I Extinction: BIG BANG

‘In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, institutions, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule’. Friedrich Nietzsche

“Every particle not forbidden is compulsory’ Totalitarian Principle, Gell-mann, discoverer of quarks.

“A Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even If they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics’.

Eric Fromm, father of political psychology

‘The most likely candidate for the dark matter of the halo is strange quark matter’ Witten, father of M-string theory, holder of the Fields medal of mathematics, considered among professional physicists, according to wikipedia the most reputed physicist alive today…

‘Strange matter does not exist’ CERN’s safety report

For those who don’t read physics, visually oriented, an easy explanation is our film ‘strange matters’ that explains from a historical, scientific and philosophical perspective, the non-future of the Earth due to the progress towards higher energies and more explosive big-bangs, natural to the very essence of the Industry of Accelerators (a clear dual fruit of the tree of science, which brings diminishing positive fruits and increasing negative benefits since its inception as the main tool of research of nuclear weapons):

In August 2014, a refurbished RHIC, a smaller machine than the LHC, distillated the first atoms of strangelet in NY. At that point the Industry should have been halted, as we halt the chances of global pandemics when we spot a sprout of a viral contagion. But alas! a virus is biological, ‘life’ but a ‘strangelet’ is a material virus; and since we live in a civilisation that denies life and worships mechanisms, the ‘religious zeal’ of our Nuclear industries completely ignored the obvious: that unlike a virus which would kill a few humans but not ended the species, a material virus, like the strangelet could eat up the entire Earth. 

 So now, in Christmas 2015 the LHC at CERN has doubled its potency, fully entering the regime of constant production of dibaryons, an usdusd stable, quark hexagonal form (the strongest configuration of Nature, from honeycombs to Buckballs to graphene sheets). The material virus though requires a critical mass to explode and so it will take time for it to fall to the center of the planet – unavoidable given its huge gravitational mass – and there rest waiting for companions till it starts the global pandemics, eating up inside out the planet.

We studied in this documentary the consequences for mankind of this new regime of energies and experiments, analyzing in detail the errors and lies of the outdated 90s safety report of the Industry, which still affirms strange quark liquid is a ‘gas’, ignoring  the liquid nature of what the accelerators are producing, misconceives the nature of cosmic rays (lonely atoms that cannot form a critical mass of strange liquid) and denies the most widely accepted hypothesis about the nature of quark stars, and quark dark matter present in the galactic halo (Witten’s hypothesis of strange quark matter), affirming that ‘strange quark liquid’ does not exist in the Universe. While in 1990s there were not absolute proofs, today we believe it is the main component of nova explosions, pulsars, the galactic halo and it is being produced at those accelerators with the enormous risk for the humankind.

So conveniently the industry, which is preparing the first collisions at CERN this summer at full potency, doubling the energy and hence the risks of those experiments, does not upgrade the report, not to warn mankind of its likely outcome: the production of enough strange matter to start an ice-9 extinction (creation of a critical mass of strangelet able to convert the Earth into a pulsar):

dark-matter-copydece4155ba

In the graphs, developed in detail in the different posts of this web, we show the 3 distinctive Life extinction events that the Large Hadron Collider – a quark cannon that throws bullets of the densest, most explosive material of the Universe, quark condensates – can cause, once it is put on line at double potency in Spring 2015, over the 10 Tev barrier of creation of dark matter – the theoretical minimal energy of formation of a ‘bag of strangelets’ and ‘micro-black holes’.

– Creation of baby black holes that do not evaporate, either as top quark condensates (Einstein’s famous frozen stars) or string stars with higher dimensionality. This risk has been overblown by media, since it is less likely and black hole theory has still a ‘mythic, speculative’ side that allowed them to divert attention from the truly, well-proved, scientific catastrophe:

– Creation of strangelets – lumps of strange quarks shown to be very common in the Universe, as all pulsars seems to be frozen, strange quark stars. This risk is absolute, meaning that according to the ‘Totalitarian Principle’ of physics, all particles that can theoretically happen will happen. And strange quark matter will theoretically happen, since the LHC is merely beyond ‘speculative theories’ a quark cannon, which produces massive quantities of strange quarks at high energy regimes.

Now, a strangelet is nothing strange, it is merely a ‘lump of strange quarks’. And we know those lumps of strange quarks, once formed devour our lighter, simpler up and down quarks.

And as it happens, the LHC is just a ‘quark cannon that produces lumps of strange quarks, strangelets. The LHC is a cyclical, ‘never-ending’ cannon barrel, that accelerates  lead ion ‘bullets’ every cycle, the heaviest non-radioactive atom with more quarks, with two purposes: to increase the mass of those quarks transforming them into ‘strange quarks’, and then collide them to make ‘strangelets’, strange quark condensates.

The LHC is JUST A FACTORY of strangelets, and so when it goes on line at full potency, will just mass produce strangelets  

Thus strangelets will be made at CERN between 2015 and 2020 on collisions over 10 Tev. Then those strangelets will fall to the center of the Earth undetected (which will excuse CERN from responsibility, AS IT will deny it produced them till the end), and it will eat up  the Earth inside out, till it converts it into a 15 km. strangelet rock.

– Finally the magnetic field of the LHC, the strongest on planet Earth, which cause disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field, cause of Earthquakes that have increased till record numbers, similar to those of II World War during the carpet bombing of the pacific seismic ‘ring of fire’, since the machine was put on line in a continuous growth. There is indeed a pattern studied in other posts on the web of LHC’s starts and increases of energy followed by massive volcano and earthquake activity. Just now in april 2015, volcano activity is at its peak, with 7 major volcanoes starting eruptions within ours, and a massive earthquake taking place in Nepal…

Any of those 3 scenarios should have deterred CERN’s physicists and its political backers, from upgrading the machine to double potency in 2015, but physicists and the P.R.ess considers the issue closed and prefer wishful thinking to ethic and social responsibility.

Why we are so sure of the dangers of CERN for the planet? For epistemological, sociological, mathematical and experimental reasons:

 

  1. Epistemological Risks

The essence of science is precisely its predictability and capacity to verify true from false theories. And at present those 3 fundamental threats of damage to Earth are sound truths of known-known physics, while the theories that dismiss them, such as the evaporation of black holes or the denial of its existence are neither proved not founded in sound theoretical background. 

Thus those risks are real, as the creation of particles in accelerators follow the Totalitarian principle of Physics, which translates the certainty of the Laws of Nature to particle physics. The principle states that ‘Every particle not forbidden is compulsory’ – meaning that everything that might happen in the realm of particle creation MUST happen. And since quark condensates, strangelets and toplets are theoretically sound and should be formed over 10 Tev, they must happen.

The Totalitarian Principle – a Universal law that applies to all natural sciences – means that in the same manner when you put fire on water it always boils with a 100% of chances, because the laws of Thermodynamics (heats move from the hot fire to the cold water) are ALWAYS RIGHT, are NOT probabilistic, any particle that can exist will certainly be formed in an accelerator under the right proportion of energy, which for the two particles that can extinguish us, black holes is 10 tev and for Strangelets is a quantity of strange quarks known as the ‘bag threshold’ also around 10 Tev, the barrier of entrance into the ‘dark world’ of ultra-powerful ‘mass bombs’ that once formed feed on all type of light matter.

The Witten hypothesis.

Moreover, the MOST ABUNDANT produce of LHC TODAY, is ‘strange quark liquid’, a mixture of uds matter which is created in growing lumps as the luminosity and energy of those collisions increases. This strangelet matter however is vehemently denied to ‘exist’ as the ‘official position’ of CERN, despite the fact that it remains the most likely candidate to form the heavy dark matter that surrounds the galaxy, and accounts for 90% of its mass (halo), according to the laws of the scientific method (economicity, efficiency, Ockham’s razor) as it is the simplest concept, based in a known known particle, for which the efficient, economic Universe should have a clear role. Hence Edward Witten, the most prestigious physicist alive, father of Super-String theory affirmed earlier in his career, it should be the main candidate to form that halo, born of the transformation of planets and stars into strangelets, since it is also the most stable matter of the Universe, one formed in enough quantity – a mere question of energy upgradings by the industry of accelerators. The Witten hypothesis is still the most accepted one among profesional physicists, as the continuous stream of professional papers testifies. 

The Fermi paradox.

Finally if that is the case, it would be the only ‘logic solution’ to the mystery of the Fermi paradox – why in a Universe teaming with planets, there is not Intelligence and/or robotic colonisation? What extinguishes life before the threshold of Interstellar travel?

Thus we introduce in this central post, those themes, studied in great detail in the side articles, as well as the sociological, military, industrial reasons, and human ‘ego-centered’ beliefs that make possible those experiments to continue, despite all those obvious warnings, easily dismissed by the power of Nuclear physicists, in an age of ‘revivalism’ of nuclear weapons sponsored by war-monger politicians.

Thus the different quark condensates that the LHC can produce and can extinguish us are bound to happen when the proper conditions of energy are met in 2015 when the machine is upgraded over the 10 Tev barrier, shown in great detail in the previous graph:

1)  CERN should therefore produce a heavy condensate of quark liquid, either strangelet, bottomlet or toplet. The possibility is so high that even CERN recognizes in the ‘CASTOR papers’, it will make them with a 70% of chances, (contradicting all its public statements). There are still some uncertainties on a factor called the ‘bag’ factor – meaning the stability of those quark condensates will depend on the numbers of heavy quarks that are created on those collisions (the more quarks, the more they will attract each other and form quark-gluon explosive condensates). The numbers of quarks to make strangelets stable though will keep growing as the ‘luminosity’ (density of bunches of quarks collided) and energies of the collision needed to create those heavy quarks (as energy becomes mass, E=Mc2) increase. So each ramping of luminosity and energy will increase those chances.

Indeed Mr. Penrose, a British physicist, from a prominent family of outstanding scientists, hence ‘evidently’ void of any possible ‘personal agenda’ (as the rest of us is, activists against the LHC are; but unlike us not so easy to submit to an ‘ad hominem’ campaign’,  since his father co-authored most Hawking’s papers; reason why  his name, site and activism is kept ‘anonymous’ by the P.R.ess) discovered a secret program within CERN, dedicated to the production and analysis of those ‘strangelets’, CASTOR, which the organization vehemently deny. Indeed, CERN denies it can produce strangelets  – but it has constructed a detector, CASTOR, because it considers quite likely them to appear in internal memorandums as this power presentation shows, to the point of building such a special detector for them:

In the graph, ‘Team Castor’ has built a Calorimeter to detect the production of strangelets at CERN. The probability for each event, according to inner documents, like this powerpoint presentation, implies that CERN will produce 500 strangelets each month starting the 11/9 of this year, when the first pb-pb collisions take place. Standard literature on strangelets explains what will happen next: strangelets will grow, absorbing quarks and transforming our matter into ultradense strange matter, till reaching the size of an atom (albeit with a huge density). Then 2 common processes of Nuclear reactions can take place: fission of the strangelet into smaller pieces that will grow again, starting a nuclear reaction called ‘ice-9’, or catalysis as the huge charge and mass of the strangelet attracts atoms that lump on the surface creating more strangelets.


In the fall of 2015 CERN will begin colliding groups of 70 million lead hadrons at 287 tev, unpacking millions of quarks in each collision. Those quarks will be first accelerated at light speed, acquiring relativistic mass, becoming heavier strange quarks, the substance of a strange quark-gluon soup called a ‘strangelet‘. The strange liquid has the potential to become stable and start an ‘ice-9′ big-bang reaction. If that happens that effectively transforms the Earth into a pulsar.

While CERN adamantly denies to the public and the press that production of Strangelets is possible, it runs a program called CASTOR for Centaruro And STrangelets Object Research, whose researchers affirm in their inner reports to the company the ‘likely’ probability of creating them. This is in accordance to the most advanced literature on the subject, but of course, it must be hidden to the public and the naive press…

This simple fact – that CERN is just a quark cannon that deconfines and gives heavier mass to quarks, transforming them into the next ‘horizon’ of heavy mass, strange quarks, which eat up planets might seem amazing to the reader, submitted to the ‘rhetoric’ of research and the blatant lies of this institution, a left-over the cold war, ‘refurbished’ with a newspeak of research. But this is the bottom line, simple truth about CERN. CERN says its experiments are similar to cosmic rays, and this is false.

Cosmic rays are mere single protons and gamma rays and electrons, light particles, NOT heavy lead atoms, massed in bunches, crashed to create quarks. So WE NEVER saw a deconfined quark in a cosmic ray.

But none of those truths have made it to the mainstream world of politics and power. They let them do it. And so now that the ion-ion collisions and its dibaryon production is on line a global silence covers the risks.

 

The black hole scenario

2) In 2015, when the LHC ramps up to 14 Tev, it will cross the 10 Tev barrier in its collisions, so it will make possible the creation of black holes, since it will be creating a massive amount of top quarks, the densest substance of the Universe, likely component of black holes (same density), but again CERN disguises this fact talking only about the Higgs (a by-product of the collision of top and antitop quarks) or rather God’s particle (using the well-known pseudo religious jargon of nuclear physicists, which during the cold war acquired with massive propaganda the undeserved status of ‘high priests’ of science to justify with ‘knowledge’ the risks they poised to mankind.

In 2015 the LHC will accelerate protons and hadrons at maximal energy, colliding them at over 1 Pevproducing heavy, bottom, charm and top quark-gluon liquid condensates, aka Higgs, possible substances of black holes. The quark-gluon soup it will produce will be far denser and attractive than strangelet liquid, hence the process of accretion of the Earth will be self-similar to the strangelet event but much faster.

Those collisions have the potential to create micro-black holes and top quark condensates (the real Higgs). The top quark condensates have properties similar to black holes, which according to Albert Einstein will not evaporate, rather convert matter (the Earth) into a 3 cm Black Hole or Frozen star. What Einstein defined as a mass-bomb, since he deduced his equation, E=Mc2, first in its inverse form, M=E/c2, thus foreseeing the existence of energy collapsing into mass.

Experts consider that beyond such barrier black holes will be produced, if:

– String Theory is truth (9 out of 10 physicists believe so).

– Thermodynamics are truth, as its 2nd law implies that an ultra hot black hole born in a cold environment, the Earth, will transfer us heat evaporating us. This contradicts Hawking’s belief, never proved experimentally that ultra hot black holes will evaporate absorbing heat from our cold world, because they ‘will travel to the past’ (Sic). Time travel TO THE PAST, has never been proved.

– And/or if Black holes are not mere mathematical objects but real objects as recent observation show. This was Einstein’s theory, reason why they are also called ‘Einstein’s frozen stars’. On that view they are ultradense, fermion condensates made of a cut-off substance of the same density, which are top quarks.

I advanced decades ago this hypothesis as a top quark star would be exactly equal in properties to a black hole. Einstein believed black holes could not be just a mathematical equation, but needed a real substance, which can only be, among the particles we know today, the top quark, with self-similar properties to a Higgs – which is produced by a top/antitop quark couple. Because then top quarks were not discovered Einstein could not explain them in detail. But he will be proved once more right. Now since the LHC will start massive production of top quarks in 2015, they might easily condensate into small black holes.

Thus if Black holes are frozen top stars, they will not evaporate because top quarks don’t evaporate. If Einstein is right they will not evaporate, because relativity means that ‘size’ doesn’t matter, it is relative and so in Einstein’s theory black holes of any size grow exponentially. As today, we have multiple proofs that Relativity theory is truth and none of black hole evaporation. So standard science proves Black holes will swallow Earth.

Further on, in Haifa (left image), 2 years ago, an homologous of a black hole, a Dumb Hole made of atomic condensates, 1 million time slower, that should have evaporated producing phonons instead of photons, didn’t.

Now in science because there is only a Universe, there is only a true theory for each fact. Each property requires a theory so several theories that describe several theories could be right. String theory, Thermodynamics, the principle of conservation of energy and information and Relativity, all proved right means we are in a ‘Totalitarian’ case. Black holes and strangelets will happen.

There is NO probability that a law of science is truth or false. It CANNOT be both things at the same time. So probabilities are either 0 or 100. If Thermodynamics are truth, we shall die; if string theory is truth we shall die; if the thresholds of energy for creation of black holes and strangelets (10 Tev, bag) are truth we shall die.

Many people are confused by this ‘error of knowledge’ which CERN exploits shamelessly saying that the ‘probability’ exists but it is small. This is due to a faulty understanding of quantum physics, in which there are probabilities REGARDING our capacity to observe a certain particle. But the particle IS there, if the theory that describes it and the events that create it happened. It is also due to an error in the perception of the factor that defines the occurrence, ‘when’.

‘When’ is the only ‘statistical’ fact we might argue, as collisions must met certain conditions of precision to accumulate quarks enough to create those particles that cannot be measured except by statistics – as we know we will get a double six throwing dices ALWAYS, if we keep throwing dices, but we cannot know in which throw, ‘when’ this will happen. We know it will happen because it is a fact that there are faces with 6. Point.

When you heat with fire cold water there is NOT A PROBABILITY that might or might not get hotter. It WILL ALWAYS because the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is truth. Point. ‘When’ it will boil, the time/quantity variable is the only question. So it is in the case of black holes/strangelets, when, the time/quantity variable depending on how many quarks we pack in those collisions, depending on how precise is the collision is the only variable we don’t know but it is NOT really a variable.

As with dices, if we had all the information about the throwing, we would know the bounces of the dice and the final position; if we knew all the information about the trajectory of each particle we would know how precise is the target collision. If we could see closer – without interference with our instruments – the quantum particle, we would see its position. We illustrate this common error of laymen regarding quantum physics, shamelessly exploited by CERN in our article on the famous case of the ‘Schrondiger’s cat’ paradox. If we repeat the experiment several times, the cat will certainly be dead.

So the when is what we can generously argue, which will increase with the ‘throwing of dices’, the number and energy of the collisions. This CERN knows. It knows it will create Strangelets and it gives CASTOR a 70% probability of detecting them. It knows it will create black holes and so it gives Hawking’s bizarre theory that denies the laws of Einstein’s relativity and thermodynamics a 100% chance as a ‘dogma of truth. Or as his Chief Theorist, Mr. Ellis put it in a recorded conference, to his ‘students’ and ‘workers’ all of them tied by confidentiality contracts ‘you must believe in Black Hole Evaporation’.

Thus if under 10 Tev in the regime that could find a Higgs we have taken 5 years to find it when we made a good collision, it is safe to say that between 2015 and 2020 the LHC will throw enough dices/particles to create under the Totalitarian Principle a strangelet or black hole that will certainly extinguish us if any of those laws in which most science is based that have always proved right are right (Relativity, Thermodynamics, Time arrows, conservation of energy and information.)

In this manner The Totalitarian Principle shall explain The Fermi paradox or absence of intelligent life in a universe teaming with planets. Only the Totalitarian principle explains it, meaning that ALL planets reach the technology of LHC before they reach interplanetary travels and ALL of them attempt the experiment that ALWAYS blows the planet into a Nova creating a pulsar (a strangelet star) or a Supernova, creating a black hole.

We shall study in this web in depth those theories, the reasons why CERN hides all this information (obviously not to loose jobs, prestige and contracts from the military-industrial complex), the reasons why physicists back them (same reasons plus the desire to prove their ‘bizarre theories’ about black holes, travel to the past, etc. the cosmic proof that this will happen (The Fermi paradox) and the human infantile, self-suicidal nature proved in the past that tends towards our self-extinction.

The Earthquake scenario.

 How we will know the Earth is being killed?

Those 2 events have different speeds: black holes, observed in the cosmos, cause a fast big-bang explosion, which we will hardly notice before becoming part of it. Strangelets should be slower. They should fall to the center of the Earth eating it from inside out. In that case, the process will be signaled by an increase in Earthquakes and volcano activity. The final proof will be the existence of a series of +8 earthquakes in the Richter scale.

Yet even before the Earth crunches by strangelets or black holes that do not evaporate, the LHC might already be causing earthquakes, as we anticipated years ago, given the fact that it causes a gravitomagnetic field, the only one on Earth today.

Gravito-magnetic fields are caused by c-speed mass cycles, as the LHC is and they provoke disturbance on (Earth’s) magnetic fields… which is the known-known recognized cause of earthquakes.

2012 year is in fact was the second year on number of big >7 Richter scale earthquakes on record, after the carpet bombing of II World War, during the pacific campaign that bombed the ‘ring of fire’ – also a man-made year of earthquakes.

Then after the machine ended its ion run and the gravitomagnetic c-speed mass cycle it was creating, earthquakes quickly diminished. The pattern thus is obvious: earthquakes have peaked during the period the LHC created a gravito-magnetic ring on Earth, to the level seen when carpet bombing destroyed during the II world war the islands of the ‘pacific ring of fire’.

Then also earthquakes diminished when world war ended.

So the cause-effect pattern is self-evident. LHC’s run create gravitomagnetic waves that disturb the magnetic  field of Earth, causing earthquakes.

Yet the ‘P.R.ess’ which considers a taboo any criticism of nuclear research ignores those facts and gives as only explanation, when it gives any… ‘Fracking’. But Fracking takes place only in oil fields mostly in North-America, where none of those big earthquakes have happened. And Fracking keeps growing, while those earthquakes have diminished. And Fracking only causes small range earthquakes.

Conclusion. According to the Totalitarian Principle, the laws of entropy, the laws of quarks, the laws of Einstein and Relativity, of the 4th and 5th dimension, the risks to the Earth are real and CERN should be the cause of our demise as a species in planet Earth.

 

  1. PRACTICAL PROOFS HOW IT WILL BE.

To be or not to be, that is the question. Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles. and by opposing end them? To die’  Hamlet, W. Shakespeare.

In the previous paragraph we studied the theoretical known-known models of the Universe that offers 3 scenarios of damage to planet Earth that should happen under the Totalitarian Principle. What are the experimental proofs that this scenarios will happen?

As in the case of any other ‘certain risk’ to planet Earth, such as Global Warming, we cannot take a decision on ‘experts’ trusting their dictums because today ‘experts’ are paid to back the agenda and interests of corporations. Such is the case of CERN, who authored the risk reports breaking all the laws of independence required for such reports. We thus must trust the authority of reason as the ‘reasons of authorities’ are bent to the interest of the company and the natural fear of scientist to the ridicule of catastrophism. Since if the risks are certain and the Earth is blown up, nobody will reward those who warn us, and if not experts will be ridiculed and loose their scientific prestige for ‘failing’ in their predictions and attacking the most powerful institution of big science. In other words, experts are ‘hijacked’ by the ‘violent’ nature of those experiments that can kill us. And so in the same manner there are few reports on the military industry and its risks to mankind, there are few reports on CERN risks. And yet from the point of view of reason and scientific truth, the Shakespearean question has only an answer:  It will be…

The industry of accelerators, where nuclear bombs have and will be researched in a small scale, will continuously upgrade its energy, as part of the process of evolution of weapons, regardless of its collateral benefits for particle research and finally will create strangelets or black holes, under the Totalitarian principle.

Why we are so sure? Once the fact that the Industry continuously upgrade its power and no institution or political group dares to oppose firmly the nuclear industry, and once the theoretical proofs are clarified the only ‘leg of truth’ required are experimental evidence. And there are at least 2 experimental proofs:

– If black holes appear there will not be black hole evaporation since no black hole has ever been found anywhere in the galaxy to evaporate, despite 40 years of research and the fact that if they were evaporating, they will do so in a explosion of gamma rays easily detectable.

The second experimental proof is also very strong. it is called the  Fermi paradox or lack of intelligent life on the Universe, Fermi the author of the first nuclear bomb stated flatly that we see no life on the galaxy because the evolution of nuclear weapons cause its demise. This is also the explanation given by most scientists that seek for life on the galaxy. In the past religious groups affirmed the cause was that we were the only planet with life, but now we have found so many planets thanks to the Kepler satellite that this possibility no longer holds. And yet none shows life, neither human or robotic life, which would have long ago colonized the galaxy. All radio waves come from black holes and strangelets – strange stars called pulsars.  So indeed planets and stars become strangelets and black holes (something also theorized in the organic models of the fractal Universe developed by this author with the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension of the Universe).

Thus, by the experimental proofs of the Fermi paradox and the Fermi satellite that has found non evaporation of black holes and the continuous streams of galactic news about pulsars, strange stars and black holes, likely top stars, the evolution of the Nuclear Industry and its quark bombs will blow up the Earth.

So now that we know with quite certainty that destiny awaits… Let us study the factual signs that the 3 scenarios of catastrophe produced by the LHC on mother Earth are happening:

– The strangelet scenario of creation of a strangelet ‘pulsar’ star as all those we see on the cosmos, by creation of a strangelet particle that will swallow the Earth

– The black hole scenario of creation of a micro-black hole of ultra hot temperature that will evaporate and attract our weak electromagnetic world.

– The milder scenario of an increase in Earthquakes, caused by the magnetic ring of CERN, the strongest magnetic ring of planet Earth that disturbs its magnetic field (disturbances of those fields cause earthqueakes).

The mass’ c-speed gravitomagnetic ring: Earthquakes and volcanic activity.

The first hints that the LHC is seriously damaging life on Earth which we predicted in 2007 –  an increase on earthquake and volcano activity – are now facts.

This  is due to the fact that the LHC is creating a powerful gravito-magnetic field, a ‘ring’ of charged, massive particles that can interact with the magnetic fields of the magma and Earth’s center.

Disturbances on the Earth’s magnetic field by the magnets of the LHC and specially the charged positive c-speed flow of protons come through 3 different processes:

– The 27 kilometers continuous ring of charged protons can interact with self-similar charged flows in the magma or earth’s center, creating a powerful electro-magnetic effect, displacing magma and causing earthquakes and volcano activity. It is a fact that the first day that the charged, proton ring was created in 2008 it caused 4 significant Earthquakesthe first one in Iran, seconds after it was powered up.

The charged proton ring thus acts as a secondary pole to that of the magnetic, inner field of the Earth.

– The creation of different types of strange liquid, some of them already produced in the first experiments, (Kaons at the LHC, hyperons at RHIC) would also provoke explosions in the magma. If stable, those strange forms of matter will leak to the center of the Earth. Some of it will remain in the center, forming the seed of a strangelet. Some will accrete and/or explode in the mantle, in highly energetic, tiny bombs. This tendency as all risks should increase in 2015 when the machine doubles its energy.

– The creation of gravitational waves.

The LHC is a 27 Kilometer ring of positive charged massive particles, turning at c -speed. This is essentially equivalent to the ‘singularity’ of a Kerr black hole –  a rotating c-speed charged ring of mass. Since a Kerr singularity can produce transversal gravitational waves;  the LHC might produce perpendicular  gravitational waves that will sink straight towards the center of the Earth (in a similar process a rotating , charged coil is used to produce electromagnetic waves). If so those Gravitational waves, which are undetectable will affect magnetic fields, provoking earthquake waves and increase volcano activity.

Thus, each time the machine increases its speed and ‘luminosity’ (mass), as CERN powers up the LHC, we should observe an increase of earthquakes and collateral deaths, till the 2 possible ‘doomsday events’ happen:

Strangelet Scenario

Synopsis.

The first and most probable scenario of human extinction is the creation of strangelets or any other kind of quark-gluon liquid made of lumps of heavy, strange quarks.

They can be created with a lower probability in proton-proton collisions, as those heavy quarks are the ‘signature’ of decay of the hypothetical Higgs or any other Goldstone boson, whose production is the confessed goal of CERN.

They can be created with a much higher probability in lead to lead collisions over 10 Tev as lead has many more quarks than protons and so the lump of quarks that can condensate into a heavy strange liquid, thousands of times heavier than the heaviest atom,  is bigger. When this lump reaches a certain critical mass, it will become stable and start a chain reaction, transforming the rest of the Earth’s matter into heavy quarks in a process similar to a nuclear chain reaction, only that instead of converting the mass of the Earth into lighter energy, it will convert the lighter Earth into heavy mass.

It is the simplest of the ‘mass-bombs’, which follow Einstein’s initial equation of conversion of energy and mass, M=E/c2 (better known by its second expression, E=Mc2, deduced by Einstein’s from the conversion of energy into mass, ergo a ‘standard’ reaction in Einsteinian Physics).

Because strangelets, unlike black holes are ‘likely’ to be produced increasing enormously our probabilities of extinction, CERN has adamantly denied there is any chance to produce it.

In 2015 as the LHC increases the potency and number of quarks it collides in its experiments, it will create greater quantities of atoms of strangelet liquid, called hyperons, made of up, down and strange quarks, which it has already produced in unexpected numbers at low energies, despite all their safety reports that said it would never produce them.

As quarks accelerate at c-speed, they acquire mass, because energy cannot go beyond light speed. Energy curls tiny vortices of space-time (Einstein’s definition of mass), making those quarks heavier. At light speed our protons made of up and down quarks (uud) will become strange quarks, converting the colliding protons into hyperons (usd particles, atoms of usd=strange liquid). Within the point of collision hyperons merge in pairs becoming dibaryons, which are stable and neutral and so they cannot be detected.

Thus dibaryons once formed, will fall to the center of the Earth, accreting matter as they form a growing ball of strange liquid. If they have not enough critical mass to become stable, which will ‘likely’ happen after 2015’s increase in luminosity and potency produces them in massive numbers, those dibaryon will explode in their path to the center of the Earth provoking mini-big bangs in the mantle, which will cause an increase in earthquake activity after the machine switches on. But some might arrive to the center of the Earth, where they will form a growing ball of ultradense strange liquid, which finally will crunch the Earth into a strange star.

We will know this scenario’s end is closer, when we experience magnitude 9 earthquakes that kill hundreds of thousands of human beings. As such earthquakes have never happened within a single year, the existence of a couple of those earthquakes will mean the process of accretion which is ‘exponential’ have been triggered.

Black Hole Scenario

A black hole is made of strings (the minimal components of quarks) which are the components of gluons and quarks. Their mathematical description is equivalent (a 5th dimensional world of strings is equivalent to a 4 dimensional world of quarks); which reinforces the idea that a black hole is a top quark star.

The LHC was created to produce massive quantities of top quarks since the Higgs and a top quark condensate are the same substance, (the Higgs was promoted as the new ‘God particle’ just to get more research resources, not allocated to study known-particles). It will not form black holes that evaporate. Since quarks don’t evaporate.

The black hole will not fall to the Earth but it will become the new, densest center of the Earth and the Earth will fall into LHC’s creation. The process will last a very short time. Some images might be captured on TV but most likely wherever we are, we will just feel a strong wind, and then a blast of attractive forces will crunch and kill us, as the Earth explodes into a Nova.

Certainties in this theme.

The black hole scenario has been the most commented by the press. Yet it remains secondary to the strangelet scenario, both for theoretical and practical reasons. Since one ‘single case’ will do us and strangelets are easier to do in ion ion collisions. This should be the first event to happen.

Of course the P.R.ess which backs CERN but also makes money with catastrophist scenarios mostly concentrates in the black hole scenario, when it wants to create a ‘big scare’, with big sales prior to the final  happy conclusion of a CERN’s expert: ‘nothing will happen, it is all a joke’,

The certainty of black hole creation in that sense is not absolute, because Y it depends on the existence of strings, of which there is theoretical certainty but not possible experimental proofs (they are too small to be observed). The models of this author on the metrics of the scalar Universe (5th Dimension) however considers that black holes are top quark stars and in that case, black holes will be produced, and certainly will not evaporate. 

Ultimately both models of black holes are not exclusive. Since if string theory is truth, all particles will be made of strings. And top quarks which show a very strong force and huge mass and huge positive charge will attract each other and the matter of the Earth with the same force that super-gravitation (the theoretical deduction of string theory). In that regard the reader should understand that most sound theories in physics are parallel, similar theories that reinforce each other, since they use ‘parallel’ mathematical equations. Models vary in the mathematical ‘sentence’, as multiple verbal sentences mean the same, when we use similar words.  So the ‘hidden dimensions’ of String theory that make Gravitation far more powerful are equivalent to the far more powerful attraction that the creation of a top quark star will cause. As the LHC is designed to produce massive quantities of Tops (which are in fact a key product of Higgs processes), all indicates that black holes either modeled with strong theory or top quark theory will happen.

We conclude that both scenarios should happen, strangelets with absolute certainty, black holes if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. So we shall give the black hole scenario for the 2015-2020 period of statistical collisions (that might shoot on ‘perfect’ target the microscopic protons to reach the required energy) a 90% of chances.

The childish irresponsibility of Physicists accustomed for 70 years, an entire human life, to accept existential risks for the Earth on top of the military-industrial complex, explains in any case their ‘law of silence’. If 99.9% of nuclear physicists accepted the cold war that already could have killed life on Earth, living on the industry of making nuclear weapons and researching them on accelerators, why now they should change their mind? Wishful thinking is the norm in a nihilist corporation that has in its entrance a statue to Shiva and Kali, Lords of death. Why the rest of society accepts those risks? The answer in this case is obvious: we live in a happy ‘Truman Show’, a happy new world mixture of the dystopias of Huxley and Orwell, in which the virtual reality of the Media System, paid by corporations censors any issues of risks related to the industrial-Military complex. And people, as in the parable of Matrix always chooses to be ‘data’, to live the virtual dream, to believe…

So only the scientific method, its experimental, epistemological and theoretical models can guide our search for ‘cerntruth’.

Of course CERN does not make public those sound-sound, known-known scientific models that prove the risks. For example, it ignores all about top quark condensates that will be produced in Higgs reactions and only focuses on the propaganda of the HIggs particle as the ‘saint grail’ of physics, which is NOT.

III. THE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF OUR DEMISE: THE FERMI PARADOX.

Now for very long CERN said there is no proof we shall all die of genocide. Indeed, the proof will come only after they kill us, so this very military response, which any death squadron could utter to the man to be shot, works fine for them.

Yet, with a ‘little bit of thought’ and recent data on the Universe and its composition it turns out there is indeed, a clear proof coming, from other planets. And it is called the Great Filter, or Fermi paradox. Indeed, recently we have found there are millions of planets out there and we hear no signs of robotic or carbon life but only the tam-tam of strange pulsars and black holes, as Fermi, the head of the Manhattan project that make the first atomic bullets, put it – the explanation is simple, we physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens.

So we must conclude that most if not all those planets collapse before interstellar travel, now on sight with the EM engine, comes into being. And this means we must do something this century to blow up the planet without chances to reconstruct our civilisation. And since life is resilient it must be something much more brutal than a war, a global warming flood, and it cannot be by chance (like a black hole colliding with us) because it happens to all planets, and moreover it cannot be terminators and A.I. or else they would have colonised the Universe.

All that leaves only a possible cause, as in all planets, being technology parallel and synergic, the easiest thing to manufacture which is a bomb, in this case a strangelet bomb MUST come first. Alas, there is not only ‘one proof’ but billions of them – all those planets which did not make it to colonise the galaxy, which can be colonised after interstellar travel very quick in a few million years. So if technological planets survive, it should be colonised already. And yet the silence is ominous. Only the tam tam of black holes and strange stars, pulsars, comes into our radio waves.

And the adamant defense of mankind of the quark cannon, is the clearest proof that Fermi was right. There are now plans just in case CERN doesn’t kill us to make a 52 km. quark cannon in China, and another of 100 km. in Europe.

And all this of course, always justified by the sacred research of our high priests, the nuclear physicists, makers of atomic cannons.

It is like if the creators of Big Bertha, the biggest cannon prior to the age of nuclear weapons would justify their bombing of Paris, with the excuse they might unearth archeological remains of Lutetia. CERN justifies its bombing of Earth with strangelets, after it goes on line at maximal potency in 2015, with the excuse that it might unearth some rare particle. So does RHIC competing for the ‘nationalistic’ honor of reaching the creation of those strangelets earlier.

But while the Germans of I World War could not get away with such a surrealist view of their cannon industry, the Americans & Germ(an)s of XXI century have become shrewder and justify their industry with those newspeaks of research. Fact is History rhymes.

Plainly speaking, the industry of artillery follows its evolution and so from the first ‘tube’ (cannon in italian), which started ballistics, through the centuries of physicists making them bigger, faster with denser bullets, to the last cannon, the quark cannon, aka LHC, with its quark explosives, through the millions of ‘cannon flesh’ corpses left in the trail, it has gone a long way. But the evolution will end soon, achieving its purpose, which the Merchant of Death, the biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, Mr. Nobel clearly explained, in a cynical letter to her peace-loving lover, who asked him for a Prize to Peace: ‘my factories will end all wars, when they evolve a weapon powerful enough to destroy entire nations with a single shot’.

This is the quark cannon and its theorists seeking collateral theories for a Nobel prize. After the letter, she abandoned Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. Then he created the Peace Prize but she did not come back. After the quark cannon produces the first bullets of strange matter that will fall to the center of the Earth and eat it up inside out, physicists will repent as many did after making the Atomic Bomb. But the Earth will not come back.  

As all has changed to remain the same.

Indeed, we are doing it for the same routines that took us into the cold war – the topic military-industrial complex, we shall comment on to end this central post.

  1. THE WORLDLY PROFESSION OF PHYSICISTS: MAKE ENTROPIC WEAPONS…

The Military Perspective: The Quark Cannon

As so many fruits of the Tree of Science, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has two perspectives. Its origin in military research, since accelerators were the last invention of artillery (a circular cannon), used to research atomic weapons, and its use for civil research, since the study of the debris of atomic explosions has allowed mankind to peer in the smallest, densest ‘knots of mass-energy’. The problem with the LHC is that its military implications far outweigh its usefulness for scientific research. And this is the fact that the rhetorics of CERN, an institution of the cold war, which systematically hides its original military purpose, has shrewdly hidden to the point that most of the people working today there, young 20 somethings, recently graduated, long forgotten the historic origin of accelerators truly believe the quark cannon is ‘only’ an instrument of research and ignore its ‘military risks’.

Yet when the Large Hadron Collider is explained in simple, military terms people can understand better those dangers. In military terms the LHC is a quark cannon, the final evolution of 800 years of western artillery, a science dedicated to kill as many humans as possible, which has used  bore pieces of metal to deliver at maximal speed, the densest possible materials (first rocks, then iron, latter lead and finally hyperdense quarks, the 99% of the mass of the atoms clumped in their centers).

This evolution advanced steadily during centuries along the evolution of physics and its comprehension of all phenomena related to cannons. First Galileo was contracted by the Arsenal of Venice with a princely salary of 1000 gold ducats to calculate the longest possible distance of a cannon shot and improve the ‘spy glasses’, latter called telescopes, to observe rival gunboats at distance (the Venetians invented the gunboat in their attack to Constantinopoli in 1208). He thus started the science of ballistics, the name of his fist book,  latter renamed physics, also called for many centuries the ‘science’ of motion, as it is a restricted discipline of knowledge basically related to the understanding of energy, motion and materials used to the construction of weapons. The field expanded but still bore this trademark.

For example, heat theory was discovered by an artillery master observing the friction heat of their cannon pieces. What this means is that the primary occupation of most physicists has always been to make weapons, latter machines (the nice twin of all weapons, so a bomber became a plane and a car a tank); and instruments to observe their effects – those spy glasses to see the enemy ‘galleras’…

Not to speak of the definition that Galileo imposed on time, as a parameter of the measure of motion: V=s/t, which still stands in Einstein’s work. This is the origin of the concept of time as the 4th dimension of space, again a very restricted definition of time. Since time has always been a ‘verbal concept’ synonymous of ‘change, with 3 dimensions, past, present and future, whose change we study with theory of information today, (from evolution to complexity), reducing what physicists study as merely the study of change in motion. Yet there are many other changes in the Universe, studied by biology, history, etc. and they are ‘time-changes’, of which physicists know nothing. 

This of course does not mean physics is not concerned with knowledge. But we must differentiate the ‘good and bad fruits’ of the tree of science – that is; research which is primarily concerned with knowledge, as for example, telescopes observing the big bang peering in long distant galaxies whose light comes from the far away past, and research which is mainly concerned with weaponry and uses the rhetoric of knowledge and some discoveries to justify the primary target.

Galileo’s work on ballistics and CERN were the first and last of those cases: the industry of artillery at its best, justified with the excuse of redundant knowledge – since the laws of motion and the big bang can be studied throwing other ‘things’ and looking with telescopes. Death is a high stakes that need a high reason. And here is where the rhetorics of the Higgs boson (not the particle of god, not even the one that gives mass to other particles but just another particle of the zoo of physical species) came in, and along it all the other ‘hyperboles’ about what is simply a quark cannon.

Indeed, cannons reached its lineal maximal potency around I world war when Bertha, the big cannon of Krupp, delivered its bullets to Paris from 60 kilometers away.

Lead was also the heaviest atomic substance. But you could not make a one kilometer lineal cannon – too heavy, too long. And after lead the heaviest elements became like Uranium is, radiactive, and difficult to handle. So how to make a longer cannon, with a stronger substance? Enter II world war. Uranium was heavier and on top of it, it split and reacted making the bullet a bomb. So physicists started to study radioactive materials, which incidentally end being lead, to substitute lead in their cannons. And then Lawrence realized that the problem of lineal cannons could be resolved making them infinitely long with a circular magnetic path, that accelerated the bullet every cycle, so the cannon could continuously accelerate the bullet as many ‘cycles’ as it wanted, making ‘de facto’ the cannon cylinder infinite. And the accelerator cannon was born. The name then was changed starting the make up ‘newspeak’ transformation of the jargon of artillery into the jargon of ‘research’.

So next, they planned to deliver atomic bombs with accelerators. They had a longer bore and a denser substance than Big Bertha. So they designed the first atomic bomb consisting in an accelerator that collided two pieces of uranium in its center provoking an atomic explosion. It was though too heavy to transport and a second design of a self-cointained bomb substituted it. But accelerators were the strongest cannons available, and alas! research of new nuclear weapons started in Earnest, with the cold war, thanks to them. All nuclear weapons would be first tested in circular cannons (the real name of the device). The West established CERN and legally protected it as a ‘sovereign nation’ (reason we could not sue it), becoming the flagship of the European participation in the cold war.

Rhetorics now were expanding as Nuclear Physicists had become the scourge of the Earth, the first caste of people who intended to destroy the planet and all forms of life on it for the ‘common good’. So along the cold war an industry of making nuclear scientists researching atomic weapons, appear as the sacred priests of knowledge, developed the concept that the fundamental form of understanding the Universe was to study the debris produced by atomic circular cannons. This would have seem absurd to more sophisticated readers prior to II world war – namely if the Germans had told us that the obuses of big Bertha thrown over Paris would be the key to understand the Universe we would have had a big laugh.

But in the present age of erased visual minds, childish thought, fiction, rhetorics, big brother newspeaks and other niceties, it worked. So now the Germans (main contributors to this machine, lead by a German, and buttressed with German technology), can truly believe that shooting the Earth with its enhanced Big Bertha, will discover the meaning of it all.

This newspeak was obviously needed because the underlying reason of the industry of quark cannons – to provide new mass-murder devices for the cold war – ended with the fall of communism. But this didn’t mean war and the most profitable of all mechanical industries, the industry of weapons had to end. We found in the Semite wars between Israel and the US vs. Arab fundamentalist Jihadists and Palestinians, a perfect excuse for perpetual war and the evolution of robotic weapons – the most profitable modern industry.

And we found in the newspeak of fundamental research the perfect excuse for the evolution of artillery.

Fundamental’ is a serious word that justifies all wars. And in this case ‘fundamental research’ is the only possible word to justify the risks. Already Mr. Teller – the nuclear physicist who found the H Bomb, patented it and made a fortune manufacturing it – realized knowledge is the perfect excuse to pass a weapon. He bragged, as we show in our film ‘quantum roulette’ that he convinced Truman to pay for the H-Bomb because it would increase our knowledge of the atom. LOL.

Then he proposed the first ‘ultimate weapon’ – a hydrogen bomb big enough to destroy the entire Soviet Union, and hence the entire planet. But he could not sell it with ‘military rhetorics’ only. Eissenhower realized nuclear physicists, all in favor of it, were madmen on a collision course with humanity and after the proposal was put on the table for ‘military reasons’, he called the ‘commies’ and started detente. Nuclear Physicists had gone too far, even for hard nose military men. Now they have gone even further. But Nuclear physicists also have become shrewder and so they have hidden the truth with research. The bottom line is industrial routine, jobs, contracts. So any technological industry must continue, even if it has no purpose at all. Cars keep evolving its speed limit even if they cannot go beyond 70 miles per hour. So does the industry of accelerators. As Fromm put it ‘the ethics of a technological civilization’ consist of evolving machines, even if they can destroy the planet.

And so finally the quark cannon, the first cannon that can destroy the planet, has come into existence, even if it can destroy the planet. It is the LHC, which as the first Galilean model, has its own ‘spy glasses’ to observe in detail the debris it produces, including a calorimeter called CASTOR to detect the creation of strange matter; since it is supposed to understand the meaning of it all, observing that debris.

But its ‘true nature’, its ‘historic origin’, is unmistakable. It is just the last evolution of the artillery industry, an infinitely long, accelerating cannon, which uses the most explosive, dense and dangerous substance of the Universe, quarks and throws bullets of quarks to the planet Earth. And one of those bullets will be able to kill mankind. It is the ultimate weapon.

And what it will produce is simple enough: quark condensates of higher density than our light up and down quarks, the substance of our atoms. For one thing, there are 3 families of increasingly dense quark matter, the up & down family (ours – the substance of the stars of the galactic body); then the strange family, which is called strange matter, the substance of strange stars called pulsars, and probably the halo of the galaxy, and then the top family very likely the substance of black holes and the center of the galaxy.

The problem is that matter is ‘darwinian’. Strange matter eats light up & down matter. And top black hole matter eats strange and up & down matter. It is a pecking order. So when strange matter – the easiest to do – will appear on the quark cannon, it will eat the earth. There is no doubt about it. And the only question that remains to be solved is when the LHC or any of its planned successors in the industry of quark cannons will have enough energy to produce with our quarks, denser strange quarks that will devour the Earth.

We believe according to known-known theory of quarks this will happen in 2015 when the quark cannon doubles its potency. It is in any case a question of time that the artillery industry in its most advanced piece, the quark cannon, evolves beyond the threshold of creation of strange matter, and kill the Earth. The industry is blind and protected of all criticism with its lies and rhetorics. It is the summit of the military industrial complex and it does indeed some collateral research besides the collateral damage to mankind to feed its rhetorics. But the bottom line is this: it is a quark cannon, it produces quark condensates, the heaviest most dangerous self-sustained, self-feeding explosive on the Universe, and it will once crossed the energy required to produce a strange quark condensate blow up the Earth.

The rest is ‘irrelevant’ knowledge, ‘irrelevant’ rhetorics, and irrelevant indeed, since an extinct species, mankind, knows nothing. Only a piece of that rhetoric will suffice to show how difficult this question is. Nuclear Physicists ALL perfectly know that cosmic rays are just simple atomic substances, protons, electrons and gamma rays, colliding on the atmosphere. We have NEVER found a deconfined quark in cosmic rays. Cosmic rays are NOT quark bullets, because they are not heavy ‘lead’ ions, which can produce ‘quark condensates’. And yet, whenever any journalist, politician or the public ask about the risks at CERN, ALL nuclear physicists lie, saying cosmic rays have done this experiment one thousand times. This is an ABSOLUTE lie, that any first ‘course’ of physics explains.

But of course, all is very shrewd. CERN does collide besides heavy lead ions, which can create quark condensates, protons, and so they do experiments similar to cosmic rays… But those are not the dangerous experiments that will create strange matter. Cern does research on fundamental particles, but this is not the reason why XX century military-industrial systems paid for the accelerator industry. And most ‘CERNIES’ are idealist kids who didn’t know the origin of their industry and think their work has no risk. But ‘big boys’ playing with big toys, big weapons are not a excuse for putting us all at risks.

The cosmic rays half-lie shows what perhaps is the saddest part of this story from a theoretical point of view. As a scientist I always thought there was a ‘realm’ in which truth mattered – science, as opposed to politics, economics or religion. This is no longer truth. Science now is also ‘wishful thinking’. CERN’s statements show THE DEGREE OF intellectual corruption, rhetorics and callousness which Nuclear Physicists, after 60 years of getting away with murder doing nuclear weapons, have achieved.

They are no longer different from fundamentalist religious people, nationalist war-mongers or fiction actors in their delivery of false speeches to justify their actions. And so once truth is broken for interest what we face is the biggest team of fundamentalist, terrorist, genociders the world has ever been, and maybe the last. It is destiny? Probably.

So why we do not do anything about it? The answer will ‘anger’ the reader, as he is human after all. IT IS ALL IN THE HUMAN EGO, which cannot tolerate not TO BE IMMORTAL, not TO BE THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, its only ‘intelligent species’ who knows better and paradoxically will rather die holding this supreme ego paradox than accept humbly its limits of life and death and knowledge in an infinite immortal Universe, of which we are just a smallish part.

The paradox of the ego, is on one hand natural to the essence of being human – we are self-centred – but inverse to the nature of science, which is objective and constantly displaces man from the center of the Universe. And it has in the case of CERN and physics a huge pseudo-religious consequence: a theory of the entire Universe called the big-bang which is the ultimate alibi for CERN to be tolerated despite the obvious risks. So we shall now slightly divert this article from the factual nature of those risks and the nuclear rhetoric, to consider 3 different questions:

-The nature of the human ego and how humans prefer to believe in happy self-centred theories of reality (anthropomorphic religions, mathematical gods) that in objective science.

-And following that trend they tend to elaborate theories of reality close to their worldly professions. So physicists that make weapons invented the big-bang explosive creation of the universe, despite its many flaws both theoretical and experimental.

-So instead we will reconsider a more objective theory of reality than those sponsored by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics and the big-bang interpretation of creation. Namely the sound-sound, increasingly proved theories of Einstein both in quantum and cosmology (pilot wave theory along De Broglie, and steady state along Fred Hoyle). Indeed after a century of ‘propaganda’ of the creationist and observer’s theory of physics, which so much pumps the human ego, the sound theories of Einstein keep coming back with new proofs, and keep giving new avenues of thought and will if we survive CERN become standard one humans stop being so arrogant about what they can and cannot know and what is the nature of reality.

IV. THE PARADOX OF THE EGO: A NEW RELIGION OF PHYSICS

In the graph, the true rational, explanation of quantum physics – the pilot wave theory, recently proved by the interstellar EM engine, vs. the subjective ego-centered theory of ‘the observer’ who creates quantum reality, which has become canonical and is ultimately a religious creationist theory.

The astounding fact about Physics today, both in quantum theory and Cosmology is its ‘outlook’ as an anthropomorphic religion that has substituted earlier abrahamic religions, without respecting the basic laws of objectivism of science, unlike all other disciplines. So Physicists have on one side accepted ‘weird’ theories of reality that make man – in this case the observer – the center of creation, against the sound-sound objective theories of reality available and far more sound experimentally, which however eliminate any ‘entitlement for human beings’. Such is the case of the infamous argument between the founders of quantum theory, Planck, Einstein, De broglie and Schrodinger, and his pilot-wave interpretation and the ‘newcomers’, Hilbert, Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg who imposed a new religion of humans and their mathematics as the ‘creators’ of reality. While in cosmology, they created by the elimination of the informative gravitational force that creates mass out of entropy in galaxies, another weird theory called the big-bang, in which all reality was once according to a simple lineal equation, V≈HoD, compressed in a single point, easy to describe with its simple mathematical tools, a mere mirror-language of reality.

At the heart of those simple, anthropomorphic, ‘creationist’ theories of reality which CERN pretends to explore further, as in the case of Abrahamic religions there is fundamental, existential problem of humanity: the paradox of the ego, which true science and his lonely humble geniuses have always tried to combat with little results – as humans systematically prefer a theory that makes them ‘exceptional’ and happy that one that tells them the objective truth of their non-importance in the universe. In as much as the indifference to the risks of cern are precisely based in the arrogance of humans who cannot conceive its extinction we cannot only consider theoretical, experimental and military reasons to CERN’s potential genocide but do have to criticise the essence of that human arrogance, the paradox of the ego that makes 1/2 of mankind to believe we are ‘chosen of a Bush-God of the bronze age that makes us immortal’ and only its verbal priests can understand, while the other 1/2 believe the Universe was created in a single point described by a single equation in the single language of God, mathematical physics, which only ‘physical experts’ can understand.

Let us then consider the paradox of the Ego that makes humans so stubborn about their importance, from the perspective of those epistemological, sociological and theoretical reasons:

Epistemological reasons are concerned with the objective, predictable nature of Scientific truths, which contrary to belief is not ‘probabilistic’, but deterministic – events will happen if its causes appear, only the capacity of man to ‘calculate’ when and where is probabilistic – so we do know for example, in the most talked about case of probabilities with certainty that a wave-particle will strike a quantum screen but we do not know exactly when and where. Since in hat sense is NOT ‘subjective’ – that is, adaptable to human ‘egos’ and needs; but objective and its causality quite easy to prove.

Sociological reasons are thus exactly the opposite, concerned with the traps of the human ‘ego’, which simply denies those objective laws when they do not satisfy the human wantings. And they apply straight on questions of human death: whenever man feels threatened by a cause he feels difficult to avoid, he denies it.

So the majority of humans – more than 1/2 of its global population – still believes that a goat-keeper of the bronze age talking to a burning bush in the middle of the desert, found the meaning of the Universe and the magic formula to defy death and make all humans eternal, because the creator of the infinite reality cared so much about him that took the form of the creeping sounds of fire to deliver him and only him the meaning of it all, and save his ambulatory cells from the cycles of life and death.

The paradox here is that people ‘die’ constantly in jihads and inquisitions to defend the idea they won’t die.

Contrary to belief physical ‘theories’ of reality have not avoided the traps of human egos, and the higher danger of death they bring to those who fear it so much.

This is obvious in the case of CERN: Nuclear Physicists simply deny their obvious ‘worldly religion’, which has been making weapons of mass destruction since its inception – reason why they construct so expensive machines, funded to research ever more powerful nuclear bombs by the russian and western military. And so they keep denying they are just following the same routine of higher energies and higher explosions, which can only bring more efficient bombs; which is exactly what strangelets and black holes are.

Yet to understand that we must criticise their theory of reality, the so called big-bang, in which also the entire Universe reduced to a point physicists ‘handle’ with the language they claim they only understand – maths; as Moses thought God was reduced to a bush creeping which he only understood with his language, hebrew.  As the ‘big-bang’ high priesthood is the DETERMINANT factor why humans risk death (as religious jihad is the main cause why people are being killed all over the world today) we shall extend a bit more this argument that we must risk death to prove the dogma of the high priesthood of ‘entropy’, nuclear physics.

Theoretical reasons. The big bang alibi connects CERN with the ‘theoretical religion’ of physicists, quite similar to that of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.

So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.

This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.

In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. There is nothing else, but already Einstein said ‘imagination’ is more important than intelligence. So as religious people have made of God with good imagination and pumping-ego ceremonies the meaning of it all, nuclear physicists have extracted from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies, with a ‘lot of imagination’, half-lies and statistics the meaning of it all.

How they did it? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.

Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation. 

Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).

Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.

The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.

The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them, such as CERN created then. And soon they recruited their twin believers in creationist points and G. bushes, so the church who still denied Evoution jumped on the wagon and every sound proof of the steady state Universe was dismissed and every fool proof of the Big bang was canonised, as we explain in our right side articles on 5D and cosmology which studies the falsehood of big-bang theories.

Indeed for God to be unique, it was just needed to kill all rival gods, and we are still on the business of killing each other to prove our ‘letters matter more’. And for the big bang to work, it was just needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold Vhod.

At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.

They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’. So the creation of mass balances the entropic flows of pure light space without form between those galaxies.

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.

In the graph, absolute relativity postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: Entropy<=>Mass (c2), which obviously has 2 arrows of time, and so it was in fact first described first, as M=E/c2, that is a process that transforms entropy into mass and information, stored in the frequency of those accelerated mass cycles.

Now, the ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansive-implosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local big-bangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies:

Scientific American 293, 42 – 49 (2005)

Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that big-bang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy,  a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe:

The first graph from sci-am shows the 20 billion years cycle of quasars, which destroy the central bar of the black hole, produce massive quantities of helium above the galaxy center (considered the 2nd fundamental proof of the big-bang after the V=HoD equation, already explained) and provokes waves of radiation. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc2 double big-bangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies.

So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’? Unfortunately another clear proof that the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes. Since the background radiation can only be produced today by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes through the halo:

And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,

So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic big-bang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.

Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOW-now cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory

Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37 K temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a non-scientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, but it is not 2.7 K background radiation?

Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But WHEN Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS I DO NOT REASON.

Indeed, there are many other sounder proper explanations to every supposed cosmic big-bang phenomena, but when an entire ego-centered group of human beings is in a ‘mission’ pumping with zealot ego human power, there is no ‘reasoning’ able to stop the tsunami – the sound reasons are hidden, unpublished, the half-reasons which favor the pseudo-religion are pumped, retouched ad hoc, as Gamow’s temperature…

So we do dedicate an entire post on cosmology to study a little bit in detail this theory, which i am now on the business of properly rewriting as the rest of this idle web for many years left alone after the failure of suits and films to rise public awareness.

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe… 

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

While basically Einstein’s attempts to put reason on quantum theory were ignored after he defied Bohr, till his death. He got an FBI file, nobody was going to his classes, and so he dedicated himself to talk to Godel on the ridiculous concept of Mathematics as the substance of the Universe, to boating and walking… Then they discovered black holes, all his theories were proved… till Hawking decided as a celebrity guru to challenge him with his theory of black holes traveling to the past, totally ignorant of the real time arrows of the Universe.

AND THINGS even got worst, with Bohm, who completed Broglie’s pilot wave theory – he got ignored, got his FBI file, was stripped of his American nationality and became an expatriate. Do not think physicists take lightly any attack on his religion of ‘seers’ of time.

And now that he has been proved bu the interstellar engine, nobody of course is putting his realist theory that ends quantum bull$hit on its place.

So let me be a bit nasty, just with words, as it is obvious I have no power (in fact, though i won’t comment it in this blog, I do have also my ‘police files’ despite my pacifist standing)… on those religious zealots, as all of them come from the same ego-trip: TO THINK THEY SPEAK THE LANGUAGE OF GOD AS ITS ONLY HIGH-PRIESTS.

 

Back to the ego paradox – the parallels between religious zealots and physicists.

The only difference between religious people and creationist physicists is in the language of those 2 supposed infinitesimal ‘wholes’, God, the name, and V≈Hod, the equation religious and big-bang  zealots think explains it all:

-1/2 humanity thinks God talks only with words, in the exact language of the believer, which only the priest understands. Another 1/2 believes God talks only with numbers, in the exact language of the believer, which only the mathematical physicist understands.

So the trick is to make the language complex enough to disguise the simplicity of the argument. Thus christian priests talked in Latin for peasants to feel awe, the Koran could not be translated, and Vhod has gotten a lot of ad ons and machines to make it complex enough for the human mass, worshipers of machines to feel there is a better priesthood upholding the supreme intelligence of the human ape, which when we look at his ‘real mind’, is an homunculus with a very small mental consciousness, a huge big mouth to utter nonsense and an even bigger hands to assembly machines and pump his ego with weapons. The graph shows man at face value. Notice how small is the ‘reasoning part’ for the ego. It is all about big mouths and machines assembling things. So the person with the biggest, most arrogant big mouth and more dexterous hands to make machines and weapons carries he day among the worshipping audiences.

Things get more surrealist when we look objectively to the ego-theories of both rivals of truth.

So when the homunculus talks in both cases, God and Vhod, and his ‘mediums’, the priest and the physicist are supposed to have the capacity to create reality ‘speaking the language’. Now, it is the priest and the scientist who creates reality, as vehicle of God.

So in Islam, god creates reality exactly talking ‘names’ in arab, which then become reality, reason why you cannot translate the Koran. In the catholic church God spoke in Latin. And only the priest could understand it. In the Hindi religion Shiva, the god of death, spoke with burning flames as in Judaism, because fire was the substance used by the military caudillos of Israeli zealots and Hindi castes to make their weapons.

In both religions the priest becomes through the ceremony and the mantras it speaks, God himself, which is also ‘eaten by the catholic’ believer in ‘the creationist power of the language’. So ‘God, the word became man and inhabited among us’. 

And this is the case of physicists today akin to the religion of Hindi Shivaites: the fire of his bombs created the Universe and a statue of Shiva presides CERN’s facilities – it only has changed according to the growing arrow of information, which as time goes by increases the complexity of those rituals, the ‘cover up’ of the amazing arrogance of the homunculus.

And of course it has changed the language. So now Vhod has ‘unified’ the words of Babel and talks only in platonic mathematics – the epistemological theory of physicists.

Do you think I am exaggerating? Or no. If anything I am downplaying the capacity of the physicist priesthood to ‘create’ reality just uttering numbers.

Let us explain this, because i am NOT joking. Physicists actually believe since quantum theorists applied the religious theory of linguistic creationism to mathematics that ‘THEY’ invent reality.

Indeed, the reader should not be surprised that mathematics is today NO LONGER defined as an experimental language that merely mirrors reality, as it was always thought of, and proved by Lobachevski and Godel (mathematics as a mirror of reality must be proved experimentally to know what theory is truth, or as Einstein, yes again, this sound guy, everybody reveres but everyone denies, put it: ‘i know when mathematics is truth but not when it is REAL’). NO WONDER his best friend was Godel, who proved mathematics needs experiments. Never mind. Physicists dismissed it all together and affirmed as religious zealots that the Universe is made of mathematical ‘entities’ and moreover, THEY CREATED MATHEMATICS. So they were like the priests of the Gods of the hindoos and hebrews, the ‘creators of reality,

Indeed, as God and the priest ‘invents’ in his mind the language which creates reality, an idealist, arrogant German, a mathematical physicist called Mr. Hilbert told us that ‘he’ invents mathematics in his mind and then mathematics creates reality.

So he started his ‘axiomatic book’, landmark of XX century physics, ‘the foundations of mathematics’ on the nature of reality with an astounding ‘self-confession’:  ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ which ‘are’ the substances of the mind that creates the Universe.

Hilbert was the main influence on the physicists that invented the ‘quantum, Copenhagen interpretation’ of a purely mathematical Universe that ‘becomes real’ only when the physicist observes it, against the sound realist model of the true masters and founders of this science, Planck,  De Broglie, Schrodinger and Einstein. THEY had an absolutely sound, experimental, normal explanation, called today the Pilot-wave theory in which waves guide particles, as it happens in the macroscopic homology of pilot waves, proved ad nauseam, recently with the EM engine for interstellar travel.

But reality didn’t make Mr. Bohr and Mr Heisenberg and Mr.Pauli, flinch. As usual they started a nasty ad hominem campaign against Broglie and Einstein, who had found the equations, they now misused and twist to prove their alt-right theory a la Trump (they had the power of the german industry on his side).

So they stated flatly that the Universe was made of ‘mathematical, imaginary functions’, and ‘only did happen’ collapsing into reality only when the mathematical physicist, the observer who ‘imagined points and lines’ looked at it.

So Einstein quipped: ‘the moon doesn’t come out when i look at it’. And he was ostracised from the group. Broglie, brutally assaulted by Pauli, had to retract as the criminals of the Stalinist Moscow trials, where all the original r=evolutionaries were condemned to death after confessing they were wrong; and the ‘impostors’ Bohr, a wealthy heir of the financial industry and Heisenberg, a Nazi connected to the military-industrial complex (sounds familiar?) carried the day, while the solitary geniuses, Broglie, a french aristocrat, and Einstein a socialist, pacifist, lonely genius, retired.

Heisenberg got the Saint Nobel of the Dynamite, the youngest man to get one, which Einstein had been denied for decades, as a pacifist, to the point one year it was declared deserted because all the ‘silent normal physicists’ refused to name another candidate. And everybody has been happy ever since, explaining you that quantum physics proves we humans create reality, there are parallel Universes as we are immortal and every ‘thought we have’ creates another Universe where we exist also so we are not ONY GODS, that is Vhods, but actually far more powerful that God, who did create only one Universe: each of us is in the business of creating ∞ Universes, in which each of our alter egos is the central creator. 

Again the imposition of this astoundingly arrogant view, now canonical as the big-bang and the G.Bush is (not the American president, busy-busy creating alt-right Universes of his own but the God Bush of Abrahamic religions :) required the ‘reductionism’ of all sound theories, eliminating all the variables, arguments, equations and elements which the human creator did NOT observe.

So by this way of reducing it all to the observer, they made POSSIBLE to reduce all to the Physicists mind-theory. One of the practitioners of this theory, an Iranian who affirmed it was easier for the LHC to produce dragoons that strangelets and black holes, Mr. Hamed, is really into it, now lobbying the Industry to convince the Chinese to make an even bigger LHC, to see if those dragoons come out for the Chinese new year. Seriously, he claims to have tabulated the number of Universes created and wants to see them through the LHC: 10 up to 500, that is there are 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Universes created by observers (more or less, i run tired of pressing zeros) and he claims to have the equation to know them all.

Indeed, what has essentially happened to physicists after that bizarre ego-trip of mr. Bohr et al is obvious: since mathematics creates the universe, not the other way around (reflects the Universe in a language), and more over it is a ‘proprietary language’ of the Hilbert school of imaginary points, lines and planes, any mathematical equation MUST be real MUST create some effect in reality – never mind there is zero proof of it. So INDEED, we can expect dragoons if you can model them mathematically, black holes evaporating to the past (Hawking) if you can write them mathematically, and so on. 

