Love vs eviL

Organic, eusocial evolution vs. Darwinian devolution


In the graph, the highest understanding of science is the formalism of the scalar, organic Universe and its 5th dimension of parts that become wholes. So because wholes come after parts we discover a new dimension of space-time, of future, according to which the Absolute Universe evolves into higher social organisms, as particles become atoms, molecules, cells, planets, organisms, global super organisms, solar systems and galaxies (organisms of stars). The power of networks of energy and information to organise individual atoms/cells/citizens (physical, biologic, social systems), into larger wholes through the efficient production and distribution of energy and information through its individual parts, is well proved, and it implies the development of a science of sciences that study how efficient informative networks (gravitational forces, nervous systems, legal political systems), and energetic, reproductive networks (electromagnetic fields, blood networks, economic networks), distribute just and efficiently enough energy and information to all the elements of the social super organism.

In mystique terms we can talk of the power of eusocial love to bring together species through such networks into wholes stronger than the individual. And to that aim a common set of linguistic values must be formed, to allow information and energy sharing.

The law of eusocial evolution, natural to all species, which evolve together, sharing energy and information through common networks, when they recognize each other as equal being, cells of the same superorganism, is confronted by the law of darwinian devolution, in which species that consider each other different ab=use the others as relative energy of their selfish agenda.

In human superorganisms, the laws of eusocial evolution were perfectly defined by the great prophets of love, in the old age, by the messages of love of Buddha, Jesus and Mhmd, in the modern age by the work of the r=evolutionaries of history, with their motto ‘egalite, fraternite, solidarite’ and the socialist vision of a planet ruled by social love. 

On the other side of history though ‘animetals=humans+memes of metal, money, weapons or machines’ perceived themselves as different, because of the power of their enhanced energetic weapons and informative, hypnotic money. So they don’t recognize other humans as equals, breaking the law of eusocial love and devolving history to a primitive ‘homo bacteria’ state, which is the dominant zeitgeist of our age. In the graph, a case of darwinian devolution by the power of weapons and one of eusocial evolution among two brothers of the same family.

Most people ignore that the Universe displays two “moral” behaviors, in order to enhance the survival of its species; behaviors which are repeated constantly in all the scales of the fractal Universe.

Social Evolution

Similar “cells” of a same species, act in herds and organisms. They are parallel species that communicate energy and information, to evolve into more complex social organisms. We could say they “love” each other. In cases of social evolution the population of a certain species will socialize, and become a more complex organism, sharing their information and energy, often “hunting” together. The population will become a society more powerful than the individuals. Social evolution will enhance the power of the herd that survives better. In history, the survival mandate of social evolution became the concept of love in Natural Religion, and “equality, fraternity, and solidarity” in modern politics. It clearly justifies as natural behavior the idea that men should not compete with men, but work together to resolve the problems of our world as a “single, historic organism”.

Darwinian Struggle

Species which are different, abuse each other as relative energy. We might say they “hate” each other. Why? Because those species cannot communicate and act together. To communicate the emitter and the receptor must be essentially the same species, or at least must have similar informative and communicative organs.

When beings are very different and cannot decode their information, they absorb that force of communication as a form of energy, and feed on it. They consider the other species an energy source, and act in consequence as hunters. Then we talk of a Darwinian struggle, a fight between species, of hate, of predators and victims.

For many decades, since Darwin talked about Darwinian Struggle, biologists thought that was the only strategy of survival. Yet recently we have realized social evolution is a far more evolved, efficient tool of survival, which accounts for the superiority of “herds” of weaker individuals, such as wild dogs which hunt better than lions, or “verbal humans” which probably extinguished non-verbal Neanderthals. In History, it implies that cultures based in social doctrines such as China or Latin countries have multiplied their individuals and cultures in greater numbers that nations based in Darwinian struggle against other nations such as Germany or Israel. Today humans accept in economics and politics only Darwinian Struggle, the ideology of war and economic exploitation. So according to natural law the chances ofsurvival of the Historic ecosystem which is destroying nature, are slim.

This dual behavior of species gives birth to two basic macro-systems in nature:

Organisms, which are sophisticated species based in the law of social evolution, which evolve together a number of cells, and their systems of information and energy. Then the macro-organism fight and survive as a top predator single individual against smaller species. So bodies defeat bacteria, despite being their cells, individually inferior to bacteria in power. Such is the natural arrow of human evolution in history, from the initial genetic organisms based in familiar ties, in genetic information (families, clans, tribes, nations) to the more sophisticated social organisms based in verbal information, (societies in which the natural law of social evolution was spelt by human religions that talked of love and communication, such as the Christian society, or Islam, or Socialism, as well as the doctrines that inspired UN).

However, today History has devolved towards genetic (racial, nationalistic), primitive social organisms, caused by economic myths of competence that deny the natural law of social evolution, and promote the systemic use of machines that compete against man in fields of war and labor (weapons, tools).

Ecosystems, which are social spaces where there exist different species, which tend to compete for a limited quantity of resources. Ecosystems are mixed environments, in which different organic species co-exist in their struggle for existence. Each social organism of an ecosystem, composed by symbiotic species, can be studied as a social form in evolution, which struggles with other social forms in evolution to control the limited vital space of the Ecosystem. For example, Hyenas compete with lions for the territorial, vital space of the savanna.

History, is in that sense an organic system of human beings, that can be studied as a social organism, where human individual cells have evolved complex systems of verbal communication, and human energy (human goods such as food, housing, etc.). Yet History also belongs to the Earth ecosystem, in which other organisms, economic organisms, called nations, ruled by metal-information (money) and machines (weapons, company-mothers), back systematically the evolution of machines, even when they compete and displace the ecosystems of Nature and social humans. We can in that sense talk of a Darwinian Struggle between animetal nations”, and “human social nations”, between History and Economics, epitomized by the phenomena o war, in which the ecosystem of top predator machines reaches its highest development and the ecosystem of history and nature dies.

That struggle between two type of organisms will be solved with the victory of one of them, and the extinction of the other. Either Historic organisms, organisms ruled by human, verbal communication, and human governments, based in laws and human ethics, which try to create a world to the image and resemblance of man, in which machines are submissive to mankind, and humans profit of machines as inferior species, they control, will prevail. And then mankind will rule and live in historic societies, in free human societies, in the Human Earth.

Organisms ruled by digital, monetary information, and company-mothers, that systematically favor machines will prevail. Such economic organisms, dominant today, aim to reproduce and evolve the maximum number of machines, through acts of work=reproduction and consume=test of machines by human beings. They are creating “paradises of machines and company-mothers” called free markets, or free economic societies, in which evolved machines (robots) make increasingly obsolete human beings and nature. If they prevail they will create an ecosystem to the image and resemblance of evolved machines (the Metal-earth), which surely will end up extinguishing history.

Unfortunately most humans ignore this struggle because they believe in “metal ideologies” and scientific myths that consider money, weapons and machines, the selfish memes of metal in  abstract, as not organic species, and men the only intelligent species of the Universe.

So they cannot understand the biological meaning of eusocial evolution and social love, the struggle between the memes of metal and the memes of life, the meaning of genetic linguistics and words like eviL, anti-word of to Live, used within our biological language that expresses those laws of eusocial evolution vs. darwinian devolution to signify that what kills us – weapons that murder our bodies and money, whose values murder our minds. In the next graph this opposition is crystal clear when we realize that in terms of monetary values, life has no value and weapons have maximal value, by the law of affinity between both species, which are complementary.

Thus a civilization based in the language of money on top of the ethic language of wor(l)ds is eviL, it is bond as the modern world is, to extinguish life:

2 Responses to “Love vs eviL”

  1. whatever Says:

    “Yet History also belongs to the Earth ecosystem, in which other organisms, economic organisms, called nations”

    here you make the same mmistake again, which is to see nations and the power struggle behind as natural.
    but nations are modern inventions only a few hundred years old. african nations even younger they exist only ca. hundred years through their invention by the colonial powers.
    the struggle of nations between each other is a IDEOLOGY which is the cause not the effect.
    it is the idea and ideology of our rulers and the ideologists behind that made the world how it is. it is not natural, quite the contrary. came out of absolutism and certain capitalist ideologues which want to let their crazy ideas appear as natural to justify them. cult it is a cult, ideology not natural

    • futureofhistory Says:

      Whatever, science – and this is not a blog of activism, in which i am known better for opposing nuclear proliferation – see but of social sciences, MUST explain all what exist in reality NOT choose what is good or bad. And nations EXIST even if they are bad and contradict the unity of the homo sapiens species. So it must be explained, and the only rational explanation is as in biological enzymes, the degradation of the human ‘enzyme-animetal’, the germ(an) culture that invented tribal nations to impose a people-caste over Europeans thanks to their control of a superior atom species, metal iron, able to kill human flesh. So the biological explanation is the only possible to explain why nations do exist, aristocrats and armies never go away and they will exterminate humanity probably this centry in the robotic wars SINCE NOBODY HAS EVER CONVERTED GERM(AN)S TO HUMANISM, only very briefly, then they revert to their ‘old ways’ of genocide. So goes for the capitalist cult(ure)s that discovered go(l)d in the Levantine region and hve for 3000 years enslaved the humankind. Those cult(ure)s of animetals merely rewrite history to appear as nice people, honest victims of mankind – and that is what passes as social sciences today – political and economical correctness That is ot science, neither it is the elft-wing dream that humans will become nice puppies of social love. This is what we all wanted to be, but it is not happening and science doesnt deal with what doesnt happen, with wishful thinking from any point of view – that of right wing people destroying the world and that of left wing people not being able to save it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: