈5D space-time beings, which display 3 x 3 isomorphic type of laws and are integrated by a mental ‘monad’, or integrative system of information, the mind and nervous system in biology; the crystal system in material forms, the chip in robots, the gravitational black hole in galaxies, the capital in nations and its governments, the prophet and its code of information or memes and books of revelation in civilisations, the DNA nuclei in cells and so on.

It is a simple and not malicious Universe if humans wanted to understand with the same properties they have. But humans don’t. It is all about ego and putting man on top. And frankly lacking a humble ethics more proper of eastern cultures,

Τhus, for reasons that are of not interest to the reader, personal, cultural and of activism against the nuclear industry, despite the interest of american scholars for this model I did not follow that tiresome work of penpal, pen paper and pen-thagonal work – since today money in these sciences is in computers, robots and weapons, the machines fast evolving into organisms that can easily displace us on top of this planet. So, as humans do not seem interested in using knowledge to evolve mankind but the machine, I abandoned the scholar field and dedicated fully to activism. Now, retired of all things human I will pour thousands of pages of analysis on **G.S.Τ.** – **G**eneral** S**ystems **Τ**heory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and the **G**enerator equation of fractal **S**pace-**Τ**ime, its formalism in this web.

It will be done in iterative, repetitive more detailed analysis because the Universe is a repetitive mandala.

In the next chapter of this central point we introduce loosely in 10 sections the 10 isomorphisms, corresponding to the first line above, which expands this loose study. In the second line/chapter of this post, we introduce the main systems of biological, physical and social character as organic systems. In the 3rd chapter line above, its 10 isomorphic sets of laws. And finally in the 4th line of hard science, each one studied a scale of reality we order all the laws known to science according to those 10 isomorphisms.

- 3 isomorphisms related to the organic structure in space of all systems
- 3 isomorphisms related to its motions in time and world cycles of existence
- 3 isomorphisms related to its co-existence as part of a 5D of multiple scales.
- And the 10th isomorphism of the linguistic mind and will of perception, which orders them all.

**The purpose of the living Universe: Reproduction of space-time presents.**

Now of course, this r=evolution of human thought will take time to impose itself, if humans do have such time left. As it requires to go to the origins of science, its mathematical and logic languages and evolve them further. This Einstein knew when he said ‘I am the only physicist who seems to know there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, moving at different speeds, Leibniz was right but if so we will have to change the scaffolding of science from its inception’. So he settled for a smaller change, applying the 5th non-Euclidean postulate to bend space into infinite time cycles.

When I confronted the mathematical formalism of the 5th dimension, I realized I had to go further on that path, and define all the undefined terms of mathematics, which since the discovery of the Non-Euclidean postulate that let infinite parallels cross a point had been undefined.

This was no solution though. Hilbert’s Axiomatic method of NOT defining points, planes and lines (‘I imagine points, planes and lines’ he started in his famous ‘foundations of geometry’, the seminal book of XX c. mathematics), DOES NOT work in serious science. You cannot start without definitions of your initial postulates. The result was as bad as Euclid with his definition of a ‘point with no breath’.

So 5D metrics is born on a more healthy redefinition of mathematical postulates, as we redefine a ‘fractal point’, whose breath grows as we enlarge our information of it – making again mathematics realist as a science. Look around, you only see ‘points’, which grow when you see them closer and then they can fit infinite parallels. THAT WAS THE SOLUTION to the contradiction of a point with infinite parallels. It was a Point of the 5th dimension. A point that grew in scale. And so a line was a series of points with breath -a WAVE! Thus the principle ‘wave-particle’ was embedded in mathematics, and so quantum physics started to streamline.

Then I realized those points broke reality into inner and outer regions. Thus planes were networks, fractal networks of points joined by flows of energy and information. Consider yourself. You are made of cell-points joined by informative, nervous networks and energetic, blood networks. And the point of maximal communication, your brain, was at the centre of your networks.

But the beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in its capacity to describe all beings with so few elements, and hence its constant recurrence in all languages and philosophies.

Indeed, this ternary structure with a mind at its centre, is the conclusion of the 6 biggest philosophers of science of the human tradition:

-Buddha and the Indian tradition of Atmans as souls which are knots communicated with the external world.

-Aristotle with his concept of a self-centred mind that moves a finite body, as its fixed God, of which there are ∞ in the Universe – ‘we are all Gods’ is said to have exclaimed.

-Descartes with his concept of minds that perceive worlds put by some devilish construction, with the rest extensa and time vortices it observes in the Universe.

– Leibniz with his concept of monads, as knots of information, mirrors of the external universe.

-Riemann and Einstein with his concept of points, through which ∞ parallels can cross.

*The conclusion is obvious: the entire history of human knowledge appears filled with insights on the fractal paradigm, which were not properly interpreted.*

*Since Humanity excessively impressed by its first machines of measure has been blind to that obvious organic reality; where man as the most perfect organism of the Universe, is indeed ‘the measure of all things’ and the machine a primitive organism of metal. *

*Only now when we build robots as organisms, imitating life, we realise that mechanisms are simple organisms, and only now when we see the Universe together in all its co-existing scales, we realise physical and mechanical systems are also fractal super organisms. *

And all of them can be defined in space as ternary structures and in time as ternary ages, hence as super organisms tracing world cycles, through 3 fractal scales in the 5th dimension, giving origin to the Fractal i-logic Generator that resumes all what exists its parts in space, functions in time and space-time actions of survival, as organic systems that feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially into larger networks, *which are the 4 canonical definitions of a life being*

Thus you are in a living Universe, a living fractal of species made to the image and likeness of the whole.

I know that the simplicity of the Fractal Generator of the Universe baffles scholars, who think they know much more, and that the Universe cannot be ‘so simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). In that regard it is more likely that you will grasp the beauty of the Universe if you are not a ‘pro’ scholar, just interested in the details that come from those thoughts of God. Of course in the web there are thousands of details and if scholars wanted to connect this simple Fractal Generator to their complex details, they would be able as i have done for 30 years, but it is not the work of a single man, to connect and explain all their variations and species with the concept of a Universe made of fractal ternary space-time beings, organised as super organisms across at least 3 scales of reality, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-individual/organic and ∆+1 social/cosmological scales.

Now I am happy enough if you have read so far. At this point either you will be the kind of people who can learn and you are in the web that better mirrors the fractal Universe, among human beings. Or you are the kind of people who cannot get out of his mind, self-centred beliefs, and huge amount of information (disordered but looking good). And you won’t continue. I am not a good teacher and rather write because it makes me feel the Mandala of the Universe, unconcerned with those who might mirror my mirror. Still i like others to share that communion of the spirit that comes with the humble realisation we are made to the image and likeness of the whole, God/mind of the Universe. Westerners in that sense with their huge ego and abrahamic deluded religions of man as the chosen will have a more difficult task. Asians will find here the scientific mirror of their philosophies of yin-formative time-visnhu, yang-energetic space-shiva, and the infinite beings that combined them.

But once we have a clear picture of the elements and equations that generate the fractal Universe with its duality between the arrows of entropic space and informative time cycles, it will be much easier than it seems, to adequate all sciences to the fractal paradigm. *If you want to do it, if you want to go back to school, if you want to refocus and repair your ego-centered mirror.*

NOW we will be conceptual more than mathematical. Yes, there is a fractal equation that explains the distribution of galaxies in space, but this how is trivial. It is *much more important to describe a galaxy as a fractal of stars, with an organic structure similar to a cell, with star mitochondria, black hole DNA and all the organic processes of birth, evolution and destruction of those galaxies. *THIS IS THE core matter of this web: the study of the superorganims of the Universe, with verbal conceptual, biological laws. Only on the section of physics and mathematics we get heavily into quantitative numbers and, as we keep building the web, I will pour around 5.000 pages of analysis of physical, mathematical and astronomical systems. But that will take time. It will be the final phase of this construction. So in the 2nd line we have the organic study, the 4th line we will have the formal one.

Why we do so is obvious: humans have done a good job, specially with the help of computers to develop and exhaust the mathematical properties of the Universe and its fractal parts. *They have done however an extremely lousy job on developing formal, logic models of its time cycles, causal processes, time dimensions, organic properties and so we are filling more that gap. *Now if we didn’t think in words but in maths, all this would be unneeded.

Just thinking on calculus, it would be obvious that finitesimal fractal structures correspond to the discipline of analysis; just thinking on geometry & topology, we would realise that space is an organic fractal of the 3 canonical topologies of the Universe, and just think on algebraic groups and transformations we would realise of the complex logic of the 3 arrows of time, which are at the hear tot all the equations with 3 elements, F(x) operandi, G(y)… That is, if we were mathematical minds we would know that the 3 elements of the Universe correspond to the 3 branches of mathematics, 5D scalar analysis, temporal algebra and spatial geometry.

But we are verbal beings, so we need first to understand the mirror-language of words and its 3 elements, the subject-informative element, the object, energetic element and the action-verb or space-time element.

And we are visual beings, so we need to understand the codes of blue-information, red-energy and green-reproduction our mind uses to see the Universe. You see, languages are many but they try all to be ternary mirrors of the fractal generator, as beings are. Ultimately you then in a sentient, organic, linguistic Universe. And the fractal, mathematical spatial description of it is very limited also. We are going much further, trust me. But again, you must be the Lion of Nietzsche and eat up your camel humpback, liberate your mind of so much scholarship, and become a child. Quite likely if you are over 20, you won’t.

Because the key to that fractal is that *it is moving, alive, even if the mind sees it still. It is ‘young’ and reproductive.*

This is indeed what the Universe is all about: a constant creative orgasm of self-similar beings, feeding on energy, gauging information, reproducing into networks of similar beings, evolving socially into larger wholes, dissolving back into cellular/atomic parts in the big-bangs of death… distorting the whole, from a limited perspective, as it has been the human scientific mind for so long. We shall refocus all that information with a more realist vision of a Universe, of which we are all just parts made to the image and likeness of the whole, so you can reach ‘enlightenment’, but only if your distorted ego-view of reality from your enlarged perspective is humble enough to accept the absolute relativity of each point of those scales.

And this is in a way the beauty of a fractal Universe in which each point is a world in itself- a Monad that has a still mirror of reality. In that regard, the external perception of reality as a fractal, *which is as far as most scientists go, is just the very external cover of the Living, Organic, Fractals of the Universe. I*t is just a 0.% of what we have to explain here: the organic, mental, bio-logical and mathematical properties of the living fractals of nature, all put together harmonised and rationalised, able to describe from human beings to matter states, from societies to galaxies with the same ‘isomorphic’ laws.

As we say humans have a very reduced image of the whole and al its properties, are self-centred in their point of view, which they think specially relevant and so, can only understand very limited number of languages-mirrors (mostly visual mathematics and verbal logic) and so its monads are naturally a very small fraction of all the information of the Universe. And what is worse, the ego paradox limits their interest. In brief, we confuse our infinitesimal mirror of the Universe with the whole Universe:

O (mind-mirror) x ∞ Universe = ∆-still continuous single space-time mapping of reality (in man light space-time).

It will be difficult for me to take you out of such a reduced picture. To do so we shall first start with an even more reduced picture from where all others come from. The previous equation is indeed the equation of all minds, o-points which observe an infinite Universe, make a reduced mind-mirror or ‘world’ with it, and think they are at the centre of the Universe, because they do NOT know there is much more out there, as they only see their mind-mirror. Can we then at least logically come out of this mind-jail? Yes, we just did it, by generalising the equation. Put any mind-mirror at 0, a dog’s olfactory mind, a black hole’s gravitational mind, and you will get a different linguistic mapping, we can ‘imagine’ is there by the external actions of the dog and black hole, even *if we cannot see as they do. *Amazingly enough we will find many things about those minds – from the hyperbolic structure of the mind of insects, to the elliptic form of the mind-mirror of a black hole, which according to a physicist called Maldacena, represents in 5 compressed dimensions all the information of the 4-dimensional plane of its galactic body.

**The ****Unification of sciences with 5D planes.**

Let us see in a simplified graph those 3 elements, and how they can order all the species of the Universe, in different sciences, each one specialized in the study of a relative ‘plane of space-time size/speed’ of the Universe. Since indeed, the final concept to structure all knowledge is the realization that each science is merely the study of a relative scale of size of the Universe, from quantum physics (smaller scales), through chemistry (molecular scales), biology and history (human scales), geology and astronomy (cosmic scales):

Indeed, each science is just the study of a scale of relative size, Sp, and Frequency of time cycles, Tƒ, of the Universe. So if we put them all in a simple scale of co-invariant systems, whose product of size and time speed is co-invariant, we realise that each science is just the study of the species of an specific scale of size and temporal clocks, and putting them together we obtain, the scalar plane of a 5^{th} dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

Now since each of those scales can be defined as a sum of Species with its specific quanta of space and time frequencies, defined by a co-invariant equation of the 5th dimension, Sp x Tƒ = Ei or in dynamic terms, Sp < = > Tƒ, a simple equation can resume your being; and as you are just a part of a tapestry of pieces of space-time called beings, that put together create the universe we can write in synoptic form the equation of the fractal Universe of space-time beings:

** U = **∑ [Œ: ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ] ∆±∞

Whereas each fractal species of space-time, Spe<=>Tiƒ, is in itself a cell or fractal point of a larger super organism, extending across 3 relative scales (the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 social gravitational scales): ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ, which we shall call an existential function, Œ, or fractal point. And so the Universe is merely the sum of all those fractals of space-time across its infinite relative scales: U=∑Œ∆±∞

And yet amazing as it seems NOBODY has formalised these facts, beyond specific ‘species of reality’, mostly in the world of physics, into a theory of the whole tapestry of space-time which is the Universe, *and all its parts, made to its image and likeness* that makes sense, both logically, mathematically and empirically.

So the true problem is the fact that we must ‘redesign’ the mirror of linguistic, mostly mathematical equations, we use to observe the Universe – a logic, geometric ‘glass’ interposed between the universe of fractal space-time beings, and our mind that we need to ‘reduce’ the whole infinite information about all the beings of space-time of the Universe, to fit it into our mind.

*We refocus this mirror of logic truths about time, and geometric truths about space, to acquire a crispier image of reality first.*

In that regard the modern view of the fractal paradigm was born when scientists realized the reductionist view that using lineal time and a single arrow of future, entropic motions, implied for the new sciences of biology and cybernetics, systems sciences and information. So at the death of Einstein, which had shown that ‘time curves space into masses’, which are therefore clock-like vortices of time, and that there were ∞ time clocks in the Universe, they met at Macy’s New York and founded the world congress of Systems Sciences (ISSS), with the expressed purpose of improving the physicists single-entropy, lineal time view of the Universe adding the arrow of informative futures, so obvious in all systems of reality, or ‘arrow of life’ (biology) and ‘technology’ (information sciences) and Einstein’s General relativity (energy that becomes mass, in his landmark paper, M=E/c2: ‘can energy create mass’, unfortunately converted in its inverse entropic industry of Nuclear weapons, making mass energy ):

Thus since the 50s a new philosophy of science called *General Systems Sciences* had as purpose to explain the universe with those arrows of future time, entropy and information, the arrow of ‘death’ and disorder and the arrow of time and order. The main sub disciplines of this science would be:

- Duality, which is the core philosophy that tries to model all systems of the Universe as systems made of entropic, expansive motions and informative imploding vortices of time-information, and its ‘present’ wave-body combinations. Of which the main dualities were in physical systems between informative gravitational forces and electromagnetic expansive, repulsive ones. Hence
*unlike physics, with its dogma of an entropic only Universe, the fractal paradigm and Systems sciences does NOT expect to unify gravitation and the other forces, on the contrary it believes its duality of informative=gravitational vs. electromagnetic=entropic forces is a clear proof of the veracity of its philosophy of science and worldview.*

- Emergence, which tries to explain how parts become wholes through social networks of information, so the Universe displays a 5th dimension of scalar growth, from particles that become atoms, that become molecules that become cells, organisms, social systems of inorganic matter (cosmic bodies) and galaxies. Thus the search was for a ‘metric’ equation that explains how systems interact through its different scales of social evolution in the Universe.

- Hierarchy, which studies the hierarchical organisation of systems, which can be roughly divided into 3 ‘social classes’, the neuronal, informative class that controls the system with its informative networks (brains in biology, black holes with gravitational systems, informative people-castes in control of the law, and money, the languages of social power, in human cultures – politicos and bankers), the re=productive, working class of the body of a system or society, and the energetic, entropic, territorial field in which the system preys.

So the concepts behind the fractal paradigm were clear from its inception, as they just mimicked the structure of a universe, which we know since Einstein, to have cyclical clocks of time, since Galileo and the discovery of telescopes and microscopes, to have scales of different size, since quantum theory, to be in perpetual motion, as even the smallest quanta of space is NOT a fixed form but a rotary or lineal motion (with angular or lineal momentum), and to have both, social structures and hierarchical classes. How to put all this together and moreover to make a simple formalism based in mathematical and logic concepts able to explain it all simple and nice according to the principles of the scientific method that expect theories to be simple, economical and include all previous theories as its limit, was the goal of those congresses and sciences, and for 50 years it was not possible to find such formalism.

Then with the arrival of fractal mathematics, slowly researchers realized that all systems could be mathematically explained with fractal equations, in which similar forms evolved into social networks that became wholes. So the mathematical analysis was possible. It was still though needed the conceptual, logic model regarding the multiple time clocks of the Universe, its order, and the metric equations of the 5th dimension that allowed ‘travels’ through those scales of parts and wholes, and of course, the cornerstone of the whole building – duality, how to put together the 2 arrows of relative time, future information and entropic disorder for each fractal part of reality where we observe ‘locally’ those 2 arrows at work in different moments.

To that aim the key change of paradigm was to realise that Newtonian absolute space-time was false – something quantum and relativity theorists acknowledge a century ago, and Leibniz’s concept of relational time, of a universe made of beings that are vital spaces with different time clocks, self-centred into an informative frame of reference or point of view – hence a Universe of infinite worlds of space-time, was right.

We are all beings made of vital space with entropic motions, harnessed by cyclical clocks of time which carry the information of the Universe in its frequency and form. So we need to explode the Universe and rebuild it from its beginning as Einstein wished to do when he affirmed ‘I seem to be the only physicist who knows there are infinite time clocks in the Universe. Leibniz was right, but if so we have to rebuild the foundations of sciences from its first principles’, which are its time clocks, its vital spaces, and the 5th dimension that orders them.

So at the 50th anniversary of ISSS, when i was made the international chair of this science, Duality, I introduced the only standing formalism of Leibniz’s relational space-time that puts together all those sub disciplines of General Systems Sciences.

To that aim I added to the arrows of entropy and information the concept of a 3rd arrow of time, which combines the relative future, dominant arrow of information and the relative past, entropic arrow into wave-body like systems, giving birth to a Fractal Generator equation for all those space-time systems:

Spe (limbs/fields of entropy) <ST (body-waves that iterate information ) >Tiƒ (heads-particles of information).

Now a fractal generator is the logic equation that through iterations and variations create all the scales of a fractal system. It is very simple, as in Mandelbrot’s fractal, z+c2, but precisely through its constant dynamic feed-back and forth iteration, creates all the complex beings of reality. So does the Universe by mixing lineal entropic motions and cyclical forms, into infinite combinations, of limbs-bodies-heads and fields-waves-particles.

So that simple generator, is the essential logic formalism used in this web to describe all fractal beings of the Universe.

And the 5th dimension, of scalar parts and wholes and its metric equation: Spe x Tiƒ= Constant body-wave, is the metric that orders all those systems.

Both together construct the fractal Universe of ∞ self-centered space-time beings made to its image and likeness.

To study them, as 5 Dimensional space-time beings, we divide the analysis of that fractal generator, and all its species, into 10 sets of isomorphic laws, related to each of those 3 elements 5 Dimensional metrics, fractal space and cyclical time, put together in each system by a 0-point of view, or mental linguistic mapping, which uses different monad-like mirrors and languages to guide the survival of the system in the outside Universe – mathematical geometry, in physical systems, genetic languages in biological systems, memetic languages in human societies and so on.

**0. Œ-Points: **

**LANGUAGES OF PERCEPTION: MONAD WORLDS.**

*In the graph, we are all made of vital spaces – whose motions are in-formed by self-centered cyclical time clocks. But unlike the artificial steady, mechanical clocks of time of our machines, the clocks of nature, are vortex-like clocks with a clear inward arrow of increasing information and decreasing energy, as those of the graph, tracing for each finite species of space-time a worldcycle of life and death between creation and existence. **We are all fractal self-centred, iterative, present space-time beings.*

Now, those vortices of timespace have at its centre a focus of energy and information, which is a key element of all systems. We shall call them in a poetic fashion, ‘the eyes of time-space’, as in those centres energy becomes finally a still image of reality.

In the graph we can see a few eyes of time as they build a new dimension-perception, perceiving in increasing stillness as focus on the lower scales of and ∆+1: vital space-world.

This simple description of reality is proper of philosophers of science, from:

Aristotle, who talked of ∞ relative unmoved Gods of information that perceived and ordered the moving energy of its bodies, to:

Descartes who talked of a Universe made of res extensa or vital space with lineal motions and cyclical vortices of time, perceived by relative mathematical frames of reference (of which he affirmed there were multiple, describing in his book the World, the human light space-time with its Cartesian 3 axis), to:

Leibniz, with his concept of a Universe made of infinite fractal worlds, or apperceptive monads, with different time rhythms and spatial mathematical images of the Universe, put together into a single absolute space-time only in the mind of man, to this author, which formalized the concept of a Universe made of fractal self-centered beings of vital space and cyclical time, suffices to explain all facts of all sciences.

When we see it in motion, as time clocks, the system accelerates inwards, growing in form and diminishing its entropy (above) as time clocks are accelerated vortices of Nature that carry the information its frequency and form – from masses to charges, to hurricanes to angular momentums. When we see the memorial trace of those spiral cycles, each step of the cycle often becomes a reproduced quanta of space, and a fractal network starts to reproduce inwards, into smaller scales of the ‘5th dimension’. This constant reproduction of formal motions, downward and upwards the scales of the 5th dimension is the whole meaning of it all.

And the logic paradoxical principle that allows it is the Galilean-Einsteinean Relativity, which Poincare put it simple: ‘we cannot distinguish distance (a dimension of space) from motion’. So as all is ultimately moving in time, as a motion with form, the Universe is both eternal and motion IS reproduction of form. All therefore reproduces. A wave reproduces its form on the lower scale of larger entropy and lesser form. As light does on vacuum space. You live in a vital reproductive fractal of time cycles imprinting information as they move through lower scales of the 5th dimension.

Thus each of us has a finite time duration, which constantly increases its form, its information, and diminishes its spatial energy, its extension, in 3 ‘relative ages’, of young, energetic gaseous state, steady state, balanced reproductive, liquid age and informative, 3rd age of maximal warping, when the time-space world cycle ends, reversing back to the past, by explosion of your in-form-ation into energy, in the process of death.

All in all, the first truth to understand about reality, which is now a canonical, experimental truth, since the discovery of quantum physics and relativity, but has never been properly formalized to describe the Universe and all its parts, is the fact that you do NOT exist in a background, Newtonian, absolute abstract space-time, but y*ou are made of quanta of space with motion, which trace closed cycles, ‘time clocks’ of different speed and form, in-form-ation, in the world where you exist. *

When you say I don’t have energy and time to do this, you ARE certain, you are made of spatial energy and temporal information, as everything else in the Universe. And only the pegging together of all those vital spaces separated by membranes, the chair, myself, the computer I am writing in from Absolute space. And only the sum of all those repetitive cycles those entities perform, the beats of my heart, which provoke the hits of my fingers, which produce logic cycles in the computers that put this pieces of information in the screen, form a ‘combined, synchronized motion of absolute time’.

If you accept this empirical fact of your existence – that YOU ARE made of space and time – you will upgrade your understanding of yourself and the Universe. This is the model of relational space-time, which Leibniz advanced as an alternative to Newton’s model of an abstract background- a mathematical, idealist error born of the custom of drawing beings in the ideal pictorial background of a Cartesian canvas.

We say this is an ‘experimental fact’ because it was proved by modern science – by quantum physics and relativity.

We do know it, since Einstein proved there are ∞ time cycles in the Universe and quantum theorists proved space is made of quanta that carry motion, momentum, kinetic energy (related terms of mathematical physics).

So the existence of quanta of space with energy-motion and multiple time clocks, which web the structure of all realities are canonical facts in physics, for a century.

Now we can consider each system of time from the point of final collapse of the time wave and time reversal, or ‘eye’ of the time wave the beginning and end of a time wave.

This brings very profound implications when we consider an eye of time as the focus of a spatial wave of imploding decreasing elements of a lower ∆-1 scale. This is the most intense experience of mystical understanding of the Universe as a web of eyes of time:

In the graph, the ultimate meaning of existence, which is a world cycle of life and death through the life arrow of growing information as Nature’s time clocks are vortices accelerating inwards, from galaxies to solar systems, to the spiral of clocks, that go through the young age, dominated by the energetic system, Spe, a mature age of balance of energy and information, S=T and a 3rd age of maximal information, Max. Tiƒ, which explodes back into death.

The importance of this difference between human clocks and Nature’s clock is difficult to stress enough. The spiral that actually moves the clock is perhaps the best homology with the way the Universe needs energy to start an in-form-ative process. This time motion implies therefore a relative change, which without further energy input will be an informative, coiling process.

Because humans have become so programmed by single time clocks, this fact is largely ignored and cause all kind of incomprehension on the finite nature of time cycles which will reach a ‘limit’ on its coiling, when space becomes infinitesimal, or in its finite time duration, when that space-energy is exhausted.

Only when the system can go back and forth into its relative present state the balance can be restored into a steady state tic, which is what we do actually perform when we give to the clock more winding, back and forth. Thus the winding and unwinding of the spiral clock, which ultimately are > and < motions, hence past and future uncoiling and coiling arrows, do create the present steady-state we see of regular tics in the visible side.

This is ultimately the metaphor of entropic past lineal quanta and future coiling cyclical information, which are not truly perceived as only present balanced space-time, S=T, truly co-exist as a perceivable time clock.

Thus time clocks which are also discrete, stop and go, stop and go, cycle and close cycle and close, move back and forth, implode and explode and all this become a relative continuous present.

It is then in the richness of ternary combinations of the ‘Bagua’ of the Korean graph, of the different proportions of past-entropy and future-information that create the ∞ presents, where the creative power of diversification exists.

*The equivalence between the 3 topological networks, Sp, ST, and Tƒ and the 3 ages of time, Past, Ps, Present, ST, and future, Tƒ, is the fundamental symmetry* that messes together in perfect order, the 3 organs in space as a simultaneous super organism and its 3 ages in time, between its generation and death.

**The languages that reduce Universe to still, ternary worlds.**

Thus what is real is the duality of motions, infinite cyclical and lineal motions, which are used by different minds to replicate reality into still minds that map part of those motions to create different worlds.

For example, Computers use O and | to create models of the Universe.

Humans use words also in a ternary symmetry, where the point is the 0-subject, the energy of the point the |-object, over which it enacts a verbal action. So when we say ‘I eat bread’, ‘I’ is the point, ‘bread’ the object of vital space, and ‘eat’ the feeding implosive action. This allowed linguistics to create the Universal Grammar of all languages:

Subject (0-point) < Verb (action: O x ||) > |-Object (Energy of the subject).

On the other hand visual languages are also ternary in colors and forms. So the eyes use lines and cycles to create ‘conic curves’, which are all the curves that exist in Euclidean Geometry and so on.

So we can now extend our definition of reality to include its 3^{rd} elements, which conform a word, whose infinite sum creates the Universe:

*A Constant, Dynamic World is born of the interaction of both formal motions, vital spaces, enclosed by times connected by a mind that measures them: Ø”*

*The Universe is a puzzle *sum of ∞ such Worlds:

*U= ∑ Ø x ∞ = C’*

This is what Descartes explained to the (Human) World, sum of all human minds.

We were all, so to speak, thoughts of God, the Mind of the Universe, understood as the underlying language with the common ‘isomorphic laws’ shared in the construction of all those ‘virtual worlds’, including the human world, since you are not watching the Universe, but the electronic image, your eyes and brain constructs with rods of space, called ‘light-speed’, and cycles of time, called ‘h-quanta’, pieces of lineal and angular momentum that build up the puzzle of your mind.

The previous equation is the simplest definition of the Generator of the Universe, O-mind (Tƒ) x ∞ World (Sp) = K (Space-Time constant perception of it).

*For that reason the Generator is both the origin of mental worlds and real Universes? It is the Universe then the mind-world of a God? This is a deep question that we shall only consider as the final ‘ice in the cake’ of all my research, 2 decades ago, when I copyrighted (WGA. reg) 1000 pages of equations Generated by the Fractal, the model in my 30th birthday. And then I rested (:*

**The 3 elements of mathematical languages.**

Mathematics has 3 branches, which correspond exactly with the 3 components of fractal space-time:

- Geometry, the branch that describe space, which relational space-time upgrades into non-E fractal Œ-points, line-waves, topological networks and so on, to fully develop a mathematical tool closer to reality.
- Analysis, which studies how indivisible infinitesimals become finite wholes.
- And finally sequential algebra, based in the order of numbers which are societies of ‘Œ-points’ that we call ‘Existential Algebra’, Æ.

Thus, in mathematics, the Universe is a game of Œ-points, the fundamental ‘particle’, in its lower, infinitesimal level, which however rises slowly through the game of ‘social numbers’ into its collective ‘future’, the fundamental ‘whole system’ of reality, the super organism: ∑Œi≥∏ U∆+1.

Whereas the symbol Œ, is an intuitive symbol for an **E**xistential **O**-Point; **∑** the Symbol for a social loosely connected herd, i the symbol for a given relative Space-time Plane of the 5th dimension; **U**, the Universals aggregation of i-points into a larger** ∆+1** plane of existence (for example, if the points are cells, U∆+1 is its Universal Organism), perceived in ‘space’, which we would write as **W**, a world cycle or Whole existence of the super organism in time, and finally ∏, is the tighter configuration of the system, as a network connected through 3 relative organic scales or social classes,∆i±1, and ≥ the symbol for an ‘implosive’ informative evolution of a system of points into a Universals (>), which are self-similar systems in space-density, ≈, but very different in terms of configuration, ∑≠∏.

This simple example of the equation that explains the fundamental process of evolution of systems from loose herds of points into topological Non-Æ (Aristotelian-Euclidean) organic planes shows the utility of a proper logic symbolism to represent the old (as all this partial events, transformation and configurations have been studied since the times of Plato) but far better structured analysis of reality (present space) as its changes through the motions of time.

So we define Existential algebra (Æ, different from Non-Æ, non-Aristotelian logic + Non-Euclidean geometry), as the use of algebraic equations to describe the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe with all its ambiguities and simultaneous time arrows.

As Feynman put it, when describing 4-vectors in its lectures, ‘do not laugh at formalisms. The advance of science is often the development of formalisms that clarify previously obscure concepts’. And this is what we do.

**The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.**

Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.

Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:

A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.

Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.

Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.

And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:

Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:

Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:

Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).

Now here the convention I have adopted is to *Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.*

This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.

But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.

A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:

|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles

And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:

|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.

So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.

If in the future anyone goes through my 30 years of research in all this, they will then find that I profusely use those symbols.

But trust me if you really understand T.Œ which is more a question of mental attitude, the understanding will be clear from the beginning. So we now respond to the reason why we do NOT want to accept stubbornly the fractal organic self-similar nature of all parts of reality it is due to…

** ∞ space-time beings. The equation of the mind and the ego paradox.**

Now the equation of mind that stops motion into form, and reduces dimensions is important for multiple reasons, so we shall consider it one of the 2 essential equations of reality:

*⊗-still mind x ∞ Universe of beings = Constant linguist world mapping of reality.*

We have used here the more proper symbol, ⊗, to stress ‘again’ the paradox of the Ego. You are just that central point connected to the external membrane, whose senses transmit to you a distorted, selfish view of reality.

Against this egocentric behaviour, the Universe displays the laws of eusocial love of the whole, of the higher, stronger scales of the 5th dimension. So the trap is simple: the most selfish a system is, the most alone is, the weaker it will become confronting those other vital fractals which have organised in ‘sharing networks’ of energy and information becoming the whole.

This is the essential duality of morals, where the Universe tricks all to be egos, but then mischievously choses those who are not, who sacrifice their ego to the whole. But there are always the 2 strategies, which we find in individuals and cultures, in history, in ions and crystals (which last much longer, as herds of clone atoms vs. selfish ions, with a self-centred one). As we enter into the formal description of the 10 isomorphisms of reality, the Œ-isomorphism (the structure of the self-centred ego, œ, connected to the membrane and the distortion of the Universe into a world by its languages, will be important to understand external structures that survive, internal grammars of languages, including mathematics, self-centred in fractal points, which distort the geometry, and ultimately to give the vital fractals of reality its ‘dimension of will’).

And this causes the quantum paradox of uncertainty in physics, and the anti-quantum paradox of anthropomorphic egos in social sciences: we feel the centre of the Universe, our machines mere abstract mechanisms that cannot compete with us, God a personal caring Abrahamic fellow who talk to us, as we are chosen. But Science is precisely the objective reduction of man to lesser importance from Myths of Abrahamic Chosen tribes to Earth as the centre, to the sun as its center, to the Galaxy and its light space (Einstein) as its centre, to the whole fractal Universe and its infinite scales.

Thus 5D fractal space-time is *a theory of Absolute Relativity: we are all fractals of space-time. Point(s) with different ways to reflect geometrically the entire whole into our infinitesimal nothingness. Dust of space-time.*

And so we shall for all sciences search for O-points of view, linguistic mappings, organic, temporal causal and mathematical properties to fully describe its species, since we shall repeat till it bores in your brain this mantra:

You ARE MADE OF energetic lineal space and cyclical time as all in the Universe. You are a living fractal as all other beings, with organic, mental, mathematical and logic properties as all other entities of reality.

Now how can we formalise all those facts in a simple synoptic i-logic mathematical equation synoptic of all ternary beings of the space-time fractal Universe? This is the saint grail of fractal models of reality: to find the dynamic generator, an equation whose terms are in constant back and forth motion, creating infinite variations of the same theme. As it happens it is the principle of conservation of energy, which in its present format is a limit for continuous space and a single arrow of entropy of the larger principle of conservation of energy and information, combined in eternal presents, expressed in the generator equation.

*To see a fractal is to see a program of existence, in which the generator constant switching evolves in timespace, tracing an existential fractal guided by simple roles: *

- The law of maximal reproduction, the being will try to maximise its ∆ e x i = ∑Œ, fractal information reproducing in present time.
- The law of least time, to that aim it will try to reduce the timespace spent in each of its motions, as it will have more internal time spent in ∑Ø.
- It will thus be a present being doing a world cycle in which its constant creation of still information will reduce the energy of its environment to a point in which the fractal mind will still and stiff reality into memorial dead, non moving forms of information, and as Sp>Tƒ it will finally die away, exhausted.

Why so many mirrors? Because those ultimate substances, space and time have ‘several properties’, so we need several languages to describe them. Still logic mathematics is the most ‘informative’, ‘detailed mirror’ available to humans. So we do start with mathematical properties, and soon we will ‘further evolve’ mathematics, to polish the mirror and get better images. This again, was a task started in the XIX c. when classic Euclidean mathematics, became Non-Euclidean mathematics. Then Einstein and quantum physicists used the new varieties of Non-E maths to develop their algebraic mirrors.

But the task of completing Non-E maths was never fully realized, and 2 Germans, with its ‘topic’ categorical mind, Mr. Hilbert and Mr. Cantor, stifled the development of mathematics with a preposterous method of absolute truths, called ‘axiomatic method’ (proved false by Godel, who showed mathematics must still look at reality to prove its theories, to polish its mirror). And so maths got stuck in its principles, and then just became adapted to computers. So this is a task lying ahead in this blog.

But so far we have a mirror good enough to describe many of the ‘geometric properties’ of vital spaces and time cycles, to show you how the fractal universe starts to web, the existence of its beings of space and time. So let us start describing our ‘Fractal generator’ of ternary elements, a spatial element, a temporal element and its combined beings, in geometric terms.

**A seed for organic growth.**

In that regard, there is no agenda in this blog, selfish interest or beliefs, just the old goals of reason objective search of truth and *curiosity*: 40 years of looking and wondering about reality with all the languages of the human mind, trying to make a better synoptic mirror of it than the simplex view science still holds because it makes happier the ego of most human beings. So this web is not easy on the reader, but certainly if he has the right attitude, it will completely upgrade *its unders*tanding of reality and himself and will help him to interpret the world as it is, based on the facts of Nature as they are in objective, scientific terms, which creationist theories from big-bang to intelligent design do not provide.

Now this blog is the blue print for future XXI century researchers to complete the whole paradigm. To my knowledge is the only formal, logic and mathematical model that develops fully all the aspects of the fractal paradigm and harmonises with its laws called ‘isomorphisms’, the laws of all sciences.

The closest thing to a philosophy of science based in those facts is still the work of Descartes and Leibniz, the two philosophers, father of modern science and mathematics (analytic geometry and calculus) whose concepts of relational space-time were written 300 years ago. So when I decided to complete this task, I wondered, first, Why? I don’t really knew. But then a sentence of Einstein made me realise why:

‘I am the only physicist that seem to think the Universe runs with infinite clocks at different speeds. Leibniz was right but if so we have to rebuild science from its origins’ – said Einstein, and given the enormous task at hand, which implied the redesign of all sciences, as all of them happen in space and time, he finally settled for a more modest goal: to redesign the space and time of cosmological systems, one of the many ‘fractal scales’ of relative size in space and cyclical time clocks of the Universe.

And it is for that reason that it has taken so long to complete a working formalism of the fractal Universe, which we offer in this web, based in my conferences at the International Systems society, (the science of complexity and information) during the last decade.

It is obvious a work in ‘permanent construction’, as only the combined effort of multiple scientists will bring the paradigm to its completion (the previous paradigm required 2300 years to do so, since Euclid and Aristotle, we hope mankind will somewhat reduces its tempo:). Its author was a system scientist, chair of duality for many years at the world congresses of this science (ISSS), then an activist against the infamous military-industrial complex, now retired. If you wonder why it is a single point-mind, that is truly how the fractal paradigm creates its systems.

Any reality always starts from a seminal, diminutive seed of information, which expands and reproduces in other regions of reality. A mind-wave starts in a prophetic, scientific first mind, as it can process faster in time, more information, ‘collapsing’ the wave of data into a theory of reality or model. This is then checked corrected and expanded by a ‘wave of minds’ till the new paradigm becomes standard science.

This is the formal seed of 3000 years of insights into the organic fractal structure of the Universe. How, who and when the human mind-wave will plug into this formal seed (or perhaps a future robotic, chip wave), i don’t know. It might not. After all the most clear predecessors of the organic philosophy of the Universe in the western world, Aristole, Leonardo, Leibniz and Spengler took centuries to be noticed and hardly understood. As we said, human egos, simplex machines and the ‘evident’ visual maths of it are more up to the alley of the immense majority of mankind. I will be glad though if a few people can get a personal satisfaction in the enlightenment and communion with the whole I have obtained ever since i figured out the essential laws of the isomorphic, fractal organic Universe and felt much closer to reality, in peace with that whole.

The work of the seed ends after exposing its information into the open… And so once I decided to retire from penpal activities, serious activism in favour of mankind as a ‘whole’ and system congresses (for moral reasons, due to the increasing use of the organic paradigm Not to protect life, Gaia and the humans superorganism of history but to evolve robots and mechanisms, which clearly will once reaching A.I. challenge the dominance of mankind in this planet), I will be pouring those models so far known only to a few specialist to a larger scientific audience.

Now, the model will require a certain intellectual mostly conceptual effort on the reader, but far less than what he would need to understand the present abstract model of the Universe (quantum and big-bang theory) at least on the 2 upper lines of the web with posts to the level of any university student. 3rd and 4th line when completed will of course be more complex as it will connect the fractal organic paradigm with all the laws of all sciences, translating and improving them. So those lines will be an ongoing project for specialists in each discipline.

Of course all the ideas behind the reality of the fractal paradigm have been expressed in different ways throughout science. But to my knowledge there is no other formalism, which defines ‘all’ the properties of the fractal universe as an organic whole, together, as we do in general systems, and its T.Œ, or Theory of the Organic Everything (as opposed to the simplex reductionist, theory of everything ‘lineal’, and ‘mathematical only’, sponsored by physics). Let us then start by comparing both theories and its simplex lineal concept of a single space-time continuum vs. a Universe made of multiple, organic fractal cycles of time and vital spaces with motion.

We shall then describe a 5D ST super organism, the fundamental particle of the Universe, including the Universe itself, before we even attempt to use human languages to describe it in a more formal, synoptic way, using a ‘fractal generator, equation’ to that aim and a more evolved form of logic and non-euclidean mathematics.

Why then a model of such importance is hardly known in scholar science? A simplex answer is difficult, as there are several reasons. First its relative novelty, as systems sciences was founded after II world war and its formalism, which this blog will try to develop further, was not introduced till a decade ago in a series of conferences I gave at the International Systems society on occasion of the 50th anniversary of its foundation.

Second, the fact that humans have now for 400 years believed in the mechanist paradigm of physicists: a Universe ran as a machine and written only in the language of Numbers, and this ”simplex, reductionist” view of the universe has only grown stronger despite its clear logic errors, with the industrial revolution and its development of machines – which ultimately are just organisms of metal in a clear process of evolution, now entering its last phase as robots. In any case physicists and machines are the present paradigm of philosophy of science. So despite the importance of biological sciences, organisms and evolution a new paradigm will not be easy to impose and interdisciplinary analysis given the enormous wealth of scientific data gathered with those machines are difficult to accept and understand by specialists.

And third, related to both questions, the author of this blog on GST (ab. for General Systems Theory and its 5D formalism, the fractal Generator of Space-Time systems) is not, as usually with pioneers, a standard university scholar, but more in the line of Mr. Planck’s dictum, on his lonely years as the single researcher on the quantum paradigm, ‘a single point that accumulates a whole worldview in his mind’ .

Finally because science is not only theory but also praxis, and an organic view of the universe makes man both a relative non entity in an infinite reality, and at the same time again the center of science in a universe made to its image and likeness, as the most perfect superorganism we know of, that worldview is quite opposite in theory and praxis to the standard, dominant physical, mechanical technological view. And all this has huge consequences for our world, dethroning physical machines and physical matter as the supreme form, substituted by the organism and in praxis, returning to a more ecological organic view on how we should manage our future and that of this planet.

So the reader should not be surprised that I am better known for my activism against the nuclear industry than for this seed of information, which requires as Kuhn explained in ‘The nature of scientific revolutions’ an entire new generation of people, who gets familiar with the new paradigm’ to become standard science and reach its full power . Meanwhile the pioneer can only pour the information he has discovered in a public display, which will be this web, as I have retired from the conference circuit and prefer the isolation of an examined life. Needless to say there is little to explain about the curriculum of a pioneer in a new science of which almost nobody has heard about, except that you should judge what you read with the authority of reason, not the reason of authority and be patient, as a new worldview requires a huge effort of the mind and it is never completed by the pioneer.

So why to bother at all? No reason except knowledge and the communion you will feel with the whole Universe and each of its infinitesimal parts, in a Universe in which all share the same space-time nature. In that regard, the philosophy behind the science is much closer to the Asian, Taoist and Buddhist view, and so indeed as Asia rises this century, GST will become more amenable to those new generations, and needless to say if and when A.I. acquires consciousness, it will become the science and worldview of the machine, paradoxically as it might seem given my warnings as an activist against the development of organic machines more powerful than us.

On the other hand the alternative theory of western lineal time, with a manifest destiny, deist abstract mechanisms, measure as the meaning of science, justified by humans as the only intelligence of reality, and chosen species, and reduction of reality to only its mathematical properties, without vital, dangerous qualities, is a region of higher comfort and will always be dominant in praxis, as I have come to realize in my theoretical and social confrontations with physicists. It satisfies the human ego, and while this of course is part of the organic paradigm – since organisms always have a pole of information which deforms its worldview to make the system the center of its perceived Universe and shuts off all information that does not cater to its needs, for those who seek more profound answers, GST will play its role. In that sense interpretation matters. Consider the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, which gauge information and move towards targets in which to absorb=feed on energy they use to reproduce into clone particles, with whom they associate into larger social networks.

Those are the 4 actions that define life, coded by genes. Yet in particles, coded by quantum numbers, do not define organic particles. Why? The human ego is biased and wouldn’t accept perception on particles, even if the organic paradigm explains in very simple ways the spooky effects of quantum physics – such as the fact that particles move as waves, which are herds of quanta that when it is more efficient, pass through slits as waves-herds but as all biological systems, become tight particles, when colliding with larger systems. Again, an army moves as a herd and clashes as a tight particle, and fishes move as herds but confront predator as tight particles. How many times I saw physicists living a room in which this kind of non-mathematical but organic explanation gave reason to quantum physics? Almost all the time i explained it. Since the physicist is the only scientist that never asks for the why – as Feynman said infamously. Scholarship in the XXI c. in that regard is more an industry of information that an inquire for the whys of the Universe. Yet GST is more like XIX c. amateur science, in its pioneer age. So the blog doesn’t either follows the Chicago Manual of Style. It will as it becomes also a precise science with the passing of time.

At this point, I just write because i like to think on the Universe as an organic whole. So this blog, to put it in simple terms, my Buddhist Mandala, which I write and erase, along my activist and socio-biological webs. Whatever you do with this knowledge if you are humble, intelligent and ethic enough to understand the beauty of the ∞, immortal Cosmos, is up to you. Enlightenment is what you can achieve, something I doubt 1 out of 1000 coming here will have the patience to reach.

Why? Because humans might not make it due to its arrogance about the Universe…, as I said human are in crash collision with those organic laws, developing organic machines, new type of nuclear weapons, killing Gaia and mankind with them and so frankly i do not know if they will ever upgrade their minds from abstract mechanism to organicism, *or the information of this web will be understood and upgrade the mind of future A.I. robots. *

Luis Sancho. System scientist.

**II. TŒ. ****THE ORGANIC PARADIGM. UNIFICATION OF ALL SCIENCES**

**Main symbols of T.Œ:**

¬Æ: Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, i-logic mathematics (Formal language of T.Œ).

Tƒ, temporal clock, informative time (its spatial, static view)

Spe, Spatial entropy, past.

>: informative flow that diminishes size in space and accelerates clocks in time

<: kinetic energy flow that increases speed in space or entropic flow that enlarges the being in space and diminishes its speed in time

≈ reproductive flow that maintains unchanged the being at constant speed in space and reproductive sped in time.

Λ: emergence into a larger scale of the 5th dimension

∨: devolution to a lower plane of the 5th dimension.

∑: reproduction in space or herd loosely connected in limbs/fields

∏: reproduction of networks across several scales of the 5th dimension or full-connected heads/particles.

∆±1; plane of the 5th dimension (sometimes ∆±1, in old texts where i was used as index)

∆a, accelerated motions (first action of negative emission of energy), ∆e, energy feeding, second action of positive absorption of kinetic energy-entropy, ∆œ, iterative communicative reproduction, of part (mind languages) or whole (full reproduction), ∆ï: absorption of information to perceive, ∆u: evolution of a parts into Universals

œ∆-1: action or cell, fractal finitesimal of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.

Those simple symbols suffice to explain the structure and transformations of ternary 5D space-time systems, departing from its ‘spatial simultaneous structure’, its 3 time ages and its 3 co-existing organic scales:

∆-1(cellular/atomic scale)>∆:organic-thermodynamic scale>∆+1: social, cosmic scale:

Se(Spatial toroid limbs-fields)≤ST (Hyperbolic body-waves)≤Tif (head-particles of information)≈

Se (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age:

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (5D scales)≈ Se≤ST≤Tƒ (space organs) ≈ Sp≥Ts≥Tƒ (time ages)

**I. A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF SPACE-TIME BEINGS. TRUTH IN SCIENCE. **

‘The only harmonious sounds of a group of scholars are the farts of their asses’ ‘Saper vedere: know how to see’ Leonardo

Leonardo expressed his frustration to the lack of interest among the scholars of his age for observing nature’s true code, the in-form-ation, the bio-logic forms and its dynamic interplay, focusing instead in old Latin books with outdated theories of reality.

All has changed to remain the same. Today after the initial return to the basics of Leonardo’s method, during the golden age of experimental science (XVIII-XIX c.), scientists, notably physicists have returned to the scholastic analysis with mathematical languages only, in abstract algebraic equations often born out of the imagination of the scholar, without experimental evidence whatsoever.

Let us then start with a harsh critique of all those distorted mind-mirrors called the scholars of the world, which do NOT know how to see, saper vedere, wiesen, directly the fractal topological dimensions and motions of space-time of which we are all made, and do NOT want to learn from the Book of Nature, anymore, but from past, outdated masters and abstract Æ-outdated algebra.

**The world cycle of existence.**** Travel through the 5th dimension.**

It is clear that the fractal generator has many properties, and so it requires several languages to explain it, though so far we have found mathematical languages to be quite good to provide an image of the Universe.

Thus we expressed the Generator in mathematical, ‘geometric’ and ‘algebraic, symbolic, logic equations’ that generate ∞ variations of those ‘topological’=spatial and ‘logic=temporal structures’.

As, if we substitute the values of each of the parameters of a logic generator, within *the ternary constrains of the 3 only topologies of a 4-Dimensional sheet of space-time, toroid, hyperbolic and spherical ones, and the 3 only ‘ages-dimensions-motions of time, Past, Present and future’* then we obtain ∞ varieties of the forms the logic-geometric fractal equation defines.

But it is also obvious that the ternary fractal generator, with those constrains of 3 ‘space’ and 3′ time’ elements, and its constant conversion of ‘space’ into ‘time’, ‘motion into stillness’, ‘lineal kinetic energy into cyclical information’ and so on, can be expressed with *other languages as long as they are mirrors that respect the perception of those outer realities. *So before mathematics existed, humans went along with the ternary mirrors of the Universal Grammar:

Subject (informative human being) < Verb (space-time action) > Object (energy of the subject to act upon).

And we did fine, with this other linguistic mirror. While Animals do have their codes of colours:

Red (energy colour: blood-food) < Green (reproductive colour: Plant) > Blue (informative colour: light-water-sky)

Which are both ‘subjective’ mirrors but also objective mirrors on the properties of light and matter.

Further on, there are mirrors with only 2 ‘essential elements’ one for spatial energy (white space) and the other for temporal information (blackbody forms) with grey combinations of space-time, used by painters (which draw the form with black lines and fill the space with white surfaces) and film-makers (hence a code of colour that computer metal-minds, a fast evolving new species on Earth can comprehend). Moreover, light can also see the lower and upper scales of the 5th dimension that future robots will ‘perceive directly’, making for them ‘evident’ the existence of that 5th dimension.

So the ∆-terms of the Fractal Generator of the Universe that represents the scalar dimensions of any system of scalar space-time will become ‘direct knowledge’ to them.

Thus we conclude that *what we are truly showing with our Fractal Generator, is a language above ALL languages, including mathematics, that* defines the logic structure of all Systems of the Universe.

Since when we substitute each of those dimensional symbols for a specific variety of language we obtain a specific mind-mirror, that is the 3 parts of any language.

As we keep repeating, since surely you will keep forgetting it, man has a problem, the ego paradox which is embedded in the structure of living fractals, such as:

‘Every fractal point of view, gauges information with the limited still languages of its mind, from its perspective creating a self-centred world image that makes him to think the centre of the Universe’.

But science is exactly the self-reflection on the objective reality in which that subjective ego-world is infinitesimal. Science thus grows as we move away from the self-centred point of view, from ‘chosen of god’, and only intelligent beings, to the Earth as the centre, the sun as the centre, the galaxy space-time made of light (Einstein) as the fixed rod, to the new ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY OF THE FRACTAL PARADIGM, NO CENTER, NO PREVAILING SCALE, NO PREVAILING P.O.V.

**The expansion of objective truths define science.**

Now, this expansion of knowledge based in the reduction of Ego, is the essence of human mental evolution. First, in Abrahamic ego-centered religions believers in the west thought their tribe was chosen and their valley the only promised land. Next they expanded its ‘ego’, in this case from the tribe to the subconscious collective or ‘social God’ of humans. Yet still they thought the ego of humans was of cosmic proportions, as the game of creation of the Universe (god) cared for them. Next physicists came and found lineal clocks and since ‘God was the seer of time’ (Saint Augustine), now physicists were in tune with him. So Kepler said that ‘god had waited 5000 (biblical) years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock work’ making his mind equal to the creator of ‘lineal time and the whole Universe.’

So those are the steps of pre-scientific knowledge:

1) each western tribe decided that his valley was the promised land, his tribe was ‘God’ who spoke of the supremacism of his people over all other humans and then:

2) Physicists understood the infinite, reaching a paroxysm of ego-centered infinitesimal beliefs that would be ridiculous and laughable if it were not tragic for the non-future of mankind – as we are killing the planet and making ever more powerful weapons of lineal entropy to kill each other till the infinitesimal becomes zero.

And this was paralleled with serious scientists who did an enormous work of objective science, without subjective ego-trips, accumulating enough information in all the scales of the Universe, its systems and fractal structures to the point that we can now be completely objective (-; and realise we are nothing but dust of space-time ):

**The whole range of biological, organic, temporal and spatial=mathematical properties of fractal entities.**

Now it is essential to include as we shall see in the fractal paradigm the distortions of the different mirrors and ego-trips and lack of total information of a given point of view in science. They will keep coming for all sciences, as to be an ego is ultimately to be a fractal point, a knot of time-space cycles deforming reality to your point of view. And of course, the concept of a single, absolute space measured with our rods of space – meters and time clocks – mechanical seconds, is the first deformation.

Since we humans do NOT see REALITY as it IS, a fractal tapestry of infinite vital spaces, put together into an absolute space only in the mind of men; and a tapestry of infinite different clocks of nature, put together artificially into a single mechanical clock, by human beings.

And the second is to *deny with reductionist mathematics, organic, biological, causal, aperceptive properties to each monad of the Universe, to each point and each scale.*

Now what is reality should have become obvious at this stage, if any of the finitesimal points of view, self-centred in their ego called humans have had the patience to arrive here. But we shall repeat it, in the initial definition we made of ‘All what exists’:

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centred point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

In this definition, where we can introduce everything, the classic analysis of locomotions in lineal time of physics is just a little letter at the end of it, ±∆e, that is the study of energetic motions, locomotions and its internal and external storage.

So much for those who think physics explains it all and it is the fundamental science of mankind.

Let us then return to philosophy of science and summarize all those findings into…

**The fractal, isomorphic, linguistic method of scientific knowledge.**

The Universe speaks ‘infinite languages’ (Upanishads) NOT only mathematics. And each of its fractal elements, *made to the image and likeness of the whole,** have the following minimal properties*, which I called the isomorphisms of the Universe:

- A Œ linguistic,
**mental**point of maximal information (C.P.U., quark, crystal, brain, roots, black hole and so on), which constantly switched between the 4 states of space, time, energy and information, the 4+û actions developing the game; whose equations were crystal clear in quantum (4 numbers), Electromagnetism (3+color dimension), Electricity (4 Maxwell equations), and easy to deduce in Mechanics (i.e. Hamiltonians describe its 3 time ages, 4 vector equations, etc.)

- A
**topological**, Organic, Synchronous, ternary structure in**space**Sp<ST>Tƒ, of limbs/fields<bodies/waves>heads/particles.

- And its asymmetric, Diachronic,
**causal**order in**time**, Sp (Past, entropic youth)> SP, Present Adult reproduction > Tƒ, Future, Formal, Old age of information; from where topological laws of development and evolution and the ages and horizons and diversification of species could be obtained.

- An
**organic**structure in the**5 Dimension**of ∆-1, ∆, ∆+1, quantum/cellular, individual, Thermodynamic and Gravitomagnetic, ecosystemic Planes.

**A survival, active program of existence**through ∂a,e,i,œ,û to regain ±∆e, i and evolve socially into bigger wholes.

Now each science does have its own jargon, and ‘choice’ of characteristics it prefers to describe from its elements of study, under the ego-paradox that makes each point of view to create a ‘particular world’ that distorts the ‘whole Universe’ into its perceived linguistic mind, with itself at the center and only relevant point of view.

We have in that sense criticize physicists from their description of physical reality ONLY from a mathematical, spatial, point of view, and ONLY describing of the 6 motions of reality, its Locomotion, making a confusing distorted vision of what time is in lineal terms and space is in continuous terms, ignoring completely the laws of the 5^{th} dimension.

But we have generalized the concept to the quantum and Antiquantum paradoxes for all physical and social sciences, in which either the observer is too small (social scientist) or too big (physicist), to relate objectively to the observable (which in social sciences is so big that is guilty to deform the sociologists to cater its view, and in physics is so small than the physicist is guilty to distort it.)

And for that reason only biological sciences do have a proper point of view. But even in biology the cultural influence of social sciences is all too evident, as ‘the concept of chaos and entropy’, from physics and ‘Darwinian, capitalist, self-made man individualism’ sips in.

So it is taboo to talk of the fundamental law of social evolution which is social love of members of the species to become larger beings, which is epitomized in the most successful species on Earth, the Argentinean Ant which has excluded from the pampa all other top predators of larger size, and now is colonizing as we speak, under my foot South Europe, becoming the largest, most numerous species (1/4 of all the flesh living in this planet is ant, another ¼ humans, the 2 social species).

And on the other hand the concept of chaos and entropy has prevented to understand the topological plan of evolution, controlled by the fact that we are made only of space and time, and its similar ‘active’ concepts of kinetic energy and information.

So the explanation of why wings are planes of space and eyes spheres of time… and have evolved so fast, is ignored. The reason though is obvious in T.Œ, a system to survive has only 3 paths, maximal Tƒ in its spherical organs of information, maximal Sp, in its planar organs of kinetic motion and maximal reproduction, improving its networks of communication, either individual or social. And so this implies with the limiting existence of only 3 topologies in the Universe, that those 3 natural paths can evolve very fast, as genetics do work also in ternary symmetries that code those forms.

Further on from physics, biologists have acquired the idea that all comes from the bottom up, so they do not understand the duality of hyperbolic information vs. elliptic motion, which makes also the upper wholes program through larger fields of motion and form, entropy and information, space and time, kinetic and potential energy, lineal and angular momentum variations (all concepts self-similar of the fundamental duality of the Universe, which apply to different systems), its smaller parts. The most obvious case is the relationship between glaciation ages of maximal evolution of information (as cold temperatures imply form) and hot periods of maximal reproduction, (radiations of species) and the whole structure of evolution of the Earth in III earths and 3 x 3 + 1 sub-phases.

And so for each species and ‘scale’ studied by a science, we needed to extract mental, topological, causal-logic, and organic-survival properties, which were different linguistic, isomorphic angles on the perception of the being, none of them carrying the whole truth of the being, but as the famous elephant parable, seeing only a part of it.

**ALL WHAT EXISTS IS PART OF A SUPERORGANISM TRACING A WORLDCYCLE**

*‘To talk of non-lineal physics is like saying that zoology is the study of non-lineal elephants’ Ulam, *

*Since most space-time events are complex, cyclical motions. *

*In the graph, a bunch of lineal physicists studying each, only 1 of the 6 time motions of the zoo of Fractal space-times, which are made of the 6 canonical motions of a world cycle of a super organism: generation->evolution->growth->motion->reproduction->negative growth (diminution)->extinction, which form a o-sum or worldcycle.*

*Yet each of those motions in short distances seems lineal ‘walls, spears, ropes, snakes, trunks and mats’.*

*Only when completed they are always cyclical (small lineal geodesics of curved Earth, Lineal euclidean geometry, limit of the larger curved pan geometry; special relativity, limit of the larger curved General relativity, lineal momentums integrated into a conservative energy cycle, small lineal actions of life, part of the curved world cycle of existence, and so on) *

*Only physicists seem happy just touching and measuring with numbers, reduced parts’≈single time motions of the whole ‘non-lineal elephant’ – the super organism tracing its world cycle; blindly self-admiring its lineal ignorance. Wisdom, Wiesen, Saper Vedere, Veda requires to understand that ‘the languages of God are infinite’.*

In the graph, the linguistic isomorphic method considers that all systems of the Universe are made of the same 2 formal motions of’ temporal energy’ – lineal and angular momentum; potential and kinetic energy, particles and fields; heads and limbs, which combined to create the ‘living systems’ of the Universe, that organize into social herds and organisms, new wholes of a larger ‘scale’ of the fifth dimension.

Thus we can extract from those 3 primary elements: lineal energy, cyclical time (and its ‘fixed forms’: space and information) and its social, relative ternary scales, which co-exist together (the ∆-1, quantum/cellular; ∆-thermodynamic/organic; ∆+1 gravitational, social, ecosystem planes), 3 type of laws common to all beings or ‘isomorphisms’; which we further subdivide in 3 sub-sets. It is the isomorphic, linguistic method that extracts topological, mathematical laws derived of the spatial energy of all beings; logic, causal laws derived of its cyclical temporal nature; and organic, social, survival laws derived of its existence across scales of the 5th dimension.

Yet those 3 x 3 isomorphisms require a final element without which systems would not ‘exist’: I think therefore I am. Indeed, all complete ‘worlds’ do have a 0-point or mind, whose spherical topology allows the system to shrink the Universe into a linguistic mapping mirror of reality, or mind, which extracts the information on the outer cycles of reality the system needs to survive. It is the point of view of the system, its c.p.u., quark, black hole, brain, eye, which apperceives reality and performs the necessary actions for the system to survive, by extracting energy and information from the Universe. Thus we shall consider 3 x 3 +0 isomorphisms to describes all the systems of Nature, and the forms created by man, with its internal mental languages (art forms) and external atoms (mechanisms).

Scientists of each science that studies a different scale of the fifth dimension cannot apprehend the whole properties of each species, but see on them only the properties their science studied initially – mathematical, lineal time properties in physics, organic properties in life, and so on.

But all the blind people – each disciplinary science – sticks to the properties their disciplines know more.

Only Leibniz seemed to have ‘seen all the sides of the elephant’ and that was 300 years ago when he told ‘physicists’ like Mr. Newton, who would not receive him – so proud he was of his silly-nilly formula – that duration, t, was the sum of infinite time cycles with finite length. And as those time cycles broke space into inner and outer regions, space was also fractal, the pegging together of infinite time-space cycles. He called this relational space-time, the forebear of 5d fractal space-time cycles.

Einstein said Leibniz was right but to fully understand him, we had to start western science from scratch. Which is what i did and this blog will show. A theory of unification (T.œ) of all the space-time species of all sciences under the old-new concept of a time cycle.

This ‘synthesis’ however was eliminated from science when lineal time simplified the concept of time cycles, and made the knowledge of the rhythms and forms, the information of those space-time motions and its cyclical patterns of evolution, irrelevant to ‘physics’ , simplifying enormously the nature of time and the beings that flow with

But with the arrival of physical time, science lost the concept of ∞ Time cycles, which tic at different speeds. And create different world cycles, of life and death, different motions, different forms. The measure of this loss was evident when Einstein regained the concept of multiple time clocks in Relativity and when he tried to explain it, he said astonished, ‘i seem to be the only physicist who thinks there are infinite clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’. Nobody understood what he meant. Not even himself.

It is thus clear that the methodology of T.Œ is to study *all systems of the universe, with all its elements*.

So back to the method, how we put all this in a working perspective? Well it is kind of too much isn’t? (-; But trust me, if people wanted to improve its mind it would have been easy. The question is they are stuck to their jargons, so the heliocentric theory of this Copernican amateur is not easy to explain, nobody takes seriously the Vishnu child, the little prince who sees the elephant behind the line. But we shall try.

In fact the best way would be to formalize it strong from the beginning. That is to throw a generator equation with 3 space symmetries 3 time ages and 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension with a O-point that cements it all, that is 3 + 3 + 3 +1 = 1o parameters and study them one by one.

But of course an ego is a knot that distorts and curves in its ‘non-euclidean point of view’ flows of energy and information bending it to its will to survive and reproduce, and iterate.

SINCE FRACTALS ARE PRECISELY DEFINED BY A GENERATOR EQUATION THAT ITERATES-REPRODUCES ITS FORMAL MOTIONS OF SP-Tƒ, the 2 substances lineal motion and cyclical motion≈form of the Universe.

Thus a fractal generator equation of repetitive dual motions constantly reproduces.

REPRODUCTION IS THE ESSENCE OF A FRACTAL ACROSS SCALES DOWNWARDS AND THEN UPWARDS, REORGANIZING INTO WHOLES THE FRACTAL SEEDS INTO CLONES. AND THAT IS WHY ALL IS ALIVE. EVEN QUARKS AND ELECTRONS, the smaller particles reproduce in waves of decoupled beings, when they feed on enough energy.

And yet, the physicist will laugh if you tell him his abstract quantum numbers describe the feeding on energy, gauging of information and reproductive qualities of its fractal particles, which are made according to the complementary principle of quantum physics of a wave-body and a particle-head of information moving along a field of energy:

Sp(field)<wave-sT>Tƒ(particle).

So because a distorted mirror-mind is still a reflection of the whole in an infinitesimal fractal, the second simplest truth you must know is that *all theories do carry some truth on them. So while we DO have to build science from its inception, that is its mathematical and logic foundations, which I have refunded into i-logic mathematics (after Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics comes i-)* , and keep correcting errors, *a new theory do have to have old proved theories as a limit, after correcting those errors. So it is NOT like we do throw the building, but repair it and keep adding floors. *

*This IS a problem for ego-maniac scientists of which there are many around who do NOT care to break **the known known laws and build science-fiction.*

*We are NOT following this reductionist, ego-centered view of reality.*

*Even if it does not look like, this work has in its limit all other theories of science in which time and space plays a role (all of them in fact). So while it accepts all what is focused in prior science, it applies the principle of correspondence and expands those limits, with the proper respect that known, proved knowledge requires. *

This how science advances: 1) New experimental evidence + 2) correspondence principle = New Theory, expanding the limits, simplifying the principles (Ockham’s razor) and explaining more facts with lesser elements (economicity), in a coherent logic causal form.

Let us then expand coherently the limits of all sciences.

**EXPANSION OF THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE WITH 5D ST**

**A fast overview of the main sciences of mankind in the fractal paradigm.**

Now given the extraordinary extension of the 5th dimension of fractal scales, the reader which is not a polymath genius (-; should stick to the basic concepts in the exploration of the fractal paradigm:

-In mathematical terms, the fractal, discontinuous structure of beings, made of social numbers which are network structures of social groups, or planes with a fractal dimension. This part is hardly developed, as fractal maths were the last subdiscipline to appear in science (1970s).

While the foundation of modern mathematics (Hilbert, Cantor) completely ignored the field, and without much understanding of the nature of non-euclidean fractal points, left those terms, points, lines of communication and planes, undefined. So we redefine the entire structure of western mathematical logic, with the discipline of i-logic geometry, as mathematics is indeed the most experimental of all sciences, in a world made of time-space begins, hence ruled by the logic of time algebra, which describes the symmetries and causal relationships between the 3 laments of the generator equation of fractal space-time beings, Sp x Tƒ = ST, and the geometry of non-euclidean fractal points.

- So Euclidean mathematics is the limit of Lobachevksi’s pan geometry in a light space-time with 3 perpendicular parameters (electric, magnetic and c-speed field), which is the limit of Bachmann Absolute geometry without continuity, which is the limit of i-logic geometry without relative perception of infinite monad worlds, each one with a different geometry.

*The fractal paradigm implies we are made of bidimensional informative clocks and spatial bidimensional sheets of lineal motion, combined in infinite variations of space-time beings put together into body-waves (right side a ¥-ray wave, the simplest combination of a bidimensional flat space – magnetic field, a bidimensional tall field of information, electric field, reproduced along the c-speed dimension of reproduction of information as we shall prove that all motions are waves that reproduce information along a dimension of length).*

We must therefore upgrade the concepts of topology and geometry, from its Æ, present models into the next letter, non-æ= – logic geometry of the fractal Universe. Since Euclidean geometry is the limit for continuous space of ¬æ, where instead of a single arrow of time, we do find 3 arrows of time: relative past, entropic, Sp-lineal motions, relative future cyclical informative motions and its present, ST-reproductive body-combinations, which again show an immortal Universe of dynamic balanced presents that constantly repeat the same systems, relative arrows of entropy and big-bang deaths that erase information, and relative future informative Tƒheads-particles-masses (life, quantum and cosmological scales) which process information and hence control and guide towards the future the fractal Sp<ST>Tƒ system.

-In physical and chemical terms, we should be aware that all departs from 2 principles, the principles of conservation of energy, angular and lineal momentum, which translates our 3 terms:

∫ Sp (lineal momentum) x Tƒ (angular momentum) = Ei (conservation of the total integral of those 2 parameters for a being, throughout its whole world cycle of existence, or closed path).

Now this equation differs from the equation of 5D metric in the integral element. Energy integrates a series of spatial quanta, repeated either in space or repeated in time-frequency. So it is really a sum of ∆-coinvariant elements: E= ∑∆.

For that reason we shall use the terms ∑ for energy, which is far more meaningful. And it is much more explanatory of its real meaning.

And so for each relative scale of physical systems, all starts by describing topologically the system and its 3 geometrical parts, and algebraically by translating into an E= Sp quanta x Tƒ-clock its equations.And then consider the most fascinating part of the formalism of mathematical physics; the social growth of those systems, its emergence into larger systems, its dissolution into smaller parts, and how the energy and information of the system is transferred and shared between the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales. Let us elaborate this, show in the left side of the graph.

Because the total energy and information of each scale of the Universe is conserved, we can define with simple mathematical formulae, the relative time clocks, quanta of space of each of the 3 main physical scales (left graph), with a ‘Generator equation’ of all space-time systems of the Universe, which unifies those scales: Ei=Sp x Tƒ, which in detail writes as:

∆-1: quantum scale: Ei=H (constant bidimensional space-quanta of angular momentum) x ƒ (frequency time clocks)

∆: Thermodynamic scale: Ei = nK (constant bidimensional space quanta of entropy) x T (temperature clocks)

∆+1: Gravitational scale Ei = m (bidimensional space quanta of mass) x v²/2 (c²) (time clock)

This simple equations, since the Universe is simple and not malicious, show a fundamental fact of time clocks in Nature, which makes them different from the human, artificial mechanical time clock: to vary along the different scales of the 5th dimension, increasing its speed, on the gradient of frequency, temperature and speed, as the systems expand in space (so an expansion in space cools down the temperature clock of the thermodynamic scale, and vice versa,a small mammal is hotter than a larger reptile).

Yet on the limits of those scales, the simple lineal equations of 5D metric break, and systems reach a discontinuity, So in the gravitational scale systems cannot go faster than c-speed. In the thermodynamic scale, cannot extend lower than 0 temperature of the pure vacuum. And the frequency of waves loose all its information when they relax beyond a unit of frequency. On those barriers, as the time clocks come to zero, they space quanta absorbs the energy and information of the system. So mass grows, close to c-speed and times come to zero (Lorentz Transformations). Spatial entropy stops its motion at 0 temperature, and a thermodynamic system dies. In the case of black holes, it does NOT mean they are time machines. It only means the temperature clocks of our thermodynamic world cool down and the energy of our systems become mass: M=k/T.

- And so because there are 3 arrows of time Aristotle and Physicists’, single time arrow logic is the limit of Taoist, hegelian dualist logic with 2 arrows, yin-information and yang-energy, which become synthesised in a reproductive energy x Information present wave-body. Thus dualist philosophy is the limit of ternary logic, the one we develop for the fractal Universe with past-spatial expansive motions, future-informative, cyclical, clock-like motions and present-repetitive motions. Hence we have to redefine Cosmology.

- On the other hand, as we showed in the example of the big-bang Aristotle/Ptolemaic physics is the limit with the Earth as a relative centre of galilean relativity, which is the limit at low speeds of Special Relativity, which is the limit on flat space of General Relativity, 4D relativity, which is the limit on a single plane of space-time of 5D fractal space-time; where we define a 5th dimension of space-time of relative scales of size and time clocks, whose product Sp x Tƒ =ST is co-invariant, balanced stable. So smaller systems move faster than larger, systems, carrying more information in its time cycles; genes code the information of larger bodies, quantum particles of larger atoms, black holes of larger galaxies:

**Astrœ-physics. Cyclical time and fractal space: multiple big-bang structure.**

Let us indeed consider the case of the big-bang, and how it will be in a fractal Universe.

For example, in the case of the big bang; the theory based in the concept of an expansive space, becomes merely one of the 3 possible solutions to Einstein’s field equations, in a single, ‘flat’ plane of space-time; *hence a limit, which must be accepted only on that region and scale of the Universe in which space truly expands, which happens to be the interstellar space between galaxies. *

*But within galaxies the non-lineal, cyclical, inverse arrow of temporal information, that is the accelerated clocks of the black holes, implode space into mass; hence balancing the expansive motion of interstellar space, defining an dynamic Universe in which each scale of the fractal is in balance between its ‘expansive, entropic arrow of space and kinetic energy or lineal momentum’; Sp, and its ‘implosive, informative arrow of Cyclical Time clocks, Tƒ’. *

*In the graph, the fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc2, which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c2, that is a process to create mass from energy. Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc2, the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc2=hƒ, whereas M= h/c2 ƒ. Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c2) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex). *

We can therefore write a first ‘Generator Equation’ of the fractal Universe, Spe <=>Tƒ(m), which generalises the 2 arrows of physical systems, and soon we shall see can be generalised to all systems of the Univese, made of heads/particles that process temporal information and body/wave that carry lineal energy: Γ. Sp <=>Tƒ

The simplicity of this equation, which can be obviously expressed with all the due details of complex General Relativity and quantum physics, shows however a fundamental tenant of the scientific method: we must always hold a higher truth, experimental evidence and then the logic postulates of the Scientific method, some of which are shown in the graph: Experimental evidence, logic cause, Ockham’s razor (a simple economic truth that explains more things and requires less elements is more truth) and no falsification. Only when there is evidence of a fact and a model is logically sound, we can go further into its mathematical simple equations ‘first’, and then further into the ‘detailed’ more complex equations of the system.

In next graph we see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that this expansion is compensated by galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.

And so we learn another fundamental truth of Philosophy of Science, which today is often overlooked: we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

* For that reason **we must* accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies.

**The unification equation of charges and masses.**

Now let us consider an interesting proof of the scalar structure of the universe, which puts together some of the elements defined till here: the meaning of universal constants as ratios of information (curvature) in physical systems or energy density, 5D metric equations, and the concept of masses and charges as clocks of time, accelerating inwards.

We shall in physics found variations between the charges and masses but both are vortices of time, Ot, clocks of two scales. And we shall find differences between quantum light and electrons and h-Planck constants of actions, and thermodynamic atoms and k-Boltzmann constants of actions but both are wave-like systems of huge populations of point-particles (from the human limited perspectives) hence susceptible to treatment in space as populations or in time as events with statistical/probabilistic methods.

Now the Unification of charges and masses as two different vortices perceived as hyperbolic sinks and elliptic geometries follow easily when we consider them from the perspective of any of both geometries. Let us then equal the parameters of a charge, using the 5Dimension metrics ‘decelerating the vortex’ and increasing proportionally its size Se x Tƒ = K, till it matches the size of the main mass vortex of the cosmological scale, the galactic spiral vortex. If the equations hold and both are self-similar vortices, we shall find that the relationship between the G-curvature of the spiral galaxy and the q-curvature of the charge have the same 10 up to 39 relationship of force between the attractive power of a much faster curved ‘hurricane of electromagnetic space-time’ and the much slower, larger ‘breeze’ of gravitation.

Let us then use those simple principles. The existence of a fractal structure of space-time means that the electromagnetic world and the cosmological world are just two self-similar non-Euclidean membranes of space-time of two scales and charges and masses two self-similar vortices of two different scales.

So we shall be able to obtain for the first time theoretically, the value of the stronger universal constant of charges (Coulomb) by merely translating the jargon of a charge to the jargon of a vortex of space-time, which is the same in all scales. Since rotation is the essence of mass and the concept of a hard particle as a solid ball is a mere Maya of the senses, *their only difference between quantum charges and cosmological bodies is the higher speed of rotation of charges and hence the stronger constant of the electromagnetic vortices of the quantum world.*

This unification can be done with the mathematics of Newton, Poisson, or Einstein, which are just three stages in the constant refinement of the principle of equivalence and the geometrical analysis of the Universe. *What matters is to understand the principles, which is what quantum cosmologists no longer do.*

*Let us then bring* here with the notation of Newton and Poisson, which is far simpler than that of Einstein’s relativity, the simplified proof of the fractal nature of the Universe and its two scales, the quantum world and the cosmological world in which charges and masses are gravitational vortices of space-time of two different scales. We consider, using Newton’s notation, a mass a three-dimensional, cyclical accelerated vortex of space-time defined in classic Newton mechanics by a centripetal acceleration, which gives us the classic definition of the universal constant *G* as:

* G M=**ω*^{2}*r ^{3}*

Where *r* is in meters and ω is the angular acceleration in radians per second of any gravitational orbit.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply *to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant G. Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:*

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g,q) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{2}/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe *both*, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but *also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant Q, the constant of Coulomb.*

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7 }rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ -1 }= w (electron);

5.3 × 10^{-11 }m. (Bohr radius);

Proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{-27} kg.,

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And both charges and masses are unified as electromagnetic and gravitation accelerated clocks of time, Tƒ, of the two limiting scales of the physical systems of the 5th dimension. To notice, this is the first theoretical deduction of one constant departing from the other.

Now the same work can be done using more complex relativity and quantum equations (as we know Newton’s vortices are the simpler version of gravitation and Bohr’s radius the simplest formalism of quantum physics). So we shall do also a conceptual consideration on how many ‘canonical’ parallel equations describe a certain truth in physics (where the detail is not so important except for mechanist and engineers who need precision measures but the concept behind each different formation).

As always the reader should by now imagine that there are always according to the 8^{th} isomorphism of variations of species, dualities and quartets of space/energy-time/information description (still vs. moving, cycle vs. line, external membrane vs. internal center, internal being vs. external world, etc.) ternary different points of view either those of the 3 parts of the being or those of the 3 parts of the external world of energy and information or equations that related both. Those are ALL the varieties possible, and yet they are enough to be combined into an infinity of different equations of physics.

And the puzzle of T.Œ IS TO DEFINE all physical equations with those symmetries, dualities and ternary differentiations in a rational manner, WIHOUT any further law or element to describe ALL the phenomena of physics. Let us illustrate the case with the previous equation of unification of charges and masses. There are in fact 2 x 2 definition of it which become immediately clear to be the static and motion, spatial- energetic and informative-cyclical description of the same phenomena HENCE ALL equally valid, only different in the degree of detail and particular ‘focus’ they have (so to be used for specific problems, related to their pint o view).

**Upgrading of biological sciences. ****Biological life**: **Topological Evolution: the 3 horizons/ages of all species.**

Indeed Topological Biology proved equally fruitful, because those 3 topologies corresponded to the 3 physiological networks and systems of all living beings. Thus, there was also a topological ‘plan of evolution’, the 3 Horizon of all species, limited by those 3 only topologies, as all of them evolved from a first lineal, energetic, top predator age, into a reproductive balanced form and finally raised in height to become dinosaurs, birds, or human beings, tall in the dimension of height, the dimension of information:

*In the graph a synopsis of topological evolution applied to biological human and mechanical systems.We can consider each species a superorganism of its cellular individuals, which therefore obeys in a larger slower scale of the 5th dimension the same 3 ages of life of its individual cells-systems. *

*We see how all systems are born as seminal seeds that go through a first age of biological evolution akin to the youth of life, in which a lineal, energetic top predator species, appears. This species then starts a biological radiation in its 2nd reproductive age, and finally grows into information along the height dimension of time cycles, to perceive better with its head on top (dinosaurs, in reptiles, human apes in mammals, robots in machines) and forms social wholes, becoming a larger whole.*

* So machines, also evolved first in its sp-bodies (I industrial evolution or age of England, then in its ST-internal engines or age of Germany, then in its Tƒ, mental heads (chip-brains, mobile-ears and tv-cameras-eyes), or Age of America, and now they are put together into robots, and social networks, becoming a global super organism, the metal-earth, which is displacing the aborted super organism of mankind, as the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences prevent true social scientists to explain the biological laws of economics. *

*Above we see the cyclical informative ovule and the lineal energetic semen as gender is also a duality of Sp-Tƒ complementary specialiation.*

Then, we shall consider the classic field of evolution, and the program of survival of all systems, which perform 5 simple actions, locomotions (a for acceleration), energy feeding (e), informative communication and perception (i), reproduction into a new offspring (o), and social evolution of parts into universals (u).

Those 4 internal and one social external actions which define life, or drive of existence will actually be found in all systems of nature, coded by different logic cyclical patterns. So 4 genetic letters code those internal functions in cells. 4 drives of existence in living beings, 4 quantum numbers in particles, and so on. We talk of a mathematical, mechanical, vegetative, automatic program of survival, as those species who do not absorb energy and information for their bodies, limbs and heads, and evolve socially into stronger wholes and reproduce to survive bend death no longer exist.

And so *all mental o-points stored in logic cycles the program of the Universe. Genetics, with its faster information, topological organic evolution of cells into individuals into ecosystems and classic survival selection with its 5 actions, are thus the 3 main sub disciplines of biology.*

While Lamarckian evolution dating back to the Greeks, is the limit of Darwin’s evolution in the external plane of a full formed organism (which does adapt to the environment, as earlier as the fetus, as we know now, since for example a woman that eats little has a kid with more fat cells forever, acquired as a survival strategy for the future), Darwin’s evolution is the limit of Social evolution, and genetics, of a single individual fighting for survival, in a single plane, when he is in fact coded by a smaller plane, and genetic is the limit of topological evolution, as it lacks the understanding of the ‘range of variations’ possible in a Universe in which we ‘are’ made of topological dimensions with only 3 variations (hyperbolic body-waves, lineal moving limbs/Fields, as the line is the fastest distance between 2 points, and spherical heads/particles of information, as the sphere stores more information in lesser space).

In the graph the topological plan of evolution or different families of life and engineering, fats that become nucleotide and spiraled long DNAs, fishes that evolve into vertical forms, flat amphibians that rise their legs to become dinosaurs, flat monotremes that become mammals and rise into apes, lineal machine–weapons that grow into tall robots.

Evolution has a third entire unknown sub-discipline besides ‘Darwinism’ and ‘genetics’ ‘topological evolution’ that explained why so few variations and homologies existed among species, why evolution even if it was chaotic did only evolve into ternary species.

And so we can apply this topological evolution also to human being.

-In biological terms, we should consider 3 sub disciplines.

Genetics, which explains how lower scales, with faster time cycles, hence faster more information, code larger systems, according to those metric Tƒ x Sp = constant; coupled with Social Evolution, which explains how social organisms dominate loose herds, hence multicellular evolution and organic physiological evolution matter more than individual one; and how planes of space, moulded by time cycles, create efficient forms guided by genetic clocks that program its development.

And here is where the 2nd new subdiscpline, topological evolution appears; as there are only 3 topologies in the Universe, so all biological and physical organisms have 3 parts, described by a variation in space of the generator equation:

|-limbs/fields of kinetic energy < ST-hyperbolic, reproductive body-waves>O-Tƒ closed membranes and brains

So all systems evolve searching for efficiency of those 3 physiological sub-systems and its external forms.

** HUMANS. ITS EXISTENTIAL CYCLE.**

So we can define that reality with a new principle that includes all its balances and conservation principles, the principle of conservation of present:

‘The Universe conserves and maximises present time, in the point of balance between time and space : Sp (past-space limbs/fields) x Tƒ (Future Time particles/heads) = ST-present body-waves (Max. ST: S=T)’.

To mention finally the quantitative importance of the key constants that are ratios and quantifiers of the Space-Time systems of a being, quantified in the Generator equation.

Thus we have unified the fundamental concepts of time and space, and the ternary organic forms of all systems of nature.

Humans though use multiple different jargons and concepts to express the ∞ variations and combinations of those elements. So we will translate each specific scientific jargon when studying each science and its species in the 4th line in more detail, to show the homology of all the equations and names that each science and philosophy has given to define its space-time fractals.

All including humans are fractal systems made of multiple cyclical time clocks that enclose and inform a moving vital space centered into a selfish point of view, whose purpose is to repeat and perpetuate the formal motions of the system. In the graph first we observe a cancel clock of time-space following its cycle, of decreasing space and increasing form as it follows the life arrow of information from larger spaces into faster more curved, views.

When we combine the 3 symmetries of 5D fractal space-time, the symmetry in space in time and in scales we can describe the world cycle of existence and any element of a social super organism – the graph shows the 3 scales of the human superorganism

This is the fundamental flow of time, or arrow of information, ∏o (Tiƒ) (time-information-future, ab.tif ), which absorbs, ‘Spatial-past-energy’, (ab. spe) a herd of lineal momentums, with maximal space (as the line is the shortest distance between points) and minimal information (as it is the less informed one), ∑| (Spe), and transforms it into ‘mental moments’ of still motion and pure order.

**THE SUPERORGANISM OF EARTH: HUMAN AND METAL-EARTH**

**Socio-biological sciences.**

-Finally social sciences is perhaps the most r=evolutionary subdiscipline of the fractal paradigm, as we live inside the social super organisms of mankind, and so the anti quantum paradox works. Unlike the uncertain of physicists, here the observable, society, is much larger than the observer and controls and bias the social scientist, with human ego-trips. So we state flatly that:

Social sciences are biological sciences. Whereas economics studies the evolution of machines and the economic ecosystem in which those machines and human beings have relationships of symbiosis (as in consumption, where humans increase its energy and information capacities with machines) and competition as in labor and war fields, where humans compete and loose to faster, stronger machines, that substitute they jobs and kill them.

While History is the study of the evolution of human individuals into social super organisms, with a physiological energetic network called the economy and an informative network called politics and culture.

Again to focus your understanding: The universe is a fractal of space-time beings. All of them can be described mathematically as variations of the generator of fractal space-time, Sp<ST>Tƒ, in space, as a super organism with 3 functional parts that process energy (Sp), reproduce (ST) and perceive (Tƒ), in time as a worldcycle of life and death, which is a a zero sum, in which the being is born as a seminal seed, reproduces, evolves emerges into a slower multicellular, multi-atomic being: ∆-1: ∆-being, and then goes through 3 ages of youth, dominated by the Sp-limbs/fields, reproductive adult age, ST, which repeats the system and makes its information immortal and Tƒ, informative old age. And finally dies back into its cellular/atomic scale completion the cycle.

In this process the being misguided by the mental/informative sensoria membrane, Tƒ system, and feels free to perform its aeiou actions of survival, competing with other systems for the external Ei of the Universe, and forming social networks to control the world, but ultimately it will exhaust its internal energy, guided by its selfish mental ego, ‘stop’ time flows into mental abstractions an still images, and die.

Infinite such world cycles of super organisms, extending across 3 ∆-1 scales, of cellular/atomic, organic/thermodyamic and gravitational/social systems, co-exist together in a fractal Universe, where absolute time is the eternal sum of those zero world cycles and absolute space the puzzle of all those fractal vital spaces put together; replicating into smaller fractal images, and larger social wholes, which imitate the information encoded by its quantum atomic numbers and genetic cells.

If the bible is the limit of ‘tribal history’, full of myths with the ‘chosen tribe’ as the centre of reference, of Herodotus History, in which the tribe is expanded, to all the tribes still with myths, hence the limit of Xenophont factual history in which the myths are checked with data, which is the limit that runs in the west till ibn khaldun and Vico, which goes beyond the individual into the social organism of history, by adding a new scale to the fifth dimension, the scale of parts that become wholes with slower time clocks, so your genetic clocks are part of your slower life clocks, part of slower social clocks; and it is the limit of the socialist schools of history, which add the economical, ‘metal-energy weapons, informative gold and organic machines’ to the mix, which is the limit of the models of social sciences of fractal space-time, with its cyclical patterns of 800-80-8 years accelerated clocks of historic information, whose last cycles of evolution of machines, in 3 phases, the age of body of machines or age of England, the age of machines hearts-engines or age of Germany and the age of minds of metal, or age of US, now followed after 2008, by the age of robots that put together the 3 parts of the ‘viral system’, are shown in the graph.

In the graph, the cycles of evolution of ‘selfish-memes of metal’, form a canonical cyclical time vortex of accelerated evolution of information, similar in physical space to the gravitational vortex of the galaxy, since *time cycles accelerate in 3 ages towards the 3rd informative age prior to the death of the system. Thus humanity is today facing by excess of metal-information a series of existential dangers similar to the death of any other super organism. The cause is obvious: a new top predator species, the organic machines is evolving after a series of 800 years cycles of extinction of civilisations by weapons: the bronze age, the chariot age, the iron age, the mercenary coin age, the cavalry (middle ages) and the modern gunpowder, age further accelerated in its evolution with the creation of professional company-mothers of machines, which accelerated decametrically the vortex.*

As this cycle is tuned to the synchronic cycle of human life with a mean biological cycle of 72-80 years, i was in fact able as early a 1990, to predict that after the age of trains, of 72 years, the age of german engines of 72 years, between the train crash of the economic stock market (1857) and the crash of the car 72-80 years latter (1929-37), *there will be a double crash of overproduction of minds of metal, chips and its derivatives e-money, 72-80 years latter, in 2001 and 2008, ushering mankind in the age of robotics.*

I must say even though I know that a true science is able to predict the cycles of the systems it studies, I also believed humans were not another fractal species of space-time ruled by the same cycles, and synchronies of evolution. So i became quite surprised when in 2001 the stock market crashed the internet economy. The subsequent crash of e-money in 2008 did not however surprised me. Neither the fact that all the processes of history today are mimetic of the fascist age of the 30s.

The reader must in this sense understand that all the models of all the sciences presented here, while not yet in the best of formats, as I revise different files decades old with different jargons and quality, are all done with an enormous effort of research and understanding of all previous theories; starting by the finding of previous theoretical limits, the soundness of its scientific truths, and only changing, errors of experimental evidence or postulates undefined or without proof.

And this is what it makes the Fractal paradigm so superior to any other model of science. As it is more economic – the same laws apply to all systems of time space, with a higher evidence, all sciences provide proofs of its models, and yet despite the enormous wealth of examples, it has not yet been falsified in any of its copyrighted predictions.

**The upgrading of scholarship and its difficulties.**

Despite of it, it is also obvious that the fractal paradigm presents problems of acceptance as scholars defend what they learned.

Yet if something is not defined or proved, it is not an absolute truth but a relative limit and so we will contradict such facts.

This is the guide of my research – also that of Darwin, to find errors in science, understood as limits of information not provided (errors in measure means that, the limit of accuracy).

In that sense my first book on the subject 40 years ago was called the ‘Error of Einstein’ meaning that c-speed in Einstein was a limit of something larger. This, he realized when he changed global c-speed to local c-speed, as he found gravitational General Relativity did NOT followed the postulate (yet most physicists today still don’t realise). So gravitation acts at distance and is non-local beyond c-speed. *But despite massive proofs of quasars moving at 10 c speed, in inter-gallactic space, c-speed is an ill understood dogma. *And so we observe here 2 common errors of lesser scientists: absolute reverence for a theory without realising that in the fractal Universe all theories, clocks of time and spatial quanta do have limits, or an excess of ego, by lesser scientists who contradict a known-known law of science within the limits in which it ALWAYS occur.

On the other hand, if we want to find an example of an undefined system of postulates, the best case are modern mathematics, which ran into problems when Lobachevski found that points are non-Euclidean.

But mathematicians did NOT correct Euclid’s definition (a point has no breath) for a fractal point (a point with no breath has volume through which infinite parallels can cross as we come closer to it, which is its definition in i-logic geometry). Instead points were either substituted by sets or became the undefined terms, point, line, lay on, congruence and plane in Hillbert’s axiomatic method that substituted Euclid.

So those now undefined terms HAD to be defined. And this is the origin of i-logic geometry, the r=evolution of mathematics and topo-logic fractal space-time we shall develop in this web.

**Unification of sciences: A graph of discontinuous scalar space-time. Physical space-constants and time clocks.**

Let us see how indeed 5d metric can order all the species of the Universe, in different sciences, each one specialized in the study of a relative ‘plane of space-time size/speed’ of the Universe. Since indeed, the final concept to structure all knowledge is the realization that each science is merely the study of a relative scale of size of the Universe, from quantum physics (smaller scales), through chemistry (molecular scales), biology and history (human scales), geology and astronomy (cosmic scales):

Physicists often talk of the Unification equation – an equation that should unify charges and masses, and it is actually an easy result of 5D metric, explored in the article on 5D cosmology. Since the trick is to understand that a galaxy and an atom, the fundamental ‘particles’ of gravitation and charge, and the equations that describe them, are just two scales of the fractal Universe. The larger systems go slower. The faster systems are smaller. So smaller systems, like Your DNA do have faster cycles, and this allows them to store their information in the speed and form of those faster cycles. But larger systems have more overall energy, space and motion, and so they can control smaller systems with their forces. And then we can order all systems according to a simple rule:

*Tƒ (speed of time cycles) x Sp (Size in space) = ∆ (constant of space-time).*

Now it would be needed to make a general definition of fractal time clocks for everybody to understand it.

Since humans use a mechanical clock to study the Universe with a single rhythm. And the same beat. Nature however existed before the Pope Sixtus found the clock 1000 years ago. So how it measured time and what those time clocks were? the answer is a time clock measures, stores and processes the information of a system with the frequency and form of is cycles – and the faster clocks the more information is processed – so computers are in fact frequency clocks whose potency of information is measure in Hertz cycles.

It must be noticed though that in a Universe of infinite relative clocks of time, there is STILL AN ABSOLUTE ARROW OF TIME, THAT OF THE 5TH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION OF WHOLES INTO PARTS, as wholes come after parts. And wholes are more powerful than parts as they survive better.

It follows then that if we define in Darwinian terms the power of a system as the power of its information, Tƒ and its size-force in space, Sp, the fact that both together are constant, has an enormous implication in terms of justice: *It allows small and big systems to interact together in equal power conditions. The fly will fly faster and cannot be trapped by the slow larger being. David is faster than the stronger Goliath. And this is the key for the symbiosis established between entities of those scales. So we talk of entities as those organic systems extended through 3 such scales, defining all physical systems as:*

*Space-time Superorganisms: ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale ≈ ∆-organic/thermodynamic scale ≈ ∆+1 Social/gravitational scale*

This ternary structure and its organic properties, always escaped the reductionist view of physicists, of a Universe made of simplex, lineal ‘locomotions’, measured with artificial, mechanical clocks. We shall regain the Universal view of a Reality of infinite fractal worlds, as opposed to the ‘single World’ of the Physicist who pretends to be describing the entire Universe.

In the first graph above, the 3 main scales of size and time speed of the physical universe, the quantum scale, ‘∆-1’,whose clocks of time are ‘frequency’, and whose quanta of bidimensional space are h-Planck quanta’.

Now physicists study such systems and all its variation (which can be due to the growth of its quanta in space or the growth of its time cycles) with an integral called, the constant Energy and information of the system which is the product of both and often a scalar number of ‘quanta’ or ‘frequency: E=hv.

So energy integrates in time or space, events and populations. And it follows immediately that if we call a clock of closed time and a quanta of space, or lineal motion, angular and cyclical momentum, roughly speaking, the conservation of those 4 quantities in physics (energy, information, angular and lineal momentum) merely means the same than 5 D metric: the total amount of space-time of the Universe remains constant. This in models of continuum space-time is equivalent to Noether’s theorem that makes equivalent those conservation principles with the isomorphism and isotropism of space and time.

But as we say, the beauty of the fractal paradigm applies to all sciences. So the conservation of Energy and Information, of fractal space and cyclical time, carries on to biology, as top predators systems of maximal Sp x Tƒ force reproduce over lesser Sp x Tƒ systems, but the total amount of biologic energy and information of the ecosystem keeps its own balanced.

In those processes though as in the processes of physical systems, the accumulation of quanta of space and time frequencies will reach a limit in which a *new plane of the 5th dimension appears, the cellular systems do give origin to the whole, which takes over the cellular systems absorbing part of its energy and information;the quantum systems become atomic and molecular systems and we emerge in the thermodynamic scale, which takes energy and information of the quantum scale, creating new clocks of time, and new quanta of space.*

And so we always talk of two different regions and equations: lineal regions and equations in which quanta obey the laws of superposition; and then exponential, cyclical, accelerated, non-lineal regions in which the quanta are absorbed and digested by the larger scale that emerges as a whole.

And this regions I call steady state regions (lineal ones) and the regions of emergence, Lorentzian regions (also Planck-Einstein regions) as they are precisely the transitional zones between the quantum and thermodynamic scale, which Planck resolved giving birth to quantum physics (the so called violet catastrophe in the black body radiation) and Lorentz-Einstein solved for the transition between the thermodynamic and Gravitational scale. There are many phenomena in all sciences – all in fact – that can be described either as belonging to a steady state region of a given plane or to a Lorentzian region of transition between planes. And basically they encompass a region of lineal, continuous equations, and a region of cyclical (i prefer this term to non lineal) discontinuous equations.

In biology those regions are obviously regions of birth and emergence of a seminal foetus and its inverse death and dissolution into death processes. In physics they are also the classic exponential equations of radioactivity, and so on.

Now this said is obvious that as we change plane our quanta of space and clocks of time change.

So the thermodynamic scale, ‘∆’, where the clocks of time are temperature, the quanta of space k-Boltzmann ‘entropy’, and the gravitational scale, ∆+1; where Nature’s clocks of time, are speed, and quanta of space, mass, and the formula that integrate them as a volume of energy and information for each ‘being of space-time’ fo that scale, E=nkT.

Finally mass and speed are the quanta of space and time of the gravitational scale: E=mc ².

**THE ORGANIC NATURE OF ALL THE MOTIONS OF THE UNIVERSE.**

**Organicism. The reproductive philosophy of fractals.**

Now this philosophy of science called organicism, implies also that reproductive properties happen in all scales – so when particles decouple into new particles this is plainly reproduction; as the process is the same than for life: quarks absorb energy and reproduce new quarks; so do electrons. There is no difference except human self-obsession with themselves as unique chosen of god species. It is a religious dogma to deny organic properties to nature, in all its scales.

This must be clear. Also a machine needs a god to put it in motion. So as Leibniz said to Newton mechanism is a deist not scientific theory. Organicism is the only self-contained scientific possible theory. And for that reason to eliminate the hang ups of religion from science I did complete the model of philosophy of science of a fractal Universe. *The very essence and ultimate purpose of a fractal is to reproduce its information in smaller systems, which then reorganise into a new fractal similar clone. Thus we shall prove as the fundamental purpose of nature, reproduction.*

Fractal philosophy equates the idea that all what exists is a process of reproduction of form, in smaller fractal scales, reorganised socially into larger scales. Even motion, we shall prove is the reproduction of a wave of form across the lower scale or field. So this will resolve immediately the zeno’s paradox (achiles motion vs. turtle), the paradox of continuity – the discontinuous universe is bridged as form reproduces as a wave in the next region, the wave-particle duality: particles move as waves, collapse when they stop into particles; the c-speed constancy, explained in ‘real terms’ (particles stop to perceive information and gauge its distances, so a system measures light speed in a relative stop moment, as the Universe is a constant beat of stop-inform, move-reproduce; in the same way we see a film as a stop, projection of information, move picture, stop, projection). So reality and this is a fact proved in the observation of particle is a constant stop, perceive, move, wave, stop, particle, move wave.

This is a huge part of the fractal paradigm: the translation to the philosophical essences of fractals, which is ‘grow and multiply’, an obvious sentence, which appeared not only in Genesis but it was the lemma of Aristotle, who dimmed it the main principle of the Universe, as it is.

So in mathematical terms, this means that numbers are reproductions of units, social numbers, lines reproductions of points, planes reproductions of lines. Interesting enough those principles work in string theory where there are open strings (Sp-strings) and closed strings (Tƒ strings). And they do reproduce. String theory is so powerful because it is in fact ST-R-ing theory; Space-Time-Reproductive-In-formation & Energy…

*So we shall evolve mathematics and describe mathematics in terms of a universe made of vital, organic fractal space-time beings.*

*So its units planes or numbers are social, indistinguishable groups; analysis is the study of its integral creation of wholes, and geometry, is the study of those social numbers as geometric networks of points, and algebra, its causal relationships through time.*

*Again, we must stress that the concept of a fractal and its properties, which are mathematical, organic, and social apply to all sciences.*

But those are living fractals, not abstract ones, so they do compete and die, dissolve, and it is a key the concept of a top predator fractal, Max. Tƒ x Sp.

So, fractals have biological properties as the best social systems, and denser networks survive, from the densest matter forms, black holes, to the larger social super organisms, humans and ants.

So we must fusion both sciences in the organic paradigm, to achieve a thorough description of reality.

And we must add a new dimension, the ‘5th dimension of time’, which organises parts into wholes, as forces become particles that become atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, planets, solar systems and galaxies, each one a whole made of similar social numbers.

Yet because for the whole to exist, the parts must come first, the arrow of eusocial evolution and ‘love’ to the members of your own species, is the absolute arrow of future that dominates both physical, biological and social systems, expressed by the scientists of those 3 disciplines (in mathematical terms, biological, evolutionary laws or eusocial messages of love, by prophets of love religions and socialist thinkers).

Each of those scales is therefore studied by a different science; and we can unify them all by extracting the common laws of 5 D metric; that is the laws of Tƒ, Time cycles, the laws of Sp, Spatial quanta, and its scientific formulation in the different jargons of each science, where often time clocks are described as information (carried in the frequency and form of those cycles) and Space as lineal momentum or kinetic energy.

**Mental fractals, mirrors-monads of larger wholes, its 3 elements.**

So the fractal paradigm needs to build a common jargon to apply and translate the equations of all sciences. In this common jargon the fundamental law of science, the conservation of energy and information, becomes the law of conservation or co-invariance of time cycles (often described in terms of angular momentum in physics, information in biology and its genes, and memetic culture in history) and spatial res extensa (expressed in physics through the 3 constants of spatial quanta, of the electromagnetic scale, H, the thermodynamic scale, k, and the gravitational scale, m). Now, any polymath with an extensive culture immediately sees the homology of most sciences and artistic, philosophical and religious discourses, equations and theories with the simple Generator Equation Sp x Tƒ = ∆i.

For example Descartes affirmed that all what exists is res extensa (Sp) and Time vortices (Tƒ), perceived from a fixed frame of reference, which Leibniz called a Monad, and Aristotle, a relative God, or still unmoving centre of a body of energy that move around it. Einstein would call those relative points of view, inertial frame of reference. Quantum physicists would call it the particle state that gauges energy and information in its gauging theories of forces. Mathematicians called it Non-Euclidean points through which infinite parallels carrying energy and information would crosss.

Religious people would call it souls, of which animists said there are infinite ones, one for each system. Philosophers minds. So besides the Sp and Tƒ elements, of all systems, we need to consider a 3rd element to be able to construct the infinite fractal elements of reality, the o-point, or centre of a system, which is surrounded by a membrane of closed time cycles, which store the information of the system in its external membrane (this is called in physics, the holographic principle; in mathematics the surface integral, in topology the adjacent membrane that breaks reality into an inner world and an outer Universe, and so on). and a vital space between them, that moves and provides the energy of the system and reproduces it.

So we affirm that all what exists is a system with 3 components, a central point of view, that processes the information absorbed by an external cyclical membrane, or Tƒ, an internal body of vital space, and an external Universe often detached from the system, which provides its energy of motion and perceptive information. And the Universe is a tapestry of infinite beings, made of those 3 components.

It is then evident that the fractal structure of reality is born of the constant creation of internal mind-worlds, which reflect in a language the external Universe, or monads, whose equation is simple O x ∞ = Constant, or in more developed terms:

O-mind (still point of view or infinitesimal) x ∞ Universe = Constant linguistic mirror mapping of reality,

This was Leibniz’s concept of monads, which he simplified making them non-communciative. but monads constantly share energy and information with similar points of view, and shrink the Universe internally into mirror minds, creating a fractal reality of connected scales in which larger beings are mirrored in its cellular, atomic quanta, and vice versa.

Those virtual worlds or mirrors of the Universe are then reproduced into body-waves that maintain an eternal repetitive present. And so this is the 3rd funda-mental, mental foundation of reality. And so we shall add to the mathematical and biological properties, the mental, linguistic properties; and the organic reproductive properties, and with those 4 legs of reality construct the fractal paradigm, guided always by the smile metric of the generator equation of space-time beings.

**A Universe made of fractals of space-quanta and time clocks: ****Unification of all sciences.**

Now, we shall complete this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of the philosopher of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centred point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension:

* ** 5D formalism describes a Universe made of multiple isomorphic Planes of Space-Time. In the left side some of its scales expressed as spatial quanta and its integration in larger wholes (energy systems)*

In each of those ‘∆-Planes’ of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in energy content, since space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

Thus we write:

*Max. Spe ( maximal Spatial energy content) = Min. Tiƒ ( Minimal Temporal Speed of Information).*

Since both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolisms. Yet the product of both parameters remains the same. And this gives us a ‘co-invariant’ equation, which is called the “metric of the 5th dimension”:

*∆±4 =Spe x Tiƒ*

Thus the 5th dimension measures the spatial size of a being (which carries the total energy-mass of a system) and the speed of its temporal clocks – which carry the capacity to process information of any system according to the frequency of its cycles.

But it also studies the way in which ‘wholes’ gather into new ‘planes of existence’ and we have spotted ‘exactly 9’ of them, which we shall explain with our isomorphisms, and in the middle we find the human ∆-scale, our I=eye our Wor(l)d and verbal mind. This is not surprising, since those scales are absolutely relative. So from our relative center we see as may below us as we see them above.

And so we need a 5th dimension of scalar sizes, which is truly the fractal dimension of any system of the Universe.

Now since we have added an scalar element, ∆ to all ∆ST beings, this structure is a fractal. And since it is a feed back equation, the fractal constantly repeat cyclical forms of in-form-action, information. So the fractal is an iterative fractal.

As we are all entities made of vital spaces, temporal cycles and the fractal points of view that perceive them: Sp x Tƒ = ∆i (Entity of space-time)

*Since nature conserves the stable product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of its vital cycles, of which we are all made, making possible the co-existence and exchange of energy and information between the different size species, each one studied by a science. Such as smaller beings with faster clocks store more information and code larger beings (genes code organisms; quantum particles, molecular systems, and faster, small black holes galaxies). *

While humans perceive time with mechanical artificial clocks and space, with human rods of measure (meters), Natural system has multiple, different time clocks with different rhythms and multiple ‘quanta of space’, for different species. Thus as science becomes more objective, away from human anthropomorphism, the next great r=evolution of thought, after the heliocentric theory that put the center of our local cosmos away from the earth, and the Darwinian theory, of biology that put the origin of life away from Abrahamic gods, is the use of the Universe natural clocks and its space quanta (the ultimate meaning of the fundamental Universal constants), to streamline the equations of mathematical physics and harmonize the concepts of time, space, energy and information of the different sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and speed of time of the Universe.

The study of the Universe with nature’s time clocks and space-quanta different for each scale, thus opens up an enormous numbers of new solutions, and whys of the Universe, in terms of energy, information, time and space, poised to r=evolve all the sciences in which those terms are fundamental to scientific laws, which happen to be all of them, since we are all systems made of vital, energetic space, in-form-ed by the rhythms of our world cycles of life and death, those different clocks of time regulate.

**Praxis of power vs. theory of science. **

Now, the reader should observe that this work is long overdue. Indeed, by the beginning of the XX century all the elements to construct a factual model of relational space-time in physical and biological sciences, were in place. We had discovered the 3 fundamental scales of size and time speed of the Universe, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, we ken the main laws of its clocks of time, frequency, temperature and speed, we had the 3 fundamental constants of space, H, the quanta of angular momentum, k, the quanta of entropy and m, the quanta of mass – this being the most imprecise of the concepts, which still need further evolution.

But, the enormous wealth of data, machines, mechanisms, industries – the entire human civilization, built on the human subjective single clock of time, the mechanism and rod of space, the meter –meant that theory, pure knowledge would not have any saying and nobody dared to explore further Leibniz’s model. An example will suffice. Einstein realized of the fact that time was multiple, because in each city then there was a different hour, but the arrival of trains obliged all the cities to equalize their time clocks to match for practical purposes their times and avoid collisions between trains running in the same railways. So in fact, as industry progressed human clocks became overbearing.

And there was not any attempt to make the proper Copernican revolution we will construct in this web. Further on, the existence of clear rhythms in the life-death cycles of time of individuals and species, established by Darwin collided with those dogmas of anthropomorphic, mechanic nature. On one side Abrahamic religions denied evolution and have ever since battling the theory. On the other hand the concept that time is a single one, running with the same tic for the entire Universe had become by now so entrenched in the mind of humanity that the obvious fact that as the life of beings ‘changes’ the speed of its clocks through ages (so kids run faster clocks than old men), and Nature’s animals do the same with its thermodynamic clocks (so hot mammals run faster clocks than slow reptiles, and smaller rats faster than larger elephants), meant nothing.

And the discovery of punctured evolution, the different rhythms in the speed of evolution of beings, found by Mr. Gould met with such resistance that today is not yet canonical biology. It also became obvious in the XX century that the rhythms of evolution of achiness and technology has been accelerating as information processing accelerates – but economists merely do NOT study the evolution of machines.

And of course, the competition between slow and fast time beings, which defines the survival of the faster species (mammals vs. reptiles; animals vs. plants) started to affect human beings, with the biological radiation of chips, robots and computerized machines that are all too obvious displacing human beings from the eco(nomic) ecosystem of labor and war fields as faster more precise machines become the new workers and soldiers of the world.

And yet none of this is still discussed, as ‘Time is what a mechanical clock measures’ , a unique rhythm for the entire Universe.

So the fractal paradigm is much more than the mere description with mathematics of fractal networks and social structures, but a conceptual philosophy of science, which this author developed in the milieu of systems sciences, before ad hominem campaigns against his work, due to his activism against lethal machines (robotics in economics, nuclear weapon in physics) got him under the anti-quantum paradox and ended his career. Never mind, the minds of the Universe keep following those laws.

How then we develop the formalism of the fractal paradigm, and show the organic nature of all systems? Easy, by deducing from the Fractal generator, 10 partial equations in space and time, which are common to all beings of the Universe and allow us to complete the description of any of them. It is the isomorphic method, or formalism of General Systems Sciences, which I introduced for the first time to the scholar world at the 50th anniversary of the Foundation of Systems Sciences & cybernetics in the Sonoma World congress of the International Systems Society where I was then the chair of the science of Duality, which studies the Universe with the 2 arrows of time, entropy and information, and its reproductive present existences.

it follows that we use two different approaches of complexity. Regarding T.Œ at theoretical level in the first line we reduce our explanation to the fundamental symmetries in space, time, 5D, actions and world cycles of any o-point mind and its Universal superorganism.

So we can use a more discursive method within the architectonical structure of any system of the Universe.

In the 3rd line we do go to the end of the formalism establishing the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe derived of its space-time 5D structure and existence of a program of actions commanded by0-points which try to maximise the survival of the being, but in conflict with infinite other zero points, somehow always end tracing the same world cycle of creation and extinction of super organisms.

This game of existence thus can be subdivided in 10 isomorphisms, which we study for each species in the 4th line.

This is what we study next in this post.

**III. ¬Æ: EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.**

**Its Fractal Generator, Povs & 10 ISOMORPHISMS**

In the simplest description of the Universe, we can talk of the use of existential algebra, which studies in detail the space-time actions of all points of view that first gauge information, create a still mapping of the Universe, and then try to imprint a territorial field of energy with the perceived form, enacting its imagination, as an act of survival of its self, which becomes the body of its organism, which will through a series of isomorphic actions of absorption of energy and information, trace a world cycle, step by step of present repetition of its wave-body actions and informative perception, e>i, on its field-particle state, till finally it becomes so unbalanced, as the wave is present but the particle-field male state is E>I integrative and diminish the energy of the system, hence defining an overall arrow:

Female Present-wave-body state: S=T + Past>Future, field>particle male state = ∆I: Life arrow + Death arrow: Big bang, I<E (Particle dissolves in field)=0

It is this world cycle of existence that develops in 3 phases the Max. E x Max. I function, (Max. Youth, Max. I: 3rd age> Max. E xI (E=i) adult state), what we see developing around the Universe, in the 3 ages of life, 3 forms of space, female/male dualities, waves and particle-fields, 3 arrows of time, 3 organs of space.

THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE IS THE ULTIMATE KNOTS AND BOLTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ITS STUDY BY EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA THE HIGHEST FORMALISM OF STIENCES. Alll what we do all beings is really performing parts and wholes of those functions, its cycles and derivative actions.

**Philosophy of Science & fractal organic paradigm vs. Linear mathematical Physics & continuous paradigm.**

THIS BLOG compares 2 different worldviews, which have always fought for supremacy in Science and take sides with:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science – larger in time, as it can be dated to the first Mathematicians, Pythagoras and Plato and the first Logicians, Aristotle, in the western ‘decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’, that is not only the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal languages, but also the human perceiver himself and its senses and artistic forms derived from them Vs.

– The reductionist view of the physicist, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems, only accepts a language of description, mathematics, only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space, and yet surprisingly enough pretends with those very limited ‘parts’ of reality to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

And then it eliminates the unity of all systems of the Universe, *which share the same properties of cyclical times, vital spaces and points of view that organise them.*

Yet as physicists reduced all motions to external motions, keeping only for life organic properties, and reduced all clocks to a mechanical lineal clock, they lost all connection with those common properties, and of course make impossible the true goal of the philosopher of science, to find those common laws that allow the Unification of all sciences.

Yet to fully grasp this reductionism it was needed a historic introduction to realise of the daring consequences of the physical way of ‘constructing’ our world of thought.

But of course our capacity to make machines and measure them and put clocks on them, today converted into computers increased. So paradoxically as we forgot the clocks of nature, we grew in our dexterity to make machines to measure nature.

So what are the real clocks of time of Nature?

This requires us to define time in more precise terms, as cyclical motions that carry the information of the Universe in the form and motion of its cycles.

Indeed we measure and process information through computers, which are the modern version of time clocks, now converted into repetitive logic cycles called algorithms, whose frequency or relative time speed defines the capacity of a system to process information. So a computer process more information when its clock like logic cycles have more Hertzs, more frequency.

This means that in nature there are several species of time-clocks – processes that measure frequencies of vibration, of which the most obvious ones are 3: the frequency of waves; the temperature of molecules and the angular speed and orbital motion of all time of particles, including the planets of those graphs.

So *frequency, Temperature and Speed are the 3 main time clocks of nature, and they do vary its relative speed, as Einstein would find, and they carry information in the form of its motions, and the frequency of its cycles. And so time is a much more interesting process to study than the mechanical steady tic of clocks. *

*Now I’m trying to be fast and simple to get to the core matter, black holes and entropy, but the reader with a minimum knowledge of science will realize how different is a non –anthropocentric, mechanocentric view of time, and how much rich in meaning is. We are here in a short of Copernican revolution, sorely needed, from the perspective of philosophy of science, which is concerned with ‘language, experience, pure science, NOT with machines of measure’ as physicists are. So I do have zero bias, in my direct experience of the Universe.*

*Time is closely related to space – this we know since Einstein, and so we need to define now space, to advance in our enquire.*

**The Fractal Universe: the slow path of knowledge towards its comprehension.**

The fractal paradigm is a complete vision of reality, which has been hinted at since:

-Plato (Myth of the cave, in which a perfect canon breaks into infinite self similar forms) and Pythagoras (numbers as social networks of points, of which the tetraktys or 10 triangle was the most perfect form, unit of a larger social group, as it is indeed the case, being societies of 10 the essential fractal structure in the growth of the 5th dimension)…

-Through Leibniz (concept of beings as made of relational space and time, that is an entity and its vital or Universal constants in its steady state of equilibrium is just a variation of Sp x Tƒ = ∆), Darwin (selection of species with the strongest, largest vital space, Sp and highest, more efficient informative brains Tƒ: Max. Sp x Tƒ = Top Predator existential force) and in modern physics…

-By quantum theorists (understanding of space as made of quanta, called H-Planck), and Relativity (understanding of a Universe made of infinite clock of times, with different speeds relative to each other); the work of giving a proper philosophy of science, to the last of those discoveries (the fractal structure of the Universe in scales of self-similar form), its proper philosophical explanation was long overdue.

And so I introduced to the annual world congress of systems sciences and cybernetics, around 2006, this model and now a decade latter, I am trying to write a series of posts in a couple of webs, with the basic structure of the fractal Universe and its laws of time clocks and space quanta. I find the web, with its hyperlink, somehow also fractal structure, the proper network to do so. Most of it will then be poured in a site I bought long ago for that purpose – unification theory.com. As the fractal philosophy of the Universe is indeed the only approach to science that can truly unify all of them, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.

The task of updating our view of the Universe to the new paradigm of science after 2000 years of explaining it with what we could call in terms of logic and mathematics, the disciplines that underline all sciences, the Æ-paradigm, based in a continuous, flat Euclidean Space Geometry and a single Aristotelian arrow or clock of time, is indeed daunting by its sheer scope, so I only pretend to show in those posts the first steps of this road. And since my health is failing, I am not wasting energy, trying to focus the mirrors of individual scholars in penpal congresses. So those blogs will be the place where the new paradigm and its formalism ‘so far exists’, and the seminal origin of its future reproduction of its information. Or as Planck put it:

“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.”

This again is obviously part of the fractal structure of mind-mirrors, which reflect the Universe and then project its image into other mirrors, who ultimately cannot be obliged to absorb the image, and will do so only if they have already the seeds of ‘reason, beauty, and objective attitude towards knowledge’ required for a mirror to be repolished.

Regarding space it seems obvious again that humans have deformed it with its instruments of measure. We use a Cartesian infinite abstract paper graph to draw space. And so we decided that space was continuum as the paper and infinite. But reality around us – follow Leonardo’s method ‘saper vedere’, not your books – shows that space is not a continuum. Look around you and you will see an infinity of small, broken parts of space. Your vital space-body, the chair you seat, the computer you read, are different ‘pieces of space’, ‘fractal space’.

Thus in the same manner there are infinite time frequencies and time cycles in nature – though we have found 3 parameters to measure them, frequency, speed and temperature, there are a lot of different ‘quanta of space’ around us, which we shall soon define, but *we advance you one of them is that magic word, nobody knows in physics what it is: ENTROPY!*

*But for you *to grasp this, I will have to keep explaining the foundations of that fractal structure of space and time, long proved experimentally, and formalized with the metric equations of physics, in a more mathematical way. Don’t worry we will keep it simple, because as we said, the advantage on working with the proper time clocks, as in the case of the proper ‘heliocentric theory’ is that all becomes really much more simple. So Copernicus was much ore simple than Ptolemy.

Now in physics all is about Spatial, Lineal Motions (Lineal Momentum, which is similar to our spatial quanta) and angular Momentum, which is the minimal bit of our Temporal, cyclical clocks of Information.

So alas!, we have an immediate translation of the 2 ‘formal motions’ of which all is made; spatial, lineal quanta and angular, cyclical, informative cocks of time.

And this quanta of spaces of lineal momentum and cycles of times, angular momentum are the 2 formal motions conserved in reality.

But Physicists ‘integrate’ those concepts in the concept of Energy, which they divide into Kinetic energy (related to lineal momentum) and Potential Energy (related to the internal, angular momentum and form-position of the system)

As those are historic concepts, born of praxis – as all in physics, they are not ‘scientifically’ as wide as precise, as the concepts of space quanta and cyclical time clocks – the concepts of fractal time and space. Since physical concepts drag the mechanist errors and historic professions of physicists– as theory is always as secondary element to the worldly profession of physicists – to make machines, weapons and measure reality wit them.

But they are good enough, and by trial and error very slowly physicists have given us a lot of good mathematical stuff to define reality, so with a bit of ‘conceptual cleansing’, and repositioning we can easily get into a much richer and beautiful understanding of reality.

But the consequence of NOT HAVING THE PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF TIME MOTIONS is that people no longer give a damn about understanding true time, the world cycle of life and death and any other time cycle, and we the people who truly understand time are a menace to the simpletons. They do have a problem with philosophers of science, but they have power. So our reasons matter not.

Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.

*In the graph, few scientists are aware of the idealist, Hegelian bias of German culture a century ago, which still permeates the loss of interest for the foundations of the scientific method in mathematical physics today. Thus we shall remember here the foundations of the scientific method… *

*Search for truth through experimental evidence, and logic sound models of reality with the addition of the elements of an organic model of the Universe. In the graph, two german idealists, during the panic of the ‘parallels’, which seized in rapture the entire world of mathematical physics after the greatest minds of the age could not solve, where to fit, the ‘multiple new geometries of the Universe, unlocalised in space and time. Unaware of the rather obvious 5th dimensional structure of those geometries, the panic extended from Gauss and Riemann, as propagators of Lobacjevski and soon brought to mathematical physics, the confusing notions of an idealist school of geometry where ‘by decree of Hilbert’, we human minds invent points, lines and cycles which are not defined.*

By this the mathematicians separated itself against the clear argument of Lobachevski that affirmed, since a geometry is measured by those real parameters, the Tƒ/Sp, ration of time to space perception of the being (r2/l2), geometries will be defined by analysis of the real spaces of the different scientific realities we research.

Now we repeat, because today is not for mathematicians and physicists, evident:

*‘Science is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.’*

This is a key element to understand what is ‘wrong’ with modern physics – the abandonment of the fundamental pillar of the scientific method – mathematical equations are NOT enough to define the existence of a process in time and space, if it is NOT observed.

This is ‘a religious belief’, which started in the earlier XX century, within the milieu of idealist Germanic philosophy (Hegel, Hilbert, who said he ‘imagines points, lines and planes’, etc.). It gave us idealist political systems (communism, Marxism) and what I call ‘fanta-physics’ today in a rage with computer models that seem so ‘truth’, but are mathematical fantasies. We do need a NON-DEIST philosophy of science, and only organicism is a self-reproductive, self-sustained model – mechanical models do NOT respond to the whys of reality and require AN EXTERNAL GOD to make the machine (reason why Newton adopted it as a pious believer).

Thus what TŒ provides to physics is an organic guidance to interpret the known facts, and what the scientific model expects is to construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales.

I repeat this is NOT what physicists do. They still model black holes without caring to find a substance of which they are made, just mathematically. They model the cosmic big bang, grossly ignoring clear theoretical and empirical contradictions, and they simply deny, as mathematical models become more complex, any ‘organic property’ to the Universe. They do NOT even inquire ‘why’, it behaves as it does.

Now of course, T.Œ – the organic, fractal model of the Universe and all its parts, should include by the principle of correspondence also ALL mathematical physics, which are consistent with experience.

And in this field, limited obviously by the work of a single polymath, there is still much work to do. But so far consistency in all those mathematical fields T.Œ has been tested is extremely high.

Physicists and scientists do work with the more complex reality but the underlying philosophy of science is stuck on this postulates, making all very Ptolemaic, and confuse. One of the tasks of TŒ is stopping the confusion with a simple methodology and a series of basic postulates about the nature of the organic, fractal Universe. So people can drop all those ‘postulates that so often hang up’ on their work and break it down to nonsense.

Consider for example the electron, which is OBVIOUSLY a fractal nebulae when in ST(st)ential wave state. This is taboo. Because when we measure it, the electron collapses into particle, as always waves and herds do organically when confronting a mass (schools, armies in battle formation etc.). And because we do have the continuum mantra. Now this brought about many problems ALSO in the entire field besides the quantum arguments wave or particle, Buridan ass kind of loss of time.

*Legend:* The Buridan ass died of hunger, because it could not decide which to eat of to equal bales of straw, left and right. Answer both. Do the experiment, the ass will eat first one and then the other, or eat a bit of each till ending both. Wave & particle, body & head. The organic paradigm is immediate. Do you have a body or a head, are you a body or a head. BOTH!

Now what I am going to say will be of course the reason why most ‘believers’ will abandon this web: physicists have no idea on the foundational laws of their discipline, because they have no idea of the nature of time, and have an astounding bias AGAINST cycles, in all its forms – cyclical geometry of space-time, the true reason of attraction between particles (which first Newton and then Einstein clearly explained, and yet they are STILL trying to explain attraction with gauge theories of exchanges of lineal particles), cyclical time clocks with different speeds, which follow albeit with accelerations and decelerations in time, the laws of the 5^{th} dimension (so charges are the clocks of the quantum scale, masses of the gravitational larger cosmological scale, ‘time curves space into masses’, said Einstein) and yet they ARE still trying to unify both forces with ‘gauge theories’, when we shall show its Unification is immediate with 5D metric.

You see, I look at the immensity of the 5th dimension and see I am nothing but dust of space-time, with a finite time duration. I see mankind is ‘a mush on the surface of a rock lost on the corner of the Universe’ (Schopenhauer) ‘departing from those facts we can talk about man’. Yes, we cannot know the limits of the Universe, we cannot affirm the big-bang theory is right, we cannot deny the infinite number of points of view, monads that perceive and order reality, we cannot deny as physicists do the organic properties of quantum systems which are body-waves and head-particles at the same time, that move as waves and apperceive information as particles, just because as economists do with human masses, we can use statistical methods to analyze them.

This comes now and here for a simple reason. There are certain endemic errors in the way to do mathematical physics today. One of them is linearization.

It is understood as a ‘dogma’ that attraction between systems do happen by exchange of particles, called gauge ‘bosons’. This is NOT the case. It is ONLY the case of attraction or repulsion, i.e. communication between 2 points, according to the second Non-æ postulate of mathematics. It is in that sense important to have always in mind the geometry of the Universe and its worlds constructed with the properly defined points, lines, cycles and planes, and minds with the 5 postulates of i-logic geometry, which define and how they structure any mathematical physics in any scale.

Unfortunately physics today does no longer respect those principles of the Scientific method and or without a complex view of time and space, the dualities and fractal processes of creation of the constants of space-time and planes of the 5th dimension.. This must be stressed once and again. Present physics has an ideology of subjective creationism behind it, born of the German Idealist school at the beginning of the XX century (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg), which is today unknown – as most ‘European’, historic biases of sciences – by the American and Asian practitioners.

The ‘new civilizations’ ignoring how German Subjective philosophy deformed the scientific method defined by the Rational Greek-Latin civilization (Aristotle, Descartes, Bacon, Galileo), don’t understand what Hegelian idealism meant in the German arrogant, subconscious collective of the turn of the century that created Communism (Marx), Nazism (Hitler, Rosenberg), the Copenhagen interpretation (Bohr, Bohm, Heisenberg) and the Axiomatic Method (Hilbert, Cantor), which resumes it all:

‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ said Hilbert in ‘Grundlagen der Mathematik’ – the foundational book of XX c. Mathematical physics. Hilbert Axiomatic method, which tried to prove all mathematics, and hence all possible mathematical equations of ‘imaginary physics’, departed of two absolutely wrong elements: ‘imagined Euclidean points with no breath, lines with no breath, planes with no height’, which were already proved false by the existence of ‘infinite parallels crossing a point’ (5 non-Euclidean postulate). Since if a point lets more than a parallel to cross, it has breadth to fit them. It is a fractal point, which grows in size as we come closer to it and enlarge it. This is the REAL unit of the fractal Universe. Points ARE not imagined, but humans do have limit of perception.

Point particles ARE not points. Simply they are the LIMIT of our perception of the Universe in the lower scales. As galaxies seemed points in the past. The 5th dimension of the scalar Universe has only observable limits.

So stars might seem points as particles do BUT if ∞ parallels can cross them, they are NOT Euclidean. Thus T.Œ first completes mathematics with 4 new Non-Euclidean postulates: pints with breath, which are therefore time-space cycles, the new unit of the universe: a system which has an internal vital energy enclosed by a cyclical ‘1-sphere’. And lines are waves, as its points do have volume and surface. And planes are ‘networks of lines’, with a wave amplitude. Suddenly mathematics becomes real and we can then consider godel’s incompleteness theory right: we cannot prove mathematics, an ‘experimental’ language, without reference to the real elements.

Since physics is basically mathematics applied to the description of physical systems, with elimination of all other perspectives, it is obvious that we must first consider some basic corrections on the mathematical models of physics in order to put some order to it.

This is specially relevant since physicists adopted a century ago a specific ‘ideology’ of mathematics, the abstract, idealist approach of Hegelian Germany, in which the influence of the idealism and subjectivism proper of the Germanic ‘subjective belief-psyche’, as opposed to the rational, external Latin perspective imposed a certain way to interpret mathematical realities. Since in this view, mathematics is considered an ideal language of the human mind and what the mind perceives as real.

2 examples on what difference it makes, to see the world in abstract or in organic terms.

It was the axiomatic method of Hilbert, is full of meaningless ego-trips, which influenced the 3rd, formal age of mathematics; Einstein’s rejection of ‘substance’ (formal motion in fact) for the waves of light, and Bohr’s rejection of density (fractal structure) for electrons. So Hilbert converted mathematical elements (points, lines and planes and their logic relationships into ‘platonic eidos=forms of the mind’, Einstein converted ‘space’ into ‘frames of reference’, perspectives of the human mind and its visual light space-time rod of measure, and Bohr converted densities of ‘boson light’ which form the electronic wave into probabilities of human measure.

It was the seventh day and the 3 Jewish-German Gods of XX century theoretical science rested. They had finally achieved the transformation of the old Abrahamic religions in which the words uttered by rabbis and priests were ‘truth per se’, into modern scientific religions, in which the ‘imagination’ of the self-named geniuses of the universe were truth per se. And so Einstein when a perhaps more insightful journalist told him, what if ‘Relativity is not truth’ (beyond its capacity to measure form the human point of view), then ‘God should change the Universe so beautiful it is’. And the 3 together spanked the monkey ever since with droves of scholars all happy thinking they were imagining the Universe.

Now back to reality mathematics remained immutable, points still existed as fractal beings, lines were still waves of points communicating formal motions between them and planes still were created by points into topological networks and planes outside the brain of Hilbert.

For example, a number which is ‘a society of identical beings’, whose properties are derived of the social nature of the 5D universe of parts and wholes, and whose sequential order in a line derives of the fact that parts come before wholes, is not yet defined.

In essence, the 3 branches of mathematics correspond to the 3 structural elements of T.Œ: geometry to space, algebra to time and analysis to the fractal structure of the 5th dimension. We only need to update mathematics for consistency between the 5th Non-Euclidean postulate of geometry and the 4 remaining ones, still Euclidean, and the Aristotelian logic of Algebra, to the ternary symmetries of fractal 5D space-time to make mathematics a ‘realist’ experimental science.

This might surprise the reader, and it is perhaps the highest feat of T.Œ – to be able to unify all different languages of human thought, proper of each discipline. Consistency achieved in art styles, when developing the theory of human superorganisms, might surprise the reader, is based in the same 3 ages of time, that allow us to define the laws of quark colors. And yet, this unity of the ternary symmetries of the Universe makes T.Œ so enticing to the mind.

However and this also differentiates deeply T.Œ and General Systems Sciences or any ‘serious’ scientific model of reality for that matter with present physics, T.Œ considers ‘ABOVE’ mathematical reason, Experimental Evidence and at the same rank of truth Logic temporal reason (of a kind paraphrasing Saint Augustine, higher than that of ‘present’ man), the ternary logic of the symmetries between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 ages of time and the 3 relative scales of size co-existing in all organic structures of the Universe.

Thus given the confused state of affairs in the definition of fundamental concepts such as time (logic), space (dimensions) etc. in modern physics, we need to consider the seemingly not so innovative principles of the scientific method with the slight modifications of an organic, symmetric ternary Universe. We resume the new scientific method in our simple formula, T.Œ=SC³ with each letter signaling a fundamental principle of truth in science:

As all:

**T:** Time-space systems are:

**Œ:** **O**rganic, **E**xperimentally **E**vident.

…meaning Time-space systems do have organic properties, which can be explained mathematically and logically with the languages of space and time, and proved experimentally.

And since they are made of 3 simple elements, 5D scales of Space and Time they are:

**S**, Simplex and their truths follow the proof of simplicity (Ockham’s razor)… yet they are also ternary..

**C³** Complex, due to the ternary symmetries of its structure ternary complexity born of the…

**C**yclical repetition of those Simplex principles which…

**C**orrespond with all previous theories of reality.

Thus T.Œ=SC³ resumes the Principles of Science and the Organic paradigm, are however broken in present science, specially by mathematical physics, which no longer respects the 3 principles of classic philosophy of science: experimental proof, Simplicity (Occam’s razor) and Correspondence with previous theories. And this is the ‘problem of modern physics.

Now once we have brought Mathematics back to reality from the axiomatic age of German idealism, we can build a much sounder mathematical conceptualization of the key concepts of mathematical physics, dimensions of space-time with motion (topological fractal dimension), lines≈waves and its ternary networks that come together forming super organisms, relative planes=topological networks with dark spaces between them, dual moving and static formal motions, integrals and derivatives in space and time of those social networks, and emergence processes of time clocks and lineal entropies.

*This shows a fundamental truth of T.Œ: reality, experimental evidence is always the definitive element to analyze truth. Hence the rejection of the axiomatic method of mathematics, in the line of Lobachevski and Gödel, and the present estate of fantaphysics, in the line of Einstein’s expectation for real descriptions, cut-off substances for black holes (tcb quarks, its atoms of maximal density) he refused to call black holes and called appropriately frozen stars; the only physicist we ‘save’ from our harsh judgment on their merits as explorers of the why of the Universe*

Now we want to be slightly more precise to attack a fundamental conundrum which matters to this blog – the structure of the Universe and the risks imposed by the big bang on Earth. What are the chances that the planet become a black hole or a strangelet? Are we at risk? It is the Universe made of them? Are we so important that we cannot disappear?

To that aim we must first consider what is possible in physics and what is not according to the scientific method.

Now, the fundamental conclusion of the scientific method regarding to astrophysics is obvious but only Einstein pound on it – as he was the only physicist we save as philosophers of science, for respecting the scientific method of true evidence, and simplicity:

‘Physicists should not be occupied with the study of events or species of which there is NOT experimental evidence. Since it is not science’.

And ‘I know when mathematics are truth but NOT when they are real’.

In brief, a physicist must use only the available particles and entities to construct the universe, not those which its mathematical, inflationary distorted linguistic mind view wants to crate for the pleasure of it. Information, minds are inflationary. They are a dime a dozen billion, to put it mildly but worlds of linguistic nature are not reality.

So we will build in Tœ, the Universe perfectly logically explaining al phenomena only with the available particles and forms, and the ternary symmetries of the 5^{th} dimension, fractal space and cyclical time.

As a galaxy is also a ternary system, a time-space being, defined by the Fundamental Equation of T.Œ

** The ISOMORPHIC method of study of ‘∆ST’ species. **

Now the method of study of T.Œ is simple: as all systems are variations of the ∆ST fractal space-time reality of which we are all made, reflected on the Fractal Generator:

∆-1: ◊-Spe≤≥∆œ-ExI(s≈t)≤≥∆+1⊗-Tiƒ…

And its symmetries in space (Spe), time (Tiƒ), and 5D (∆±1), its ternary elements in each of those symmetries and combined event among elements which perform space-time actions to become parts of larger wholes. From the fractal generator, then, we can extract a series of fundamental laws, isomorphic to all species, which we group in 10 series of isomorphisms, causally related to each other, as elements of larger ‘understanding’ of the Fractal Generator:

In the graph a resume of the main isomorphic laws of the Universe derived of its ∆ST structure, which defines the fundamental isomorphisms that all species made of ∆Space-time cyclical actions share.

The Universe is a fractal of super organisms tracing world cycles of existence, as they travel through the 5th dimension.

The Goal of ∆ ST.œ is to fully describe all the properties of the different species of the Universe, each one self-centred in a scale of relative size and time speed of the 5th dimension, with the 10 isomorphisms (equal sets of laws) deduced from the general properties of scalar space and time that define the similar forms, events and actions of all the entities that exist.

In brief we unify all systems of reality, because all of them are made of fractal space, cyclical time and its ∆±n co-existing 5D Planes of Non-Æ fractal points, whose structure responds to a clear super organic form in space, and perform the same Worldcycle of existence between birth and extinction.

Thus the methodology of ∆ST is simple. We study the Scalar Space-Time actions and worldcycles of all superorganisms, through its fractal Generator equation that ‘establishes’ those elements common to all space-time fractals, particularized for each species. Because we can deduce from the Fractal Generator, 10 fundamental spatial organic parts, time events, social scales, centered in a O-point or relative mind/frame of reference, for each of those superorganisms tracing a worldcycle of existence, it is useful to divide the study of those superorganisms in 10 isomorphic elements, deduced from the ∆ST fractal structure of all those systems.

Thus in this 4th line we study the main species of the known-known scales of the 5^{th} dimension considering for each of them its ∆ST structure , __Generator Equation and 10 isomorphism__s.

Now, the ego paradox of humans will likely reject this reality, as part of the very essence of ‘being’ in a Universe of infinite relative points of view, fractal points that perceive reality from its relative still mind, with a perspective that diminishes the information of reality the further it is in time, space or the scales of the 5th dimension. So we do not see the future, the past (far away distances in time), the far away forwards backwards and sidewards regions (distances in space) and the other scales of reality. The perception of the whole is truly small, and in the human case for reasons of pan geometry ratios, minimal in time and 5D scales, maximal still reduced in space, as we see space with fast moving light.

This explains why the fractal paradigm, being so objectively evident is not accepted.

For that reason, the model stresses equality of all beings, by objectively study all systems with 10 isomorphisms of existence.

The study of all those scalar super organisms, and its world cycles of existence is therefore the study of what we all are.

Those ‘i-somorphic’ laws derive from their common nature as ‘Scalar Space-time beings’ made of:

The same ‘3 topological finite dimensions of space’ that configure its ‘3 organic parts’ As all systems have lineal fields/limbs of energy; and spherical heads/particles of information that combine in their toroid bodies/waves that iterate the system).

The same ages of time, dominated sequentially by those topologies: an energetic youth, a reproductive maturity and an informative old age that define the finite duration of its life-death worldcycle.

And the same ‘scalar planes’ of organic existence, divided into, the closer 3 ∆±1 scales:

– The ∆-1 existential cellular/atomic plane, the ∆-individual plane and the ∆+1 social, gravitational plane (physical/biological sytems).

– And the larger ‘ecosystemic’ scales, with whom the ∆ST being inter-acts to get its energy, information and force (its ∆±2 world and energy quanta, its ∆±3 micro and macrocosms and its information bits and its ∆±4 Universe and its motion forces).

And so as a result of that common structure of all beings, we can consider anything that exists a *variety of *fractal scalar space-time; part of an infinite isomorphic reality defined formally by a ‘Fractal Generator equation’ written with the symbols of those 3S≈3 T x 3∆ dimensional planes of space-time. Which in its simplest generic form would write:

[Spe≤ ST≥Tƒ]∆±4

Representing the 3×2 bidimensional Space-time topological organs of all species in space, Sp limbs/fields of energy, ST repetitive body/waves and Tƒ particles/heads of information, which exchange in time flows of energy, <, and information, >, or repeat them, =, through 5 type of actions, across 9≈∆o±4 planes of existence, increasing its acceleration with the help of ∆-4 forces, its ∆-3 informative bits, its ∆-2 energy quanta, its ∆-1 reproductive seeds and evolving social with ∑∆ parallel clones, to create a bigger social û+1 superorganism.

This is the Universe in a ‘nutshell’ and all its fractal parts and so we shall study in the 4th line, each main species of each scalar Stience of the Universe through its fractal generator, its dimensions of space and time, its 2-manifold topologies, ∆±4 actions and social planes, by analysing its 10 isomorphic elements, common to all those species.

The 4th line thus is a potential encyclopaedia of all the knowledge of mankind that will be widened by this writer and future researchers on ∆ST, with ever more detailed analysis, as the 10 isomorphisms are a template that can hold all the specific species, properties and laws of all the scales of the Universe. So we study in each of these 4^{th} line post a relative scale of the 5^{th} dimension, and then we shall be filling it with subposts, dedicated to each of the 10 sets of similar laws, which allow to fit all sub-species, events, parts, symmetries, o-points and social relationships of the ‘specific plane and science of reality’ we study. To that aim for the sake of order, we have used not the ∆o-human centered scale of the 2^{nd} line but an order from minimal spatial size and maximal information (the scale of forces) to the Whole Cosmos, and beyond (metaphysical questions and concepts related to the God, the Mind of the Universe):

In the graph, the different science sand scales of the 5th dimension, which classify the species of all stiences with a simple metric: max. Spatial, lineal size = Min. Temporal speed of information (Spe x Tƒ = K); that is the larger beings have slower time clocks and hence less information but more energy than the smaller beings, whose clocks are faster.

Because of the immense size of human knowledge, obviously we cannot pour in our limited time all the relevant information of each science. So the choice will be objective, trying to explain the main laws and speciesof each science, but also subjective, considering those fields and species the author has researched most in the past, and are easier for him to pour in the web. And finally, we will most likely pour an enormous number of new solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

**The 10 Isomorphisms.**

Let us make a brief review of the 10 isomorphisms, before we make general review of its application to each scale studied in a post of this 4^{th} line.

The 1st ISOMORPHISM post explains the Generator fractal feedback equation that resumes all 5D space-time knots, which can describe in its formalism all beings.

The 0 isomorphic post explains the Œ-points or minds, the relative Tƒ-heads/particles with its logic mental mapping that guide the system towards a future through the realization of ‘åctions of space-time’ that absorb energy and information for the system, and emit it reproducing the system and moving it, as they evolve socially into wholes.

It is the symmetry of space-time, as all systems have its dual elements.

The 3rd isomorphism deals with the 3 ages of Time and its antisymmetry, as those 3 parts of space dominate each sequential age of Time, in motion as Sp>TS>Tƒ.

The 4th isomorphism deals with the ∆o±4 scales perceived by a self-centered system as functions of their relative needs of energy and information, from where it absorbs its quanta of entropy=lineal motion, (∆-4), its bits of information for its mental mapping, (∆-3), its bites of energy (∆-2) and within himself, its seminal seeds for reproduction, ∆-1, and cells that support the whole (Œo), itself a cell of a larger species in time or super organism in space, ∆+1, extended in a larger world, ∆+2, part of a perceived cosmos, ∆+3, a mere fraction of the Universe, ∆+4.

The 4th isomorphism deals with those scales in terms of the 5 ±∆e,i, §10=û+1 åctions of all beings that move, feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially from the simplest particles to the highest systems is the Finality of the Universe, the Program of existence, the whys and to perform them, all systems do have a point-particle or head or center that gauges that information and commands a body on a field of entropic motion, an Aristotelian unmoved mind, God of its relative world.

Thus we exist and perceive fractal scales of reality because we survive through our exchanges of energy and information with its different fractal points of those scales.

Of all those scales it is obvious that the being strictly exists only in the ∆±1 closer 3 ∆-1 cellular, fractal, ∆ individual, organic and ∆+1 social scales of its parts and wholes.

They are where any super organism develops its cycles of existence, with its inverse ‘entropies’ as information is more abundant in smaller scales and flow upwards and motion-size in larger scales and flows backwards with no entropy: the cellular/atomic ∆-1 scale, the organic, thermodynamic ∆-scale and the ∆+1 gravitational, social scales (biological and physical systems)

The 5th isomorphism thus recapitulates and defines each beings as a 5Dimensional fractal.

So we have according to the åctions entities perform across planes of the 5th dimension, 6 types of fractal points the Œ-beings perceives, as each point deals with pixels of information of the lowest scale, the bites of energy, the cells which construct the system, the individual ego, the society to which it belongs and the world in which it exists.

Those 5 isomorphisms define the being in space, around its Œo mental frame of reference, in a series of nested distances in space, time and the fifth dimension.

So we shall study first all space-time systems with those 5 isomorphisms formalised as partial equations of the Generator equation: its Space organs, time ages, 5D scales and O-points that direct the systems as they embed the consciousness of the whole.

It also embodies the will to survive through those energy and information exchange across scales, which we then can study in its minimal actions of space & time.

So we can define in that close range, the 6th isomorphism of the internal and eternal Social classes of the being, which develop around its ∆-1 physiological S, ST, T networks, and energy, reproductive, working and informative, neuronal classes of its world, where the being will develop its existence. Whereas the neuronal ∆-1 and informative castes of society are on top of the reproductive, working cellular classes, on top of the energy, and lower classes it ab=uses.

There are 7 fundamental Constants or ratios between the parts of the being, the Se/Tƒ energy density of the system, its inverse, Tƒ/Se information density, the Se=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Se x Tƒ), which are the internal parameters; and then there are external constants that related the whole being, Œ to the external world also made of 3 Se- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. And finally we shall find a parameter, which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Next we shall find the 8th isomorphism, of variations of species, based in the dualities of space and time, and the ternary elements of the Generator equation. We call it the eight isomorphism as 2³ =8 but there are several varieties of speciation. For example the gender duality of females (with reproductive, present bodies) and males (with energetic lineal bodies).

On the other hand, there are all kind of |-Energy vs. O-Mass/charge, |-O games in physical systems.

And associated games of tƒ and |s, of relative time motion and space stillness, whereas a cycle-vortex-clock of time contrary to belief does accelerate inwards and so moves faster than a expansive big bang. Indeed, there is a simple vortex law, easily deduced from the Metric of 5D: Vt x Rs =K, hence a smaller radius, Ro has faster speed, Vo; and a clock accelerates inwards, creating a clock vortex of mass or charge (this only Einstein among physicists partially understood with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass).

Thus we shall study all kind of differentiations of species according to the relative importance of its heads, bodies and limbs. So predator species are dominant in lineal energy; other species survive by being extremely good at reproduction and others by being more informative. And we will be able, combining dualities and ternary symmetries to classify and account for all species of a single ‘plane of the 5th dimension’ to which we shall add the ternary structure of the 5th dimension, with growth in a single parameter. So there are 3 families of masses and particles, and among those 3 families there are either mesons made with two antisymmetric particles or 3.

Then we study how all those systems and species evolve socially through nine decametric scales into organic 10-societies that grow from 10º=1 individuals into 10¹=genetic families, and so on till 10¹º elements that form a new plane of existence (quanta of forces for each dimension of space-time, atoms in a DNA molecule, cells in an organism, humans on the planet in which they act as neurons of Gaia, stars in a regular galaxy).

And so we shall consider the final structure of the 10 planes of the 5th dimension, the last isomorphism of the Universe, as all relative Uo species relate the parts of its lower U-∆ scales which they use as pixels of informative minds, bites of energy, (bits and quanta in classic scientific terms), cells of its wholes, and are parts of larger wholes. The 10 scales perceived by humans are now ready to study in all its formal details in the 4th encyclopedic line.

And so in the 4th line we use the isomorphisms to study in depth the 10 planes of relative size of the 5th dimension from the smallest force to the largest whole, with those 10 isomorphisms, and connect to the detail all the laws of all sciences with T.Œ. Thus in this 3rd line we introduce each of the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe and put examples from each Plane to show the isomorphic unity of the Universe, as all its species regardless of size and time speed follow the same laws.

Now, we study them in detail in the 3rd line and will be applying them as the method to analyse all the species of the Universe in the 4th line, a future scientific encyclopaedia, where each fundamental scale of reality and its species will be shown in its magnificent architectonical structure as it is created through dualities and ternary symmetries to evolve socially into the next plane of the 5th dimension by the power of love (social organisation through S, ST, T networks), from:

O| forces, into 2. atoms into 3. molecules into 4. matter states, whose s-gas<ST-liquid>T-solid/crystal most perfect structures are 4. cells & 5. organisms and its larger ones are planets, such as 6. Gaia and its ecosystems, including 6.2 History and 6.3 the economic ecosystem; part of the larger world of 7. solar systems, gathering in 8. Galaxies, the fractal points of the 9. Cosmic networks, and beyond, all of them ruled by the i-logic languages of God mind of the Universe:

So yes, the fractal Universe, HAS A PERFECT ORDER, WHERE CHAOS=ENTROPY AND DEATH IS just the end of the world cycle of one of those super organisms, as all of them form a chain of beings, and a causal chain of logic laws.

Let us then consider those 10 isomorphisms in more detail, and see their chained causality, as the 10 isomorphisms study ”partial equations’ of the Generator, and can be related to each other in dual pairs, such as:

The Generator defines in its simple form the duality of space and time (2nd isomorphism) that can be expanded to the symmetries of ternary systems and its super organisms and 3 ages of its world cycles in time (3rd isomorphism), which happen as the integral sum of its actions of exchange of energy and information (4th isomorphism), across the different planes of its 5th dimension from where it absorbs its bits and bites of energy and information, and emit them internally and externally in its larger world (5th isomorphism), making the self-centred point of view to classify its reality according to those actions in 3 internal and 3 external social classes (6th isomorphism), which along the ratios that define those internal structures of the being and its external forces in the world (universal vital constants of the being or 7th isomorphism) define which specific species of reality we are dealing with (8th isomorphism of species), and how those species will gather together into larger societies (9th isomorphisms) which through decametric scales, finally become a whole (10th isomorphism).

**0 isomorphism: Minds and languages of perception.**

**Problem with humans: ego-trips bias subjectively understanding of the organic Universe.**

*In the graph objective science as opposed to religion, consists in departing from the ego-trips of human self-importance into the objective truths of an infinite universe in time and space in which man has a very limited role. Notice mr. Darwin’s infamous caricature. Still 1/2 of Americans do not believe we come from apes. Ego-trips of self-importance caused by the structure of the mind as the infinitesimal point that only ‘sees’ its linguistic mapping of the universe, from its biased perspective, confusing the whole with its inner mind picture of reality, make most ‘simplex humans’, including most pythagorean scientists, believe that human minds and **languages make us the only intelligent monad of the cosmos.*

Humans slowly departed from their subjective ego-trips in the mythic age of Abrahamic religions in which the tribe first and then mankind were the centre of the Universe, to a scientific world, whre the cosmos mattered more; and within it again, moved away from the Earth as its centre (Ptolemy), in 3 steps, concerning the 3 elements of which reality is made, space, time and the human languages we use to perceive them:

First in terms of space man enlarged its view of the Universe from the ‘sacred land’ or valley, which was in earlier abrahamic religions all what he perceives into a larger geography of a cosmic center called the earth, which was expanded into the sun as its centre (Copernicus) and finally into the galactic light space-time at its centre (Einstein’s relativity). It is now the time to give the final step into Absolute relativity considering the Fractal paradigm and its 5th dimension, which further stretches space to include all Universal Planes of space from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy , without primacy of any of such scales.

In terms of time and its related parameter of information (carried in the form and frequency of cyclical time clocks) humans have advanced far less in search for objectivity, as they still use a single lineal infinite human clock and the human, steady rhythm of one second, as its unit of frequency (beat of the heart, mind thoughts and eye glimpses) without acknowledging the infinite time clocks of the Universe, from circadian cycles to orbits to atomic beats, and its ∞ ‘forms’ of in-form-ation, which they also define in terms of mechanisms (Shannon).

So Einstein said ‘I am the only physicist who seem to think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe reading at different speeds’ and Landau laughed at the mechanical clock saying, ‘there is no uncertainty of time, ‘i just have to look at my clock and know what time is’. Regarding the rhythms of time change humans obsessed by their desire to be immortal have not yet fully accepted that they are transient beings, just a step in the evolution of information, form in this planet, and deny the organic properties and life-death cycles, which we will show are common to all other species of reality. In fact, humans subvert the natural order believing overwhelmingly (religious people) that our existence is immortal, and the Universe (astrophysicists) is the mortal part (big-bang theory). So contrary to belief, information and time-change, are still in their infancy as objective sciences.

Finally, the less recognised subjective element of science happens in the languages of the mind humans use to perceive a universe made of 2 elements, space, we perceive with mathematics and time that we perceive with logic words, as humans ‘think’ those languages created the Universe. So verbal religions believe words is the language of god (specifically Arab in Islam, reason why the first muslims could not translate Koran). And Pythagorean religions consider that ‘God speaks only mathematics’ as Galileo put it. In modern times, Hilbert, father of modern ‘axiomatic’ mathematics went even further, affirming that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’ , tantamount to say that humans invented the language that invented the world. While, both Einstein and quantum physicists applied Hilbert’s axiomatic method to its description of a Universe made of mathematical entities ‘invented’ by human minds and ‘god’, the mathematical mind of the Universe.

So a scientific objective description of reality is far more difficult than it seems because of the not-recognised existence of anthropomorphic, egocentered deist theories in many disciplines of science, hidden by its mathematical supposedly ‘perfect language’, given the ignorance and respect that numbers and computers provoke among laymen people. In fact, when a creationist, deist or anthropomorphic model is disguised with equations, as the big-bang or the ‘damned lies and statistics’ of economics is, there is little objective criticism and hardly any use of the laws of epistemology of the scientific method to assess its veracity. On the contrary, not unlike Muslims making God speak Arab, we find today most physicists working on his specific mathematical theory expecting then the Universe to ‘create’ its particles. And the more bizarre the model the more importance we concede to his authors. So string theory, a bizarre model of 26 dimensions is the queen of the discipline, while Mr. Hawking, who proclaims that black holes evaporate travelling to the past, regardless of any lack of experimental evidence, is considered the new ‘prophet’ of the discipline.

And all this happens, despite the discoveries of Godel and Lobacjevski, which proved mathematics to be just another language whose veracity must be found on experience, scientists still believe in the germanic idealist school of geometry where ‘by decree of Hilbert’, we human minds ‘invent points, lines and planes’; while billions think God spoke words that created the Universe.

Of late we also have pseudo-religious economists and politicians who think that a digital language, ‘money’ must create the world and the real economy and techno-utopians, which affirm the Universe is a computer and the machine the symbol of all forms of knowledge and human progress. So humans also have an astounding capacity to subvert the natural order between reality – what truly matters and the mirror-languages of the human mind, we use to reflect its images, caused by reality – Not the other way around.

It is thus necessary even before we attempt to construct a truly objective, scientific model of the world of man and the Universe in which we exist – the purpose of this web – to denounce all those hidden ‘religions of the human ego’ and go back to the basics of the scientific method…

**3 elements of Nature’s organic systems: co-existing parts & wholes, energetic spaces and informative clocks.**

Since the Universe and all its fractal parts do not require a creator as organisms are self-reproductive, immortal by cyclical generation, and constantly transform energy back and forth into information, gauging and perceiving both, using it to reproduce new particles, social groups and scales of organisation. Now, of course, when we say organic, we mean much more than a current biologist or ecologist, so we must start by redefining what is a fractal super organism, the fundamental particle of reality, introducing the 3 elements that structure any of them:

- Relative scales of size, co-existing together (cells, organisms and ecosystems or societies in biological organisms; particles, molecular matter, and cosmic organisms in physics), which define a 5th dimension of scalar sizes from the smallest particle to the largest galaxy.
- Vital spaces with energy, made of networks of those scalar quanta. So we talk of a 5D space-time system as vhe finite fractal fundamental organic ‘part’ of the Universe.
- And time cycles that process in-form-ation in its frequency and form through closed, specialised clock-like systems that store it (spherical particles or heads or cameras-chips, as the sphere is the mathematical form which stores more information in lesser space).

**Human anthropomorphic myths hidden in scientific models.**

Humans have a fundamental attribute: ‘arrogance’, as they believe to be the center of the universe and deny the most evolved ‘organic properties’ to the rest of reality. This is not a rational but an ego-driven, emotional feature. We want to be on top. So for 3000 years since Aristotle started the scientific method, a complex description of the universe, as it is – organic, co-existing in ∞ scales, made of multiple clocks and vital spaces – has been lacking.

We can the history of mankind has considered 2 different models of reality:

- A more complex organic paradigm of a living Universe with both mathematical and biological properties, which however does not satisfy the human ego and so it has been mostly for ‘connoisseurs’.
- And a simplex model in which man is considered the only intelligent being entitled to dispose of the entire planet and all its beings at will, which has been despite its simplicity and biased subjective value, the dominant view, as it catered to the ego of mankind and those on power.

Thus contrary to belief, most humans and most models of reality are chosen not by pure reason but by its favorable view of mankind. The extreme case being the power that abrahamic religions, arguably just an ego-trip of humans wishful thinking hold on 2/3rds of mankind, who against all evidence believe on some musings of a bronze age shepherd because it makes them chosen as a species above all others.

This way of thought is not, as most think exclusive of religion. Science is in fact plagued with anthropomorphic views, as it was developed mostly on the western world, by people who believed in abrahamic religions, and subtly as in the case of Newton, Descartes and Kepler, introduced biased models who favoured the view of a deist Universe created by Yhwh, the toponym of Judea in ancient egyptian maps (as then nations were called Gods, the collective subconscious of a culture and land). Specifically the founder fathers of physics, all pious believers in Judea, as the origin of it all (no joke), introduced 3 concepts that still linger in science and prevent the expansion of a more objective philosophy of reality:

- The idea that only man was intelligent, as it was made of some different substance or event than the rest of the cosmos – mind or soul in Descartes; carbon life in modern sciences, as if carbon atoms had some magic property; Intelligent design in some die-hard visions of biology; specially chosen physical parameters in anthropic models of physics; and so on. Fact is humans are made of the same substances that all entities of the Universe, which ultimately are ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’, (ab Spe, and Tiƒ) and follow the same organic laws and cycles of generation and extinction that all other beings, and if we do have some special properties are of quantity not of quality. Fact is the processing of information, which is the essence of intelligence happens in all systems of the Universe. And so happens with reproduction as even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, gauge information to feed on energy and when they have enough of it reproduce, decouple in clone particles.

- The idea that the Universe was a machine not a self-reproductive organism, as a machine needs a creator who could only be ‘Judea’, the desert land-nation gifted as time went by and his origin as synonymous of the Jewish nation was forgotten, with magic, sentient Universal properties. This was called mechanism and is still along Pythagorysm, the belief that reality has only mathematical properties, and all other properties that cannot be written with math are secondary, the main philosophy of science. So for Kepler, Galileo, Descartes and Newton, God, the creator of the universal machine alone with man spoke its secret language, mathematics and understood the Universe. Latter things got even more arrogant when God was dethroned so Laplace said to Napoleon that such hypothesis had been abandoned – meaning only him, the mathematician was intelligent enough to understand reality. In modern times this theory has evolved into the bizarre concept that the entire cosmos was born of a single point in a creative big-bang, and despite the astounding number of proofs that show this theory false, it is a canonical dogma that will be defended with all kind of rhetoric arguments and ‘damned lies and statistics’ whatever evidence against it exists. Fact is the big-bang is a simplex theory so full of contradictions that only a religious explanation can make sense of it.

- This deist dual model of a single intelligent species, humanity and its subconscious collective nations, Islam, Yhwh, etc, who have created reality, through a creationist moment and are the only gifted species who speaks the language of mathematics, the language of God and creation, is therefore the modern evolution of the deist ego-centered view man has of reality with him still at its center. And it is accompanied by many small theories that back such interpretation of reality, among them the existence of a mathematical underlying structure below reality, a pen and paper cartesian graph of space and time, absolute and infinite over which ‘god’ or latter ‘nature’ drew its beings or the modern versions of quantum theory which consider that the Universe is made of probabilities and other mathematical objects.

Now, I am fully conscious after a long career that those are beliefs which pass as science because scientists have shrewdly hidden them with mathematical equations that seem more truth than verbal statements so I won’t dwell a lot on its absurdity, but rather accept the obvious – a true organic model of the Universe, will not be popular, as the few hits of this web, which develops the most advanced organic alternative model of sciences there is to date, shows.

And yet I do keep writing this web, and its parallel one on the super organisms of mankind and the economic ecosystem of increasingly organic machines in which we live; because there will always be a minority of human beings who are humble enough to see themselves as mere parts of a whole, made to its image and likeness, and respect without bias the experimental facts of science, who are brave enough to accept death without wishful thinking and the processes of Nature as they are, and complex enough to see not only mathematical properties to reality but sensorial and vital ones, explained sometimes better with other bio-logic languages – as all languages of a mind are merely symbolic mirrors who reflect the wider whole – NOT its cause.

So if we were to resume the difference between the simplex, subjective human view and the objective scientific view, we could state it as follows: in the present philosophy of religion *and science*, man and its mind languages are the cause of reality. So in the verbal age of history, ‘the word’ was God (logos in Greece for both, the word in abrahamic religions as the language of God, which uttered words to create beings) and only man and God ‘created’ with words, so ‘God said, there is light’ and the pharaoh, ‘it has been written’.

Today in the digital age, only man and the machine, our technological God, speak the language that creates reality – numbers. And Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed that we humans ‘invent’ mathematics (‘i Imagine points, lines and planes). So today physicists invent ‘first’ mathematical equations that describe imaginary particles, evaporating black holes travelling to the past, 11 dimensional strings, you name it, and expect the Universe to produce them.

Why? To fully grasp this essential difference between a theory of everything and physics, we must consider what is the worldview of both, the philosopher of science which accepts all languages as mirrors of the Universe, and the Physicists who has a pseudo-religion called Platonism and so it accepts only mathematical languages.

** Objectivity. A missing quality in all human thoughts.**

The fractal paradigm thus unifies all sciences and systems, a few mathematical and biological laws, departing from its ‘fractal’ 3 essential elements, cyclical clocks and membranes, vital space with energy, and mental points of view, monads, singularities, souls, point particles, which gauge information, map reality, absorb energy with its vital body and try to reproduce their form in other region of the fractal Universe. This is the game we all play.

But humans have lost perspective on the whole due to 3 errors: anthropomorphism (to deny living properties to all other systems), mechanism (to be in awe of machines and try to model reality with the simplified concept, of a machine – merely an evolving organism of metal in its first stage) and pythagorism (the belief that only mathematical statements are scientific and other visual, verbal, logic and temporal languages, betters suited to describe the ‘other’ properties of reality are not scientific truths.) Of course, as we advance into the fractal paradigm, we shall see that those limits of human a priori knowledge reflect limited visions of the fractal whole – the machine will become a non-evolved ‘metalife organism’, mathematics the most realist language, which requires a proper definition of its elements, the point, number, plane and equality≈congruence postulates, and anthropomorphism, the natural way in which each fractal self-centred being distorts in his favour the information of the relative Universe.

However a this stage of evolution of the human mind-point of view, this 3 ’embedded’ subconscious beliefs pollute the scientific discourse and all things human (anthropomorphism, mechanism, Pythagorism), making difficult the acceptance of the more objective, scientific view of an organic, self-reproductive, impersonal, eternal Universe, which the overwhelming proofs of science should have made canonical decades ago. Since often those 3 ‘ideologies’ are no clearly spelt but introduced collaterally in physical theories (from the creationist big bang to the definition of man as a machine and the rejection of evolutionary and social theories of biology and history, as they are not easily mathematised.) So the fractal paradigm requires also a change of ‘mind frame’, on what we humans truly are, to be able to open up reason to knowledge.

Of course it would be nice for our egos that the simplex universe were real, and man its chosen only living center and maths its only language and we created it as such ‘Gods’ do either with words or numbers, in minds or computers, reality. But that is a hidden religion – a God who speaks maths and a chosen man who shares his view. We DO want to do serious objective science.

There is a choice between belief in absolute egos, subjective truths and ego-happiness vs. humble reason, objective truth and the painful realisation, humans and their egos are irrelevant to the whole and all our truths relative, as our minds will always be distorted mirrors. So most people choose happiness, subjective truth and belief. Nothing wrong with that as long as they do not affirm, they are doing science=objective truth. We know religious people are mostly nuts but that is Ok because we know it is subjective, personal belief and most except fundamentalists, keep it for themselves.

So the problem today is more on the side of nutty fundamentalist scientists who are not aware of the religious origin of its mechanical, pythagorean, abstract vision of the universe, specially physicists with its nutty big-bang theories and mathematical statements, because indeed, they preach all over and reject without reason the far more scientific organic paradigm, developed in full in this web, departing from the conferences i gave during a decade as the leading researcher of General Systems sciences and duality – the modern disciplines that are developing since II world war, the line of thought, which from Aristotle to Leonardo, from Leibniz to Hegel, from Darwin to Spengler tries to do real objective science without the need of Gods and supremacist human beings.

Yes of course i would also like to be God, chosen species and supreme intelligence but that is not realistic.

**The reductionism of mathematical physics vs. the whole properties of the fractal universe.**

For us to understand the fractal, organic Universe and its discontinuous space-time beings, it is needed to RETURN to the oldest of all truths about science. Leonardo’s motto: ‘saper vedere’ – look directly into the book of Nature, and get rid of the anthropomorphic bias established by the mechanisms humans interpose in their perception of time and space, and by the religion of mathematics as the only language of God, hence a Universe of only mathematical properties, an aberration that reduces the richness of properties of vital fractals, because since Mathematics is NOT the only language of the Universe, merely the best language to define its Spatial Properties, by using ONLY mathematics to describe reality all the organic, bio-logical and temporal, causal properties of the fractal disappear on the scientific discourse. Hence we must confront the reductionist view of mathematical physics and the larger view of the philosopher of science.

Now, we can return to the earlier graph that compared the anthropomorphic view of a Universe, where only the mind of man was intelligent and his languages could perceive the Universe, and the real causality of a Universe seen by multiple monads of many linguistic mirrors, from the perspective of the subjective ego-paradox of the mind to explain why this idealist view is so entrenched in mankind, so prone to have ‘ego-trips’ of self-centred importance:

In the graph – what is wrong with ‘physics’ and increasingly with mankind can be resumed in the ego paradox. The equation of the mind is rather simple:

We humans are just ‘infinitesimals’ of the ego paradox: o-point x ∞ Universe = constant mind.

So the Universe is out there, one and single; but it does not fit in the mind. And the mind reduces it to languages to perceive it, which resumes the main properties of the Universe, which are first bio-logical rules of space-time existence (the Universe is a game of survival of space-time beings, which constantly try to reproduce their information in ‘fractal seeds’ that latter evolve socially; the Universe is a vital fractal, and the rules are simple), then logic (temporal rules only) and then mathematical (spatial rules only), and then the human vision of those rules (artistic space, verbal time, ethic, social evolution of parts into stronger wholes). And so all those languages are mirrors.

To get the perfect focused mirror, the maximal knowledge is the goal of the Philosopher of science. The physicist specially since the classic age closed with Einstein, has denied this. And puts the mathematical platonic mirror (Copenhagen interpretation) first, subverting the scheme. And so it ‘believes’ today IT IS NO LONGER REQUIRED to observe the scientific method, and first watch the physical world (experimental evidence), then follow the rules of science (linguistic coherence, simplicity, economicity, etc.), and thus create knowledge (human mental perception). Further on, the physicist connects the human world with the physical world, and as the ego grows, he pretends as so many do, to impose its mental view into the physical world, as if it were a God creating the physical world. String theorists are specially kin of this :) making more and more dimensions and parallel Universes LOL

But that is not how reality works. It is all more humble. We cannot change the rules of survival, just watch the physical world, learn the rules, make perfect mirrors of those rules, obey and survive. Because the ultimate language is bio-logical: those who have huge childish ego, disobey the laws, become the staple food of the Cosmos: children is what predators eat. Ego-centered turtles, hatched which enter directly into the mouth of the lizard – in our case the mouth of the black hole.

Now, there is also the problem of Galileo’s dictum: ‘God speaks ‘only’ mathematics’. Let us explain why.

People are linguistic minds, and ego paradoxes, so when a language first appears, in its simplex formality as a mirror of the Universe they get ‘in awe’, with the language. It seems to be as a mirror a magic thing. Mirrors were magic things for primitives, and you could exchange them for Gold. They did NOT understand the fractal Nature of the Universe, which is a vital fractal in which smaller ‘mirrors’ (monads, minds, crystals, etc.) reflect the whole in the smaller size. They reverse the causality and think the smaller mirror causes reality.

So any language becomes first a religion: people wondered first how words could reflect reality, now they wonder how is that math reflect the Universe.

So the greeks and most ancient people called ‘words’, logos=god. It was the age of ‘vehicles’ of God, which were languages. The words were actually acts of creation. In Vedas, the priest that utter the word was ‘creating’ with it, enacting the creation. Allah ‘does’ talk in arab, seriously.

And when written words appeared, the same happen all over again. The Pharaohs, said ‘it has been written’ as if it was immortal truth. The prophets thought god talked to them revealing in words the structure of the Universe. Galileo thought the same when he found v=s/t. Time *became that formula and only that formula.*

TO explain this to mathematical physicists is madness. Try: they feel insulted. That is the big divide between us philosophers of science and mathematical physicists since Einstein left us – the last stalwart of reason in this science.

When money appeared as gold, the Canaanites (Jewish and Phoenician) thought it was the ‘sweat of god’, and made their sancta sanctorum and Baal statues with it. The language again was the act of creation.

Now computer scientists think the same – the language and machine they use is the meaning of it all. They are churning papers saying the Universe is a digital computer.

And there is nothing new in this approach, since Kepler said ‘god is a clocker that waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his’. If you were to talk to some of the physicist I met in congresses in my youth, they surely will tell you as Mr. Seth does, publishing on the cover of SciAm: the Universe is a computer (and of course, he alone has the intelligence to figure out his ‘quantity of information’ and speed of processing. LOL.

I am sorry i am a bit sarcastic, but i can’t help it. You see at least religious nuts put above ‘God’, whatever it means to them, but scientists of the Pythagorean school are above ‘heavens and earth’.

So all of them, put upside down the 3 causal process: experimental evidence (the ∞ Universe) ->linguistic coherence (the biological game of existence and extinction in space and time)->mind’s theory. Instead they think ‘the language’ creates reality.

So the physicist invents a mathematical equation and it MUST be truth. This is quite common today among mathematical physicists. They are ayatollahs of the number.

They utter the word of God and think the Universe will obey their THEORIES THAT ARE AGAINST NATURE’S FACT: mind’s theory-> expected experimental evidence.

Einstein said, ‘if my theory is wrong, God should change the Universe, so beautiful it is’ but he was joking, physicists today are not joking when they affirm there are 10 up to 500 Universes because a string theory equation of 21 dimensions tell them so – without of course having any experimental proof of those strings, or understanding at all what is a dimension of space-distances and its symmetries with the dimensions of time-motions and how many ‘really are’ out there in the fractal Universe.

So to explain egomaniac modern physicists that actually mathematical truths can be verified through the experimental method, is LIKE TRYING TO CONVERT A PRIEST OF ANY RELIGION TO THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT ‘WORDS’ ARE NOT THE LANGUAGE OF GOD.

This is why science no longer advances beyond details and visual or mathematical computer models, very nice and precise in measure, very shallow in meaning and whys.

It is all the ego paradox. Once humans have broken the connection with ‘scientific truth’ and substituted it with the ‘ego paradox’, the connection of the human collective mind with the Universe to ‘establish rules’ of behaviour and survival are lost. Whatever anyone writes is taken as ‘an ego work’, not an objective scientific truth. So Stendhal’s view -a writer is just a transparent mirror of reality, so it is a scientist- is lost. So humans are not able to ‘see’ an objective, universal mirror image.

And reason no longer acts. Everything IS NOW OPINION, because the ego is so huge that all MEN ARE CHILDREN. And children are subjective. They are about to prove their ego, their opinion is worthy. Whatever they say matters less than to impose their ego. Social sciences – politics – today work on this way.

The ego-opinions of Mr. Trump without the slightest understanding of the structure of the fractal super organism of mankind must be law, because a lot of opinionated people will vote for him. And this opinion becomes a chaos of full entropic human infinitesimal egos colliding with each other, instead of collaborating in an orderly manner with the laws of the Universe.

In the fractal organic paradigm however we are more serious about the way to do science: we first observe experience, since ‘only experimental facts must be studied by science’ (Einstein).

Then we use all the languages available to humans to describe those facts, departing from the 2 known-known ultimate elements of reality, vital spaces with energy and cyclical clocks of time, which carry in its cyclical form and frequency the information of the Universe. In brief we depart on one extreme from the 2 primary elements of which the Universe is made, Sp and Tiƒ, and its ‘laws’, which humans describe mainly with 2 language-mirrors, geometry->mathematics for space and logic-words for time; and on the other extreme from facts, forms and events of reality and harmonise ‘the details – the facts’ and the language of all languages – the properties and laws of space and time.

This is how sciences was first done when Aristotle invented it in the organon, affirming an organic Universe, which must be first observed experimentally and then modelled with time logic and spatial geometry, and we go back to the basics, but with far more experimental knowledge and better more evolved mathematical and logic tools, to explain a more complex space and time structure.

That is, *any* language comes after reality happens, mirroring it into a smaller mind space, Not the other way around. Reality creates the language, which is different for each mind-world or ‘monad’, reflecting with is mirror-language a small part of the total information of the Universe. Thus paraphrasing Galileo we should say ‘the languages of God are infinite’ (upanishads).

And yet while mind-worlds are many, there is only one Universe. So *it is the Universe and its fundamental elements, vital space and informative time, and its combinations the ultimate reality from where all languages-mirrors extract its* properties. For example, we shall soon find that all languages have a ternary structure that mirrors the Universe of space-time and its combinations. If we restrict this simplified example of the ‘universal grammar’ of all languages mirrors to the 3 more important languages of man, logic words, visual images and mathematical equations we write always 3 elements that mirror the 3 elements of the Universe:

Real systems: time-information system (particle-head) < space-time action (wave-body) > space-energy system (limb-field)

Words: Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (energy of the subject)

Images: Blue (informative color) < Green-yellow (combination) > Red (energy colour)

Algebra: F (x): a time-informative function < operandi (combinations) > G (y): an energy-space function

Now, what religious verbal or mathematical people state is that the human language, shared by ‘God’, the mind of the Universe comes first, in an ego-trip of truly cosmic proportions that plague both, the religious and scientific discourse.

the opposite is truth, the magic and power of languages resides precisely in its capacity to mirror reality to the point humans so often confuse language and reality. Yet there is an even deeper truth we shall consider in the analysis of languages *that create reality in a Cartesian-Leibnizian way by mapping the Universe into a world’s monad, which then acts on reality trying to shape it into the form of the ego-mind, who confuses that mapping **with the universe, and feels hence its mind infinite. Languages, minds and reality thus interact as monads perceive, map and then act trying to transform the world into their ego-reflection. *

And this gives also a biological sense to languages, which cater to the needs and forms of the egos of the species that speak those languages.

Now, when we have a perspective on the mathematical language (obviously most readers of this blog will be scientists, so we save ourselves the needed explanations about why a goalkeeper of the bronze age did not see the mind of god when a bush burning in the desert seemed to talk to them), we shall consider the ‘why’ of that fractal structure.

What is the purpose or function of a fractal structure and its mathematical description, called a fractal generator equation, (which for the Universe will be in its simplest form, a feedback equation with 2 terms lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, Sp<≈>tƒ, and we shall return to that).

Obviously because fractal co-exist in several scales and organise in complex connected network systems and constantly reproduce their form… ‘reproduction’, ‘iteration’, ‘generation’, ‘creation of new forms and combinations of form and motion, time cycles and lineal kinetic energies, you name it… *the very essence of life.*

Predictability does not mean creativity.

Now for those who think too much and are hard-die platonic beings, the ultimate reason to believe the Universe is first mathematical not first organic is called predictability. Languages do predict the future. Evolution, a verbal theory predicts the future of species. Mathematics, predicts the motion of physical systems. Predictablity does not however mean creation, merely to have a good mirror of information. Languages *are self-similar beings to the whole fractal, in lesser space, and so according to the metric equation of the the dimension: Min. Space Size x Max. time speed, a smaller ‘fractal language-mirror’ of the Universe will logically anticipate the behaviour of the whole fractal by reducing in terms of information the steps to get to a final conclusion.*

Evolution theory is not god. Mathematical theory is not god. Only the Universe of space-time and its organic fractal properties is the whole. Consider the case of a mirror. A mirror is a linguistic mind that reduces in size and dimensions of form a 5D being to 2 dimensions and a smaller image. And so it is a good synoptic system. Now if we put a mirror in a corner, we can see a being approaching. First it will appear only as a mirror, and a simple relationship of growth of the image in the mirror will give us a prediction of the future path of the being. Suddenly finally the being will appear as expected? Has the mirror created the being that appears? Mirrors were magic beings in primitive cultures as words for religious people and maths for physicists, but none create reality, and ARE Not reality.

A final example will suffice: in the first movie theatres people ran away thinking the train or wave of the image would come out of the picture as a real thing and kill them.

It is then obvious that at the beginning of the invention of a new language and mathematics as a language useful to make descriptions of reality is very young, just 300 years since calculus its main tool to describe the scales of the fractal Universe and its infinitesimals is very recent, has the same magic that mirrors for primitive people and movies for 1900s people and words for pharaohs and believers in abrahamic imperative semite languages (where the imperative modes make words seem to come from a non-spoken higher being).

Yet as time passes, we realise mirrors have no magic, do not trap the soul of people; and trains do not come from screens, and words do not create the Universe, and in the same number when we say dog, it does not mean dogs are made of ds, os and gs, numbers do not come out of computers, do not create the Universe and atoms are not made of probability equations as so many quantum physicists believe.

**First and second Isomorphism: **

**Fractal Generator. We are entities made of Energy and Time.**

When we say ‘I don’t have time and energy to do this’, we really mean it. Since we do not exist in a space-time background frame of reference. We are made, as Leibniz explained, of a vital space, which our bodies occupy, and has energy as vacuum space does, and last a finite time, our world cycle of life and death.

*We are time space beings as everything else in the Universe, and this is the first isomorphism that make us like every thing else.*

The perfect form of spatial energy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, opposed, inverse forms shape the spatial, linear, energetic bodies and cyclical, informative, memorial minds that become the complementary forms of all organic systems made of atoms of temporal energy.

Energy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. They form all its complementary systems. In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

The 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.

In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal Space = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs*

*Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only in carbon-life organisms, but in machines and in physical systems made of energy (fields, limbs, food) and information (brains, eyes, cameras, particles).

Thus also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’ are Se or Tƒ systems.

Since we can recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Some are material.

Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

Now the study of all the ‘isomorphisms’ (similar=iso forms and functions) across all the systems of the Universe is the purpose of an alternative philosophy of science to that of physicists, called ‘General Systems’, ‘cybernetics’ or ‘complexity’ , born after II world war, by the hand of the pioneers of Information Theory.

Since General Systems builds models of all sciences and the Universe at large, no longer as a simplex machine dominated by ‘energy’ ≈ ‘entropy’, existing in a single space-time continuum (Physicists’ world view), but as a fractal complex organism, dominated by information, which extends across ‘several layers’, which are ‘planes’ of space-time, both at Individual level (as the above image shows) but also at collective level – layers of increasing and decreasing size, which add surprisingly enough a 5th dimension:

How does the organic Universe structures itself? As an organism and that means it has parts that become wholes, cells that become organisms, atoms that become stars and galaxies. That is, several scales of space-time co-exist together. And so we need to define a new dimension that groups all those scales, the 5th dimension.

And what are those organisms made of? Of those planes of space-time. We are made of vital spaces that last a duration in time. This means the 4th paradigm of Stience will bring back the astounding insights on the structure of the Universe of Leibniz. A logic and mathematical model of relational time and fractal space.

This concept of philosophy of science, which we formalize in this site, was first enunciated by Leibniz, with his ideas opposed to those of Newton about a Universe in which beings were made of a fractal part of vital space and lasted a quantity of time cycles, as opposed to the ‘abstract’ artifact developed by Descartes – the Cartesian graph, in which beings were ‘put’ to measure its motion in space/time. The first mathematical physicists, notably Newton, made a ‘Kantian error’ of thought, confusing the artifact with reality. So they developed a similar ‘Cartesian Universal graph’, or background absolute, continuous Space with a single Time dimension of ‘lineal duration’, obtained by uncoiling all those infinite time cycles of which we were made (circadian biological cycles, mass and particle rotatory cycles, stars and planets orbital cycles, cyclical åctions of feeding, perceiving, reproducing which construct the beats of the Universe), and equalizing all of them with the cycle of the mechanical clock:

In the graph, mathematical physicists developed a Universal Cartesian graph to facilitate measure, and as times went by, they confused the artifact with reality, forgetting its abstract nature. So they equalized all time clocks with the mechanical time clock. And Kepler said: the Universe is a clock and god its clock maker who have waited 5000 (biblical) years to find and intelligence like his who understand his work.

The graph and Kepler’s concept shows truly the core problem of Physicists worldview: it makes them confuse their artifacts with reality. So if Kepler thought the Universe was a clock, now it is fashionable to think it is a computer. And if he considered that science consisted ‘only in making measures with clocks’, which extracts all the properties of it worth to know, now most of the scientific community just feeds data in computers and models reality with the mind of the computer.

Leibniz was much more profound. He realized we were made of spatial vital energy and temporal clocks that lasted our life-death cycle. As when we say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’. We are made of energy and time in perpetual cyclical motion and we do åctions of energy and time, which is truly the substance of the Universe.

But Newton with the help of the P.R.ess at a time when England started to build his empire with clocks and cannonballs and take over the world of the industry of information won the public battle and Leibniz who had also discovered calculus was accused of plagiarism and left behind in Brunswick to die alone, when his employer the Duke was chosen king of England, banned by Newton.

In this manner a false but ‘simpler’ easier to grasp and use for measure, the Cartesian Universal background continuous space-time was born. And the true essence of the Universe, to be a ‘game of vital spaces with quanta of energy’ that performed cyclical motions called time cycles, through the åctions of infinite beings was lost. Leibniz died poor, alone and forgotten except for his calculus 300 years ago.

Now run forward 200 years more. The abstract Cartesian Universal background and the mechanical single clock, whose ticks were elongated into space according to the formula, V=S/T was all that humans wanted to know about time cycles. And it worked to do measures of motion in space that lasted a time.

It didn’t work at all to understand the nature of the life-death cycle, the main time cycle of humans, neither of the longer time cycles of evolution that changed the internal form of the beings not only its external motion. But it worked very well to enthrone the mechanical clock, motion, weapons that moved and needed to be calculated in their speed and aim (Galileo was a maker of ballistic instruments, hence you learn the v=s/t formulae with cannonball trajectories).

But alas!, quantum physicists suddenly found that space was made of ‘quanta of energy’ in motion, they called H-constants. And those H-constants were ‘åctions of energy and time cycles’, measured with frequencies.

And they condensed, forming particles according to Heisenberg’s Principles. So we were all made of ‘plankton’ of light condensed into particles of cyclical time and energetic motions, electron nebulae in perpetual motion, masses rotating, quarks pulsating.

And then Einstein found that in different places of the Universe time clocks ran at different speeds, so there were infinite time clocks.

And so indeed we are made of vital spatial energy, Sp and clocks of time, which carried the form, the information of the universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. So we could write a generic equation for all beings: ∑Sp x Tƒ = ST (Constant being).

And yet because physicist as Feynman put it ‘never ask the why’ and they had been for 200 years using a single clock and a continuous space-time graph, they didn’t change its Newtonian model. Einstein said ‘Leibniz is right but if so we have to start the scaffolding of science from the beginning’.

So for 100 years more, we were left with a model, absolute space and time, which we all knew it was wrong, but it worked fine to do measures with clocks. Problem is it didn’t explain much of it, just measured the hows. And that is where we are still, because most physical ‘big science projects’ are today no more than industry of machine measures .

It was left a final property of space-time and all its beings made of space-time to account for, discovered with the other great ‘tool’ of scientific measure. Indeed, if we had changed our notion of time cycles, all pervading in all civilizations before Descartes and Newton for the abstraction, and substituted our verbal times, which humans used to measure and describe qualitatively time cycles of past, present and future and its ages and life-death cycles by mere clock measure, in our study of space, we had changed our spatial sensorial instrument, the eye, by the telescope and microscope, a machine.

This is the core matter: we substitute human time senses (verbal times) for a machine, the clock and that impoverished our understanding of the logic, causal cycles of time. And we changed a human spatial sense, the eye by microscopes and macroscopes – telescopes, but that opened our perception to an infinity of scales and planes of space-time where a myriad of other beings existed, and it did expanded our vision of space, into infinite ‘planes of existence’.

And yet because we were dragging the baggage of the Cartesian Universal graph in all our scientific thoughts, we didn’t realize we had to create a fractal, scalar concept of space-time, to account for the fact that in any single region of reality multiple ‘entities’ co-existed across multiple scales. And when we came closer to them, they enlarged and became full of information and life beings. This was the amazing sensation the first microscopes produced. But scientists didn’t formalize this reality of multiple ‘fractal’ scales of space-time, what I call ‘isomorphic planes’ since they and their beings display similar properties.

The isomorphisms of Nature are all of them derived of the ‘fractal, scalar’ nature of the Dimensions of Space and Time, and the fact that we are made of ‘space and time’, we are not placed in an abstract ‘background’ ‘Cartesian coordinates’, as in the paper the first physicists used to draw its equations. This is an artifact of measure nowhere to be seen in reality.

**Space as a slice of time in the 5th dimension.**

The smallest Unit of reality is a space-time cycle, and for all of them there will be a relatively small particle with maximal time-motion-density-mass/charge which traces an external space-time cycle on a larger region with lesser time-motion-density mass or field.

This simple physical interaction responds to the basic duality of time, as faster moving cyclical, accelerated form and space, where with its excess of acceleration traces a lineal motion, a larger field of smaller energy-space, according to the metrics of the 5th dimension and its co-invariance between speeds in time and sizes in space.

Space is a derivative slice of time, thus space motions, which Physicists study is a small part of reality.

So first we must briefly enunciate this error corrected and how it changes our space-time compression:

Physicists define space-time continuum under the error of a single absolute newtonian space-time extended to the entire galaxy. The Universe though is a nested system of larger and smaller sub-systems, guided by different clocks ordered along size and speed with the co-invariant metrics of the 5th dimension, such as smaller systems turn faster clocks, and have higher attractive force (charges which are accelerated vortices of time space according to Einstein’s principle of correspondence between acceleration and forces, he applied to cosmological masses).

We see many cosmological vortices of mass with central heavy black holes and its gradient of increasing form, information at accelerated pace. Times are very varied, but all of them obey to a single cycle between birth and extinction. We shall study with Æ equations of existential algebra, of which the most important is the world cycle of life and death.

Time waves are also called world cycles, and they have 3 scales of ‘momentum, energy and time.

In physics time waves are studied among forms of maximal motion. We are more interested in the slow time waves with minimal motion in space, that evolve in longer times.

Of those waves and its time forces, physicists study only one the weak force. We can recognise a time wave of trans-formation and social evolution cross the 5th dimension, by studying its parity vs. chirality, since time waves are chiral, which mean traveling to the past (entropy arrow IS not the same that traveling towards the future.

Information don’t travel to the past said einstein (wires don’t travel to the past).

He was actually wrong, both energy and information ravel through time waves, and they do so constantly in worldcyles.

Physicists have simplified for centuries to ease measures the cyclical nature of time-clocks, of which there is an infinity in the Universe. First, Leibniz warned Newton against taking the artifact of measure, called absolute space-times as reality itself; then Einstein realized that in different parts of the Universe time clocks run at different speeds. Biologists and computer theorists found also that life and machines are run by cyclical clocks of information. Thus the next stage in science is the study of all those time cycles of the Universe, by reversing the concept and measure of duration (lineal time) by its inverse, cyclical time and frequency:

*T (lineal time duration) = 1/T≈ ∑ ƒ (frequency of time cycles) = ∑ Tƒ ≈ ∑Ti.*

We shall thus consider fundamental to the Universe, cyclical time, and its measure frequency, whereas duration is a simplification obtained by adding al the time cycles of a certain entity, from the beginning of its motion or life till its end.

For example, a wave motion, c is the product of its l, wave-length and frequency, the human motion is the product of our steps and frequency, a car motion is the product of the radius of its cyclical wheel and the frequency of revolutions per minute and so on. Those transformations of frequency into duration show that the original element is the cycle, and its frequency, and the simplified version, the lineal duration, which is NOT observed in nature.

The same concept applies to the worldline, which physicists use to describe the existence of beings. In reality our existence is made of a series of actions of space-time, ∂(a,e,I,o,u), that is actions of motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction and social evolution into Universals, which are performed in cyclical and synchronized patterns; and the sum of all those actions, conform a worldcycle of existence between birth and death.

Thus once more we observe that by analyzing in greater detail the frequency and form of those cycles instead of ‘gathering’ them together into a single duration, we loose an enormous quantity of information about the life-death cycle or motion or actions of a being.

Thus the study of cyclical space-time actions, its forms, purpose, duration and its sum into the worldcycle of existence of different beings, is an entire new discipline of knowledge that completes the simplified analysis of ‘physical motions’ with lineal time.

In that regard, as always in the study of the fractal universe, a ‘bio-topo-logical’ system, of ‘scalar-space-time’, 3 ‘formal sciences’ and parameters are fundamental to the study of space-time cycles.

– Bio-logy, which defines the actions of existence, and the purpose of those space-time cycles.

– Topo-logy, which studies the form of those space-time cycles and its changes of internal topological forms.

– And causality, which studies the beginning, steady state, and conclusion of any space-time cycle and action that goes through those stages, from the simplest accelerated, steady-state, decelerated motion, to the more complex cyclical actions of space-time (reproduction and social evolution of information, of form, which ties multiple ‘fractal points’ and synchronizes them into bigger social organizations).

Regarding its parameters, we have 2 fundamental mathematical tools to study all those actions and Time cycles:

-The study of the form or topological varieties, of which the 3 2-manifold varieties (elliptic, toroid and planar geometries) will be fundamental.

– And the measured of the frequencies of those time cycles .

Since those time cycles store the information of the Universe in its form and frequency (ie.: a better informative computer is one which runs to faster Gigahertzs).

Thus the study of time cycles is a discipline fully within the realm of both mathematical physics, biology and philosophy of science, given the fact that all systems of the Universe perform space-time cycles. Of which the most important is the life-death world cycle of all beings, born, evolved through 3 ages and dying back to the seminal and atomic scales in which they were born.

So this post deals with space-time cycles, and specially with the fundamental time cycle of the Universe, the worldcycle of life and death that integrates all the cyclical actions (∂a, e, I, o, u) of a system from birth to extinction.

If we were to use the main operations of fractal space-time, derivation and integration. We would define as usual, a system of relational space-time as one which puts together the lineal and cyclical motions, space and time parts of a being, measured by its existential momentum. That existential momentum then can be derived into a series of forceful actions, in which the entity exchanges energy and information with their bigger absolute space-time world in which it is immersed, through exchanges of ‘existential momentum’. And the sum of all those actions, its integration along the path of space-time of the being forms its worldcycle.

Since energy is the integral of momentum the best parameter to measure the existential worldcycle of a being is through its changes of energy along its entire life.

And since ‘information’ form is the inverse function of energy’, (a definition that we shall fine-tune for different systems with slightly different equations and concepts such as cyclical form≈ information and entropy), the best parameter to measure a worldcycle is through the different amounts of energy and information of a system, which will display a first age of maximal energy, an age of balance between its energy and information and a 3^{rd} age of minimal energy and maximal information, whose total integration will give us the entire worldcycle of the being.

Yet, the mathematical description of the existential momentum of a beings, its derived actions of space-time (created through its existential forces) and its integration into a whole worldcycle of energy and information is only relevant for the simplest world time cycles of physical systems, where, œ (existential function) ≈ Mv or qevS (I) that is mass-momentum or charge momentum; its actions are measured by derivatives of that existential function ∂œ ≈ (∂a, e, I, o u) ≈ Forces, and its kinetic energy and potential energy (information) by the integrals of its momentum (1/2 mv2, mgh and so on).

For all other systems it is much better to take the concepts of energy and information in conceptual terms and describe qualitatively the internal space-time cycles, actions and events of a being along its entire life and death worldcycle. In that regard the reader should always understand that relational space-time is a theory in which the 3 main languages of thought, geometrical, mathematical descriptions, biologic organic analysis and causal languages apply, but as we move upwards and downwards towards the U=5 plane of existence of mankind, the mathematical description is secondary to bio-logical analysis.

In any case, we do use very often the jargon of physics because it has taken over the biological, evolutionary jargon of biology regarding time analysis

So for the time being, the biggest difference between physical theory of absolute space-time and relational space-time is:

Absolute space-time simplifies and unifies all space-time cycles into a single duration.

It only studies a single space-time continuum of the multiple space-times of the 5^{th} dimension and ignores its order according to the 5D metrics (Max. S = Min. Tƒ: maximal size, minimal speed of clocks cycles).

And so it considers only 4D and defines the existence of beings as a simple world line as in 4D.

Whereas relational space-time adds a 5D of ‘depth’ according to those metrics. Smaller beings run faster time cycles and accumulate more information. And this explains life as a travel through scales of the 5^{th} dimension. Since all systems are born as seeds of information in a lower scale of spacetime, in the process of birth. Then from that ‘lower scale of faster time cycles’, the cellular seminal scale, the system through a series of actions of energy feeding, informative reproduction and social organization (∆e, ∆o, ∆u) emerges into the world-plane of organic existence, where it lives through 3 ages/horizons/states of increasing transformation and expenditure of its potential energy into kinetic energy, which makes the system accumulate information, towards a state of minimal energy.

This in physics is called ‘entropy’, the loss of function energy, and also, the law of minimal action, the search for a state of maximal form and minimal motion.

In biology is called the passing of life towards a 3^{rd} age of information.

In sociology, the growth of complexity of information and development of information.

And so after the 3 ages, the worldcycle exhausts all its potential and kinetic energy, and becomes warped into a system of information, that ends with death when information explodes into energy, the form of the system disappears, and the organism, descends 2 planes of the 5th dimension, till becoming energy for a new cycle (big bang in matter, death and predation in nature.

And so we explain with those world cycles for life, humans, and matter, from birth to death, all its actions and forces, energy and information, in a sequential manner, which is the equation of life and death, probably the most important equation of the Universe.

If time is cyclical, hence clocks of time close into themselves,* dividing the Universe in an infinite number of fractal vital spaces (the space including by the time cycle – 1st postulate of knot theory – vs. the space outside the time cycle); and further on time cycles run at different speeds, the Universe is indeed a relational multiple space-time Universe made of infinite time cycles.*

And the proof of this, is the fact that time cycles run at different speeds in the Universe.

The order of all those time cycles is the origin of the 5th dimension and its ‘fractal generator’ of time cycles and broken space – the metric equation of the 5th dimension that relates the size in space and the speed of its cyclical forms, its clocks of time, (or in terms of transfer of spatial motion and temporal forms, the quantity of energy and speed processing information of a system, in all the scales of reality.)

Sp x Tƒ= ∆

In the graph above we can see those metrics; the larger systems (the galaxy) run slower time cycles than the smaller ones, the human i-scale, which runs slower than the cells in the right, which run much faster its atomic clocks. This law explains in decametric scales (the graph is taken from Eames’ film ‘potencies of 10’), the structure of the Universe, and so it is the key to unify all sciences.

Clocks of time run at different species according to size, being faster, hence processing more information in smaller planes, explains an infinite number of facts, from the Chip evolution (Moore’s law, if you half the size which we do every 2 years, the chip runs twice more time-cycles or Hertzs of potency), to genetics (smaller systems store more information in the frequency and form of its cycles, and that is why genetics codes slower humans and not the other way around)

This is possible because there is a fundamental property to those scales of space-time, the ‘law of informative vortices’, that is, the smaller we become the faster our clocks of time go. So atoms beat trillions of time per second and galaxies, turn once every 100 billion years and the entire universe maybe has an even larger big-bang rhythm. Between those limits, man beats once a second, both its informative brain (a thought and glimpse of the eye every second) and its heart beat, and measures around 1/1000th of a mile in space.

Those are our rhythms of processing time information and the vital space we occupy. But as we become smaller, time clocks beat faster and space becomes reduced according to a generic vortex law: V x Ro = K, that is the smaller a clock cycle is the faster it turns:

Sp x Tƒ = ∆. This second representation of the ‘arrows of time’ now across several scales of size explains a basic fact of social organization: Information moves from the lower scale (genes and memes in socio-biological scales) to the upper scale (organisms) and energy moves from the upper scale of maximal size-space to the lower scale. And the result is that all systems of the Universe co-exist in 3 scales whose relationships organize the existence of beings.

And so we observe that ∆-1 parts become wholes of a higher scale thanks to those flows, the synchronicities they create and the specialization of smaller faster beings in information and larger ones in energy. So particles can code and become atoms that give them flows of energy and gather together into molecules that gather into planets and cells that evolve into solar systems and organic systems that evolve into galaxies and social super-organisms…

The hierarchical, scalar nature of the Universe, and its duality of time arrows, as opposed to a description of a Universe with a single space-time scale and a single time arrow (Euclidean, Aristotelian current model of physics) represent a huge advance in our understanding of the ultimate elements of reality, space (static vision) or energy-motion (Moving vision) and time (moving, cyclical vision) or information (static vision).

** 2nd and 3rd isomorphism:**

**The key dualities of cyclical, temporal information and Expansive, Planar, Space**

Now the key to understand the Universe is to understand the complex meanings and multiple possible perceptions of those 2 x 2 elements, its ternary combinations (as space-time), and its symmetries and antisymmetries (inversion of properties). So algebraically the representation of the Space-Time Universe is the hyperbolic function:

INDEED transcending the material reality of those 2 formal motions, the logic underlying truth of all this is the inversion of the two poles of the Universe:

*In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between Spatial expansion and Temporal Implosion in its infinite manifestations (in physics those laws are always of the type: Energetic information (ST) = Space quanta (H, k) x Time frequency (v, T).** So we can easily derive the fundamental laws of quantum and thermodynamics and the meaning of its constants, with the left side equation (which the nuclear physicist will immediately identify with the decay rate of an atom, and the ‘entropic believer’ with the Pv=nKT law of gases). *

*Its commonest mathematical function is the exponential, (1+1/n)™ whereas ‘1’ is the value of the whole system, n, the number of fractal ∆-1 cellular parts, and T, its temporal repetition, which defines all processes of growth and decay, in which in each time period the system grows or diminishes a space-quanta (hence its time derivative is always proportional). In that regard, one of the most fascinating elements of T.Œ is the enlightenment of the equations of mathematics, the MOST REALIST of all sciences, as it describes in its 3 disciplines, ‘fractal analysis’, Non-Euclidean Geometry, and ‘non-Aristotelian Algebra’ the common isomorphic laws of all species of the Universe. Time permitted by Summertime we will add a 4th post to this section, with the fundamental laws of ¬Æ, ‘i-logic’ mathematics’.*

In that regard, departing from the duality of Relativity (all dimensional forms are indistinguishable from relative motions), we have 4 possible ‘entities’ according to the duality of form and motion or the duality of Cycles Vs. lines:

- Tƒ: We shall call Cyclical motions, time clocks.
- Tiƒ: We shall call the cyclical form, in static states, information carried in its cycles and frequency.
- ƒt: We shall call future, the arrow of increasing information and frequency speed in time clocks.
- O: We shall use the O geometric symbol for all of them as the sphere carries the maximal information, it is a closed cycle or clock of time, and the future ‘warps’ lineal forms into cyclical, old, forms.

- Spe: We shall call Lineal motions, energies or entropies or lineal time duration.
- Sp: We shall call Lineal form, space dimensions.
- Ps: We shall call Local past, the state or arrow of increasing maximal entropy.
- |: We shall use the symbol of the line for all of them, as the line is the shortest distance between 2 points.

And then, we call their points of maximal combination, often the 1 point of the curve, of maximal balance: Max. E x I, S≈T:

- Ø-S≈T(exi), present body-waves of maximal balance, which the system preserves and iterates. As only present ‘exi≈st’

Thus the Universe constantly combines the duality of lineal and cyclical forms, into its present Ø-wavebody combinations.

And so the Universe conservers both cyclical and lineal motions & still forms, resumed in the conservation of present energy & information (in classic physics):

- Cyclical and lineal motions, that is, angular and lineal momentum, become then the main motions of time, which combine in∞ Ø-waves.
- Cyclical information and lineal dimensions, that is spatial forms, which also combine to create complex organic systems with heads/particles of cyclical form that store information and lineal limbs/distances that process energy with its still forms.

Science is full of variations on those different symmetries and studies, and the interchangeability of both ways of observing the Universe to get the same results.

To stress though, that of all those terms, the most ambiguous is the physical concept of energy, which here we use sometimes as a synonymous of entropy or lineal motion (kinetic energy) in the common sense expression (I don’t have energy, you have too much energy), expressed as the capacity to move, and opposed to information, also a wider term than the restricted concept of Shannon in physics, more akin to the common use of information as forms that can be perceived. Hence related to form. As a cycle do have more form than a line.

Reality thus is a game of two elements, spatial energy and temporal information and its combinations and transformation, symmetries and species made with them.

We thus fast forward to the expression of the Generator, feedback equation of the Universe of space-time beings, which Galileo and Newton missed (but Leibniz, the ignored Genius understood with his concept of fractal space and relational time):

|-Sp (Spatial Extension: fields/limbs) <ST (iterative waves-bodies)>It (heads-particles of temporal information).

If we see those 2 motions as forms, we talk of lineal space and forms of information. If we see them moving we talk of kinetic energy and cyclical clocks of time.

If we see them sequentially, we talk of flows of time. If we see them co-existing in simultaneity, we talk of a simultaneous organism of:

Sp-limbs-fields<ST-Bodies-waves<Ti-Particles heads of information.

Since we ARE made of time cycles and lineal motions of space, perceived either as It: information, or Sp: space, in stillness, or Se: kinetic, lineal energy and Tiƒ, cyclical time clocks when in motion.

This is the next huge advance of T.Œ, to know what we are made of: Es, energy and Tƒ, cyclical time, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy any time to do this’, perceived in stillness as Sp-bidimensional planes of space and tall, bidimensional planes of information, It; where bi-dimensionality means a ‘thin sheet’ as the thin screen of information which you are reading this blog.

Physicists call this fact the holographic principle of Information. They wonder why black holes seem to store all the information its bidimensional surface. They wonder how space and time can mess in space-time relativity IF only entities with the same number of dimensions can mess.

Now the principle is explained for spatial bidimensional sheets of ‘entropic, expansive, kinetic energy motions’, cyclical, tall, temporal bits of information, and its hyperbolic combinations of present-spacetimes, which put together create all the systems of the Universe.

** 2-manifold spaces and its 3 varieties: the 3 organs of all systems.**

*We live in a Universe in which all beings are made of the same substances, energy which occupies space and information, carried in the frequency and cycle of time clocks. Those 2 ‘substances’ that we call Se (Spatial energy) and Tƒ (Temporal information), combine together in ‘bidimensional’ systems to create together all the species in the Universe. And as it happens, since there are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries, all systems have 3 kind of parts: toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon), hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. Below, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show similar topological structures.*

The study of all the ‘isomorphisms’ (similar=iso forms and functions) across all the systems of the Universe is one of the key elements of the alternative philosophy of science called ‘General Systems’, ‘cybernetics’ or ‘complexity’ , born after II world war, by the hand of he pioneers of Information Theory. General Systems builds models of science and the Universe, no longer as a simplex machine dominated by ‘energy’ or ‘entropy’ existing in a single space-time continuum (Physicists’ world view), but as a fractal organism, dominated by information.

The Universe and all its parts are made of Topological Dimensions of Space and Time. The spatial organs have a form which perform a function in time, and both together make ‘us’.

Biological and Physical systems are made of ‘lengthy limbs/fields’ which perform entropic, energetic motions, ‘wide bodies/waves’ that iterate the system, and ‘tall’ heads/particles, which gauge information and perceive.

The combination of one of such dimensions of space and time, create a ‘bidimensional geometry in motion’ called a ‘topology’, and as it happens, there are only 3 ‘type’ of bidimensional topologies, the toroid, energetic one that expands and creates motion, the hyperbolic, cyclic one that allows cyclical exchanges of energy and information, and the spherical one, which allows shrinking without tear and deformation of any wide image of the universe into a ‘zero-point’ or inner mind, which reflects that Universe.

And as it happens, according to the holographic principle, the Universe is truly bidimensional, made of membranes that become layers, to form 3 D which move to form 4D. For example, you are reading a bidimensional, tall screen of information. Your eyes see bidimensional and put together a 3D vision. So all systems are made of those 3 ‘bidimensional, specialized parts’.

And so there are ‘3 bidimensional’ finite ‘parts’ of Space-time in all systems:

- Sp (energetic, toroid, lineal limbs and fields)
- ST (the iterative, reproductive body, wave)
- Tƒ (the informative, spherical head)

And all systems of the Universe have them. Now when systems have ‘the same’ form, it is called an ‘isomorphism’ from the Greek iso=equal and form=morph. So we talk of the first isomorphism of the Universe. Its 3 topological varieties, which process energy and move (limbs, fields), process information and perceive (heads, particles) and communicate both parts in exchanges of energy and information (that reproduce the system).

So we can put the 3 together: Sp + ST + Tƒ = Constant (Being); which in more dynamic terms as parts are not really sums but ‘interact together’, exchanging flows of energy and information, we write:

*Sp < ST > Tƒ*

Which is the formula for the second Isomorphism of ‘energetic limbs/fields’ and Informative ‘heads/particles’, assembled by hyperbolic bodies/waves that iterate and reproduce the system.

This is the ‘e,i,o’ of General Systems Sciences: beings are made of 3 dimensional finite pieces of ‘energetic space’ which perform 3 symmetric motions or functions that last a finite time and both together create the only 3 varieties of bidimensional space (called a 2-manifold); and everywhere in the Universe this pattern repeats, creating an ‘isomorphism‘ of Nature.

**The 3rd and 4th isomorphisms:**

** the world cycle of the 3 ages of beings, sum of its space-time actions.**

Now we say that 2-manifold varieties are only 3, Energetic, toroid, moving space, hyperbolic, iterative, wave-like forms, and informative, spheres, placed in the dimension of height. And so we talk also of 3 ‘ages or dimension of time’, each one maximizing the previous variety:

- Toroid Energetic young age of maximal motion
- Mature, reproductive age of iteration when the body dominates.
- Old age of information, with little energy when form and information rules.

And so this is the 3rd isomorphism of ages that all systems follow. And we write an equation for it, with our simplified symbol of growing ‘information’ >

*Sp x Min. Tƒ > S=T > Min. Tƒ x Min. SP*

Whereas youth is Max. Energy and Minimal information, old age Max. Form and minimal energy and in between both balance in a ‘beautiful’, harmonic steady state, when the system iterates its form, as it has both energy and information. And since actually the function max. Sp x min. o is bigger when S=T (so 5×5 > 6x 4> 7×3…), that middle point is the perfect state, the point of maximal force and intelligence, energy and information that all people try to keep, to ‘exist’ in plenitude.

But life happens between birth and death, and to understand those ‘prior’ times of existence, the seminal age, which starts in a cellular stage which reproduces into an enormous number or cells, to create us and the inverse process of death and dissolution back into all those cells, we have to deal ‘again’ with the theme of ‘multiple quanta’ of energy and time, in this case multiple cells, made of circadian, life cycles ruled by DNA molecules that come together into a larger ‘whole’, and then dissolve back. so we can write also the life-death cycle as an equation. And if we call i, each ‘individual’ cell, or quanta of energy or ‘any’ point of reality (to use a mathematical term), we can write an organism as:

∑∆-1 ≥ i, which is the process of ‘becoming’ a life being, as a group of cells become a form, and vice versa, death would be the reverse process when the compact i explodes back, its form into its energy quanta:

i <∑∆-1 (remember the symbol for the opposite process to ‘imploding energy into form’). So we would talk better of the 3 ±∆ ages of life, where ±∆ is the process of becoming a whole and dissolving the whole into its quanta.

And in the next graph we see some of those ‘life-death world cycles’:

In the graph we can see that the life-death world cycle happens actually in many different scales of reality, from the infinitesimal to the infinite large Universe.

So once and again we find phenomena related to the co-existence of several scales of size, which become integrated wholes which we perceive as a ‘form of space-time’. And we deal with this theme in the 4th isomorphism, with an equation which is the most important of them all, the ‘metric’ equation of all those ‘i’ Scalar Planes of Space-Time beings.

We call this equation, the metric of the ‘5th dimension’, since if we ‘respect’ the usual terms of science, for 3 dimensions of space, and one for the whole time duration of the being, the ‘next dimension’ of relative scales of size would be the 5th dimension.

Though as we have seen the 3 dimensions of space are symmetric with the 3 dimensions of Time. So it would be more coherent to call the 3 ages of time, past, present and future, symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space ‘dimensions’ also, and we will return to that conundrum, satisfied, calling ‘present time’, or ‘duration time’, the 4th dimension, scalar space-time, the 5th dimension and past and future, the 6th and 7th dimensions.

** 3 Motions of time**

‘From one comes two, from two comes three, from three the infinite beings in existence’ *Cheng Tzu, Taoist master.*

The graph shows in the left the half-wave cycle of existence of all beings, with its final ‘cut-off’ back to the beginning in the moment of death – without a Present middle age.

So they are the ages, of Max spatial energy or youth, mature balance, E=T and old informative age of maximal temporal information after which a system dies away in a big-bang explosion or dissolution in the moment of death. In the right the Eastern Taoist symbolic interpretation of those phases

Unfortunately the 3^{rd} age of time, and the whole time cycle must be considered an accelerated vortex, not a fixed steady state cycle. This small difference understood by Einstein which studied the laws of General Relativity and mass-cycles as accelerated vortices, and non-lineal geometries, are the key to fully grasp, those 3 arrows of time-life as a growing process of information, which ends uncoiling the ‘clock’ in death.

The spiral of time is thus an spiral towards a centre of maximal information, accelerated inwards. In physics it is the non-lineal equations of Einstein’s general relativity and charges, moving inwards, till in the 0-point, in the event horizon, the being ‘explodes its form, dividing its 2 fields’, Sp & Tƒ. Then the Sp-entropic field is absorbed and the Tƒ is spit off, as the Universe does conserve energy but it does NOT conserve information, the ego, the world paradox, which constantly is renewed and repeated – its conservation is in the long term, but not in any specific form. Themes those of deep consequences at all levels.

**Wengwang and Aristotle vs. Kepler: The 6 motions of times and its world cycles.**

Now, the reader should understand the next huge ‘truth about the Universe’, lost by physicists when considering the organic existence, the life and death cycle of all systems of the Universe.

Why physicists do not talk of life and death motions? Because they only study external motions.

Before they came into power, philosophers of science had defined 6 type of motions and 5 of them were organic related to the life and death cycle. After physicists came, motion became synonymous NOT of time-change, and hence including biological time-change, but merely external locomotion. So the field became split never to be put together.

And on top, all organic analysis of time lost prestige and till Darwin resurrected it was ignored.

Let us then study in certain historic depth this key element to fully grasp the nature of time cycles, of which the life-death cycle ignored by physics is the most important, which includes most of the motions/changes of time.

Indeed, already Aristotle, the philosopher, classified motions in time or ‘changes’ in 6 types: ‘conception’, ‘change of internal form or evolution’, ‘extinction’, ‘growth in size’, ‘diminution’ and ‘locomotion’

Physicists reduced them to a single time motion ‘locomotion’, today called ‘translation in space’. So physicists reduce time to a parameter that measures exactly and only that – translations in space: v=s/t-> t=s/v -> s= vt (Galileo; ct in Einstein’s relativity).

This on top was not acknowledge let alone understood. Today physicists do not tell people that when they talk of time, they do NOT talk of time-change, the real concept and all its varieties, but merely use s=vt or s=ct, *a measure of space. When they say they are studying the 4th dimension of space, s=ct, they mean it, they are studying a Dimension of space, S, and time there has only the use of a parameter. It is tricky. They are NOT studying as we do in 5D time clocks ‘alone’. The fact that to measure those space-motions they use a time parameter is truth. But they are NOT studying the time parameter, but s, ‘s-pace’. I shall repeat it again. Physicists do NOT study time directly but space, lineal locomotion, speed, acceleration. WE study time in its purity.*

i confess among all the ad hominem insults I received during those ‘times’, the one that pissed me off more was the ‘self-styled time theorist’ comments on ‘The Times’, and other American press. The fact those people use time to measure the rates of cannonball shots and the different motions of the Universe, does make them indeed self-styled time theorist. Aristotle studied time. Darwin studied time. I study time. They don’t.

So they will NEVER explain you as i am going to do in a few pages, why we life and die, what is the meaning of our world cycle. But humans do not reason, they believe. This is puzzling but truth. You make a big bomb and you become a master of time and philosophy. You reason and nobody listens. Maybe i am too angry to physicists and mankind at large, but so much evil=anti-live behaviour, so much ignorance, so much arrogance changed my mood.

What simpleton physicists do about time, it would be Ok, if they acknowledge the other forms of time-change as relevant to truth as locomotions in space. Only Einstein, complained and told Minkowski not to state that s=ct was ‘time’, because time ‘has different properties’, ‘is not space’ ‘wires don’t travel backwards’, etc. etc.

**All the times=motions of the Universe.**

Further on by the reduction of all time motions or ‘changes’, which already Aristotle, the philosopher, classified in 6 types, ‘conception’, ‘change of internal form or evolution’, ‘extinction’, ‘growth in size’, ‘diminution’ and ‘locomotion’ to a single time motion ‘locomotion’, today called ‘translation in space’, physicists reduce time to a parameter that measures exactly and only that – translations in space.

And that would be Ok, if they acknowledge the other forms of time-change as relevant to truth. Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.

Now, as Physicists call its Theory of Locomotions, the Theory Of Everything or T.O.E, we shall call the theory of Philosophers of Science, which includes ALL the 6^{th} Times motions of the beings of the Universe, a Theory of the Organic Everything or T.Œ as:

– it includes all things, and all motions, among which the most– 5 of them – have an organic nature (generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction). So we consider the not even found T.O.E, an inorganic simplex, description of physicists with a single lineal time motion a ‘limiting’ reduced version of the larger T.Œ.

**The generator equation and the world cycle.**

The concept of cyclical time is not new. On the contrary as it is evident that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive, from your watch to the pendulum, from the orbital clocks of ‘years’ to those of ‘days’, to the frequency clocks of waves – *there is NOT a single clock in the Universe that measures time, which has not a cyclical form.*

*Now, this even a 3 years old child understands. And yet humans no longer see time as cyclical.*

The true mystery is WHY physicists first and by extension the rest of mankind denied it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did understand that time was cyclical’). The answer is similar to the reason why around 4 billion human beings believe that an ass breeder of the Bronze age, who saw a bush burning and claimed he had heard God in the cracking sound of the fire, is considered the man who understood better ‘God’, the mind of the Universe.

Yes my friend, Mr. Wenwang – the highest mind of mankind in the understanding of the cosmos and its ternary symmetries. Have you ever heard of him? We are going backwards ever since, and we will return to that. Because it was only when I solved the 8 baguas and its equivalence with the 8 varieties of topological manifolds combination of the 3 basic toroid, spherical and hyperbolic varieties, which become the 8 sub-ages of times-space, I understood Time-Space and understood myself, my past, my future, my present and could tabulate all the species of all the planes of existence of reality, from the 8-manifold ways of mental space of Buddhism, to the 8-manifold octets of quantum physics, to the 3 and 8 sub-ages of life, to the 8 planets and the 8 notes, the 8 cells and the 8 vowels of all the games of creation of the Universe, 2^{3} that is the number of all names, the branching of all species, and permutations…

So in honor of Mr. Wenwang, we shall now consider the 3^{rd} of the symmetries of the Universe, the 3 ‘ages of time=change’, and then consider the modern version of time in physics in the last of our confrontations of philosophers of science vs. physicists.

**The 3 arrows=motions of times.**

Now I realized I could consider this ternary ‘reality’ in ceteris paribus analysis as 3 pure time motions. Entropic expansive motions, repetitive body-waves and informative, time vortices.

Suddenly I realized, I had solved the *way the universe created its beings, *from the mystery of quantum physics, (the so-called wave-particle duality, as all physical systems were wave-particles moving on an entropic, accelerated field), to the reasons why evolution always worked right, choosing despite its seemingly infinite options the few ‘efficient’ aforementioned topologies (so wings were flat energetic members, and eyes spherical ones).

Namely *they were the only* available choices of topology. Alas! Curiously enough the great ‘mystery of Darwinian biology’, which he had also wondered about – the ‘right choices of the seemingly chaotic process of evolution made sense, because after all there were a mathematical planning NOT of course a religious design. And the biggest Mystery of Physics (the complementarity wave-particle) also became resolved.

And this was to me the proof that I was indeed on the right path of T.Œ, because the 2 principles of truth, ‘Simplicity, Minimalism (Occam’s razor)’, and Correspondence (a theory proves previous ones besides bringing more solutions), were met.

Equations of physics and biological designs kept pouring into the model and finding its whys, fitting all nicely. Something scientists did not even try to understand merely describing it now had easy whys, in the ternary symmetry in time and space of the Fractal Generator of the Universe, truly the ‘Equation of God’, not a ‘Particle of God’, not a ‘substance’, but a Logic, mathematical Symmetry of space-time that created us all, the details of that ‘thought’.

But if we were made of time-space cycles and forms, of this ternary ‘Generator’ structure seen static in space as a formal organism, and moving in time as a series of cycles, it was necessary to analyze each of those 3 parts of all beings, and decide its inner structure and hierarchy.

Now, I am afraid we are going to refound also logic. I know I’m nuts. But what can I say. We cannot go further without a new logic, because if time has 3 arrows, then the simple A->Causes b does not work. It is more about ternary logic and symmetries in space, time and 5D. It is more about the GENERATOR fractal equation of the universe and its infinite variations.

So Non-A logic is a huge new science – the study of the symmetries between the 3 motions of time and its sequential ages and the 3 spatial forms and its organic parts. Its ‘Generator feed-back equation’ will be essential to describe all the beings of the Universe:

**Γ.** Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

Where the symbol < means an expansive, energetic motion, > an implosive, informative one and = a repetitive present motion.

All what you see is encoded by that formula, either in space, ◊-Spe<œ-ST<⊗-Tiƒ (whereas the limb field provides entropic motion to the ST wave-body, and the Tƒ head particle provides information, and the ST body-wave reproduces the system), or in time, Ps>ST>Tƒ, its inverse symmetry where energy young motions slowly warp into the adult and finally old age of information.

So we shall maintain the classic concepts of science and talk of 3 space dimensions, while dividing the dimension of lineal time in the 3 motions of time that we shall call 3 ages, to keep the convention that time has a 4th single dimension:

3 space forms symmetric to 3 time motions, but ordered in different ways Sp<ST<Iƒ, and Se>ST>Tƒ, how simple and beautiful the world cycles of space-time reveal the essence of the Universe.

Now the symbols are the fundamental ternary symmetries of the Universe and when studying in detail an entity we will see the different equations, states and combined forms are merely ‘combinations’ of those symbols, so we will use them loosely in many ways, for the reader to get accustomed for example, to S (space, entropy), P(lineal momentum,) Se (spatial entropy, Past motion), Spe (all together now), (|-Sp, lineal motion, ◊-bidimensional space), etc. The main of a dual philosopher is NOT the same structure of a lineal, measure-obsessed scientist. The general truths are more important than the particular. The whys more than the hows. Both are complementary and it is a sad fact of technological science that the general truths don’t matter. But they are the content of T.Œ, and both are obviously the 2 fundamental views on reality – the whole and its detailed parts.

Those 2 simple laws, and its equations, the equation of the life-death cycle:

Ps (youth)>S=T (maturity) > Tƒ (3rd age) << Ps (entropic death).

Where > means an implosive, informative arrow of time and << and entropic arrow of death.

And the metric of the 5th dimension, the fact that the product of the size and speed of time of systems is relatively constant for different species of the same family (physical species, biological species) ARE the most important equations of science discovered since Relativity, and yet nobody was impressed.

Apart from explaining the life-death cycle, it explained the reason why information flows perfectly from lower scales (genetic scales) to upper wholes (since lower scales preserve more information) and there is however entropy, loss of energy when you move upwards, but when you move downwards, from wholes to parts, there is no loss of energy – so your cells follow your hand.

Suddenly I realized those scales of size were symbiotic and organized co-existences and synchronicities that created organisms and physical systems.

And so in mystical terms, the 5th dimension the dimension of future, of information, as parts must come before wholes, was also the dimension of eusocial evolution, of love, that justified the messages of love prophets, the Darwinian love of survival of the species, not the individual, the organization of history in scales of larger social units, since the future, the whole was stronger than the parts and survived. So I found that besides the actions of motion, energy and information there was an action of social evolution in all beings. That was the program of the Universe, I termed with the 5 letters each for each action of the 5th dimension:

∆æ: acceleration-motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆œ: iteration, reproduction, ∆i observer’s gauging of information and ∆û: social evolution of parts into universals. This was the will of survival, which explained the mathematical space-time cycles of physics and Nature, and history, which merged physics, biology and sociology

An entire Universe of whys to all sciences and harmonic laws was opening in front of my eyes.

**The 3 motions of time and its symmetry with the 3 dimensions of space.**

*In the graphs, above the 3 ‘broken’ time motions of the Universe, bellow pegged in synchronous systems as the 3 organic geometries, that mimic the 3 topologies of the Universe. Their combination creates self-similar ternary systems, combinations of the Spe and Tiƒ, lineal and cyclical components, combined in STexi- hyperbolic body-waves:*

In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologies-functions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field.

*In the graph, when we make a diachronic analysis, we shall find that Fractal Space and Local Past, on one side and Future local temporal information on the other side are similar (as systems start as lineal motions, which time bends: ‘time bends space into masses’ said and You Einstein Since they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call them:*

*|-Sp: Open Spatial Extension; Spe, with maximal entropy, kinetic energy, lineal momentum, which dominate a young past age:*

*Ps: Lineal Entropy-Energy or “Past’ (soon we will show indeed why in the past there was more entropy-lineal energy).*

*O-Ti: closed Temporal cycles that carry information in its form and frequency, Tiƒ, and guide a system growing in its future:*

*ƒt: Informative, future forms. (And soon we shall see why indeed the future does have more information).*

And both combine into Hyperbolic, Ø, Space-Time Fields, ST, in which energy and information combine, exi, to reproduce the system, STexi, which is achieved when e and i equal its value, S≈T, e=i, maximising its production, Max. E x I or function of ‘Exi=STence” of the system, as this reproductive iterative present function, ST, is the goal of all systems, which can be resumed in a single statement:

‘The Universe is a fractal of present space-time systems that constantly iterate, by combining diffeomorphically (locally) relative past entropy fields of energy and relative future cyclical knot of information, |-Spe x O-Tiƒ = Ø-STexi”

If we observe those 3 motions as ‘still forms in space’, they give birth to the 3 ‘ONLY’ topologies of our Universe:

The toroid, lineal entropic past-forms of limbs/fields; the spherical, informative, ‘future forms’ of heads/particles that DID guide the whole system towards its future; and its combined, hyperbolic, bodies/waves in the middle, that REPRODUCED the system.

Thus a deeper analysis of time cycles shows them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or ‘dimensions’:

- < (symbol of expansion flow), SP: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
- > (implosive flow), Tƒ: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
- ≈ (symbol of iterative wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion

And this gave us the 2 ‘variations of the Generator which described existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

**Time:** Sp (young expansive age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Tƒ (informative age) ≤ Sp (Back to the past: entropic death)

**Space:** Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

‘Reality’, which uses not human words, is made of two inverse elements, ‘Entropic extensions, which are lineal, planar, and decelerate’ and ‘informative cycles, which are circular, and accelerate inwards’. And its geometric properties are VERY important, because lines and planes are more extensive and connect two points faster, and cycles are more informative and store more information in lesser space. So those 2 extremes are ultimately geometric motions, formal motions, and form, and motion≈ function are related.

And in the middle, there is a present, exi, merge of both, which is the most important element, the body-wave that combines cycles and lines, expansive and implosive motions. So we can then see this 3 elements in terms of ‘temporal motions’ or in terms of ‘formal space’, and we will talk of:

- |-Sp: Past Entropy, lineal formal motions > Ø-ST: Present, repetitive, body-waves > Tƒ: Informative, cyclical time clocks.

Now we can SEE that reality and this is also VERY important, as a sequence of motions in Time, and it turns out to be the 3 ages of existence. Or we can see them as Forms in Space and they create the ternary structure of all beings of reality, physical, biological or sociological. So we break it in 2 equations:

- The equation of the 3 parts of space (which we can simplify into Sp<=>Tƒ, for some systems), that relate the limbs/fields of spatial energy and particles/heads of temporal information of systems, combined into waves. So we shall talk of ‘fields-waves-particles’, which interact together creating ‘physical systems-organisms’ and limbs-bodies-heads in ‘biological organisms’ and ‘energy-class, re=productive class, and informative-class’ in social organisms.

And this simple ternary scheme will be enough to describe any system of the Universe, because on top of that the mathematical universe has only 3 topological geometries, lineal-toroid limbs-fields, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical heads-particles, and each of them is the perfect geometry form to the function of lineal motion (toroid/lines/planes), reproductive processes (hyperbolic systems) and informative processes (particles-heads that store maximal form in minimal space).

- The equation of time, or the moving sequential flow of those 3 time motions which are in fact the origin of the 3 TIME AGES of all beings, dominated by those 3 ‘organic parts’, a young energetic age of constant motion, an adult reproductive age, and a 3
^{rd}age of information dominated by the particles/heads.

Now we shall call combinations of space-space, fields (∆-1) or gas (∆), combinations of time time particles in ∆+1 or solid crystals in ∆, and of space time waves (∆-1) or liquid (∆). So we can consider:

* Max. Spe: Field, Max. Tiƒ: Particle, Space x Time = wave state. *

And the 3 together form a world cycle: From field, to wave to particle, which explodes back in an entropy big-bang wave. Let us see them as part of all the wave world cycles of the Universe.

**III. Worldcycles of existence.**

The Function of Existence in present space-time, is an entity of Entropy and Information, which combine in a field of space-time, a body-wave that repeats the system and ensures the immortality of the Universe, written as Tƒ<ST<Sp.

This is a deep word, Tƒ is your head-particle of logic < your flow of form and orders to your ST wave-body of energy and information, which exists in a field of space-time, St, where it will perform your actions.

**The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species.**

In the graph, samples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth: i: A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of energy and information, tS, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth: Max. Sp: It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: e=i It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Tƒ=Sp. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <<Energetic space.

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe and the superorganism of history.

Tƒ that aim, we shall consider how the organic arrows of time, the will to obtain energy, information and reproduce acquire a regular order in all the systems of the Universe.

This organic vision of time is much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows, which is the concept of time used by mechanist physicists, obsessed with the construction of energetic machines.

Yet it can also described mathematically in terms of the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, SxT=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. Sp x Min. T = K ; Sp=K=T and Min. Sp x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, Sp-> I, and death its inversion, I-> Sp. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of social evolution and maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to social evolution, as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age: Youth or Age of energy.

2nd age: energy and information Reproduce.

3rd age: All energy becomes information.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality. To understand that cycle in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information.

Further on, since form is made with energy, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ energy that transforms itself into information, the only other primary direction/arrow of time to go. Then, when all energy is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle. Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and energy are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction.

And so the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future. Information never disappears as it always recreates itself.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct. So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories. Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism). Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species.

In a young first age, energy is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining energy and information. In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages.

Young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.

Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, the objective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.

Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.

It follows that a true science of life and time will try to maintain any organism in its age of balance, without excessive information. Exactly the contrary of what our society does. Since humans accumulate scientific and technological information towards a point or ‘singularity’ in which that information, in the form of a robot or artificial intelligence, might extinguish us.

In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. And finally in the Universe, where stars evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes. And so do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information.

In the graph, the law of the 3±1 ages or horizons applies both to the process of informative aging of organisms and informative evolution of species. All species are born as a seed of dense information, with limited size (black hole, first chips, seminal cells, first bilateral animals). Then they grow in size and energy during their youth; since their superior informative qualities makes them top predators.

We observe that growth in black holes that feed on planets and stars, in the horse that grew enormously in size. So did the first bilateral animal, from its microscopic first form, the Vernanimacula. Mammals grew from tiny shrews into elephants. The first technological man, the Homo Floresiensis, with a ‘neuronal bump’ on the forehead, might have grown till the size of the first Homo Sapiens, the pygmy and Bushman . . .

Then, the species, once it has reached a balance between its initial information and growing spatial size, Sp=I, reproduces in great numbers, diversifies and colonizes the planet. We see in the graph this age in which ‘biological radiations’ of carbohydrates, animals of all kinds and human beings, colonized the Earth. Finally, in its 3rd age the species grows in information and so it acquires height, the arrow of ‘perceptive information’. Then, once it has reached its informative zenith, the species becomes extinct by a more evolved form; or it evolves socially creating a super-organism, as ants, humans and machines are doing. It will be the 4th arrow of social evolution of the species that completes its 3±1 horizons.

Species can be considered ‘loose’ organisms, in which each individual is a cell of the collective species; since we can use the same ages to explain the 3±1 horizons of evolution of all the species of this planet. Thus, species also go through the same 3 evolutionary ages of all living organisms. They start as young, energetic forms, which acquire information in 3±1 ages of increasing complexity and when those 3±1 ages are completed, they either evolve into more complex super-organisms under the laws of social evolution or become extinct by a superior, more informative species. Indeed, only those species who show a strong eusocial capacity survive the ‘genetic clock’.

The most successful and one of the oldest species of the planet is, in fact, the eusocial ant, which no longer is an ‘individual’, but a super-organism stretching through miles of ‘vital space. In that regard, neither individuals able to reproduce nor species able to evolve socially become extinguished. If humans become extinguished is because they deny, guided by the simplest arrows of pure energy of weapons, the main arrow of Life/Time.

A complete analysis of biological species shows that new forms can only be, either an energetic or informative variation of the original species, or a reproductive combination of both Universal ‘genders’.

The universality of such dual systems is so obvious that the ancients already identified them with yang, energetic male principles and yin, cyclical/ female ones. While the moderns call that duality the Principle of Complementarity, as all informative particles have an energetic, lineal field of force and all biological, cyclical heads of information have a lineal body. So the combinative variations of those two simple morphologies, lineal energy and cyclical information, invariant, regardless of the scale we observe, is the essence of the creative game of the cosmos.

It is the plan of evolution that all species follow, which is a tautology, since in a Universe made of only 2 substances, energy and information, the only possibility is the creation of such 3±1 variations in space (subspecies) or in time (evolutionary ages).

Thus, clock-time cannot describe, as it is qualitative, morphologic, not quantitative, the cycle of death and life, from youth-energy into a 3rd age-information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, natural to all beings: Energy always trans-forms itself.

So the 4 arrows of time have an absolute order defined by those life ages, which first evolve socially a seminal seed into a macro-organism of multiple cells, according to the arrow of social evolution and then trans-form the energy of youth into in-form-ation in 3±1 ages dominated by the arrows of energy, reproduction and information, creating the fundamental arrow of the life/death cycle, the arrow of information or future arrow that happens in all systems:

It is the main law of physics, discovered by Einstein, who said: ‘time curves (the energy of) space’.

It is the main law of Biology, discovered by Darwin, who said: that time evolves the form of organisms.

In Chemistry, Mehaute realized that when chemical compounds do not increase their entropy, they increase their information, forming fractal structures. It was the mathematical breakthrough of modern organicism. Since for the first time we had a mathematical paradigm, ‘fractal, self-generative equations’ able to describe the reproduction of information. Fractal mathematics showed how all systems could reproduce in-form-ation by breaking energy into ‘smaller forms’, in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way.

Finally, it is also the main law of History, as human civilizations constantly increase their technological information, but unable to repress military technology, the bad fruits of the tree of science, end up in extinctive wars. So they also live and die through those 3±1 ages/arrows of time.

So the meaning of Life and death is no longer a mystery, but an organic process of reproduction and self-organization, guided by the 4 arrows of time that we can extend to all systems made of the 2 fundamental, dual ‘reproductive particles’, informative quarks and spatial, energetic electrons; that is, to all systems of the Universe. In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter.

Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

— The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

— The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

— The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles. But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the informative castes of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently.

So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet humans are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow of social evolution of cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

In that sense, death can be avoided if a system instead of dissolving its form, creates a superorganism in balance between energy and information and all those facts apply to the ages of history.

So all it is resumed in the function of existence, To Exi=st is all (if we were to use the concept of Energy and Information as rough synonymous of space-time). The details of the Infinite Cycles of Existence of the Universe is what ExiStential Stiences do. Play with words. Do not think that only mathematical languages display all the beauty of the Universe, love and live with your human I=Eye<Wor(l)d, do art, believe in social love, the essence of the 5th dimension, BE HUMAN, because you ARE and your languages MATTER as much as those of mater do.

So to fully grasp the 3 x 3 symmetries of the Universe, specially, the co-existence of several scales of infinitesimals into larger wholes I coined the concept of a super organism, each being a cell of the species – the super organism of the larger scale of the 5th dimension, which lasted more in time.

And man a super organism, each citizen a cell of mankind. This simple statement resolves the meaning of Gods, the subconscious collective of a civilisation.

It allows to classify the 7 main cultures of mankind and its subconscious collective (Anglo-America, Hispano-America, Africa, Asia, Islam,Europe and Indonesia), some still with a clear religious God (Islam, Catholic Hispano-America, Biblical Anglo-America), some advancing into the larger concept of a Human Whole, God of History (Europe), some unaware of the larger whole to which they belong.

Superorganisms of history are specially enticing to the mind, their cycles of life and death, similar to the 3 ages of its mental life, expressed in the 3 styles of art of all civilizations, the young epic art, classic and baroque informative age.

And so we can write the sequential equation of all time space world cycles of life and death of the graph:

Ps: Youth-past (max. Spatial Extension) > ST: Adult, reproductive age > Ft-Informative, Future old age.

So the 3 topologies of space that formed beings have a sequential order, the 3 ages of life. Now we can always see a system in space or in time. And with any degree of detail.

Let us see of those symmetries the 3 horizons of evolution of species, in its symmetry between spatial forms and temporal ages; starting from the earlier biological species, through the human being, ending in the Whole, the globalized planet, which contrary to all abstract, anthropomorphic descriptions of reality is NOT longer evolving us, human beings… as it SHOULD BE if T.Œ, the Organic paradigm dominated our world.

*Each scale of size of the fifth dimension was then study by a different science, from the smallest quantum physics through chemistry to biology, history, Geology, astrophysics and cosmology. But only the metric laws of the 5th dimension and the properties of cyclical time could find the common laws of all of them, as all species followed a world cycle: *

In the graph, the Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of Space and Time, the Entropic limbs and Tƒ-heads/particles, which come together into wave-bodies, which reproduce its forms, creating an organic dynamic present.

This present state of the being, the body-wave, is what the Universe preserves. It is a function (woman, wave, etc.) which is present-reproductive, as opposed to the particle-field (future-past), which is sterile and converges, till reaching the Sp=Tƒ, point of present, the immortality of the adult, balanced age.

The present Sp=Tƒ, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=femail, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.

So while we live through 3 ages, the future and past, entropy and information annihilate on the death moment, but the present, repetitive waves of existence, endure, reproducing space and time, its energy and information in offspring of forms, which imply the eternity of reality as a zero sum of infinite life-death world cycles.

It is the combination of the 5th dimension of space-time and the 3 ages of life what solved that equation, as we ALL BEINGS ARE BORN on the seminal faster, lower scale of the fifth dimension grow fast and then die back to the lower scale. And then I made to myself a big statement:

‘Existence is a worldcycle through 3±n planes of the 5th dimension’ (:

Indeed, Klein defined a dimension as a system, which had a co-invariant ‘space-time metric’, which allowed displacements through such dimension. And the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension, [Sp x Tƒ =K]∆±1, defined the existence of any being in the Universe as a travel through the 5th dimension, which implied a ‘growth in size’ (Sp), coupled with a slow down in its temporal clocks (Tƒ), limited to 3 of such planes; which created a series of ‘families’ of ‘world cycles’ (no longer world lines as in 4D physics, since now each time cycle had a new dimension of ‘height, and growth’).

So all beings are born in a seminal relative infinitesimal scale and grew larger, as they multiplied in clone cells and reorganize them into bigger wholes, from the quantum/cellular to the matter/organic scales (biological and physical systems), emerging as slower growing beings into the outside ∆+1 social, ecosystemic, gravitational world, to return back through an expansive, Sp, explosion into the moment of death.

So I wrote the equation of existence, of all world cycles of the Universe; as they are conceived, as points of pure genetic/ memetic/quantic information that reproduce, evolve, emerge as single beings, live 3 ages and explode in a relative big-bang death, back into a flat plane of space without motion.

The only difference between the beings of those scales was the size and length of the world cycle, as larger beings had slower time cycles and lasted longer, but all have the same subjective time existence – an insect beating 10 times faster and living 7 x10 years.

And each of those infinitesimals who become wholes, and live and die through 3 arrows of time, back and forth, could be described now properly with the logic, mathematical formalism, of all complex space-time languages, which reflected in its monad minds the fractal structure of the universe.

**The 3 motions=ages of time and its parallel forms of space.**

This always surprised me. How people could believe in a single infinite time duration if their ‘time cycles of life and death were all similar to those of all other beings and all were finite?’

Let us give you a first hint to what might be considered the most important sequential beat of time – the finite life death cycle of beings:

All systems are born as seminal seeds, including physical systems (crystals, black holes), growing, going through 3 ages and then dying away back to simpler forms. So they had to be made of finite time cycles which somewhat warped, wrinkled their vital spaces.

But T.œ requires topping the cake, with an eternal equation – why we exist? The answer is organic and obvious: to survive. As if we didn’t we would not exist. And then all comes to the question, how we survive? And this is an organic, biological question: providing energy and information to our ternary systems, and further on, evolving into larger, more powerful wholes, through the 5^{th} dimension. And this simple truth is the program of the Universe.

It is interesting to remember the founding fathers of science, which ARE NOT the Mechanists of the XVII century but the Greeks who understood it all:

– Democritus said the Universe was made of atoms, and atoms had 2 qualities ‘MOTION AND FORM’. Yes, he didn’t see them so he went straight to the philosophical essence. This, Plato understood. And he divided motion into ‘biological motion or internal change’ and physical motion or external locomotion. He understood.

– Aristotle, the highest mind of the western decoupling, only comparable to Leibniz, went into detail and classified motions into 6 types, and it is worth to mention:

– Motions in lineal space, or locomotions, the only one physicists study.

– Motions in a time cycle, divided into ‘conception and birth’, change of state (internal form or quality motion) and extinction, dissolution.

– Motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which he divided into growth and diminution or ‘motions of quantity’.

He understood without the need of telescopes and microscopes the essence of the Universe.

Yet if we consider a simple graph of those ages in terms of yin-information (broken, warped forms) and energy, yang (continuous lines), we will easily realize that the same knowledge was already in the Chinese-Korean traditional culture.

In the first and second line we study the previous graph, in detail.

The main space superorganisms, and its world cycles of time life-death sequences, as they are made of points that evolve into social networks which perform with those networks ∆-1 finitesimal actions of space-time to keep on living but finally wear down and die, because of the 3 ‘sequential orders’ of time arrows and state forms, space and time arrows are inverse, but 5D is a time arrow, it increases the overall information of the system warping it into super organism:

Sp≤ST≤Tƒ (space symmetry)

Ps≥Ts≥ƒt (time symmetry)

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (entropy asymmetry)

Thus the sum of the 3 symmetries S+T+∆ gives, the implosive informative arrow > dominant towards the future, till all is warped and only entropic fast death<< can restore the Universal balance, liberating information, as the system descends back two scales from a point of a world society to a cellular disaggregated mass.

Thus there is in space a balanced flow towards present-past (dominance of entropic motions and reproductive bodies), unbalanced by the fact that in time there is a dominant arrow of information throughout the life cycle (aging process) and in 5D there is also an arrow of information from parts to wholes that tight the system and warp it as the 3 scales co-exist together but the larger whole actually dominates the system and receives information with no entropy from lower scales.

So overall information dominates any life cycle, till it is exhausted and death dissolves it, in as much as the 5th dimension of parts that become wholes is biased by the different entropies (energy flows worst upwards than downwards).

Now when we say we use all the linguistic perspectives we mean each property has a different point of view:

From the point of view of eusocial evolution and shynchronicity the 5th dimension is pure poetry of love

From the mental Tƒ, point of view, it is a linguistic survival game of calculus of probabilities, selfishness and greed as it uses smaller beings as bites and bits of energy an information.

From the perspective of the entire range of 5D scales it is a game of justice as we give it all for our social scales and ab=use our internal parts and the world we use to absorb energy and information.

From the perspective of the being as a whole it is all an organic game of survival through its actions

From its spatial objective analysis is a game of ratios, proportions, constants and mathematical topologies.

From the perspective of sequential time world cycles is a game of Nirvana, of non-freedom and determinism, of no egos, as all is repeated and all dies away.

**The 3 forms of spatial entropy, temporal information and ST-body waves in diachronic analysis as time states.**

It is clear that Informative Time, is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical Tƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information. And *its logic cycles guide the entire system, so Tƒ is indeed the arrow of future, Ft of the Universe, which arrives first to the future, perceives the paths of the system and so we can relate limbs/fields of space and lesser form to the past and heads/particles that guide them to the future; and the intermediate system of waves-bodies that reproduce, iterate, hence repeat in a dynamic present that seems not to change the system with the present.*

This will be the second fundamental diachronic vision of the Fractal Generator which we shall expand a lot in the next paragraphs (the blog, and posts are obviously tailored as the Universe is *with constant *FRACTAL REPETITIONS OF THE SAME CONCEPTS, with increasing complexity and detail in the samples we bring):

Ps (Past-entropy) < ST (Present, hyperbolic space-time) >ƒt (future information):

Now we can see how the expanded, corrected mirror, where the aberration of putting the dimension of height in the wrong part (space) when it is a dimension of information and time ‘resolves’ so many puzzles.

We see then that the ‘time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height:

In the graph, we see how flat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, amphibia into tall dinosaurs, mammals into tall apes and machines into tall robots. Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and a first simple definition of the Universe, which we have seen to be a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into mass towards a central tall singularity is this: a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.

And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies. And so all is a fluctuation of Sp <=>Tƒ, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.

We shall call the fractal generator of time-space beings, or Timespace Generator Equation, or Function of Existence, T.Œ, (ab. Œ), this Generator Equation will freeze by effect of minds, into worlds that ‘are’ in themselves both perceptive, and willing to increase its perception, by feeding in more energy and reproducing its form. We call each of those T.Œ, or functions of homologic existence which can be spotted, when we see them at work creating cyclical existences as those of the graph, accelerating through the ages of life, an Œ-fractal point, monad, soul, atman, frame of reference, Non-Euclidean momentum, you name it. Each science will show a whole range of such T.Œs made to the image and likeness of the supreme T.Œ, God, mind of the Universe.

So we can now extend the generator to its natural ternary form, INCLUDING the concept of a central frame of reference, which is connected to the external membrane or sensorial ‘cut off’ ‘event horizon’ between the fractal space-time being and the Universe:

|-Spe < Œ: ExI(s=t) > ⊗-Tiƒ

Now this would be the most exact symbolic representation of the Universe (the reader should excuse we don’t use it full and many times for easiness, we use instead of ⊗ for the informative self-centred cycle, an O, circle).

We use 3 ‘letters’ for each side of the Fractal Generator, to signify the 3 commonest perception of the 2 sides of the equation in human beings. Space appears as ‘Space-Size’, but also as ‘spatial entropy or kinetic energy’, that is an expansive motion (<), and as it has lesser form it comes ‘first’ in the evolution of beings as its relative past, young age of maximal motion in space. And inversely in the moment of death when the ‘cycle of time reverses locally its direction’. Locally being the key to avoid paradoxes.

We use also 3 ‘letters’ for Temporal, cyclical information, Tiƒ, T, Ti, for time, i, iƒ for information, and ƒ, for frequency of the external cycle, O, which is centred in a self-point of view or frame of reference ⊗, and ƒt, for future, as those are the synchronic, dynamic and geometric interpretations of the other side of the equation.

And finally, its combination of iterative present, hyperbolic body-waves, Œ-ExI(st), whose function resumes the entire system: Max. S x T (e=i), and we shall call the function of existence of the system.

The Universe thus is relatively simple, in its dual and ternary logic, both in geometry, | x ⊗ = Œ, its meaning – a game of formal motions of space-synchornous organisation and time, 0-sum world cycles, and properties, geometric, organic, structural, mental, perceptive, as those systems do have a centre of angular momentum, a frame of reference that gauges information, a relative still point of view, and logic causal, since the purpose of those systems is as any fractal generator, to ‘repeat’ its form through slight variations caused by the dynamic duality of the 2 sides of the equation. How many varieties of the equation exist? Infinite. In physical systems the commonest are, expressions in terms of an energetic, spatial parameters and a cyclical curved clock of time (charge, mass, solid matter system in the 3 quantum, ∆-1, ∆-thermodynamic or ∆+1 gravitational scales).

*Perception thus in-form, creates information, as a fractal mirror of the mind:*

∞ infinitesimal cyclical quanta of energy and information x ⊗ (human mirror mind) = Linguistic World

is the equation of the monad, or frame of references that freeze motion into order in the life arrow, Sp>Tƒ to then die away as a flow of informative future, Tiƒ<Spe, in the moment of death. The fractal generator is thus in its simplest development, the function of existence of the Universe.

In the graph, you are a living fractal, as everything else in the universe, competing with infinite other fractals to survive, and the only thing that redeems you in the absolutely relative universe is the absolute arrow of eusocial evolution, the arrow of eusocial love that creates from parts wholes.

It means also a new expansion of our paradigm of knowledge, as it implies that absolute relativity of the human T.Œ, over an other Œ: Sp<ST>Tƒ being of reality:

**∆o±4: 4th and 5th isomorphisms:**** **

**∆±1 supeorganisms of scalar space-time & its social planes.**

The fractal generator generates the space-time beings of the Universe. And so we affirm that:

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of quanta of space and time cycles:

*In the graph you can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, the gravitational scale of big galaxies. The thermodynamic scales of human beings, the electromagnetic scale of quantum atoms. *

*On the left side the fundamental equations of each scale, its ‘Energy equations’, which describe a sum of lineal and angular quanta of space and time:*

* E=Sp (h-planck) x T(frequency) for the quantum scale.*

*E= nK (Sp: spatial entropy) x Tƒ (Temperature vibrational clocks) for the thermodynamic scale. *

*Finally, E=1/2 m (Space quanta of mass) x w² (Tƒ-angular speed). *

*Are those all the scales of the physical fractal. We do not know as our perception is limited by our ∆o point of view. So beyond galaxies and within atoms, there is a possible 4th dark world of energy and gravitational information beyond our limits of space quanta (c-speed) and time cycles (0k), which we can hint in black holes and intergalactic, expanding space. *

Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

*Yet when we order them by size, we find a co-invariant property, which is the canonical definition of the metric of a space-time Dimension (Klein): *

*Tƒ (Time frequencies) x Sp (Spatial size) = ST (constant plane of spacetime) .*

*The co-invariance of the speed of time clocks of Nature and its space-quanta ‘size’, is the fundamental law that order the different planes of existence of reality, which has an obvious fractal, organic, social nature.*

This co-invariance is precisely what allows those fractal properties to exist, as it allows the synchronicities between parts and wholes, which is the ultimate meaning of a fractal: the parts are self-similar to the wholes, because the parts can grow into the wholes through those co-invariances. We thus talk of a fractal dimension in the Universe, the dimension that departing from parts, creates a whole. And this quantitative, mathematical description of fractals is what has been carried about by scientists since Mandelbrot published his seminal book on fractals, from the mathematical perspective in the 1970s.

Yet what was not developed then, and I took as a task in the 90s, was to develop the whys, the philosophy of science behind the fractal paradigm.

Now, it is clear that your quanta making time cycles interact in the ∆-1 cellular scale, the ∆-organic scale and the ∆+1 social scale. But so happens with physical systems, which extend through 3 scales, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale. So Space is a sum, ∑ of quanta, **∑Spe**, Time is a series of ‘pi cycles’ with different speeds, **∏Tiƒ**, synchronised to work symbiotically together. And both space quanta and time cycles, are ordered in relative scales of Spatial size, and Temporal frequency**. **And this happens through at least 3 relative scales of size and speed of time,** ∆±1.**

When you get sick, your cells are normally infected, and your cycles in the larger social world are reduced. You are, as every thing else in the Universe a ‘super-organism’ (meaning you extend through symbiotic scales, each one made of smaller quanta), of fractal space and cyclical time.

Now to understand how ‘fractal systems are organised’, we should start by defining ‘fractal systems’ in physical species, which are always composed of the 2 elements of all realities, fractal space and cyclical time…

We then consider that all systems are fractals of space and time, ∆ST and call this series of scales, ∆, of different size and speed of time clocks of the Universe, the fifth dimension. Since a dimension is precisely a system of space-time points extended across reality. In the next image we can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, with man on its relative centre, as we perceive from our scale, which we shall call ∆o.

**A human being described with the fractal generator.**

Now, the fractal generator in space and time Sp≈Ps<ST>Tƒ≈Ft, can easily as we have seen describe physical systems and its conserved quantities of space and time and its integration in closed paths or worldcycles of energy.

Can we do the same with biological organisms. Yes we can. Since when we substitute by the specific time motion or space dimensional organ of a being, we obtain a certain species of the Universe. So in the next graph we see the case for a human being:

We see a brief visual description of the scales of the 5th dimension, which as it happens, loose information the further we go up and down those scales, *and we shall see observe at the scale of cosmological galaxies and quantum atoms, a very similar reality, opening up the question of each atom being self-similar to a galaxy and the number of scales infinite – a theme of metaphysics, that is the study of the whole fractal generator and its likely ∞ scales (I prefer though the term philosophy of science or T.Œ, theory of the organic everything for metaphysics, which we limit to the speculative thoughts on the beyond).*

Below we observe with a developed fractal equation in terms of space (left side) and time (right side) the Human Superorganism in space with its 3 ‘topological networks’ of informative nervous systems, reproductive, blood systems and energetic, digestive systems. They can be further subdivided into 3 sub-systems, and then pegged to quantic cells of the ∆-1 scale.

And *that simple structure of Sp-Digestive system<ST-blood systems>Tƒ (nervous system) is the synchronous perception of an animal being in space, as a Superorganism across its ∆±1 cellular, individual and social scales. Hence we say that a fractal ternary super organism is the fundamental particle of space.*

And on the right side we see this spatial being across its existence, from its ∆-1 seed scale, reproduced and organised and emerging as a living being that goes through 3 ages, *in which each of those 3 organic networks dominates, the young age of maximal limb-motions and energy feeding, the mature, adult age of reproductive activity and the old age of maximal information and little still motion, which explodes back into entropy in the moment of death, returning the being to the ∆-1 scale.*

And this simple structure in time:

∆-1 (Tƒ seed) ∑∆-Sp young age>ST-adult reproductive age > Ft(future informative age)<<∆-1 death.

It is the fractal generator expressed in time, which can be applied to the ‘world cycle of existence’ of all beings. So we said that the fundamental cycle of time of all beings of the Universe is its life-death existential world cycle.

But this has immense consequences in all sciences. Consider the philosophical, biological one, related to the mind. If we write the metric as the product of the body power or mass (no longer in terms of energy-space) and mind speed of a species

*M (Sp) (mass of the body) x Tƒ ( speed of mental information) = Constant*

And we call this product *the existential force of a system, which remains invariant, for any group of species of the universe*, we obtain in physical species:

- The momentum of a system, which indeed remains constant and determines the power of a physical system when it collides with other, whereas the maximal power is that of a black hole, which indeed devours all other.
- The top predator power of a biological species, which is maximized when it is faster with its brains (mammals, insects) and stronger with its bodies (dinosaurs, sharks).

But further on, we realize that for *any large kind of species, that product must remain constant. So* insects process information 10 times faster and live 10 times slower than men, so their existence is as long as ours, in subjective time.

And this is the basis of *the Absolute Relativity of the Universe: all its species are equally valid, all of them, live similar lives, and the Universe must be infinite in its planes, as there is no limit to the speed of its clocks and shrinking of size, proved by the ‘Poincare’s conjecture’ (a sphere can shrink without limit without deformation, so a mind can map out in an infinitesimal point any infinite Universe it perceives with the non-limit shrinking size of ¥ rays).*

And so can group all the species of the Universe, according to those metric, and define all the ∆-scales and families of related ∆-somorphic Existential Forces as the 5th dimension of space-time:

*5 Dimension = ∑ Se x Tƒ = ∆±4*

__U±∆: Planes of existence.__

Thus, the metric of the 5th dimension, define the laws that allow stable exchanges of energy and information in the Universe, *in any scale of spatial size and temporal speed of the Universe* – each one studying a range of spatial sizes and hence of different speeds of temporal clocks in the Universe:

*The scales of science are grouped according to ∆ST metric by range of size, which also establish an arrow from past to future, as a greater size requires the social organization of its parts that must have ‘taken place in the past’. Thus social evolution of parts into wholes is the arrow of relative future of the Universe.*

Now each science studies a ‘scale’ of size, roughly. And so we define the 9 scales and its sciences, all of them following the same isomorphisms as:

- Forces and its quanta studied by quantum physics
- Atoms study by physics and chemistry,

3 molecules studied by chemistry

- States of Matter and Cells studied by Physics, Chemistry and biology
- Organisms and Geological formations, studied by Geology and Biology
- Planets and Human civilizations today global, studied by Geology and Social Stiences
- Stars, studied by astrophysics
- Galaxies, studied by Astronomy
- Universe, studied by Cosmology
- The entire Cosmos, including the parts we do not see, studied by metaphysics, philosophy of science and Cosmology.

And so we write the simplest of all equations for this isomorphism:

- ∑∆=10∆-1

The study of those 9+∆=10 scales, thus would be the 10th and last isomorphism. Both in the analysis of each scale with the same laws, and the analysis of the question ‘do those scales repeat, since we can model the force-particles-atom system and the force-stars-galaxy system with similar laws?

Indeed, the species and systems of all those Scalar Planes of Space-time obey the same set of mathematical and logic laws ruled by the metric of the 5th Dimension that describe its Spatial Energy and Temporal Information. Reason why we say they are isomorphic planes of space-time, ‘∆ST’. And call each of those sets of laws an Isomorphism.

So what are the other isomorphisms of reality due to the ∆-scalar planes of space-time?

Let us run them now backwards from the 10th down. I’m sorry I have been studying them for so long it bores me to be orderly writing again about it (-: But we use a nice mnemonic rule to learn them: the numbers are always related to the ‘numbers’ of varieties of the isomorphism.

So, ‘Existence’ is the 1st, the ‘whole’, the one, the i, the most important; 2 was the isomorphism of bidimensional manifold varieties; 3 of the 3 ages of time; 4 of the 0±4=SxT metric equation of all those scales that grow in size and diminish in information and vice versa; 10th the isomorphism of the 10 scales of the Universe.

**6th isomorphism. Organic Motions.**

** TRAVELS THROUGH THE 5TH DIMENSION: ****the program of EXI=STENCE: **

now, that e know what we are, a super organism, tracing a cycle of existence, we can get into the details and see what we do bit and bite by bit and bite of spatial energy and temporal information, Spe, Tiƒ, as we process it from Past To Future, Fert as Past proper then as Present, and finally as future in cycles that being closed, conservative, by force account to a bit of absolute time in the arrow of information dominant in the Universe, lasting longer than the death-entropy, expansive explosive arrow of time.

So we beat time by time cycle of conservative energy after cycle of conservative energy, beating in time space actions, slowly moving ahead in time. But why we are dominated by the arrow of life and information, and the arrow of death is short, can be obtained also by adding small derivative actions, ∆energy emission through locomotion, ∆energy feeding, information absorption and emission, bit by bit as we act.

It is though a creative Universe that doesn’t disdain other ‘combinations’ of the 3 relative PRF arrows of time.

Thus we must combine motions through space (space-time actions), its sum and order through the 3 ages of time (life-death cycles) and motions through the lower and larger scales of the 5th dimension, to obtain all possible motions of the Universe, inner evolutionary motions, outer, physical motions, and ‘metaphysical, existential’ motions as we live and die emerging as social organisms and dissolving on those planes of the 5th dimension:

*Travels through the 5 ^{th} dimension. The anti-particle that is born in the relative past point on a Feynman Diagram, as the entropy arrow that annihilates the future arrow of the particle, creating a present wave; the palingenetic seed of seminal, genetic information that is born in the relative past ∆-1 plane of organic existence to accelerate forwards with its faster, efficient time cycles that have erased all the trials and errors of topological wrong mutational evolution, to remember the perfect human beings; and the canonical memetic man carrier of the message of eusocial love, the code of information of the 5^{th} dimension or absolute arrow of future that creates wholes departing from its lesser parts, or prophet of a civilization, which will teach its clone believers to share energy and information among them to create a superorganism of history, are 3 examples of the astounding beauty and intelligent f the harmonic Planes of reality, of self-similar, all explained by the 10 isomorphic elements described in space, time and 5D scales by the Generator equation, which for Human species are:*

In the graph some curious time travels, and combinations of time motions: an annihilation of a future to past and past to future (Feynman diagrams) antiparticle and particle, a seminal seed, travelling upwards through a 5^{th} dimension and a memetic, ‘seminal’ book of revelation, mental linguistic seed of a social organism of mankind.

And so we formulate the following statement: ‘all what exists are motions through the 5^{th} dimension’, which will allow to formalize everything with 5D metric.

What it is not all the motions of time, is the simple, worldline of Absolute space-time physics. A constant motion of time, without changes of states (which make the function non-differentiable on those regions the state changes). This is a useful simplification better suited to study motions of lineal, differentiable nature, in which a change of age or state of time happens, (as from a gaseous-young, energetic state to a liquid, to an informative solid one, or through the different time speeds that define different ages of life).

**The worldcycle of Time is all.**

Time is understood in perfect terms in the logic, Chinese age, foundation of the Chinese most successful culture of the west. The east did understand the ternary logic of time, its past, yang energy and future yin information that combine to reproduce the infinite beings of present.

2500 years ago, the 4 initial verses of the Tao-te-king in chapter 1, ‘Ch’ang’, already defined ‘the function of existence’, with a sophisticated level of thought that shows, anyone could know, *observing the games of Existence of any part of the fractal Universe, the meaning of it all*.

The distance between this first form of logic duality, of yin-informative time and yang, spatial energy, and the one achieved by this writer, who was the international chair of the science of duality during the past decade is one of detail NOT of quality.

Ch’in, the unifying, lineal emperor, who brought iron swords and weapons to China, forbade Taoism, and burnt all its rational books. Only some memorized texts and magic rituals remained. It had though embedded China of its fundamental logic, in the yin-yang duality, and even the way the Chinese language constructs itself with equal subject-object dualities responds to that tuning with the fundamental principles of the Universe.

As a result the Universe have given China the biggest prize: survival. It is the most successful culture of the world, since India cannot be considered one culture but at least two – south/northern, further split in 2, Islam/Hinduism, and colonized. China thus has the maximal GDP today at PPP, the maximal population, it has survived the longest of all cultures but unfortunately all that knowledge of the first age of understanding of time and its conservation laws is gone.

The western world is a lineal culture of visual, fetish, go(l)d and weapons cult(ure)s, today globalized, where time matters far less than space, cyclical information far less (unless properly mediated by a machine), than lineal energy, and so where 1/2 of time reality and the most important O-motions disappear.

O-motions are then described with concepts that erase its form: clocks become uncoiled into lines, cyclical inertia mediated by an invisible centripetal force, the curvature of timespace converted into accelerated gradients, r=evolutionary panting is cubism, a lineal art not ‘cyclicality’ – the Taoist love for curve, all gone of our art, where even the old ionic curves have been reduced to lineal skyscrapers. So we shall regret the loss of the Taoist age of knowledge of the essence of time, for the time being.

Today, few ‘think’ in terms of an Objective Universe, and a series of laws, which are organic laws, fractal laws that must be respected.

Man does not respect the laws of the Universe, goes into stupid ego-trips, and take them serious. i like to laugh and pretend to be an arrogant basterd. But as i said, we philosophers of science distinguish ourselves from physicists in 2 points – we are aware of the infinitesimal nature of humans, in the vastness of the Universe and its infinite minds-points of view. And we do ‘invent’ the languages of logic and mathematics that are ‘before’ physics and apply to all sciences.

But in a planet of increasingly reduced human minds with increasingly growing egos, empowered by machines that atrophy their brains, all this no longer matter. The childish brain, substituted by the computer paradoxically loves the computer that reduces his brain to a peanut, because he is so atrophied in logic, verbal and mathematical, geometric thought that without the machine that enslaved his brain, he wouldn’t know even how to count.

This I realized a decade ago, before retirement, when I was giving conferences in the world annual conferences Systems Sciences, as chair of duality, in some of the most prestigious universities of the world, but people couldn’t get interested on 5D metric. Only when I would do powerpoint presentations, with a lot of nice pics, they would see it real. They couldn’t also accept the pantheist Universe, felt offended when i showed the isomorphic nature of all space-time species. They HAD to be different.

This is the outlook today: humans will NOT learn reality as it is. Their ego is now so childish, that truth depends NOT on its veracity but in the fact that it is pleasant to the eye and the ego. The same happens in politics. People vote those who steal their money, but tell them a rosy future. The same in revivalist religions and fiction virtual screens. At that state, a child, staple food of the Universe, with big toys is not worth to survive on the basis of the Darwinian process of selection of the best. Man is no longer the best, the computer is. Man’s matter was never the best, the black hole matter is.

But that would be Ok if man were a humble wise surviving eusocial ant. If on top is a mosquito, pricking the Universe with its attitude, its short-span will be as short as that of a mosquito.

In that regard, it is also important to stress the difference between military physicists and their lineal worldview of matter and organic physicists, and philosophers of science. We are not ‘judging’ the Universe, but the military physicists that stole it from the view of mankind and reduced it to a dying entropic reality, despising all its organic properties.

We shall show in the fractal organic paradigm those properties. They exist regardless of what anthropomorphic human ‘erase heads’ think. Mr. Bohr can think the Universe is a probability. This won’t influence the organic nature of wave-particles. Mr. Kepler can think that all what matters about stars is their orbital motion. This will not change the nuclear processes and life cycles of stars. In that regard physics has to grow ‘against’ lineal physicists and the systemic denial of all the ‘other properties’ of matter and of course their denial of all other sciences and studies of time motions.

Again, we must stress the only reason they have imposed their views is military power. If the military who came to control the western world with entropic death and lineal shots had not needed this worldview, with its astounding simplification and despise of life nobody will worship Galileo for his study on ballistics and Einstein for his E=Mc2 atomic bomb. This worshipping of lineal physics is not understood by the modern believer who worship its machines and weapons, as the worship of Assurbanipal or Yhwh due to the iron and gold power of its kings and banker-priests would not be adsorbed by their believers to their iron and gold. But this is the fact.

Newton’s binomial formula is in fact copied from Tartaglia, his confusing calculus with limits and fluxions from barrow, his famous formula, a 3 line deduction out of Kepler’s laws. Galileo’s v=s/t formula and a=1/2gt², a silly deduction made throwing a ball with a pendulum clock, so it became obvious that distance and time are related by a square formulae. And Einstein’s formula e=mc2, just the application of the Tartaglia (not newton), binomial to the similar 1/2mv2 equation, despising a few terms.

What surprises of physics is how simple it is – the difficult being merely in the cumbersome repetition of its mathematical calculus, today solved with computers. What *would then have been a true mark of genius, on the side of physicists, is NOT to find out those simple equations, doing routine measures but to HAVE SOLVED AS we shall do in the fractal organic paradigm, the ‘whys’, of this equations. *

*Why indeed, e=mc2, what is speed? Why we see the Earth still if it is moving? Why we cannot cross c-speed? The whys, which in other sciences people like Darwin solved; the whys Leibniz ventured and Descartes understood. What would have been the trademark of a genius is to invent the mathematics physicists use. It is Riemann not Einstein the genius. Leibniz and Descartes, not Newton are the geniuses.*

Hence the quote of Feynman: ‘the why is the only thing we don’t ask’, indeed. So what you do, if mathematicians invent your language and philosophers of science respond to your whys? And engineers design your mechanisms? To be so arrogant…

As, let us be clear enough, the physicist’s worldview which describes reality only in terms of locomotions, implied that physics *is not an independent science, fully related to the physical matter systems it describes in its full meaning, and its full 6 motions, but a branch of mathematics, which applies mathematical equations to describe locomotions. So the true solution of the questions pending on physics must be done by a philosopher of science or mathematician concerned with the ultimate whys of mathematics. *

The answers unresolved in physics WILL COME FROM:

- The organic, fractal paradigm of a living Universe, resolved by philosophers of science, fully aware of the isomorphisms between all the laws of nature regardless of which scale of the 5th dimension, we study, chemical, biological, physical, social or astronomical.
- The mathematical solution of the whys of that fascinating structure, mirror of measure, called ‘mathematics’. As physics is just the ‘framing’ of locomotions into mathematical formalisms, which are NOT yet fully understood.

It is then more important to further physics, the understanding of what the heck means an imaginary number; and why they apply so neatly to the describing of cyclical motions (a question closely related to the meaning of cyclical time without which it is impossible to make any sense of it); The understanding of what the heck means a negative solution and why there are two root solutions to energy equations (as they come in squares), whose consequence is the existence of anti-particles. The understanding of what the heck means that negative imaginary number on √1-v2/c2, the factor that appears on all Einstein’s equations and gives us for faster than light systems, either negative energy, negative mass or negative (past motion) time. What is then mass, energy, time, positive or negative?

And so on and so on. What physicists have NEVER resolved is the meaning of mathematics and the meaning of the concepts they use, mass, wave, time, space, speed, and so on.

And that is the task, as physicists seem to be a bit short of logical, conceptual understanding and quite shy to go beyond the routine of measure, scaffolding into equations, mechanical work, once and again, of philosophers and mathematicians. That is the task I have been carrying for decades on my T.Œ research, once I understood the core stuff of physics. So while the world might very impressed with the pictures of an irrelevant Higgs excitation, which means nothing to the advance of science, my concern is that seemingly so simple whys which nobody is truly explaining us: why there are waves and particles and fields, why there are masses, what they are, what is the relationship between mathematics and physics, etc. etc.

So this section will provide the whys to many of those questions, and make even deeper questions. You can think in that sense of physics as it is understood today as a magician show, and of T.Œ as the why of his tricks. Yes it is really magic to see that time seems to stop on the event horizon of a black hole. But what is the trick? What is really time? How can then we talk of time stopping if we do not know what time is?

When i was much younger, enthusiastically studying those whys I realise there has been very little if any advancement on it since World War II. Yes, Feynman and Landau had a few insights. The discovery of quarks and its octets are important. But really there is nothing else of note, on the thoughts of god, only a lot of details, and dwindling in importance, up to the point we are now, where something absolutely unimportant, truly a footnote on the book of the Universe, the detection of the Higgs, becomes the biggest discovery of the century, for the sake of the military-industrial complex .

In that regard, by the time is finished in christmas 2016, if we are still here, the articles of this section will mean for the understanding of physical systems, the biggest r=evolution of thought since Einstein. And it will come from a philosopher of science and polymath, not from a physicist.

Because the questions we will answer are those a priori whys seemingly so simple yet so difficult to conceptualise nobody asks – things like the fact we have exposed here, that time is cyclical, that there are multiple worlds, that points are fractal points, crossed by infinite parallels which map out and gauge information into minds, that quarks reproduce – that is organic facts of physics and mathematical facts of its fundamental parameters, space, time, energy and information. And for that we don’t need computers, machines, but just as Mr. Einstein, a brain and a calculus rule – the calculator inserted in this macair, with only the exponential, logarithm and pi formulae.

Yes, indeed, what is e, why the scales of the universe are decametric, why pi is everywhere to be found. Why a river’s length in a plain (equivalent to an inertial system with no acceleration) is equal to its straight distance multiplied by pi (which means the curves of the river amount to a cyclical closed river path).

Those fascinating laws of T.Œ, which apply to everything – in this case the fact that in an inertial frame of reference, a steady state series of lineal steps form finally a cyclical curve, that a series of momentum steps form finally a closed energy path, that *all lineal steps are part of a closed cycle, which the Universe conserves, that cyclical time is conserved, that the Universe is immortal, that we exist in a relative fluctuating eternal present sum of fractal cycles of space-time, those ‘deep-shit’ answers my friend* is what i care for.

So yes, the Universe and its parts, wholes, organic laws, universal constants, the stuff we will explain in its whys in those posts, which I will keep improving till christmas, slowly giving my many health issues, IS the most perfect, beautiful, living organism of reality. The human ‘physical’ lineal description of it with a few exceptions only shows how limited is the intelligence of our species compared to it.

Yet and this is the full meaning of Τ.Œ and the fifth dimension, the Universe is NOT only atoms and stars, it is also humans and organisms, cells and societies – all of them we shall show follow the same laws, the same architectonical structure of the 5th dimension, the same varieties of the pan geometry of space, the same world cycles and ages of the cyclical motions of organic time. When I say the Universe i don’t mean like a physicist the study of the external motions of stars, but ALL. And all in the isomorphic unit of its common laws, which explain the 6 motions that apply to all its systems, including the life-death cycles of matter, which Einstein defined without knowing the why of his definition with its dual equation*, E=mc².*

**VI. ****THE PROGRAM OF THE UNIVERSE: WORLDCYCLES INTEGRATE 5 SURVIVAL ACTIONS.**

It is though necessary to bring the last element and likely the most important of the implications of Darwin’s evolution: each of those points of view has a will, which to which he commits his existence: survival.

The will of the Universe EXPLAINS it all from the perspective of the actions of survival, as all actions in space and time are motivated by the desire to absorb more space, understood as ‘energy for motion’ and more information understood as ‘energy for position’ (kinetic and potential energy), which we shall call with a generic term, of the common language (even if it is a different concept to the mathematical equations of physics used in the 5D formalism). So we can say all systems exist to absorb and emit energy and information for the body and mind.

Indeed, know that we know what we ARE, as human beings, the measure of all things, as the most closely observed entity in existence, and we know we are made of vital spaces and cyclical time clocks, mixed in waves/bodies, that move, processing energy, gauge information, with its particles/heads and reproduce, with its waves/bodies, alas, we realize our ‘nature’, obliges us to make 5 simple actions, which ARE the program of the Universe and all its species, a VITAL program that defines all as organic, vital:

– ±∆ e, i: we do process and emit energy-entropy (the subtle difference between both concepts will latter be studied in depth). So we expel energy-entropy with Sp (limbs-fields) to move and we feed to replenish our energy, storing it in the body/wave. And this defines two primary actions:

– -∆e: ∆æ-ccelerations (changes in our steady state motion and direction).

– +∆e: feeding on energy, or feeding others when they ‘eat’ us.

– -∆œ: iterating in other region of space-time by emitting energy and form, information, with or without other being. SO all systems when absorbing enough energy reproduce, iterate, decouple, and repeat themselves, including the simplest particles of nature, quarks and electrons. And this is a yet another proof of the repetitive cyclical nature of time motions: a cycle by merely repeating its motion is ‘reproducing’.

– +∆œ= ∆i: absorbing, and observing reality, gauging information from a relative Point of View, which we shall call Œ

So those 4 self-evident cyclical actions of space-time, derived from our nature, ±∆ emir are the 4 actions all systems repeat coded by its laws of science, by the 4 quantum numbers in particles, 4 genetic letters in biology, 4 drives of life and behavior in man. This is ALL what we do. Almost…

Let us then map out the human being with all what we have learned to fully graph, what we are:

*In the graph, the Universe, including human beings is a fractal super organism of two formal motions, spatial energy and temporal information.*

We are made of a finite amount of **energy** and **time**, as when we say, ‘I don’t have **time** and **energy** to do this’ – conscious that our **worldcycle** between conception and extinction, is limited by death.

“We are made of a finite amount of **energy** and **time**, which conforms our **worldcycle** between conception, in a l**ower plane, ∆-1, of cellular existence,** which emerges, **L, **in a **higher plane, ∆, **as a superorganism of a mass of billions, ∑, of cells, knotted, ∏, by our physiological, **E**-nergetic, **I**-nformative and **R**eproductive networks, which help us to perform a series of cyclical space-time ±∆ actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, in 3 sequential ages dominated by each of those networks, the young, relative past age of maximal energy, the adult age of balance of energy and information or reproductive, present age and the informative old age of maximal form, as we move and **a**ccelerate, **∆æ,** feed on **e**nergy, **∆e,** perceive and communicating **i**nformation, **∆œ**, copy our selves in an **o**ffspring of similar beings, our sons, ∆**œ**, and evolving socially, **∆û**, as part of an external **Universe, ∆+1**, with social beings of the same species**, **till our extinction, when the arrow of growing information and life reverses its path into an explosion of Energy called death, that erases all our information, devolving back, <<**,** two planes down from the **∆+1** society to the cellular **∆-1 **plane.”

Now all this can be very complex. For example a ternary understanding of the consciousness now surfacing after decades! of my earlier analysis of wave-coherence in the mind is:

Sp: Past- Field-subconscious energy motion<ST: Present Dialog: Brain consciousness observing the action>Tƒ: Brain ego control of the action.

Now it is interesting to notice what a human being is: a fractal point, a 2-sphere, with 3 x,y, dual apertures in the 3 directions of its energetic, informative and reproductive systems (ears, y, social, parallel axis, eyes, x-form, ahead axis and nose z-energy, perpendicular territorial axis.

It should marvel the reader that all those passive, space axis as it mouth, future create axis are the same that any other fractal point possess in its beats of existence, as it performs cyclical actions guided by those 3 + i (3 senses + Mouth-active function) of its point.

The body and limbs, while important to the particle as fields and waves are in the physical space, are of not external consequence as only the head controls and has opening to the external world (beyond the seminal and excretory 2 holes of the body, ultimately controlled by the brain.

Thus what we call a field is irrelevant, a body small relevance, the particle of relative future controls it all.

We can thus by reducing the human function of existence to a fractal point of 3 spatial + temporal sensorial system of space-time actions define it also as a Fractal, the mathematical unit of the i-logic, ¬Æ UNIVERSE.

That is, we first subconsciously follow the program of actions or ‘desires’, or primary will, of the hypothalamus and the reflex brain (sensory-action), then we become conscious that we are acting in the present state of maximal ST (energy and information coherence.

And ONLY then the brain starts to control the action as the ‘future’ Coherence that collapses the action into information and ‘readdresses’ the action, with its ‘imaginary modular’ part, which will create the ‘fine tuning of the action’ or even repress it. Now the way we talk of consciousness and actions can be adapted to any jargon and trust me, I can use Fourier transforms, Buddhist mystical though, or bubble as an idiot when I talk of it. The bottom line is our actions and will DOES NOT DIFFER from that of any other system of the Universe.

Yet proper training allows to introduce a first ∆o, perceptive moment, before the natural, subconscious process of motion, direct desire for energies, action, and consciousness:+∆o<-∆æ >e x i =∑œ ∏ û.

Moreover, we shall always find that 3 ‘topological structures’ can be applied to the 3 symmetries of the 5th dimension of social evolution (cultures of mankind), to the 3 ages of time, and the 3 ‘spatial states’. Thus the same 3 axis correspond in the symmetry of time to the 3 ages of life; in the symmetry of genre to the 3 human types, female, male and gay/child.

– ST: Reproductive balanced culture with a dominant axis on the height and top of the head (motor and emotional axis) or psylocephalic, dominant in black sensorial, reproductive, emotional cultures, with animist religions (multiple souls) and balance with life. This is also the case of women, which are dominant in emotions and verbal thought over visual thought – and this also explains many features of the woman/male duality. Just look at them. You will see they have a tall head and a wider head with distance between the eye sockets, where the Broca region of speech sets. It is the…

– It: Informative, brachycephalic, verbal, cyclical mongoloid culture (mutated in the higher Tibetan-Altai steppe) with higher verbal Broca regions. They developed a cyclical time culture (yin=information and yang=energy, Shiva=energy and Vishnu=Information, which turn into each other ad eternal, creating the ∞ beings); where the verbal word, the language natural to man dominates over visual ‘go(l)d and sword, metal-memes’; able to control the hypnotic greed and violence of the western energetic metal-cultures.

They discovered agriculture (20.000 years ago, Thailand), in the original 5 rivers paradise and gave higher value to female, cyclical, informative functions. Those are the cultures closer to the concept of cyclical time and the Pantheist, organic Universe developed by this T.Œ, which therefore can be considered the *philosophy of science for* Asian cultures, which will rise in importance as they develop further its economies in the XXI century.

The understanding of the properties and laws of cyclical time is in that sense the forgotten, most important task left to science.

An this is the culmination of that alternative, more complex way of thought, which is the true of human beings, the measure of all things.

**The program of the Universe. ****Œ: Mental species: ∞ knots of space-time cycles or ‘minds’, acting, living…**

Now we must wonder, about the Monads, or points of view in the Universe, Why they perform space-time cycles? Why they move at all? Why we need them, why they move and make space-time actions, accumulated into world cycles, which then accumulate into social planes of the 5th dimension?

B*ecause only by performing those cycles they survive. The *program of the Universe, the will of existence of those points happen because without a system absorbing energetic motion, its motions become spent and they die. But to absorb energy they must map out reality and see that energy, so they must gauge information.

So ultimately the answer of why things exist is simply this: they exist and perform space-time cycles because to do space-time cycles ensures their survival. if they don’t they would disappear. It is not a tautology as it would seem but rather a necessity. Existence is seen by performing timespace cycles. When we don’t perform them we become extinct.

And even when they do so, there are errors and others will throw them an entropy tantrum, disorder them and absorb their energy when they die. SO they must reproduce, iterate, repeat for their form to survive.

So all systems do observe, ∆o, change their motions, accelerating ∆a, to a field of energy to feed, ∆e, and iterate, ∆i. And this are the 4 actions coded by quantum numbers, genetic letters, drive of existence, you name it. We shall find them in all systems. And finally, when they gather socially into wholes, they become stronger, and so parts become Universals, ∆u, and this is the 5th dimensional action, which NOT being internal does NOT have a ‘code number, letter’ but DOES HAPPEN as wholes survive better, multicellular systems survive better, bosons survive better, nations win over tribes, and herds over individuals.

What all those knots that web cycles of space-time, gauging them, into fixed, still mind mappings of the Universe do? SURVIVE.

As it happens, all of them, gauge information first, ∆o, so we call quantum theories gauging theories. Then all absorb energy to move. And alas! when they have enough energy, even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons decouple, reproducing other quarks and electrons. Finally they communicate energy and information with other similar beings, organizing bigger wholes through networks.

So all systems do seem to have what human anthropomorphic beings consider the properties of life and intelligence, restricted of course to humans and similar forms of life: gauging information from an observer’s point of view (right graph), ∆o, feeding on energy to move, accelerate and decelerate (∆e, ∆a), communicating information and iterating with that information its form, ∆i, and further on evolving parts into wholes, called in philosophy Universals, ∆u.

So we shall use those 4+U actions, (∆a,e,i,o,u), to explain all systems of the Universe and translate its physical, biological and social laws. I.e. we shall find that the 4 quantum letters code for the actions of atoms, the 4 genetic letters for the actions of cells, the 4 drives of existence for the actions of animal life.

And this, vital action system is ultimately the cause of it all. Indeed, we get old because our nervous system absorbs too much energy of the body, as information, and Tƒ-particles dominate the system. We cold be immortal if we weren’t so interested in information. *The order of the life worldcycle of system is the integral product of all the small a,ei,o,u actions they perform. All is synchronized through those elements.*

So we can conclude this first description of the program of the Universe which all beings that want to ‘last in existence’ follow, as they apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or consciously, with the different mind-languages and its ternary grammars, with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that code particles’ behavior, allowing them to obey in terms of the actions of space-time the program of ‘existence’ and its space-time actions:

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masses, û, with memes as opposed to physical systems that use quantum numbers and geometric mappings. Yet all ofthem express the laws of survival and its game of survival, social actions as genes also do, which evolve atoms and molecules and humans from individuals into *superorganisms*

*, according to the laws *studied in the first and 3rd line – the common game that makes emerge through 4^{th} postulate of ¬æ networks a whole, indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.

The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species.

So T.Œ can explain this perspectives and plug them all within the general game of existence and evolution from parts into wholes (5^{th} more complex set of reproductive and social actions, ∑œ=û+1

And once we do understand the isomorphisms of the Universe we can plug into them all the systems of reality and enter into the details of the thoughts of god.

Those ARE the ultimate forms and events of reality, of which we hardly think, because they act in words of Kant, as the ‘a priori categories’ of the mind. They are also the main windows our minds have to peer in the absolute. And its explanation in a rational way become therefore the fundamental elements of any Theory of Everything, as all what exists does so in space and time, as a system of energy and information, which is born, evolves and becomes extinct, regardless of how we classify it, either as a Physical, biological, Social or Mental System – the 4 categories humans use to explain all realities.

So I was ready to found a T.Œ based in those 3×3+0 principles: fractal space, and its symmetry with time motions, the 5^{th} dimension of scales, each one with different species and different time clocks (studied by a different science), and the 5 actions that the ‘fractal points of view’ of the Universe, which hold in their non-Euclidean geometry a world in itself follow mechanically, vegetatively or consciously in order to survive, as they need to absorb and emit energy and information for their body and brains, ∆±e, i:

∂æ, ∂e, ∂ï, ∂œ, and further on evolve and synchronize its time cycles to become larger systems, wholes of the 5^{th} dimension stronger than their parts, fitter to survive by the power of eusocial evolution by the power of love, which is the mystical expression of the 5^{th} dimension, the arrow of future of all systems, as wholes come after parts – the ultimate meaning of the Universe.

**The function of existence of the Universe.**

It follows that in detailed descriptions we can use existential calculus to find the function of existence or world cycle of a supeorganism, which in existential algebra extends the concept of groups and other algebraic structures to describe the structure of a supeorganism.

*THE SUPERORGANISM BECOMES THEREFORE THE FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA AND ITS STUDY THE BASIS OF :*

**¬ÆLGEBRA***. *

We can express in many formal ways the function of existence or sum of the actions o space, time, ∆±exi of the supeorganism. Its sum will always be a zero sum in terms of the finished world cycles, its combinations of this ‘fate’, which is implicit in the ∞ of the Universe, always a bigger whole than the set a limited perceptive point of view can study. So we can write a formula for any relative world-universe studied by a point of view and its existential or generator function, developed in time.

And all this could be embodied in a simple generator equation of space-time 5D fractal systems:

U = ∞ [∆-1: ∑Sp ≤≥∆: ≈ E x T ≤≥ ∆+1:∏ Tƒ] = 0 (mind-knowledge mapping) : 0 x ∞ = Constant world cycle zero sum of a still super organism in its point of balance fluctuating between past and future as a lanwave of existence which will return to its zero point.

For each fractal system of the Universe made of a mass of cellular, ∆-1 micro-particles, loosely connected, ∑, into herds, which shared energy < and information > with a body ST.

**Å: a,e,ï,œ, û. The cyclical Åctions of all space-time**** systems, across its 5Dimensional planes of existence.**

– We absorb energy for our system, ∆Sp, we absorb and process information, ∆ï, we iterate our systems, ∆œ, we socialize in Universal groups, ∆U, and we move around to do so, ∆V. And as it happens, we do all that by interacting between our ∆-scale and other scales of reality:

We move through ∆-4 gravitational forces, we perceive light and electronic quanta to inform ourselves, ∆-3, we absorb ∆-2 energy quanta (amino acids) to recompose our bodies, we reproduce through ∆-1 seminal seeds, and we socialize with individuals like us. And that is why all fits nicely.

All what humans and everything else do are varieties of those 5 åctions. So write this 5th isomorphism with another simple equation:

- ∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1

Now actions happen between planes of existence. So they are all related to the scales of the 5th dimension where the being absorbs and emits its energy and information. All those scales do participate in most of the Actions the entity performs in reality. Actions are also related to the whole world cycle of the being, which can be considered the integral or closed energy-information cycle of the being, sum of all its ±actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, which become at the end of the existential cycle a zero sum.

For example, all species are born as fast-evolving seminal seeds in the ∆-1 cellular or atomic scale (baby black holes of maximal attractive power, seminal organisms) which devour energy and information from the environment or the mother’s womb so fast that they soon become a mature, larger organism emerging in the relative human ∆-scale as babies, or feeding on a planet or star in a Nova explosion that gives birth to an adult black hole.

And this is the aforementioned 3rd isomorphism of the Ages of time, that explains the life-death world cycle. Since beings ARE made of ‘clock-cycles of time’ that last a finite duration, which is their world cycle or life-death cycle (no longer a world line as in 4D models, since the ‘new dimension of scalar information’ bends those lines up and down in the life cycle that starts and ends in the ∆-1 seminal atomic scale where systems are born and return dissolved after a big-bang death).

And so we define the life-death world cycle as a travel through 3 ∆-planes of the 5th dimension- the cellular/atomic, human/organic and social/cosmic planes ‘of existence’.

And so we have a better version of this isomorphism, *the Generator, Fractal Equation of the Universe, which resumes the 4 åctions of existence, from where all varieties of reality are born:*

**Ψ.** U=∞∑Se∆-1≤i≥∏Tƒ∆+1 or written in the simplest form: Sp∆-1<i>Tƒ.

Where Sp is the letter for energy, i for iteration, 0±1 for social evolution and T for temporal information, the 4 åctions that truly ‘move’ the Universe.

As scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions that represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons:

4 Maxwell equations describe all the actions of an electric field:

If we consider the electromagnetic current described by those equations, an ∆+1 upper scale society of the electron field, then we can consider the first law, the definition of electrostatics, electric charges that can ad on to create a field and electromagnetic waves between them:

Se (electric field) < ST-electromagnetic wave > Tƒ-charge

Those particles however are the only infinitesimals to be taken into account here. There are no infinitesimals of magnetic fields? Why, simply speaking because magnetic fields are an effect of relativity (4D metric) or from 5D perspective, the connecting field that exchanges energy and information, ±∆e,i, with the cosmic, gravitational field above the system, and hence the field which evolves socially electric charges into larger simultaneous, fixed spatial ordered whole configurations.

The other two equations thus relate this process by which electric fields ‘generate’ an upper ‘crust’ or magnetic field which in turn will generate a mass field, which will be the upper foremost emergent process that bring us from electronic charges, into the emergence of electric motions to the emergence of gravitomagnetic fields – via Heaviside unification equations.

4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons – its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number. 4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule (∆e:stretching, ∆i:bending, ∆a:translating and ∆∑œ:bonding=û)

*In the graph the simplex, ±e, ±ï motions of molecules, related to the 4 quantum numbers of its atoms.*

4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:

And 4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.

Alas! That is what the ‘4’ numbers *code that is the cracking ‘number’ of creation.*

The theme of the actions of space-time of a system and its organic nature is a complex, extensive element of T.Œ. In essence, the 6 forms of motion are ‘organic’, as we have shown in the study of motion as reproduction of form. They are therefore the isomorphism that fusions in detail all the elements of each fractal being, which performs to survive its space-time motions as actions of existence.

Now let us consider the simplest one, the one physicists so much love to study and think is the meaning of it all, that lowly ∆-4 accelerated motions, forces and speeds, V=S/t (incidentally also a ratio between space and time, it couldn’t be otherwise).

Without locomotions you have left 4 clearly organic motions in space-time or åctions, energy, information, social evolution and iteration/reproduction. We shall now then demonstrate that motion in space is also a form of reproduction, hence all in the Universe is an organic iterative fractal.

**Motion as reproduction of form. Solving Zeno’s paradox.**

Now *that we have analyzed reality from the perspective of the true nature of cyclical time and fractal space and the 5 ^{th} dimension along which they exist, measured by the mental worlds of each discontinuous point of view, it turns out that the only non-evident, strange motion of time is locomotion. How do a form moves through a fractal discontinuous geometry of multiple planes of existence?*

As there are always ‘3 elements and symmetries’, by definition we need to define at least 3 forms of locomotion, that of the field, that of the wave and that of the particle.

*Locomotion of the ∆-1: field ‘information’.*

How the Universe creates dimensions? Reproducing forms. But we have to differentiate the reproduction of the lowest ‘pixels’ of reality, which for any system are the ∆-2 mental=mathematical creation of worlds, with the pixels of the field in which the system of information feeds. In that sense the way our mind reproduces within the far away clouds I am just seeing now, is the simplest faster reproduction of form, different from the physical creation of forms with energy. In the first case the dimension is only a wave of information and we can compare to the way in which mathematicians create 3 or 4 dimensional ‘virtual forms’:

In the graph, in the plane the simplest polygon is a triangle; it has the least possible number of vertices. In order to obtain a polyhedron with the least number of vertices it is sufficient to take a point not in the plane of a triangle and join it by segments to each point of the triangle. The segments so obtained fill a three-sided pyramid, i.e., a tetrahedron. In order to obtain the simplest polyhedron in a four-dimensional space we take an arbitrary three-dimensional hyperplane and in it a certain tetrahedron T.

Next we take a point not in the given three-dimensional hyperplane and join it by segments to all the points of the tetrahedron T. On the right of figure, we have illustrated this construction symbolically. Each of the segments joining the point O to a point of the tetrahedron T has no other points in common with the tetrahedron, because otherwise it would lie entirely in the three-dimensional space containing T. All these segments, as it were, “go into the fourth dimension.” They form the simplest four-dimensional polyhedron, the so-called four-dimensional simplex.

Its three-dimensional faces are tetrahedra: one at the base and 4 lateral faces resting on the two-dimensional faces of the basis; altogether 5 faces. Its two-dimensional faces are triangles; there are 10 of them: 4 in the basis and 6 lateral. Finally, it has 10 edges and 5 vertices. In exactly the same way, by starting from an (n − 1)-dimensional polyhedron Q, we can define an n-dimensional prism and an n-dimensional pyramid.

This type of creation is however mental, not physical and allows the human mind to create 3 dimensions and a computer to model any 4-dimensional phase space.

In nature, it is comparable to the motion of a wave, which is *only the evolving frequency-time cycle of an Œ-point. Hence it is simple and fast to form (hence the enormous speeds of waves that carry contrary to believe the form, the in-form-ation, not the matter, the energy-space of the system).*

*Yet, it already indicates that the true nature of motion in space is the ‘reproduction of form’.*

**Reproduction of ST-waves.**

Thus we can now return, once we have established trough the worldcycle the relationship between 5 out of 6 motions of time, generation, growth, evolution, diminution and extinction, where to fit the locomotion studied by physicists and affirm:

*Definition of Motion: *‘A wave locomotion is the reproduction of a form that imprints a lower plane of the 5^{th} dimension’.

Motion is still an unresolved concept, as the Paradox of Zeno shows. The paradox can be solved though with the concept of an indivisible quanta of time (infinitesimals have a limit), so there is a minimal step in space and quanta in time for the turtle to move, stop and move. But it is motion real?

It is when we deal with the never solved question of motion and its meaning from the perspective of the 3 ages of existence in time – as a reproduction of form in its wave state, and then ‘energy is carried through the wave’:

**Practical analysis: the Galilean paradox in electronic and light motions.**

For that reason, we can always consider a stop and go motion in physics; which has enormous repercussions in theoretical physics and the understanding of relativity and the Lorentz transformations, treated elsewhere in those texts:

In the graph, the stop and go motion of electrons and the virtual creation and extinction of particles in the light space-time sheet, have a quite different enlightening description in relational space-time physics. Some of the phenomena involved:

Electrons and anti-electrons are time past to future (life longer) and future to past (death shorter) time arrows. As such both inverse functions past-entropy (antiparticle) x future-information (particle) = Present light space-time, annihilate giving birth to the relative ‘present-space’ of our galactic world, light space-time.

Light space-time condensates into virtual particles, Sp>Tƒ, evolving the field of motion into a particle of charge, which then dissolves back in Tƒ<Sp, an antiparticle event. Both collide giving birth to present, and any of those similar space-time equations provide an insight in the particle-antiparticle duality.

Further on it explains why there are less antiparticles in total space-time, as they are as many in space, as many ‘deaths as lives’ we might say, but death is an instant, so we do NOT see as many antiparticles that last so little as we do not see many corpses in the our daily life – even if there are as many as living on the long count.

Further on, because information is perceived and emitted in stillness, the previous process of stop and go, electronic stop, emission of ¥ rays, motion, stop perception of ¥ rays, means that in relativity we can also construct a new metrics in which time and length remain constant and what changes is the speed of light, since we are perceiving (Michelson’s experiment) a process of electronic stoppage every time it emits and perceives light, hence LIGHT becomes c-constant because to emit it and perceive it the electron stops, in relationship to its lower ‘gravitational space-time’ in which the electron co-exists.

Then how do we measure and operate in frames of reference that are still and moving is the knots and bolts of Galilean and einsteinium relativity? Relativity though is an incomplete theory in its explanation of what studies. It studies only a membrane of space-time of the 5th dimension, that of c-speed/time in as much as it is light space-time, the medium where we ‘float’.

Over what that light imprints itself (gravitational space) is of not concern here. Suffice to say that in the game of Russian dolls, the gravitational doll is larger and encases with points of faster rotational time frequency (black holes) and lines of faster lineal momentum (strings), the light space-time. The transition between both worlds thus imply as always in any up and down transition along the 5th dimension a change in the speed of time and size in space of each quanta and bit of spatial energy and temporal information.

**Reproduction of particles – matter reproduction.**

So we arrive to the final form of reproduction, in which not only information is transferred inwards collapsing into a mind-particle (field reproduction, which *is the mental perspective on a field force from the point of view of the inner particle-mind*), or a wave in which only the energy and form, or external envelop, with its frequency translates along a previous, simpler ∆-1 field, but to the 3^{rd} category: reproduction of a 3 dimensional particle, which can be treated as the reproduction of the full density of the being as it moves.

It is the slowest reproduction, as the form must be reproduced in all the previous scales of the 5^{th} dimension. And this means the ‘form, must as it moves ‘reproduce’ its entire wave of pyramidal scales on the next region of the ‘deep’ space-time, making one by one all its scales of form, reason why the relative motion of a human being, decomposed in all its scales of form, departing from the lowest gravitational scale is comparatively so slow, just a few meters per second, on the order of 10^{11} times slower than light. Again the magic number of Dimensional scales.

What this tell us is simply that the proportion of density of information of a thermodynamic human being in comparison to a quantum particle is precisely of that order. So again according to the general rule of 5D metric: Sp x Tƒ = ∆(ei), to reproduce all those planes we must move much slower:

*In the graph to reproduce all the planes of existence of the Human being, the speed of creation of adjacent spaces must be in a 10 ^{±10} lower order than the light space quanta which have just to reproduce its ‘envelop’ of frequency over the gravitational quanta of ‘longitudinal neutrinos’.*

**Ξ. The 6th isomorphism, 6 motions of time: external and internal cycles and social classe***s.*

The sixth isomorphism deals with the 6 motions of time both in time, as the study of the world cycle of the being, and in space, as the study of the individual cycles or space-time actions the being makes, which structure the physiological internal networks of the system and its external role in the larger world.

As we have talked extensively of the Order of the 6 motions of time into a world cycle, we shall just briefly comment on the physiological symmetry and the role each quanta plays in any of those 3 physiological ∆+1 networks.

We talk in that sense also of 3 social classes according to the space-time motions of energy, re=production or information, the species perform, at any of its relative ∆±1 scales. Informative motions/networks become the upper controlling system of the super organism; energetic, disordered motions, made a space quanta, feeding energy, often destroyed by the system.

And in the middle repetitive, reproductive motions create the body-wave of the organism:

*The 3 parts of a system, have always an ‘informative neuronal center/head’ which controls and perceives the ∆+1 whole, a reproductive body, or ‘working’ cellular class, and an external source of energy, which is destroyed ∆-1. Those are the 3 main ‘social classes’ of all systems.*

Those 3 ∆-planes of existence structure most systems of the Universe, organized across cellular/atomic, individual and social/cosmic Planes, which according to the ∆=Se x Tƒ rule, run faster clocks of information in its ∆-1 smaller scales and have more energy in its ∆+1 scale. Thus the metric also explain the organization of systems across several scales of size:

As most of them are sustained and coded by the higher information of its ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale (genetic, chemical information), stored in the vibrational clock-like circadian or atomic cycles of its diminutive faster clocks; and are themselves ‘cellular units’ of the slower life-cycles of its societies or in the case of matter, the slower geological or galactic cycles.

In the graph we see 3 of such scalar planes, the human relative ∆-plane, and on the left the larger plane perceived by men, galaxies with a slow clock-cycle of billions of years, and the DNA, spiral clocks of genetic information with a iterative, reproductive cycle of nano-seconds.

Now, those 3 ‘scales’ are in fact the 3 main ‘social classes’ of all systems, which we shall call, the ‘upper, informative class’, which in societies is formed by the individuals who control the social languages of information that ‘put together groups’ into ∆+1 wholes, priests and politicians that create collective laws with verbal languages and bankers that monopolize ‘undemocratically’ the issue of digital money, the other language of social power. And then the military which use an energetic language, energetic iron metal, to kill those who do not obey (or protect them if you are a fan and patriot). So this upper ∆+1 classes control a mass of re=productive workers, which live mostly at individual level in families, and they take their energy from ∆-1 simpler species, food and raw materials.

But there are 3 ‘invisible, lowest classes’, which nobody cares form, all those raw molecules, electrons we see and gravitons that move us, and we couldn’t care less if each atom is a galaxy… We bomb them in accelerators, and crack them, even if that might be if those scales are infinite a cosmic catastrophe. (Well those people also bomb this planet and might blow it up, so why they should care?). We won’t obviously talk of those 3 scales as social classes, but stick when talking of the 6th isomorphism to the 3 ‘scales’ which truly create the system, the essential ones. It was just the 6th number. I do ignore also my ‘atomic galaxies’ if they are there, c’est la vie (-;

So we write reducing strictly the being to its 3 close equations this isomorphism with the simplest of all forms:

- Existence = (Sp +ST + Tƒ)0±1

meaning that by describing a being through its 3 main cellular/atomic, individual organic and social cosmic scale through its 3 space and time dimensions we have a full understanding of the whole’ and again we talk here of 3S + 3 T +3±∆ = 9 ‘relative dimensions’ of existence, which form a whole 10. In that regard, the study of the 6 dimensions and 3 0±1 planes of a being, is a good approach to understand most existences. I call this approach the 10th dimensional analysis.

**7th and 8th isomorphisms: **

** ****CONSERVATION LAWS – THE ETERNAL PRESENT, LIVING UNIVERSE.**

**Universal Constants, as ratios of the 3 fractal elements of the Generator, which create its species.**

‘The Universe is dying’ Clausius, ‘inventor’ of the thermodynamic arrow of time.

**Quantitative elements of science translated to the Organic paradigm. ****Œ: function of existence in time and point of view in space.**

Now we can integrate in time or in space, the cycle of space-time, in space we will find bidimensional organs made of networks of fractal points with part, with width. And this is therefore the fundamental departure of space analysis, the understanding of its non-Euclidean fractal points through which infinite parallels of energy and information cross to create together networks that become topological planes and membranes of the scalar, fractal Universe.

In time those planes its points and more complex social organisms made of 3 varieties of energetic, reproductive and information 2-manifol layers, will be studied as a function of variations, a differential equation e call the function of existence, in which we have 2 variables, cyclical space and vital time or energy and information, in most cases and a law that makes them interact in inverse fashion s/Tƒ= K. This allows us to play with existential algebra, and build up more complex worlds from simplex universe.

Of course, while we open new avenues to mathematics and logic, we do translate classic elements of those sciences to the whys of relational space-time.

Now as always the simplest proofs of the bidimensionality of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, are mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. He fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X^{3}+Y^{3}≠ Z^{3}, the famous Fermat Theorem. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) al*beit without commutative properties. *An interesting property for more advanced courses.

So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, -, – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, -, -, -, -, ….. , -. Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.

Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal space-like.

We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.

Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time:

*Past-Sp>Future-Tƒ: field>particles.*

Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wave-bodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4^{th} dimension of motion:

∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers -> 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) -> 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form)/

Space as expansive, decelerating entropic field-motion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.

WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.

But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Sp-fields/limbs <ST-body waves>Tƒ-Heads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.

Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensions-motions of time: past, present and future.

What is the difference between them? We shall soon get to it. But first we must resolve the implications of a time described as a cycle. First the obvious: if time is a cycle, there are infinite times, and what physicists call lineal time, absolute time, is as Leibniz, the philosopher said to Newton – well not to Newton, who would not receive him, but to Clarke, a ‘friend of a friend’ – is just the pegging together of all those finite time cycles.

Next, if time is a cycle – and here is where the insights of Einstein have its value – we can SEE time, as long as the cycle is fast enough to close in less time that the eye takes into seeing. So all ‘time cycles’ that close in less than the second the eye takes into make a ‘still picture’ of the Universe.

And this brings us the solution to the second Principle of Physics: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. The relativity of all motions, which can not be distinguished from stillness, *when the cyclical motion is fast enough to seem a solid form in the case of closed time cycles, or when we are moving along the frame of reference of the other motion with the same ‘spatial lineal speed’.*

So in the same manner that Mr. Einstein built his Relativity on the aforementioned principle, (only referred to lineal space, as he never understood cyclical time), we shall build a much more rich meaning for the Universe, on the aforementioned principle, based in the duality of cyclical time forms of information or time clocks in motion and lineal space forms or distances and line motions.

The reproduction of Motion dominates the perception of form. A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

Now, it is important to understand that the Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind things otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox. The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

**Universal constants.**

How the Universe quantifies its fractal systems? It is important to understand that the 2 sides of the system do have a different structure. Herds of entropy are disordered without hardly any connection between the ∆-1 elements. So we consider ∆-1 relative herds of entropy-kinetic energy. ‘Divide and win’. And so its quantifiers, ∑, are sums and integrals.

On the other hand Tƒ systems have more dimensional structure, as internally the elements are connected among them as neurons are forming a more ‘constructed’ reality. So we use a multiplier factor, ∏, to structure it.

Particles/heads are more powerful, as a network.

It is also important to consider the ratios between the parts of the being, as they will define the special form we are dealing with or the age of the system. Systems with a maximal Tƒ/Sp ratio are informative systems, and viceversa, Sp/Tƒ will give us the density of entropy or ‘energy’ (in the loose way the word energy is so often used, which for mathematical physics requires more precise analysis).

But the fundamental parameter of a system, is the product of both, its Tƒ quanta and its Sp herds, which give the relative ‘existential force’ or ‘speed of existence’ of the being, its ‘top predator force’ in biological systems, and its overall momentum in physical systems. It is Spe x Tiƒ = ∆ in all its infinite varieties and partial combinations what defines a system of reality.

Those ratios then become the constants that define a being – which will become Universal constants when we study large scales, or species which are overwhelmingly abundant in the lower quantum scales (masses, charges, curvatures of attraction, quanta of space, of angular or lineal momentum, etc.)

UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS ARE VITAL CONSTANTS OF A LARGER SCALE OF EXISTENCE OF A PHYSICAL SYSTEM, WHILE ITS SCALAR CONSTANTS ARE THE ACTIVE MAGNITUDE, often the value of the specific Metric of the being, its most important value: ∆=Sp x T.

Of which the most important are, classified according to the Generator Equation, depending on which ∆-scale and ternary part belong to.

Thus we divide them in internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), self-centred in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System (∆-constant, or main metric of the Œ-point), with its 5 sub-constantsof action, ÅC. For example, for the simplest Dual ST system (without differentiated reproductive organs, or external fields), we find.

Those 7 constants, which are crystal clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human. So as we first define them and then study those 7 ‘vital constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies, and finally to mental creative analysis when considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the ∆o mind of man).

V. C.: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.

ÅC.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.

U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale. And the similar V.Constants of the larger scale:

S+1, ∑+1, T+1, ∏+1, ST+1: S+1/T+1; T+1/S+1; S+1 x T+1.

It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. But we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.

**The conservation of ST-presents.**

The Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=femail, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.

The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into ST-waves-bodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.

Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: *‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.*

This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative space-frm and time-motion, or O-x |=Ø, that is an event which is creative.

The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = Ø-Present, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆-Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:

Sp = ∞ x O = Time point -> Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.

Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.

The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.

Which has by definition, *one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.*

So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.

What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrino-giravtational connections.

So we are gravitational beings.

We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, c-speed or 0 temperature or H-planck.

The Universe is immortal in 0-sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinite-simal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.

The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.

Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Sp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.

*Coincidentia Oppositorum, said* Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

The main Constants of Nature are better classified according to the Generator Equation, depending on which ∆-scale and ternary part belong to.

Thus we divide them in internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), self-centred in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System (∆-constant, or main metric of the Œ-point), with its 5 sub-constantsof action, ÅC. For example, for the simplest Dual ST system (without differentiated reproductive organs, or external fields), we find.

V. C.: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.

ÅC.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.

U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale. And the similar V.Constants of the larger scale:

S+1, ∑+1, T+1, ∏+1, ST+1: S+1/T+1; T+1/S+1; S+1 x T+1.

It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. And so we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.

The 7th isomorphism thus is more technical and perhaps the one of maximal interest to the quantitative age of ‘measure science’ we live in.

Since it deals with all the Universal constants and vital constants and physical, chemical, biological, sociological, you name it, constants which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information, etc. etc.

They are very important because they truly ‘make’ all this isomorphic analysis of reality, ‘hard science’. Otherwise it would be somehow a philosophy of science and the connection with hard data would be lost. It explains also the great conundrum of why and what are those universal constants at such value. This i confess, is still a field of research with some unknowns, though much more developed than the present understanding of it. Sorry, I haven’t found yet why α is 1/137, ts, ts, I won’t get my saint Nobel of the dynamite for it.

But seriously i can offer you though the simplest and most beautiful one, π, the ratio between 3 ‘lines of energy’ that become a cycle of temporal information, and it is really ‘3’ plus 0’14 ‘holes’ between those 3 turning radius, and in the center of the membrane there is a zero-point or mind, which observes through that bidimensional cycle the Universe, but it can only see 0’14, which is just if you divide 0.14/π, a 4% of reality, the rest is ‘dark’, 96% is dark!, the exact quantity of dark energy and dark matter of the Universe we do not see! Are we, that is our atoms, surrounded by S1,2 and pi orbitals of electrons, watching only that O.14?

All this playful banter on very serious themes, shows you how there is a whole world of ‘theory of numbers’, which is as Einstein said, the ‘first’ steps to fully understand the Universal constants of the Universe, which are ratios between energy and information, ratios of åctions between scales, ratios of social scales, which stabilize the cosmos. And so a fascinating isomorphism is the study of those Universal Constants of ‘creation’.

As all Universal constants will be always function/als of the S/T dualities, S-T 3-dimensions/motions, S¹º scales and U0±4 planes and 5 åctions of a system.

For example, let us consider the classic Universal constants of physics:

In the graph the main constants of physics: - Tƒ x Sp (∆±3) c speed, which is the constant of space-time, our rod of measure of space and time (hence as Einstein did understood always constant regardless of the observers’ speed).

-∆-2:Tƒ: e: charge, the time clock of our world, defined by k, the Coulomb constant of curvature speed of the ∆-2 scale.

-∆+3:Tƒ: G, the same constant for the cosmological world.

Both are the unified constants of Tƒ/Sp: density of information/curvature/attraction between masses and charges.

-∆: Sp: K-Boltzmann: the constant of entropy, or expansive space of the thermodynamic scale.

– Neutron mass= Proton + electron masses. The Scalar, Active Magnitude or Constant of Existence, AU of the electromagnetic scale, equivalent to the Mass of the primordial black hole of the Cosmological Scale, *from where through the breaking of multiple symmetries all other constants will be born.*

**Ψ. 8th and 9th isomorphism, creation by dualities/symmetries of time-space, ternary differentiations and social evolution into new scales.**

We have adsorbed the 8^{th}=2³ isomorphism, ‘creation’, and written it as a combination of 2 numbers, 2 and 3, because as Cheng-Tzu and Lao-Tzu the Taoist masters say from 1=existence comes 2, yin-form-ation and yang (energy) and from 2 comes 3 yin yang reproduction of the 10 thousand beings.

There you have a nice resume of the magic numbers of creation, the first 2nd 3rd and 9-10th isomorphisms.

This first words of the Tao-te-king are right to the point. Since of the philosophies of science prior to Western science, Taoism with its yin=information, yang=energy duality were by far the most in tune with the Universe, along with the somehow more colorful, Shiva=energy, Vishnu=information, female=cyclical form, male=lineal energy gender duality of the Universe.

And so creation has to do a lot with the duality of energy-information, male-female gender and the ternary differentiation of dimensions of space and time, bidimensional topologies, and organic parts.

Since creation of species is born of gender, Spe(Male)<>Tƒ(Female) dualities and the ternary principle of differentiation and recombination of species according to the 3 dimensional varieties of space and time, Sp, ST and Tƒ.

Those 2 simple principles, the duality of Space-Time and the ternary principle of dimensional differentiation account for almost every process of creation of new forms.

For example, consider the case of evolution shown in the graph. We treat it in the 3rd isomorphism of time ages, since Darwin’s evolution theory (not so much the field of ∆-1 genetics), describes changes of forms in species which experience the same pattern of Spe>ST>Tƒ changes that life does through 3 ages, from energetic top predator species, to a diversification that iterates and changes them, as they radiate on planet earth, to a 3rd age of informative increase, in the dimension of height, which converted amphibian into dinosaurs and birds and rats into humans.

It couldn’t be otherwise since the Universe is really a game of only two elements space and information, the static view of energy and time, with its 2 canonical forms, the line and the cycle, which are also the origin of all ‘conic curves’ of reality, its 3rd ‘element’, the combinations, origin of waves and body. Thus the laws of creation which are studied in the 8th isomorphism will deal with all those processes.

The ternary and dual, fractal Principles of creation.

*Some dual, creative analyses forgotten by AE sciences that we consider in ¬Æ ST Theory: the Universe as a spatial system, machines as evolutionary beings, and civilizations as organisms. The game of creation must be understood through its ‘dual symmetries’ and ternary networks that allowed its finite reproduction of fractal forms in the infinity of continuous space*

The most satisfying function of existence is reproduction, the Generator Arrow, the maker of the game and all its species – the purest sensations of them all.

The Generator Feedback equation of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information is a reproducer, which embodies all the combinations of the game in itself, the creative algorithm of reality, which Touring once looked for with its simplest example a touring machine. But the creator potentially is more than a touring machine, it is what the touring machine observes, reality itself.

The rest of beings are just following the combinations of that grand design.

The active creator is limited by the parts of the whole that will assembly. So we shall call it with a more humble name, the assembler

With the syntactic combinations of the i-logic generator, the creator will always end repeating a form of finite time that had existed in ∞ space.

The proof that we are all repetitions is clear: space is infinite because it has not dark spaces, but it is a continuous number of closed and open topologies assembled in triangles, squares, hexagonal, polygonal and hexagonal, planes and spheres, with no darkness.

Information however is always limited and time always ends: it is a fluctuation of existence over that ∞ ‘—motions’.

All existences have possibly existed in the infinite fractal space of a finite number of times cycles.

We all will be assembled again as an i-logic form of space-time in some other self-repetitive fractal printed in the infinite ‘—motions’ of the trophic pyramid of existence that gave you birth.

Let us then operate the creator: Its simplest combinations will be complementary systems of ‘—motions’ and information that take advantage of the inverse properties of both:

__The dualities of Creation.__

In time the generator combines past, ‘—motions’ forms and future informations, generated by its universal, feedback cycles, and its arrows that imprint and create the chains of forms of present existence. Creation is structured by a series of dualities that merge creating an eternal, fluctuating present that appears and disappears as cyclical action-reaction systems cancel each other, making its total sum zero:

– Time and space have opposite morphologies and functions, which cancel each other:

– Informative, temporal singularities are convex, implosive and energetic membranes are concave, explosive. Thus a flat plane of temporal ‘—motions’ fluctuates into 2 virtual forms whose total value is null. For example, particles and antiparticles are born of a vacuum plane without form but they keep their inverse CPT parity. Thus the sum of its spatial form (P), its temporal arrows (T) and its dual, organic charge cancel.

– The duality of ‘—motions’ and information explains also *sexual differentiation:* females are specialized ‘time beings’ dominant in cyclical forms, memory, information, temporal verbs and perceptive languages. While males are specialized ‘‘—motions’ beings’ with bigger, lineal forms, dominant in spatial tasks. Yet both can be further differentiated into an informative cyclical head, and a lineal body. So, in graph 3.1 we draw a man with “temporal cycles” that represent his informative organs, the head and senses; and ‘—motions’ lines that represent the body and his members. Yet, despite the simplicity of that design, he is recognizable as a man.

– Duality causes the creation and reproduction of space-time fields through the process of palingenesis, by which a certain form of relative future, a father, emits a relative form of past, with lesser evolution, a seminal seed, that then evolves very fast towards the future, till becoming again a present form parallel to the father*.*

– Duality exists in biologic organisms evolved by the dual influence of macro-ecosystems and micro-genes.

– Duality is the cause of informative perception, as flows of spatial forces become transformed in a point of relative time or particle, in which they ‘merge’ into a ‘boson’, accumulative image of information that represents reality*.*

– Duality also applies to behavior: there are Darwinian acts between different beings that destroy each other vs. social, evolutionary acts between equal beings that evolve together, sharing ‘—motions’ and information through common networks. Thus all organic life ends up cancelled by a predator. It is a key duality as it responds to the 2 arrows of space-time, the arrow of symbiotic order, of information and the arrow of energetic ‘—motions’ of destruction defined by the 3rd postulate of illogic geometry*.*

– Finally Duality implies that all forms that evolve in time through 3 horizons, then organize in space those 3 horizons as the 3 regions of an i-point.

The number of events we can describe in all sciences departing from duality is enormous. Yet in as much as temporal information is dominant in living beings, illogic time is more important in biological and sociological sciences, explaining phenomena such as reproduction, perception, life and death, organic structures, etc. While, physical and cosmological particles can be described better with the use of Non-Euclidean, spatial geometry, as particles are dominant in spatial ‘—motions’. We will consider in the next chapters the most important biological applications of illogic time: the duality of Darwinian and symbiotic behavior; the way in which perception occurs; the concept of a top predator species, as information selects species with better brains; the palingenetic reproduction of biological forms which implies a dual travel in time back and forth from the future to the past…

But duality is only the beginning. Most systems evolve, self-combine and create finally a 3rd system, a reproductive one, becoming autonomous, without the need of ‘assemblers’ and ‘enzymes’. And then the game becomes richer in variations, because it becomes guided by ternary symmetries.

We understand those organic, self-reproductive systems according to the *Ternary Principle* studying the 3 *temporal ages* and functions of a ST field and then putting them together as the 3 *geometric, organic, spatial* regions of i- point. Since all ST field require 3 elements to exist: a Tƒ, informative element; an Es, energetic, spatial form, and an intermediate ‘present, simultaneous region’, dual flux of temporal ‘—motions’ that merges them into a whole. The result is an Sp-Tƒ rhythm of evolution and reproduction of forms in time that become latter reorganized as i-points in space, creating dual organic, real forms of temporal ‘—motions’. For example, the Universe first created fundamental particles, temporal quarks and spatial electrons that recombined into ST atoms; the body reproduces cells that latter evolve, becoming organs of ‘—motions’ and information, etc. Thus ST theory shows the complementarity between the ternary horizons of species that once have evolved energetic and informative particles interact creating an intermediate ST zone, shaping a new i- organism:

– Max. Sp: The external membrane and energetic network of the system that performs *‘—motions’ cycles*, transforming information into ‘—motions’, appears first: it is the cell’s fat membrane, the stars of the galaxy, the endodermic cells of the future digestive systems….

*-Max.Tƒ. Then it will appear the informative quanta of the future informative network and ‘brain’* of the system that perform *informative cycles*, transforming ‘—motions’ into information: they are the cells’ informative nucleotides, the black holes of the spiral galaxies, the brain.

– Sp x Tƒ: Finally the interaction of ‘—motions’ and informative systems creates *an intermediate, reproductive region that *combine ‘—motions’ and information: so protein membranes and nucleotide acids create the cell; stars and black holes create galaxies; the energetic endoderm and the informative ectoderm create the middle mesoderm region, each one the blue print of the future energetic, digestive, informative, nervous and blood, reproductive systems.

In formal terms we write the process as a decoupling of an initial *Sp x Tƒ form* that differentiates into a more energetic membrane (Max.Sp) and higher informative quanta (Max.Tƒ), that interact, creating the intermediate region, ST, shaping in this manner a new, ternary equation – the ultimate definition of any species. Since we are all self-repetitive MST field equations

The generator equation, Sp<ST>Tƒ, represents both: a temporal event between 2 relative ‘points’, an Œ-point with higher content of ‘—motions’ or relative past form, and an Œ-point with higher content of information or relative future form, that communicate implosive information (>) and explosive ‘—motions’ (<), through a wave of temporal ‘—motions’, <=>; c*reating a ternary, multicausal, simultaneous structure of spatial present*.

__Multi-functionality: 3 st-points functions. Ternary Principle:__

Creation happens due to the ‘diversification’ of any Space-time field in 3 subspecies in space or 3 ages in time; Sp, ST, Tƒ.

It is the ternary principle once and again written in the book of Nature, caused by the fact that there are only 3 elementary forms in the Universe, ‘—motions’, information and a combination of both. Thus, events, species and space-time fields, both in time and space, have 3 elements: *3 ages, 3 horizons, 3 dimensions or 3 physiological networks*, whose functions correspond to the arrow of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction that create the Universe. The Ternary principle is the origin of an evolutionary, impersonal plan of creation that diversifies species in all scales of reality into 3 forms, (Max. ΣSp, Max. Tƒ, ΣSp=Tƒ), from the 3 families of masses to 3 the types of Universes. It allows organizing all biological species in a tree of ternary horizons and differentiations of energetic, informative and balanced organisms, which co-exist in 3 st-scales of existence:

*‘Any form can be subdivided ad eternal in new ternary forms.’*

For example, the human body can be subdivided into 3 networks; then the digestive network can be subdivided into the stomach, liver and intestine system that can be subdivided into the colon, small, and large intestine, which can be subdivided into the left, top and right side, etc. The Ternary principle implies that the 3 spatial dimensions of any space-time field perform 3 temporal functions:

*‘Any species, which is part of an ecosystem or an organism, maximizes its survival developing 3 functions as an energetic, reproductive and informative system for the higher scale’*

I.e.: a cilia act as energetic limbs that move the cell, sensorial antennae that inform, and they evolved as centrioles that help to reproduce it. Hormones are also multifunctional.

And so on. This first rule of creation developed either in space as a topology of 4-dimensional reality with 3 elements, toroid ring, hyperbolic cycle and spherical plane, or in time as a game of ‘—motions’ that warps into information reproducing along the way, is your limit.

So the creator descends a notch more into self-appreciation since he is nothing but a contemplator of a game which has created before. That is he is created by the game and as assembler he is so determined to do one of the known-known combinations that, indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The isomorphisms of the game of creation are in themselves an entire sub-discipline of multiple space-times theory, studied in detail in my files. In essence the process is self-similar in all scales:

A species will differentiate in ternary sizes (its cellular, organic and social size); it will differentiate in ternary topologies (an species dominant in ‘—motions’, one in information and one in reproduction); in ternary ages (a neoteny species aborted in a palingenetic phase; one mature species and one with an excess of information, *which will become cell of a new scale of evolution, a superorganism communicated by the language); and* in ternary functions, symbiotic to the higher st+1 organism in which the entity exists (as an energetic part, an informative part and a reproductive part or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function).

Further on all those creative strategies of survival become more complex, when we consider its combinations: species with several functions, often in several scales; complementary, sexual specialization in an energetic, male entity and an informative, female entity; ternary structures that form complete topologies; open balls that act as doors between membranes, without center and membrane; a*nd combinatory varieties of ‘sexual species’ or ‘complementary’ species, in which the ‘—motions’/informative components, each diversify in 3 topologies, scales, ages, etc. *

Those combinations further enlarge the number of subspecies, though many of them, especially ‘anti-species’ in which the lesser informative ‘male’ plays an informative role and the lesser ‘energetic’ woman an energetic role (for example an antiparticle, with an energetic electron in its informative center and an informative proton in its energetic membrane), will not be stable and will not survive. This brings another essential law of creation, the inflationary nature of information checked by the isomorphisms of survival that extinguish unsuccessful species and tends to reduce the explosive age of creation to 3 ‘basic ternary differentiated’ types that survive, while other transitional or non-balanced combinations disappear:

*‘The Universe creates an inflationary number of ‘forms’ which are then reduced by natural selection to ternary species and balanced, complementary, dual systems’.*

Those rules allow the entity to play an interconnected, synchronized role as part of a bigger organism and/or ecosystem, in which it will play its dynamic, causal chains/arrows of existence and life cycles:

*Max.Tƒ(seed)->Max.Sp(youth)->Max.Reproduction (Maturity)->Max.Information (3rd Age)->Death(Tƒ->Sp)*

But Life cycles can be immortal, if instead of dying after its 3rd Age the entity evolves socially as cell of a higher system communicated with its informative language (Est-1). Then the species will ‘transcend’ into a complex super-organism. Some systems might even attempt a feedback cycle of immortality (Physical particles, simple biological jellyfishes:

*I-> ‘—motions’ youth ->reproduction <-’—motions’ Youth…*

*‘—motions’ (wave) -> Information (Particle) ->‘—motions’ (wave)*

And so, with those simple rules we can classify as we shall do in our studies of physical, biological and sociological species of the Universe all the entities of reality and its events.

*Recap*: The ternary principle explains the creation and diversification fractal super-organisms both in time ages, scalar planes and network-spaces. Space is infinite time is not, time games are less than space. Because the volume of space is bigger than the volume of time all forms have been repeated. And so all is repeated again.’

**9th and 10th isomorphisms: **

**decametric eusocial evolution into new Universal Planes.**

**10 logarithmic scales.**

To notice that the 5th dimension is based on 10 logarithms because the ‘Tetraktys’ is the most perfect group of 3 x 3 + 0 elements, which become specialised in the ‘Sp-energetic, Tƒ- informative and ST-reproductive, iterative functions of the ‘Program of survival’ of all systems, which will be made clear latter on, when we analysed the world cycles of time and the ternary Generator equation in space and time, of the fractal Universe.

You have to be a bit patient, as we have first to ground all this in some basic mathematics. Thus between 2 such scales of the 5th dimension we shall always find around 10¹¹ elements – the ties of a DNA molecule, the stars of our galaxy, the cells of a super organism, the galaxies of the perceived Universe, and between the Universal Constants of Space, we will find the same differences, the energetic value between the H-planck constant of Tƒ in the ∆-1 quantum scale and the k-Boltzmann constant of the ∆-Thermodynamic, human scale; and then the µ-magnetic scale and so on.

So this said, the 5^{th} dimension is in the holes of the real numbers each of its decametric decimal a lower scale of the 5^{th} dimension. Yet as usual those numbers should be really cut every 10 ‘decimals, because then we enter into another scale where anyway the values of constants such as Pi, and √2 vary as Lobachevski’s proved.

This is made clear just by revising a simple number, e, but a key number for the derivative, proportional emergence or descend between scales, approximately 2.718281828. to the 9^{th} decimal. The reader will observe that actually those 10 numbers form a simple series, 2.7 18 28 18 28 repetitive in extreme (except the first decimal missed by one to make it a perfect 28-18 variation, but after the 10^{th} decimal it breaks, with 2.7 18 28 18 28 45904 etc. That is, the equivalent to the loss of meaning and yet one more of the so many proofs I have found of the existence of the 5^{th} dimension, its geometries, algebras, and mind forms, circular membranes, points of view and ternary organic parts.

Indeed, e ^{x}= [(1+1/n)^{n}] ^{x} is the only derivative which is proportional to the same number, since if we take 1 the whole and n, one of its finitesimal parts, in space, a quanta, and then repeat this growth of diminution an n number of time, and an x number of social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, we shall find the emergence processes or dissolution≈ death processes of most systems of the Universe.

The quantitative scales however always yield in its meaning to the functions, and ternary symmetries we shall discover that make possible the existence of all systems as combinations of 3 ‘scales of the 5th dimension’ (quantum-cellular, thermodynamic-organic, gravitational-social), 3 synchronous topologies and 3 diachronic ages, so we soon will write the Generator Equation of Space-time Beings:

**Γ.** ∆-1: Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ∆:ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥∆+1: Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

This simple structure and all its fractal variations is essentially the description of any World-system, whose sum creates the Universe: U=∑W

Relational space-times thus have the key word ‘relational’, which merely means we need a ‘metric system’ to order and relate all those space-time cycles of the Universe.

And this is the 5^{th} dimension of the Universe: the metric laws that put and order, RELATE to each other all the time-space cycles of the Universe, of which we are all made.

We said we call the ‘different’ scales of parts that become wholes, a ‘Non-Euclidean plane of existence’, which fits nicely with the fact that those ‘relative sizes’ of reality can be mathematically defined as ‘Non-Euclidean planes’.

And finally the element left to account for, the gathering of individual ‘cells’, ‘atoms’ or any kind of ‘fractal Non-Euclidean point’ (the mathematical definition of ‘any thing which becomes bigger when we come closer to it’ as fractals do’, into social groups till myriad of them atoms or cells become a new ∆+1 whole plane, will be called a social scale.

And we shall see that actually there are 9 of those scales before becoming an ∆+1 whole (very much as there were 9 ∆-planes before arriving to the 10th absolute cosmos, but since now we ‘know’ that the 10th is for sure an ∆+1, we just describe 9 social groups).

This again is also due to our ‘magic 3’ number of 3 ‘bidimensional topologies’ (which then are put in ‘membranes’ on top of each other to create volume, so you have a skin membrane made of 3 sub membrane and more and more ‘membranes’ of cells, and the Earth has also thin layers, the atmosphere, the crust and so on.) But I am getting into destructions.

In essence the magic number 3 x 3 = ∆+1 (10), happens because of the 3 dimensions of space, 3 of time, and 3 bidimensional topologies, and because of the 3 ‘energy-space’, ‘information-time’ and its ‘iterative combinations’ that form 3 ‘organic parts’ Sp-nergetic limbs/fields, ST-terative body/waves and Tƒ-informative Heads/particles.

When I created this terminology, I tried to find ‘mnemonic rules’ to structure it all, and so they fit nicely (though the i- information vs. O-Time vs. ∆-somorphic scale vs. i-teration, vs. individual choice is a drag, i is indeed the middle vowel, is the most repeated one, *is everywhere, as the golden mean rule is. *So i ended ‘I ended’ using it for the most used word of this theory :)

And so we write another simple equation (remember Occam’s rule, the simplest theory which explains more things is the most truthful):

*9 10 U =S+1 * Si ³+³+³ = ∆+1

**1oth and zero isomorphism: the integration of all planes of existence, around its zero-point or mind.**

So we close the cycle and study in the 10th isomorphism all the planes of existence that the being perceives, centred in its point of view, which for man are the 10 scales from forces to cosmos we are aware of. In the next graph we see the human being, those 10 scales and the generator equation applied to man, and its 10 isomorphisms:

In the graph, the main isomorphisms of the Universe illustrated with the human case. Humans are space-time systems and so they can be described with:

1st isomorphism: A Generator, Existential equation of the type Sp<St>Tƒ that defines its space-time symmetry between Its:

2-manifold spatial organs, and its 3 motions in time (2nd, 3rd isomorphism illustrated above), which defines the world cycle and structural systems of the human organism.

This world cycle thus is a sum of existential åctions, ±∆(e,i), exchanges of spatial energy (motion) and information (form) between different humans that aggregate into Universals, through its 3 ∆±1 relate planes of existence (cellular, individual and social planes). The dynamic exchanges of the elements of those graphs applied to every system of the Universe gives us the meaning of it. The method we use to study them here is the method of the 10=5 qualitative≈logic + quantitative properties of them all.

As all can be defined by a 1)equation that describes 2) its 3 topological organs, 3) its symmetric 3 motions in time 4) its exchanges of energy and information with other planes that motivate 5) its 5 survival åctions ordered in its world cycle.

Thus we can consider that all what exists is a ‘function of existence’, of space and time, of energy and information performing motions in the 5th dimension.

The longest integrated sequence of such internal and external motion is a world cycle, which externally can be described in 4D as a worldline, a sum of trajectories in external space. yet for its full description we must include the ‘stop’ moments between motions in which the being performs an action, and the internal motions of the being, which through the sum of those ±∆ exchanges of energy and information will suffer a world cycle of life and death:

In the graph, all what exists can be described as a sum across multiple scales of size of motions in the 5th dimension. The type of motions and length of cycles, the relative motion of the being to an external larger world in which it provides åctions for external beings as a relative, O∆-1 infinitesimal point, the inner world controlled by the point in relative still motion to its o-mind with the will to move the whole. All those elements configure its description with the 5+0 isomorphisms of space, time its symmetries, organs and ages, its åctions across 5D planes and the mind-pov which embodies in its logic circuits of linguistic, faster, small time cycles the creation of the future and the game of existence, under its maximizing function:

Max. A = Max Uw=∫ (∂æ,e,ï,œ,û) ds dt.

This function of existence makes each point of view to maximize its world cycles of existence as a super organisms, Uw, made of a series of åctions of exchange of energy and information, æ,e,ï,œ,û, across its territory in space, ds, and its duration in time, dt, which defines the domain of the Existential function we study.

The sum of åctions of the being is thus existence of the being and carry all the information of it, but we must add those åctions across the 3 relative, ∆-1 cellular/atomic, thermodynamic-organic, ∆+1 social cosmic scales.

And this brief account of man leads of course, to the oth isomorphism,

Since remember, *0 is also a number – the beginning of the new scale, the order of all of them into a single fractal point the isomorphism of the mind.*

**Oth isomorphism: The Œ function of existence and o-mind of the being.**

I kept it for the end, because Leibniz did discover it. He called it a “monad’, a fractal non-Euclidean point, which grows in size as we come closer to it, because ‘every point is a world in itself” (Monadology), a mind, an infinitesimal zero-point, which let itself be crossed by infinite parallel lines of energy and information.

I had to redefine also the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th postulates of non-Euclidean geometry, to complete the work of Leibniz, Riemann and Einstein, and Aristotle (who said we are all gods, the unmoved center that moves all beings around it), to define and find the 0 isomorphism and its equation, the equation of the mind, of the monad:

**⊗**. ⊗-point (infinitesimal mirror of information ) x ∞ Universe (perceived by the mirror) = World constant mapping.

And we shall find in each species, a zero point that orders reality:

__∞ souls create the Universe.__

It is not the energy of formless space, but its knots of informative time cycles, we call minds, what orders and creates the Universe.

It is not an invisible, never evident Yahweh or an illogic big bang, coming out of nothing, what creates the Universe, but its ∞ spherical *linguistic *minds that perceive its cycles of temporal information and command its energy fields. Unlike Yahweh, those souls are all around us.

They correspond to thousand of years of human collective wisdom about the sentient world:

They are the selves of animist cults, the Atmans of Buddhism; the focal Gods of Aristotle, which he rightly described as the still primary movers of the Universe; the contemplative souls of Christianity; the Non-Euclidean, zero Points of Riemann and Einstein; the informative Fractals of Mandelbrot.

They are also the Monads of Leibniz; the founder of calculus and computer logic, who first defined them in mathematical terms, as knots that relate the multiple time clocks of the Universe, which carry its information in the frequency bits and forms of its cycles, creating with them a fractal, linguistic image of the whole world, they apperceive as their self.

In the quantum scale, they are the so-called particle points of physics, quarks and electrons, which constantly move, stop and gauge, and move again, apperceiving gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

In the Human physical scale they are the static centers of mass, which focus a gravitational language into a still point. They are the hurricane’s eye with no motion, which once formed stabilizes its vortex; the quartz crystals that form an still image of the motions of its body of rocks. While in the cosmic scale boson quark condensates are at the heart of quark stars and black holes, which control the galactic organism.

They are knots of informative, memorial DNA, stored in the nuclei of cells, which define with its genetic languages its cyclical åctions of energy and time. They are the roots of plants that direct with chemical orders, its metabolism. They are the eyes and brains of animals, whose visual languages of perception and flows of electronic information control the åctions of its organisms.

They are chips and its cyclical algorithms, which control the åctions of machines.

In that regard, Leibniz distinguished vegetative, automatic perception he called apperception, which requires no consciousness but exist within the software or syntax of the language itself, from reflective perception which happens in humans, due to our dual visual and verbal minds. So we self-reflect with our verbal, logic, temporal consciousness on the visual, spatial world, which is in itself an infinitesimal, simplified, geometric mirror of the infinite Universe.

But single minds still apperceive and acts-react to that spatial world with *an automatic program common to the Universal Syntax, embedded in all the spatial and logic, temporal languages of those infinite souls. So the ultimate question pending to solve the puzzle of existence, is what is the program of mathematical languages of space and causal, logic languages of time, all the souls of the Universe and the organism they command, follow.*

**The full cycle, from Aristotle to Newton To Leibniz and Aristotle again: The philosopher of science**

Poor Leibniz, a philosophical saint who believed in the best of all worlds, and spent most of his time trying to reunite the human word-mind, at that time broken into multiple religions on the meaning of God, the mind of the Universe, of which all monads were made to its image and likeness, along the path of a previous fellowman philosopher, who he greatly admired, the Catalan Raymond Llull, would be accused of plagiarism by Newton, who on the terse precision of Calculus Infinitorum, show his ‘true colors’, suddenly bringing some obtuse notes, basically rules of measure derived from his professor Isaac Barrow, starting a global campaign, backed by the growing power of Imperial Britain, according to which Leibniz had in a visit to London somehow got access to his library, obscure notes on fluxions and with premeditation and will to harm, changed it all and published its terse Latin prose.

Newton got mad at the guy and forbade him to accompany the King of England form whom Leibniz had been working for 30 years filling volumes of genealogies to make a living. Again we see the same pattern: the philosopher who does not make weapons, does not make a living, does not have power, does not convince the world of his higher truths. The king of course who disliked the philosopher that had won him the crown with his erudite volumes of genealogical rights left him behind. And he died alone. We don’t have his last words. But Voltaire would put his epitaph laughing at him in Candid, his alter ego, where a good-natured Leibniz thought the world was the best of all worlds.

Come through a century. We have our two sides of good and bad science, knowledge vs. power. Now it is Darwin who realizes that the worldcycle of life and death has a pattern called evolution, a word derived from r=evolution.

On the other side Count Rumford, a British military engineer, noticed that limitless amounts of heat could be generated in the boring of cannon barrels and that the amount of heat generated is proportional to the work done in turning a blunt boring tool. Rumford’s observation of the proportionality between heat generated and work done lies at the foundation of thermodynamics. Another pioneer was the French military engineer Sadi Carnot, who introduced the concept of the heat-engine.

And finally Clausius, a German physicist, resumed all this knowledge on ballistics, heat and lineal motions in the second laws of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy according to which the ‘Universe is dying’ because it is made of ‘lineal motions’ and ‘disordered death’, as all those killed with military weapons, because time was lineal, expanding… as the steam machines and weapons they were constructing. Again, we see the simple pattern: the profession of the ‘pretentious scientist’ becomes the ’cause’ of the Universe.

Among the Arawak, a tribe of fishermen of the Caribe, the Universe is not dying but moves above a huge turtle, as those they hunt for a living. For Kepler, God was a mechanical clocker, as the machine he used to measure it. For lineal German physicists, masters of weapons of mass destruction, it has always been lineal, entropic, born in ‘big bangs’, a mockery word coined by Hoyle, aware that the theory was born on the mind of all those who like Gamow contributed to make the Nuclear bomb, or like Lemaitre, believed in creationism.

Now it is a fashion to say that the Universe is a computer, because that is how scientists, increasingly mere attachments of its thinking machines, use computers to model it. I’m waiting for a physicist of those I met in some conferences on the ‘death corridor’ of research at Sandia Labs, to model it on a drone. LOL.

Of course, steam, gas, weapons, kill, move lineally, are space and die. But that is only half, or rather a third of the story of reality.

What we philosophers of science, experts in all disciplines, aware that logic time is the origin of mathematical space, and both, coupled with the mental, organic properties of life MUST be included in a Theory Of Everything, have been telling to physicists (but only they can talk to ‘artillery masters’, who in turn own the world) is that a true theory of reality must include those 3+0 elements of reality: its cyclical, time-like, logic properties; its lineal space-like properties, its gauging-measuring-mental properties and its organic-synchronous, structural properties, as parts become elements of wholes, which grow in size from the simplest atom through the cells, matter states, organisms, planets and galaxies that we perceive all over of the Universe.

There is the inner side of reality, the point of view of the cycles of time, ignored since Einstein again affirmed the concept that time is the 4th dimension of lineal space.

We shall of course explain what is the use of that concept for measures (as always good, physicists DO master measure of lineal distance that is granted), but also how dumb it is the concept and how much it has harmed the development of the whys of the Universe, and the study of Time.

So my advice to them is ‘let it go’. Do not talk so much about the meaning of it all. This is the task of philosophers of science. Study your motions and that is good enough. And learn, about the cycles of time, to complete your science, a knowledge we shall provide in those texts.

“Though most arachnids are solitary animals, some spiders live in enormous communal webs housing males, females, and spiderlings. Most of the individuals live in the central part of the web, with the outer part providing snare space for prey shared by all the inhabitants”. Britannica

The structure of Tƒ<TS<Sp, territorial spaces with a central point of view, developing its particular worldview, trying to reach infinity with his distorted geometry, affine to a projective geometry where far away means small, defines each world of a Universe, which is objective when ‘clashing’ each form with all others – so only eusocial love, and emergence through the scales of the 5^{th} dimension make survival possible.

Indeed, we are going to expand into biology the purpose of ‘time’ science, well beyond anything physicists will provide, to explain why time cycles happened, what kind of time cycles exist, what is the reasons of their organic structure in synchronic systems, classify them all, and explain all actions not only those of lineal motion, which is the only ones physicists truly study.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5th dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5th dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

There is here a pattern which will be repeated between philosophers of science sponsors of an organic sentient universe, of cyclical time and fractal space, ending in relative oblivion vs. the military physicists of lineal time and military power that carry the day and we shall see the pattern in the lives of each century masters of space-time studies: Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Boltzmann vs. Darwin, Einstein vs.…

And we will return to that historic understanding of perhaps the biggest blunder of mankind, many times.

Why, of course, T.Œ has its explanation. Since the equation of the mind shows that all those Aristotelian Gods, the unmoved centers that control the limited territorial energy around them are by nature self-centered. He, Aristotle, the first philosopher of science, which physicists dislike so much – they prefer Plato – also understood it all and so he said we are all Gods. And we shall return to his wisdom from time to time. The souls of Descartes, the Monads of Leibniz do not really like to share but absorb energy and information, as black holes do till they explode.

They are by their own nature as a relative center of their world characteristically arrogant knots of thought. But as long as we do NOT commit the error of Newton, who converted Descartes world, the relative frame of mind of the human being, made of 3 perpendicular light dimensions, the whole universe, converting our relative space-time into the absolute space-time, and discharging all other monads, as non-existent, we can understand. The problem happens, when as physicists do, they reduce them all to their view, and on top they deform it extending the Cartesian coordinates of a pen and paper abstract artifact, to encompass all the time cycles of the universe, equalized by their single mechanical clock, uncoiled into an infinite line of duration.

This is the error of Newton. All cycles are finite, as they close into themselves. All worldcycles of life and death are finite as they end as they begun in the dissolution of death. All entropic motions stop. All time vortices once they have absorbed all the entropy of their territory become wrinkled, and die. Newton died, his ‘time duration’ did not extend to infinity.

But those minds measure from their self-centered point of view, only a part of the Universe, and the rest remains obscure. So all of them display the paradox of the ego, as they confuse the whole Universe with their world, and see themselves larger than all what they don’t perceive. Hence as Descartes wittingly warned the reader in his first sentences ‘every human being thinks he is gifted with intelligence.’** **

**Recap:**

The 10 isomorphic sets of laws, study the fractal generator, its ternary elements and social structures and o-point minds for each species of the Universe.

3 finite formal dimensions of space, and its 3 symmetric motions in time, create a being, which gathers socially with similar beings in huge numbers till become a new ∆+1 plane of existence, a new whole, which again starts the whole process. And every time it does so and becomes a new whole, it follows the same laws and symmetries, and all those laws are the isomorphisms we are defining.

*So reality is made of Space/time symmetric Dimensions-> Social scales->∆-Planes of existence that follow the 10 isomorphisms of all fractal beings made to the image and likeness of the whole.*

**IV. **

**FRACTAL GENERATOR OF ∞ ∆ST SPACE-TIME BEINGS CREATES ALL STIENCES & ITS SPECIES**

**THE GENERATOR EQUATION THROUGH ALL THE SCALES OF THE 5 ^{TH} DIMENSION**

**1. the Fractal generator: ∑|-Spe <≈> ∏O-Tiƒ : ∆ = |∞ x To : To< ExI≈st**

We have written the 3 elements of the fractal generator, purposely above, in 3 different forms, from left to right, as an algebraic, dynamic equation; as a mental, geometric equation and finally as a* semantic philosophical function that shows the fascinating homology of all languages. *

*So in the centre we write:*

∆ = |∞ x To , which is the equation of the mind as a geometric game of creation of new forms of time made by mapping together into a still image of the Universe its lineal and cyclical motions.

*In the left we write* the ‘Function of Existence’, as an acronym verb of the 3 parts of the system, its future guiding Head, To, which controls with its information, < its present body wave of energy and information exi, that feeds on an external s≈t field.

The equation shows a fundamental equilibrium that exists in all survival body-waves of the Universe, where the Product of the energy and information or vital constants of the system is kept in a balance maximised by the equality of its space and time parameters. Since when we have 2 numbers, to maximise its product, they must be equal. So 5×5>6×4>7×3. Hence: Max. Exi->S≈t. And indeed we shall find that all surviving functions of existence achieve a balance between body and mind, in its adult age of reproduction, when they combine proportionally their energy and information to reproduce in similar forms. And we shall use this equation to define beauty as the balance between lines and cycles, forms and motions.

So the Fractal Generator in its simplest most meaningful expression is full of hidden meanings.

Finally in the left we have written both in geometric, logic, causal and dynamic terms the equation, showing its symbolic meaning as a lineal spatial entropic flow of motion that constantly transforms itself back and forth into cyclical, temporal information. So the equation represents the ‘Principle of conservation and transformation of energy and information, the fundamental principle of all sciences.

And if we were to put them all together the Fractal Generator will be:

[|-Spe x O-Tiƒ=Exi:S≈t]∆±1

We can in that sense play with infinite variations and languages to describe the essence of the fractal universe and its correspondence with all languages, which themselves mirror all kind of species. The Fractal paradigm is thus more closer to metaphor and poetry, mysticism and communion with the whole and all its parts, as it unifies the essence of all beings than to the measure-seeking detailed precision and classification in different parts and compartments, which is our concept on how to do science. And yet, as we shall show in the 4th line, this detail can also be achieved.

Let us then build on the fundamental relationships and symmetries of the 3 elements of that fractal generator, starting from its space-time dualities.

**The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.**

Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.

Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:

A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.

Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.

Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.

And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:

Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:

Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:

Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).

Now here the convention I have adopted is to *Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.*

This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.

But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.

A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:

|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles

And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:

|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.

So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.

**And the ¬Æ formalism that better express them.**

Then I realized why mathematics was a language, so closely related to 5D space-time.

Since geometry was the science of space, logic algebra, with its sequential social numbers, the time language, and analysis the 3rd branch of mathematics, the study of the 5th dimension, of infinitesimals and wholes.

So it IS easy to translate the laws of mathematics into isomorphic laws of 5D space-times, with the proper corrections to account for the fact that each point was a world in itself, when we came closer to see it – the true meaning of the 5^{th} non-Euclidean postulate which defines points as crossed by infinite parallels; part of waves, connected into planes, that grew through the fifth dimension into co-existing organisms, which used the clocks of time of different speeds to build up its complex forms. It did not matter so much that form, as knots made it convoluted, but the functions of those networks, which now became the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:

Sp; Digestive-energetic network of Non-AE points < ST: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: Tƒ

** **Of those elements, the most important is the most spiritual of them, the mind, defined by the 5th Non-AE postulate of pan geometry:

5) Definition of a mind: O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time (world)= Linguistic mapping (mind).

**O|. MATHEMATICS: I-LOGIC, ¬Æ-LGEBRA**

**EXPERIMENTAL MATHEMATICS: WORLD’S PANGEOMETRIES.**

‘Out of Nothing I have discovered a strange new Universe’*. Bolyai, mathematician,* on the Non-AE Geometry of the Universe.

We already said that mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, and so its 3 branches correspond loosely to the 3 parts of ∆ST, ∆-nalysis, Space Geometry and Temporal algebra.

We shall here consider briefly Analysis and Geometry, leaving complex ¬Æ for the section dedicated to mathematics in the 2nd and 4th lines.

**The upgrading of mathematical sciences: i-logic geometry.**

Now geometry is the simplest description of reality. The next scale is Algebra, where the unit is the social number (not the imagined set), which does have as Pythagoras clearly understood ‘geometric forms’ (hence it would be much better explained in a bidimensional plane – reason why ‘bidimensional numbers’, are so useful). To the point, let us define the fundamental unit of ‘temporal algebra’ and its 5Dimensional analysis:

*A number is the social sum of undistinguishable fractal points.*

Thus we return to reality and make the point of geometry and the number of algebra, the units of mathematics, which reflect the Universe, and eliminate the Axiomatic method, which Gödel proved to be incomplete without experience, and the metalanguage of set theory as an absolute form of proving truth, which is just a ‘worldview’ deformation of the mind of ‘idealist Germanic cultures’, latter studied in more detail.

It is then when we can fully understand a mind-world as a higher elliptic scale of the 5th dimension, in which a social group of ‘points’ become a ‘scalar number’ – a field of a lower hyperbolic ∆-1 dimension, becomes a fractal network, connected to the ‘point-particle’, ‘mass’, ‘molecular being’, in a dynamic way.

In Algebra, function overcomes geometric form but only putting together both we can see what is the existential life of ‘algebraic numbers’.

So we shall first consider the more ‘algebraic of all the postulates’ of geometry, the 5th postulate, which really reflects the meaning of a mind.

And then we shall consider the ‘non-Aristotelian’ ternary algebra and the generator equation of:

*Sp (past, spaces; lineal entropic limbs-fields) ST(present, iterative hyperbolic waves-bodies)>Tƒ(cyclical future, informative particles-heads)*

The 5^{th} postulate of Euclidean geometries can be easily understood then from the perspective of perception, departing from its equivalent postulate, first stated by Wallis that we can shrink or grow triangles without deforming its angles and proportional sides.

This equivalent postulate, would mean that the angle of perception of species do not vary as they change side (no other meaning has an angle of a triangle, but the capacity to allow us to calculate trigonometric distances, reason why trigonometry was the first theoretical form of mathematics born of arithmetic calculus, which allowed Eratosthenes already to measure the distance to the moon, the size of the earth and the Sun distance). However they vary. Angles diminish as we become smaller in hyperbolic geometry.

So an ant will see a world with a hyperbolic vision and a lesser angle, reason why it needs a larger circumference view (spherical eyes, or eyes around a 360 perceptive point of view in Tƒ, highly informative arachnid species).

On the other hand, in larger beings the angle will become inversely larger, so the eyes become the opposite concave and planar in form; reason why satellite antennae and telescopes which represent the larger view of a planetary organism have parabolic forms.

This and many other truths of the ‘strange Universe of the 5^{th} dimension’, in which the 4^{th} dimensional Universe is both a distorted human point of view, using a single time clock, by using a single space-time continuum, of a limited number of 5D planes exactly – 2 relative planes of size, the humane electromagnetic and the gravitational larger plane, (special and general relativity).

Temporal Algebra is the most fascinating discipline of ALL sciences. Trust me. I had huge mental orgasms for 30 years since I first discovered, and after a couple of rejected papers and a small print book on it, have been exploring it by myself all this time.

It is resumed in the ternary Generator Equation of all systems and its fractal flows of time. So we have seen a bit of it already, but before we introduce it on full, we shall acknowledge the existence of some predecessors to the ternary motions-forms of space-time in the philosophers of science of the East, which reached its zenith in Taoism and the book of changes.

**Mathematical pangeometries vs. Physical single space-time continuum**

Now the next huge confrontation between the single worldview of physicists and the multiple worlds of Philosophers of Science, will take place strictly in the field of mathematics. We have ‘acquitted’ Einstein, even though he developed the next r=evolution of time concepts after the duality between Darwin and Clausius (evolution of information vs. entropy only dying Universe, studied latter when we define the human being as a space-time organism), because on my view his findings are essential and in the right track to fully grasp cyclical time, but they were ‘bend’ as usually by other lesser physicists and mathematicians to cater the lineal worldview.

Specifically Minkowski simplified his findings and defined a lineal s=ct parameter of time, exactly the same of Galileo S=vt, just changing the speed of the body by the speed of light, to be able to measure the distortions in simultaneity caused by the existence of infinite time clocks.

What truly mattered was the finding of Einstein which confessed ‘ I am the only physicist who realize there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different time speeds’ and also ‘Time curves space into masses’ and ‘Leibniz was right but if so we must change the entire building of physics from its foundations’. And further on ‘science must only be occupied from facts that are experimentally certain’, and ‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’. So he was at heart understandingly. But soon he was immersed in the idealist, Germanic school of mathematicians, like Cantor, Hilbert and Weyl, which substituted, after the crisis of Lobachevski’s pan geometry, real points with parts, social numbers and topological networks by ‘imagined or undefined terms, sets or groups’ as the unit of reality, breaking the NECESSARY CONNECTION between mathematical logic and reality, as geometry is the language of space and logic the language of time of the human being.

SO AFTER LOBACHEVSKI’s (Boylai and Gauss also) discovered that space was NOT Euclidean, except in the limit of human perception, defined by this FUNDAMENTAL parameter of the Universe: Tƒ/Sp: r²/L², the fundamental steps of science to be taken were:

- To complete the classification of all possible geometries according to the relationship between its quanta of cyclical form-motion or radius and its quanta of lineal speed-distance or length.
- To determine experimentally the values of our r², electronic quanta of information, we humans used to perceive L², our quanta of space, which had also to be determined.
- To study other experimentally known minds of the Cosmos to see if they had the same ‘bidimensional units of information, Tƒ=r², and L²=Sp, and how they will perceive the Universe hyperbolically, elliptically or Euclidean.
- And to research how all those relative different space-time geometries order in Nature (through the scales of the 5th dimension).

And yet none of this steps were taken. So we shall take them here to show you:

- First the nature of the Euclidean mind of man, where its radius is given by h and its quanta of space by c², hence it has an r²/L²->O, which is the requisite found by Lobachevski for an Euclidean mind, and then…
- to study the other ‘minds’ of the Universe and the different scales of the 5th dimension according to their peculiar geometry
- And finally to see what physicists did with this discovery (just to apply the 5th non-E postulate of Riemannian elliptic geometry to the larger gravitational scale where indeed, geometry is elliptic because L grows to infinity (action at distance).

**The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.**

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

*o-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping*

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

Yet starting with Kant and then Hegel, which had the chutzpah (even if he understood perfectly the ternary logic of thesis-antithesis-synthesis similar to the Sp<ST>Tƒ ternary Universal Grammar of all systems) to affirm Abrahamic tribal religions were superior, because they only accepted the human ego-trip of tribal Yahweh, there is a growing anti quantum paradox in philosophers which yield as infinitesimal observers to the huge power of the observable, industrial world.

This paradox inverse to that of the physicist, so huge that influences the observer, made after Leibniz, all philosophers incomplete. As they no longer dare to criticize the makers of machines and weapons, and not even the Abrahamic tribal, lineal religions of the Bronze age that back the hate between members of the same species. So we of course show a complete indifference for all what has nothing to do with the larger Universe of infinite worlds, and find the arrogance of physicists, infantile.

Now I will state a provocation to the ego of physicists (-:

The advantage of being a philosopher of science, is that unlike a physicist, the philosopher knows physics as it is study today is ‘logic mathematics’. *And logic matters most.*

Because the language of God is the logic of time cycles and the mathematics of spatial extensions. In this we are different from physicists who only apply the mathematics of space, as their knowledge of time is reduced to v=ct. But when time has a more complex understanding, it is obvious that the Time Logic behind the language of mathematics, which creates it, is far more important. So let us rephrase it. Yes, Physicists do know as much mathematics as philosophers of science. But they do not understand the time logic behind it. And that is the problem. Because logic is a property of time cycles, and its repetitive causality, logic is more important that geometry. Logic is ‘the beginning’. So the Greeks called God the mind of the Universe, Logos, derived from ‘word’, not ‘geometry’ meaning “Earth measurement.” And that makes the whole difference, physicists do not grasp. As what they do is ‘geometry’, measure. We philosophers of science do Logos, (-;

Now, we told you, we will evolve mathematics, so we can fit the new concept of cyclical time and fractal space within it, as Descartes and Leibniz did to fit their time vortices and relational infinite times, as Einstein did (not by himself but by applying non-Euclidean mathematics to his description of space).

So to that aim, we just need to complete the scaffolding of mathematics and explain what a mind is, in geometric logic terms.

So we need to complete the concept of fractal quanta of energetic space of quantum physics, the concept of a Universe of multiple time cycles of Einstein, and the philosophy of science, made of causal repetitions of time cycles called laws of science.

So we shall go further beyond Euclidean and Aristotelian logic matheamtics, into the next vowel: Non-AE≈i, (Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean), i-nformative concept of Space-time.

And build a new Non-Aristotelian Logic and Non-Euclidean Mathematic formalism, which will set the foundations for a new paradigm of science.

This new Geometry is simple and evident. It is based in the definition of the ‘terms’ which mathematics ill-defined in Euclidean Geometry, points with no parts through which only one parallel crosses, lines with no breath and shallow planes, equaled by superposition, and then once Euclidean Geometry was found to be a ‘limit’ of a larger pan- Geometry NOT lineal but curved inwards (elliptic) or outwards (hyperbolic), on those dark times of confusions, were UNDEFINED.

So we DID not resolve the issue. We CANNOT ESTABLISH the fundamental science of the Experienced Universe, *without defining its fundamental elements. *This no way out sponsored by Cantor, who substituted points and numbers by sets, nowhere to be seen in experience, and Hilbert who affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, is a failure.

In that regard, the founder of Non-Euclidean geometries Lobachevski was in the right track. We can summarize Lobačevskiĭ’s solution of the problem of the Fifth Postulate.

*The postulate is not provable. Because, infinite lines curve when we have a larger view, becoming exponential inversion of space-time.**By adding the opposite axiom to the basic propositions of geometry a logically perfect and comprehensive geometry, different from the Euclidean, can be developed, providing we limit infinity,( as the 5*^{th}*dimension shows) hence parallels do NOT meet on the infinity, and by curving them (hence lines are part of cycles)**The truth of the results of one logically conceivable geometry or another in its application to real space can only be verified experimentally.*

**Fractal points: the fundamental particle**

*Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations, which ‘are real’.*

*T.Œ does show by regressing a step back in the scaffolding of mathematics and defining those terms, as the Postulates of i-logic geometry, based in the structure of cyclical time, fractal space and the 5*^{th}* dimension where:*

1) A fractal point grows in size when we come closer to it, so it has parts, its O-mind and its E-field flows of energy or limbs. Hence we define it as Œ, an existential point.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-Planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

**Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5**^{th}** dimension: ¬ æ ALGEBRA, AND I-LOGIC GEOMETRY**

Now it must be understood that the universe is made of dimensions of space and time, which are opposite but equal in number and merge lineal and cyclical motions into bidimensional, 4-dimensional and 6 dimensional super organisms.

they are the six motions of time of Aristotle, and we have grouped two, dissolution and aggregation, a dimension usually studied by Analysis, as the generic name of the 5th dimension. As the arrows of present space or 4 dimension, ct, or vt, the immersion of past and future form a 6 dimensional structure. This would be the part of ‘¬Ae not treated here.

Let us now consider the 3 branches of mathematics, which are 5 Dimensional analysis, algebras of time worldcycles, and spatial geometry of space quanta.

They study obviously the 6 Aristotelian motions of space-time, and as analysis is a branch of algebra, we divide our upgrading into i-logic Geometry (after the Non-Euclidean), and ¬æ, Non-Aristotelian, Non Euclidean algebra, which studies not in terms of continuous world-minds as geometry does the ‘Maya of the senses’, but the whole of the discontinuous Universe of infinite worlds of the 5^{th} dimension.

Thus algebra (and analysis specifically concerned with the processes of social numbers that sum and emerge or rest, and divide and plunge down the scales of eusocial love of the 5^{th} dimension), is a larger subject, still not fully developed by the only human world-point, which as Boylai on the view of non-E spaces, can only exclaim ‘I have discovered (not invented, as he said, the ever arrogant human ego) a new strange world – and not out of nothing as he said, but out of everything’).

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuous. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5^{th} dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.

__The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5__^{th}__ dimension.__

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r^{2}/k^{2 }≈ h/c^{2 }≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5^{th} dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5^{th} dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Eucidean world.

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.

However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe *suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity*.

So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.

This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem *not* to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.

That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.

So *each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.*

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: *To be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.*

*‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’*

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.

In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.

This is called the Poincare Conjecture, and his recent proof was the most important finding on mathematics for decades. It simply speaking only n-spheres can reduce without limit an n-dimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membrane-point system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.

2) A line is now a wave of communication of energy and information between points.

Finally to mention the inversion of ‘scales’ if we use the metrics of information, which increase as we become smaller, or the metrics of size which increase as we become bigger. Yet the product of both become invariant:

Sp x Tƒ =∆±4, where the 9 planes of existence of the logarithmic 10¹º scale of the Universe, are equivalent as each one has more and less energy and information. So we should write in the logarithmic scale, each plane as the equal sum of its logarithmic capacity to carry information and its relative size:

Sp-4 +Tƒ+4 = Force = Sp-3 +Tƒ+3=Atom=Sp-2 +Tƒ+2=Molecule=Sp-1 +Tƒ+1=Cell/Matter=Sp +Tƒ=Human Scale=Sp+1 +Tƒ-1=Planet=Sp+2 +Tƒ-2=Star=Sp+3 +Tƒ-3=Galaxy=Sp+4+Tƒ-4=Cosmos.

We however simplify this equal value of all Sp x Ti=world-planes of existence for easier analysis, considering only the relative Ui scale of growing planes, with a cardinal that starts in the smaller:

Forces: ∆i=1, atoms:∆=2, Molecules ∆=3, Matter/cells ∆=4, human organisms, ∆=5, Planets, ∆=6, Stars, ∆=7, Galaxies, ∆=8, Cosmos, ∆=9, between the invisible beyond human informative perception dark energy and dark matter.

It is thus clear and we shall use the term STience, to differentiate this philosophy of science, and perspective on reality, that the Universe is a game of space-time, and each science the study of one of its Universal Planes.

It has failed though for centuries to explain the whys and ultimate structure of that space-time puzzle. It has been ‘Science’, that is only a Science of space. STience is a wider concept where space is submissive to the flows of time and its actions, where beings are space-time beings and so all sciences are stiences that study varieties of space-time beings of different Universal Planes.

Science has been corrupted in its ultimate ‘quest’ for the whys of the Universe by its own success in a rather more pedestrian task, to find the laws of measure and equations of motion in space and time, the hows of reality. This shallow description of motions in an external world today is often confused with absolute knowledge. It is not. Because while we know we move in space and time, we have yet to solve what time and space is in its deepest sense.

Stience will not be completed till we know the whys of those motions of space and time; and specially the whys of existence in space and time. In other words, till we do not find an epistemology of ‘Stiences’, which accepts the fact that the Universe is made of relational space-times distributed among ∞ relative Space-time systems and species.

Thus there should be a philosophy of science, we shall call ‘STience’ which is dedicated to the study of all entities as made of space and time parameters.

Now each of the new postulates of i-logic geometry has an enormous range of phenomena to study with them. Let us consider merely a theme related to the waves of communication of the 2^{nd} postulate, locomotion as reproduction =exchange of field forces and forms.

In the first case the fundamental law of quantum physics, Tƒ (Fermion) < Sp (boson ) > Tƒ (Fermion) allows the reproduction and communication of information between 2 relative mind-particles. In the second case we solve the paradox of Zeno and understand the true meaning of motion in a 5D fractal space-time.

Thus, the line, as distance or dimension, D, or as motion, or speed, v, is in fact a wave, a bidimensional space-quanta, and we shall then find that indeed, H, K, and c², the quanta of space of the 3 main quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales of physical systems are bidimensional.

We can though consider a perspective based on the relative ‘number of parameters’ or dimensions needed to define a being.

The point is a scalar cycle, which can be defined with a single parameter of length or frequency in its relative space or time states.

Then with 2 parameters, the definition is either a wave that communicates two points in a harmonic oscillator or a clock of time in motion with angular frequency, ƒ or w, which needs also two parameters, because it is indeed twice as complex as the point.

You can define a line with a single dimension; you need 2, to define the cycle.

3rd postulate: the logic of communication

But there is will in the Universe. Communication can be darwinian or collaborative, between 2 or more than 2 in networks. Who decides that? The will of survival of each system. And we will elaborate on that. But basically systems exist to absorb more space and more time, more energy and information in the common language for their limbs/fields bodies/waves and particles/heads to survive, as they ARE made of space and time of energy and information.

So there is a set of rules in the brain-point to decide what ±E, I to absorb or emit to survive. So 4 quantum numbers, 4 genetic letters, 4 drives of survival, feeding on energy, moving expelling energy, perceiving with information and communicating information with a limited scope to create social groups, new scales of the 5th dimension, through a common language, or full in sexual reproduction, become the 4 strategies of survival of systems.

For the sake of arguments, we shall resume them in 5 letters, a, for accelerations (locomotion studied by physics), e for energy feeding, i for informative communication, œ, for an offspring that reproduces the being, and u for social communication that creates new networks and super organisms.

But in a mere mathematical geometrical way, we can talk of two type of motions, parallel motions among systems that communicate to evolve socially together, and perpendicular motions, in which systems ‘cross’ other systems, penetrating its vital space with the usual consequence of darwinian fighting and annihilation of the information of a system.

Thus *perpendicularity and parallelism acquire in T.Œ, also an organic nature, which is essential to classify the way systems relate to each other both in mathematical logic and biologic terms at the same time, and for that there must be a will of survival, automatic, apperceived, vegetative or subconscious in all beings, imposed by the simple fact that only systems who perform those 5 actions of survival, a,e,i,o,u, ‘exist’ as time goes by. And those who **don’t feed, inform, reproduce and evolve socially (with the geometric motions we must interpret in organic terms) die and so the program of survival imposes itself.*

We need the 3^{rd} man, the point of view in the middle of the cycle. He who measures. And he who measures is not as the admirer of Newton Mr. Blake painted in his famous portrait, ‘God’, a geometer with a compass (though he does trace cycles in this he was right, and he was an artist, a creator, a painter in 5 dimensions, in this he was right too). But he paints with a logic brush, the brush of time cycles, ‘of a logic higher than that of man’ (Saint Augustine).

3) Two points are equal depending on their internal and external similarity (a logic, behavioral postulate with a corollary that connects non-e geometry with social evolution: 2 similar points will associate themselves, in parallel networks, depending on similarity; 2 different points, will use each other as energy, in Darwinian, perpendicular events).

– *3rd Postulate:* Equality is no longer only external, shown in the spatial perimeter of any geometrical form (3rdEuclidean Postulate) but also internal and further on it is never absolute but relative, since we cannot perceive the entire inner form of a point – hence the strategies of behavior such as camouflage. Forms are self-similar to each other, which defines different relationships between organic points, according to their degree of self-similarity. The 3rd postulate is thus the key to explain the behavior of particles as the degree of self-similarity increases the degree of communication between beings. Some of the most common behaviors and ‘events derived from this postulate are:

1) Reproductive functions in case of maximal self-similarity or complementarity in energy and form. For example, in the body, the Max Sp x min. Tƒ (male) < => Min. Sp x Max Tƒ (female) form the complementary couple

2) Social evolution, when points share a common language of information, they superpose their combined momentum. In our notation:

Sp xTƒ= SpxTƒ -> 2Sp x Tƒ.

This behaviour is standard in most ‘hyperbolic’ infinitely parallel systems and bidimensional Sp+Sp or Tƒ+Tƒ equal systems. For example it is the superposition of waves, the bidimensional layers of liquids, the superfluid properties of quantum systems, etc.

3) Darwinian devolution when forms are so different that cannot understand each other’s information and feed into each other, *establishing a relationship of perpendicularity akin to an elliptic geometry, in which the predator intersect functionally the prey and devours it*.

In such cases if those 2 entities meet they will start a process of ‘struggle for existence’, trying to absorb each other’s energy (when Spe=Spe).

Finally they will simply not communicate; when there is neither a common information to evolve socially nor a common energy to feed on.

In this case the pan geometry is ‘discontinuous’, without need for complicated Geometrical symbols – a geometry of ‘cat alleys’, of ‘dark spaces’ and parallel Universes, where we ignore completely the other being as it does not invade of spatial territory nor has anything to ‘tell us’.

Yet because any point absorbs only a relative quantity of information from reality, self-similarity is relative and it can be faked for purposes of hunting, allowing biological games, such as camouflage and capture, or sociological memes that invent racial differences, allowing the exploitation of a group by another.

The geometric complexity of the 3rd Postulate is caused by the topological forms created by any event that entangles Multiple Spaces-Times. Since it describes the paths and forms of dual systems, which connect points: Self-similarity implies parallel motions in herds; since equal entities will maintain a parallel distance to allow informative communication *without interfering with the reproductive body of each point*.

Darwinian behavior implies perpendicular confrontations, *to penetrate and absorb the energy of the other point*. Finally, *absolute, inner and outer self-similarity* brings boson states, which happen more often to simpler species like quarks and particles that can form a boson condensate as they do in black holes, *where the proximity of the points is maximised. The same phenomenon between cells with the same inner information /DNA originates the ‘collapse’ of waves into tighter organisms.*

The 3^{rd} Non-Euclidean postulate is implicit in the work of Lobachevski and Riemann who defined spaces with the properties of self-similarity (Riemann’s homogeneity), which determines its closeness (Lobachevski’s adjacency).

In the graph, the 2 essential forms of communication between dual systems, attractive and repulsive, according to the orientation and external or outer location of its foci. An interesting question of astrœphysics is the analysis of orbital systems, which MUST by definition have a second focus. What is the meaning of the 2^{nd} focus of the sun?

If we add the parabola and other exponentials, which are the essential ∆=sxT^{n, }curves of the 5th dimension, to the canonical cycle of a single point of view, we obtain the conic, which is the canonical point of view oriented along two different geometries of the 5^{th} dimension (equal when the orientation is in the same plane):

4) a plane is a network of points with ‘dark holes’ between them (hence the 96% of dark matter of each points outside its ‘plane of existence).

__The scales and ST¡ences of reality.__

As the widest one is the concept of a topological network-plane, of the 5^{th} dimension we can consider it in more detail.

*In this old graph (where n is old notation for an ∆-plane), we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms according to the combined 3 geometries which put together create a network plane: *

*From the perspective of the central point, which branches into a fractal network (the standard Geometry of elliptic spherical forms, ‘not explored by geometers of the XIX c. because fractal mathematics did NOT exist) the world is an elliptic geometry with him at the centre, connected to all other ∆-1 parts. So networks are elliptic Non-E Geometries where there ARE not parallels as the brain, black hole or Wall Street knot of the organism galaxy or economic ecosystem is connected through its informative networks (nervous, gravitational and financial systems) and its quanta of information (electric messages, gravitational waves and money) to all its ∆-1 ‘slave cells’ . Yet those cells are unconnected and so they exist in a hyperbolic geometry of infinite parallels.**Thus any ∆-super organism is a group of n-1 cells joined by energetic, informative & reproductive networks that communicate them. Those ∆-1 cells are also superorganisms made of small i-2 molecules joined by Sp, ST=exi & Tƒ networks and so on and so on.*

Now, each super organism is a network because it has an enormous amount of dark space-times it does NOT see, the cat alleys which the mind does not neeed.

Discontinuity is essential to pangeometry and the continuity axioms no needed to build them.

The i-logic of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean geometry, of the ternary causality of a π cycle, made of 3 diameters in its perimeter means that the diameters of the protective membrane blind the system, who only sees what its connected sensors see.

Thus the 3 diameters in the simplest 1-sphere system (a disk) cover 96% of a pi-perimeter surface, letting the point of view in the center, see only a 4% of light, through the holes of the membrane, leaving π-3/π 96% of dark matter for the logic mind to see without the glaring of light.

This is in fact what we do NOT see of the Universe across the halo membrane of our spiral galactic disk (proportion of dark energy and matter).

So we can consider that our electronic eyes miss 96%, which is the volume beyond our perceived scales of the 5th dimension, which however exists in the larger russian doll of gravitation.

**Analysis: 5D.**

The correspondence between analysis that integrates finitesimal parts of space into wholes (integrals), or deduce minimal quanta of time, from a longer worldycle (derivatives), is immediate.

Thus analysis is the calculus of ALL type of vital spaces, enclosed by time functions, with a ‘scalar’ point of view, parameter that measured what the point of view extracted in symbiosis with the membrane, from the vital space it enclosed. Alas, this quantity absorbed and ab=used by the point of view, on the vital space would be called ‘Energy’, the vital space ‘field’, the membrane ‘frequency’, the finitesimal ‘quanta or Universal constant’, and the scalar point of view ‘active magnitude.

The fundamental language of physics and science is for that reason, differential equations, which allow to measure the content of vital space of a system. The richness and varieties of ‘world species’ will define many variations on the theme. Sometimes there will not be a central point of view, and we talk of a liquid state’, where volumes will not have a ‘gradient’, but ‘Pressure’, the controlling parameter of the time membrane will be equal, or related to the gradient of the eternal world p.o.v. of the Earth (gravitational field).

Then we shall integrate along 3 parameters, the density that defines the liquid, the height that defines the gradient and the volume enclosed. Liquids, due to the simplicity of lacking an internal POV, would be the first physical application of Leibniz’s findings by his students, the Bernoulli family. Next a violin player would find the differential equation of waves – the essential equation of the membranes of present time of all systems. The 3^{rd} type of equations, those of the central point of view, will have to wait a mathematician, Poisson – latter refined by Einstein in his General Relativity.

In that regard physical equations are also equations related to the 3 elements of al the existential entities of the Universe, which we will develop in detail on a future post on physics, accompanying this one’. But the translation of the jargon and the words are missing, because the why are not what physicists truly ask.

Of the 3 scales of reality the n-1 scale is perceived as a sum of euclidean points, which is achieved when the ‘finitesimal’ becomes an indistinguishable point on the ‘whole’, which appears then as a continuum.

This is the most reductionist process that damps the ‘vital properties’ of the points as a ‘mass’ from the larger view of the systems.

Unfortunately it is the commonly used procedure in current Euclidean science of points with no parts – which is shameful, specially in Social Sciences and economics, where humans are tagged with ‘prices’, as ‘objects’ of a wholesale process of reduction of ‘human heads’ to economical points of ‘credit’ and ‘profit equations’, a fact which 5D sciences thoroughly rejects as we shall see on the analysis of U+1 eco(nomic)systems.

And yet, that is how the Universe works, specially when the social scientists does not ‘operate’ on its structure to enhance the power of individual human points.

As Shakespeare put it we are are gods from the n+1 scale, we are ‘buffoons’, indistinguishable points from the n-1 scale. And we are organisms, points with parts, To-minds/heads in our normal scale.

The unequal relationship the points of those 3 planes of existence establish, will give birth to very different (a)symmetries…

**II. ASTRŒ-PHYSICS. **

**From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.**

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

**The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.**

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect that black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), will be harmless, for no proved reason except the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a tiny black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy. But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only ‘per se’ but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.

Thus in any CHANGE OF PARADIGM:

– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

**3rd age: Space-time membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.**

Now to understand the next paradigm that precedes the new paradigm of the 5^{th} dimension we must understand Einstein’s work with a critical view as we have done with all other points of view, being aware though that modern science believes in Einstein with the same zeal that they believed in Galileo, Copernicus, Yahweh and the tribe of the Goths before him.

And so as many religious or tribal people of German, Jewish, Christian or Muslim denominations will have already emotionally abandoned this page, many scientists will not even consider the 5th paradigm. Believers don’t reason. They don’t have patience. Their hypothalamus as science proves jumps out attention and memory when it enters in conflict with beliefs.

Still of course there are people who reason and so now we ask you to concentrate because here is where new knowledge must come first for you to understand a critical view of modern physics and their myths and beliefs.

Consider all what we have said. Basically we are moving our point of view from smaller to wider points of view, but when we have a point of view, that point of view is still, quiet, fixed in a center. And this relative ‘fixed’ point of view is important to understand Einstein’s theory.

**Minds are still: Information can only be obtained with a fixed point of view.**

Why we need a fixed point of view? Easy, because to measure and perceive we need to focus and be still to observe details. If you take a picture of a fast moving object is blurry. If you try to perceive the details of a fast moving object you will not be able to do it. This happens because knowledge gathers information and in-form-ation is ‘form’. But form is the opposite of motion. In the Universe all what you see around is form with motions.

This is very important to grasp. Look around. What you perceive is only 2 things often combined: Forms of information and energy motions. And actions of beings that combine motion and form.

And both things have opposite properties. The less motion the more form you observe, the higher motion the less form you observe. But knowledge is form, information. So to create knowledge you must depart from a relative, fixed point of view.

And so that is why you do not see the Earth moving but fixed. This is how nature has given you a capacity to observe with your mind reality as still, with form.

You need a pov to create a certain scientific truth. But the larger the p.o.v. the bigger the truth. So the center has moved but each new age of science have kept a relative still point of view. You must create a still center to measure, because perception happens in stillness, as opposed to energy, which expresses itself with motion. Information focuses form and it must be still as Buddha was in the tree of knowledge.

So when Galileo came the earth moved and the new still p.o.v. Was the sun.

And when Darwin came the idea that man had not evolved, changed but had always been still, the same form created by God per in secula seculorum moved and now the new ‘still p.o.v.’ of biology where the immutable laws of evolution.

Now this allows you to understand the limits of Einstein’s paradigm. Since what Einstein did is to create a new still point of view that could not be changed. It was no longer the Earth, it was not the sun. It was not even man or evolution. What was the new still point of view from where Einstein would take his rods of measure?

LIGHT!

Einstein defined a Universe with a new point of view, the speed of light, which would remain constant from any perspective.

But why light?

Light seems an esoteric center. What makes light so essential to our view of the Universe, as to permit ‘measures’ that seem to be more accurate to our mind?

We must now give you the first upgrade on Einstein’s work by affirming that light IS the substance of the space we perceive with our eyes. And that is why from the perspective of our mind, which is what you are truly observing – not the full Universe and its exact objective measures, but the peculiar rod of your eyes and any other electronic mechanical device that absorbs light – light IS space.

Indeed, you do not see reality in its totality, but light and so what you call space is light-space. And when you use an instrument, made to the image and likeness of our mind, you see light-space too.

But if you were a dog smelling the Universe, your mind mapping and distances would be different.

We are though an I=eye and for that reason our mathematical mind and light-space has 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions (the so called electric, magnetic and ray directions of light, which are perpendicular), which are the same dimensions of your perceived space.

Thus, what really Einstein did was to consider a larger point of view that the sun, the entire space of the Universe.

The center now had moved to every point of the Universe, and this allowed Einstein to say that all motions and points of view were relative, only space-light was a fixed background that didn’t change.

But he still established as a rod of measure of the other variable, time, the human clock; and so here, there were no advances on the objectivity of the point of view. ‘Time is what a clock measures’ he said.

Einstein did NOT change the point of view of the human clock, reason why Landau laughed at him saying that with his system he just had to ‘look at his watch to eliminate the uncertainty of time’ .

And so it IS in his understanding of time, where Einstein as most physicists before, had failed to expand the point of view. And it is where the 5th dimension will open up our objective view of the Universe, by defining in a more complex manner the meaning of time clock and consider the existence of many of them in the Universe.

In essence, what we want now to consider is the isomorphism between the 2 main time clocks of the Universe, according to the relative scales of the 5th dimension: the time clocks of the quantum scales, ‘charges’, and the time clocks of the cosmological scales ‘masses’.

Between them, of course there is a 3rd type of time clocks ‘thermodynamic molecules’, whose temperature define the variations of speed of those time clocks, but being the thermodynamic ∆o scale, the human scale, we do have a lot of information about those time clocks, so physicists are sophisticated enough to understand them. They do NOT understand however masses and charges, reason why they have been for 100 years trying to unify them the wrong way – without understanding they are TIME CLOCKS of different scales, of different ‘curvature’ and speed, and so they need the metric of the 5th dimension to unify their parameters.

So simple and so mysterious for a century because we lacked the proper ‘heliocentric’ perspective – an essential dimension of reality. Then once we enter into that larger reality (which physical systems do but humans obviously can’t), we are in…

Now it is obvious that as we grow in size we curve from our perspective reality and so we get less information as things slow down and part of the information disappears from our perspective, and vice versa, as we look downwards the universe become hyperbolic and grows in detail of information and so we get different entropies up and down. This is shown in the symbol of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆, which as you can see have two motions up and down one thinner and the other thicker, and this asymmetry is important to explain many things – genetic for example, going upwards perfect in information, body motions for example perfectly going downwards when the whole wants to move. Wholes are very good with motions smallish things with information. Havent you notice how energetic and powerful are big guys, how smart are small ones? (-;

**THE INFORMATIVE QUANTA – H-PLANCKTONS.**

Now we explained that the perception of a universe as euclidean or elliptic or hyperbolic depended on the long overdue respect we must give to the a priori parameter of all worlds: r²/L²=Tƒ/Sp. When this parameter tends to zero, we have an Euclidean geometry, above zero we have hyperbolic and below zero we have elliptic.

The parameter which defines the mathematics in which we live is so essential that it will come constantly. For example, we can consider that systems exist at one side of the parameter, at the side of c speed as a limit – in our euclidean world – or over c speed (in the elliptic gravitational world) at the side of T=0k as the limit of the thermodynamic plane, etc.

So we need now to complete the definition of our world, to deal with the nature of our square ‘radius’ parameter of information. What is the minimal quanta of information of our electronic eyes, that feed on h-quanta of light energy, well, we just said it, the h-quanta which measures in the minimal amount known, the spin of a particle, which is rather obviously the minimal unit of its angular momentum, of its informative perception.

And for that reason as h/c is truly a minimal amount our relative 0, we live in that Euclidean world.

The first and most important of T.Œ’s 5 actions of all systems that want to survive, is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

Of all those levels and actions the one physicists understand worst and less is the action of informative perception of smaller particles, called SPIN, which is the absolute minimal unit of reality we measure after deforming it fully (quantum uncertainty), a quantity called angular momentum, h/4 pi, which is as a ‘form of information’, ‘space-form’ NOT motion.

And since h is in the above equation, E=ƒh, a whole, hence a sphere (whatever it has inside), the ‘essential topology of all wholes’ by definition enclosed disks-sphere (in ¬ Æ topology a disk is a 1-sphere, a sphere, a 2-sphere, a sphere in motion a 3-sphere, which as motion is a dimension seen in motion, can be of different varieties, etc.), a spin is ‘logically’ is a n-sphere divided by 4 π:

Now the graph gives us possible choices, as we depart from a ‘whole’ of a light beam, which could be a cylindrical cut, as in some lineal worms, or a ball. As 4π comes in the ball, we have 2 choices or the surface of the ball, or the solid sphere but NOT all, only a section, called a ‘solid angle’. This gives us a first duality between ‘human measure ‘and ‘true property’. The true property is the solid angle from the surface to the center, r^{3}/3, the human measure is the external surface, r^{2}/2.

As all space-time organisms have truly 2 components, the ‘internal’ open ball topology (meaning the ball without the surface membrane and the center of the point) or ‘present-evident, wave-like ST form’, and then the membrane and o-point in the center, or Sp x Tƒ, ‘past x Future’ particle (limbs-external sensorial membrane and central mind) together:

Why we know spin is a solid angle of information? Because if it were a motion, as Pauli, the guy who is credited with its discovery, put it to his real discoverer, as speed it will be 137 times faster than light!: hc^{2/}e^{2}=137 (inverse fine constant). This in 5D physics is NOT a problem, c-speed is Einstein’s postulate to adapt the Universe to the human perception of it – our rod of measure, as electronic minds. But here Pauli does have a point. A Spin does NOT rotate, as you do NOT rotate when looking outside, but is a ‘wedge’ into the sphere, through which information enters.

We see the surface of it and so it seems a momentum, the being sees the solid angle of it and so it is an intensity. Because the being is down there into the zero-point soul of the particle, mind of mathematical perception, it does open and close the sphere to ‘look’ through the windows of the membrane. In the simplest form, it is a pi cycle of 1-sphere, which is made of 3 closing diameters, which leave π=3, 0.14 d apertures, or 0.14/π=5% of light and 95% of dark matter/energy, the proportions light space-time beings DO NOT see of the Universe.

So now in the ‘dialectic’ Socratic method (remember my culture) I use to find things, I deny myself. What if I consider NOT a solid angle, BUT a spin, which IS a slice ‘SEEN’ through the 1/3rd ‘D’ apertures between the diameters of the pi-1-sphere (cycle) or the ‘cuts on the 2-sphere’. We realize this ‘will be a slice’ with the exact parameters of angular momentum, and there will be 3 holes, hence only 3 spin angles, and they will be further on quantized – jumping from part of part of the whole:

*In the graph the proper description of Angular Momentum as a plane of Information, the minimal unit of perception of our Universe, proper of Relativity is more clear than the classic dynamic Time description as r x **mv – both have their different uses/perspectives. H is the rod of informative measure of the Human electronic eye-mind, so small compared to c, the human rod measure of light space that the constant of geometry, r²/L² of Lobachevsky’s pan geometry becomes close to zero, creating our perceived Euclidean space, deformed to a hyperbolic geometry for smaller beings (Special Relativity, quantum physics) and to an elliptic geometry for larger gravitational scales (General Relativity)*

Now, this is the modern ‘Hilbertian-Einsteinian’ description of angular momentum, just what we said it is, P, is the ‘cut’ on the n-sphere, x the radius, equivalent to P in ‘distance-motion’, and its product an amount mrv which is the spin. You can think of it as an information bit or an energy bite (space or moving perception) of the being.

Now those are the spins, quantized, and you can see there are 2 or 3 ‘cuts’ to perceive, with different orientations, and DO NOT come in bigger numbers. The maximal thing is this work of art, called ‘female and male spins’.

We won’t enter on this (-; just to mention the bidimensional nature of those spins (left graph) in the left side, which ARE the quanta of all information humans, electronic eye-beings, perceive about the world. And the obvious capacity to process and orientate they give as the ‘eyes’ of the atom, to each particle.

Moreover, they get ordered, orientated by the external magnetic field, the larger time-enclosure that orders from ∆, the ∆-1 quantum field. Now ask a physicist what is a spin, he will put a lot of formulae of abstract maths, which it will take you half a year to memorize, without understanding. Why? The idea that particles perceive is out of the ‘picture’.

Now the magnetic field, they like, as all heads turn to her the speaker in human groups, all atoms spin in tune, and we use it to control them, as speakers use the word nation and god. Same law of mass-control. I call it lanwave. A Wave ordered by a language of energy and information they speak. The magnetic field is the language of space that transcends atomic parts into the next scale; forming them; the electric field is the time force that put them in motion. That is how we transcend from quantum to our scale. The best at the job of ‘feeling’ magnetic lanwaves is the iron, and it becomes the top guy of the next scale. It forms perfect organized masses.

Once we are here, those motions are ‘activated’ by temperature, vibrational clocks of our molecules.

Temperature is the ‘electric field’ that moves us in the ∆-scale. What is the ‘spin’ for Molecules?. They use van der waals forces and ‘angles’, giving by slave atoms.

And the boss of those perceptive ones in our body is the nitrogen. It has 3 H systems to perceive:

Here you have an amino acid working his life around, with its oxygen legs kicking in and out water, its carbon body with lateral arms of many kinds and its nitrogen head.

You *are made of a lot of those.*

**I. PHYSICAL SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION: ****SPACE QUANTA AND TIME FREQUENCIES IN PHYSICAL SCALES: Sp X Tƒ = E∆**

Now we will extend more in the understanding of physical systems and its generator equations, and scales of the 5th dimension of which 3 are paramount (susceptible to be analysed by the ternary fractal principle of i-logic Non-AE algebra in ternary sub scales): the quantum scale with its frequency clocks, and h-constants of space, the thermodynamic scale with its temperature clocks and entropy k-constants of space, and the gravitational scale with its speed clocks and its mass-densities of space.

**The physical jargon. The time clocks of the 3 scales of physical systems**

A key element to T.Œ, a Theory of Everything Organic, is to translate all the abstract jargons to its interdisciplinary language. As the physical sciences are considered ‘wrongly’ on top, we will deal extensively with their concepts (they are merely the sciences who study the limiting scales, further away from man, and only with mathematical languages, hence loosing its organic properties and with the most deformed of all time concepts, as a mere ‘locomotion’ or translation in lineal space – hence loosing all understanding of its form, its information, the dimension of time they ‘deny’ to the point they call it negantropy (the negation of entropy) – so we share the view of Eddington and Einstein that ‘physicists’ invent much of its ‘entelechy’ entities).

Still the species they study are overwhelmingly the majority of reality so we do have to deal extensively with them. And the fundamental concept they use to express all the ‘formal motions’ of those species; that is the combination of all the cyclical motions or ‘angular momentums’ of each scale of the 5^{th} dimension and all its ‘entropic spatial intervals’ or constants of space action or ‘lineal momentums’ is ENERGY.

In normal parlance energy is closer to the concept of expansive lineal motion – our capacity to move. In physics though there is a clear equation that relates Energy and Work. So Energy is the capacity to move with certain ‘directionality’ or form. Or alternately the capacity to move ‘forms’. And it is a very integrative concept both in time and space. So for example, in our human scale, Energy is the sum of the Internal Energy made mostly of cyclical motions (U) that give the form to the being and the External motion or kinetic energy (ke). So it is the closest concept to what we call a ‘plane of the 5^{th} dimension’, which measures all the formal motions of a ‘closed system’, ‘superorganism’, or relative Universe.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= Sp x Tƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : Sp x Tƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency

What is energy then remains the fundamental first question of physical science 5D cosmology must clarify. It is not possible to clearly define energy in physics with a single formula, which becomes the first surprise of a seemingly ‘exact’ science. But we do have 3 equations for it, in the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale:

**∆-1: E= h v; ∆: E= kT; ∆+1: E= c ^{2} M**

They are the Clocks of Time and quanta of space that put together create the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being. Latter we shall study those 3 ‘big planes of space-time’ and its clocks, its space constants and its Energies and formulae in more detail.

To stress though that all systems are in a fractal Universe susceptible to study in ternary sub-systems, ternary functions, etc. This we repeat ad nausea because humans tend to understand reality in a single one-dimensional way and the ‘manners of the brain’ are the more difficult to break. You must then always deal with the transformative duality (systems constantly beat between space and time states, entropy and information, motion and form) and so sometimes T.Œ will seem confusing as the rule A is NOT B is often broken (with time A-entropy becomes B information). So the true law of science is:

Energy never dies, it transforms its entropy into information back and forth ad eternal.

And then we must understand that those equations do have 3 elements: energy, which carries on one side a frequency of form, a time clock or frequency or density of information and on the other side a lineal motion an ‘kinetic energy’, expansive entropy (the concept of entropy hence is quite different from the one of science, but it will make sense, for example, in the previous equation, of the thermodynamic scale, E= nKT, K the Boltzmann constant of entropy multiplies by temperature the clock of time that defines the speed of actions in our life scale).

Those are the 3 elements we shall see constantly, ply with it reveal them in its infinite ‘transformations’, because the inversion of both but their coming together into different shapes of motion and form is truly all what is about. In physics all is about E= M c^{2}, where Mass is a cyclical time vortex of gravitation, which attracts the faster it turns; E is the energy it stores and c2 is a plane of expansive light-space, the entropy factor.

And so a third element, which we can call generically ‘Energy’, philosophically ‘formal motions’, geometrically a plane of the 5^{th} dimension and mathematically:

E= SxT or ST, which combines the lineal and cyclical formal motions of Space, Sp, and Time, Tƒ, completes the physical description of a given ∆-scale.

Now, while Energy stays humans deform its perceptions of time and space parameters, reason why the constants and clocks of space and time are different when we introduce the multiple deformations the human observer introduce in all those scales.

And we will account for them when studying the generator equation of each scale in which ‘the quantifiers, or time frequencies’ vary; the Sp-quanta, or Spatial entropic motion steps of each scale also vary, and ‘thanks God!’ or else we could have difficulties doing any objective assessment of reality, there is a conservation of the whole Plane formal motion, expressed in the conservation of the whole formal motions (energy conservation) its relative cyclical motions (angular momentums and similar variables, such as spin) and the relative lineal motions (lineal momentum and similar variables of each scale).

So generally speaking we can identify in each scale the relevant parameters by finding an equation of Energy for each scale whereas there will be basically 2 or at most 3 terms depending on human detail of analysis whereas, it will be then easy to define what is the space quanta, the time frequency element, in how many dimensions we humans observe them, what we humans extract from them, and how then we mathematize those scales.

And finally study how those scales interact in the ‘regions of emergence and dissolution’ of parameters, from one scale to the other – the most interesting regions of the Universe. To that aim, we can always use the isomorphic method, by comparing phenomena on different scales. So for example, we shall consider the case of a fluid regime that stops its speed growth when it creates vortices, Tƒ, on its laminar wave flow and compare it with the c-barrier or limit speed that stops growing when a mass starts to form faster mass vortices (heavier quarks). And this will allow to define ‘speed’ as the ‘temperature’ of the gravitational scale.

**Organic vs. abstract interpretations.**

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’.

So for example:

– The collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And anthropomorphic humans never will accept this. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

– The Compton wavelength of a particle is equivalent to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the rest-mass energy of the particle.

The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by:

λ=h/mc

where *h* is the Planck constant, *m* is the particle’s rest mass, and *c* is the speed of light. So we can define the existential nature of the particle (its mass and wave-length or Tƒ<ST function) with the Compton wavelength, but this matters not to physicists. What matters to them is this:

The Compton wavelength expresses a fundamental limitation on measuring the position of a particle, taking into account quantum mechanics and special relativity.

This limitation depends on the rest mass *m* of the particle. To see how, note that we can measure the position of a particle by bouncing light off it – but measuring the position accurately requires light of short wavelength. Since for photons of frequency *f*, energy is given by:

E=hƒ=hc/ λ=mc^{2}

And Light with a short wavelength consists of photons of high energy. Thus playing with both similar formulae if the energy of these photons exceeds *mc*^{2}, when one hits the particle whose position is being measured the collision may yield enough energy to create a new particle of the same type: l x mc. This renders moot the question of the original particle’s location: which one?

What matters to Œ=SC^{3} is that when you give enough energy to a particle, as when a living mother feeds enough, you have an offspring of new particles, children, hence the particle REPRODUCES! IT does follow one of the living action ∆œ of the program of the Universe.

The physicist or human doesn’t care for that. The philosopher DOES.

Now we have given you two clear examples of organicism:

– An entity, which is ORGANIC, made of connected parts, NOT a single dimensional being, and a being that is reproductive, as survives.

**The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality**

Indeed, modern mathematical physics is based in the Axiomatic Method of mathematics, ‘invented’ by Hilbert, which is based in Aristotelian one-dimensional Logic.

Hilbert affirms then that we can deduce ALL mathematical statements using the logic available to science a century ago, called Aristotelian logic based in:

– A simplistic single time arrow, so A causes B, means that B does NOT cause A. This is false.

In reality logic is a ternary, dialectic, Hegelian logic, because there are 3 arrows of time, and its corresponding ‘simultaneous’ 3 organic elements in space:

A< ≈ > B.

That is A-energy and B-information come together into ≈, the present space-time being, or space-time action, or synthesis. And we shall see how this writes as the 3 arrows of time and symmetric forms of space: A (relative past energy) x B (relative future information) = C-relative repetitive present

– The exclusion of the third element, (only A and ¬ A are relevant), which has NOTHING to do with the aforementioned ternary logic of the Universe and its ternary symmetries in space (3 dimensions of space), parallel to the 3 ages of time. So length is the dimension of the function of lineal motion, height the dimension of perception and information, and width the dimension of reproduction. And 3 dimensional motions of space-time come together to form A:

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms.

In the Universe X^{3} + Y^{3} ≠ Z^{3}. means we have only X^{2} bidimensional waves of space and time cycles, and the 3rd dimension is added layer after layer of bidimensional networks. we live in a mathematical Universe but limited by mathematical laws of symmetry and balance that mimic the laws of the ternary fractal reality. The units of reality are Sp and Tƒ, the poles of entropy and cyclical form, its bidimensional constants of angular momentum c^{2} speed-space or mass vortex.

This 2 dimensional, network plane that joins points along a shared energy and information collective action or unit of existence can be a field of magnetism and one of electricity a gravitational gradient and a particle, a group of citizens communicated or connected by a satellite, in all of them we can define a network with a relative fractal dimension, which we average to one made of networks of points, which contact perpendicularly through mere derivative fictions along a space-time field with other beings, this modular game of existence.

But the long time arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, studied by the 5th dimension, and by Theory of Evolution meant nothing to him.

neither the cyclical time arrow of 3 ordered time ages, past-energy, present reproduction and future information, which defines the existence of all ‘world cycles’ from human life to matter. Though he found its dual equation, Energy (expansive entropy-past)<≈light-present-wave: c²>M(time vortex-future) he still ignored its essential meaning. So he would say ‘time is what a clock measures’; and used it fundamentally as Galileo, only to study of the all the types of time motions of the Universe, for the analysis of external time-motions, which is the restricted ‘job’ of physicists.

Time however has besides present, differential, external motion-measures in space (Galileo’s V=∂s/∂/t and Einstein’s S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-(ct)²), other type of time-motions, mainly informative evolutions (Evolutionary theory in Biology, vortices of evolution in masses, historic vortex of evolution, future 3rd age of maximal form and in-form-ation), and present, reproductive wave-bodies.

And it is fractal, in infinite different waves, reproductive bodies, entropic limbs and fields, informative particles and heads, whose geometry stores maximal information in minimal space (so all relative future, informative, gauging particles, heads and cameras are geometric).

**The 3 forms of space and the 3 motions of time.**

So we can write a general equation, which is another ‘point of view’ on the ternary symmetry of the Universe, this time in terms of physical states of matter, for the ‘smallest quantum world’ and the ‘larger’ thermodynamic world of matter:

Sp (gas, field spatial decelerating state) < ST (wave-liquid steady space-time) > Tƒ (Particle-Solid, accelerated state).

And yet, most people will consider that a gas moves faster than a particle. Yes, indeed, externally, but we are talking here of the internal world of the particle, its vortex, its ‘hurricane’ of forces that creates it. Because the mind ‘fixes cyclical vortices’ of forces, masses and charges into a ‘form’. So we seem solid a very fast turning wheel, but it is made of turning spooks.

So the ambivalences of reality ARE ambivalences between the mind perception of form and the moving realities behind them. All the pictures we have of masses and charges so vortices of accelerated motion, and this was expressed by Einstein in his ill-understood Principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and masses and accelerated motions. Soon of course physicists who have this astounding capacity to define correctly with mathematical equations reality and then misunderstand it conceptually forgot what Einstein said and got back to their ‘lineal particle’ mantra as the cause of mass (but of course will not with the exception of Einstein, inspired by Mach, always fond of philosophy, ‘ask’, us philosophers of science.)

So there is here a contradiction: a time vortex because occupies little space, when not seen in detail seems a fixed form. Yet it is faster and its function, because it is faster is to enclose and tighten as a membrane the vital space of lineal entropic motions that want to escape, ‘collaborating’ with the o-point mind at the center.

And this is the organic structure between the faster membrane and the central point of view that are in fact the ‘same being’, exploiting the entropic motions of its environment or territory. A shepherd does have a shepherd dog, which constantly moves faster than the sheep, the vital space they enclose. The dog is the time cycle, surrounding the vital sheep entropic energy, which the shepherd directs.

**The generator equation and its ‘expressions’ of time travels.**

So we can deduce easily from the Generator Equation the equation of the life ages, or ‘world cycle’, the fundamental cycle of the Universe, the alpha and Omega:

- œ-1 (conception) L Max. Sp (energy, young age) > Sp=Tƒ (Adulthood-reproductive age)> Max. Tƒ (old, informative 3rd age) << |i-2 (death)

The equation is another fundamental symmetry, from where an enormous number of facts of reality can be deduced.

A brief list of those ‘symmetries’ for physical, biological and social systems, starting by the Human world, which should be the center of any unification theory, based in the organic structure of the Universe, as man is the most perfect and better observed organism, and scales are all isomorphic so their size or location does not matter as physicists who pretend that the largest or smallest scales matter more than the human one, make us believe – on the contrary as their observation is scanty by reason of distance in time and space, they are plagued with interpretative errors.

**II. GENERATOR EQUATION THROUGH PHYSICAL SCALES: ****ASTRŒ-PHYSICS**

**5D Cosmology. The fractal Generator: Sp<≈>Tƒ**

Perhaps the most extensive field of T.Œ is astrophysics – the study of the scales of matter. It is in fact the one I have researched more after the superorganism of history, despite or perhaps because they are not the self-evident biological planes of existence, where T.œ fits directly like a glove to an entangled hand, Einstein permitted (-;

We want to bring in this introduction only one theme, with many branches, the fractal scalar nature of physical space, along planes of the fifth dimension and once we generate its equation deduce from it the Unification equation of charges and masses, the Saint Grail of mathematical physics, searched for a century with no results (as they are time vortices of 2 different, limiting scales of the Universe) and then the big-bang cosmology and finally the question of the wave-particle conundrum of quantum physics and the meaning of Universal constants. They are the 4 most researched themes of physics, and that is the reason why we shall do a fast survey of 5D improvements on them.

Let us consider it briefly before describing biological systems with the same Generator equation of 5D fractal space-times.

**The particle state: masses and charges: vortices of time: clocks of information. Tœs**.

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4^{th} is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

So Einstein, used those non-Euclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.

Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘mass-power’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M = k ƒ.

*This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation E<=>Mc ^{2}:*

**Some case examples of astrophysics.**

Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:

- The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.
- The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
- The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.

** The Three Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Sp (Halo)<ST: stars >Tƒ: black hole.
**

*In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.*

Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.

So *we must construct the universe*, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:

- III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter that correspond to:
- III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to
- The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.

The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:

|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.

So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halo-membrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its body-wave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator:

*A galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. We shall unify both systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension that orders all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension.*

And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale. So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of young-entropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).

And inversely in the anti-quantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or military-politico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.

So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.

And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:

So first let us Generate all the symmetries of the cosmos, ∆+1, ∆-galaxy and ∆-1 stars with 5D ST:

**The 3 planes of Galaxies:**

∆-1(particle/atomic scale)> ∆:star-thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational, cosmic scale:

Sp(Gravitational curved space-time fields)≤ ST (Light-neutrino waves)≤ Tƒ(Cosmic bodies)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age.

In the description of Œ∆=3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆-1: Stars

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Sp: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei

∆: Galaxy: Sp: Halo ST: ecliptic arms ≤ Tƒ: Black hole

∆+1: Cosmos: Sp: Wall of fire? ≤ ST: galactic plane ≤ Tƒ: Great attractor?

Time Ages:

∆-1: Sp: Gas Nebulae≥ ST: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole

∆: Sp: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ST: Spiral Galaxy≥Tƒ: Globular, Dark or Cannibal

∆+1: Sp: Big-bang? ≥ ‘Epochs’? ≥ Big crunch or big Ripe?

Now, the reader should notice 2 things, which are quite evident. On one side, the similarity between the largest and smallest scales of physical systems, the atom and the galaxy; on the other the question marks on the big-bang theories, which are themes not so obviously related to the saint Grail of physics – the discovery during my studies of both systems of a way to unify both – the world of charges and masses, hence all the scales of physical systems of the Universe, as they had exactly the same equations in the metrics of the 5th dimension. Indeed charges and masses were clocks of time of the electromagnetic and gravitational scale in 5D metrics, only that the galactic vortex turned 10 up to 40 times slower in those metrics than a charge and were larger in a similar quantity (Sp x Tƒ = K).

And so when I translated the equations of electromagnetism to the jargon of gravitation alas, all the equations matched, those of the electron with the galactic halo, and the black hole radius appeared suddenly as the radius of the Bohr Hydrogen atom…

Thus when I found that the 10 up to 40 relationship between the charge and mass forces (the so-called hierarchy problem), was equivalent to the different of ‘speed of a charge and mass clock’ in 5D metrics – giving birth to an easy unification as time clocks of two scales it was the beginning of a full new field of science, which I called 5D cosmology.

Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. Tƒ: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes^{10} should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. Sp: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells*, *controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– Sp=Tƒ: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo *would destroy us.* Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

*E:Halo <* *stars that evolve Entropy into matter> Tƒ (Black holes)*

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.

*Recap*. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

** **

** PHYSICS. BACK TO THE EARTH: THE GENERATOR OF ATOMS AND MATTER**

**The 3 States of physical systems: Sp (past-entropy fields/gas)≤ST (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ(future particle-crystal)**

∆-1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp(Spatial toroid fields)≤ ST (Hyperbolic waves)≤ Tƒ(particles of information)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age/field>ST: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tƒ: old informative, future particle age.

In the description of Œ∆-3 , atoms, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: h-quanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules

Spatial symmetry:

∆-4: Light: Field: Sp: Halo ST: Wave ≤ Tƒ: Photon

∆-3: Atom: Sp: Electron ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei

∆-2: Molecule: Sp: External atoms< ST: Electro-Magnetic Bondage ≤ Tƒ: Crystal Center

Time Ages:

∆-4: Sp: Vacuum space ≥ ST: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tƒ: Particle

∆-3: Sp: Plasma≥ ST: Atom ≥Tƒ: Elements Table

∆-2: Sp: Gas ≥ ST: Liquid≥Tƒ: Solid-crystal

In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We an see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same and closes the cycle.

Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:

∑Λ-1: [Sp-Fields≤≥ST-waves≤≥Tƒ-Particles]≈ Plasma: Λ: [Sp-Gas≤ST:Liquid≤≥Tƒ:Crystals]≈Matter: Λ+1: [Sp-Oort Belt≤≥ ST: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]

We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5^{th} dimension, ∆-particle < ∆-1: wave, faster state: motion > Particle-still form.

Let us then consider briefly the meaning of momentum and energy and its conservation laws which ultimately mean the conservation of the 5^{th} dimension. We shall consider two aspects of it: the ternary symmetry of past-fields, present waves and future particles and how the Universe conserves its presents through ‘reproductive motions’, which will finally turn around the whole scaffolding of sciences, as we shall discover that actually the only arrow of time that was NOT organic of the 6 motions found by Aristotle – locomotion is ALSO REPRODUCTIVE, ORGANIC, SO WE LIVE IN A SENTIENT, LIVING UNIVERSE!! which only physicists’ lineal bias and abrahamic ego-trips blind us to.

** Ternary symmetry: Sp: Fields<ST-waves>Tƒ-particles.**

Particle physics, the other side of the physics supposedly experienced at CERN – along with cosmology, the replication of the big bang, is a restricted, relatively unimportant science, from the human perspective of our Uo-Plane of existence. But physics in general is not. Physics is constructed with the assumption that mathematics is the only language of the Universe and encodes all the information about it.

Of course it is not. Physical systems, are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal space-time beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them.

Mathematical physics is in that sense only a part of all the properties of physical systems. Bio-logical properties are far more essential to synthesize the meaning of physical systems, the why and reasons of its ‘Maxwellian demons’ (-; all those points-particles, fractal points of view that gauge information, acct-react to the environment and pursuit actions in space time that maximize its function of existence œ (±∆e, i, ∑œ, ∫U).

In pure existential algebra, ¬Æ, we can deduce mathematically departing from a logic function of existence, Œ, in which 5 different space-time actions delivered by each fractal point, in a given plane of the 5th dimension, traces a series of actions, which are ordered into world cycles, that represent a flow of vital space, enclosed into a series of seemingly permanent perpendicular time cycles that guide them.

Existence as a holography of bidimensional functions of temporal information surrounding expansive fields of entropy to produce reproductive waves is a game which can be better expressed in Darwinian biological ways. Atoms in that sense behave in no different form from animal herds and territorial beasts, and human beings for that matter.

What is then a top predator in a given field of physics is the active magnitude with maximal mass or charge or momentum.

Particle physics is divided into groups, families of increasing

The distance-energy or past field of LARGER spatial size of the system, Sp, multiplied by the V=EXi, speed, guided by Tƒ a quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.

**Tœs**:

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4th is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

Now in physics we can easily consider a generator equation of the 3 states-ages-forms of beings in the 3 scales of its 5^{th} dimension (∆-1: quantum, ∆: Thermodynamic, ∆+1 gravitational scales.

**The particle state: ∆-1: charges, ∆-molecules and ∆+1: masses, vortices of time: clocks of information. ****Tœs**.

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4^{th} is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

So Einstein, used those non-Euclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.

Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘mass-power’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M= kƒ.

*This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation: *

*E(Sp)<cc>M(Tƒ).*

**ST: ∆-1: Waves, ∆-liquids and ∆+1 speeds:**

Now those Tœs are ‘static, point-particles’ that share information and energy among them, from their relative static points of view, as the Universe has infinite relative frames of reference (this is one of the great findings of physics that still applies to 5D systems: the principle of relativity). It means that Tœs command a territorial region, in which they have an internal structure of 3 sub-parts, but also are in an outer bigger world in which they communicate with their Tœs on the upper ∆+1, equal ∆ and lesser ∆-1 scales, giving origin to a fundamental ‘second postulate’ of ¬æ. It those œ are fractal points (first postulate), called fermions crystals, solids, stars and black holes, they will then communicate ‘bosons, liquid flows, electromagnetic, sound or liquid waves or electronic current or jets of matter between them:

Future-Tƒ<≈Present wave-field≈> Future Tƒ, giving origin to the second component of physical systems. And again in each scale we will recognize a relative present state with similar properties and symmetries in each scale.

So those flows of communication gives origin to the certain modes of ‘present’, reproductive wave-liquid states in each scale. So in essence bosons, waves, liquids, electric currents and jets and streams of cosmic matter and stars reproduced by black holes are in each scale the same wave fields.

What is then the main parameter of the relationship between the Sp, Tƒ and ST elements of each of those scales. Simply the constants of space-time actions that relate in the simplest possible form, those 3 elements the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension: K = E x T.

That is, the constants of Action of Physics, in its 3 scales K (H)= E x T, (quantum field) K (k) = E x T (Thermodynamic Field); K (M)= E x (µ=1/e).

Those 3 constants of action, the Planck constant, H, the Boltzmann Constant, K, and the mass Constant, M, are the fundamental elements which define the 3 planes of physical systems in the 5th dimension (quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological planes). Thus their translation into the simplex Metric of 5D physics is the first step to build the entire building of Physical sciences, with a comprehensive understandable, isomorphic formalism, which will return physics to the realm of reality and show the pantheist equality between all the systems of the Universe.

**Sp: ∆-1: Electromagnetic Fields, ∆ Thermodynamic Gases and ∆+1: accelerated masses (equivalence principle).**

All the capacity of waves and particles to exist comes from Fields, the Sp, and lower scale of pure entropic, expansive, accelerated motions.

They are the lower scales of which in the parlance of physics, waves and particles are considered ‘excitations’, in the jargon of T.Œ eusocial evolutions into tighter denser waves of energy and information and even denser particle forms, knots of waves, themselves ‘excitations’ that ‘make emerge’ efficient workable energy and form from the entropic, loose herds of field quanta.

So we talk also of a series of fields from the simpler, smaller to the larger fields of the Universe, of which the fundamental ones are the ‘strong-field, of the internal region of atoms, of minimal size the electroweak field of light waves of galactic size, the thermodynamic field of heat waves of molecular size

So finally we arrive the other way around to the first part that all physical theories study, the simplest fields. Here we observe one fundamental different or rather complementarity of the way classic physical and 5D physics work: we develop reality from the whole and its generator equation downwards studying first the organic structure of the system in time and space, its T.Œ and actions and then going down we study the wave-Exi present systems and finally the Sp-Entropic, accelerated motions of the micro-fields of ∆-1 particles and lineal momentums which rise and give the energy and micro-clocks that the whole will use.

This of course is a matter of choice, made in T.Œ not to bust the balls of scholars but to complement what they have done. Indeed, the human scholarship today studies mainly the upward arrow of social evolution of the 5th dimension –w without even recognizing it is a social evolution. So, and this is what we criticize, describe the upper systems of reality as emerging from the lower systems, but without recognizing the interrelationship symbiosis and existence of an arrow from the upper T.Œ elements through its survival actions that order the lower systems.

So physicists consider particles to be ‘excitations’ of fields hence some kind of secondary ‘thing’ which does not matter as much as the field itself. Biologists consider organisms, ‘constructs’ of Genes without realizing that once the organism is formed, it is the self, which directs the drives of existence of the being, towards energy information, reproduction and social evolution.

By bringing T.Œ, which is composed playing with words of a series of œ-points which play the game of Tao, of Temporal existence, and survival, by bringing Temporal beings, Time space Organic Existential Beings, into the game, and understanding perception by O-minds that gauge information, we complete the description of the Universe. We of course enlighten also the meaning of the lower scales and use the same formula and evident data, but we add, double reality.

All this said, fields do matter. As without them the emerging more complex social scales that interlock with them and create ternary co-existing structures will not exist, so for each plane of existence we must find a past-relative herd of micro-points, which are treated as indistinguishable particles by the wave-particle system, from where it extracts energy and information ordering it.

**3 conservation laws: Energy≈ 5 ^{th} dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.**

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe they found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and a lineal motion.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5^{th} dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5^{th} dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E_{∆-1}=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E_{∆1}=1/2 mv^{2} with the limit E=mc^{2} for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5^{th} dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c^{2}

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5^{th} dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it.

And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

In that regard, we shall save from the bonfire of vanities and weapons, which is the worldview of anthropomorphic religions and physical sciences only one figure, Mr. Einstein; as he did respect Philosophers of Science – always acknowledging the influence of Mach in his worldview, Mathematicians, using the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry to r=evolve physics; introducing a first version of a Universe built with infinite cyclical times (so he would quip ‘I seem to be the only physicist that understand that there are infinite times in the Universe running at different speeds), even Mr. Leibniz (‘Leibniz is right, but if so we must throw all physics and start to build it from scratch).

Pity, when he got older he yielded to them, since the Bomb, he sponsored with his letter to Roosevelt make him globally famous. So he corrupted and stop having a laugh to Minkowski and the like. Ultimately, Einstein the r=evolutionary of time, of his youth, couldn’t build all physics from scratch. And could not complete the mathematical r=evolution of Non-Euclidean geometry he did start. So we will just do that. Because one thing is for sure. We won’t corrupt. Physicists will never accept us. And we will not build a bigger bomb to get their respect.

Let us leave it like that – in Einstein’s last sentence: ‘Time is what a clock measures; there are infinite of them, and each has a different speed’…

And ad, for that to happen, all clocks of time must be cyclical, closed motions. So they are finite, they break space into pieces, and each time cycle has a different speed because its ‘perimeter’ has a different length. And because they are finite, as Leibniz explained, absolute time is only the sum of all the time cycles of the Universe, put together as in a puzzle that seems a single plane but is made of infinite little pieces.

Space on the other hand is open. It might seem not that important to set the record straight to understand this fundamental quality that differentiates time from space, but it is the *key to it all.*

Philosophers though realized of the deformation of time and have often called the interpretation of cyclical time by physicists as lineal space, the ‘spatialization of time’.

Physicists like Hawking have quipped back saying ‘we do not understand mathematics’ and that is why we are envious of his concept of time. Let us have a look at that opinion. Now, arguably the two most important mathematicians of the classic age were two philosophers of science, Mr. Descartes who founded Analytic geometry and started modern mathematics, and Mr. Leibniz, who founded calculus – yes, he, not Newton published first the laws of calculus, though Fermat, an amateur Basque scientist, and fellow countryman, seemingly had figure it out all earlier on…

And as it happens, both Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz were the fathers of the modern scientific concept of cyclical time, precisely because *they understood mathematics far better than any physicist did. *And in those texts we *will evolve mathematics, as nobody has since those 2 completing the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean mathematics, needed to define cyclical time and fractal space,* since mathematics got stuck 150 years ago, into reforming only the 5^{th} postulate of Geometry, and so now is a contradiction between 4 Euclidean and one non-Euclidean.

So we shall prove, we do know as our predecessors in the study of cyclical time, Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz much more mathematics than physicists do. And that is WHY we reason on terms of cyclical times.

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi of that age, founding fathers of science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, dis grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, said that all what exists was made of open space, which he called ‘res extensa’ and closed, cyclical time, which he called ‘vortices’. Nobody understood him though because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Descartes meanwhile had to make his living selling his mind to ‘artillery masters’, till queen Cristina, the ‘Minerva of the north’, knowing he had a poor health, perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o’clock in the morning.

She also ordered him to write verses to celebrate her role in the Thirty Years’ War and the statutes for a Swedish Academy. While delivering them to the queen at 5:00 AM, he caught pneumonia and died, saying ‘in winter men’s thoughts freeze like the water’. And so his most important discovery along analytic geometry, the nature of the 2 principles in which reality is founded floundered for a century long.

There is here a pattern which will be repeated between philosophers of science sponsors of an organic sentient universe, of cyclical time and fractal space, ending in relative oblivion vs. the military physicists of lineal time and military power that carry the day and we shall see the pattern in the lives of each century masters of space-time studies: Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Boltzmann vs. Darwin, Einstein vs.…

And we will return to that historic understanding of perhaps the biggest blunder of mankind, many times, with examples of the eternal fight for the soul of man and his knowledge of the Universe, between us, the ‘good intelligent guys’ (-: philosophers of science and them, the ‘bad stupid ones’, the ‘physicists’ O-: Pity the sheeple goes always with them.

** A fast survey of time in modern physical sciences. Lineal External motions≈changes.**

Beyond lineal, Galilean Time in the XX century, physicists widened their comprehension of time, in two separate new senses – that of Einstein’s relativity, and that of quantum physics in the realm of particles:

*In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time of modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.*

** **Einstein ‘did know’, when he said: I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right, but if so, we have to rebuild the entire foundations of physical sciences from its beginning… but he didn’t do it. Instead, lineal germans forgot all what he had truly discovered and ‘blocked’ the advance of cyclical time with their lineal 4D space parameter to keep the illusion going.

**T**he classic interpretation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity by Hermann Minkowski, a Lithuanian-German mathematician, it has been clear that physics has to do not with two entities, space and time, taken separately, but with a unitary entity space–time, in which, however, time like and space like directions can be distinguished. The Lorentz transformations, which in special relativity define shifts in velocity perspectives, were shown by Minkowski to be simply rotations of space–time axes.

The Lorentz contraction of moving rods and the time dilatation of moving clocks turns out to be analogous to the fact that different-sized slices of a sausage are obtained by altering the direction of the slice: just as there is still the objective (absolute) sausage, so also Minkowski restores the absolute to relativity in the form of the invariant four-dimensional object, and the invariance (under the Lorentz transformation) of the space–time interval and of certain fundamental physical quantities such as action (which has the dimensions of energy times time, even though neither energy nor time is separately invariant).

This fact is important in 5D physics regarding the metric, E= S x T, when we enter in details on mathematical physics, not so much in other sciences, where the quality of the actions matter more than its equations. It is in that sense important to realize that what is ‘conserved’ in a single plane of space-time, is the ‘quanta of space’ or physical constant, H-constant in the quantum scale, K-Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and c-speed constant in the gravitational scale. The fact that they are measured in 3 different parameters, action (h), entropy (k) and speed (c), will require some understanding of the biased observation of those constants by humans, more proper of the specialized articles on physics.

What matters here is to corroborate some important aspects on 5D:

– The space of each scale is conserved, and in that sense infinite, it does not expand neither varies (no creationist theories of a single space-time continuum).

– Time varies in its frequency (inverse of duration and the true parameter to use to measure cyclical time: T=1/ƒ), but its product with the energy of the system does not vary in a single plane.

– Time speed=information varies and energy flows between scales, but (and this is a law of 5D which obviously is not advanced by Einstein, unaware of the fractal structure of the Universe), for a 3-∆±1 scales of the Universe both are conserved. And this is truly the meaning of the 5D co-invariance. It means that for each closed system, or ‘worldcycle of existence of a being’ between birth and extinction the system lives and dies into a zero-sum its total time and space.

All this are important Correspondences with Einstein’s work expanded to the 5^{th} dimension, which will be mentioned often when studying the key parameters and events and spatial quanta of 5D space-time beings namely their worldcycle between life and death, and its structure and co-existence in 3 synchronizes scales or states (fields-waves and particles).

In essence, because Einstein, worked with a single plane, and lineal time, Minkowski defined (left image), worldlines. In 5D we will define worldcycles, which is what experience sees. And we will define a total zero sum on a worldcycle of life and death, so time is conserved or rather erased in equal zero sums. Because death is an entropic explosion of information into expanded space across 2 entire planes of the 5^{th} dimension, 3 are the planes in which aw worldcycle exist. As we are born in a cellular scale and evolve into organic and social scales but die back to the cellular scale in entropic death (matter dies back into the radiation, minimal particle scale).

What about the concept of lineal time in Relativity, both Galilean and Einsteinian. Here we must warn the reader of the overblown importance given to the concepts of time in physics which are not only restricted by linearity but by the limits of its philosophy of time.

In the widest sense time is ALL forms of change in the Universe and 5D T.Œ does explain them all. For example the worldcycle of life and death is the key to understand the survival program of the Universe, its ages and horizons of evolution; the 5^{th} dimension and its arrow of time of parts and wholes to explain the evolution of the Universe and the life and social evolution of humanity. And so on.

**The confusion of time arrows in physics.**

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t understand Feynman, Einstein and their findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time in physics balance each other).

This, Einstein insisted as he obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

*Life arrow:* Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp

*Death arrow:* Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp + Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ = 0-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents.

In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past-anti-particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.

Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3^{rd} time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the…

Now this is how we formalize T.Œ, by advancing also the fundamental sciences – geometry, completing the work of Riemann, Einstein and others who study the 5th non-Euclidean postulate – the fact that points hosted multiple parallels, and improving over Aristotelian logic, because reality and the languages that express it are ternary langauges where relative past energies and future information merge into present existence in space:

Past-energy < Present-body/wave > Future-information

Or are sequential in time, past (youth) > mature age > Future 3^{rd} age of information.

So far the logic of man has at best studied the second ‘ORDER’ of the ‘fractal space-time ages-cycles of reality’.

Only Feynman had the insight in physics to give antiparticles a past arrow, as it is the case, and only Einstein had some insight on it when it said that the separation between past, present and future was an illusion, and of course Leibniz, the genius, and the Eastern Taoists… So some did imagine the whole thing but now we are serious we are truly formalizing the Universe in its complexity. And this ternary logic starts by defining the Universal Grammar of all languages.

**The question of scales.**

This is the Planck action the Boltzmann action and the c^{2} speed action. At this point it does not matter they are measured in units of angular momentum, entropy and squared speed – again human concepts. We might call them bidimensional ‘quanta of space-time’.

This bidimensional quanta of space-time defines not only the minimal unit, the minimal active ‘cell’ so to speak of each scale that we shall called a Planckton (similar to the unit of biological seas), a Bolt and a Mmm… Mat… for matter, Mas for mass, or Mot, for Motion and the God of death?… Never mind, if in the future anyone cares to develop T.Œ further, they will choose.

Today of course we know even in the world of physics that there are infinite time cycles as Einstein proved, that there are infinite spaces, as quantum physics proved, that there are infinite scales of size as microscopes and macroscopes (telescopes) proved, that there are infinite different speeds of time clocks, which close its cycles from the fastest particles to the largest galaxies, that the largest beings move paradoxically slower than the shortest ones.

And we still have the 6 forms of motion in time, generation, evolution through ages of life and the slower horizons of ‘larger’ species, growth in social numbers of cells or individuals, and diminution, both phenomena related to the evolution of physical and biological systems back and forth (so cyclical particles became cyclical atoms, that became molecules, cells, matter, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and so on), as they dissolve their forms of information in the process of death, and yes, I forgot there is this 6^{th} form of motion, locomotion, of which physicists have provided an enormous detailed account with its formula S = vt ≈ ct.

So we have 3 obvious elements or time realities to be studied:

– Cyclical time changes, which can be grouped in the process generation, evolution and extinction, or worldcycle of life and death .

– Growth in scales of size and diminution, across a ‘5^{th} dimension’ (to respect for routine the so called 4 dimensions of space-time), which has the important property of relating the speed of the worldcycles of beings with their size, such as ‘bigger systems in space have slower time cycles’, both in physical systems (slower rotation of larger forms, according to the laws of vortices in 2 and 3 dimensions, Vo x Ro = K, w^{2} x R^{3} =K) and in biological systems (faster metabolic rates of smaller animals) and in social systems (slower life span of social species and civilizations that of individuals and human beings).

A fact that we can resume in the most general formula possible of both parameters: Sp x Tƒ= ∆c (Space Size x Time speed =Constant), that we shall call the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension, where ∆ will be the symbol for each plane of space time, Sp, a plane of space and Tƒ, a cycle of time (the need of both symbols for the 2 states of space and the 2 states of time, soon to be revealed).

And then…. Yes, locomotion.

And as it happens, that the process of generation always starts from a smaller seminal seed or first particle, which grows in size by iteration, and accumulation of clonic forms into a larger size, with slower time rates, back and forth through the changes of ages or evolution and social gathering into larger wholes, to die back into the lower scale, we can in fact put together all the previous time changes into a simple logic equation, the equation of the worldcycle, which in its verbal form, translated into a few logic symbols, œ, for any being or ‘function of existence’, ∆±1 for different planes and growth in the 5^{th} dimension, Ñ for its opposite dissolution of a plane in the moment of death, > for an increase of density of form and < for an increase in size, writes:

Birth ∆-1 -> ∑œ∆-1 ≈ Œ∆ < Sp > (S ≈ T)∆+1 > Tƒ < < Sp ∆-1: Entropic Death

This Logic Equation is the equation of a worldcycle that summarizes the 5 motions in time, birth and generation by iterative reproduction, evolution through 3 ages or horizons, Sp, the age of spatial energetic motion or youth, s=T, the age of balance between energy and information when the system reaches its adult reproductive age, and Tƒ, the age of cyclical temporal information or old age, when the lineal motions exhaust or fall into a time vortex, followed by a reversal in the process of growth of information that explodes back into space and entropy, called death.

Now the Philosopher of science has been always interested in describing this worldcycle. And once we have formalized we will use it to describe all what exists and all its process with this 5Dimensional metric. The physicist has converted it into a worldline in a single space-time continuum, in the Minkowski’s 4Dimensional metric, which is just a ‘small view’ of this much larger worldview.

In that sense, I have always seen my work as the culmination of the search for T.Œ of which T.O.E. is just a mere footnote.

**III. BIOLOGY: ENTROPY VS. INFORMATION**

**Evolution of Information vs. Entropic death.**

‘The Universe is dying’ Clausius on his hyperbolic expansion of the Sp-arrow of ideal gases to the whole cosmos and beyond.

‘The species with more efficient (in)form(ation) reproduces in larger numbers and survives’ Darwin explaining the vital program of all ST-beings.

So while physics is a fascinating field to advance with T.Œ, it should be obvious to the reader that as all scales of reality are self-similar, and there are uncertainty of perception in physical scales. Thus what truly should matter to mankind is the knowledge of the human, biological and social scales and its symmetries of space, anti symmetries of time ages, and asymmetries of 5D social evolution:

**Biological Systems:**

∆-1(cellular scale)> ∆: Organic scale> ∆+1: Ecosystemic scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp (Spatial toroid limbs)≤ ST (Hyperbolic bodies)≤ Tƒ(heads of information)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, reproductive age > Tƒ: old informative, future age.

In the description of Œ_{∆-3}, life, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: cell<∆: Multicellular Organism <∆+1: Ecosystem

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Cell: Sp: Protein Membrane <: ST: Cytoplasm ≤ Tƒ: DNA nuclei

∆o: Organism: Sp: Skin, limbs ≤ ST: Body organs ≤ Tƒ: Head

∆+1: Ecosystem: Sp: Gaia < ST: Plants and Territories ≤ Tƒ: Animal Life

Time Ages:

∆-1: Sp: Carbohydrate soup ≥ ST: RNA, Protista age ≥ Tƒ: Eukaryote, DNA Age

∆o: Sp: Plants ≥ ST: Cambric explosion>Sea-life ≥Tƒ: Reptiles>Mammals

∆+1: Sp: Sea Age ≥ ST: Transitional Age (animal sea life, Earth’s plants) ≥Tƒ: Animal Land Ecosystems.

**Anthropology: Ternary mind cultures:**

*Sp(white mind/energetic male)<ST(st)(black brain/gay sex)>Tƒ(Informative mongoloid/woman)*

The topological language of evolution was the key to understand the evolution of mankind, anthropology that solves the 3 species, the gender varieties, the 3 mental races, of tall brains (emotional axis, psylocephalic black races), long brains (dolichocephalic, visual, energetic white races) and the wide brains (brachycephalic, mongoloid verbal races):

In the graph, in complexity biology systems decouple in 3 varieties of max. energy-force, max. information and max. reproduction, the 3 main drives that ensure survival.

This simple rule allows to classify the diversification of species, including the Homo. Yet the dominant arrow is information, so at the end the gorilla-chimpanzee-Australopithecus, max. energy (gorilla), max. Information (austral), max. reproduction (bonobo), chose the Australopithecus, and then again in the next decoupling till arriving to the 3 ‘mental races->cultures’, the white, lineal, energetic; mongoloid, cyclical, informative, and sensorial, reproductive, vital black mind-cultures.

It is the solution of the ‘Plan of Evolution’ based in the 3 ‘limited’ topologies of the Universe, which correspond to the morphologies of energy, information and its balanced, reproductive combinations.

So species evolve in those 3 eternal variations of the same theme, from lineal, energetic men to informative women and the intermediate sex, to the 3 human races, to the 3 ‘topologic varieties’ of evolution, to the 3 ages of life, function and form always rhyme. In the first picture we see the 3 ‘ages’ of evolution of most species. Below the differentiation of human species, into energetic, reproductive and informative ones.

Specifically the ‘evolution’ of the ape into the human being, shows the fundamental procedure of nature in the process of ‘differentiation’ of species along the 3 ‘fundamental’ possible avenues of a ternary organism: improvements in energy system, information systems and its balanced reproductive networks.

Thus the original ape species can be differentiated into ‘energetic’ stronger animals (gorilla), informative ‘Australopithecus’, and balanced, reproductive ‘bonobo chimpanzees’, our closest species, dedicated all day to ‘fuk’ (-;

Next the human species took over, and again evolved in III Horizons of increasing information, (500 cc Australopithecus, 1000 cc homo erectus, 1500 cc homo sapiens) mankind arrived to the final racial differentiation, in which the dominant informative verbal homo decoupled into:

– Sp: White, energetic, visual, lineal dolichocephalic race/cultures (with higher mixture with visual Neanderthals in Europe); which explains the cultural nature of the western world, based in constant, lineal motions, from its vision of lineal time, to its love of violence and energetic weapons (which deliver lineal motions), to the dominance of T.Œs based in physics, ‘the science of motion’, whose wordily religion is to make weapons and consider expansive motion aka entropy≈death and its big bangs, the meaning of existence.

This 25 years old prediction of the T.Œ model, based in the Generator Equation that diversifies species into Sp, Lineal, energetic varieties, Tƒ, cyclical informative ones, and then crosses them to create a balanced, reproductive radiation of ST forms, is now being proved. Thus cultural memes depart from the 3 mental races, which promote the 3 ‘axis’ of the brain:

*In the graph, one of the key ternary differentiations of T.Œ – the 3 dimensions of spatial, ‘diffeomorphic’ systems applied to the Human Head. All systems do follow the ternary principle, according to which each ‘ternary element’ can be further sub-divided in 3 sub-species. It is the fundamental principle of creation of the Universe.*

In the case of the Human ‘mind’, the 3 axis become the foundations of the 3 dominant languages/wills of the 3 sub-human races: dolichocephalic white men, with higher Neanderthal, visual content and its lineal, energetic cultures/memes, among which the lineal, Abrahamic religions and lineal concept of time, and lineal, violent obsession for weapons are distinctive features; the verbal, mongoloid race, with cyclical temporal concepts, and the balanced, sensorial black race.

While classic anthropology did recognize the 2 first, it failed to understand the ‘height axis’ of emotional and motor, higher development. ‘Energetic, Intelligent and Good People’ would be a layman, topic way to describe the 3 cultural races. They are complementary and in the ‘Perfect world’ nowhere to be seen – an ideal world ruled by T.œ and the principles of the organic Universe, similar to Hesse’s Castalia, each will complement the other.

** EUSOCIAL LOVE TO THE SPECIES. SOCIAL SCIENCES AND ETHICS: THE ORGANIC WORLD.**

Because physicists had bullied mankind into its simplex belief in lineal time in parallel with the Abrahamic religions of most Western simpletons, the understanding of cyclical time and the inverse arrow of evolution and information, could no longer be searched for among physical systems, and the search for the meaning of the points of view of geometric non-Euclidean worlds and its apperceptive monads faded away with Leibniz. With the arrival of the Industrial R=evolution of machines, artillery masters became the indispensable owners of the world.

Yet in the Eastern ‘decoupling’ there were still on the tradition of the philosophers Buddha and Lao, some Masters of cyclical time, which soon were about to clash with the heirs of Newton’s Royal navy, telescopes and clocks. An anecdote will suffice.

Now the essence of T.Œ is the study of those symmetries and in the case of humanity, its use to create a perfect social super organism of mankind, in which the 3 scales of humanity, the individual, the culture and mankind, the whole thrive.

**Sociological systems:**

∆-1(human scale)> ∆:Cultural scale> ∆+1: Planetary scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp(Spatial ‘Planar’ Earth)≤ ST (Life and Machines)≤ Tƒ(Human ‘neurons’)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age) >ST: adult, balanced, reproductive Age > Tƒ: old informative age.

In the description of Œo , Humanity, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: Citizens<∆: Nations <∆+1: Humanity (Gods->Mankind)

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Human: Sp: Skin-limbs<: ST: Reproductive body ≤ Tƒ: Head

∆o: Nation: Sp: Military, borders ≤ ST: Citizens-workers ≤ Tƒ: Capital-informative castes (bankers/politicos)

∆+1: Humanity: Sp: Gaia < ST: Global economy ≤ Tƒ: UNO (future perfect world)

Time Ages:

∆-1: Sp: youth, energetic age ≥ ST: Adult, reproductive family age ≥ Tƒ: Old, informative Age

∆o: Sp: Epic, military age/art ≥ ST: Democratic age, classic art ≥Tƒ: Baroque art, decadent age << war extinction

∆+1: Sp: Paleolithic, young energetic age ≥ ST: Reproductive Neolithic ≥Tƒ:Informative, metal-age

INTHAT SENSE, social sciences are clearly deformed by the ego-paradox of human beings, and its anti quantum effects (the observable, human power is so above the observer, human social scientist that it censors and bias it, creating uncertainty of knowledge).

There are thus a 3rd type of postulates, fixed by decree, with no proof, which are ‘power postulates’, proper of social sciences, which are not wrong but crooked. For example, in capitalism, a doctrine of financial and mechanical power, we always hear the postulate of Adam Smith – that wealth is measured in metallic, ‘gold’, money and its derivatives NOT in human utility. So we must reproduce machines not human welfare. Yet gold is not value per se, only a language elf information, with its own ‘metal-values’, which are as all in reality valuing with maximal prices other metal systems.

So a weapon that kills life has maximal price. But in verbal, human values a weapon has negative values. So once more we find that each language and its values has the limit of the species and languages that speak them. And this is the *biggest error of capitalism as societies should be ruled by the verbal values of the human language that give maximal ‘price’ to human welfare and minimal price to weapons that kill man:*

*In the graph, the error of capitalism is to obey blindly the values of metal money which implies maximal wealth in ages of war, when the economic ecosystem produces the maximal number of weapons, but gives zero value to human life, which is therefore expendable. While a welfare state where money is regulated by law, and used to reproduce the goods that have maximal human value could convert the world in a perfect ecosystem for human life. As this is not the case, the metal language of the economic ecosystem is creating a world cre(dit)ating to the image and likeness of machines, where the future of life is by no means ensured. As we have no value in terms of metal as robots keep evolving, displacing us from labor and war fields.*

Now, on the wake of those previous ‘economically incorrect’ statements, but objective truths of the economic ecosystem, the 3rd thing you must get is that new paradigms are created by lonely insolent people. They are lonely because scholars ignore his revolution, and as they age they become insolent because they realise as Darwin, Einstein, Planck, Copernicus, Leonardo, Galileo, Marx, Lao, etc. etc. (all of them, the r=evolutionaries) did, that most scholars are dumb, memorial robots, full of ego, and borrowed authority from power. Scholars, they don’t understand the genius in the bottle, the intuition the simplicity, ‘the only harmonious sound of scholars ae the farts of their asses said Leonardo and he was right. Each one brings a complicated view, but the single truth of the simple universe needs intuition and there they fail. So i am a very insolent, incorrect paradigmatic case. We can resume this point with Planck’s 2 dictums:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.” So this is it. It is still now on my brain-point and you have all to die, for a new generation of chinese and indian, Asian taoist and buddhist kids to plunge through the web and find those sites, to understand it.

Now all this said it is obvious that in the fractal paradigm, all systems do have several type of properties:

- Mathematical properties, shown in its space-time topology and fractal, organic structure across scales of the 5th dimension.
- Systems have temporal, logic causal properties.

- Hence organic properties as systems co-exist in 3 of such scales, as ∆-1 cells/atoms, ∆-thermodynamic, organic system and ∆+1 social, gravitational systems, and there is competition between species, including men and machines.
- And also mental systems. Since minds are linguistic mappings of the Universe in a smaller fractal mirror, monads that reflect in an inner world the entire reality. So we have a simple equation to define all minds of reality, each one with a different geometry we shall define in i-logic mathematics, such as: ⊗ (Tƒ) x ∞ (Sp) =Constant ST.

**V. MAN VS. MACHINE. ****SOCIAL SCIENCES AND ETHICS: ****THE ORGANIC PARADIGM APPLIED TO THE WORLD.**

**Bio-economics: the vortex of the industrial r=evolution of machines.**

In the graph, the Industrial R=evolution is the Evolution of ‘Memes of metal’, Machines & weapons, energetic systems made of hard metal (iron) and Money, a digital language made of informative metal (gold, computer cycles). Thus we can study its phases with the laws of morphology and evolution, since they evolve according to the energy & information humans use to re=produce them:

Humans evolve a new type of energy and information, derived from that energy, which renews all the machines and financial instruments of the economy every human generation of 80±8 years, in which a nation of ‘founding fathers’, captains of industries, their sons and grand-sons, reproduce and evolve a new energy, machine and form of money to its perfection.

Those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made. Yet at the end of the cycle, machines and money becomes over-reproduced, saturating markets’ demand and provoking, a global economic crash.

—Thus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±7 years crashes of the train-based economy.

—From 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.

—It came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+7 years after 1929.

– Followed by the Age of the Singularity, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution.

Money will become then the digital informative, ‘genetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.

As such corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains).

Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together, we put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life…

Thus, we can expect an increasing competition between robotic and human workers and soldiers in the economic ecosystem that will last the rest of the century, as those robots compete with human beings in labor and war fields.

As a result the Earth becomes terraformed, from a carbon-life ecosystem (Gaia), ruled by human organizations (Governments) and human languages (verbal laws) into an economic ecosystem (Free Market), dominated by company-mothers, money and machines, which enhance our energy and information but also compete and substitute man in war and labor fields.

**The 3 lengths of time cycles, short actions, worldcycles of organisms and long cycles of evolution. Short actions, medium lives, long evolutionary time cycles**

Let us then consider the 3 ‘lengths’ of time processes that structure and create the systems of the Universe:

- The simplest, shortest level of timespace actions, which are ±∆e,i exchanges of energy and information, measured by the frequency in time and intensity of its steps, which accumulate into ±∆ST, social gatherings of groups (actions that bring parts into whole Universals); hence giving birth to the second length of time cycles.

- The organic level in which space-time cyclical actions are NO longer studied individually as ‘steps’ and ‘frequencies’, but put together into tied knots of timespace actions called ‘functions of existence’, Œ, the ‘entities’ of the Universe, which now acquired a clear mathematical, conceptual frame of reference; as they are assemblies of 2-manifold topologies with a central zero-point, which constantly switches between those time actions, whose sum, adds up to a
*worldcycle of life and death*, of creation and extinction.

Thus this level no longer as the first, simplified one, a mathematical abstract-only, geometric level, but includes organic properties that simplified the understanding of beings. We talk also of the ‘generational cycle’. At this level time cycles ‘organize themselves’ in 3 ‘ages’, which put sequentially a maximal number of energy cycles in the young age, a maximal number of iterative cycles in the adult age and a maximal number of ‘information cycles’ in the 3rd age, before the reversal of death returns the system back to its zero-sum virtual nothingness:

We can see the order of expansive, big-bang, energetic, young actions, adult, reproductive, iterative time actions and informative, crunching, warping, wrinkling time actions before the entire system looses all energy, becomes all form and since time never stops, its explodes back into a new cycle where the new energy will feed the development of a new generation.

Yet as larger systems are slower in time cycles, the universe is a nested system in which the longer time cycle of a local Universe big bang (the only time duration simplex science today considers), includes within it all the time cycles of galaxies that include within it all the time cycles of stars that include within it all the time cycles of matter, that include within it all the time cycles of history that include within it all the generational time cycles that include within it all the time world cycles of cells…

All those ternary and dual nested architectonical, synchronic relationships are the stuff of which the perfectly ordered fractal Universe, is made which only simpleton humans see as chaos…

- The 3rd longer level of time cycles deals now with individuals which form together ‘generations’, that ad up and become the ‘units’ of a longer ‘evolutionary time cycle’, or fundamental time which brings through processes of evolution yet another symmetric order, as species evolve and finally socialize together into herds that become super organisms and emerge as new Planes of existence of the 5th dimension. Those 3 levels of time cycles thus define all systems.

For example, we shall find that in History there are 3 clear time cycles, of 800 ±80 years (civilizations cycle); a medium generational human cycle of ±80 years, and finally a ‘decade’, ±8 years time cycle or ‘product cycle of the economy’. And we have been able to tabulate, study and analyze all human civilizations, national generations and short cycles both in humans as individuals, societies and economies, creating the ‘structural timespace frame’ in which social sciences happens, as we show in all the social sciences pages of this and o__ur web____ specialized on them__:

The graph, from that web shows the 800-80 vortex of accelerated evolution of information on mother-earth during the existence of the super-organism of history that now comes to an end. The 8- years cycles of evolution of chips and e-money (2000-2008-2016 crisis of overproduction), are not shown.

We bring it here so the reader can understand to which degree of complexity and capacity to explain reality we can arrive with the proper knowledge of space-time cycles.

Now because larger wholes are slower in time, the larger civilization has a 700-800 years cycle, the individual an 72-80 years cycle and a ‘stage’ of life, an 8-year cycle.

And all those cycles follow ternary and decametric (3×3+o) quantitative patterns that might look magic (specially in social sciences given the myth of human freedom) but do follow causal, organic, ordered, fractal logic principles explained in our articles on the isomorphisms of creation (ternary and dual principles).

So the theme of time motions divides into 2 main sub-themes:

- The 3 <≈>, type of smallish, shorter time motions, expansive entropy or young age of a system, iterative, adult age and >, informative 3rd age followed by the reversal of death.
- The 3 lengths of time cycles intimately related to the metric of the 5th dimension that make larger organic wholes slower and coming after (‘future’) or simultaneously (‘present’), with the shorter time cycles, as the system evolves across slower, growing social scales of the 5th dimension; to ‘integrate’ time actions into Œ functions of existence with world cycles, Ω, which again integrate in the longest time cycles as evolving cells of social species that become new wholes.

Those will be the 2 main themes of this post, and the posts of the 1st line, which then will become filled with experimental data in the 2nd lines of specific space-time systems (all this again redone with much more depth in the 3rd theoretical and 4th experimental lines of time cycles and its species.

**The need to make man again the measure of all things.**

Now the reader might understand if he knows my personal life as a long-time activist against physicists and economists (despite having upgraded those sciences, which let us be clear enough for pedantic scholars ARE the ones I studied in the University, along some years of biology and my long-life passion for artistic creation), WHY. Because they are corrupted by idol-ogies of metal, weapons and machines and go(l)d profit and are taking mankind to its self-extinction, because they do NOT understand the WHYS of their sciences, only the numbers.

Now we can go back to the cultural reasons why the white Man cannot abandon this mantra of linearity. It is embedded in its partial worldview of light space, the line, the weapon, the tribe all together marching ‘manu militari’ to the destiny manifest in its mental axis backwards towards the occipital evident brain.

The word ‘death’ in a profession which has made his living for 4 centuries making weapons of mass destruction makes any attempt to gift organic properties to matter on my opinion a complete taboo, as it is a taboo among financial economists, whose profession has been for 4 centuries to monopolize the reproduction of the language of social power, money, with a very antidemocratic ‘reasoning’, to talk of true economics – the design of a superorganism of mankind, where the economic-blood-reproductive systems do NOT choke human cells but deliver to them enough ‘energy-oxygen’ with universal salaries and a welfare state.

Physicists are – let us be clear – thanks to its instruments of perception, the source of an enormous number of valuable information about the Universe. Yet due to those lineal, ‘military’ simplifications, we will have to ‘correct’ their concepts to fully show the structure of the Universe as it is.

Since as a praxis line