This philosophy of science is now canonical and plainly false.

Of course the simplex nature of the scientific method when it does NOT interpret reality works, whatever philosophy of science you choose.

There is nothing intelligent in doing the praxis of science; you collect data, you put it in equations – now you don’t even need to know much of it, just plug it into computers and you make machines with it. But humans will always take a flight of the ego just because Nature NOT them transmits information perfectly through waves, etc.

We are talking though here of the huge questions, ‘the thoughts of god’, the meaning of it all, NOT the details. And in this field the Copenhagen and big-bang interpretation is pure ego bull$hit, as Einstein fully understood. Because people use in real day machinery based in quantum physics, the practitioners of the Hilbert->Bohr religion of the observer can sell their infinite Universes and entropy only theory and people tend to think all this quantum ‘bull$hit’ is real.

To me the only remarkable thing about it, as in the case of the ridiculous ego-trips of abrahamic religions is what it tells us about ‘humans as an egolatric species’, who will always rejects truth and hence ‘existence’ as it is, if you sell him a good fantasy to make him again the center of the Universe. But the penalty they pay is not only theoretical – the complete misunderstanding of the thoughts of God, but quite real – its future extinction by all those species of ‘organic bombs’ they thoroughly despise as irrelevant. The human microbio must be above heavens and Earth.

The languages he speak – either words or numbers – must be the vehicle to understand, even create the Universe.

And the proof of all this must be not reason and experience but ‘prizes’ , ‘ceremonies’, the seal of ‘authority’ of some other clueless human; the peer solidarity; the routines and dogmas repeated by   new generations, since as Gerry Garcia said ‘whores, religions and old buildings get respetable with age’. So has happened with the religion of Copenhagen and the big bang dogma.

So, don’t dare to insinuate that it is all a pseudo-religion of the ego, which it is. A wall silence will rise to anyone who tries to deny dogmatism in physics, as it happened to Hoyle, Einstein for quite sometime till his formula was used to do bigger bombs, Eddington for insinuating that without direct evidence quantum interpretations were just myths of the mind and many others.

Frankly i never understood this ‘peer thing’. Facts are facts, models must be based in facts and be rational and anyone with enough IQ can understand them or falsify them. We are NOT insects collected in boxes with ‘national’ or ‘profesional names’.

But then I came to the conclusion that humans are memorial beings, which do NOT reason but BELIEVE. It took me half a century to understand that reasoning only came for a few – having a certified 180 Iq i never thought there was other form to seek truth than critical intelligent evaluation of all what I was told. I have never believed anything which I didn’t understand. But people’s mind works the other way around – they only believe what they don’t understand. And that is why the entire simple, evident bullshit of quantum and big-bang physics explained here in its simplest terms has become so confuse.

The same happen for example with the racket of the issue of money the language of social power who controls the world and the American FED makes so complex to issue that the Americans really believe the fact a few private banksters have hijacked their democracy issuing money and giving orders of work with them to their slavish population is ‘freedom’.  Indeed, wall street invents a digital number called money for free, and for example, this week invented 20 billions and gave it to a crony friend, for a silly nilly crapcode repetitive algorithms, called snapchat, but if they want the minimum welfare they must pay every penny with taxes. The astounding racket of the cdo scam – over 2 trillions extorted in taxes – worked the same way: people in that country are so clueless about what money is and who invents it, they handled 2 trillions to bankers who just had ‘invented’ false mortgages, and sold it ‘twice’. Well, instead of going to jail, they sold those mortgages a 3rd time to the people of America on exchange for 2 trillions, and people gave to them. 

The whole circus of modern ‘mathematical physics’ and quantum interpretations, big-bang explosions and the role of physicists as the high priests of knowledge is born of the same concept: ‘people must remain ignorant for them to obey’ said Calvin, the biblical bigot. ‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’, said Goebbels.

The Universe though does NOT work on ego. It works exactly on the opposite qualities: humble, cautious species do survive. And ‘simplicity is true genius’ (Leonardo) because ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein).

What can I say? Of course all this bull$hit well greased with P.R.ess, censorship of rival theories, subtle ostracism, denial of experimental evidence (Einstein’s black holes) or lack of it (Hawking imaginary ones) and the military-industrial complex and its clueless politicos slavish of whatever nuclear physicists said, carried the day. So not even the previous recent proofs (as well as the EM engine, which can only be explained with pilot-wave theory) have done a dent into the big-bang and Copenhagen or Multiuniverse quantum creationist  theories of reality.

So we shall conclude this paradox of the ego, turning around the heads of those mathematical believers and defining the equation of the ego paradox in mathematical terms to show the believers their infinitesimal nature.

BUT FOR THAT first we need to understand how entropy and information together create a time cycle.So let us explain you without ego, and with both arrows of time, entropy and information and its infinite, energetic combinations, how the Universe truly works.

Since indeed, when we abandon the entropic, lineal only-time theory of physicists, biased by their worldly profession, we realise all clocks of TIME in the Universe are cyclical and store information:

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 10.28.43 In the left graph, all time clocks and cycles, which return to its origin, creating a circle that stores the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles.

This self-evident truth is ONLY denied by physicists, biased by their worldly profession, to make lineal weapons, which deliver entropic lineal shots with cannonballs (left, Galileo’s drawings on ballistics, which brought the concept of lineal-only time). As physics and war became the trade mark of western civilisation, physicists dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, changed the two arrows and cycles of time, which became reduced to lineal entropic ‘big-bang’ time.

Even after Darwin brought back the concept of evolutionary time and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter applied this concept of r=evoution to history and economics and biology expanded as a science of life and information, stored in circadian and genetic cycles, the concept of cycles of time today accepted in life, history and economics – IS STILL DENIED by entropic physicists.

Time, which means change=motion in philosophy, however cannot be reduced to a simple LINEAL formula, v=s/t that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure elongated into an infinite duration AS it is more convenient to study loco-motions, the lineal entropic motions of those cannonballs, which imposed with power the simplification of time cycles that still endures and justifies the big-bang experiments of planet Earth.

So after concluding his first book on Physics, called ‘military instruments’ Mr. Galileo affirmed, his lineal time would be the ‘delight of philosophers and artillery masters’. Funny thing though is that even the entropic lines of its cannonballs were ‘twisted’ downwards into a curved parable by the informative force of gravitation. It would take 400 years for Einstein to explain indeed that ‘gravitational forces of time vortices, masses, curved space, informing the Universe’

But particle, quantum physicists still deny him, from Hawking who affirms black holes travel backwards in time, so they are not vortices of mass-information but entropic explosive things that evaporate, against ALL theoretical and experimental evidence, to the deniers of the Einstein-Broglie-Bohm pilot theory, proved recently ‘again’ by the EM engine able to move in interstellar travel with no combustible thanks to the ‘guidance’ of the wave… All this shows a simple fact: the worldly profession of physicists and the power of machines DOMINATES AND IMPOSES its lineal bias on theory. And truth and reason cannot ‘bend’ that.

0-Minds: Still mappings with languages of information of the ∞ Universe.screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the graph, Science and any other form of knowledge merely tries to reduce the infinite Universe to a smallish mirror mapping or ‘monad’ or ‘frame of reference’ or ‘language’, to act and react to the flows of entropy and information of that Universe (combined in the 3rd arrow of time, energy).

What both physicists and religious people do is to ‘exclude’ all other mind-views, mirror-mappings and languages of perception from reality, biasing the Universe into a ‘straightjacket’ called ‘theory of everything’ based in its single language.

Let us then return to the origin of their peculiar concept of ‘reality’ created by the language of mathematics and the force we perceive, entropic lineal light, which excludes completely the in-formative force of ‘invisible gravitation’ and the intelligent mirrors of all other species, from feromonal ants to gravitational black holes who externally act as if they were ‘intelligent’ perceptive beings ordering their territorial domain, as we do with words, and scientists and sensorial machines (clocks of time, eyes of metal, telescopes and microscopes) do with maths.

In other words, the Universe needs infinite minds, focuses of information to order it.  And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’, the less important part of the ternary systems of the Universe, the cytoplasm of cells, the inner space-time of light matter in galaxies, where we live, the cells of your body, the light filled space of atoms, etc.

– Closed, cyclical times, the external membranes, which he called ‘vortices’ and separates the system from the outer Universe, the halo membrane of galaxies, the electron of atoms the skin of your body, which jails the inner space.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, is the fact that he perceived them from a singularity, central linguistic point of view, the verbal mind that controls the system – the black hole of gravitational information, the nervous system, the DNA code. So he said: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’. Yet this point and language-mirror is an infinitesimal reduction of the whole Universe, even if the mapping is quite accurate reflection of it. So we can now define in a simple equation all the minds of realty:

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

0-mind x ∞ Universal cycles = C: constant World mirror of the Universe.

So each mind is an infinitesimal world mirror of the infinite universe. And so there is only one infinite Universe but infinite Linguistic Monads.

What the physicist or religious person does is TO DENY all other mirrors, languages, monads and affirm HE CREATES WITH HIS LANGUAGE the Universe, the infinitesimal creates the infinite talking words in arab or ‘imagining point, lines, planes and particles that collapse when the physicist looks at the moon that before was NOT there’ LOL, try to laugh at them. Then they will show they are right because they can kill you.

The explanation of this paradox though is immediate if you look again at the equation of ‘any mind’ (o x ∞ = Constant, undetermined world):

The mind believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which seems to be quiet, as the mind stops motion to put it all inside and so human minds have always thought the Earth did not move, and it was the center of the Universe.

And while Copernicus taught us not to be the case, Einstein proved it was all relative motion, Darwin explained we are just a step in the ladder of evolution of information, and my models of duality and the fractal Universe shows our scale of size to be also relative, the concept has creeped slowly back into physics, with the anthropic principle, the big-bang theory, the marketing and propaganda and ego-pumping P.R.ess that made of nuclear physicists in the cold era, to back their worldly religion of producing enough atomic bombs to kill us all, to heights of anthropomorphic ego never seen since G. Bush talked to the bronze age peasant. 

Alas, now we again confuse the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’  WITH THE UNIVERSE, which Hilbert, Bohr and CERN is creating with entropic death. So their minds are just fractal points, but believe to know it all.

Descartes  was not a simpleton though as those big-bang physicists are. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

Newton though carried the day, and all attempts to put the record straight by Leibniz (relational time), Einstein (infinite time clocks), Bohm (pilot-wave theory of normal quantum physics), Darwin (man as an evolving species), and so many others including this writer, Sancho (Organic dual theory of the Universe) have met with the imposing Wall of the EGO-CENTERED man, a la ‘Trump’ who creates his ‘alternative truths’ that people love as long as it pumps the ego of all of us – never mind they always keep producing enough entropic death and war to kill us all.

The Universe is infinite in time, space and scales. Yet paradoxically all its parts are finite. Infintesimals in fact, as a part of a whole is its inverse function, 1/n. thus the larger beings as in a game of russian dolls are made of smaller ones. How small is then the homunculus in each of us? Is the paradox of ∞

‘Two things i deem infinite, the universe and the stupidity of man’ A. einstein

The structure of languages

How does a religion based in a language, which is a mirror of the universe works? For that we need to understand a minimum of the TERNARY structure of both of the Universe, and the language that reflects it, which of course, the ‘believer’ in the languages does NOT even consider as relevant to its inquire. 

Since for the wor(l)d believer ‘the word IS and CREATES reality’ and requires no ‘deeper layer’ inquire. Alas, Allah says ‘rajul’ and man is created, because god is ‘the word that became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John 1.1). So happens to the Hilbert->Copenhagen & big-bang interpretation of reality. But if you have come so far you might be a little bit less shallow than that. So before we show you the structure of languages and specifically mathematics, so you DO understand things, not only get used to them, we need to lay down…

The ternary structure of all systems: informative singularities, body-waves and cyclical membranes.

LET us now that we have learned the structure of all ‘Cartesian beings’, self-centred in a mind of information apply this knowledge to better understand God, mind and the Universe, because indeed, it is worth to pass page on the theoretical realm, for a moment (unfortunately we cannot pass page on the menaces of CERN), and leave behind the ‘primitive’ simplex outlook of reality sponsored by those entropy-only physicists. And it will help us to understand better the structure of the galaxy and the role man and strangelets and black holes play on it.

We concluded as Descartes, Leibniz and other geniuses of earlier science that systems are made of 3 organic parts, which correspond to 3 ‘space-time arrows’. The informative center which in galaxies are black holes, in humans heads, in trees roots, in the economic ecosystem the internet and so on; the membrane which cuts-off the system from the Universe, encloses it and protects it with its cyclical, clock-like form, which in galaxies is the halo, in life, a skin, in the earth the electromagnetic field and so on; and the middle space, the cytoplasm of the cell, the light matter of stars and planets, the body of organisms, the wave of quantum particles.

What fascinated me of this simple, beautiful ternary scheme is that all what exists can indeed be explained with it: entropic fields/limbs, informative particles/heads and the energetic body-waves in between. So for the first time we have a sound-sound scientific model which unifies life and matter without the need to absurd religions and reductionist theories of time.

Indeed, this is the basis of our advanced models of complexity and theory of information which describes all what exists as a combination of ‘limbs/fields of lineal entropy, combined with body/waves of cyclical time information’, which are both iterated into present waves-bodies of energy:

In the graph, we see some examples of the Universe, which becomes so simple and self-evident when we put straight the record of the arrows of time. So we write a simple equation for the 3 arrows/ages of time which in duality or rather trinity we use to describe all systems of the universe:

Past-Lineal  fields/limbs of entropy x Future-cyclical particles/heads of information = Present body-waves of energy.

Or in short geometric notation: | x O = Ø. It is called the Fractal generator of space-time beings, and it is the canonical equation of the alternative science of Duality or Complexity, which i formalised at the turn of the century before getting involved in the suits against CERN.

Which for physical systems is described by Einstein’s equation:

Relative past lineal space death of E-ntropy ≤ Constant present waves of energy (c2) ≥ Informative, cyclical mass vortices (M).

The ternary structure of all the systems of the Universe, applies to any physical, biological and sociological systems (in social organisms they are the 3 social classes of the system, the informative dominant class who controls the languages of information of society, money and the law, politicos & priests that control verbal languages on one side and bankers and corporations/scientists that control their digital language; then the working, reproductive body-class and finally Gaia, the entropic energy we destroy).

For example, all laws of electricity can be described considering ‘charges’ the electric singularities, magnetic fields (the surrounding membrane, which does NOT have a monopole, as it is the membrane of the charge) and the intermediate space. So happens to mass, systems, atoms and galaxies surrounded by a halo/electronic membrane with a singularity of higher mass (nucleus, black hole) and the intermediate region. The next graph shows a few of those systems:

We shall thus concentrate for what matter to us in the ‘ternary structure of the galaxy’ but first, in the ternary mirror-languages, so you understand why indeed words and mathematics matter to knowledge of the Universe by the mind but DO NOT reflect more than a limited number of its qualities.

Trinity APPLIES TO LANGUAGES, since as focused mirrors of realityall of them having this ternary structure. Let us show it to you in the 3 main language of mankind:

wor(l)d mirrors:     Subject (Informative human) < Verb (space-time action overt) > Object (entropic energy for the subject).

AND ALL SENTENCES as my penpal friend Chomsky showed can be reduced to this Universal grammar (or a dual mirror in more simplified versions).

Visual  languages have all 3 colours that the brain ‘codes’ according to frequency to signify those 3 elements:

Blue/Black (color of temporal information) < Green/yellow: color of reproduction: ST> Red (color of entropic energy).

This IS how each species codes colours. So when it feeds it follows the spill of entropic blood, sign of death, when it informs it looks up to the light, which it sees of a bluish color, and women who reproduce us, plants who reproduce, are code in the green color, and as it happens those 3 colours are ordered by frequency on that limited range of biological perception; so the mind has used them in the range the eyes see around the ‘light spectra of the sun of maximal energy’… So there is a constant interaction between language-mirrors and reality. But the reader should observe that the ‘languages of god’ are infinite, meaning, any mind-mirror can code reality with a specific language to obtain its essential ternary elements of information and act-react on it to survive. So happens with ‘spatial mathematics: geometry’, and ‘temporal mathematics: algebra’ and the 3rd huge discipline of mathematics, concerned with the SCALAR nature of the Universe (its fifth dimension), which is analysis.

So again, in this game in which we MUST depart NOT from the mirror but from reality, we need to introduce you the scalar structure of the Universe so you realise why ANALYSIS is also needed:

REALITY IS a scalar, fractal infinite Universe where all is relative and man is NEITHER its center, NOT its only intelligent form, NOT even the dominant scale of reality:

 

fractal universe

In the graph, the fractal Universe of entropy and information and its infinite wave-like energetic, fractal beings.

It is not the intention of this blog to explain the 5th dimensional, scalar ternary Universe (we do so in a small section and in other blogs). But so far we can consider of that graph 2 facts:

Now why this is specially important to the issue of CERN? 2 reasons:

1) it means if the Universe is a fractal of information, of infinite scales of size, General Relativity becomes absolute relativity. Since, none of those scales is more important. So humans ARE nothing, objectively, just dust of space-time and any attempt to build arrogant theories of our importance and ‘immortal standing’ doom to fail.

2) The entropic big-bangs essayed at CERN are not exploring the Universe at large but just an explosion of quarks at the scale of this planet and provide no further evidence of a possible cosmic big bang. We shall soon consider those 2 elements and what they imply for our position in the Universe.

So mathematics has 3 main disciplines to code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).

It has Geometrical space, (Spe) and temporal algebra (tiƒ).

And it has its ST ‘combinations’. So mathematics evolved in a way that now we do have to explain the ‘actions of space-time’, as words have active verbs and colours green/yellow mixes; more evolved space-time discipline.  For example geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with numbers, and topology which is geometry with motion. Again we are NOT here trying to upgrade the human mind, which of course I have done long ago before I became a certified crackpot instead of what I am, and if you reason you should start noticing (:

Ok. Now we can understand what religious people, aka physicists do NOT understand about their mirror-language mathematics, which we concede carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in celebrities than in physicists :) the dominant language today, and overcome religious words.

Still the language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY and in its present ‘underdeveloped form’, (its complete structure which I finished when young, before applying it to understanding the metric of 5D and the 3 arrows of time) is WELL BEYOND what mathematicians do now, as it is non-Euclidean (and they have only solved the 5th non-euclidean postulate of mathematics) and non-aristotelian (meaning it requires the 3 ARROWS OF TIME CAUSALITY and those ‘simpletons’ are working only with an arrow, entropy, so the MIRROR is both UNFOCUSED, and limited; but again this is not the task of this blog. Only one example. The ‘homunculus’ simpleton physicists of the XX century changed ALL the outlook of mathematical physics, when they applied the 5th postulate of non-euclidean geometry, the fact that through a ‘point, infinite parallels’ can cross to the physical space, and this really all what is about Relativity – they bended the ‘straight lines which define parallels’ to fit them into the point. But they completely miss the ‘meaning of a ‘non-euclidean point’. Indeed, if a POINT can be crossed by ∞ parallels:

– it is only a point for the mind that shrinks it, because parallels are straight lines and a ‘point with no breath’ (Euclidean point) can only fit one line. So to fit more lines, the point must be enlarged, when we come closer to it, so the point is no longer a star-point or particle-point but a FRACTAL POINT of the 5th dimension, which becomes huge star and then yes! voila, infinite parallels and now they are parallels, straight lines, can cross it.

So what Gauss, Riemann, or Einstein or at least Mandelbrot should have noticed (i talk of the 4 mathematical physicists I respect more of the last centuries) IS that Eucledian mathematics shrinks reality to fit into the mind, but REALITY makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact, and that the universe is SCALAR, and so redefine POINTS  not AS HILLBERT DID, when he realized he didn’t understand them – in a runaway process, deciding that because he DIDNT understand points, lines, planes, congruence and so on, they WERE JUST invented by their imagination. Instead he should have redefined the fractal point, line, plane and so in terms of 5D scales:

  • A fractal point (first axiom of Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian ¬Æ=i-logic mathematics) has breath, as it includes a volume of  energy and, which makes it a ¬Æ vital structure through which a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallels of entropy and information can cross.

We have to introduced the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘primitive’ is the mind of man. But of course, if you notice, and know something of maths, there is a guy there Perelman, who just solved a minor theme of the 5th postulate and is heralded as a homunculus genius (needless to say I do not exist, I was vaporised for trying to explain homunculus that this attitude does not get them beyond the century, but this is not about homunculus, but about the structure of the Universe).

In the graph, a few versions of this fractal point.

So humans even those who use the proper languages, and understand with humility the Universe are as they should be, just finitesimals (infinity only reaches to the limit of a scale of the fifth dimension) with a huge ego, because they confuse their point-mind finitesimal with the Universe, thinking the volume of information they store there is all. And do NOT there to come humbly to explain them they just do doodles on the sand, specially if you are not a chosen ‘mechanical’  big-hang, big-mouth homunculus with a prize and a huge budget. Just a final example, as we have put one of spatial geometry on temporal algebra – the closure of numbers And its universal syntax.

All equations have again the universal syntax:   F(x) ≈ G(Y), where the first element tends to be the time≈informative function, the ≈ symbol is the operandi (space-time action, equivalent to the verb) and the 3rd symbol the spatial function; and there are multiple variations of it.

Then we have polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimensions, and we do have analysis which does the same in a more sophisticated way. And then we have if we go instead of up in complexity down in simplicity the structure of ‘numbers’ which are the minimal points-units of temporal algebra, equivalent to spatial points, but not exactly the same (reason why for example in geometry pi, √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ as numbers are discontinuous, a bit of it to do the closure). 

