The political network is the informative, nervous system of a social, human organism. Ideally in the perfect world the political network would be global formed by the fusion of the 7 cultures of mankind into a single global super organism, and politicians will obey ‘democratic laws’, being judged a posteriori after tenure, with pain messages as all efficient super organisms do. Then, they will have to obey its promises and since democracy would be real, they would have as all evolved mammal organisms, nervous control over the financial-blood system, reforming it, to provide to every human being, a universal salary, to create a demand economy:
In the graph, explained in great detail in other posts of this text, the 6 measures needed to create a political, informative, nervous network for the planet, in which humans are the subconscious collective mind, and the verbal language, and its values, expressed in just laws, resumed in the human constitution, the informative network or head that should guide mankind to achieve maximal ‘biological freedom’ and survival as a species.
As this perfect world does not exist, what we find, is the duality of the paradox of history: Metal-earth vs. Human Earth, expressed in the duality of parties: right-wing, metal-earth parties, who cater the needs of selfish memes of metal, even though this is not told as the human view is they cater to the owners of those memes and its ‘animetal idologies’, (military dictatorships, capitalist, corporate and financial elites) vs. human parties, who try to create a perfect world to the image and likeness of mankind, of which today the only non-corrupted, non-placebo parties are the ecological parties, which never go beyond a 10%, hardly 1% in the leading animetal nation of the mechanocene (US). Hence the little chances for a resurrection of history as the nervous, informative brain is ‘dead’, corrupted, in complete chaos= freedom, without any real organisation of its citizens-cells and any expected r=evolution of the system.
Right=mechanist vs. left=humanist Politics, expression of the paradox of History.
There are 2 types of parties, those who try to create a world to the image and likeness of life and man, or ‘Humanist parties’, today basically extinct, except perhaps the green parties in European nations and to a lesser extension the Chinese Government; and those who try to create a world to the image and likeness of go(l)d, machines, weapons, its values and its company-mothers, today almost all the parties of the world. Since the economic ecosystem has become supreme. Yet when there was still a struggle between both worlds, the meaning of parties was clear: “Right=Metal-parties defend the Metal-Earth and its machines, opposing Left=Human parties, which defend the Life-Earth and its human goods”
Why democracies back economic ecosystems?
There has been always a historic opposition between left and right parties, but what that opposition really means? In fact that opposition is yet another case of the paradox of history that confronts two ecosystems, the economic ecosystem in which metal-species have higher rights, and reproduce in great numbers; and the historic, human ecosystem, based in carbolife species, in which man is the measure of all things, and their natural goods, human goods, are reproduced in greater numbers.
So what you call left parties, are basically parties that cater for the rights of mankind, understood as the great mass of the Organism of History: they try to increase the quantity of human goods of a society, and improve the welfare of mankind.
While right-wing parties, are basically parties that cater to the species of metal, money, company-mothers of machines, and weapons; and the few humans symbiotic to them, the Animetal castes. So right-wing parties try to increase the quantity of weapons a society has, and the quantity of machines. They worship technology, invest in machines, and reduce the money, societies dedicate to human goods.
It then should be obvious that the majority of humans should vote only for human parties, for left wing parties, and elect democratic governments that cater for their needs; human goods, and peace. And yet we live in an age in which metal-parties dominate politics. The main nations of mankind are ruled by metal-parties, or parties which pretend to be human parties, as the Democratic party of America, or the Labor Party in Britain, or the Social-democratic party in Germany, or the classic Communist parties of East Europe, but cater also for machines, technology, and invest their money in the evolution of metal, and weapons; not in human goods and the evolution of mankind. They accept the myths of the “free markets”, and promote free ecosystems ruled by company-mothers where men have lesser rights than machines, the property of company mothers; and are brain-washed to become workers=reproducers and consumers =testers of machines.
We might say that today all political parties except perhaps the ecological parties that obtain merely a 5% of votes at best, in elections cater for the needs of the Metal-earth, reproduce and evolve the Metal-earth, and hence by the Paradox of History push the extinction of mankind. Why is that? Why there is such contradiction? Are we a suicidal species? Yes and no. What really happens is that “democracies” are not political systems in which human beings can freely express their desires, not the process of voting, represents really the will of the human kind. Democracies are in fact “stockracies”, societies ruled by money, specifically by stock-money and the organizations that control that money, company-mothers. Yet to hide that control “stockracies” have developed a political mask called “democratic governments” that pretend to represent the will of the people, but dilute, and eliminate that will of the people, expressed in elections, withmultiple mechanisms of control, that eliminate that will and substitute it by the will of company-mothers.
Those mechanisms of control act systematically against the programs of left-wing=humanistic parties, which cannot develop their policies. The main of those mechanisms is the control of money which is given by “constitutions”, laws that cannot be changed, to stock-markets and companies. So left-wing parties have their hands tied up, since they cannot invent money unlikecompany-mothers and so they cannot pay for their welfare policies. Their policies become then false promises, attacked systematically by the free market. The rules of the democratic=stockratic game, therefore forbid truly the creation of a human ecosystem, in which the governments elected by the people, create a paradise of human goods with credit to such products. “Democracies” are tricked, and do not really act as free human societies, but only as free economic markets.
In this page we will study how the myths of democracies have transformed the game of political parties, in a tricked game, in which the will of the people is manipulated at pleasure, and our ideas are deformed in such manner, that we vote against our welfare, and the future of mankind. Who are the people, the caste of power, that controls democracies, and invents the myths that people believe, in order to act according to the desires of those castes of power, and vote against the welfare of mankind?
If you are a cultured man, with an independent point of view, who has read extensively, and knows history; who has cultivated his capacity to differentiate truth from lie and myth, you don’t need an answer to this question. You know already that corporations, lobbies and mass-media companies control democracies. You know they have done so since its beginnings . You know they manufacture ideas and laws in favor of machines and technology, in favor of “free ecosystems of machines” (free markets) in favor of company-mothers, (such as the laws that give company-mothers free credit in stock-markets, and forbid governments from having free deficits to produce human goods).
You know all those laws, tricks, and misinformation, prevent people from taking the right decisions about how to govern their nations. Those ideas are then expressed by metal-communicators, which people easily believe… You know that among those ideas the most important ones are “the myths of democracies” that convince people they really govern themselves, to allow company-mothers to control without opposition, in the hidden, the economical and political system…
Yet if you are a naive citizen, who never cared to question much, what he was told, if you are by nature a “believer”, easy to convince by those myths, you will think citizens control democracies, due to those many myths. Among them the most important is the active myth of voting: people are told they are powerful because they put papers, called votes in a box with the name of a person they do not know. This fairly meaningless act seems to protect the life, rights and freedoms of mankind…
Let us then tell you, really what is going on in the political world, to understand why those parties who truly try to defend mankind, such as the ecological parties today, never get enough votes to take power…
We need to do so a little bit of historic perspective on the birth of democracies, founded by company-mothers, and how those company-mothers invented voting as an alibi that could disguise their control of government, under the umbrella of a false power of the people.
The trick of democracies: the myth of verbal power.
People do not govern in democracies. Democracies are governed by a small caste of people called politicians, which are controlled by a bigger group of people called lobbyists, themselves controlled by a bigger group of people who own companies, who own governments.
The few hundred politicians that govern America, have around 60.000 lobbyists dedicated to corrupt them legally and make them vote for laws in favor of corporations. In turn around one hundred thousand people that we call stocrats, the new ari-stocracy, who are the elite that own around 90% of stock-companies or work as managers for the main corporations of America, control those lobbyists. They are the owners of the American government, and their companies are dedicated to reproduce metal-goods and machines (bulk of the 500 fortune).
How that happened? How democracies became corrupted? Unfortunately, they have not become corrupted, they have always been like corrupted, owned by stocrats. In fact those people, the stocrats founded the first modern democracies in Holland and Great Britain, the model which all other democracies have repeated all over the world.
Hence we have to call modern democracies, stockracies. The very same word democracy is another myth, to disguise the real name of those political systems, and convince the demos, the people, they govern. Stockrats are the bottom level of power-decision in democracies. Stockrats meet, and decide what is good for corporations. Corporations then pay lobbyists, or acting directly motivate politicians to create laws that favor them. It always was like that in those countries where democracies were invented (Great Britain, America), and hence where the system is more pure.
Even the good politicians were like that. So Mr. Washington was the richest men of America, a lobbyist for the slave plantations, which opposed the introduction of blacks as humans, in the constitution, and kept them as slaves, since plantation companies, and gunboat companies that exported cotton wanted them as slaves. While Mr. Lincoln who apparently freed those slaves, actually was the lobbyist for the Illinois railroad company, paid by those companies who wanted to end slavery, and control the cotton of the south and export it to the North. The reason of that war was a tariff question that favored the south. The North companies wanted high tariffs to get the cotton for themselves. They paid Lincoln who found a democratic myth (Freedom) and used it to make war.
Then he mad the “free railroad act” to favor railroad corporations, which were the only people that became truly free with total rights after that war, starting the age of robber baron.
So was Mr. Hitler an elected politician to the pay role of iron companies who started rearmament to allow Daimler, Krupp and Thyssen to multiply his tanks. Or Mr. Clinton, who represents metal-head companies and implements Laws that oblige to put chips in TVs, computers in colleges, and promotes robotics and smart weapons, because Chip companies pay his campaigns and motivate him to legislate in this favor. In this manner Laws are created in democracies always for company-mothers. Among those laws the control of money by company-mothers (laws ofstock-markets), the special rights of stocrats who have no legal responsibility (laws of anonymous societies), and the use of tax-payer money to pay for weapons, are the most important laws that democracies systematically create, to favor the economic system, against human goods.
Before democracies existed, instead of money, weapons imposed their criteria to politicians. Then those castes of warriors who invented laws were called aristocrats. Now those castes of traders who invent laws are called “stockrats”, since they are similar to old aristocrats, only that now they own instead of weapons as aristocrats did, money, stocks, companies.
The trick of control of the mass of human beings, the citizens, in both, aristocratic and stockratic systems is the same: a digital language of power, alien to man, based in a metal-communicator of life and death, either money or weapons, substitute the natural language of man, verbal thought, as the vehicle of power-orders. So verbal Freedom becomes irrelevant, since now money is the language of social power.
Then citizens are not given rights to reproduce or invent money, nor governments have right to invent it (laws of zero deficit) but in fact the little money government selected by the people have, is stolen to citizens by law through the mechanism of taxes (myths of the free market). Meanwhile, companies acquire all the rights to reproduce money for free in the form of notes (banks) and stock-shares.
To avoid rebellion of citizens against such injustice, economical truths are changed by economical myths, the way stock markets invent money is hidden, and the loss of verbal power of societies is also hidden. Instead a great theater game called voting, and a great rhetoric about governments is created. So people think governments govern, and vote is important, and then they are given rights to vote. Yet citizens ignore that their vote is meaningless, that it not longer create reality.
The myth of verbal power, which is no longer relevant, since people can lie, politicians can lie, companies can lie [propaganda, advertising] without being hold responsible, holds then the belief of people.
People do not realize they are no longer ordered by words, and laws, but my monetary orders of consume (price) and wages (labor). So those who control money, the stockrats, can give orders of power, as those who controlled weapons, the aristocrats, gave orders of power in the past. Democracies do not exist, because previously, the power of words have been emptied. Those who hold sacred the power of words, religious prophets, intellectuals and writers, honest politicians, are laughed at, scorned, corrupted and ignored by the system. It is either the menace of violence (dictatorships), or the prize of money (democracies) what motivates society, politicians and people [workers and consumers] to act, what controls our lives, no the verbal will of the people, or the ethics of verbal languages.
Only a political system in which the will of the people would control, money the language of power of modern societies, could be called rightly a democracy. Such system unfortunately does not exist today in any nation of the world. So real democracies do not exist.
The Dutch/Anglo-Saxon Democracy model of modern democracies
History proves that thesis right: companies invented democracies and designed a system in which their will could create laws, and the will of people could be systematically cheated. The first modern democracy was invented by the stockrats, owners of the first company, VOC, a Dutch East Indian company.
To the point that in those primitive first versions of democracies, there was no disguise: The positions of shareholders, mayors and members of the first parliaments in Amsterdam and London were held by the same individuals, the stocrats, who allied themselves with the warrior elites of the ancien regime (aristocrats). Only shareholders, the military, and landholders (old aristocrats) could vote. That stockratic system was then replicated in America, when it became independent.
The concept in all those democratic (stockratic) nations is always the same: a lobby of politicians represents the power of a certain top predator machine whose company-mother supports laws favoring its rights to reproduce and cre[dit]ate its product. When a new top predator product with maximum sales and profits appears, the company-mother’s lobbies bid more and new legislation is made in favor of the new product. Because they are very expensive, weapons pay for many laws, and wars. This system is easily understood in America. Laws favor expensive products, mainly weapons, that have strong financial and political backing. Sometimes the fight between weapons lobbies will cause a civil war to be won by the stronger, for example between English and American gunboat traders as a result of the War of Independence, and between northern railroad barons and southern cotton/gunboats due to the American civil war.
In this manner the evolution of weapons and machines is subsidized by the government. The power of companies and their shares/money that pay for laws explains the permanent victory of eco[nomic]systems over history in America. The Constitution states “all men are created equal”, but slavery was legal in America because it benefited American gunboat companies. The opposite paradox exists today when children can buy weapons. The railroad age took all the credit from farmers and gave it to railroads. Lincon’s Free Railroad Act gave huge tracts of land to railroad barons. He was in fact a political pawn of the Illinois rail road company. Next the car age brought laws which supported the automobile industry that made the tanks that won World War II. Ford allowed himself to amend the Constitution (alcohol prohibition paid by Ford’s lobbyists). Many other laws were bought and paid for by the Morgan-Rockefeller tandem.
In present days America legislators are subsidized by computer lobbies to put free chips everywhere, creating the “chip-tv” law, the “internet for schools” law, and the air wars of modern days. It is logical to assume that the Third Industrial Revolution of metalife will also be protected in law, despite its ability to bring about the extinction of our species . Unless American political reform occurs, the American evolution of autonomous machines, backed by the laws of the stockrat elites, may bring an end to humankind.
In “democratic” nations, constitutions are designed to create abstract rights for humanity while a wealth of detailed laws protect the property of companies, rather than human property and human rights. On the other hand there are no limits to laws that favor companies (Laws of Anonymous societies). Human rights of a social nature, health care, education and agriculture are minimal in order to enhance money dedicated to technology.
The result is chronic scarcity of human goods, high prices for those goods, and overproduction of metal-goods, which cause periodical wars. Hence against the will of the people, the democratic age, is the age of constant warfare.
Against that situation left-wing political parties, that represent the will of most people, have historically rebelled. Some of them understood the tricks of democracies, and tried to change the entire system (communist parties). Yet once in power, stocratic nations declared them war, and so to survive, they had to raise big armies (red army, Napoleonic army), which in turn, took power over the left-wing party, and transformed the party into another metal-party in favor of weapons. The r=evolution of social history in search of human goods, was thus destroyed by the need of those nations to create armies. Napoleon destroyed the French revolution, Stalin destroyed the Russian revolution, and Hitler the Weimar revolution. Yet they were elected because stocratic nations declared war to France, to Russia, and choke financially Weimar Germany. To those stocratic nations war is profitable, and they rather have a military dictatorship that a real democracy dedicated to the creation of human goods, that could be a real example of how to crate a human paradise.
A few countries influenced by those previous humanist revolutions (France, Spain, or Italy influenced by love religions) tried in the XIX century, to transform from within the system, promoting welfare products with government credit. They tried to balance metal and human rights with government deficits, but “World-stock” the collective brain of company mothers, attacked them, not with weapons, but with monetary speculation against their currencies, as today attacks the Euro, and promotes the dollar that defends stock-market investment in machines. So finally even Europe has imposed total rights to stock market to credit machines and null to governments to credit human goods through the Maastritch Treaty. So all nations walk tied together towards a world in which the power of the people is nil, as in people cannot control or vote for the languages of power: laws, cre[dit]ation of money and production of weapons which are all in the hands of stocks/companies. In a true democracy, people could vote for the elimination of weapons, the accreditation of human goods and laws that did not suppress human rights. These are precisely the laws that stock-democracies never vote in because weapons/machines produce higher profits than human goods.
People vote for politicians who obey constitutions that limit government credit in favor of company credit. These constitutions are good at creating limits that make the whole democratic process a rhetorical exercise of nil verbal power. Politicians have no credit and minimal monetary power and are held morally responsible for the slightest error of human (sexual) desire (witness Clinton-Lewinsky). But lobby-based corruption is ignored. So companies have all the advantages and (honest) governments all the disadvantages. Any honest politician that fights companies can be destroyed through legal tricks, lack of credit and mass-media campaigns. Meanwhile, companies cannot be defeated, restricted in credit or have individual employees taken to court.
In those conditions the will of the people expressed by voting, is merely a placebo will unable to change the real mechanisms of economical and monetary power that rule our societies. Let us consider that myth in more detail.
The Myth of Voting. The True Purpose Of Voting
The myth of political freedom says that because a man can go on a certain day to put a piece of paper marked with the name of an individual (politician) in an box, he is a free man.
It is difficult to pinpoint the nature of this freedom, that influences our life every day, based as it is on this brief event which has what importance for each of us.
If all politicians basically work for companies, then what is the real value of voting? It is merely a check on the opinion of people, allowing a better control of their ideas. In fact, the concept of voting evolved parallel to the evolution of companies. There are three ages in the evolution of the “democratic” vote and they coincide with the three ages of evolution of the Metal-Earth: the age of company-mothers, the age of bodies of metal and the age of minds of metal.
In the first age, voting is restricted to the people controlling company-mothers. In the second age, wars multiply and the vote extends to male soldiers to encourage identification with nationalism and war. Finally, in the age of metal-communicators after the first world war, when control of human opinions is absolute, the vote is extended to most adult individuals.
First Horizon: The Age of the Company. Restricted vote: 17th, 18th and 19th century
The first company: the slave-pepper-gunboat company of East Indies invented stockracies in Holland by controlling and reforming the medieval parliament of Amsterdam. The directors of the company, of the government and of the town council belonged to the same families. The system was exported to England by the Calvinist love of go[l]d and Cromwell and became stable in 1688, when the “stock-King” William of Orange moved to London with Dutch capital and founded the Bank of England. Soon suffrage existed as a privilege for stockrats, investors in stocks,and aristocrat land owners. Around 1% of people could vote. The number of voters increased as companies increased their control over more people, although the majority of them still could not vote. Women, who were more likely vote for religious, nonviolent ideals were still excluded. With such restrictions of popular will, the transition from hierarchical systems of warrior power to extended oligarchies of stockrats and companies was complete. In this sense, it is obvious that “democracy” was just a byproduct of companies, existing only where they existed: Holland, England and America.
Second Age: The Age of Body Machines. The Increase of The Popular Vote
During the period from the Napoleonic wars to the first world war, the control of information by physical metal-communicator the press] created a rhetoric in favor of the system, that convinced most people of the goodness of machines and democracy. Once that mental control was developed, access to the vote was extended. The old restricted system of voting still worked in England (maximum stockrat power) but during the French and American Revolutions, people demanded the right to vote, to have control over their own laws. However, in both countries, companies aborted the demand for freedom (land speculators, cotton, weapon and gunboat companies in America that declared Indians non-citizens, and blacks, property, Napoleon that ended the French revolution). With the restoration of the old stockrat system, the control of voting by a minority of wealthy people returned. As companies expanded their middle classes (managers), and the metal-press control of popular opinion expanded, the elite felt confident and extended suffrage to more people:
• Science and warrior ideologies have displaced love religions that promoted social evolutioncompletely. Most humans are perfect animetals who want only to consume and work. They are against all real social r=evolution.
• People have accepted the mask of voting as an expression of freedom. It is easier to let them vote and choose politicians who avoid any direct attack on the credit power of stock-markets.
• Wars became endemic after the French Revolution. Soldiers are no longer paid as mercenaries were. But many states, breaking all the fundamental rights of the individual, oblige men to serve in the military. Often they die for the stockrat system in economic wars. To engage people in war is the norm. Voting becomes an easy alibi that justifies this type of human sacrifice through war. The citizen is satisfied, thinking that the ritual of voting is meaningful. Theatrical freedoms increase with parades, political rallies, etc.
Yet the status of most workers still prevents them from voting; a lack of freedom, of property, or simply being female. At the same time, a “false” opposition is created between the right wing, pushing war products, and centre/left parties, advocating peace products. This divides the government support and subsidies of top predator products between war and peace species.
Third Phase: Metal-communicators Age. 20th century: The Universal Vote is Achieved
Radio, television and metal-press propaganda has reached such a level of sophistication that stockracies can easily control the voter’s opinion from an early age. The only relevant information is provided by computers and cameras. This information is controlled by companies that promote violence and love of money. Mankind has forgotten all it knew about ethics and freedom.
In Europe some real democracy was achieved by social parties that creditated money for human goods during the 1950s-70s. But the global stock market (“world-stock”) ends with those rights.
New metal-communicators (radio and television) allow further control of voting intentions. In 1972 the mass-media gave a coup d’ état against American institutions; Watergate, manipulated by TV power. The stockrat elite realizes that now its control of voters and rebel politicians is absolute. Politicians need metal-communicators to reach their audience, and e-money to pay digital campaigns. So stockrats, by controlling metal communicators and e-money, can imprint ideas supporting stockracies in human voters at an earlier age. After cleaning up the economic science of pro-human theories (e.g. Nobel Prizes given by the bank of Sweden), stockrats eliminate government deficit/rights of cre[dit]ation of human goods (cf. Maastritch, GOP campaign). They systematically bring down the currencies of nations that try to follow social policies. The paradox of the modern vote is that while the masses have finally gained the right to vote, politicians have less freedom, and the majority votes more often for right wing, pro-war, pro-stock politicians, who foster the digital radiations that will extinguish labor and life.
A real democracy requires political and economic ideas in favor of man
Today, a single economic ideology based on machine-ideologies (right-wing=metal economics) rules the behavior of all economical and political parties, either left or wing, socialist or capitalist, communist or religious parties. We have studied how such aberration against the survival of man has happened during the historic past.
Could this trend be reversed? Could at least those parties who used to fight for mankind (religious parties, socialist parties, and the so called left-parties) return to their initial policies? Could they learn bio-economics and ignore the ideologies of machines and capital, that have converted the world in a big market where machines are evolved by consumers and reproduced by companies?
Could politicians and economists become doctors of history? This could be possible if two conditions take place:
The creation of a unified economical, pro-human program of behavior, in all those political parties, economical institutions and religious organizations concerned with the survival and welfare of mankind, able to create Human Goods.
A parallel unification of political, scientific, economic, and military organizations, at global level, to fight lethal machines, specially the robotic radiation.
We can resume that dual goal in a simple biological equation, that we shall call the Human Constitution, the constitution of a healthy body of history:
Maximize Human Goods[Economic ministry]=Min. Lethal goods[ministry of defense]
The constitution of a healthy body of History, developed by a healthy World Political Union,and implemented by healthy Economic and military systems of government.
Since only an economical policy based in human goods, could favor the survival of History. Such policy does not exist today. Either pro-machine parties govern our countries (right wing=metal parties, which are basically animetal parties, that support monetary power, technology=machines and weapons). Corrupted, divided left-wing parties (parties that used to support human policies based in human goods) rule governments and defend market policies against mankind (American democrats, British labor, European social-democracies, Chinese communist).
Today human parties are divided into different groups with differing social theories, like communism, ecologism or Socialism, all of them obsolete, and ignorant on the ecosystemic nature of economics. It is that lack of coherence and modernity, what divides and defeats Human parties, in general elections.
However, left-wing=Human parties could forge a valid alternative to assume power, if they were able to unify their economic ideas and social objectives, with the very same theoretical rigor, of “Right-wing”=metal parties. Up until now there is no serious economic alternative to right-wing=metal economics. It is surprising in the sense of the lack of evolution in Human economics, compared to the constant renewal of right-wing=metal economics, that know how to dress-up their objectives in new clothes which the common man fancies.
For the time being, left-wing parties still promote obsolete ideologies, such as Marxism, or have betrayed their voters, and pretend to be Human parties, while catering to right-wing=metal ideas. The rational human voter feels defeated in this landscape. He does not want the failed theories of Marxism, in favor of weapons and machines. He does not want to vote for parties that pretend to defend the citizen against economic abuse, and then become instruments of companies, in Mr. Clinton’s style. Neither does he want to make the defense of the Animal Kingdom the focus of politics as ecologism does.
As a consequence, the three great proposals of left-wing=Human parties, ecologism, Marxism, and socialism, fail in elections. They will continue to fail, given the obsolescence of their ideas, against the technological messianism of companies which control right-wing parties, and pretend to make the world into a great “company-mother” of machines, where humans will become consumers and reproducers of those machines.
Any serious political ideology in favor of the rights of man over machines, has to start with an economic model about money, machines and their networks of energy/information of certain scientific rigor. Since the economic ecosystem dominates the present world, the citizen wants to understand such economic world in which he lives, to be able to change it collectively and improve it for the wealth and health of mankind, through politics. How could Human parties explain in a scientifically rigorous way their social and economic proposals? Very simple: by speaking the truth about economics . In that sense, Human Parties, have a great advantage over the abstract economics of right-wing=metal parties, with their messianic concept of money and machines, as the only tools to make man progress and evolve.
Human Parties, thanks to new scientific approaches to economics [bio-economics], based on theTheory of Evolution, can validate their ideas about what products the economy should reproduce, and how nations should manage the economic world. In fact classic left-wing=Human parties do know and put into practice the right answer to such a question, even if they do not have the theoretical background that explains their correct behavior. Since their policies, special when they had rights to invent money (government deficits) systematically favored Human goods, which are goods that men require to survive, and better themselves: Agriculture, housing, health, education, free time, peace, freedom, textiles, a clean environment, books, art, public transport, etc. Goods that also promote employment since these goods require a lot of human work, because many of them cannot be reproduced by machines alone. Such is the case of art, housing, agriculture, health and education, that need human labor and create employment.
All this means that even within the limits established by constitutions in favor of company mothers, political parties promote still two models of democracy:
The model of right-wing parties, or “machine parties”, the dictatorship of democracies, where the rights of machines, and their “company-mothers” are superior to the rights of human beings and their natural goods.
A model of “humanist parties” or left-wing parties, many of them with a tradition of rebellion against the control of governments by company-mothers and corrupted democratic institutions,where the rights of human beings, their elected governments, and their goods are superior to the rights of machines. This is the only true democracy where citizens have through their governments, power to direct the economy and the politics of nations. Yet it can only be implemented as the previous experience of revolutions show, through a World Government based in healthy, human-biased economical polities, able to control the World stock-market, that at present rule the fate of democracies, human beings and machines, favoring the rights of those machines and their company-mother