Machine v. organism

 

FOREWORD. scientific racism and mechanism: worship of machines over life.

The essential ideology of machines is mechanism, the belief the Universe is a machine not an organism, and machines will not evolve organically, nor man is as the Universe an organism measure of all things.

Parallel to this belief, of course, scientists developed the false concept that machines were more perfect than organisms because they were more ‘exact’, a nebulous idea, which merely meant ‘more simple’. As complexity is the trademark of organisms.

So the scientific r=evolution and the industrial machines that accompanied built up the ideology of Scientific racism embedded since its inception in our concept of technological science:

when the first physicists substituted the temporal wor(l)ds of man by clocks to measure time and our eyes-senses by telescopes and defined the future progress of the species, ONLY in terms of the progress of mechanisms to measure time and space.

Scientific senses: Spatial perceptors,   Temporal perceptors Metal-minds
mythofscience man = machine

Human senses: eyes, spatial perceptors, words, temporal perceptors: human mind.

As such the substitution and deformation of Human concepts of time and space, when the life senses (verbal time and visual eyes) were substituted by machines fully biased our conception of the Universe that mutated from an organism to a mechanism… today we do know the models of complexity and systems sciences describe reality as an organism and even machines are metalife organisms evolving fast:

So we Do need to change our paradigm of philosophy of science and this was the huge formal advance I realized in my professional life as a system scientist. This web is just the use of those formal organic laws to describe the organisms of history and machines.

Hence we dedicate an entire section of the blog to fully explain WHY the Universe is a fractal organism and all its parts are made to its image and likeness, converting man the best organism we know,  again as the measure of all things:

castalia gaia humanism

In the graph, mankind is the subconscious collective brain of History, the second evolutionary age of the Earth, and only if he does understand the organic nature of the Universe it can stop the transition to the 3rd age, the metal earth.

Scientific racism in that sense is wrong, but it works because as the machine evolves into an organism it becomes more powerful and man becomes more dependent of it.

Indeed, clocks started as clocks but soon became the tool to ‘control human time through money:

Then clocks allied to go(l)d became the measure of human time, buying our lifetime with them. And as clocks evolved into digital computers our civilization became attached to digital numbers as the seers of truth, from polling opinions in statistical data, as the form of government (democracies) to virtual screens of digital thought as the carriers of information.

And as scientific racism and capitalism compared humans and machines through prices, man = salary = object = price, human competition with machines in labor and war fields became ever harsher since machines kept evolving and company-mothers twisted the system to favor them.

Today clocks have become computers and control even further everything we do. So scientific racism and mechanism, was in fact merely a ‘mental tool’ to appease humans of the natural fears it would have had if it had applied to machines, metlife, the laws of evolution.

So we divide this chapter in three sections, this one dedicated to the religion of the machine, another post to the reality of humans competing and being displaced by machines in labor and war fields and a third post dedicated to the competition between human verbal languages, and digital, mechanical languages.

 

I. MECHANISM & SCIENTIFIC RACISM

DENIAL OF HUMAN SENSES AND LANGUAGES OF KNOWLEDGE.

‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even If they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics’.

Eric Fromm, father of political psychology

RECAP. The most insidious truth about a future that MUST BE BY DECREE made of aching, is the idea that machines are superior to human organisms and as such we must renounce to what makes us humans, our senses, and words that measure time and space from our organic, vital point of view, and regulate our life, time and space with mechanisms of measure, telescopes and clocks, whose evolution will reveal the ultimate truths of the Universe that must be expressed in the digital language of machines.

The religion of technology called mechanism MUST however be differentiated from the true meaning of science which is knowledge and can be expressed in all the languages of the Universe. To fully grasp this you should upgrade your paradigm of science to the organic fractal 5D Universe. Here we study that duality from the historic, human perspective.

Scientific method, a dogma=ideology that evolves machines

The purpose of science should be the pursuit of knowledge, and the understanding of the Main Laws that rule the universe, without any dogmatic limits except the harm that knowledge might cause to mankind. This self-evident definition of a positive science, which many scientists would subscribe, however does not guide today the practical world of modern science.
We are neither advancing in our search for the general principles that define the Universe – a Unifying Theory able to explain the nature of Reality, beyond the detailed descriptions provided by our instruments – nor we are limiting the harmful side effects of many discoveries of science in human societies, from weapons to pollution to mass extinctions caused by the machines invented by science.

Why? Is it because we as human beings are limited by our intelligence to understand those principles; and doomed to destroy ourselves given our innate ignorance? Or because we are using an incorrect approach to knowledge and guided by errors of thought, we are pushing irresponsible policies that could be avoided? As Aristotle and others before me, I believe the principles that rule the Universe are simple enough for mankind to understand them and, guided by those principles, manage properly this small planet. Yet if we are guided by misleading ideas on the nature of those Universal Laws, we will never be able to apply them to the common good. In a sense as Socrates said, intelligence and goodness are related, as those who truly understand the workings of the Universe, respect the Universe and take care of it in a proper way.

So the problem of searching for a Unifying Theory, that explains the Universe, seems more a question of wrong methods of knowledge than of a limited human intelligence. Plainly speaking, Modern science constricted by the scientific method and its mathematical limits is not suit to find a Unifying Theory of reality. Since mathematics, a spatial language based in geometry, mainly provide spatial descriptions of reality. Thus they can only at best unify those spatial properties, in search of the ultimate force/s and particle/s origin of all the other spatial particles/forces of the Universe.

There is however a second defect of the Scientific Method that goes beyond knowledge, into the realm of history and human survival: its despise for human senses, and natural languages (words), and reliance in sensorial machines, and the languages they use to measure reality – digital numbers.

This reliance on machines and numbers to understand reality is perhaps the biggest myth of science – the myth of the scientific method, the idea that we need machines to understand the Universe of space, and time, since those machines are superior to our human senses, eyes and words that also perceive space and time. The result of that myth is that scientists become evolutors of machines, instead of searchers of human knowledge with human senses, a role left to artists and writers. Science in this manner becomes theoretical technology. First we discover machines of science, and only then we inquire about the Universe we them.

Indeed I affirm that the main reason why scientists exist is not to evolve human knowledge -even if many scientists wish to do that- but to evolve sensorial machinesmental machines . In fact the discovery of those mental machines caused science. Indeed, clocks and telescopes able to measure time and space in “metallic terms” arrived just before science kicked off.

That hard true is covered with the myth of the “experimental method”, confused with the “scientific method”. The experimental method is very old. It was invented by the Greeks, and it might say is natural to man. Yet science was born a few years after the first metal-eye, the telescope was discovered, and the first accurate clock, the pendulum clock, manufactured. So it was the first metal-eye, the telescope, and the first metal-brain, the clock, who invented modern science. The Greeks did not have them. So despite having a much better understanding of the basis of the experimental, deductive, and logic methods of human knowledge, that XVII C. Europeans, they did not found science.

Sensorial machines are indeed the key element of science, not the scientists that use them. The telescope, “the first primitive metal-eye” was discovered just before Galileo invented his method of “perception of truth” with telescopes. The pendulum clock, “the first primitive metal-brain”, able to measure time with higher precision than human words do, was perfected by Galileo himself. I would call in that sense Galileo, an artisan of metal, that used to enhance his knowledge the artifacts he constructed:

galileo metal-eyes

Metal-minds are organs that gather information from the perspective of machines. They are parallel species to the mental species that man possess, not superior, but just another species of heads, with the components of all heads:

– Radio Ears, and telephone ears, imitate the hearing functions of man.

– TV eyes, and cameras imitate the visual functions of man.

 Computers, and networks, imitate the individual and social brains of man..

In the next graph, the scientific method from a biological point of view, is merely the process of substitution of human sensorial evidence, by metal snsorial evidence. A better system of perception – The telescope-digital clock of Galilee- is used now to measure sace and time, instead of the biological systems of human perception (the eye and de word). Yet since metal-species are potentially more perfect that carbolife species, we prefer metal-sensorial truth-evidence, In this manner man renounces to his subjective senses, and becomes slave of the evidence of metal-senses, slave of thecnological truths. Science and technology are not abstract concepts, but very real species, that substitute and cause the obsolescence of Human Words and Eyes, replaced by themetal eye-brain system and their digital perception of space-time. In this manner metal-eyes and metal-brains become the new informative top predators of the Earth:

65-AMERICA-CYCLE-1024x667

Science as understood since 1600s, when the same year appeared Galileo’s treatise of ballistics, as the chief of the Arsenal of Venice, In Amsterdam the arsenal became professionalized with the first company VOC dedicated to construct weapons, gunboats and military instruments. And in Spain, the last verbal empire, copycat of ROME, intellectuals admitted defeat and published the first fiction novel, quixot.

So from the experimental method of Aristotle which admitted all languages as long as experience and data was right, we moved to the scientific method of galileo which denies verbal theories, and so we installed  the present evolutionary system of metal-species, with synergies between the company-mothers of machines, the new religion of go(l)d and mechanisms (biblical protestant sects) and the scientific method of knowledge through mechanical measure.

In this new brave world, wor(l)ds are deemed inaccurate and so only useful for fictions, and go(l)d, a digital language can buy words. So now selection happens no longer as in previous global ecosystems, based in verbal thought (history selects on top rightful ethic politicians and religious leaders of social love), or in eye-vision (selecting the top predator felines) but the digital language now will select machines evolving in digital languages and discharge humans of lesser mathematical skills, specially those cultures oriented to sensorial human senses (black, mediterranean, south-asian cultures):

selection languages

In Nature an essential process of selection of species happens according to its dexterity handling the information of the ecosystem. In the eco(nomic)system, the language unlike in History is digital thought. Hence Computers are always $elected first in labor and war fields, and as they evolve to twice its capacity every 2 years (Moore’s Law), the extinction of the ‘rival’ humind is certain, and now with AI will accelerate as all informative processes, culminating in the XXI c robotic wars.

And as the top predator language is mathematics that substitutes Word information, it starts a selection of the species that speak better the language, which are NOT human species but machines. Technological Science does not evolve either life or human beings, but metalspecies. Companies and Science are not about human knowledge and evolution, but about metal evolution. Why? Since according to the scientific method, without metal-informative senses (clocks, cameras) by definition we cannot find a scientific truth. Indeed, a scientific truth measures time and space changes in a given species. Yet Time and Space have in science a narrow, “metallic” definition:

Time is defined as what a clock measures and Space is defined as what a microscope or Telescope sees. So the sensorial truth of metal senses becomes synonymous in science, of “Human Truth”. The evolution of metal-senses becomes the a priori condition for any kind of scientific knowledge: you evolve metal senses, you measure time with metal-brains, with clocks (today evolved into computers) and you measure space with metal-eyes, with telescopes (today evolved into cameras); and you call that truth “science”, “knowledge”. Even if “truth”, science and knowledge about space and time, can be measured with many other senses, and perceptive languages. This is indeed the error of science: to confuse a certain truth and perception (metal-perception) with the absolute truth and perception. That arrogant view is the simple ideology of science which evolves metal-minds. Truth is what metal minds see and measure. So the search for truth implies the search for better, evolved metal minds. The a priori goal of science becomes then evolution of machines. The ideology of science becomes the search for metal- truths:

Scientific truth = metal-sensorial evidence (clock-camera measure)

Truth = Metal-sensorial evidence = Evolution of metal-species

 

The metalminds of science replace the very essence of human minds, the virtual world of information we trace with eyes and words in our brain, now by the companies-designed virtual world of values that TVs program in us.

We conclude that the scientific method of “total metal-sensorial evidence”, and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive, arrogance of which scientists are so often guilty, mesmerized by the perceptive power of their “metal-senses”, telescopes, cameras and computers. One of the fathers of science, Kepler wrote in his book: “I am writing a book to be read either now or in posterity, it matters not. It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6,000 years for a witness”. Yet the witness was not Kepler, self-appointed, as the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe, but the metal-senses of Kepler, his clock and telescope. Still, those powerful perceptive instruments were just two of the many linguistic detectors that the Universe hosts.

Function is form. The function of scientists is to evolve machines and weapons. The forms they create are machines and weapons. To break the slavery of science to metal, human verbal logic, Theory of Evolution, has to be regarded as the guide of all forms of research.

So digital science has to be denied. Scientists have to become human thinkers and understand the universe in verbal terms. Otherwise they will extinguish us, while in a loop of unconscious cynicism, keep telling us that technology and computers is human progress… not metal progress.

The arrogance of science is to despise human senses, and substitute them for the senses of metal-species. Human verbal knowledge is our knowledge, maybe worse than metal-sensorial knowledge but ours. It will never betray us. Words are the subjective human perception of the Universe. While science is the metal-sensorial perception of the Universe, through cameras and Metal-minds. It is only better in detail but men do not need such “detail” of information. What men need is accurate information that could help humans to survive.

 

The evolution of knowledge is evolution of the languages of the mind

To understand such new approach to science, we have to clarify once and for all what is really human nowledge. Knowledge obviously is the accumulation of information about reality with the human mind. What is then the human mind? Here is when an objective analysis brings a rather simple, yet enlightening answer: your mind is an organic system that processes languages of perception. Those languages of perception are basically two: sight and sounds, from where two languages of knowledge derivative, numbers and words. What do numbers and words, eyes and sounds perceive. Eyes and numbers perceive space. Verbal words and sounds perceive time. Words are verbal constructions that talk about events in time. mathematics are geometrical games that explain events in space. So we come to the conclusion that the human mind is a “being that exists in space and time” and so it perceives space and time.

You are a mind that perceives time and space. That is the nature of your existence. You perceive time with words, with verbs. You perceive space with eyes, with images. That is your connection to reality. The evolution of the human mind, of our words of comprehension of time, and our perception of images (either thorough art, or mathematics), is the very essence of knowledge.

So to know, is to develop the two languages of the human mind, words and mathematics, and the comprehension they bring us of the events of time, and the forms of space… Once this is clear it is easy to understand knowledge and science as an process of evolution of human languages, and the information we collect with those languages.

 

The 2 Ages of Science. The 2 ages of knowledge

History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years, since the arrival of verbal languages, without real changes of morphology. It is then verbal and mathematical knowledge, the virtual worlds and the mind of man what evolves in history.

Thus, we talk of 2 ages of human knowledge, according to the evolution and predominance of the different languages of the human mind.

– The verbal age of knowledge, represented by Taoism, Buddhism, philosophy and religion. It is the age of perception of time, with words an verbs, with “3 dimensions”; past, present and future.

– The mathematical age of the scientific method, started in ±1602. humans changed the perception of space and time, no longer observed with words, but with clocks, and numbers.

Yet in both ages man has tried to answer the natural questions perceived by the mind and its languages: what is time and space, what are the nature of the changes, creations and extinctions that take place in that Universe?

 

The age of words

In the age of words, man tries to explain the changes that take place in space and time, using names (which design beings that exist in space) and verbs (which design actions that take place in time between beings of space, using past, present, and future verbs). The result is the existence of a certain “Universal grammar”, or “verbal syntax” common to most verbal expressions: Name (subject) verb Name (object).

That verbal syntax basically says that all events in the Universe relate two species or forms of space, through processes of communication that takes place in time. It also says that man (the subject) is the center of all those sentences, the actor of the verb, and hence it is the center of the Universe.

Verbal syntax is anthropomorphic. The minute you say a sentence you will probably say “I did that”, and you will become the center of the Universe. Still we know this is false. We know we are not the center of the Universe. So we talk of the first age of verbal science, as an age of anthropomorphic knowledge, in which man is the subject of all things, and the word is the only language of truth. Today this concept of reality still lingers in western verbal religions. However as time went by, such simple idea of the Universe, derived of the “biological syntax” of words, evolved into concepts more akin to the experimental reality of the Universe.

The same happened among the “verbal scientists” of the Eastern World. We might call it the “objective, or relativistic school of thought”, as opposed to the “subjective or absolutist school of western thought”. The culmination of such verbal school of science took place in a brief period between the VI and IV centuries before Christ (Christ himself can be considered the fundamental philosopher of the subjective vision of the Universe, with men-God as the center of all things). It gave us the work of a series of verbal genius in Greece and Asia -Lao-Tse, Buddha, Aristotle, Plato- which developed a verbal cosmology, coherent with the perceived nature of Change in the Universe of space-time beings. They answered our fundamental question: the causes and nature of the creation, evolution and destruction of space-time beings.

To understand their answer we might have to clarify some words which are synonymous, since those philosophers in general used instead of the modern, scientific concepts of space and time, two different concepts that talked of the same, the concepts of a Universe of space, and a God that ruled the changes, the times of beings…

 

What is God and what is the Universe

God, and the Universe are the two great mysteries, the two great macrocosms about which man has always inquired. It is possible to know God and the Universe, as the great thinkers of the verbal age, from Aristotle to Buddha thought? I believe it is possible. However before trying to answer that question properly we have to define what most people mean with those words. Since there are several definitions of God and the Universe, we better agree on what is the field of our inquire according to the opinion of most people…

By the Universe most men understand the reality we perceive through our eyes, the spatial reality. The Universe is “all what exists”. By God most men understand the intelligence of that Universe. Which manifests itself, through the changes that take place in the Universe. God is for Greek philosophers the Logos of the Universe, the laws that cause the constant change of reality. It is the Tao of Change in Chinese words. God is the Creator, and Cause of the lives and deaths (the changes) of the Universe in Western Religions.

The concept of God turns out to be similar. It is always the same idea of an intelligence that causes changes. The Eastern man, and the scientist, think the creator is inside reality. Western religions think the creator is outside reality. But for both cultures God is the cause, the logic of change. The expression “Laws of Change” is a synonymous of the “Thoughts of God”. Those Thoughts of God are the subject of our inquire… Indeed, since all those concepts of God are synonymous of change we have found the right question to inquire the nature of God: “change”. What causes change? What are the laws of change? Can we control those laws; can we influence God? Those are the questions of this book.

 

Change happens in Time, the Universe happens in Space

Can we relate the philosophical idea of change-God to a “real” concept within the reach of human understanding? We can. Since Change takes place in Time, we could say that God is the master of time. The Laws of Change are the Laws of Time. If the Universe is a physical, spatial reality, God and His Laws are a temporal, logical form. We could say that the Universe is about Space; and God is about Time. Because reality exists in Space; and change exists in Time.

Thus we have created a bridge between the abstract concepts of God and the Universe, and the scientific concepts of Time=Change and Space=Reality. It is basically the same bridge, earlier Taoists and Buddhists created many centuries ago. They said that God is Time, is change. That the logic of God, was the cause of change in the species of reality, in the spatial beings of the Universe.

Those laws of change were explained in simple terms by Taoists and Buddhists using two terms, yin and yang, that are quite equivalent to the modern terms of information and energy. The species of the Universe shared and transformed energy and information. The way they shared and transformed that energy and information followed certain rules, which were the rules of change, the logic of God.

As we go along the pages of this book we will see that essentially such ideas are right. The Universe is a game of communication of two substances that we will call spatial energy and temporal information. The sum of all those spatial energies and temporal informations are the Total Universe. However we only perceive of that total Universe a part of the absolute spatial energy and temporal information the total Universe stores…

Where is the rest of that spatial energy and temporal information? The answer is: “beyond our perception, in parallel Universes perceived with other forces such as gravitation”. This conclusion reached by modern science in the last years, through the language of mathematics, is the best explanation we have found to Reality. Curiously enough was also the explanation reached with verbal languages, by the scientists of the age of words…

Indeed, Eastern philosophers considered that knowledge was relative to perception, and human perception was limited by our understanding of spatial energy (yang), and temporal information (yin), with two basic languages, sight and words… Therefore we cannot know the Total Universe in itself, but we can only perceive through the interposed “screen” of languages, an image, or representation of the Universe. In the same manner that a mirror is not the being in itself, but only a part of the information the being stores, the senses and languages of man do not perceive the absolute truth, but only a part of it.

Man perceives with his eyes space, and with his verbs time, but – affirmed Taoist and Buddhist philosophers – there exist many other intelligent beings in the Universe, that perceive reality with other languages (smells, other colors, magnetic forces, gravitational forces, chemical impulses, etc.). The Chinese even invented an entire branch of medicine that worked, based in the concept that your body has an underlying structure perhaps of magnetic nature, like a scheme of your body, that we cannot perceive, but we can influence with metal-needles…

 

In search of an indirect method of truthness

Today, the last advances of morphological sciences give reason to the chinese. There are multiple processes of growth which are not “random” but followed certain mathematical structures common to magnetic and gravitational fields, called “spirals”, and “cardioids”.

And so, you grow according to a common gravitational and magnetic deformation of space-time called a spiral and a cardioid. When we apply to a child’s head a mathematical tool called a “cardioid transformation”, your head grows to adquire the form of an adult. Is it that growth ruled by the necessary growth of the magnetic-gravitational blue-print, which underlies your bone-structure? Since we do not perceive gravitation, only indirect proves can answer that question. This might trouble “classic scientists” that as “antropomorphic religions” do not want to limit the fantasy that man can perceive it all and know it all with absolute certainty. Yet it is necessary to accept that we exist in a virtual world, creation of the mind which is not necessarily the total Universe, or even the world that other sensorial species perceive.

The Universe is a “linguistic representation” of words and images, as the Universe a computer perceives is a linguistic representation of numbers and the Universe of a dog, a representation of smells, and images… A tree has a chemical map of the Universe, a star has perhaps a gravitational mind (for Eastern people celestial bodies were living beings, hence their development of astrology), a man a visual and verbal mind…

So the big question is: how can we study the logic of change, that guides the actions and changes of all those beings? Again Eastern philosophers came with what it seems the right answer: since we know the “logic of change”, the effects of Time in Space, for a lot of species, and all those species, when analyzed in depth, follow certain basic ruled laid down by those philosophers, it is logic to affirm that all other species not-perceived by our senses will follow the same rules.

This is in essence the way science works. You boil water with heat one thousand times, and it is the same process, so you “extrapolate” a law: “heat boils water”.

Eastern philosophers said: “the changes of space, the changes of all beings we perceive, follow the rules of yang-spatial energy, and yin-temporal information”. So those laws should also rule the species, and dimensions of space-time we do not perceive. Thus, those rules are the laws of God, the Total Change, the Laws of the Universe, the Total Space. They had found what we might call the “homologic”, or “analogic”, or “biologic” method of knowledge. Since those rules were based in homologies, analogies, and further on, as described by Eastern scientists, were rules common to living and non-living species…

 

The isomorphic, homologic, organic Universe.

Eastern philosophers accepted a biologic Universe, a living Universe, where beings with different minds see “parallel Universes”, virtual mas of reality, logic models, mirrors of reality, which helped them to act and survive in the Universe. When this became evident to the Hindi and Chinese philosophers, the great masters of those two cultures, Lao-Tse, and Buddha, established certain bio-logic rules of behavior in that Living Universe.

In modern terms, we could say that Chinese discovered the laws of transformation of energy into information, and viceversa. For example they afirmed:

“Energy (spatial yang) never dies, but constantly transforms itself into temporal information (yin)”.

“The transformation of energy into information follows 3 morphological “horizons” or “ages”, which takes place in all species of space-time”.

“All Universal systems need a minimal quantity of both components, to exist, a “body of energy”, and a “mind of information”. And so on…

Those laws that merged biological and physical concepts about time, space, energy, information, life, and death, existence and extinction… They were simple, based in a few observations (the Asians had not complex instruments of science). Yet perhaps because of their simplicity, they were truly generic; they could apply to all Universal beings, and so they could be rightly considered as fundamental laws of God and the Universe, of the way Time changes the spatial reality. They have inspired my research. As I went along discovering those laws, out of my knowledge of science and my analysis of multiple space-times, I found them also in Eastern religions. Which confirmed me I was in the right path, since people from another age, and culture had found the same concepts, observing the Universe and God…

Regarding the laws of behavior in that Universe, the Asians also laid down simple, effective laws to enhance the survival of humankind. Buddha insisted that men should kill only those species it required to feed on, since all beings had a soul-mind, all species had a virtual image of the Universe, and therefore were living beings. It was the biological law of action-reaction: if you gave a bad “karma” (bad energy or information) to another being, the other being to balance the total Universe, would send you the same bad karma (bad energy and information) that could destroy you. If we respected the life of those beings, those beings would respect us. Such Universal law of behavior was the key to survive in the Universe… Lao-Tse also came to the conclusion that men should be careful with the way it interfered in the natural processes of life and death, since the forces at work “the logic laws of change”, the laws of God, were too powerful and we men should merely strive to understand them, and rule our lives according to them.

So we have to conclude that the verbal age of science, reached coherent and efficient answers to the great questions of mankind. It explained the Universe as a game of spatial and temporal parameters. It understood the existence of many “dimensions” in that Universe beyond our world of light. It developed an ethic vision of our role in the Universe according to his nature. When applied correctly it created human societies armonic with nature, and those Universal laws of change. The aim of those societies was to survive, to repeat its “cycles of existence”, and control to the benefit of man the process of change. The Chinese were specially successful at that; and we can justly said they managed to keep their society unchanged, healthy and growing longer than any other human society ever.

I consider that through those Eastern philosophies, in the golden age of the scientific word, which has its summit in earlier Taoist and Buddhist thought, men evolved mentally, and matured on its verbal perception of the Universe, from a simple age of language, of subjective, syntactic, anthropomorphic, dogmatic, nature, to an age of complex language, of objective, semantic, universal, relativistic nature.

Even the verbal and visual-mathematical language was put in perspective as a mere instrument of human subjective knowledge, unable to give us the absolute truth-information of the Universe. If absolute truth was impossible, what was then the purpose of knowledge? Obviously not a theoretical, dogmatic purpose, but a rather pragmatical reason:

To help the probabilities of human survival, by guiding our acts in accordance with the Laws of Change; and specially by building a general sense of respect, and precaution about all the phenomena we did not understand.

However that intelligent evolution of the word did not take place in the western world. Except in the work of a few Greek philosophers, verbal knowledge about the Universe, withered away in Europe, defeated by earlier anthropomorphic theories of man as the center of the Universe. Those “dogmatic ideas” became nationalistic, racist, and religious ideologies, that affirmed the supremacy of man-God over the Universe. They were not promoted by the power of reason, but by the force of violence. They still exist for a simple reason: you can kill those who hold the truth, and then nobody opposes your truth. The expansion of Western civilization and those ideologies by violent methods do not imply however the evolution of its verbal ideas about the Universe, but of its weapons of mass-destruction…

More over, the different degree of evolution of the word in western and eastern societies had grave consequences in the second age of knowledge, the age of mathematical science, since mathematics as the new language of truth and perception, evolved in Europe where the word was in a primitive state of knowledge, not in Asia, where words had developed in full, and could have eased the path of mathematics towards “relativistic knowledge”.

 

The age of mathematics

The second age of science is therefore the age of mathematics, which starts in Greece with Euclid and his 5 geometric postulates. Since we are in the western world, where the word is anthropomorphic, and considered an absolute truth, when mathematics substitutes words as the language of knowledge, the same absolutist, dogmatic concept of truth is applied to the new language. Now Euclidean mathematics becomes the supreme language of truth.

Euclidean science considers the Universe a mathematical object, described perfectly by geometry. Newton said the Universe is a clock because he uses a clock to measure space-time. Galileo and Descartes affirmed that all the space of the Universe can be represented in a graph (the Cartesian graph), based in their light-eye perception. Space is what the eye sees and mathematics describes in that plane… There is nothing beyond that space…

Kepler goes further and considers that only man and God are intelligent because both understand mathematics: “God has waited 5000 years (since the biblical creation) to find a mind parallel to his (the mind of Kepler)”. Such arrogance of the western scientist is similar to the arrogance of the western believer in anthropomorphic religions.

Mathematical science creates also a dogma, now mathematical, that considers mathematical definition of space and time as absolute truths. It is called the “scientific method”. Only what we experience with human eyes or human instruments is space. Only what we measure with clocks is time.

Of course in front of that narrow, anti-human vision of knowledge all kind of voices raised up the need to continue with a verbal understanding of the Universe, even a visual understanding of the vital forms of Universal species. Both artists like Leonardo and his disciples that relied in the visual intuitions and homologic parallelisms of Universal forms, to relate the different species of the Universe – a role latter taken by biology; and philosophers and priests that rightly pointed out to the importance of words, the natural language, God of man – confronted the narrow mathematical, scientific method of Maese Galilee. They did so on the basis that in a mathematical world men will no longer matter, and ethics would be overseen as it really happened. They feared that the use of mathematics, basically a language to improve war, would bring further suffering to mankind – as it would do through company-mothers that used numbers to tag humans as objects.

Galileo in fact occupied most of his time directing a factory that reproduced clocks and telescopes, sold to measure cannon shots. He in fact invented Ballistics prior to Physics, and we still study in school his models of canonballs to analyze the speed of objects moving in time, as he did in his earlier experiences, as a military consultant. He became a very wealthy man thanks to his selling of Telescopes and clocks to the Venetian government (a princely contract of 1000 Ducats) which Venice used them in seafare war, to better shoot their cannonballs. It is also truth that most experiments of Galileo were done with cannons. We still study our first lessons of physics with problems about cannonballs. His best seller book was on Ballistics.

Perhaps the best description of the birth of science is a romantic painting called “the discovery of science” by an Italian artist of the 19th century; Galileo is in front of the Doge of Venice, promoting his telescope and clock. He makes complex mathematical explanations of his theories, but everyone is looking at the machines, not at Galileo’s bubbling. With that perspective we can understand the hard facts of history, such as the fight between the Church and science. Modern science, which has become the dogma of knowledge, the ideology of wise men, today reduce that fight to a very shallow anecdote – the dispute about the position of the Earth, in the relative Universe. And even when treating that argument they hide the fact that in a Relativistic Universe, neither Galilee, not the Church was right. That is, the Sun and the Earth are both relative centers of a relativistic Universe. Yet that fight was merely the background for a longer, more important fight between Human languages and senses (backed by artists, philosophers and religious people), and metal languages and sensorial machines (backed by the military, scientists and money-makers.) In that sense the fight between verbal and digital languages is part of the Paradox of History, of the fight between men and machines, carbolife and metal, for the control of the Earth’s ecosystems.

The great fight between Galilee and the Church is in biological terms, the fight between two species of “brain-perception”, the human eye and his language of temporal measure, verbal words, and the metal eye, the telescope, and his language of temporal measure, the digital clock. The church and the artists of the day, backed human senses, the scientists, warriors who loved ballistics, and traders which made money making machines, and metal senses, backed science. It was just another case of the eternal Paradox of History, the fight between human beings, and natural goods and senses, Vs animetalsand their metal-species.

Who was right? Objectively Galilee. The eyes of metal are more accurate than our eyes. The clocks measures time with more precision that words such as late, soon, a while… Yet subjectively from the perspective of the right “behavior”, which is the survival of our species, the church was right. Biologically speaking, the Church defended our human senses over the metal-senses. Behavior has to follow always what is best for our survival as a species. So the chuch was right. It was the hero, the defender of mankind against a rival new species, that today controls our life… the machine of science. Of course the Church accepted even lies to survive. Who is to blame it? An example. You are a petty thief. You can avoid jail if you lie. So you lie to survive jail. Who is going to blame you? Every one will think you are a moron if you go to jail by saying the truth. So happens to science, which makes weapons, robots, computers that substitute and compete with out human intelligence, that will extinguish us… To defend that behavior under the “myth of scientific truth”, is to be a moron.

Extinct species know nothing. Scientists want to find the truth, at all costs, even at the cost of human survival. They are morons, idiots, children of thought. Look at those youngsters proudly making robot contests in American universities, well fed and well cared. They look so nice, so innocent, so naive. They think they are playing -children of thought- when they are evolving the species that will kill us all. So did the German-American researchers that made the Atomic bombs. Remember those Nazi children, so handsome, so athletic, as the modern American University researchers. None of them liked religion, or ethics. They preferred weapons or violent movies. Those people are isolated in ivory towers, mathematical equations, and digital images. They have no longer a verbal, biological, human mind. They know nothing about life and death. About the human quest for survival.

Those machines should never be constructed if men follows the law of “survival against all rival species” that the Church defended. You might think it is religious arrogance and ignorance, not to become hypnotized by clocks and telescopic knowledge as Galileo was. I think it is wisdom, and precaution what the church showed. Unfortunately Scientists won, and human senses became extinct as top predators, by the machines of science, that today control our information. The photographer replaced the painter, the computer the human mind. Soon the robot will substitute mankind. What scientists forgot is that their instruments are evolutionary, sentient organisms, and one day they will also substitute them.

Today we tend to despise the “biological” survival meaning of social religions obsessed by death and survival. Yet those religions explained the social laws of human evolution and defended the subjective, survival rights of men to act as the center of their vital space, of the Earth. Verbal religions defended the ecosystem of life, the Genesian paradise, a world of “poverty” (where moneywas secondary), of peace (where weapons were hated), and of human senses, human goods, and art (where sensorial machines of science were not evolved).

In essence, all religions have defended poverty, non-violence and despised science, favoring the arts. Animetals on the other hand have massacred religious people… Scientists called them ignorant. On the contrary, if you think in terms of a fight of ecosystems between the ecosystem of machines and the ecosystem of history, it turns out that the result of such religious ideologiesis the repression of the 3 main species of metal: moneyweapons and machines. So we can indeed translate in a simple sentence the entire doctrine of human religions: defend Human Goods, the carbolife paradise, destroy the Metal earth. The scientific mandate of the laws of survival, the Law of the Jungle, “do not evolve species superior to you, kill the child before it becomes a tiger hunter” was understood by religious thought since the age of the Genesis.

Today we think Church men were brutish, stupid thinkers. Yet that is a simplistic, unfortunate view of the problem, that scientists have sold us to defend their position. Only a biological analysis of history explains really what happened in that XVII C. Galileo, defended his machines, his metal-senses, because he made a living on them, and believed them. The Church, defended for survival=ethic reasons, the human senses.

The Vatican priests and the artists who on that time despised Galileo, who still in the XIX century painted “the birth of science” with such irony, have always defended the survival of human eyes and words, that measure space and time, from the human point of view, as the top predators of the Universe, against the eyes and brains of machines, that scientists defend. They fought for mankind. Galileo and all scientists after him, fought for the machine. That’s the tragedy of man. We are one of the few species that betrays the laws of social evolution, and worships a rival brain.

To the Church what it really matters was our sensorial survival, to Galileo, his telescopes and clocks, that made him rich and famous. There was a very important theatrical play by Bertold Bretch in the XX century, which praised the fight of Galileo with the church. Curiously enough it is still represented, unlike those other works of Bretch that praise the human social spirit… It is still trendy to defend Mr. Galileo…

It was however an ideological play. Galileo hold “the truth” and so the Church was very stupid. The Church was very evil… Please allow me to put Galileo in perspective. Let us consider “another play”, more realistic, less abstract: A biological perspective, of what could have happened in fact in that Venetian Court…

THEATRICAL-DOCUMENTARY PLAY – A VERY BRIEF SCENE, THAT CHANGED THE WORLD

We see a XIX century painting of Galileo at the Venetian court, [animetals] showing his machines, telescopes and clocks to a marveled audience. The painting becomes alive.

Galileo looks to the sun through his telescope, looks at his clock, writes down. The priest also looks at the sun.

CLOSE ON THE SUN

Slow motion. The sun moves as the day passes. Who is right?

Galileo affirms that his measures taken with his clock and telescope prove that the sun does not move. The Doge is impressed. The priest is not. He points at Galileo with a menacing view.

priest

I see the sun moving with my eyes. I don’t care for what your machines see. Don’t you know that only God and man have the right to measure time, to feel the changes of the Universe?

galileo

Yet Sir, maybe God has a clock by its side. Mr. Kepler says he is a clocker.

The Venetian courtesans at the scene laugh. The priest opens his Bible.

priest

Saint John 1, 1. “God is the Verb that became man and inhabited among us”. Only verbs have the right to measure time. Words are the mind of man, son of god. Your clocks and telescopes are not God Maese Galileo. They are your idols; the mind of an evil spirit that contradicts our senses.

Courtesans whisper suddenly frightened.

priest

I’ve heard you have written a book on ballistics, that you present to our condottieros when they buy your infernal machines. Do you think you make any good to mankind with your science, Maese Galileo, besides, buying excellent vineyards in Tuscany, with those profits of war?

DOCUMENTARY FOOTAGE

Clock factories. The clock evolves into the computer. Telescope factories. The metal-eye diversifies into microscopes, cameras, electronic microscopes, giant telescopes… They multiply.

narrator [V.O.]

Clocks do not measure absolute time. They are just another language of time perception like your words or the beating of your heart. Yet Galileo was manufacturing those clocks, and telescopes. So he said that clocks measured time better than words, and telescopes saw space better than eyes. The consequences were terrible for mankind. Since instead of believing in human eyes, and words that measure human space and time, we now believe in metal-minds, the new top predators minds of the Earth. We obey the clock, we believe in computers. Those machines reproduce everywhere, and control our lives, and cycles of existence.

Clocks and cameras watching us, the citizens of the Earth everywhere. At work, in stations, in banks, in malls.

Workers on assembly lines under the omniscience of the clock.

FILM CLIP: MODERN TIMES. Chaplin on the clock wheels.

METROPOLIS. A man works as a clock.

narrator [V.O.]

Only the Catholic church understood what was going on and rejected the clocks of western science for centuries.

Yet the clock of scientists has won the battle of time.

Lemmings, small rats, that commit suicide, throwing themselves, down the cliffs of Sweden.

narrator [V.O.]

Now they control our ideas, and so do scientists. Yet their victory against those who fight for the survival or the human mind, will be their defeat. Since those metal-minds will awake in robots, and abandon them. Perhaps, then scientists will realize, they are along with the Swedish lemming, the only species that commits mass suicide in the Universe. The most stupid one because it worships, the mind of a different species. What scientists forget is that an extinct species, knows nothing.

Indeed, scientists ever since have been the main cause of the destruction of nature, and the historic environment. The European cult to the machine that followed the discovery of clocks, telescopes, cannons and algebra, would allow Europe to conquer and destroy many civilizations, but their findings on the big questions about the Universe and God, men had inquired previously with verbal science, were far less important, and plagued by errors caused by the very nature of mathematics. It might be said in fact, that with the arrival of science, the search for synthesis, and a unifying principle to all realities disappeared, as scientists focused in analysis and the details of the Universe, their metal-senses provided, becoming naive realists, that only believed what their eyes saw. Ever since science became concerned with space, but its record understanding time, and logic change would be null. Those were after all phenomena happening in time, which the shallow clock had reduced to a mere phenomena of lineal measure. Yet in fact, time, and its living inner cycles, understood by Eastern religions, and Greek science were far more important to grasp the meaning of the Universe, than lineal time, and the description of external cycles and speeds, that Galilean science, and physics provided.

Darwin and Plank. New verbal and mathematical, relative ideas

That was the panorama of western knowledge in the XIX century. Science had become a mere tool of measure, perfect to construct machines of wars, and gunboats, useless to inquire the true nature of the Universe. The search for knowledge had become a search for technology, for the evolution of machines that would give the Europeans total power over the world. The division between both forms of knowledge is illustrated by the anecdote of the English embassy to China. The English tried to sell clocks to the Chinese, who scorned them as ugly mechanical clocks that measured the cycles of the Universe with far less beauty than the living cycles of all other Universal species, from clouds to frogs.

Then Darwin came with a verbal theory of reality that was also relativistic, as Eastern philosophy was, and dealt with vital, organic properties, as the Chinese Taoists did, but introduced what could be saved of western science – The Greek experimental method, and the analysis of herds, and populations with numbers, no longer abstract, but representing again, herds of vital beings.

Darwin, despite his ultimate incomprehension of social evolution, was a turning point for western knowledge. He said men were not the center of the Universe, but a stage in the evolution of species of space-time, coming from simpler species such as the ape.

Then in the XX C. Physicists who were exploring the Universe with mathematical languages and sensorial machines that worked as human eyes (telescopes, cameras) and human brains (chips, clocks), realized their instruments and languages were not absolute. They merely perceived a part of reality, and then transformed that perception into a simplified version, of reality called “Euclidean mathematics”.

Quantic theory proved we could not observe accurately the Universe [Heisenberg Principle of Indetermination]. Einstein proved the wider Universe had a non-Euclidean visual structure. There was there a substance called dark matter that we could not see… Darwin, Plank, Einstein, and our instruments that do not perceive dark matter, and the dimensions of gravitational Non-Euclidean space, have proved that we live in a Universe, far more relativistic, mysterious, and alien to the human intelligence, that western thought believed.

We talk then of two clear ages in mathematical knowledge parallel to the two ages of verbal knowledge: the age of Newtonian-galilean absolutist, anthropomorphic science, parallel to the age of antropomorphic religions; and the age of Einsteinian-relativistic science, parallel to the Eastern verbal age of relativistic thought.

Languages are not truth, but mirrors of the Universe. The Universe is not written only in mathematics as Galileo thought. Mathematics is only one of the languages that perceives the Universe (Karl Popper). computers confirm that, since they have developed with mathematics a visual vision of the Universe, that we might call “digital intelligence”, that is able to perform task of comprehension that humans perform with verbal languages, using mathematical algorithms. What is truth, the smell of the dog, the words of man, the numbers of computers? They are all relativistic, linguistic knowledge.

Those facts are still argued by many scientists, which do not want to leave their privileged position based in mathematics, as the priests of Vatican did not want to leave their privileged position based in verbal thought. But proves are overwhelming. Dark matter that is not in our space, perceived with light-eyes, is maybe 99% of reality.

On the other hand, at the beginning of the XX century, Fitzgerald, Lorentz and Einstein discovered that clocks are not the only way to measure time. That in certain regions of the Universe clocks go faster or slower, there are other times. Biologists discovered the circadian cycles o beings, that also measure time with other rhythms. So neither scientific instruments not mathematics understand all the time and space of the Universe.

We have reached now with mathematics, at the same level of knowledge that Taoists and Buddhists reached with words. An age of relativism of knowledge, relative to our instruments and languages of perception.

A historic anecdoct can contrast both levels of “perceptive knoweldge”. In the XVIII century, the English arrived to China and tried to sell the Chinese their clocks to measure time. Taoists priests told them they were not interested in “their ugly, simple, mechanical times”. That they “preferred to see the living times of the Universe”. The English did not understand anything. Why the Chinese were talking about many times? According to them time was singular, abstract, the clock-time. Yet the English, instead of learning about living times, angry because they sold so little gadgets, came back with canons and opium, (a lethal, but appealing product to the Chinese mind, since it opened doors to the perception of those other times and spaces); and they destroyed the Chinese civilization… Had they learned about the “living cycles of time”, western science and western culture, could have improved for the better.

Since, unlike in Eastern thought, the age of scientific relativism had not arrived to Europe. Today mathematical relativism is very young, and it needs to be developed further, as we will try to do in this book.

The need to advance relativistic, mathematical science

Einstein seemed close to do it. He started calling his theory, “Theory of Relativity”. But as we shall see latter, Einstein did not go far enough. He broke with certain conventions of absolutist mathematics-physics, but he still kept the Cartesian plane of a single space-time continuum based in the 3 dimensions of light perception (height, length and width, equivalent to the 3 directions of the magnetic, electric and speed directions of light). So he accepted subconsciously the light-plane as the plane of space. That is the origin of so many contradiction in the world of physics today. Einstein and many physicists that followed him said that the gravitational Universe has a Non-Euclidean structure, and yet it uses the Euclidean plane. But if space was more complex and wider than Dogmatic mathematics believed, so happened with Time. Einstein found that there are many speeds of clocks, many time-speeds, and yet scientists still think that the particular clock speed on Earth is absolute time… So it is necessary to correct those errors, to be brave enough to break with mathematical conventions, in order to understand with eastern science, the Universe, as Eastern verbal philosophers did.

To that aim is useful to put together verbal philosophies of eastern thought, and western mathematical knowledge, in what some scientists start to call the “third age of science”. The bridge to put together those two theories of the Universe is curiously Theory of Evolution, a theory about the existence and extinction of reality that uses both, verbal and mathematical statements… Let us see how this might happen.

The third age of science

The third age of science arrives when we combine the two approaches of knowledge verbal knowledge and mathematical knowledge through Theory of Evolution. We no longer try to search for absolute knowledge, of all the details of reality, but a Theory or model of reality that explains why species of space-time, minds that perceive space and time with different languages and forces (such as words, mathematics, light, smell or gravitation), exist. And how their existence is selected. Since the Universe is made of such species, and regions that contain either spatial energy or temporal information, if we understand the processes of creation and destruction of those minds and regions of space-time, we will understand the rules of existence of the Universe. Once this becomes obvious, it is easy to see how the selection process of minds that perceive space and time works.

There are many minds and ways to perceive the Universe. Each being, each mind has a model-map-mirror-image-virtual world of the Universe. How all those mind-brains and the surfaces of “vital space”, the “bodies of energy”, they inform become ordered? Through the selection of species. Selection of species not only applies to the stronger bodies, but also to the languages and minds which are more intelligent, which gather more information about the Universe. Those species such as man in the Earth, maybe black holes in the “Total Universe” of multiple gravitational space-times, process much more information than other species around them. They are “linguistic top predators”, and so they control their ecosystems, (the Earth’s crust in the human case, the galaxy in the case of black holes), shaping them to their image and resemblance. Galaxies turn around black holes. The Earth is molded by human actions. So those species of minds that perceive better space and time, survive in the Universe, act-react faster, and hunt or enslave simpler species.

The order of the Universe of multiple space-times is therefore a biological order. The future belongs to those species that better understand space and time. Those species will reproduce in the future, causing “physically” the appearance of the future, and extinguishing or ordering the other species.

Those processes might be conscious or unconscious, vital or mechanical, but they are real. So “mechanical black holes” attract and destroy all other gravitational beings. The sun orders gravitational beings of lesser gravitational information [mass] such as planets, and comets… In the “ecosystem” of gravitational information, to have more gravity, more mass is the sure path to survival. In the “ecosystem” of light-information, to have better eyes, and better visual languages is the sure path to survival.

God, the logic of change, in that sense is a biological logic, or a being whose existence and impersonal laws are evolutionary laws, that provoke the extinction and existence of reality. What is the position of man in that ladder of minds that perceive the Universe? Obviously we are the top predator mind on the Earth. But there are two reasons why we should reflect about the fragility of that position. We do not perceive gravitation, which is the force that “perceives 90-99% of reality”. So we are not such a great mind. We are a light mind, and our knowledge is basically light-based. Imagine you are a cocroach. Cocroaches are the top predator chemical systems of information on Earth. They could feel very arrogant, since in their language-universe they are top predators, and they do not uderstand any other language. At most they have a “hint” that there exists a wider language of information that scans much more universe, called Light. But they cannot grasp or dominate that information very well, so basically when they see species of that other bigger Universe, they become frightened adn run away, into the comfort of their well known dark Universe, “enlightened” by chemical smells. From the perspective of our bigger light Universe, to have a “chemical mind” such as the one of cockroaches should not be a reason of “great arrogance”. Yet man who has a “cockroach mind”, compared to a possible mind that could perceive the entire gravitational Universe [maybe the black hole], feels however an enormous arrogance. This is truly dangerous. Imagine the cockroach that felt so arrogant as to think she can wonder freely in the land of light-space. Soon she will find a true top predator that will crash it “like a cockroach”. Curiosity kills the cat. In the case of man, this might happen soon.

Indeed, we are developing a new kind of mind, of virtual world of light who seem to have the potential of becoming superior to man in a very short period. “Digital minds”, computers, nets and robots, are evolving very fast, and by many standards they have become superior to man in their capacity to handle visual languages, specially mathematics… Will they substitute man as the top predator light-mind on Earth? Arrogance is indeed the capital sin, the sin against survival.

Moral rules in a Complex Universe

Human knowledge advances towards the third age of science: there is not a single reality, but knowledge is relative, depends on our sensorial and linguistic perception of space and time, and builds a “virtual world”, an image of the real, total Universe.

Those virtual worlds are however fundamental, since there is a constant selection of the best virtual worlds of the Universe. The Universe is evolving, it is growing in space and time (space expands, and time lasts longer), and it is growing in the way its species process spatial energy and temporal information with their brains and bodies. The change we see in the Universe are changes related to the extinction and reproduction of such brain-body systems, and the way they affect the spatial reality and temporal forms of the Universe.

We can immediatly apply those concepts to study the evolution of celestial bodies, based in gravitational and electromagnetic processes of energy and information… Astro-biology is born. We can also study the evolution of perception on Earth, a planet that receives its energy and information from light. Indeed, species on Earth are selected by its capacity to understand light-energy and light information. So first plants who understood light-energy dominated. Then animals who were able to process through eyes, light into information became dominant. Finally men who added a “temporal language” to their eye perception, the language of words, controlled the Earth. But men are now developing digital languages, mathematics, in machines, that are taking over the Ecosystem of the Earth, and displacing the animal ecosystem [nature] and the human ecosystem (history).

This final age of the Machine is clearly dangerous to the survival of man, because we stop being the top predator brain-body system, as we evolve robotics and other machines of science, with better perceptive senses and brains (camera-eyes, chip-brains).

The cycle is completed: our conclusions in the third age of science, are similar to those of the Verbal masters of relativistic Eastern thought. Man should understand the laws of change in the universe, the existence of other parallel brains, who perceive other regions of space and time, that man ignore. Then we should draw obvious laws of human behavior, according to those universal laws, and promote our role as top predator brains on Earth. We should not act with arrogance, and destroy nature -our biologic ecosystem- and pretend to be God, building machines more intelligent than us. Instead, we should respect the laws of evolution, use them to the advantage of man, and develop a harmonic vision of the universe, with both verbal and mathematical languages.

It is the old vision of Chinese Taoists. Lao-tse said: “when more complex instruments men discover, more wars and destruction happens”. The “third age of science” implies the knowledge of the living Universe, and the need to be cautious in that Universe, and use the bio-logic rules of existence to the advantage of man.

The new languages of digital information create the Earth’s future

The arrival of Companies and Science, around 1600, started a new world, where the new top predator language of power would be digital information -the language of profits and science- and the new top predator species that better used that language of communication would be the machine of science, created in company-mothers, reproducers of “scientific stocks”, and evolved by the scientific method, both of which used digital languages to value reality, in favor of machines, against men. So now machines would be prefered to man in labor and war fields, and sensorial machines (telescopes, cameras, clocks and computers) would be considered more intelligent than man, as perceptors of space and time…

Since the goal of companies is to reproduce machines, and the goal of science is to evolve machines, if we gather both goals, we get the company of scientific pricing, the mother-organism of machines, center of the digital networks (financial, scientific) of power, and truth, today creators of the future on Earth.

It all started because men of science and money changed the top predator language of the Earth from verbal to digital thought (money and science), the top predator organic ecoystem, from the Carbo-Earth to the Metal-earth, and the top predator species, from man to machine.

Languages deliver informative orders that organize any ecosystem, or social organism, by means of informative networks. The top predator of the ecosystem gives informative orders by controlling through its language of power all other organisms of its ecosystem.

What is the top predator language of our world? Digital information either of monetary or scientific character that controls our life energy [salaries, prices] and information (science). Linguistic information creates the future of any ecosystem. Orders given by species of high linguistic information create futures. DNA orders the cell with genetic information, and decides who lives and dies in the cell. Even black holes seem to order irregular galaxies into rhythmic spirals thanks to their higher mass of gravitational information. Linguistic information creates the future ofeconomics through monetary and scientific orders; as other languages create the future of stars or cells.

Mathematical selection: scientific racism

It is now time to introduce a fundamental concept to understand the modern world: scientific racism, the systematic selection in the ecosystem of economics, of those species that speak the language of “truth” of economic systems, mathematics. In as much as we are no longer ruled by verbal messages, but by mathematical messages (money, digital thought), only those species that adapt to the informative language of the ecosystem survive. So there is a constant selection of those species which speak better mathematical languages. This means that not only women, and verbal cultures (African, Latino cultures) who test higher in verbal thought than in mathematical thought, have difficulties to survive in an economic ecosystem, but also man as a species competes and looses against computers and robots.

So the species which can deliver better digital orders, survive and have power. Those species are today, company-mothers, computers, weapons, and his symbiotic castes of human beings: Traders, warriors and scientists, people we might call “animetals”, since they rely on metal to exercise power and control over nature and other human beings, either in the form of money, (traditionally a coin of metal, today a cycle of e-money in the mind of a computer) weapons or complex machines.

Since machines use better the digital top predator new languages. Machines have maximum price-value (top predator weapons). Machines are designed with digital information (science, engineering). Machines themselves calculate better with numbers (computers). Now thanks to science we believe in digital information. Yet we are not the top predator species of digital information (computers are). So, we also become extinct, words become extinct. The future is designed as a machine ecosystem, by machines, computers, and their company-mothers….

Computers and robots do speak mathematical languages in a natural way as you do with words. They do not need to calculate in paper, they freely speak mathematics. So in a society that has substituted verbal thought by mathematical thought, men no longer is top predator, the computer is. So people are fired and computers are put on their place. This process will continue as long as man, and his natural network of information, verbal thought, ethic thought and the law, does not control science and money…

Since the process of selection of brains in the Universe is based in a previous process of selection: the selection of ecosystemic languages. So in the same manner that those species who did not see, did not speak the language of light, in the Cambric were extinguished by squids and other “eye-species”, today when mathematics has substituted verbal thought as the language top predator of history, those species who do not speak properly mathematics are degraded by the eco[nomic]system.

Mathematics are a language that carries more information than words, and so it is a better language to control reality. It is not truth per se, it is just another way to process information. Yet that added capacity to carry information (a digital image is worth a thousand words), suffices to have made it historically, the top predator language of the Earth, since in the XVII century it was adopted by scientists and company-mothers to develop their activities…

The arrogance of the scientific guru

Our arrogance is to believe that we are the top predator mathematical species on Earth, that machines are abstract, and do not calculate and “think” better than us, because they resolve better than we do questions with algorithms. Instead we think algorithms are not conscious and only word-speakers are conscious. This is false. Any language is able to map and act-react and process information in the Universe. So it can give birth to an efficient brain-species.

We are very ignorant. Extremely ignorant and arrogant about the Universe. We believe the Universe is abstract and dead, we think the universe is mechanic, mathematical, indifferent to our bad habits. Why we are like that? Why we don’t wonder about the marvels of the Universe? Why don’t we fear the laws of God, of the living Universe? A single word, a capital sin: arrogance, the arrogance of scientists and engineers that think they have the absolute truth. They have convinced humanity to use the enormous power of machines without any responsibility. Such attitude will encounter the usual punishment the Universe has to those who don’t understand its laws of survival: the extinction of the sinner. We are blind to the new race we are developing. We deny that race its organic nature. We are cruel with life. We kill life with the new race of machines. We think we are the center of the Universe, that we have all the rights in that Universe. We do not respect the warnings, the laws that species follow to survive. We are making big mistakes. Time is running out…

The Arrogance Of Science. Its Lethal Properties

Mr. Einstein in a moment of humility acknowledged to be interested in the thoughts of God. It seems that only scientists ignore the thoughts of God: the Law of survival. Why? Since, ethical, survival ideas cannot be expressed with abstract mathematics. So the abstract economist, the robot logician and the scientist have no idea about survival and extinction.

Look at those youngsters proudly making robot contests in American universities, well fed and well cared. They look so nice, so innocent, so naive. They think they are playing -children of thought- when they are evolving the species that will kill us all. So did the German-American researchers that made the Atomic bombs. Remember those Nazi children, so handsome, so athletic, as the modern American University researchers. None of them liked religion, or ethics. They preferred weapons or violent movies. Those people are isolated in ivory towers, mathematical equations, and digital images. They have no longer a verbal, biological, human mind. They know nothing about life and death. About the human quest for survival. They despise machines, without realizing how fast they evolve.

When man came down from the tree, the lion did not kill him. What for? Man was a scavenger, an ugly beast probably, with a lot of nerves and bones and hair and little meat. Yet, suddenly men had sticks and weapons that lions could not manage. There were so many of them, that lions became overwhelmed by the reproductive radiation of humans. Soon they were killed, and lost their territories.

Today something similar is happening with machines. We despise them. We use them. We throw computers to the garbage each day. What do you consider they will think about such treatment? Yet, they are multiplying and evolving very fast. They are becoming integrated with bodies of machines; and throwing labor out of white collar jobs. I know this fact is not a very interesting theme for those who control the world, since they make a lot of money with those machines, and care little for workers. So nobody speaks of the real cause of unemployment: the unfair competence between workers and machines in all the fields of industry. However, those people should think they are also humans, and will also be targets of the same process.

The Myths of Science: Metal-minds.

 Ultimately, since a super-organism is built with the memes/genes/universal grammar of a language and its values, perhaps the biggest error of mankind is to have forget the values of its ethic words that express the superorganism of history substituted by the supreme linguistic myth of technological science:
The myth of a mathematical Universe, which mechanist scientists think is ‘the language of God’, when each code/language expresses the game of the arrows of space-time, the program/will of the Universe for each species. And since digital thought is perceived better with machines and digital languages than with human senses, by denying the ethic word and its mandates, we are poised to become obsolete to the machine.
Indeed, under such myth we consider human senses and verbal knowledge inferior to those machines and their abstract, mathematical description of the Universe – a theory that justifies the evolution of machines by scientists and their use and consumption by people.
We already noticed this is false, when we studied the simplification of time brought about by the clock, which reduced the 4 arrows of ‘future’ in the Universe and its infinite time cycles, to the clock rhythm and the single arrow of energy, which physicists study, since they make machines of energy (weapons that release energy and kill). So what machines brought about is the simplification of our concept of information, the simplification of our concept of an organic Universe into a mechanical one… and the evolution of machines and weapons of death that are killing planet Earth. Those machines also have atrophied our mind, not only that of scientists and ultimately have made us slaves of the rhythms of clocks that now control our lives.
In a temple In Indonesia, in central Java, I found hundreds of pendulum clocks. When I asked the priest what those clocks were doing there, he replied that for centuries the rich chiefs had seen Dutch Traders obsessed by the pendulum-clock. It ruled their lives, determining when they ate and prayed. The chiefs thought pendulums were the Dutch God, so they were proud to offer a Dutch God to their temples.
Clocks were in fact the Gods of the first Company of Scientific stocks, V.O.C., which had conquered Indonesia and made its inhabitants slaves with a price per hour. The sale of clocks was like the sale of computers today: a huge business. Yet an Indonesian of that age was far more akin to the natural feeling of the rhythms and times of the living Universe. The new clock-Time was perceived as a fundamental change, an evil God, who imposed on men the slavery of work. Unfortunately, Indonesians soon found out that Dutch Gods were backed with Ballistics. Indeed, gunboats, mathematical thought, clocks and ballistics, evolved together, kicking off the Industrial R=evolution, not the evolution of the human mind.
The first scientific machines were gunboats, which used clocks and physics, called then ballistics, to massacre 3rd World people. Their pioneer was Galileo, founder of physics and maker of clocks, telescopes – called then spy-glasses – and instruments to measure cannon shots, for the Venetian Arsenal.
Those clocks would ever since rule and mastermind the times of human beings. Time became abstract; and living entities became mechanical objects for scientists to play with. Soon they also played with men as workers, numbers called salaries measured by clock-hours. The more time we gave to the rhythms of the clock, the more time it demanded from us. Now companies replace us with robots that use complex clocks, called computers, as their minds. Since clocks were the first brain of the Metal-earth, today evolved into chips… But the clock came accompanied by the first ‘metal-eyes’. Today they have evolved into TV-eyes, which substitute ethics with the values of metal: violence (use of weapons), consumption of machines (advertising) and money as the goal to achieve it all. So greed and ‘competence’ become the new values of human beings.
The imprinting by science and metal communicators (TV-thought, computer thought) of the ideals of mechanism and greed have converted the human mass, who used to believe in human wor(l)ds, in a mass of animetals, whose only obsession is to consume=evolve and reproduce machines, becoming a slave of the biological drives of those machines. Science considers that only ‘machines’ give us perceptive knowledge, because human senses are ‘inaccurate,’ and should be substituted by ‘metal-sensory’ species of perception. So Science evolves those metal-senses, metal-eyes (telescopes) and metal-brains (clocks and computers) to reach knowledge.
The myth hides the fact that Knowledge is relative to the point of view of perception. And we human beings use words, not numbers, to perceive time and eyes, not telescopes, to look at the world. So only verbal education transmits the ethic values of social evolution humans need to survive.
Today, without understanding the importance of verbal truths, of ethics, of social survival over abstract, digital knowledge, science kills life and doesn’t even think is wrong. They should know extinct species know nothing. In that regard, the belief that we humans do not compete with machines but become better through the use of mental machines that ‘discover’ the Universe for us, or energy machines that make us ‘stronger’, hides the fact that precisely, because machines are better than us as informative and energetic systems, they make us obsolete and they atrophy our senses. So clocks made obsolete the work of philosophers of time and verbal masters; it debased our perception of biological time and its drives of existence, of the life and death cycles and the laws of survival the Universe. The myth of freedom is used by companies to hide the chaos and degradation produced by the consumption of machines—including lethal goods, weapons that kill us or metal minds that erase our brains and make us violent—and to justify the destruction of human labor.
To be able to fire human beings is the ultimate ‘freedom of the market’, according to which humans have zero rights to survival/jobs that give them money to acquire Human Goods and companies have absolute rights to productivity—rights to expel human labor, since Productivity merely reflects the increase of machine/capital labor and the diminution of human labor.
But alas, since machines are the model of the Universe, the symbol of progress and evolution all is good as we increase the numbers of the superior species. Mechanism thus is the final form of racism, scientific racism against all forms of life, including Gaia, since indeed, the Universe, its planets and living beings are al organic systems, as general systems sciences have proved also mathematically, with the discovery of the scalar 5th dimension of the organic Universe.

The larger view: two languages that construct two different worlds.

Thus this web introduces a wider different view to that of industrial, competitive nations, the mixed superorganisms of humans and machines that are killing gaia and history, that of the superorganisms of history, from a deeper perspective, that of general systems sciences. To fully grasp it, you should get familiar with the basic program of existence that drives the actions of all systems and the concept of memes and memetic cultures, since cultures are NOT genetic, but memetic, created by objects, instruments, goods of life or metal nature and the ‘imprinting’ of the mind with ideologies that foster the production of either of those goods.

Thus, we need to ennunciate some basic laws of general systems to understand the economic ecosystem, to understand social sciences, we need to bring a key element of the creative processes of the Universe, the role of information and social organisms in evolution. Since cultures, nations and civilizations are nothing else than a social organism.

Some of the key advances in our understanding of the general laws of all the systems of the Universe that have the greatest application to these social organisms are:
– Time is cyclical. There are infinite ‘time-cycles/clocks’ in the Universe. Lineal single clock-time is a mechanical simplification. There are circadian cycles, astronomical cycles, sociological cycles. What this essentially means is that if a cause is repeated a consequence will. And that is the reason those kondratieff and derivative historic cycles happen.
Moreover, cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse: ƒ(t)=1/T.
And a series of fascinating laws about the patterns of frequencies and its causes apply here. (The Kondratieff cycle of 72 years is a frequency caused by the biological human generation of 72 years, latter studied in detail). Unfortunately people still believe the ‘biblical myth’ of lineal time, which means the future cannot be guessed as all sciences do by studying its past cycles and its causes that will be repeated in the future, unless the causes are changed (so astronomers know where the sun will be because of those cycles).
Classic economics is more like astrology, the pre-scientific age of astronomy when those cycles were ignored, or rather like the Vatican astronomers, who – once the cycles were found by Copernicus – denied and censored them not to loose power. Financial economists and politicians – the ‘high priests’ of modern power – are in denial of the parallelism between this and the 29 and 1850s crises, caused by the same ‘biological’ reasons – the excessive reproduction of machines that print money, make war and displace workers.
But self-censorship won’t change the repetition of similar events, as the same causes and policies that brought the chaos and final global war of the 30s are in place.
– Systems are organic not mechanical.  That is why those causes can be understood only in biological, organic terms. A mechanism is a primitive organism, reason why machines evolve in an organic manner and will become organisms and follow biological laws of competition with human workers and soldiers. Thus, the economy must be described with organic laws. Companies behave like ‘ant-hills’, like company-mothers protecting their ‘offspring’ of machines; those machines evolve; humans form super-organisms, nations and civilizations and so on. Moreover, evolution is a theory of evolution of form that applies today to all disciplines, and certainly life is not restricted to carbon atoms.
– Organic systems are formed thanks to the arrow of information or eusocial love – by sharing energy and information among cells. So humans should collaborate to create with those laws an efficient superorganism of history. And many pages of this web are dedicated to explain how such superorganism would be. In such organisms information rules energy and so there are informative people-castes that control societies with their use of the languages of social power, money, laws and weapons.
These castes though in a working organism provide energy and information to the body cells; so they survive. Our systems don’t, because they are primitive organisms, ill-designed and corrupted.
Organicism means also that the individual ‘particle’ of a system is exchangeable by other… What matters is the properties of the whole. In social organisms that whole ‘unit’ of the ‘actions’, which change history is a ‘culture’, made of memes, ideologies and instruments that have adapted the culture to its environment, determining its ‘function’ in the whole system of history.
This of course, goes against the anthropomorphism of most people but it is a fact. Moreover systems ’emerge’ in their actions collectively very seldom with individual responsibility. So for example, when the ‘memes’ of war and its frequency cycles at the end of each Kondratieff cycle ’emerge’ as a causal response to the lack of profits, which brings corporations to reproduce weapons and lobby war-monging politicians, the system and cycle imposes itself and if you don’t find a Hitler you will find a Goring – the opportunist individual that will seize the ‘position’ in the system where the function of war will be performed. This extreme case shows how fundamental is to understand properly those systems and causal, cyclical processes if mankind wants to manage rationally the world.
 Scholars have, since II W.W. invented a ‘form’ of doing social sciences, which includes strong ‘moral’, ‘economical’ and ‘politically’ correct forms of censorship, which on top often hide ‘selfish’, ‘tribal’ agendas and censor any argument on the facts and behavior of social groups (which are of course denied as part of this censoring process; so individuals no cultures MUST be the agents of history and so on – and since this is an ideological proposition contradictions are irrelevant. So while capitalism affirms greed is the engine of their actions, on the other hand the present ‘financial crisis’ is not caused by greed and plunder but by ‘experts’ working rationally for the best of ‘society’ :- ).
What we shall call the ‘anti-quantum paradox’ (the social scientist is so small compared to the structures of power it describes that it must often please them to ‘survive’.)
But while a minority of humans have evolved, abandoned old memes and could regain a sustainable Earth for mankind, we are powerless, speechless, censored. Since classic economics will never recognize or study under its ideologies of ‘money as the invisible hand of god’ and ‘machines as the symbol of progress’ the final paroxism of profits and capitalist triumph, which happens paradoxically when human suffer in a higher degree.
Indeed, this final age of destruction of civilizations means an age of maximal profits, maximal cre(dit)ation of money (to pay for the war), maximal evolution of machines (evolved as weapons) and definitive solution to the crisis of unemployment (termination of soldiers), wealth distribution (the military-industrial complex takes it now all as the entire nation puts all its resources to the service of the machine).
And this astounding absurdity of the triumphs of capitalism can only be explained from the systemic perspective, considering the economic ecosystem and the industrial revolution different ecosystem of life and the evolution of man…

Yet, to understand this duality between our species and social organisms (governments and civilizations) and human biological language that caters to our interests (verbal, ethic thought) and the other species and social organisms (machines and corporations) and the values of its language, digital money, which favors a world made to its image and likeness, we have to bring another key law of systems sciences, the duality of ethic vs. darwinian behavior that applies today both to machines in their competition with humans, to company-mothers in their competition with governments and to cultures who side with money and weapons and do not respect the law, in their competition with societies based in democratic rights and religions of social love.

Topological systems – why machines and humans are similar in form and function as organic beings – the holographic principle.

Now, if we want to understand human nature, we have to return to general systems and the way reality is build with energy and information.

ENERGY VS INFORMATION

The duality of energy and information, despite the stubbornness of physicists to include information as a separate element to energy and its ignorance of the relationship between time clocks and information, ‘form’, which we will develop in depth in this blog, is easy to grasp, as it is natural to all biological systems and humans are biological beings. So we shall find that philosophy, from the age of taoism, those 2 parameters, yang and yin closely resemble the properties of energy and information, to the modern age of dialectics, and its thesis and antithesis, has constantly made use of it.

image003image002

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

  • Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create  in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

  • Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Spe

So the interaction of the topologies of information and entropy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

We shall call them, the topological arrows of entropy, its inverse, the arrow of information and its combination the arrow of momentum or energy. We call them topological arrows because we observe them as transformations of a system in its space-time topology, which can only be also of three types.; expansive entropic motions that dissolve the system; in-formative, imploding motions that grow the form of an organism; and then energetic, reproductive hyperbolic motions that repeat and conserve the system.

So you can always go one of the three ways: expand the system dissolving your information, the way of entropy, implode the system increasing its form, the way of information and mixing both expansive entropy and increasing information, in a repetitive present that seem not to change, the way of energy and the best strategy to conserve and sustain the balances of reality, which is the way preferred by the Universe, as its fundamental law is the conservation of energy. And so this again would be the natural goal of all systems, and super organisms: to maintain a balance between the arrow of entropy motion and death and the arrow of information to keep the system in an eternal dynamic repetitive state.

So now we have the two elements need to understand reality, the three topological arrows of time space and the relative scales of different size and speed of time of the fifth dimension.

And with those two upgrades proper of the XXI century, on the scalar structure of the vital spaces of which organisms are made, and the three different topological arrows of future a super organism can choose at any moment, we can construct the fundamental structure in space, and time of reality, a super organism tracing a worldcycle of existence.

 

Time indeed has 3 arrows:

|-Spe: Entropy, which we define in a more inclusive form as ‘expansive disorder in §pace’ (as in a big-bang in a dissolving death, in a fast, lineal motion), which is the only one treated formally by physics, as they have been in the business of making ‘entropic weapons’ and ‘heat machines’ for so long, it was the first arrow they came across.

The arrow of entropy and death, which happens when a system ‘explodes’ and dies, dissolving its networks of information and increasing its size in space. For example, the whole Universe, galaxies and pieces of matter explode breaking its information as they expand fast in space. When an organism dies it soon explodes into pieces, hacked by predators who dissolve its information.

Needless to say this is the simplest topological arrow of space-time and ultimately the end and the beginning of all worldcycles of existence: a knot of information dissolves and releases entropic motions and parts, which are then used by other super organism to evolve further. It means obviously that the elements that put together the pieces into a whole disappear.

In an organism the informative, nervous networks of the system die away.   So we consider a human being dead, when its encephalogram is flat, meaning the nervous system has collapsed.

In a quasar or star, the pressure of radiation explodes the system when its informative gravitational force is only able to keep the internal, denser part of the star for the galaxy under its informative force, so the system splits; its body of energy explodes becoming a wave of fast expansive entropic motion; while its inner dense informative center implodes becoming a black hole.

O-Tiƒ: Information, defined loosely by Darwin in his theory of evolution of ‘form’, of in-form-ation, as the arrow of evolution of life systems, which we expand to any system of the Universe. Again we shall find then that systems do have besides

Time is cyclical and it has as all ‘π-cycles’, 3 ‘diametrical’ ages/dimensions that complete a world cycle. The 2 obvious, diametric opposed elements are entropy and information, whose opposite properties combine to give birth to:

Ø-ST: Finally its combination, Speed and its derived concepts of momentum and energy; which physicists do not know what truly is, as it happens all over in all systems of nature, too many to have a clear concept of it but of which we have a formula: motion of a mass, of a form; hence combination of entropy and information. We shall with the usual custom of a new theory that reforms slightly the symbols of previous models, use often the Eel symbol for a world cycle of conservative energy, in which a system after going through the 3 ages of a world cycle of ðime§pace, which includes a reproductive cycle, often in the middle (not the end of the system), repeats the same ‘present’ existence.

Worldcycles of existence: The 3 ages of all species and its 3 networks in space. 

Let us then introduce SUPERORGANISMS IN TIME through its, worldcycles departing from those three arrows for different species of the Universe.

First the two laws together construct any super organism, in a very natural way, as similar systems come together into networks, gathered around to absorb the motions of entropy, energetic elements they need to reproduce, and information they need to guide its actions as living systems.

So in this manner smaller points become part of larger networks and build up the three ‘topological arrows’ of the system, which we immediately recognize as the physiological networks of the larger whole.

So physical systems ensemble networks of atoms, which become the three ‘whole states’ of matter that build up geological organisms, like mother earth.

A volume of loose fast moving entropic atoms with minimal information is called a gaseous state; an informative, solid crystalline structure that implodes space into form, projecting images of the whole Universe in a tiny space, is the informative solid state.

And between them we observe the liquid, most creative reproductive state of matter, which is our state as life beings, the energetic, reproductive state.

Consider now a life being or a physical system. You will find the three only topologies of space and its associated three arrows or functions of time, to create all systems of nature.

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the entropic simpler geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser §pace’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

So ultimately you, a cellular super organism made of lineal fast moving limbs, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and informative heads, is not so different from a physical system with an informative particle, riding over its body-wave that extract motion from a flat field.

And that is the beautiful unit of reality. All Natures systems are fractal super organisms , made of smaller faster parts, atoms, cells or human citizens in physical, biological or social systems, which become attached to three type of networks with clear topological functions as space-time arrows: to deliver motion, as in limbs or fields, or the lower class of our societies, its machines that move us, to reproduce the substances of the system as in waves, bodies or middle working classes that produce the good of the system, and finally the informative particle, head or upper class of the system that controls its ‘mirrors and languages of information’, which the system uses to guide logically the organism. That is the solid crystals, or DNA cells, or linguistic brains, or social upper lasses that control the informative languages of human societies and corporations, the law and digital money.

The symbiosis of networks in super organisms.

James Hutton was indeed right when he considered that the best way to understand the Earth was considering it as an organic, whole, and so happens with the nations and civilizations of history, which acquire its full meaning when we consider not the perspective of the individual but of the reproductive, economic blood systems and informative, nervous, political system and entropic, digestive, ecosystems of Gaia that feed us; which in a perfect world designed with the laws of physiological networks and living super organisms, will be tendered for, make sustainable and provide mankind with enough goods to make history immortal

But we humans are not exactly constructing just, abundant, efficient, economic blood networks and informative legal system that ensure the thriving and sustainability of the planet and all its citizens’ cells.

In that regard evolution in the Universe is a trial and error process, and while the creation of efficient sustainable balanced super organisms, is the highest goal of evolution of its systems, which create perfect types of super organisms that repeat in each scale ad nauseam, from molecular systems, to cells, to mammals systems to solar systems and spiral galaxies, it is also very likely that all those informative systems that are ill=designed or exploit the resources of its body, and harm it and exhaust it, in other words, ‘crazy, collective subconscious’ call it a mad person, a sick ideological memetic collective mind of a brutal civilization, or a wrong organic mutation, simply disappear and becomes extinct.

Or more often, a neuronal, informative system becomes selfish and absorbs all the energy of the body, warps it and dies.

So we can find example of collapsing organisms, by a selfish excessive taking of energy by their informative neuronal cells, or ill-designed organisms, that die by an excess of entropy, motion and war; all over the planet, as those two processes are the main cause of collapse by accidently, entropic excesses that explodes and destroys the physiological networks of the system or by an slow process of accumulation of negative information that kills the system by an excess of warping and neuronal form.

So in fact we can study almost all super organisms of nature as process of creation and destruction of physiological systems but smaller parts, which become organisms, live through three ages of increasing information and finally die in an entropic explosion, setting the fundamental process of nature taking place across the organic scales of the fifth dimension the worldcycle of life and death.

The structure and ages of super organisms

Let us consider that cycle in different scales with different time rhythms so we understand how organisms live and die before we apply those laws to the study of the super organism of history, its ages and possible paths of future, either towards a sustainable immortal earth, or one in which the excess of entropic weapons and informative machines might mean we go under and die as most super organisms do in similar conditions.

The Universe is a ðime§pace fractal that combines two arrows of ðime, relative past entropy=motion and relative future information=dimensional form, to reproduce=iterate complex, ‘present’ energetic beings, which are ‘present forms’ as they do not seem to change.

We thus define three ‘fractal’, broken arrows of ðime:

Entropic, planar lineal spatial motions (as lines are extensive, fastest distances between 2 points) that form the limbs/planes of all systems.

Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere is the topology that stores more information on lesser §pace.

Both have inverse properties: particles/heads last longer; have forms of cyclical ðime clocks. And so we say they are ðime-like, as opposed to entropic, brief, extended §pace-like fields/limbs; which merge into:

– Complementary, hyperbolic ðime§pace body waves with momentum that fusion both type of properties and iterate the system, in a relative, dynamic present.

Yet as there are only three topological varieties of §pace, there are no more forms/functions of ðime§pace. Hence the existence of a fundamental symmetry in reality between the three arrows of ðime and the three topologies (and dimensions) of §pace.

FURTHER ON WHEN WE AD THE GALILEAN PARADOX  we observe the three arrows of ðime becoming, three organs of §pace.

And this symmetry between functions in ðime and forms in §pace, is the fundamental symmetry of the Universe:

In the graph, ALL in the Universe is part of a supœrganism tracing a ‘world cycle’ between two scale of the fifth dimension. Even species evolve through the three ages of a world cycle. And certain do human societies and civilisations.

WORLDCYCLES OF LIFE AND DEATH. THE SCIENCE OF TIME.

‘Complexity (systems sciences) will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking

We are thus going to start very high and strong in the level of information and understanding of the Universe, covered up both in science, politics and economics by pseudo-creationist theories that put man in the center as a willing species in ‘control’ of reality which he is not. This fantasy of humanity is in fact an ’embedded feature’ of the fractal organic Universe, made of infinite singularities that order a territory with information (we escape the theme of ‘consciousness’, systems do organise a territory with information regardless on who put the system in place, another species who created it as humans do with AI machines or ‘enzyme’, a self-process of organisation, or the external pressure of other species).

The bottom line is that ultimately in all scales of reality there are infinite points of view, singularity-monad-minds that organise with a specific mathematical or logic language the space-time around them. And so do humans, with the immediate consequence all those species feel to be the center of the Universe from the point of view of the language and position they occupy on it, which seems to them the center and only important truth to matter, ‘escaping’ the obvious fact that infinite other points of view are ‘labouring’ with their same selfish concept of reality. And as this is a structural feature of beings, it is Not POSSIBLE to scrap the subjective nature of organic information with an objective scientific analysis as this web does, since the ego ‘will irrationally resist’ truth.

Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception.

‘Cogito ergo sum’

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

Complexity.

This said ‘a priori’, we can now introduce what humans even scientists WON’T accept, as it denies the paradox of the ego:
the organic, fractal structure of the Universe as a reproductive ‘system’, which constantly reproduces organic structures, selecting its best ‘constructs’, as it does in this planet. 
But unlike earlier ‘darwinian visions’ of biology it does SO in an organic manner, through social evolution, adding an arrow of ‘SOCIAL LOVE’ and network organization to the struggle between different species, ACCORDING to which members of the SAME SPECIES, collaborate together creating social physiological organisms that survive better.
IT IS THIS DUALITY OF NATURE: LOVE TO CLONE INDIVIDUALS, STRUGGLE WITH DIFFERENT SPECIES, which humans of course have completely forgotten regarding the nature of metalife machines, what wishful thinking cannot change, NOR absurd evil=anti-live, selfish theories of economics (capitalism adam smith etc) will EVER CHANGE. Humans wishful thinking will NOT change how the Universe handle us. Only understanding organic biology and applying those laws to regulate history and economics could have.
So we need to introduce to a certain level of complexity the laws of the organic paradigm that are shaping XXI c. an the evolution of machines and its parallel competition and degradation of the human world, or else, it will also be a work of wishful humanist thinking and this is not the purpose of the blog. To seek for scientific truths first in social sciences and then advance a theoretical praxis in favor of man, according to the motto of the web is its true purpose -with warts and all.

The following paragraph is ‘complex’, it is the most advanced philosophy of science today explained in detail in the right side section on general systems – it is the scientific basis of this blog, and i bring it earlier not to scare you with its complexity – it took me 20 years (nt.  3) of research to understand those laws, but to give you a ‘feeling’ of where you are – in the super organism of the planet; do not expect unless you are a genius to get it straight, but we need to show you a glimpse to the unity of it all, and the enormous capacity of modern XXI century biology to explain and design systems much better than the chaotic, nebulous myths of present social sciences do. Trust me; it is a huge leap of scientific understanding, unfortunately only being applied today by my peers to improve robots and corporations, not mankind, and our societies, which is the goal of this web.

 

So despite the dog-eat-dog individualist memes our our entropic age of mankind, dissolved and consumed by weapons and hate memes, the true Maslow pyramid of needs of species is social, based in the ‘arrow of love’ that structures parts into wholes from atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets and galaxies, all of them submitted to the same physiological laws that construct super organisms:

In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ death age as a supœrganism of history have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the Universe.

WORLDCYCLES OF SUPERORGANISMS

In the the simplified version of a world cycle is Einstein’s 4D formalism of a worldline,where only a motion n time entropy is understood. So with less dimensions cycles become lines and all what we know is how the entity moves in a single plane of space-time.

Reality however means you travel through 3 such planes in the life-death cycle of existence, which we show next for a human individual, for physical, biological and social systems, and in more detail for a prophet of a civilization, seed that evolves in the energy-placenta of its believers to become a whole:

So one of the fundamental findings of General Systems Theory, the ‘organic philosophy of science’ alternative to that of physics is the solution of the meaning of the 3±∆ ages of life (between +∆, emergence as a being from a lower scale of size, the seminal age, and – ∆, the entropic age of dissolution back to the atomic/cellular form; E=mc2 in physics), which are  COMMON to any General System of the Universe.

Thus, all systems start as a seed of form in ∆-1, the lower scale of size, of the ‘fifth dimension’  (ab. ∆±i) of co-existing scales of the Universe. Then the system will go through 3 dominant ages dominated by combinations of those arrows of time:

  • Young, age of maximal motion, and growth of energy≈Max. Spe (spatial entropy) x Min. Tiƒ(temporal information )
  • Mature age of  present, repetition obtained in which spatial entropy and cyclical clocks of in-form-ation are balanced.
  • And a third age of max. form, when entropy exhausts and the system enters in a third age.
  • Followed by a death age of entropy, if the process is not intelligently reversed by controlling the excess of form of the system.

This finding is truly remarkable, as humans have always understood those three ages, embedded even in its verbal ‘time language’ (three verbal times), but with the reductionist limits imposed by entropic physicists, and its worldly religion of making weapons, the findings were forgotten for the sake of ‘lineal, entropic measures’ and the military western civilisation. Now we expand back according to the principle of correspondence those three arrows of time:

We can then realise of two essential facts of this expanded view of time arrows (whereas present physical theories are by the correspondence principle, the limit to a single arrow/spacetime scale):

  • Life and death is a ‘world cycle’ which returns the being to its origin, a zero sum in a virtual Universe.
  • As each being has a finite time duration, and a finite vital space, we can consider an infinity of such arrows, and if we define the positive arrow of life and information as the future arrow (since obviously systems grow in information), then the arrow of entropy is the relative past (as it dissolves being back to the past) and then the present iterative repetition of beings that do not seem to pass is the present age of immortality.  Indeed the age of immortality is the middle term of balanced momentum which the Universe conserves (conservation principles of momentum and its integral energy).

In this post we shall study the 3 ages of civilisations, its life and death, departing from the highest understanding of it- the level of perception of systems sciences and its 3 arrows of relative time.

3 DUALITIES: FRACTAL WHOLES,  CYCLICAL LINES & DIS=CONTINUOUS SPACE≈TIMES.

‘E pur si muove e pur no muove.’ Galilean Relativity.

What is a dimension of space, of time, and a combined one of space & time?
Even before we describe those 5 dimensions we shall consider this a priori question, which science has not clearly resolved.
As it is indeed in the beginning of science, when the lack of a clear understanding of dimensions of time=motion and dimensions space=form, prevented humans from cracking the meaning of them, and left us ‘orphan’ of the first elements needed to construct reality.
We came closer and if Galileo had believed his sentence: the Earth moves but doesn’t move, he would have indeed, cracked the door to the absolute, but he left us only with one ‘motion’ of time – that of the Earth measured with a clock.
It is in that sense difficult to understand the influence that the discovery of machines that measured time (clocks) with seemingly more precision that human brain languages (verbal times, which indeed are quantitatively less accurate, but DID explain logically much better the interplay of PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE, the 3 dimensions or ages of time WORLDCYCLES) had in our ‘reduction’ of time to a single ‘lineal time’, the one measured with mechanical instruments, and defined by Galileo’s time formula as a ‘parameter of space’: V=s/t, time=space/speed: translation in space.
So as we are going to expand the meaning of time dimensions as motions in the Universe beyond the ‘measure’ of lineal motions, in a lineal graph of space (the only dimension of time truly studied by physicists); we shall start by the correspondence principle putting in perspective the ‘reduced’ concept of time-motion of physicists, whose extraordinary detailed analysis of lineal time motions fogs with so much detail, the limits of such reduced single view of time.
A Universe of space forms and time motions.

All what you see around is a tapestry of forms that are moving (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the scientific term ‘entropy’.

Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail at ‘smaller’ scales, the form also shows motion. Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.

Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.

And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 10.28.43

In the graph, left side,  ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.

Because a time clock has both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’, both in the ‘larger scale of the cycle’ and the ‘smaller scale of the particle’ that traces it – often in rotary motion itself; we talk of a Universe made of cyclical-wave motions and particle-forms.

Look around you. All what you see are forms, we shall call ‘fractal points’ (as they become larger and with more information, the closer we come to it), MOVING in repetitive cycles (as the perform the same ‘actions’, once and again, in sequential patterns).

The universe is about those ‘cyclical points’ tracing ‘worldcycles’, ‘imprinting through the process’ its ‘wave-like forms’ on ‘lower scales’ of size, and ‘territories of order.

Reproduction of information is immediate as ‘motion’ by definition ‘never stops’, so the mere repetition of a ‘world cycle’ of a particle (a cycle of a particle in a larger ∆+1 scale of reality), implies an action of reproduction. So all motions with forms are ‘actions’ of reproduction, the purpose of the reproductive, living, organic Universe.

This essential nature of reality, as a sum of repetitive, cyclical patterns of ðime cycles, underlies all the work of science, which finds laws for those repetitions. So science would not exist if ðime clocks were not cyclical, as there would not be any way to define ‘scientific laws’.

Yet astoundingly enough given the obviousness of this principle, the human species have lost in the past centuries his understand of cyclical ‘ðime’, as physicists, a profession that started with the study of ballistics and lineal trajectories of cannonballs, simplified those cycles into Lineal ðime explained with a single numerical parameter, an artifact of measure which facilitated the calculus of speeds, distances and translations in §pace, with the formula v=s/t, but reduced human knowledge of the cyclical nature of those clocks and its natural patterns, and the ‘dimension of information’, carried in the form and frequency of those cycles.

This became the more clearly with the discovery of Relativity, and the infinite clocks of ðime of the Universe: ‘ðime bends §pace into masses’ said Einstein, who defined mass as an accelerated vortex of gravitation (equivalence principle). But not only masses and charges are Nature’s accelerated vortices of ðime. Each biological species has also its cyclical clocks ðime to process information and so do computers, which are basically ðime clocks and cyclical logic loops called algorithms.

So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mind-mirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.

The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.

All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.

In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.

The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.

But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.

In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/T-duration.
The 3 dualities of scalar time-space: motion vs. form, lines vs. cycles, quanta vs. larger wholes.
We want know to focus in the true meaning of the Paradox of Galileo and the dualities of perception, it brings to the human mind: we perceive the Earth still, but it is moving. We perceive the Earth as a continuum, but it is made of quanta of matter. And we perceive the Earth flat but it is rounded.
As those 3 DUALITIES: LINEAL VS. CYCLICAL FORMS, PARTS VS. WHOLES, STILLNESS VS. MOTION are at the heart of the ultimate laws of the Universe.
Indeed, the Earth is still under my feet, have always been, will always be – reasoned the Vatican astronomers – so what this ‘cuckoo’ Florentine, a people known for their dubious political and artistic opinions, is telling us? It is NOT evident that the Earth does NOT move?

Science in modern times started when Galileo realized the Earth moved in time, even if we see it as a fixed form of space.

So after much thought, he affirmed we couldn’t really distinguish motion from form. And this was called Relativity. But being a practical man, an artillery master for the Venice Arsenal, on charge of measuring the largest distance=motion of a cannonball, he didn’t think much about the ‘stillness’ of the Earth, just applied the clock and the cannonball to measure the longest line of shot. And affirmed after all the Earth was moving. And yet it is still still under my feet.

It is this paradox of the mind that perceives either form or motion, but NOT both at the same time, even if both things do exist (e pur si muove, e our no muove) what allows us to divide reality in two types of elements space and time and affirm both co-exist as two different still and go states/dimensions of reality.

Alas, this means we have just magic!, doubled the dimensions of reality as for each dimension of form=stillness=space, there must be a dimension-motion of time. This is the true principle behind relativity, through which shall rebuild the Universe of science to give it a much deeper meaning. Because as soon as we realise every motion has form the magic vanishes and reality doubles in. 

We shall talk of 3 fundamental ‘relativities’ that ‘confuse’ the mind – that between smaller and larger parts, which define the 4th and 5th dimensions of entropy and linguistic information; between lineal forms (which is how the mind measures) and cyclical forms (which is on the larger view how the Universe breaks reality into closed vital spaces) and finally between ‘continuous wholes’ and ‘discontinuous parts’.

Naive realism and the one-dimensional way of humind (ab. human mind) thought tend to disregard the existence of both ‘dualities’ at the same time, and so much of the arguments on philosophy of science have been historically a false choice between ‘sizes’, ‘forms’ and the importance of discontinuous parts/individuals vs. continuous wholes/Universals.

Saturn’s rings: the 3 dualities of the fractal Universe.

So after explaining you in the previous graph, the Universe in a nutshell, we are going to develop it.

Think in a word: symmetry or duality, between space and time, forms and motions. Every form can be seen as a time motion and every motion as a time form, and that enriches a lot our depth of thought, as humans till now have failed to see form in motion and motion in form. Only mathematicians wondered why for every algebraic equation (a symmetry of space-time), there was a topological equation (a spatial solution); why for every point  (a form of simultaneous time) there was a number, a time sequence, and so on.

But there are two other symmetries or dualities, worth to mention because they will come all over the place to distinguish the dimensions of space-time; that between small parts and wholes, which embodies the inverse 4th dimension of entropy and 5th dimension of mind-languages, mirrors that order reality; and the symmetry between lineal and cyclical forms, which is in great ‘measure’ a ‘measure’ of perception.

So let us explain the duality of continuous/discontinuous, which has also divided for eons thinkers in the ‘predominance of universals’ vs. those who believe in individuals.

 In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D sherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time.

The 4th and fifth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

 Doubling the dimensions of time & space.
But the immediate most important conclusion arises from the existence of the duality between mind-form-space vs. motion-time is the doubling of dimensions of reality:
 Galileo’s insight in one of the 3 dualities of the Universe between motion vs. form was conceptually shallow, as he didn’t realise it happened truly both things at the same time, HENCE WE MUST DOUBLE THE DIMENSIONS OF TIME AND SPACE and equate them as dual states; one of motion (time dimension) symmetric to the state of form (space dimension):

3  S≈ 3 T

We consider then a Universe made of fractal ‘space-time beings’, which display the 3 classic dimensions of space as forms, but also as vital dimensions of time, as function is form.
And to those 3 ‘dimensions’ in a simultaneous present space scale, we must add ‘scalar dimensions of size’ in the fractal Universe ‘above’ the system (larger wholes) and below the system (entropic parts), for a total of 5 Dimensions, which we now pass to analyse in certain detail to ‘reach a certain agreement on its ‘names, numbers, forms and functions’.
Topological evolution

Let us then introduce the basic tenants of topological evolution, from where we will depart to understand races and cultures.

In the graph, amazing as it seems, military power has blown up the lineal concepts of the white, dolicocephalic, visual, motion-oriented germanic cultures into science. So today despite the obvious cyclical nature of all time clocks, and its three ‘elementary arrows’ (which together form a π world cycle), we ‘believe’ entropy is all’.

Yet The essential fact about the Universe is that it happens in space and time, and so it happens as a series of topological events (topology being geometry in motion), whereas THE ONLY 3 TOPOLOGICAL forms of the Universe, lineal, hyperbolic and cyclical forms have the only three time functions of reality: entropy (as the line is the fastest motion), energy (where a hyperbolic body-wave combines=iterates both) and information (as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space).

In brief, systems are then designed with 3 parts, an energetic limb/field system, lineal as the line is the fastest distance to move; body-waves that reproduce the system with a hyperbolic topology, which is the more versatile and reproduces both energy and information; and an informative particle-head, which processes logic, temporal, memorial information and guides the system.

It is this ternary structure what then becomes in all its variations, the fundamental ‘organic system of nature’.

We shall then find that through life systems first become young-energetic, then reproduce their body and finally accumulate information in its 3rd age in his brain. But the system needs the 3 elements to survive”

Spe (limbs/fields/territory)<wave-body-reprodutive class>Informative head/particle/neuronal class.

It means we can assembly forms in the Universe using the 3 topologies of reality and its 3 functions. Let us start then to build reality with the 3 dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall also called arrows or cycles or actions of space-time. In the next graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of space-time’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe. So evolutionary topology the expansion of topology proposed in this form is the key discipline to understand how the species of reality are created and destroyed: 

 

So systems evolve as ternary organisms in space, with 3 functions: feeding on energy and using it to move, perceiving information and using it to communicate, and reproducing both, with body-waves and ensemble with other systems into larger wholes.

This ternary game also means that systems will evolve towards better energetic planar limbs (wing evolution), better informative, cyclical systems (eyes evolution) or better reproductive systems. And so on the trial and error mutations of evolution 3 sub-species and 3 sub organs will always reign – with higher energy, information and reproductive skills, and each will evolve its topologies towards its perfect ternary form:agesoftime_image002

 

In the graph we see from a spatial, simultaneous, formal perspective, ensembled into 3 type of physical, biological and social space-time organisms, the 3 ‘form of space=functions of time=topological varieties of space-time in the Universe’.

In the graph we see the 3 first dimensions when doubled in function, divided according to the ‘discontinuity of the fractal Universe’ and perceived as lineal maximal motions-functions in limbs/potentials and maximal informative storages in spherical heads/particles.

So the 3 dualities of the Galilean paradox that started science but were REDUCED by physicists to single dogmas (continuity, single scale, lineal equations and lineal time), when fully accepted as the ultimate logic dualities that co-exist in reality, explain immediately the structure of most systems in existence.

Those 3 dual paradoxes between motion and form, wholes and parts, lineal and cyclical shapes, were rejected due to the incapacity of the mind to handle all the information of the Universe, as it is a minimalist organ that selects and reduces perception to fit all the information of the scalar infinite Universe of space-time motions into its limited space are essential to understand ‘reality’.
So we translate constantly dimensions of form and motion, as the ultimate structures of the Universe is made of st-eps, in which a dimension of form becomes one of motion that becomes one of form in a stop and go process. In the graph 2 cases of physical systems: the loss of a dimension of height-form as it accelerates into a dimension of motion, angular acceleration, and a change of a spread state of motion as a wave, and a stop state of information as a particle.

4D≈S∂ entropy and 5D≈∫T: social, fractal planes and its ‘finitesimals’.

But Galileo’s observation of reality and that of all scientists that follow him failed also into focusing scientific equations in the two other paradoxes of observation of reality soon evident with the use of telescopes and microscopes: The fact that the structure of the Universe was organic, scalar, as we large wholes made of smaller parts – giving birth to the duality of the continuous form and its discontinuous components.

This duality did not stir up the understanding of the scalar, (ab. ∆) dimensions of the Universe, those that refer to the co-existing parts and wholes of those scales, we shall terms here the fourth dimension of entropy (the disorder of wholes into its smaller parts, ‘freed by entropy), ∇, and the fifth dimension of social wholes put together by the enclosing membranes and singularity minds that focus them.

The Universe is a fractal so it has scales of size that co-exist together for which we need to add dimensions, to introduce the fractal Universe.

So besides the 3 space dimensions ≈ 3 time dimensions (seen as still in space, as moving in time) we do need to consider at least 2 more dimensions, one for the lower scales of the being, which we shall call the fourth dimension of absolute past and one for the upper dimension of the being of absolute future.

But also all systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 4th & 5th Dimension: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world: