‘of Neopaleolithic’:

ego px. as a limit to objective social sciences.
The fundamental reason why humans seem to be doomed is purely mental – the ego paradox, embedded in all species.
So we shall first define mathematically the mind to understand why whenever a social scientist try to be truly objective about mankind he gets a knee-jerk denial reaction that prevents any rational solution to our existential problems, often ad hominem. And that is the end of it. 
And the funny thing of course is that it is a biological proof of the organic nature of the Universe. I have called it, the Antiquantum or ‘ego’ paradox. Simply stated: All organic systems see reality from its biased point of view, selecting information to cater to its selfish needs and objectifying therefore the rest of reality they ab=use. So humans cannot accept biological properties in machines, in Gaia and the Metal-earth, or a superior intelligence to his – that of the program of social evolution of the fractal Universe.
The degrees of the ego paradox then are relative to the ‘power’ humans have above other humans which being the only species they consider truly intelligent, alive, is their selective process of ‘sense of superiority’ and this gives origin to THE IDOL-ogies of animetals which ab=use other humans with weapons money and machines, come on top and feel above heavens and earth.
Let us then define mathematically the mind.

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.


Our mind is a linguistic system that selects information with visual images and then traces a mind mapping of reality to impose upon it its will.

Schopenhauer truly understood it when he said the ‘world is a representation’ biased by the will of man to control it.  Mathematically it was defined by the father of modern philosophy of science, Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, which he call the world, far more reduced than the Universe. Since he said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

º-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside ONLY a static linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ that humans often CONFUSE WITH THE WHOLE VITAL, MOVING UNIVERSE.

So the mind is an infinitesimal monad or ‘point that stores a world in itself’ (Leibniz).

But humans unlike philosophers who believe in panpsychism and consider a Universe of infinite mind-points ordering information, think only THEIR MIND is perceptive, intelligent and has A WILL TO ORDER REALITY from its biased point of view.

Descartes  was not such a simpleton though. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, ‘The World’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only the human mind based in light images.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between most people who think the mind of man is the entire Universe and all the serious philosophers of science which are pan psychic from Aristotle to Descartes to Leibniz to Einstein to this writer.

SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information, with infinite languages.

This is illustrated in the graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.
Impressionists realized latter of the same thing and so they painted space as LIGHT. And now we construct digital minds which also perceive electronic light, reason why we can feel a tv or VR system as ‘reality’, because it is based in the same kind of electronic mind, which will be the pan psychic mind of robots that already move as our eye does instinctively to the red colors as natural born predators that like red, the color of energy and ‘blood’ (which hypnotizes us in gore films).

The ego paradox – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘Every infinitesimal Mind thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it confuses with its mind, self-centered in his ego’.

Only the objective mind of ‘scientists’ are able to overcome the ego paradox and realise our mind is in a buddhist sense just a Maya of the senses particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole, and all is alive.

But THIS objectivity fails when applied to social sciences as it needs the common people and the people with power to accept it. And they deny it and censor human objective social scientists that ARE INSIDE the organisms of history and so can be easily denied. This is the anti quantum paradox, inverse to the quantum paradox where the observer is so huge that modifies the particle. In social sciences, the scientist is so small inside the organism of history that the ego centered powerful people do not accept criticism and prevent social sciences. And the common ego-centered people agrees.

For that reason bjectivity does only enter the mind of people who do social science. Instead they follow Tertulianus: ‘you will defend me with the sword and I will defend you with the word’.

Modern science however has gone the other way, increasing the objective view of man as a non-preferred species, NOT even in scale, as organisms of history and its memes program them. So the fractal organic Universe and its scalar 5th dimension of parts and wholes brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings:

It must be understood that without infinite minds-particles gauging the Universe science would NOT exist. Even quantum physics is called a gauging theory as particles reproduce, move in groups, and they do so as schools of animals as if they were checking their distances with each other all the time. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.


The SCALAR organic Universe: Memes and fractal planes.

‘I seem to be the only scientist who believe there are infinite cyclical clocks of time in the Universe’

Einstein, father of modern cyclical time theory, on his fight with peers to impose the old/new perennial philosophy of science of the cyclical Universe.

Let us now ground the concept of Gaia, the Earth and the metalearth as super organisms evolving in time, in MORE OBJECTIVE TERMS through the science of systems, and the discoveries about the fractal, organic Nature of the Universe, and how information is transferred between smaller scales (ab. ∆) and larger whole organisms, in ANY SYSTEM OF PHYSICAL, BIOLOGICAL OR SOCIAL NATURE.

We have to understand this: a time cycle breaks space into an inner and outer region creating a timespace organism, or information-energy system (as we have seen information and time are two sides of the same coin and vacuum space has motion and energy, so modern physics discovered that time-information and space-energy ARE the substances of which we all are made-We are ALL systems made of time clocks that carry our information (as we speak I hear the nobel prize of medicine is given to the discoverers of the laws of cyclical time clocks of human organisms), stored in cyclical heads and particles and ‘energy body waves that move’ our systems; and this duality of organic structure, has an astoundingly simple, beautiful law to order the infinite species of time cycles and spatial energy, in SCALES of organic symbiosis