Organic Systems:


General systems sciences and organicism.

The science that studies the organic nature of the Universe, its planes of space-time and the common laws or ‘isomorphisms’, which exist between them, is called General systems sciences. However it is simpler and more realistic to consider merely the formalism of the 5th dimension of space-time without any prior jargon as that developed by Systems Sciences. Even if we acknowledge the fact that this blog is the only ‘formal’, logic-mathematical model of both disciplines, known commonly the science of Complexity.

There are other efforts worth to notice. Notably the work done in Santa Fe Institute and the congresses of the International Systems Sciences Society, among collaborative efforts and the work of Mr. Troncale at Ponoma U. among individual researchers have tabulated many isomorphisms in the Universe (self similar laws across different disciplines of science, which as it happens are ordered by space-time planes of relative size, hence according to ∆ST metric: fig.2). But collection of data is only the 1st step of the scientific method, which requires to fit data into  a ‘general mathematical and logic model’ good enough to fit new discoveries in different fields – to test its veracity.

In any case since there has been always a ‘Philosophy of Science’, or discipline of disciplines, General Systems can be considered merely the formal attempts to convert into hard science the ‘scientific philosophy of an organic Universe’, as opposed to the other simpler model of a ‘mechanical one’.

And so we could put in both sides – the simpler, more accurate mechanical model vs. the Organic model, most of the thinkers of the past. Mechanism is easier so it has triumphed, Organicism has taken more time to become – still needs a lot to be done – a standardize system.

Thus the 5D model fits all the data of all the sciences of those scales to the extent of the knowledge of this polymath writer. Thus it is probably the better tested model in terms of the Principle of Correspondence and Ockham’s principle (a theory that fits more data in simpler laws, is the most truthful.)

Thus the site studies mainly those 10 isomorphisms in great detail ³.

The whole site, on general systems sciences, when I rewrite it properly, will be a small encyclopedia of all sciences, seen through the focusing, orderly mirror of the 3+3 Dimensions of the Universe, its 9 planes and scales and isomorphisms. I started to do this, in august 2015. Though the work is much older.

While the model was published in a very reduced format  in a series of peer reviewed conferences at ISSS during the last decade, this blog is the place where I will pour 2 decades of independent research in the aforementioned formalism.

You might then wonder why nothing of this is well-known in science (and why this blog i assume won’t change that trend).

In the field of social sciences we explain the anthropomorphic causes. In essence, humans as all systems are ∆-centered, and so they don’t like objective science. They like myths and that make them the center of the Universe. So religions are always more successful. And i attribute to that fact the delay on understanding the 5th dimension: human anthropomorphism. Since the 5th dimension shows an organic, ‘vital’ Universe ruled by Absolute relativity. Since humans simply occupy a relative world-plane of an infinite 5th dimension, self-centered in its point of view, an infinitesimal point with no importance whatsoever, ruled by the same laws that define the form and functions of all other systems and ‘scalar social herds and superorganisms’ .

Thus the ‘organic philosophy’ of the 5th dimension of isomorphic, scalar space time (∆ST), called ‘General Systems Theory (∆ST) ‘ is a philosophy of an organic vital Universe:

“All type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are the content of the formalism of the 5th dimension, from where we can deduce the main laws of each science that studies a relative ‘scale’ of spatial size of the social, organic Universe, from physics which studies its smaller and larger atomic and galactic scales to biology and social sciences which study its intermediate life and human scales.”


Universal Systems of energy and information

‘Complexity (general systems) will be the science of the XXI c.’ S. Hawkings

The definition of any General or Universal System is this:

Any system of the Universe is a complementary whole made of a points/particles/heads that gauge cycles of temporal information and control planes/fields/bodies of energy that move them (mathematical, physical and biological jargon of a Universal System) The understanding of this ‘fundamental entity of the Universe, ∑e<=>i, allow us to resolve an enormous number of ‘fundamental questions’ about reality, recognizing those energy/information entities by its morphology, as the purpose of an informative particle/head is to gauge and perceive and process information fast in time, it will be smaller (chip paradox) and it will be cyclical (the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space) – as heads, eyes, chips are. Since the purpose of the body/field is to move the particle/head it will be lineal (the fastest distance between two points) or planar (the biggest surface with less volume). And so the topologies of the Universe are ‘organic’, vital – the more so when we introduce concepts of Non-Euclidean geometry – in which points have volume – and topology – in which motion is part of the geometry.

Energetic Bodies & informative brains:

Energy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. Their properties and interactions studied by the science of complexity, are inverse: Energy is spatial, big, mobile,  lineal, destructive, as bodies and weapons are; information is temporal, small cyclical, still, perceptive, creative, as brains and eyes are. In the graph the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘bodies and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space.

So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. Let us consider the properties of those 2 elements, energy (bodies, fields) and information (particles, heads) and some of its species, in life and metal:

Moving Energy                       Reproductive Information

Lineal, spatial, big, moving                Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple                  Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon,                     Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon                             Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death                       DNA, human, dolphin, life.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

Maximal Space = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

From these simple facts of universal morphology, applied to human beings and metal, we can classify ‘objects’ and human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex organisms:

—  Energy organs are lineal systems with minimal ‘form’ that kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the in-form-ation of their ‘preys’.

—  In-form-ative organs create form and trans-form energy into languages that map out ‘reality’ with formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’, in ‘lesser space’, the ‘future’ cycles of reality, anticipating them. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, regardless of the specific language it uses to gauge reality. A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electro-magnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 act-react to their measures. So they all are informative organs.

—  Reproductive organs repeat informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular in-form-ation. Thus, human mothers and company-mothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.

So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including company-mothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.

The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human, energetic bodies. Both compete in a war and the ‘metal-energy’ species wins and kills us, causing the biological process of death. So weapons are lethal, machines and should be repressed as we repress biological predators and killing virus. company-mothers also compete with human cultures for the control of mankind and the creation of a world madee to the image and likeness of its offspring of machines. Yet Mechanism affirms that machines are objects that do not influence or compete with humanity. So, if some ‘collateral effect’ happens, our death, or the ddestructionn of gaia, the life superorganism by machines, it must be blamed on humans.

This of course is false: the only difference between organisms and machines is that organisms possess both, a body and a head or particle of information. On the other hand, machines normally have only one of both elements in perpetual balance. They are either dominant in informative systems (computers, TVs), or energy systems (weapons, transports). As such they don’t switch behavior, becoming first informing heads and then moving bodies, as biological life does. . .  till the arrival of robots. Thus, classic machines are predictable, reliable and their simplicity makes them efficient.

If a mechanism is a system that has only information and energy organs, an organism has both systems and so it is able to reproduce by combining its energy and information into a replica of itself. In that regard, the reproductive organism of machines is today the company-mother that reproduces them with the aid of informative metal (money) and machines (chips), energetic machines and human workers that act as catalysts and re=producers of those machines. And because we live all in a planet of limited resources, machines and life increasingly compete to reproduce the limited energy and information of this planet. So a series of vital relationships of symbiosis and predation between carbon-life and machines take place, despite the stubborn denial of ‘mechanism’, the ideology of scientists that make those machines.

Of course mechanism argues ‘ad eternal’ that computers will never be able to process information better than our brains, but the fact is they already do and that is why they displace workers. We can build computers that process the same information our brains process, encoded in numbers, with a few atoms of gold, while our brains need very complex masses of carbohydrates that move 3 million times slower than photonic chips do. The creators of intelligent computers are today the stars of scientific media. They are funded by the scions of ‘money and weapons’ of our society, Wall Street and DARPA, the robotic arm of the Pentagon. Sadly enough our economic ecosystem is interested in metallic brains more powerful than ours. Why? Because we have created a series of myths and ideologies, along the historic path of evolution of metal that justify the creation of all types of machines, according to the ethic values of our ‘Technological civilization’, which consider all machines positive to mankind regardless of their lethal use.

The change of paradigm, from a World in which man was the measure of all things, to a world in which the machine and its evolution became the engine of history, can be traced to the discovery of clocks and telescopes that made obsolete human eyes and verbal words, which had been till then our biological senses of space and time. They also brought about the ‘mechanist’ ideology of science that denies an organic Universe, built to the resemblance and likeness of man. Yet, in fact, a mechanism is a simplified organism.

Mechanism, as a philosophy of the Universe, is a simplification of the organic cosmos. Since a mechanism is just a deconstructed organism that has only energy or information organs; while Nature’s organisms are made with both, energetic systems (called bodies in Biology, machines in economics, and fields of forces in matter) and information systems (called heads in Biology,money in economics and atomic particles in matter).

Indeed, the Universe turns out to be dual, based in systems that can handle and switch, in ‘feed-back cycles’, between the arrow of energy and the arrow of information. This is the fundamental law of quantum physics, called the Principle of Complementarity between informative particles and energetic fields (so not single particles or pure fields of energy exist). In Biology it is called the Complementarity between heads/cellular nuclei of information and bodies/cells of energy, or between female, informative, perceptive beings and males, specialized energetic sub-species. Thus, most life systems have genders and all life systems have bodies with heads or cells with informative nuclei. Since heads without bodies or bodies without heads don’t exist as living species, according to the Complementarity Law.

Thus, classic machines need humans to reproduce and act as information or energetic systems, since they are incomplete beings. And so a symbiosis between classic machines and humans exist and it is beneficial to man, because it is based in the human, mental control of machines. Yet that symbiosis no longer holds as machines become, during the IV Cycle of the singularity, organic, autonomous robots which don’t require a human being to work and will be able to consume other machines. So robots compete with humans, as workers=reproducers of machines and consumers that use other machines: Workers in the age of the singularity are becoming obsolete to robots and software systems, in a process that is causing the biggest wave of unemployment since the creation of assembly lines in the 1920s.


Networks of cells of Energy and information, origin of complex superorganisms.

But reproduction is not a simple process, after the orgasm comes the building up of the organism – the creation with a radiation of self-similar forms of a higher, more complex structure, and this is the meaning of evolution, which is truly social evolution, the evolution of  A SPECIES INTO A NEW SUPER-ORGANISM, A NEW PLANE OF SOCIAL EXISTENCE:


5D best


All Stiences share the isomorphisms of duality and organicism. Since the forms of ‘—motions’ and information and its properties remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe, described in the next graph:

Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of ‘—motions’ and information and its arrows of time and events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes. Yet the proportion of ‘—motions’ and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (with minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity).

In the graph, in system sciences the fundamental concept is a social organism, a herd or group of self-similar forms, which gather together thanks to their capacity to share the same code/language of information and the same energy. Such herds evolve together in complex networks, which survive better than individual particles or cells, acting together as a single group.

Thus, systems sciences recognizes as the fundamental evolutionary force of the Universe the survival capacity of groups, which determine an arrow of future that has evolved the organisms of reality from simple atoms into molecules into cells into organisms into societies.

What is an organism of information and energy? A herd of species related by networks of energy and information, that constantly transform energy and process it in a vital way. How individual species organize themselves into complex herds, that biology calls ecosystems or bodies, or organisms? Precisely through those physiological networks, the key to understand any organism, including human social organisms (nations, civilizations).

In the Universe there are many type or such social organisms. Since “energy never dies but eternally transforms itself”, organisms have an enormous variety of species and sizes, depending on what energy they process. What do they all have in common? All organisms are “societies”, organized by networks of Energy and Information.

The former is clearly the case in all the sciences from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single regular formation. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of humans and machines; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles).

Atoms share energy and information between them through electrons who finally shape ð orbitals that create molecules. Molecules grow and become DNA, which controls the cell. Cells then radiate until their density saturates the vital territory of the herd of cells. To improve in such small territory the Information and energy of each cell, the nervous-informative organs, and the energetic, blood organs appear. A new, more complex species -the animal, and the man- is born. Then humans increased in social size, forming a new macrocosm -the macrocosm of History and economics– where a lot of humans and machines organize themselves into societies, through words and digital information. The purpose of this web is to study such organisms; historic organisms (a social organism of humans), and economic ecosystems (a wave of products that interact with human beings), as organic systems; trying to design and improve them, from the perspective of the health of what is best for the survival of man, as the ruling species of that organism.



3 HUMAN scales best

In the graph, all systems of the universe are points of view and super organisms  and individuals parts of social herds, which interact through exchanges of energy and information in a single plane. Those 3 perspectives of a being are studied together to fully grasp the nature of any system, as the entire system constantly interact across a certain number of ±∆ planes of existence.

In the graph, we describe the main isomorphisms of Human p.o.vs and our ternary super organic spatial and temporal structure (below). As we are made as all systems of Particles/heads that gauge and perceive information, Tƒ, with limbs/fields, Se, that extract energy of a relative U±2 world, combined in bodies and waves that iterate the system.

Thus all systems have a spatial, topological assembly of 3 organic parts, that will exist causally 3 ages of evolution of its forms through those 3 topologies, and will in the process establish a series of åctions in time, combination of their vital energy and information with the ‘complex world of U±4 planes of existence around it.

In the previous post we study the superorganisms of the Universe from the perspective of its time symmetry or worldcycle.

Yet if the world cycle of life and death and its 3 ages are the ‘time view’ of Universal Superorganisms, its Œi structure as networks of points is its spatial view, and as such the Superorganism embodies both the spatial and temporal, formal and functional organic and temporal meaning of all existences.

Universals then treated as networks become the ‘biggest’ scale of growth possible to any system born in the ∆-1 seed state. As it will finally reach the 10 up to 10 scale that makes it ‘transcend and emerge into a Universal new Plane of existence. Such is the magic number of stars in a spiral galaxy, atomic ties in a DNA, cells in a normal organism, and so on.

We can then talk of a ‘discrete’, scalar game of social groups of 10 elements that evolve in the same plane of existence, the same ecosystem, and as it organizes its numbers finally emerge as a whole being.

And so the study of this game in its spatial and temporal symmetry through the building of its networks of cellular/atomic points, its societies of decametric elements, its horizons and languages of coordination, and so on, is the highest level of ∆ST, of Philosophy of Science, of knowledge about the meaning of it all – from ∆-1 to ∆+1…

Universals are the U∆ Huge Wholes, established by a logarithmic scale on base 10¹º. Thus to make a U∆, a Universal Plane of Existence, we talk of billions and trillions of cells, particles, which become far away points of The U∆, Whole, topological plane.

Unlike societies of lesser numbers of ‘atomic cells’, ∆-points in Universal Planes are quasi infinite. In fact, as they disappear in detail and become ‘points’ only observed externally by science, they become the ‘infinitesimal’ of those wholes, and hence the meaning of infinity, is the whole and of infinitesimal existence, the point-article of the whole, cells in biological systems, atoms in physical systems, stars in cosmological galaxy and so on

For discussing the properties of a system, it is usual not necessary to go beyond one level of substructure.

Turning the table around, we can say that the properties of any elementary particle are hardly discernible in systems which have more than one level of structure.

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.



“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”
Leibniz. On Newton’s absolute time, its lack of understanding of gravitational vortices, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and the denial of cyclical, inertial motions, still features of popular physics.

The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him.  Schopenhauer
Screen Shot 2016-03-18 at 21.36.16

In the graph, the motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe.

 The organic whys of the Universe: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.

People tend to believe that science did away with such awesome ego-paradox, but not quite. As Laplace put it to Napoleon, when asked about God, scientists responded ‘Sir we have rejected that hypothesis’, so not even the nebulous idea of a higher scale of wholeness, ∆+1, remained, neither the existence of other minds and monads; of apperceptive beings (in Leibniz’s terminology) which are not ‘conscious’ but do process energy and information in a VITAL sentient manner would be accepted.

In that regard, a  deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.

The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.

This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.

So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry).

This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?

Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work.

According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

The paradigm of information though is completely different in his philosophy. Since fractal, ‘Relational’ space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism which is completely necessary to make sense of its 4 elements, ∆•ST.

Of those 4 elements, obviously the easiest to accept is topological space, as it is quite standard science, validated in the case of the Universal space by Einstein’s 3 solutions to EFE, which reflects the ternary topologies of space.

Next comes the 3 ‘ages’ of time, which are a subconscious wisdom of all humans. Then, I found most people to shut down their ‘aristotelian mind’ comprehension, when we deal with ∆-scales and the co-existence of parts and wholes, which share the same space but are displaced in time. 

As here humans have a huge difficulty to understand what Einstein, the deterministic ‘right guy’, told us: ‘the separation of past, future and present is an illusion’. But where people stop in their tracks and reject the model, is when we introduce the equation of the mind, the limits of human @ristotelian thought, and the relativism and panpsychism of the Universe. So first I ‘hid’ this variable and made just an external description of it all with the other 3, looking more like ‘science’.

But as all modern scientists and philosophers since Darwin and Schopenhauer understood, without the will, the biological program of evolution, action and survival carried by the linguistic, pure informative mind, the whys of existence are imposible to define (latter we shall see that a 5th element, attached to the duality of space-motion, which gives us ‘pleasure’ and time-information, which gives us ‘pain’ will be required to warp it all). 

ALL THIS of course cannot be proved as it is internal to the mind (perception, awareness, sensation). So we could get away with it and eliminate the mind and its painful perceptions of information and erasing pleasures of motions. But it won’t then give the total answer. So what we do is rather simple.

As we have defined man as a space-time being like all other beings, it follows that the method of knowledge of Socrates, ‘know yourself’ is a key element to project our inner non-observable properties in all other entities of reality which are also made of space-time.

Essentially what the physicist and by extension the scientist did was to REDUCE the Universe to a series of mechanical automaton locomotions, as DOGMA that allowed man to remain now the ONLY intelligent, sentient, vital being; and this IS an absolute taboo no scientist would dare to break – the excuse being, we cannot ‘measure’ with mechanical instruments, perception and vital properties.

Of course the ultimate consequence of this reductionism has been to made of the ‘machine’ the new God and dethrone the human organism and life, bringing the final ‘laugh of the gods’, the creation of a world of machines for whom humans increasingly obsolete to them, toil. So science today is NOT the logic search for human deep knowledge of the principles of reality – the thoughts of God, mind of the Universe, but the massive, mechanical acquisition of ‘measurable data’ with computers and its rods of time (the single mechanical clocks) and space, (the light constant speed) – in other words, the creation of a digital mind of computer machines, which are the new ‘God of knowledge’; even if humans do understand so little of its meaning. While any attempt to bring back to the Universe organic, vital, sentient properties and to explain truths with human languages, besides math, is shunned off.

Ultimately what the fundamentalist view of some ‘mathematical physics’ as the only language of time that matters so common among lesser minds, hides is a deep ignorance of the foundations of physics – merely as it is taught today, the pouring of data on certain physical scales of reality into mathematical equations, hence a mathematical appendix; itself a series of logic connections based in the language of ±truth, hence a logic, causal temporal science. We shall therefore advance and clarify on the foundation of those science to fully grasp why ‘time is all’, all lines as Kepler had it, are parts of cyclical trajectories, all motions become conservative closed ‘world cycles’ in an immortal cyclical Universe of infinite cyclical space-time beings living those ‘world cycles of existence’.

Of course, man also has an a priori point of view  or belief – the selfish mind that prevents us to ‘rationally understand’ we are not above any other system of the Universe so one of the first things we have done is to define the mind as one of the many world-views of reality possible, to put the objective mirror and perspective over man.

Relational space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism.

We have gotten to the conclusion that all what exists is a fractal point, which seen in maximal detail appears as a super organism performing a world cycle, whose inner parts are structured as cells of the 3 Se<ST>Tƒ networks of the higher entity. Existence in a Universe of infinite Points of View, Œ, means that we co-exist with at least 2 main infinitesimal and infinite planes of existence, that of our cellular parts and the social world in which we live. Thus we are always at the same time:

  • A cell of a larger social body
  • An organism that tries to survive playing the game of space-time åctions, ∫∂(±∆e,i)dt ds=WU∆±1. that is as an organism we shall make a series of infinitesimal exchanges of energy and information, ∂e,i, which will be sequentially integrated into a world cycle of our U±∆ organism.
  • And finally a super organism or ‘relative God’ as a point of view that controls its territory.

Those 3 points of view from above and below and within ∆±1 become then converted into partial definitions of a system from different points of view. But only when we consider ALL the outsider and inside perspectives of the being we can reach full knowledge of it.

In terms of its analysis we talk of certain ‘isomorphic’ qualities or ‘sets’ of laws that all systems follow and try to embody of the full information of the being the most important of it. Thus we shall talk of the 3 structural isomorphisms of all beings:

  • U∆±1. Its existence through 3 different scales of the 5th dimension, subject to different time rhythms and spatial distances, enclosed in a bigger social system in which it performs its cycles of space-time.
  • U∆; Its existence within a single scale as a super organism that traces a world cycle of existence between birth and extinction, ruled by the ternary symmetry between its spatial parts and time functions and ages.
  • Uo: Its existence as a zero point or ‘will’ of existence which forms together with all its inner parts an ‘island Universe’ constructed along a series of planes of the 5th dimension.

This ternary view of the being, in its world cycles of external, social, internal, organic and mental, perceptive existence, conform the being. How to study them? We consider here a simple set of fundamental laws and properties that will resume the system and we call in the jargon of epistemology, isomorphism of the super organism:

  1. The Existential equation of the being, ‘its metric equation’ in the 5th dimension, which defines it and can be developed in ‘nested’ analysis as much as we want but will be generally written as a function of space-time, of the type Se <ST>Tƒ
  2. The spatial view, and its topological 3 type of organs in space.
  3. Its temporal view, and its 3 ages in time.
  4. Its planes of existence, departing from its o-point of view.
  5. Its Actions of Exchange of energy and information, ±∆e,i that determine the being.

And its zero-point of view ‘analysis’ from any of its multiple perspectives.

For example if we consider a galactic organism we would describe the central black hole or zero point, its gravitational and electromagnetic equations that describe its ‘ST networks’, its Se-star systems and to-dark matter systems; its 3 parts (halo, star disk and black hole center) and its 3 ages in time, between its irregular birth and extinction in a quasar, as well as the 3 ages in time of its upper social scale (types of galaxies which can be considered another game of evolution) and in the lower scale (Sp=M  ages of matter, from plasma to nuclear explosion). And so on.

We can diminish or grow in scales and do analysis of its parts and wholes, according to the ternary and dual symmetries and fractal divisions of parts into wholes and vice versa, always following the rule that in a Universe with only 2 parameters all are symmetries of ‘space’ and ‘time’ or ternary combinations of it.

So in this post and the one dedicated to the isomorphisms of the Universe, we shall describe what laws have in common all infinite infinitesimals, that is, all entities extending across 3 planes of ±∆ existence, in which they perform such roles, and then describe most of the system of the universe with those isomorphisms.

Thus in the next line we study the different super organisms nested between two ±∆ planes of existence, starting by the largest of all known to man the cosmic system between the two limits of our perception, the galaxy and the atom.

Then we study in more details those galaxies and atoms, which conform the astro-physical systems of the Universe.

And descend in the nested stair, to life system, human social systems and finally the U0 human centered mental point of view.


The super organism – the ultimate meaning of the game of existence.

There are 2 forms to describe reality – the physicists’ way, which merely ‘sees’ the Universe, quantifies it and cares little for qualitative and relational meanings. In this view, what matters is to find some ‘fundamental particle, which should have substance and be the ‘brick’ of which all other beings are made. Even if that particle were found though, there would be little to say about the why questions of reality, the temporal causal questions, the past to future meanings of it all? Why we exist? why we are what we are? Are we alone and different? What is the purpose of it all?

Relational space-time and the game of existence all space-time beings of finite duration and finite space follow, is much deeper in its analysis, as it is a time theory not a space one. So it simply states this:

‘ The Universe is a game that creates super-organisms of ∆±1 space and time scales’.

Simple, and both mathematical and conceptual. The meaning of reality is to create super organisms across 3 relative scales of space-time, the best combinations of which, known to man are biological systems (extending through a ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic and ∆+1, social ecosystemic scales) and physical systems (extending through the quantum, electromagnetic, ∆-1, thermodynamic, i and cosmic, gravitational ∆+1 scales); the one we form part of, the super organism of History is the less understood of them all. But all have a set of common isomorphic laws, which define their existence, structure in space, time ages and place it within the scales of the 5th dimension.

So we can say that the fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.

U± infinite, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.

But in most cases the system is just U±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism:





Screen Shot 2016-05-15 at 15.31.07

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal, organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung.

Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new Fundamental particle of the logic/geometrical Universe, the Non-Euclidean Point, which unlike classic Euclidean points, has inner parts – an informative center and a field of ‘—motions’ that moves it. Such points constantly communicate ‘—motions’ and information with self-similar points, through non-Euclidean lines (waves which share the ‘—motions’ and form of those points), shaping together ‘Non-Euclidean space-time planes’, the network-entities of the graphs, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce organizing a canvas of simpler, energetic ‘cellular’ motions.

From the simplest particles, quarks and electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bites of ‘—motions’, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies. We can mathematize those processes using non-Euclidean topologies and generator fractal equations that iterate and self-organize in networks those points of nature – an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle.

Thus, when we fusion the mathematical and organic understanding of reality, the Universe appears as a fractal of ‘—motions’ and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms. And the quest of the fractal paradigm is to find an equation able to define all those systems – the ‘Fractal Generator of the Universe’: Sp<=>Tƒ





1. The 4th paradigm of knowledge. The organic whys of the Universe.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (fact and experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events.

Then the Greeks used reason to ask the ‘what’ (experience) and ‘how’ of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The tics of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton(‘Letters to Clarke’). Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Such theories cannot satisfy the rational, objective, self-sufficient nature of science, as they require external myths to work. This leaves us only with a 3rd objective, scientific possibility, organicism – a more complex theory that comes of age in this work: if the why is neither God nor the machine, there is only a 3rd option in between – the organism, which is an intermediate concept; since an organism is self-sufficient as God is, yet it is part of Nature as the machine is.

So what systems sciences does, is to bring about a more scientific paradigm, in which everything becomes organic; and so God is not required to build an immortal Universe as in Mechanism. Why people who pretend to be ‘scientists’ still defend mechanism has to do with tradition (the Baconian Idols of the tribe of physics, who initiated modern science without abandoning their biblical beliefs) and with power (machines control the world in our technological civilization – they are the new Gods of mankind; and so they are the ‘role models’ for our philosophy of science – more than with objective scientific epistemology that can only accept as a rational self-contained theory, organicism.


2. A Universe of super-organisms and the 3 jargons of GS2 (systemic, organic and dimensional).

Definition of a 10 Di Super Organism

General Systems Science (abb.GS2)considers that all what exists is part of a whole made to its image and likeness, and that whole is a super-organism of energetic space and temporal information extending in 10 fractal dimensions of space-time in 3 relative scales of size, the ‘cellular’, individual and ‘social scales’. Thus what general systems sciences does is to describe the structure and laws of those super organisms, which is the template of all the systems of Nature, and then apply those laws to understand the ‘scientific super organisms’ of different scales of reality, each one studied by different sciences, from the microscopic scales of quantum physics to the geological and astrophysical scales of the Universe, going through the biological and sociological scales of man. To that aim we need to explain the 3 ‘sub-elements of the ‘fundamental organic system’, template of all what exists, defining:

– What is a system of energetic space and temporal information.

– What is a super-organism.

– And what are the 10 dimensions of all those super-organisms.

Those 3 sub-elements of the ‘fundamental entity of the Universe’ give origin to 3 different jargons, the systemic jargon that explains all as systems of energy and information, the biological jargon that considers all superorganisms, and the mathematical and physical jargon that explains all as fractal, 10 Dimensional Space-time Island-Universes. They are used indistinctly in our texts, since they are 3 equivalent jargons focused in each part of the superorganism:

– The jargon of Systems proper, deals mostly with mechanical systems of energy and information; as it was born with the development of cybernetics, Theory of Information and Computer science. This jargon is obviously the commonest and standing, accepted jargon, preferred due to its abstract nature, easily to use when considering systems of machines or economic systems, without any ‘holistic’ philosophy attached to it. However the scope of this jargon is ‘limited’ and ultimately does not debunk the ‘mechanist’ philosophy of reality proper of our ‘technological civilization’, which we consider erroneous in its ‘first principles’. So this jargon, while being the standard of ‘systems’ sciences as its name indicates and perfectly suited for smaller analysis of systems, sub-systems and mechanical systems, made by human beings, imitating its own biological organs, it is not well suited to studied the ‘Universe as an organic system’ and “Nature’ and its self-created systems. This jargon also considers the existence of isomorphisms – same properties in different systems, without explaining ‘why’ they happen. To that aim we need:

– The jargon of biology that defines the fundamental particle of the Universe as a 10 Dimensional Super organism of energy and information. Because this jargon accepts organicism not as a metaphor or analogy but as the homology from where to extract the hardcore formal, mathematical and logic laws of all systems of the Universe, we consider this jargon to be the ‘truth’ of General Systems sciences. Thus we shall use in our papers mostly the jargon and laws of super organisms, which have been hardly explored due to the lack of a proper formalism to study them; as its description requires new advances in our understanding of the structure of space-time and its ‘scales’ of size and different time speeds. Mainly the understanding that there is not a single space-time continuum but infinite clocks of time that break space into infinite fractal parts; and the equivalence between space and ‘energy’ and time clocks and information, carried in the frequency and form of all the time clocks of the Universe.

– Which leads us to the third jargon, the formal, logic and mathematical jargon of a Universe made of multiple scales of space and multiple, different speeds of time clocks that defines the 10 fractal, relative ‘Dimensions’ of all super organisms. In this formal level is where the most novel advances of this science take place, as we need to evolve our understanding of basic concepts such as space and time, its synonymous concepts of energy and information, the nature of fractal dimensions and fractal scales, etc. To that aim we use new tools of ‘fractal geometry’, non-Euclidean topology, multiple and causal logic to explain the meaning of the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future – a task developed in our previous conferences on GS2o.

The limits of human inquire in the organic nature of the Universe and the little acceptance of a holistic analysis of reality are due to the poor understanding of the fractal, multiple nature of space and time. Science has preferred due to the lack of formal precision of this more accurate truth, a simplistic, ‘mechanist’, single space-time continuum that facilitates measure. But this is no longer the case with the advances on Non-Euclidean Mathematics and non-Aristotelian Logic of multiple time arrows, developed by this author. As now we have the tools to reach in our organic vision of the Universe the same degree of precision that the simplistic single space-time continuum and mechanist vision of classic science. And so most of the novelties on hard science of these papers0 are found in the analysis of the ‘last sentence’ of our definition of a super organism or ‘system’ of energy and information, the understanding of what ‘dimensions of space and time’ are, and why super organisms are systems of 10 dimensions.


Recap. Any theory of science that pretends to describe the ‘whole’ must have a sound philosophy behind – which in the case of General Systems Sciences is the fact that the Universe to be self-sufficient, without an external maker, must be an organism – and a formal model of its philosophical statements that translates into mathematical and logical equations its description of its ‘fundamental particle/model’. Such finding of a complex formalism to describe the organic properties of the Universe and its parts has been in fact, the main problem of General Systems Sciences. And so this formal model is what we are introducing in our papers, in a series of conferences at ISSS0. The systemic jargon is a ‘first step’ of depth in the understanding of the organic paradigm of the Universe. It is useful when we deal with scientists accustomed to ‘abstract descriptions’. For example, talking of mechanical systems we prefer the ‘systemic jargon’, as cybernetic and computer scientists do. If we talk of physical systems we prefer the dimensional jargon. But the more detailed, ‘real jargon’ is the one of superorganisms. So in this paper shall switch to the biological jargon of superorganisms to reach further knowledge of the structure of those universal systems. Thus we define the Universe as a superorganism of energetic space and temporal information extended in 3 scales of space-time with a total of 3 x 3 Dimensions of space that make the 10th Dimension or Whole superorganism. And we explain such superorganisms with the jargon of systems sciences and theory of information, with the jargon of biology and theory of superorganisms and with the jargon of mathematics, logic and space-time physics to better understand the 10 dimensions of those superorganisms and its fractal, scalar structure in space and time.


4. Systems of energetic space and Temporal Information

General Systems Theory (abb.GS2) studies the common laws of all the superorganisms of energy and information of the Universe. So to understand those 2 primary components is the first step to understand a superorganism:

– Es, Se: By energetic space we mean both space and energy, considered the same reality. The difference between both concepts is perceptive. The mind fixes and sees the ∞ lineal, planar motions or ‘energy’ that fill vacuum space – being motion, the ultimate substance of reality – as static space, distance and size. The mind maps a ‘continuous’, static perception of all the infinite quanta of moving energies of the vacuum and puts it together. Thus Space= ∑Vacuum Energies. As space distances and speed motions mean the same. So astronomers say that the space of the Universe is ‘expanding’ or that galaxies are moving away at hyper luminal speeds (Z>c). This will be truth in any ‘relative’ fractal scale of ‘motions that occupy space’ and the mind sees as a continuous. So a biological, vital space is seen as an ‘individual’, while it is merely the sum of infinite circadian cycles and flows of carbon-life dissolved in water. Thus we shall call both together ‘Energetic Space’ as ‘Energy’, meaning ‘a sum of lineal motions’, is the truth that a single space-continuum simplifies.

– To,Ti: Temporal information: In the same manner, Time clocks – cyclical motions – and information – the static forms of those time clocks perceived by the mind – are the same concept. The mind again ‘simplifies’ to fit in its limited space, all the time clocks of the Universe into ‘forms’. Cyclical time, measured by the frequency of its cycles, is the inverse of ‘duration’: T=1/ƒ. And it has the same unit of measure that a bit of information; a ‘hertz’ or unit of frequency, which is completed in any system when a clock cycle is closed. Thus, the faster any biological or physical time-clock turns, the more informative hertz-cycles it can store, (right side of graph). As it happens in computers, which are basically a complex system of time clocks, whose logic forms process in-form-ation. Thus we can consider the total time of the Universe, a sum of all its time clocks and informative cycles; T=∏I, and talk of temporal information (and energetic space) as the real two motions/substances/forms/arrows of the Universe.

We call this fact of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as we humans perceive the Earth ‘quiet’, as space, when it is moving as a mass of rotating clocks. The Galilean Paradox is essential to understand the Universe as fixed lines are also lineal motions and bits of information are time clocks. And one can transform into the other: Es<=>To.

Only then, when we realize that energy and space are the same and time and information are also the same, we can come the conclusion that we are NOT placed in an abstract space-time continuum, but the Universe is a puzzle of entities made of energetic space/lineal motions and clocks of information/cyclical motions, which combine to create infinite complementary systems of ‘vital energetic space and informative time-clocks’


Something quantum physics acknowledges in its fundamental formula, ExI=K, which we write properly as Es x To = K: Energetic Space x Temporal information combine to become an action of energy and time; and we all are a sum of actions of energy and time – balanced, stable, constant Systems of energy and information. So we say I don’t have enough energy and time (our substances) to do this.

Thus ∑Es x ∏Ti=k is the fundamental equation of the Universe that defines all systems as a sum of energy quanta and information bits/clocks (∑, ∏ being the operators that aggregate quanta of energy into vital spaces and bits of information into networks). And this ‘simplex’ equation explains all systems of the Universe, made of ‘particles and waves’ (Physical systems, complementarity principle) or ‘heads/nuclei’ and ‘bodies’ (biological systems).

The formal and functional properties of Energy and Information and its combined body/waves.

Let us consider the properties of those 2+1 systems, energy systems (limbs, fields), information systems (particles, heads) and its reproductive waves and bodies that combine its properties and some of its subspecies:

Moving Energy                      Reproductive Information

Lineal, spatial, big, moving                Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple                   Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon,                      Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon                                Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death                        DNA, human, dolphin, life.


We summarize the formal & functional differences between energy vs. information (organs) in a morphologic equation:

Maximal Space = Energy = Minimal Form=Limbs Vs

Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=heads

E=I: Balance between both, ‘Reproductive, iterative, ‘present’ Bodies’.

Those properties are common to every ‘particular’ system’s organ. Information is smaller and processes ‘time cycles and logic paths faster’. For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain that processes information faster. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. But black holes that turn faster and carry more information in the frequency of its cycles are also smaller than stars. Thus the morphology of heads of information follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’:

Maximal informative capacity= Minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies, we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) & information (brains, eyes, senses, words), but all beings, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Some are physical, geological. Yet all of them have a biologic influence over us, provoking changes in the energy & information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

Human sages have intuitively understood that duality. I.e.: Descartes said all was made of space or res extensa and cyclical vortices – charges and masses that act as clocks and carry the information of the universe. And he was right.

Eastern religions also understood the dual game of creation, as all is yang, Shiva, energy and yin, information, Vishnu that combine together, exi, to create the ∞ beings in existence (quoting the 1st verses of ‘Tao Te King’).

All species, sciences, religions and arts play a Game of creation, which is a logic-mathematical function: to Exi=st. That is, to combine energy & information (exi), creating constant, stable superorganisms of space-time (st).

Yet the function exi is maximized when E=I (5×5>6×4…). Thus a top predator superorganism, one that survives better is one that maximizes the balance between body and head, mens sana in corpore sanum: Max. Exi (e=i). And this is the goal of existence of all systems of the Universe, which survive and we see as ‘superior forms’. Indeed, it is the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of spatial size and form: harmony and proportionality. It is the ‘mature age’ that lasts longer, after the young age of energy, before the 3rd age of ‘excessive form’, when systems reproduce.

It is thus essential to understand the properties and balances of energy and information, departing from its simplest mathematical and logic equations that combine its perfect forms, the line of motion or shortest distance between two points, and the cycle or shape with maximal ‘form’ in minimal space, origin of all other ‘conic shapes’ of reality, as they are the ‘ultimate’ essence of the detailed properties of each complex superorganism of spatial energy & temporal form.

It is also important to grasp the ‘general’ meaning and parallelisms of jargons described those 2 elements, as they change slightly from scale to scale and its forms change as they become more complex, with ‘more dimensions’ and extend through more ‘scales’; but even then they maintain its equivalent forms and functions. Information is ‘dimensional form’ and Energy lineal motion. And so its two most perfect shapes are the line and cycle in 1 and 2 dimensions. And yet whe we grow in dimensions we find the 2D plane and the 3D sphere, the geometry, which stores maximal form in minimal space, in which again information has one dimension more than energy.

So heads, particles, cameras and black holes are spherical and small in space but store a lot of information in its ‘dimensional’ curves. Energy or motion is ‘lineal distance’, displacement, and the line is the shortest distance in space, so bodies, fields of energy, planes, cars and galactic planes are ‘planar spaces’ to maximize motion.

Further on, all those systems tend to occupy the 3 different dimensions of their local space-time. Since heads perceive better from a projective geometry on top of the system, the height dimension is the dimension of information. And so all systems guided by the dominant mind-informative dimension evolve in height, from physical systems (planar Universe and planar irregular galaxies evolved by tall black holes of gravitational information into spherical and high dimensions) to life, from individuals (kids who rise to walk), to species, (from planarian worms to men, from reptiles to birds):

Then the dimension of motion is length as it is the lineal motion on the surface of energy the system feeds. And finally its combined exi, reproductive dimension is the width dimension of its diffeomorphic space-time. Those dimensions are obviously local and so they can be even inverted according to what is energy for each species. So animals, which receive information from light vs. plants who receive energy from light and information from chemical roots have their dimensions inverted: the head of the plant is under the ground, and the animal has it above to ‘see’ light. And light itself has the electric dimension of information, its height, the magnetic dimension of energy, its length, and the c-dimension of reproduction of its wave, its width, which eyes see as length. The global 3 dimensions of the Universe are the puzzle sum of all those entities moving with its 3 local dimensions.

In biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘bodies and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biologic: Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human, energetic bodies. Both compete in a war and the ‘metal-energy’ species wins and kills us, causing the biological process of death. So weapons are lethal, machines and should be repressed as we repress biological predators and killing virus. Yet Mechanism affirms that machines are objects that do not influence or compete with humanity. So, if some ‘collateral effect’ happens, it must be blamed on humans (in that regard organicism changes radically the meaning of the industrial evolution of machines and the relationships of symbiosis and predation between man and machine->see last chapter of this paper).

We shall use therefore as synonymous, Energy, Space and lineal motion, Es, Se, E, S, |, and Cyclical Time, Information, cyclical motion, To, Ti, I, T and write the ‘Universal equation’ accordingly: EsóTi, EóI, SxT, EsxTo etc. Since using synonymous will help the reader to ‘change its chip’, its way of thought from ‘lineal logic; in which A is always A and only A to think in parallel, and see the unity of all forms underlying its ‘appearance’. To that aim he must also change its ‘scientific mind’ from ‘geo-metric, exact measure’ to ‘topological variations’, where motion and form go together and slight variations do not change the topology of the being. And we will return to that.

Energetic Limbs, Reproductive Body/Waves & informative heads/particles.

From these simple facts of universal morphology, applied to human beings and metal, we can classify ‘objects’ and human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex organisms:

—  Es: Energy organs, fields or limbs are lineal systems with minimal ‘form’ that kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the in-form-ation of their ‘preys’.

—  Ti: In-form-ative organs create form and trans-form the clocks of the Universe into forms of languages that map out the ‘reality of time cycles’ performed by all the entities of the ecosystem, in which the species exists, into formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’ in ‘lesser space’, anticipating the ‘future’ cycles of reality. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, regardless of the specific language it uses to gauge reality.

A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electro-magnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 act-react to their measures. So they all are informative organs. And they dominate, control, guide & shape the future of the system.

—  Reproductive organs repeat the informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular in-form-ation. Thus, human mothers and company-mothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.

So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including company-mothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.

The body, reproductive system might not be though part of the ‘integral system’. We observe, most often a ‘mother’ in a bigger scale (stars for atoms, corporations for machines, mothers for semen) or an external reproductive system (enzymatic reproduction), as in the case of human factories, carbohydrates or atoms in stars. In those cases we will see ONLY the limbic/head, energetic/temporal systems.

But there is always somewhere a 3rd reproductive system, or else the organism will not survive beyond death.

Let us resume some of this ‘dual’ or ‘ternary’ systems of energy and information:

– Physical systems are made of particle with clocks of information and waves that feed on fields of lineal motion.

In physics quantum theory is a detailed analysis of reality and its minimal parts, as opposed to Relativity that uses a general, simplified view of a single space-time continuum, as it is concerned with the study of the ‘whole’ Universe, a superorganism whose ‘whole’ spacetime is the sum of all its parts. Yet in the more detailed version, quantum physicists concluded that Physical systems are always made with a wave that absorbs energy & a particle or clock of temporal information and one cannot exist without the other (complementary principle of quantum physics).

Further on physical systems can be described according to the duality of the Galilean Paradox (all can be seen in motion or stillness) as composed of solid particles, charges or masses absorbing fields of lineal energy seen as extended space, or we can see them dynamically, as a vortex, a cyclical Eddie, which absorbs the motion=energy of a flow of gravitational or electromagnetic forces that falls into the mass or charge vortex. Then all what we see is a cyclical motion, the mass or charge, and a lineal motion, the field falling into it. And this is indeed closer to reality – a Universe in perpetual motion, where energy and information are two type of motions combining and reproducing by the mere act of continuing their motions, creating the infinite shapes of the vital Universe.

6.einstein mass

In the graph, we can see the classic, material vision of a particle or mass as a solid form which creates a curvature in space that makes fields to fall into the mass or charge, or we can consider the systemic view of a pure cyclical motion, hence a clock of time, with a frequency of cyclical motion that carries in its patterns the information of the universe.

Easily proved mathematically combining quantum and relativity equations: E=hv, E=mc2->m=hv/c2=K(h/c2)v. Thus mass attraction is directly proportional to the v-frequency of the vortex, as in hurricanes or eddies. Masses and charges thus are eddies of forces which turn with a frequency that defines the information of the Universe, acting as the simplest clocks of cyclical, informative time, whose acceleration or frequency of angular speed, w, is in fact the meaning of mass (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass of Einstein’s general relativity). They are time that curves the lineal speed of a gravitational or electromagnetic field that sinks into the mass or charge, becoming transformed into a magnetic, electric or gravitational field (‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein). And the physical system is a delicate balance of infinite broken, cyclical and lineal motion defines then the Universe.

Ultimately what we describe as fields of energy and particles of time is what Newton said the Universe was made of: Forces of Reality= Mass (cyclical clocks) x Acceleration (lineal motions): F=ma.

That is, the universe is made of vortices of mass or charges, cyclic acceleration and lineal forces, lineal accelerations: Descartes said all could be described as vortices, matter and ‘res extensa’, vacuum. So this ultimate duality is the first dynamic structure of the Universe that switches on and off between both states: M(Ti)<->Es.

Biological beings are made with a head of information and a body that processes energy and moves it – or in cellular organisms, with a nucleus of DNA-information and a cytoplasm body that moves it.

Mechanic systems, robots, made by imitation of man’s organs, re=produced in company-mothers, have chip-brains attached to camera-eyes that process information with body-platforms that move with a field of electric energy.

Sociological systems are divided into networks of upper class cells/citizens who control the languages of information of society and its working, body class that reproduces the goods the social body needs, using the energy of the Earth.

Each of those systems will process information with a different network of logic or mathematical paths, through particles, genes, chips or brains, attached to a re=productive body that will repeat the elements and cycles of existence of the system, and a limbic, moving platform that will use different types of ‘energetic space’ to displace it.

In the jargon of physics we talk of clocks of cyclical time – charges and masses – that carry in their frequency the information of the Universe; reproduce that information with its body, waves and move using the energy of its fields of force. In biology we talk of heads, brains and cellular nuclei that process information, reproduce it with their bodies and cytoplasm, using the gravitational fields of the Earth and its water and air currents as the energy of its motions. All those systems obey certain laws derived of the nature of energy and information, the 2 formal motions whose interactions cause the game of creation and extinction of living superorganisms, which makes up universe.


5. The 3 dimensions of time, and its metrics: entropy-past, balanced presents and information-future.

The ultimate ‘substances’ of reality are lineal motions (or energy-space), which has 3 ‘dynamic’ states, as ‘acceleration’ (entropy growth or 6th dimension), ‘deceleration’ (growth of form, or 5th dimension) and constant speed, (lineal motion or ‘energy-space’ in a static 4th dimension of time). And Cyclical motions (or time-information) which has also 3 ‘dynamic’ states, as acceleration (increase speed of vortices that diminish in size and increase its rate of processing information as in chips or black holes), or 5th dimension, deceleration (expansion in space and slow down) or 6th dimension and static form (in a relative present 4th dimension of time).

Those are basic concepts to understand the Universe in terms of dimensions of space and time, its motions and life-death processes in the infinite ‘fractal space-times’ of which we are all made. And the fundamental property to observe is the inverse complementarity of those 2 formal motions, energy-space and time-information, which is the fundamental law that structures all the systems of reality in a tug-of-war between both tendencies, which ultimately always end in a zero sum such as 5th + 6th arrows of space-time (information + entropy) = Static present.

We shall then generally put together those 3 arrows and dimensions of time under the co-invariance of their product, which defines the metrics of the 4th -5th-6th Time dimensions: Se x Ti = K.

This equation will become the essential equation of the Universe. As it resumes the 3 ‘dimensions of time’ and hence the 3 dimensions of present-space, a slice of the total flow of time of the Universe:

Present: Se x Ti = K (an instantaneous derivative of the flow of time, expressed in Galileo’s relativity: V=s/t and its complex einsteinian version).

Past-energy-youth arrow/dimension/age of time: ∆Se x ‡Ti = K (entropy arrow, or 6th dimension)

Future-information-3rd age/dimension of time: ∆ Ti x ‡ Se = K (information arrow or 5th dimension),

Now the choice of the ‘number’ of ‘dimensions’ of time, is relative. I have used in different papers different numbers, but in this paper, as the 4th present dimension is a convention of classic physics, I give the 5th dominant arrow of time – information the 5th dimension and the opposite arrow of entropy the 6th dimension, and establish a dominant 5th dimension arrow and ‘metrics’, such as systems that grow in spatial size decelerate in informative, time speed and vice versa, systems that increase in temporal information diminish in size (chip black hole paradox). But the longer, dominant arrow of time is ‘the 5th dimension’ or life arrow, as death, the energy-entropy arrow lasts an instant of time, and ‘present’ 4th D-arrow is just an instant of the total flow of time. So we tend to use the concept of the 5th Dimension or flow of information as the total ‘time flow’ of the Universe, and in fact in many complex analysis we can ‘eliminate’ the 4th instant of present and the 6th death, instant, and study time as a 5th informative arrow.

So we could say that General Physical Systems Theory, basically has an opposite view of the Universe to that of classic physics that concentrates in the analysis of spatial, entropy motions and makes time a ‘derivative’ of space parameters, considering only the 4th Dimension of present, by turning the whole conceptual frame upside down, and studying the Universe from the perspective of information and time, making ‘space’ a parameter or present dimension of time flows. And considering in greater detail the dominant 5th Dimension of information; so it illuminates reality from a complementary perspective to that of classic physics.

Thus ‘the 3 dimensions of time’ are past, energy, spatial size; future, which increases the speed of temporal clocks that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles and its complementary present , balanced actions of energy and time, and its metrics Se x Ti = K’.

We shall indeed observe that most laws of Nature are particular cases of all those dualities resumed in the Co-invariance of Se x Ti = k present systems shown in its constant balances (being Universal constants and vital constants the expression in physical and biological space-time of those balances).

But we have to make some key adjustments to ‘lineal physics’. For example, the concept of cyclical time or information is the inverse parameter of lineal time or duration, Td =1/To, which physicists write as T=1/ƒ. Thus what we call here cyclical time is in physical equations, ‘frequency’ of information showing indeed why cyclical time clocks carry the information of the Universe. And so many laws of physics now become ‘enlightened’ in their conceptual comprehension by merely substituting Time duration by frequency and observing them as by-products of the metrics of the 5th-6th dimensions of time (abb. ‘metrics of 5th dimension, as information is the long-lasting dimension of time).

For example, physicists write: S/T=V (constant speed), And so we write S x ƒ(v)=K, which is the clearest expression of the metrics of ‘time-space’ for one-dimensional systems (we again write time-space, not space-time, as GPST, considers time and information dominant, so we also talk of 5th Dimensional metrics as the 5th dimension of flows of information dominates and in a certain way encloses the 4th, present and 6th past dimension).

And we write E=M(t)c2 or E/M(t)=C2 as the commonest physical expression of the ‘metrics of the 5th dimension’ for bidimensional systems, since a mass is a bidimensional clock of time, in physical space.

And we write Entropy (E) x Charge (T)= K3 for tridimensional systems of physical space-time – our Universe.

As such, space-time systems always relate those 2 ‘inverse’ parameters, which balance each other: SexTi=K.

6. The metrics of fractal, scalar space-time (Abb. The metrics of the 5th, dominant, informative dimension.)


5d metrics best

According to Klein’s definition, ‘a Geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a space(time), under transformations within itself’ (Erlangen Program). Thus, the Geometry of the 5th dimension studies the invariant properties of such space-time, as we move within it, expressed in formal equations (the metrics of the 5th dimension) and logic laws that define those invariant properties: Se x Ti=K.

Most systems of the Universe, ‘seeing’ in present are balanced co-invariances of both parameters, SexTi, together. And dynamically they show how space and time are intertwined: when systems grow in spatial size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminishes proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. As we grow in space, time clocks tick slower and vice versa: as we become smaller the time cycles of all species, which carry their in-form-ation in their form and frequency, tic faster and the frequency of information processing accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism.

Yet, in any interconnected system, including the Universe as a whole, the product of the speed of time, Ti, which determines the quantity of information the system can process and its spatial size, Se, remains invariant.

Thus ‘5D’s metric equations’ (we abbreviate the 3 dimensions and total metrics of cyclical time, past-death, present and future information with the expression, 5th Dimension related to the dominant, lasting future time), show in any Universal system how variations in spatial size are balanced by a parallel inverse diminution or increase on the speed of time clocks and information we observe. That is, the product of the spatial energy, Se, and Temporal Information, Ti of any system remains constant: Se x Ti = K.

The graph shows in 3 scales (cosmic, human and atomic space-time) the co-invariance of the 5th dimension:

The clock-like cycles of matter, planetoids, planets, stars and galaxies, become slower as we grow in size and vice versa: the clocks of smaller molecules, atoms and particles becomes faster, as we shrink. So Mercury turns faster than Pluto according to Kepler’s 3rd Law, and any clock-like vortex turns faster the smaller it is, according to the vortex equation: VoxRo=K. Since Kepler’s 3rd Law and any physical vortex are particular cases of the metrics of the 5th dimension. As the laws of invariance of momentums that combine both parameters are.

The same time acceleration happens in living systems. Small animals have faster metabolisms and cells reproduce daily while their organisms reproduce once a year. Even machines follow this co-invariance: A computer processes information faster the smaller it is, as its ‘clock-cycles’ measured in Hertzs increase. So today we have nano-chips that process information at many Giga-hertzs per second.

This happens because a 5D vortex of temporal information is NOT a fixed physical, spatial form, but it exists dynamically through time; even though it can be perceived statically in space as in the case of a physical time-clock, mass or charge that appears according to the aforementioned paradox of Galileo as a fixed substance or particle. And this fact is of enormous importance for the algebraic analysis of the 5th dimension, as it allows to generalize the laws of those accelerating vortices of information and apply them to explain biological evolution and the constant increase of information of living systems that warp with ‘age’, become more ‘intelligent’ species, or as our civilization does, constantly increase their technological complexity.

There are Infinite clocks of time, hence infinite spaces, some of which are illustrated in the graph. What is then the total reality? Another concept, which we cannot explore in detail is ‘endophysics’, the fact that the brain selects from all the information and motions of the Universe a quantity of space-time, energy-information relevant to its brain. So for example, information is bidimensional because the brain only sees ‘2D pictures’ (put together with stroboscopic vision into holographies of 3 dimensions). Thus it kills the 3rd dimension of space, the inner ‘parts’ of each being, observed only in its external membrane, and most of the motions of reality.

Thus the total 6 D Universe is much richer in energy and time cycles that what we perceive. Endophysics is thus essential to go even beyond what this paper goes and sometimes we shall bring some elements of the mind’s deformation of the Universe. But we are still humans and so when we try to do science we are limited to our senses and instruments. That is why we are not trying to study a space-time based in minds of smells but one which goes merely further in our visual understanding of reality, albeit now considering also ‘the fringes’ of our universe (the strong force and gravitational force worlds of the inner atom and the outer intergalactic space, we do not see) and specially considering the infinite clocks of time of our Universe, instead of a single human mechanical clock to measure all those different time speeds.

Information is a still picture of those time cycles. Thus since the mind ‘understands’ information, it always fixes reality, from its fixed, central point of view, which becomes its world or ‘informative truth’ that doesn’t change. But while man is the center of his world, science evolves by widening its p.o.v. about space beyond the Earth, and about time, beyond the single speed of our mechanical clocks; finally accepting in this work ∞ scales of space size and time speed.

In classic physics, this was done first with the ‘Earth’ as the center of the Universe (Ptolemy’s model); then with the sun as the center (Copernicus model) and then in a little understood expansion of the relative center, with the c-speed of our membrane of vacuum space as the still center (Einsteinian Postulate of fixed light speed in relativity). So the light-rod became the relative still center of the Universe, and this ‘spatial-energetic’ vacuum rod is today in physics, the ‘fixed point of view’ that allow us to make all type of measures. But while this ‘convention’ is excellent to make measures of physics in the galaxy, where indeed, vacuum space is a background radiation of light, it introduces many errors when we study ‘regions’ where light-speed is not constant or it is not the ‘fundamental’ form of vacuum space.

This is the case of intergalactic space-time, dominated by gravitational dark energy-space. Or inside the nuclei of atoms dominated by strong forces. It is also a ‘convention’ proper of the human mind, since our mind perceives electronic information and electrons ‘stop’ emit light and ‘go’. So light is always emitted in ‘stop’ positions.

Hence when Michelson measured the light speed with electronic instruments obviously it found it always constant as the ‘stop electron’ that emits information and the ‘stop’ electron that perceives it were in relative stop motion to each other. But if we choose the ‘gravitational’ scale of space-time over which ‘light and electrons’ float, such gravitational mind would see light speeds varying as probably quarks and black holes do. So we must understand the relativity of all ‘fixed minds of space-time perception’ even though we can only work with our electronic mind. I bring those facts in this paper so the reader understands the space-time light-vacuum continuum of Relativity is a convention useful for its mind, but we are going to use here a ‘wider’ fixed point of view, the previously explained co-invariance of the 5th Dimension (the past-present-future time arrows, and its Se x Ti = K coinvariance).

This is then the still point of view of the 5th dimension which ads all possible space scales of the Universe and all possible time clocks and speeds and so it allow us to study many more phenomena, than Einstein’s C-rod.

In that regard, while knowledge is always relative, something must be ‘still’ still to make ‘information’ focused.

Our rod though is wider and so as Einstein’s rod was wider than Copernicus, encompassing all the galaxy space-time, since in all universal systems, the product of the information and size of the system does not vary this dual invariance or co-invariance, Se x Ti =K is what defines the geometry and laws of all the scales of space-time of the Universe, including the gravitational, quantum and strong force scales, and all the arrows of space-time of the universe, including the arrow of information (5th dimension proper) the present arrow of ‘simultaneous light-space measures’ or 4th dimension of relativity and the 6th dimension of past-entropy-energy. In this simple form, thus the ‘metrics of the 5th dimension’ are the equivalent to Einstein’s metrics of the 4th dimension – the famous S – (ct)2 equation:

In the graph we illustrate that co-invariance. And so now we must define the 2 elements of the 5th dimension – the multiple clocks of time and scales of space that co-exist in every part of reality.

The image, taken from a film called ‘powers of ten’ by Eames, show this astounding fact: the speed of time-clocks, Ti, which are anything that ticks and turns, multiplied by the size of the space they occupy, Se, is constant, Se x Ti =K. And this fact allows the camera to travel through the 5th dimension by shrinking or enlarging your size, with the result that if you see the film you will NOT distinguish your travel outwards, growing in size in the 5th dimension from a normal travel in the 4th dimension, without changing scale of size or speed of clocks (we have added in our pictures the change in time speed, ti, which Eames did not know).

Each ‘family of species’ and relative scale of the Universe has a different SexTi=K equation, giving birth to the ∞ variety of Universal species. Such equation however becomes in a Universe in which we are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the most important equation of each species. And within that species remains mostly invariant. The same happens between all the derived species of that relative membrane of space-time.

The use of infinite clocks to measure time rhythms in the Universe is a theory of multiple spaces-times, whose parameters of Temporal Information and Spatial energy, surprisingly enough follow a simple mathematical law, Se x Ti = K, from where the order and structure of all the parts of the Universe can be deduced.

In the graph, different scales of the 5th dimension; the ‘real’ infinite quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information of the Universe, and 3 complementary systems, Se x Ti, made of ‘energetic bodies/fields’ and informative ‘particles/heads’ from physical sciences (a light field-photon particle), from biological sciences (a human body-eye system) and from economic sciences (a weapon-camera system).

Since the Universe is a fractal of infinite complementary systems, made of energy and information, whose ‘common’ properties is the field of study of the 5th dimension.

Let us resume a few basic errors of physics provoked by the ignorance of the informative arrow of the Universe:

– Masses are natural vortices of time clocks of the gravitational scale and do NOT need a Higgs, which is merely a particle involved in the weak force that transfers information between both scales.

– The scalar universe is immortal. The 2nd law of entropy applies only to the energetic expansive force of electromagnetic light-space but i+1 gravitation is an informative=attractive force that balances the cosmos.

– The impossibility of a machine of continuous movement only applies to heat processes that include the ‘molecular parameter’ of temperature, but the entire universe is a perpetual machine of 2 motions, E>I, I<E.

– Black holes don’t evaporate and there is not paradox of information. They are doors between 2 sheets of electromagnetism and gravitation, which transform our electromagnetic space into mass, evaporating our world into the gravitational world and not vice versa as Hawking believes  – reason why we never saw one evaporating.

– The Universe neither grows nor it shrinks. Gravitation, which dominates galactic vortices implodes energy into mass and electromagnetism expands mass into energy: E=Mc2+M=E/cbecomes then a zero sum of implosions and explosions, beats of E<=>I, which together balance the total Universe.

– Negantropy is a real arrow that reproduces fractal information, which Mehaute proved to happen always, when entropy no longer acts, as both arrows are inverted.

All this said 4 fundamental conclusions of 5D metrics that change completely our perception of reality are:

– The Universe is eternal, made of 2 motions in perpetual exchange, NOT of substances.

– Since the metrics of 5D for the whole space-time Universe are the same than the equation which defines the 2 parts of any system, we conclude that we do NOT exist over an independent space-time but we are made of space and time, each of us is a complex system made of bits of temporal information, of circadian or physical clocks & surfaces of vital space imprinted in form by those cyclical in-form-ations.

In physical systems all scales and particles are background dependent, constructed with pieces of spatial energy and temporal information, starting with the smallest theoretical scale of background dependent, lineal, open strings which are rods of Planck’s space and cyclical, closed strings which are the tiniest Planck’s time-clocks.

– Since all systems are made of Se and Ti, 5D invariances and laws apply to all systems of the Universe, creating a pantheist Universe, a fractal of its Fundamental Particle, the Complementary Systems, SexTi=k.

– All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its actions: Motions With Form.

7. The scales of the Universe.

time dim ension

An essential element of the Universe which physics reject with its ‘primitive’, abstract, mechanist view of reality is the organic purpose of its systems. Physics was born with the use of sensorial machines (eye-telescopes and clocks that substituted in the measure of space and time our organic eyes and verbal time dimensions of past-present and future tenses). Thus the machine became the model of the Universe and Kepler said God had waited 5000 (biblical years) to find a mind that understood its clock-work. Only Leibniz replied that this was more of the same religious view, as a machine MUST be constructed by an external God. This didn’t bother the pious believers of physics then – Newton dedicated more time to biblical studies than physics. It should bother though modern physicists. The alternative is GS2 – organicism.

The Universe structures itself into complex systems by assembling its parts, through networks of energy and information into bigger wholes, creating new scales of space-time. We are all made of space-time as super organisms of smaller cellular, molecular and atomic super organisms, all of them connected by two networks – one of energy and one of information. But this structure allow us to describe also the working of galaxies, similar to that of cells, also connected with a network of energy – the electromagnetic network of stars, and information, the gravitational force that informs it; and two species, the ‘gravitational DNA’ (black holes, dark matter) and the ‘energetic stars’ that reproduce the matter of the galaxy – its ribosome. This organic description of reality as a self-repetitive fractal that structures itself into super-organisms of course does not invalidate the mathematical description of it. Both type of properties – spatial, mathematical, topological and biological, social, organic, network based – are needed to fully grasp both the mathematical how and the organic why of reality.

In the graph, the scales of the Universe, its 3 time dimensions of evolution of information and their sciences.

In the graph, we have written the two arrows of space-time, slow energy and fast information as past and future, and the human time speed as our relative present. Those scales are indeed the origin of the causal order between past, present and future and their life-death cycles in time.

Further one, in the complex models of GS2 it is essential to understand how different scales interact with each other in the 3 dimensions of time and space. Indeed, a question never wondered, of enormous importance to explain the structure of the Universe is the relationship between those scales, the smaller ones that sustain the creation of the larger structures. Do they exist in the same ‘time moment’? Or do the simpler scales – let us say the particles traced in the vacuum – appear earlier and sustain in a pyramidal constant construction the larger scales. Are we constantly drawn with ‘formal motions’ in an architectural design? That is indeed the case.

The simpler scales of that pyramid are NOT figuratively but really in the past. Because the Universe constructs a physical system literally by in-forming and molding the simpler Universe into new forms, ‘brick by brick’.

This fact resolves the ‘Paradox of Motion’, understood since Zenon. In a continuous Universe motion is impossible, And indeed there is no motion. Motion is reproduction of a movement that like a light-wave in the vacuum imprints and forms the previous scale; and then again, electrons are printed as ‘a fractal nebulae’ in the previous light scale and molecules are formed as complex motions drawn on the previous scale. When a gas cloud moves, it does not move so much as it ‘draws its motions’ in a lower scale space-time. Motion is really reproduction of information. And for that reason the ‘speed’ of systems slows down as we go upwards in those scales (more motions must be drawn).

So the wave of atomic forms rebuilds first a string world of open string motions and closed string clocks that builds then bosonic light that collapses into atomic particles that draw again a molecular orbital.

Thus if you are so simple as light is and only have to inform and draw a light beam you move very fast, but if you are very complex and you have to draw all your information you go slower. And because the next scale is built upon the previous one, the previous one is in the past. Hence the arrow of information is in the future literally. When your cells, displaced a quanta of time to the past, build you as a ‘whole’, those cells, whose life cycles are back into the past, sustain you and draw you in their relative future.

In a Universe of ∞ scales – hence of Absolute Relativity – the i-number is relative to the limits of the perception of the observer that classifies them. So as humans we perceive between 2 i-limits – the atom and the galaxy, which might be self-similar, as black holes and quarks, their knots of information show self-similar equations in 5D metrics and 4D metrics that models a galaxy as a hydrogen atom in the Einstein-Walker space. In any case they form the minimal and maximal scales of Human Sciences, creating our Se-size arrow.

If we use a decametric scale for the physical World with 2 limits beyond our perception, 0 (gravitational space-time) and 10 (Hyper-Universe), we establish an i-parameter of space-time planes, ∆Se=∆i, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy & temporal information, each one studied by a science that in the 2nd part of this work we analyze with the metrics and invariances of the 5th Dimension. While in parallel, we can also establish a relative i-scale to study Living Systems and the Human World. Thus the main |-energy and 0-clocks of time of each scale for physical and biologic worlds is:

1st Scale: Open strings of energy and closed time strings: Strong Forces & Gravitational space-time.

2nd Scale:  Bosons: |-Light and O-Photons.

3rd d Scale: Fermions: |-Electrons & O-quarks.

4th Scale: Atomic Organisms: Periodic Table.

5th Scale:  Inorganic and Organic Molecules

6th Scale; Life Cells. States of Mater: Energetic Gas, ExI Liquid and Informative Solids.

7th Scale. Life organisms; Energetic Plants; Informative Animals. Organic Metal-Machines

8th Scale: Planets. Human Civilizations; Economic Systems.

8th Scale: |-Stars & O-Black holes.

9th Scale: Galaxies, which might be the beginning of a new Scalar Game.

10th Scale: Universe, which might be a Gas cloud of Atoms of the new Scalar game.

Each scale has different speeds of time information, which we measure and compare according to their frequencies.

There is thus always a ‘third way to see’ reality beyond the 6 direct dimensions of this world, which are the scales in which we interact, and this i-dimension is of paramount importance to the total count of dimensions of an organism.

But from a larger non-subjective perspective all the scales of reality have the same existential value; as smaller scales grow in information (as a fractal does). So the product of its energy-size & information is the same in each scale. This ‘co-invariance’ of the size and information of any region of the Universe is what mathematicians call the ‘metrics’ of a ‘dimensional system’. And in this case it is the metrics of the ‘scales of space-time’ of the Universe.

Those 3 ‘scales’ of any superorganism are different in its properties as a ‘space-time’ since the unit/scale of space is different and so it is in an inverse fashion its time-speed (the speed of the clocks of time of each scale). As ‘things become larger in space’, their clocks of time slow down in its capacity to process information.

So an ant lives 7 years but think 10 times faster, and a quark is much smaller than a galaxy but turns around billions of time in a second. Yet both, the speed of ‘time’ and the ‘size in space’ balance each other, such as Es x To = K. This fundamental law of the Universe is what allows a super-organism to ‘coordinate’ 3 scales and the actions it develops on the 3 scales in synchronicity. So for example the faster speed of cell processes allow the cell to reproduce in a day, which is a ‘life’ for the cell and produce enormous quantity of enzymes for the entire body. The faster speed of a small chip allows it to process all the information of a large machine. What a system ‘looses’ in size in space and force and energy it gains in speed in time processing and intelligence the smaller it becomes, and this introduces many contradictions.

Essentially all what you see is part of one of them. It might be seen partially either because we focus in a ‘part’ of a whole, or because it is indeed an isolated part.

Thus from 1 the superorganism comes 3 topological parts +1(the whole); then adding the 3 +I social dimensions of the whole, 6+1 and then adding its 3 inner cellular dimensions (-i) 9+1. And this 10 Dimensional description is what will give us fully all the needed information about the existence of an entity.

3+1->6+1->9+1 however will make too bulky our analysis and logic equations. Thus we ‘’compact’ the 3 ±I scales of the system with the ±I symbols that resume the dynamic process of emergence (birth and social maturity) and devolution (3rd age isolation and final death) which relates the individual to those upper and lower scales of existence.

How can we then formalize logically the structure of the superorganism and all its parts? With a new ‘logic system’ of symbols that represent those dimensions of a superorganism, in the form of a ‘fractal generator equation’.


8. An equation to represent the Dimensions of all Systems of Reality.

The simplest equation to define all the superorganisms and systems of the Universe uses only 3 symbols. It expands the fundamental equation of science, (energy conservation) into the principle of conservation of energy & information:

‘All what exists is a complementary system that transforms back and forth, energetic space into temporal information:

∑Seó∏Ti (dynamic view) or ∑Se (limbs-field) X (body-wave) ∏Ti (head/particle)=K (balanced system – static view).

It describes all the systems of the Universe, as complex systems of energetic space and temporal information, in permanent motion, gauging information, moving with energy, and combining both, exi, to create, decouple and reproduce similar systems, in an immortal Universe made of infinite fractal complementary systems of energy and time, including you, who sometimes say ´i don’t have energy and time to do this’. Actions of energy and time performed with your ternary system are all what you or any entity of the Universe does.

As it happens those two processes are inverse and so we can talk of systems as dual, bipolar, feed-back equations of the 2 essential ‘arrows or motions in time’, flows of expansive energy, and imploding information, E<=>I, interacting with a bigger energy/information system – the Universe.

The first breakthrough of this more complex vision of reality took place in physics, when Max Planck the founder of quantum physics discovered that the Universe was made of actions of energy and time, not of substances but of motions with form: A = E x To. Light, the ultimate substance of creation was composed of two different motions, cyclical clocks of time (electric information), and lineal motions (magnetic fields). Energy (lines of space) and Time clocks (cycles of information) are two types of motions. Substances are a Maya of the senses. This Galileo noticed when he said ‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’. That is, the Earth moves but it seems to be still, so our eyes can perceive and gauge information.

In static present terms. Es=To, implies all systems seek a balance between its energetic space & temporal information (as the equality e=i maximizes the previous equation max. e x i=5×5>6×4). And so the survival of the fittest, those with a higher, ExI, existential, energetic and informative force, makes most systems balanced Max.ExI (e=i )systems.

Those 3 symbols represent a superorganism in i=ts individual scale as its 3 topological networks/organic functions:

– Es: Energetic space, the lineal motions of the Universe.

– ó, X, the dynamic or static ‘body/waves’ that join both poles.

– Ti, To: Temporal Information, the cyclical clocks and heads of the Universe.

Where i (or st) represents a specific scale of wholes that become parts of growing wholes and create the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe – which put together in a continuum defines the 5th dimension of the Universe – its scale of social complexity from i-∞ cells that gather into whole i-ndividuals part of, I+∞ social superorganisms of a new scale.

Thus i-scales of complexity show the relationship of a superorganism with its social scales, which the superorganism perceives as a series of ‘actions’ he performs within its social group or ecosystem. Hence its 3 temporal, social actions’ or ‘functions’ that those 3 spatial dimensional organs enact in time are described also by 3 symbols:

+i, +st: The positive arrow of information or life, the longest arrow or dimension of time, and direction of the future, as all systems are dominated by a particle/head of information that constantly curves and transforms into form, the energy of the System. Thus +i represents the arrow of future-information – the function of forming, perceiving, warping & wrinkling the superorganism till exhausting its energy in its 3rd age. Since the purpose of the Universe is to create networks of cells communicated with languages of information that emerge as a whole, we use those 2 symbols, +i, +st, for a ‘higher’ eusocial plane of existence – the creation of a new ‘whole’ plane of space-time. And viceversa, when a space-time plane dissolves as its communicative, informative networks disappear and the being dies, we use:

-i, -st: The negative arrow of entropy, energy motion and death, the shortest arrow, and direction of relative past, as energy diminishes from an age of youth and motion, towards the future of information in which all energy is spent, and the system then reverses in the ‘instant of zero time’ called death, dissolving fast its information back into cellular energy disjoined and extended without networks that put those cells together. So Atoms explode into photonic parts, humans into cellular parts and galaxies into dust of space-time. Thus –st, -I means a lower plane of smaller ‘cells’.

∑, ∏: Those Symbols represent the process of social evolution of parts into wholes, either as ‘energetic parts’ that are assembled into herds, ∑, or as ‘informative parts’ that join into networks, through ‘axons’ that connect each cell to all others (hence the ∏ multiplicative system and the higher power of informative systems over loosely connected herds).

We put all those symbols that analyze systems in its 3±i, 6±i or 9±i dimensions in a single equation that resumes it all:


The Equation explains the structure of 10 Di Organisms, which are all from the Universe to man. It is the fundamental ‘Generator, Fractal equation’ of General Systems Sciences or Complexity, a XXI C. science that unifies biology and physics, through the use of 2 ‘arrows of creation/destruction’: information or cyclical motion, or ‘time clocks’ – traditionally studied by biology – and energy or lineal motion, or entropy, traditionally studied in Physics. So we say:  ‘Everything in the Universe is a Complementary System that transforms back and forth energetic space into Temporal information: Es<=>To’

The power of that equation to explain all entities is enormous. For example the 3 states of matter, gas = max. energy, liquid = balance between energy and form and solid = max. form respond also to the ternary language of the universe.

So do the 3 ages of life, the energetic youth of maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age, e=i and the old age of maximal wrinkles and information, max. i.

Thus the equation also represents the ternary elements of a universal grammar, e<=>i, which describes the syntax of most languages that are used by minds to map out in a synoptic manner the 3×3±I superorganims of the universe:

In mathematics we always write, F(x) OPERANDI g(Y). Where the function of x and y tend to be parts and wholes or energy and information variables, and the operandi one of the fundamental actions or events of the universe.

In colors we find 3 primary colors, and we relate red with energy, blue with information and green with a reproductive mixture of both. So in societies the elites that control the languages of social information tend to use blue flags, and the people that provide the working energy prefer red. So do the energy genre, man with its lineal bodies who prefers red… They are are also the 3 genders, if we consider the gay sex a mixture of both.

In the 3rd language of mankind, words, Chomsky found its universal grammar to be also a ternary, IóE equation:

Subject (human, informative element) <verb (describes exi actions) >object (energy element submissive to the subject)

Further on, we can classify those languages, into primary, perceptive languages – the spatial language of colors and the temporal language of sounds/music – and complex exi languages, which combine both elements:

-Max. I x E: the language of words, dominant in time-verbal dimensions and…

-Max. ExI mathematics, where geometry is a spatial language and arithmetic & algebra a sequential, temporal one.

Mathematics is the dominant language of physical sciences, as those are species of higher energy-space-motion. But the much despised language of words with its causal logic of past->present->future dimensions IS better suited to explain informative, temporal processes. Hence evolution and social sciences rightly use it in its scientific theories.

We can even go further and comment on religion. Saint Augustine wrote a book called Trinitas, to explain the mystery of the trinity of God – where a God or Nation is the subconscious collective superorganism of all the believers that share the ‘same’ memetic ‘DNA-code’ as cells of the body of ‘christ’ (or Buddha, etc.). Hence Gods as human social superorganisms, which can be compared with many other ternary systems. In our example, the mystique metaphor of Trinity merely puts 3 elements in relationship, God, the collective superorganism, the mind of each human cell that believes and sustains the superorganism in its i-1 scale and the informative network or memetic code the Revelation book of words, which acts as the DNA genetic code in a body – making all cells with the same DNA code; all humans with the same Memetic ‘saint spirit’ act in harmony.

Thus the saint spirit is the verbal language, which in religions is considered the language of creation, as physicists consider mathematics for the same role. And so Saint John said:

God, 1st person, the word, 2nd person, became the mind of man, 3rd person, and inhabited among us (Saint John, 1)

All those visions of the ternary game of existence are partial visions that we unify in G.S.T. Since neither religion and his sacred language, the word, or science and its sacred language, mathematics, or art and its sacred language, images, which are the 3 manifestations of human languages in its purest forms, are all the languages of the Universe. Upanishads said the ‘languages of god’ are infinite, but they all relate to the language of general systems sciences and its generator equation of superorganisms. Each ‘ternary code’ reflects part of the total properties of the Universe. As only the whole universe has all its information about itself and its ∞ parts, (Haldane). But we men can understand how all languages map reality and extract from its universal grammar, images of its ternary, e=i systems. We deduce laws common to all those systems, called isomorphisms or invariances – the common truth of the whole and all its parts.

We are exploring the main equation of the universe, the one that generates the motions=actions of all its systems.

Indeed, we can also reduce the actions of all structures, forms, cycles and events of Nature to 2×2 simplex, individual and complex, social actions of energy and information, which are both the 4 ‘fractal dimensions’ of physical entities (light dimensions+social color, 4 quantum numbers, 4 Maxwell equations), and the 4 ‘wills or ‘drives’ of all biological beings – since biologists define life as entities that feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

The main of them, is the existence of only 2+2 type of actions in the Universe:

– 2 simplex, individual actions of energy and information feeding (Max. E, Max. I) and 2 complex, social versions:

– Exi = Reproduction with a couple by imprinting the excess of energy with form and social evolution in herds and…

– ∑E, ∏I, creation of herds and social networks that combine to create the whole, represented by the generator equation:

– ∑E(X,<=>)∏I, where we add 2 symbols of social evolution, S a sum of the cells of the ‘body’ and ∏ a multiplicative network; since informative systems form networks that relate each cell to all others, multiplying its social power. While X is the organic, static, present vision of the system, and ó the temporal, ‘dynamic’ feedback flow perception of it as a sum of cycles of exchange and combination of energy and information that all entities of the Universe. Thus 4 arrows, actions, drives, dimensions, cycles or whys suffices to explain all events, actions and its static forms in any i-scale of reality.

Recap. All what exists is a complementary system of energy and information that switches between both states: ∑Se<=>∏Ti. Each of those 4 symbols describe the whys of the 2 Simplex individual and 2 Complex, social actions of all beings, whose cycles create the space-time we perceive:

E: energy cycles (moving, feeding),

I: informative cycles (perception, inner form) and their social combination,

E<=>I, reproductive cycles and

∑, ∏, social cycles that create herds of energy and networks of information.

9. The program of the Universe. Isomorphism of actions of all natural superorganisms.

Existence and life is not about motion or form but its combination – it is about actions. We all like to act, not to gather information or lower ourselves to the mere sensations of energetic pleasure. So happens in physics where the unit of all systems is the ‘action’ of energy and time. Thus the universe and all its species follow a program of 4 actions or ‘functions’ or ‘drives’ or ‘dimensions’ or ‘arrows’ of existence, determined by the duality of energy and information:

–   Max. E: To feed on energy to move and refill the energy of the system.

–   Max. Ti: To gauge information to direct the motions of the being, perceive and create parallel forms.

–   Es x To: Thus to reproduce, combining both, energy and form, into actions and parallel beings.

–   ∑, ∏, i: And finally, to gather socially with similar exi entities into whole, new planes of existence.

And this simple program of ‘motions in spacetime’, of actions, which ultimately responds to the ‘need to survive’, by feeding the body-limbs, informing the mind, reproduce it beyond death and becoming part of a stronger ‘whole’, able to gather energy and information for the herd, is the ‘purpose of existence’. What all systems of the Universe do.

Thus we shall see constantly that form and function, dimensions of vital space and its functions in time work in parallel. And recognize the ‘vital, organic’ nature of the Universe in those 4 ‘arrows or dimensions of existence’, called in biology drives of life, which all systems follow, even physical systems, studied in a parallel paper to this one0.

Moreover the ‘4 Dimensions of classic space-time’ are related to those 3 drives of existence, as we ‘are made of spacetime’ and the ultimate vacuum space is light in motion (proved by its energy and constant creation of photons). This light-space thus have 4 Dimensions, which correspond to its 4 ‘drives of existence’: Max. I: the high dimension of the electric field where the head-photon stays most time. Max. E: The magnetic field dimension perpendicular to the electric field. exi: the dimension of reproduction of the wave or speed, which indeed in Maxwell equations is the product of the energetic-magnetic and electric-informative field. And finally colors, the social dimension.

Yet in atomic particles we also find the 4 quantum numbers that define the electron and respond to those 4 vital dimensions: the main number or ‘energy dimension’, the secondary number or ‘informative dimension’, the spin that defines the reproduction/decoupling of particles with inverse spin and the magnetic number that orders the societies of electrons. And then again we find 4 Maxwell equations that represent those 4 dimensions of existence in electric flows. We only study in this paper the 4 Dimensions of life systems, which will be coded in life beings in 3 scales, in cells by molecules (4 genetic letters), in organisms by physiological systems (sensorial-informative, digestive-energetic and blood systems, unified by the ego-brain, which creates the whole) and in society by memes and its networks (energetic-military networks, economic-reproductive networks and cultural-political informative networks, the ‘whole’).

Thus we call those ‘4 drives of existence’, feeding, perceiving, reproducing, and evolving socially, each one represented by a symbol of the ‘Generator Equation of energy and information systems’, ∑ (herding), E (feeding) , <=> (reproducing), I (informing), the program of existence as all from the atom guided by its 4 quantum to each human with its cycles of working, informing, entertaining, eating, moving, loving, acting socially performs it. They are the proof of a living, organic, sentient Universe, in which all its parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole. Since both physical and biological systems, process energy (feed on energy to move), process information (gauge information to orientate its motions), reproduce or decouple into similar systems or particles and evolve socially, ∑, into bigger systems. Quantum theories are called ‘gauge theory’, because particles seem to gauge information. Sociological groups are called ‘fields’ because they can be studied with physical laws in their motions.

When we accept the essential similar hierarchical, scalar structure and dual energy-information dynamics of all systems then we come to startling conclusions regarding the equalitarian nature of all systems of the Universe, different in ‘quantity’ and ‘complexity’ but not in ‘quality’. We shall study in detail in this paper those 3±I arrows/dimension/drives of existence both in individuals and its superoganisms, which are its species, and see how they are ordered in time by the life-death cycle, which is paralleled in species by the processes of evolution->radiation of species->extinction of those with lesser energy x Information force, which happens to be those who did not evolve into superorganisms.

(The reader will excuse the use of synonymous constantly in those texts but that is the essence of GS2, to show that different sciences merely use different ‘names’ for the same phenomena, so ‘drives of life’ is the program of life for biologists, ‘dimensions’ is the program for mathematicians, ‘quantum numbers’ for physicists, arrows of time for poets, will of existence for philosophers, and so on. The same happens with energy and information vs. space and time, just parallel concepts of biologists and physicists, with systems or organisms, etc.)

From 1, the Superorganism, comes 2, the system of energy and information. From 2 comes 3, the spatial organisms with energetic fields/limbs, reproductive waves/bodies and informative heads/particles. And from 3 comes 4, the arrows or ‘drives’ of existence of those superorganisms, which absorb energy, information, reproduce and evolve socially its cells into bigger superorganisms. This 1->2->3->4 ‘series’ take the entity into a new scale of existence.

Recap. Since life is defined as a system that processes energy and information, reproduces it, ExI, exchanges both with an external Universe, and becomes organized, ∑, into complex herds and cellular organisms, both physical systems, which associate into atoms and molecules, reproduce by decoupling self-similar particles and become organized with a field/wave/body and particles of information, which cannot exist without each other… and life beings, which also reproduce, gauge information, absorb energy and move with it, and associate in more complex wholes, in a bigger scale of which they are mere units.


10. Topological Spaces. The why of geometrical forms.

All what exists is a form of space with a motion/drive/dimension/action in time. We can thus simplify formally all systems, considering that a ‘geometrical form with motion’ is called a topology (a geometry of space that can be deformed in time by motions without breaking it), and that in a 4D Universe (as ours is ‘classically’ described in a single i-scale of space-time), there are only 3 known ‘forms with motion’ or ‘topological varieties’ (mathematical jargon), each one becoming one of the 3 ‘vital organs’ of the superorganism. Thus the forms of those organs in space have their equivalent function in time and both together define one of the 3 ‘topological varieties’ of the organism, observed in a single i-scale of space-time. And NOTHING else can exist, as there are only 3 topological varieties, 3 dimensions of space and 3 functions of time. Thus the 3 spatial networks and its 3 time functions create 3 type of topologies (geometries with motion), which are:

– Energetic topologies – networks: Spherical-Planar varieties that form the ‘enclosing membrane of the system.

– Informative topologies – networks: Hyperbolic-Tall varieties that form the central ‘zero-point’ or mind of the system.

– And reproductive topologies – networks: toroid-cyclic varieties that fill the body between membrane and nucleus and reproduce with its cycles of exchange of energy and information, both the membrane and the zero point.

– Which put together create a ‘whole’ ‘fractal point with volume’, a solid sphere or ‘Ball’ (in topological jargon) composed of its 3 organs, with the zero point in its center and north-south axis, its relative planar membrane separating it from the outer universe and its body organs with its cycles between the center axis and the surface exchanging energy and temporal information, EsóTi. In the graph we can see many of those ‘whole’ balls and since almost all entities of the Universe have an external membrane with a few apertures to exchange energy and information with the environment and topological varieties admit ‘deformation’ (so your skin would be the surface of a deformed ball with the apertures of the senses and excretory systems), we can consider that the Universe is made of ‘fractal points’, points with volume which are in words of Leibniz ‘a world in itself’.

We must in that regard before we study the connection between those ‘whole fractal points’ and its 3 topological parts that inform, move and reproduce the system, consider a formal ‘analysis’ of such points, which is given by the ‘expansion’ of Non-Euclidean geometry, fusion with Fractal mathematics and topology, the 3 most advanced branches of mathematics today, which accordingly are the ‘formal foundations of GS2 – the most advanced science.

10. Non-Euclidean Points of view



Let us then start that journey considering the expansion of Non- Euclidean geometries needed to formalize complex physics with the definition of a complex, fractal, Non-Euclidean point. The last advance in Geometry was made by Riemann and Einstein. Riemann realized that a point can fit multiple parallels and Einstein used those Non-Euclidean points (in Euclidean mathematics a point has no breath and only fits one parallel), to describe the space-time of the Universe. A Fractal point is an advancement of that concept. It states that all points when perceived in close distance enlarge and have inner parts of energy and information, of ‘motion and form’. So as a fractal grows in information when we come closer, so do the points of the Universe. Then they can fit multiple parallels. Moreover, since now points have parts, the 5th non-Euclidean postulate requires to change the other 4 postulates built on the concept of a point without parts. This fact surprisingly ignored by mathematicians for 150 years is the departure ‘point’ of a new Non-Euclidean set of 5 postulates needed to formalize the complex models of superorganisms and the fractal geometry of a Universe of Multiple scales of Spaces and multiple clocks of Times:

1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point is a world with an inner content of information that creates its 3 internal, topologic, organic dimensions and a content of energy that traces its external motions=time arrows’

2nd Postulate: ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’

3rdPostulate: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar when their external, spatial perimeter or their inner information is equal. Similar points form organic networks by sharing their energy and information. Dissimilar points ab=use each other in Darwinian relationships’

4th Postulate: ‘A plane is a network that joins points through waves of energy and information.’

5th : ‘A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’

The first postulate explains a fractal point as a point with parts. Now a point can be any entity of the Universe. In a more detailed analysis those parts turn out to be the three canonical topologies of a four-dimensional Universe, which describe an informative, hyperbolic region or ‘head’, a toroid, ‘reproductive body’ and lineal or planar energetic limbs and membranes, common to all the points of the Universe.

The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’ and its laws are essential to understand the communication of energy and form and the creation of networks between points. The 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. It is thus the essential postulate to understand the causal actions of creation and destruction, eusocial evolution and Darwinian struggle in the Universe. And they resume in a simple sentence: Love your brother/species, who shares your information and evolve together into a social whole.

The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scales of space-time.

Finally the 5th postulate, which seems redundant with the 1st defines a ‘mind’ or focus of multiple flows of information:

In the graph, because a Cartesian graph (left) is an abstract continuum of lineal space-time, based in a single rhythm of a mechanical clock and a continuous space of points with no ‘breath’ (Euclidean definition of point), ever since it became the canonical representation of space-time, science has reduced the infinite vital spaces and time clocks of the Universe into a single, absolute time and a single absolute space, with a single point of view, that of the human I=eye mind in the origin of coordinates. In that sense the Cartesian plane represents the visual continuous light space-time that fills vacuum and it represents the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light. Thus Cartesian coordinates are equivalent to the height=electric field, width=magnetic field and length=wave speed of light. Since light is the space we see and so its 3 coordinates are self- similar to those of the Cartesian, human mind made with light.

The real Universe though has infinite minds or points of view that gauge information in infinite scales of space-time with different pixels besides light (smelling minds, gravitational minds, sound minds). And they will see a different world. Since the Cartesian world is just the light space-time we see.

Each of those minds will be a zero-point, an infinitesimal that stores a ‘still mapping’ of the infinite Universe in its focus of perception, stored in the language it creates with the pixels of those forces, to represent the Universal Grammar of all languages: space-time events of exchange of energy and information, EóTi.

So each mind, as we have seen studying human languages of perception will map with ‘ternary’ elements the ‘ternary topologies’ of the Universe and use that information to act-react in its environment looking for its 4D program of existence (feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing actions and self-similar beings and evolving socially). Each of those minds-points of view will have therefore volume to fit the flows of energy and information that go through them, which is the definition of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point of view through which ∞ parallels can cross.

Thus, we define all entities as ‘whole’ fractal points whose laws can be explained with a new geometry of space-time, Non-Euclidean geometry, born of the completion of the work of Einstein in physics and Riemann and Lobachevski in the field of mathematics. Since now all points have form and motion, they have breath; and since now all lines have form and motion they are waves; and since now all planes are networks, they are discontinuous planes. Thus, the new formalism of space-time explained in detail in other lessons of this workoredefines also the geometry of the Universe in dynamic, discontinuous terms. Now the scalar nature of reality comes in mathematical terms from the fact that points become communicated by waves and then n-points become communicated by planes/networks, which ‘warp’ in the 3 dimensions of space to form a ‘bigger point’, unit of a new i-scale. So for example cells become neuronal networks, creating a human ’point-head’, which is part of a global super-organism, which if we were to map with a point for each human head would form again a spherical network over the surface of planet earth – our social superorganism.

The universe is made of networks of such i-points, and each network is what we call a world or discontinuous space-time, st, unit of a bigger fractal network, a new st-point in itself. So a network of particles becomes an atom, which becomes an st-point of a molecule and so on till creating the networks of the Universe.

Even humans can be studied as Non-E points, in which each head is indeed a spherical point that communicates constantly energy and information with other humans, forming social networks.

Recap. To understand Multiple spaces-times we need to evolve further mathematics, the language of science. Leibniz, Einstein and Riemann, who in the XIX c. realized that ‘through a point infinite parallels can cross’ (5th postulate of non-Euclidean geometry) are the points of departure. ‘Non- Euclidean points’ with form and motion, made of knots of time cycles, are the final elements needed to understand the why of the Universe. They socialize into networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies; while planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks. Thus each Non-E, fractal point is a world in itself – a topological point with a volume of energy and information that relate it to other points through waves, which carry energy and information and create networks that warp into bigger points.

11. Dimensional analysis: Diffeomorphism: fractal relativity. Each species has 3 relative ternary dimensions.



The 3 topological regions of any ‘fractal point’ orientate in 3 relative dimensions of ‘informative height’, energetic length and its perpendicular combination into reproductive width: exi=k. Thought those 3 dimensions are diffeomorphic, adapted to each relative ecosystem of space-time where the system absorbs energy and information. Thus each ‘space-time being’ deploys a particular ‘direction of height-information’, ‘length-energy’ and ‘width-reproduction’, different from other beings, interacting with the flows of energy and information of its ecosystem through its particular, ‘local’=diffeomorphic coordinates, which departing from its informative zero-point or relative ‘self’, establish accordingly its 3 relative, perpendicular, fractal dimensional actions of energy, information and reproduction. The Universe then becomes the sum of all those diffeomorphic 3D fractal space-time beings.

A key, mathematical element is required to have a vital, topological view of the superorganisms of space-time: the relationship between the 3 canonical dimensions of the continuum Euclidean space and the ‘fractal’ (smaller) dimensions of each fractal point/superorganism, whose external limit is the membrane.

Each of those dimensions is maximized in the corresponding functional topology: height is the dimension of informative perception, as it allows a ‘higher’ point of view that scans a larger territory, length the dimension of energetic motion, ‘parallel’ to the lineal field of energy that moves us, and its perpendicular, wide dimension is the reproductive dimension that combines both (exi). This is clearly evident in the simplest forms that show the ‘geometrical game’ with more precision: the magnetic (energetic, flat), electric (informative, tall) fields of light space-time, and its Product (Maxwell equations), the reproductive light wave are perpendicular to each other (exi).

Each of them corresponds to each function of light (being the 4th function social color). This is the ‘first’ cellular unit of our light world, from where all further ‘evolutionary scales’ of space-time beings are born. Thus the causal justification of the perpendicularity of the 3 functional, organic dimensions is its existence in the basic action-unit of space-time, our vacuum space-time made of actions of light. As we are all social evolution of H-plancks space-time actions. Again we see the 3 perpendicular fields happening in electromagnetic fields (Maxwell rule).

It has to be noticed that we talk of ‘fractal dimensions’ not continuous, ∞ dimensions. The difference between them is this: A fractal dimension is a ‘filling’ of a dimension by networks and branches which grow and will ultimately fill the total continuous dimension of the entity in the domain in which we define the entity but can reach in its filling in a certain moment a ‘quantity’ between the 0 and 1 value of the total filling/dimension. They are partial dimensions. And this is precisely what we mean. A Superorganism, for example, a human being, will have 3 ‘local, fractal, networks’ attached to many cells, and those are its 3 fractal dimensions: the informative, nervous network and all its attached cells and organs, the reproductive, blood networks and all its organs and the digestive, energetic network and all its organs.

In the graph, 3 examples of diffeomorphic beings of space-time and its relative arrows of energy and information: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information, pointing towards the central informative black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative/energetic dimensions are inverted.

Since plants use light as energy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information from the sky, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorb chemical information. Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as it often happens between energy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Thus each species establishes its own up and down arrows; its relative energy and informative directions, departing from that central knot of information, which is gauging and perceiving.

What classic science denies and system sciences proves is the reality of an existential will in that perceptive=informative knot, which controls the entire organism and directs its search for ‘actions’ that provide energy and information to the being. It is precisely the infinite number of Discontinuous, Non-Euclidean Points of View, what creates a general arrow of Information in the Universe that constantly reproduces the form of those entities and balances the arrow of continuous entropy, energy motions and expanding space, which physicists dogmatically consider the only arrow of the Universe. And so in all entities, when the zero point appears, order systematically grows: the crystal starts to reproduce its formal structure in ‘cells’, the hurricane becomes stable (and vice versa, bombing the ‘eye’ of the hurricane destroys it; the galaxy once the black hole of gravitational information is formed acquires it order, etc.)

12. The 3 varieties of topological space-times: We are ternary assemblies of vital, organic geometries.

In the graph, Reality is made of fractal points, whose parts perform energetic, informative & reproductive functions. As complex as one of those points-entities might be when observed in detail, any fractal point is made of 3 regions whose geometry responds to the 3 topologic varieties of a 4-Dimensional Universe, the convex plane, the torus & the sphere.

The Universe comes down to wholes made of 3 internal parts whose geometrical properties maximize their energetic, informative and reproductive functions: When we see fractal points far away we describe them as points with breath, with the tools of Euclidean geometry since the ‘inner space’ shrinks to a point and so the ‘bulk’ or curvature of space-time shrinks to a plane. Yet, when we come closer to them, they grow into points with volume. The volume of those Fractal, Non-Euclidean points can thereafter be studied with the 3 types of canonical, Non-Euclidean geometries or topologies of a 4-Dimensional Universe – the Universe we live in. Those 3 topologies make up the 3 regions of the point, which correspond each one to the 3 essential functions of any system: the external, energetic membrane; the central, informative brain and its reproductive combination, exi.

– Max. E: An outer membrane of energy, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry.This external, energetic membrane has the topology of continuous surfaces called the Riemann sphere, which is the external surface of any point – the skin and limbs and any of its multiple self-similar entities, some of which are drawn at the bottom of the graphic. In any system of the Universe, the membrane acts as the energetic, external surface of the informative, point through which the point absorbs energy from the external Universe, to process it into information.

– Max Ti: A zero point: an inner center, corresponding to convex topologies (left graph), made with 2 cyclical forms. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with ‘height’, with negative curvature.Temporal information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increasing height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages  (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple, unmoved Gods of the Universe.

This is a key property of information and informative minds: to gauge, map and perceive reality we need stillness, so all minds and informative systems, are still. And that is the meaning of Aristotle, when he said that we are all gods, and gods are unmoved, still, perceptive. He thus considered that all entities of the universe had motion bodies and still heads that moved them, particles and fields in physics. And he was right.

Energy and information systems have inverse properties: energy is expansive, external, more extended. Information is implosive and smaller. Thus we find the informative head or system either on top of the reproductive body, with a spherical and smaller size or in the center, and its topologies will correspond to those of maximal form; the so-called hyperbolic topology. In the upper graph, it is the double ring, or convex, hyperbolic surface, with maximal form, or informative center of any entity of the Universe, the point in which the fractal reproduction of information reaches its zenith. It is the same form than the toroid but with a higher content of information, reproduced by doubling the toroid.

– ó: The toroid, a middle, body or reproductive zone, described by Klein as a disk of quanta in cyclical motion that communicates energy and information between the inner and outer zones, filling up the space-time between the nuclei and the external membrane. It is the zone where the reproductive organs of the system exist. . It must be noticed that according to Klein, the topologist that studied better this type of surface, the toroid is NOT really a fixed form of space, but we must consider those cycles’ motions and add the parameter of speed. Thus Klein introduces the Paradox of Galileo to describe the Non-Euclidean geometries of the Universe as we have done in this book. Cycles are mere static perceptions of motions and we must always consider distances as space-time distances. So we say: London is at 4 minutes distance because we consider distance and speed together. This is ultimately the meaning of time in physics, a measure of the speed of motion as a way to gauge space-distances: v=s/t.

The ideal, abstract mathematical intermediate spacetime, which combines both functions, describes the behaviour and form of many real, dual systems and its social herds. For example, a herd of animals in an ecosystem will move between their hunting and water fields (where they gather energy) and their breeding, inner region where they reproduce information, making cyclical trajectories between both regions. In this manner, they occupy a vital space-time, called a ‘territory’, which shows the properties of the reproductive body (a Non-Euclidean Klein spacetime, as it shares its fundamental property – the fact that the particles of the intermediate space are confined between the other 2 regions, which are never reached in its cyclical trajectories. For example, in a cell, the molecules of the organism will not touch the protein membrane or the central DNA nuclei. Thus, the inner quanta are confined within the Klein’s disk by the 2 other regions that have more energy & information and destroy them and/or absorb their energy and information at will.

In abstract terms, mathematiciansintroduced in the XIX c. the concept of an infinite, relative distance measured no longer in terms of static space but in terms of time and movement, as the distance between the point and a region that cannot be reached. Thus Klein defines a relative infinity, as the region beyond the discontinuous membrane whose insurmountable borders the inner time-space quanta can’t cross, as a cell cannot go out of a body, an atom beyond C speed or 0 K temperature and a man beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. Thus, the informative center and external membrane become the 2 relative infinities or limits that the movements of the intermediate point cannot breach.

As in the myth of Achilles and the turtle, Achilles never arrives because every time he moves he crosses a smaller spatial distance. The same happens in a fractal space-time, when a point moves temporally towards its inner or outer space-time limit and finds an increasing resistance to its movement, till finally it is deviated into a cyclical trajectory around the outer, energetic membrane or the height dimension of the inner informative singularity or it is destroyed. So the intermediate, fractal cells of the point circulate in parallel cycles always inside the interior of the sphere with contact zones of the type A (central, 2nd row of figures in the previous graph).

In a human organism, the blood system might seem infinite for the red cells that transport energy since they never reach the outer Universe. For that reason in the drawing, Klein interprets the intermediate region of the Non-Euclidean point as an infinite circle with an invisible, unreachable membrane, whose motion-distance is unreachable, hence infinite, equalling the ‘space-time distance’ between the intervals B1-B2 (long) and B2-B3 (short but difficult to cross), despite being B2-B3 increasingly shorter in space. Since the quanta take longer in each step and don’t reach the membrane. This is due to a growing density of space, which despite having less distance has more points in its network, such as the case of black holes or jails. When those inner points reach the membrane at point C they become destroyed or deviated.

Thus, the energetic membrane and informative center are the discontinuities that isolate the intermediate cellular quanta, creating a discontinuous ‘World’ within the point. Those discontinuities are called in Geometry a relative infinite, in Biology a membrane, in Sociology or Topology a national border, in fractal theory a co-dimension of a point. They are defined in physics by Lorenz Transformations that make c-the limit of energetic speed and 0 k the limit of temporal, formal stillness. Yet those physical limits are not limits of an absolute Universe, but limits of the fractal membrane of light space-time and its evolved electroweak beings, since the Universe has at least another bigger gravitational membrane, in which the smaller light-space exists; a fact with enormous repercussions for a proper description of the Cosmos, which extends beyond those limits. Since a gravitational scale is faster than light-speed forces and cooler than 0 K masses.

In the graph, we observe several non-Euclidean points created by those 3 canonical topologies that can adopt multiple forms by deformation, but suffice to construct all the shapes of our Universe. Indeed, a topology is deformable. So an external membrane, which corresponds to the topology of a sphere, can become any shape, as long as it is not torn up, to enclose a reproductive and informative zone. So your skin is in topology a sphere, which encloses the complex forms of your reproductive organs.

Since those 3 topologies suffice to describe any 4-Dimensional form, it follows that the Universe is merely a puzzle of energetic, informative and reproductive parts, iterated=reproduced and then associated in ‘numbers’, creating all kind of entities as those shown in the previous graph, from different sciences, which are assemblies of those 3 topologies.

Thus the laws of the 5 Non-Euclidean postulates and 3 topologies common to all species formalize mathematically the structure of superorganisms and explain why in space mathematics is the language of the Universe – as we are vital mathematical geometries of space-time with motion, albeit more complex than the static, Euclidean simplifications used by mechanist science in its description of those superorganisms. Thus the evolution towards a topological Non-E description of species brings back the ‘vital’ motions lost in the abstract, Euclidean simplifications:

In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a galaxy, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson display the 3 topological zones of a fractal point, each of them performing 1 of the 3 functions/arrows of space-time.

Thus a key law of GS2 is an old law of science: Each form of topological space performs a time function/arrow.

Those 3 topological regions correspond to the 3 main arrows/dimensions of space-time of each of those systems:

Information (head) x Energy (membranes) = Reproduction (toroid cycles between both)

Thus the toroid regions explain processes of transformation of energy unto information as topological transformations.

From the ‘analytic’ perspective of Non-E Geometry, the ‘whole’ is a fractal point (1st postulate), which absorbs energy and information through apertures in its membrane (5th postulate), and evolves socially with other points through waves of exchange of information and energy (2nd Postulate), in relationships of social evolution or Darwinian ‘perpendicularity’ according to their similarity (3rd postulate), forming ‘networks’ of cellular points (4th postulate).

Thus while the 3 topologies of a single ‘space-time’ scale of the superorganism, corresponding to the 4 Dimensions of space-time of that single ‘scale’, describe the 3 arrows of all systems performed in a single scale, the Postulates of Non-Euclidean mathematics allow us to understand the 4th arrow of social evolution, which requires more than a point – parts that become wholes, and hence more than a single scales of space-time – as points (1-5th postulate) join in lines and planes (2nd and 4th postulates).Thus the 3 most advanced branches of ‘XX-XXI c. ‘mathematics, fractals, Non-Euclidean Geometry and Topology confirm the organic paradigm, as the natural evolution in our comprehension of the Universe beyond the simplex vision of mechanist science and Euclidean static mathematics and a single space-time. We live in a mathematical universe, but it is a Universe of Multiple Spaces-Times, where all ‘forms’ have a ‘function’ and hence a ‘motion in time’. Let us consider a few more ‘formal functions’ and details of those ‘vital, mathematical, superorganisms’.

In the graph, the 3 functional topologies of a Non-Euclidean point become the 3 regions of all Natural organisms:

Physical systems: Fig.5, Atoms have a central, informative mass of quarks, spatial, electronic membranes and fields of gravitational and electromagnetic forces exchanged between them. Those 3 topologies also describe the galactic structure (fig.4): the central black hole is the hyperbolic, informative topology, the Halo of the galaxy is a Riemannian, spherical form, and the stars in the intermediate region, which feed the dark matter of black holes and reproduce the atoms of life, turn in cyclical, toroid paths around the central black hole.

Electromagnetic space-time (fig.3) is the simplest physical world where the most basic morphologies play that same process of transformation of external energy that converges and reproduces cycles, attracted by a Non-Euclidean point, charge or mass: E=Mc2. The interaction of electromagnetic fields that ‘reproduce’ a central ‘zero-point’, a high new flow of electric or magnetic information shows the constant, reproductive and creative nature of the Universe.

Planets (fig.7) also have an outer membrane (radiation field, atmosphere) that protects the system from external high energy rays, an intermediate cyclical field of convective flows of magma that reproduce and ‘form’ the rocks of the planet and an internal zero point ‘crystal’, which likely ‘perceives’ gravitational forces guiding the orbits of the planet.

Finally a ‘bosonic’ highly ordered state of matter (fig.9), packs in a hyperbolic dimension of ‘height’ atoms.

Biological systems: Cells (fig.8) have lineal, external membranes of proteins, which are a deformation of a Riemann sphere, an informative nucleus and in between they are invaginated by all kind of eói cycles that transfer energy and information from the outer world to the cell. Animals (fig.1) are in its palingenetic, simpler forms, of spherical symmetry, displaying digestive=energetic networks, informative, sensorial/nervous networks and reproductive organs. In its seminal and embryonic state (fig.2) some of those functions are exercized by the ‘higher’ mother superorganism of its upper i+1 scale. When they are external seeds (fig.6, tomato), the structure as a fractal point is independent, with the genetic information (seed proper) in the center, the protective external membrane and the ‘body of food’ that will allow the reproduction of that information in between.

A human has a reproductive body; lineal, energetic limbs & a cyclical head, with an informative, smaller brain, composed of two hemispheres, which are hyperbolic, convex, warped forms, corresponding to the informative dual ring of a Belgrami cone. The hyperbolic, highly warped brain is a double toroid, self-similar to the hyperbolic topology of informative cycles. So the brain hosts more information in lesser space than the body, as a mirror of its functions. Man though, shows in his 3 canonic, topological organs a specific diffeomorphic adaptation to a specific environment – the earth, and its high light-information, low land-electromagnetic, repulsive energy motion and prey feeding axis.

Yet from the simplest seed to the complex topological evolution of a human being, the 3 elements of fractal points always display the properties of its topological forms/functions:

– The informative zero-point is either in the center, where its communication with all the inner parts of the system is maximal or it has height as it accumulates information, from an external ecosystem and it is the smallest part.

-The external membrane is larger, continuous and protects the system. All Fractal points are inner worlds, whose membrane creates a discontinuity that defines an External Universe or outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information.

– In all fractal points there is an inner middle volume or intermediate territory, which combines the energy coming out of the external, spherical, topological membrane and the information provided by the convex, complex formal center. In the simplex, pure description of Non-Euclidean topology this region is made of similar points that form groups in perpetual movement that draw cycles of parallel lines, between the other 2 regions, as they gather energy and information combined in new parts. And they create space by cycling within the other 2 regions. Thus, the intermediate zone is filled with organs that reproduce the parts of the system with orders of information given by the center and the energy absorbed through the membrane, which latter migrate towards the other 2 zones. So in a galaxy, stars are transformed into black holes that migrate to the center. In a cell we find mitochondria that produce energetic proteins and RNA for the surface membrane. In the human body organs reproduce hormones and products used by the brain; while bones, reproduce red cells that migrate to the open membranes to absorb external energy. In an ecosystem, the territory controlled by an informative center, the predator, produces preys to feed the predator, who takes them to its central den.

However the membrane is also the zone through which the point emits its reproduced micro-forms of information, and so it displays ‘sensorial holes’ to relate the point to the external Universe. Thus all fractal points, despite being discontinuous worlds, will have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the organic system:

   – Max. +Es: Amouth’ or opening that absorbs energy.

   -Max. -Es: Cloacae’, through which the cyclical body expels its residual energy.

Max.+Ti: Aneye’ through which the informative center receives external information.

Max.–Ti: Anantenna’ to emit information.

As information has more form, it is quantized. So Energetic apertures are single & bigger (mouth, anus) than informative ones (eyes, ears). Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In simple spheric seeds, they are mostly situated in 3 regions in which exists a dimensional parallelism between function and form:

– Max. Es: The lower region, or Plane=Equator of the system tends to the membrane region that absorbs energy. So your mouth and nose that absorb energy are below your eyes and ears.

– Es=Ti: The Intermediate tropics where often the same opening emits and absorbs temporal energy.

– Max.Ti: The upper region or in spherical fractal points (common in 3-Dimensional ‘environments’ in which there is not a diffeomorphic orientation as in human/earth environments, mostly in water or vacuum space) the North-South Poles axis act as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension that crosses the zero-point informative singularity or Belgrami hemisphere (non-E ideal form).

– ΣEs<=>Ti: The reproductive, central region, body or ‘territory’ which combines Energy and Information: The + North Pole absorbs information(magnetic fields in atoms & planets) that crosses through its central singularity where after absorbtion is deflected to the intermediate region where it mixes with energy from the equator plane coming from the ‘mouth’ apertures of the membrane to create exi actions & forms.In many fractal points the informative and energetic centers establish 2 opposite flows of energy and information that become relative negative/positive poles. So, the particles of the intermediate region trace elliptical trajectories, with 2 focus on the centers of the energetic/informative topologies. It is the case of any bipolar system, from binary stars, one dominant in energy and the other an informative neutron star or black hole; to bimolecular systems or n-p pairs in the nuclei of atoms. The same duality of 2 specialized centers controlling a common territory, or vital space happens in biology where most species have male-energetic, lineal bodies and female-informative reproductive ones, ruling a common territory in which they combine their genes to rise its offspring.

In graph, the analysis of the human being in terms of its 3-network systems and its 6 senses, which absorb energy and information for those networks, ‘who’ perform the energetic, informative and reproductive actions of the living system.

Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.

Recap: The fundamental Particle of the Universe is neither physical nor spiritual but logic-mathematical: the fractal point described by the Laws of Non-Euclidean, fractal Geometry and topology, as an entity which becomes more complex when we come closer to it, till we can differentiate its 3 regions, corresponding to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: an energetic membrane, an informative center, and an exchange zone of bites of energy and bits of information between both.

In all systems we find a core/brane that acts as the dominant region of the organism and display paradoxically less spatial extension than the other regions they rule. It is the smaller nucleus of cells, humans and galaxies generates its information (DNA, human brain/eye system, galactic black hole, CPU (central processing unit) in computers, etc.) In a galaxy the halo of dark matter and the central black hole dominate and seem to feed and form the radiant matter of which we are made. In man, the informative brain, extended through the central spine and senses, dominate the reproductive body and guide it.

The 2nd region in importance is the ‘body’ or reproductive region, which absorbs energy from the limbs that become imprinted by the system’s information. Finally the 3rd region of the system, which is easier to renew, due to its formal simplicity is the energetic region, the skin, limbs and membranes, which brings energy to the intermediate region to allow the reproduction of the information stored in the center or head of the system.

Given the ∞ possible deformations of those 3 unique topologies of 4-D space-time, reality creates an enormous variety of species, from an original seed of spherical information that develops those 3 regions in morphologies that soon resemble energy lines, reproductive cycles and information centers.

Our energetic region extends in lineal limbs; reproductive cells group into organs, becoming the body; while the informative centers move to the height dimensional and multiply its cellular forms in the sensorial boundaries of the head. All those processes studied by morphogenesis, can now be explained not only in its how but its why.

Thus, the 3 relative forms of energy (external membrane), information (dual ring) and reproduction (the cyclical paths that exchange energy and information between the external membrane and the inner convex form), can be found in any system of reality. In all those systems, the informative region dominates the bigger, simpler reproductive body.

12. The 10 Fractal dimensions of Super Organisms.


A super-organism is an organism made of smaller super-organisms and part of a bigger super-organism or living in a bigger territory. Thus a super-organism is a ‘scalar’, ‘fractal’ structure since it exists in ‘3 scales’ of relative size, of parts that become wholes. We call those 3 scales the ‘inner, cellular’, ‘individual’ and ‘external, social’ scales in a generic manner, even if those 3 ‘specific names’ only apply to animal organisms, made of cells, individuals and part of societies.

Other systems have different specific names. So for example, a cell will have a molecular scale, cellular scale and social, organic scale as part of an ambulatory collection of cells called humans.

In physical systems the same happens, a star will be made of plasma ions, its cells and form part of a superorganism, the galaxy; and so on.

What matters to us in this first definition is the realization that all systems which have a relative ‘zero point’ of view, or ‘informative center’ that process its information will have around that relative center an upper, central and lower scale of existence, which are in fact ‘fractal scales’ independent of each other and hence with 3 ‘relative space’ dimensions of height, width and length.

Thus if we add up the 3 x 3 dimensions of the system, we get a nine-dimensional system across 3 scales of reality. If we call I, the ‘individual’ main scale of the system, where most ‘information’ is gathered, we talk of i±1 scales for any super-organism, tightly related to each other. Such as for example, a human being co-exists in its cellular i-1 scale, its social i+1 scale and its individual scale as an organism.

And it is impossible to explain the existence of the entity as an individual without considering its other two levels of ‘energy’ and information, i.e. its genetic i-1 scale of cellular information and its i+1 memetic scale of social and cultural information; its i-1 cellular organs and networks of blood-energy and its i+1 work and wealth.

The super-organism is always determined by 3 scales and hence by 9 dimensions, which make up a ‘whole’. This ‘whole’ is what we call the 10th Dimension of the Super organism or energy and information System, as it integrates the entire system into a unit of a new scale. Hence it ‘exhausts’ the 9 ‘equal scales’ of the system becoming the 10th scale.

All superorganisms are made by an assembly of 3 type of dimensional, spatial networks or ‘forms’ of space each of them having a certain ‘functions’ or motion in time; that is all of them are made of the 3 organic dimensions of space, and 3 arrows, or functions in time.

As such what GS2 studies first is the nature of those 3+3 dimensions of space-time and how they build up the superorganisms of The Universe. All of them are defined as 3 Dimensional ‘forms of space in motion’, thus with 3 parallel dimensions of time.

Those ‘3 dimensions’ make a local 3-Dimensional system in our scale of individual space-time, which is the human being. Then we will find in a lower scale of space-time our cells occupying also each one 3 dimensions to fill up the cell space-time, and in the upper scale we will find our society with its global superorganism and its political and cultural, informative networks, its reproductive, economic networks and its energetic, Earth’s geography. But in all those cases the dimensions will not be infinite and they will be relative in scale to the size we perceive.

To understand the fractal nature of those dimensions we must bring up another key characteristic of those superorganisms – their diffeomorphism – a word borrowed from Relativity which explains precisely this: any superorganism is relative and local as it has a ‘focus-mind-point of view-CPU that processes information’ around it in those 3 scales of space-time, perceiving and mapping the Universe from its ‘relative focus of information’ in the forces and languages that ‘traverse’ its zero point of view or hyperbolic center of informative processing.

This is essential to understand the unity and relativity of the Universe. As any superorganism with a focal point of view will consider and extract most of its information on those 3 scales which for it will become the only real scales.

Thus a superorganism is a structure in which a cellular system is divided in 3 topological spaces, a limb-energetic space, a body-reproductive space and a relative head-informative space, which perform 3 motions in time, energetic motions, informative motions and repetitive motions… And because those cellular systems can be seen in different i-scales of relative size and informative speed, from cellular to individual to social scales, we must consider that we can perceive such dimensional organisms at least in 3 scales, one of relative ‘micro-size, normal size, and macro-social size.

This i-element is essential to fully grasp the fractal self-repetitive scales of the Universe and so we can talk of it as the 7th dimension or 10th dimension of space-time that completes the entire organism. Let us see why.

The superorganism is structured in 3 relative scales always. As the soul or point of view of the superorganism, in the human case, the human mind, obviously sees downwards and upwards a smaller negative scale and a bigger positive one. Those are the 3 scales of reality, and we observe further that each component of the organism is focused onto one of the 3 scales: the mind to the social organism, the body to the direct sensations, the cellular scale and the limbs to the lower fields and sensations of gravity, heat and cold, related to smaller scales that give us energy.

Strictly speaking, because the organism co-exists in 3 scales we must define it as 10-dimensional organism, that co-exist in a territorial of i-1 scales, in a body of i-scales and a social mind of i+1 scales. And so the total are nine scales + I, the beyond below and over us. Though we can make less exhaustive dimensional analysis. Such as:

3D organisms, in which we consider only the 3 diffeomorphic, space-time dimensions and its functions, (->8).

4D systems, if we add the dimension of present time (classic science, superseded by the more complex dimensional analysis of this blog).

5D superorganisms, if we consider the entire scalar dimension of relative i±1 scales a dimension of eusocial evolution, as we did in previous papers0

The usefulness of those different scalar or dimensional analysis thus will depend on which aspects of the system we concentrate. To state that all ‘organisms’ are in fact superorganisms in the more complex 10Di analysis, though if we consider a 3-4D analysis in a single space-time scale they seem to us ‘organisms’ as we don’t study its smaller cellular and social superorganic scales. Of those partial analysis the most important is the 5D analysis as it allow us to deal with the fundamental, complex action of superorganisms: its evolution into complex social systems, determined by what we shall call the ‘metrics of the 5th dimension’. This leads to a better understanding of the 3 ‘causal dimensions of time’, past, present and future – the other essential analysis of superorganism, focused in its functions and life/death cycles.


Recap: The One, the Superorganism, is made of two ‘substances/forms/motions’, temporal information and energetic space, which combine to form the infinite bodies and waves of the Universe. And so from one comes two and from two the 3 parts of space and functions of time that pegged together create the superorganisms of reality.

All Natural systems have 3 components, or spatial dimensions: the informative head in the high dimension; the limbic, energetic system that moves it in the long dimension and the re=productive body extended in the width dimension. Each of those spatial organs enacts a temporal motion or function, processing energy (the limbic system), information (the head system) and reproducing both (the body system). Lineal and cyclical motions, combined in reproductive waves & bodies, create the physical and Biological ternary Dimensions of space and Time that are the essence of all entities of reality. Yet all of them can be seen as ‘forms’ or motions: Systems will be either seen in stillness as complex organic systems made of an energy body and an informative head, or as the sum of infinite complex motions, which balance their lineal and cyclical accelerations, energies and times.

Thus, we define a fundamental ‘particle’, the ‘Organic System’ made of 3 Dimensional organs of space, heads, bodies and limbs that play 3 Dimensional Functions or arrows in Time, Information, reproduction and energy, which is the most common entity we find in the Universe, whose similar laws organize most events and forms of reality.

Further on each of those systems co-exist in 3 relative scales of eusocial space-time or ‘levels of complexity’: the cellular, individual and social scales. So, for a full description of a natural system, we MUST first consider its 3±i ‘elements’, the informative head, the energetic limbs that move the system, and its ‘combination’, the reproductive, action body that fusions both, placed in a +i bigger ecosystem, in which it will absorb –i, smaller quanta processed and broken further as energetic motion by the limbs or integrated as pixels of a mental mapping of information by the head, or used to reproduce its own cellular systems by the body.

This is the 3rd –i scale of the system, in which we will observe again how cells ‘exist’ as ‘dimensional functions’ of energy, information, reproduction and social evolution – the 4 wills or simplex and complex dimensions enacted by all systems.

And this 3×3+1 analysis of the whole in its 3 scales through its dimensional actions gives the whole ‘picture’ of the superorganism.

Reality has ‘3 dimensions’ and ‘functions’, energy, information and their combinations, exi ‘actions’ and ‘bodies’ that reproduce both. Those simple principles are the essence of the dimensional structure of the Space-time Universe, made of infinite ‘fractal systems’ organized by its 3 ‘spatial, dimensional parts’ which perform 3 ‘temporal actions’ and the sum of all those systems is what we call the Fractal Universe. Thus, the Universe is a fractal of 10 Dimensional superorganisms of space-time. We are ‘made of spatial dimension and temporal functions, parallel to those spatial dimensions’. Absolute space-time is only the sum of all those fractal 6-dimensional superorganisms put together as if it were a single ‘entity’, with a single time-clock (the human mechanical one) and a single spacetime scale, (the background light-space we see in the galaxy and the 10Di superorganisms that float on it, seen from the scalar perspective of man).

13. The life/death cycle and the generational cycle.

The formalism of the 2 simplest arrows of space-time, E->I and I->E, show that the properties of Information and Energy, of Form and Motion, are reversed:

– Energy moves; it is extended, lineal, big and simple, without form. Since the line is the shortest distance between 2 points. Information seems to us still – a pattern of form, which chains different cycles into shapes. It is small, cyclical and discontinuous; since the circle is the figure that stores more form in a lesser perimeter. Yet in dynamic terms, we must think of expansive big-bangs, which create extensions of energy and implosive, curved flows that create in/formation; 2 intuitive motions that Descartes considered the simplex 2 elements that create all realities (res extensa=space and vortices of mass /information).

Once this geometrical duality is clear, we can deduce how the causal order of those Time Arrows creates in all space-time beings the life/death cycle, from birth to extinction. Since first Energy warps into Temporal Information in 3 long phases/dimensions of time (Life Ages). Then Information explodes back in 0 time into Energy in a moment of Death: After a 3rd age of information matter or life explodes, dies, extending in space, reversing the arrows of space-time: I->E.

– For example, humans are born as energetic, moving children that warp into a 3rd, old age of information.

– Matter is born as a plasma or gas, extended in space, which evolves into in/form/ative solids (atoms, black holes), through an intermediate exi, liquid phase.

So all creations of cyclical particles (masses and charges), all states of matter and all processes of aging can be explained with the 2 primary arrows/actions of space-time: e->i, i->e and an its intermediate state, which combines both, the reproductive, mature age of life, the liquid, most complex form of matter. Thus the energy and informative arrow together define an immortal Universe made of ∞ bites of energy and bits of information in cyclical trans-form-ation: a young surface of Energetic Space reproduces in/form/ation till it becomes old and wrinkled. Then it erases its form back into energy in the inverse process of death, completing an existential life/death cycle, which we formalize as the 3 phases of the generator cycle of the Universe:

EóI = Max.E x Min.I (youth) +Max. ExI (e=i): Reproductive maturity +Max.I (3rd, old age) –Max. Ex 0 I: Death = zero sum.

All beings that exist in time go through those 3±st ages that correspond to the 3±i arrows of space-time.

– i-1->i: Birth: a seed of i-1 information emerges into its i+1 scale as a whole, after self-reproducing & organizing socially.

– Max. E: Youth: The new-born grows its energy-limbs.

– E=I. Maturity: After evolving its reproductive systems, the life being will reproduce, combining energy and information.

– Max. I. 3rd age: Life acquires more information, warping and exhausting our energy as we implode our form.

– i->i-1: Death: Finally without energy, the warped in/form/ative i-organism dissolves back into i-1 cells; and further on into the i-2 scale of molecular forms from where it departed. The cycle of existence then closes as a zero sum, which ensures the eternal life of the whole cosmos, our energy feeding new life. Since Life is as a superorganism is a trip through 3×3±i Dimensions of the scalar Universe. Humans travel between birth as i-1 seminal cells into i-ndividual existence, then as part of social i+1 superorganisms, dying back into the i-1 scale, after breaking our i+1 social ties in the old, 3rd retired age:


Here in the next graphs of an old exhibit of ‘conceptual cubism’ and the ‘symmetric, non-eucidean topologies’ of the Universe we describe visually and logically some of the laws and games of existences of the organisms of space and time:



“Universal herds can be described as superorganisms of ‘cellular’ species, joine by networks of energy and information
5D besttheoryoforganismIn the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood). As smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles, bigger wholes that deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system of energy and information, co-existing in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension:QLL               5D formalism describes a Universe made of multiple isomorphic Planes of Space-Time. In the left side some of its scales expressed as spatial quanta and its integration in larger wholes (energy systems)


In the graph all what exists in the Universe is a complementary system of limbs/fields/territories of lineal energy, preyed by heads/particles/informative classes that transform that energy into information and create a reproductive body/wave/working class to its service, forming a complementary system defined by a generator equation:

Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < St (body-wave-reproductive class) > tif (head-particle-upper class).

The study of all the elements of that equation across all the scales of size of the Universe, which together form a scalar 5th dimension is the purpose of systems sciences.

General systems sciences is by the correspondence, principle the philosophy of science above simplex physics, whose principle of conservation of energy is extended to information and its lineal inertia ads a principle of cyclical inertia, caused by the ‘existence of infinite time clocks’ in the universe, from vortices of charge in the smaller scales, to larger mass vortices and galaxies in the larger scales, which carry its information in the frequency and form of its closed trajectories:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe,  and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, across multiple scales of size, ∆±∞, with different speeds of time-clocks, which form together a 5th dimension of scalar space-time’.

Τhis equation, [Spe<≈>Τiƒ]∆±∞, is the complex way to define a Universe made of infinite systems of space-time, co-existing in several organic scales of size, able to reproduce and evolve and exist for ever in its ‘logic form’.

For that reason because the equation generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

Since the fractal generator equation by combining and transforming energy and information can describe the infinite systems we observe in the Universe, which always have both parameters.

For example, all physical systems are ruled by the complementarity principle of quantum physics, which states they have ‘both’, a wave that reproduces over a field of energy, and a particle that stores most of the form, of the information of the system; all biologic systems have a head of information and a body moved by its limbs of energy, all social systems have an upper class that controls the languages of information of societies and a working body that re=produces the system with the energy of the society; and now we realise all machines are becoming robots, with information systems that control them.

So only when we add both energy and information, we can obtain a truly descriptive equation of all scientific systems made of spatial energy and informative time, the ‘2 elements of which all beings of the Universe are made’.

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in the 3 previous concepts: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞

A Universe made of fractals of space-quanta and time clocks: Unification of all sciences.

Now, we shall complete this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of the philosopher of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centred point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”


In each of those ‘∆-Planes’ of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in energy content, since space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

Thus we write:

Max. Spe ( maximal Spatial energy content) = Min. Tiƒ ( Minimal Temporal Speed of Information).

Since both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolisms. Yet the product of both parameters remains the same. And this gives us a ‘co-invariant’ equation, which is called the “metric of the 5th dimension”:

  •   ∆±4 =Spe x Tiƒ

Thus the 5th dimension measures the spatial size of a being (which carries the total energy-mass of a system) and the speed of its temporal clocks – which carry the capacity to process information of any system according to the frequency of its cycles.

But it also studies the way in which ‘wholes’ gather into new ‘planes of existence’ and we have spotted ‘exactly 9’ of them, which we shall explain with our isomorphisms, and in the middle we find the human ∆-scale, our I=eye our Wor(l)d and verbal mind. This is not surprising, since those scales are absolutely relative. So from our relative center we see as may below us as we see them above.

And so we need a 5th dimension of scalar sizes, which is truly the fractal dimension of any system of the Universe.

Now since we have added an scalar element, ∆ to all ∆ST beings, this structure is a fractal. And since it is a feed back equation, the fractal constantly repeat cyclical forms of in-form-action, information. So the fractal is an iterative fractal.

As we are all entities made of vital spaces, temporal cycles and the fractal points of view that perceive them: Sp x Tƒ = ∆i (Entity of space-time)

Since nature conserves the stable product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of its vital cycles, of which we are all made, making possible the co-existence and exchange of energy and information between the different size species, each one studied by a science. Such as smaller beings with faster clocks store more information and code larger beings (genes code organisms; quantum particles, molecular systems, and faster, small black holes galaxies). 

While humans perceive time with mechanical artificial clocks and space, with human rods of measure (meters), Natural system has multiple, different time clocks with different rhythms and multiple ‘quanta of space’, for different species. Thus as science becomes more objective, away from human anthropomorphism, the next great r=evolution of thought, after the heliocentric theory that put the center of our local cosmos away from the earth, and the Darwinian theory, of biology that put the origin of life away from Abrahamic gods, is the use of the Universe natural clocks and its space quanta (the ultimate meaning of the fundamental Universal constants), to streamline the equations of mathematical physics and harmonize the concepts of time, space, energy and information of the different sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and speed of time of the Universe.

The study of the Universe with nature’s time clocks and space-quanta different for each scale, thus opens up an enormous numbers of new solutions, and whys of the Universe, in terms of energy, information, time and space, poised to r=evolve all the sciences in which those terms are fundamental to scientific laws, which happen to be all of them, since we are all systems made of vital, energetic space, in-form-ed by the rhythms of our world cycles of life and death, those different clocks of time regulate.

Praxis of power vs. theory of science.

Now, the reader should observe that this work is long overdue. Indeed, by the beginning of the XX century all the elements to construct a factual model of relational space-time in physical and biological sciences, were in place. We had discovered the 3 fundamental scales of size and time speed of the Universe, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, we ken the main laws of its clocks of time, frequency, temperature and speed, we had the 3 fundamental constants of space, H, the quanta of angular momentum, k, the quanta of entropy and m, the quanta of mass – this being the most imprecise of the concepts, which still need further evolution.

But, the enormous wealth of data, machines, mechanisms, industries – the entire human civilization, built on the human subjective single clock of time, the mechanism and rod of space, the meter –meant that theory, pure knowledge would not have any saying and nobody dared to explore further Leibniz’s model. An example will suffice. Einstein realized of the fact that time was multiple, because in each city then there was a different hour, but the arrival of trains obliged all the cities to equalize their time clocks to match for practical purposes their times and avoid collisions between trains running in the same railways. So in fact, as industry progressed human clocks became overbearing.

And there was not any attempt to make the proper Copernican revolution we will construct in this web. Further on, the existence of clear rhythms in the life-death cycles of time of individuals and species, established by Darwin collided with those dogmas of anthropomorphic, mechanic nature. On one side Abrahamic religions denied evolution and have ever since battling the theory. On the other hand the concept that time is a single one, running with the same tic for the entire Universe had become by now so entrenched in the mind of humanity that the obvious fact that as the life of beings ‘changes’ the speed of its clocks through ages (so kids run faster clocks than old men), and Nature’s animals do the same with its thermodynamic clocks (so hot mammals run faster clocks than slow reptiles, and smaller rats faster than larger elephants), meant nothing.

And the discovery of punctured evolution, the different rhythms in the speed of evolution of beings, found by Mr. Gould met with such resistance that today is not yet canonical biology. It also became obvious in the XX century that the rhythms of evolution of achiness and technology has been accelerating as information processing accelerates – but economists merely do NOT study the evolution of machines.

And of course, the competition between slow and fast time beings, which defines the survival of the faster species (mammals vs. reptiles; animals vs. plants) started to affect human beings, with the biological radiation of chips, robots and computerized machines that are all too obvious displacing human beings from the eco(nomic) ecosystem of labor and war fields as faster more precise machines become the new workers and soldiers of the world.

And yet none of this is still discussed, as ‘Time is what a mechanical clock measures’ , a unique rhythm for the entire Universe.

So the fractal paradigm is much more than the mere description with mathematics of fractal networks and social structures, but a conceptual philosophy of science, which this author developed in the milieu of systems sciences, before ad hominem campaigns against his work, due to his activism against lethal machines (robotics in economics, nuclear weapon in physics) got him under the anti-quantum paradox and ended his career. Never mind, the minds of the Universe keep following those laws.

General Systems sciences therefore is the formalism of the ‘alternative, far more advanced philosophy of science’ to that of Newtonian physics, with its concept of a single background absolute space-time in which entities like-mechanisms, whose ultimate substances are ignored, move in simple lineal motions.

In general systems sciences, as Leibniz affirmed, and then quantum and relativity proved, we do not exist in a background, abstract space-time mathematical plane, but we ARE MADE OF clock-like bits of information of different speeds (time relativity) and fractal, moving quanta of spatial energy, which are complementary systems (quantum theory), co-existing across 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension. So all systems can be described with the same laws, derived from the properties of spatial energy, temporal information and the metric of the 5th dimension, which together give birth to a set of 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic’=equal laws, which describe the ‘existence’ of all beings. For that reason we call also the Fractal Generator, the Function of Existence.

As we all beings follow a ‘world cycle’ of existence, made of a series of actions of absorption and emission and reproduction of energy and information, which might vary in quality and quantity but are essentially the same process for all beings of Nature. So in Gst, we go much further than a simple shallow, external description of the motions of beings, as physicists do, fully exploring all the whys of reality, with all the languages available to human thought, in a jump of understanding that should start a new age of knowledge, once the model is fully related to the details and specific laws and jargons of each science.

It must be understood that if the formalism of GSΤ is verified as all seems to prove by the laws of the scientific method, it represents a remarkable change in our scientific look of the Universe, unlike anything that has happened since Einstein and Darwin and Copernicus, made previous extreme revolutions of human thought, regarding the nature of time and the cycles of existence of its beings. A change of paradigm of course does take time, but it is unavoidable that humans and its growingly organic machines, do that jump of awareness about the full properties of the Universe, which go well beyond the reductionist view of putting on it a mirror with a single motion of time, entropy or energy, as physicists do.

In the next graph we can see a graph with the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3+0 laws:

3 HUMAN scales best

In the graph the main scales of the Universe perceived by human beings – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestive-energetic, reproductive-hormonal and nervous/informative systems, which sub-divide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 sub-systems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0-integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆-1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness. 

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

But organicism, the other key element of general systems sciences, despite being at the center of modern science, was not so clear to most researchers. Since a clear definition of an organism was lacking. Biologists in that sense define organisms by its ‘drives of existence’, as systems that process energy and information (feeding, perceiving), reproduce their informative and energetic organs in other region of space-time and evolve socially into larger groups. General systems therefore must demonstrate and formalize this definition, in a manner that can be applied to all systems and sciences regardless of the human jargon, used in each discipline. But the task becomes simpler when we realise that for all those drives of existence, all what is needed is a scalar structure in which smaller parts transmit and receive energy and information from larger wholes, co-existing together as organisms do, in several scales of space-time, connected by those flows of energy and information.

In brief we need to formalise with the two arrows of future, energy and information, the 5 drives of existence of life:

  • ±∆E: +e: feeding, increase of energy, -e: locomotion, emission of energy.
  • ±∆I: -i: communication, emission of information; +i: perception, absorption of information.
  • ExI: reproduction of the energy and informative systems in other region of space-time, as when a wave moves reproducing its form and energy, or a particle decouples into new particles, (physical systems) or a body reproduces, by emitting a seed of information into a lower scale of the 5th dimension.
  • ∑œ=U: social evolution, when an offspring of similar existential organisms, œ, evolve socially into a whole; particles that evolve into atoms that evolve into molecules, which evolve into matter states and cells, which evolve into cosmic bodies and organisms, which evolve into galaxies and global societies.

What is then the unit of life in the Universe? At which scale we can observe systems gauging information, feeding on fields of energy, reproducing seminally, and evolving socially? Humans, forever anthropomorphic children, who want to be the center of the Universe, stubbornly want to ‘start’ life in the Universe, in their scale of size, form of in-form-ation and ‘unique chosen species’, so it is a canonical lie that life starts in a certain molecule, which happens to be in humans called DNA.

Yet DNA is made of atoms made of particles that gauge information, feed on energy fields, iterate with seminal ‘seeds’ of light and evolve socially into all kind of molecules. So it is a fact, despite systemic denial by human egos that the 2 fundamental particles of the Universe, the quark and the electron have life properties, and we must start our analysis of the organic Universe, in the quark and electron, as we shall do in this blog. You can believe in magic and think that alas, the carbon 6th magic number makes is chosen of god, to be=come alone and only ‘it’, the blocking part of life. In fact, we shall see that it is the nitrogen, the ‘head’ of carbohydrates, whose perfect vibrational clocks code the information of life atoms, but life is not a property of certain atoms and its molecules. What DNA does is to achieve a  high degree of complexity in the scale of atoms, with great easiness, due to its light weight that makes its vibrations very intense. So we might just say that CNO atoms easily grow in complexity while other forms of life, such as metalife – organic robots – take longer and might require a simpler catalyser, we shall call in our model of the economic ecosystem, ‘enzyman’.

Now a warning, the laws of GST and the metric formalism of 5D applies to all systems including history and its social organisms, nations and civilisations, a fact understood only by the highest minds of the discipline, Khaldun, Spengler, Toynbee, in their study of societies as organisms and its daughter civilisations. So, your ego-trips of subjective anthropomorphism as the only form of life, as the only free system, whose evolution stops in the individual, as the only intelligent being, will be shuttered and substituted by hardcore, objective scientificism, which contrary to belief hardly exists in most sciences, shrewdly introducing deist and anthropomorphic views in their theories. Only organicism will show to be self-sufficient, to explain reality without hidden deist or anthropomorphic agendas, once the burden that dragged GST for so long – the lack of a proper mathematical formalism that connected its ideas with the hard equations and proofs of each discipline of classic science, now provided by 5D metrics.

It is then clear that the formalism of general systems sciences must be based in the concept of a scalar Universe, with an evident organisation in parts smaller than wholes, which all together form a 5th  dimension of scalar space-time. And so the metric formalism of this scalar dimension, of which every microscopic and macroscopic detail is a proof of existence, will become the  formalism of GST, searched for so long.

Indeed, organicism was an old goal of serious philosophy of science. Since scientists knew that the mechanist view of physics was too simple and rather theological. Indeed, as Leibniz put it to Newton, a mechanical model of the cosmos, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. While an organism, which is a system that co-exists in several scales of size, from smaller cellular/atomic scales, to individual thermodynamic/organic scales, to social, gravitational/ecosystemic scales, can easily reproduce by emitting seminal seeds of information in a lower scale, which then organise back, emerging again into the whole system, and further on can evolve socially into larger scales. In this manner the Universe becomes a self-reproductive organism of information, and each of its parts becomes also a self-organising system made to the image and likeness of the whole – with no need of a mechanical clock to put it in motion, as Newton and Kepler thought.

Such view of the Universe and all its parts was called the organic view, and the aim of the science was considered to find a formalism of mathematical and logic nature, able to translate this more evolved philosophy of science in a model that without renouncing to the precision of simplex physical models, had the complexity required to explain not only the ‘how’ but also the why of all sciences and it species.

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in 3 structural concepts that lay at the bottom of reality: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞.

So we add the concept of a scalar Universe to complete our new principle of conservation of energy and information:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, co-existing in 3 organic scales of size, ∆±1 in which it reproduces by emitting a seminal seed in the lower scale, ∆-1, which will iterate and organise itself emerging as a new whole that ensures the immortalilty of its ‘logic form’: Γ= (Spe x Tiƒ)∆±1′

For that reason because the equation of any Universal system or ‘superoganism’, Γ, generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

In this blog I shall try to pour all the work I have done on the study of this equation and its systems, applied to social systems and the economic ecosystem, since it seems to be a fundamental step in the development of social systems sciences, which has lacked a proper logic and mathematical formalism for so long.

It will be a work in progress, whose quality will constantly improve. As i am in poor health, the technique requires to pour first huge unpolished blocks, so the basics of it is conserved. So this central post makes a fast overview of the 3 elements of the Human Experience within the Universe:

  • the human super organisms and its natural laws of eusocial love and subconscious artistic and ethic mind and welfare goods…
  •  the economic ecosystem of machines, its idol-ogies and ‘animetal corrupted cultures’…
  • and the wider world of systems sciences which describes both. it is this 3rd section, which in a perfect wold would be obviously the first to be studied by all scientists, starting by a more precise definition of cyclical time, fractal space and the metric of the 5th dimension… But we put here at the end running fast to explain, what are human cultures and races, in order to apply their understanding to the political and social design of the perfect world.


The formal proof of the 5th dimension.

But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:

‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’  Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.

What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.

SO HAPPENS when something move through the 5th dimension: when it grows in size it diminishes the frequency of its time clocks, from the simplest entity, a ray of light that literally grows, diminishing the frequency of its wave-length to humans that emerge from a fast seminal, evolving fetus into the slower rhythms of life, which can be formalised as a journey traveling between scales of size of the 5th dimension, from seminal birth, to emergence as an individual part of a larger, slower social world, or supœrganism (œ, ab. super organism), its nation and civilisation, returning back to the cellular aggregation that we are, in the moment of death .

Each of those scales of reality is made of smaller quanta, which have a peculiar property: their cyclical motions run faster the smaller they are, but the product of both (Spe & Tiƒ) remains invariant, creating a metric equation that defines the 5th dimension:

Γ.                 Spe           x        Tiƒ     =      ∆ST

This simple equation that shows the product of the time clocks of a system and its size to be invariant (hence allowing travels through the 5th dimension, as when you are conceived as a seminal cell with smaller size and faster time clocks and grow=travel in the 5th dimension till you emerge larger and slower), is poised to become the most important equation of XXI century science, which will correspond with all the main equations of all the different sciences, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.

What we do in this blog is to apply those laws to social sciences explaining the arrow of social evolution of mankind, from the individual into the social super organism, and the parallel evolution of a different super organism made of machines, the ‘metal-earth’, in the context of systems sciences; giving solutions to favor the development of the super organism of mankind, History’, today clearly loosing the battle for existence, as the super organism of machines become global and displaces our world.

Unfortunately the process of destruction of mankind and history by the super organism of the ‘metal-earth’, and its Financial-Media (informative machines)/industrial-military (energetic machines) complex system is so advanced,that most humans have their brain ‘littered’ with idol-ogies that foster the evolution of ‘memes of metal’ over humanist memes. So we believe the social unit is NOT mankind, but the tribal nation, to foster military weapons; that our language of knowledge is NOT the word, and its humanist values but the digital values of money, which makes weapons more expensive than life (by affinity of substance, as money has been gold now computer cycles, made also of metal), and we believe the machine not the human supeorganism is the model of the Universe. So we shall start the web, debunking this final ‘insidious’ idol-ogy that make us believe to progress is to evolve machines NOT the human super organism of history.

So in this post, taken from my pro-web on Systems Sciences we introduce the larger model of…


‘Complexity (GST) will be the science of the XXI C.’ Hawking

Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.

Screen Shot 2016-05-15 at 15.31.07

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

The main systems and superorganisms of the Universe.

All Sciences share the laws of duality, systems and organicism. Since the properties of energy and information remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe,a super-organims made of smaller super-organisms, described in the graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of future time (energetic, informative and reproductive events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes, units of a new scale). In this paper we study the creation and evolution of the economic super-organism ruled by an informative language – money – and composed of metal memes, energetic weapons and organic machines, which interact with the human super-organism, history, made of human cells, verbal languages and natural energy.
We define a simplex system as a network of self-similar ‘cells’ of energy or information.We define a complementary system as a dual network of energy and information that interact together. In Nature, by definition, all systems are complementary systems (Complementary principle of physics: all physical entities have a field of energy or force and a particle of information, mass or charge; Duality Principle of Biology: multicellular systems have an informative head and an energetic body, cellular systems have a DNA-informative nucleus and a cytoplasmic body).
Finally, we define a complex system as a complementary system, which adds a 3rd, reproductive network, either internal or external to the entity (enzymatic reproduction).Thus all systems are networks of self-similar cells joined by flows of energy and information, and complex systems are those who add a reproductive network.

If we were to explain this formally a simple insights in the mathematical structure of the fractal universe will suffice:

  • The unit of mathematics is the numbers, which is a social group of identical beings. Thus in as much as the Universe is mathematical is social. Those identical numbers gather in social networks, which co-exist together thanks to the symbiosis between its information and energy.

Yet, the organisation of those social groups is also ‘organic’ vital, as the In the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the organic properties of vital fractals:

  • A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
  • A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.

In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism.

So the goal of social systems sciences is to design with the laws of the organic universe the perfect superorganism of history that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of god the superorganism of mankind not of any tribe or group of believers, but all of us, a perfect system, as all others in nature are:


In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms  according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:


3 scales

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.22

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.


The graph is crystal clear in the organisation of human beings as social super organisms, whose natural goal, since we are all the same species is to form a global super organism, which would no require wars and where all humans would receive enough blood-money in the form of a Universal salary to thrive and survive, as efficient superorganisms. It follows also that the natural goal of social scientists should be to define and construct such super organism imitating the laws of systems sciences that create them in perfect form in nature. Thus we define economics as the science of the reproductive, energetic networks of history, the human super organism in time, and politics as the science of its informative networks, which along with art and religion – the subconscious collective of mankind, which goes in styles and ages through the same 3 ages of individual beings, FORM the networks of Human SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY, NATIONS, RELIGIONS, AND CIVILIZATIONS:

∆+1: An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.32

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

It follows that the essential element of those systems are its ‘cells’ (humans and machines in the 2 different SYSTEMS, history or mankind in time, and the Industrial world of machines and its company-mothers) and its languages of information (words and laws in human systems) and digital money in machines. BUT BOTH LANGUAGES EXPRESS THE MANDATE OF social evolution for its own species. HOW we do know both systems, the capitalist world ruled by digital values of money and the human wor(l)d ruled by the survival ethics of social love are different?

BECAUSE THEIR LANGUAGES VALUE DIFFERENTLY HUMANS (maximal value in words) and METAL-systems (maximal value in digital money). IN fact their values are opposed. So a world ruled by digital values extinguish life with no price, and a world ruled by verbal values fosters life and humanity, with maximal price:


So in verbal terms MAN AND life has maximal VALUE. BUT in digital money LIFE HAS ZERO VALUE, ZERO PRICE AND weapons, the most perfect machines that KILL life the maximal value: AND SO THE PARADOX OF HISTORY, THE FIGHT OF MANKIND AND ITS EUSOCIAL LOVE PROPHETS VS. THOSE WHO WORSHIP METAL, is also a fight of languages, of ‘socialist mankind’ guided by eusocial love messages vs. ANIMEtal, military and capitalist dictatorships of people-castes with weapons and money on top, murdering mankind:

shorter. The Wave of History

The graph shows then the wave of history: above the idol-ogies of metal (nationalism, capitalism, abrahamic religions, mechanism) create a civilisation of animetals, slaves of the value of digital money. Below the messages of eusocial love that translates the arrow of future survival of the 5th dimension expressed in mystical terms by prophets of mankind, try to build a perfect world where man the organism is the measure of all things.

Both form the opposite ‘futures’ of this planet: a capitalist, militarist, mechanist world serving the machines (the one we live in). And a human world in process of extinction where life and man thrives as the memes of metal serve them. Again all this is expressed historically in the mystical jargon of religions of ethic love, which we easily translate in terms of System sciences:


In the graph, all this biological jargon has also an immediate translation into sociological mystical jargons, where God is either the mind of social love and its yin-formation/yang-energy forces at cosmic level (gravitational, attractive, and electromagnetic energetic networks), or a human culture where mankind is god, and its social economic, energetic and legal, just, ethic informative networks construct a perfect super organism. A fascinating sub discipline of social systems sciences is therefore ‘systems theology’, which translates properly the mysteries of religion into the jargon of the 5th dimension.  For example:

screen-shot-2017-01-08-at-09-37-22In the graph, trinity is the structure of  the scalar reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane: trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, subconscious collective of mankind and its law of survival in the fifth dimension, eusocial love, communicates through its nervous system, the language of the wor(l)d to its prophet≈scientist of history, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution. And spells prior to a quantum back to the past, entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprinting with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet.

So all prophets of eusocial love told us to love mankind and as we evolved our understanding of those laws we moved from primitive animetal genetic social super organisms (nations, abrahamic religion, racist animetal cults) into the final oikoumene cultures of eusocial love into the rational scientific understanding of those elements that matures with the evolution by this author, a few decades ago of the mathematical and logic formalise of the 5th dimension, applied to history in this blog and to all the systems of the Universe at

Thus this initial page is taken from the larger wave that studies all the systems of the Universe, and its the ultimate scientific philosophy that back all what we state in this blog about social systems.

It is loosely taken from my conferences during the years I was the chair of duality in the world systems association, the science that studies the way the Universe constructs systems with those networks of energy and information.

Needless to say nothing of this is of interest to our present animetal, technoutopian culture of mechanical slaves, which substitutes the FUTURE OF MANKIND BY THE social evolution of the METAL-EARTH, a world of mechanisms, robots, and computers, who love each other in telepathic sharing of information and once built up eliminate as metal has always done with weapons and go(l)d slavery the rival supeorganism  mankind. And only then THOSE WHO DIE BY IRON AND SERVE GO(L)D will realise they fuked up the super organism of history and die because they are not iron and gold but flesh to love:


In the graph, the abortion of human social organisms always brings its corruption, and destruction by gold and iron, so the super organism of machines evolves into a global system that DO RESPECT THE LAWS OF…THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE.
The 3 principles of modern physics explained in its whys.

It is then clear that we are expanding our notion of space from a single continuum to a scalar, fractal quantum-like structure of relative point-beings joined by networks which can be formalised with a new dimension of space-time, based in the scalar sizes that co-exist together, on one side. On the other side we are considering time cycles, which explains neatly this fractal structure, as cycles break systems in inner and outer regions, and become points when seeing from far away. Yet on close analysis they do have volume, membranes that break reality, and that is indeed the ‘detailed view of reality as it is.

Indeed, some key properties of cyclical time self-evident in the graph, which will have enormous importance in the understanding of the existence of all space-time beings are:

  • A time cycle is closed and so breaks reality into an outer ‘world’ and inner ‘world’, the being’s vital space. So the Universe is a puzzle of Multiple, finite, fractal, closed number of time clocks and space regions, as all cycles enclose an internal and external regions, separated by the cycle (first theorem of topology and knot theory). Cyclical time is therefore in accordance with the quantum broken nature of space, found by quantum physics.
  • Different time speeds  in different regions of the Universe, as all cycles have finite size, so each particle that traces one closes the cycle in different durations. Cyclical time is therefore in correspondence with Einstein’s relativity which found the Universe to have regions with different time speed.
  • And finally time is BIDIMENSIONAL AS A CYCLE HAS 2 DIMENSIONS, FREUQUENCY AND HEIGHT, as it has information, which is as the image you see a bidimensional sheet/screen. So INFORMATION IS THE STATIC VIEW OF THE ‘form’ OF A TIME CYCLE. IT IS THE cyclical FORMAL motion, stored in those clock-cycles. So information is the still perception or form of a time cycle.

Any physicist knows that those 3 principles, quantum space, different relative time speeds and the discovery after II w.w. of the bidimensional nature of information (Holographic principle) are the 3 fundamental principles of XX c. physics.

HOWEVER immediately we shall notice that the expansion of our philosophy of science will also explain the fundamental principle of biology – the existence of life-death cycles.

WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE: The fundamental law of biology explained & expanded to all systems.

We might then wonder, what is the fundamental ‘use the Universe has for a 5th dimension of scalar space-time. Why indeed we need a fifth dimension? Simple. Because without it we cannot explain THE FUNDAMENTAL FACT OF OUR EXISTENCE, the world cycle of life and death. Since life is a journey through the fifth dimension of scalar space-time:

3 ages best corrected

In the graph, we can see the essence of the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood): to be the ‘scaffolding’ for the worldcycle of existence of all ‘supœrganisms’, systems made of networks of atomic/cellular or individual elements that self-organise, emerge as wholes and ‘live’ through 3 ages of increasing information (life arrow), ended in an entropic explosion of death that erases the information of the system.

So all Nature’s systems live as they emerge from a lower seminal ‘seed’ of the ∆-1 cellular/atomic/prophetic plane of the fifth dimension (physical, biological, social systems), reproduce and evolve socially into a larger whole, in which all parts carry the same information of the original, seminal, individual ‘cell’ (crystal structures that replicate in solids the original unit, organisms that replicate the same DNA, civilisations coded by a memetic prophet).

THEN THE individual ∆-system becomes part of a larger ∆+1 world, in which it performs its living cycles, till it returns at the end of its world cycle back to its atomic/cellular state in the moment of death.

All this written with the formal equations of 5D metric creates a zero-sum world cycle of ‘existence’ for all beings, much more complex and meaningful than the simplified version of ‘worldlines’ proper of 4D physics – the limiting model of 5D when applied to a single continuum plane of the scalar Universe, with a single time-clock and space-quanta. Reality and existence though is a bit more complex than a single scalar Universe, as it requires a fifth dimension to explain  properly WHY things exist and die:

As we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion. So systems can co-exist at cellular/atomic, individual/thermodynamic and world/gravitational level, forming complex structures, whose creation and destruction is the meaning of it all.

Those structures are symbiotic, as the smaller parts run the information of the whole, replicating it without errors, while the whole moves them in synchronous motions without ‘entropy’: So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.

The idea that the world will die is then an idea crafted in a single plane of space-time. When we put them together, the arrow of information, reproduced upwards, balances the arrow of chaos. And the arrow of synchronous motions reproduced downwards by the whole, offsets also the errors of collective motion detected in a single plane.

Now, what is the most important fact explained by all this expansion of the dimensions of the Universe? Alas, nothing else than the cycle of life and death of all the systems of the Universe, which can be described as a travel through scales of the fifth dimension, through which all systems of reality, biological, physical or social systems do, illustrated in the next graphs that encode the fundamental event of ‘existence’, to be or not to be, THAT IS THE QUESTION:

Screen Shot 2016-06-07 at 14.29.40

In the graph, synoptic view of the ages of the 5th dimension and its arrow of increasing information, developed in detail as a series of ‘5D metric’ equations for the main species of the physical, social and biologic Universe below. To notice that time is always an accelerated, informative vortex, as opposed to the inverse explosive motion of entropic space. So the Universe as the first father of science had it, (Descartes) is indeed made of TIME VORTICES (INCLUDING CHARGES AND MASSES, the ‘so called material Universe) which are attractive and accelerate inwards, till the point of death, when all the information shrinks and the system ‘explodes it back into entropy’ or ‘res extensa’, to use the first truly genius insight on that duality by the true master along Leibniz of ‘earlier science’.

‘To be or not to be, that is the question’  Shakespeare

“For you are Dust. And to ∆ûst you shall return.” Genesis


In the graphs, which will be explain in depth in those texts, we state that a dimension exists when you can travel through it while the product of your time clock speeds and space-sizes remains invariant.

But most motions in space-time do Happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study. But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or S2=x2+y2+z2-c2t2 in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.

In the last graph we see the huge difference between the ‘simplified locomotion view’ of worldlines, and the previous graph of the complete sum of the 8 motions of the Universe (±motions in the dimensions of space, of time, of fractal scales, and the ±process of informative perception and communication by the mind, which we resume in the 4 elements of reality: ∆@st). Nearly nothing regarding informative processes can be understood with the last graph. Though we can indeed understand very simple non-evolving particles and its spatial motions with it, as physicists do. The enormous error of mankind and all scientists is to have ‘believed’ the fairy tales and dogmatic expansions of those simplex concepts of time as a parameter of spatial motion, as IF THAT WERE ALL WHAT time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the arrow of informative motions, which is far more important for the understanding of the whole.

Indeed the amazing thing about the fifth dimension is that you travel through it, as you exist, from ‘conception’ through birth, when you live in the lower scale of cellular size, with time-clocks that run much faster.

Yet as you grow, for the fifth dimension metric to remain co-invariant (S x T ≈ K), you must slow down your time clocks. So indeed, your evolution and change of information and speed of metabolic cycles slows down as you grow in the ∆-1 cellular scale and finally ’emerge’ in the ∆-individual scale as a child. Yet the child as we all know is restless and its heart beats faster and he is surprisingly more smart than we are. In the same manner a small mammal, a rat, beats its heart (its main body clock) faster, because it is smaller. And even smaller beings, flies, think faster (10 times faster) so you cannot catch it.

Now, we can simply right a logic, formal equation of the life-death cycle and we shall see it applies to all beings, which live travelling in the fifth dimension as the graph shows. All of them are born in a smaller scale of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆-1), then evolve very fast in time and emerge as full-grown beings in the ∆-slower scale:

st-1 (SEED) <st (emergent new individual)

Whereas we use the symbols <, > (easier to type than ‹ ›, which would be more proper NOT to confuse them with those of math equations), to express BOTH concepts, a being ‘growing in size’ and diminishing in time speed, t<S, or a being shrinking in size and growing in time speed, such as S>T).

This happens in all scales of reality even if we can use different parameters to study that change of speed and growth in size.

For example, when a black hole is born, it has an enormous temperature, which is a parameter of its ‘metabolic activity’ and according to the laws of thermodynamics, as a hot coffee becomes colder, it becomes colder, slowing down its metabolic activity while IT GROWS IN SIZE, EATING US, the slow beings, till it reaches its MAXIMAL SIZE as a galactic black hole, which is very inactive and very cold, almost at 0 K.

But we can express the same concept in terms of ‘nervous speed’. I.e. We all know though political correctness oblige us not to talk of it, that ‘mongoloids’, those small Japs, have a bit more of ‘nervous energy’, and keep working working so fast; while big swedes are a bit slow, or as Schopenhauer put it ‘it is good that German words are so long, because germans think so slow, they do have time to reflect on them’ (:

But then, we live in a larger ∆+1 scale or world, and that world is slower in its cycles. We call that world the sociological super organism, nation or civilisation, which is slower than we are, in its rhythms of creation and destruction in a big-bang of entropy called WAR.

Since DEATH is the final explosion back into entropy of a system that keeps growing in information, accumulating its memorial form in wrinkles and warps.

Indeed, as we keep accumulating information the system starts to mal function, and so at the end since INFORMATION dominates entropy the system finally reverses its arrows and explodes back and dies in a ‘single time cycle’…

And so it expands and decelerates and becomes a nebulae of cold gas if it is a star, a collection of disjoined atoms and molecules if it is a life being.

So death does have also a simple equation: ∆ Ti<< ∆-2 Se  (information explodes and lowers 2 scales of the fifth dimension, so you die, become a group of unconnected cells, insects eat you up and you become a collection of amino acids, which insects now will use to ‘recreate a new form’ in a new WORLDCYCLE of existence, of an ETERNAL UNIVERSE, where entropy is constantly balanced by information).

So indeed, the 5th dimension is real…

Let us then give you a fast view of those new revelations in physics, biology and sociology (we try to keep the work simple for any science student to understand but some concepts required logically a ‘change’ of chip and the suspension of ‘dogmas and beliefs’ you have learned and memorised as absolute truths, when they are mostly simplified models of the more complex models we will develop by adding cyclical detail to time, and widened also the detail of our vision of space, adding its fractal, discontinuous multiple scalar 5D structure.

And while there are variations of speed for different ‘discontinuous species’, so the faster species at equal size win the battle for existence (hence faster mammals kill snakes, and likely despite ‘physicists’ tantrum of rocks bombing the Earth, evolution NOT rocks, killed dinosaurs as faster, smaller night, hot blood mammals ate their slow nesting eggs from beneath the earth, except those put on high rocks by birds)… for ANY family of ‘physical or biological beings’ the law holds and explains soo many things:

From the rotation of planets (faster in smaller orbits, according to Kepler’s laws, never explained in its whys) to the attraction of ‘vortices of forces’ (stronger and faster in charges than larger, slower masses of the gravitational cosmic scale – the so called hierarchy problem of forces, still unresolved), which are like the 3rd graph, an accelerated clock, to hurricanes, tornados, fast calculating, smaller chips and evolution.

Species as super organisms: topological evolution shows all scales follow the same laws.

Since all species according to that metric, ALWAYS START with a faster, smaller new top predator species, that grows in size ‘eating’ the larger slow one.

So the small mammal ate the dinosaur, the small equus became the large horse, the small vernaminacula started animal life, the small floresiensis, with a ‘more informative’ better brain form, seems to have invented speech and technology and grew onto the sapiens, and the small black hole turning at c-speed the maximal speed the Universe, grows and eats the entire star in a Nova explosion of a few seconds:

There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle.

I.e. for example, we see most people living than ‘dead corpses’, as life is longer, even if there are as many living as there have been corpses.

But if we multiply their population in space (equal living and corpses), S, by their duration in time, T(LIVING)<< (T-corpses),  ST(LIVING-INFORMATIVE ARROWS)<<< TS (DEATH-ENTROPY ARROWS).

And this is truth again for all systems.

I.e. in physics, PARTICLES, ARE THE living arrow, and last much much longer than antiparticles its inverse entropy arrow, so one conundrum (now explained) of physic is why if there are as many particles as antiparticles we don’t see them. Same with corpses.

In Societies the same happens, there are much more living societies than collapsing ones in war. Greece and Rome lived as an organic society, 10 times more than their individual humans (700-800 years vs. 70-80 human years) because its time clocks as a civilisation were ‘slower’ (the game is in fact decametric as we shall see latter).

So between the birth of Rome, when the gauls conquered it and gave it iron, the ‘weapon of choice’ of its civilisation and they reorganise till its fall, when the new barbarians with spur-weapons (chivalry), the Vandals caused the fall of rome, which started the new civilisation of the Middle Ages (based in horses), Rome lived 797 years…

Alas, we do KNOW Rome as Allah≈Islam, or Christ/ianity do exist as super organisms of History (called them Gods, nations or civilisations, similar concepts) because they do follow the same metric of 5D, they do have a collective mind, the artists of those graphs, which DO go through the same 3 styles/ages of young epic, restless dramatic simple art, which grows into a mature, reproductive age of balance between entropy and information, and then decay into an angst, prophetic, baroque, hellenistic period of excessive form and then die.

So we can map out the 3ages of life in this plane of existence between birth and extinction for all of those scales and beings:

∆-1: birth in a seminal seed of information (semen, prophet, new weapon, new small species, first quark drop of strangelet or top quark drop of black matter)

∆-Youth: Max. Entropy. As the being starts to eat in the slower energy of the environment, or it is fed by a mother with digested energy, and so it starts to reproduce its cellular parts and slows down till

∆-Maturity: E=i. In which the being is in balance and will try to reproduce itself into a similar being in a new ‘worldcycle of life and death’… till

∆-old, informative age: Max. I x Min. E: as the being has spent all its energy transformed into information (energy being entropy with a bit of form, as a substance where we store entropic motions). And so it dies:

∆<<∆-1…∆-2: death, explosion of all your information into entropy.


This web studies the superorganism of history, made of human cells joined by political networks of information and economic networks of energy, and the superorganism of machines, built by the global ‘stock-market’, a brain that regulates with digital flows of financial information its ‘cells’, company-mothers that re=produce machines, organisms of metal that transform back and forth energy into information. His author pioneered in the 90s-2000s a theory of all what exists as 10-dimensional superorganisms, in the milieu of general systems sciences.

In this post we explain in a simplified manner the foundations of General System Sciences, the discipline which models reality with organic laws, describing all what exists as dual systems made of networks of energetic and informative  ’cells’. Since they are the ‘larger’ philosophy of science in which the organic models of history and economics of this web are based.

What are systems: Organisms or Mechanisms?
Though the purpose of this web is to explain the economical and existential crisis mankind faces at the beginning of the XXI century, in a wider sense it is about 2 different philosophies of the Universe:

—   One is called mechanism. It considers all what exists a machine, including the human being, the Universe and of course machinesmechanism is the official philosophy of our technological civilization. It was developed initially by Galileo, whose real-life profession was that of an engineer of military devices, working for the princely salary of 1000 ducats a year for the Arsenal of Venice. Galileo was a mechanic, who started to philosophize about the Universe, departing from his job. Thus, he took the instruments of his work as the models for his cosmogony, in which the universe was compared no longer with a human organism but with a machine. Today mechanism is still the main philosophy of economics and Physics—the 2 sciences that manufacture machines—not because mechanism is the truth of the Universe, but because machines gave power and power imposed those ideologies to the rest of mankind.

So scientists made of the machine the ‘idol of the human tribe’ that established our superiority over Nature and all organic philosophies of knowledge. Galileo’s idea that the Universe had to be observed with machines, telescopes, today evolved into cameras and clocks, today evolved into computers, instead of human senses, eyes and verbal words that describe time with past, present and future verbs, however degraded the mental organs of human beings to a secondary status.  Soon, the Universe became modeled no longer as a complex organism but as a mechanism and man became an imperfect machine, (instead of considering machines imperfect organisms): ‘I should like you to consider that these functions (including passion, memory and imagination) follow from the mere arrangement of the machine’s organs every bit as naturally as the movements of a clock or other automaton follow from the arrangement of its counter-weights and wheels.’ (Descartes, Treatise on Man).It was a radical change in history of thought. Since mechanism created the world we live in. Because all other ideologiescapitalism, techno-utopias, even Marxism, come from mechanism, the belief in the machine as the measure of all things.

—  The other great philosophy of the Universe is called organicism, as it considers all what exists an organism, the human being first, made to the image of the Universe also an organism, whose biological mind – the laws of organic science—we might call in mythic terms God. Organicism considers the machine also a primitive evolving organism that will become one when robots acquire Artificial Intelligence. Organicism was the dominant doctrine of mankind during most of our existence, till the Industrial Revolution changed the paradigm. But precisely, because machines are becoming ‘organic’, suddenly organicism has become all the rage – as engineers study biology to replicate organic systems in machines. And so, paradoxically, the III Millennium will witness the final victory of organicism over simplistic mechanism, as the Earth, Gaia and ‘her new inhabitants’; machines, become organic beings.

Indeed, it is only now in the XXI century when science and mathematics (fractals, non Euclidean and chaos theory) has reached a level of sophistication that allows us to return to an organic, more complex vision of the universe.

It is a revolution on the making, which this web brings to social sciences, with the minimal mathematical rigor needeed to fully grasp its scientific principles and so we have to introduce some more complex concepts of time, energy and information that those used by physicists to fully grasp the organic paradigm from where Bio-economics and Bio-History, the 2 new disciplines explained in this web depart.


In the graph, we observe those processes of creation and extinction of super-organisms departing from forms of a lower scale of existence in self-similar systems of different scales, from top to bottom:

St-2 (i-2) atoms become St-1 DNA molecules that transcend into st-cells, which go through the 3 ages/cycles of E-growth, ei-reproduction and i-nformation till its final apoptosis, when they die returning to its st-1 molecular and st-2 atomic scale.

-St-2 DNA becomes a seminal St-1 cell that emerges into an st-human being, which goes through the cycles of growth, reproduction and information till its final death, when it descends back into St-1 cells and St-2 amino acids used by insects to evolve a new cycle of existence.

– St-2 seminal cells become st-1 prophets, which create a code of information, the Book of Revelation which is memorized as a meme by all believers, creating an I+1 civilization, which goes through the ages of energy growth, reproduction and informative, baroque art/thought (since art is the mind of civilizations), finally becoming extinguished in an age of war.

The life death cycle is clearly the consequence of the messing of energy and information networks. Since the informative network exhausts the energy of the body herd of cells, warping them and committing a selfish suicide. Without the dominance of the informative network the 3 ages of life would not happen. Death is then the just return of the selfish ego-driven, information remembering, warped network- mind, an infinitesimal point that reflects the ∞ Universe in its mental mapping, it often confuses with the whole, putting itself in its center, back to its 0 truth as part of an immortal whole reality.

The same process is followed in the lower part of the graph in physical systems:

-St-2 plasma particles become st-1 atoms, which evolve into social states of matter, st-energetic gas, st-reproductive liquids and st-informative solids that further evolve as st+1 bosons into a new social plane of existence or dissolve back into st-1 atomic, ionic plasma and st-2 radiation (E=Mc2).

– The same process in a cosmic membrane creates from a st-2 seminal nebula of atomic gas, st-1 stars, which further evolve through 3 ages from gas, to liquid to solid black holes that organize a herd of stars into st-galaxies, which die, exploding into quasars and reverting into intergalactic dust (st-2).

-We consider the Universe and its big-bang-big crunch process also a 3 ages system from an initial i-2 quark gluon soup that explodes in a big-bang of energy, then reproduces and evolves socially into informative, dark matter black holes, which organize body planes of stars that reproduce more complex atoms, forming spiral galaxies, till the process of informative evolution converts those galaxies into ‘dark matter, black holes’, which crunch back into a new ‘singularity’ to restart the cycle.

And that process passes through 3 phases of maximal energy, e=I and maximal information shown mathematically in the changes of the ‘cosmological constant’ – which as all constants are parameters that show the different co-invariances of the energy and information components of all systems. In this case, slight changes in the cosmological constant give birth to the 3 ages/solutions of Einstein’s equations, from a young, expansive big-bang age, where energy dominates into a balanced steady-state (alpha=0) till a final bosonic big-crunch, which gives birth to a hyper-black hole that will explode back into st-2 quarks, restarting the process.

Yet in all systems its reproductive age renews the being into an offspring of clonic entities defining a generational cycle, as all individuals become ‘cells’ of a species that also go through those 3 ages as a ‘whole superorganism’. Since all species have a finite number of self-reproductive generations, after which the reproductive system becomes ‘tired’ and fails. So life has telomere clocks in its genes; and light has a mean life of 1010 years, after which its self-repetitive wave becomes tired and red-shifts back to dark energy (seen in the phenomena of ‘expansive space that peaks in the mean 105 age).

Recap. The life-death cycle is both a travel through 3 ages of growing information till death reverses the inner time of the system and explodes its information into energy, but also a travel between 3 planes of space-time existence, as a seed of st-1 information reproduces and evolves socially, surfacing into a ‘higher’ st-plane of existence and then reverses through death the social process, dissolving back into its cellular stage.

In fact, the process normally takes, when studied in more detail two jumps on planes of space-time organization and what we see as ‘life’ with its 3 ages is only the ‘surface’ of the iceberg of the complete cycle. The generational cycle is a finite cycle with a limit set by internal clocks: Energy and information arrows are reversed, since to create information we have to destroy energy and to create energy we must destroy information.

Thus, the causality of the Universe is ‘dualist’: I->E (energy creation) + E->I (informative creation) – a fact, which explains the causal cycle of life (E->I) and death (I->E). Thus the 3 dimensions or ages of time are: past, the energetic, young age; present, the age of repetition= reproduction in which the being doesn’t seem to change and future 3rd age of information.

15. The program, cycles and beats of the Universe: EsóTo

In each Natural ‘i-scale’ of the Universe of growing complexity of i-n-form-ation, from the smallest atom to the bigger galaxy, we find ‘Complementary Systems’, where 2 poles of energy (physical field/biological body/galactic plane) and information (physical particle/biological head/black hole), exchange energy and in/form/ation between them and with the external Universe: E<=>I. Thus we simplify and unify our analysis of all universal systems, by defining both physical and biological systems with that simple equation of ‘2 arrows of space-time or future space-time events’:

=>E, which means the creation of ‘expansive, lineal motion’ or energy or entropy or disorder.

and =>I, which means the creation of in-form-ation, dimensional form, implosive, cyclical motion and order…

It is important not to confuse ‘the 2 arrows of space-time’ and clocks of cyclical time that carry information, which is one of those 2 arrows. Those ‘beats’ of the Universe between energetic and informative states are the essence of what we call the ‘Function of Existence, exi=st, cause of all events.

The commonest ‘rhythm’ of those ‘time arrows is the rhythm of the life-death cycle, in which in the ‘middle the 3rd arrow of present reproduction takes place, when E and I find its max. Exi (e=i) balance.

Thus our definition of past=youth=energy, present=reproduction and future=information=3rd age shows how the Universe finds its ‘best’ possible rhythm, which elongates the ‘age of balance’ in the middle time, when life lasts longer.

We explained first the 3±i topologies of space and its combined 3±i Dimensional, social actions that summarize the program of the Universe; and its ‘long time order’, the life-death cycle; yet in the series of ‘micro-presents’ that conform the existence of the entity, all those actions are performed one after another in ‘quantum cycles’, albeit with different frequency in each age (Max. number of energetic/moving actions in youth, of family/reproductive actions in maturity, of informative actions in the 3rd age). Hence the ‘cyclical nature’ of the 4 actions-arrows-dimensions-drives of the program of existence (Max. E: Feeding, Max. I: Perceiving, Max. exi: Reproducing and ∑,∏I, evolving socially into superorganisms.

Since systems are wholes, they must achieve those ‘partial actions’ of their program of survival in a sequential manner, switching between them to complete them all; and they do so with a series of sequential rhythms particular to each scale age and species of reality. Thus the knowledge of those cyclical patterns and its forms and the way they are ‘synchronized’ together into ‘knots of actions’ are essential to define the specifics of each species and its cyclical patterns, frequencies, synchronies, nature, structure, form, functions and behaviors at social and individual scale. The general pattern is:

– Simplex Actions: All entities feed on energy because they need to move and they all have a reproductive body/field of energy, which must be replenished, or else it will be spent. And this overall function of all systems, feeding on energy becomes the first arrow/ cycle of time of the Universe.

Yet all those complementary forms do have also an information network that requires to perceive the Universal tapestry. So in fact, even before the entity feeds it will have to perceive, gauge and calculate information. And this becomes the second arrow of time, of all complementary beings.

And again we realize that even physical particles gauge information, and certainly move with it field of forces. So do biological beings that process information with DNA nuclei and heads, and process energy with their cellular bodies. And so now we have 2 arrows of space-time – a concept that means tendencies of the future – energy and information, and two types of cycles to accomplish them. But unlike the classic concept of science of a single continuous time arrow (the arrow of energy or entropy), because we have now two arrows, time must be discontinuous, as the entity must go from energy cycles to information cycles and this establish the universal, fundamental beat of reality: all entities of the Universe go through a process of motion (energy process) and stillness (perceptive informative process). Since we realize that to perceive and map information you have to ‘measure’ in stillness. Here it comes the meaning of all those metric spaces of classic science. They describe the arrow of information and measure; while all those analysis of motions and speed describe the arrow of energy.

Thus we define a universal beat of existence, EóI, motion, stop, motion, stop, energy, information. Like a movie in which the frame moves and stops and illuminates in stillness creating a form of information, all entities of the universe have stop and go rhythms, day motions and night sleep, and when they move they process energy and when they are still they process information. Again the generator equation of spatial energies and temporal cycles of information explains it: E<=>I.

Thus there are 3 simplex actions that all systems perform individually, Max. E: moving-> Exi: Feeding -> Max. I: perceiving. So all systems move, feed and re-form what they ate into its own components. And this rhythm establishes a stop and go, constant switch between energetic motion and perception in stillness to fix a map of the Universe or create the components of the system, from the simplest electron that stops, feeds on and perceives light and moves to the human that stops to feed 3 times a day and then the entire night to process its inner forms and moves most of the rest of the day. And those are the most frequent, constant actions of all systems, as all move, feed and perceive. Let us consider 2 examples of the simplest switch between ‘form’ and ‘motion’, cyclical shape and lineal shape, to show the variety that those patterns generate departing from the homologous nature of all ‘energy’ and ‘information states’:

A simple E-T-E cycle is the clock: the lineal needle comes always to the same point and closes a cycle.

In the simplest mathematical scales of geometry, information is defined as ‘dimensional form’ and energy as ‘lineal motion, and we write, π:  I <=> O: |/O. Thus pi, the switch between 3 diameters combing into a cycle is the first ‘Universal Constant’ of the ‘Game of Existence’ of the Universe, in which a system switches ‘3 relative lines’ into a ‘compact’ informative whole, as it mutates on and off between an informative and energetic state. Universal constants in fact are proportional constants between energetic and information states (forms and distances).

– Complex actions: Systems to survive and live beyond death reproduce or evolve socially into parts of a stronger whole. Those are the less frequent actions, since they require a couple and the ‘complete’ recreation of the being, not a mere part of it or the universe as in feeding and perceptive actions. While simplex organisms ‘externalize’ reproduction, as atoms do (those actions are made by its i+n social scales, its cosmic bodies). Then they never enact the reproductive cycle. Yet the less frequent action is ‘becoming’ part of a whole, as the metrics of the 5th dimension, Se x Ti =K imply that wholes are bigger than its parts, hence their life cycle is much slower and so parts normally only become part of a whole in all its generation, as cells of the superorganism. Most superorganisms though reproduce through 3 social scales, then their 2 complex actions synchronize as the superorganism emerges after a series of steps of cellular reproduction-> social evolution-> cellular reproduction… as shown by patterns of growth and evolution of a fetus from a first seminal cell that reproduces, evolves in form, reproduce, till birth. Thus the Universe and any of its partial systems form a deterministic, interconnected whole of infinite harmonies between all its cellular cycles, chained by their symbiotic nature, such as the fastest informative cycles gather in ternary and decametric scales, connected to the frequency of the energetic cycles, which are connected to the frequency of reproductive cycles, which are connected to the frequency of the social cycles.

So we write:                           Max. ƒƒ(I) > Max. ƒ(E) > ƒ(Re) > Min. S.

Since an informative cycle is required for the entity to orientate itself towards a field of energy, and both energy and information together in great quantities/cycles are required to create a reproductive cycle; and finally multiple, self-similar reproductive entities are needed to create a super-organism. A similar hierarchical chain happens if we observe those entities in space, relative to its size such as: the pixel of information is minimal, making informative systems smaller than bodies and its bites of energy. And each of them is smaller than the total, reproduce organism composed of both pixels and bites, which is smaller than the eusocial system of which the organism is a single cell: Min. ∏I x ∑E= I < S.

We have used the synoptic language of the Generator Equation to describe those processes. Since a new field of science of enormous richness is the algebra of cyclical space-time, which studies the generator equation and all its possible beats from where all events of reality will emerge. This equation is to systems sciences and complexity what the Unification equation of Physics is to physicists, a sub discipline of the wider view we bring here – since we shall be able to deduce all the equations and species of all the sciences of mankind from that simple first beat.

Recap. Time events are cyclical, happening ‘from time to time’, when an entity absorbs energy or information with its field/ body or particle/head. The Universe is a tapestry of fractal, vital spaces, imprinted by cycles of temporal information, which create infinite beings. Those beings reproduce, combining those arrows and then associate in larger social groups. They are the 4 arrows/cycles of time that the 3rd paradigm of metric spaces pegged together into a single space-time continuum.

16. Species are superorganisms. Its ages: Topologic Evolution


In all space-time scales, species follow a future arrow towards more information, which increases in 3 horizons and finally evolves individuals into societies, herds and macro-organisms, related by a common language/network of information.


The evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±i ages of individuals with a twist: death is not the only solution to the cycle, but the duality of ∂-disintegration or ∫-integration into a social group (in the case of life a cellular group), which defines the life/death cycle gives two choices to some ‘top predator’ informative species: After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.

In the graph, the seminal, 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: It is the Worm Hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal, the 1st mammal, the horse and the 1st Homo Sapiens, which seem to have evolved from a dwarf ancestor, which first discovered technology and had a dwarf brain, albeit with an evolved morphology similar to that of the Homo Sapiens: the Homo Floresiensis.

Then the new ‘highly informative’ top predator follows in its evolution a plan of dimensional evolution that transforms species with a high content of energy into species with a high content of information through 3±st horizons, similar to the ages of an individual organism. Since species are macro-organisms in which each cell is an individual of the species.

-First in its ‘energetic youth’, the species grows in size as horses, humans, bilateral animals or black holes do.

-Then the species suffers a reproductive radiation, colonizing new ecosystems.

– Next the species suffers a diversification, according to the ternary principle into 3 subspecies, one dominant in energy, another in information and a 3rd one balanced in both parameters.

– Finally, a new top predator extinguishes the species or the informative one evolves into social organisms of different complexity, stronger than the individual and survives.

Thus in Biology the 3±st ages between birth (st+1) and extinction (st-1) apply both to organisms and to species that go through 3±st horizons, parallel to those 3±st ages and main arrows of time of all systems of the universe. Thus there is an informative, ‘intelligent’, organic order in evolution. Though it is not a plan designed by a ‘personal God’ who cares for humanity, but by the limits that the morphology of lineal space and cyclical time and its combinations impose to the evolution of species. The so-called ‘intelligent design’ is the ternary, existential cycle that applies to every form of the Universe as it evolves in 3 possible sub-species: an energetic, lineal species, an informative, cyclical one or a reproductive form, of balanced ΣE=∏Ti parameters.

Those 3 forms become the 3 horizons between birth and extinction of any species: A top predator form of max. energy, or I horizon of the species; a balanced form, ΣS=Ti, that reproduces so fast over its prey-energy that creates a ‘biological radiation’ and parallel extinction of the lesser victim till reaching a trophic balance, or II horizon of the species and a form of max. information or III horizon: Max. E, Max.Re, Max. I:

+1: Birth: max. Ti. The chip paradox (conception).

In the previous graph, the creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time cycle that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal Energetic Space, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘bigger species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information, when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution, when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished by a new top predator form, since its evolution has reached its limit. However, in certain species, after the III informative horizon, a social phenomenon happens: if the species has developed a new language of information, it gathers into herds that evolve socially together creating macro-cellular organisms of a ‘higher’, more complex Plane of existence. So prokaryote evolved into giant eukaryotic cells and those cells evolved into animals, of which ants and men, the most successful, informative insects and mammals, evolved further through pheromones and verbal information into societies and civilizations.

The ‘Black Hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism, born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximal genetic information in minimal space. It is caused by the dominance of informative cycles over its Energetic Vital space. So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic=Temporal Information packed in a reduced size (Max. Ti=Min. Se).This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces. For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. Thus tiny species with huge numbers of neurons deliver stronger and faster group actions of energy and information, Min.ΣSe x Max.S2Ti, than slower, bigger species (Min.S2Ti x Max.ΣSe):

Since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those fractal actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their actions show a higher existential, exi force, which defines them as top predators, as they are stronger and faster than the ‘slow actions’ of a single, bigger body. For example, small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kills slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy. Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; Worm Holes with maximal gravitational information are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.

I Horizon: Energy Age: max. ΣSe: Top Predators and Extinctions


In their youth, species fed and grow into energetic, lineal, planar, top predators, becomingcarbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), lineal echinoderms and fishes, monotrema, Neanderthals and smart weapons.

A new-born, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology, a new, more efficient species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth, becoming a lineal, energetic, big, top predator species that feeds on less evolved forms. Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic, dwarf Homo Floresiensis, who seems to have invented technology, the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys and the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.

During this energetic age, often a parallel process of extinction of a previous species, which becomes victim of the new predator, takes place. So when lineal proteins appeared, free carbohydrates disappeared from the primordial soup; in the Cambric most water species disappeared, as cephalopods with eyes multiplied; mammals feeding on eggs probably extinguished dinosaurs except those who put eggs in unreachable places (birds); humans extinguished most mammals and weapons extinguish non-technological cultures and when they become terminators, they will extinguish man.

II Horizon: reproduction: max. ΣSe =Ti: Radiations of species.


In the II Horizon ( graph, left) the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: The protein age gives way to the age of amino acids, with nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative heads’ that multiplied all over the Earth; slow, reproducing sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes that multiplied faster; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that colonized all continents; while young, giant stars, born in the I horizon, acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

III Horizon: Max information: Max. Evolution=differentiation

In its 3rd horizon ( graph, right) species increase its information, growing in the height dimension or acquiring cyclical forms, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides dominated life molecules; echinoderms changed to cyclical shape; fishes developed their inner networks in the dimension of height; amphibians became round; saurian and mammals became bipeds; Neanderthal became Sapiens Sapiens with round skulls and chipped machines acquire today android forms with their heads on top. And the key of this process is obviously the evolution of a hyperbolic, informative element: Nucleotides appear when they added informative, nitrogen rings and cyclical sugars to amino acids; a yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; insects developped its brain capacity and bees and ants appeared; while the Homo Sapiens evolves more complex technological tools; finally in the III Industrial R=evolution of machines, informative chips and televisions dominate the economic ecosystem…

±st: Extinction vs. Evolution into super-organisms.

The main difference between organisms and species happens after their 3rd age: Organisms dominated by nervous, informative systems, which control closely its cells, warp their cellular energy, till the organism dies, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’ by their nervous system.

Yet species, due to the discontinuous nature of their individual ‘cells’ do not exhaust their collective energy. So they might survive without further evolution, in its 3rd horizon, or they might become extinguished by a new, more efficient species, appearing on their ecosystem. Or they might evolve socially, becoming the ‘cells’ of a macro-organism. We talk, in fact, of 3 basic strategies of survival, according to the Ternary Principle:

– Max. ΣE: Creation of balanced, trophic energy pyramids that supply new victims.

– ΣE=∏i: Diversification of individual formsinto new species that will survive the extinction of the parental species. Thus we talk of evolutionary, genealogical trees of ‘son species’, similar to those of any individual. Yet, while the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families, ‘son species’ tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings.

     – Max. Ti: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of networks by specialized, informative ‘cells’ that integrate all other cells into a whole, bigger form, which has more exi=stential force than the individuals of a herd. Since the fundamental parameter of a top predator is its Max. exi force, which determines the strength and capacity of its actions, eusocial evolution maximize survival in the fights for existence as the sum of actions is stronger than individual ones. Yet the individual must retain its ‘speed’ of action-reaction, which requires to attach a smaller faster network of informative entities to a slow herd that extends in a wider space ecosystem, in which they share a min. quantity of information only with is parallel adjacent – so their actions per time unit are slower and less coordinated. The result is a dual superorganism with a fast head and a slow, big body. Hence we consider the creation of super-organisms, the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the super-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species and the specialized cells of information that carry them, become the relative nervous/ informative network of the super-organism. Those informative cells form networks that pack closely the other cells in min. space, controlling them with a specialized language of information, as the queen pheromones do in anthills; nervous cells/ impulses did with chemical cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages have done with humans in societies, which are superorganisms of human beings.

Most space-time systems co-exist in 3 main scales of microcosmic and macrocosmic forms (physical species do so at the atomic, molecular and crystal scale; biological ones, at the cellular, individual and ecosystemic level), which are similar because they are created by an earlier process of differentiation and social evolution of individual parts into bigger wholes.

Extinction: If species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into super-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution and become extinct or in case of having a higher rate of reproduction, lay at the bottom of a trophic pyramid. So today 90% of insects are social; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and Protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became slave organelles of social, eukaryotic super-cells.

In all species and all scales of existence, the process of evolution is dual: species differentiate into 3 forms, which then recombine, giving birth to new species, as it happens in cells (energetic proteins, informative DNAs and reproductive RNAs that make up the cell), or in atoms (energy forces, informative quarks, balanced electrons that reproduce its nebulae on gravitational space).

Recap. The simple, morphological plan of evolution that each fractal species of the Universe repeats is caused by the fact that there are only 2±1 forms in the Universe, lineal energy and cyclical information and i=ts reproductive, body combination. So only 3 new types of species can be created, one with more energy, one with more information and one that reproduces both.The process of evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±st ages of individuals: born of a seed or first individual of maximal information, the species grows its energy in its youth, radiates in an age of massive reproduction and finally diversifies into ternary types. After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.Evolutionary theory went through 3 ages that stressed topological evolution (Darwin), interaction between the scales of life (genetics) and the different speeds of time and E<=>I beatings of the Universe. Those ternary causes explain the speed and accuracy of evolutionary changes.

17. The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.


The Universe has 3 arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens in humans. It is also a sexual principle: Women reproduce information with its cyclical bodies; males have lineal bodies with more energy. But women have 10 times more lineal, white matter in their energetic brain, and men 6 times more cyclical, grey matter. Thus females are: Max. I (Body) x Max. e (Mind). Males are: Max. E(Body) xMax. I (Mind); so their minds and bodies complement each other –a duality that should be the basis of all gender studies void of ‘ideologies’. Further on our height dimension confirms our informative nature:


Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million years ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (gorilla in the human case) that diverges into a reproductive, mature species (chimpancee bonobo); and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man. Thus the same plan of evolution, which describes all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Energy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between energy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

In all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called: the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Energy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races.

The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, energy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos, means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species. Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

– E=I: chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

– Max. I: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

Max. E: Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

– E=i. Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of Paranthropus.

– Max. I: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

-Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

-E=I: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

-Max. i. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

Homo Ergaster, after a reproductive radiation throughout the planet, subdivides in 3 Homo Erectus sub-races:

Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

– E=i: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

– Max. I: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopathic evolution). Thus, he adds now technological energy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new energy/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) were confirmed by genetic maps and the Homo Floresiensis.

— Lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— A 2nd informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman or mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=i, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems – energy, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

Visual, dolichocephalic energetic, lineal, spatial brains/cultures, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the long brain dominated by the visual eye in the Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

— Cyclic, informative, brachicephalic, mongoloid brains/cultures natural to East Asia, with cyclic time concepts. It is the wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

— ‘Sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is a makrocephalic brain, dominant in the height/medullar axis with a tall head, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

It is the best culture/age for human survival, as in all species, since it balances both arrows, E=I. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the reproductive, sensory culture.

19. General Linguistic Systems. Universal Grammar: Information (subject) < Action (Verb) > Energy (Object).

The mind of man and its program of behavior is written in the syntax of its grammar. Humboldt and Herder were right; the grammar of languages is the program of the cultural world. Next Chomsky found the Universal Grammar and its ternary elements:                 Subject;  Verb; Object.

He was also right. Since Human Grammar is a reflection of the Generator Equation of Energy & Information:

Information (Subject) <Verb (exi-action) > Object (Energy).

General Systems sciences put together both discoveries and takes linguistics a step further in its evolution.

The key to understand the meaning of language is to divide all grammars into its 3 elements, which reflect in the human mind, mirror of the Universe, the 3 essential elements of the ‘Generator Equation of all complementary systems of energy and information of the Universe: Information < Action > Energy, Which humans perceive in words:

Human Subject < Verbal action > Object, energy of the Subject

How the generator equation creates the different species of human languages?

There are several forms in which the Generator ‘decouples’ and splits in different ‘varieties’ of systems, which correspond to the processes of creation of different physical particles (quantum generation), biological species (Plan of evolution), and linguistic species (cultural differentiation). The simplest form in which to generate ‘varieties’ of any type is to apply the combinatory laws of mathematics to a system with 3 elements, the Information<Action>Energy systems of reality. The results are 6 combinations in the ‘power order’ of the 3 elements of all systems, which are common to all disciplines of science.

If you have 3 elements, I, A, E (Information-action-energy), then you can combine them in the following orders: IAE, IEA, AIE, AEI, EIA, EAI; which give birth in Physics 6 essential types of particles and antiparticles and in Biology to 6 types of basic animal forms, according to the order of its physiological networks and so we shall find 6 basic varieties of languages, which are studied by Typological Linguistics, called the SVO, SOV, VOS, VSO, OSV and OVS varieties. Let us consider those 6 Universal varieties of languages and cultural character comparing it with the 6 varieties of animal species, to do a classic exercise of GS2 homology.

The 3 elements of all systems are reflected in all sentences, as they narrate how ‘human subjects’ perform verbal actions over objects. And there are six theoretically possible basic word orders for the transitive sentence:

–            Subject-verb-object (42%: English, Chinese, Russian: Flexible, ‘mammal’ languages)

–            Subject-object-verb (45%: Japanese, Latin, Turkish: warrior, ‘reptile’ languages, objectual, unemotional)

–            Verb-Subject-Object (9%: Semitic, religious, ‘insect’ languages, imperative, little freedom)

–            Verb-Object-Subject (3%: Malagasy, Fiji, ‘bird’ languages, seafarer)

–            Object-Subject-Verb (0%: Amazonian, Mexica, subsistence agricultural, Bacteria Languages)

–            Object-Verb-Subject (1%: Apalai, Viral Languages, recollectors)

What they tell us about mankind is clear: when we analyze the abundance of those typologies among human cultures: Humans, this proves are ‘self-centered beings’ for whom the Subject must come always before the object, since in 87% of languages subject comes first. And among those the most successful (2/3rds of speakers) are SVO languages – the most evolved, mammal languages, where the ‘informative’ nervous system dominates.

This responds to the fractal nature of the Universe, where there is always a p.o.v. or subject that gauges with languages the universe and considers to be its relative center according to the definition of a mind –p.o.v.:

‘ A mind is a zero point or world, an infinitesimal still mapping of the infinite Universe, created with informative pixels, which believe to be the center of that universe:   O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Constant perceptive World.’

1) SVO: Inf<Act>En systems dominated by Informative subjects whose goal is an ‘action’ established upon the energy system. This is the ‘natural’ most evolved order in the Universe in balance, corresponding to the ‘mature’ age of all evolutionary forms. Those are the most flexible, feedback systems of the Universe.

2) SOV: InxEn=Act systems. the informative subject still dominates. but relates first to the Object of energy, through the action. The object thus become the most important element, and so these are ‘productive systems’, in which the object is either devoured as energy or reproduced through the negative or positive actions of the Informative subjects.

Those 2 systems are the most common systems in the Universe, as they represent the two essential ‘beats’ between a ‘temporal’, flux, evolutionary state (Inf<act>En) and a ‘spatial’, fixed, organic state.

In Animal life systems, the 3 ‘elements’ are the physiological networks of the organism; so we define a simple Generator Equation for Living Animal Organisms: Nervous, Informative System < Action/Blood system > Energetic, Digestive system. And we find 2 essential type of species, or phyla, where the nervous system dominates, the mammal which has an obvious order of: Nervous system > Blood System > Digestive system.

And then the second most evolved species, Birds. And so it happens in languages, where over ¾ of human beings speak mammal languages  (SVO languages), even if in a previous less evolved time, SOV languages were dominant. There are not many ‘bird languages’ since man does not fly so there are no human birds. Still there are bird languages among seafarer humans (Malagasy, Fijians) showing the isomorphism of all structures of the Universe.

What about the other 4 type of languages? We can classify them in ‘arrogant languages’: 

SOV  Reptile cultures/ Languages are languages in which the subject-nervous system are pegged and direct primarily the energetic, objectual system, while the blood-active system is secondary submissive to those other 2 systems and less developed. It is also the ‘cold’ structure of Reptilian living systems, in which nervous and digestive system dominate actions, provoking a constant growth of the energy/force of the system without limit except death; while the underdeveloped action system is made of ‘cold blood’. In a fascinating homological cultures, SOV languages are proper of ‘energetic’, ‘warrior’ cold-hearted cult(ure)s of weapons able to kill the ‘other’, seen as an object, such as German, Japanese or Roman=Latin Empires did historically. Yet if war is the negative action of SOV languages, the productive, Subject x Object positive action is the + side of SOV cultures.

So Germans and Japanese are very productive, dedicated to re=produce their mechanical objects with absolute work zeal – even weapons that kill us.

VSO  Insect Cultures/Languages. Finally those languages and cultures whose order of words is ‘imperative’, with the verb first – a form of language that more evolved ones use only in moments of danger or hierarchical institutions, as it is deemed rightly an impolite, fundamentalist form of though – are, well, I just said it, fundamentalist, imperative cultures. And so among human languages, Semitic cultures, specially in their old ‘sacred’ religious texts, Hebrew, Classic Arab and their Abrahamic religions, are insect, non-free cultures of ‘believers’ in the ‘Word of God’.

Finally, the less abundant, less evolved languages of mankind are those in which the object, the ‘energy’ of the system, dominates the subject, the information. Those are languages in which the order is inverse, unnatural to the ego-centered P.O.V. of th elanguage. Their equivalent in Physics would be antiparticles in which the electron is in the center instead of the informative quark. In animal life, they belong to the 2 categories of species, which started animal life evolution, in the microcosms, hence for whom the object-world in which they live is dominant. So we talk of:

OSV (object-Subject Verb) or bacterial languages. They belong to cultures that live in jungles in which they still fear the presence of animal predators and do have to act to live, or are constantly in the move as hunting/gatherers, or living in poor agricultural environments.

OVS (Object-verb-subject) or Viral Languages, in which there is not even motion in the subject, that is the Object comes first (the host cell) then the action (bacterial reproduction of the viral genetic DNA) and finally the seemingly dead, reproduced subject – the virus who parasites the cell, the human who parasites nature). Thus those are in Nature viral species, of little motion, and in the Paleolithic, they were proper of ‘recollector cultures’ where humans just reach a banana and eat without moving much, in paradises and allopatric islands without predators, in which humans are enjoying life and sex in a passive way. Those are the less abundant languages, and only occur in the Amazonian jungles, in which life is truly easy such as the Xavante and Warao …

18. The superorganism of History.

Humans started in the Neolithic a process of eusocial evolution as the collective ‘mind’ of Gaia, our body of energy. Prophets of the wor(l)d expressed that goal through eusocial messages of love, empathy and ‘sharing’ of energy and information among humans to form networks and ‘cultures and civilizations’ – superorganisms of history.

The final goal was to create a global superorganism based in welfare life goods in which all men could exercise its 4 drives of life (feeding, informing, reproducing and evolve socially). But the process was halted with the arrival of hard metal weapons (bronze age), and a language of information of metal (digital gold), which killed the body and hypnotized the mind of mankind, and whose values (violence and greed) eliminated the social networks of love, making some humans, who used it, ‘animetals’, to feel superior to non-technological cultures.

They evolved metal in its 3 topological varieties, becoming associated to it the 3 people-castes on top of societies: lineal metal=weapon+man=warrior animetal, O-metal=money+Man, banker animetal, exi-organic metal machines+man, scientist. They despised as ‘inferior’, non-technological species, extinguishing them. Finally they created the superorganism of evolution and re=production of machines, the company-mother, which started with flows of monetary orders, the present process of terraforming of planet Earth into a planet of metal, in which man is a species secondary to the machines, symbol of ‘the future’ and its progress. So the evolution of mankind into a global, healthy superorganism of history was halted and nationalistic wars that justify the use of weapons, capitalist idol-ogies that justify the control of society by money and mechanist science that makes machines the center of the world, control our minds and maintain warriors, bankers and scientists as the top classes of our societies.

The result is the present ‘dying world of life and Gaia’, asphyxiated and about to collapse, as selfish memes of metal, a new organic species (weapons=|- metal, money=O-metal and machines=organic metal) evolve and substitute us. This process is about to end as robots substitute humans in labor and war fields (cause of the present labor and perpetual war crises), in a process similar to the molting of a soft life larva into a hardcore insect, which ends with the death of all the enzymes, or ‘enzymen’ that provoked the mutation, creating the ‘viral’ machines or hard enzymes of the stronger system (robots) that once born kill the soft enzymes.

Thus the Earth is molting from carbon-life to metalife, or from the human perspective lives in a cancerous process in which corporations and bankers monopolize the oxygen of the system, and release it only to corporations of machines denying a demand economy, based in a Universal salary=blood that could provoke a massive production of WHealth, welfare goods normal humans need to survive and would demand instead of expensive weapons and corporative robots.

Thus, humans should design a better superorganism of history, a ‘perfect world’, based in a demand economy where as in all superorganisms, money=oxygen is produced from the bottom up with a global currency, Y€$ money (1 $=1€=100 yens=5 Yuans, at fixed parity with prices adjusted internally) and distributed to all cells of mankind. humanity will then demand and produce ‘human, life goods’, not selfish memes of metal, weapons that kill our body and hate-media and fictions that atrophy our mind.

And instead of nationalist memes to justify the production of those weapons and hate-media, humans should allow diplomacy and a common legal, informative, nervous system to resolve national issues, evolving those anti-natural, smaller tribal superorganisms, the Homo Americanus, Britannicus, etc. into our natural Homo Sapiens Superorganism, ‘History’, as EU and UNO institutions try to do. Then we would not need to evolve the future terminator weapons that will eliminate us to combat ‘tribal enemies’.

Those 2 economic and political reforms coupled with the prohibition of evolving robotics, the new ‘species’ stronger and faster processing information than us, which will replace mankind, could ensure our ‘immortality’ on Earth. Since under the present ‘capitalist system’ we will not survive the lethal evolution of machines of energy and information beyond Gaia’s and human capacity to survive. Since death is an excess of energy (accident) or information (3rd warping age) that breaks the immortality balance E=I of the mature, classic age of any superorganism.

Thus humans will die due to 3 ‘singularity’ events, which are as all divided in 3 ages:

– Max. E: the evolution of weapons of max. Energy (Nuclear bombs researched at CERN in its self-feeding, cosmic horizon – strangelets, black holes). Next year, 2016 CERN will double potency and pass the threshold of B.H. creation

E=I: Mechanisms of max. reproductive power (iron nano-bacteria that could kill earth eating its machines in 3 months)

Max. I: A.I. (platoons of robots guided by satellites). Those two events will come latter in the century, but observing the Universe teaming with planets, without A.I. Robots or Intelligence but filled with Black holes and strange stars (pulsars), it seems men will die in a Nova Explosion, if as it seems, politicians do not halt the evolution of weapons.

20. Conclusion: The isomorphisms of all Superorganisms. General Systems Sciences.

best cover dimensions

General Systems is the Philosophy of Science that unifies Biological and Physical Systems, first, by accepting 2 ‘two arrows of creation of futures’, the creation of energy or motion (studied by Physics under the term, ‘entropy’) and the creation of information (studied by Biology under the term negantropy).It is a tenant of GS2 (General Systems Theory) that the Universe constantly ‘transforms back and forth, energy into information’: E<=>I; and so all what exists can be described as a ‘Complementary System of Networks of Energy and Information, ∑E<=> ∏I’.

In the graph, all sciences study 10-Dimensional fractal systems of energy and information – superorganisms – that obey the same laws, called ‘isomorphisms’ explained by GS2: All those superorganisms are made of 3 organic dimensions of space, their hyperbolic, tall spherical heads/particles of information, moved by flat, lineal, energy systems, in the direction of length, and possessing a body in the dimension of width, which laterally reproduces the system. And those 3 organic dimensions of space, perform their actions in a time order, from a first age/dimension of maximal energy or youth, when the system is born, through a reproductive age of balance between its energy and information components, or present, mature time dominated by the body and finally a 3rd age of maximal information, when the head has absorbed most energy of the body, followed by a time reversal when the energy of the system is spent, all is trans-formed into in-form-ation And so for the game of existence never to stop, the system dies, explodes back into its parts of cellular energy:

Death = Max I-> Max. E. Thus we can consider that all systems co-exist in 3 dimensions or scales of informative complexity, the i-1, cellular, i-ndividual and i+1 social scales. And so those 3 x 3 dimensions of space, time and complexity define a new whole, a 10 Dimensional superorganism.

General Systems Sciences classifies then all natural systems as wholes or parts of superorganisms. And it applies to the study of each particular superorganism the essential isomorphisms derived from its 10-Dimensional structure. Those 5 common properties of all superorganisms of the Universe and its laws is what truly defines a harmonic Universe in which all its parts behave like the whole and act in an organic, vital manner:

– Isomorphism of its 2 components, energetic space and temporal information, which ‘combine’ to create the infinite varieties of the Universe.

-Isomorphism of its 3 physiological-topological forms in space and its relative dimensions (lineal limbs that move the system with energy; tall, informative heads that guide it and wide, combined bodies that reproduce them).

– Isomorphism of its life-death cycle in time and its 3±1 ages, defined by the dominance of energy (youth), information (3rd age) and its balanced combination, e=I (maturity.)

– Isomorphism of the 3 relative i±1 fractal scales of cellular parts that become wholes, as the entity exists travelling through 3 relative seminal/cellular, individual and social, collective, i+1 scales. All those scales define therefore a fractal, 5th dimension of space-time, whose complex laws are the key laws of general systems sciences.

– And isomorphism of its 4 dimensional cycles of space-time, the actions that all systems perform and create an ‘organic program’ of existence, combination of the 2 arrows/substances/forms of the Universe, divided into:

– Simplex actions of energy and information performed by the i-ndividual:

– Max. E: Feeding, lineal motion; Max. I; Informing, perceiving.

– Complex social actions performed with a couple: exi, Reproducing or with a group, ∑: evolving socially, as a herd of energy and ∏, evolving as a network of information, through ‘axons’ that communicate each unit with all others:

A 4 ‘dimensional analysis’ of systems show that all entities grow performing those ‘4 drives’ of life. Some examples:

– 3+1 perpendicular dimensions of light: flat magnetic field: energy; tall, electric field: information, where photons are most likely found; its product (Maxwell equation): c-speed of wave reproduction. Social Evolution: Colors (∑ photons)

– The 4 quantum numbers: Principal number defines the orbital energy and changes as electrons ‘feed’ on light. The orbital or angular number, its ‘angle of height’ or informative state; the spin number, its spin orientation, according to which it will or not couple with other electron and/or in favorable conditions with opposite spins emit a ‘seminal ray’ of light which crossed with the opposite spin ‘gender’ gives birth to a new electron; and finally the magnetic number arranges groups of electrons in a society. Similar numbers are found for quarks the other fundamental particle of the Universe. Thus since the essential particles of physics, photons, electrons and quarks, feed, inform, reproduce and evolve socially, we can indeed define a ‘living, organic Universe’ where all parts follow the same isomorphisms.

– 4 Maxwell equations define also those 4 actions for social flows of electrons in the next scale (laws of electricity).

– 4 basic atoms exercise those actions in simple carbohydrages: N act as the hea with its informative, vibration clock of enormous precision, Oxygen as the energy legs (OH-, H+ ‘kicks’), Carbone as the structural, reproductive body, and H2O as the territorial, social ‘ecosystem’, being H, both the pixel of information and the particle for energy transfers.

– 4 CGTA nucleotides code the 2 x 2 actions; the dual, more complex Purines for informative or social traits, the simplex Pyrimidines for simplex or energetic ones – a hypothesis, which genetics still cannot fully prove, till it couples all combinations of genes with their genotypes.

– 3(x3)+1 physiological systems define an animal: the Energetic/digestive system, the reproductive, blood system and the Informative, nervous system, each one displaying 3 sub-systems; all of them integrated by the ‘I=eye’ mind.

– As a consequence 4 social drives define the will of life and welare of human beings: our need for food and shelter (E), our need for education and information (I), our desire to start a family (reproduction) and live harmonically in society (social evolution). And as such they should be the program of all humanist governments.

– Tthe industrial r=evolution of metal (machines& weapons) also takes place along those 4 sub-systems: in the XIX c. we made during the I Industrial Revolution, the energetic ‘limbs’ of machines (trains, steamers); then during the II Industrial R=evolution, its ‘body-engines’ (electric, oil engines); then its heads of information (mobile-ears, chip-brains, eyes-cameras), each of them enhancing, atrophying and substituting the equivalent drive of humans. While machines’ ‘complex actions’ are carried by its ‘reproductive’ systems, company-mothers, and its social evolution, by the stock-market that through informative flows of e-money decides the corporations that survive or become extinct.

– Finally galaxies feed on interstellar gas; its body-plane of stars Reproduce atoms, their central black holes in-form them with gravitational waves, and emit polar flows of dark energy that connect them socially with other galaxies.

Orga(ni)sms. Reproduction=Present survival is the game.

All what you see and distinguish as a ‘unity’ is thus a Universal System composed of an entity of energy and one of information which exchange flows of energy and form, such as the particle/head orders the body/field. How this causal orders from heads/particles to body/fields are formalized in terms of ‘time causality’ is very interesting. As the body/field receives the orders that set up the motion of the object from the head, we say that fields and bodies are displaced ‘a fraction of time’ into the past, respect to the head/particle. (In complex General Systems this turns to be actually the case solving some paradoxes of quantum tunelling). So in terms of causality: I (gauging) ->E -> Motion.

This means that the language of information acts before the body moves, even if latter we see them synchronous. So money acts first to kick the productive process and the mind thinks first. And genes are first constructed and their orders create the organism.

All this requires for a formalism that can be applied to all systems to introduce some new mathematics and logic. Concerning mathematics, we have to widen the restrict idea that a point has no volume, because otherwise we cannot study all the points of the different scales of size of the Universe but a new postulate, that of a fractal point: a point has a volume which grows as we come closer to it. So a star grows as we come closer to it, and so does a seminal particle, till it breaks into cells and molecules.

This new mathematics of points with parts was first studied by Riemann and Einstein applied it to physics, but they merely changed the 5th postulate: a point can be crossed by infinite parallels, without realizing if this was truth, then the point must have volume. Instead they ‘curved the parallels’ and made the pass through the point. Here our approach is different and sounder. If you curve parallels then you dont have parallels defined as ‘straight lines’.

And still if the point has no breath (Euclidean point) you cannot fit more than one. So you enlarge the point till our ‘perception of curved space’ becomes flat. In that ‘relative enlargement’, the now flat universe with points with volume and parallels entering through the gaps of its membranes, is again a self-similar world. And so in fact beings travel through those planes of existence as they live, and that is the more complex part of the game: the eusocial evolution of points with volume into organisms that emerge as full blow beings in the upper plane of existence:


The Universe is a a self-repetitive game of infinite complementary systems of energy and information exi, which try to reproduce by recreating, in a lower plane of cellular existence – a Non-Euclidean plane in illogic geometry – a seed of information, i-1, which will then self-replicate in a clonic wave over a receptive field of space, ∑e x i, sch us to surface in the future as a single unit of the higher plane of non-E-xistence. In the jargon of illogic geometry, the higher language to describe all sciences and systems and species under the same organic laws, all systems can be expressed as forms in process of reproduction rebirth and extinction, Illogic geometry departing from those 3 planes of existence, describe all events including those of creation and destruction of social organisms. The game thus described in this web, in an intermediate jargon – biological – bridge between illogic geometry and common speech of social science (a jargon which frankly i have little patience with for his astounding intellectual idiocy, selfishness and primitivism – treated in the section of ideologies) – a word though that connects both is the concept of an ‘organsm of existence’, an action of reproduction, e meets i, e fucs i, i reproduces exi (-; 

Now in the previous graph of Non-Euclidean Geometry the reader can observe the existence of any ‘General System’ of the Universe (Universal System in brief) to exist between different fractal planes of space-time. It is necessary to fully grasp the cycle to understand the 5 non-euclidean postulates (4 of which the writer introduced to be able to handle a General Systems formalism), which define a fractal Universe in which ‘points have volume’, they are cells, and so biological systems and social systems made of self-similar cells and human minds can be studied with those laws. In such Non-E Geometry the life-death cycle is defined with precision as a process of informative creation of a seed in a micro-plane of existence where the seed, the mind of the prophet, the first crystal unit, the first fractal appears. Then the fractal will reproduce in social waves reorganized to ’emerge’ in a higher plane of existence, as a ‘whole’ General System.

This process though is in detail a morphological process in which the being will go through the 3 ages once it has emerged as an eusocial being of cells (an organism) of humans (a god or civilization), of atoms (a molecule) and so on. And in this upper plane, i+1 in the graph it will live a youth, Max. E, then a mature age, e=i, of balance, its reproductive classic age in which e<=>I creative flows are maximal and finally it will loose energy, Min. E x I till it looses it all and explodes back into death, in the lower plane from where its seed was born.

Let us be frank here. The Universe is a constant game of reproduction of beings. This is all what is about: an entity is born, it reproduces in flows that socialize into bigger organisms, and then they explode. So to maximize the game you maximize reproduction.

‘Grow and multiply’ is the game, and the best survival strategy is reproduce faster than you and your clones die.

That is why all is about maximizing your orgasms. Seriously. And that is why there are so many births.

The Universe is a self-reproductive fractal of energy-yang-male-lineal-spatial-explosive-entropic-disordered motions-beings and information-yin-female-cyclical-temporal-implosive-formal motions in an eternal dance of creation of other patterns and selves. As each of us is also a complementary mix, of a yin and a yang, an informative head-particle and a body-field of energy… In the interaction of those fields of Universal reach and infinite self-similar fractal forms the all explains itself.

That is all what is about, e x i = st, the energy, male program and the informative female program combine creating infinite space-times.

‘Grow and multiply’ means that…

Birds do it…

Eternity means that. Eternity creates also balance and beauty, e=i, is the meaning of beauty, when yin and yang become perfect mirrors of each other, or decouple in symmetry. Symmetry is a function of beauty.

To exi=st, to be and not to be when you don’t operate in the range of survival (Max. exi -> e=i).

This second function, the maximization of orgasm, when e=i (simple proof, let us have a 10 set divided in two groups, e and i, such as e+i=10, it is easy to proof that max. e x i happens  when e =5= i; exhausting all cases, 10×0=0, 9×1=9, 2×8=16. 3×4=12, 5×5=25).

So the point of maximal reproduction is when the female principle and the male principle reach perfect complementarity as opposite mirrors in a symmetry group in which both together appear as a neutral element of a non-euclidean five-dimensional geometry…

Thus in illogic geometry, the highest of all levels of this mind-web ( what we say is this:

Company-mothers of machines overeproduce memes of metal and their enzymen look to it, and their managers, economists create theories of reality in which the overproduction of memes of metal that are competing and extinguising life is good.

The bible tells you ‘grow and multiply’

And you are a penis seeking a hole all your life.

The orgasmic Universe was an article i sent long ago to scientific american – i don’t think those anglo-scientists who merely assembly machines could even figure out on the equations of self-similar orgasmic beings exchanging liquid, e=i state fluids between their two poles of existence could mean… It is what they call in the inquisition of science – with its own disqualificative language pathological science.

But it is all right. Wherever you see you will observe the dances and tunes of the dual universe and its fields and bodies heads and particles, yins and yangs, in a series of bits, whose ‘steps’ in time and space are all self-similar.

There is the overture tone, e>I<=>>e, exi=e>>i<∑πi, the time jump… i->∑ex > i+1, the equation of death, I< ∑e, the equation of the ages of life, i< ∑ ei > Ei = ∑eI, > I, the equation of immortality Max. Exi, and present, e=i, all those ‘words’ which have been ill-defined by lack of a logic symbolism to explain the explosion of creation of fields of space-time around us, vibrations of energies and information that constantly orgasm and transform into each other ad eternal acquire one.

This language, of which I am the only human speaker, so far, (-; is incomprehensible to you, and yet is everywhere in you, outside you… in all what you see… All what exists can be written as a logic chains of events of time, reduced to a mere symbolism of steps of grown and transformation of those two parameters yang and yin energy and information, and thus this language of how which sentences, what is the conversations you see all around, is the substance of illogic geometry, the mathematical and logical formalism of general systems sciences which describes all the chains of thought of God, the mind of the Universe, the game of existence, the orgasm of self-reproductive chains of logic fusion, fission, reproduction, self-organization, mirror creation, decoupling, combination, quantification, analogization, digitalization, all and each of those different processes, can be ultimately limited to a series of actions which ultimately are themselves ‘reproductions’ of particles into waves, or bosonitations of waves into particles


0In Cancun, Sonoma and Tokyo’s ISSS meetings we considered the conceptual, formal, mathematical model, expanding our comprehension of Non-Euclidean, Fractal Geometry, Multi-dimensional topology and its application to describe the forms and motions of super organisms and its scales. We also developed the complex model of 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time, past=energy, present=repetition and future=evolution.

In our conferences at Madison we used those laws resumed in this paper to describe the laws and species of biology and physics, since each species is in fact a superorganism of a higher scale than the individual, following the same morphological laws of evolution.

In the conferences at Hull and Waterloo we introduced the Socio-economic model, studying the evolution of the superorganism of history and the eco(nomic)system in which we live, and its sickness, ‘capitalism’, where a caste of cells of the body of history, the financial industry, monopolizes the distribution of ‘air-blood’ restricting and asphyxiating most human cells, creating a cancerous growth that is killing mankind, at the same time that it releases selfish memes to make people happy with their own asphyxia (as parasites and cancerous leukemia do, releasing substances that the cell craves or implanting selfish genes to make them work for them)

This is the function of the media system, owned by the same financial corporations and the economic abstract science, with their fictional opium, ego-trips of nationalistic, religious or egoistic nature and the confusion of machine evolution with progress and human evolution.

In San Jose we dealt with the main isomorphisms of the Universe, with a ‘reduced’ dimensional model in which the upper and lower scales of systems and superorganisms, i±1 was treated as a whole ‘single’ 5th dimension of social, evolutionary time between the remote past of vacuum space and the complex future of the whole Organic Universe.

In Washington we are resuming the whole model explained in previous conferences in this short introduction.

It is only left to introduce the 3 films made on the model, the documentary on the ‘Superorganism of History’, the documentary made on the Organic Universe of 10 Di physical superoganisms and the 3rd film ‘quantum roulette’ on the future extinction of man by organic bombs (black holes made by nuclear physicists) and organic machines (nanorobots and A.I.), completed and ignored by the ‘system’, which unfortunately as per our conferences at Hull and Waterloo is utterly corrupted, collapsing life and so it denies with its somas of technoutopias, abrahamic religions, capitalism and nationalism the negative side effects of those selfish memes of metal that help us to increase our power of energy and information but also atrophy, substitute, make obsolete and kill our bodies and minds (audiovisual fictions).

General Systems Sciences is indeed the highest possible understanding of the living Universe both in its new Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian formalism, its organic vision of the superorganisms of mankind and its solutions to the problems of our species; though I doubt it will be known on time to cure our illness or those who are killing the superorganism of humanity under their somatic program will care to stop the process.

In any case I have enjoyed all my life this higher knowledge of the program of existence and the unity of all its systems and further on, as the Universe is a fractal, there will be infinite other planets in which life is thriving because GS2 and the organic paradigm NOT the mechanist paradigm and the somatic memes of tribalism and egoism dominated life.

1 Macrocephalic brain is a new word coined by this author to define the ‘high’ emotional axis of the human mind.


One Response to “Organic Systems:”

  1. russell olausen Says:

    I have spent my life amongst the drudges and have been told in no uncertain terms a machine will be my boss. I can see why the upper class bare such scorn. I ask myself, is sight a curse?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: