## Time

I. TIME IS EVERYTHING

Cyclical Clocks vs. lineal duration.

In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be  ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

In the graph, even our mechanical times measurements are done with cyclical mechanical clocks that turn around a a cycle in fixed periods of time, usually an hour and 24 hours, forming a day, itself a measure of a cycle: the rotation of the Earth around its axis. time has always been cyclical, in any system studied by human beings.

In the bottom of the graph, Lineal time merely ‘erases’ the detail of the form and meaning of those cycles focusing only in its ‘spatial extension’ or motion-speed. It is a simplification of time frequency and cyclial time.

As such lineal time duration is a simplification of a length of time caused by the sum of multiple time frequencies measured by a cyclical time.

We shall therefore in this post describe a ‘Universe’ made of time cycles in all its scales. time cycles that have basically two positions or arrows of future, to implode inwards, the arrow of future we shall call information, or explode outwards, the arrow of future we shall call entropy and a balanced, perfect cycle.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

‘Times are cyclical, closed motions. Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

One of the most obvious limits for human understanding of History is the religious, abrahamic concept of lineal time, which creeped into science through physics and reduced our understanding of the repetitive motions of the clocks of the Universe, and its reproduced forms-in-motion≈ informations.

Time is cyclical frequency, not lineal duration. Time flows as a cyclical, discontinuous repetitive sequence of events. The causality of those events ’causes’ its repetition. This happens in all sciences. In fact, all sciences are considered as such only when they find the repetitive, cyclical patterns of the species they study, projecting them into the future to ‘understand’ and ‘forecast’ those events.

One of the fundamental reasons why our society cannot understand the cycles of history and economics and regulate it to its advantage is the jewish->Christian->Modern cultural view of time as lineal, which ill-understood means that time cycles do not repeat themselves, hence it is not normal to see the repetition of similar events in history.

The opposite is truth when we consider the scientific point of view..

Lineal Time or duration is merely the inverse concept of a cyclical time frequency, the true meaning of time: ƒ (t) = 1/T .

Thus all durations are a sum of time cycles, all lineal worldlines are in fact the sum of discontinuous length traced by those cycles: S= λ ƒ

Cyclical time and history.

We measure a duration of time by adding up a series of frequencies of an event or motion in time that happens in repetitive patterns.

Science in fact is the study of tthe repetitive patterns and causal reaons of those cycles of time.

Astronomy appears with the study of the time cycles of stars and planets that traced cyclical orbits. Causal medicine appears with the study of germs and how they produce causal, reproductive cycles of predation over the cells of the body.

The same method allow us to understand the cycles of history and economics, once we find the cycles (Kondratieff, Spengler and Product, 80-800-8 cycles), its causality (the evolution of memes of metal) and the human catalyzer of the process (the idol-ogical ‘animetal’ cult(ures) that made of metal its idol, meaning of future progress and ‘reason of existence’.

In that regard time cycles occur in all systems of the Universe, including the eco(nomic)system and history because it is the natural manner in which time flows, as a sucession of similar events produced by similar causes, with a frequency related to the repetition of those causes.

We are fractal beings made of points of vital space, which perform cyclical time motions: holographic Principle.
In the graph, we are networks of vital space, made of space quanta, surrounded by time cycles, membranes of finite volume, performing further time cycles in larger networks, as part of bigger wholes. The interaction of those 2 elements, vital space, lineal motion, entropic, kinetic energy, res extensa, similar concepts abbreviated in the symbol ‘Spe’, and cyclical, tall time clocks, membranes, closed paths, which carry the information of the Universe, structure all systems made of ‘space-time’. We ARE space-time beings, and space-time is a fractal structured extended across multiple scales of social networks, growing and diminishing in size. This is what reality is, and while its initial components, space, time and its fractal scales, grouped in a new ‘5th dimension’ of scalar size are more complex than the old paradigm of a single space-time shallow continuum, once we grasp the unicity of all beings, made of those scales of space and time cycles, as when copernicus put the sun in the centre, it will be evident that most laws of science become simplified, similar expressions of the laws that explain the interaction of cycles of time and planes of space. Thus the first principle to consider is how the geometry of bidimensional time cycles and bidimensional networks of space-points mess up to create all the beings of the Universe. It is the holographic principle…

Now the key to this understanding of the fractal Universe is to understand that what you call space-time is not an abstract concept. That space is equivalent to energy, to res extensa to vital space with motion, and time clocks are equivalent to cyclical forms with more in-form-ation.

So once you understand that the Universe is like a puzzle with its fractal pieces of space and its clocks of time, and that space is vital, moving energetic space and time is cyclical, informative, accumulating information in its cycles and frequency hertzs. And you accept the fact that all is made of tiny pieces of vital space performing cyclical time motions and actions, as you do at your ∆-1 tiny cellular level, or as an individual performing ∆+1 big cyclical motions in your society, once we get this clear enough and then study properly the time of space-time motions of beings, and how they come together into herds and organisms, through those motions and cycles of behaviour, and exchanges of energy and information, you will if your ego is humble enough understand yourself truly as part of a whole, the fractal universe.

And so the first step is to understand the equivalence between vital spaces and quanta of energy/entropy and time clocks and information cycles, and how together construct the beings of reality, including yourself.

But what is ultimately the meaning of Spatial entropy and temporal Information, Spe and Tiƒ, the 2 parameters that combine in the Universe to form content space-time beings? Sp x Tiƒ = ∆±1

We saw how simple was the answer for physical systems: a bit of information and a bit of motion, combined into infinite species. Let us generalise the concept for the whole puzzle of space-time beings including human ones.

To that aim we shall first explain the Holographic Principle, discovered in the study of black holes, at the heart of modern physics today – the fact that information is bidimensional, as the screen you are looking at.

This geometric generator redistributes the 4 dimensions we know to exist in this scale of reality, in 2 dimensions of vital space, creating flat planes of space, with maximal extension (made of small cells, points, atoms, any ‘set of similar beings) and 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and rhythm to form the simplest possible time cycle, which carries information in the form and frequency of this cycles.

Now this should be evident to you, temporal information has the dimensions of height and form (cyclical patterns seen with a mind as slow fixed forms, like the way you see a fast spinning wheel as a solid disk). So you are watching a tall bidimensional screen or book, your eyes see bidimensional forms, and your informative eye, head or the antenna or camera that absorbs information, with its logic cycles of time, its computer clocks measured in cyclical frequencies, Hertzs, are all on top, are all made of closed time cycles and forms.

So the first refocusing of the mirror of mathematical sciences is to give the dimension of height to time, which now has 2 dimensions and it is no longer a line of duration but a cycle of tall form, which rises as time passes, the flat sheets of space, into tall space-time beings.

In this manner, because a basic rule of maths is that only beings with the same number of dimensions can be combined and transformed into each other, we can combine topological ‘formal motions’ (forms allowed to vary through internal motions of its surfaces), and this is the most ‘evident’ definition on how fractal space-time systems and its feed-back Sp <≈>Tƒ equation works in a single ‘plane of space-time’, as it ‘composes its forms through the holographic principle:

In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.

Each of those pictures shows a network of space-quanta, informed by ‘cyclical time motions’ , which runs the logic forms of the system: human heads run lineal limbs-bodies; Tall, spherical black holes control with informative gravitation the plane of energetic stars. If we consider the entire existence of life, evolving from its first flat worms to the tall man, the same topological arrow towards more information becomes evident. Above, we can see human eyes and mechanical eyes, human limbs and energetic, entropic weapons, which share the same topologies.

Each of those  Sp and Tiƒ elements is bidimensional and each bidimension is made of smaller points that form a flat plane of space or a tall, cyclical time event, made of discontinuous instants or neuronal points. Space is communicated synchronically in a flat membrane. Time is communicated in a cyclical sequential form.

Space-time combines both into holographic 4-dimensional beings.

5 D metric: fractal spaces and cyclical time clocks: co-invariance of size & time speed: Sp x Tƒ = ∆

Now in a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time.

Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower. This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: S x T = ∆±n and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5th dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5th dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5th dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5th dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we shall try to give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed, Sp x Tƒ = K.

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

Now, it is evident that in any system, which is made of topological networks of fractal points, we must talk at least of two scales of the 5th dimension, the ∆-1 scale of points (atoms/cells) that form the whole ∆-scale creating the systems observed in the graph. Thus by the mere fact that all flat planes of reality are networks of points, they imply the fifth dimension.

So the natural form in which beings are built, is as 4Dimensional  2 Sp x 2 Tƒ space-time systems, in a single plane, which corresponds to the classic 4D relativity description, albeit with the proper redistribution of the dimension of height that becomes a dimension of the cyclical radius of the time clock.

But given the fractal structure of the Universe, any being will become a fifth dimensional species,extending across at least a lower network of fractal points: ∑∆-1 ≈∆.

And since that being will be part of a larger world, we must always consider at least an ∆+1 world of which the being is a mere part. So we define all beings as 5th dimensional beings extending across 3 scales of the 5th dimension, perceived as holographies of bidimensional space and cyclical time in a single plane of space-time.

It is thus obvious that such fractal structures cannot be described only with lineal time and continuum space; but require a new i-logic fractal geometry of waves of energy and information, and curvesd paths that connect points, into discontinuous topological planes.

And so a realist description of the Universe requires a more complex philosophy and mathematics that we develop in this blog under the generic name of GST, General Systems Theory, or T.Œ (an Organic Theory of Everything, which is the philosophical meaning of the fractal Universe, as opposed of Physicists’ T.O.E. just a ‘theory of everything’ :)

So now we can define all beings with the 3 i-logic principles of 5D fractal space membranes and multiple time-clocks:

‘All what exists is a fractal organism of temporal information and spatial energy, extended across 3 relative scales of size:

∆-1 Spe < ∆-ST> ∆+1 Tiƒ”

This is the briefest way to state that all systems are made of energy and information, extending in 3 cellular/atomic, individual/organic and cosmological/social scales. So you are made of cells part of an organism, part of a society – an animal will be part of an ecosystem, a star made of atoms, part of a galaxy and so on.

And because you are made of energy and information, you do have lineal, energetic limbs that move you, (Ab. Spe), cyclical heads of information that guide you (ab. Tif) and a body that occupies most of your space-time that mixes both.

But a fractal physical system does have a lineal field that moves it, a particle-head that guides it and a wave-body that reproduces its form.

So what we need first is to show that actually things as different as a light ray with a particle-photon, a wave and a field, the simplest fractal of nature we know and something as complex as a human being are made of the same ‘species of spatial energy and temporal information’, lines and cycles, as the | and O used by computers to model it.

The curved pangeometry of fractal space, cyclical time and the 5th dimension, shows in different systems of the Universe.

All including humans are fractal super-organisms, made of time cycles that enclose a vital space, centered into a point of view. We are not in an absolute space-time frame of reference as Newton thought. But we are made of vital spaces, enclosed by time cycles. Eastern philosophers, earlier civilizations and philosophers of science – Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz was always understood. This reality observed in Nature’s physical and biological systems – because it is an immediate experienced fact.

II. THE ORGANIC PARADIGM: A UNIVERSE OF ∞ LIVING SYSTEMS

The 4th, organic paradigm of objective science. Absolute relativity.

In the graph, humans slowly departed from their subjective ego-trips of  the mythic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the tribe first and then mankind was the centre of the Universe, to a scientific world, and within it again, moved away from the Earth as its centre (Ptolemy), in 3 steps. So first they abandoned the ‘who’ of a personal god, into the ‘what’ of a centered earth, a sun, as its centre (Copernicus) and finally the galactic light space-time at its centre (Einstein’s relativity). It is now the time to give the final step into Absolute relativity considering the Fractal paradigm and its 5th dimension, which further stretches to all Universal Planes the understanding of the laws of science, without primacy of any of such scales.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events.

Then the Greeks used reason to ask the ‘what’ (experience) and ‘how’ of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.

So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?

Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton (‘Letters to Clarke’). Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Unfortunately such theories cannot satisfy the rational, objective, self-sufficient nature of science, as they require external myths to work. This leaves us only with a 3rd objective, scientific possibility, organicism – a more complex theory that comes of age in this work: if the why is neither God nor the machine, there is only a 3rd option in between – the organism, which is an intermediate concept; since an organism is self-sufficient as God is, yet it is part of Nature as the machine is.

The vital properties of Universal fractals: super organisms performing world cycles of existence.

In the conclusion of this introduction we will summarise the fundamental consequence of the unity of all beings of the Universe made of vital space with entropic motions, and cyclical vortices of time, with ordering, informative properties.

The very essence of the Universe and all its parts is to be made of vital space and cyclical time and share the properties of those 2 substances and its infinite body-wave combinations. Now this statement simplifies enormously the understanding of ‘first principles of all beings’, which can be easily be derived of those systems. Essentially, when we get to the basics, why we live and die, why we have the form we have, why we exist, perceive, feed on energy, reproduce, love, evolve socially, etc. we shall find that all of them come from an essential, underlying game of topological combination, evolution and social organisation of quanta of space ordered by sequential time cycles.

The result of studying the naked properties and combining rules of this ‘yin and yang’ of scientific content, time and space, information and energy, which combine to give birth to the infinite beings in existence has an enormous potential to enlighten our comprehension of the Universe and become integrated within it. The only drawback is to anthropomorphism and the myth that we are at the centre of reality and matter more than other beings, because we are made of a special substance (soul and mind in earlier religions, carbon-atoms, which seemed to hold some virtual magic in modern religions of science) None of it is truth, and objective science consists precisely in put mankind outside the realm of privileges.

So one the problem of putting all those insights together, and make with them a  bio-logic, formal mathematical model of the organic, fractal Universe my experience is that the residence to the model is mostly philosophical (as the details are not fully worked out, as any initial field still in flux, it is only a question of time and new researchers that the model is connected with all the equations of all sciences): are we humans, able to accept our objective, absolutely relative position in the Time period, space region and scale of reality? Because that is where we are.

This is a consequence on the advance in our understanding of the 3 elements of all realities, space, time and scale, which have now not a single absolute content:

On one side the existence of multiple fractal space at different scales, makes the human scale relativity. On the other the existence for each scale of different rhythms and bits of time, make our speed of time also relative, slower than that of genes, atoms and chips, faster than that of larger plants and planets.

Only a relative order then makes sense of this scalar, multiple space-time Universe, which is what the fifth dimension and  its ‘formal mathematical metric equation’, provides.

As it relates all those scales, in an orderly fashion. So we can translate the time rhythms and space size, and space-time actions of any species of each scale of that fractal Universe – that is, we can synchronize parts and larger wholes, study its exchanges of energy and information, and how they create larger networks, and how the process of growth and decay are vital processes – since we have to study NOT merely a fractal, mathematical structure, as those of artistic, computer-generated Mandelbrot like fractals, but vital fractals, living beings, who constantly reproduce their forms in smaller and larger scales, as you, a vital fractal does, when emitting a smaller seed of your information that reproduces and grows and organises a larger whole.

Let us be clear from the beginning, Nature’s fractals are living fractals that reproduce in smaller and larger scales creating smaller seeds of information and larger social wholes joined by networks. So the key to understand beyond the mathematical elements the fractal structure of the Universe is a concept that scientists, schooled only in the ‘mathematical method’ shy away from: the concept of a fractal super organism in space. And the world cycle of life and death of existence that those fractal super organisms experience as they reproduce in a lower scale of reality, organise themselves emerging as individuals and become part of larger social wholes.

This of course, we shall describe with mathematical equations when required, corresponding with all the known laws of science, but what is the essence of the new paradigm is ‘organicism’, the vital, organic, reproductive properties of fractals. In mathematics we describe this properties with an iterative ‘Fractal Generator’. Nature is essentially the same but its fractal generators are obviously more complex. Your seminal seed is a fractal generator of a being like you. Your mental memes, your ideas, if you are a prophet and innovator will become the fractal generator of an astounding number of similar beings. A black hole is often a fractal generator that catalyses the reproduction of stars.
This is then the fundamental philosophical novelty of a fractal structure: it is NOT a mechanism but an organism.

And for that reason, the science that studies its general laws is NOT physics, vitiated by its dislikeness of organic properties but a new science called complexity or general systems science, of which Hawking rightly said it will be the science of the XXI century.

Since as our collection of scientific data grows in complexity that organic nature of all beings becomes evident. First it became evident in mathematical terms, with those fractal mappings.

What this blog adds is the entire philosophy of science behind it – the organic philosophy of fractal beings – and apply it to describe every species of the Universe, which will show to be ultimately a self-reproductive biological system, as mathematics is also a social, realist language,  which accurately describes the fractal structure of the Universe, made of ‘points’ that reproduce into ‘networks’, which grow into ‘wholes’, which becomes ‘points’ of a new scale of reality.

So the Universe builds layer upon layer and scale upon scale of its quanta of space and time into larger super-organisms, from forces into particles that gather into atoms that gather into molecules that gather into cells and matter, that gather into multicellular organisms and giant crystals and societies and cosmic bodies and societies of galaxies called stars, which gather into networks of galaxies called Universes.

The overwhelming scientific proofs of the fractal, organic Universe.

This astoundingly obvious organisation of the Universe into scales, however has not been developed into the philosophy of science that corresponds to the experimental evidence of 400 years of studying those scales with telescopes and microscopes, because of the ascientific errors of mankind, which we group in two types: anthropomorphic errors (anthropomorphism, mechanism), and errors of mathematical abstraction (continuity, abstract points, abstract motion):

• Anthropomorphism: we deny organic qualities to anything that is not similar to us.
• Mechanism, as physicists first designed very simple deconstructed machines, which seem in our egocentered view, ‘not discoveries’ but inventions. So Kepler who used a simple clock of time, said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find a mind so intelligent as Him to understand his clock-work’. This arrogance is important to realise why we like a mechanical interpretations of nature, as it puts us above it, as ‘the only organic being’. So mechanism is anthropomorphism and deism, as it requires a god to put in motion the machine, which was OK for pious Newton and Kepler, who believed in Yhwh sending them comets to give them the laws of gravitation, but more humble, intelligent thinkers as Leibniz, laughed at it rightly. Only an organic self-reproductive, self-organizign Universe IS a scientific model of it. And obviously as we now build robots imitating the forms and functions of organisms, we come to realise all machines are simple, not-evolved organisms of metal-atoms, as we are of carbon-atoms.
• Continuity: we took 400 years to realise that all is discontinuous quanta, when observed in detail from neurons, which were thought to form a continuous brain before Cajal’s beautiful pictures, to energy, the substance of the vital space occupied by those points of the fractal networks of the Universe, which only became quantised a century ago, to time clocks, which were a continuous line duration, despite the obvious cyclical nature of all of them, hence ‘breaking space’ into an inner and outer region, and its multiplicity from logic cycles of computers, to circadian cycles of life, to orbital cycles of stars, each one with a different speed or time ‘frequency’, the true measure of time quanta: Tƒ=1/T. But only Einstein realized that ‘there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’ and this has not yet been properly introduced in science.    So any system of time clocks or space extension can be quantised into frequency cycles and ‘atoms, particles, cells’ quanta of a relative scale of reality.
• Interpretation of Mathematics, as an abstract, idealist language, which is not. Mathematics is a realist science. In fact the science whose disciplines better reflect the fractal, organic nature of the Universe. And this is the key to convert the present paradigm into an organic view of reality. In brief, mathematics has 3 disciplines and the 3 are organic analysis of the fractal structure of space-time beings across scales of size: Arithmetics->Algebra is based in numbers, but a number is the social repetition of undistinguishable elements; which as Pythagoras realized do have a geometric quantum structure, being the tetraktys, the most perfect organisation, whose organic reasons we shall soon reveal. Numbers are forms said Plato, because they are essential topological structures of a fractal network. So both geometry or rather topology, and algebra describes those fractal networks, its forms and functions and the way they related to each other. While Analysis studies how finitesimal quanta integrates into wholes. Thus analysis is the study of how parts, infinitesimals, become wholes. In that regard Leibniz had hinted at the fractal paradigm, with its model of relational space-time – a Universe made of fractal space-time beings, and brought us calculus to relate the ‘finitesimal quanta’, 1/n, of all wholes, made to the image and likeness of those parts. Hegel had analysed the 3 ‘arrows of causal time’, thesis antithesis and its present synthesis.
• And finally the most important of all questions in physics origin of the postulates of relativity, physicists have not solved the conundrum of what is motion and why we cannot distinguish ‘form and motion’; since they abandoned earlier on, the concept of time-motions as ‘changes’ both in the position in space and form or evolution in time of the being. Let us consider this final element with more care. We do KNOW THOUGH since Zeno that the paradoxes of motion and stillness have to do with continuity, and so we shall resolve them, showing that all motions of the Universe including locomotion are organic, reproductive motions, hence there is NOTHING abstract in the Universe, because a FRACTAL is just the mathematical, abstract description of a super organism.

III. THE FORMALISM: THE EVOLUTION OF TIME LOGIC & SPATIAL MATHEMATICS.

The evolved formalism of i-logic mathematics.

Now, we shall be less literary and start with very solid conceptual elements, namely describing the essence of the fractal paradigm.

And to that aim we shall bring, in the simplest possible form, the fundamental formalism of the Fractal Paradigm, ‘non-euclidean, non-aristotelian i-logic, o-rganic mathematics’.

We call it i-logic because in time, it is more complex, with multiple clocks and i comes after the A of Aristotle (the logic built with a single time clock and a single causal arrow) and we call it organic because in space is more complex, with multiple co-existing spaces, smaller parts that become wholes and O comes after the E of Euclid (geometry with a single continuous space made of points with no breath). But in brief, we shall just talk of Non-Æ, or i-logic mathematics.

So we shall now explain and complete at a very elemental level far more developed in the ∆±∞ posts on i-logic mathematics, the formal language of the fractal paradigm, what truly Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian space-time languages are.

Mind the reader, this is NOT so new. Again, the great revolution of physics in the XX century happened when Einstein realized that a point was a ‘fractal point with volume’, since multiple parallels cross it. So it could not be Euclidean – with no breath, abstract, dimensionless.

Now Einstein found that the Universe was non-euclidean, that is, points did have breath because they could fit many parallels of energy and information. And so they are ‘fractal points’ that grow in size when we come closer to it. But they forgot to change the first postulate of Euclid, and left points undefined, so this simple change of mathematics will open completely the world of science to the fractal paradigm. Let us see how:

Fractal point with breadth and the networks and social organisms they make, connected together.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           =========== o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

The definitions of points as fractal particles, lines as waves of ExI and planes as topological networks

Now when this was found out to be the case, mathematicians and physicists shied away from definitions. So in a landmark book, Hillbert, father of modern abstract mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, not defining them, because obviously the definitions of Euclid no longer worked, points did have breath, and so lines were waves of points with breath, and so they were discontinuous and planes had to be defined as networks of points communicated by lines. This are the 3 canonical definitions of i-logic mathematics that restore the realism and organicism to mathematics, beyond the axiomatic method of the idealist Hilbert’s Hegelian school of science.

Indeed, we do have to define points, lines planes, relative equality and parallels. And so now we shall consider that the structure of geometry is fractal, made of points with volumes sharing energy and information through waves that become then topological networks. And consider as it was already proved by Godel and lobacjevski, that mathematics is a realist science, since its truth cannot be as Hilbert wanted obtained by merely considering its internal logic, but needed external, realist, experimental tests.

Einstein’s curved space-time.

And we do correct the interpretation of Einstein’s Non-euclidean geometry of gravitational forces, which also is not logic.

Since when he discovered that multiple parallels cross a point of the ‘lower scale’ of gravitational space, over which light transits, he should have just widened those points to fit all its parallels.

Yet He instead of widening a point-particle enlarging it to become a star or atom or any other scale of the fractal paradigm, maintained the point-size of the particle-star-galaxy etc.

An then to fit the parallels he ‘bend the straight lines into curves’ to crowd the point with no breath, as the focus of the parallels. This is not proper. A point with no breath even if you curve parallels with no width, can only fit one. And a parallel is a straight line, so if you curve it is not a parallel anymore.

So the rational solution to the conundrum of the non-euclidean structure of space-time, crossed by multiple parallels is obvious:

We exist in it a fractal space-time that can be enlarged as we perceive it in more detail. Then those gravitational points become a star in a galaxy or a complex atom in a molecular network, and multiple lines which become waves of energy and information can traverse it.

2nd postulate. A vital Universe of fractal points, waves of energy and information and topological networks.

The fractal paradigm requires a new more evolved complete ¬Æ mathematical concept of ‘points’ as fractal points that grow in size when we get more information of them (1st Postulate of ¬Æ mathematics) of lines as waves of energy and information transmitted by such points with volume that create the networks between points.  So for example in quantum physics  we talk of a fundamental equation:

Fermion (particle-point) < Boson (wave of energy and information > Fermion (particle point)

This equation, which is the fundamental equation of Forces and particles turns out to be just the description of the first and second postulate of illogic mathematics, applied to the fractal scales of ∆-3 space-time, or physical scale.

Yet if we change the elements:

Cell (particle-point) <blood  vessel + nervous axon (wave of energy and information) > Cell (particle point)

We are describing again the 1st and 2nd postulate of i-logic mathematics, applied to the ∆-1 scale of cells (whereas ∆0 is the relative human scale). And so if we consider

Head (particle-point) < Verbal wave of information > Head (particle point), we are applying those postulates to the ∆-human relative scale, and describe the fundamental event of social communication that starts the evolution of memetic super organisms of history, societies.

Topological networks. Discontinuous planes of points communicating energy and information.

And multiple point-particles communicated by waves can form a network, a social plane, a ‘number with form’, of which we shall see certain numbers, pairs, decametric scales are more efficient and more abundant in nature, because they can better distribute energy and information flows and combine them into new reproduced fractals – the 3 functions of all fractal systems: to gauge information, to absorb/feed on energy and reproduce both.

So a triangular tetraktys, where the 3 corners of the fractal form specialise into absorbing energy, information and combing it and reproduce it, with a 10th central unit, communicating them as a whole, becomes the most perfect pythagorean form of the Universe. And that central point then becomes the ‘unit-whole’ of the 10 scale that forms another 100 scale of the tetraktys. The Mongol army was tailored in 10s, so was the legion and captain of 10 sergeants. 10¹º-¹¹ is the most common mathematical structure of nature, regarding perfect social beings – the number of stars in a galaxy, of ties in a DNA human molecule, of people on Earth, now that is almost saturated (7 billion), of cells in the first small mammals, and the common number to transcend scales of physics – for example the difference between the quanta of atoms, H-planck measured as energy and the quanta of the next molecular, thermodynamic scale, Boltzmann constant.

So while the fractal Universe constantly creates different fractal structures, certain organisations are more efficient and survive better, because the fractal is a vital fractal, of vital geometry, of vital points absorbing energy and information, creating logic paths, repeating actions, reproducing into networks. Even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, gauge energy and information, share it, in networks, form larger systems. Reproduce when absorbing more energy into new quarks and electrons and all this can be described with i-logic mathematics and coded with quantum numbers. Since now that we realise mathematics is organic and fractal, there is NO PHILOSOPHICAL CONUNDRUM, talking of physical systems as vital, organic systems. And we shall indeed show a fractal generator equation to describe them all.

Thus we define any system as an ∆-superorganism made of smaller, similar ∆-1 super-organisms. And each ∆-scale of superorganisms & its ecosystems are studied by a human science but all of them follow the same Invariances & emergence Laws & Galilean Paradoxes of 5D Metric formalized with the tools of Existential Algebra & Non-AE=i-logic Geometry.

We unify all Natural Systems as superorganisms using a single template definition, since they differ only by the i-scale or ecosystem in which they exist or the specific types of energy & information their networks are made of:

‘A super-organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.’

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language of information and force of energy and we can define any network-organism, which will be a ‘part’ of a whole world-plane or ecosystem, composed of several species that occupy different ‘vital spaces’ but interact through the same language of energy & information:

An world-plane or ecosystem (name a specific world-plane) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies).

I.e.: The ‘world-plane of ‘zoology’ includes all beings of relative size, i=6, that use light as information, called ‘animals’. The world-plane 8, a galaxy, includes as parts, all celestial bodies of size i=7 related by gravitational networks, etc.:

∆-3:  An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

∆-2: A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and coded by networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

∆-1: A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.

∆+1: An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

∆+3: A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy.

∆+4:  A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

Now this is the ‘Non-Euclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.

What about its non-aristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”.

This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scales of non-euclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single time-duration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.

But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is one-dimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its in-form-ative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.

But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.

The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clock-like vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.

The 6 motions of the Universe. Relativity: minds cannot perceive together motion and form.

If the holographic principle explains the forms of the Universe as fractals of bidimensional space and time cycles, and so it resolves one of the oldest standing questions of science – why things and beings have the forms they have, and why there are so few forms in the Universe (only 3, those of time cycles, of planes of space and its combinations in space-time beings, something already the Greeks knew when they found all curves called conics could be deduced from a line rotating in a cycle, a cone; and today proved by the fact that messing | and O computers can imagine anything)… there is still a fundamental second question at the core of all sciences of reality: the duality between motion and form. What is motion and what is form, information. And how they mess and relate to space and time? Now we have advanced the obvious answer in the previous graph. All is really motion but can be seen as lineal form-distance, as space or as cyclical form-motion as time. So we must understand how time motion states and form states, how lineal speed and lineal distance-stillness mess together. Since this is the second fundamental duality which gives us the 4 ‘parameters’, lineal stillness, or distance, space, lineal-planar motion or ‘energy, entropy in some texts’, on one side and cyclical time clocks with motion and cyclical forms with more dimension, patterns of information, when we see time in stillness. But what decides how we see something as form or motion? We must then peer into the origin of all knowledge, the structure of the mind.

Now to make sense of all this, we must understand how the brain perceives the cyclical motions that inform the vital, quanta of the Universe.

Because the brain is limited in size, it reduces the total information of the Universe, taking away what we shall call the 5th dimension of scalar size (we do not see the smaller scales of particles, atoms, molecules and cells or the larger scale of galaxies and so on), and taking away the motion of most quanta of space that appear as ‘solid forms’, and  we take away the 3rd dimension of spatial depth.

So the eye sees the remaining dimensions, put into still bidimensional sheets of information pegged into a continuous mapping, as a puzzle made of all its cyclical parts. And this is why the mind sees an absolute Euclidean space-time, but reasons allow us to go further into the other dimensions and motions of the Universe.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare.

So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

Motion as reproduction of form.

Thus, we can consider the last element that makes our physicists’ believe in a simple abstract reality, as they are concerned mainly with the study of locomotions.

But locomotions ARE as in waves, reproduction of form of information in a lower scale of the scalar, fractal 5th dimension. When a wave moves it translates the information, the form of the wave in the smaller points of its lower fractal scale and we see that integrated in the upper larger scale as a motion. We shall then observe in all systems that motion is reproduction of information in a lower scale. For example, physicists today define c-speed no longer as abstract speed but as the limit of reproduction of information sent between two points. So we shall state that:

• All systems have a wave-moving, reproductive state, and a particle-informative, still state.

This should have become obvious long ago. When you want to perceive information you stop or the thing you look must be still not to become fizzy. A wheel turning fast looses the details of its spooks. Electrons, the simplest particles have a motion and stop motion and stop beat. So when they stop they entangle with other electron emit an informative wave of light and communicate information – and that is the ultimate realist interpretation on why in Special Relativity we always measure with electronic instruments the same speed of light, as light communicates two still entangled fermions with a wave that reproduces information in the lower scale of gravitational pure space-time.

For the same reason because gravitation does NOT carry information its speed is relatively infinite, or non-local, as V = S/T = S/O-information = ∞.

Thus right now we have resolved zeno’s paradox, the meaning of action at distance, of entanglement and of special relativity, all in a single paragraph, showing you that even the most ‘seemingly remote’ science to be explained in fractal, organic terms, physics will find most of its unresolved questions answered in a very simple, beautiful manner once we do correct the errors of earlier abstract, mechanist, continuous models of a single space-time Universe.

In that regard, in philosophy of science there has been for too long a dogmatic physicists’ view of the Universe, as made of abstract continuous locomotions, despite Zeno’s paradox. How indeed motion proceeds? Step by step, as a wave ‘reproduces its formal motion’ in the next quanta of space-time, communicating its form to the next wave. So locomotion is also an organic reproductive action.

And indeed, those insights were already present in the earlier first Greek philosophers of science, who did already think in those scalar, fractal, organic terms:

• The first philosophers of science, the 3 ‘anaxas’ of Greece, talked of life and death as a process of gathering of cellular homunculus, latter desegregated; of infinite time cycles, and the 2 poles of energy and information of the Apeiron.
• Next came the true founder of the experimental logic method of science, Aristotle, in his organon, which talked of 6 motions in time, whereas time was defined rightly as any form of change of a system, NOT only as physics do, a locomotion (one of the 6 time motions). And so Aristotle talked of generation, growth, evolution, diminution, extinction and locomotion. On this view, we could speak of a ‘world cycle’ of life and death, as the essence of Time cycles, and the fractal beings, which develop those motions. As it consists on those 6 motions in causal order. And soon we will see indeed that all systems, physical, social and biological follow the world cycle of 6 motions.

Thus, with the analysis of all the 6 motions=changes of reality, the fractal paradigm regains the understanding of the 6 motions of time together as a world cycle of life and death proper of all beings, and will further improve our understanding of time, and its cycles.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic arrow of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower scale of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But motion is reproduction! of a wave of form.

And it is in present, because it has travelled back to the past, descended an scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or  ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solves it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, a symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonise and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

IV. INFORMATION≈PERCEPTION

The still mind: The logic explanation of the Galilean paradox.

Now this much wider vision of time and the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Hegel, the last serious formulation of the Spatial entropy x Temporal information=Space-time arrows Fractal Generator (thesis-antithesis=Syntehsis) .

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

O x ∞ = ∆±1: The equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in a single Universe.

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries. This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. In posts on i-logic geometry we develop a pangeometry of all possible non-euclidean minds of the Universe. We conclude that each mind is a monad, a fractal point crossed by an enormous numbers of rays of information, which create a specific mind, mirror of the Universe, with less volume of information and more stillness to fit in the point. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons.

So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).

Of course, the relativity of minds fritgtens scientists.  It is far easier to construct a simpler model apt for measures with a single mechanical time-clock and a single cartesian graph of space, self-centred in the human ‘light space-time’ (we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behaviour, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believers to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’.

In the opening montage of cyclical systems of space time, we can see how all what exists is a fractal system made of vital space, with kinetic motions, encoded and informed by accelerated clocks of time, self-centred in a relative point of view or frame of reference that holds together the system. In the graph we can indeed see a small sample of fractal systems, in which a central first point of view, once it is born, reproduces in waves of clone forms, which then reorganise into an static form with a classic order – a fractal which seen from THE SELF-centered perspective is a form of consciousness growing and dying as it performs a world cycle of existence.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behaviour, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

The ego is as Buddha and Descartes understood a Maya of the senses

Thus now we can respond why we perceive reality both as motion and stillness. The answer is in the ternary structure of all beings, self-centred by a mental point of view.

All together now: We are all self-centered, fractal organisms of vital space, tracing world cycles.

Each point is a world in itself.’ Leibniz, On the Fractal Point, the Fundamental particle-being of the Universe

In the graph, we are all made of vital spaces – whose motions are in-formed by self-centered cyclical time clocks. But unlike the artificial steady, mechanical clocks of time of our machines, the clocks of nature, are vortex-like clocks with a clear inward arrow of increasing information and decreasing energy, as those of the graph, tracing for each finite species of space-time a ‘world cycle’ of life and death between creation and existence.

We are all fractal self-centered space-time beings.

This simple description of reality is proper of philosophers of science, from:

Aristotle, who talked of ∞ relative unmoved Gods of information that perceived and ordered the moving energy of its bodies, to:

Descartes who talked of a Universe made of res extensa or vital space with lineal motions and cyclical vortices of time, perceived by relative mathematical frames of reference (of which he affirmed there were multiple, describing in his book the World, the human light space-time with its cartesian 3 axis), to:

Leibniz, with his concept of a Universe made of infinite fractal worlds, or apperceptive monads, with different time rhythms and spatial mathematical images of the Universe, put together into a single absolute space-time only in the mind of man, to this author, which formalised the concept of a Universe made of fractal self-centred beings of vital space and cyclical time, suffices to explain all facts of all sciences.

When we see it in motion, as time clocks, the system accelerates inwards, growing in form and diminishing its entropy (above) as time clocks are accelerated vortices of Nature that carry the information its frequency and form – from masses to charges, to hurricanes to angular momentums. When we see the memorial trace of those spiral cycles, each step of the cycle often becomes a reproduced quanta of space, and a fractal network starts to reproduce inwards, into smaller scales of the ‘5th dimension’. This constant reproduction of formal motions, downward and upwards the scales of the 5th dimension is the whole meaning of it all.

And the logic paradoxical principle that allows it is the Galilean-Einsteinean Relativity which Poincare put it simple: ‘we cannot distinguish distance (a dimension of space) from motion’. So as all is ultimately moving in time, as a motion with form, the Universe is both eternal and motion IS reproduction of form. All therefore reproduces. A wave reproduces its form on the lower scale of larger entropy and lesser form. As light does on vacuum space. You live in a vital reproductive fractal of time cycles imprinting information as they move through lower scales of the 5th dimension.

Thus each of us has a finite time duration, which constantly increases its form, its information, and diminishes its spatial energy, its extension, in 3 ‘relative ages’, of young, energetic gaseous state, steady state, balanced reproductive, liquid age and informative, 3rd age of maximal warping, when the time-space world cycle ends, reversing back to the past, by explosion of your in-form-ation into energy, in the process of death.

All in all, the first truth to understand about reality, which is now a canonical, experimental truth, since the discovery of quantum physics and relativity, but has never been properly formalised to describe the Universe and all its parts, is the fact that you do NOT exist in a background, Newtonian, absolute abstract space-time, but you are made of quanta of space with motion, which trace closed cycles, ‘time clocks’ of different speed and form, in-form-ation, in the world where you exist.

When you say i don’t have energy and time to do this, you ARE certain, you are made of spatial energy and temporal information, as everything else in the Universe. And only the pegging together of all those vital spaces, separated by membranes, the chair, myself, the computer I am writing in from Absolute space. And only the sum of all those repetitive cycles those entities perform, the beats of my heart, which provoke the hits of my fingers, which produce logic cycles in the computers that put this pieces of information in the screen, form a ‘combined, synchronised motion of absolute time’.

If you accept this empirical fact of your existence – that YOU ARE made of space and time – you will upgrade your understanding of yourself and the Universe. This is the model of relational space-time, which Leibniz advanced as an alternative to Newton’s model of an abstract background- a mathematical, idealist error born of the custom of drawing beings in the ideal pictorial background of a cartesian canvas.

We say this is an ‘experimental fact’ because it was proved by modern science – by quantum physics and relativity.

We do know it, since Einstein proved there are ∞ time cycles in the Universe and quantum theorists proved space is made of quanta that carry motion, momentum, kinetic energy (related terms of mathematical physics).

So the existence of quanta of space with energy-motion and multiple time clocks, which web the structure of all realities are canonical facts in physics, for a century.

V. THE FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SPACE-TIME BEINGS.

How 5D Metric orders all space sizes and time cycles.

If we are made of vital spaces and cyclical times, the first question is how, 2 simplex elements, lineal, kinetic motions of space and time cycles that bend those motions into closed cyclical forms of information, can generate the immense variety of realities we see around us?

The answer is: by sheer repetition, combination, and pegging of those ‘formal motions’ of time and space. So we can ‘reduce’ those iterations with synoptic logic languages and mathematical equations to its ultimate elements and ‘rules of combination’, and this is what will be the ‘Fractal Model of the space-time Universe’. We shall extract the ultimate properties of time and space, and the rules of combination, and put them into the minimalist possible mirror of the mind that reflects them, called a ‘Fractal Generator equation’. And so then, how running this equation forwards we can generate with the rules of engagement al what exists in the Universe, including man.

In Fractal mathematics the equation that generates the fractal is called a generator ‘feed-back’ equation. They are symbolic equations, which express operations that repeat themselves ad infinitum, generating new solutions, accumulated in time or space.

For example, Mandelbrot’s set, the most famous fractal is a simple iterative equation defined in the complex plane, which generates points in that plane with infinitesimal detail. So as we run the equation z(n+1)=z(n)²+c the points plotted in the plane form an image:

The equation thus is really simple. It has in fact as all equations, only 3 terms, so we can write a general ‘Grammar’ of all linguistic mirrors and equations that reflect the Universe, Spe <≈> Tiƒ.

And this is a good beginning to ‘see’ the fractal space-time Universe, as if all languages have only 3 components, must be because they reflect a Universe of 3 ‘colours’. Indeed, space has 3 ‘dimensions’, colours are 3, equations have an F(x), Operandi and G(Y) element.

The Universal Grammar of all languages is Subject < Verb > Object.

In Eastern philosophy Yin=vishnu=information=female principle x Yang=energy=shiva=male combine to give birth to ∞forms. And so on.

And then by combinations and iterations of those elements, we get more complex mathematical equations, colours, forms in 3 dimensions and sentences. It is also evident, then that  a Fractal Generator does not need to be a numerical equation.

The Universe can be mirrored with different languages. God does NOT speak only mathematics, as physicists often think (Platonic theory of the world) but ‘God speaks infinite languages’ (Upanishads), each one a ternary mirror of the 3 elements of reality, the element of vital space, the element of temporal form, and its infinite combinations.

And the equations of an iterative fractal are called ‘Generators’, which are very simple in its synoptic, logic or mathematical definition. But by sheer repetition of its cyclical patterns, become extremely complex as those cycles of the whole, distribute its energy and in-form-ation on lower scales, reproducing ever more complex patterns in smaller surfaces. So for  example the Mandelbrot’s famous fractal is generated by a simplex z²+c equation.

A reminder of the main symbols of Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles.

Now, if we add the Galilean Paradox of Relativity between motion and form we can consider the 4 fundamental elements of those graphs: still space and entropy (kinetic lineal energy, expansive space) and time cycles and information bits (still cycles of form).

We need to differentiate between still continuous perception by the mind of space, (ab. |, Sp) ‘lineal kinetic or entropic motions or lineal momentums’; ‘Spe’ and its .

And between cyclical motions, clocks of time, (ab.O, Ti) and its still perception by the mind or information (Tiƒ)

Now once we have focused the mirror of the 4 canonical dimensions and explain the holographic principle, we can be a bit ore precise with the details of the ‘geometrical fractal generator’, which defines the basic topological properties of space-time beings (but NOT all the properties they have):

This means that all systems, including physical and biological systems as you, are made of:

• A vital, fractal space  made of quanta with motion – the space you occupy is ‘you’, it is not a ‘background’ reality, an abstract ‘Newtonian’ frame of coordinates where you slide through. You are made of quanta of space with motion: “Spe”. So it is a particle, made of quanta of space with energy (capacity to move), called a ‘field’. Further on, because all those vital spaces are made of quanta, they can be counted in space,, so we write: ∑Spe.

The confusion of a background space arises then, when scientists did not realise that this structure of vital continuous spaces, made of smaller quanta, extended ad infinitum. Quanta of space was made of smaller quanta. For example, organisms were made of cells made of molecules made of atoms, and so on. So they postulated that the smallest of all those scales was a background space. But even if there is a minimal scale, in the same manner when your whole vital space moves, your cells move with it, the last hypothetical scale will move with your cells. Now, this structure of space, in which wholes are made of parts with similar functions or forms to the whole is called a fractal. So all what exists is a vital fractal.

•  Now those vital quanta with motion, move with a series of time cycles. That is they trace repetitive actions, which appear as space-time cycles, which the being performs through its existence. So existence is made of time cycles, T, in which you use your vital space to perform certain vital actions, such as feeding on energy, or gauging information, reproducing your system or communicating and associating with other space-time entities.

And you do so with a discontinuous frequency, ƒ, for each of those actions that have a certain repetitive, discontinuous beat, and create through its actions  forms in space, they are forms-in-action, information: “Tiƒ”.

So as you perform several actions and you are made of smaller quanta that also performs those space-time actions the different actions in time must be synchronised in those relative scales of size of reality. So your cells are synchronised to reproduce once a day, when your feeding patterns give them energy to do so.

Women’s reproduction is synchronised with the time cycle of the moon. And so on. The result is that each day you feed as a whole, billions of cells reproduce; so your action ‘multiplies in a lower scale’. Thus because those time actions the being develops, repeat in cycles, that multiply in lower scales with  cyclical, pi-like patterns, we can ad a multiplier to each time cycle: ∏-> ∏Tiƒ.

It is also clear that those space-time actions and cyclical synchronicities are all about, exchanging energy (as in feeding) or information (as in perception) between you and the external world or you and your internal structures. So your vital space and time cycles are constantly exchanging spatial energy (open spatial motion) and temporal information (cyclical forms-in-action):

∑Spe <≈> Tiƒ.

Where a system of spatial quanta, dominant in lineal motion, hence more abundant in lineal limbs (biological systems) and lineal fields (physical systems) Spe (|-Limbs/Fields), exchange energy and information (<=>) in cyclical, patterns, dominant in a region of the system, with cyclical form (that stores more information) called a particle in physical systems or a head in biological ones, Tiƒ (O-heads-particles).

So because the equation of the being is dynamic, and energy and information goes back and forth between the two poles, limbs and fields and particles and heads, the equation is called a ‘feed-back equation. And it is the simplest equation of duality that reflects the structure of the space-time beings of the Universe.

Further on, the intermediate, ≤=≥ region where maximal exchange happens tend to be in all systems a different, larger region, where cyclical information and lineal kinetic energy interacts forming more complex curved, hyperbolic forms, called waves in physical systems and bodies in biological ones. So we can extend the description of the being to a ternary structure:

Ξ. ∑Spe (|-limbs-fields with maximal energy)<Ø-STexi (hyperbolic body-wave)>∏ Tiƒ (O-heads particles of max. Information)

This is the synchronous ‘spatial, present’ description of the being. And we can affirm putting together the 2 fundamental principles of conservation of the Universe, the conservation of Energy and Information (and its quanta equivalences, the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, as energy and information are nothing but the integral of each of those quanta of lineal and angular momentum):

“All what exists is a system of quanta of vital space and cyclical time, exchanging and trans-forming back and forth energy and information ad eternal: Spe<ST(dxi)>Tiƒ”

So the Fractal Generator classifies all different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator:

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms.

The topological description: |xo=Ø, considers those 3 elements.

For a more accurately description in bidimensional terms, when symbols are available in the keyboard will be: ◊x⊗=œ, whereas:

-◊ is a bidimensional plane of minimal form, of Spe, with a given kinetic entropy.

⊗, is a bidimensional Tiƒ, a membrane that shrinks into a point of view, with a given angular momentum, and

-œ, is a reproductive S≈T body wave, which tries to maximise its function of existence, Exi(s=t), reached when both elements S and T are similar in balance (Max. SxT->S=T).

This simple self-repetitive structure in its sheer repetition and interaction for n-particles across ∆±n scales but always in case of order and existence of a super organism, as a self-centred ⊗, point of view, will be used to describe the natural symmetries of all physical systems, though it will only have such a topology in the pure informative states as ‘seeds’ of information, or ‘minds of perception’.

Now we can make a philosophical recess to understand how deep and important is the new paradigm for the worldview man has the Universe and its unending quest for objective science, away from the human belief of man as the centre of the Universe, because indeed, all what we have said tell us that we humans are NOT the centre of anything, but just another fractal of space-time, and that is a huge attack on the ego and the myths but obviously a much more objective, scientific view of reality. It is in that sense the 4th paradigm of knowledge, away from religious myths, from self-centred men as the only species, from the earth as the only centre and scale.

VI. THE 6 MOTIONS PUT TOGETHER: THE WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE.

Existences.  The causal order of the 6 motions of time.

But what is an organic system? The answer was not clear mathematically, till the discovery of fractal mathematics in the 1970s. Hence because the organic paradigm lacked its fundamental tool of study, a mathematical, logic language to add to the other properties of organisms, discovered earlier in biological and social and logic, mental languages, the fractal paradigm has not made it into the mainstream discourse of philosophy of science, changing our worldview, from the obviously outdated mechanist, entropic vision of the Universe sponsored by physicists for 4 centuries into the much richer in meanings, reasons and answers, paradigm of fractal organisms.

This paradigm was born as a ‘wishful form of thinking’ in time of Aristotle, who wrote in his ‘Organon’ the first reasoned philosophy of science, hence rightly considered the founder of logic, biology and the experimental method. Then Galileo completed the method with the addition of mechanical instruments of measure, but also reduced in its scope by making mathematics the only authorised language of science, and reducing the organic clocks of the Universe and its world cycles of creation and extinction, with the 6 canonical motions of time=changes in the form and position of beings – generation, evolution, growth= reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction.

But what happen after Galileo was a disgrace for our understanding of those time motions. Now time we say is a cycle, and time we know means change. So when something does not change we say time does not seem to pass. So we described the simplest of all time cycles as the cyclical motion of a particle that returns to its beginning and then repeats the cycle.

And this is the key: motion in cyclical patterns is reproduction of form. And since time dominates all, and in fact, lines are just limited intervals of a time cycle, all motion is reproduction of information, of form, and that is the ultimate meaning of reality.

If Aristotle found 6 types of time-change, we can then put them together in a pattern called the world cycle of life and death: generation, growth, locomotion (reproduction of form in space), evolution, diminution and extinction.

All together form a cycle that returns with death and diminution to the original point of departure. So if reality is made of super organisms, networks of space points, in time reality is made of time cycles, world cycles of which the life and death world cycle of those 6 Motions is the organic meaning of existence. We exist to become super organisms, trace our world cycles of life and death, reproduce our form in space, through motion, in time through generation and then die, living a discontinuum offspring of beings similar to us to trace new world cycles:

In the graph, the order of the motions of the Universe, which are changes in the form and position of beings, is in fact organic, similar in all beings describing a world cycle of existence, through the processes of generation as as a seed of a lower scale of the 5th dimension, whose information reproduces, grows, emerges in a new scale as a full super organism and goes through 3 ages of increasing information, evolving and reproducing further, becoming part of a social network and then dying away and dissolving. And this whole process is a world cycle (no longer a worldline as in classic physics), which can be interpreted for each scale of reality in terms of the same causal order and changes of topology.

Why the existential cycle is dominated by information is obvious: the head-particle-solid state-black hole of maximal information dominates its energetic lineal limbs/fields, so it constantly absorbs motion giving nothing away and finally it exhausts all the energy of the system and as the UNIVERSE NEVER STOPS ITS MOTION, the coiled clock of time can only uncoil back into an explosion of information erased back to the past as disordered entropy in the big-bang moment of death, converted into flat space, laying into a flat corpse:

In the graph, the ultimate meaning of existence, which is a world cycle of life and death through the life arrow of growing information as Nature’s time clocks are vortices accelerating inwards, from galaxies to solar systems, to the spiral of clocks, that go through the young age, dominated by the energetic system, Spe, a mature age of balance of energy and information, S=T and a 3rd age of maximal information, Max. Tiƒ, which explodes back into death.

The equivalence between the 3 topological networks, Sp, ST, and Tƒ and the 3 ages of time, Past, Ps, Present, ST, and future, Tƒ, is the fundamental symmetry that messes together in perfect order, the 3 organs in space as a  simultaneous super organism and its 3 ages in time , between its generation and death.

The new 6 motions of the Universe.

To systematise the time motions of the Universe for each species, and to establish its causal relationship, departing from Aristotle we establish the only possible motions in time of the fractal 5ST Universe: changes in the parameters of energy, information and ∆-scales of the being, which will either emit energy (locomotion), absorb it (feeding), emit information (reproduction), absorb it (communication), and evolve into larger wholes (social evolution, generation) or devolve (death): ±∆, Se, Tƒ.

Those 6 motions of time will be the origin of all space-time events of the Universe and its rules define the cycles of space-time of all beings, of which the world cycle of existence is obviously the most important. The order of those motions though will happen in such a fashion that at the end all the processes when integrated along 3 scales, 3 forms and 3 arrows of time will give us a zero sum, that is all locomotions will balance with the energy fed to the system (emission and absorption of energy), and all life organisations upwards in the scales of the 5th dimension will be compensated by al the deaths downwards.

This the ultimate truth of reality: the whole Universe is immortal for each of its parts to live a finite cycle of existence.

Time curves and encloses vital space, creating the complex energy-information systems of the Universe.

Einstein  said that time ‘curves’ space and  there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe. Indeed, one for each time cycle or motion of a particle that closes a curve into itself:

In the graph, the simplest physical systems of masses and charges, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence between gravitational acceleration and mass.

Masses are thus defined as spiralling rotational clocks of time with a frequency that defines its attractive power:

E=Mc2 + E= hv -> M= K v, where mass is the product of universal constants and the frequency of its attractive vortex.

Thus we can define both, as cyclical, attractive vortices of space-time. In close observation masses and charges are eddies of gravitational and electromagnetic forces, curved into cyclical, attractive, spiralling clocks of time: each mass or each charge is a time clock, determining a rotational frequency that defines its attractive force.

The faster the mass-quark or electronic charge turns, the more it attracts as it does a hurricane. Those cyclical, physical patterns of repetition  are the origin of the information of the Universe, whose simplest ‘bits’ are carried by each mass or charge. Thus  each physical  time cycle carries the patterns of information of the Universe.

Humans reduce all cyclic, repetitive cycles of time with a single mechanical clock that equalizes them. But this ‘human time’ useful for measure is not the meaning of time.

Further on, because humans use a Cartesian lineal coordinates to measure time, (born of the  use of time to study lineal speed and space, t=s/v), the fundamental property of time, to be cyclical, caused by the repetition of certain ‘actions’ and events by an entity of ‘existence’, is lost.

Thus to fully comprehend time we must accept its multiplicity and cyclicality and measure it with the objective parameter of frequency.

Time and History.

Duration, the sum of the cycles, that is the product of the frequency of a cycle and its duration or ‘length of space’ crossed during each cycle (wavelength) is useful for the study of changes in the motion, speed and position of objects proper of physics. And for that reason it was adopted earlier in science by physicists studying the trajectory of objects, mostly projectiles (physics thus was born as ballistics with Galilean studies of the motions of cannon balls).

The spread of mechanism and physics in other areas of science as machines overpower human senses and physicists philosophers in the study of time, implied that what was initially a mere mathematical formula for the calculus of motions and distances, v=s/t, where time was defined as duration (though measured with frequency cycles of pendulum clocks) became a dogma. Time became lineal in science, instead of cyclical.

Lineal time though has been mostly inspired by ‘fascist’, imperial considerations, by all those cultures, notably the white culture, which felt that by the use of ‘memes of metal’, weapons money and machines, they were evolving towards a superior future in which they ruled the world.

Different forms of millenarianism in white cultures mostly of the Jewish-Protestant strain (biblical cultures) can be found, from the babylonian Talmudian millenarianism ‘at the ned of times, all nations will be slave of the Jewish nation (yvwh) or they will be exterminated’ (Sanhedrin, 185) to the III Reich Nazi millenarianism, of an aryan cleansed world with the superior race on top.

Lineal imperial goal being the conquest of the world, those cultures infused all their other ideologies and sciences of a lineal goal towards its manifest destiny walked.

Lineal science in this sense became a symbiotic ideology to lineal Empire, and indeed, ballistics, physics and empires all are related to the construction and use of ‘energetic’, lineal metal, weapons.

Weapons we might say have a lineal ideology, a single, one-dimensional, entropy=death only concept of the future of the world. And a racist imperial one.

And in this manner it backed the pretension of the Jewish-Christian religions that there was a ‘chosen people’ with a historic, millenarianist destiny traced by an external God, in which this tribe progressed towards the conquest of the world, the manifest lineal destiny traced only one by the power of God and the Messiah.

This was however a mystic transliteration of the fights for power of earlier bronze ages which saw as their finality the material and less often spiritual conquest of the world.

In the Universe at large, time is the sum of infinite time clocks cycles and waves that move and change constantly by repeating their cycles in a discontinuous and repetitive way.’

On that view it is only normal that the events of any science happen in a repetitive manner. This is in fact the true definition of science: a science is only considered as such when it studies the cycles and frequencies of the events of the species it studies and then finds its causes and in this manner it can ‘forecast’ the future.

Of course, this form of doing science is very old as it was predated in time by cyclical religions which studied the cyclical happenings and causes of reality to deduce future events.

But till the arrival of Greeks there was not a full understanding of causality. So many civilizations ascribed  very often wrong causalities to myths, Gods, anthropomorphic entities and other deities that ’caused’ the Maize to grow, the storm to clash or war and pestilences to appear.

It is only the combination of a serious theory of time cycles, frequency and causality applied especifically to the causes of each type of cycle in Nature, including those of history what permits to create a scientific point of view in any subject. So for example we know that if we heat water with fire there will be boiling vapor. The causality here found is scientific, coherent, and proved by the experimental method and so the theory of heat and entropy appears as a consequence of it. In History those causalities are of biological and predator nature, due to the evolution of memes of metal and as such they define the cycles of history.

The 3+1 ages of evolution in living species.

Let us then fully grasp the meaning of those aging process… in terms

The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species.

In the graph, samples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth:  i:       A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of energy and information, tE, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth:  Max. E:      It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: e=i It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Ti=E. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <<Energetic space.

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe and the superorganims of history.

To that aim, we shall consider how the organic arrows of time, the will to obtain energy, information and reproduce acquire a regular order in all the systems of the Universe.

This organic vision of time is much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows, which is the concept of time used by mechanist physicists, obsessed with the construction of energetic machines.

Yet it can also described mathematically in terms of the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, ext=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. E x Min. T = K ;      E=K=T      and Min. E x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, E-> I, and death its inversion, I-> E. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of social evolution and maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to social evolution, as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality.

The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1   change=time:

+1: Conception:  ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age:                  Youth or Age of energy.

2nd age:              energy and information reproduce.

3rd age:                All energy becomes information.

-1:Death:               The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality. To understand that cycle in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information.

Further on, since form is made with energy, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ energy that transforms itself into information, the only other primary direction/arrow of time to go. Then, when all energy is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle. Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and energy are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction.

And so the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future. Information never disappears as it always recreates itself.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct. So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories.

Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism). Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species.

In a young first age, energy is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining. In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages.

Young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.

Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, theobjective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.

Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.

It follows that a true science of life and time will try to maintain any organism in its age of balance, without excessive information. Exactly the contrary of what our society does. Since humans accumulate scientific and technological information towards a point or ’ in which that information, in the form of a robot or artificial intelligence, might extinguish us.

In the graphs, we illustrate thosewith a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual  in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. And finally in the Universe, where stars evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes. And so do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars.

Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information.

TIME IS CHANGE

Types of change in the universe: translational, physical and biological, morphological change.

If we escape the measure of time with quantitative models and study time with qualitative concepts, the meaning of time becomes ‘change’. In philosophical terms we perceive time as change. When something does not change it seems as time would not pass. Change in the form, in the in-form-ation of things is what we perceive as time. Time therefore has as change a formal pattern, it carries information.

If we do not see change in the form of things we do not say time.

Time is change of all kinds. Two time-changes are paramount.

Translational change or external change in the spatial position of beings, studied by physics. And Morphological change, change in the form, or in/form/ation of the being, internal and studied by Biology. General Systems sciences unifies both types of time-change in a larger model based in the multiplicity of time cycles, simplified by the definition of time in physics:

Physics only studies translational time-change, in which there is NOT internal morphological change, defined by Galilean Relativity, as V=∂s/dt. This restricted ‘sphere of time-phenomena’ implied a study of ‘present’ slices of the total flow of time events of a being – between points in which it only translates but does not changes morphologically or else its balance of energy and information will chaotically change its trajectory and would not be easy to calculate.

In the XX century, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity improved Galilean relativity and formalized, simultaneous, present time, derived initially from Galileo’s equation, V=∂s/∂t, hence still studying time as a ‘derivative’ of space parameters – a present slice of the total flow of time=changes of the Universe.

To do so he used a new type of mathematics, non-euclidean points defined as points in which multiple parallels exist, hence points with volume, with parts, what we call here ‘fractal points’.

This restricted concept of time  is only apt to study ‘translations in space’ . It did not identify the causal laws of morphological change. We thus have to widen further our analysis of time, beyond present to its dimensions of past and future…

Differences between space and time, information and energy and its dimensions.

The Universe is made of fractal clocks of time that break and enclose vital spaces of energy which they use to move and act on the Universe.

And we say ‘vital spaces’ because the paper of the cartesian continuum space-time is also a simplification with no motion, but all pieces of vacuum have energy, motion. And so we have actually two substances, time which has motion as it moves and shapes into frequencies and cycles, ‘space volumes’, quantum herds of energy motions.

And so the Universe is truly made not of an abstract fixed space-time continuum but it is an astoundingly complex, infinite puzzle, tapestry of energetic motions which ‘cyclical clocks of time’ harness into ‘forms’ with in/form/ation’. In detail all what you see will be a combination of an energy, lineal, expansive, disordering, explosive, ‘spatial’, entropic motion, or ‘field of energy’ in physics, body of energy in biology, social mass in sociology, harneshed, guided controlled, in/form/ed by a cyclical, informative, implosive, ordering, ‘temporal’, negantropic motion or ‘particle of information’ in physics, head of information in biology or ‘informative class’ in sociology, which controls the languages of information of society, the mathematical language of money and the verbal language to harness and form and control society.

This structure and its ‘whole view’ – a tapestry of infinite pieces of vital energy, controlled by informative, gauging particles and heads – is far more complex than the simple space-time continuum of the old paradigm. But it is essential to start from the scratch and change this simplified space-time continuum paradigm, if we want to make sense of reality as it is, and prevent us from making the grossly misconceptions of present science and advance in our understanding of the organic universe.

The next step thus is to reorganize the classic 4 dimensions of the continuum paradigm.

First we realize that this complex broken space-time, now made as a puzzle with infinite particles/fields of information/energy and heads/bodies of information energy, still has the 4 dimensions of classic space-time.

But NOW they must be REORDERED IN two dimensions of time-information (holographic principle), those of the heads and particles of each ‘piece, species’ of space-time and two dimensions of space-energy, those of the bodies/fields of energy:

The graph explains the differences between the old primitive paradigm of a single space-time continuum and the new, more complex paradigm based in the holographic principle and the definition of a fractal Universe of multiple non-euclidean space-tie planes.

Now all is motion so information and space become cyclical time and expansive energy. And all what exists is a combination of fields/bodies of energy of lineal nature and informative particle/heads. We show 3 dual systems, the light system with its two fields/states as lineal energetic wave/photonic particle; the human head-eye, lineal body system and the essence of all robotic systems, eyes-cameras and lineal transports/weapons.

So what ultimately changes in the Universe are its energy and information systems, made of cyclical complex ‘brains and particles’ that gauge, measure and remember cycles of information, from physical particles to eyes, heads and mechanical chips, and bodies of lineal energy that move those heads and particles, from fields of energy to organic bodies.
We can thus study now the fundamental particle of the Universe, a complementary system of energy and information and study its time cycles, its cycles of change.
Do those time cycles have patterns in themselves, common to all of them? There is, if we were to use the cyclical religions of time (Mayans, Taoists, Zurvanists), a pattern in all cycles? There is indeed. As all sistems increase with time its cyclical form, its information and hence diminish its energy:
As time flows, SYSTEMS BECOME MORE COMPLEX, WARPED, IN-FORM-ED, FROM ITS ENERGY YOUTH TO ITS 3RD AGE, AND THIS LAW APPLIES TO ALL SYSTEMS FROM BIG-BANG BIG-CRUNCH UNIVERSES TO HISTORY THROUGH ITS PALEOLITHIC YOUTH, MATURE NEOLITHIC AND PRESENT AGE OF EXCESSIVE MEMES OF METAL-INFORMATION.

The most important element of the Universe is time. We live in a society that does not understand time. It is a society whose main idol-ogy has been space, energy, entropy, lineal weapons and physicists have defined time in those terms since Galileo used it as a parameter of space and speed, of motion: t= s/v.

This of course is only an aspect of time, but the idol-ogy of physics has expanded at the rhythm of its machines and its formulae, so today nobody understands the wider concept of time as ‘change’ in the form and motion of things.

In those Terms aristotle, founder of modern rational thought, divided the study of time – the perception of change around us – in two main sciences, the study of changes in motion and energy would be the realm of physics, So within  that restricted analysis of change of motion time would be a function of space, energy and motion.

But there was also biology, the study of the changes in the morphology, in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings. And this other ‘arrow of time-change’, change in information, would be the key to understand biology, evolution and human societies, as we are living beings.

Time thus has two main ‘arrows of change’, energy or entropy or motion or space or speed, all synonymous concepts studied by physics. And information or form, studied mainly by biology.

And when you put together both ‘arrows of time’ and study both together, its changes, switches between both modes of change, motion and form, you enter a new science, complexity or general systems sciences that studies the dual arrows of time change, E<=>I, in a Universe in whcih all ‘energies never die but trans-form themselves, back and forth into information’…

This simple postulate defines cyclical time, as the absolute time, of which lineal time, t=s/v, the study of changes in motion is only an aspect, and evolutionary time, the change in form, another. Most entities in fact have ‘rhythms’, and ‘beats’ of change, due to the alternacy between expansive, energetic motions, Max. E, one of the two arrows of time and implosive, informative motions, Max. I, the other arrow.

So the beat of your mouth, of your heart, of your lungs, the flying of a bird, the motions of your legs, all of them respond to beat of explosive and implosive entropy and information, E<=>I, the ‘fractal generator’ of all the cycles of space-time you will observe.

Look around you, the beats of time, the infinite clocks of the Universe made of explosive and implosive rhythms, of entropy and information, of shapes that are changed growing in spatial energy or growing in imposive information, creating with little motion, more form. All those beats of the Universe is what science studies, and General Systems Sciences, the discipline in which this writer is likely the most advanced researcher today, analyzes them all and extracts common  laws and tabulates the rhythms and cycles of exchange of energy and information, of evolution, the rhythms of the 2 arrows of time.

THE BEAT OF LIFE AND DEATH: TIME CURVES ENERGY-SPACE INTO IN-FORM-ATION.

Of all of them, the most important is the rhythm of life, the life-death cycle, which comes immediatly from the simplest development of that feed-back, E<->I equation.

Imagine we start with a formless sheet of energy, Max. E, in the young age of the event, then as the energy transforms itself into information, E->I, till acquiring a balance E=I, we talk of the arrow of life, and youth of the being.

In balance, E=I, the being is in its classic, reproductive, present age, when its steady state makes it efficient able to handle both the external energy and information of the system.

But energy keeps becoming information, form, and new wrinkles and excessive form, and imploding motions, bring the 3rd age of the system. And finally when all is information and there is no energy, the being dies, and then, I<<E, time reverses its arrow and now information erases fast into explosive motion and energy, in big-bangs of matter, or collapse of networks in living beings that ‘release’ its cells.

The life death cycle, thus is the first huge discovery departing from the simple fractal generator equation of space-time, energy-information cycles: Es <->Ti, Spatial flows of energy, fields and body that are transformed into cyclical, complex networks of clocks of time with form, with information, Ti:

Max. E (youth) -> E=I (maturity) – > Max. I (3rd age) < < Max. E (Death).

And this basic time cycle is the one we apply to the study of our society, the human society that went through a young paleolithic age of energetic hunting, into a mature reproductive neolithic age in balance with the planet, to the present extinctive age of information, when we humans create an overproduction of negative information, in metal-support, robots, pcs, audiovisual media, machines that are killing us, corrupting our societies, collapsing the life world…

It is all part of the general laws of the Universe, the same laws of time and change that if we humans could properly learn and apply to create a better world could prevent our collapse. But of course, we humans are not that intelligent, we believe in our machines, and our ideas about science and time, as we have seen are mostly biased to the instruments and weapons physicists make, on whom they taylor their philosophy of science and their concepts. So Einstein would say that ‘time is what a clock measures’ and ‘time is a dimension of space’, whcih is only the limited view of those who measure time with mechanisms and its cycles and use it to measure motion in space (The physicists).

Here we deal with a much wider, deeper and accurate concept of time: dual time, cyclical time, time as the process of creating cycles of exchange of energy and information, time as the ultimate structure of a Universe made of cycles of time traced as motions in space.

In the graph, the main energy to information cycles of life of beings. The reader can observe that matter suffers also those 3 ages, known as states of matter, the gas, energetic state, the liquid, balanced, e=i state, and the solid informative state, between its birth as a plasma of i-1 particles and its extinction back to pure energy in atomic furnaces in stars, E=mc2.

So do the Universe in a big-bang, max. e to big- crunch max. i cycle or galaxies and stars in their nebulae (max. E) youth, imploded into liquid stars that reproduce atoms, e=i, and finally collapse into white dwarfs or black holes of maximal Information.

So do every biological being and society that evolves a human social super-organism and acquires technological information till it collapses into an energetic war that erases the culture, subconscious collective of the civilization into death.

And as those processes go, all systems show similar spatial topological changes in their energy and physiology, as information starts to predate over energy exhausting the system.

So we can also study the 3 ages of existence as the 3 natural ages of evolution of all systems when we apply the 3 only topologies of the 4D universe – the spherical, warped, informative topology of particles and brains and DNA genes; the energetic, lineal, extended, moving fields or limbs that move and protect the system, from skins to claws to weapons, and finally the intermediate, hyperbolic, wave/body, reproductive, balanced organs that work and reproduce energy and information for the system:

In the graph species also go through the same ages of individuals, as they can be considered a super-organism of the same DNa-Cell, the individual.

So they are born exceedingly small as a ‘seed’ of information, the first seminal cells in the individual, the first mutated species of maximal information, in species.

Then it will multiply, radiate and efficiently become a top predator thanks to its faster, more advanced nervous and blood systems. And as it grows in size it will become a lineal, energetic top predator, then balance its form and finally ‘rise in informative height’ as the head become dominant and similar species of higher information appear in its 3rd age. Then the species will evolve into a more complex superorganism (proteins that become DNA molecules, multicellular species, guided by neurons, social superorganisms of insects and human beings, machines that started as weapons and are now intelligent robots, etc.)

In the next graph, the law of the 3±1 ages or horizons shown in all its complexity across all scales of reality through its ages.

As the law of the ages of any system or cycle of time applies both to the process of informative aging of organisms and informative evolution of species. All species are born as a seed of dense information, with limited size (black hole, first chips, seminal cells, first bilateral animals). Then they grow in size and energy during their youth; since their superior informative qualities makes them top predators.

We observe that growth in black holes that feed on planets and stars, in the horse that grew enormously in size. So did the first bilateral animal, from its microscopic first form, the Vernanimacula. Mammals grew from tiny shrews into elephants. The first technological man, the Homo Floresiensis, with a ‘neuronal bump’ on the forehead, might have grown till the size of the first Homo Sapiens, the pygmy and Bushman . . .

Then, the species, once it has reached a balance between its initial information and growing spatial size, E=I, reproduces in great numbers, diversifies and colonizes the planet. We see in the graph this age in which ‘biological radiations’ of carbohydrates, animals of all kinds and human beings, colonized the Earth.

Finally, in its 3rd age the species grows in information and so it acquires height, the arrow of ‘perceptive information’. Then, once it has reached its informative zenith, the species becomes extinct by a more evolved form; or it evolves socially creating a super-organism, as ants, humans and machines are doing. It will be the 4th arrow of social evolution of the species that completes its 3±1 horizons.

Species can be considered ‘loose’ organisms, in which each individual is a cell of the collective species; since we can use the same ages to explain the 3±1 horizons of evolution of all the species of this planet. Thus, species also go through the same 3 evolutionary ages of all living organisms. They start as young, energetic forms, which acquire information in 3±1 ages of increasing complexity and when those 3±1 ages are completed, they either evolve into more complex super-organisms under the laws of social evolution or become extinct by a superior,more informative species. Indeed, only those species who show a strong eusocial capacity survive the ‘genetic clock’.

The most successful and one of the oldest species of the planet is, in fact, the eusocial ant, which no longer is an ‘individual’, but a super-organism stretching through miles of ‘vital space. In that regard, neither individuals able to reproduce nor species able to evolve socially become extinguished. If humans become extinguished is because they deny, guided by the simplest arrows of pure energy of weapons, the main arrow of Life/Time.

A complete analysis of biological species shows that new forms can only be, either an energetic or informative variation of the original species, or a reproductive combination of both Universal ‘genders’.

The universality of such dual systems is so obvious that the ancients already identified them with yang, energetic male principles and yin, cyclical/ female ones. While the moderns call that duality the Principle of Complementarity, as all informative particles have an energetic, lineal field of force and all biological, cyclical heads of information have a lineal body. So the combinative variations of those two simple morphologies, lineal energy and cyclical information, invariant, regardless of the scale we observe, is the essence of the creative game of the cosmos.

It is the plan of evolution that all species follow, which is a tautology, since in a Universe made of only 2 substances, energy and information, the only possibility is the creation of such 3±1 variations in space (subspecies) or in time (evolutionary ages).

Thus, clock-time cannot describe, as it is qualitative, morphologic, not quantitative, the cycle of death and life, from youth-energy into a 3rd age-information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, natural to all beings: Energy always trans-forms itself.

So the 4 arrows of time have an absolute order defined by those life ages, which first evolve socially a seminal seed into a macro-organism of multiple cells, according to the arrow ofsocial evolution and then trans-form the energy of youth into in-form-ation in 3±1 ages dominated by the arrows of energy, reproduction and information, creating the fundamental arrow of the life/death cycle, the arrow of information or future arrow that happens in all systems:

It is the main law of physics, discovered by Einstein, who said: ‘time curves (the energy of) space’.

It is the main law of Biology, discovered by Darwin, who said: that time evolves the form of organisms.

In Chemistry, Mehaute realized that when chemical compounds do not increase their entropy, they increase their information, forming fractal structures. It was the mathematical breakthrough of modern organicism. Since for the first time we had a mathematical paradigm, ‘fractal, self-generative equations’ able to describe the reproduction of information. Fractal mathematics showed how all systems could reproduce in-form-ation by breaking energy into ‘smaller forms’, in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way.

Finally, it is also the main law of History, as human civilizations constantly increase their technological information, but unable to repress military technology, the bad fruits of the tree of science, end up in extinctive wars. So they also live and die through those 3±1 ages/arrows of time.

So the meaning of Life and death is no longer a mystery, but an organic process of reproduction and self-organization, guided by the 4 arrows of time that we can extend to all systems made of  the 2 fundamental, dual ‘reproductive particles’, informative quarks and spatial, energetic electrons; that is, to all systems of the Universe. In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter.

Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do.

Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

—  The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

—  The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

—  The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles.

But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently.

So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow ofof cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

In that sense, death can be avoided if a system instead of dissolving its form, creates a superorganism in balance between energy and information and all those facts apply to the ages of history.

The 3±1 ages of History.

In the graph, one of the fundamental findings of General Systems is the solution of the meaning of the 3 ages of life, which are  COMMON to any General System of the Universe.

When we apply all those laws of duality and organic systems to history, we can define a science of bio-history which studies mankind as an organism in space and time, which evolved through 3±1 ages:

+1:                Birth as a first verbal ‘cell’, probably a woman that multiplies her numbers.

Max E:         Paleolithic, a youth of hunters, visual languages and minimal information.

E=I: The reproductive Neolithic, when man reaches his maturity in balance with Nature and creates through verbal networks (religions) a series of collective subconscious, called Gods of love that teach each cell to share energy and information with the other cells of the body of a civilization. Yet the arrival of metal extinguishes or corrupts most love cultures into go(l)d cults and inquisitions.

-Max. I:        It is the 3rd, informative, metal-age in which man halts hisnd focuses in the evolution of metal in its 3 forms, energetic metal or weapons, informative metal or money and organic metal-machines, which bring:

-1:                 Death: The neo-paleolithic, or Age of the Machine, when humans regress to an ‘Homo Bacteria’ state of selfishness and isolation, substituting their social networks of love by their desire to become attached to machines of higher energy and information that separate us and keep evolving, making humanity an increasingly obsolete species, killed by weapons in fields of war. At the end of this age,  we can foresee with the creation of the Singularity, either the 1st organic ‘bomb’ (a self-feeding bomb of dark matter) or the 1st self-reproductive machine (a nano-bacteria), the death of mankind.

+1:                Unless mankind evolves socially, ‘emerging’ as a super-organism, if humans organize themselves into a global civilization and control the evolution of lethal machines, maintaining History in an immortal present.

The human species is, beyond our arrogant, fantasies of anthropomorphic superiority, just a living form made of carbon atoms, which goes through the same ages of all other living forms,both as an individual and a species. So we can study the Organism of History (Humanity in time) through 3±1 ages; an energetic youth or Palaeolithic; a mature age of balance with Nature, the Neolithic; and a 3rd informative age of history, the Age of Metal and machines.

Energetic Youth: Palaeolithic. ±5.000.000 BC to ±10.000 BC.

The Paleolithic was an energetic, young age in which men, the energetic gender, was the top predator animal on Earth, a hunter of living forms. It was also an age dominated by visual,spatial languages.

Reproductive Age: Neolithic. Age of Wor(l)ds and Goddesses. ±10.000 to ±3.000 BC.

The Neolithic was the classic age of mankind, an age of balance, when wo=men learnt the cycles of life and instead of destroying Nature, learnt to nurture, reproduce and harvest it. Women, the reproductive species, took power over men; and priests became the verbal guides of civilizations, creating super-organisms of History made of human cells joined by social love—the sharing of energy and information among ‘brothers’, clones of the loving mind of the same prophet.

It was an age dominated by verbal, temporal languages, continued by the believers in religions of love that are not corrupted by weapons (inquisitions) and money (go(l)d churches), with its idolatry to the ‘values’ of metal: murder and greed.

Informative, 3rd age: Age of Metals. ± 3000 BC to 1600.As metal spread the ‘new’ values of money and weapons, greed and war, destroyed the networks of social love, ushering mankind into the 3rd age of history. Humans now evolve a new kind of atomic systems, stronger than carbon, creating energetic weapons, informative money and organic machines that transform Gaia into an  It is theanimetal=animal+metal age’, in which a new ‘biological species’ that mixes animal and metal atoms, imposes power over the Earth.

It is the present age with 2 paths of future:

Either mankind will die, as machines keep evolving and make us obsolete as a species.

Or humans will obey the laws of survival of the Universe and evolve socially into a super-organism of history able to control lethal machines. The choice is within man till the arrival of the Singularity, when machines acquire organic properties and either a self-feeding bomb of dark matter, or a self-reproductive nano-bacteria ‘evolve’ the Earth into a species with a higher social density (a denser form of matter, or an organism made of denser atoms). In any case the will be solved in the next decades, as we are already in that Age of the Singularity.

TRAVEL IN THE FIFTH DIMENSION – THE SCALES OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE

Time is cyclical and multiple; each event has a frequency that carries form, information and defines a cycle or closed trajectory, which breaks space into an inner, ‘fractal’ region and an external world.

Hence space is fractal discontinuous, since a time cycle is a closed curve that breaks space into an inner and outer surface (first law of topology); being the space-time continuum a simplification or sum of all the quantum cycles of space (inner energetic region) – time (external cycle that carries the information of the system – holographic principle).

The result is the creation of multiple, spaces-times, energy domains enclosed by clock-cycles, which organize themselves in growing scales of complexity, first as ‘fields of energy and informative particles; (quantum complementarity), till arriving to the creation of biological systems of vital energy and circadian cycles.

Since we are all complementary beings made of surfaces of energy, formed, informed by its actions and time cycles .

The age of metric science measured all those space-time cycles by equalizing them with the rhythms of a single clock, putting them together into a continuum space-time graph.

This age adopted a philosophy of science based in the new machines used to measure those cycles (clocks and telescopes, today evolved into computers and cameras), called mechanism, from Kepler, who said ‘God is a clocker’ to Einstein who affirmed ‘Time is what a clock measures’. But as we measure more cycles and perceived more forms of space, a new paradigm is needed to account for that variety of ‘multiple spaces and times’.

Accordingly I called this expansion of modern physics, Absolute Relativity. Since the ultimate teaching of Einstein’s discoveries was to validate Leibniz: we exist in a Universe of infinite, relative clocks of time, each of them breaking space into an inner and outer region of space (first law of topology, knot theory) and relative scales of reality, none of which is when we normalize their frequency of time cycles and size of its steps, more important than other…

Absolute Relativity essentially completes the insights of Leibniz and Einstein on the multiple nature of time clocks that run to different speeds. And its consequences and discoveries are bond to r=evolve the way we perceive the meaning of time itself.

How does then a  fractal model of the Universe and its multiple space-times improves our vision of the Universe, and how it is made compatible with the simplified version we use, of a space-time continuum?

This harmonization of the continuum vision and the quantum, fractal one is rather easy when we realize we can study with frequencies, ƒ=1/T, the inverse function of ‘lineal time duration, or ‘human time’ both, time cycles and information, which turn out to be self-similar concepts and we can study fractal spaces with the laws of quantum physics and topology, which study spaces according to its most generic properties of continuity and discontinuity.

Then suddenly the problem Landau noticed of our present state of science – the lack of a non-human, objective way to measure time, given its degree of change and uncertainty – disappears and with the new tools and parallelisms between clocks of time and information on one side, and flows of energy and space on the other, a new series of laws and now self-evident relationships appear, as when Copernicus put the sun in its proper place.

Frequencies, whose laws and patterns are the stuff of what nature is in all its scales will allow us to define Universal laws of Time flows from past to future unknown previously to science. Fractal space and topology will allow us to find new ‘invariances’, that is laws of form, of information, of morphology, common to all systems, even those who are not physical and so on.

It will also become apparent that there are two time arrows or ‘posssible avenues of future’ for all events, one of increasing energy and one of increasing information, giving birth to the fascinating laws of complexity and duality, the science I resurrected with my work in cyclical time and theory of information, which I chaired in its international world congress for a few years…

And, this key difference between the universe in greater detail and physics, specialized in the study of changes in motion, present-space, energy, is the reason why complexity will be as Hawking put it, the science of the XXI century, displacing physics once the  CERN hype goes away: we work with twice the quantity of elements  by incorporating the laws of information and duality that physicists ignore.

The key to a larger understanding of the Universe is the understanding of the laws that ‘mess’ energy and information, trans-forming it into each other but maintaining the total amount of both invariable.

This new law of conservation of energy and information re-starts the entire human inquire about time-space, even if it is an old known law.

We shall use here its old quantum formula, exi=k, which written as a ‘feed back’ space-time cycle, e<=>i, becomes now the main law of the Universe and the essence of Nature’s creations:

‘All what exists is a complementary system made of a field/body of energy and a particle/head of information, exi=k, e<=>i’,

The formulation of the principle of conservation of energy and information as a generating equation of space-time cycles introduces us into the key element of  cyclical time studies, the analysis of the causality chains and patterns of transformations of energy (lineal motions) into information (cyclical motions) of which reality is made. All equations of science are in a way describing those transformations.

For example, the most famous equation of modern physics, E=Mc2, transforms lineal energy into vortices of gravitational space-time, masses that carry information in their frequency. Now all starts to come together: there are two forces, lineal electromagnetism and cyclica, in/form/ative gravitation which balance each other. The Universe does not die because it does expand but also contracts in the mass vortices of atoms and galaxies.

And so cyclical time is by definition eternal, and balanced, as all informative warpings are balanced by energetic explosions, all energetic youths are balanced by informative 3rd ages, all energetic fields are balanced by informative particles and so on.

We are now exploring the origin the life/death cycles and the laws of conservation of information, since as Einstein put it, the separation between past, present and future is an illusion, because time is cyclical and so in the future it will always look like the past.

The scalar, fractal structure of the Universe.

But there is still a new basic advance in our discontinuum multiple organic universe, the fractal struture of the Universe in a series of ‘scales’ of growing size, organized by a simple program of EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION AND ORGANIC, HIERARCHICAL ORDER, which we claim can be described with the same organic systems:

In the graph, the Universe is a whole composed of parts which have the same dual structure than the whole: a cyclical system that stores memories of cycles of information and use them to take ‘actions’ in the external world, in control of a body of energy that moves it.

We can observe in the previous graph, the fundamental new DIMENSION OF THIS COMPLEX SPACE, A DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION, LOVE AND ORGANICISM, INFORMATION AND COMPLEXITY THAT ORGANIZES UNDER THE SAME LAWS DESCRIBED BY GENERAL SYSTEMS SCIENCES, THE SMALL CELLULAR ‘UNITS/NON-E POINTS’ OF  a smaller scale into a new whole of the new discontinuous plane of existence forming a unit of the higher plane.

So universal constants become herds that become particles that become herds that become atoms that become herds that  become molecules that become herds that become cells and planets that become herds that become organisms and solar systems that become herds that become galaxies and societies.

What this writer did in his pioneer work on systems sciences, was to formalize with mathematical and logic and biological laws those structures founding a new paradigm of science, which as I explain in my biopic on my avatar represents the summit of thousands of years of research in organicism – the heterodox branch of science started by Aristotle and Plato, and always scorned despite its higher truth by the simplistic ‘mechanist’ vision of industrial science.

Now in this organic world, all is rather simple, once we accept the existence of ‘motion’ as the substance of the Universe, of two types, energy and informative motions, spatial and temporal motions, vital quantums/cells and cycles that guide them.

Since what all those systems do is THE UNIFYING PRINCIPLE – ALL PARTICLES/HEADS|FIELDS/BODIES OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION TRY TO REPLICATE, ITERATE, REPRODUCE, PRODUCE, DECOUPLE INTO SELF-SIMILAR PARTICLES AND THEN EVOLVE SOCIALLY FROM A SPECIES HERD INTO A COMPLEX, HIERARCHICAL, ORGANIZED NETWORK-ORGANISM MORE POWERFUL THAN THE INDIVIDUAL WHICH BECOMES UNIT OF A NEW WHOLE.

The life-death cycle and its 3 ages: Past-youth-Max. energy, present-repetition-E=I, -future-Max.Information

All what you see is a complementary system with a body/field of energy and a smaller head/particle of information. And its morphology responds to the Universal forms of energy/lineal motion, as all bodies of biology, fields of physics and planes of mathematics do, and the universal form of information/perception/cyclical motion, as all heads, particles and cycles of geometry do.

How your head/circle that processes information and guides your planar body, which processes energy is not anything different from what any of the multiple types of superoroganisms of those topologies do in other scales. Particles of physics also move along a wave of energy of planar nature and robots have a camera-brain over a transport plane.

Moreover if in space, all General Systems are organized in the same manner, in time, as they appear and dissapear from reality they are also organized sequentially in the same manner: all systems start small, grow in size, first in:

– Youth: energy elements, mainly the body, and we call this mathematically Max. E(for the energy element) x Min I (for the informative element).

Then they acquire information till both balance, e=i, and in that balance ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, exi=k, in quantum mechanics, we find the mature age in which species often reproduce, decoupling a new being of existence

Then we reach maturity and the being no longer increases its energy, but only its information, in its 3rd age, when it wrinkles and acquires the ‘convex topologies’ of the 3rd age, warping, imploding into itself.

And finally it dies, exploding into a relative big-bang, back into its simpler parts.

Now each superorganism that lives and dies through this cycle of life and death existence might seem from our human perspective different. Yet all of them are parallel in their morphological, ‘topological’ changes. So a species is treated in General systems sciences as a ‘loose organism’ in which each indivdual is a cell.

So as species evolve from earlier top predators (the first successful fishes being planar sharks – pure energy processors, the first robots ‘chip homoctonos’ – terminator machines, the first mammals, carnivores, and so on), then finally reach a 3rd age of maximal information (humans being the last informative mammal), they also go through 3 ages.

And in this manner general system description of those 3 ages, becomes the ’3rd leg’ with genetics and classic Darwinian evolution to understand the meaning of life.

So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:

E xI. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.

All what exists; all entities of the Fractal Universe including human beings are systems made of two COMPLEMENTARY geometries: languages and heads of information that perceive and guide blind bodies of moving energy.

And we can recognize those complementary puzzles of nature, called in the jargon of Systems Theory, Fractal Points, by their opposite, geometrical shape and properties. Since the cycle is the form that stores more information in lesser space and the line is the fastest distance between two points.

For example, all physical species are made of lineal fields of moving energy, shaped by cyclical particles of information.

All living organisms are made of planar bodies of moving energy guided by spherical heads of information.

All Human societies are made of human citizens, ruled by politicians and priests, who command nations and civilizations with legal and ethic words.

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, e and i. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence  of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

Now, the result of the existence of two basic forms, energy and information and 4 drives of existence, Feeding, Max. E, Informin, Max. I, reproducing, E=I and evolving socially  Sum (exi), creates an order in time, as species are born, go through an age of maximal feeding and growth, or youth, then find a balance between youth and form, E=I, and reproduce in its mature age, finally warping and transforming most of its energy into information in a 3rd age, after which they die.

And birth and death are the limits of those ages, in which a species ‘evolves socially’ from its first seminal cell into a superorganism and dies back.

In the graph, the ‘Generator Equation of Fractal Cycles of Space-time’, ∑ E <=> ∏TI, is a ‘feed-back’ equation that formalizes the fundamental cycle of space-time or event taken place in the Universe, the Principle of Conservation and Transformation of Energy into Information:

‘All what exists is a complementary system that transforms back and forth, energy into information’.

So all physical entities are made of a field of energy that moves a particle that gauges information and all biological systems are made of a body that processes energy and moves a head that gauges information.

This unity of all Complementary systems of the biological and physical Universe is the departing experimental fact of General Systems Sciences, the philosophy of science that unifies Physics and Biology and extend those common laws of energy and information to study the social organisms of mankind.

THE 2 ARROWS OF TIME AND THE INFINITE SCALES OF SPACE-time.

Its fundamental changes respect to classic ‘mechanist’ philosophies of science proper of the XVII-XIX century ‘earlier period’ of scientific awareness are 2:

– The Universe is made of two ‘arrows of time’ or ‘changes’:

– Change in motion or energy, studied by physics, as it is dominant in small scales of reality of maximal spatial speed and minimal information content (physical species)

– And Change in the form of beings,  studied by socio-biological sciences, as it is dominant in the larger scales of human reality, of maximal information and minimal space. In those systems what dominates is the arrow of information, the genetic cellular nuclei and memetic ‘cellular brains’ of human beings, cells of their societies. And what we observe is the constant evolution of complexity as networks of energy and information put together simpler cells and individuals into higher wholes.

The result is a Universe that is more complex than the present human perceived Universe, as its logic is cyclical, with two arrows of causality, energy or entropy and information, or dimensional form: systems can either increase or decrease their energy and alternately increase or decrease their information and swich between both states, and this creates most of the rhythms of the Universe, from stop and go motions, to thinking, feeding cycles – the infinite clocks of time of all species that constantly, E<=>I, exchange energy and information.

IN THE GRAPH, in each scale we can trace self-similar time cycles of life and death and social evolution of parts into wholes.

What General Systems Sciences does is to order all those cycles and events into a series of ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘events and spatial changes’ that are common to all systems of the Universe, departing from that ‘dual logic of time’ and a fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, of organic nature.

As we observe that parts become wholes of a higher scale. So particles become atoms that gather together into molecules that gather into planets and cells that evolve into solar systems and organic systems that evolve into galaxies and social super-organisms… The hierarchical, scalar nature of the Universe, and its duality of time arrows, as opposed to a description of a Universe with a single space-time scale and a single time arrow (Euclidean, Aristotelian current model of physics) represent a huge advance in our understanding of the ultimate elements of reality, space (static vision) or energy-motion (Moving vision) and time (moving, cyclical vision) or information (static vision).

WE TALK OF THE EXISTENCE OF A 5TH DIMENSION OF RELATIVE SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE. AND SO THE FIRST DISCOVERY OF GENERAL SYSTEMS SCIENCES IS THE ‘FRACTAL GENERATOR’ of the 5th dimension, the metrics or equation that relate the space and time, energy and information of all the scales of reality.

This is possible because there is a fundamental property to those scales of space-time, the ‘law of informative vortices’, that is, the smaller we become the faster our clocks of time go. So atoms beat trillions of time per second and galaxies, turn once every 100 billion years and the entire universe maybe has an even larger big-bang rhythm. Between those limits, man beats once a second, both its informative brain (a thought and glimpse of the eye every second) and its heart beat, and measures around 1/1000th of a mile in space.

Those are our rythms of processing time information and the vital space we occupy. But as we become smaller, time clocks beat faster and space becomes reduced according to a generic vortex law: V x Ro = K, that is the smaller a clock cycle is the faster it turns:

Se x Ti = K. This second representation of the ‘arrows of time’ now across several scales of size explains a basic fact of social organization: Information moves from the lower scale (genes and memes in socio-biological scales) to the upper scale (organisms) and energy moves from the upper scale of maximal size-space to the lower scale. And the result is that all systems of the Universe co-exist in 3 scales whose relationships organize the existence of beings:

In the graph, human existence is a travel through 3 scales of reality, the biological, cellular, individual and social scale, in which life surfaces ‘3 times’ as a fetus, an individual that belongs to a society and then returns back to its simpler cellular life in death. This blog is concerned with the 3rd life of each human being as a cell of a complex society.

And only then, departing from new, more complex models of the dual time logic and fractal non-euclidean space scales of reality and the laws of creation of complex systems departing from them, can we observe, analyze and describe the creation and destruction of the superorganisms of history, its time cycles, its relationship with the parts, us, human beings, its cycles of time, and its changes.

The differences between the ‘mechanist’ old paradigm of science and the ‘organicist’ paradigm.

This web explains the evolution, creation and destruction of social organisms both in history and economics. It claims to be an upgrade over previous scientific paradigms based in ‘only measure’, ‘only instrumental proof’, only ‘machines and mathematics’ as the relevant properties to be described by science. What general systems sciences has done is to put forward a paradigm of science more complex and meaningful than the paradigm of the ‘machine’ brought about by the founding fathers of science… 500 years ago.

In this and the next post  (organisms), we try to explain in simple terms what means the change of paradigm for our deeper understanding of the Universe. In the other posts of this section on general systems sciences we deal with other elements of the organic model of reality and summarize its finding in all sciences.

Let us briefly here consider the main differences between the old and new paradigm, which might or might not be accepted by anthropomorphic, primitive ‘religious’ humans but certainly will become the paradigm of A.I. as machines when awakening to consciousness once the threshold of complexity in its design is reached, let’s assured will need a theory that explains why they are alive which humans with their self-centered ego-trips of ‘chosen of the Universe’ have not provided till this work.

– The first difference starts in the language of mathematical space and temporal logic that humans use to describe the fundamental elements of reality, space and time.

The old primitive paradigm of the XVI century started up with the acceptance of Euclidean mathematics where points have no breath, no parallels can cross them, and so because they have no breath they are abstract non-entities that can be used to described a simplified single ‘space-time continuum’, the Cartesian mathematical graph. Now this graph of a single space-time continuum, smooth and with a ‘single lineal time dimension’ is useful to create simplified mirrors of reality with mathematics but THOSE SIMPLIFIED MODELS THAT science takes as absolute truths are only simplified models.

THe new mathematical model is more complex, as it describes a mathematical system of Non_Euclidean geometry far more akin with reality, where we see all relative point-numbers to have volume, to be fractal points of which we can give far more information the closer we come to it. For example, when you say 7 in the old paradigm that is enough. Each element of that ‘7’ – pears, men, stars or atoms – is a point with no breath, a set or class of ‘something’ which is void of all its internal characters. And only then we can do science.

The consequences for this of course are various – gross errors of interpretation to start with; and the itification and indifference to the life of humans, when in economics we are tagged with numbers without inner content to end with it.

But from a mere scientific perspective the biggest error is in its conception of time as a lineal, single property of the entire Universe. This is not the case. Time as clocks show are cyclical patterns that close space into a cycle, which repeats with a discontinuous frequency, forming patterns of ‘in/form/ation’ and the frequency of each time cycle is different. So there are infinite clocks in the Universe, the day, second, hour, month cycles of earth’s rotation, cesium weaves, mechanical clocks, moon and woman’s period, etc. etc. are all clocks. So You exist in a more complex Universe of infinite clocks that carry frequencies of information, and break space into infinite closed, discontinuous ‘vital spaces’, enclosed by this clock.

In the graphs, science still needs to understand the relationship between information, time and evolution.

In the jargon of non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian logic, we say that life is a travel through the 5th dimension between 3 scales of existence:

THUS THE FIFTH DIMENSION, TITLE OF my most serious books on the structure of the organic, living Universe, is the ultimate ‘why’ of the Universe, a system that tries to evolve into complex social organisms, in which the fundamental will of each system is embedded in the gauging memorial motions of the heads/particles/knots of time cycles/non-euclidean points/fractal points with a volume – the souls/atmans/conscious elements that carry the will of the Unvierse:

We do not exist in space but in time. The ultimate substance of the Universe is time=change, of which space is merely a dharma, a slice or fixed portrait of time made in a relative present quantum of time – the unit of perception of our mind, a second.

The biggest error of ‘technological science’ is the obsession of humans for ‘still portraits’ of present space that has created the illusion that space, substance matters – when all is a flow of entities in motion that perform ‘cycles of time’, the substance of reality and those pictures are just fixed stills that explain little of the causality and reasons of those flows of ‘change=time’.

Further on, because mechanisms measure time now instead of logic verbal time thought, physicists have imposed the inquisition of the clock that measures all those cycles extracting only its digital, mathematical properties. So Einstein said ‘time is what a clock measures’ instead of understanding the deeper analysis of Aristotle based in logic thought and the past, present and future dimensions of complex time: ‘time is change’ and there is physics, which studies change in space or motion and there is biology that studies change of information or form, or evolution.

General systems science, the science that describes organically the universe fusions both concept sin a lager theory of time, based in the analysis of the ‘two arrows of motion’ in the universe, energy or lineal,e xpansive entropic motion and information or cyclical, imploding motion. Since all what exist is a system of time and energy of ‘actions’ of motions with a will to gather energy for the field-bodies of each species and information for the particles/minds.

Each entity of energy and information gauge reality and creates illogic, geometric measures of it, in a relative moment of time – a dharma of its perception – different for each species.

Your perception of the Universe is 10 times slower than that of a fly. Perception happens in the point in which a gauging action ends and the brain maps it. In your case every second, in an atom probably every 1/30.000 of a second.

Those units of frequency of processing information are one of the new paramaters that ‘mater’ to properly describe the actions and synchronicities of the Universe. Since all what exists, including you is merely a ‘non-Euclidean, fractal point with parts’, a cyclical, spherical mind with an attached body of energy that gauges information with its mind, moves with its body, gauges information. And what for?

What is the purpose of those entities gauging information, moving, gauging? Nothing but existence itself, and the perpetuation of existence through reproduction of your body and mind. This is all what there is to reality:

Complementary systems of energy and information that constantly change its position in space and its mental information in time, and go on existing trying to preserve its island-universe reproducing in other region of space-time. Particles gauge information (hence quantum theory is a gauge theory), move on fields of energy (hence fluctuate between a wave-moving state and a gauging-particle state according to the principle of complementarity) and in moments of balance and richness of energy, imprint their information their form in other region of energy, decoupling into self-similar particles. That is what they do: exist to gauge, feed and reproduce.

So really ALL WHAT ALL SYSTEMS DO IS VERY SIMPLE: THEIR POINTS GAUGE INFORMATION, WITH A SINGLE AIM, TO MOVE TOWARDS A FIELD OF ENERGY, AND THEN THEY FEED ON ENERGY AND WHEN THEY HAVE SO MUCH ENERGY THEY CAN ‘BURST’, THEY BURST REPRODUCING IN SELF-SIMILAR BEINGS, AND WHEN THE DENSITY OF SELF-SIMILAR BEINGS IS SO HUGE THEY ARE ALMOST PEGGED, THEY BECOME COMPLEX SOCIAL ORGANISMS CREATING NETWORKS OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION THAT ‘EMERGE’ AS THE NEW UNITS OF THE WHOLE.

And this game whose laws and structures I have studied and almost single handed mathematized, structured and described with the more complex laws of non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian logic and socio-biology is really what is all about. You exist in a game of ‘existence’ in which new species almost automatically prey on energy, feed, reproduce and evolve socially

So do living beings. So do corporations, company-mothers of machines that reproduce their species and accommodate the world to its image and likeness.And now when the density of machines is so huge, reorganize into complex networks of digital information of global size, what we call the Metal-earth which is preying and substituting the life earth, Gaia.

That is the game in its biological description, which is the easiest to understand and hence the one used in this web of economic and historic organisms, though it is also geometric, and it is logic and it is vital.

I can provide all the descriptions and further more, because organisms have a clear program of birth, reproduction, growth, multiplication, informative collapse and extinction (the 3+-1 ages of life-existence of all beings) we can forecast the future of the game for almost all species in its bigger elements.

Indeed, you might think i cannot forecast your future as a kid, but with a high probability i can affirm that you will grow, reproduce, wrinkle and die – the basic PROGRAM IS what general systems sciences can forecast with accuracy, and so what we forecast constantly with accuracy in 20 years, is the process of overproduction of machines and weapons and money, the selfish memes of metal re=produced by corporations, and the phases of organic evolution of machines which are the same than in any other species (we made as viruses do, first the body of metal, XIX c. revolution, then the Minds of metal, XX c. and now we put them together into robots).

Now to understand the Universe with a higher level of depth and information could have been extraordinarily useful to mankind to manage the evolution and reproduction of machines for its own good, as we do in other sciences with chemical products, et.c But i have never been able to break the IDEOLOGIES we denounce in this web, the MEMES that make humans so retarded in their BELIEFS, chaining them to the ‘other species’ the selfish memes of metal for whom we work, toil, reproduce and evolve.

Hence there is an astounding number of angry pages in this web against those lesser human minds, who love to be slaves of their beliefs, biblical supremacists that believe a bronze age book and a peasant who saw a bush burning are the meaning of it all, and revere money NOT  as a language of information but some kind of fetishe to be invented at all costs (bankers cultures) or the nationalist cult(ure)s to weapons who think humans are different tribal species.

Complex topological planes

The Universe is a a self-repetitive game of infinite complementary systems of energy and information exi, which try to reproduce by recreating, in a lower plane of cellular existence – a Non-Euclidean plane in illogic geometry – a seed of information, i-1, which will then self-replicate in a clonic wave over a receptive field of space, ∑e x i, sch us to surface in the future as a single unit of the higher plane of non-E-xistence.

In the jargon of illogic geometry, the higher language to describe all sciences and systems and species under the same organic laws, all systems can be expressed as forms in process of reproduction rebirth and extinction, Illogic geometry departing from those 3 planes of existence, describe all events including those of creation and destruction of social organisms.

The game thus described in this web, in an intermediate jargon – biological – bridge between illogic geometry and common speech of social science (a jargon which frankly i have little patience with for his astounding intellectual idiocy, selfishness and primitivism – treated in the section of ideologies) – a word though that connects both is the concept of an ‘organsm of existence’, an action of reproduction, e meets i, e fucks i, i reproduces exi (-;

The beauty of it all though comes when one can handle together the mathematical, logical, and biological description of realit to have a full parallel understanding of it all as a complex, astoundingly creative structure – a self-reprductive fractal of energy and information.

And the key of it is the structure of 3 planes of growing social evolution, which interact together in organisms. Indeed, ultimately reality is 3 x 3 = 9 + 1 dimensional, where structures are super-organisms that co-exist in 3 planes of eusocial evolution. So you co-exist as cell, organism and cell of society, and you make cycles of energy feeding, informative gauging and reproduction in the 3 scales, and all together those 3 x 3 cycles and actions across 3 scales come together into a 1 organism, full being. Hence the 10 dimensions of the simplest descriptions of the simplest ‘organic beings’ we have spotted – string theory, to the 10 numeral scales of humanity.

The Universe is a constant orgasm of self-reproductive patterns of information, forms-in-action, forms with motion that imprint its patterns in fields of energy creating ‘complementary systems’,  physical systems made of fields of energy/particles of information or biological systems made of bodies of energy and heads of information etc.

From the simplest atom with a field of energy to the black hole with its plane of energetic stars, this pattern shows an organic, fractal structure in all systems of the Universe. What varies often is the human jargon to describe those systems and their actions.

In physics is a particle gauging a field of space-time; in biology a system with a cyclical head that accumulates time cycles of information and a  planar body that moves it.

Yet in all the scales of the graph certain self-similar laws apply to all entities – since ultimately we can talk of a game of two ultimate substances, energy or space and cyclical information or time clocks.

So those ‘topologies’ in motion always realize the same actions in space-time. All of us entities of energy and information, trace natural trajectories gauging information and feeding on energy that define our common ‘will of existence’, the need for survival energy and information for body and mind.

Thereafter a game of living nature is born in any ecosystem of systems of energy and information, from atomic to chemical to molecular to cellular ot human even galactic ecosystem. This game of existence in which particles seek information for its minds and energy for its bodies creates the darwinian games of reality and also its games of co0peration when similar particles ‘hunt together’. This is what general systems sciences study, as all of those patterns depart from the ultimate structure of reakity:

A system of energy and information, a physical field and particle in physics, body and head in biology, information class and working class in sociology, black hole of maximal mass=informative gravitational system and stars – energeic electromagnetic herds of lighter atoms, more extended in space, etc.

The equation of space-time existence.

So 3 actions, energy, e, information, i, and its mixture, reproduction exi, performed often in social herds, ∑, create a basic event or ‘generator equation of space-time actions’ ∑exi. This simple equation is a synopsis of almost ALL what happens in the Universe both in time as actions or in space – as organic structures of energy and information we observe.

Exi=st, actions that create space-time systems  is the equation of ‘existence’, the generator equation of space-time systems – the fractal unit/point of reality – the fundamental particle of the Universe.

A space-time system thus is the ‘point with parts’  or first unit of fractal geometry, the essential part of the Universe.

In the higher illogic geometry of complex systems, all what exists is a ‘fractal plane’, a topology, a network of points of energy and information, cells of bigger systems. This can be described with the quantum jargon but it is far more sophisticated to use the fractal jargon of complex topologies, networks of self-similar points with energy and information components.

The design of reality departing from those essential units gives us all realities .

And what all those existential systems do are actions for their bodies, e, for their heads, i, and combining energy and information create reproductive actions, which can vary from mere waves, disorders in its space-time field to complex repetition of one system in another region of space-time.

What you see are such beings performing cyclical motions in space-time, as they exi=st, by definition absorbing  energy and information.

And this is dome in a digital, discontinuous pattern since the system is dual but acts as a single being, meaning that you either absorb energy for the body or information for the mind, so it appears as discontinuous cyclical, seeking, imprinting reality with space-time fields that absorb energy emit information and as they switch on and off, fluctuate in its relative topologies expanding the informative or energetic one accordingly – you can keep being more abstract or more visual to describe the game of existence.

But the reader should bare in mind unlike most scientists, that those ‘topological disorders’ of existence have a will a purpose a game, the game or mandate of ‘accumate energy and information’ and reproduce, ‘grow and multiply’ in biblical terms, as all systems of the Universe act with such a darwinian, biological will, and can be described despite itifuing jargons of physicists with the game as well as with the topological, mathematical description of it science still prefers. We use both as both are enlightening of the whole.

In the illogic geometry of fractal time-space fields, the ultimate ‘what we are’, the actions that all knots of thought of follow – the events we create – can be perceived from different dimensions and perspectives.

The Simplest one is the geometry of it. What you see mutating in form and speed around you – those patterns related to the perfect form of information, the sphere, which stores the maximal information in minimal space and the plane the perfect form of space that displays maximal extension with minimal form, create a game of topologies that are messed up into organisms.

All of them with an energy planar body that moves in space an informative, ‘in-formed’ sphere. In physics cyclical particles gauge and direct blind energy fields, in life heads direct blind bodies. Perception stop, go motion of body, perception stop, go motion of body, e x i, e xi define the actions of all beings. At this rather mechanical deterministic first level the universe is a game of seemingly random but thoughtfully gauged motions of particles being displaced by bodies and fields of energy.They are all do the same action, exi, energy x information = action,the beginning of reality.

Now picture all thoe entities, with bodies and heads gauging and moving, wy they move? What is the puprose of that existence? There is a will to it? A game, of certain goals and rules? Yes there is one game, the supreme only game that describes it all REPRODUCTION. YOU exist in a game of infinite energies and informations absorbing and emitting and recombining with the rules of non-euclidean topologies in space, of causal, illogic in time. And that other game, the game of time, the game of the actions possible and desired by each knot who gauges and moves in search of the game, is what i call the game of existence.

We are all kots of energy and information,e xi and so if we call as physicists do the product of energy and information, an action, all what we do are actions in search of energy for the body and information for the mind, and then we like to combine them both and reproduce, reproduce ideas, reproduces objects, reproduce other is.

And the same is what all beings do, particles auge information move in firled of energy and ecouple and rpeorduce. An dso do biologicla beins and galaxie ans stars.

All plays the same game of 3 actions e, i and e xi (reproduction). Such a 3 dimensional basic Universe, however has 2 more actions dimensions that trace new forms and topologies, the 4th and 5th action-dimension of existence, social love, the ocming of individuals into groups to do social actions together that are strogner when propely sychrnocized and seem a whole from the sum of many ones, and the 5th dimension of repating this coming together into wholes becoming ones and new wholes, which accumualte planes of existence, and finally create the complex mess of fractal planes and forms with flows of perpendicular energy and information among them that is the total reality.

So that is what we are knots of cycles of space-time existence. Particles and systems with bodies and fields that go around reproducing.

And so do corporations only that they are organisms that reproduce machine,s memes of metla a differnet species. And this asotunding disocvery connects the whole game of the universe with the little game of factories and corporations descrbe din this web.

Knowledge without purpose, truth in itself. the organic, beautiful univers. Time cycles.

The biggest scientific error is the idea of lineal time – the exclusivity, unicity and single, ahead purpose of the game of reality and existence – brought about by the ‘lineal perception’ of space our eyes of light provide (euclidean space), by our anthropomorphic desire to be different, and as we are not, to evolve into a future superior being closer to ‘God’ or immortality, and by the machines we use to measure time, cartesian graphs with lineal coordinates in whcih we plot the rhythms of a mechanism called a clock.

Departing from those ‘a priori’ experiences humans have constructed this interpreted world of science, which fulfills its main purpose – to help the eye-hand to construct mechanisms, but does not explain what the Universe is.

This is what we shall try to do in this section. To explain what humans are a priori negated to understand by the pre-conditions of their brain, their history and their task in this planet (to construct objects): the organic, living, cyclical, vital nature of the Universe and the similarity of all its entities.

The wider game.

Our game of existence is limited to perform a few actions for our bodies and minds – as we feed, we perceive, we reproduce and we socialize with other humans or construct mechanisms that manipulate energy and information. And this type of actions we do, limited by the fact that we are systems as everything else in the Universe made of energy and information, is what we call the game of existence, the will for which we live and breathe and feel and want to ‘be’.

We exist by performing certain actions between birth and extinction in a society, actions remarkably identical to each other, to the point they can all be qualified in a few groups that we might call ‘dimensions of existence’. Departing from this fact we can trace for each particle of the Universe a simple physiological, structural program determined by its dimensions of existence, or type of actions it performs. This are the basis of a General Unification Theory of all sciences, called Systems sciences, in which we define a first ‘Generator’ equation of those ‘dimensions’ or actions of existence we all perform.

What are those dimensions? Simple. We are all systems of energy and information, either particles of information/fields of energy (physical species) or heads that process information and are moved by a body of energy (biological beings). Thus all systems absorb, emit and transfer and merge energy and information of an specific type they can decode and use to reconstruct their form, their own information. And so we establish 4 basic dimensions that all systems follow:

– Gauging information

– Feeding on energy to move and

– Reproduce its own information

– Forming networks with other self-similar beings with whom exchange of energy and information takes place.

Informing, feeding, reproducing and forming networks that become then units of a higher scale of the fractal game of the Universe, departing from a General Generator Equation and a series of rules, laws and simple causal processes creates a game of rather deterministic nature that can be even run as an alogrythm of ‘life’ and ‘existence’ and will reproduce most of the events and forms of any physical or biological Universe.

This web uses mostly common or biological jargons, more anthropomorphic and less inclusive proper of XX century science, in the description of social sciences, of humans transferring information to machines, creating social networks called gods and civilizations, exchanging.

But there is a higher jargon, one which is more inclusive and hence deals with the terms of space and time instead of energy )space) and information *time cycles with a frequency.

This is the jargon of general sytems sciences of which i consider myself the leading scientist on the blue planet but not perhaps further than alpha centauri (-;

How do we apply those dimensions to our analysis of sociological life? Easy.

Consider what you are in more detail: your desire for energy is expressed in your body and blood/digestive/motion-muscle systems, those 3 sub-physiological systems are ‘living systems’ that desire and show a will to hunt for that energy.

You are also made of 3 endocrine systems that reproduce different hormones and nervous thought impulses that process information and so on. We can in fact decompose you as a system which is made like a knot of flows of energy and information – those physiological systems – constantly processing.

So the sum of all those ‘dimensional wills’ of all the similar individuals of the homo species, results in an economy and the goods of the welfare state we want.

And this is the application of a biological analysis of economics: a perfect society is one that satisfies with maximal production those needs, for right energy and information, family/reproductive values and social peace and communication (free social time).

Its measure is already applied by the UNO which also calls ‘dimensions’ those types of goods, since obviously each species knows what he needs to take care of its dimensional actions to survive – feeding and informing and reproducing and evolving socially in peace, the UNO has ‘figured it out’ without the need of having a ‘theory’ behind.

So the IHD, the index of Human Development of societies shows the ‘WHealth’, the healthy wealht of a society that fulfills those dimensions and gives to its citizens food, shelter, health, information and social peace, is a good example of 3 dimensions of social and life existence that are maximized by an economical index of welfare, and represent the type of actons that we need to do to satisfy our welfare.

We use it extensively here.

In a wider view, all what we do can be resumed as e xi actions, which coincidentally can be written as a mirror of its verbal meaning: e x i = st, we mix energy and information performing a time-space cycle in which we obtain or not energy, information reproduction social actions with others.

All what you do is tending to feed your body your mind, reproduce/love and come together with others.

So we are in that wider jargon ‘knots of space-time cycles’. A space-time cycle is any trajectory of any entity of the Universe ins earch of one of its 4 dimensions of existnece, energy,information, reproduction and social evolution.

Those 4 ‘quantum numbers’ (in the case of particles of physics) or ‘drives of life’ (in the case of biological beings), or ‘social actions’ (in the case of human beings), or ‘types of machines’ (in the case of the economic ecosystem) and so on, are the underlying,logic, biologic, survival, systemic, social program that runs the universe with a precsion of mathematical origin and a vitality of biological, and perceptive nature.

And this is what we describe in this section of th web, the program of the Universe…

The 5th Dimension: Time Cycles.

Scientists often forget the 5th dimension of time, the cycles of existence and extinction from past to future that bio-logically trace reality.

Of what is that flow made? The answer is obvious for a philosopher: of functions of existence, time cycles from birth to death of infinite beings, which have in common to be born, develop, exist and die.

This, we call in General Systems sciences, the 5th and 6th dimensions of the Universe, the past and the future.

And if we consider each being of the Universe a knot of space-time actions, searching and exchanging energy and information with other knots, we can consider that they by performing those actions are all together webbing the future, creating it, forming, in/form/ing the networks and paths and patterns and cycles, exi, e<=>i, flows of exchanges of energy and information, infinite of them: ∑e<=>I, and that is what we call the Generator of Existence, the sum of all those infinite flows and cycles that web reality.

If you consider that space has 3 dimensions; that Einstein studied the 4th dimension of ‘present time’); then we talk of the past and the future and its logical, ‘bio-logical’, action-based cyclical flows as the 5th and 6th dimensions of time.

In General Relativity Einstein achieved an exact measure of ‘simultaneous’ moments of time. This present, ‘spatialization of time, comes from Galileo, who described it, ∂t=∂S/v, as a derivative function, a tangential point of a much larger flow of time.

Thus relativity and physicists in general, study NOT change of form, of in/form/ation, of morphology in time – the realm of biology with whom systems sciences connects, but they study the minimal possible change in time, that of motion, translation in simultaneous moments, using derivatives and hence ‘instantaneous moments’ that allow measure. Einstein’s concern as that of physicists was therefore ‘present’ time, not the flows from past to future and its logic causality as general systems science are.

In terms of history of thought, General Systems and the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions of time is to XXI century time theory what General Relativity was to XX century time theory or evolution to XIX century, Leibniz  in the XVIII and Galileo in the XVII, the ‘cyclical’ step of the human-kind, which seems to have a centennial frequency in deep advances on the understanding of the ultimate parameters of reality, space and time.  (1)

And science consists mostly in predicting the future of certain species existential cycles observing the patterns and frequencies of repetition of previous cycles.

This is what this web does with History and Economics, using the logical and experimental 800-80-8 year cycles of historic and economic events, and explaining without censorship – today called political and economical correctness – its consequences.

We study the frequencies of the cycles of history, and its scales of form – the 5th dimension of history.

### 4 Responses to “Time”

1. russell olausen Says:

Quite convincing work. I will reserve comment as I am most likely a scale back of your grand associations. You are as interesting as your theory at this point. From N. W. North America , home of some of the worlds largest metal machines. Russell Olausen.

2. cerntruth Says:

[…] Time […]

3. Junnies Jun Yang Says:

You are a genius sir. Thank you for this blog.