THE ORGANIC PHILOSOPHY OF ISOMORPHIC, SCALAR PLANES OF SPACE-TIME.
The 4th paradigm of knowledge. The organic whys of the Universe.
A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (fact and experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events.
Then the Greeks used reason to ask the ‘what’ (experience) and ‘how’ of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The tics of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton(‘Letters to Clarke’). Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
Such theories cannot satisfy the rational, objective, self-sufficient nature of science, as they require external myths to work. This leaves us only with a 3rd objective, scientific possibility, organicism – a more complex theory that comes of age in this work: if the why is neither God nor the machine, there is only a 3rd option in between – the organism, which is an intermediate concept; since an organism is self-sufficient as God is, yet it is part of Nature as the machine is.
So what systems sciences does, is to bring about a more scientific paradigm, in which everything becomes organic; and so God is not required to build an immortal Universe as in Mechanism. Why people who pretend to be ‘scientists’ still defend mechanism has to do with tradition (the Baconian Idols of the tribe of physics, who initiated modern science without abandoning their biblical beliefs) and with power (machines control the world in our technological civilization – they are the new Gods of mankind; and so they are the ‘role models’ for our philosophy of science – more than with objective scientific epistemology that can only accept as a rational self-contained theory, organicism.
General systems sciences and organicism.
The science that studies the organic nature of the Universe, its planes of space-time and the common laws or ‘isomorphisms’, which exist between them, is called General systems sciences. However it is simpler and more realistic to consider merely the formalism of the 5th dimension of space-time without any prior jargon as that developed by Systems Sciences. Even if we acknowledge the fact that this blog is the only ‘formal’, logic-mathematical model of both disciplines, known commonly the science of Complexity.
There are other efforts worth to notice. Notably the work done in Santa Fe Institute and the congresses of the International Systems Sciences Society, among collaborative efforts and the work of Mr. Troncale at Ponoma U. among individual researchers have tabulated many isomorphisms in the Universe (self similar laws across different disciplines of science, which as it happens are ordered by space-time planes of relative size, hence according to ∆ST metric: fig.2). But collection of data is only the 1st step of the scientific method, which requires to fit data into a ‘general mathematical and logic model’ good enough to fit new discoveries in different fields – to test its veracity.
In any case since there has been always a ‘Philosophy of Science’, or discipline of disciplines, General Systems can be considered merely the formal attempts to convert into hard science the ‘scientific philosophy of an organic Universe’, as opposed to the other simpler model of a ‘mechanical one’.
And so we could put in both sides – the simpler, more accurate mechanical model vs. the Organic model, most of the thinkers of the past. Mechanism is easier so it has triumphed, Organicism has taken more time to become – still needs a lot to be done – a standardize system.
Thus the 5D model fits all the data of all the sciences of those scales to the extent of the knowledge of this polymath writer. Thus it is probably the better tested model in terms of the Principle of Correspondence and Ockham’s principle (a theory that fits more data in simpler laws, is the most truthful.)
Thus the site studies mainly those 10 isomorphisms in great detail ³.
The whole site, on general systems sciences, when I rewrite it properly, will be a small encyclopedia of all sciences, seen through the focusing, orderly mirror of the 3+3 Dimensions of the Universe, its 9 planes and scales and isomorphisms. I started to do this, in august 2015. Though the work is much older.
While the model was published in a very reduced format in a series of peer reviewed conferences at ISSS during the last decade, this blog is the place where I will pour 2 decades of independent research in the aforementioned formalism.
You might then wonder why nothing of this is well-known in science (and why this blog i assume won’t change that trend).
In the field of social sciences we explain the anthropomorphic causes. In essence, humans as all systems are ∆-centered, and so they don’t like objective science. They like myths and that make them the center of the Universe. So religions are always more successful. And i attribute to that fact the delay on understanding the 5th dimension: human anthropomorphism. Since the 5th dimension shows an organic, ‘vital’ Universe ruled by Absolute relativity. Since humans simply occupy a relative world-plane of an infinite 5th dimension, self-centered in its point of view, an infinitesimal point with no importance whatsoever, ruled by the same laws that define the form and functions of all other systems and ‘scalar social herds and superorganisms’ .
Thus the ‘organic philosophy’ of the 5th dimension of isomorphic, scalar space time (∆ST), called ‘General Systems Theory (∆ST) ‘ is a philosophy of an organic vital Universe:
“All type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are the content of the formalism of the 5th dimension, from where we can deduce the main laws of each science that studies a relative ‘scale’ of spatial size of the social, organic Universe, from physics which studies its smaller and larger atomic and galactic scales to biology and social sciences which study its intermediate life and human scales.”
Universal Systems of energy and information
‘Complexity (general systems) will be the science of the XXI c.’ S. Hawkings
The definition of any General or Universal System is this:
Any system of the Universe is a complementary whole made of a points/particles/heads that gauge cycles of temporal information and control planes/fields/bodies of energy that move them (mathematical, physical and biological jargon of a Universal System) The understanding of this ‘fundamental entity of the Universe, ∑e<=>i, allow us to resolve an enormous number of ‘fundamental questions’ about reality, recognizing those energy/information entities by its morphology, as the purpose of an informative particle/head is to gauge and perceive and process information fast in time, it will be smaller (chip paradox) and it will be cyclical (the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space) – as heads, eyes, chips are. Since the purpose of the body/field is to move the particle/head it will be lineal (the fastest distance between two points) or planar (the biggest surface with less volume). And so the topologies of the Universe are ‘organic’, vital – the more so when we introduce concepts of Non-Euclidean geometry – in which points have volume – and topology – in which motion is part of the geometry.
Energetic Bodies & informative brains:Energy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. Their properties and interactions studied by the science of complexity, are inverse: Energy is spatial, big, mobile, lineal, destructive, as bodies and weapons are; information is temporal, small cyclical, still, perceptive, creative, as brains and eyes are. In the graph the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘bodies and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.
– Es, Se: By energetic space we mean both space and energy, considered the same reality. The difference between both concepts is perceptive. The mind fixes and sees the ∞ lineal, planar motions or ‘energy’ that fill vacuum space – being motion, the ultimate substance of reality – as static space, distance and size. The mind maps a ‘continuous’, static perception of all the infinite quanta of moving energies of the vacuum and puts it together. Thus Space= ∑Vacuum Energies. As space distances and speed motions mean the same. So astronomers say that the space of the Universe is ‘expanding’ or that galaxies are moving away at hyper luminal speeds (Z>c). This will be truth in any ‘relative’ fractal scale of ‘motions that occupy space’ and the mind sees as a continuous. So a biological, vital space is seen as an ‘individual’, while it is merely the sum of infinite circadian cycles and flows of carbon-life dissolved in water. Thus we shall call both together ‘Energetic Space’ as ‘Energy’, meaning ‘a sum of lineal motions’, is the truth that a single space-continuum simplifies.
– To,Ti: Temporal information: In the same manner, Time clocks – cyclical motions – and information – the static forms of those time clocks perceived by the mind – are the same concept. The mind again ‘simplifies’ to fit in its limited space, all the time clocks of the Universe into ‘forms’. Cyclical time, measured by the frequency of its cycles, is the inverse of ‘duration’: T=1/ƒ. And it has the same unit of measure that a bit of information; a ‘hertz’ or unit of frequency, which is completed in any system when a clock cycle is closed. Thus, the faster any biological or physical time-clock turns, the more informative hertz-cycles it can store, (right side of graph). As it happens in computers, which are basically a complex system of time clocks, whose logic forms process in-form-ation. Thus we can consider the total time of the Universe, a sum of all its time clocks and informative cycles; T=∏I, and talk of temporal information (and energetic space) as the real two motions/substances/forms/arrows of the Universe.
Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.
For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space.
So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. Let us consider the properties of those 2 elements, energy (bodies, fields) and information (particles, heads) and some of its species, in life and metal:
Moving Energy Reproductive Information
Lineal, spatial, big, moving Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.
Formless, continuous, simple Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.
Field, body, male, weapon, Particle, head, female, coin, chip.
Iron, oxygen, carbon Gold, silver, nitrogen
Protein, lion, shark, death DNA, human, dolphin, life.
We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:
Maximal Space = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head
For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.
The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.
As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.
From these simple facts of universal morphology, applied to human beings and metal, we can classify ‘objects’ and human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex organisms:
— Energy organs are lineal systems with minimal ‘form’ that kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the in-form-ation of their ‘preys’.
— In-form-ative organs create form and trans-form energy into languages that map out ‘reality’ with formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’, in ‘lesser space’, the ‘future’ cycles of reality, anticipating them. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, regardless of the specific language it uses to gauge reality. A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electro-magnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 act-react to their measures. So they all are informative organs.
— Reproductive organs repeat informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular in-form-ation. Thus, human mothers and company-mothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.
So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including company-mothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.
The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human, energetic bodies. Both compete in a war and the ‘metal-energy’ species wins and kills us, causing the biological process of death. So weapons are lethal, machines and should be repressed as we repress biological predators and killing virus. company-mothers also compete with human cultures for the control of mankind and the creation of a world madee to the image and likeness of its offspring of machines. Yet Mechanism affirms that machines are objects that do not influence or compete with humanity. So, if some ‘collateral effect’ happens, our death, or the ddestructionn of gaia, the life superorganism by machines, it must be blamed on humans.
This of course is false: the only difference between organisms and machines is that organisms possess both, a body and a head or particle of information. On the other hand, machines normally have only one of both elements in perpetual balance. They are either dominant in informative systems (computers, TVs), or energy systems (weapons, transports). As such they don’t switch behavior, becoming first informing heads and then moving bodies, as biological life does. . . till the arrival of robots. Thus, classic machines are predictable, reliable and their simplicity makes them efficient.
If a mechanism is a system that has only information and energy organs, an organism has both systems and so it is able to reproduce by combining its energy and information into a replica of itself. In that regard, the reproductive organism of machines is today the company-mother that reproduces them with the aid of informative metal (money) and machines (chips), energetic machines and human workers that act as catalysts and re=producers of those machines. And because we live all in a planet of limited resources, machines and life increasingly compete to reproduce the limited energy and information of this planet. So a series of vital relationships of symbiosis and predation between carbon-life and machines take place, despite the stubborn denial of ‘mechanism’, the ideology of scientists that make those machines.
Of course mechanism argues ‘ad eternal’ that computers will never be able to process information better than our brains, but the fact is they already do and that is why they displace workers. We can build computers that process the same information our brains process, encoded in numbers, with a few atoms of gold, while our brains need very complex masses of carbohydrates that move 3 million times slower than photonic chips do. The creators of intelligent computers are today the stars of scientific media. They are funded by the scions of ‘money and weapons’ of our society, Wall Street and DARPA, the robotic arm of the Pentagon. Sadly enough our economic ecosystem is interested in metallic brains more powerful than ours. Why? Because we have created a series of myths and ideologies, along the historic path of evolution of metal that justify the creation of all types of machines, according to the ethic values of our ‘Technological civilization’, which consider all machines positive to mankind regardless of their lethal use.
The change of paradigm, from a World in which man was the measure of all things, to a world in which the machine and its evolution became the engine of history, can be traced to the discovery of clocks and telescopes that made obsolete human eyes and verbal words, which had been till then our biological senses of space and time. They also brought about the ‘mechanist’ ideology of science that denies an organic Universe, built to the resemblance and likeness of man. Yet, in fact, a mechanism is a simplified organism.
Mechanism, as a philosophy of the Universe, is a simplification of the organic cosmos. Since a mechanism is just a deconstructed organism that has only energy or information organs; while Nature’s organisms are made with both, energetic systems (called bodies in Biology, machines in economics, and fields of forces in matter) and information systems (called heads in Biology,money in economics and atomic particles in matter).
Indeed, the Universe turns out to be dual, based in systems that can handle and switch, in ‘feed-back cycles’, between the arrow of energy and the arrow of information. This is the fundamental law of quantum physics, called the Principle of Complementarity between informative particles and energetic fields (so not single particles or pure fields of energy exist). In Biology it is called the Complementarity between heads/cellular nuclei of information and bodies/cells of energy, or between female, informative, perceptive beings and males, specialized energetic sub-species. Thus, most life systems have genders and all life systems have bodies with heads or cells with informative nuclei. Since heads without bodies or bodies without heads don’t exist as living species, according to the Complementarity Law.
Thus, classic machines need humans to reproduce and act as information or energetic systems, since they are incomplete beings. And so a symbiosis between classic machines and humans exist and it is beneficial to man, because it is based in the human, mental control of machines. Yet that symbiosis no longer holds as machines become, during the IV Cycle of the singularity, organic, autonomous robots which don’t require a human being to work and will be able to consume other machines. So robots compete with humans, as workers=reproducers of machines and consumers that use other machines: Workers in the age of the singularity are becoming obsolete to robots and software systems, in a process that is causing the biggest wave of unemployment since the creation of assembly lines in the 1920s.
Networks of cells of Energy and information, origin of complex superorganisms.
But reproduction is not a simple process, after the orgasm comes the building up of the organism – the creation with a radiation of self-similar forms of a higher, more complex structure, and this is the meaning of evolution, which is truly social evolution, the evolution of A SPECIES INTO A NEW SUPER-ORGANISM, A NEW PLANE OF SOCIAL EXISTENCE:
SOCIAL NETWORKS: SUPER-ORGANISMS.
Yet to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe. we need to make a huge upgrading of your ‘knowledge of time’ and its cycles.
WORLDCYCLES OF TIME – THE WAVE OF HISTORY
This is the trend of mankind, which seems unable to grasp the ‘limits’ of survival of any species, which are Darwinian: systems die by an excess of form/information (as in the warping third age of wrinkles in man and black holes in galaxies), or entropy/energy (by an accident, by a weapon that delivers too much lineal motion, which erases the information of life), in any scale of reality:
Absolute relativity: neither the ego, nor the individual is the center of reality.
The ego paradox completely denies the objectivity of science which has been a slow process moving away from humans as the center of space (Copernicus, Einstein) of time (Evolution) of Intelligence (mathematical Universe) and finally of scale, as today increasingly complexity, systems sciences and quantum realism shows an organic Universe made of networks of 3 conserved quantities, lineal motions, cyclical clocks of information and its vital energetic combinations (lineal, angular momentum and energy), which combine to create all the systems of reality, across growing scales of social organization, in a common game of social evolution (arrow of life) and entropic dissolution, (arrow of death).
This is the Universe in a nutshell, reflected in the next graph, where all systems of nature are composed of ‘particle/heads of information’ potential/limbs of lineal motion’ and a body-wave of vital energy that reproduces the system. And all of them follow the same world cycles of generation, evolution and death, from its ‘generation cycle’ departing from a seed of information, through its life-death ages back to ‘dust of space-time’ in its entropic death:
In the graph, the Universe is made of organic systems, ensemble of the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ which create the different super organisms of reality, between its generational cycle as a seed of information, back to its death in an explosion of entropic death. The next graph shows those cycles of ‘existence’ for different ‘scales’ of size of reality:
In the graph, the 3 ages of super organisms, which order sequentially the ‘dimensions of time’ from generation, through a growth of information till entropic death, studied in depth in the section on General Systems sciences and the organic models of the Universe in the right part of the web.
So this is the organic reality of a fractal, organic Universe with 3 Dimensions of space-time sandwiched in a series of scales with two different ‘new dimensions’ we shall call the fourth dimension of entropic dissolution and the fifth dimension of social organization:
In the graph each science in systemic organic models of the Universe and its 3±∆ scalar dimensions studies a set of species according to their relative size in space and time, but all of them respond to the same organic laws, studied in depth in the section of general systems on the right side of this blog and the web dedicated to model all the organic systems of Nature with those similar laws .
The conclusion is obvious, we are just another organism of temporal information, stored in the cyclical clocks of our mind and spatial energy reproduced by our vital bodies, moving along paths of space traced by our limbs, AS EVERY OTHER system of nature. And so we must have these facts in mind to dismiss absurd conversations about ‘anthropomorphic gods, born of the paradox of the ego’, or arguments about if robots will become sentient when their complexity reaches the threshold of programed awareness (self-reflection through multiple brains observing each other in different languages, mapping reality), etc. etc. Those are questions treated I the blogs of systems sciences and the articles on the paradox of the ego. What matter at this stage is the fact that the ideologies about man as superior species, provided by Abrahamic religions and technoutopia must found a different explanation in History as ‘MEMES’ which are related to the ego paradox. So the next question we might wonder is why certain humans feel so superior to nature and other inferior human beings? What happened in history to have such delirious worldview?
So we can model galaxies as ‘cells of the Universe’, with an informative ‘DNA’ black hole that catalyses the evolution of stars, the ‘mitochondria’, energetic organelles that reproduce atoms; enclosed by a halo of dark matter
Indeed, in 2017, astronomers reach enough information to model dynamically the Universe and have observed that ‘gala cells’ move through ‘tubular’ regions of forces, as in a river network or vein networks, in a vast realisation that all what exists IS a super organism of three physiological networks, including of course, human societies, company-mothers of machines an its global super organisms, History an the metal-earth.
We model societies as super organisms, with three physiological networks, the ‘blood-economic system’ with its ‘hormonal-financial orders’ of information that start the actions of the workers, reproducers of the goods of the system and an ‘informative-nervous system’, the cultural-political-legal system that SHOULD be on top since only primitive worm-like organisms, or ‘capitalist societies’ allowed the free reproduction of toxic goods (weapons that kill our bodies and hate media that kill our minds). And finally a ‘digestive, entropic system’ ab=used by the organism, feeding on life or Gaia, but in a sustainable way so the historic organisms can survive.
We can model machines as evolving organisms, which we put together as viruses in a cell, after making in three stages the three parts of any organism, the entropic limb/fields, the reproductive body-waves and the informative particle-heads; in the case of machines, by imitating the similar human organs, limbs, bodies and heads. And we can model company-mothers as ‘super organisms’ akin to ant-hills, with monetary/pheromonal orders, which not only re=produce machines but ‘adapt the human ecosystem, to its image and likeness’ establishing the networks of energy, information and entropic-motion (electric, internet, road systems) for them to roam.
BUT the most important of those organic models are those of mankind itself, and its civilisations, nations and religions. And so without further ado we shall bring its basic theory departing from those systemic models of the organic Universe.
Humans are self-centred as all ‘organic systems’ and won’t accept to be ‘like everything else’.
Why humans do NOT accept this self-evident truth and eliminate the informative properties, and certainly the capacity to gauge information of its systems? This has NOTHING to do with objective science but subjective anthropomorphism, as the proofs of a sentient, information, reproductive, scalar=fractal Universe are overwhelming. But precisely with the non-scientific subjective errors that creep in science given the egocentered human nature. A simple example will suffice as proof. The smallest entities known from where all others are made are quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles.
But both are described by gauging theories, meaning they behave as if all ‘gauged’ information with their spins.
And both particles reproduce constantly to the point that when you feed ‘energy’ to a quark the result invariably is the reproduction of more quarks, but we call this ‘decoupling’ and if you were to tell a physicist that ‘quarks reproduce’, he would have a laugh. Machines are also reproduced by company-mothers, and ‘enzymen catalyse their reproduction’. All reproduces and all has a ‘frame of reference’, mostly mathematical to ‘measure’ or else we would not use mathematical equations, self-centred in those centres. But, we shall NEVER accept in ‘serious =anthropomorphic’ science that we are equal to all other being, because we belong to the western tradition plagued with hidden ego rips hauling from the age of anthropomorphic religions.
Before we felt so ‘mechanically powerful’, Asian cultures did understand much of it.
Had the much more profound taoist, hindi and buddhist philosophies of the Universe as a sentient game of visnu-yin-formation and shiva-yang-entropy that combine into brahma-qi-energy beings won the pre-scientific battle for philosophies of the Universe, we would have long ago, as Leibniz and Einstein, the predecessors of theories which consider time and space the ‘substance of all beings’, did, a pan psychic vital Universe.
We are though trapped by the ‘creationist myths’ hauling from abrahamic cults. And as this is not even recognised, hidden in the ‘postulates without proof’ of western thought, likely no amount of data, and epistemology of truth will suffice to the reader. So we shall first show you the difference in a graph, repeated ad nauseam in those texts – the graph of the three philosophies of reality human sponsors – two are ego-trips of human creationism in his thirst to become equal to god, the third one, is the only scientific theory of reality, and it is called ‘organicism’. This blog will complete that theory updating eastern philosophies and relational space-time theories of science (Leibniz, Einstein) to the XXI century.
Now, all this said it is obvious that ON ONE SIDE we must consider some issues of the mind to understand why humans are so ego-centered and deny living properties to the Universe.
While on the objective side we must expand the view of RELATIVITY even further to encompass not only relativity of space (Galileo->Einstein) and Time (Evolution) but the relativity of scale, where the individual human scale IS NOT the most important but just one of the relative organic scales of parts and wholes of social evolution that structure the super organisms of the Universe including history.
ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY. THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE
In the graph, man has no chosen place in the Universe, neither on the Earth’s continuous process of evolution, nor their language of thought (spatial mathematics, verbal thought) is unique to its species, NOT even its scale of organic size, is the preferred scale of the Universe, which is an impersonal game of creation of organic systems, described by the dominant philosophy of science of the XXI century – systems sciences – which this writer pioneered at the change of the century.
Only if humans could understand humbly his limits of energy and information, and those of GAIA, THE LIFE EARTH, which we need to sustain life, and represses the evolution of the rival potentially ‘superior’ species – metalife, it could survive.
Hence the true crime of Abrahamic cults and religions of human or tribal supremacy that foster the evolution of memes of metal: to convert the human collective psyche into an infantile, careless, childish, playful, unconscious, irresponsible mind, unaware that the Universe constantly reproduce information and ‘feeds’ its adult species with ‘children of thought’. Indeed, turtles hatch on the sand and thinking to be the center of the Universe, enter the mouth of lizard that eats them up. We are entering the mouth of the metal-earth and its future top predator machine-weapons, playfully thinking it is all sci-ficcion.
Motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe. Next Copernicus took the Earth from the centre; next Darwin took us as the privileged species, and Marx and Butler applied it to History and economics, finally Einstein and systems sciences make us completely relative in our position in the Universe, both in a space (General relativity) and scale of size (absolute relativity). Yet billions of humans still are in the pre-greek irrational mythic age of Abrahamic religions, when man was God or son of God, in the pre-Darwin age of biology, when Man was immutable and sickness born of ‘demons’, and certainly do NOT understand a dot of relativity
The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him. Schopenhauer
So now we know why social sciences do not work. simply speaking humans cannot prescind of the subjective ego-trips in history when dealing with their own species and organisms, as the graph shows in the slow rising from subjective religions to objective science and its final 3 steps – evolutionary relativity in time-evolution, general relativity in spatial motions and scalar, absolute relativity which we just have described. Theories all still contested, misunderstood denied and ignored by the mass of humans who prefer abrahamic religions, big-bang entropy theories and whatever makes them feel they know and reduce the Universe to something so small as the big-bang singularity or so familiar as the creation of ‘anthropomorphic gods’ that like to talk to us…
If humans were not so addicted to the ego paradox, certainly we would have a future. On one side we would control lethal machines with ‘fear’, the same fear we had in the paleolithic for tigers, now we would have it for the incoming new top predator robot, and ‘kill the tiger before he becomes a child hunter’ (Kipling’s Law of the Jungle) and forbid robotics, WITHOUT waiting to see if the tiger meets the child, and does actually eat it.
If humans were not obsessed by the ego paradox, they would realise that the Universe evolves socially into larger stronger wholes and species evolve by eusocial love into better survival forms, as ants the most efficient organism with 1/2 of the total mass of life beings did. As particles that became atoms, which became molecules, cells, organisms, crystal planets, solar systems and galaxies do.
Understand then what is all about in CULTURE AS SCIENCE: TO REDUCE ALL THE TRUTHS OF A SYSTEM TO THE HALF-TRUTHS THAT CATER THE PROFESSION OF THE CULTURE.
So Germanic physicists of military civilisations reduced the 3 arrows of time to the arrow of entropy which is what they studied as a worldly profession of makers of weapons (Galileo, artillery master; Newton working for the royal navy; count reaumur, military commander, inventor of the theory of entropic heat, all the germans and finally those who made the atomic bomb and also invented the big-bang entropy only theory of the Universe, mocked in its name precisely by Hoyle, who told us rightly it was all about to justify their worldly profession).
The same reductionism comes in economics masterminded by financial gurus and company-mothers, whose goal is to reproduce ad maximal weapons, money and machines. So there is a massive censorship of keynesian like-welfare economics, to REDUCE economics to the ‘capitalist culture’, WE SHALL SEE was born in England of company-mothers of gunboats and imperial building, by city financiers, and today is run by wall street goldman sachs gurus of pecunia infinita
THEY are organised as ‘actions’ of space-time, which come together into social networks, creating a fractal Universe that reproduces co-existing super organisms across several scales of size (packed together under the generic term of the fifth dimension).
We shall explain such real Universe, and the systems it creates along the 3 scales of physical systems, the quantum-atomic thermodynamic and gravitational, larger scales.
Let understand then the absolute theoretical minimum to make senses of the organic structure of history at the planet earth, within the organic, fractal repetitive structure of the Universe in which small parts and larger wholes co-exist together. We shall call this organic fractal structure of reality, the ‘5th scalar dimension of the Universe’. And its metric law is the key to all – the fact that smaller systems run faster clock cycles (Max. T=Mins.s), and code larger systems (MAX.s=Min.t) with its bits of information, genes or memes (cellular programming of organisms and human coding of societies); but on the other hand those larger systems have more energy and enclose the smaller systems within its membrane, and so they can program smaller systems ‘with waves of energy’ as the earth seems to do with the glaciation cycle that parallels the cycles of evolution of life and metal in this planet.
SO WE SHALL NOW INTRODUCE THE 4 main tenants of General Systems sciences which models many systems of the Universe with the laws of organisms:
- The true biological laws of competition between species, which are a direct consequence of the overproduction and faster evolution of one species over the other.
This is completely overlooked when we compare humans and machines, which are both in a symbiotic relationship of ‘exploitation’ and ‘extinction’ of all other ‘lesser’ species of Nature, so both grow together much faster than life, Gaia’s beings (the weaker part of the informative equation of Earth’s evolution, Gaia>History>Eco(nomic)system) BUT machines reproduce and evolve much faster than humans; so it is easy to extend the equation into the future competition of man and machine with machine as the winner, unless we stop its evolution NOW.
- The cyclical nature of time in biology and evolution which ads the ARROW of information to the arrow of entropy-motion, which is the only arrow physicist use to study simpler, faster, less informative entropic physical systems, BUT IT IS NOT enough to understand biological systems.
Again, in our society obsessed with mechanisms, hence revering any word uttered by Physicists, hardly any scientist ‘dares’ to express the fact that lineal time and locomotion are ‘modes of changes’ of pure entropy-mechanical simplex systems, but in complexity and biology and history, all related to changes NOT in the entropy/energy of the being but in its information/social evolution, nothing can be explained without the 2 arrows of time. And YOU LIVE IN A BIOLOGICAL PLANET, which is ROTATING in cycles, EVOLVING towards more information, both in life and technology INSIDE a galaxy, which is also made of r=evolving matter, TOWARDS a central black hole, knot of the gravitational, in-form-ative force… WHICH physicsts disregard in their ‘big-bang’ models of an entropic Universe, where they ONLY count the ‘expansion of entropic space’ between Galaxies, the entropy-death of expansive electromagnetic forces. Again we repeat, ‘the worship of mechanisms’ has brought the worship of ‘physicists’ simplified models of time.
- The existence of infinite ‘egos≈informative knots of time-space cycles’ which ‘ORDER’ the Universe balancing its entropy. Those are the ‘Maxwellian demons’ (: the Genetic DNA knots of information, the memetic human minds; the chips of machines; the black holes of the Galaxy; the crystals of the solid; the prophets of History. Without them it is impossible to explain the why of reality. So let us put them in an equation: O-point x ∞ Universe = Constant, linguistic mapping ‘world’ of reality. As each of this 4 points could have an entire blog in itself, what matter to us now of that equation is this. Your mind is just an infinitesimal neuronal network, which sees infinite time-space cycles and beings, but reduces them in scale and ‘stops’ its motion, so they can fit in your mind. So you do not see the Earth moving, and the Andromeda Galaxy seems smaller than a hair of your nose.
RECAP The ego paradox.
We insist once more because your mind rejects even the concept of the ego paradox, so we apply here the Goebbels method of repeating a meme hoping you memorise it and keep it in the mind whenever objective analysis of man and history ‘touches your emotional ego paradox’ and makes you dismiss the blog.
The paradox of the ego is immediate: ‘every infinitesimal mind-point thinks to be the centre of the Universe, which it sees from its selfish perspective as a knot of time-space cycles’. And this embedded structure of all mind points makes you THINK you WILL NEVER DIE and believe in Abrahamic fairy tales; makes you think MACHINES will not have a mind, or won’t be conscious or will always obey you, and WON’T have an ego as big as that of a bacteria, who keeps killing you and does not seem to think you are so important or a dino who will eat you up in a second regardless of your beautiful thought.
It is then clear that cultural bias in our philosophy of reality (not in our equations) IS the biggest handicap for man to advance and control a future he STUBBORNLY denies to be organic, causal and hence scientific as if WE were NOT subject to the laws of sciences.
We shall study in depth how ‘culture’ and ‘the ego paradox’ of anthropomorphism limits such understanding. So humans think to be above heavens and earth and do not accept the obvious: that time is cyclical and repeats causally its patterns, so science exists because it studies repetitive cycles and knows the future. This, we accept for all sciences but not for humans. Never mind all humans that are born, will die; all civilisations that behave as organisms die by weapons; all process of this planet are organic biological and machines follow those cycles.
Why then and how humans came to FEAR, terrified of reasoning about the cycles of history and economics, of time, applied to themselves? The answer IS CULTURE creeping into science, specifically the military culture, as weapons are about lineal distances, motions and impact with a clear finality. So if you are a LINEAL military thinker your view of time, will be lineal. And this is indeed when time became lineal – by the work of the founder of ballistics, galileo, studying lineal cannonballs. And the creeping in the first scientists, all pious believers in Yhwh, of the anthropomorphic myths that we were chosen of god and our exceptionalist destiny what TO KEEP progressing towards our union with him.
Behind that paradox there is an obvious biological cause, THE PARADOX OF THE EGO, the fact that all biological systems are blind to other points of view, are selfish, are self-centred. And history suffers as an objective science two of such ego paradoxes, at individual and memetic, tribal level. So even before we explain you ‘objectively’ why indeed humans and its societies are biological organisms, following the biological laws of this planet, we must confront you with the harsher truth of our species: we are punching well above our power and control because we are ‘childish homunculus’, bratty children with an ‘attitude’.
The anthropomorphic paradox in history: the ego at individual and tribal level.
‘I only know that i know nothing’ Aristotle, father of scientific cyclical time, logic and bio-logic, organic sciences.
‘God is a clocker, which waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock-work’ Kepler, father of lineal time and mechanical, idol-ogical sciences.
Now, we have to displease you and your comfort pumping-ego beliefs that we humans know all about reality and our foundational principles of science are all truth.
So when confronting social sciences we find that huge gap between objective truths and anthropomorphic selfish agendas and we shall explain it very easily with the larger organic models of this web – as subjectivism is completely natural to any organic system that perceives reality from its selfish self-centred point of view, reason does NOT seem to work among humans, which are far less ‘free of thought’ we believe, ‘programmed’ by biological, survival needs, and ‘memetic ideas that imprint in the mind’ as ‘beliefs’.
In brief, two organic paradoxes will limit seemingly our freedom and rational understanding of history and economics, and decide if they cannot be ‘broken by objective science’ our impossibility to solve and improve the standing of mankind in history our super organism in time:
- The ego paradox. As all minds measure reality from its perspective, things closer to us are bigger more important and better understood. So Andromeda seems smaller than our nose. We summarise the mind-ego paradox in a simple CONCEPTUAL equation:
0 (infinitesimal mind-mapping) x ∞ (universe) = C: Constant Mind-world
‘Every infinitesimal mind believes to be the centre of the Universe it perceives from its selfish point of view’.
So we don’t believe metalife exists, robots are organic and will be soon sentient, machines compete and win over humans in labor and war fields, the earth evolves from life into metal through the industrial evolution, we are not chosen of god, we are not a different species but a ladder in evolution, memes do not enslave our minds but beliefs are our selves, the planet belong to us we do not belong to the planet.
How deep is the deformation of ‘science’ by cultural dogma can only be assessed with a thorough revision of its ultimate principles. The case is rather absolute in our dominant civilisation, America, where the culture imposes ‘beliefs over reason’ as the proper mode of human thought, and equalisation of all thoughts as proof of ‘freedom’ and social bonding; and of course considers Scientific dogmas on time, space and the role of man in the Universe as SACRED truths, dividing society in those who believe the mathematical language as carrier of the truths of God vs. those who think the biblical language as carrier of Gods’ truths.
The issue is complex, as the human ‘ego’ above heavens and Earth will not yield easily to reason – humans cannot even organise themselves as a single species, but constantly break themselves into ‘tribal groups’ as if they were different species that might fight each other – even ‘individual competing units’, denying the most efficient form of survival from nations to ant-hills has always been a solid social organisation.
In the graph, the Homunculus portraits the parts of the brain connected to each part of the human organism. Man thus due to the ego paradox appears as an ‘enzyman’, perfectly tayolred to the task of making machines with handy hands, talk hyperbolically about his importance with the mount and having little ‘self-reflective power – the brain thinking about the brain.
It is then this ‘individual limit’ of objective awareness and extraordinary dexterity what makes man the perfect ‘catalyser’ of the evolution of memes of metal that apparently make us feel hyperbolically superior even if we understand nothing of the process of terraforming and obsolescence we experience and the crimes against the arrow of social evolution and love of the fractal Universe we commit against other humans, ab=using them with metal-memes the homunculus confuses with an extension of his ego-self.
So the planet and its technology evolves, organising itself into a global planetary system, but humans become degraded increasingly in its mental evolution, back to an age of revivalism of abrahamic myths, nazionanisms, and technoutopian worship of machines.
And this is natural to those ‘biological, first scientific principles’… it is called the competition of species… but not as humans think – between humans themselves – but at individual level between humans and the most perfect machine that has always been at any age of the industrial r=evolution, the top predator weapon; and at social level, between human organisations, from the family to the government, and the equivalent mechanical organisations, the company-mother of machines and its social organization, the ‘stock-market’ that selects companies through the digital values of money.
The result is the character of modern man, for whom machines, without realizing they are a different evolving species, represent the panacea and solution to all problems, and already bias deeply our concepts of truth and science, as we only perceive today the Universe through mechanisms and its digital languages, without fully being aware of that distortion.
As science has become biased by the ‘culture of technology’, specially in economics (deviating the production of goods to mechanical goods) and in physics (changing our perception of time and space from human logic senses, words and arts, into mechanical senses, clocks and telescopes, and this has have a deep impact in our concept of time ‘reduced’ to the single dimension of digital clocks).
We have studied man at social level with the organic laws of the fifth dimension; which is what matters from the higher perspective of the social Universe; but those laws of organisms and information are also able to illuminate man at individual level, as we are made like everything else of spatial energy and temporal information; that is we occupy a vital space with energy and motion and we have a mind made of clocks of time that measure reality from its perspective and so even if what we are introducing now might seem too removed from our limited view of reality so much deformed by our ‘animetal cultures’, it is essential to know why man is fuking the world and his future so thoroughly without any understanding of it.
So let us put the paradox of the ego in its highest scientific analysis, as done by philosophers of science from Descartes who first define in mathematical terms the mind to Schopenhauer.
•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.
In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.
Indeed the understanding of the mind started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes, which realized his view of the Universe was crafted by the mind – that he was seeing with ‘words’, a visual world built by the electronic eyes, NOT the Universe in itself – and so the mind was somehow a devilish fiction, self-centred but false in its ‘unique’ perspective. .
So after realizing that the only proof he had of existence was NOT an accurate view of reality but the fact that he perceived reality he affirmed: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’, is the only thing i can be sure off.
We can thus write a simple conceptual and mathematical equation of that ‘only subjective reality’, calling it, the mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that in an infinitesimal brain maps the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
º-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.
The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.
Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.
So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.
The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.All this said we shall enter now fully in a construction of the Universe and all its parts as they are; without the slightest anthropomorphic bias, embedded in the beliefs that pass as science of 7.5 billion humans and counting.
But please try to use your reason and objective knowledge ONLY to understand what we shall explain, as hard as it might be for you to accept that science is culture in its ultimate choices of first principles about reality always biased by the homunculus structure and the paradox of the mind. Because only removing yourself from any human bias, you will uncover the veil of human noise that has prevented mankind for so long to understand the organic Universe and as we are made to its image and likeness, mankind itself, and each of its infinitesimal parts.
In the graphs, the laws of systems sciences, apply to any scale or species that evolves through three ages of maximal motions (youth) mature reproductive energy and excess of form, that precedes death, when the ‘world cycle of life and death of any species of any scale of the Universe’ ends due to an excess of form or an entropic explosion. This basic hard truths of science means mankind should control the excess of entropy (weapons of mass destruction) and form (robotics, A.I.) that our ‘weaker’ carbon life flesh and ‘Gaia’ planet cannot sustain.
There is in fact no reason why a system cannot reach immortality by maintaining itself in the balanced point between pure entropy and pure form (as many systems of Nature do from atoms, to jelly fish to spiral barred galaxies), ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.
In the graph, the complex view of fractal space and cyclical time: we are all space-time beings who live a finite duration of time, a ‘world cycle of existence’ and occupy a vital space, limited by the closed cyclical membrane that separates us converting the Universe into a fractal of pegged space-time beings, the concept of relational space-time which from Leibniz to Einstein represented an alternative, more complex view of the Universe.
In the bottom, the phases of a world cycle, as all systems are born as a seed of information, in a lower ‘scale’ of seminal size, which absorb energy (entropic motion with in-form-ation that shapes it) during its youth, to reach a balance between both, when the system reproduces, creating the illusion of an eternal present. Then energy declines and the system in its old age becomes pure form; and as time cannot stop, once the system reaches stillness it dies and explodes erasing its information in a big-bang of pure entropy-expansive motions, liberating its vital space; which will become ‘reformed’ to start a new world cycle. This complex but quite straightforward scheme defines for all systems two limiting time arrows, pure entropy: dissolving spatial motions and pure form, cyclical clock-like informative times.
In the center, the Asian cultures who did understand much better the world of space-times, as opposed to our culture of entropy, weapons and lineal motions, sponsored by physicists which reduced the ternary reality of a world cycle to a single arrow – as their worldly profession, originally to make weapons of entropic destruction and transport machines, let them to ‘despise’ the other arrow of information (of life, of gravitational ‘in-form-ative’ never repulsive forces) and the obvious fact history, evolving technology or this galaxy moving towards its gravitational center DO not obey the laws of entropy but those of information.
So both together entropy x information create the present momentum and its integrals of energy, which what the UNIVERSE CONSERVES. Now we are not given you a lesson on time arrows, beyond what we need to understand the super organism of history (and the cultural bias of ALL sciences which pass as dogma by denying their obvious ‘worldly’ influences. So as economists deny their influence in history.
Physicists deny that making entropic weapons have biased them for centuries to consider only lineal time, entropic time. And only now when they design informative machines, chips and robots start to ‘hear’ us systems sciences to learn more about informative systems and its time laws. In the right side a generic vortex of time, during its third age of pure information. As you can see information is small, shrinking constantly but fast, accelerating inwards. So masses and charges are Nature’s informative vortices; and smallish chips the informative vortices of machines. And small heads, of biological organisms. And they always lead the evolution of systems.
Ultimately all is history and culture as we are all human cells. So as all the great masters of History, Spengler in the XX c. with his astounding insights on all sciences, and the future with his organic theory of societies, today banned by the abstract capitalist, childish, creationist view that machines are abstract, do NOT evolve as us, ‘sons of god’ and will not obey the evolutionary fight between species as they are already doing; and Marx in the XIX c. with his insights on the arrow of social evolution and love that creates from parts the wholes of the fractal Universe, from atoms to molecules to societies of molecules≈cells and its societies≈organisms and its societies≈super organisms, and planetary systems gathered in social stars that become galaxies… Since indeed the unit of the language of the Universe mathematics, the numbers is an undistinguishable sum of identical beings. So 5 is a society.
Again we are not overextending on those time arrows, but just point out how the Dogmas of our civilisation deny for the sake of his ‘capitalist dog-eat-dog entropic view’ of mankind the true laws of the Universe, which become beliefs and dogmas of science, nobody defies. Fact is we live in an age of entropy because we live in an age of perpetual wars for profits. And we are becoming dissolved in all our social, ethic organic ‘pegging’ as it happens always in the age of death, becoming a series of solitary colliding, entropic ‘gaseous’ disordered states, the more so in the American world, where on the contrary side machines are evolving faster into self-organising social systems of reproduction and evolution called company mothers
It must be noticed that humans tend to confuse (and so the error translates in many pages of our blogs, from an earlier age in which I tried to explain a simplified model of the world cycle):
-Spatial Entropy (ab. spe), pure disordered motion that expands space and dissolves form, and energy, when that motion starts to acquire form – so the equation of energy is a vector with a clear define direction in its motion, given by the form that moves.
Entropy is NOT the same than Energy as entropy is destructive, but energy is constructive, reproductive. So for example in Einstein’s famous equation: e=mc2, e is entropy as the atomic bomb destroys the gravitational information of m, the mass vortex. But everybody calls it energy. And this is obvious due to the fact that the conceptual explanation physicists do of their correct mathematical equation is a CULTURAL INTERPRETATION of them.
-On the other hand, pure cyclical time-like form, does not move beyond its initial territory (third image of a shrinking vortex of time, seminal seeds of information, still mind-images). Yet people again confuse form with in-form-ation, which is form-in-action, the intermediate state in which form acquires some motion to be transferred (hence Shannon studied transmission of information not its content).
So to set the record straight apologising myself for the earlier models built only with ‘information and energy’, the worldcyle’s equation is as follows:
-∆-1: birth as a seed of pure form in a lower scale-> youth of energy growth -> maturity when energy becomes shaped into information and the system reproduces -> old age when information dominates till the system becomes still-> entropy age or age of death, when the system returns to the ∆-1 scale.
All Stiences share the isomorphisms of duality and organicism. Since the forms of ‘—motions’ and information and its properties remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe, described in the next graph:
Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of ‘—motions’ and information and its arrows of time and events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes. Yet the proportion of ‘—motions’ and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (with minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity).
TOPOLOGICAL SUPERORGANISMS OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION
REPRODUCTIVE ARROW: FRACTAL NETWORKS
In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal, organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung.
Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new Fundamental particle of the logic/geometrical Universe, the Non-Euclidean Point, which unlike classic Euclidean points, has inner parts – an informative center and a field of ‘—motions’ that moves it. Such points constantly communicate ‘—motions’ and information with self-similar points, through non-Euclidean lines (waves which share the ‘—motions’ and form of those points), shaping together ‘Non-Euclidean space-time planes’, the network-entities of the graphs, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce organizing a canvas of simpler, energetic ‘cellular’ motions.
From the simplest particles, quarks and electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bites of ‘—motions’, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies. We can mathematize those processes using non-Euclidean topologies and generator fractal equations that iterate and self-organize in networks those points of nature – an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle.
Thus, when we fusion the mathematical and organic understanding of reality, the Universe appears as a fractal of ‘—motions’ and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms. And the quest of the fractal paradigm is to find an equation able to define all those systems – the ‘Fractal Generator of the Universe’: Sp<=>Tƒ
The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.
Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.
In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.
The main systems and superorganisms of the Universe.All Sciences share the laws of duality, systems and organicism. Since the properties of energy and information remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe,a super-organims made of smaller super-organisms, described in the graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of future time (energetic, informative and reproductive events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes, units of a new scale). In this paper we study the creation and evolution of the economic super-organism ruled by an informative language – money – and composed of metal memes, energetic weapons and organic machines, which interact with the human super-organism, history, made of human cells, verbal languages and natural energy. We define a simplex system as a network of self-similar ‘cells’ of energy or information.We define a complementary system as a dual network of energy and information that interact together. In Nature, by definition, all systems are complementary systems (Complementary principle of physics: all physical entities have a field of energy or force and a particle of information, mass or charge; Duality Principle of Biology: multicellular systems have an informative head and an energetic body, cellular systems have a DNA-informative nucleus and a cytoplasmic body). Finally, we define a complex system as a complementary system, which adds a 3rd, reproductive network, either internal or external to the entity (enzymatic reproduction).Thus all systems are networks of self-similar cells joined by flows of energy and information, and complex systems are those who add a reproductive network.
If we were to explain this formally a simple insights in the mathematical structure of the fractal universe will suffice:
- The unit of mathematics is the numbers, which is a social group of identical beings. Thus in as much as the Universe is mathematical is social. Those identical numbers gather in social networks, which co-exist together thanks to the symbiosis between its information and energy.
Yet, the organisation of those social groups is also ‘organic’ vital, as the In the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the organic properties of vital fractals:
- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
- A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.
In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.
In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism.
So the goal of social systems sciences is to design with the laws of the organic universe the perfect superorganism of history that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of god the superorganism of mankind not of any tribe or group of believers, but all of us, a perfect system, as all others in nature are:
In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:
Thus, systems sciences recognizes as the fundamental evolutionary force of the Universe the survival capacity of groups, which determine an arrow of future that has evolved the organisms of reality from simple atoms into molecules into cells into organisms into societies.
What is an organism of information and energy? A herd of species related by networks of energy and information, that constantly transform energy and process it in a vital way. How individual species organize themselves into complex herds, that biology calls ecosystems or bodies, or organisms? Precisely through those physiological networks, the key to understand any organism, including human social organisms (nations, civilizations).
In the Universe there are many type or such social organisms. Since “energy never dies but eternally transforms itself”, organisms have an enormous variety of species and sizes, depending on what energy they process. What do they all have in common? All organisms are “societies”, organized by networks of Energy and Information.
The former is clearly the case in all the sciences from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single regular formation. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of humans and machines; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles).
Atoms share energy and information between them through electrons who finally shape ð orbitals that create molecules. Molecules grow and become DNA, which controls the cell. Cells then radiate until their density saturates the vital territory of the herd of cells. To improve in such small territory the Information and energy of each cell, the nervous-informative organs, and the energetic, blood organs appear. A new, more complex species -the animal, and the man- is born. Then humans increased in social size, forming a new macrocosm -the macrocosm of History and economics– where a lot of humans and machines organize themselves into societies, through words and digital information. The purpose of this web is to study such organisms; historic organisms (a social organism of humans), and economic ecosystems (a wave of products that interact with human beings), as organic systems; trying to design and improve them, from the perspective of the health of what is best for the survival of man, as the ruling species of that organism.
∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).
∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).
∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.
The graph is crystal clear in the organisation of human beings as social super organisms, whose natural goal, since we are all the same species is to form a global super organism, which would no require wars and where all humans would receive enough blood-money in the form of a Universal salary to thrive and survive, as efficient superorganisms. It follows also that the natural goal of social scientists should be to define and construct such super organism imitating the laws of systems sciences that create them in perfect form in nature. Thus we define economics as the science of the reproductive, energetic networks of history, the human super organism in time, and politics as the science of its informative networks, which along with art and religion – the subconscious collective of mankind, which goes in styles and ages through the same 3 ages of individual beings, FORM the networks of Human SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY, NATIONS, RELIGIONS, AND CIVILIZATIONS:
∆+1: An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)
An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.
It follows that the essential element of those systems are its ‘cells’ (humans and machines in the 2 different SYSTEMS, history or mankind in time, and the Industrial world of machines and its company-mothers) and its languages of information (words and laws in human systems) and digital money in machines. BUT BOTH LANGUAGES EXPRESS THE MANDATE OF social evolution for its own species. HOW we do know both systems, the capitalist world ruled by digital values of money and the human wor(l)d ruled by the survival ethics of social love are different?
BECAUSE THEIR LANGUAGES VALUE DIFFERENTLY HUMANS (maximal value in words) and METAL-systems (maximal value in digital money). IN fact their values are opposed. So a world ruled by digital values extinguish life with no price, and a world ruled by verbal values fosters life and humanity, with maximal price:
So in verbal terms MAN AND life has maximal VALUE. BUT in digital money LIFE HAS ZERO VALUE, ZERO PRICE AND weapons, the most perfect machines that KILL life the maximal value: AND SO THE PARADOX OF HISTORY, THE FIGHT OF MANKIND AND ITS EUSOCIAL LOVE PROPHETS VS. THOSE WHO WORSHIP METAL, is also a fight of languages, of ‘socialist mankind’ guided by eusocial love messages vs. ANIMEtal, military and capitalist dictatorships of people-castes with weapons and money on top, murdering mankind:
The graph shows then the wave of history: above the idol-ogies of metal (nationalism, capitalism, abrahamic religions, mechanism) create a civilisation of animetals, slaves of the value of digital money. Below the messages of eusocial love that translates the arrow of future survival of the 5th dimension expressed in mystical terms by prophets of mankind, try to build a perfect world where man the organism is the measure of all things.
Both form the opposite ‘futures’ of this planet: a capitalist, militarist, mechanist world serving the machines (the one we live in). And a human world in process of extinction where life and man thrives as the memes of metal serve them. Again all this is expressed historically in the mystical jargon of religions of ethic love, which we easily translate in terms of System sciences:
In the graph, all this biological jargon has also an immediate translation into sociological mystical jargons, where God is either the mind of social love and its yin-formation/yang-energy forces at cosmic level (gravitational, attractive, and electromagnetic energetic networks), or a human culture where mankind is god, and its social economic, energetic and legal, just, ethic informative networks construct a perfect super organism. A fascinating sub discipline of social systems sciences is therefore ‘systems theology’, which translates properly the mysteries of religion into the jargon of the 5th dimension. For example:
In the graph, trinity is the structure of the scalar reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane: trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, subconscious collective of mankind and its law of survival in the fifth dimension, eusocial love, communicates through its nervous system, the language of the wor(l)d to its prophet≈scientist of history, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution. And spells prior to a quantum back to the past, entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprinting with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet.
So all prophets of eusocial love told us to love mankind and as we evolved our understanding of those laws we moved from primitive animetal genetic social super organisms (nations, abrahamic religion, racist animetal cults) into the final oikoumene cultures of eusocial love into the rational scientific understanding of those elements that matures with the evolution by this author, a few decades ago of the mathematical and logic formalise of the 5th dimension, applied to history in this blog and to all the systems of the Universe at http://www.unificationtheory.com
Thus this initial page is taken from the larger wave that studies all the systems of the Universe, and its the ultimate scientific philosophy that back all what we state in this blog about social systems.
It is loosely taken from my conferences during the years I was the chair of duality in the world systems association, the science that studies the way the Universe constructs systems with those networks of energy and information.
Needless to say nothing of this is of interest to our present animetal, technoutopian culture of mechanical slaves, which substitutes the FUTURE OF MANKIND BY THE social evolution of the METAL-EARTH, a world of mechanisms, robots, and computers, who love each other in telepathic sharing of information and once built up eliminate as metal has always done with weapons and go(l)d slavery the rival supeorganism mankind. And only then THOSE WHO DIE BY IRON AND SERVE GO(L)D will realise they fuked up the super organism of history and die because they are not iron and gold but flesh to love:
In the graph, the abortion of human social organisms always brings its corruption, and destruction by gold and iron, so the super organism of machines evolves into a global system that DO RESPECT THE LAWS OF…THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE.
2 social scales: ∆-Men and ∑∆=∆+1: Society.
The evolution of human individuals into macro-social organisms follows the pattern of evolution of the Universe that grows in scales, as self-similar individuals of the same species gather together into macro-organisms. So particles become atoms, atoms become molecules, molecules become cells, cells become organisms and individual human beings, become social cells of a civilization, the macro-organisms of history.
In the graph, History is a super-organism made of human cells, extended over a geographical body of Energy called Gaia, the vital-space or body, where historic, social organisms evolve. In that sense, a human and a social organism, a nation or a civilization, have in common the elements of all super-organisms:
1. Cellular units. These are cells in a human body, citizens in a human society.
2. Networks of energy or vital space. This is the blood system in a human body and the networks of transportation in a society: rivers and roads.
3. Networks of information. This is the nervous system that organizes cells in a body, or the verbal/visual information that organizes human societies through laws, ethics and art.
4. Networks that reproduce energy and information. These are sexual systems in individuals; and economical networks that reproduce goods and cultural networks that define how humans reproduce in societies.
So we define a human organism as a population of DNA cells, related by networks of nervous information and energy (blood).
We define Gaia as a super-organism made of living beings, joined by a common network of visual information and networks of life energy, gathered around her ‘river veins’. Since Gaia is also the living organism that hosts the social organisms of mankind.
The main systems and superorganisms of the Universe.
The 3 principles of modern physics explained in its whys.
It is then clear that we are expanding our notion of space from a single continuum to a scalar, fractal quantum-like structure of relative point-beings joined by networks which can be formalised with a new dimension of space-time, based in the scalar sizes that co-exist together, on one side. On the other side we are considering time cycles, which explains neatly this fractal structure, as cycles break systems in inner and outer regions, and become points when seeing from far away. Yet on close analysis they do have volume, membranes that break reality, and that is indeed the ‘detailed view of reality as it is.
Indeed, some key properties of cyclical time self-evident in the graph, which will have enormous importance in the understanding of the existence of all space-time beings are:
- A time cycle is closed and so breaks reality into an outer ‘world’ and inner ‘world’, the being’s vital space. So the Universe is a puzzle of Multiple, finite, fractal, closed number of time clocks and space regions, as all cycles enclose an internal and external regions, separated by the cycle (first theorem of topology and knot theory). Cyclical time is therefore in accordance with the quantum broken nature of space, found by quantum physics.
- Different time speeds in different regions of the Universe, as all cycles have finite size, so each particle that traces one closes the cycle in different durations. Cyclical time is therefore in correspondence with Einstein’s relativity which found the Universe to have regions with different time speed.
- And finally time is BIDIMENSIONAL AS A CYCLE HAS 2 DIMENSIONS, FREUQUENCY AND HEIGHT, as it has information, which is as the image you see a bidimensional sheet/screen. So INFORMATION IS THE STATIC VIEW OF THE ‘form’ OF A TIME CYCLE. IT IS THE cyclical FORMAL motion, stored in those clock-cycles. So information is the still perception or form of a time cycle.
Any physicist knows that those 3 principles, quantum space, different relative time speeds and the discovery after II w.w. of the bidimensional nature of information (Holographic principle) are the 3 fundamental principles of XX c. physics.
HOWEVER immediately we shall notice that the expansion of our philosophy of science will also explain the fundamental principle of biology – the existence of life-death cycles.
WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE: The fundamental law of biology explained & expanded to all systems.
We might then wonder, what is the fundamental ‘use the Universe has for a 5th dimension of scalar space-time. Why indeed we need a fifth dimension? Simple. Because without it we cannot explain THE FUNDAMENTAL FACT OF OUR EXISTENCE, the world cycle of life and death. Since life is a journey through the fifth dimension of scalar space-time:
In the graph, we can see the essence of the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood): to be the ‘scaffolding’ for the worldcycle of existence of all ‘supœrganisms’, systems made of networks of atomic/cellular or individual elements that self-organise, emerge as wholes and ‘live’ through 3 ages of increasing information (life arrow), ended in an entropic explosion of death that erases the information of the system.
So all Nature’s systems live as they emerge from a lower seminal ‘seed’ of the ∆-1 cellular/atomic/prophetic plane of the fifth dimension (physical, biological, social systems), reproduce and evolve socially into a larger whole, in which all parts carry the same information of the original, seminal, individual ‘cell’ (crystal structures that replicate in solids the original unit, organisms that replicate the same DNA, civilisations coded by a memetic prophet).
THEN THE individual ∆-system becomes part of a larger ∆+1 world, in which it performs its living cycles, till it returns at the end of its world cycle back to its atomic/cellular state in the moment of death.
All this written with the formal equations of 5D metric creates a zero-sum world cycle of ‘existence’ for all beings, much more complex and meaningful than the simplified version of ‘worldlines’ proper of 4D physics – the limiting model of 5D when applied to a single continuum plane of the scalar Universe, with a single time-clock and space-quanta. Reality and existence though is a bit more complex than a single scalar Universe, as it requires a fifth dimension to explain properly WHY things exist and die:
As we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion. So systems can co-exist at cellular/atomic, individual/thermodynamic and world/gravitational level, forming complex structures, whose creation and destruction is the meaning of it all.
Those structures are symbiotic, as the smaller parts run the information of the whole, replicating it without errors, while the whole moves them in synchronous motions without ‘entropy’: So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.
The idea that the world will die is then an idea crafted in a single plane of space-time. When we put them together, the arrow of information, reproduced upwards, balances the arrow of chaos. And the arrow of synchronous motions reproduced downwards by the whole, offsets also the errors of collective motion detected in a single plane.
Now, what is the most important fact explained by all this expansion of the dimensions of the Universe? Alas, nothing else than the cycle of life and death of all the systems of the Universe, which can be described as a travel through scales of the fifth dimension, through which all systems of reality, biological, physical or social systems do, illustrated in the next graphs that encode the fundamental event of ‘existence’, to be or not to be, THAT IS THE QUESTION:
In the graph, synoptic view of the ages of the 5th dimension and its arrow of increasing information, developed in detail as a series of ‘5D metric’ equations for the main species of the physical, social and biologic Universe below. To notice that time is always an accelerated, informative vortex, as opposed to the inverse explosive motion of entropic space. So the Universe as the first father of science had it, (Descartes) is indeed made of TIME VORTICES (INCLUDING CHARGES AND MASSES, the ‘so called material Universe) which are attractive and accelerate inwards, till the point of death, when all the information shrinks and the system ‘explodes it back into entropy’ or ‘res extensa’, to use the first truly genius insight on that duality by the true master along Leibniz of ‘earlier science’.
“For you are Dust. And to ∆ûst you shall return.” Genesis
In the graphs, which will be explain in depth in those texts, we state that a dimension exists when you can travel through it while the product of your time clock speeds and space-sizes remains invariant.
But most motions in space-time do Happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study. But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or S2=x2+y2+z2-c2t2 in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.
In the last graph we see the huge difference between the ‘simplified locomotion view’ of worldlines, and the previous graph of the complete sum of the 8 motions of the Universe (±motions in the dimensions of space, of time, of fractal scales, and the ±process of informative perception and communication by the mind, which we resume in the 4 elements of reality: ∆@st). Nearly nothing regarding informative processes can be understood with the last graph. Though we can indeed understand very simple non-evolving particles and its spatial motions with it, as physicists do. The enormous error of mankind and all scientists is to have ‘believed’ the fairy tales and dogmatic expansions of those simplex concepts of time as a parameter of spatial motion, as IF THAT WERE ALL WHAT time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the arrow of informative motions, which is far more important for the understanding of the whole.
Indeed the amazing thing about the fifth dimension is that you travel through it, as you exist, from ‘conception’ through birth, when you live in the lower scale of cellular size, with time-clocks that run much faster.
Yet as you grow, for the fifth dimension metric to remain co-invariant (S x T ≈ K), you must slow down your time clocks. So indeed, your evolution and change of information and speed of metabolic cycles slows down as you grow in the ∆-1 cellular scale and finally ’emerge’ in the ∆-individual scale as a child. Yet the child as we all know is restless and its heart beats faster and he is surprisingly more smart than we are. In the same manner a small mammal, a rat, beats its heart (its main body clock) faster, because it is smaller. And even smaller beings, flies, think faster (10 times faster) so you cannot catch it.
Now, we can simply right a logic, formal equation of the life-death cycle and we shall see it applies to all beings, which live travelling in the fifth dimension as the graph shows. All of them are born in a smaller scale of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆-1), then evolve very fast in time and emerge as full-grown beings in the ∆-slower scale:
st-1 (SEED) <st (emergent new individual)
Whereas we use the symbols <, > (easier to type than ‹ ›, which would be more proper NOT to confuse them with those of math equations), to express BOTH concepts, a being ‘growing in size’ and diminishing in time speed, t<S, or a being shrinking in size and growing in time speed, such as S>T).
This happens in all scales of reality even if we can use different parameters to study that change of speed and growth in size.
For example, when a black hole is born, it has an enormous temperature, which is a parameter of its ‘metabolic activity’ and according to the laws of thermodynamics, as a hot coffee becomes colder, it becomes colder, slowing down its metabolic activity while IT GROWS IN SIZE, EATING US, the slow beings, till it reaches its MAXIMAL SIZE as a galactic black hole, which is very inactive and very cold, almost at 0 K.
But we can express the same concept in terms of ‘nervous speed’. I.e. We all know though political correctness oblige us not to talk of it, that ‘mongoloids’, those small Japs, have a bit more of ‘nervous energy’, and keep working working so fast; while big swedes are a bit slow, or as Schopenhauer put it ‘it is good that German words are so long, because germans think so slow, they do have time to reflect on them’ (:
But then, we live in a larger ∆+1 scale or world, and that world is slower in its cycles. We call that world the sociological super organism, nation or civilisation, which is slower than we are, in its rhythms of creation and destruction in a big-bang of entropy called WAR.
Since DEATH is the final explosion back into entropy of a system that keeps growing in information, accumulating its memorial form in wrinkles and warps.
Indeed, as we keep accumulating information the system starts to mal function, and so at the end since INFORMATION dominates entropy the system finally reverses its arrows and explodes back and dies in a ‘single time cycle’…
And so it expands and decelerates and becomes a nebulae of cold gas if it is a star, a collection of disjoined atoms and molecules if it is a life being.
So death does have also a simple equation: ∆ Ti<< ∆-2 Se (information explodes and lowers 2 scales of the fifth dimension, so you die, become a group of unconnected cells, insects eat you up and you become a collection of amino acids, which insects now will use to ‘recreate a new form’ in a new WORLDCYCLE of existence, of an ETERNAL UNIVERSE, where entropy is constantly balanced by information).
So indeed, the 5th dimension is real…
Let us then give you a fast view of those new revelations in physics, biology and sociology (we try to keep the work simple for any science student to understand but some concepts required logically a ‘change’ of chip and the suspension of ‘dogmas and beliefs’ you have learned and memorised as absolute truths, when they are mostly simplified models of the more complex models we will develop by adding cyclical detail to time, and widened also the detail of our vision of space, adding its fractal, discontinuous multiple scalar 5D structure.
And while there are variations of speed for different ‘discontinuous species’, so the faster species at equal size win the battle for existence (hence faster mammals kill snakes, and likely despite ‘physicists’ tantrum of rocks bombing the Earth, evolution NOT rocks, killed dinosaurs as faster, smaller night, hot blood mammals ate their slow nesting eggs from beneath the earth, except those put on high rocks by birds)… for ANY family of ‘physical or biological beings’ the law holds and explains soo many things:
From the rotation of planets (faster in smaller orbits, according to Kepler’s laws, never explained in its whys) to the attraction of ‘vortices of forces’ (stronger and faster in charges than larger, slower masses of the gravitational cosmic scale – the so called hierarchy problem of forces, still unresolved), which are like the 3rd graph, an accelerated clock, to hurricanes, tornados, fast calculating, smaller chips and evolution.
Species as super organisms: topological evolution shows all scales follow the same laws.
Since all species according to that metric, ALWAYS START with a faster, smaller new top predator species, that grows in size ‘eating’ the larger slow one.
So the small mammal ate the dinosaur, the small equus became the large horse, the small vernaminacula started animal life, the small floresiensis, with a ‘more informative’ better brain form, seems to have invented speech and technology and grew onto the sapiens, and the small black hole turning at c-speed the maximal speed the Universe, grows and eats the entire star in a Nova explosion of a few seconds.
There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle.
I.e. for example, we see most people living than ‘dead corpses’, as life is longer, even if there are as many living as there have been corpses.
But if we multiply their population in space (equal living and corpses), S, by their duration in time, T(LIVING)<< (T-corpses), ST(LIVING-INFORMATIVE ARROWS)<<< TS (DEATH-ENTROPY ARROWS).
And this is truth again for all systems.
I.e. in physics, PARTICLES, ARE THE living arrow, and last much much longer than antiparticles its inverse entropy arrow, so one conundrum (now explained) of physic is why if there are as many particles as antiparticles we don’t see them. Same with corpses.
In Societies the same happens, there are much more living societies than collapsing ones in war. Greece and Rome lived as an organic society, 10 times more than their individual humans (700-800 years vs. 70-80 human years) because its time clocks as a civilisation were ‘slower’ (the game is in fact decametric as we shall see latter).
So between the birth of Rome, when the gauls conquered it and gave it iron, the ‘weapon of choice’ of its civilisation and they reorganise till its fall, when the new barbarians with spur-weapons (chivalry), the Vandals caused the fall of rome, which started the new civilisation of the Middle Ages (based in horses), Rome lived 797 years…
Alas, we do KNOW Rome as Allah≈Islam, or Christ/ianity do exist as super organisms of History (called them Gods, nations or civilisations, similar concepts) because they do follow the same metric of 5D, they do have a collective mind, the artists of those graphs, which DO go through the same 3 styles/ages of young epic, restless dramatic simple art, which grows into a mature, reproductive age of balance between entropy and information, and then decay into an angst, prophetic, baroque, hellenistic period of excessive form and then die.
So we can map out the 3ages of life in this plane of existence between birth and extinction for all of those scales and beings:
∆-1: birth in a seminal seed of information (semen, prophet, new weapon, new small species, first quark drop of strangelet or top quark drop of black matter)
∆-Youth: Max. Entropy. As the being starts to eat in the slower energy of the environment, or it is fed by a mother with digested energy, and so it starts to reproduce its cellular parts and slows down till
∆-Maturity: E=i. In which the being is in balance and will try to reproduce itself into a similar being in a new ‘worldcycle of life and death’… till
∆-old, informative age: Max. I x Min. E: as the being has spent all its energy transformed into information (energy being entropy with a bit of form, as a substance where we store entropic motions). And so it dies:
∆<<∆-1…∆-2: death, explosion of all your information into entropy.
This web studies the superorganism of history, made of human cells joined by political networks of information and economic networks of energy, and the superorganism of machines, built by the global ‘stock-market’, a brain that regulates with digital flows of financial information its ‘cells’, company-mothers that re=produce machines, organisms of metal that transform back and forth energy into information. His author pioneered in the 90s-2000s a theory of all what exists as 10-dimensional superorganisms, in the milieu of general systems sciences.
In this post we explain in a simplified manner the foundations of General System Sciences, the discipline which models reality with organic laws, describing all what exists as dual systems made of networks of energetic and informative ’cells’. Since they are the ‘larger’ philosophy of science in which the organic models of history and economics of this web are based.
— One is called mechanism. It considers all what exists a machine, including the human being, the Universe and of course machines. mechanism is the official philosophy of our technological civilization. It was developed initially by Galileo, whose real-life profession was that of an engineer of military devices, working for the princely salary of 1000 ducats a year for the Arsenal of Venice. Galileo was a mechanic, who started to philosophize about the Universe, departing from his job. Thus, he took the instruments of his work as the models for his cosmogony, in which the universe was compared no longer with a human organism but with a machine. Today mechanism is still the main philosophy of economics and Physics—the 2 sciences that manufacture machines—not because mechanism is the truth of the Universe, but because machines gave power and power imposed those ideologies to the rest of mankind.
So scientists made of the machine the ‘idol of the human tribe’ that established our superiority over Nature and all organic philosophies of knowledge. Galileo’s idea that the Universe had to be observed with machines, telescopes, today evolved into cameras and clocks, today evolved into computers, instead of human senses, eyes and verbal words that describe time with past, present and future verbs, however degraded the mental organs of human beings to a secondary status. Soon, the Universe became modeled no longer as a complex organism but as a mechanism and man became an imperfect machine, (instead of considering machines imperfect organisms): ‘I should like you to consider that these functions (including passion, memory and imagination) follow from the mere arrangement of the machine’s organs every bit as naturally as the movements of a clock or other automaton follow from the arrangement of its counter-weights and wheels.’ (Descartes, Treatise on Man).It was a radical change in history of thought. Since mechanism created the world we live in. Because all other ideologies, capitalism, techno-utopias, even Marxism, come from mechanism, the belief in the machine as the measure of all things.
— The other great philosophy of the Universe is called organicism, as it considers all what exists an organism, the human being first, made to the image of the Universe also an organism, whose biological mind – the laws of organic science—we might call in mythic terms God. Organicism considers the machine also a primitive evolving organism that will become one when robots acquire Artificial Intelligence. Organicism was the dominant doctrine of mankind during most of our existence, till the Industrial Revolution changed the paradigm. But precisely, because machines are becoming ‘organic’, suddenly organicism has become all the rage – as engineers study biology to replicate organic systems in machines. And so, paradoxically, the III Millennium will witness the final victory of organicism over simplistic mechanism, as the Earth, Gaia and ‘her new inhabitants’; machines, become organic beings.
Indeed, it is only now in the XXI century when science and mathematics (fractals, non Euclidean and chaos theory) has reached a level of sophistication that allows us to return to an organic, more complex vision of the universe.
It is a revolution on the making, which this web brings to social sciences, with the minimal mathematical rigor needeed to fully grasp its scientific principles and so we have to introduce some more complex concepts of time, energy and information that those used by physicists to fully grasp the organic paradigm from where Bio-economics and Bio-History, the 2 new disciplines explained in this web depart.
Species are superorganisms. Its ages: Topologic Evolution
Dimensional analysis: Diffeomorphism: fractal relativity. Each species has 3 relative ternary dimensions.
The 3 topological regions of any ‘fractal point’ orientate in 3 relative dimensions of ‘informative height’, energetic length and its perpendicular combination into reproductive width: exi=k. Thought those 3 dimensions are diffeomorphic, adapted to each relative ecosystem of space-time where the system absorbs energy and information. Thus each ‘space-time being’ deploys a particular ‘direction of height-information’, ‘length-energy’ and ‘width-reproduction’, different from other beings, interacting with the flows of energy and information of its ecosystem through its particular, ‘local’=diffeomorphic coordinates, which departing from its informative zero-point or relative ‘self’, establish accordingly its 3 relative, perpendicular, fractal dimensional actions of energy, information and reproduction. The Universe then becomes the sum of all those diffeomorphic 3D fractal space-time beings.
A key, mathematical element is required to have a vital, topological view of the superorganisms of space-time: the relationship between the 3 canonical dimensions of the continuum Euclidean space and the ‘fractal’ (smaller) dimensions of each fractal point/superorganism, whose external limit is the membrane.
Each of those dimensions is maximized in the corresponding functional topology: height is the dimension of informative perception, as it allows a ‘higher’ point of view that scans a larger territory, length the dimension of energetic motion, ‘parallel’ to the lineal field of energy that moves us, and its perpendicular, wide dimension is the reproductive dimension that combines both (exi). This is clearly evident in the simplest forms that show the ‘geometrical game’ with more precision: the magnetic (energetic, flat), electric (informative, tall) fields of light space-time, and its Product (Maxwell equations), the reproductive light wave are perpendicular to each other (exi).
Each of them corresponds to each function of light (being the 4th function social color). This is the ‘first’ cellular unit of our light world, from where all further ‘evolutionary scales’ of space-time beings are born. Thus the causal justification of the perpendicularity of the 3 functional, organic dimensions is its existence in the basic action-unit of space-time, our vacuum space-time made of actions of light. As we are all social evolution of H-plancks space-time actions. Again we see the 3 perpendicular fields happening in electromagnetic fields (Maxwell rule).
It has to be noticed that we talk of ‘fractal dimensions’ not continuous, ∞ dimensions. The difference between them is this: A fractal dimension is a ‘filling’ of a dimension by networks and branches which grow and will ultimately fill the total continuous dimension of the entity in the domain in which we define the entity but can reach in its filling in a certain moment a ‘quantity’ between the 0 and 1 value of the total filling/dimension. They are partial dimensions. And this is precisely what we mean. A Superorganism, for example, a human being, will have 3 ‘local, fractal, networks’ attached to many cells, and those are its 3 fractal dimensions: the informative, nervous network and all its attached cells and organs, the reproductive, blood networks and all its organs and the digestive, energetic network and all its organs.
In the graph, 3 examples of diffeomorphic beings of space-time and its relative arrows of energy and information: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information, pointing towards the central informative black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative/energetic dimensions are inverted.
Since plants use light as energy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information from the sky, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorb chemical information. Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as it often happens between energy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Thus each species establishes its own up and down arrows; its relative energy and informative directions, departing from that central knot of information, which is gauging and perceiving.
What classic science denies and system sciences proves is the reality of an existential will in that perceptive=informative knot, which controls the entire organism and directs its search for ‘actions’ that provide energy and information to the being. It is precisely the infinite number of Discontinuous, Non-Euclidean Points of View, what creates a general arrow of Information in the Universe that constantly reproduces the form of those entities and balances the arrow of continuous entropy, energy motions and expanding space, which physicists dogmatically consider the only arrow of the Universe. And so in all entities, when the zero point appears, order systematically grows: the crystal starts to reproduce its formal structure in ‘cells’, the hurricane becomes stable (and vice versa, bombing the ‘eye’ of the hurricane destroys it; the galaxy once the black hole of gravitational information is formed acquires it order, etc.)
In all space-time scales, species follow a future arrow towards more information, which increases in 3 horizons and finally evolves individuals into societies, herds and macro-organisms, related by a common language/network of information.
The evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±i ages of individuals with a twist: death is not the only solution to the cycle, but the duality of ∂-disintegration or ∫-integration into a social group (in the case of life a cellular group), which defines the life/death cycle gives two choices to some ‘top predator’ informative species: After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.
In the graph, the seminal, 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: It is the Worm Hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal, the 1st mammal, the horse and the 1st Homo Sapiens, which seem to have evolved from a dwarf ancestor, which first discovered technology and had a dwarf brain, albeit with an evolved morphology similar to that of the Homo Sapiens: the Homo Floresiensis.
Then the new ‘highly informative’ top predator follows in its evolution a plan of dimensional evolution that transforms species with a high content of energy into species with a high content of information through 3±st horizons, similar to the ages of an individual organism. Since species are macro-organisms in which each cell is an individual of the species.
-First in its ‘energetic youth’, the species grows in size as horses, humans, bilateral animals or black holes do.
-Then the species suffers a reproductive radiation, colonizing new ecosystems.
– Next the species suffers a diversification, according to the ternary principle into 3 subspecies, one dominant in energy, another in information and a 3rd one balanced in both parameters.
– Finally, a new top predator extinguishes the species or the informative one evolves into social organisms of different complexity, stronger than the individual and survives.
Thus in Biology the 3±st ages between birth (st+1) and extinction (st-1) apply both to organisms and to species that go through 3±st horizons, parallel to those 3±st ages and main arrows of time of all systems of the universe. Thus there is an informative, ‘intelligent’, organic order in evolution. Though it is not a plan designed by a ‘personal God’ who cares for humanity, but by the limits that the morphology of lineal space and cyclical time and its combinations impose to the evolution of species. The so-called ‘intelligent design’ is the ternary, existential cycle that applies to every form of the Universe as it evolves in 3 possible sub-species: an energetic, lineal species, an informative, cyclical one or a reproductive form, of balanced ΣE=∏Ti parameters.
Those 3 forms become the 3 horizons between birth and extinction of any species: A top predator form of max. energy, or I horizon of the species; a balanced form, ΣS=Ti, that reproduces so fast over its prey-energy that creates a ‘biological radiation’ and parallel extinction of the lesser victim till reaching a trophic balance, or II horizon of the species and a form of max. information or III horizon: Max. E, Max.Re, Max. I:
+1: Birth: max. Ti. The chip paradox (conception).
In the previous graph, the creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time cycle that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal Energetic Space, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘bigger species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information, when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution, when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished by a new top predator form, since its evolution has reached its limit. However, in certain species, after the III informative horizon, a social phenomenon happens: if the species has developed a new language of information, it gathers into herds that evolve socially together creating macro-cellular organisms of a ‘higher’, more complex Plane of existence. So prokaryote evolved into giant eukaryotic cells and those cells evolved into animals, of which ants and men, the most successful, informative insects and mammals, evolved further through pheromones and verbal information into societies and civilizations.
The ‘Black Hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism, born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximal genetic information in minimal space. It is caused by the dominance of informative cycles over its Energetic Vital space. So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic=Temporal Information packed in a reduced size (Max. Ti=Min. Se).This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces. For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. Thus tiny species with huge numbers of neurons deliver stronger and faster group actions of energy and information, Min.ΣSe x Max.S2Ti, than slower, bigger species (Min.S2Ti x Max.ΣSe):
Since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those fractal actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their actions show a higher existential, exi force, which defines them as top predators, as they are stronger and faster than the ‘slow actions’ of a single, bigger body. For example, small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kills slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy. Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; Worm Holes with maximal gravitational information are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.
I Horizon: Energy Age: max. ΣSe: Top Predators and Extinctions
In their youth, species fed and grow into energetic, lineal, planar, top predators, becomingcarbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), lineal echinoderms and fishes, monotrema, Neanderthals and smart weapons.
A new-born, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology, a new, more efficient species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth, becoming a lineal, energetic, big, top predator species that feeds on less evolved forms. Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic, dwarf Homo Floresiensis, who seems to have invented technology, the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys and the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.
During this energetic age, often a parallel process of extinction of a previous species, which becomes victim of the new predator, takes place. So when lineal proteins appeared, free carbohydrates disappeared from the primordial soup; in the Cambric most water species disappeared, as cephalopods with eyes multiplied; mammals feeding on eggs probably extinguished dinosaurs except those who put eggs in unreachable places (birds); humans extinguished most mammals and weapons extinguish non-technological cultures and when they become terminators, they will extinguish man.
II Horizon: reproduction: max. ΣSe =Ti: Radiations of species.
In the II Horizon ( graph, left) the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: The protein age gives way to the age of amino acids, with nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative heads’ that multiplied all over the Earth; slow, reproducing sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes that multiplied faster; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that colonized all continents; while young, giant stars, born in the I horizon, acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.
III Horizon: Max information: Max. Evolution=differentiation
In its 3rd horizon ( graph, right) species increase its information, growing in the height dimension or acquiring cyclical forms, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides dominated life molecules; echinoderms changed to cyclical shape; fishes developed their inner networks in the dimension of height; amphibians became round; saurian and mammals became bipeds; Neanderthal became Sapiens Sapiens with round skulls and chipped machines acquire today android forms with their heads on top. And the key of this process is obviously the evolution of a hyperbolic, informative element: Nucleotides appear when they added informative, nitrogen rings and cyclical sugars to amino acids; a yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; insects developped its brain capacity and bees and ants appeared; while the Homo Sapiens evolves more complex technological tools; finally in the III Industrial R=evolution of machines, informative chips and televisions dominate the economic ecosystem…
±st: Extinction vs. Evolution into super-organisms.
The main difference between organisms and species happens after their 3rd age: Organisms dominated by nervous, informative systems, which control closely its cells, warp their cellular energy, till the organism dies, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’ by their nervous system.
Yet species, due to the discontinuous nature of their individual ‘cells’ do not exhaust their collective energy. So they might survive without further evolution, in its 3rd horizon, or they might become extinguished by a new, more efficient species, appearing on their ecosystem. Or they might evolve socially, becoming the ‘cells’ of a macro-organism. We talk, in fact, of 3 basic strategies of survival, according to the Ternary Principle:
– Max. ΣE: Creation of balanced, trophic energy pyramids that supply new victims.
– ΣE=∏i: Diversification of individual formsinto new species that will survive the extinction of the parental species. Thus we talk of evolutionary, genealogical trees of ‘son species’, similar to those of any individual. Yet, while the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families, ‘son species’ tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings.
– Max. Ti: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of networks by specialized, informative ‘cells’ that integrate all other cells into a whole, bigger form, which has more exi=stential force than the individuals of a herd. Since the fundamental parameter of a top predator is its Max. exi force, which determines the strength and capacity of its actions, eusocial evolution maximize survival in the fights for existence as the sum of actions is stronger than individual ones. Yet the individual must retain its ‘speed’ of action-reaction, which requires to attach a smaller faster network of informative entities to a slow herd that extends in a wider space ecosystem, in which they share a min. quantity of information only with is parallel adjacent – so their actions per time unit are slower and less coordinated. The result is a dual superorganism with a fast head and a slow, big body. Hence we consider the creation of super-organisms, the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the super-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species and the specialized cells of information that carry them, become the relative nervous/ informative network of the super-organism. Those informative cells form networks that pack closely the other cells in min. space, controlling them with a specialized language of information, as the queen pheromones do in anthills; nervous cells/ impulses did with chemical cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages have done with humans in societies, which are superorganisms of human beings.
Most space-time systems co-exist in 3 main scales of microcosmic and macrocosmic forms (physical species do so at the atomic, molecular and crystal scale; biological ones, at the cellular, individual and ecosystemic level), which are similar because they are created by an earlier process of differentiation and social evolution of individual parts into bigger wholes.
– Extinction: If species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into super-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution and become extinct or in case of having a higher rate of reproduction, lay at the bottom of a trophic pyramid. So today 90% of insects are social; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and Protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became slave organelles of social, eukaryotic super-cells.
In all species and all scales of existence, the process of evolution is dual: species differentiate into 3 forms, which then recombine, giving birth to new species, as it happens in cells (energetic proteins, informative DNAs and reproductive RNAs that make up the cell), or in atoms (energy forces, informative quarks, balanced electrons that reproduce its nebulae on gravitational space).
Recap. The simple, morphological plan of evolution that each fractal species of the Universe repeats is caused by the fact that there are only 2±1 forms in the Universe, lineal energy and cyclical information and i=ts reproductive, body combination. So only 3 new types of species can be created, one with more energy, one with more information and one that reproduces both.The process of evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±st ages of individuals: born of a seed or first individual of maximal information, the species grows its energy in its youth, radiates in an age of massive reproduction and finally diversifies into ternary types. After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.Evolutionary theory went through 3 ages that stressed topological evolution (Darwin), interaction between the scales of life (genetics) and the different speeds of time and E<=>I beatings of the Universe. Those ternary causes explain the speed and accuracy of evolutionary changes.
17. The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.
The Universe has 3 arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens in humans. It is also a sexual principle: Women reproduce information with its cyclical bodies; males have lineal bodies with more energy. But women have 10 times more lineal, white matter in their energetic brain, and men 6 times more cyclical, grey matter. Thus females are: Max. I (Body) x Max. e (Mind). Males are: Max. E(Body) xMax. I (Mind); so their minds and bodies complement each other –a duality that should be the basis of all gender studies void of ‘ideologies’. Further on our height dimension confirms our informative nature:
Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million years ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (gorilla in the human case) that diverges into a reproductive, mature species (chimpancee bonobo); and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man. Thus the same plan of evolution, which describes all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.
In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Energy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.
In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity: as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between energy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.
In all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called: the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Energy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races.
The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, energy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos, means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species. Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:
– Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.
– E=I: chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:
– Max. I: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:
I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.
We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:
– Max. E: Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.
– E=i. Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of Paranthropus.
– Max. I: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.
Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:
-Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.
-E=I: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.
-Max. i. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.
II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.
Homo Ergaster, after a reproductive radiation throughout the planet, subdivides in 3 Homo Erectus sub-races:
– Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.
– E=i: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.
– Max. I: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.
Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopathic evolution). Thus, he adds now technological energy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new energy/information duality:
The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.
The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.
Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) were confirmed by genetic maps and the Homo Floresiensis.
— Lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.
— A 2nd informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman or mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.
± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).
± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=i, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.
Cultural races The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.
Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems – energy, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:
— Visual, dolichocephalic energetic, lineal, spatial brains/cultures, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the long brain dominated by the visual eye in the Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.
— Cyclic, informative, brachicephalic, mongoloid brains/cultures natural to East Asia, with cyclic time concepts. It is the wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.
— ‘Sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is a makrocephalic brain, dominant in the height/medullar axis with a tall head, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.
It is the best culture/age for human survival, as in all species, since it balances both arrows, E=I. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the reproductive, sensory culture.
19. General Linguistic Systems. Universal Grammar: Information (subject) < Action (Verb) > Energy (Object).
The mind of man and its program of behavior is written in the syntax of its grammar. Humboldt and Herder were right; the grammar of languages is the program of the cultural world. Next Chomsky found the Universal Grammar and its ternary elements: Subject; Verb; Object.
He was also right. Since Human Grammar is a reflection of the Generator Equation of Energy & Information:
Information (Subject) <Verb (exi-action) > Object (Energy).
General Systems sciences put together both discoveries and takes linguistics a step further in its evolution.
The key to understand the meaning of language is to divide all grammars into its 3 elements, which reflect in the human mind, mirror of the Universe, the 3 essential elements of the ‘Generator Equation of all complementary systems of energy and information of the Universe: Information < Action > Energy, Which humans perceive in words:
Human Subject < Verbal action > Object, energy of the Subject
How the generator equation creates the different species of human languages?
There are several forms in which the Generator ‘decouples’ and splits in different ‘varieties’ of systems, which correspond to the processes of creation of different physical particles (quantum generation), biological species (Plan of evolution), and linguistic species (cultural differentiation). The simplest form in which to generate ‘varieties’ of any type is to apply the combinatory laws of mathematics to a system with 3 elements, the Information<Action>Energy systems of reality. The results are 6 combinations in the ‘power order’ of the 3 elements of all systems, which are common to all disciplines of science.
If you have 3 elements, I, A, E (Information-action-energy), then you can combine them in the following orders: IAE, IEA, AIE, AEI, EIA, EAI; which give birth in Physics 6 essential types of particles and antiparticles and in Biology to 6 types of basic animal forms, according to the order of its physiological networks and so we shall find 6 basic varieties of languages, which are studied by Typological Linguistics, called the SVO, SOV, VOS, VSO, OSV and OVS varieties. Let us consider those 6 Universal varieties of languages and cultural character comparing it with the 6 varieties of animal species, to do a classic exercise of GS2 homology.
The 3 elements of all systems are reflected in all sentences, as they narrate how ‘human subjects’ perform verbal actions over objects. And there are six theoretically possible basic word orders for the transitive sentence:
– Subject-verb-object (42%: English, Chinese, Russian: Flexible, ‘mammal’ languages)
– Subject-object-verb (45%: Japanese, Latin, Turkish: warrior, ‘reptile’ languages, objectual, unemotional)
– Verb-Subject-Object (9%: Semitic, religious, ‘insect’ languages, imperative, little freedom)
– Verb-Object-Subject (3%: Malagasy, Fiji, ‘bird’ languages, seafarer)
– Object-Subject-Verb (0%: Amazonian, Mexica, subsistence agricultural, Bacteria Languages)
– Object-Verb-Subject (1%: Apalai, Viral Languages, recollectors)
What they tell us about mankind is clear: when we analyze the abundance of those typologies among human cultures: Humans, this proves are ‘self-centered beings’ for whom the Subject must come always before the object, since in 87% of languages subject comes first. And among those the most successful (2/3rds of speakers) are SVO languages – the most evolved, mammal languages, where the ‘informative’ nervous system dominates.
This responds to the fractal nature of the Universe, where there is always a p.o.v. or subject that gauges with languages the universe and considers to be its relative center according to the definition of a mind –p.o.v.:
‘ A mind is a zero point or world, an infinitesimal still mapping of the infinite Universe, created with informative pixels, which believe to be the center of that universe: O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Constant perceptive World.’
1) SVO: Inf<Act>En systems dominated by Informative subjects whose goal is an ‘action’ established upon the energy system. This is the ‘natural’ most evolved order in the Universe in balance, corresponding to the ‘mature’ age of all evolutionary forms. Those are the most flexible, feedback systems of the Universe.
2) SOV: InxEn=Act systems. the informative subject still dominates. but relates first to the Object of energy, through the action. The object thus become the most important element, and so these are ‘productive systems’, in which the object is either devoured as energy or reproduced through the negative or positive actions of the Informative subjects.
Those 2 systems are the most common systems in the Universe, as they represent the two essential ‘beats’ between a ‘temporal’, flux, evolutionary state (Inf<act>En) and a ‘spatial’, fixed, organic state.
In Animal life systems, the 3 ‘elements’ are the physiological networks of the organism; so we define a simple Generator Equation for Living Animal Organisms: Nervous, Informative System < Action/Blood system > Energetic, Digestive system. And we find 2 essential type of species, or phyla, where the nervous system dominates, the mammal which has an obvious order of: Nervous system > Blood System > Digestive system.
And then the second most evolved species, Birds. And so it happens in languages, where over ¾ of human beings speak mammal languages (SVO languages), even if in a previous less evolved time, SOV languages were dominant. There are not many ‘bird languages’ since man does not fly so there are no human birds. Still there are bird languages among seafarer humans (Malagasy, Fijians) showing the isomorphism of all structures of the Universe.
What about the other 4 type of languages? We can classify them in ‘arrogant languages’:
SOV Reptile cultures/ Languages are languages in which the subject-nervous system are pegged and direct primarily the energetic, objectual system, while the blood-active system is secondary submissive to those other 2 systems and less developed. It is also the ‘cold’ structure of Reptilian living systems, in which nervous and digestive system dominate actions, provoking a constant growth of the energy/force of the system without limit except death; while the underdeveloped action system is made of ‘cold blood’. In a fascinating homological cultures, SOV languages are proper of ‘energetic’, ‘warrior’ cold-hearted cult(ure)s of weapons able to kill the ‘other’, seen as an object, such as German, Japanese or Roman=Latin Empires did historically. Yet if war is the negative action of SOV languages, the productive, Subject x Object positive action is the + side of SOV cultures.
So Germans and Japanese are very productive, dedicated to re=produce their mechanical objects with absolute work zeal – even weapons that kill us.
VSO Insect Cultures/Languages. Finally those languages and cultures whose order of words is ‘imperative’, with the verb first – a form of language that more evolved ones use only in moments of danger or hierarchical institutions, as it is deemed rightly an impolite, fundamentalist form of though – are, well, I just said it, fundamentalist, imperative cultures. And so among human languages, Semitic cultures, specially in their old ‘sacred’ religious texts, Hebrew, Classic Arab and their Abrahamic religions, are insect, non-free cultures of ‘believers’ in the ‘Word of God’.
Finally, the less abundant, less evolved languages of mankind are those in which the object, the ‘energy’ of the system, dominates the subject, the information. Those are languages in which the order is inverse, unnatural to the ego-centered P.O.V. of th elanguage. Their equivalent in Physics would be antiparticles in which the electron is in the center instead of the informative quark. In animal life, they belong to the 2 categories of species, which started animal life evolution, in the microcosms, hence for whom the object-world in which they live is dominant. So we talk of:
OSV (object-Subject Verb) or bacterial languages. They belong to cultures that live in jungles in which they still fear the presence of animal predators and do have to act to live, or are constantly in the move as hunting/gatherers, or living in poor agricultural environments.
OVS (Object-verb-subject) or Viral Languages, in which there is not even motion in the subject, that is the Object comes first (the host cell) then the action (bacterial reproduction of the viral genetic DNA) and finally the seemingly dead, reproduced subject – the virus who parasites the cell, the human who parasites nature). Thus those are in Nature viral species, of little motion, and in the Paleolithic, they were proper of ‘recollector cultures’ where humans just reach a banana and eat without moving much, in paradises and allopatric islands without predators, in which humans are enjoying life and sex in a passive way. Those are the less abundant languages, and only occur in the Amazonian jungles, in which life is truly easy such as the Xavante and Warao …
18. The superorganism of History.
Humans started in the Neolithic a process of eusocial evolution as the collective ‘mind’ of Gaia, our body of energy. Prophets of the wor(l)d expressed that goal through eusocial messages of love, empathy and ‘sharing’ of energy and information among humans to form networks and ‘cultures and civilizations’ – superorganisms of history.
The final goal was to create a global superorganism based in welfare life goods in which all men could exercise its 4 drives of life (feeding, informing, reproducing and evolve socially). But the process was halted with the arrival of hard metal weapons (bronze age), and a language of information of metal (digital gold), which killed the body and hypnotized the mind of mankind, and whose values (violence and greed) eliminated the social networks of love, making some humans, who used it, ‘animetals’, to feel superior to non-technological cultures.
They evolved metal in its 3 topological varieties, becoming associated to it the 3 people-castes on top of societies: lineal metal=weapon+man=warrior animetal, O-metal=money+Man, banker animetal, exi-organic metal machines+man, scientist. They despised as ‘inferior’, non-technological species, extinguishing them. Finally they created the superorganism of evolution and re=production of machines, the company-mother, which started with flows of monetary orders, the present process of terraforming of planet Earth into a planet of metal, in which man is a species secondary to the machines, symbol of ‘the future’ and its progress. So the evolution of mankind into a global, healthy superorganism of history was halted and nationalistic wars that justify the use of weapons, capitalist idol-ogies that justify the control of society by money and mechanist science that makes machines the center of the world, control our minds and maintain warriors, bankers and scientists as the top classes of our societies.
The result is the present ‘dying world of life and Gaia’, asphyxiated and about to collapse, as selfish memes of metal, a new organic species (weapons=|- metal, money=O-metal and machines=organic metal) evolve and substitute us. This process is about to end as robots substitute humans in labor and war fields (cause of the present labor and perpetual war crises), in a process similar to the molting of a soft life larva into a hardcore insect, which ends with the death of all the enzymes, or ‘enzymen’ that provoked the mutation, creating the ‘viral’ machines or hard enzymes of the stronger system (robots) that once born kill the soft enzymes.
Thus the Earth is molting from carbon-life to metalife, or from the human perspective lives in a cancerous process in which corporations and bankers monopolize the oxygen of the system, and release it only to corporations of machines denying a demand economy, based in a Universal salary=blood that could provoke a massive production of WHealth, welfare goods normal humans need to survive and would demand instead of expensive weapons and corporative robots.
Thus, humans should design a better superorganism of history, a ‘perfect world’, based in a demand economy where as in all superorganisms, money=oxygen is produced from the bottom up with a global currency, Y€$ money (1 $=1€=100 yens=5 Yuans, at fixed parity with prices adjusted internally) and distributed to all cells of mankind. humanity will then demand and produce ‘human, life goods’, not selfish memes of metal, weapons that kill our body and hate-media and fictions that atrophy our mind.
And instead of nationalist memes to justify the production of those weapons and hate-media, humans should allow diplomacy and a common legal, informative, nervous system to resolve national issues, evolving those anti-natural, smaller tribal superorganisms, the Homo Americanus, Britannicus, etc. into our natural Homo Sapiens Superorganism, ‘History’, as EU and UNO institutions try to do. Then we would not need to evolve the future terminator weapons that will eliminate us to combat ‘tribal enemies’.
Those 2 economic and political reforms coupled with the prohibition of evolving robotics, the new ‘species’ stronger and faster processing information than us, which will replace mankind, could ensure our ‘immortality’ on Earth. Since under the present ‘capitalist system’ we will not survive the lethal evolution of machines of energy and information beyond Gaia’s and human capacity to survive. Since death is an excess of energy (accident) or information (3rd warping age) that breaks the immortality balance E=I of the mature, classic age of any superorganism.
Thus humans will die due to 3 ‘singularity’ events, which are as all divided in 3 ages:
– Max. E: the evolution of weapons of max. Energy (Nuclear bombs researched at CERN in its self-feeding, cosmic horizon – strangelets, black holes). Next year, 2016 CERN will double potency and pass the threshold of B.H. creation
E=I: Mechanisms of max. reproductive power (iron nano-bacteria that could kill earth eating its machines in 3 months)
Max. I: A.I. (platoons of robots guided by satellites). Those two events will come latter in the century, but observing the Universe teaming with planets, without A.I. Robots or Intelligence but filled with Black holes and strange stars (pulsars), it seems men will die in a Nova Explosion, if as it seems, politicians do not halt the evolution of weapons.
20. Conclusion: The isomorphisms of all Superorganisms. General Systems Sciences.
General Systems is the Philosophy of Science that unifies Biological and Physical Systems, first, by accepting 2 ‘two arrows of creation of futures’, the creation of energy or motion (studied by Physics under the term, ‘entropy’) and the creation of information (studied by Biology under the term negantropy).It is a tenant of GS2 (General Systems Theory) that the Universe constantly ‘transforms back and forth, energy into information’: E<=>I; and so all what exists can be described as a ‘Complementary System of Networks of Energy and Information, ∑E<=> ∏I’.
In the graph, all sciences study 10-Dimensional fractal systems of energy and information – superorganisms – that obey the same laws, called ‘isomorphisms’ explained by GS2: All those superorganisms are made of 3 organic dimensions of space, their hyperbolic, tall spherical heads/particles of information, moved by flat, lineal, energy systems, in the direction of length, and possessing a body in the dimension of width, which laterally reproduces the system. And those 3 organic dimensions of space, perform their actions in a time order, from a first age/dimension of maximal energy or youth, when the system is born, through a reproductive age of balance between its energy and information components, or present, mature time dominated by the body and finally a 3rd age of maximal information, when the head has absorbed most energy of the body, followed by a time reversal when the energy of the system is spent, all is trans-formed into in-form-ation And so for the game of existence never to stop, the system dies, explodes back into its parts of cellular energy:
Death = Max I-> Max. E. Thus we can consider that all systems co-exist in 3 dimensions or scales of informative complexity, the i-1, cellular, i-ndividual and i+1 social scales. And so those 3 x 3 dimensions of space, time and complexity define a new whole, a 10 Dimensional superorganism.
General Systems Sciences classifies then all natural systems as wholes or parts of superorganisms. And it applies to the study of each particular superorganism the essential isomorphisms derived from its 10-Dimensional structure. Those 5 common properties of all superorganisms of the Universe and its laws is what truly defines a harmonic Universe in which all its parts behave like the whole and act in an organic, vital manner:
– Isomorphism of its 2 components, energetic space and temporal information, which ‘combine’ to create the infinite varieties of the Universe.
-Isomorphism of its 3 physiological-topological forms in space and its relative dimensions (lineal limbs that move the system with energy; tall, informative heads that guide it and wide, combined bodies that reproduce them).
– Isomorphism of its life-death cycle in time and its 3±1 ages, defined by the dominance of energy (youth), information (3rd age) and its balanced combination, e=I (maturity.)
– Isomorphism of the 3 relative i±1 fractal scales of cellular parts that become wholes, as the entity exists travelling through 3 relative seminal/cellular, individual and social, collective, i+1 scales. All those scales define therefore a fractal, 5th dimension of space-time, whose complex laws are the key laws of general systems sciences.
– And isomorphism of its 4 dimensional cycles of space-time, the actions that all systems perform and create an ‘organic program’ of existence, combination of the 2 arrows/substances/forms of the Universe, divided into:
– Simplex actions of energy and information performed by the i-ndividual:
– Max. E: Feeding, lineal motion; Max. I; Informing, perceiving.
– Complex social actions performed with a couple: exi, Reproducing or with a group, ∑: evolving socially, as a herd of energy and ∏, evolving as a network of information, through ‘axons’ that communicate each unit with all others:
A 4 ‘dimensional analysis’ of systems show that all entities grow performing those ‘4 drives’ of life. Some examples:
– 3+1 perpendicular dimensions of light: flat magnetic field: energy; tall, electric field: information, where photons are most likely found; its product (Maxwell equation): c-speed of wave reproduction. Social Evolution: Colors (∑ photons)
– The 4 quantum numbers: Principal number defines the orbital energy and changes as electrons ‘feed’ on light. The orbital or angular number, its ‘angle of height’ or informative state; the spin number, its spin orientation, according to which it will or not couple with other electron and/or in favorable conditions with opposite spins emit a ‘seminal ray’ of light which crossed with the opposite spin ‘gender’ gives birth to a new electron; and finally the magnetic number arranges groups of electrons in a society. Similar numbers are found for quarks the other fundamental particle of the Universe. Thus since the essential particles of physics, photons, electrons and quarks, feed, inform, reproduce and evolve socially, we can indeed define a ‘living, organic Universe’ where all parts follow the same isomorphisms.
– 4 Maxwell equations define also those 4 actions for social flows of electrons in the next scale (laws of electricity).
– 4 basic atoms exercise those actions in simple carbohydrages: N act as the hea with its informative, vibration clock of enormous precision, Oxygen as the energy legs (OH-, H+ ‘kicks’), Carbone as the structural, reproductive body, and H2O as the territorial, social ‘ecosystem’, being H, both the pixel of information and the particle for energy transfers.
– 4 CGTA nucleotides code the 2 x 2 actions; the dual, more complex Purines for informative or social traits, the simplex Pyrimidines for simplex or energetic ones – a hypothesis, which genetics still cannot fully prove, till it couples all combinations of genes with their genotypes.
– 3(x3)+1 physiological systems define an animal: the Energetic/digestive system, the reproductive, blood system and the Informative, nervous system, each one displaying 3 sub-systems; all of them integrated by the ‘I=eye’ mind.
– As a consequence 4 social drives define the will of life and welare of human beings: our need for food and shelter (E), our need for education and information (I), our desire to start a family (reproduction) and live harmonically in society (social evolution). And as such they should be the program of all humanist governments.
– Tthe industrial r=evolution of metal (machines& weapons) also takes place along those 4 sub-systems: in the XIX c. we made during the I Industrial Revolution, the energetic ‘limbs’ of machines (trains, steamers); then during the II Industrial R=evolution, its ‘body-engines’ (electric, oil engines); then its heads of information (mobile-ears, chip-brains, eyes-cameras), each of them enhancing, atrophying and substituting the equivalent drive of humans. While machines’ ‘complex actions’ are carried by its ‘reproductive’ systems, company-mothers, and its social evolution, by the stock-market that through informative flows of e-money decides the corporations that survive or become extinct.
– Finally galaxies feed on interstellar gas; its body-plane of stars Reproduce atoms, their central black holes in-form them with gravitational waves, and emit polar flows of dark energy that connect them socially with other galaxies.
Orga(ni)sms. Reproduction=Present survival is the game.
All what you see and distinguish as a ‘unity’ is thus a Universal System composed of an entity of energy and one of information which exchange flows of energy and form, such as the particle/head orders the body/field. How this causal orders from heads/particles to body/fields are formalized in terms of ‘time causality’ is very interesting. As the body/field receives the orders that set up the motion of the object from the head, we say that fields and bodies are displaced ‘a fraction of time’ into the past, respect to the head/particle. (In complex General Systems this turns to be actually the case solving some paradoxes of quantum tunelling). So in terms of causality: I (gauging) ->E -> Motion.
This means that the language of information acts before the body moves, even if latter we see them synchronous. So money acts first to kick the productive process and the mind thinks first. And genes are first constructed and their orders create the organism.
All this requires for a formalism that can be applied to all systems to introduce some new mathematics and logic. Concerning mathematics, we have to widen the restrict idea that a point has no volume, because otherwise we cannot study all the points of the different scales of size of the Universe but a new postulate, that of a fractal point: a point has a volume which grows as we come closer to it. So a star grows as we come closer to it, and so does a seminal particle, till it breaks into cells and molecules.
This new mathematics of points with parts was first studied by Riemann and Einstein applied it to physics, but they merely changed the 5th postulate: a point can be crossed by infinite parallels, without realizing if this was truth, then the point must have volume. Instead they ‘curved the parallels’ and made the pass through the point. Here our approach is different and sounder. If you curve parallels then you dont have parallels defined as ‘straight lines’.
And still if the point has no breath (Euclidean point) you cannot fit more than one. So you enlarge the point till our ‘perception of curved space’ becomes flat. In that ‘relative enlargement’, the now flat universe with points with volume and parallels entering through the gaps of its membranes, is again a self-similar world. And so in fact beings travel through those planes of existence as they live, and that is the more complex part of the game: the eusocial evolution of points with volume into organisms that emerge as full blow beings in the upper plane of existence:
The Universe is a a self-repetitive game of infinite complementary systems of energy and information exi, which try to reproduce by recreating, in a lower plane of cellular existence – a Non-Euclidean plane in illogic geometry – a seed of information, i-1, which will then self-replicate in a clonic wave over a receptive field of space, ∑e x i, sch us to surface in the future as a single unit of the higher plane of non-E-xistence. In the jargon of illogic geometry, the higher language to describe all sciences and systems and species under the same organic laws, all systems can be expressed as forms in process of reproduction rebirth and extinction, Illogic geometry departing from those 3 planes of existence, describe all events including those of creation and destruction of social organisms. The game thus described in this web, in an intermediate jargon – biological – bridge between illogic geometry and common speech of social science (a jargon which frankly i have little patience with for his astounding intellectual idiocy, selfishness and primitivism – treated in the section of ideologies) – a word though that connects both is the concept of an ‘organsm of existence’, an action of reproduction, e meets i, e fucs i, i reproduces exi (-;
The super organism – the ultimate meaning of the game of existence.
There are 2 forms to describe reality – the physicists’ way, which merely ‘sees’ the Universe, quantifies it and cares little for qualitative and relational meanings. In this view, what matters is to find some ‘fundamental particle, which should have substance and be the ‘brick’ of which all other beings are made. Even if that particle were found though, there would be little to say about the why questions of reality, the temporal causal questions, the past to future meanings of it all? Why we exist? why we are what we are? Are we alone and different? What is the purpose of it all?
Relational space-time and the game of existence all space-time beings of finite duration and finite space follow, is much deeper in its analysis, as it is a time theory not a space one. So it simply states this:
‘ The Universe is a game that creates super-organisms of ∆±1 space and time scales’.
Simple, and both mathematical and conceptual. The meaning of reality is to create super organisms across 3 relative scales of space-time, the best combinations of which, known to man are biological systems (extending through a ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic and ∆+1, social ecosystemic scales) and physical systems (extending through the quantum, electromagnetic, ∆-1, thermodynamic, i and cosmic, gravitational ∆+1 scales); the one we form part of, the super organism of History is the less understood of them all. But all have a set of common isomorphic laws, which define their existence, structure in space, time ages and place it within the scales of the 5th dimension.
So we can say that the fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.
U± infinite, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.
But in most cases the system is just U±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism:
THE SUPERORGANISM: THE FUNDAMENTAL POINT OF VIEW.
In the graph, all systems of the universe are points of view and super organisms and individuals parts of social herds, which interact through exchanges of energy and information in a single plane. Those 3 perspectives of a being are studied together to fully grasp the nature of any system, as the entire system constantly interact across a certain number of ±∆ planes of existence.
In the graph, we describe the main isomorphisms of Human p.o.vs and our ternary super organic spatial and temporal structure (below). As we are made as all systems of Particles/heads that gauge and perceive information, Tƒ, with limbs/fields, Se, that extract energy of a relative U±2 world, combined in bodies and waves that iterate the system.
Thus all systems have a spatial, topological assembly of 3 organic parts, that will exist causally 3 ages of evolution of its forms through those 3 topologies, and will in the process establish a series of åctions in time, combination of their vital energy and information with the ‘complex world of U±4 planes of existence around it.
In the previous post we study the superorganisms of the Universe from the perspective of its time symmetry or worldcycle.
Yet if the world cycle of life and death and its 3 ages are the ‘time view’ of Universal Superorganisms, its Œi structure as networks of points is its spatial view, and as such the Superorganism embodies both the spatial and temporal, formal and functional organic and temporal meaning of all existences.
Universals then treated as networks become the ‘biggest’ scale of growth possible to any system born in the ∆-1 seed state. As it will finally reach the 10 up to 10 scale that makes it ‘transcend and emerge into a Universal new Plane of existence. Such is the magic number of stars in a spiral galaxy, atomic ties in a DNA, cells in a normal organism, and so on.
We can then talk of a ‘discrete’, scalar game of social groups of 10 elements that evolve in the same plane of existence, the same ecosystem, and as it organizes its numbers finally emerge as a whole being.
And so the study of this game in its spatial and temporal symmetry through the building of its networks of cellular/atomic points, its societies of decametric elements, its horizons and languages of coordination, and so on, is the highest level of ∆ST, of Philosophy of Science, of knowledge about the meaning of it all – from ∆-1 to ∆+1…
Universals are the U∆ Huge Wholes, established by a logarithmic scale on base 10¹º. Thus to make a U∆, a Universal Plane of Existence, we talk of billions and trillions of cells, particles, which become far away points of The U∆, Whole, topological plane.
Unlike societies of lesser numbers of ‘atomic cells’, ∆-points in Universal Planes are quasi infinite. In fact, as they disappear in detail and become ‘points’ only observed externally by science, they become the ‘infinitesimal’ of those wholes, and hence the meaning of infinity, is the whole and of infinitesimal existence, the point-article of the whole, cells in biological systems, atoms in physical systems, stars in cosmological galaxy and so on
For discussing the properties of a system, it is usual not necessary to go beyond one level of substructure.
Turning the table around, we can say that the properties of any elementary particle are hardly discernible in systems which have more than one level of structure.
‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’
Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.
THE ORGANIC PHILOSOPHY OF ISOMORPHIC, SCALAR PLANES OF SPACE-TIME.
“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”
Leibniz. On Newton’s absolute time, its lack of understanding of gravitational vortices, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and the denial of cyclical, inertial motions, still features of popular physics.
The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him. Schopenhauer
In the graph, the motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe.
The organic whys of the Universe: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.
People tend to believe that science did away with such awesome ego-paradox, but not quite. As Laplace put it to Napoleon, when asked about God, scientists responded ‘Sir we have rejected that hypothesis’, so not even the nebulous idea of a higher scale of wholeness, ∆+1, remained, neither the existence of other minds and monads; of apperceptive beings (in Leibniz’s terminology) which are not ‘conscious’ but do process energy and information in a VITAL sentient manner would be accepted.
In that regard, a deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.
The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.
This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.
So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry).
This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?
Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work.
According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.
The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.
Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
The paradigm of information though is completely different in his philosophy. Since fractal, ‘Relational’ space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism which is completely necessary to make sense of its 4 elements, ∆•ST.
Of those 4 elements, obviously the easiest to accept is topological space, as it is quite standard science, validated in the case of the Universal space by Einstein’s 3 solutions to EFE, which reflects the ternary topologies of space.
Next comes the 3 ‘ages’ of time, which are a subconscious wisdom of all humans. Then, I found most people to shut down their ‘aristotelian mind’ comprehension, when we deal with ∆-scales and the co-existence of parts and wholes, which share the same space but are displaced in time.
As here humans have a huge difficulty to understand what Einstein, the deterministic ‘right guy’, told us: ‘the separation of past, future and present is an illusion’. But where people stop in their tracks and reject the model, is when we introduce the equation of the mind, the limits of human @ristotelian thought, and the relativism and panpsychism of the Universe. So first I ‘hid’ this variable and made just an external description of it all with the other 3, looking more like ‘science’.
But as all modern scientists and philosophers since Darwin and Schopenhauer understood, without the will, the biological program of evolution, action and survival carried by the linguistic, pure informative mind, the whys of existence are imposible to define (latter we shall see that a 5th element, attached to the duality of space-motion, which gives us ‘pleasure’ and time-information, which gives us ‘pain’ will be required to warp it all).
ALL THIS of course cannot be proved as it is internal to the mind (perception, awareness, sensation). So we could get away with it and eliminate the mind and its painful perceptions of information and erasing pleasures of motions. But it won’t then give the total answer. So what we do is rather simple.
As we have defined man as a space-time being like all other beings, it follows that the method of knowledge of Socrates, ‘know yourself’ is a key element to project our inner non-observable properties in all other entities of reality which are also made of space-time.