THE TRUE SOCIAL SCIENCES: HUMANISM, ORGANICISM, SOCIALISM
Because of the present zeitgeist most of the blog is dedicated to bash the idol-ogies of animetal enzymen, fundamentalist of money that deny life their drives of existence and their primacy in this planet as human beings are life being that should first serve its goals as a life species.
IT IS then necessary to understand how obvious and simple are the true social sciences that take care of the physiological networks of mankind:
- Socialism, the belief humans should be democratic and rule themselves and their languages of power, so money should be reproduced by a Universal salary and by governments to promote welfare goods, biological goods first, and only when those basic needs are covered, mechanisms selected in production according to utility. Ethonomics then would be the ‘economic theory’ of systems sciences.
- Humanism, all humans equal, no weapons and borders, for murdering members of the same species.
- Organicism, man as the measure of all things, the most perfect super organism which we should cherish and imitate to build a perfect human world.
All what we talk about is in fact a mere denial of those 3 social science, mostly by capitalism, the M.A.D. ideology of gold, Nazionalism, which divide humans into tribes to war, and mechanism which simplifies the Universe to make the machine an evolving organism, the measure of all things.
Let us then briefly indicate the difference between the true social sciences and the idologies.
What is Life: Actions: ethonomics – demand economy.
‘Don’t confuse motion (entropy) with action (motion with a goal)’ Hemingway to Dietritch
Life is Action, a program of drives of existence that should rule the memes of mankind and society. We consider then 5 actions that define life: 3 simplex actions: energy feeding for the body, motion for the limbs, information gauging for the head, and together they ‘feed, and maintain’ the 3 ‘elements’ and physiological networks of our organisms. And two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution that ensure our existence beyond death:
In the graph we can understand life, observing a human being, as the feeding with 3 simplex actions of the 3 parts of the organism, its moving limbs, energetic body and informative mind.
But as parts of social organisms humans also reproduce with other human organisms, and evolve socially defining two complex actions. Nothing else is needed to define life, including life of mechanical beings, whose actions of ‘existence’ are performed by its company-mother-mothers, which show the ‘living properties of machines”:
But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.
Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:
So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.
So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow:
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…
Actions of space-time are the minimal vital Unit of reality, and as such all the codes of the Universe can be written in åctions
In that sense, the definition of biological live, which sets the goals of being human, in turn sets the products and goods a proper economic systems should reproduce for humans to thrive at individual level through ‘our simplex’ 3 actions of feeding, moving and perceiving and at social level through our reproductive and eusocial, loving actions.
To live is to act. And there are only 5 type of actions, which a proper economic and political system should promote and enhance for all cells to thrive. In the next graph we consider those 5 actions from the highest level of complexity in systems sciences, observing how all systems of reality reproduce those actions, including atoms, and company-mothers.
Humans however are NOT meeting those actions in most beings who cannot thrive and enjoy life ad maximal, because we live in a planet dedicated to promoting the life of machines.
In economics this means that not all the products created by the economy are necessarily good for man. Since the ‘prices’ given historically by metal-money, were biased towards other forms of metal, being weapons the most expensive, and did not reflect their value for humanity. The result is we are creating the wrong wealth. A healthy economic ecosystem should respect the will of man, creating the goods that maximize that will, shown in the next graph:
In the graph, a ‘real’, biological, scientific ‘frame of coordinates’ with the human point of view in the center, which should be used in an ethonomic system that wants to create a world to the image and likeness of mankind, fostering credit for the goods of the positive side of the frame of biological reference, since those goods foster our natural energy, information, reproduction and social evolution. While goods that are negative for our biological drives should be discredit, regardless of its profits for the Economy. The previous graph responds to the ‘program of existence of human beings’, complementary organisms of energy and information that maximize their existence and happiness as human beings when they maximize those arrows, expressed in our body through the senses, outlets of our physiological systems of energy, information and reproduction.
In the graph, today as always the 5 vital actions of the human organism and the pleasure and happiness they bring to human existence are the self-evident GOODS an economic system SHOULD PROMOTE, BASED IN A DEMAND ECONOMY: energetic food, verbal information, human reproduction, motion/sports/travel/tourism and eusocial love.
BUT WE DONT HAVE A DEMAND ECONOMY BUT A SUPPLY ECONOMY THAT CATERS TO THE REPRODUCTION of those goods for machines. WE LIVE IN A WORLD made by company-mothers for machines NOT for human beings:
Conclusion: the need to evolve human social systems to control the economic ecosystem.
To understand the political and economic crisis in which the world lives in – an age of never ending low, intensity robotic wars and vigilante states in control of the population, where there is always money for the last tech military or robotic gadget, that substitutes human beings in labor and war fields but none for the production of welfare goods and life jobs people need to survive in perpetual scarcity, where a small of elite of bankers, owners of corporations and their employees politicos and celebrities live in a paradise of wealth and privilege, isolated from society through a growing barrier of electronic mechanisms while the life goods and wanting of the immense majority of mankind are never met, despite the empty promises of our governments and politicos that without any systems of control, turn after being elected on false promises, turn their back against them selling laws to the most powerful military and financial corporations, we must accept a painful fact about the world we live in:
We have not created over the surface of Gaia, and efficient social superorganism of mankind the last stage of the strategies of survival evolution of species, which in its most successful forms….. evolve through networks of energy and information.
The problem of mankind is very simple, as expressed by Einstein: OUR evolution of machines and its systems of company-mothers has enormously exceeded our evolution of history, our social systems of organization, politics and economics as sciences that should try to evolve humanity first and put it in control of the world of machines we are building in parallel as a biological ecosystem (which we do not recognize as such), increasingly independent of mankind.
Only if humans were able to evolve the sincere of history and the way they manage societies, today based in raw power, and primitive memes of tribal supremacism (abrahamic religions, competing, nations, class structures, you name it), they could survive what is obviously happening to the world – our obsolescence in a planet in which a small elite uses all the resources for its benefit.
In that regard perhaps the most profound confusion the world suffers today, is on the understanding of the real hierarchical order e
stablished between the ‘two words’ that describe our system of political and economical government: ‘capitalist democracy’ and the privileges granted to the two organisms they cater for: Company-Mothers of machines, and Human families, which reproduce two different species, machines and human beings.
The free citizens of Capitalism are stock-market companies, overwhelmingly company-mothers of machines, its re=productive free citizens, whose goal in order to get profits for its stock holders on the sales of those machines, is to evolve, reproduce, and sell those machines.
The human goal of those companies affects only to the 0.002% of mankind that owns them and so it is gets profit from those sales. Yet those profits are completely irrelevant to the 99.9% of humanity affected by its real effect son the planet: to reproduce and evolve machines, terraforming in the process the world, which they adapt through laws and sales to those machines, to the image and likeness of its offspring of mechanisms.
AND BECAUSE unlike human Mothers, those company-mothers have absolute rights to credit, used also liberally to pay politicos to promote with its laws their offspring of machines, since the beginning of the Industrial r=evolution, mankind has suffered an exact non-stop generational, biological process of evolution of energies and its informative, military and transport machines, as all the resources of the planet have been geared first to that aim, and only WHAT IS LEFT-OVER, has been used to feed and reproduce and help the evolution of human-mothers, its social and family structures.
So CAPITALISM MUST BE DEFINED AS THE IDOL-OGY OF COMPANY-MOTHERS OF MACHINES, whose purpose is terraforming the earth to the image and likeness of machines. While Democracies would be the ideology that considers the world to be owned by humans which should terraform it to the image and likeness of history, our super organism in time and space. How it is possible to create both goals? the answer is NOT: EITHER CAPITALISM RULES AND THE WORLD WILL BE TERRAFORMED – IT IS ALMOST made to the image and likeness of those machines, or democracies come on top – now they are on the bottom of the pyramid of capitalism, as humans have essentially no rights to credit – the language of power of society that creates the world – and then humans prevail. Yet for that to happen obviously democracies have to regain their power over capitalism by regaining their power over the language of social creation, money, which is now fully owned by those company-mothers; REGARDLESS OF THE PLACEBO newspeak of caring and political correctness that tell us the system work for the human kind.
For example, the goal of mercedes for its tiny group of stock-holders is the abstract reception of profits. But the real goal of the company is to build and evolve cars, today self-driving robocars, soon to have autonomous solar skins, and construct or convince politicians to construct the networks of energy and information, roads, GPS satellites, electric grids, and oil pipes to provide energy and information for those machines in a process that is obviously absorbing resources and space, from the other life species that need them. So today cars absorb 1/4th of the maize America reproduces, and no longer feeds humans and cattle, whose food prices rise.
And the land of many cities and territories become criss-crossed and barren to be used by machines.
What about human families? Our goals of existence as human families are obviously the same than those of company-mothers regarding their machines, but focused as it should be on our children.
So what we want is to have enough energy to feed them, enough information to educate them, and terraform the world to the image and likeness of human beings, to be able to roam the planet Gaia, enjoy life and its drive of existence, evolve socially in peace with other human beings and reproduce more children.
This is exactly what company-mothers of machines are doing so successfully, evolving, reproducing and integrating into planetary social networks its machines.
But humans are failing to achieve those goals for themselves. Why? There is no computer without energy, or proper internet connection to which the economic system dedicates billions of dollars. But most humans are undernourished and information is primitive at best, when there is information at all. There is no limit to the motion of machines on planet Earth a global free market for the reproduction, evolution and transfer of machines and money from companies, but humans are limited in motions by borders, in money by the lack of any rights to invent it, which companies have.
Can the reproductive units of human societies access the languages of social power, money ad the laws, to create a real, demand-based democracy, kicking the preproduction and consumption of life goods they need to survive, and investing in a world made to the image and likeness of human beings?
The obvious truth is NOT. As today the most segregated, underfunded, with less rights, clearly unjustly treated element of our societies is the human mother, which is – let us remember it, as it seems humans have forgotten – the origin of OUR life, the bearer of our species, the fundamental element that pegs together our families, ensures our survival and happiness. So this fact seems a bit of a contradiction with the notion that we live in a democracy, the government of the people.
Therefore the big question about our system is why Company-mothers are so successful achieving their goals of evolution, reproduction and terraforming of the Earth to the image and likeness of machines? And why human mothers are so miserable? Simply enough because we do NOT live in a world ruled and dedicated to human beings.
I shall repeat it ad nauseam to counter the opposite effect of repetition of happy newspeak of freedom and optimism by company-mothers of informative machines, aka mass-media: you DO not live in a free world, in a real democracy, as you DO not rule that world. Company-mothers do; since they are the only Free citizens of free markets, with full, free access to the two languages of power of our social organisms: the economic. reproductive language of money, that can buy and sell the lifetime of both human beings and machines; and the informative, nervous language of Laws that money systematically buy to ‘politicos’, which don’t have rights to issue money (deficit zero laws) and must extort citizens from it (taxation), while companies issue it for free in e-money derivatives and stocks.
The graph shows the consequence of this indifference of economists and its capitalist system to humanity: the ‘future’ head of machines, a mobile ear/camera/brain, which soon will be ‘attached’ to robocars and any moving camera, as a detached head, displacing all humans of labor and war fields, the iPhone is worth more than the living beings of 3 of the most populous nations of the world, still dominated by the pre-machine agricultural civilization. What this biased pricing in favor of machines tell us is that we humans are expendable and are being spent.
While in the side of humans a organization which IS submissive to the capitalist system, called Democracy, tries to make a world to its image and likeness, delivering the goods human mothers need to reproduce. And what people do NOT understand is that both mother SYSTEMS and species, and organizations are different, and while there are obvious symbiotic processes between them – as machines enhance our energy and information capacity, in most cases, SPECIALLY IN THE ROBOTIC AI AGE, when machines become autonomous species, competition is the rule of the game, and HUMANITY is loosing that competition.
Fact is the refusal to use the language of biology and organisms to talk of the industrial evolution of machines and its super organisms of re=production, company-mothers and tackle the issue of the darwinian competition between both species in labor and war field is by far the biggest intellectual blinder of mankind, with enormous consequences for our well-being and survival on this planet.
SOCIALISM VS. CAPITALISM. WHO SHOULD ISSUE MONEY
Money is a digital language, which regardless of its specific ‘countable support’, has a function akin to other digital languages of systems, used to compare mathematically and reproduce through exchanges of flows of energy different type of goods.
Money and the law, the 2 network languages of human super organisms of history and economics.
All systems of nature require to well-function as social organisms 2 languages:
one of pure information, which is subjective, delivered by the ‘brain/informative elements’ of the system to organize the whole; nervous system in biological organisms, gravitational information in galaxies, genetic codes in cells, legal, ethic words in human societies… Such languages are biased in favor of the ‘neuronal brain and organism’ that controls it, being ‘particular in its function.
And a language of reproduction which is objective, hence normally delivered by a digital system, as the equations of mathematics equal being to be compared and exchanged. This is the case of electromagnetic forces in nature that exchange particles, hormonal and oxygen codes in biology and digital money in social super organisms, which regulate the reproductive economic system.
It is then very easy to consider what is wrong with the use of money in human societies, how those 2 languages should be designed in a perfect world=superorganism of history and what is the primacy between the two languages just by considering how THEY EXIST in efficient, survival super organisms of nature, all of them following the same laws of systems and networks:
What is wrong with the world money is used today can be easily inferred of the ‘NON-ESSENTIAL qualities’ of money, which come in the ‘discourse of our wrong-designed parasitic system of money’, where 2 qualities which are irrelevant to it, appears heavily featured in all treatises of money: MONEY AS A SUBSTANCE, gold or precious metal, ‘store of wealth’ and money as DEBT, a standard of payment of obligations (as in the famous Jevons definition of most classic books of economics).
- Money IS NOT A SUBSTANCE, as it is a digital number, which of course must be written in some support, but the support is not important. And as such is not ‘wealth-energy’, but information, language.
- And money IS NOT DEBT, as its function as all languages of information is to start the process of reproduction and exchange of goods and work to produce, in the same manner you act after thinking, but the words IS not what matters, only to kick start the action. So money CANNOT BE USED AS DEBT TO PARASITE AND RETURN to people, as you do not talk expecting someone to return your words, but to bey them and ACT under your command.
As it happens those 2 primitive forms of money, as metal and as debt-usury-slaving substance became imposed by our ‘dear’ animetal people-castes, creating a go(l)d religion of accumulation of metal-wealth and slavery of human lifetime to money, which became the standard origin of our capitalist civilization, as opposed to the Nomisma, rational Greek-Latin view of money as a secondary legal language to reproduce and organize society submissive as it must be to the word. This European view of money, vs. to the Semite, Biblical view of money as substance, debt and wealth, today represented by America and its capitalism, consisting in reproducing as many numbers of money as possible to herd it without any concern for its social value and rights of all humans to reproduce and receive a minimal salary to kick out their demand of welfare goods and work actions, AS NATURE DOES WITH ALL REPRODUCTIVE LANGUAGES TO WHICH ALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE ORGANISM HAVE ACCESS, is the root of most of the eviLs and dysfunctions of our societies.
This 3rd section of ‘Economic Science’ is dedicated to the work of Humanist Economists which study the scienc with an objective, scientific, humanist view. 2 are its fundamental schools, Socialism and Keynesianism. Its main difference being that Socialism rightly asked for the nationalization of the financial industry, which Keynes, a member of the British elite did not want – a fact which paradoxically made his school less ‘scientific and humanist’ but more succesful.
It however collapsed because it did not achieved the alternative measure Keynes asked for – a global currency of free debt money printed to create massive deficits to invest in the welfare state – what our biological school calls ‘Y€$ money’ and could solve easily the crisis.
So without resources of free debt money or a nationalized bank system, the welfare state was obliged to extort people with taxes to pay for its resources, while bankers and corporations had unlimited rights to print money in stock markets and e-money. And so in the 70s they printed e-money without limit, provoking stagflation – inflation due to overabundance of money and null growth as they kept most of that money for themselves.
Further on with that money they paid pamphletists of the Chicago school, like Hayek, who blatantly lied in his 3 pamphlets, ‘road to serfdom’ ‘against Keynes’ and ‘the denationalization of money, accusing the state of printing too much money and causing hyperinflation crisis, with the example of the Deutsche mark hypernflation (hiding the reichbank was then a private bank), of the end of freedom in Keynesian societies (hiding that the fundamental flaw of democracies is not to control the language of social power money), and asking for further privatization of finances, finally writing a pathetic pamphlet full of insults against Mr. Keynes… And then the private rijsbank gave him the Nobel Prize.
And paid think tanks to resurrect the primitive thinking of monetarists and classic economics of the old Go(l)d religions, the neocons that now control economics and politics. So Keynesianism was killed by ‘damned lies and false statistics’, as Socialism had been.
In this article we introduce the rules of the scientific method and compare with them the 2 schools, ‘neo-classic’ go(l)d religions vs. Scientific schools of economics (it is taken from the central post). And in future posts we will study each of the main masters of the socialist and keynesian schools analyzing critically their work with those 4 legs of the scientific method.
Now let us consider how we can merge those 3 levels after this hiatus, continuing our analysis of this crisis, the wolfs dressed as sheeple, our banksters (a perfect word to define their camouflage and true nature), who only care for their class and prey with ‘complex mathematical jargons’ on the humankind, and how a true science of economics and history could design a praxis, a better world.
A social, free democracy & demand economy could create a world paradise.
The solution is obvious: a real democracy that caters to the need of the people and it is efficient, as social organisms made by nature are requires at least 3 elements:
– The control of the 2 languages of social power by the collective brain of the organism, the informative/nervous legal system and the financial, blood, energetic one. Otherwise the organism is totally dysfunctional. Imagine your body with two ‘siamese’ heads, each one going a different way, or more accurately with a brain giving nervous/informative/legal orders of motion left, when the heart/blood/economic/financial system acts independently moving the body right. In your body the nervous/informative/legal system CONTROLS the economic/blood system and uses both to ‘feed’ with right information and energy ALL the cells of the body, even if the neuronal ‘people-caste’ obtains 10 times more energy for its commanding role.
Today the system is even worst. It is called a cancer: there is an astounding minority, the 1% of stockratic owners of corporations, with a managerial ±9% that have absolute rights to the entire blood/financial system of the body and give none back, as cancers do, multiplying their wealth, and extracting the meager resources of the rest of the body – a bloated, mindless liver that absorbs all the healthy blood and sends poisonous ‘memes of metal’, weapons and hate-media to the rest of the body. It is like a leukemia, in which the brain of the cell – our verbal, ethic, humanist laws that made us reproduce the welfare goods we need and love and share energy and information with other cells as healthy bodies do – is substituted by the DNA of the virus – our ideologies of human hate, selfish ego-trips, homo bacteria behavior, and techno-utopias that consider machines not life the meaning of it all – that make us reproduce only the viral DNA, poisoning our planet.
Instead we should select through a financial system owned by the brain-goverment, the good fruits of the tree of science that make us survive and evolve our brains and forbid those who kill us and trash our brains. So we would have massive investment in health care, housing, agriculture, education, humanist sciences, tourism, languages, environment, infrastructures, non-fiction information (documentaries free press), a credit handled by nationalized financial industries to private entrepreneurs in all those sectors, who would maximize the efficiency of individual entrepreneurship and the public rationale of non-profiteering bankers, just civil servants with the job of selecting the best purposes for credited companies. While those companies who create lethal machines for our body and brain will have null credit or would be legally banned, despite its higher profits (as weapons and digital trash software are the most profitable goods, in mathematical, economic equations: profits = Maximal price (weapons, the most perfect, top predator machines) – Minimal cost (digital software, that reproduces easily with no limit).
Finally labor will be the goal not productivity, which is exactly the opposite equation of labor. Since productivity=machines/labor, grows when we put more machines and fire more workers: ∆Productivity=∆Machine-capital/Labor
This equation, so simple and easy to understand that a school student can explain it is the mantra of our corporations and corrupted politicians, who tell us the anti-truth that rising productivity will create labor, when it does the opposite.
What those equations of productivity by firing workers and profits by creation of lethal machines tell us is several things:
– Machines compete with humans in labor and war fields and corporations are promoting those who destroy our lives, because their purpose is not human. It is to create a world made to the image and likeness of their offspring of machines, and so they need ideologies that justify that destruction, which are better served in a language we do NOT understand.
– the corruption of the political system is so absolute that they are pushing all the policies that destroy labor and life and citizen’s wealth to service corporations and bankers. So this leads to the 3rd measure (after a real control of the 2 languages of social power by elected governmetns) – a real democracy that ensures politicos will not be corrupted employees, puppets-clowns, house-negroes et al of those corporations, or else citizens can easily penalize them harshly. And again the model to achieve such perfect democracies is Nature and its perfect mammal organisms.
– Indeed the organism is also a perfect democracy, because those commanding neurons are JUDGED-VOTED a posteriori, with PAIN messages by a feed-back nervous power given to the cells. This means in a perfect democracy there would be also a VOTE at posteriori which will allow citizens to penalize those politicians AND BANKERS to the service of the people that ABSORB MORE ENERGY than they are allowed, or lie and do NOT try to accomplish their programs.
A real democracy will vote first in open lists NOT TO PARTIES BUT TO PEOPLE, because there is only a ‘natural social science’ whose purpose would be to BUILD A PERFECT WORLD, ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF NATURE, designing a perfect social organism that caters to the need of all mankind. So the choice is not of two siamese parties to the service of corporations but of individuals, ethic and intelligent enough to make the best of the resources of this planet. But the main vote would be a posteriori with penalties of jail for crimes against life or fines for monetary gain (negative, pain messages), or re-election for a job well done, or a salary pension if the politician retires.