So what are numbers? Again here homunculus as usual ‘get used to them’ and do not understand. Only one short of did, Mr. GAUSS, when he insisted on calling imaginary numbers lateral numbers. So numbers indeed are just the needed units to explain space, time, its energetic space-time combinations and the scales of the fifth dimension, and as usual we started with space numbers, the obvious counting of populations in space with natural numbers, but the visual homunculus has NOT understood much of the others, just found them and get used to them. So we just mention here the 2 ‘generator ternary equations’ of numbers to see how they match the parts of the Universe:

The closure of the systems of numbers grew from reflecting merely space populations (natural numbers), into 5D numbers, reflecting ‘partitions’ of social groups (represented by those natural numbers), with Egyptian ratio-nals; expanded further with the realisation that certain ratios did apply to ‘scaling’ in the fifth dimension without limit (as in the pi ratio of Spe-entropic lines into cyclical time O-cycles).

Alas, things got interesting here, but as the homunculus did not understand, the discoverer of pi, legend has was murdered by Pythagoras the first ‘religious mathematician’ because it found that pi was not perfect. It took to Poincare 2500 years latter to find that this is an awesome form of perfection because it means a mind-point of spherical form, with equal distance to all the realities it reflects can shrink with no limit (Poincare conjeture – the one that Perelman resolved recently with tons of pages). Alas, when I was a youngster I resolved it departing from my Fermat conception (this guy i do respect, maybe because he was as I am a basque, the first European people, and the longer surviving culture on mother earth)  that a good proof can fit in a margin. So once I solved the Fermat conjeture, in a margin (:completely trivial), i resolved the Poincare conjeture in a margin (almost as trivial), NOT with the axiomatic method but with the empirical method as mathematics does REFLECT REALITY as a language, it is a mirror and so you can AS YOU PROVE ANY SCIENCE BY THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD, solve mathematics if YOU KNOW what is reflecting, the fractal, non-euclidean, non-aristitelian Universe of 5 dimensions and 3 arrows of time symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space. 

So i did have a riot when all those so-called geniuses, with nobel prizes and fields medals needed computers, years of calculus and thousands of pages to complete their margins. (The proofs are of course available, and DO fit in a margin, just a bit below :)

Now, we have SPATIAL, natural numbers, 5D rational and transcendental numbers, who cross through 5D scales without tearing according to the Poincare postulate proved in a margin (: but this is NOT enough, because we need negative and lateral (not imaginary) numbers, and those are temporal numbers, numbers who describe processes in time not in space, as negative numbers do, as they represent merely the inverse arrow of time, so if you make a positive number an arrow of motion-entropy, or relative past loss of information, the negative number will be the arrow of future-information, and the lateral i-number, will be the bidimensional sum of both the real and the negative, to represent the present space-time.

So we can translate the ‘closure’ of all phenomena in terms of numbers, for the ∆ & ST elements of reality (broken in 2 sub-generators to simplify the comprehension) such as:

Spe (+ numbers) < St (imaginary lateral) > T (- numbers)

∆±i: i-ratio-nal or transcendental numbers; ∆±1: ratio-nal numbers.

And with this, you have the closure of all numbers and when you apply them to mathematical physics, then you do have the focused mirror all those homunculus who do NOT do ‘thought experiments’ as Einstein and this ‘vaporised’ not entity does, lack, REASON WHY THEY will kill you with their religion, which they do NOT understand only get use to it – aka believe. As you do, homunculus de mierda. (Sorry i have a bad day as we all know basque people are ‘terrorists’ and ‘primitive’ a la Fermat :) but remember i only insult your homunculus ego, they will kill you telling you are god.)

Pd.1 Now, the proofs in a margin for those who have arrived so far,  which i guess will be none, given that i have dished out to the homunculus and its ego a lot of bull$hit (: and very few homunculus use his big mouth to have a laugh at themselves (as a brit put me only we and you spaniards have jokes about themselves, to which i told him – we are the same, 80% of your genes are basque, so are spaniards, because to survive, and noone has done so long as the likes of Mr. Fermat, you DO have to respect NATURE, as we do here, but also know to use technology for the humankind and not to be slave of it, and kill first, that is prevent, in this case kill that machine…

So alas, as we said mathematics is an experimental mind science which is NOT closed in its demonstrations as Godel proved and lobachevski and Einstein explain ‘i don’t know when mathematics are real’, since the geometry of the Universe is real, THE PROOFS as in all science must be experimental, since ‘sciences should not be concerned with facts who have not happened, of which there is no evidence; (imaginary particles and cosmic big-bangs – the Fermi paradox though is a proof of the extinction of planets with life). So the proofs of Fermat’s theorem and Poincare conjeture are immediate.

Since the Universe is a bidimensional holography of ‘bidimensional space sheets with no motion; which can be seen as entropy with motion’ or bidimensional informative pages with no motion – as the one you are reading, see, 2 dimensions, height and length, hardly any depth, which are seen as time cycles with motion; so time is information in motion and space is entropy with no motion, alas ONLY BIDIMENSIONAL FORMS and its holographic st-merges are real.

Thus only X²+Y² exists as an exact new bidimensional form. 3-dimensional forms in natural numbers, which are ‘space populations’ are NOT added but multiplied; hence X³+Y³ ≠ Z³. Did Fermat had this prove? (: Obviously not – he needed the holographic principle, but never mind, the guy is still one of my heroes because humility and some sense of humor about oneself, is in the Universe highly regarded. Intelligence, trust me, is overrated. 

Poincare’s conjeture proof is also immediate, from the definition of a mind as a temporal informative Tiƒ element, since minds store information, and the n-sphere IS the form that stores more information in lesser space. Hence in as much as the equation of the mind 0 x ∞ =K, defines the shrinking of the whole infinite universe into a single point, only the spherical mind can shrink information with no limit without tear. 

Pd. 2 All this said I did enjoy Mr. Perelman’s proof as yet another clear ‘proof’ that ‘simplicity is genius’ and the axiomatic method only takes you to hundred of pages, which in an economic, experimental, real, Ockham’s Universe is proof of veracity. So to me the need of such long proofs only prove, the axiomatic method is the Ptolemaic epicycles of modern times.

I did respect this man though more for 2 reasons: he did it unlike the proof of Fermat, without computers, and specially I respect the fact he didn’t lower himself to receive its go(l)d. He did it as I have done everything in my life AMORE GRATIS, for the pleasures described by Kant in his tomb: ‘the wonders of the mind’s languages inside, and the beauty of the infinite Universe they reflect ‘above’ us’.

And then, once his job was done, (or not), he disappeared from the public view, as I have done.

Indeed, all what could be done about CERN was tried, and I had enough of homunculus insulting me, of P.R.ess calling me crackpot and self-styled time theorist or ‘writer journalist’, of a group of people assaulting me in LA the day before the last court suit, breaking my arm in 5 pieces, so I wouldn’t arrive on time (as i laid on the floor the police ‘suddenly arrived of nowhere’, put me in a hospital, from where i could not leave So i had to wait till night, escape the hospital, walk 20 miles, take a plane without crouches. I had enough of pretentious saint nobels of the dynamite, of celebrity gurus with mental anoxia, denying me an interview, of Mr. Hawking’s conference, who named me as Walter as ‘2 unknown persons’ and when I filmed him, of more police, stealing my cam (the tape was on my balls, because also that I have to defy pure eviL=anti-live, but those homunculus? For God’s shake, Mr. Wilczeck who didn’t dare to appear on court, not to confront truth, complained like a sissy that someone had sent him a menacing email… and the press published. The day after i put a suit with Bush in power, using the Patriot act as a stunt, asking the American government to take away the Nuclear grade bomb material at CERN according to the act that authorised the American government to remove any foreign nuclear material that menaced the life of Americans – in this case of all of them, i got a call from a self-named journalist, telling me that as a foreigner, they could apply me the patriot act if I didn’t take the suit, and I didn’t flinch. And never mentioned it to the press.

The whole thing got people so berserk out of pure absolute cowardice. The homunculus is so infantile, so coward that he cannot even discuss or recognise death, so he invents ‘religions’ and cannot recognise the dangers of cern not to pee on his pants. And when he goes to war he needs all his machines to murder entropically in the name of sacred VHod or sacred God, innocent people, just because they don’t share his beliefs. To hell with them. Kudos Mr. Perelman. We need more scientists like you.

The problem of religious people who have no reason: they kill you.

‘Religion is the art of animal training, it trains people how to think’. Schopenhauer.

Now, it is quite obvious for any rational scientist that religions fictions, either verbal (Abrahamic) or visual (celebrity circus) or mathematical (big-bang, Copenhagen interpretation) MUST BE DENOUNCED, because they are dangerous not only for the mind, but also for the body. But given the ego paradox nobody in his right mind, does contradict it in public, because religious people turn easily violent ad hominem and so why to fought them?

Problem though is that they kill, so someone has to denounce them. Indeed, Jihad with his concept that the infidel can be killed if he does not believe in Allah, murders people even if nobody really wants to denounce the myths of Islam, as blasphemy is condemned in many muslim countries with death. Orthodox, Segregational Judaism with his idea expressed in Talmud that only the jewish people are humans and specifically blacks and arabs are lesser than dogs, because they are descendants of Ham, who peed on Noah, provoked modern slavery and now has provoked an apartheid state against arab palestinians, basically living in a concentration camp without human rights, even if nobody dares to denounce Judaism, not be called anti-Semite. And the most peaceful of those religious myths, the catholic church, softened by the love message resurrected in the Vatican congress, also has his problem of pederasts, due to the celibate ‘machist’ hang-ups of earlier doctrine, and did for very long through the inquisition murder people. But nobody says it is all an ego paradox to avoid the usual fundamentalist christian getting berserk.

Now the difference between the religion of big-bang physicists with cosmic cannons and those of Jihadist with a few kalashnikovs mainly shooting other Muslims in their countries, Jewish zealots who affect mainly the Palesitinians and the pederasts who affect a few youngsters is obvious: Only physicists have the weapons of mass destruction to kill US ALL. So IT IS QUITE absurd that the entire planet focuses on the violence Abrahamic religions but says NOTHING of the most dangerous of all religions, that of nuclear physicists, so far the ONLY people who have been NOW FOR 70 YEARS, producing merrily the ONLY weapons that truly can kill us all. So obviously given the sheepishly obedience of mankind, whose true religion today is the machine-weapon to those people, as NO BELIEVER will ever denounce its own religion (how many jews you know who are pro-palestinians, how many muslims you know who make jokes on Mhmd, how many catholics who deny the infallibility of the pope, how many physicists who deny the infallibility of the big-bang?

So we couldn’t recruit anyone, and had to come forward, as the people who were evolving further the science of physics from the perspective of duality and complexity and the understanding of the arrow of biology, life and information. So Walter was a biologist and physicist, me a system scientist and philosopher of science, Rossler a chaos theorist and doctor. The answer of the ‘believers’ in that sense surprisingly was accepted by all: we are the experts, we have therefore the right to do the experiment even if we kill you all for our credo. Since this is the jihadist and zealot theory: we are the muslims so we can kill the infidel, we are entitled to the sacred lands of Samaria, so we can kill the palestinian who occupies them, which most people unless indoctrinated by arab or jewish media will deny. Conclusion: ‘the ethos of a technological civilisation is indeed the ultimate religion of present mankind, because ALL except a few dozen of people did accept the ‘position of CERN’ and of course his ‘coda’ – we are NOT killing you, which is what the jihadist will say – we are not dying but entering the paradise – in the case of the physicist the paradise of supreme knowledge.

Let us then apply the far more evolved concept of a Universe made of ‘systems’ with  the 3 ‘space-time’ organs, a cyclical clock-like membrane that contains a body-wave of energy, self-centred in a  singularity of information to the galaxy, to further understand the Witten hypothesis, and why it is so likely we become merely a strangelet particle in the halo of the galaxy.

 

 

 

V. THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROOF: THE WITTEN SOUND-SOUND HYPOTHESIS

In that regard, it is necessary to stress as we do in many articles the sociological and military-industrial topics, which so well work together to prevent the simple, easy solution to CERN – close the factory of strangelet liquid, which is nothing but deconfined quark matter, the ‘thing’ the LHC keeps doing each year in bigger amounts till it become stable and does us all. Basically the LHC is the showcase for most high tech industries and the pet-project of the most powerful group of science, physicists – since they make the machines and weapons of our industrial civilisation; and so sponsor ‘Fromm’s technological ethics: ‘if we can make a machine we must make it, even if it kills us all.

So on one side the pressure of peers is enormously and on the other the rest of mankind who worships machines and physicists will never dare to defy something they don’t understand. 

This means only the most advanced theoretical physicists and philosophers of science (the true queen of scientific disciplines, despite physicists attempts to ‘push us aside’) will tell the truth about it. But only physicists will be exposed and had the power to avoid the certain creation of strangelets in this machine and they won’t for it is their worldly profession. 2 examples of both kind of scientists and their relevance on the issue will suffice:

  • The physicist. As today  the most respected physicist alive is NOT Hawking but Witten.

He became the top physicist of the world today, when he discovered superstring theory, unifying the 5 models into the so-called M-theory. So huge is his prestige in the profession that he has even received a mathematical ‘fields prize’ – Hawking only popularised his work with M-theory books as he did with that of Einstein in ‘a brief history of time’ – it is the celebrity of the discipline.

Now what people do not know is that one of his first papers was about strangelets. Since he had been for 20 years ‘soundly’ explaining that the only known-known halo candidate to be 90% of dark heavy matter are quark matter, strangelets, the most stable matter of the Universe. Since the so-called ‘Witten hypothesis’ obeys both, the ‘principle of economicity and simplicity – Ockham’s razor  – as strangelets are made of ‘heavy quarks’  we know do exist, and Nature does NOT create a new species of top predator mass, JUST to keep it on the rooms of the LHC. Hence strangelets MUST EXIST, be more common than the weak Ud-mass we are made of and have a REAL use on the Universe.

Further on, today we know that the galaxy is filled with planets, shown to be overwhelmingly the most numerous objects of the perceived galaxy. And since stars reproduce black holes, which are at the center of its galaxies, similar to a cell, with its gravitational dense informative centres of black hole, its energetic planets and stars in between, made of our light ud-quarks, the symmetries of Nature between microcosmos and macrocosmos, preclude that the 3rd known-known type of quarks, should be the substance of that halo made hence of strangelets that feed on planets (while the super-heavy top quarks should be having similar density, the substance of black holes).

 This ternary symmetry, which follows the laws of simplicity and economicity in science, if anything have been further proved by THE LHC, which keeps ELIMINATING all other theoretical only ‘inventions’ of physicists tinkering with equations (so not Supersymmetry, not axions, NOT NOTHING except what we know is there and suffice to construct the ‘simple not malicious’ Universe (Einstein) since ‘simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), and Ockham’s razor work’:

dark macrocosmos

In the graph, the ternary symmetry between the microscopic and macroscopic scale of matter, which prompted Witten’s Hypothesis, is routinely explored in professional papers, and this scientist has used to model galaxies as an organism of 3 ‘topological parts’ similar to all systems of nature, made of a hard membrane that separates the ‘entity’, in this case the galaxy halo, similar to the protein membrane of a cell, or the electronic cover of an atom; a central, informative singularity, in the galaxy the swarm of black holes, in the cell of DNA genes, in the atom of quarks, and the lighter, ‘food’-energy that feeds both, in the galaxy our light ud-atoms, of stars and planets that seem to reproduce black holes and the Halo of strangelets, in the cell the energetic mitochondria that reproduces both proteins and DNA, and in the atom the ‘interatomic space’ filled with energetic waves that move back and forth between quarks and electrons. It is the most beautiful symmetry of physics between both scales, proved by Ockham’s razor, economicity, experimental evidence and now unfortunately the Fermi paradox.

So,  no planet shows life activity and intelligent or robotic communication, hence it seems in all of them, physicists blow up our future (the so called fermi paradox)  with something more powerful than a few H-bombs, as humans would survive in few numbers and soon regain the planet. it is the entire planet which goes under and the only explanation is the Witten hypothesis, coupled with the Nuclear Industry exploring big-bang bombs.

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. And we are its food. It might be that humans are only ‘animals that make machines and weapons till they destroy themselves’? As Einstein put it: ‘it is obvious that our technology has overcome our humanity’

So turning around the ego-trips of humanity and its physicists and religious people, the more sound objective, experimentally proved theory of reality would be exactly the inverse of the anthropic principle physicists sponsor (a Universe created with the constants that would give birth to man, supreme intelligent being): we are NOT the center of the Universe, dense dark matter is; the galaxy is NOT created for us, but we ARE the food of dark matter, and all galaxies END UP as pure vortex of mass, collapsing into the black hole, surrounded by a forbidding halo of strangelets, which prevent us to escape and only arrogant physicists and religious people who cannot stand death and the infinitesimal nature of human beings, deny that and indeed die for their idol-ogies and false Gods and theirs of the Universe, which they hide in their ‘secret’ language, making it all look so complex and convincing the human sheeple they ARE THE CENTER OF IT ALL, censoring systematically any attempt to explain humbly and objectively reality as it is.

So you would expect on that overwhelming evidence that the alibi of CERN – that we have no ABSOLUTE PROOFS of the existence of strangelets, as obviously they are dark matter, so we neither have proof of invisible gravitation or black holes, but not physicist in his right mind would deny them – WOULDN’T WORK among professionals who respect the scientific method, and Witten’s standing and work. Or at least that Witten would have become vocal about this craziness of the remains of the old Nuclear Age of bomb research – as he does not need to work there and his reputation is unassailable. But he has been mute, and has never criticised CERN. It is indeed an absolute wall of silence, so surrealist as the behaviour of people in dictatorships or wars, which they ‘attack’ with enthusiasm, despite knowing they will likely die on them, with the ascientific, emotional excuse of ‘tribal nationalism’ – that is the belonging to a tribal species not to the scientific reality of a unique human homo sapiens species.

This is where we stand here. People are so coward, passive and fear so much criticism of peers or physicists at large that will rather ‘forget’ they have a ‘Damocles death sword’ ahead and of course, have pumped up the ascientific, emotional excuse of ‘huge discoveries’ that will reveal the meaning of it all to shut up all criticism.

So despite the fact that the likely candidate to become food for strangelets in the Halo, which is 90% of mass, are the planets, which play the role with stars, of mitochondria in cells that feed also the central DNA-nucleus of ‘black hole information’, and the hardy ‘protein membrane’, humans seem to go ahead with the destiny for all the wrong reasons, which have nothing to do with reason and science: power, ego-trips, money, weapons, scientific prizes.

Now, let us be a bit more humble and explain you where those lonely researchers that do thought experiments a la Broglie and Einstein are taking sound physics further in the explanation of the Universe using the 2 arrows of time entropy and information and its present energy combinations, which sorry does not make you immortal, does not make you god or vhod and does not create infinite universes only one, which stubbornly refuses to go away and let all those other ones ‘appear’ in this reality, despite the zillions spent in their search (indeed CERN has NOT seen any other new particle besides those who we knew they were there, no other hint of extra-dimensions, extra-universes or dragoons running amok, it is just producing in its 99% growing lumps of strangelet matter that will sooner or latter big-bang planet Earth at the reduced scale where big-bangs are proved: novas, quasars and E=mc2 bombs).

Since the big bang is ONLY  the death of matter that eliminates from the mix, the gravitational informative force and the dark quark heavy matter that holds those galaxies together, enclosed in his halo of strangelets, and shrinks the expansive space between them.

So when we put together both arrows of time, we observe what we observe: REALITY AS IT IS.

Now i am not giving you a treatise on the foundation of mathematics and then upgrade your physical mirror, which would blow up the mind of any homunculus who can understand it, but just a bit of light on your mirror, even if you have 3 nobel prizes, 20 fields medals and have resolved all the problems of the millennium you are an ‘idiot’ on the true complex wholeness of the language of mathematics and even if you have ALL the language solved as I have done with ALL the languages of man, you are still not better than my mind, a finitesimal mirror of the wholeness, the entire Universe which has ALL the information about itself, and ONLY him does. We you the idiot with 20 fields medals me, not so stupid with the entire ¬Æ structure are still microbe and we would do much better not opening the ‘scalar Universe’ to the seemingly point but actually huge black hole from the gravitational scale, ok?

To know means nothing if you die, and those people neither know nor will survive.

Duality or rather trinity, 5D and numbers.

Now, we have a better mirror. Sorry the homunculus only has prizes, I do have the better mirror on my point-mind but homunculus does not want me to share, because I have told him his big mouth and big hands are going to kill us all, and he got sored. good luck.

This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.

It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.

Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).

The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.

So when i took over the discipline of Duality at the world congress of systems sciences and information theory – the sciences which were found at the death of Einstein in the Macy’s congress precisely to follow in his path, and find dualist theories which offset the simplex entropy word of physicists – I told the people we should rename it TRINITY  as entropy and information, yin and yang, are just the 2 starting elements to combine into infinite energy beings, whereas energy is precisely defined by a lineal motion of entropy tracing a closed path of information.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information. The simplicity and capacity to explain the Universe with the 3 proper arrows of time is in that sense a revolution unlike none has happened in science, since copernicus simplified the equations of Ptolemy putting the sun in the center. Why to say this – of course as usual the suspicious reader bought by the paraphernalia surrounding the weapons industries and its inventors, physicists will either ‘reason’ and understand or ‘believe’ and think I am here selling theory. Not so. The point is this: for a century now physicists have NOT made any huge inroads in the thoughts of god only the details because models made with an entropic single arrow of death are completely exhausted, as models with the Earth at its centres were exhausted by the time of Galileo. So there is NOTHING to gain of making ever more expensive, more dangerous cosmic explosions and mankind should pass page on the tradition of ‘lineal time and ballistics’.

It is this theoretical fact, which will as all revolutions of thought take too much time to substitute the previous paradigm what was needed for mankind to realise that PHYSICISTS were not the ‘holders of absolute truths’ and their ‘theories’ were NOT alibi to put all mankind at risk.

But they carried the day, and imposed their truths with technological, financial and mass-media power.

TRINITY: The life and death cycle.

Since of course, both religious jihads and big-bang terrorists will just insult you if  REASON is brought to the argument. They will affirm they are the only ‘experts’ and you know nothing, mind your own business, we have the rights to explode the planet to prove death is the origin of it all. The only difference being that Jihad terrorists have only Kalashnikovs, so they can only kill humans one by one to prove the sacred fire of Allah; CERN’s terrorists have the backing of the entire industrial-military complex and so they can kill all humans with a single shot.

CERN, nuclear physics, its entropic military theories of reality and its imposition of truths with propaganda, pumping the ego of supposed geniuses (any physicist that makes some mathematical doodle in the sand of thought or discovers a new machine and the astounding arrogance of its practitioners, except the few realgeniuses of the discipline) in that sense, represent the anti-science of power: All the wrong ways to defy the truths of the Universe, which only appeal to humans.

Of course, the reader will think this is all personal. But it is not. On the contrary, we tried for long during a year before suing CERN to talk with the people involved in this project who had made the wrong calculus and designed a machine able to make strangelets. But there was no way to open an argument, no possibility to dialog with other physicists, no respect to the environmental rules of America and Europe and soon, the entire strategy of CERN, which had easily achieved the wall of silence that has surrounded always physicists’ worldly profession of making weapons, was to attack ad hominem and destroy the career of the few scientists that opposed and denounced those experiments.

Consider for example the destiny of my career, as head of Duality in the world of scientific congresses, once the Pandora box of those suits was opened, on the hope humanity would reason and care for their survival.

If the reader ‘can reason’ and reads with an open intelligent mind what we have said till here, he would realise of the important of introducing the arrow of information to describe the Universe, of the great advances which means to have a logic and mathematical formalism to describe cyclical time – explained in depth in the article on the 5th dimension, easily the biggest advance on time theory since the 4th dimension formalism of Einstein. This was the opinion of many people when I started to make my round of conferences after publishing a few papers on the theme back in 2006. However my work was too recent to have become established as ‘standard science’ when I put the suit to CERN, while the other activist Mr. Rossler, was at the end of his career. This shouldn’t have matter at all in a question which was completely objective, totally unrelated to the MESSENGERS, as it was pure objective science of black holes, strangelets, planetary exploration and so on. But from the very first day the suit became public with a cover on New York Times nobody discussed scientifically the issue. All was a brutal ad hominem on slaughter on the messenger, as military tyrants would do. Since of course, the avalanche on the messenger is a much easier form to eliminate an issue, which cannot be tackled without exposing the flaws of CERN that arguing as we have done the true risks and reasons to be worried.

It is thus unavoidable to explain the personal effects of that on slaughter, even if it means unavoidably the appearance of my ego – ad hominem in this manner always works. If you ignore it, people will think it is because it is truth, if you defend yourself people will think indeed you have a huge ego.

In this case though, as Rossler and me represented some of the most advanced theory on the new paradigm of ‘XXI century science, complexity’ (a quote of Mr. Hawking, not me), it is part of the issue to discuss those complex models of the Universe along with the personal adventure and the risks involved, which I know very few will understand. Ultimately though a true scientist must completely ignore the sociological, military and ego paradoxes that condemn mankind.

To the point. When I brought Trinity of time arrows to science, people were enthusiastic realising of all the new avenues i was opening with the full range of the 3 arrows of time, past-entropy-youth, present-reprodutive, energy and relative future-information that guides with its particles-heads the system of body-waves of the Universe. I was receiving invitations all over the world to explain those new discoveries, because this was an objective new view on time and space, which finally after 50 years of search of a formalism of theory of information that would properly put together those two arrows of time, and explain the meaning of energy, the conundrums of the Universe, the life-death cycles of systems, its similar structure, etc, etc. could be expressed in the logic and mathematical languages of science.

The most beautiful result was indeed, the symmetry between the 3 organs of all beings, the entropic limbs/fields, the reproductive body-waves and the informative heads/particles and the 3 ages of life in time, the entropic moving youth, the reproductive maturity and the informative, 3rd age of excessive warps and curves. Nobody had ever solved the ultimate question of existence, with equations. And all systems of the Universe followed them:

Now in the graph we can see the natural development of the 3 ages of time Max Spatial Entropy x Min. temporal information or youth, E=I, or mature reproductive classic age of balance and Max. I x Min. E or 3rd informative warped age, which are also the 3 topological ages of all space-time beings (for the galaxy and the Universe the 3 solutions to EFE, young entropic big-bang, mature, reproductive steady state, and 3rd informative big-crunch). So the big-bang is ONLY the entropic age of matter, so clearly expressed in the 3 ‘possible states’ of matter (entropic gas, balanced liquid, 3rd informative solid; or in the 3 arrows of Einstein’s equation: E=mc2, M=e/c2 and c2=E/m and so on). The beauty of it is they are the same arrows of life, and the same arrows of societies, in their subconscious collective art, after an epic young age, a classic age and a baroque, angst age, which ends in death by entropic war. So every ‘entity’ of the Universe is a proof of trinity and the 3 arrows of life, and this discovery during the short period I gave conferences around the world on it, was provoking the astonishment of scientists of all disciplines.

I remember the standing applause I receive at the 50th anniversary of the foundation of this science at Sonoma, north of San Francisco, the center of those information sciences.  But then they didn’t change the name from duality to trinity.

As it happened I learned about CERN’s black holes, put them a suit for genocide and physicists met with system scientists in a congress I was not invited despite being one of the vice-presidents and founding chairs, which had to be invited and erased duality from scientific congresses, which remind me of the chin emperor, who brought iron weapons and coins to China, and considered himself immortal poisoning himself eating gold, who burned all taoist books except those about technology and murdered all its earlier scientists.

This was along the ‘ad hominem’ campaigns of CERN against us, the millions of bloggers insulting our work and many other happenings completely ignored by the P.R.ess who sided massively with the LHC a bit of a surprise; as I was more idealist then about mankind and the ‘system’. Needless to say a decade has passed and now you could say I am the most authoritative ‘anti-system’ science in this blue dot lost in the corner of the Universe.

Now, the reader as many personal friends have told me, would expect me to continue my career, to lobby, shout, keep fighting but this is not built-in into the character of the revolutionaries of science. We are NOT social, celebrity-seeking people. As Planck put it: 

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

Contrary to the ad hominem campaign, for me was a true martyrdom to oblige myself to open this blog, make the film strange matters, go to court, warn people make press releases, lobby my peers – I hated every part of it. I was simply forced by the global attitude and felt always like sisifus rising a rock that mankind together should have blown up with a rational, humble, preventive attitude. This was not my role on life, which was and it is, now as a lonely explorer to look through what Picasso called ‘his window to the absolute’ , in my case my window to trinity and the fifth dimension. Every lonely genius who has broken into his field is like this. The ones in the subconscious collective you can remember from Leonardo writing backwards, to Leibniz or Fermat communicating only on private letters, to Darwin 20 years without explaining himself to Marx, writing alone in the British library, to Einstein, who couldn’t stand anymore the obnoxious lobbying of that retarded egolatric Bohr, on a crusade to prove himself above heavens and earth and his colleague Hllbert, who had the chuptzah of publishing Relativity theory first as if it was his, to de Broglie, with whom I feel a special connection for the simplicity and depth of his thoughts, akin to the simplicity and depth of my pioneer work on the 5th dimension others should have by now extended as a paradigm if I had not been vaporised, have in common that loneliness, on the view of the human lack of ethics and intelligence, both in our corrupted leadership with his meaningless honor ceremonies and the mass, always ready to cheer its pumping-ego religious theories of entitlement.  And yet knowing those precedents we came out of the closet.

The logic that guided us – that humans were corrupted and the system was corrupted by power – we all know that – but in front of a collective global genocide, moreover happening in Europe, seemingly a civilised place, people will discuss the theme and reason and life would prevail – was wrong.

All courts followed ‘suit’ and dismissed ‘technically’ all those suits, since as the Hague court told my lawyers, ‘we only judge genocides’ once they have happened. Indeed, they will be busy busy trying to regain the lost information, when they are inside the black hole to see what went wrong. Sorry, after so many years of angst, I am a bit cynical about the Homunculus species, but not about the Universe. In this as in so many things, I coincide with Einstein and its concept of infinity (mind the reader I consider myself a physicist, and study physical systems with great pleasure, but not a ‘human physicists’ of the kind we find in the big-bang and Copenhagen schools and we shall return to that): humans are infinitely stupid due to their ego and the Universe is likely to be infinite in scales, hence in relative sizes and time cycles that will last for ever.

Back to REALITY, it is made, as we said, of the dimension of life and information, which ends its world cycle of existence in the explosive dimension of entropy and death in a cyclical, fractal Universe, in which big-bang means merely the E<=>Mc² death side of Einstein equation.

But this equation runs the other way around creating mass, collapsing entropy into mass. In fact Einstein first wrote it as M=E/c², in a landmark paper, explaining how gravitation could create mass out of entropy, as those strangelets and black holes, do collapsing light mass into heavy mass particles, as galaxies do, collapsing vacuum space into gravitational mass.

More over, this is happening in all scales of size, none of which is more important – so there are big bang deaths of tiny matter in atomic bombs, of larger planets and stars in nova explosions, and of galaxies in quasars, with a 20 billion year cycle, which is the origin of the ‘LOCAL’ measures of entropy physicists have blown up to cosmic dimension and move back in entropic time to collapse it all into their infinitesimal point, who ‘talk to them’ with imaginary points and lines…

5D best

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. S, $pe), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, Tiƒ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

As it happens, I keep exploring this wonderful universe, all around myself, and all its parts with those 2 arrows of time, which create constantly fractal information across scales, as you are born in the infinitesimal scale of cells that reproduce its information till forming you. So happens with galaxies, seeded by dark matter, dense black holes and strangelets, which feed on our matter. I know, I know, duality has been declared dead by decree, but as i see it, in the same way the chin emperor died eating gold and taoists kept musing about the two arrows of Tao, which create the infinite yin-yang beings of energy, I am quite sure that once physicists evaporate with their 10 up to 500 parallel universes and dragoons, there will be out there all those fractal beings made of spatial entropy and temporal information, repeating its body-waves, unaware that to ‘exist’ is forbidden by decree, only entropy-death is allowed.

 

VIII. THE HARSH, OBJECTIVE CONCLUSION OF TRUE SCIENCE: NOT IF BUT WHEN.

The Totalitarian principle of Gell-mann – any particle that can exist WILL exist; the ethics of a technological civilisation of Fromm (‘if we can make a machine, we will make it, even if it menaces to kill us all’) and the Witten-Sancho hypothesis (the Halo of galaxies is made of strangelets, as it is the only known-known particle that fits into its properties and the ‘ternary, organic structure of the galaxy’- this is my contribution through the formalism of the 5-D scalar Universe – obliges it to have a cut-off substance of the microcosmos, which can only be strangelets) and the Fermi Paradox, (the non-existence of intelligent life or robotic life in the Universe, teaming with planets that extinguish before reaching interstellar travel, today possible thanks to EM-engines) precludes that we WILL be extinguished by the Industry of Accelerators.

NONE of those 4 proofs have been rebutted, merely censored. And as we show in other posts, the process of production of dibaryons and strange liquid is now well-documented. So the pending questions is ‘when’ not ‘if’ or ‘why’, the Earth will become a strangelet and likely migrate to the halo of the galaxy… Witten though in this case won’t get his nobel prize… which seems to be more important for those minions of thought behind CERN that the protection of human life, ‘whatever it takes’.

So the fifth proof is the behaviour of humans in the face of death, which basically is the ‘Ostrich reaction’: dig-it and hide your head and brain beneath, just hoping the lion doesn’t see your bumpy a$$. Sorry, the issue is too surrealist to keep a moderate tone. Indeed, ‘human consensus’ in madness is not a proof of truth.

For example, 4 billion humans seem to believe that some goat-keeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning found the meaning of it all, and talked directly to the creator the infinite Universe, just because they fear death so much, they can’t even accept the obvious. Mr. Meshu was a delirious peasant in a very ignorant age, and we are ‘ashes of space-time’.

But alas, 3000 years have passed of all the wrong ceremonies to deny this, and even today, paradox of paradoxes, people die as jihadists and zealots to sustain this view that they won’t die. So do entropic physicists, clueless about the information systems of the Universe, who will not renounce to explain it all with entropic disorder=death, the worldly religion of its real profession, to make weapons, which kill humans, something they also don’t acknowledge to be doing. So as in the Abrahamic case, they will die because they can’t even contemplate death. Indeed, ashes to ashes.

In that regard, the only ‘uncertainty’ in a totalitarian, deterministic universe is not ‘if’ but ‘when’. It will be CERN’s constant upgrades of the LHC? Or shall we wait for the creation of the Chinese 100 km. collider? Or for the much cheaper, far more powerful ‘table plasma accelerators’?

Let us repeat this: the universe is a block of deterministic space-time. There is no probability but lack of knowledge or not desire to know the future. We can only in this case talk of the ‘probabilities’ of this happening at a certain time. But if the industry of accelerators IS NOT cancelled ‘soon’, which doesn’t seem to be the case; since the ostrich is moving her tail trying to attract the Black Hole lion, as we speak; this WILL certainly happen. When? Before Interstellar travel is possible at the end of the century.

Yes, I know this is not popular. Most people leave now the blog, and some send me spasm. What nobody does is the logic behaviour in such a case: to complain to CERN, the apocalyptos, not to the messenger, the rational cautious human being. 

When? is in that sense THE ONLY PENDING QUESTION.

And the Fermi paradox tell us it will be soon – this century as we could be colonising the Universe with EM engines and robots much earlier than that but not a single civilisation has passed in the galaxy the Great Filter or else they would be here with their ‘robots’ and we see none.

It is for that reason that I call in my models of the super organism of history, and its 3rd age of excessive information and childish behaviour, the zero generation: our sons or grand-sons being born today, which will be ‘certainly’ vaporised, while humans as always have done, put their ostrich head in the nearest ‘black hole’.

In the graph, the Industry of Accelerators keeps evolving, with cheap, smaller plasma versions, upgrades at CERN and Chinese plans to build a super-machine of 100 km. since the ‘issue’ of its dangers for mankind has been buried, censored and so humanity with his astounding capacity TO DENY truths that conflict with their ego and sense of entitlement has passed page on the first clear risk for his survival on Earth, far more important than global warming also caused by the ‘pollution of machines’. Indeed, the ‘human factor’ of reason and survival instincts, which is the ‘only’ factor to ad into the certainty of the Totalitarian principle is solved. We are chosen of go(l)d and it is blasphemous to doubt that we shall not become eternal, dominate black holes, reach the supreme knowledge through the expansion of entropy=big bang death and solve all the mysteries of the Universe making ever bigger quark cannons and learning its mysteries by the pedestrian method of shooting quark balls to mother Earth Fact is the issue is not solved Authority not reason, power not human caring has imposed a Law of Silence that the ‘human sheeple’ accepts merrily with the childish attitude and selfie indifference, zeitgeist of our age. Thus it is only a question of when the energy of those accelerators will succeed piling up enough strangelet liquid, already produced at the LHC to make the ‘quark ball’ a stable lump of strange matter and start an ice-9 reaction – a factor, which we can calculate theoretically but only the ‘moment’ of collective death will assert with absolute certainty. Till then my advice is ‘carpe diem’, live the day. As you cannot ‘explain death’ to entitled children of thought, bad boys with big toys, which is what most humans are. What they truly excel at is on ceremonies that pump up their ego, silly-nilly prizes and axiomatic dogmas of truth by ‘consensus’ censorship and power imposition that time and the Universe reveals once and again to be partial truths or absolute falsehoods.It is in that sense remarkable that 99% of what the LHC PRODUCES is quark liquid (strangelet in the making) but it is THE ONLY THING THEY DO NOT TALK ABOUT. Indeed, you will hear about Higgs, SUSYs, multiple dimensions, antimatter, axions, axinos, neutrinos, all the zoo of imaginary particles but that 99% of potentially genocidal substance, the most powerful explosive of the Universe, in the making IS not a theme of con-cern. It does NOT officially exist anywhere in the Universe. This is the degree of surrealism reached by the industry. Imagine a factory that produces 99% of cars and then some ‘debris’ but only would talk of the scrap proudly as if that was the purpose of the factory. 

 

 

 

 

EPILOGUE: CAN MANKIND RESURRECT IN MIND AND LIFE?

Humans guided by the anthropomorphic, ego-centered germ(anic) and $emitic cult(ure)s of war and go(l)d with his entropic point-gods and burning bushes today despise fully, the Universe, its galactic top predators and the homunculus feels he is much more than a microbio on a mitochondria of the gala cell, the only perceptive, intelligent, entitled being, even if he does not understand something so simple as the trinity structure of time-space and its linguistic syntax.

For god’s sake, they still call time numbers imaginary numbers – they are just ‘animetals’, visual animals with some dexterity assembling machines. they only understand what they sees, pace, pictures of particles, have zero understanding of time cycles, causality, the logic that creates the Universe. But if you try to enlighten them with reason and the logic of time, they just think, this guy is contradicting my ego. Do you think the Universe cares for that primate slavery to memes of metal? Never mind many humans are not like that. Those who lead us, those who pay for those machines, those the homunculus revere are.

So yes, history in this planet is determined by them, since as Leibniz another humanist german who abandoned those primitive memes put it, the Universe is the best of all possible worlds, because it extinguishes all species that do not make the mark.This one, or rather the cultures that won the battle of history with his ego paradox of gothic entropic religions and go(l)d chosen races won’t.

 Now, I just saw this picture of an artist of human thought on the news, which truly ‘resumes’ the cult(ure)s in power, their memes, their weapons of mass destruction, their leaders, their goals, their dual symbols of gold and iron – but what the Universe thinks of them is ‘hidden in the second layer’ of those 2 a-bombs, look harder – what you see on them?:

Clowns, because this man, the most powerful homunculus is just a clown with a big mouth and big hands to press all the wrong bottoms, zeitgeist of the age – a totalitarian ego, which the Totalitarian Principle and the ego paradox will reduce to his face value – none.

Yeap, Trump-eteers of Apocalypto, nazis and askhe-nazis, goths and chosen of go(l)d,  germ(an)s and $emites who kill rational, artistic, humanist, scientific, humble Greece>Latin>r=evolutionary europe rhythmically now are again at it at CERN and the ECB came.

We, the oldest culture of the continent, see them coming but so far have survived. This entropic germ(an)s came to the basque country twice. The first time with iron, after massacring everybody, calling themselves goths, god in germ(an) languages. We just took one of their swords, analyse it, found rocks of iron in our land, made them and kill them all. Then they came back with a new weapon, the spur and armoured cavalry. We left them loot Pamplona, and in the mountains, where they couldn’t use horses massacred them a 3rd time. Then they came in Guernika. By then we were civilised; unfortunately so we just painted them. But our grand-sons, the brits did the job. Unfortunately when they did CERN, I couldn’t convince my people to blow up the machine…

But rest assured in many other fractal planets, playing the game of history, the barbarians with its gutural languages, the germs of history, the goths, never cross the Rhine. Of course if they were able to reason, i would have kept trying but they do not have that capacity in their wor(l)ds; as Schopenhauer put it: ‘it is good the germ(an)s have long words, as they are so slow thinkers’. but that is the problem, they have the most primitive verbal language of them all, with long unbreakable sword-like languages, full of absolute trhts. They do not ‘cogito ergo sum’, but ‘credo ergo sum’. On top, they speak objectual languages, OSV where the grammar starts with the object, not the human subject, so they lack empathy, love of mankind. They ARE robotic minds of believers, first in the sword of goths, who killed everybody and considered themselves goths, by the power of death. Then they reduced physical systems to entropy and death (thermodynamic Helmothz laws), and kept killing everybody in Europe. And now they are going again to kill us with their big-bangs. This is the sociological side of it – the germ(an)s of history, and what they do to mankind, call it Hitler, Trump or CERN.

Now what the ‘animetal’ cult(ure)s on top of mankind today, the germ(an) cult(ure) of weapons and entropy-only physics that validates their ‘worldly profession’, to kill life, with the most entropic atom of the universe, iron, and the go(l)d $emite cultures of the most informative atom, gold≈money that hypnotises their mind, are very good at is killing the messenger, but that ensures the message will happen; and also at denying the message and how to avoid it death, with their ego-trips of abrahamic religions or entropy-only physical religions. All what I have is reason and that doesn’t work with those methods. Facts are of lately also denied. Consider the most obvious fact: survival. 3000 YEARS ago there were in the west 3 cultures, the basque-spanish/british western culture, the go(l)d Semite, Cananean culture and the Germ(an) culture – they divided the western world between them. Today, the germ(an)s who came as goths, with iron weapons and murdered everybody else, after a series of action-reaction processes THE TRUE LAW OF THE UNIVERSE THAT TREATS YOU AS YOU TREAT THE ‘OTHERS’, they are hardly 100 million of them. But they learned nothing. They are the core physicists, the engineers of that machine, and are now bidding to kill us all for their gothic religion of entropy.

NEXT, the go(l)d culture, judaism has 18 million survivors as it considers itself chosen of go(l)d, invented money and slavery along his ‘tribal brothers’ phoenicians (today exterminated) and started a cycle of debt, usury, ruin of nations, wars and holocausts, while emitting all kind of racist dogmas from the Ham damnation uphold in courts to accept slavery to their ‘special race’ nature. So at the end nations get ruined, wars ensued and they get killed. But this cycle IS ABSOLUTE taboo in history, as MANKIND is guilty. They never do anything wrong, and capitalism, their monopoly on banking is science NOT praxis of power. They were next to physicists the main practitioners of this entropy religion.

SO THE EGO PARADOX will kill them all again. Consider now a german-you, Mr. Einstein who changed memes (is all about idol-ogies NOT race, again another absurd belief of those cultures), and became socialist, pacifist, humanist and humbly respected the laws of science. Of course, he remain a loner, realising what the homunculus were all about. First he renounced to germ(an) nationality; then when the yous offered him the presidency of Israel he said: ‘I can’t accept it’ and when asked why he quipped ‘Israel will be judged not by their technological advance but by the way they treated their arab brothers’. Now, cern, hawking, religious physicists, nationalist bigots, all deny what this intelligent man knew to be the laws of the survival Universe, who kills those who kill by iron and serve go(l)d. The 3rd western culture, ours, is not ‘without blame’ but has a minimum sense of humor, respect for nature and survival vital instincts. So in the neolithic NOT with weapons and slave trade, colonised with agriculture, western Europe, western france and the british islands, and then went into the sea as whalers and then sea-farer traders, and so you have this Iberian (portuguese, spanish), western french and british cultures all over the world. And even better faired the Taoist Chinese, which DID understand the essence of duality and are now, 100 times more numerous than the enslavers and 13 times more numerous than the germs. This is how the Laws of the organic, fractal informative Universe and its action-reaction newtonian laws work.

The project.

MY words are harsh, but i am not so heartless of course as my cynical standing and appreciation of the homunculus might seem. Fact is we might still be one of the very few planets of this galaxy in which the totalitarian egos of the western religious culture of entropy=death and golden calf chosen do NOT win. Since finally! it seems our cult(ure)s are in retreat and we ‘are still here’.

There is indeed an avatar solution to the totalitarian principle and the fermi paradox, of respect to life, bravery to defy death, love of truth and control of the machine to the service of man, which in the west the Latin culture and in the East the Chinese one have represented for most of history; and so as the Chinese culture is in the rise and it is the people who are planning the next upgrade (the plasma model of accelerators though being so cheap is an impeding risk, which the west can develop even as it falls victim of their own cycles of war, go(l)d and hate). So as of 2017 I am going to do what I did when young but didn’t come out of the closet in time: to r=evolve all physical sciences, in 4 seminal posts, which will, when the Chinese enter internet, and realise it is the natural extension of their philosophies of the Universe, become the standard science of a possible survival ‘Avatar-like’ planet, in humble respect and connection with the Universe, starting by the general formalism of 5D and trinity, which is quite properly written.

As all this is old research, (new in as much as my scholar career was aborted, just when I started to care to communicate a decade ago) it should be possible to do it this year 2017 in 3 posts, latter subdivided in sub-posts with more profundity:

  • The language of Non-Æ mathematics
  • Cosmology (written still in a careless uncorrected style, but with the 1st part on the falsity of the entropy only big-bang quite done)
  • Non-Æ Physics (properly understood with the correct grammar of Non-Æ maths)

Obviously this should have been done 30 years ago but the reader should understand how ‘tiresome’ is to deal with the ego paradox of the western homunculus, with one hundred years of denial of the Universe for the ‘mind thoughts’. Indeed, Hilbert was not alone. As usual the usual suspects – a  tandem of a german and jewish idologists of the superiority of the human mind over the Universe similar to the Bohr-Heisenberg tandem went to work here. If Hilbert didn’t understand the fractal point and decided to invent points in its mind, as the ‘new postulate of creationist mathematics’, Cantor didn’t understand the meaning of imaginary numbers and the closure of algebra with groups, nor the proof of Godel of its incompleteness who should have put to rest Hilbert’s Axiomatic method and Cantor’s pretension to make another abstraction, a set, the unit of algebra, which IS and always be the number. So mathematics departed from reality, but it was the perfect way for mathematicians to feel also ‘high popes’ of science, as they claimed to have the ONLY language which does NOT act as a mirror of the Universe. This was on Hilbert’s view ‘the paradise of set theory and the axiomatic method’. Here again, only Einstein among those who used maths to see reality sided with Godel. The mass sided with the arrogant ego-paradox so common in those 2 cultures of metal-power and despise for life and nature. AND THIS was 100 years ago.

So I did try 30 years ago to explain mathematicians and physicists that truth always requires the experimental method, and numbers of time, and points of space, and finitesimals (quanta of a plane of 5D) ARE the units of the 3 disciplines of maths that mirror the 3 elements of the Universe. As usual in my life there was just a wall of silence. Somehow the West (and we do have reasons of anthropomorphic nature to explain it – basically the lineal dolicocephalic neanderthal red hair, white, hooked nose genes, are visual with gutural verbal simple ‘believers’ languages, objectual german, imperative semite languages, with little reason and flexibility… ) always SIDES with anyone who has an anthropomorphic, ego-centered theory. Set theory in this case is soo obvious wrong with his absurd paradoxes of infinity, which plainly prove since Russell his theory wrong, as the axiomatic method of Hilbert is wrong since Godel.

There is NO infinity but merely ‘limits’ on each system which arrives to the membrane of the system or the relative minimal quanta of space or minimal time clock cycle. So as Leibniz rightly understood there are 1/n finitesimals, minimal quanta which therefore limits the ‘domain’ in which functions and numbers are meaningful beyond which you find a ‘chaotic state’ I.e. e has 10 scales of exponential growth with a regular number, 2,718181818…4 and then becomes chaotic. In that sense, the whole baroque comparisons of infinities of Cantor are truly nuts…

So what you do when you know you have found a higher truth, proved by the scientific, EXPERIMENTAL METHOD, but you live in a pseudo-religious age, which will not attend reason? Well, there is a simple choice. Of you recant as Galileo did, or if you face the inquisition they burn you like GIORDANO, OR Bohm. Only Bell wondered how it was possible to ignore the pilot-wave theory, being so obviously truth – this makes it even worst – the homunculus scientificus is NOT aware he is a religious believer in dogmas, such as Cantor’s paradise, Hilbert’s mind axioms, Copenhagen observers, and gothic, entropic big whams, sorry bangs.

The lesser man has a LOT of attitude. Thus you get smarter, like Leonardo and write backwards, and keep writing your notes… go the patent office like Einstein and keep exploring your insights, move to the pleasant english meadows, and write a book 20 years, or go to the british library and write your book 20 years publishing after death, as Marx and Copernicus did. You come out of the closet only pressed by circumstances, as Darwin did when Wallace published, as i did when CERN TOLD US it planned to blow up the planet. Sometimes is too late, and that was I think my case. Sometimes you are lucky, and Wallace sends you his paper before publishing, as Darwin had it. Sometimes is by chance that your work ends up helping the bad guys as Einstein’s case, and then you become an A-bomb celebrity.

You see it really does not matter. The destiny of us homunculus, microbe, from the larger view is irrelevant. Some of us are privileged to have empathy with the absolute window, which our mind mirror has become. Why to shut that down, and wrestle with the ego paradox? My life divides in 3. My young age, of learning, my mature age of knowing, my past decade of angst for the homunculus, hopefully my last decade, till death will allow me to enjoy the window again and from time to time post for future homunculus if they evolve into homo sapiens.

Indeed, the enormous beauty of mathematics as a mirror focused properly is revealed precisely NOT by inventing it with weirdo ‘paradises’ (Hilbert would say nobody will take mathematicians from the paradise of Cantor’s sets) but when the mirror is clean, clear and well focused. Then all is simplified. But mathematicians have gone the usual way of making it all more superficially complex and pretentious to find absolute proofs absolutely flawed, specially when trying to convert them into ‘real beings of the physical Universe. Will they ever return to the proper ‘units of mathematics’ and look at the Universe as it is? On my view is plainly cultural. The duality of the Universe contradicts the lineal time of the visual white man, its lineal religions with a manifest human destiny, and its military zeal. So only the Asian revival could return the arrogance of mathematicians and physicists. This I have it clear, and the complete impossibility to take indeed the west out NOT of the Cantorian paradise, but the hell of the ego paradox, basically means that only Asia can save the white man from committing suicide with this planet. So this work will be for the slight chance that the religious outlook of the lineal, simplex West goes under and the vital, humbler, dualist cultures of India and China rises.

There are in that sense some positive signs in China.

One of his nobel prizes have explained in clear terms that a new accelerator would be a waste of money in meaningless research and Mr. Hamed and his 10ˆ500 dragoons are in retreat; Mr. Trump, puppet-clown of the 0.02% of Wall Street owners and its corporations, who do not seem to have enough owning the 90% of the wealth of America are in a crusade to reduce the public sector of their nation to rubble and sink further down the way of life of their ‘slavish believers’ in Yhwh and the machine; so while this is regrettable for the American people, it ensures there will not be many more contributions to CERN coming from the other side – what life-survival didn’t happen in our suits, will happen now just by pure greed. Indeed, yesterday Twitwatrump told the german Physicist chancellor US does want to cut down his contributions to OTAN. The petite grandeur of the French will also be soon on the hands of neofa$cism, with its obsession with islamophobia and anti-european standing. So this relic of the cold war collaboration of US and its European partners-in-crime might be living his last upgrades.

Of course it could all be late, as we do not know how many ice-9 has fallen to the Earth – for that we just need to watch the statistics of earthquakes; and there it rests the problem of plasma accelerators, with difficult solution if there is not a global ban on research of strangelets.

A man alone even if it is an evolved homunculus can only do so much… specially when the hordes of trolls and wolves disguised of sheeple, he tries to save are so far removed from life. In that regard, the best thing the west could is sink into oblivion fast. But as we stand, it all seems to show we belong to one of those quasi-infinite planets that didn’t pass the great Filter and preferred to make the ‘ultimate weapon’ of Saint Nobel and its Cantorian paradise. One infinite for sure there is for all of them, the infinity between our death and the end or the beginning of the Universe.

My infinitesimal ego paradox

This said, I also warn you that I am quite fed up with the whole business of defending mankind and do have my ego bruised, so NOT all my texts have the ‘gravitas’ required by the zeitgeist. At this time of my life I quip a lot, a la Einstein, and so I apologise in advance for the tone, the jokes, the ego paradox of me, I and myself. The intention and the content more than the form and the character is what you should accept and reason. The system has been a bit brutal and ‘vaporised’ the confabulator theorists for its thougtcrimes, against doublethink unaware that truth must come through pictures an telescreens, and scientific research as one commentator put it to dismiss the case is illegal if done by own life, must be in huge groups, with statistical methods and big machines, bb LOL

Indeed, there you could make a good theatre play, with the work of Kuhn and Orwell a la Bertold Bretch, having the 3 masters of modern serious, realist humble theories of the Universe, the own life thoughtcrime people, all packed into the same room worried by the constant vigilance of the FBI, for being pacifist, socialists, reasoning on humble grounds:

Einstein did in fact saved Godel from deportation but Bohm would be stripped of his nationality. Add Hoyle, the greatest astronomer with Eddington of the british empire both laughed at and ostracised from mainstream because they hold a sound steady state theory and dismissed most of quantum copenhagen and many-worlds interpretations as deliriums of the ego (Eddington, who dared to say biology was far sounder based in easier observations, closer to us and with more usefulness). To the last instalment of all those who opposed cern, which became official ‘confabulator theorists’ for the global Press, without any serious examinations of the issues explained above.

 

Of course, the reader will think this is all personal. But it is not. On the contrary, we tried for long during a year before suing CERN to talk with the people involved in this project who had made the wrong calculus and designed a machine able to make strangelets. But there was no way to open an argument, no possibility to dialog with other physicists, no respect to the environmental rules of America and Europe and soon, the entire strategy of CERN, which had easily achieved the wall of silence that has surrounded always physicists’ worldly profession of making weapons, was to attack ad hominem and destroy the career of the few scientists that opposed and denounced those experiments.

Consider for example the destiny of my career, as head of Duality in the world of scientific congresses, once the Pandora box of those suits was opened, on the hope humanity would reason and care for their survival.

If the reader ‘can reason’ and reads with an open intelligent mind what we have said till here, he would realise of the important of introducing the arrow of information to describe the Universe, of the great advances which means to have a logic and mathematical formalism to describe cyclical time – explained in depth in the article on the 5th dimension, easily the biggest advance on time theory since the 4th dimension formalism of Einstein. This was the opinion of many people when I started to make my round of conferences after publishing a few papers on the theme back in 2006. However my work was too recent to have become established as ‘standard science’ when I put the suit to CERN, while the other activist Mr. Rossler, was at the end of his career. This shouldn’t have matter at all in a question which was completely objective, totally unrelated to the MESSENGERS, as it was pure objective science of black holes, strangelets, planetary exploration and so on. But from the very first day the suit became public with a cover on New York Times nobody discussed scientifically the issue. All was a brutal ad hominem on slaughter on the messenger, as military tyrants would do. Since of course, the avalanche on the messenger is a much easier form to eliminate an issue, which cannot be tackled without exposing the flaws of CERN that arguing as we have done the true risks and reasons to be worried.

It is thus unavoidable to explain the personal effects of that on slaughter, even if it means unavoidably the appearance of my ego – ad hominem in this manner always works. If you ignore it, people will think it is because it is truth, if you defend yourself people will think indeed you have a huge ego.

In this case though, as Rossler and me represented some of the most advanced theory on the new paradigm of ‘XXI century science, complexity’ (a quote of Mr. Hawking, not me), it is part of the issue to discuss those complex models of the Universe along with the personal adventure and the risks involved, which I know very few will understand. Ultimately though a true scientist must completely ignore the sociological, military and ego paradoxes that condemn mankind.

But they happen to us as they happened before to many other scientists who defied the ego paradox. When I brought Trinity of time arrows to science, people were enthusiastic realising of all the new avenues i was opening with the full range of the 3 arrows of time, past-entropy-youth, present-reprodutive, energy and relative future-information that guides with its particles-heads the system of body-waves of the Universe. I was receiving invitations all over the world to explain those new discoveries, because this was an objective new view on time and space, which finally after 50 years of search of a formalism of theory of information that would properly put together those two arrows of time, and explain the meaning of energy, the conundrums of the Universe, the life-death cycles of systems, its similar structure, etc, etc. could be expressed in the logic and mathematical languages of science.

I remember the standing applause I receive at the 50th anniversary of the foundation of this science at Sonoma, north of San Francisco, the center of those information sciences.  But then they didn’t change the name from duality to trinity.

As it happened I learned about CERN’s black holes, put them a suit for genocide and physicists met with system scientists in a congress I was not invited despite being one of the vice-presidents and founding chairs, which had to be invited and erased duality from scientific congresses, which remind me of the chin emperor, who brought iron weapons and coins to China, and considered himself immortal poisoning himself eating gold, who burned all taoist books except those about technology and murdered all its earlier scientists.

As it happened, the top university of systems sciences then was in Santa Fe, apt name, ruled by a physicist, who had been head of accelerators at Los Alamos death corridor of Weapons industries, Mr. West; which had said in an interview his biggest goal as an intellectual was to understand the life-death cycle and its 3 ages. So I had lunch with him just after the conference. He was enthusiastic. Then i wrote him a letter about CERN and his invitation to give a course in Trinity at the Saint Faith institute was withdraw. Next year at Tokyo, as the conferences were deserted I went instead to Hiroshima where I shot the scenes on the ‘lanterns of the spirits of the dead’, which opened an earlier version of strange matters called quantum roulette. Needless to say I lost all interest for scholarship; when some of my google papers were erased and all my webs put at rank 0 in its search engines i no longer protested.

Indeed, all what could be done about CERN and been tried, and I had enough of homunculus insulting me, of P.R.ess calling me crackpot and self-styled time theorist or ‘writer journalist’, of a group of people assaulting me in LA the day before the last court suit, breaking my arm in 5 pieces, so I wouldn’t arrive on time (as i laid on the floor the police ‘suddenly arrived of nowhere’, put me in a hospital, from where i could not leave So i had to wait till night, escape the hospital, walk 20 miles, take a plane without crouches. I had enough of pretentious saint nobels of the dynamite, of celebrity gurus with mental anoxia, denying me an interview, of Mr. Hawking’s conference, who named me as Walter as ‘2 unknown persons’ and when I filmed him, of more police, stealing my cam (the tape was on my balls, because also that I have to defy pure eviL=anti-live, but those homunculus?

For God’s shake, Mr. Wilczeck who didn’t dare to appear on court, not to confront truth, complained like a sissy that someone had sent him a menacing email… and the press published. The day after i put a suit with Bush in power, using the Patriot act as a stunt, asking the American government to take away the Nuclear grade bomb material at CERN according to the act that authorised the American government to remove any foreign nuclear material that menaced the life of Americans – in this case of all of them, i got a call from a self-named journalist, telling me that as a foreigner, they could apply me the patriot act if I didn’t take the suit, and I didn’t flinch. And never mentioned it to the press. What for? When you defend mankind and reason and true knowledge this is what happens to you. As another bigot put it on my home door ‘as long as i have a weapon your destiny is not in the hands of god’. In the case of Bohm he lost his US passport, for blasphemous.

What I thought then of that bunch of idolaters and the one million bloggers against us, who tried to defend them is that the whole world got so berserk out of pure absolute, homunculus cowardice.

The homunculus is so infantile, so coward, when he is exposed to his true value as weak flesh, just made of light atoms, down there at number 6,7, 8 9 (Spe-Oxygen<St-carbone>Tiƒ-Nitrogen, being its ternary atomic generator just in case you like the wisdom of trinity systems, who of course applied also to bio-chemistry :), that he cannot even discuss or recognise death, so he invents ‘religions’ and cannot recognise the dangers of cern not to pee on his pants.

And when he goes to war he needs all his machines to murder entropically in the name of sacred VHod or sacred God, innocent people, just because they don’t share his beliefs.

Needless to say, I feel like all those pioneers, an infinitesimal ego-mind observing an infinite when looking at the Universe, but as a homunculus, frankly I don’t see why I have to respect the titles, ceremonies, machines and doodles in the sand of a people who try to kill us all. So yes, I am angry and arrogant when talking of the homunculus, just a detail, in awe when taking of the thoughts of God.

Perhaps is just my ego paradox, likely, but as Schopenhauer put it, ‘vanity is meaningless, arrogance tends to have a reason’. My reasons have been laid down above. And those 4 musketeers, Einstein and his 3 friends, Hoyle, Eddignton and Bohm, are to me much closer in actions and thoughts that all the thousands of nobel prizes and field medals and kids with machines… We were 4 musketeers against CERN, Rossler, Walter, me and Penrose, and we got all bruised. Rossler got the worst part in Europe, operhaps because he was prestigious as a classic chaos theorist, me, was becoming the new ‘kid in town’ in space-time theory. So he got called an old lunatic guy, me was vaporised, yet not well known. So was Penrose, son of the collaborator of Hawking (bad propaganda never mentioned) While Walter got the royal treatment in US.

Since of course, both religious jihads and big-bang terrorists will just insult you if  REASON is brought to the argument. They will affirm they are the only ‘experts’ and you know nothing, mind your own business, we have the rights to explode the planet to prove death is the origin of it all. The only difference being that Jihad terrorists have only Kalashnikovs, so they can only kill humans one by one to prove the sacred fire of Allah; CERN’s terrorists have the backing of the entire industrial-military complex and so they can kill all humans with a single shot.

CERN, nuclear physics, its entropic military theories of reality and its imposition of truths with propaganda, pumping the ego of supposed geniuses (any physicist that makes some mathematical doodle in the sand of thought or discovers a new machine and the astounding arrogance of its practitioners, except the few realgeniuses of the discipline) in that sense, represent the anti-science of power: All the wrong ways to defy the truths of the Universe, which only appeal to humans.

The problem of religious cult(ure)s who have no reason: they kill you.

‘Religion is the art of animal training, it trains people how to think’. Schopenhauer.

Now, it is quite obvious for any rational scientist that religions fictions, either verbal (Abrahamic) or visual (celebrity circus) or mathematical (big-bang, Copenhagen interpretation) MUST BE DENOUNCED, because they are dangerous not only for the mind, but also for the body. But given the ego paradox nobody in his right mind, does contradict it in public, because religious people turn easily violent ad hominem and so why to fought them?

Problem though is that they kill, so someone has to denounce them. Indeed, Jihad with his concept that the infidel can be killed if he does not believe in Allah, murders people even if nobody really wants to denounce the myths of Islam, as blasphemy is condemned in many muslim countries with death. Orthodox, Segregational Judaism with his idea expressed in Talmud that only the jewish people are humans and specifically blacks and arabs are lesser than dogs, because they are descendants of Ham, who peed on Noah, provoked modern slavery and now has provoked an apartheid state against arab palestinians, basically living in a concentration camp without human rights, even if nobody dares to denounce Judaism, not be called anti-Semite. And the most peaceful of those religious myths, the catholic church, softened by the love message resurrected in the Vatican congress, also has his problem of pederasts, due to the celibate ‘machist’ hang-ups of earlier doctrine, and did for very long through the inquisition murder people. But nobody says it is all an ego paradox to avoid the usual fundamentalist christian getting berserk.

Now the difference between the religion of big-bang physicists with cosmic cannons and those of Jihadist with a few kalashnikovs mainly shooting other Muslims in their countries, Jewish zealots who affect mainly the Palesitinians and the pederasts who affect a few youngsters is obvious: Only physicists have the weapons of mass destruction to kill US ALL. So IT IS QUITE absurd that the entire planet focuses on the violence Abrahamic religions but says NOTHING of the most dangerous of all religions, that of nuclear physicists, so far the ONLY people who have been NOW FOR 70 YEARS, producing merrily the ONLY weapons that truly can kill us all. So obviously given the sheepishly obedience of mankind, whose true religion today is the machine-weapon to those people, as NO BELIEVER will ever denounce its own religion (how many jews you know who are pro-palestinians, how many muslims you know who make jokes on Mhmd, how many catholics who deny the infallibility of the pope, how many physicists who deny the infallibility of the big-bang?

So we couldn’t recruit anyone, and had to come forward, as the people who were evolving further the science of physics from the perspective of duality and complexity and the understanding of the arrow of biology, life and information. So Walter was a biologist and physicist, me a system scientist and philosopher of science, Rossler a chaos theorist and doctor. The answer of the ‘believers’ in that sense surprisingly was accepted by all: we are the experts, we have therefore the right to do the experiment even if we kill you all for our credo. Since this is the jihadist and zealot theory: we are the muslims so we can kill the infidel, we are entitled to the sacred lands of Samaria, so we can kill the palestinian who occupies them, which most people unless indoctrinated by arab or jewish media will deny.

Conclusion: ‘the ethos of a technological civilisation is indeed the ultimate religion of present mankind, because ALL except a few dozen of people did accept the ‘position of CERN’ and of course his ‘coda’ – we are NOT killing you, which is what the jihadist will say – we are not dying but entering the paradise – in the case of the physicist the paradise of supreme knowledge.

Trust me, we try it all before denouncing them, once we realise as Einstein and Bohm, or Hoyle had that ‘religious people’ and ‘military thugs’ only understand the language of power, and so we trusted judges would care for life. But they were corrupted. The decrepit 90 year old guy who judged said that ‘the destruction of the Earth will not be attributable to the US’, and that he being a veteran of Pearl Harbor, obviously did not have any fear of the big-bang, while the nobel prizes who should have come to defend cern all defaulted. And one Mr. Smith, Matrix-like agent of the government told them to dismiss the suit, since after all I had arrived with my broken arm. ‘So you came on time? Glad to meet you Mr. Sancho’ said one of the ‘officers’ of the government side, holding my hand a la Trump – I smiled back. Bullies don’t defeated us – it was the global sheeple who worship those who kill them what made us think it was not worthy to fight for the homunculus.

The bottom line though is not, me, obviously just an anecdote in this story, not even what my mind might hold on the ‘foundations’ of science.

The bottom line HERE is the Homunculus IS READY to wrestle the TYRANNOSAUR REX of the Universe. And NOTHING of what I might say WILL ever change his mind; or shut up his mouth because the Only THING that matters to him is to play with his big hands, assembling machines and that IS ALL he cares for. Or as Mr. Goring put about another non-nonsense germ(an) chancellor: ‘he talked about real things, machines weapons, roads, cars’.  So I could write thousands of pages on thought experiments, on the brutal modes of the military-industrial complex and its newspeaks of caring and research. As LONG as we can make a machine and feel PROUD looking as it awesome size, the rest are vagaries. How many tanks has the Pope? Said Stalin. It was though needed to give it a try. Yet for the very few if any who still like ‘thought over matter’, some more food for the soul. Now on the supreme issue here, the meaning of life and death and his equations.

This was along the ‘ad hominem’ campaigns of CERN against us, the millions of bloggers insulting our work and many other happenings completely ignored by the P.R.ess who sided massively with the LHC a bit of a surprise; as I was more idealist then about mankind and the ‘system’. Needless to say a decade has passed and now you could say I am the most authoritative ‘anti-system’ science in this blue dot lost in the corner of the Universe.

Of course, if they were rational scientists, if mankind had not become so slavish to the ethics the technological civilisation if this issue had been properly judged, evaluated and objectively reviewed with the available tools of science, experimental truth, sound equations, ockham razor, and so on, I wouldn’t be so derisive. It is nothing personal trust me. The anecdotes I have told didn’t make me flinch. If I abandoned the field was not for the bullying. Couldn’t care less. We, basques are tough people.

One thing is for certain, they will NEVER forget, as they need to invent ‘criminals’ and paranoia menaces against their subconscious planning against the Human world.

Indeed, I have now it seems as a pacifist who has fought for the survival of Gaia, a 2-code passport, (just below the 1-code for active terrorists!) which as the Canadians told me when I went there to make strange matters, allows them to enter my email, interrogate anyone who talks to me, prevent me to enter any landmark building and break into my houses to collect evidence, of what? He, he, actually I kind of laughed at the border but it was all truth. I was doing home-exchange and the 3 places I was in, had their doors broken and they didn’t even repair the handle. So my editor came one day to pick me up and instead of open the door, got the handle in hands. In another nice home, I met the jewish doctor with an important position on the health-care system of Toronto, who lend me his basement,  at the door portal of the upper house, after arriving from the week-end, monday morning, trying to repair the broken lock – did you loose the key luis, he asked me, pretty angry  (:  It seems of course being a capitalist country with low budgets for state departments that as they have the right to break in, they don’t even bother to pay for a new lock.

The editor got berserk one day – ‘they have entered my computer! I have a young daughter, what are you into Luis?! And that van has been there for 3 days parked (I was going to his house to review the editing). One day it was hot summertime and one the van guys came out in my third place to have lunch, so I came to seat in the park benches, and tried to make small conversation. Ts, ts, the guy wouldn’t talk. with Then one day I tried to visit the famous television tower and it seems that was the landmark! building, which me, a guy who has never had a weapon, or kill a fly for that purpose, was menacing, so 2 private security men came to me, even before i entered! and told me to leave the premises (the park around) as it was private property. I told them I was just in a bench looking upwards to the skyline, as the insisted, they guide me to a street, which seems to be just the ‘border’ of private property. There was there a wall. I looked at them and peed ‘outside their ‘private property’. Couldn’t care less; on what the animetal civilisation considers the right way NOT to be human. It is indeed obvious what the pornography of this world is, their metal-penis, their barrels and cannons – their paranoia against humans, their slavery to their machines.

The animetal homunculus is just a program of despise, repression and murder of life. In the eternal Universe the human being has been perfectly moulded through eons to develop such an  immense  handy-man ego that it can kill all life forms on the planet that hosts him and commit suicide without realising with his peanut brain, what he does, at the maximum speed possible for the ‘halo of strangelets’ to be complete ‘in time’. The universe must be purely deterministic.
But it have arrived to the 5th nirvana phase of the Kohler model of death.

Of course the resources to create the electronic big brother and the eternal splendid little wars for profits in this neofascist age must be so huge that they have to transform activists as terrorists. I might even be labelled as a  ‘lonely wolf’. Oh, yes I recognise myself as a ‘steppenwolf’, the artist and humanist thinker of Herman Hesse masterpiece book, on the loneliness of the long distance runner, of the ethic man with his own code, who must stay alone in an age of neo-fascism, as the one we live in, and NOT mix with the pack of sheeple neither with the wolves that devour them:

This is the world we live in, where humans are less than numbers, happy to enter slaughter house. And for that reason we abandoned the cause. Not because of the bully but because the sheeple, the millions of bloggers who had not interest on this, neither money or rat race or prizes at stake, was the most sanguine against us, the most addict to those who will kill them. So who were we fighting for I wondered? My own life was of no importance to bother; and mankind was no longer mankind.

Indeed, the people of this planet who live a surrogate life through ‘its machines’ is fast degenerating into a paltry shadow of the potential of man in all his languages. In as much as any language is a reflection of the Universe, as both Planck who considered musicians higher minds than physicists, as he appreciated more the language of music than what then was called NOT the religion of the Universe but the science of motion, which is really what ENTROPIC physics is, and Einstein who admired philosophers like March or Leibniz, of whom he said ‘Leibniz is right, there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from the beginning’ (which is incidentally what absolute relativity does) understood True knowledge is the evolution not of machines but of human minds, with the learning of its sciences which reflect reality with mechanical space-eyes, and time-clocks but also with the human mind which reflects it with verbal time and eye-mirrors.

So artists and philosophers are at the same level than scientists, or even higher because they use their own minds, and do not atrophy their senses with surrogate machines as our last generations are doing, thinking on top those machines are they, so they inflate their ego paradox, in the neo-paleolithic:

IN THE graph, we can see the mass-decline of humanity which either become automatons ruled by numbers – democratic polls, digital money, another language of ‘chosen of go(l)d’ we discuss in earnest on our posts on the economic ecosystem – or reduce to visual neo-paleolithic children with null temporal, survival instincts as the kids working at cern. IT is a wasteland, of which I have become extremely tired.

The ideal of the post-war wor(l)d humanist master, Hesse, expressed in Castalia – a world of master ludi, in command of all languages, which have resolved the Universal grammar that generates them all, and could easily move from a bidimensional painting to a musical game of Spe-bass and Tiƒ-treble sounds through the ∆-scales of a musical score, to then write an homological equation in complex numbers, reflection in the mathematical mirror of that score, to write next a poem, with the same scalar rhythm – this perfect world I envisioned when young is NOT EVEN comprehensible to humans of the paleolithic age that only understand the surrogate virtual world of its hypnotic screens.

On that view, the death by strangelets, which seem to be the destiny of the homunculus ‘mush on a rock on a lost corner of the Universe’ is a painless fast track to exit mundi, compared to the other only alternative cre(dit)ated by the go(l)diron culture of germ(an)s and yous, who despise us, the living beings that ‘spend their go(l)d’ in drinks and women. My despise for the germ(an)s is so profound as that of his highest wor(l)d masters from Schopenhauer to Nietzsche, who stubbornly denied to be German – and prefer a more human polish birth, to Hesse and Einstein exiled in Switzerland. But they do have their weapons, Witness, Mr. Twitwatrump, the essential homunculus with big hands and bi mouth, tabula rassa, zeitgeist of the age.

We are at best on the prophecies of future of our  last British wor(l)d masters, in a mixture of Time Machines, empty, beautiful californios, flesh for the morlocks of corporations that devour their minds, 1984 and brave new world. Only that we won’t need 800.000 years to arrive to that unbearable lightness of being human. It is with us now. A culture of bubbles, to be punctured by the particle points of highest density in the Universe.

In that sense, the true reason i have never attempted to publish again any paper, on the Laws of the ternary universe of space-time and its languages of thought, beyond my 3 careless blogs, should be obvious to the reader, if anyone has gone so far (as soon as I introduced a higher form of knowledge that data and gore on this Chronicle of a foretold death – stats plummeted near the zero mark :) is simply the ‘negative’ dual zeitgeist we have contradicted, of a purely entropic technological civilisation of our collective mass-thought.

Since machines are atrophying our brains fast, substituting our language for the digital language they speak – not us – while its twin brothers, weapons either robots or D-Bombs (dark matter Bombs) are getting ready to murder our bodies. And yet the homunculus love their surrogate power. So nothing can be said to stop them from evolving the other species. And the same can be said of non-Æ logic mathematics – the zero generations of visual californios have already a hard time to learn Aristotelian logic and grasp the reality of quantum physics (not its imaginary interpretations). So how can we expect them to upgrade to the next ‘level’ of focused linguistic mirrors. I have in that sense, written mostly all my life for myself, as Leonardo did backwards, or Aristotle for a few disciples, or Darwin for 20 years.

As I realize to change the program of those ‘homunculus automatons’ is as difficult as reprogramming a mother-board.

Indeed Master Ludi Joseph Knetch at the end of the book drawn himself in the water of life. To me the mind of man is becoming extinct, and the body will soon follow. But without a verbal, logic, temporal, survival, instinctive ‘living mind’, our culture of children and virtual fantasies and selfie ego-trips cannot even realise. In both cases, communication is useless even if the no future can be predicted by ‘evolution’ NOT a mathematical but bio-logic discipline. All what I would say to our physicists in search of the saint grails we have resolved here (but will look too simple and written in the logic, temporal language, they completely ignore) is this

‘An extinct Scientist knows nothing; so as long as the Industry of Accelerators continues its bid to extinguish Mankind, in body and mind, this is the ONLY issue that should con-CERN all scientists in this planet’. 

And yet this issue, officially does not exist as strangelets officially do not exist according to CERN. And of course all other collateral causes are dismissed with the usual shallow knee-jerk labellings, ‘confabulation theory’ and so on.

It would be ridiculous on my side to go around merrily publishing papers on the foundation of mathematics, the trinity of physical and biological systems, and all the resolved conundrums of physics, ‘trivial’ when both mathematics and time-space laws are streamlined with its 3 arrows and topologies, as IF the issue of our extinction by CERN was a minor peccadillo, to leave it happen, and pass page for selfie reasons, to clean up my name. Once it was clear we couldn’t alert the world, our words did get angry, but they actions are the ones that will kill us – of course, in a don’t worry be happy of verbal erased heads, with all the mass cheering ‘four legs, four legs’ to the real wolves with sheepskin.

So in our suits and activisms we noticed in fact far more enthusiasm for cern in the press and people or rather sheeple, who will be zealots of the religion of the big-bang, than in the priesthood of nuclear physicists, who in private acknowledge the risks, but never said what they were going to do. Sorry, goodism lasted as long as we tried to reason with people, media and science Once it was clear the bottom line of mankind was an astounding ego trip and belief on our leaders, obviously we came to the conclusions of Einstein: ‘2 things i deem ∞ the Universe and human ego (stupidity)’, ‘Technology have far outstripped our humanity’; ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods’; ‘the people in this profession, who are for the sake of knowledge can be counted with the fingers of a fist’, ‘I am no longer on the rat race’. and so on.

And now that he has been proved but the interstellar engine, nobody of course is putting his realist theory that ends quantum bull$hit on its place.

Why physicists do not side with truth, but overwhelmingly follow Schopenhauer dictum: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools do exactly the opposite’, is a mystery to me.

Frankly i never understood this ‘peer thing’ of lesser men who need to back his statements in ‘masses’ of mediocrity and past Baconian idols of the tribe. Facts are facts, models must be based in facts and be rational and anyone with enough IQ can understand them or falsify them. We are NOT insects collected in boxes with ‘national’ or ‘profesional names’.

But then I came to the conclusion that humans are memorial beings, which do NOT reason but BELIEVE. It took me half a century to understand that reasoning only came for a few – having a certified 180 Iq i never thought there was other form to seek truth than critical intelligent evaluation of all what I was told. I have never believed anything which I didn’t understand. But people’s mind works the other way around – they only believe what they don’t understand. And that is why the entire simple, evident bullshit of quantum and big-bang physics explained here in its simplest terms has become so confuse.

The same happen for example with the racket of the issue of money the language of social power who controls the world and the American FED makes so complex to issue that the Americans really believe the fact a few private banksters have hijacked their democracy issuing money and giving orders of work with them to their slavish population is ‘freedom’.  Indeed, wall street invents a digital number called money for free, and for example, this week invented 20 billions and gave it to a crony friend, for a silly nilly crapcode repetitive algorithms, called snapchat, but if they want the minimum welfare they must pay every penny with taxes. The astounding racket of the cdo scam – over 2 trillions extorted in taxes – worked the same way: people in that country are so clueless about what money is and who invents it, they handled 2 trillions to bankers who just had ‘invented’ false mortgages, and sold it ‘twice’. Well, instead of going to jail, they sold those mortgages a 3rd time to the people of America on exchange for 2 trillions, and people gave to them. 

The whole circus of modern ‘mathematical physics’ and quantum interpretations, big-bang explosions and the role of physicists as the high priests of knowledge is born of the same concept: ‘people must remain ignorant for them to obey’ said Calvin, the biblical bigot. ‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’, said Goebbels.

The Universe though does NOT work on ego. It works exactly on the opposite qualities: humble, cautious species do survive. And ‘simplicity is true genius’ (Leonardo) because ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein).

What can I say? Of course all this bull$hit well greased with P.R.ess, censorship of rival theories, subtle ostracism, denial of experimental evidence (Einstein’s black holes) or lack of it (Hawking imaginary ones) and the military-industrial complex and its clueless politicos slavish of whatever nuclear physicists said, carried the day. So not even the previous recent proofs (as well as the EM engine, which can only be explained with pilot-wave theory) have done a dent into the big-bang and Copenhagen or Multiuniverse quantum creationist  theories of reality.

All what I know is I am vaporised.  And feel comfortable in this invisible role, alone with what Picasso called ‘my window with the absolute’.

Of course, for the word, I am just a crackpot, the fifth dimension does not exist – it is in fact a music group (: Duality is no longer a science, Trinity the name of the first atomic bomb and the catholic mystery, after all the major newspapers of the world massacred us ad hominem Even the New York times, who had put the suit initially in its Sunday magazine cover, wrote an editorial saying that judges should throw the suits against cern to the nearest black hole, breaking the law that forbids newspapers to influence courts and public opinion before a judgement was made.

In any case, CERN might ‘cheat all the people all the time’ but it will not cheat the laws of the Universe. And so we shall see what are those laws from 2016 onwards, when the upgrading is complete and they do go over 10 Tev – the most likely threshold to create a black hole or a quark star.

So let me be a bit nasty, just with words, as it is obvious I have no power (in fact, though i won’t comment it in this blog, I do have also my ‘police files’ despite my pacifist standing)… on those religious zealots, as all of them come from the same ego-trip: TO THINK THEY SPEAK THE LANGUAGE OF GOD AS ITS ONLY HIGH-PRIESTS.

What they are then became clear to me. I called their cultures, animetal cultures, and them enzymen, men who catalyse as homunculus the reproduction and evolution of machines, and assembly with their hands little pieces of it. And then go around with their big mouth uttering prophecies of chosen of go(l)d in imperative barking languages, or chosen of the sword, in lineal words with no freedom.

Indeed, the reader should know topological linguistics, as there are 3 – remember – elements, the human subject, the verb and the object.

Well civilised languages put the human subject first; but primitive religious semites, guided by the first military men and gold enslavers, ‘bark orders’ first in imperative languages. THIS IS ALL WHAT THERE IS TO THE old testament that the love religions of the gospel tried under the influence of Platonic greece, soften into an evolved love message. It is NOT yhwh, who shouts you but the priest talking a primitive imperative, VerbSO language. It is NOT Thor, the sword God, who enlightens the germ(an) with its entropy world, but his objectual ObjectSV language.

The rest of us ‘cogito ergo sum’ in humanist SubjectVO languages, from China to Spain, from zululand to Ireland. So I crafted a simple wave equation of history: max. technological evolution = Min. Mind evolution, with 2 sides, the side of love and art, and humanism and reason and true science vs. the animetal world of arrogant homunculus egos with their go(l)d, their weapons, their machines, today their robots and LHCs.

Of course the cultural element was never mentioned, during the times of our activism, as I am perfectly aware of the knee-jerk pre-programming of mankind, which if it MAKES any attempt to correct the homunculus ego at individual level in the selfie age an absolute non-no, which ensures your individual confrontation, any attack to the wrong cult(ure)s of mankind that have made of selfish memes of metal the backbone of our technological civilization is an ever bigger taboo.

The animetal goth and go(l)d chosen is the rightful, civilised, progress-culture, with higher mechanical GDP, entitled to do whatever we want, including committing suicide but at this stage when it ha become so clear the degradation of humans as a species by those machines and the fast sliding into bigotry and war; as i do not see the slightest reaction in this orwellian world of false placebo newspeaks, against the machine, my interest in refurbishing this web is to put the wholeness of all the aspects of our extinction as a species.

AS IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENTAL DEATH, WHAT WILL KILL US BUT A STUBBORN WRONG CULTURAL BID FOR all what is not life and human, from entropic theories against life and information, to weapons research to go(l)d worship.

Humans guided by the anthropomorphic, ego-centered germ(anic) and $emitic cult(ure)s of war and go(l)d with his entropic point-gods and burning bushes today despise fully, the Universe, its galactic top predators and the homunculus feels he is much more than a microbio on a mitochondria of the gala cell, the only perceptive, intelligent, entitled being, even if he does not understand something so simple as the trinity structure of time-space and its linguistic syntax.

For god’s sake, they still call time numbers imaginary numbers – they are just ‘animetals’, visual animals with some dexterity assembling machines. they only understand what they sees, pace, pictures of particles, have zero understanding of time cycles, causality, the logic that creates the Universe. But if you try to enlighten them with reason and the logic of time, they just think, this guy is contradicting my ego. Do you think the Universe cares for that primate slavery to memes of metal? Never mind many humans are not like that. Those who lead us, those who pay for those machines, those the homunculus revere are.

So yes, history in this planet is determined by them, since as Leibniz another humanist german who abandoned those primitive memes put it, the Universe is the best of all possible worlds, because it extinguishes all species that do not make the mark.This one, or rather the cultures that won the battle of history with his ego paradox of gothic entropic religions and go(l)d chosen races won’t.

 Now, I just saw this picture of an artist of human thought on the news, which truly ‘resumes’ the cult(ure)s in power, their memes, their weapons of mass destruction, their leaders, their goals, their dual symbols of gold and iron – but what the Universe thinks of them is ‘hidden in the second layer’ of those 2 a-bombs, look harder – what you see on them?:

Clowns, because this man, the most powerful homunculus is just a clown with a big mouth and big hands to press all the wrong bottoms, zeitgeist of the age – a totalitarian ego, which the Totalitarian Principle and the ego paradox will reduce to his face value – none.

Yeap, Trump-eteers of Apocalypto, nazis and askhe-nazis, goths and chosen of go(l)d,  germ(an)s and $emites who kill rational, artistic, humanist, scientific, humble Greece>Latin>r=evolutionary europe rhythmically now are again at it at CERN and the ECB came.

We, the oldest culture of the continent, see them coming but so far have survived. This entropic germ(an)s came to the basque country twice. The first time with iron, after massacring everybody, calling themselves goths, god in germ(an) languages. We just took one of their swords, analyse it, found rocks of iron in our land, made them and kill them all. Then they came back with a new weapon, the spur and armoured cavalry. We left them loot Pamplona, and in the mountains, where they couldn’t use horses massacred them a 3rd time. Then they came in Guernika. By then we were civilised; unfortunately so we just painted them. But our grand-sons, the brits did the job. Unfortunately when they did the LHC, I couldn’t convince my people to blow up the machine… (just joking, remember ETA has dissolved, and it was anyway just a bunch of nazi-onanist, I never cared to contact – these days one can not make any kind of surrealist jokes, it is ok to have a lunatic like Trump or the CERNie division ready to press a bottom to blow up the planet, as long as their newspeak does NOT tell you but affirm they are making America and the World great again, not shrinking it to a nugget).

So even if we don’t survive, I would like the very few people who have come so far, to have at the end of this year, at least the same window to the absolute I have had for so long alone. Thus after one decade on focusing on CERN dangers,pretty well established in the film and the first column of posts, this 2017 I will focus on 5D and its applications to physical sciences.And then I will shut up again, since…

‘When all has been done, it is better to remain silence’

Another Ludwig, which didn’t like much either the homunculus ego of Mr. Cantor and rightly called him nonsense

Advertisements
Comments Off on I Extinction: BIG BANG
%d bloggers like this: