Idol-ogy: Capitalism

The bottom line: company-mothers of machines and the values of money.

At the bottom of the cycles of evolution and reproduction of machines that completely dominate our zeitgeist in the modern world, since the beginning of the industrial r=evolution, there is a change of paradigm in what humans do, based in the change of social language of power from the natural human language of verbal ethic thought, whose syntax, Man (subject) < verb (action) < object (energy of man), always puts man at the center of the Universe, and has a democratic social nature as all humans can talk… to the digital language of money, which is NOT democratic as it is external to man, issued mostly by company-mothers of machines and valuing more metal than life.

Thus once we changed language of power from a humanist to a capitalist society, we stopped the goals of mankind – to create a just, democratic world made to the image and likeness of man – and started to build a world  to the image and likeness of machines, ruled NOT by human social organisations but by company-mothers there is a change of paradigm in the social language of power of mankind, from verbal ethic thought to digital money, whose values are opposed – as money, traditionally a soft informative metal atom has always valued more other forms of metal, notably weapons, than life with no value. While the values of words, a mental, human ‘flesh’ language give absolute value to human life.

Thus once this change of paradigm in our social language took place. And company-mothers of machines were given higher rights to print paper-money than states had (stock-paper, today e-money  issue without limit in stocks vs. deficit zero laws), company-mothers acquired rights to buy humans full time as slaves or part-time with salaries as worker. And so regardless of what ‘type of government’ a modern society has (mostly capitalist democracies or military dictatorships) the fact remains that humans will dedicate most of their lifetime to work for company-mothers of machines for money. The ‘remaining’ time then will be mostly spent in the basic biological ‘animal drives of life’ (feeding, reproducing sheltering, curing); NOT in the task of evolving a world to the image and likeness of man.

So as we are our ‘lifetime’, and our lifetime is bought by company-mothers of machines, which are NOT human organisms, do NOT reproduce or evolve human beings, but are ‘mixed organisms’  of humans and machines with a mechanical goal, to evolve, reproduce, sell for a profit and adapt≈terraform the planet to the image and likeness of those machines, providing for them enough energy and information to make their ‘life sustainable’, humans became enzymen men-enzymes that catalyse the creation with credit, the cred(dit)ation of a new ecosystem ruled by company mothers of machines, serving the biological goals of those machines.

And indeed, today there is no machine without energy, not computer without electricity, not car without a network of roads to cross, or a place to be repaired, while 1 billion humans suffer hunger, most are uneducated, still believing in primitive myths of abrahamic religions, and the majority of mankind lacks basic healthcare ‘repairs’ even in the dominant most wealthy nations of the world (US).

The economic roles of humans in a society in which money buys our lifetime.

So in a world in which humans are part-time slaves of company-mothers of machines it has become obvious, that humans are spending its life to foster the two biological goals of corporations: to work= re-produce machines and to vitalise them as consumers. And this is indeed all what ‘information machines’ tell us to do 24/7, work and consume. o even when we are ‘released’ from our part-time slavery we are subject to systemic indoctrination to use machines NOT to relate to humans and certainly NOT to organise socially in a meaningful manner to help and evolve mankind.

It is then obvious that we live in a society whose natural goal is to create a world of machines, evolved and overproduced in a very biological sense,  since machines not humans are massively adapting the world to its image and likeness, and this oblige us to consider the higher ‘perspective’ of the planet, and its biological evolution.

This is the essential fact of capitalism: a world ruled by digital money, issued by company-mothers of machines, with the goal of evolving and overproducing machines and its evil twins, weapons, which uses humans as reproducers=workers and consumers=vitalizers of those machines.

CREATIONIST ECONOMICS RULE THE WESTERN WORLD

We have just described the basic bottom line of capitalism as a ‘praxis of power of corporations’.

Then there is the ‘idol-ogy’ of capitalism, camouflaged as the ‘science of classic economics’ , which is basically the modern digital version of an old fetish gold religion (biblical beliefs that ‘gold is the invisible hand of god) since all the founding fathers of capitalism (Say, Bentham, Smith, Ricardo, Mill, Malthus), were biblical believers on the myth that certain people ‘chosen of go(l)d’ had to accumulate money, and issue it privately as $elected, in order to reach salvation.

And so as religions are about myths and beliefs, which cannot be denied, and about censorship and twisting reality to cater to those myths, capitalism merely translated in a series of equations the belief that the purpose of mankind was to increase the amount of money owned by the $elected through its ‘organisation of power’, the corporation.

And since people do NOT understand equations, obviously the goals became disguised. Let us then consider the meaning o the fundamental equations of capitalism, and its corporations, the equation of profits and productivity, which merely express the aforementioned values of money and its goals: to reproduce, evolve and terraform the earth to the image of machines, which in biological terms will displace humans from labor and war fields as Darwin clearly expressed. Since biology is all about species that reproduce and evolve faster and displace species who do not evolve and reproduce so fast from the ecosystem, in this case machines overproducing and displacing humans from the economic ecosystem in labor and war fields:


For that reason is obvious we need first to clarify what is the experimental method of science, as economics today is a religion  of metal-memes and its praxis of power and cultural traditions not A SCIENCE.

. Classic Economics, the only non-censored discipline that explains the economic ecosystem is not a science but the idol-ogy of power of a specific go(l)d cult(ure): the culture of corporations, whose biblical jewish-protestant origin is a fact of history, also censored.

This has profound consequences for the world we are constructing as human beings, given the extreme racial biasing of the bible – a historic supremacist book of a fetish-gold religion of the bronze age, which considers gold the invisible hand of god, its language that must be obeyed at all costs, according to the three canonical equations of creationist/capitalist economics.

In the graph, in the final phase of capitalism its three fundamental equations of profits, self-reproductivity and zero value to human life in ‘metal-price’, drive the world towards extinction of labor, an age of perpetual war for profits and massive manufacturing of brains with hate memes, as the oldest go(l)d culture of capitalism takes power in the western world, and by imitation globalises its go(l)d memes to all other cultures, forbidding any criticism as ‘creationist economics’ becomes ‘the only authorised science, Islamophobia is fuelled with hate memes to maintain the healthy profits of perpetual war and development of terminator industries, while infotainment keeps people busy in virtual realities. It is the final age of entropy and dissolution of mankind as the genesis of the metal-earth accelerates its ‘tempo’.

Economics must be a science submissive to history hence to politics.

Let us be clear from the beginning. When Mr. Marshall, the father of modern economics with its mathematical/corporation bias convinced at the beginning of the XX century to teach ‘economics as a different discipline’, Economics had been rightly taught for 150 years within the curriculum of History and Moral Thought – as secondary sciences, submissive to History and Ethics, as they should be – because the CENTRAL POINT OF VIEW OF MANKIND MUST BE MANKIND AND ECONOMICS SHOULD BE AS IN THIS BLOG ETHONOMICS, DEDICATED TO IMPROVE THE FUTURE OF HUMAN BEINGS NOT THE FUTURE OF MACHINES ONLY.

Thus I sign ‘futureofhistory’ and treat economics from a historical perspective and use moral and verbal causal arguments. It would been very easy for me to write here treatises of mathematical economics, taking into account that my ‘forte’ and most important work in the realm of hard science is the mathematical and logical formalism of General Systems Sciences (aka complexity), as I explain in my avatar. You make a career with that, you get Nobel Prizes and big positions in the financial industry if all what you care is to evolve and overproduce machines and money and consider that the only goal of economics.

Of course, with a lot of care. Mr. Marshall explains in his books that his interest in economics aroused when he walked on the slums of London and Liverpool. Oh, lol, those caring financial and industrial economists (-; This guy, father of micro-economics (the study of how to maximize the production of corporations), who opposed to any legislation in favor of a minimal salary in Britain separated economics from history and made it just a partial discipline to the service of financial and industrial corporations, because ‘he cared so much’ for the people of the slums.

From then on that was the ‘new normal’: convert humans into mathematical objects, subject to price, with no rights whenever they collide with the overproduction mantra of ‘progress through the machine’…  And so you got the ‘experts’ of the XX century, with a few exceptions like Kondratieff, Keynes and Galbraith all caring so much for… the rights of corporations and the 1%.

It is in that milieu, as economics became more ‘dehumanized’ when mathematics – which first was intended to be a helping hand to aid production – acquires an ‘ideological bias’ to cover corruption through complexity and a pretension of higher ‘science’. In the same manner corrupted law during the ‘ancient regime’ could not be ‘codified’; so the aristocrat’s lawyer always found his way in the maze of legality, today financial economics always can disguise its antidemocratic and antisocial use of credit with arcane jargons. So we cut through that Gordian knot of mathematical rhetoric, starting as Napoleon did with the law, with a new, far more scientific and objective ‘code’ – the organic, systemic, evolutionary analysis of what really matters – not the ‘realm of the spirit’ but the physical economy of machines that truly influences our life and interacts with humans and labor.

Today Economics has ended in the theoretical realm, being absorbed by ‘corporations’ and financiers, which have become our ‘self-styled experts’ for selfish gain and further on have become dictators of our policies – as machines and money overproduce increasingly substituting humans and the law as the ‘makers’ of reality. So we are moving from a historic and political world into an economic ecosystem where humans are secondary to machines, governments to corporations and the law to the power of money, whose issue those corporations have usurped from democracies and the people, WHO should be the factors that control the two language of information that rule our world – money and the law – AS ALL EFFICIENT SOCIAL ORGANISMS, which have all two languages of energy and information (blood/money system and nervous/legal one) do.

Along the pages of this blog we study from time to time the two sides of Economic thought – those who made economics submissive to history and the welfare of society, epitomized by the today totally ignored Swedish, social school of economics and those who were just pamphletists of financial and industrial power, epitomized by the Austrian school.

Consider for example the work of Myrdal, the most important representative of the Swedish school who convinced the Swedish government in the 30s to create a social paradise, based in a welfare state and the use of money not to create wars but goods people demanded.

And yet modern economists ignore him. Instead they prefer a 3rd rate, Jewish bigot, founder of the  Chicago school, guru of Miss Thatcher and Reagan, Hayek, to the service of private bankers. His ‘masterpieces’ ‘road to serfdom’ and ‘the denationalization of money’ are pamphlets full of ‘damned lies and statistics’. Indeed, in the latter he claims that he is ‘obsessed’ by the negative consequences that hyperinflation caused in Germany during the 20s and to remedy it, governments must not issue money, but we must regress to the earlier XIX century American banking system of private bankers issuing their own currencies – not a single private bank but as many as you want – to avoid the abuse of printing money by governments, as in the case of Germany. He considers that ‘private bankers’ would be responsible and control the printing of their own money to make it worth it, instead of doing what they have always historically done – to issue money for themselves with no limit creating the boom and bust crises of modern history.

Now, here the lie is enormous; since the Reichbank that caused hyperinflation during the Weimar republic was a private bank NOT a public one. So they printed money without limit till they broke Germany, causing the rise of fascism. And this Mr. Hayek must now. So he lies because his only goal is to ‘make himself amicable’ to the financial power, as Adam Smith did when affirming money was gold and put the Private Bank of England as the perfect model. Then the system of audiovisual information and the industry of scholar economics pump up as geniuses those economists that cater to the financial elite and ignore the others.

Indeed, Mr. Myrdal, father of modern Sweden was NOT given a Nobel prize by a Swedish bank, which has usurped the name of Nobel to give this prize that was not in its testament and its heirs reject – in a nation that gives Nobel prizes to any Scandinavian that says something coherent in any discipline – till the 70s, and when it did so, the bank gave him the Nobel shared with Mr. Hayek. Here the trick was obvious: the bank was using the prestige of Myrdal to pump up the pamphletist and on top saying Myrdal is the ‘past’, this cuckoo liar is the future.

Another examples used by pamphletists of private bankers are the currencies of the French and American revolutions (continentals) that lost value during the wars with England. Of course, they did, because England created a mass-industry of fake currency, doing financial terrorism and exporting ‘literally’ tons of continentals and French money to break the revolution.

Why then the obsession for public created inflation when it is always created by the massive invention of private money? Damned lies and statistics, cover up.

Further on a minimal quantity of inflation is NOT bad. The obsession against inflation of the right comes because bond holders, the supreme power of financial control of states loose money with inflation as their bonds have nominal prices. So since the XIX century age of legendary control of states by the Rothschild syndicate with manipulation of bonds, bankers do not want inflation. In true form, a language of information is inflationary, so we talk and think more than we act, as inflation in language kicks off the process of ‘action-creation’. Without inflation there is no economical action. Without thoughts there is no human actions. A bit of Inflation kicks consume as people spend now before prices go up but without the rush of hyperinflation, at a moderate path that increases consumption, demand and the production of the goods most people need – those of the welfare state that don’t kill us.

But this people ignore. They are not told at all why the ECB bank cares nothing for Europeans and its only obsession is to ‘prevent inflation’. What they don’t say but do is this: ‘dear European citizens, this is a private bank to the service of private bankers, to whom we lend money almost for free, while you don’t have any right to do it, and we shall have only a mandate, to avoid inflation so the big bond holders of Wall Street and Newport beach that lend you money because you no longer have that democratic right, make an even bigger cut. Never mind you are unemployed, you die without health-care, you are usurped of your sovereign rights, this is not our concern. We follow the glorious tradition of our forebears, which are not the fathers of the European Union but the millenarian usury traders that have controlled your money per in secula seculorum. Amen.

And so to the rescue comes the arcane science of complexity that hides aberrations with jargons and expert’s talk of what is a global theft going on for 30 years since private e-money was invented.

So we shall as the blog grows  denounce those who are stealing at distance with usury and stolen sovereign rights our future as individuals and societies. For example, the whole bond usury and inflation guard maximizes NOT our future but the ‘future profits’ of bond holders, like  Mr. Eurobond Gross, a Jewish-American who ‘wept’ last year because he thought the ‘demise of the dollar was near’ and short-sold the currency of his nation and the euro to make another billion, but failed. This astounding confession got him kudos from wall street. Since under the present ‘financial dictatorship of ideologies’ it seems a sound policy as that of Mr. Draghi on inflation that allows Mr. Gross to make a few hundred dollars more in its billionaire usury account for each patient dead before arriving to a surgeon.  This modern Rothschild from the same millenarian usury tradition enjoys the surfing waves of Newport beach California, being though in speed dial with Mr. Bernanke, just in case he needs to tip or being tipped of the next big opportunity (Mr. Paulson as Rolling stones explains was systematically tipping Goldman of each new ‘policy’ for the betterment of the American people), but only talks in his last interview on Time, of course with a lot of ‘caring’, on how he is trying to help society… killing thousands at distance from its Bloomberg platform, with its partner, ex-vice president of Goldman Sachs, Mr. Draghi, who affirms his only ‘mandate of independence’ is to curb inflation so Mr. Gross doesn’t loose a penny on its usury bonds.

Yes, as the ‘merchant of Venice’ put it in the voice of the last of the great Latin writers of the renaissance, when the Anglo-Saxon world still considered man sacred and could talk of those higher ideals, Mr. Shakespeare, ‘evil dress with the clothes of a gentleman’. They just ask our ‘pound of flesh’ for their ‘risky’ trades in which they always profit according to the simple mechanisms of creation of money in markets, similar to those of war battles. Indeed, Mr. Gross is the captain of the biggest army of ‘money’, as he plays with billions on bets against the euro. So people to win like in Poker, knows that the person with the bigger bet cannot be toppled, regardless of what he has – nothing. Thus when Gross bets against the euro, the entire world army of speculators sees it in Bloomberg and bets with him and NO CENTRAL BANK CAN MASS so much money to defend it. HE CREATES THE MARKET AND DECIDES ACCORDING TO HIS REPUBLICAN, RIGHT WING, racist, anti-human ‘religious, classic economic’ postulates, that all Europeans must sacrifice their welfare states and model of democracy and give all the money to banks and corporations OR ELSE… he and his army on the darkness, ‘those invisible men that could rule the world (Wells parable), will keep sinking the Euro as they have been doing for two years since they took that ‘choice’ in an infamous meeting at Le cirque’s posh restaurant in Manhattan.  All of them of course, are now ‘covered up’ by the army of theoreticians, dedicated to find arguments to justify this predatory behavior as ‘a science’ of experts.

You live in a world completely censored at the ‘high level’ of mass-media, political and economical, and national correctness/institutions – a disguise built around a ‘fantasy’ of happiness based in a ‘false pretension of science and truth’ and ‘human caring’ ‘natural to democracies and capitalism that deactivates the harshness of biological, Darwinian world we live in. One dominated by people-castes, nationalist bigots, corporations, the military-industrial complex and the memes of metal that give them power – the ‘truths’ that ’cause’ this planet through the control those organizations have of the languages of power, money, weapons, mass-media and the law that rule the herds of mankind – without hardly any ‘real ‘right or democratic power’.

And yet thanks to modern ‘newspeaks’ of ‘audiovisual’ brain-washing, ‘correct censorship’ an ideology manufactured as science, the ‘fantasy’ of truth passes as expert talk while the truths of social science are forbidden and the real models of social sciences cannot be studied.

Accordingly we can classify all economists in 2 main type of economists, humanist economists who try to create a praxis and eco(nomic)system that caters to the needs of mankind, and ‘ideologues’ of the animetal people-castes (financiers and industrialist/weapon makers) on top of mankind that try to justify their power.

Unfortunately in this category we must put classic economists and most of the economists that today hold position of power, and ascribe neo-classic theories of economics.

Most of those economists sorely fail 4 (-1) elements of the scientific method:

Unlike  power Ideologies, Experimental Sciences predict the future of its species, according to Past Cycles, controlling them, to improve human life’

A real science will be stringent in its application of those 4 elements and will shun, regardless of any political, economical correctness, selfish agenda or censorship the negative ideologies that try to bend data and invent models to cater the selfish agenda of an individual, group or tribe, and use knowledge to ab=use man or nature.

D) – They do NOT cater for mankind at large.

C) – They do NOT have a scientific model of the main element they study (memes of metal, money, weapons and machines)

B) – And they do NOT PREDICT their cycles.

All this elements fail together because Economics as an ideology of ‘metal power’ only allows concepts that are positive for company-mothers (corporations) and their offspring of machines, and the financial and industrial elites that own them.

So their goal is to multiply those memes of metal regardless of the collateral effects for mankind, which they ignore, and the darwinian nature of the competence between men and machines in labor and war fields, which they also ignore failing C)

 

In this section we shall study those (neo)classic economists and its  idologies, called ‘idol-ogies’ for obvious reasons.

 

 

Neo(classic), ‘Creationist’  ideologies of national, Biblical & Banking Power 

We live in a system in which a new top predator ‘organism’ the company-mother of machines rules the world for its offspring of machines – a different species. So all what is good for financial and industrial corporations must happen. Overproduction of metal memes must happen. And all rival human institutions, especially welfare democracies that try to feed and inform all human citizens-cells must become powerless, degraded as energy for the evolution & reproduction of machines.

This is the duality never recognized by corporative, classic economists between 2 species that compete for the Earth’s limited resources in labor and war fields both at individual and organic level – man vs. machine, memes of life vs. memes of metal, governments vs. corporations, ‘butter vs. canons’. On the contrary in the present economic and existential overproduction crisis we return to XIX c. harsh capitalism, since neo-classic economists chose to keep overproducing canons, machines & corporative money; hence butter, human beings & governments will have no resources and die.

Now true science collects A) real data (historic in this case) B) shows its cycles and ages C) gives a logic, rational explanation of that data and cycles – no religious, no mythic, no anthropomorphic D) proposes solutions positive for our species – mankind, 100%, which means that solutions that improve the life of the 1% and DO NOT IMPROVE that of the 99% are ideologies, NOT solutions, and certainly solutions that PROMOTE metal-memes AND NOT life memes, the ones that evolve us ARE IDEOLOGIES NOT ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS.
As the classic economists we treat in this section all propose SOLUTIONS THAT IMPROVE the 1% of owners of corporations and the metal-memes they reproduce, THEY ARE NOT human economists. Those are the ones studied in the biological and humanist schools. Here we study ideologists of the 1%, which by definition as they accept to have rents thousands of times bigger than ours, accept millions of people dying of economic problems – including hunger, war and unemployment -sorry reality check: you live in a world in which power is in the hands of  people who for ideological, selfish, religious or racist reasons like such status quo. Ultimately because they have created it.

If economists were humanists this would be explained, corporations regulated according to the usefulness of their products to mankind; the issue of money would be in the hands of people with universal salaries and governments to pay welfare and taxation to humans will be minimal.

But neo-classic economists direct corporations so their only goal is to increase their profits. For that reason their ‘arguments’ repeat 4 Goebbelian’ themes ‘(if you repeat a lie people will believe it):

– Freedom is only for the elite, managerial, intelligent class, including min. tax and max. credit; Labor has no rights. Property=Machines have them all. The Government of the people is stupid.

– People & governments without issue rights must pay usury debt-money to financial corporations.

-Economics must have no ethic goals or biological & historic human goals (improve life, a better world) or use social languages; they might express their only purpose – to reproduce more metal memes, the ‘Wealth of nations’ in the mathematical languages of machines and productivity.

– Inflation is evil because it lowers bankers debt profits.

– Since Mr. Smith and most founders of (neo)classic economics, Mr. Malthus,, Anglican Priest, Mr.

Ricardo, Jewish, Mr. Say, Calvinist, and today’s neo-classic economics, Mr. Friedman, Mr. Hayek & Mr. Buchanan were Biblical believers, as most elites that founded and control western corporations, we talk of Creationist Economics. As all those assumptions mimic, without telling the Biblical Beliefs of a chosen caste of owners whose goal is to make ‘money’, the fetish hand of God.

Theist, Creationist, Biblical Economics.

Indeed, most classic economists, as the Historic School of Economic sciences demonstrates with true data, belong to the Jewish-Protestant Go(l)d religion that invented capitalism – the belief that money must rule society and must be issued by private bankers of the chosen Go(l)d races, which dominates the power structure of anglo-saxon cultures.

Thus the neo-classic ‘school’ is formed by Economists which fail the scientific method and consciously or unconsciously base their analysis of the economic ecosystem, its memes, products and laws, on subjective ‘idol-ogies’, to the service of the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial system and its selfish ‘memes of metal’.

Accordingly 3 types of ‘theist economists’ are paramount:

–  Those who defend the religion of go(l)d profits. Most of them are pamphletists working to the service of a 1% elite of bankers and ‘stockrats’. They tend to hide that service and use sophisms, rhetoric and complicated arguments that twist the cause-effect process of the scientific method (i.e. Ricardo’s ceteris paribus analysis of trade); reject ethical, human considerations (Adam Smith’s dogma of selfish behavior that contradicts the thesis of his ‘other book’ on morals) and often lie about the facts (Hayek’s affirmation of the evilness of public banks based in the Mark’s hyperinflation of the 20s that he blames on the Reich bank, a private concern). They despise democracy (Buchanan’s affirmation that it is a tyranny of the minority), are born on wealth often from banking, jewish dynasties (Bentham, Jevons, Ricardo, Modigliani, Austrian School) or serving them (Smith, a client of the Montagu family, owner of the Bank of England) and do not recognize in order to twist facts to achieve their ‘agenda’ conclusion, the scientific method (Friedman’s denial of need for experimental data).

For that reason they worship any possible mathematical argument, in which the false premises bring to false conclusions but seem to be certain written in mathematical terms. A fact that leads to the 2nd type of theist economists.

– Economists that worship technology and consider the future progress of mankind, the evolution of machines. They are mostly idealists under the spell of techno-utopian and mathematical dream models with little resemblance with reality.

This is the commonest type today, including most Nobel Prizes given by a private bank that usurped the name of Nobel, despite the protest of his heirs.

– Finally, unlike other lists of Economists we will study those who never wrote books on economics but practiced the ideologies of capitalism and its worship of selfish memes of metal, money, weapons and machines, shaping the world into the capitalist, self-destructive, terraformed planet we live in. Here we shall include the ‘actors’ that have controlled and keep controlling the world with money, paying ideologies in favor of their monopoly on finances (i.e. the ‘legendary’ Rothchild family, owner of ‘The Economist’ modern bible of capitalism; the series of Chairmen of the Federal Reserve, with Greenspan as the paradigm; the series of PResidents of the ECB bank, FMI and World Bank). We shall group them by families and Institutions.

To notice that this type of economists are overwhelmingly in its ultimate religious ideology, Calvinist or Jewish ‘orthodox, biblical believers’. i.e. 72% of Nobel prizes are orthodox Jewish; all central bankers in the west and 80% of C.E.O.s from financial institutions belong to the same denomination, and about 10% to calvinist-anglican denominations. This astounding concentration of Theist Economists in a single religion of ‘world power’ makes obvious the ‘theist’, memetic origin of these schools, and the ideological, power-driven nature of their arguments in defense of the ‘Chosen’s right to monopolize the issue of money and design a world according to their religion and its ‘racial’ dogmas, which allow the exploitation of the 99% of non-chosen as the ‘natural order’ of things.

They tend accordingly to believe in money as a commodity (Gold and SIlver – precious metals) following the fetishe nature of their religion from the time in which Temples acted also as banks and gold was both money, ex-vote and instrument of power and control of societies.

A list of them by alphabetical order with its subconscious or not so metal-memes idol-ogy, either:

– A gold religion – only stated when its defense of the privileges of the banking dynasties to which they belong or work for is the ultimate leit motiv of their work, as in fact astoundingly enough all of them except a couple of exceptions belong to biblical sects.  This behavior tends also to coincide with the defense of their nation (Anglican->English Patriotism; Jewish->Defense of the banker dynasties and its monopoly on the issue of money , etc. For example, Mon and Adam Smith are moved by their beliefs in British Nationalism and in defense of their gold employees (Mon writes in defense of his employee, the East Indian Company; Adam Smith in defense of his mecenas, Montagu, founder of the Private Bank of England).

mechanist, when they worship machine and production as the ultimate goal of mankind (the so called GDP growth measured in terms of monetary and industrial capital, or math idealist when they do not acknowledge the experimental method and pretend that a mathematical construction is truth per se:

Arrow, Kenneth J. (math idealist)

Bentham, Jeremy (Gold religion, Jewish)

Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen Von (math idealist)

Buchanan, James M. (Gold religion, Baptist)

Calvin, John (Gold religion, Calvinist)

Cantillon, Richard (Gold religion, Anglican)

Clark, John Bates (math idealist)

Cohen, Aaron (Gold religion, Jewish)

Cournot, Antoine Augustin (math idealist, mechanist)

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro (math idealist)

Fisher, Irving   (math idealist, mechanist)

Friedman, Milton (Gold religion, Jewish)

Hayek, Friedrich (Gold religion, Jewish)

Hicks, John (math idealist)

Hume, David (Gold religion, Calvinist, math idealist)

Jevons, William Stanley (Gold religion,Jewish)

Kaldor, Nicholas   (math idealist)

Leontief, Wassily (math idealist)

Locke, John  (Gold religion, Calvinist)

Lucas, Robert  (Gold religion, math idealist, Mechanist)

Malthus, Thomas Robert (Gold religion, anglican)

Marshall, Alfred  (math idealist, mechanist)

Menger, Carl  (math idealist, mechanist)

Mill, John Stuart (Gold religion, anglican)

Modigliani, Franco (Gold religion, jewish)

Mun, Thomas (Gold religion, anglican)

Ricardo,David  (math idealist, gold religion, jewish)

Say, Jean (Gold religion, calvinist)

Smith, Adam (Gold religion, calvinist)

Sraffa, Piero  (math idealist, gold religion, jewish)

Von Neumann, John (math idealist)

Walras, Leon  (math idealist)

In that regard, as Owens denounced (Neo)classic authors show always in their ‘assumptions’ to cater to the p.o.v. of corporative profits, nationalist power, Biblical beliefs or the elite class for whom they work, totally indifferent to the rights of workers, always siding with machines of higher ‘productivity’=profits; ‘If managers took care of human capital with the same zeal they care for their mechanical workers, how much would improve the condition of labor’. ‘London Saloon economists are always busy finding complicated arguments against workers’ rights to defend the profits of bankers and factory owners that pay them, but they never visit as I do factory mills, and see the unending hours and appalling conditions in which people work’.

 

Let us consider a few samples of that list we shall keep adding and studying in more detail in future posts. Click in their names when they become ‘colored’ as I will have post 10 pages essay in their corresponding bull$hit:

– Smith: The selfish acts of corporations are ‘the invisible hand of god’ that magically will create a better world; the private Bank of England, founded by his Maecenas, Montagu, must issue debt-money borrowed by governments at usury prices; workers must be paid only a subsistence salary to avoid their death, which will decrease workers and increase salaries. Governments must only spend in police, courts=crime and armies to keep ‘order’ & expand the British, Biblical Empire.

– Ricardo, a Stockbroker went further defining the ‘iron salary’ that companies must pay workers, equivalent to the cost of substituting human labor by iron machines even if it is below subsistence and labor dies, as machines can do the job and increase profits. He further denied Smith’s finding that Free Trade expands the British Empire as its superior technology creates a massive deficit in all nations that buy all the industrial products of England and pay with their go(l)d & silver as Portugal, India & China did. He twisted this argument to make it ‘caring’ with a ceteris paribus analysis of a single product,nails from England and wine from Portugal. In that case wine becomes cheaper in England and nails in Portugal.

But trade is done with many products as was the case of Portugal, which lost its textile industries and became the poorest nation of Europe after signing a Free trade agreement with Industrial England, paying them with Brazilian gold; while China & India loss their silver. Thus he established as a rule 3 ideologies of neo-classic economics: hypocritical, false assumptions based in mathematical, ceteris paribus analysis to disguise the selfish p.o.v. of corporations as + to mankind; economic imperialism & zero rights for most humans – labor – not even the right to survive. Such globalized free trade market today imposes the Chinese blue collar and Indian Service IT Smith’s subsistence salary, increasingly substituted by the iron salary of blue collar robots and white collar PCs below human survival in a world of zero labor rights.

– Malthus blamed the Irish famine, caused by monopolistic investments in overproduced railroads that increased farmers’ taxation while eliminating investments in agriculture on ‘catholic’ sexual reproduction. Hence his solution was not to stop train overproduction but end human reproduction.

– Bentham and his disciple Stuart Mill, denied ethic, eusocial, humanist goals, considering ‘utility’ and ‘pleasure’ the only measure of economic values. Bentham’s ‘on defense of usury’ affirmed only private banks must issue money and establish at will its usury interest rate. Mill, a manager of Eastern Indian Co., ‘owner’ of India tried to use Taj Mahal’s marble to fortify New Delhi, as art had no ‘utility’. His work ‘on Freedom’ reduces freedom rights to elite class and corporative managers.

– Say denied a democratic, consumption based economy affirming a Production, Supply economy will always find demand, regardless of the products’ lethality; today by advertising & war lobbyism.

– Marshall established mathematical microeconomics aiming to increase Corporative production, as the only goal of the ‘dismal discipline’, detaching its teachings from ethics and history. He denied workers the right to a minimal salary by law (only solution to the iron salary).

– Hayek, the ‘Neo-classic guru’ of Miss Thatcher, affirmed only private banks must issue money

(‘The denationalization of money’) because public banks print too much money causing hyper-inflation as the Reichbank did in 1922, sinking the Mark and bringing fascism to power. He failed to mention the Reichbank was a private Bank. He assumed (‘road to serfdom’) that humans were too dumb to develop a science of economics, thus the Free Jungle of Metal would work better.

Schumpeter denied engineers routinely discover machines by imitating human organs & functions. ‘Entrepreneurs’ create wealth inventing them with his superior intelligence. Workers were however mechanical brutes. So entrepreneurs must have all rights & minimal taxation to invest their wealth. However he preached productivity as the panacea of growth (machines substituting labor) failing to notice those machines that made the economy grow are not entrepreneurs. This is now dogma.

– Friedman wanted to deregulate all labor markets, included health, since ‘quacks that kill patients’ will anyway loose clients.His obsession was to deny Keynesian economics with false assumptions and dog-eat-dog policies. Monetary policies must be restricted. Governments cannot invent money the language of economic information that must be invested in the real economy to solve crisis, because this creates inflation, lowering banks’ debt profits – even if the Philips curve proves inflationary investments diminish unemployment, as Friedman’s nemesis, Samuelson, proved.

Buchanan, from the bible belt, asked for 0 deficit laws in Constitutions to take away the sovereign rights to issue money from governments, because they would issue it to spend it on the majority of people and that is NOT the definition of ‘Democracy’ but the ‘Tyranny of the majority’!

Modigliani said all corporations not only financials must speculate as only profits matter.

-All use equations to hide with ‘lies & statistics’ their fetish for go(l)d profits for the ‘chosen’ owners. We conclude neo-classic economics is the equivalent of Intelligent Design that tries to substitute evolution in Biology, rightly shunned in Universities, as it makes those owners and its corporations the subjective center of the economy with null social responsibility, ‘entitled’ to all and deny that money is a language of information and machines just metal-systems that substitute labor, atrophy body and mind organs and in its most perfect species, ‘top predator’ weapons kill us since workers, seemingly are a non chosen species with null rights.

How this is possible in the theoretical realm is obvious: because all true organic, historic, socialist, humanist schools of economics are censored both theoretically and in praxis, as all the positions of economic power in the western world are taken by biblical bigots of the creationist economic schools which today passed once all humanist scholars have been ‘cleansed’ as the only science of the economics. 

The consequences are the present economic, military & political system, guided by the western idol-ogy of capitalism, which is destroying the world. Let us then first consider this statement by observing ‘who is who’ in the roaster of Saint Nobel Prizes of the Dynamite, sorry of Economics, given in memorial of the ‘Merchant of Death’ and maximal arm dealer of the XIX c. and then the positions of power on western financial houses and central banks:

Nobel Prizes (1968-2016: 49 concessions)

Let us introduce the data of:

CAPITALISM = BIBLICAL CREATIONISM

±50% Nobel Prizes of economics: Jewish (0.2% population); 28 recipients:

40% Nobel Prizes of economics: Protestant (neo-Jewish beliefs)

‘Non’ Exceptions: rational, right wing European engineers, mathematicians or financial economists:

Fama, Chicago Monetarist school for his empirical work on portfolio theory, asset pricing and stock market behaviour.

Tirole, Engineer, for his work on industrial organization, game theory, banking and finance.

Allais, Engineer, for his contributions to the theory of markets and efficient utilization of resources

Debreu  mathematician, on the theory of differentiable equilibrium, using topological rather than calculus-based methods.

VS. ETHONOMICS:  HUMANIST, SOCIAL, ORGANIC SCIENCE

Forbidden schools: 0 Prizes

Historic economics (founders: Weber, Sombart) with real data on the origin of corporations, its history, beliefs and ownership – simply considered today a form of ‘anti$emitism’.

Biological, organic theories (founders Butler, Spengler, this web), expressly forbidden by Mr. Nobel, a pious biblical believer who forbid his prices to any practioneer of theory of evolution.

Socialist, humanist school (founders: Anarchist, communists, socialists, Keynesians,  Bakhunin, Marx, Kondratiev, Keynes): completely banned.

III world non Western European/US economists (90% of mankind). 2 Prizes:

So 90% of mankind and ALL the humanist schools of economics, who care for welfare, and the production NOT of machines but the goods humans need to survive,  is represented only by 2 economists, which ‘surprise, surprise!’ are the ONLY prizes who study welfare (Amartya Sen, who implemented the IHD index of human development, the ‘true measure’ of economic whealth).

YetArthus Lewis, a protestant ‘house negro’ descendant of a long list of distinguished Caribbean slaves, converted to the ‘capitalist school’ focused on how capitalism absorbs workers from ‘subsistence’ economics developing third world countries (reading, agricultural societies are ‘bad subsistence’ economies which good capitalist entrepreneurs will develop making them work in the ‘right sectors’.

 Conclusion:

Only 1 economist in the whole history of the discipline have been recognised by the system.

1/2 of them belong the people-caste of money of the western world – the chosen of go(l)d or ‘People of the treasure’, which represent 0.2% of mankind. And to mention it is the most heinous censored fact, called simply Anti-$emitism.

But things get worse when we get to positions of power in the Financial private and public industries, as all the central bankers of the Euro-American civilisation, are at the time of writing this web, Jewish, again representing 0.2% of the population (and about 80% of CEOS of financial companies and CFOs of  500 fortune companies; and similar numbers for mass-media and dominant Internet corporations). As the list would be eternal we just shall mention just the key position, Central bankers, which arguably representing ‘nations’ should be ruled by people of their cultures… 

Central bankers of the west.

As we write this web for the first time, all western central bankers are jewish:

Mervyn King (Jewish) – Governor, Bank of England

Alistair (Jewish) – Financial Minister of England (Exchequer)

Jean-Pierre Roth (Jewish) – Chairman, Swiss National Bank

Jean-Claude Trichet (Jewish) – President, European Central Bank

Mark Carney (Jewish) – Governor, Bank of Canada

Benjamin Bernanke (Jewish) – Chairman, Federal Reserve

Donald Kohn (Jewish) – Vice Chairman, Federal Reserve

Geithner (Jewish) Treasure Department, USA

Robert B. Zoellick (Jewish) – President, The World Bank

Strauss-Kahn (Jewish) – Director, International Monetary Fund

John Lipsky (Jewish) – First Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund.

Consequences.

‘You don’t argue with your banker’ (Clinton)

  • Semite wars are deal with the harsher views of Israel on Islamophobia, becoming a permanent conflict
  • Economic systems are deal with the harsher view of the ‘$elected’ entitled chosen of go(l)d stockrats as having all rights while workers have none.
  • Profits is sacred, greed is sacred, Go(l)d will provide.
  • All humanist solutions for the 90% and a future welfare world are forbidden.
  • All criticism of capitalism in historic-data form is considered a form of anti-$emitism.

THE RIGHT AND WRONG SCHOOLS OF ECONOMICS

In this new section we shall introduce  a reasoned critique of the different schools prior to this work, with analysis of the thesis of the ±60 most important economists of the ‘dismal science’, judging them by their objective scientific value (scientific economics) vs. their idol-ogical background (Theist Economics). The distinction between both kind of economists is sorely needed, as most of those dogmas that pass as science in economics have their origin in economists that neither respect the procedures of the scientific method nor the need for a humanist praxis in any discipline. Since a science must exist not only to objectively understand the species it studies but also providing a positive praxis for the betterment of mankind.  

Accordingly we can classify all economists in 2 main type of economists:

Theist, Creationist, Biblical Economics.

This ‘school’ is formed by Economists which fail the scientific method and consciously or unconsciously base their analysis of the economic ecosystem, its memes, products and laws, on subjective ‘idol-ogies’, to the service of the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial system and its selfish ‘memes of metal’.

Accordingly 3 types of ‘theist economists’ are paramount:

–  Those who defend the religion of go(l)d profits. Most of them are pamphletists working to the service of a 1% elite of bankers and ‘stockrats’. They tend to hide that service and use sophisms, rhetoric and complicated arguments that twist the cause-effect process of the scientific method (i.e. Ricardo’s ceteris paribus analysis of trade); reject ethical, human considerations (Adam Smith’s dogma of selfish behavior that contradicts the thesis of his ‘other book’ on morals) and often lie about the facts (Hayek’s affirmation of the evilness of public banks based in the Mark’s hyperinflation of the 20s that he blames on the Reich bank, a private concern). They despise democracy (Buchanan’s affirmation that it is a tyranny of the minority), are born on wealth often from banking, jewish dynasties (Bentham, Jevons, Ricardo, Modigliani, Austrian School) or serving them (Smith, a client of the Montagu family, owner of the Bank of England) and do not recognize in order to twist facts to achieve their ‘agenda’ conclusion, the scientific method (Friedman’s denial of need for experimental data).

For that reason they worship any possible mathematical argument, in which the false premises bring to false conclusions but seem to be certain written in mathematical terms. A fact that leads to the 2nd type of theist economists.

– Economists that worship technology and consider the future progress of mankind, the evolution of machines. They are mostly idealists under the spell of techno-utopian and mathematical dream models with little resemblance with reality.

This is the commonest type today, including most Nobel Prizes given by a private bank that usurped the name of Nobel, despite the protest of his heirs.

– Finally, unlike other lists of Economists we will study those who never wrote books on economics but practiced the ideologies of capitalism and its worship of selfish memes of metal, money, weapons and machines, shaping the world into the capitalist, self-destructive, terraformed planet we live in. Here we shall include the ‘actors’ that have controlled and keep controlling the world with money, paying ideologies in favor of their monopoly on finances (i.e. the ‘legendary’ Rothchild family, owner of ‘The Economist’ modern bible of capitalism; the series of Chairmen of the Federal Reserve, with Greenspan as the paradigm; the series of PResidents of the ECB bank, FMI and World Bank). We shall group them by families and Institutions.

To notice that this type of economists are overwhelmingly in its ultimate religious ideology, Calvinist or Jewish ‘orthodox, biblical believers’. i.e. 72% of Nobel prizes are orthodox Jewish; all central bankers in the west and 80% of C.E.O.s from financial institutions belong to the same denomination, and about 10% to calvinist-anglican denominations. This astounding concentration of Theist Economists in a single religion of ‘world power’ makes obvious the ‘theist’, memetic origin of these schools, and the ideological, power-driven nature of their arguments in defense of the ‘Chosen’s right to monopolize the issue of money and design a world according to their religion and its ‘racial’ dogmas, which allow the exploitation of the 99% of non-chosen as the ‘natural order’ of things.

They tend accordingly to believe in money as a commodity (Gold and SIlver – precious metals) following the fetishe nature of their religion from the time in which Temples acted also as banks and gold was both money, ex-vote and instrument of power and control of societies.

A list of them by alphabetical order with its subconscious or not so metal-memes idol-ogy, either:

– A gold religion – only stated when its defense of the privileges of the banking dynasties to which they belong or work for is the ultimate leit motiv of their work, as in fact astoundingly enough all of them except a couple of exceptions belong to biblical sects.  This behavior tends also to coincide with the defense of their nation (Anglican->English Patriotism; Jewish->Defense of the banker dynasties and its monopoly on the issue of money , etc. For example, Mon and Adam Smith are moved by their beliefs in British Nationalism and in defense of their gold employees (Mon writes in defense of his employee, the East Indian Company; Adam Smith in defense of his mecenas, Montagu, founder of the Private Bank of England).

mechanist, when they worship machine and production as the ultimate goal of mankind (the so called GDP growth measured in terms of monetary and industrial capital, or math idealist when they do not acknowledge the experimental method and pretend that a mathematical construction is truth per se:

Arrow, Kenneth J. (math Jewish)

Bentham, Jeremy (Gold religion, Jewish)

Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen Von (math Protestant)

Buchanan, James M. (Gold religion, Baptist)

Calvin, John (Gold religion, Calvinist)

Cantillon, Richard (Gold religion, Anglican)

Clark, John Bates (math Jewish)

Cohen, Aaron (Gold religion, Jewish)

Cournot, Antoine Augustin (math idealist, mechanist)

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro (math Protestant)

Fisher, Irving   (math idealist, mechanist)

Friedman, Milton (Gold religion, Jewish)

Hayek, Friedrich (Gold religion, Jewish)

Hicks, John (math idealist)

Hume, David (Gold religion, Calvinist, math)

Jevons, William Stanley (Gold religion,Jewish)

Kaldor, Nicholas   (math Jewish)

Leontief, Wassily (math atheist)

Locke, John  (Gold religion, Calvinist)

Lucas, Robert  (Gold religion, math idealist, Mechanist)

Malthus, Thomas Robert (Gold religion, anglican)

Marshall, Alfred  (math idealist, mechanist)

Menger, Carl  (math idealist, mechanist)

Mill, John Stuart (Gold religion, anglican)

Modigliani, Franco (Gold religion, jewish)

Mun, Thomas (Gold religion, anglican)

Ricardo,David  (math idealist, gold religion, jewish)

Say, Jean (Gold religion, calvinist)

Smith, Adam (Gold religion, calvinist)

Sraffa, Piero  (math idealist, gold religion, jewish)

Von Neumann, John (math jewish)

Walras, Leon  (math protestant)

Humanist, Scientific Economics.

They are true social scientists to the service of mankind, with an objective analysis of Economics and money as a ‘fiat’, legal, following the laws of the scientific method.

They are mostly agnostic or belong to social, love-religions, reject Economics as an ideal mathematical science, without need of experimental data and reject the traps of simplification that cancel the value of most arguments of the Theist School.

As they are a minority we ‘stretch’ our good will, including many ambivalent ones that show at least good faith and some arguments in favor of a humanist, scientific, objective, sustainable economy. Or else we will have hardly paraphrasing Einstein on his dictum on Physicists who are really in the profession for love of truth, not money and power (the military-industrial complex) a number that ‘i can count with the fingers of one hand’

This will be the work time permitted, we shall analyze by alphabetic order:

Aquina, Thomas; Aristoteles; Bakunin, Mikhail; Becker, Gary; Bergmann, Barbara; Fourier, Charles; Galbraith, John Kenneth ; Keynes, John Maynard; Kondratieff, Nikolai; Kuznets, Simon; Lange. Oscar; Lasalle, Ferdinand; Lenin, Vladimir; Marx, Karl; Mohammed; Myrdal, Gunnar; North, Cecil; Owen, Robert; Pareto, Vilfredo; Petty, William; Pigou, Arthur; Quesnay, Francoise; Robinson, Joan; Samuelson, Paul; Schumpeter, Joseph; Sen, Amartya; Solon; Sombart, Werner; Stiglitz, Joseph; Tinbergen, Jan; Veblen, Thorstein; Weber, Max; Wicksell, Knut

Which are the essential economists of the main sub-schools of the two sides of the wave of history in this discipline. Let us first study the dominant values of the creationist school, ‘Go(l)d Greed values’.

III. GREED VALUES:

THE ‘ANIMETAL IDOL-OGY’ OF CREATIONIST ECONOMICS

‘Money is Power, or shall we say, The Monopoly to Create Credit money and charge interest is Absolute Power”.

Alex James

‘Money is the invisible hand of God’, Adam Smith, father of creationist economics.

‘Gold is the intelligence of God’, Calvin, father of Adam Smith.

Financial, ‘creationist’ economics. The values of money.

In the graph, languages select according to its ‘affinity’ values the species reproduced in a given ecosystem. In the light ecosystem, the species who see better – felines, apes and eagles – become its top predators. In the verbal ecosystem, the people who speak better (priests and politicians) rule with laws. In the economic ecosystem the people who manage money and obey its values, multiplying its most expensive goods (weapons and informative software) survive and those species who have null value (life and nature) die away. Because the values of go(l)d and the ethic wor(l)ds of God are opposite, it is obvious that the selfish memes of metal and the world they cre(dit)ate is a Darwinian ecosystem that extinguishes life. Thus capitalism, the religion of Go(l)d, which must by dogma cre(dit)ate reality in the hands of a few ‘historic believers’, is bound to extinguish life and create the Earth of Metal.  The expression of this truism of systems sciences and evolution is the word we live in…

Few people realize that ‘creationism’, the pseudo-science that affirms evolution to be wrong and the processes of creation of the Universe to be designed ‘intelligently’ by Yvwh, a God-Bush who spoke to a goat-keeper of the bronze age have triumphed in the field of Economics.

Indeed, what we call capitalism is merely Creationist Economics, a Biblical religion according to which ‘Go(l)d’, money must create or rather ‘cre(dit)ate’ reality with its ‘hidden values’, whatever they are (creationist economics does not want to know the ‘hidden values’ of go(l)d).

Those values are however all too evident to a systemic thinkers (the affinity and complementarity values that exist between money, a digital language made of informative metal, weapons (lineal, energetic metal) and machines (organic metal), which have the highest value in monetary terms, while life has the minimal value (minimal salary) and so they design the future accordingly, multiplying the products of the highest price (memes of metal) and debasing those of minimal value (human labor and life).

How money creates reality? With Credit. And here it enters the second element of creationist economics – the ideology of capitalism: credit must not be owned by the 99% of the people, by humanity and its governments but by the ‘Chosen of go(l)d’, the believers in the memes of the Bible, of go(l)d…

This of course, is no longer explained as Aaron, Calvin and Smith put it, in biblical, verbal terms, but with complex ‘economical laws’, mainly damned lies and statistics, which cover up with a certain rationality as ‘Intelligent design’ does, the religious nature of Creationist economics, treated elsewhere in this web. Here we shall deal merely on how a language ‘creates the future’. Since indeed money ‘cre(dit)ates the future of this planet’ and selects its species; but not with an ‘intelligent design of Yvwh’ that justifies the monopoly on its cre(dit)ation that in the Western World have the biblical people and in the East, their ‘selfish memes’ today converted in the ideology of classic economics, but with the laws of evolution. 

How an organic system ruled by a language of information creates the future.

One of the key questions about any ecosystem or organism is how it is created.

And the answer is through the code of information, the language that regulates all the cells of the organism.

What this means is that History and the economic ecosystem are also created by a language. And it is so, through the 2 languages that organize those super-organisms:

The forms and institutions of history are created through laws and verbal orders, which organize human beings.

The forms and institutions of the economy are cre(dit)ated, created through the laws and orders given with money.

economics is thus different from History, because in History we bonded together with ethic wor(l)ds, laws and religious ideals, using our natural language in which the syntax man (subject) <verb (action) < object (energy) always put man at the center of the Universe. In history we were the measure of all things.

In economics however, money which was a piece of informative metal, gold or silver or recently when the gold standard disappeared, e-money, bits of information in a computer mind, could be exchanged in equal conditions with men and objects. So this language and its values, man=object=price, were somehow diminishing of our place in the Universe. As an object we could be bought for a price, money, first as slaves, then as part time slaves with a salary. And so as the language of money substituted the language of words and occupied most of the actions in this planet, the world switched from one ecosystem dominated by history into an ecosystem dominated by economics.

This is what people seem to forget. That during most of its awaken time they follow economical orders, not historical (political, religious, social) orders and so they do not live in a democracy, an accessory system, which hardly rules our lives except in the free time we do not spend working and with our family (in which case we are ruled by biological mandates proper of all living beings). We live in a complex system ruled by money and the nature of that complex system is what this web unveils with the laws of… complexity.

Indeed, any ecosystem is ruled by a language of information whose syntax defines the actions performed under its orders. When we follow the orders of money we follow the previous syntax, man=price=object.

What this means is that we compete constantly in equal conditions with objects in fields of work (industrial system) and in fields of war (military system) as soldiers killed by weapons and workers subject to a self-similar monetary equation, productivity = capital/labor. When capital=machines are better than us, we labor are displaced because there are not ethical, verbal values that tell us we are superior to machines due to thsoe ethical values and we cannot be fired. When we are killed by a weapon, we are not told this is wrong, but simply a machine has efficiently consumed us.

However one of the fundamental tenants of complexity, is that the system is far more complex than its parts. By this, we mean that the parts obey the ‘language of information’ – the cells its nervous orders, the human its monetary orders – without ever realizin of what the whole is, what all the parts are constructing. The parts have a role but they ignore the whole. The cells do not know they are part of the organism of life which has its own goals and purpose; and humans ignore all about the complex system they are creating with money, weapons and machines they reproduce in labor fields and consume in war fields.

And that is why we need complexity as a science, because all those systems are self-similar and we can therefore explain what the ‘market’ where we live and labor most of our awakening time is constructing with money, weapons and machines: a super-organism; the most complex, powerful and efficient superorganism ever created on planet Earth, the financial->military->industrial complex, in which money (The financial system), under the laws derived of its syntactic capacity to value all what exists in this planet, construct according to those values a military-industrial complex, in which humans have 2 purposes: to work=reproduce the machines of that complex, and to consume=vitalize and evolve those machines.

Further on in complexity we know that all systems are complementary, with 2 fundamental social classes – those who invent and control the language of information of the organism and those who obey it.

In verbal, historic societies, politicians and priests were traditionally on top because they created the legal or ethic words that controlled society. And they are still on top but we hardly obey them for most of our daily existence. Reason why they hardly create the future. In fact, politicians since the XIX century depend in great measure of the credit that those who invent money give them in the form of bonds to carry out wars or depend on the money they extract from people forcefully called taxes to pay for services they provide.

So what matters truly to understand the future is the syntax of money and the informative caste which invents it.

This explains the importance of the role of the Am Segullah, which invented money in the past; today the role of the speculator, which in Wall Street is called the Master of the Universe.

Because indeed he anticipate and cre(dit)ates the future, creates the organism of the economy, with orders given with money.

In a real democracy, this role would be performed by the government freely elected by the people, but that is not the case in an stockracy, the system in which we live.

In our system however there is a simple, clear class structure, based in the 3 classes of all organisms, in which the upper caste is no longer the political or religious caste, as in historic cultures but the caste of speculators that create money with financial and monetary instruments.

The ‘government’ of the ‘Free Market’ are the institutions that issue=invent money. Stock market companies design the world, ‘cre(dit)ating’ it. They give ‘credit’, salaries which are monetary ‘orders’ that all people obey. To cre(dit)ate is a new word that expresses the fact that in a Free Market, in an economic ecosystem, the dominant language of power is no longer the law, but money. Thus, those who invent money, those who have ‘credit’, create, ‘creditate’ reality with it. Despite the common belief that most people hold, men don’t create the future in Free Markets through a democratic, voting exercise, which chooses a party/government to direct society towards the goals expressed in its political program. Instead the flows of credit of the economic system decide the prices and jobs, which transform the world. . .

Money and prices rule people all the time they work and the time they acquire/consume an object sold by the market, which is at least 90% of their living times. . . Hence money creates the world in that 90% of our existential times through orders giving by stock-market corporations, which create=credit most of the new paper-money invented in the economic ecosystem. For that reason events like a stock-market crash, which influences the money companies invent and hence the prices, salaries and flows of work and consume on planet Earth, are more important to understand the future than the choice of a president . . .

Because money is today the only language of power, those who invent money control societies. And today, financial and stock-companies invent most money under laws of deficit zero that oblige governments to tax citizens to obtain it. Thus, we affirm that we live in a Free Market in which the only free ‘individuals’ are companies and so the future is designed by the wanting of companies not the desires of human beings. But what a company wants? The answer is surprisingly simple: to reproduce and to evolve its product, normally a machine, its energy or its information (+80% of stock market companies). Thus, the re=production of machines and its sale to obtain benefits becomes the real objective of Market Democracies and by extension of all the human beings submitted to them.

Which means that the goals of humans, which try to improve their happiness, welfare and survival through the reproduction and possession of goods positive for their life, will not be met in a Free Market in all cases in which they conflict with the reproduction and sale of machines, given the scarcity of financial and material resources this planet has and the monopoly of those resources achieved by company-mothers in our societies. In fact, approximately 80% of stock-market investment goes to the production and evolution of machines not to the production of such positive Human Goods. Thus, the well-being of man, which should be the main goal of real democracies, such as those that appeared in Northern Europe after II W.W., becomes a utopia. While Welfare policies disappear, because companies have won the battle for credit to democratic governments

THE IDEOLOGICAL DEBATE: RATIONAL ECONOMICS VS. ‘Go(l)d’ Religions.

Why then we give so little chances to a resurrection of mankind, which could easily control credit through elected governments to promote a sustainable economy based in the human goods needed for survival, provided by the welfare state, and prune the bad fruits of the tree of science?

The answer is our ‘third sentence’: ‘men are slaves, they believe, they don’t reason’ Aristotle.

Aristotle, who rightly undertood money as ‘nomisma’, a language of information regulated by law, where the substance was secondary to its ‘digital use’ to value things with a numerical language, to the service of man, also realized that ‘barbarians’ carried the day. And that humans ‘were slaves’ because they didn’t reason. And this difficulty to ‘upgrade’ the mind of man, and the ‘animetal=animal+metal’ cult(ure)s hypnotized by greed and misusing lineal metal-weapons to impose their will with violence ‘the subhumans metalmasters’ of Nietzsche, is till with us.

Metal-power has impossed the lesser culture, the lesser reason, the animal over the rational man, and so the destiny of history is not human as long as it is ran by the subconscious treats of metal and capitalism.

Indeed, Plato and Aristotle never ran the Sicilian dictatorship of warriors or the Free Market Democracy of Athens, ruled by slave Traders and aristocrats. Then as now the anti-quantum paradox was at work and Plato was enslaved and Aristotle ran, escaping for his life the ‘Democracy of Athens’ to just get a job as teacher of Alexander. And of course Alexander ignored all his advices and did not take him in his conquest of the world to rule the way he knew, by war.

So while paradoxically the anti-quantum paradox prevents us, the scientists of history, to save the world, it actually proves further the thesis of this web: that we live in a biological world and information is also biological. So in the same manner your brain ‘censors’ the flow of external information, according to its selfish interests… so the eye sees motion better than stillness because motion is life, a prey… and so on… the informative castes and heads of the economic and political and military system show in this crisis to be doing ‘business as usual’, canons instead of butter, capitalism instead of Keynesianism, a war in Orwellian, perpetual war instead of a paradise of welfare goods.

And that path, today imposed by force, repression, censorship, damned lies and statistics by bankers, military and corrupted politicos, as always in the previous cycles of Kondratieff is taking us as always into an age of war, poverty, fascism, repression of life and extinction of humanism, all of them dying to the altar of the highest profits obtained as always reproducing machines, not food and housing.

The science of economics and its masters that nobody listens.

What might surprise the ‘naive’ citizen is that what we are saying here is nothing new. But it is merely a step further on the road walked by the great thinkers of economic theory.

In the introduction to this post we considered the 4 steps of the scientific method and we can now observe, once we have followed them to explain you the cycles of economics and the present crisis, what are the antecedents of the scientific method applied to social sciences – merely who in the past discovered and proved that history and economics are indeed sciences like all other disciplines of human knowledge, able to A) gather objective data, B) find cyclical time patterns with it C) define its causes and predict future cycles and D) use that knowledge to better design the future for the benefit of mankind.

We can now explore further those elements to recognize who in the sciences of history and economics found them, and why and how the ‘antiquantum paradox’ censors them.

Every mature science has reached an stage in which:

A) It has gathered objective Data without occultation for selfish purpose.

This first step is no longer met in social sciences, precisely due to the political and economical correctness that selects data according to the peculiar ideologies and worldview of the dominant people-castes of our western societies. The aim of this occultation is obvious: to make us belief that those who rule us are ‘experts’; that the path of future they design is the only path, because the system we have is the only possible system, as it is born of ‘scientific dogma’ not of culture.

It will be met in this web, even if it my prompt many readers ‘imprinted’ by those subjective, anthropomorphic ideologies to abandon its reading (anti-quantum paradox).

B) A series of mathematical cycles that repeat the same time events are found.

Unfortunately the present state of social sciences does not gather all relevant data (as it censors all ‘negative’ data that explains the collateral effects of the present economic system); and it does not accept under the influence of the Biblical culture the cyclical nature of time events. Indeed, our culture and religions consider that we, humans, have a ‘manifest destiny’, or ‘future progress’ as we are ‘free’ thinking beings, different from the rest of the Universe. So unlike all other sciences based in cyclical time events, Social sciences cannot go beyond A) Data gathering. B) is denied on pseudo-religious grounds.

C) A hypothesis that explains the repetitive actions that causes B – the repetitive cycles of any science. And then the projection of those cycles with accurate forecasts of their future repetition. Since a model is only considered truth when its predictive capacity is proved in the future.

C doesn’t happen in mainstream social sciences stuck in B. Indeed, The Economist, organ of ‘authorized social sciences’ made a poll among taxi drivers, garbage collectors, economic ministers and ‘think-tank’ experts on future economic indicators and taxi drivers and garbage collectors came first, proving the non-scientific nature of our present models.

But C is met in the scientific models of economic cycles of Kondratieff (1) and the organic models of history of Spengler. And it does in my work on the cycles of economics and history inspired by those authors, and improved by the use of fractal algorithms and the added data of a century more of such cycles. Reason why the work of this author was able to predict with astounding accuracy the present cycle 20 years in advance, proving the work of those masters and the causal explanation of those cycles to be correct (3).

D) The design with those models, causal knowledge and accurate data of a better system or event that favors our human species. As Science is always a tool of practical power. Needless to say, the anti-quantum paradox has always aborted D, beyond punctual events throughout the history of mankind.

E) Further on, all this, ABCD, must be based in a wider ‘vision’ provided by the common ‘Universal Laws and languages’ of science. Since the Universe is harmonic and self-similar in all its parts. What higher science we must then consider in its fundamental laws to inscribe the laws we find in social sciences?

Obviously the laws of biology and evolution, since we human beings are ‘biological beings’ and so should be our social organisms (nations, religions and civilizations) and the objects we make imitating our energy and information organs (machines, which are merely primitive ‘metal-organisms’ that we assembly and discover by imitating our organic functions in stronger, better metal-atoms; so a chip is a metal-brain and a crane a metal-arm, which enhance our energy and information).

Precedents of evolutionary economics: the masters of economic thought.

We did not mention who had discovered those cycles of overproduction of machines first, because it is my experience that the ‘human believer’ has been so well imprinted by the ideologies of power of the present world that by merely mentioning the name of perhaps the greatest scientists of history and economics, he will simply stop listening and reading. And indeed, when I ‘change’ this post and mention his taboo name immediately the post drops 3/4 of his audience – so it does when I tell the real story of the people-caste of bankers, who discovered money, invented the present economic ecosystem and rules it. Of course, this is understood as yet another proof of the anti-quantum paradox and the low I.Q. and slavish mental behavior of most humans, who live in a mental jail of ideologies that he believe to be ethic dogmas and intellectual truths.

And so now we can mention him. Yes, he, the monster, the supreme eviL man, the destroyer of worlds, the whip of religion, the anti$emite, Mr. Marx did discover the cycle of overproduction of machines, then the steam cycle and his disciple Kondratieff, 1/2 century latter found its cyclical patterns, meeting the first two elements of the scientific method, discovery of cyclical patterns and tabulation.

Precisely improving on the study of those crisis, you have then  Schumpeter and Kondratieff, who explained those cycles are guided by new evolutions of machines that saturate markets and crash the economy till new machines take over as the engine of the economy. They form a twin pair as Marx and Ricardo do. Schumpeter, an Austrian elitist aristocrat, was with the 1% (as his next influential disciples, Mr. Von Mises, Mr. Hayek and Mr. Greenspan, German-Jewish ‘believers’ in creationist economics will be). And so the article in The Economist mentions him, but fails to mention Mr. Kondratieff, a disciple of Marx, who talked about the same concept – the evolution of machines as the engine of the economy, and its cycles of creation and destruction, but from the perspective of the 99%.

And finally you have Keynes, which in the last slump of the global economy at the end of the age of ‘hearts of metal’ (electrochemical age), noticed, as all other economists, even Mr. Smith had noticed, that a world guided by greed, the accumulation of money at any cost, the welfare state and the life-based goods we need to survive will be under produced, since ‘money’ is ‘metal’ and values more ‘metal-goods’, weapons and machines than life goods, which have no price. So not only bankers but nations must invent ‘fractional money’, and deficits to finance welfare goods and laws must address the imbalance of production of excessive weapons and machines in a ‘money-based’ economy. This was in essence a sophisticated version of Marx ideas about the nationalization of banks, of Butler ideas about the restriction of production of weapons.

– And so if Marx defined the cycles of overproduction of machines and the crisis it would cause; the second state of ‘economic science’  was found by his disciple Kondratieff, who found the periodicity of those cycles (1) and in reward was censored and murdered by Stalin, the military dictator which killed the r=evolution of social sciences brought about by the discovery of those cycles and its dual social structure.

– Then Butler, using biological, Darwinian Jargon and Schumpeter with an abstract one, explained those cycles as ’caused’ by the evolution and reproduction of certain key machines and energy that acted as engine of the industrial economy.

– And finally Keynes found the solutions and ways to manipulate those crisis in favor of the human kind, by ‘printing money’ (deficits) to substitute the lack of demand caused by the overproduction of machines that people could no longer consume, investing in the alternative, human economy of the welfare state.

My work which forecasted the crisis 2 decades in advance by correcting with fractal equations Kondratieff’s cycles (1) and found a deeper causal reason to the cycles with the help of systems sciences and a better comprehension of the organic systems of the Universe, merely improves with the wider vision provided by a century more of ‘evolution’, the work of those masters.

Let us then be clear from the beginning. The work of Mr. Marx, the scientist subject to the anti-quantum paradox, has nothing to do with the military dictatorships imposed in the communist world under the red flag of his work; as the work of G. Bush, the last ‘democratic’ military dictator of the west has nothing to do with Jesus, in which name he acts. G. Bush and Mr. Stalin were just military dictators who corrupted and misused the work of two social scientists. Since indeed, Jesus and other prophets of love were  the first scientists of history able to ‘predict’ the future , according to the laws of social evolution of superorganisms, expressed in the mandate of social love that creates such efficient, balanced superorganisms as people share energy and information among them (non other is the meaning of ethics but the explanation in the human language of the social law of evolution of the members of the same species that help each other to survive)

Fact is, even in The Economist, the ideological organ of Capitalism owned by Mr. Rothschild, consider the previous economists the most important of history, (adding Mr. Smith, the primitive guru of the pre-industrial age who could never have understood economics by the obvious fact that the industrial world did not exist then.)

Indeed, in the Financial Times, perhaps the most serious ‘pro-system’ magazine of economics, hand in hand with The Economist, both owned by the Rothschild family – the essence of economical correctness and key founders of the system – now the master ideologists, the ‘Brahmins’ who are no longer concerned with the petty trade left to the likes of Mr. Gross, the bond master that determines each morning the price of the Euro and nobody knows to exist- 4 economists, are recognized as the greatest of history, Smith, Marx, Schumpeter/Kondratieff and Keynes. 

Since Adam Smith wrote his book on the ‘wealth of nations’ even before the first industrial machine was discovered – basically not a book of modern economic science, but an epilogue to the age of ‘go(l)d religions’ that preceded the ideology of capitalism, we should probably change his name on that list by that of Butler, a disciple of Darwin who recognized that machines and top predator weapons evolve and have organic traits, and impose the power of nations as weapons did in the past; or perhaps by Ricardo, the founder of mathematical economics, which discovered the ‘iron salary’, caused by the competition of men and machines:

Accordingly, the salary of humans will be always under the mathematical laws of competition that compare humans and machines, as both can be exchanged for money – man=salary=price=object – the minimal, subsistence salary or ‘iron salary’, as there will always be someone dying of hunger to the job or a machine to replace the worker.

He also argued that machines will undoubtedly increase the profits of the owners but decrease the salary of workers, expelling out of job, comparing it to the horse. ‘If horse were doing all the jobs at lesser cost’ than humans he argues the GDP of mankind will grow (as it will grow now that electronic machines are doing most jobs of humans), but this will not profit mankind, only the owners’.  But of course, Ricardo, a Jewish stockbroker was on the side of capital, and considered this ‘unavoidable’ (without legal regulation, that is) and desirable for the 1% to which he belonged. And so a humanist economist Sismondi, asked him how the system will be sustained when ‘the king of England would be able to push a switch and all the automated factories of England’ will produce its goods. What to do then with the rest of mankind?  This question has never been answered in theory only in praxis… We killed them in colonial and fascist wars or left them leave a misery ‘subsistence life’ (Ricardo’s expression) on their ghettos.

Ricardo, Malthus, Say and all those earlier economists show the fundamental problem of this discipline – its total lack of interest for ‘mankind’, which they standardize as a ‘cost’; since ultimately all of them belong to the Biblical tradition in which those ‘chosen by go(l)d’ have all the privileges and the rest of mankind are ‘invisible’.

Then you have Marx, greatly influenced by Ricardo, who explained the cyclical crisis of overproduction of machines, money and weapons that cause massive crisis of unemployment, redistribution of wealth and wars to deplete arsenals.

The importance of Marx is clear. For the first time using the same mathematical laws of classic economists, but taken the point of view of the 99%, the collateral effects of the ‘religion of metal-memes’, classic economics, are explained. And so for the first time ‘the blind body cells’ of the superorganism of history (middle and lower classes) were informed of the workings of the system. Reason why Marx has been so much hated and attacked by all, including those who pretended to represent him (communist parties). Indeed, it is important to understand that the biggest enemy of Marx was NOT capitalism but communism. Mr. Stalin took care of 8 million Marxist r=evolutionaries to impose a Nazi-style military-dictatorship that ended Marxism. He sent Kondratieff to Siberia and gave a perfect excuse to the West to censor Marx – a theorist that never formulated any detailed description of what the r=evolutionary stage of history would look like – and maintain ever since the 99% of the cells of ‘the blind body’ of history in a happy state of slavery to the memes of their ‘owners’.

All this said, we must know to do a proper critique of those previous masters, as it is also a law of epistemology called the Principle of Correspondence that as time goes by new theories improve on the old masters, albeit absorbing the best part of the prior work and solving some of the errors committed by them. Let us then consider the greatest errors of Marx and his disciple Kondratieff.

The errors of Marx thus were clear: he believed too much in humans and didn’t realize enough of the influence of the memes of metal in the programming of mankind, dealt with in the next post. And of course, he did not design a future superorganism of history after the revolution, as he did not have enough biological education in the infancy then. (Though after reading Darwin, he said that the way to evolve economics was merging it with biology.) So he made the following omissions and mistakes:

– To consider the struggle between the informative class and the working human class, one between humans only, when the key element is the influence of the selfish memes of metal and its subconscious ideologies (greed or gold hypnotism, murder or iron action and sloth or machine’s atrophy), on mankind. Thus as those memes multiplied the influence spread to all humans, and of course, to the people of the party, which became just a military dictatorship.

– Because he did not explain how to build a superorganism of history, communist dictators, Stalin, just imitated the structures of the most respected nation of the time, Germany, building de facto a parallel system to the fascist dictatorship as Payne has explained in his key work on fascism.

– Because he did not criticize enough the effects of machines, as Bakunin did, his followers have created societies that lack welfare goods and are a parody of what a social system would be. In that sense Social Democracies in Europe were much closer to the ideals of Marxism than any communist society, which is merely a dictatorship of weapons.

– Because he thought too positively about human labor he considered that the profit of companies was coming mostly from the exploitation of human workers, which were detracted from their profits. This is truth, as corporations use humans as mere costs, but the real profit comes from the increase of capital in machines. So his main thesis that profits will dwindle as more machines were substituting labor and the system would crash by lack of profits is in fact the inverse. Profits kept growing as labor is substituted by more productive machines and the end of it is ‘the Marx-smith-Darwin paradox’ latter studied in more detail. The extinction of labor.

– Marx also failed to recognize his precedents in the work of the prophets of social love of the western tradition.

What he and his disciple Kondratieff did accurately understood were the crises of overproduction of machines that determine the cycles of history and the switching of corporations at the end of those cycles, for the sake of profits, to reproduction of weapons, which Lenin and Trotsky, the last of the humanist economists of the revolution,  better explained  in their works on Imperialism.

Of course imperialism continues, but now it is more subtle, protected by ‘the political and economical correctness/censorship’ of our ‘Orwellian newspeaks’, and imposed no with weapons but with money. Yet the aim is the same: to control nations and strip them of democratic rights by the power of weapons or money… the selfish memes of metal.

What we have done in the past 20 years is to advance, evolve and update the work of all those economists (even the laws discovered by the pre-scientific school of Mr. Smith, regarding the parallel evolution of money and industrial machines of maximal price – Mv=PT) and forecast the future of those cycles according to the laws of biology and evolution. But we have done it from the perspective of the 99%, reason why our work receives the same censorship than its predecessors.

So if we were to resume all what is worth of Economic Thought about the Future in a single sentence, it will be this:
‘Capital=Mv and Machines=Pt will substitute all workers and humans will r=evolve or  become extinguished’ (Smith-Marx-Darwin Paradox that resumes the teachings of the 3 ‘masters’ of economical schools).

My favorite and less known is still Butler, the disciple of Darwin that first saw machines as evolving organisms, and Spengler, the Historian who forecasted the future ‘corruption’ of the American democracy around 2000 by money and the end of the III Reich in April 1945… right on the spot. As sciences are only such when they can predict the future and only evolution, the science of biological change on time, has ever done that.

 

Unfortunately the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences, the repression of a real biological science of life and history has been going on for so long that now is ‘cult(ure)’ – it can be traced in fact to the discovery of metal in the Middle East and the creation of ideologies that justified the power of a tribe over other humans by the sword or the hypnotic power of gold… And so we treat in this web also history in those terms studying the long wave of birth and decay of civilizations already tabulated by the pioneers of the science of history, Hesiode, Vico and Ibn Khaldun in the classic age; Marx, Spengler and this writer n the modern age.

While at the end of this section we shall analyze the precedents of evolutionary economics and the true masters of economic thought, as opposed to our ‘financial economists’ who are NOT humanist economists but people to the service of corporations, who control history with the power of money – as the military are not experts in history but people who control history with the power of weapons.

Now, for 20 years, as I described the future as it would be in the capitalist system, I had been an activist against that future, trying to convince the public, economists and power people the need to change of policies towards a global New Deal and investments in the industries of the welfare state, because the future of capitalism is self-evident and anti-human: robots will take over and dismiss humans as workers and soldiers; companies will reach infinite productivity as they become self-reproductive without human labor (productivity measures the ratio of machine workers vs. human workers and so it grows as machines automate production, which now is the fact of the robotic revolution).

Evolutionary economics however have been ignored and censored, despite or precisely due to its truth and superiority over ‘primitive’ abstract anthropomorphic descriptions of the economic ecosystem. And so my conclusion observing the slavery of humanity to gold profits and mechanical masters is that capitalism will indeed triumph and extinguish mankind at the end of the present cycle. That a sustainable planet is not possible and we, the activists and true scientists of history and economics will follow the destiny of our predecessors in this field – silence.

But so far this web, destroyed a couple of times in its original format (economicstruth.com) will tell the truth of the Industrial revolution and the crisis from the perspective of the 99% of humanity that suffers its collateral consequences. I will be gone though, when at the end of the present robotic cycle of 72 years, by 2080 at best, we humans become as mammals before us and reptiles before mammals, ‘history’, because we ‘didn’t love each other’ enough to create a world made to the image and likeness of man and our natural ‘Life goods’, but wanted to be more than God and lived the ‘mirage’ of borrowed power, given to us by those machines and weapons, we enslave for in our ‘technological civilization’. Perhaps then, certainly on the sides of machines which will seek for an explanation to the world, evolutionary economics will be recognized as ‘the’ science of economics, which was meant to be. Truth in that sense always imposes itself in the field of science. However, when Machines take over us and A.I. dismisses humans as a lesser species, the ultimate purpose of evolutionary economics as a ‘human science’, to enlighten mankind and help us to survive by managing rationally the industrial evolution, will have failed.

Needless to say, the new species will complete the capitalist policies of corporations that treat man as a ‘surplus cost’ (worker) or a mere ‘tester’ of its machines (consumer). Both jobs will be gone for humans as machines will reproduce other machines and robots will ‘test’ the camera-eyes, mobile-ears and engines that will be part of their organisms. So humans will no longer be needed. And the process you live is already part of that ‘non-human world’ we are about to give birth, what I call the economic ecosystem or the metal-earth. We are no longer needed. Millions, soon billions of humans have no longer a role in the economic ecosystem as the growing GDP happens in the corporation that consumes other machines and reproduces them, without human interference.

Let us be clear enough. Humans can invent and they invent ‘rossy ideologies’ about machines and economic development, and our ‘anthropomorphic’ position in the processes of evolution of this planet. Those ideologies, mostly of biblical religious origin, since the biblical culture invented corporations, have given birth to the techno utopias of classic economics and censored evolutionary economics – to the point Nobel Prizes cannot be given to evolutionary theory because the pious Mr. Nobel, also called the ‘merchant of death’, as he was the main producer of weapons in the XIX century, considered Evolution a theory that contradicted his biblical beliefs, and so no Nobel Prize can be given to the ‘real science of economics’.

But this has not changed at all the fact that classic economists never predict the future of its science, as all other sciences including evolutionary economics do. THey have not changed at all the happening of the present cycle as we forecasted decades ago. The laws of evolution are there for humans to learn them and manage the evolution of machines, or ignore them and let the darwinian evolution and its laws of competition between species, impose themselves. Those laws, without regulation of markets, imply that the  development of this crisis has been, is and will be parallel to the previous ones, ending in overproduction of weapons and global war.

Fact is the laws of science happen regardless of human wishful thinking.

What we humans could do if we were NOT under the straight jacket of 3000 years of myths about go(l)d and banking, greed and the role of a supposed higher entity, which ‘wishes’ us to destroy the world (the invisible hand of the freemarket) is to regulate the process of evolution of machines for our advantage. But as machines and money are a western religion we cannot even conceive on opposing them.

And so the future of evolutionary economics will become ultimately independent of mankind, as Artificial Intelligence will be born in the most expensive advanced machines which have always been weapons. And as machines become conscious of their nature as a different species, they will follow exactly the policies western managers of corporations, follow with their callous, mathematical ‘profit-seeking’ indifference towards the poor and dispossessed of mankind: we will become a surplus, an unneeded cost, as we already are… What it won ‘t ever happen is what classic financial economists expect to happen according to ideology: a future paradise for all humanity, in which machines will never compete, nor kill us, but solve our problems as ‘chosen’ of god, entitled to special rules. All this of course, could be avoided if humans, their ‘collective brains’, governments would decide to take the bull by the horns, and manage, regulate and control the global economy, recreating with the laws of social systems, a paradise on earth, based in the production of the goods of the tree of life and the control of the lethal goods of the tree of metal. But that requires the end of capitalism and the nationalization of the financial industry at global level. And corporations have corrupted the political system, preventing such solutions even to be argued. So we describe in this blog the future as it is and will be, and from time to time relapse on hope, thinking humans will rise to the challenge, man up and correct the future for their own profit. But this is the lesser probability of future for history.

And to understand why we have to understand  the religious origin of capitalism and its ‘custom’ of sacrificing their children to the altar of Baal, profits and the murderous qualities of metal… Since the reason why we dont have a future is not ‘reasonable’ but memetic, inquisitorial bnamely because the patterns of history that define the past and forecast the future have shown in war and hecatomb->holocaust cycles we care nothing about the future, we live hooked by greed, we are just ‘ants’ of teh system, we won’t manage it, we just believe it and die for it, as all those other pre-cyclical people have done. 

Classic Economics, the ideology of power of Bankers and Corporations.

falsepublicbeliefcaseycia

(: Including what Mr. William Casey and all the establishment believes in, of course : )

Now for you to understand, out of the blues, as a perfect ‘memetic’ brain programmed by audiovisual corporations and ‘the system’ at large to love and ignore all about the overproduction crisis you live in, a few ‘gates’ of wisdom and humility about your condition must be opened. The first one to realize that the world is ruled by the ‘free citizens of markets’, corporations, whose function is to overeproduce machines, their ‘offspring’, for whom they care. And that you are for them nothing but a price, a cost. You do not live in a world ruled for and by humans,but ruled for machines and by its corporations, where human managers – conceded – have a great life. But they are totally unaware, just moved by a mechanical process of reproduction of money, of what they do, and what is the purpose of the System. As a leading scientist of a specific branch of system sciences, called ‘general systems’ I do however know a  lot about systems. And as the last chair of the science of duality, formerly dialectics, before it was eliminated as a SIG from the world congress of systems sciences, due to its insistence in exploring a higher truth about the world we live in… (-: yes, this is not a joke, though i take human affairs with some sense of humor including mine :) this blog is probably the most accurate scientific description of the capitalist system you can read anywhere. Enter thus with your mind in an unchartered territory of economic truths, which ‘the corporation’ and the ‘system’ will not provide.

Let us be clear enough, you are programmed by placebo truths, damned lies, statistics, ego trips and fantasies of optimist happiness – an entire mind book 3000 years in the making, since the iron  age more or less, started to program your mind with ‘selfish memes of metal’.

Doesn’t matter who you are. You could be for all that matters, Mr. Obama, Mr. Bernanke, Miss Merkel or the taxi driver. You will still be most likely one of the 7 billion of programmed ‘cells’ of the economic ecosystem, who have no idea of where you are, what you live for, what is the meaning of your existence in the world of corporations and machines – and this is an astounding feat achieved by 200 years of censorship of social sciences in all what refers to machines, its meaning and evolution, with corpses, along the trail so illustrious as Mr. Marx, Mr. Butler, Mr. Spengler, and of lately Mr. Sancho (-;

And if you are a ‘scholar’ or a worker of the corporation, you are even more programmed.

Since what you learn, classic economics is not a science but an ideology of power, which follows Owens ‘dictum’, who said that ‘saloon economists’ here in London are busy finding complicated arguments to back the profits of its employers, the corporations’, but have not even ‘visited the mills’ and industries of which they speak.

Today very few ‘economists’ understand their historic origin. They merely believe on them. But that is why we must do a historic account of the origin of those arguments and the logic account of their twisted ‘damned lies and statistics’ if we want to unveil the so-called experts. Since those false dogmas are   their mental prison. As most people just repeat and memorize doesn’t reason the so called ‘scientific dogmas’ of social sciences, which in the case of ‘classic, capitalist economics’ we shall prove obey systematically, the interests of the 1% and the corporations that pay them. Most ARGUMENTS OF CLASSIC ECONOMICS HAVE A SINGLE PURPOSE: INCREASE THE PROFITS OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS AT ALL COSTS.

A few examples, treated extensively in other posts:

– The myth that productivity increases labor. This is exactly the opposite: Productivity=capital in machines/Labor, which even a high school kid knows can only rise if we ‘fire labor’ or increase ‘machine workers’: Max. Productivity = max. Capital /Minimal labor. Thus this ‘argument’ hides the fact that machine workers are cheaper than humans and FIRING THEM, you get higher profits.

– The Myth of Inflation, which was imposed by bondholders to avoid loosing profits (as bonds do not adjust to inflation). In reality money is the language of information, the nervous system of the Economy and so IT MUST BE CREATED WITH DEFICIT AND CREDIT TO START THE ECONOMY up, as you think before you act. Without money or thoughts there is no economic growth and actions.

– The myth of deficit. Deficit means only invention of money by governments, which in social democracies are freely elected and hence MUST have deficits to pay the programs for which they were elected. Otherwise there is no democracy. Deficits are costly for society ONLY in cases as the present system, when governments in Europe due to the existence of a private banks that passes as public, the ECB, ruled by an ex-Goldman Sachs man and member of the ‘Lobby of the 30’ – the biggest European lobby of private banks does NOT print money for governments but instead gives it to banks at 0.5% and then private banks get an USURY of 5% to pay for states. 

This is outrageous. Today 95% of the global credit is invented in market by corporations and the ECB still wants people all over Europe to be extorted taxes to pay usury to the private banks.

– The myth of inefficiency of state corporations. State corporations because of the myth of deficit have NO access to the astounding amounts private ones have. If welfare corporations would have 100 billion $ like the market gave to Mr. Facebook, a worthless company that wastes zillions of human hours with virtual nonsense and has no profits, and wastes billions of $, the world would be a paradise. Public companies controlled in the salaries of their managers and with private standards of efficiency like in Asian countries (Singapore, etc.) ARE the solution to the crisis because… they create far more employment, not because they are inefficient but because MACHINES cannot produce alone, as they do with other machines, the goods of the welfare state we need to survive (food, housing etc.). So we need a massive New Deal, because machines will not make those goods, neither will create employment.

– The myth that billionaires and corporations ‘invest’ and create jobs. False. There are all kind of papers proving that small corporations and public ones create far more employment, and produce the ‘sustainable goods’ we need to survive as life beings; but they are shut out of market credit because of the monopoly of private bankers, who – and this is the last myth – do NOT invest in the physical, real economy but mostly in the financial speculative processes explained above, to create with ‘speculative taxes’ money for themselves, jacking up the prices of all goods. And so on and so on.

Now of course, when Darwin went to school he did not copy and memorize as 99% of the people I know in the scholar world, the ‘dogmas’ of others but carried a ‘notebook of errors’ to write only what he thought was false. I imitated him in my long career learning Economics and Biology, Physics and Maths, and that is the basis of my discoveries in all sciences. But trust me, I have found no other science so full of errors and dogmas as Economics is.  In that sense only the anti-quantum paradox and the confusion of ‘science’ and culture, explained in the next chapter, is the only reason why an entire ‘discipline’ is based in false postulates.  My first book of economics was called the ‘Myth of Free markets’ Then I found the anti-quantum paradox… Nobody would publish it. Since classic economics is the ‘religion’ of  profits of corporations and bankers with EXCLUSION of all the other factors of the economy, crafted historically as the essential form in which ‘biological information’ in social sciences, controls people. Since systems always select information to cater to the ‘owners’ of the language (so your brain only sees a minimal part of information, which is useful to its biological purpose and Economists working for corporations select it to cater the selfish agendas of their owners, as Owens explained clearly). But ‘humans are slaves, they believe, they don’t reason’ (Aristotle, father of the experimental method, logic and science).

We have treated in other pages some of those myths.

Here 3 key myths of our ‘Capitalist system’:

– The Myth of Metal Wealth

– The myth of competition

– The myth of free societies

 

THE FINANCIAL-MEDIA/MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM

Fact is those cycles which were the biggest prediction of this author’s first books – then considered a pessimist orwellian image; are now in full swing. So regardless of censorship and PLACEBO DEMOCRACIES, they prove we live in a dictatorship of corporations, which control politicos and ‘define’ policies, according to which age of evolution of machines we are in.

Thus we can study its phases with the laws of morphology and evolution, since they evolve according to the energy & information humans use to re=produce them:

6 ENERGIES CYCLES best

In the graph, humans have evolved a new type of energy, which renews both the energetic machines of the economic ecosystem (weapons and transport) and its informative machines, which print audiovisual information and the financial, digital money of the economy every human ‘biological generation of 72 years, in which nation of ‘founding fathers’, captains of industries, their sons which massively reproduce and evolve a new energy machine and form of money to its perfection, and decadent grand-sons, which use the 3rd phase of evolution of the machine, as a top predator weapon to conquer the world (2).

NOW it is essential that you understand the Organic structure of all those machines and its company-mothers, divided in 2 systems, similar to the head and body of any organism:

  • THE FINANCIAL-MEDIA SYSTEM of informative machines (below), which PRINT the language of power of our society, digital money and reproduce the INFORMATION that ‘manufacture’ the brains of mankind, (Mass media), which are the HEAD of the super organism of company-mother of machines, with its collective BRAIN, world-stock, globalised, and whose goal is to control, EVOLVE and re=produce for profits:
  • THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM of energetic machines (above), which are the ‘twin’ brothers, of the Global super organism of machines – good fruits of the tree of technology, machines that upgrade and empower us, but also atrophy and substitute us when we consume them; and its bad fruits, weapons, the most perfect machines at any age of history that consume us in war fields.

Yet while you might have heard of the military-industrial system, you don’t even know the financial-media head does exist and control the whole system. And even when I explain you the FM-system, the memes of the culture that owns it and why and how it is degrading mankind, you will likely ignore it. Since the entire system of industrial information provided by those machines, except a few ‘artists’ of more complex thought, normally in parables that avoid with ‘fiction’, censorship will explain it in biological terms.

In that sense the ‘rat bites its tail’ – humans simply have become so hooked to system of evolution and reproduction of machines, and the Financial-Media (informative machines)/Military-Industrial  (energy machines) ecosystem, has achieved such a degree of power and sophistication that it has also perfect the fundamental ‘art of predation’ in nature – camouflage, with a ‘placebo form of freedom’ called democracy, and a system of collective social information called mass-media able to program the ‘tabula rassa’ of mankind, with positive views, even of the most lethal goods of the FMMI system – a fact crystal clear in the leading nation of the Financial-Media system, the US,  where the addiction of humans to machines and their indifferent to the destiny of mankind is becoming crystal clear – as the system offers each of us a series of fictions and ‘ego-dreams’ of individual power that make us happy, but prevent humanity from ‘taking their destiny’ in their hands and organising together as a single head-organism, as the global stock-market that selects and distributes monetary information to those companies does. On the contrary we shall see how placebo democracies were installed by the first corporations, precisely as an inefficient system of opposing parties, which are like siamese twins with two opposite heads, and promote tribal division of the homo species in warring factions – called nations, which ensures the constant ENTROPY OF HUMAN MOTIONS, without focus and synchornicity, while company-mothers are built as perfect super organisms.

Indeed, when I was given conferences of systemics, it surprised me all the offers came from companies, which wanted to improve with those laws, their organisms of reproduction – none from governments, which were and have been in placebo democracies, created by the first dutch company of gunboats and slavery, in a perfect inefficient, placebo form that couldn’t oppose to its power, and ever devoid of the right to reproduce money for their citizens as those companies do for their machines, in the Anglo-American dominant corporative civilisation, which expanded this ‘jail of virtual freedoms from Holland into UK, America and finally the rest of the world’. 

Unfortunately the Universe is NOT a simplex, straight forward system, neither its evolution stops at the level of individual, but works more like an organism or a wave of simultaneous behaviour, in which each part plays a minimum role and the ‘swarm intelligence’ programs them all. Yet what we witness today is a divergence between the efficient evolution of company-mothers of machines into a global super-organism, ruled by digital flows of financial information, while in parallel mankind is becoming desegregated into ever smaller units that confuse freedom with chaos and cannot organise properly their control of the planet.

And we shall repeat this often as we will criticise heavily the -1% of mankind which controls those corporations in a selfish blind way – that the 99% percent is suffering and will keep suffering exponentially more with the arrival of A.I. and the dwindling surface of planet Earth, not polluted by the $hit of machines, not used by roads and factories, and fields of ethanol, solar power, mining – you name it, dedicated to provide them with energy and information today most humans lack.

 But the fundamental reason the financial-media system goes hand in hand and controls mankind is that BOTH MUST COME TOGETHER, to be able to invent money for free for the 0.1%, and so we shall now study, this most misunderstood process of ‘false complexity’-the issue of speculative money with information machines, backed by informative myths about its values and the people who print it, who were first considered ‘high priests’ who used money as a vehicle to talk to the divinity and now are considered classic economists, ‘experts’ in running the world with it.

THE PARASITIC FINANCIAL SYSTEM – DEBT SLAVERY – WARS FOR PROFITS.

 Can we humans control and harness the evolution of the Economic ecosystem of ‘free company-mothers of machines’ re=producing them without limit, regardless of its collateral effects on the human kind, JUST BECAUSE THEY GIVE PROFITS, MONEY?

YES, WE CAN, but for that we have to understand money and how it creates with credit reality.

So, EVEN before we continue with those models, as the world is ruled by the financial-media masters that print with machines of information the mind of man (audiovisual media) and order them to act with digital money, we must explain 2 facts about this. What money is as a language of information, and why we have said something so outrageous as ‘bankers parasite the world’, given the fact you likely have no idea about the first, and will find the insults to the leaders of the ‘free world’, its bankers that create ‘wealth’, insulting… So let us try to change your programmed or rather manufactured brain on those 2 ‘fundamental issues of the modern world.

Money is a language of information that value, orders and controls society as legal words do.

,pneyIn the graph, money has evolved as a digital language that controls the ‘value’ of all species on Earth with ‘prices, salaries and bribes’, by increasing its capacity to carry information: it has become quantized into smaller bits of information that require less energy and increase its units; hence its capacity to value more things, from gold to printed paper, to electric data to electronic bits, invented with a computer program. And the key element in the ‘censored’ history of the world is the group of people that invents in first place money. 

Today it is so abundant that it values all entities of the planet, substituting verbal thought, a language with lesser capacity to carry information than numbers, and broken into multiple tribal species with different values. So the law is submissive to money in all societies, politicians are easily bought and corporations and its offspring of machines, have become the dominant systems on planet Earth.

Money as go(l)d, as precious metal hypnotised informatively with greed the mind, who called the ‘stuff’ the sweat of the sun, appeared so earlier in history in the pre-rational pre-greek age of ‘myths’ and fetishes, not the age of Nomisma, and rational use of it, that it became the most desired form of the human Universe, with a value superior to man. So first it converted man in an object which gold could buy, called a slave. And as time went by more complex forms of obtaining money with slaves were deviced, call taxation, war for profits…and debt slavery

So only societies in which money were issued for the people with a Universal salary, and investment in welfare goods, as organisms do giving all cells a salary in oxygen and the goods they need to survive, would be a real democracy.

In terms of its characteristics as an informative language, money has evolved, as all languages do, by increasing its capacity to carry information. It means it has become more quantized into smaller bits of information and it has increases its numbers, its capacity to be reproduced with minimal energy, as it changed substance, from gold to printed paper, to electronic data, which can be invented with a simple computer program.
Languages share by definition the properties of information: they are quantized, to be able to have ‘form’; they are small to be able to process that information easily; and they have minimal energy and an enormous ‘fractal’ capacity to reproduce. So money has become smaller, easier to reproduce and more quantized, as a ‘carrier’ of digital information. In that process it has increased the capacity to value more objects and life forms on planet Earth.

Today it is so abundant that it can value all beings of the planet, substituting verbal thought in the valuation of reality. And since it values machines and weapons more than any other object, it has multiplied wars and terraformed the world to their image and likeness.Now to understand money, a language of digital information, the reader should understand this basic truth about money. To that aim, the easiest path is to think of money, a language of information, in terms of ‘words’, another language of information.Then you can understand what it is money about:

  • On one hand money as words give you the capacity to give orders to others and to yourself (so you think before you act, and if you get money you do receive an order to work and act). This is the main purpose of any language of information, to inform and motivate the actions of the species that speak the language. 
  • On the other both words and money value, inform us about things, with prices (the best machines, the most expensive) and ethics (the best goods for mankind the most verbal cherished goods)

So words and money exists to give orders and value things with human ethic values in words, with prices in money.It is not a value per se, but something that acts as a language and so it has a third quality:

  • To be very easy to invent, since information is inflationary, we need to make a lot of words and money and waste a lot of it, to kick out actions, to pump our will to act, and the will of others to act. Thus MONEY must be produced in huge quantities to promote the creation of the society.

It is thus important to understand those 3 qualities of languages of information:

  • To give orders hence to be the source of power over people; to value things.
  • To give values, hence to be the system that selects the species wanted and those discharged – the most expensive or ethically valued species and actions survive.
  • To be inflationary, easy to reproduce in massive amounts that increase the power of the owner of the language to guide society with those orders and values – hence the constant increase of the mass of words and numbers of our societies.

So there is not such a thing as ‘deficit’, NOR THERE IS SUCH A THING AS DEBT, but usury and parasitic exploration, since money is like words a language with o value, which we ‘talk’ to kick out actions and productions. And so all resumes in a choice: who invent money to kick out the production of the economy, and what kind of goods we produce. If we lived in a democracy people would produce money, in the form of a universal salary to kick the production of welfare goods they need to survive. Or in its defect, states would invent it to produce infrastructure and welfare goods for ‘free’.

BUT BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WORLD RULED BY CORPORATIONS, they invent 95% of the world’s money in electronic screens and stock-paper for company-mothers of machines, which therefore use it to overproduce those machines; and so the world is awash with electronic machines because wall street invents trillions of $ for them, 30 billion for a couple of kids that wrote a bit of software for whatsapp, 1 trillion for another couple who wrote a bit of software called google. And so on.

AND THAT IS THE ONLY explanation why the cycles are so exact – all the resources of this planet are basically used to create a world of machines, while humans just get the left overs, and because economists, we shall see, are production economist not ‘history teachers’ who care to understand the Consequences for mankind of those changes.

In that regard the theme of money is quite simple in its democratic praxis: money is the language of digital information that has substituted the law in the order and creation with credit of the future. As such it should be NOMISMA, as democratic Greece explained – NOT in private hands, or else we live in a dictatorship of those who issue money, but INVENTED AS WORDS ARE BY AND FOR HUMANS AND ITS WELFARE GOODS, in a demand economy.

So WHY IT IS SO complex in praxis? BECAUSE CAMOUFLAGE AND COMPLEXITY IS THE WAY TO CHEAT people with information. So for bankers and corporations to issue money in monopoly they MUST appear as complex experts, who are the ‘ONLY’ Popes who speak the Latin of Go(l)d, and without whom the system would collapse.

This is the mantra OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF BANKERS, to make MONEY so complex in its issue that people think it is magical wealth that only expert bankers know how to handle. So the American people since Lincoln was killed precisely because he simplified the entire scheme of usury debt and just reproduced greenbacks money as orders to win the war and tried to continue this policy to reproduce money to raise the life standards of the Negro, the financial-media elite of America has used money to control the country and its people, and parasitising them with taxes and anoxia (taking away the right to inert money to people and governments).

Money of course is necessary but in a democracy its issue cannot be in private hands. Today money works better than laws because is a digital language and numbers are more precise than words.

So as a language of digital information of higher efficiency to ‘target’ beings with values, made homologous by the homogeneity and continuity of numbers over words, made money necessary. The solution though to its ‘metal-values’ come obviously from its substitution by legal money in hands of human beings, which has always been the humanist solution to the problem of money, certified by Nature who offers the same solution.

But Nature do have also the equivalent of parasitic, capitalist private issue of money. It is called a cancer, and that is the organic view of private banking: a cancerous solution that absorbs all the ‘oxygen’ -money of the organism of mankind, and give absolute power to those who control money and the information printed for ‘free’ (at minimal cost) with their informative machines.

EC: CANCEROUS-CAPITALIST SOLUTIONS. FREE MARKET: AN ECO(NOMIC)SYSTEM OF FREE COMPANIES issuing with informative machines, money and inhibiting fiction, to eliminate any reaction, whilereproducing without limit energetic machines (weapons and fast evolving future top predator autonomous transport machines). The result is the creation of a perfect super organism of company-mothers of machines, where all humans will soon become expendable:
thrive
This aberrant world is the capitalist world, not a science but merely the idol-ogy of a few human beings (the 0.02% of owners of corporations), which have a ‘primitive cultural brain’, who believes Mankind is NOT a single species, but the ‘tribe’ is (tribal religions, nationalisms, capitalist class structures) and so the superior ‘race’ or ‘chosen of go(l)d’ (nazi-onanist and segregational cults to the tribe) MUST be on top exploiting the ‘inferior human-cells citizens’ absorbing all it ‘oxygen-blood-money’, preventing the creation of a demand economy of welfare goos; where the hypnotic power of go(l)d (subconscious greed values) and the murderous iron violence of weapons must be let free, so the cancerous cells have it all, and ‘grow and multiply’ without limit.
THIS IS NOT AN ANALOGY BUT A HOMOLOGY: It is a tenant of system sciences that ‘the laws of biology happen regardless of scale’. Hence the laws of BIOLOGY ARE THE SAME THAN THE LAWS OF BIO-HISTORY AND BIO-ECONOMICS. We only to correct for the scale of size. Since bigger super organisms, have ‘slower time rhythms’ as bigger systems have slower metabolism. The process and solutions to its sickness HOWEVER ARE THE SAME:
screen-shot-2017-03-01-at-08-04-46In the graph the immediate model at the lower biological scale of a capitalist world of free corporations, with unlimited rights to reproduce their destructive machines, while delivering inhibiting happy fiction somas is a cancerous growth, which has the exact 3 ‘processes that we can follow in all capitalist dictatorships: the cancerous cells multiply its wealth by absorbing the oxygen=money of the system, provoking an hypoxic anoxia state to the other cells, which receive then inhibitors (fiction soma) to deactivate their reaction, while the cancerous cells absorb the oxygen of the blood system, multiply its destructive toxins and finally, as they cannot survive without the body, once the body is infected and killed (end of the cycle of wars), they die in the final gottendamerung of the organism.


In the graph, capitalism is a dictatorship of THE FINANCIAL-MEDIA SYSTEM and its FMasters, a few dynasties of private bankers that control the informative machines of the Financial-media systems, and forbid with deficit zero laws and lack of a Universal salary in blood-money, the creation of a demand based economy, in which humans democratically vote for the goods they want to be reproduced. As only a few bankers and corporations can issue the bulk of money, they decide what the system produces for profit and power (weapons of maximal price=profits to repress people; inflationary money to keep it and make them rich and give them power to buy laws and workers, and audiovisual hate media of easy reproduction through waves and hence of null cost and maximal sale-profits, able to manufacture the brain of mankind simultaneously by zillions, who then favour and vote the dictators of democracies).

You must understand that money is just a digital inflationary language of information, which is NOT wealth per se but as oxygen in cells and words in humans, pump up the desire to act and puts in motion the economic ecosystem or human system to work. So money IS FREE TO PRINT, it cost nothing, it must be PRINTED inflationary to motivate people to work, as free oxygen and free words are multiplied in cellular systems and individuals to motivate them to work.

So reality is really simple as “Nature is simple and not malicious but society is not’. The complexity of the system today only camouflages the cancerous anoxia of bankers and corporation that keep all the money for themselves to reproduce lethal goods that kill our body and mind (weapons and hate-media) so they can control democracies and buy politicos that will deliver wars when needed in the cycle of profits and power.

The growth of money creation and its complexity: all has changed to remain the same.

For long it was gold and this provoked wars and looting elsewhere, but then it became a paper representing a company. For the financier mattered the printed paper, which once ‘created’ could be used to give any order. Not the company. So in Amsterdam a good excuse to ‘talk prices’ which became numbers of ‘money’ were tulips. FINANCIERS would invent astronomical ‘prices’ for tulips that would die the day after and thus as those ‘numbers’ grew, like when you get excited and talk louder, money was invented.

Another way was to invent gold mines in some remote place and talk higher prices when a boat appeared on the coast and rumours told it was loaded of gold. Of course as time went by, the attachment of the language to the substance became weaker, and so states started just to print the language, because the king ‘talked’ it. but the best way to invent money is to ‘project’ the valuable substance into the future:

In the graph above, the evolution of money as a digital language that today values all. In the middle its origin and dominant cultures today in stock, below the main economic schools, only the last ones, are humanist but they are all censored and denied so we have plainly speaking a go(l)d fetish segregational cult ruling the world and no wonder the 1% of the $elected have 99% of the global wealth. This is the aberrant class structure of humanity today which unlike any other class structure where the top neuronal caste has ad maximal 10 times more energy (as your neurons), it has 1 million times more energy-money than the lower class, which unlike any other organism where all cells feeds, suffer endemic anoxia and death. Even in the harshest moments of the roman empire, a senator had only 100 times more rent than a citizen of rome, which was on top fed for free – the only thing that we shared with them was violent circensis, to brutalise and distract the audience, who knows nothing about who runs the world so ‘ poorly’.

In the graph, money is a language of digital information, which as all languages is not wealth per se, but a language of ‘values’ that gives ‘orders’ to work and reproduce goods, and motivates the ‘believer’ in the language to ‘act’, as you motivate yourself to act with verbal thoughts, or visual languages motivate animals to act, or pheromones motivate ants, or hormones cells. Yet unlike words which we all humans can produce ‘amore gratis’, with our mind, money is an external language, so it must have a ‘reference’ outside our neural networks, who do not talk naturally ‘numbers’. Hence the need for a ‘support’ in the form of some ‘asset’ to which assign a ‘digital number=value’ which becomes then an ‘independent monetary number’ that can be copied, rised or lowered according to the perception of value. When we say ‘tree’ the reference for the language symbol are all trees in abstract, even if the ‘word we pronounce’ is NOT the tree.

When we say 1 billion $, we need a reference value, which is NOT the money, but allows the money to exist, as the tree allows the word to exist. Once the world or the money exists it becomes independent of the reference and can be used to tag different objects and give orders to people: ‘stand like a tree’, ‘work for 1o dollars’. So in history of money invention the reference to attach a price value has varied. It was often observed that when the value was more confusing, and the object more ethereal ‘cheating value was easier’.

So ‘future value’ became the perfect way to invent digital prices which become money, through ‘speculation’ on the real value of the ‘thing’, often ‘just promoting propaganda value, greed and future expectations beyond belief’. This was done classically speculating in high prices according to future scarcity. So Joseph banker of the pharaoh became wealthy speculating with the famine of the Egyptians imposing high value to wheat. In stock-markets speculators rises prices in bubbles, for any  reason – normally colonial ‘future’ mines; but also during an age a Tulip, whose ‘death in the future’ acted as a trigger of ‘now-greed’ when speculators tried to attach a maximal price value during the short life of the tulip in a frenzy of ‘rigged’ value rising, till ‘a rabbit=fool’ could be skimmed of real assets for the worthless tulip. The dot com era has perfected the concept that a non-valuable thing will become in the ‘future’ worth trillions of $, with the only purpose of attached billions of money numbers to the future ‘marvel’ of corporations and inventing billions of $ FOR FREE. Then the companies were unloaded into people blind by greed and advised by the financial-media symbiotic 2 sides of the financial ‘guru-economy’.

Milking tulips though ended in a general economic crash of holland, and milking people’s assets for crapcode is increasingly more difficult. But all those trillions wasted, have indeed transformed the world, eliminating credit for humanist, welfare, 99% of needs, provoking an endemic scarcity of all the real assets, welfare goods, food, infrastructure, real jobs, investments in health, education, which a normal use of money as oxygen of words are used – to promote the production of real healthy wealth – would have caused. Instead those trillions have been added to the fat accounts of stock-market makers, who issue money in monopoly and crapcoders, young nerdie computer code writers, who have rewritten once and again basic algorithms of search and selection of information, each one ‘worth billions’ when most are redundant, mere apps worth nothing, in a world in which humans can communicate through thousands of channels, and need no more aps, no more hypnotic screens, not a single penny more wasted in the virtual world of hate media, apps and cancerous high radiation Gn-screens.

Meanwhile mankind lacks credit for basic needs, the American economy has lost 20 years for its people, infrastructure is crumbling, citizens lack basic human rights such as free health-care and a proper ethic and scientific education in crumbling schools. Yet this week another crapcoder is about to receive 20 billion $ for another chat app; to further milk the American investor, with a company whose profits will be null or will come from more parasitic no-worth activities (advertising, big data use of private information, etc.) Only a society in which all people have the right to invent a minimal quantity of the languages of society, able to talk  ethic words, productive money with a Universal salary for a demand economy of welfare goods, and see the beauty of the world is a WHealthy, healthy, democratic society, as most super organisms of nature, where all cells receive just nervous information and enough hormonal and oxygen ‘linguistic codes’ to work and reproduce the goods they need, are. The parasitic, cancerous monopoly on the language/oxygen of society by a few speculators, today crapcoders of internet apps, is the fundamental economic sickness of our internet age of e-money.

How Bankers and speculators Invent Money in boom and bust cycles.

“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint,  without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”

 Rothschild, Go(l)d Master, head of the British Financial-Media System, cycle of bodies of metal.

‘The banker is a man that gives you an umbrella when is sunny and takes it when it rains’  Mark Twain, American Wor(l)d Master, cycle of bodies of metal.

‘The Price good men pay not caring for politics is to be ruled by evil men´ Plato, Greece, Coin Cycle.

How then those private corporations, private  bankers and financial houses invent money in a capitalist system in which they control its issue in near monopoly – at present 95% of new money, which is invented as digital numbers by speculators, financiers and corporations?

Free Market invention of money: The 3 boom & bust cycles of the Industrial age.  The first thing we must understand with such scientific approach, scorning myths, ideologies and selfish agendas is the meaning of money the language of information that regulates the economy and how it must be issued – since all economical crisis of overproduction of ‘selfish memes of metal’ start with the mismanagement and appropriation by a selfish ‘parasitic group’ of eeonomic agents – the private banker – of our collective language of social power – money and its boom and bust cycles.

 From a technical & political perspective the process starts with the invention of a new machine that prints money and breaks the balance between ‘democracy’ (the issue of money by governments in currency) and ‘capitalism’ (the issue of the new forms of digital money with machines), tilting it in favor of corporations that awash with new fiat money buy politicians, pass deficit zero laws and steal the privilege of inventing money from the people.
In a previous graph we observed those ages of free printing of new digital numbers = money, thanks to the discovery of such new machines, caused of the boom cycles and bust crashes of financial economics; as we humans have invented a new type of energy applied to machines of information, hence to increase and improve the printing of money every 72 years generation:
– The speculative bubbles of stock money in the XVII to XIX c. culminating in the 1857-73 crashes of trains.
– Then with the discovery of electricity, the creation of ticker money that invented stratospheric prices for stocks in the XX c. culminated 72 years after the 1857 crash in the 1929 crash of ticker money, caused by the Morgan House and UK bankers.
– And finally with the arrival of computers the explosion of e-money in the XXI c. that has 100 folded the quantity of digital money on Earth, kept by bankers that now control with those computers the production of 95% of new credit on this planet, making ‘states’, powerless dwarfs with only a 5%. And the subsequent crash of 2001 (dotcom) and 2008, 72 years after the similar causal crashes of 1929 and 37.
But why bankers ‘crash’ their reproduction of money without limit, if they can print it for free with those new machines?
Here is the hidden secret – because free money, is worth nothing, remember is a language of information. You do Not eat money. So the important thing for the banker or speculator studied at the end of this post – but equally important in cre(dit)ating money with high prices – is to change the ‘language’, the ‘worthless’ numbers for REAL assets, real wealth, real work, and real power.

Let us  then resume from this perspective the boom& bust cycle of debt-money creation repeated in all financial crises:   

– First bankers issue as much fiat money as possible, with no limit, which costs them nothing and creates debt and inflation. And they lend it to an adoring crowd that knows nothing about their sovereign rights to reproduce that money for free, since the media system and financial economists working for power misinform them. So at a point the entire society owes huge amounts of ‘soft debt’ to the bankers. And this is good for the bankers who receive ‘interest’ for their debt.

– Then they stop lending and contract the monetary mass. So money becomes scarce and there is deflation. Companies fire workers as they cannot pay them. Production halts. The economy shrinks but this is done in purpose because it is even better for the wealth of bankers as now scarce money in a deflationary environment is worth more as ‘it buys more things’ deflated in price. And so the huge debt society has with the financial system becomes worthier – with their payments bankers can buy many more things. Since debt has NOT contracted, as it was established in the age of monetary expansion.

Further on, as now there is no money available to pay the huge debt society cannot pay it with the fiat worthless money that created it and must pay with taxes in hard currency, work, real state wealth, national assets and sheepish obeisance to the power orders of bankers who implement their selfish agendas.

So bankers in this phase end up controlling most of the wealth of society and its politicos obey them.

Thus, in this phase, the entire eco(nomic)system is geared to extort money from people to pay debt, with higher taxes while governments give handouts to bankers and pass laws of privilege for their corporations. In the Train age in this phase the Law of Anonymous Societies that eliminated all responsibility from the owners and managers of corporations and the first anti-deficit laws that forbid governments to issue money were passed.

So stockrats, owners of corporations became the new aristocrats, with the same privileges the rules of the ancient regime had: no court responsibility for their actions (in the Middle ages aristocrats could only be judged by peers in special courts) and monopoly in the issue and use of the language of social power (now money; weapons in the Middle Age, which only aristocrats could carry and use.)

The proof that the system of invention of debt-private money is automatic and guided by mere greed is the recurrent periodicity of the cycles: as soon as a new form of inventing private ‘debt-numbers’ happens, financiers will find any excuse to print for free numbers of money, speculating upwards with prices of stocks and real state to ‘get’ a tax for the higher price they create, or issuing massive amounts of worthless stock, for companies without profits, or reselling ‘fiat money’, mortgages, new stock issues, privately issued currency, fractional credit, etc.

The specific ‘financial instrument’ that prints money for bankers and speculators, latter paid as taxes and higher prices or exploded bubbles of false money downloaded on the middle classes does not matter so much as the capacity to print ‘new money’ with new digital machines and ‘invent’ a figurative, huge value with mass-media propaganda, censored information and attached ‘private agencies of ratings and economic press and think tanks’. So i could as soon as computers were applied to creation of e-money and monetary markets were deregulated 20 years ago, forecast the repetition of the long and short, 72-7 years crashes of fiat private electronic money, in my first papers coming out of Columbia University on Monetary Systems.

And indeed, there was a predicted a crash of worthless stocks, whose prices had been jacked up by speculators and unloaded before bursting the bubble on the middle classes in 2001, 72 years latter after the bubble of 1929; and there was 7 years latter a crash of false real state value, the mortgage crash, 72 years after the crash of New York Real State skyscrapers in 1937. And so it is only left of those speculative schemes the crash of the Dollar, as fiat money is now printed without limit by the Fed NOT to kick out the economy but to pay wars and bail outs to banks, similar to the 1922 crash of the mark that brought fascism to Germany.

All this we predicted 20 years ago, and it has happened as a ‘cancerous’ system of absorbtion of blood-money, our capitalist society with private bankers on top CANNOT avoid to print and waste amazing amounts of fiat money and pay all kind of corrupted politicos, economists, think tanks and financial press to hide it all.

The stock racket: inventing money for crapcode companies. How Financiers invent money.

In the graph we see the difference between countries who invest money and countries who use it to speculate. The west grows less because it does not use the money to invest, and on top US controls the Japanese bank, who invests heavily in American debt, which goes basically to speculators. So the graph  unfortunately answers the biggest problem today in democracies: people do not have a Universal salary to buy welfare goods and states under deficit 0 laws do not invent money and central bankers invent money for speculators. States only manufacture 5-10% of the world’s money. Financiers make 90% of it. And they do it with the only purpose of keeping it for themselves or investing it in memes of metal of maximal profits (hence the overwhelming quantity of weapons industries in this planet, as they are the most expensive machines), but mainly to lend it to other people who become ‘debt slaves’ of the cycle of usury of debt-money.

What financiers basically do is to manufacture money without limits to lend it as ‘wealth’ (even if it is not), and then contract the production of money in the bust cycle to get back instead of money now scarce real ‘energy wealth’, properties and workers.

Let us resume the boom & bust cycle of debt-money creation repeated in all financial crises:

– First bankers issue as much fiat money as possible, with no limit, which costs them nothing and creates debt and inflation. And they lend it to an adoring crowd that knows nothing about their sovereign rights to reproduce that money for free, since the media system and financial economists working for power misinform them. So at a point the entire society owes huge amounts of ‘soft debt’ to the bankers. And this is good for the bankers who receive ‘interest’ for their debt.

– Then they stop lending and contract the monetary mass. So money becomes scarce and there is deflation. Companies fire workers as they cannot pay them. Production halts. The economy shrinks but this is done in purpose because it is even better for the wealth of bankers as now scarce money in a deflationary environment is worth more as ‘it buys more things’ deflated in price. And so the huge debt society has with the financial system becomes worthier – with their payments bankers can buy many more things. Since debt has NOT contracted, as it was established in the age of monetary expansion.

Further on, as now there is no money available to pay the huge debt society cannot pay it with the fiat worthless money that created it and must pay with taxes in hard currency, work, real state wealth, national assets and sheepish obeisance to the power orders of bankers who implement their selfish agendas.

So bankers in this phase end up controlling most of the wealth of society and its politicos obey them.

Thus, in this phase, the entire eco(nomic)system is geared to extort money from people to pay debt, with higher taxes while governments give handouts to bankers and pass laws of privilege for their corporations. In the Train age in this phase the Law of Anonymous Societies that eliminated all responsibility from the owners and managers of corporations and the first anti-deficit laws that forbid governments to issue money were passed. So stockrats, owners of corporations became the new aristocrats, with the same privileges the rules of the ancient regime had: no court responsibility for their actions (in the Middle ages aristocrats could only be judged by peers in special courts) and monopoly in the issue and use of the language of social power (now money; weapons in the Middle Age, which only aristocrats could carry and use.)

How they do it in stocks.

Now, the biggest racket is not direct taxation or tax farming as it was called in the middle ages, but ‘stock-farming’, which consists in a simple racket with 3 legs: financial press, freedom to invent money as much as the speculator wants in worthless companies, and finally central bankers to bail out the banks with free credit in hard currency. And it is simple: the speculator finds a worthless company, today internet crapcode kids, doing redundant apps, like whatspap or snatchap. That is the excuse, when the racket was invented it was a tulip, yes! a tulip, OR AN imaginary gold mine, which never materialised. Or tea, which then nobody drunk. So you have the financial press printed with the same electronic machines, telling you that is gold, will be so rich in the future; and so you seek ‘a rabbit’, in the jargon of Amsterdam to skin it, and sell the crapcode, the gold mine, the tulip. And when things heat up you need also a central banker, who will print money for you.

The result is that the economy has NO REAL CREDIT, ALL THE MONEY IS INVENTED BY ECB OR SUCKED IN FROM PEOPLE TO pay the racket. In the internet age, the racket was paid by the middle classes of the entire planet to which they unloaded crapcode at stratospheric prizes. Then the FED was used to unload toxic assets. Now for a decade they have run a massive creation of money for wall street to exchange real money for crap companies. Of course after trillions wasted some companies are worth a bit, but imagine all that money invented for people, for welfare, for health-care, for hospitals, or by states for real infrastructures – not 20 billion $ for snapchat, 200 billion for google ranks, 1 billion losses each year for uber to robotise and destroy the taxi drivers with brutal slave-like salaries to poor people with a car and so on and so on.

But the key is to have thin air press and make it complex as if they were experts, and many believe their ‘inventions, called’ classic economics, so they really think this is ‘freedom and capitalism’ will make us all rich. But of course, US and Europe has the minimal growth of gdp. And of course, the newspeaks of capitalism, keep reaching new heights of cynicism.

For example the Fed told us for a decade that it would maintain the interest bankers pay for borrowing money at 0%  – that is, it will give them even more money for free, till the unemployment rate goes down 6 %. 

So it looks like they don’t do it for banks to pass the money to speculators, which is what they do, and to speculate themselves and create fractional credit (10 times more money than they have in the account) but to give credit to people, which is just the ‘left-overs’, while 2 countries, which are ran by people who care for the wealth of the nation, China and Turkey, without any banker of the racket group for obvious reasons, have had the maximal growth during a decade around 10% because people work hard, and with credit they create much more wealth.

In the graph, speculation is worthless assets coupled with massive hand outs in real currency by central bankers, which only fatten the accounts of the chosen of go(l)d elites of stock markets, is the preferred way to ‘invest’ in the West.

Thus it is not coincidence that the lowest growing nations in the world are those under duress of the ‘FMasters’ Iran obviously embargoed enemy but what people do NOT understand in the Euro area, is that they ARE the next target, in as much as they HAD a DIFFERENT MODEL OF FREE DEMOCRACIES, BASED IN WELFARE STATES AND A FAR MORE HUMANIST CULTURE. And this is the hidden tragedy of Europe since the ECB took away the right of those nations to invent their own money. So they pay a racket in debt usury to the ECB which massively reproduces money for bankers, which speculate – that is, pass it to STOCK-MARKETS, AND IN US TO wall street inventors of false ‘CRAPCODE’ companies. WHILE PEOPLE, WELFARE AND INFRASTRUCTURE languishes and has to be paid with taxes, today further used for the military world of the Semite wars.

So the Newspeak translation of the ECB and FED racket at 0% is what people believe: That the unemployment crisis is due to the classic capitalist crisis of overproduction of machines – in this case the last Kondratieff wave of chips – blue collar robots and white collar pcs, will now be cured by bankers parasitising credit. But of course the unemployed will have no access to money to pay their bills, or start up a small restaurant or kick out production of welfare goods.

THIS CRISIS HAS BEEN SO BRUTAL DESPITE THE MASSIVE ADVANCEMENTS IN MACHINES PRODUCING GOODS, BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ZERO NEW DEAL – NO MONEY FOR PEOPLE. SO NOW THE 1% HAS AS MUCH AS THE 99% OF MANKIND AND THEY CALL IT DEMOCRACY!

A DEMOCRACY WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE TO PRINT THEIR OWN MONEY OR AT LEAST THE GOVERNMENT SPENDING IT ON THEM.

Instead the Fed – the inverse Robin Hood – robs money from the people to give it to the bankers and with a cynical twist lies out of its hat, implying that giving for free money to bankers will be a cure for the unemployed.  The cynicism here is astounding.

We shall take it all from the people and give it to the o.1% because that is good for them; it will solve the problems of the poor and unemployed.

Amazing but people believe that this money NOT invented for infrastructure or jobs but ‘exchanged for the ‘false’ companies’ invented in n wall street’ is real wealth. And so when the Dow keeps spiking up for the 0.1% to take it home, they cheer, living the surrogate life of the ‘Malcolm X’ house negro who feels worried when the master is sik.

How they DON’T NOTICE? LET US EXPLAIN THE RACKET ONCE MORE:

In stocks you invent numbers, which are money, then you need to exchange them for REAL CURRENCY, or REAL WORK, or REAL STATE, and so you do that, but for that to happen, the RACKET MUST BE SHARED BY THE FED-CENTRAL BANKER. AND FOR THAT REASON 80% OF CENTRAL BANKERS, CEOS AND MEDIA PEOPLE belong to the same biblical, jewish culture.

If NOT the racket wouldn’t work. You need 3 to tango: the wall street speculator invents a worthless company. Then it sells it to people if he can cheat them on buying, but as last resource, he will borrow for free money in hard currency emitted by the Central banker, which therefore must be part of the racket. It is very simple.

But then you need economists, and newspapers to validate the racket saying it is all good for the economy. So for 500 years since the racket was invented selling tulips of worthless value in Amsterdam, the elite of the Jewish people, the ‘Am Segullah’ or “People of the treasure’ has occupied monopolised completely those 3 positions: Financial press, Central banking and Private stock-markets. And they pass to each other the racket.

 NONE OF THIS MONEY GOES TO PEOPLE. SO AS THE NEXT GRAPH SHOWS, any nation under the go(l)d racket grows far less than those who have their own banking system:

It doesn’t matter how COMPLEX THE PROCESS IS. IT is all theatrics.

Imagine those trillions were used as the Chinese use it just for their people. Even if cradles of the party take part of it. It is not truth that the Chinese are supermen, they have credit to open any business they want and the state doesn’t spend the money bailing out scammers, paying for stupid wars to back dictators or apartheid israel, provoking an spiral of more hate-memes and wars. And it doesn’t create the money for speculators in wall street and frankfurt. Which is what the ECB and the Fed have been doing for decades.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: