“Economists, and politicians, doctors of history, should promote human, biological goods, which mankind most enjoy as they allow us to fulfill our natural drives of existence – the desire for biological energy, verbal information, reproduction andEusocial evolution, and prevent the reproduction of lethal goods, which limit our evolution, either atrophying and substituting our brains or killing our bodies (weapons and digital machines)”
The true science of Economics is called Ethonomics. Its goal is organic, biological, social: to achieve the maximal healthy wealth for all human beings, cells of the superorganism of history. Its method follows the laws of efficient super organisms, based in the understanding of the ‘drives of existence of mankind’ – OUR need for ENERGY, information, reproduction and social evolution (love, peace).
Those drives that make the individual human being ‘thrive’ are ‘expressed’ in a mathematical frame of reference whose values are NOT prices.
That frame of reference has a negative side. Where lethal goods have ‘negative value’.
And so the maximisation of the positive side of the frame of reference of WHEALTH.
AND THE minimisation of its negative values, is the goal of Ethonomics, and IN THE PERFECT WORLD, ALL ECONOMISTS ARE ETHONOMISTS.
THIS IS WRITTEN with an equation, in the paradoxical form of all evolutionary, survival equations of general systems:
Max. Human goods x Min. Lethal Goods = WHealth.
This equation is also called the Constitution of Mankind, as it would create a ‘Healthy Superorganism of Mankind’.
The sickness of the Organism of History
We are biological beings, which follow the biological drives and laws ofEusocial evolution of living organisms and efficient, survival species.
Thus, without the understanding of the Nature and Needs of human beings, it is impossible to design a perfect economical world, made to the image and likeness of man.
In brief, an efficient economy that caters to the human species, should satisfy and re=produce massively those goods that satisfy our need for natural energy, verbal information, family values (reproduction) andEusocial evolution (the memes of love that create a global super-organism of mankind) hrough the control and direction of credit by elected governments to the re=production of those goods.
The present world however is not ruled by bio-historians and politicians who understand the nature of man, but by financial economists with a simple primitive meme: greed is good, the reproduction of money, mostly for ourselves, bankers, is the goal of societies. The needs of the people are secondary to our selfish goal. And so only the nationalization of money to promote a welfare, private economy that subventions and encourages the production of biological goods can solve the problems of our world.
Otherwise the present economy ruled by financial elites and company-mothers of machines, whose only goal is to make profits by sellingmachines and substituting expensive human labor by cheap robots and pcs will end up in a world of infinite productivity and null human labor where we will be obsolete workers and soldiers, guided by economists who preach productivity laws – the substitution of labor by capital, sinceproductivity=capital/labor increases when we fire workers and increase capital=machines.
This world also will become less and less democratic as the sinking of a middle class, substituted by those machines and displaced into the 3rd world of suburban ghettos protests and must be repressed by an increasing number of automated police machines, security systems and big brother technologies. Thus Keynesian Militarism will substitute Keynesian Welfare goods and an age of neofascism in the making, will control the population that rebels against the zeitgeist of our age.
The alternative science: ethonomics – a demand, democratic economy based in human goods.
A biological approach to economics can truly understand the nature of machines , and how they are transforming our human ecosystem. Then as the doctor does with the body we can design antidotes, and counter-measures to defend our social body of history, from the lethal mutation it is experienced under the effect of certain machines. Indeed, there is a second role that a scientist plays. He does not search for the laws of nature, only to know those laws, but he studies them to manipulate reality with that knowledge. Since the scientist knows the laws of nature, he can modify reality to improve his existence. So happens in the science of chemistry and medicine. Now man can cure many diseases of which he was a victim in the past. The doctor applies the laws of nature to improve the life of humanity.
Hence the enormous importance of a “real” science of economics and history. If man applies a “true scientific model” of history and economics, based not in abstractions and ideologies of machines, but in the natural goods, and needs of the human species, politicians, economists, and the common people, could direct in their own advantage the behavior of the Earth’s ecosystems, and design their own future (as scientists do, with those species whose laws of behavior and change they know). Men could create a future positive to our species, controlling the financial orders that reproduce machines, with verbal ethic laws, and implementing counter-measures against lethal products, reinforced by the military -the leukocytes of a well-run human organism- to cure the ecosystem of history.
If the “doctors” of history and economics, our entrepreneurs and politicians, our military and economists, were able and willing to understand the laws of financial networks and evolutionary machines, and the way they invent the future, they could manipulate history andeconomics in favor of man, of our collective species. They do the opposite today, cheated by complex ideologies in favor of all kind of machines, that do not distinguish the good from the bad apples of the tree of science. In this manner subconsciously they are directing mankind towards self-suicide, and destruction of his natural ecosystem.
The natural, biological Goods of a human economy
In the graph, the 3 organic goals of mankind, human social evolution human energy, and human information, are fostered by certain goods. If we give to each good a certain value in those 3 organic goals, we can put them within the frame of reference. Positive Y values are given to goods that foster human mental-informative evolution. Negative Y values are given to goods thatdiminish human mental evolution. Positive X values are given to goods that foster human body evolution. Negative X values are given to goods that foster human body devolution. Finally, in the positive Z coordinates we consider goods that foster human social communication and reproduction of social networks. In negative Z coordinates we consider goods that diminish human social communication.
Since we know thanks to the laws of the vital Universe the nature of human mental and body evolution it is very easy to put in one of such graphs all kind of goods, and classify them as negative goods with negative GDP value, to be extinguished, or positive goods to be promoted. The product of its XYZ coordinates will give the negative or positive value of a good for the national GDP.
A scientific frame of reference establishes negative and positive values, according to the language and the frame of reference. From the point of view=frame of reference of ethonomics, of economics of verbal thought, and human survival, we can establish a positive and a negative value for economical products.
In such frame of ethical reference, we can take judgment and make valuations on metal-species, based in human biological values, not in the values of money . What extinguishes or degrades human minds, or human bodies, is negative; what promotes human life, evolution, and perception through human senses is positive. Such products should be promoted by politicians and ethonomists, governments and markets. The lethal products should be limited.
In the world of economics we have to differentiate the products reproduced by companies and individuals into two clear groups:
– Human goods which are goods that men require to survive, and better themselves.
– metal goods such as weapons or metal-heads, or robots, which harm human beings, expel labor, and create unemployment, kill our bodies, make our minds obsolete and will surely when they reach consciousness compete as top predators of energy and information for the control of the Earth.
The wealth of a nation should be defined as the wealth in Human Goods,that most citizens require and enjoy, because they improve their lives. These goods create also a lot of human work, because many of them cannot be reproduced by machines alone. Such is the case of art, housing, agriculture, health and education, that need human labor
Countries like Spain came very up that list, headed by nations like Australia, Canada, and France. On the whole nations of the European Union are well up in that least, despite their perceived military and monetary weakness. On the other hand countries like America or Russian whose societies are/were based in the production of lethal goods sunk in the real standards of life of their people.
Indeed if we measure today wealth by the quantity of money and expensive items, such as weapons and complex machines a nation has, America is on top of the world. Yet in the list of healthy nations it appears way down. Since in that list certain goods do not add to the health of nations. To have more missiles in the statistics of GDP growth does not make a nation healthier. To have hundreds of TV channels, and internet connections, instead of libraries and good schools does not make children more intelligent, sociable, and happier. To measure all the things and humans by their monetary value, price or salary, make us economic objects. Yet monetary values are different, sometimes completely opposed to human values. For example murder and weapons are very expensive. They have however a negative human value. Yet human values and human goods is what make us happy.
America and the EU, the powerful and the socially evolved nation, the wealthy and the healthy, the nation ruled by abstract economists,primitive ideologies of animetals and digital numbers, or the nation who still reveres human culture (arts, verbal thought), in which there are still certain ideals about the progress of history, and concerned citizens which want to evolve socially, seem to be opposed in many ways. Which one is a better nation for its citizens?
Perhaps we should ask to the neutral people of the world, that vote visiting one and the other. Their decision is clear, because despite so muchpropaganda and hip about the American way of life, provided by its media companies, tourists go to Europe more often, and hardly travel across America… Obviously they do not want to share the main wealth of present America, its weapons, and the growing discomfort of a people that despite their many qualities, hard work, and thirst for life, are suffering the consequences of ill-devised physiological systems, that rule the American nation.
Europe used to be like that before the II World war. Then Europe ran into wrong ideas about what health and power should be as America does today. European Nations invested on “lethal goods”, germs-like weapons, and information became corrupted. It became propaganda to cover up, such false “wealth”, that showed up in all statistics as an impressive growth in GDP… Totalitarism arrived. Nations suddenly preached the doctrine of “action” and “violence”, to solve the problems of our age. Sustained by the weapon-germ industry, fascism and Stalinism terrorized Europe for 2 long decades. Yet people in fascist and communist countries did not know they were reproducing “germ”-products, because thenetworks of information –mainly radio and press– were optimist about the future, and praised the beauty of war; denying systematically any wrong doing by those politicians and entrepreneurs, on top of society.
To that aim, words and economic numbers were “read” in a convenient way. So Germans and Russians thought they were very “w-healthy”, while marching under the banner of industrial progress. Their minds were brain-washed, and their love for things like sports and technology, filled up their life… Everybody looked at Germany with envy. The economical miracle of Hitler was very much praised by the press of that age.
Germany had the highest rates of economic growth, even if that growth was in lethal machines. It did not matter. Numbers cheated people. Germans were all at work… making lethal, expensive weapons, that counted in the optimist statistics of economics. As America -the paradigm of metal wealth does today- Germany had the best weapons and best communication systems… who delivered an unending stream of confusing, propagandistic news, and violent speeches…
Indeed, nations with a lot of weapons and high-tech goods look very rich, because weapons and high-tech goods are the most expensive items of society. So a nation who had many of his people without basic attention, and basic goods, like communist Russia, fascist Germany, or XXI century America, but had/has a lot of weapons looks very wealthy.
Yet weapons had to be used, and they were used, and I world war, came, and II world war came. Europe suffered as never mankind had suffered before. It was a hard lesson, that Europe learnt after the war. Enemy nations who seemed irreconcilable like Germany and France, suddenly realized all was militaristic propaganda and “the endemic cultural racism” among them, disappeared.
Nations joined together. The rich switched from weapons production to human goods, that fed the social cells. The politicians decided to keep the poor healthy and educated, instead of teaching them how to use weapons, that could turn against the elite. Guided by the nervous-legal system, thanks to subventions, the economy soon was able to produce the human goods that every cell of society required to live with the proper energy and information (such as food, health, housing, and education). It worked. Europe did not have a war for the rest of the century, till last year… in Kosovo.
It seemed that Europe had evolved his pre-war, primitive free market system into a more natural social organism, that made people happier, avoiding war and violence, and ensuring the rich, their position in society, as responsible information cells. There were no more revolutions, civil unrest, pogroms and other penalties against the “freed”=Freedom of greed of stockrats, owners of company-mothers proper of less evolved societies…
We have to consider that after the II WW America did not take note of the lessons Europe had learnt. It did not reform its blood-freed market system. Instead it opted for wealth at any price, as Germany had done. It made of “GNP” numbers which are biased to weapons and high-tech, the main statistics to show the wealth of the nation. It ignored its “human development”. The rich thought they would be happier putting more zeros to accounts they already could not spent in an entire life, instead of sharing part of that wealth to create a healthy nation, where they could walk around without fear. So those industries with higher profits -weapons and computers– despite their clear dangers for the national well-being, became the backbone of the American economy.
And so today America as Germany before the war, ruled by castes ofanimetals who are blind to any rational vision of history is pushing head to head with those nations whose systems she “has created to its image and resemblance” such as Taiwan, Japan, or South-Korea, towards a rule in which machines substitute and men, robots menace the survival of our species, company-mothers dominate governments, and individuals devolve to a primitive “bacterium-like state”, loose their freedom,dedicating their entire life to reproduce and vitalize machines, ignoring anything about social evolution, and the survival of the species. Plainly the American model, as primitive as the German and European models were before the war, are leading mankind towards extinction. It is what we call Neofascism, imposed by the power of weapons and the corruption of money, against the will of the American people and the human people at large.
It is a question of ideologies, against reason. How can then we introduce some reason, some scientific truths in the world of ideological economics? Let us try to do that in this page. The first task of such real science of economics should be to classify goods according to their positive or negative effects in the human kind.
It is fundamental to divide goods between metal goods which are devolutionary of man, and cannot be consumed-destroyed easily, without polluting the Carbo-Earth; and human goods which cater to human senses: food, housing, agriculture, art forms, tourism, transport, health care, education, etc. metal goods are either weapons, tools of pricing, or technological machines and metal senses: instruments “who” substitute human bodies and Minds, since they increase human perception. Those 3 kind of goods are the most desired by man, and yet the most harmful to man. Their regulation should not be given to the market that makes them top predators over human goods, but to a worldwide Government: The World Union, and its ministries.
In Ethonomics it is fundamental to understand the concept of negative price value. In Ideological Economics in favor of metal-wealth, weapons and digital machines add to the GNP. In a real ethonomical system, that maximizes human welfare, lethal products have negative values. They do not add but subtract to the GNP of a nation, since they go against the evolution of mankind.
Perhaps some theoretical background on the nature of scientific coordinates, is required to understand the Ethonomical coordinates of values.
Since knowledge is subjective, when describing a Universal ecosystem, we need to create first a linguistic frame of reference, or coordinates with negative and positive parameters, that describe in terms of our “linguistic values”, the Ecosystem.
In physics we do use mathematical coordinates, with positive (+) or negative (-) values referred to the space-time position of the observer. For example if we measure speed, negative acceleration rests in the negative side of the frame of reference and positive acceleration adds. It follows that in Ethonomics we need also negative and positive prices referred to the effect of products in the observer (the Human species). The frame of reference in Ethonomics is the Human constitution:
Max H[g] = Min M[g]. Or Human[goods]=positive; Metal[goods]=negative.
Since the goal of the constitution is to increase human goods, metal goods that “decelerate” human evolution, and the creation of a healthy body of History, based on the Human constitution have negative value. Human goods that accelerate human evolution, have positive value. So the “health and human wealth” of a nation, its “real GNP” that measures the “real utility” of products for human societies, is calculated adding the production of Human goods, and discounting the production of lethalmetal goods. The outcome will give us a more accurate measure of the “healthiness” of a human society.
Religious authorities should back ethonomical systems and the rules of societies by the laws of biohistory.
Masters of verbal ethics in the past (religious prophets) [love religions] have all classified human and metal goods in the same terms, since the age of the Tree of science. There is no scientific excuse to classify all goods in positive terms. Only rhetoric might convince you that TV-consumptionand weapons consumption is good to man. Those are clearly negative species that devolve the human mind and body. So they are in the lower Y and X coordinates of the ethonomical frame of reference. Their value should be discounted, not added to the GDP of nations.
The extinction of nature, of ethic religions (networks of human information) and agricultural societies (networks of human energy) are sides of the same problem. Historians, ecologists, religious societies and social parties should understand that process of extinction, with the law of biology, since it is a process of death of a social organism. Then they should ally together against the advance the “germs”, of the lethal products, of the III Earth, the Metal-earth and its reproductive organs, stock-markets that deviate credit from the reproduction of human goods, and finance, company-mothers which reproduce those goods, mainly weapons, and metal-heads, that kill or make obsolete human bodies and brains .
The problems of mankind, are problems of a collective species, that affects the entire planet and only can be cured at planetary level, through international organizations, that should be given the power to do so by nations, most of them abstract organizations, without a real cultural origin, mainly created by old castes of “animetals”, that divide artificially our species, and prevent the analysis and cure of the entire Organism of History, the Planet Earth.
In that sense, History can only be understood not from the perspective of the Individual species, but from the perspective of the “physiological” networks of energy and information, that truly rule and design the planetary, organic ecosystem.
The vision of a nation that a bio-economist or bio-historian has is very much that of a doctor, who sees the body of a human being, as a collection of individual cells (human beings in history), joined by two basic networks, the blood network of energy -the economic network- and the nervous network of information, the legal orders that society obey. The main learning a doctor requires to keep his patients healthy, is called physiology. Physiology ensures the understanding and well-functioning of the energy-blood and information-nervous networks of any social body. When those two networks are healthy, all the cells of your body receive energy-food and proper information, and survived.
A bio-historian sees his nation in a similar way: as a social organism, that politicians -the informative brain of laws- and industrialists -the blood system of goods- had to keep healthy, giving the proper energy and information to all the social cells, to avoid their collapse and death by the main sickness of historic organisms: war, poverty and ignorance. To him poverty and ignorance are anti-natural, a symptom of physiological sickness in those two organic systems. A sign of corrupted laws, and a corrupted system of credit that reproduced lethal goods, which the body-cells did not require.
After all every single cell of the body receives from its energy-blood system, and its nervous-information system, a minimum quantity of those two precious goods needed to survive. The nervous system informs the cells who trust the nervous system and move the social body to escape danger. The blood system feeds them so they can run away. Yet when the systems ofenergy and information of the body fall sick, the entire organism suffers. Then, when both systems collapse, the body dies. So happens to a society, where collective sickness such as external or internal war, and the expansion of “germs”, of lethal goods, such as weapons, are often the product of a bad ruled organism, with unjust laws and lack of production of human goods, that cells need (education, food, housing, etc.). To the bio-economist the minimal rights of the cells, the right to have fair prices in those goods they needed, the right to have health care, and available jobs, are natural rights for all cells of a healthy organism. Unlike many politicians that blame the people (the cells) of the sickness of the social organism, the bio-historian knows better. He knows that in most social bodies, when the physiological systems, the energy and information systems work properly, the cells respond, and work hard to maintain the blood and nervous systems. Yet in anysocial organism the main responsibility for collective health is not in the individual cells of the body, but in the privileged cells of those systems, who control the information and energy of nations, the vital resources of the country. So the bio-historian, the honest politician or economist, wants the blood system of industrialists and bankers (who control the money, the salaries and prices, the vital energy that made the social cells work) and the nervous system of politicians (who create the laws, the vital information of the nation) to design healthy organic systems, the best possible system for the people.
The “organic-nation” requires as any organism, that all cells have a minimum quantity of the right energy and information to survive. This does not mean, that all cells of the organic nation have to be equally rich in energy-money, or equally cultured in information, since organisms and cells are not equal. Each cell has a purpose, and it becomes differentiated soon after birth. If you are born in the brain region you will become an informative cell, which is the top cell of the organism, with unlimited supply of blood, and a lot of knowledge. If you are born into the feet, you will become a hard working cell, supporting with your physical strength the entire organism. Yet still you will receive blood, and you will be able to complain when the body treats you bad, sending pain messages to the brain cells. Otherwise the organism would collapse. Since if your feet cells die, or suffer too much, they will refuse to move you. The worker-cells will go on strike…
So utopias such as communism are also not natural to Universal organisms. Yet today we are far away from utopias, in the other extreme, of an organism in which each cell caters for its needs, and the information cells of the brain prey over the energy cells of the body. That process has also a name in physiology: leukemia, nervous cancer, or merely old age, since old age is a process of selfish degeneration of the body by the brain cells. Such is the present case of history in which the working people suffer in excess, under unfair laws and salaries (nervous and blood orders) from the privileged blood and neuron cells of modern history. Today the physiological cells of history lost in their fantasies of power , often forget that they belong to a social body, that they would not exist without the feet cells. They abandon their social responsibility and then the body falls sick.
In your mind, the brain cells think about God and the Universe, about Love and Fun, about pleasures so remote to the working cells of the feet, that often they forget the pain messages of those down-to-Earth individuals. If they could cut the nervous-pain messages of the feet they would do. Yet the organism is wise, and does not allow the neuron cells to degenerate in their duties, to run amok into their fantasies. So they take care of the body. Unfortunately historic organisms are not so well put together. They are recent inventions. In the social, evolutionary scale of the Universe that grows from atoms to molecules, from molecules to cells, from cells to organisms, from organisms to societies, the historic society is the last one to appear. It seems it is not yet perfect.
Certainly there have been improvements over more primitive social systems such as monarchies. Today human societies have found the right concept: a democracy in which the government cells are chosen by the body cells, and are controlled by pain messages, by judges, and laws, to oblige them to use their legal privileges for the welfare of all the people. Yet it happens often that those politicians prevent with unjust laws the proper workings of the democratic system, that should allow a feed back from citizens to government, from muscle cells to neurons.
Obviously we have not built the perfect social organism, since we suffer still wars, and hunger, and lack of education among our people. There is still a lot to do, a lot of responsible work to accomplish by the privileged neurons before they can sleep over into the realm of imagination and say: our nation is a perfect running organism. Many reforms are required, many laws ill-designed need to be changed. Yet where else but in Nature, in the way Nature constructs its perfect social organisms, can we look to find teachings to our collective goal: the evolution of history and economics for the betterment of the Human Kind?
The equation of the human constitution: Human Goods Vs Metal Goods: Max H[g]=Min M[g]
The fundamental measure that all those organisms take to maintain their body healthy, and allow their growth and evolution is to multiply the natural goods (human goods) the organism and its cells require, and control the infections by lethal goods, that poison the organism. This should be the only aim of bio-economists, and bio-policians: to create goods that help the Human Organism, and destroy goods that attack and destroy the bodies and brains of the cells of history: weapons that kill humans, and metal-heads that make human brains obsolete.
We call that goal, the “Human Constitution”, since it truly is the goal that allows to constitute a healthy organism of history. We can express that goal with a mathematical or verbal sentence:
Creation of Human Goods = Extinction of metal goods.
The constitution is in that sense dual: it implies the control of metal-species of information (metal-heads) and lethal energy (weapons) of higher complexity than the brain and body of man, and the multiplication of human goods that favor our survival.
Obviously, to achieve those goals politicians and the military in one side, and economists and industrialists in the other should act together. Politicians and the military should create World systems of power, able to implement laws, and reinforce them if required by force, to abort the reproduction of robots, metal-heads, and weapons. Economists should design new worldwide systems of credit that would promote the reproduction of Human Goods, and limit the investments in Lethal goods. Let us consider in this page some of those economical goods, implemented by “ethonomists”, economists ruled by the ethic laws of mankind, which are the laws of survival of the species.
Since the human constitution is merely the application of the Universal laws of survival to the survival of the Carbon-Earth ecosystem. Today those human goals of survival, have been forgotten due to the power of companies, and the wrong concept of knowledge defended by scientific institutionsand abstract economists. Those wrong ideologies of history are very powerful, not because they are right but because they are very old and through the mere processes of historic inertia today they control most of the present national and world institutions: national governments, company foundations, universities paid by companies, prizes like the Nobel prize given by a bank, or economic forums that only represent companies and the wealthy such as the Davos and GATT conferences, the IMF, the World Bank, International institutions from the cold war era, etc.
All these institutions affirm a false Postulate which validates metal economics. What we might call the Smith Postulate: “The wealth of nations is the quantity of money and machines a nation has”. Once this postulate is religiously accepted as a matter of faith, since men want to be wealthy, it follows that our objective in life must be to reproduce more machines and more money. This is represented mathematically by an equation that we might call the Equation of National product (MV: quantity of money = PT: quantity of products of great prices, mainly machines).
Thereafter all politicians and economists, indoctrinated by the Smith Postulate, will try to increase the National Product of a nation, measured as the money and machines the nation has. However the Smith Postulate does not define thewealth of nations. It is more a religious postulate founded on the work of people such as Smith, believer in Calvinism, who tried to support the doctrine of Calvin: “The intelligence of God is money”. It is a historical fact that the time when a nation has more money and machines is during periods of war. Then the quantity of human goods, basic for our survival, such as food, housing, life and Freedom are minimal. It seems in fact that the more machines and money there are in a society, the less quantity of human goods and human life, (the true wealth of nations) there are.
So if money and machines are not the wealth of nations, how should we define wealth in human terms? This is the question that economists and politicians should ask themselves, and answer scientifically, to face the rather obsolete economic discourse of metal parties, still holding onto the religious postulate of Mr. Smith.
What you call Economics, are a very rudimentary analysis of the ecosystem of machines and prices, biased to favor the point of view of Companies and go[l]d religions: “metal-evolution=human progress”. Economics cannot be considered a Science under such myths. Economics are the only science that do not use a complete frame a reference, to measure the value of their species. This is often ignored by scientists; but we cannot claim to be reaching any real knowledge without a frame of reference, a dimensional system in which to measure the value in time and space of the species of the ecosystem, we study. This is solved with the ethonomical frame of reference.
The ethonomical frame of reference allows to systematize the goals of the Human Constitution, as well as translate them into practical measures of economical an political nature. It is the main tool to implement the Human Constitution, since it should inform the decisions of work, credit and consume of the citizens and leadership of the World Union.
In ethonomics, accountancy is very simple: GDP aggregated value of all digital industries: – x trillion $ subtracted from the national GNP. Extinction of all those industries = + x trillion $ added to GDP growth. Extinction of Metal heads and weapons could imply an enormous increase of perhaps 30% in world wealth in the new GNP statistics, plus maybe another 30% of credit, paid in compensations to bail out companies and proprietors, money that becomes reinvested in Human goods.
We are creating here a Demand based economy where the true wishes of most humans -human goods- not the offer of technological companies, will be the guidance of ethonomical laws and prices. Entire sectors of the economy which have absolute negative value for Humanity, in biological terms (Digital machines, marketing-propaganda and weapon’s production) could be limited. Yet people will see increases on their statistical wealth.
The limits to metal-evolution set by the Human Constitution avoid both our extinction and poverty. We talk of two “safety limits”, 1972 -threshold of chips-, 1939 -threshold of atomic weapons and TVs-. At least the first of those thresholds should become the aim of the World Union, to return back history within the limits of human survival.
For practical reasons we will consider the age of digital chips which started around 1972 the age of digital chips which started around 1972 the closest limit of human survival and the political and economical goal of the doctors of history, of a World Union.
The minimal date of devolution of a metal-species to ensure human survival, 1972, is back to the age previous to LSI circuits, color TV, and satellite networks. In military technology a desirable limit is the second WW which the Atomic Age started in. Those dates caused a jump of complexity in Metal minds and weapons that made obsolete human minds and bodies. Human devolution in bodies (by wars) and Verbal Minds (by digital images and mathematical prices) has accelerated, since those products were discovered. Verbal standards keep dropping as people watch moretelevision. While A-Bombs meant for the first time since the birth of Man, a growing probability of total carbolife extinction. With the arrival of chips, applied to all kind of hunting machines [from fishing boats to weapons that erase all kind of species] the process of obsolescence of human minds, and carbolife bodies has reached exponential nature. As programs of star wars give to satellites and computers the decision to throw atomic bombs, in the future the decision of Human extinction can be taken by chips, a species alien to carbolife. Star wars will make that decision in the nearby future, when Artificial Intelligence appears , much more probable. Since alien species have no “ethical mandate” for the extinction of other species, and metalife needs not water and, or carbolife energy to exist.
Ethonomic measures to create human goods and diminish lethal goods
Once we have clear the goal of economists, nations and industrialists, to produce human goods, we should implement measures to that aim. The question we ask ourselves first to do so is: How an economic society reproduces our two kinds of goods? It does so through credit, that is through the invention of money, which later on is used to give orders to citizens, that will work under salaries, reproducing either one or the other kind of goods. However, there are two ways to invent money in our society.
Money can be invented in the stock-market, through paper-shares, which are a credit given to a company. That company-mother will then use that money to invent and market their product. Money also can be invented through governments, and banks, by means of paper-money. Again that money is later on used by the government to reproduce or promote the products of the welfare state. We talk of 2 kinds of deficits: deficit of stock-markets, and deficit of governments.
Technically speaking, both deficits mean the same thing; it is free money, invented to reproduce goods. If either the market or the government invents too much money, there is inflation and money loses value. So there is a limit to the quantity of money governments and stock-markets should be allowed to reproduce, or else, the economy becomes unstable. However both kinds of money, are not used in the same way. The market, since it appeared in the XVII century in Holland, as an instrument for the reproduction of gunboat weapons, systematically invents money for metallic goods, but it I hardly invents a penny for human goods.
The former happens because “stockrats”, the owners of companies only look for profits, and profits are higher in expensive goods (the most expensive goods are weapons) and software goods (digital goods very cheap to reproduce). This is why there are so many weapons and “metal-heads” in our societies. We do not need them, but the credit of the market reproduces them. and we have to consume them. On the other hand, the government invents money for welfare goods, human goods, needed by humanity, which also creates a lot of employment.
So we have to increase the money invented by governments and diminish the money reproduced by company-mothers of lethal goods in stock-markets. Economists and Politicians are the doctors of history. They should direct economics for the betterment of man. They should “prune” the tree of science, destroying its “bad=extinctive” products, in order to create a true paradise of human goods where men and not machines, are free. Where all of society is free and not only the product and the market, as right-wing=metal parties desire.
We could talk of a new approach to economics, “ethonomics”, where ethics, and laws in favor of mankind and human goods, should control credit in order to create true wealth for mankind.
a global currency ¥€$ money
Government deficits. To correct those anomalies, all the nations of the world should agree to a massive government deficit in human goods, parallel in all nations, to reduce stock credit and multiply human goods. Today if a government in those zones of the Earth where stock power is not absolute tries to curb stock credit and increase government credit of human goods [government deficit], the world-stockratic community attacks and sinks its national currency. Social governments are penalized with currency crashes, which cause them an incapacity to print money for human goods (end of welfare states).
Thus it would be necessary to create a global currency ¥€$ money, with fixed rates between Yuans, Yens, Euro and Dollar, for a +75% of the global economy – an international currency as the one Keynes wanted to found, which being the main global currency cannot be crashed or devalued (against whom?), and hence it can raise state deficit to a fixed of 15% annual rate – enough to create a welfare state for all the inhabitants of those nations – a currency to which others will soon peg. This would create an immediate demand for human goods.
During this years as the Euro comes close to parity, this fundamental tool of the World Union could be implanted automatically, canceling the forex market of speculators and setting a Euro=Dollar=100 Yens global Yes currency by a mere agreement between the 3 central banks and solve the scandalous profiteering and destruction of democracies taken place under the pressure of speculative houses.
The Law of deficit could be the first Law approved by a World Union.
Government Deficit will be mandatory to all nations, at the level of stock deficit. It will create an inflationary state against metal goods; and re-distribute wealth towards producers of Human goods. Ethonomists should redesign economical rhetoric to favor positive perception of inflation and government deficit among citizens, explaining ethonomics in terms of human goods; and designing systems of negative GNP valuation for devolutionary metal-goods.
Today the systematic investment of stock-markets in technological species plummets investments in Human stocks, in Human Goods. So we write:
Max up stock = Max. Metal form Investment = Min. Human Goods Investment [Housing-food stuffs-education-health care-textiles-urban transport etc.]=Max. inflation in human Goods Prices.
Human goods companies are in Stock-markets the laggards unless provided lavishly by government’s money (case of health-care companies). A massive government deficit could have the opposite effect.
Ethonomical reforms of the stock market
The aim of Human governments should be to modify the behavior of credit in present markets, in favor of Human Goods. To achieve that goal some basic reforms could be implemented:
– Technological Companies will make their shares nominal, requiring a Notary (Roman law) or Judge (Anglo-Saxon law) to be transferred.
– Companies that produce lethal products, (weapons, Metal minds) will be bailed out of the system at market price, to avoid resistance of their stockratic owners, and extinguished.
Indeed, to avoid the outright boycott of stockrat owners of Metal companies, which -let’s not forget control today through lobbying all the systems of power of the World- a massive bail out of lethal companies, through Yes money, could be implemented.
Cartels could keep up profits on those metal companies that have to stay in the market to maintain fundamental systems of the Metal-earth, that do not require further evolution, such as electricity, airplane companies, wired telephony, etc.
This has been done in non-efficient nations of totalitarian character, proving great inefficiency of reproduction in monopolies such as communications. So, against the present tendency of competition in telecom and computer systems, nations should return back to the age of hefty monopolies and inefficiency of service. Cartels could maintain profits for stock holders and control both the models in the market – which now will be “simplified makes”, and the arrival of new companies, eliminated by all the dirty tricks of legal Cartels. After bailing out the excess of companies such cartels could freeze digital evolution.
– New shares in tech companies will not be able to trade in stock-markets.
– The Law of Anonymous societies which gives special privileges to stockrats and prevents the needed responsibility of companies for his acts, will be abolished.
Shareholders in proportion to his stock-power will be responsible economically for the illegal acts of their companies. Management will hold also civil responsibility.
Devolution of Products, end of Patent Rights
In an Ethonomical World, innovation is taboo. Companies in fact devolve products, and so research is no longer needed. Patents are forbidden. Universities dedicated to the study of lethal products (robotics, computer sciences) are eliminated in all worldwide curriculums. An original measure could focus companies and consumers in the goals of recreating a human paradise, and should be implemented worldwide:
Control of temporal evolution by “moving backwards clock-time”. With this symbolic measure humans will understand that the aim of the World Union is to reverse the evolution of metal machines. Metal-clock years should move backwards as man devolves backwards metal species. Companies will be obliged by law to produce all models according to the new calendar. Each year companies will produce previous generations of machines, regressing to the barrier of 1972-products, when e-money and chips were born. Again, a strong government can achieve that. Cuba was at the “1959” level of Metal-Evolution for 30 years, with high standards of health-care and education… Of course that was a dictatorship, yet without attempting basic rights, only the rights of machines, the World Union could create “capital punishment” for lethal machines, and destroy factories of such machines, compensating their owners with World money…
In such backwards-world, since the methods of reproduction and management are already established in the past, work becomes relaxed, and the life of workers much easier… Further on in a still economy without technological progress, poor nations that today are lagging behind, with real unemployment close to 50%, could now catch up much faster, and join progressively the World Union, with growing numbers of workers. This will avoid present immigration problems.
We are creating here a Demand Economy, by creating Human Goods and metal industries which are positive for Human evolution, and need a lot of Human Labor.
Local stocks and Yes money: The last Radiation of Money
It has to be noticed that in the past, Human r=evolutions of History were paid with a radiation of new currency. The French had their continentals, Lincoln his green backs…
As in all previous cre[dit]ations of human r=evolutions (credit implies today the creation of reality hence the name/verb cre[dit]ation, credit=creation, that we use for the acts of creation performed by money), it is clear that to achieve the extinction of company-mothers of lethal products their owners will have to be compensated. And so, the only way to construct a human Union and give orders to the human population is with a new radiation of money – the last radiation – able to equalize the monetary value of stock-shares, and buy them out according to the values of the Human Constitution and its Ethonomical frame of reference. When a company or product is eliminated of the Carbo-Earth ecosystem, automatically the Ministry issues “Yes money” a worldwide currency product of the Unification of the Yen and Yuan, the Euro and the $-dollar, to buy out at market price all shares on such companies. The owners of companies destroyed and paid in monetary value will substitute them with massive investments in human industries.
It is necessary to radiate worldwide money to back the Human Constitution. A single worldwide currency, Yes money (Yen+Yuan expanded to Asia, Euro+Pound+Ruble, $ expanded to South America), could avoid the risks of hyper-inflation and capital evasion, that plagues today’s welfare-based nations.
Yet to achieve an efficient worldwide radiation of good money, a single currency and so a single World government, a new organic level of human social evolution is required… Further on, inflation in yes money will multiply demand of human goods. Why? because Stock shares are metal money, M[g], while currency is Human money, H[g].
Indeed, currency is spent in higher quantity in human goods, that shares money. Currency is used by the poor which use more Human Goods. Currency creates an economy based on demand, not in offer, favoring also human goods, the most demanded goods of the economy. A demand economy will improve the Human Earth not the Metal Earth that tech stocks promote. The yes currency, present dollar, Euro and Yen+Yuan, is the single currency of the World Union, without limit of reproduction by the World Trade Ministry. Stock credit is limited by nominal shares which have by law in lethal metal-companies a fixed value, and hence cannot obtain speculative credit on the Market. Who issues credit then in a World ethonomy? Money is cre[dit]ated only in local stocks of Human Companies; or in currency by the 3 World ministries in their tasks of government.
Yes Money implies a single world currency, a banking-based cre[dit]ation system, the end of global metal stock-markets and e-money, a World Union, and a complete change of the Laws that today protect stock-companies’ absolute rights to credit. Its design is a technical formality if the wish and information about the survival of History spreads among our elite. It is the will of Survival of Mankind what can change this theoretical exercise into reality.
Substitution of taxation by cre[dit]ation of yes money
An interesting consequence of the new mode of cre[dit]ation developed by the World Union is the lack of personal income taxes, since the World union is an inflationary demand based economy, where money is invented by governments, not demanded to citizens who use it to cre[dit]ate human goods. The lack of taxation against citizens is a basic right of the World Union, and the true meaning of economical Freedom.
As in the present economy in which companies invent money a priori in stocks, to offer their products, even if they have no real demand before propaganda sells them out; in the World Union, money is created by governments to increase demand on human goods. The government creates money to produce its welfare goods. It does not ask the people for money through taxes.
Distribution of rent to poor countries
Yes Money is mainly spent in human goods cheaper in third world nations. The present artificial distribution of economical value in favor of metal nations is against third world nations. In the World Union, investment, workers and tourists will flock into tropical paradises, where human goods production could have higher demand, making investors richer.
Money invested in third World Nations, given their relative low prices, could buy many more products. Tourism will bring wealth to the third World and merge cultures much faster.
You might believe this is a fairy tale. It is not. Such system was widely used in the incipient European Union, where southern nations, Italy and Spain, with massive touristic influx, upgraded their life and cultural standards, due to tourism. It worked, closing the gap between Northern and Southern Europeans.
Further on, since human consumption of human goods has a limit, human goods will tend to flow towards third world countries, in the opposite direction of present flows of capital, from third world countries to metal-stocks. Such change will re-address a 400 years tendency by which entire continents like Africa are under priced. However this should not imply a lower standard of life in rich countries, since all the money created will be in substitution of devolutionary metal production. Let’s not forget that America will receive most of the new Yes money, since most of the digital companies are in that region, and given the inflationary prices of those stocks, compensated owners will receive “a lot” of money.
When they invest that money as tourists and citizens of America, or Great Britain, in third World Nations or human goods industries, for the first time in History they will not have to face the hating eyes of those which once were exploited by their stockratic systems. That love of mankind for his elites, is an added value, that not even Yes money can put a price.
Ultimately modern economies are based on the promotion of metal products, the products of rich countries, against Human Goods, the products of poor countries and the poor within (farmers, artisans etc.). Stocks only cre[dit]ate mechanical metal goods, creating a constant inflation in the price of human goods. This is a historical injustice -main cause of Carbolife extinction- that has to be reversed. It could be reversed, if credit for Human Goods Stocks and Yes currency are implemented.
Only a correct reading of Economic indicators, according to a model that differentiates human and metal goods, can provide humanity with arguments in favor of its social policies. Otherwise, as long as our societies accepts right-wing=metal economics, in open contradiction with the production of human goods, humanity will be serving the goals of machines. For example, in the past few months, we have observed a growth in inflation caused by the food and fuel sectors. Since agricultural credit is dwindling and credit to public transport also is going down, to favor credit in technology on the stock-market, the result is that “human energy-goods”, are under-produced, they become scarce, and their prices go up; while machine-energy (electricity) and machine-goods (robotics,“metal-heads”, and weapons) are over produced, and their prices go down. Yet our people desire food and cheap human energy, not robots and weapons… A real democratic system will credit those human goods, to increase their production and lower their prices. However, the dictatorship of democracies, the exclusive rights of credit, that stock-markets and companies have, promote robotics and weapons and digital software of higher profits. So there are more of those goods which destroy human jobs and human lives. Of course Economical rhetoric coming from the right, lies about the real cause of inflation in human goods, to hide the profits of stock-market speculation that creates millionaires and billionaires, by stealing all credit from governments, small businesses and producers of human goods.
One lie adds to another, and in the end all lies form an apparent true “science” together; based on false postulates, that we today call Economics. The result is that even our left-wing politicians today accept, either because they are corrupted or because they know very little about real economics, the explanations about inflation and productivity of right-wing=metal economists paid by companies of technological products…
The truth is that Inflation has been endemic in developed economies since electronic money was invented in the 70s to credit computer technology and its derivatives: telecommunications, robotics, and weapons. The truth is that productivity is an euphemism that hides the constant loss of human jobs, substituted by computers and robots, which is a result of the Third industrial Evolution.
Systematically economists have lied about these themes, accusing the products of poor countries (raw materials, agriculture and oil), as the cause of inflation. Even when oil prices tumbled in the 90s, and inflation escalated, they never explained to the public that inflation was caused by the free invention of money in stock-markets that multiplied by ten the monetary mass hold in company-shares. That is to say, companies freely received 10 times the quantity of money there was in America (Dow Jones moved from 1000 to 11.000). Such enormous credit, eliminated all credit to governments chosen by the people (laws of deficit zero), that could have created a paradise of Human Goods, that men desire: peace,Freedom, housing, food, education, tourism, environment, and why not, luxury, artistic goods… Instead we have robotics, 100 TV channels andcomputers, which eliminate jobs and through weapon systems, menace the life and well-being of mankind. Yet, the left-wing, obsessed by communist myths, has hardly noticed the irreparable spoil of the last decades.
The fight between social classes is not the engine of History when the elite and his companies reproduce human goods that people desire. It is only important when the elite, guided by greed, produces goods that destroy societies and individuals. Those goods are “military goods”, “fascist goods”, that erase our minds and bodies from existence. They are the goods systematically reproduced in these days, and promoted by parties which despite their marketing and “smiley” faces, are becoming as radical as fascist parties were in the 30s. We have to move back to Hitler, to find politicians that allow as the American parties allow, the existence of ±250 million weapons in the hand of citizens, military budgets, which are five times bigger than those of the next nation. Furthermore a legal, racist system, that penalizes the poor and the non-white races, and moves towards the exploitation of prisoners as workers-slaves, as well as a system of information that promotes systematically militarism, cult to weapons, violence, and sexual perversions through films, video-games, and the internet, within the reach of any youngster.
Fascism is not defined by uniforms and military parades, but by the policies of its parties. Do we want the neo-fascist model of present market ideologies, so cherished by our economists and right-wing=metal parties, because of its economical efficiency, to expand worldwide and provoke the systemic evolution of robotics, computers and weapons, till we humans no longer control the Mother Earth? Do we want the economical efficiency of Germany in the 30s? Have we forgotten what happened in the 40s? Do we want a virtual state of civil war similar to what is happening to America, of a World War such as the one Germany imposed upon the world, only to promote the wealth of a few “stockratic”speculators? All those who still feel human, left or right, animetals or social beings, selfish or solidarious, should speak loud and clear, about therights of survival of mankind, of verbal ethics, of our carbolife ecosystems, against scientific, religious and economic ideologies of false knowledge, false Gods and false wealth. They should learn a true science of economics, to avoid metal economics that keep cheating our citizens, who vote the destruction of our societies, blinded by technological propaganda. Today socialists vote parties that destroy credit to human goods, and the welfare state.
Today farmers vote Metal-parties that destroy credit to agricultural goods. Christians and Jewish vote Metal parties, that systematically promote weapons and greed, against the message of Christ, and Moses (he who kills by the sword dies by the sword; you cannot serve God and money at the same time, as the Word of God; those who adore the Golden calf will be punished in the years to come). All of them do so, cheated by Metal economics, and scientific ideologies that despise human senses and biological languages. Those ideologies undervalue systematically human goods, and over value metal goods, because they give higher profits to companies, and they give a false sense of superiority and intelligence to those who use such machines.
As long as Mankind does not learn ethonomics, and return to their roots, promoting the “genesian paradise”, of human goods, as long as they do not face the rhetoric about metal-wealth, that abstract economics provide, the world will walk towards the extinction of our species, prisoner of ideological and economical policies against them.