The founder of Classic Economics is the paradigm of an Idol-ogue of memes of metal and the right of its ‘animetal people-castes’ to be on top of human societies. Reason why it has been leonized by the elites of the Industrial R=evolution ever since he was born.
His 4 fundamental ideological thesis, treated in individual posts in more detail, are in fact shameless apologies of the fundamental tenants of the 4 ‘idol-ogies’ that make of selfish memes of metal the purpose of our societies, studied in depth in this web:
– Based in its belief on racist Go(l)d idol-ogies (Judaism ->Calvinism), as he believed this ‘greed engine’ was the ‘invisible hand of God’… following his Master, Calvin (‘Gold is the intelligence of God‘)
– That machines are always good because they increase production through specialization and division of tasks – a thesis already mentioned by Greek philosophers – the classic ideology of technoutopia, which disregards its collateral effects with mankind (alienation of work, atrophy and competence with humans in labor and work fields).
Basically those fundamental thesis were written to validate the monopoly of issue of money of its mecenas, the montagu family who founded the private bank of england and its friends, the first industrialists of Scotland, among which we find Mr. Watt.
The duplicity of his work as a pamphletist of the 1% of mankind is obvious in many ways:
– Regarding greed, he first wrote a book on ‘Morality’ affirming that the engine of mankind was love. Now he contradicts his thesis.
(to be cont’ed)