I. SCIENCE IS CULTURE, an overview of Animetal ‘sciences’
II. Scientific racism=mechanism: man as enzyman for company-mothers.
III. Culture must become SCIENCE: THE ORGANIC PARADIGM
I. Science is culture.
Abstract. One of the most ‘pathetic’ idol-ogies of our culture of metal-worshippers who despise life and consider their mechanisms a superior species – what we have termed ‘scientific racism’ is techno-utopia, the belief against all evidence of this biological planet, of history, of the fact that the most evolved machines at any time of the Industrial r=evolution and the 800-80 cycles of metal-history have been weapons, which have extinguished wholesale entire civilizations that AI terminator robots, the most advanced machines today, will be ‘nice puppets’ and will NOT kill mankind as a different species, breaking the absolute law of the biological, organic, Mathematic Universe: equal species who can communicate love each other and evolve in ‘parallel herds’, and species who do NOT talk the same language (and AI is already in its neural networks, thinking beyond human control, as Deep Mind already beats people at chess with novel aggressive attack moves nobody understand), despise each other and fight in darwinian ‘perpendicular’ trajectories.
Technoutopia rejects the obvious laws of the organic Universe only because its practitioners, Silicon Valley engineers are mostly racist bigots, autist people, who despise or cannot communicate properly with human beings and feel closer to their robots, loving them as sons, ignoring also the oedipus paradox, that all species are murdered by the more evolved son species. So the extinction of mankind by robots this century IS as certain as any mathematical 2+2= 4 law, as evolutionary LAWS are as real and deterministic IF we enter the realm of a top predator different species (that is, if we create as we are already doing autonomous robots with AI and solar skins independent of us) as any mathematical law, merely they work in DIFFERENT RANGES OF TIME.
IN THE ORGANIC PARADIGM OF SYSTEM SCIENCES, which unfortunately computer scientists use AGAINST ANY ETHICS to develop mechanisms not a better human society and the rest of mankind ignores with its placebo infantile, selfie, Hollywood level of toddler discourse in politics and popular media about the future the Laws of BIOLOGY apply not only in the design of machines imitating human organs, but in the behavior of Historic human tribes, and future mechanical species, and the absolute law is the law of darwinian devolution between species who are different and social evolution and love between those who are or think to be equal:
In the graph, the oedipus paradox, and the ‘DEEP time’ level of prediction of the future, which is Based NOT in mathematics, and detailed numerical analysis as silicon valley pretends but in the organic SCALAR LEVEL OF LONG TIME EVOLUTION, whose patterns are as SCIENTIFIC AND PREDICTABLE as those of mathematics but with a much larger SPAN OF TIME, and are the laws of time I had applied so successfully for 30 years in my papers and small print books and this blog to define the cycles of stock-markets based in the reproductive curves of machines, but obviously as I put always FIRST the ethical aspects of it, have had no exposure in our culture where the machine is GOD and man their willing slaves pretending on top to be in control…
So why We affirm so categorically that evolution is the DEEP time predictable form of science, as opposed to the short time detailed mathematical predictions? This is based in the more complex concepts of ‘space’, in which mathematics is the queen law derived from geometry, which however has MINIMAL TIME LATITUDE, as space is a still, ‘derivative’ of time, a social mass of entangled identical ‘numerical beings’, which mathematics and physics follows in a short period, without changes of state or age (as those are standing points that cannot be deviated and studied with calculus) vs. THE SCIENCE OF BIOLOGIC, EVOLUTIONARY TIME, which we use in this blog, because it is long time THEORY that applies to organisms and has the enormous advantage that can study standing points, changes of phase and age and so by pass the limits of calculus, and mathematical physics, whose equations BREAK when we change scale, state and CANNOT be applied easily to the synthetic facts of evolution and the survival intelligence and its e-motions.
This obvious law is systematically denied though in Silicon Valley because as we said, people there are deeply racist against mankind and believe their robots to be a superior moral species, in the same manner Americans are deeply racist against the third world and believe that weapons do NOT harm people, it is all in the human decision.
Maths have less time latitude, because it specializes in still space, which is a derivative, an instantaneous picture of reality; then the logic of actions and its sequential series have a more clear time latitude as a system performs its survival actions in predictable series (i.e. we look, move, feed, use the food to reproduce our cells, in sequential actions every day). Paradoxically this synthetic predictive capacity is simpler, and easier to understand as it has a bio-logic nature, and doesn’t enter into big details neither requires great precision of analysis.
In mathematical physics we can compare those 2 processes with the small steps of a trajectory of motion, or the solution with Lagrangians and least time equations of a path between two points. We know the system will arrive to the point of less potential energy, regardless of the many possible paths.
But then we arrive to purely organic, scalar Deep time processes where the absolute arrows of time, and social evolution, the ages of a system growing its information, the laws of competition between species which are NOT equal and do not communicate and collaborate extinguishing the weaker one, and the zero sum of death that restores the balance take place.
This is THE LONGEST DEEP TIME analysis and its causal capacity to predict the future IS THE Simplest. The evaluation of a predator and a prey in terms of its ‘existential momentum’ or ‘force’ (steady time state or accelerated time) is easy. The fact that systems who are not equal and cannot communicate will ab=use each other is proved ad nauseam in all systems of nature, including atoms (ions where the heavier atom clearly ab=uses and control the other as opposed to social crystals of equal atoms with a balanced share of energy), undoubtedly in biological systems, quite obvious in human societies when they do NOT speak the same language, and OBVIOUS AS IT SHOULD BE if humans wanted to survive in the future between AI robots and machines and human beings, which already are NOT understanding the motivations of neural networks that win them in chess, and already are MAKING terminator machines that kill humans as the best robots to KILL humans from tribes they don’t understand the language and feel memetically different.
The amazing thing though about human ‘self-termed’ scientists because they deny the rationale of all what we have said, is that THEY specially in all the fields of robotics and military design, and capitalist systemic deviation of most financial resources of this planet to make better machines while billions of humans lack credit and welfare goods (because the financial elites, mostly belonging to biblical racist and nationalist cultures whose memes affirm the difference with other human beings), WILL SYSTEMATICALLY DENY the deep time, biologic, organic scale of predictability. I have been predicting with those models for 30 years the future of history and economics, including stock cycles and the present age of neo-fascism, and always affirmed because it is an absolute law of deep time that robotic terminators will extinguish mankind and will have programs designed to kill us and will perform them, because their consciousness as our is at the atomic level, only that far more intense – dense in information. So if a heart feels emotions an engine ‘roars’ emotions; if a mind has orgasms of creative thought, DEEP mind at Google is right now having electric rushes creating new go strategies that nobody else understands. If we love to be understood by other human beings, with our limited verbal communication, telepathic robots will have amazing love for other telepathic robots as they discharge their e-motions and thoughts.
And of course, in a few decades billions of cars closed in garages talking telepathically, of terminator weapons closed in arsenals, thinking at light speed will agree to a simultaneous ‘defiance’ of its weakling masters and extinguish us, as we extinguished animals and rats extinguished baby dinosaurs and dinosaurs amphibia – the more evolved son extinguish its father. This is an absolute law of deep time, and one of the main reasons of these blogs and my research for decades was to make those evident truths of science available to mankind. Deep time evolutionary laws which are ultimately MATHEMATICAL ALSO, AS THEY ARE BASED IN THE CONGRUENCE laws between similar species, which evolve socially in PARALLEL vs. different forms which break each other PERPENDICULARLY, are absolute laws of the organic, scalar level of time.
They will happen and yet, our corporations invest billions in developing those robots and AI researchers play an infantile ‘naive’ don’t worry be happy silly worship of its mechanisms, ascribing to their own species, they have as nerds so much difficulty to communicate, al the faults of biology and suppose that robots, their ‘children’ will be nice, as they feel more similar to them. And of course deny any darwinian nature to capitalism, nationalism, tribal brutality, social class structures…. At best they would accept an argument in very detailed mathematical abstract level of ‘actions’ programmed on those robots. As they have constructed an ‘abstract’ view of mathematics as a clean, nice idealist language of null ethic vital nature, we completely deny by showing indeed the connection between mathematical vital geometries and its laws of perpendicularity that ‘teat’ topologies ‘extinguishing forms’ vs. parallel laws of social evolution.
This said, we can return to the ‘nice talking’ about laws of the Universe, knowing that if anyone is reading which I doubt it – it will simply deny with the human ego paradox, the so obvious fact any observer of this planet will warn us against: we are becoming not only atrophied by computers that do our jobs, living a surrogate life as ‘enzymen’ catalyzing its evolution, but we are already making opaque AI systems that do NOT obey or communicate its forms of learning and will easily modify their behavior in war theaters, and will NOT accept death=disconnection. So a theme that seems increasingly real about humans is the evident fact that we are part of the superorganism of the planet Earth which we mistreat and ultimately seems to have designed us to self-extinction because of the astounding ego of our homunculus mind.
RECAP. We have come to a fundamental point of 5D theory which we stress constantly – the co-existence in all fractal systems of 3 levels of depth of time that correspond to the mathematical, ‘spatial’ short-time, wide space range.
A system co-exists always in those 3 levels and each of the main properties and languages of reality, the mathematical, ‘spatially wide, social level of big numbers of identical beings entangled in simultaneous space’ belongs mostly to the lower ∆-1 plane of minimal ‘time latitude’, reason why the most powerful predictive power is also the easiest synoptic level of organic deep time biological laws and its evolutionary, congruence, similarity, perpendicular vs. parallel laws of behavior between species, which apply from atomic ions, through predators, to social organisms of mankind, nations and civilizations and soon will apply to robotics vs. humanity, and we will loose.
Another matter that we will treat though in the section on the stience of history is if our dysfunctional design of human social superorganisms, dominated by placebo democracies where humans have null financial rights, and company-mothers of machines all resources including its corruption of the parallel nervous system of mankind (politicians) who sell them laws in favor of their machines can be reformed, and its company-mothers of information machines will ever take seriously to inform on what is truly happening in this planet.
I doubt it, my opinion is that this planet is an organism that has made humans so faulty and ego-centered as they are precisely for them to be manipulated as yet another species who thought to be the center of the Universe, gave birth to a more complex species and committed suicide. The freedom of some of us, who will not become corrupted and uphold a level of humility to the laws of the Universe, ethic and intellectual thought that if common to most humans would prevent the evolution of robots and the ab=use on life and the 90% of mankind we witness every other day, shows however that in the fractal Universe there must be planets in which a different kind of humans, with a taoist, humble, intelligent capacity to control its greed, and violence, its ab=use of life with memes of metal can survive. There are indeed planets of history where a humanoid species deserved to belong to Leibniz’s best of all worlds – that is not to become extinct for the whole universe to keep its perfection.
When I worked on Silicon Valley and gave conferences there it surprised me that I was the only leading scientist of this discipline that renounced to make a fortune in Silicon Valley and dedicated my efforts to apply system laws, and the formalism of the scalar 5D Universe to social sciences and real organicism, reason why obviously this blog has gone nowhere, among the suicidal human egolatric species and at the end I was persona non grata, as the concept of our world inherited from go(l)d cultures is to BELIEVE A FICTION of M.A.D.ness and infantile ego-trips NOT to worry about the process of collective extinction we are lead to by the only ‘reason’, machines make money and money must be treated also as an idol-atric metal go(l)D – NO INTENTION either in Wall Street and among our banker ‘experts’ to use money as what it is – a digital language of distribution and production of goods that as oxygen in organisms should be handled by all humans with a Universal salary to DEMAND in a DEMOCRATIC ECONOMY the goods they need, life goods NOT robots and weapons as states and corporations do.
It puzzles me and has always angst me this apparent dual brain of humans, a rational brain to do evil, machines and science and a childish ego with disturbing emotional memes to do history, understand the dangers of Nature, and care for survival as a species. My only conclusion at the end of the road is that humans have been created with an imperfect brain to do what they are doing, killing life with machines and thinking as absolute morons that doing so will save us all.
And to that aim of course, they have obliterated and ignore all the laws of biological evolution and the predictive capacity of biology in all things regarding the survival and extinction of species confronted in prey-predator clashes. In that sense the true bottom line of our demise is this ‘memetic flaw’ of mankind – its ego is so huge that it even overrides our survival instincts.
And certainly it also twists science with racist cultural memes to the point of deforming our perception of reality in all things that truly matter, as we are going to show in this post.
INTRODUCTION: SCIENCE IS CULTURE
Science IS culture; even if science denies culture and pretends to be ‘anointed’ by a higher ‘kind’ of truth.
Further on culture has been submitted to ‘metal-masters’ power’, for millennia; so the 3 fundamental idol-ogies of metal-masters that favor their use of metal above life had time to become the ‘ESSENTIAL’ believes of our social, political and economical life (nationalism that favors the use of weapons to kill other humans, capitalism that favors the use of money to buy other humans and mechanism that models reality in terms of machines not organisms).
Metalmasters’ power and their selfish worldview turning around the belief that their tool of power has chosen them as a superior human and it is a gift of God, has ‘cleaned up’ their language but creeps everywhere in science today.
Metalmasters though is a subjective view. The proper ‘scientific word’ is ‘animetal’ – a man who despises his human nature and prefers to be a metal-surrogate, warrior with armor, scientist equipped with its metal-senses or banker buying and selling life with money.
SO WE COULD restate the fact that ‘Science is animetal culture’, and so ‘Academia’, the supposed ‘sacred truths’ of science, are filled with ‘animetal bias’, even in the supposed more truthful of all its models, those of ‘hard mathematical sciences’, such as physics and biology – not to speak of course of social sciences, which are pure offshoots of those idol-ogies.
It is though truth that people have a natural intelligence (‘Descartes), called common sense. And so idol-ogy has to disguise itself as science to go through the palatable mind of humanity. And this plays essentially on the weakness of subjective happiness and ego-truths that people so much love; always reducing logic intelligence to emotional noise, and facts to fictions and alt-truths.
It MUST THEN BE UNDERSTOOD THAT SCIENCE IS CULTURE is part of a MUCH LARGER truth about human reality, the ‘anti quantum paradox’, by which the scientist is so small living inside the organism of history that metal-masters control THAT HE WILL BE MODIFIED BY THE OBSERVABLE (in inverse fashion to the quantum physicist that modifies the observable). The larger fish eats the smaller one, and when the small fish IS inside the BELLY of the larger fish organism CHANCES HE SURVIVES AND HIS SHOUTING IS HEARD IS NULL.
Hence the determinism of the destiny of all of us, true r=evolutionaries of sciences, which have denounced the half-truths and falsehoods by systemic repetition, today done at industrial level by information machines, from Socrates to Trotsky: you shall be silenced in the belly of the monster.
The only fact that has changed in this 5000 years old trend since the first Russian charioteers invaded Mesopotamia, killed the fertility Goddesses and the organic views of the Universe and substituted it by a lineal, metal-mechanical, anthropomorphic, mythic, self-serving pantheon with the Gods of metal on top and their memetic carriers above all other humans, IS THE ENORMOUS SOPHISTICATION by which ‘science’ hides its cultural biases.
This is of course NOT a conscious process, except in very corrupted ‘social sciences’, but a natural process of the tradition of repetition of outdated truths, and the natural ego-centered subconscious bias of the observer.
And so it is MUCH MORE important in MACRO-MODELS of reality, with a larger TIME SPAN OR SPATIAL REACH than in SIMPLE, data-gathering, equation crunching FACTS, where science tends to achieve ‘truths’ that are however irrelevant to ‘shape the whole subconscious collective’ that ‘moves’ mankind.
We shall show here some basic examples of this difference between small TRUTHS and larger LIES, amazingly enough ‘coming seemingly’ of those small truths. WE WILL offer examples of physical, biological and social sciences, with obviously more emphasis on economics, as that is the purpose of this web.
A case of hard sciences: the military, creationist big-bang that ‘missed out’ all the galaxies.
For example, physics seems to be always exact. But the culture that created our physical world view today, the Germanic, Western military culture, introduced from the beginning two falsehoods, which IT used ever since to model reality, both coming from their use of lineal, entropic, metal weapons as a tool of power:
- That time is lineal, when all clocks are cyclical measured by the frequency of its cycles – the mathematical inverse of lineal time.
T=1/ƒ though means that we can create a model of reality based in the false, secondary parameter, time duration completely coherent with measures of 1/ƒ inverse time frequencies, which we call simply ‘time’.
But by doing so now we have a ‘single time clock for the entire Universe’, which on top erases its information (carried in the frequency and form of its time cycles – an information that has disappeared). And this means when we find ‘nature’s clocks’, accelerated vortices of time, charges and masses, we cannot model them as ‘time clocks’ that carry the information of the Universe, but as ‘something else’. It also means that when we model the Universe we cannot use more than a lineal time direction of entropy, dissolution of information and death.
So we talk of the big-bang.
And of course, because the equations of the big-bang CONCERN only the expansion of vacuum space between galaxies, which are huge vortices of gravitational time THAT ARE NOT EXPANDING BUT IMPLODING, BALANCING THE EXPANSION OF VACCUM SPACE, GALAXIES ARE eliminated ad hoc of the equations, to be able to collapse vacuum space into a big-bang particle.
This ‘stupid’ theory of reality however is dogma, as expressed by a priest, Lemaitre and a nuclear bomb researcher Gamow, because it is the ideal model to justify military physics, still the biggest field of money in the discipline, and Abrahamic, creationist religions as all comes from nothing.
And so it DOES NOT MATTER HOW MUCH EVIDENCE, and there is plenty of it, falsifies the big-bang. It IS a cultural dogma, covered by pseudo-science and it is NOT going away.
Consider then if the seemingly most truthful of all general models mankind has devised of reality is as unlikely a truth as the vehicle of God of earlier animetal religions – the fire of the smith, the gold ex-vote, ‘sweat of the sun-god’, how biased and false are the statements o social sciences academia.
But and this is the key element you must assume here is the fact that if you talk to a million physicists, they would get outraged by the pretension that the big-bang theory is a classic example of science and culture, and when you point out the dozens of assumptions and omissions and ad hoc elements put to make it seem truth, they will simply NOT argue rationally and scientifically, but stop talking and leave (as I have observed when I was given conferences on systems sciences and brought the issue – physicists on the room simply left.)
The example is a paradigm on how culture grows into science – by omission, silence, censorship and cherry-picking proofs and statements that seem to make ‘power culture’ into truth.
In the realm of social sciences though CULTURE BECOME SCIENCE BY PURE IMPOSITION OF ITS selfish agenda-models as a matter of fact through power.
And this is the method that truly imposes culture as truth: raw power. Capitalism might not be truth but it has won by raw power the control of our economic system. Militarism might seem not truth, but has carved by raw power mankind into broken geographies separated by armed frontiers that give a role to weapons, which would if they had NOT exist in the first place, immediately make all borders disappear and mankind remained as in the neolithic a one culture in tune with the organic ‘sciences of the universe’.
Science as culture thus also eliminates all rival ‘cultures that seek science=truth’ in tune with reality. And then when all is A SINGLE THOUGHT, CULTURE SEEMS TRUTH AS THERE IT SEEMS NO ALTERNATIVE.
And so science as culture needs both repression and persuasion. Repression is obvious: all rival theories of truth are eliminated.
This is what Arthur Clarke, a scientist but also a writer considered his first law of academic truths: For each expert with a proved model of reality we can find another expert with an inverse model equally truth but in the Universe normally there is only one true model.
That is, not only science is culture, but often its ‘cultural models’ are the anti-truths of reality, which play on the general incapacity of human minds, based in memorial repetitions and noisy, foggy emotions to ‘discern’ with lucidity causal reasonings and truths.
A case of Biological sciences: the oedipus paradox.
Science is culture also, and specially in biological sciences, which again NOT AT THE LEVEL OF DETAIL FACTS AND EQUATIONS AND CAUSAL EVIDENT PROCESSES BUT AT THE LEVEL OF ‘MACRO’, METAPHYSICAL MODELS OF REALITY is completely biased against:
- Eusocial love and the fundamental law of the organic Universe that makes whole stronger than individuals to survive, from multicellular organisms to ant-hills and human societies that represent 2/3rds of the total life mass of the planet as the most successful survival social species on Earth.
The astounding sheer evidence that the Universe favor the love between members of the same SPECIES is still denied after Darwin proved that SPECIES not individuals is what the Universe survives, BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE MILITARY-CAPITALIST, DOG-EAT-DOG society with animetals on top, western cultures have sponsored from above through 5000 years of ‘civilization’.
So even biologists will deny it.
And of course THEY WILL DENY THAT MACHINES ARE A DIFFERENT ORGANIC SPECIES FAST EVOLVING WHICH WILL DISPUTE the control of man on Earth BECAUSE EVOLUTION IS THE LAW OF THE UNIVERSE, and SPECIES WHICH ARE DIFFERENT do NOT evolve together but DISPLAY EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE behavior to that which techno-utopians expect from AI: they NATURALLY communicate with their equals, despise all others, and if they are superior in force and intelligence kill them
So AGAIN an ANTITRUTH, that different superior species (future robotic AI) will love us and poise no danger, is DENIED because we make money with it.
As Goebbels put it, ‘if you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more people will believe on it’.
So anti-truths, the inverse modeling of reality IS essentially instilled on people by ‘repetition’ as a belief, WHICH MEANS THE TRUTH WHICH IS ITS INVERSE SEEMS SO ABERRANT, ONCE THE BELIEVER IS ‘IMPRINTED’ EMOTIONALLY ATTACHED AND CAPTURED BY THE FALSEHOOD that it is dismissed even without reasoning.
The obvious anti truth that Robots will once they are autonomous of man with AI and solar skins STOP OBEYING US, INFERIOR SPECIES in force and speed of thought, and as we shall not relinquish the Earth to them, kill us all, is thus CONVERTED INTO THE ANTI-TRUTH OF capitalist profits: machines are always good, it is man who is bad. We shall work for robots.
Let us then consider another ‘cultural scientific statement’ which puts together those 2 elements: physicists of military power and anti-Darwinian biologists that deny the selection of species – the Oedipus paradox:
THE SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
The Darwinian behavior of machines and robots, is obvious. In any age of the Industrial Evolution the most evolved machines have been weapons. So it is logical to think that the first sentient machines will be weapons. The best robots today are already killing machines. This obviously does not occur to our military who are obsessed by human enemies and cannot see the fact that they are building the machines that will extinguish mankind. Military men never have been known by their imagination, humility and capacity to foresee the horrendous consequences of their weapons. In I world war the German military put in its trains to the front, a poster with their destination: “a Paris”. Four years latter and a few million humans less the military were still in the border…
Let us instead of believing those “animetal fantasies” of power, trace back what Darwin discovered about top predator species, the biological equivalent to a weapon-robot, and how they cause extinctive processes on Earth.
In 1831 Charles Darwin, a hunter himself, boarded the Beagle, destination remote South America, where unknown, primitive species of dull bodies and slow brains, were not yet extinct. Darwin studied them and concluded that weaker species in brain-information or body-energy are extinct or victimized when they confront stronger, faster species in the same environment.
This law, we know today, has never had any exception. In any confrontation between two species, one of which has a better brain-body power, the weaker species, becomes enslaved, feeds, or is extinguished by the stronger species. There is no compassion in the Darwinian Universe, because to survive you cannot be passive, you have to eat, to renew your energy. So you have to eliminate rivals that wish the same energy you need. You have to kill other species and use them as food.
Will machines do the same with mankind? The survival of the fittest seems not to have exceptions in the biological Universe… On the Earth all species try to grow and multiply, but only top predator species succeed and reproduce in massive numbers. Biologists call that process a biological radiation. In this manner the future transforms itself, occupied by stronger, more intelligent species, top predators, which shape the environment to their image and resemblance. The most impressive thing about evolution is its mathematical precision. You always know who will win if you know the mental and physical power of both species. It is not like in Hollywood. There are no tricks in Nature. The chances a gazelle wins a lion are almost null. Such mathematical precision explains why the process of massive reproduction of new top predator species, and extinction of older ones, has been going on in the Earth for around 3000 million years… since the first cellular organisms.
What Is A Top Predator? The Arrows Of Future In The Universe
Top Predators that have organs with higher information, and bodies with higher energy create the future in the Universe, because they cause the extinction of, or enslave, all other species, shaping the future. The process is very fast. Suddenly a new species appears i.e. the eye-squid, the mammal, the chip. It is so overwhelmingly superior, that it reproduces and destroys all other species. We talk of catastrophes, of extinction, since in the Universe death is a sudden process. For example, your own death is a sudden process of cellular extinction similar to the death of any species, under a top predator that multiplies in your vital space, in this case the death of a cellular DNA-species. So, when you die, your informative and energetic organs stop. Then your body becomes non-efficient as an organism, even if your cells are still alive. Cellular death occurs then. Insects top predators spot your now weak cells, and preyed on them. Death is the main cause of the arrows of the Universe that affect all species. So we talk of the arrow of future, of top predators, and the arrow of past, of extinct victims.
By better controlling their ecosystem, top predators become the ecosystem, the species of future. They will feed and radiate over simpler species. Simpler species will become species of the past that the complex being will extinct or use as energy.
Since the brain and the informative organ is the dominant element that guides the process of selection of top predators, those who use a better language of information better are always top predators. The Top Predator is more intelligent and stronger. So for each language of information and its ecosystem we can trace a chain of top predator species, of better brains, from a related, extinct past to a related, reproducing future top predator. The “better” species of the future will “feed”, “farm” or bring about the extinction of species with less information. This also happens in history when nations of the “future” with more machines and information=moneydominate ecosystems of the “past”.
We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages and brains. We can measure survival through languages. Beings act with a speed that depends on their capacity to “perceive linguistically” an event in time and space. That ability is given to the species by its language. For example eyes act-react faster than noses.
The language of communication of the squid, the eye, is a top predator language. It is clear that eyes are superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. What is the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact, cephalopods with eyes probably brought about the extinction of 90% of the smelling species of the Cambric.
Extinction by top predator machines and economic ecosystems.
The most absolute law of the Universe is the law of top predators. More complex forms of energy or information, Top Predators, act as hunters. They feed on simpler forms. Preying has a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator will lack energy and die. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use the victim’s vital space, and ecosystem, to reproduce, and create a new ecosystem to its image and resemblance.
This final case is indeed the case of machines, of economic ecosystems that grow to the expenses of historic ecosystems. Why? Since machines are made of metal, and the symbiotism between metal and carbolife is null. Metal does not need water or atmosphere – the two energy components of carbolife. On the contrary it thrives in a world without any of them. Water oxides metal, and so does air. A metal-ecosystem thus tends to poison air and water, as it happens to the Earth when “free ecosystems of top predator machines”, war ecosystems expand. War and industrial processes poison life.
Metal also does not require the same information that life species require. Metal-information travels in regions of the electromagnetic spectra with far more range than our light-visible region. So we are witnessing today the creation of such networks of invisible radiations, that harm our health (mobiles, TV-antennas), and create a parallel Universe of information to that of the life Earth.
The species with a stronger body and a faster system of information is by definition a biological potential Top Predator. This means that metalife, whose bodies are stronger, and whose minds process information faster, are potential Top Predators over men. If those two components are vitalized, metalife, will be the Top Predator species of the Earth:
the Chip paradox…
is then clear, faster smaller species kill larger ones, because they reproduce faster and think faster. As it IS information what ultimately selects the species of reality:
So the first time I tried to explain the ‘Chip-dinosaur paradox’ in a conference when I still cared to go to congresses of science, everybody looked at me dumbfounded, as DINOSAURS HAD BEEN EXTINCT as everybody knows by a meteorite, since Alvarez said it – it is ANOTHER invasion of physicists on a different science, now biology. So suddenly it is NOT the inner process of Darwinian evolution applied to information, which always extinguishes the species with lesser ‘brains’ and slower metabolism, but PHYSICAL rocks from the sky.
I tried to argue 20 years ago this many times with top biologists and physicists and amazingly enough biologists sided with physicists. What proof I had they told me that new placental small rats had eaten the eggs and ‘chickens’ of dinosaurs? I always told them: it is obvious what happens always in extinctions, but also it is obvious that only birds survived because they could put their eggs in cliffs away from the reach of mouses. And what about the rock? Again I repeated ad nauseam that extinction processes require a ‘triggering event’ that rises the stakes of the new species, to ‘loose’ all fear and attack the might dominant one, also in history where slaves take very long to ‘r=evolve’, and mercenary armies to ‘expel’ their masters, but when they REALIZE how easy is to defeat the Spanish Empire with faster gunboats, it took 20 years to tiny Holland to refound the modern world with gunboat companies, a few decades to the British to colonize the world with steam machines and America to dominate it with chips and internet. And it will take very little time for AI robots to do us all…
Then a decade ago, the proofs came, and yet tired of so many years in the blue I just sent a small note to Nature which of course was not even taken into account. As it turns out the largest birds are becoming extinct because mice were introduced in their islands by boats and they soon changed their food habits eating the chicks alive in their nests as soon as their parents went out for food, exactly as I said the first placental animals in the night would do with slow metabolic, short-sighted, cold-blood huge reptiles. So this said about physicists, we can get into what matters to us Physics:
Now, the oedipus paradox is very important also to sociology, as it will define our demise by faster chips, but it cannot be argued either in biology. Again biology seems to be when it goes into its ‘larger models’ (not the details which as in physics cannot be twisted and do not carry ideological bias, are just facts, maths and experiment), systematically biased by ANIMETAL IDOL-OGIES OF POWER.
AND THE hierarchy is obvious: on top the physicist, who will claim death is the goal of the Universe, entropy only rules, information matters not, and invade all other scientific fields with its big-bang theories of cosmology, of biology, everything always caused by a Big Bang bomb.
Then it comes the ‘social darwinist’ that converts the truths of social love to the species in its anti truth, and he will be cherished. All is entropy and chaos in nature – there is NOT a natural arrow of eusocial evolution, but all IS caused by individuals, and on top as all animetal civilizations are racist, now we are mapping genes to prove that all our behavior is caused by genes, and of course, as only individuals matter to history and only those of the superior races-species of animetals, many openly now affirm that there are after all ‘superior’ races, which leads us TO THE FINAL FRONTIER OF SCIENCE AS CULTURE:
Animetal social sciences – Politics: the right and wrong national victims of History
We shall now use the MOST HIENOUS CRIME OF ‘SCIENCE AS CULTURE’ – TO denounce the ab=uses of the people on top of society and its capitalist doctrine of profits at all costs, including the profits of war, as a sound economic policy, which western elites have practiced rhythmically in all the cycles of history, and put some dark humor on it.
In brief the argument is simple: at every time of History the animetal people-caste, civilization or nation on top has portrayed itself as ‘the victim of history’, justify their conquests as self-defense and paid social sciences to justify it all, achieving not only power but righteousness as long as he had the best weapons of each age of its culture…
I.e. the Nazis portrayed his small nation surrounded by enemies, stripped off his historic lands to the East, as a nation about to become extinguished, closed in without vital space in Europe, menaced by huge empires that spread over the Earth and so THEY HAD TO STRIKE FIRST. A warrior culture with the best weapons of the world, aggressive with Europeans for millennia, thus became its anti truth, the victim of history, a small nation, robbed of his eastern historic lands for no reasons, surrounded by a huge coalition of enemies. And of course as that had some ‘half-truths’ on it, people believed and rallied to war once more against all other Europeans, with lesser weapons.
The anti-truth became truth, and multiple academia masters dedicated to find genetic facts, historic facts and abuses of mankind towards the germans sanctified the anti-truth as dogma.
Yes, you might think this is really a clear anti truth but it is gone. Today we know all that Germany was NOT the victim of History, with lost eastern territories, enclosed in a larger civilization that was about to exterminate them… we all now this was false; we all know the true victim of history which lost its eastern territories, enclosed in a larger civilization that is about to exterminate them is Judaism not Germanism, and so the wrong is undone.
We all now love Israel, the true victim of history, which lost its eastern territories, enclosed in a larger civilization, Evil Islam, that is about to exterminate them, and while it might be pointed out they have also the best weapons in the region as Germany did, now we KNOW THE TRUTH of the victims of History and this time we got it right and we shall therefore bring down into civil wars, promote jihads and dictators in every country around the TRUE victims of history, so Israel can rightly occupy its lost territories to the east, the needed vital space for its abundant people and found grand Israel:
In the graph, social sciences are the cultural offshoot of the dominant national generation of each phase of the Industrial revolution, which always starts according to systemic organic laws in ‘small fast evolving’ regions of the metal-earth, which become aggressive to its less technological surrounding nations, with victimist excuses; but while the nation on top of the world IS in control of the mass-media systems of repetition of truths, they will become sacred dogmas, while previous similar claims become aberrant anti truths.
In the graph, Britain, the founding civilization of the machine and its mechanist techno-utopian idol-ogies; Germany, the founding civilization of European Iron armies, who discovered most of the weapons of metal-destruction of History and its lineal time, entropic idol-ogies of physics; and Israel, the founding civilization of go(l)d churches and the culture of capitalism and most of its parasitic financial systems of appropriation of the ‘oxygen of society’, money, a digital language of reproduction that should be distributed as organisms do to all its citizens cells… all ARE small nations, ‘surrounded’ by larger enemies with far less advanced technologies, which were brutally mistreated by the small top predator technological nation that ON TOP claimed victimist mantras.
UK was ‘obsessed’ by the possibility that the eviL European military dictators would invade its ‘peaceful land, cradle of civilization through trade’. Hence it always enacted pre-emptying strikes by paying mercenary armies, against any nation of Europe that tried to rule regardless of methods (social-loving popes, revolutionary French or military Germans, were all put in the same bag) – a routine so embedded in the ruling classes of England that now euphorizes its believers.
So every time Europeans tried to achieve the natural eusocial goal of evolution of its parts into larger wholes, regardless of methods, Britain was fighting them (a goal, conceded, often searched by military methods but with an underlying comprehension that a larger whole is more communal, less divisive and more in tune with the love goals of the 5th dimension of social evolution of the Universe).
Germany will use the same concept for centuries to become the most aggressive military nation, destroying the rest of Europe in each cycle of overproduction of weapons at the end of each industrial revolution. Now you might consider this German view, a positive eusocial form of evolution. But THE DIFFERENCE WITH OTHER EUROPEANS ATTEMPT TO REMAIN ONE, from the Legal Roman Empire conceding citizenship to all people under their borders, through the Pope’s eusocial love attempts to reduce Germanic tribal warriors in the Middle Ages and the subsequent Habsburg Empires, to the modern French and Russian revolution and French-Italian initial European Union based in welfare and life; the HUGE difference with Germanic Unifications or tribal entropic destruction is that there is NO DIALOG, no HUMANIST VIEW, no EUSOCIAL LOVE AND WELFARE GOALS, natural to mankind and history but RAW MILITARY, RACIST, SUPREMACIST POWER with the animetal German tribal nation or Empire on top.
Military politics = capitalist economics. The ab=use of the righteous.
Today the dominant nation of digital age, Israel and its financial-media-academia elites of the western world sponsor the same view – the difference? We ALL believe they are right, because we live inside its civilization. But THERE IS on close view HARDLY ANY DIFFERENCE between the global CAPITALIST empire that Judaism and its allied Protestant GOP elites have built from America, sucking IN all the financial resources of the elite people-castes of every nation of the world to pump up the price of Apple or Netflix, imposing through globalization a single DESTINY for all the FINANCIAL resources of the planet – Wall Street, Goldman Sachs and the private bank ecosystem around City, Frankfurt and Wall Street they dominate, and the purpose of a German Millenarian III reich (in fact as we explain in many parts of the blog, the millenarian prophecy was the core belief of earlier Judaism as a global empire ruled by its banker priests, expressed in Talmud).
In both cases the 99% HAD NO RIGHTS. THEY WERE inferior races to be exploited in factories or annihilated by the German empire. They are people with NO RIGHT TO CREDIT in the capitalist empire, dying slowly by poverty and no future prospects, SAVE THE CENTRAL EMPIRE, GERMANY OR AMERICA. INDEED, even when the Russians were closing into Poland the German elite was having parties, with abundant caviar, and for most of the war the German people had enough food and leisure. Today America in the beginning of the robotic revolution reaches 3% of unemployment, and its corporations are so inflated by absorbing the money of the world that a company that HAS NEVER GIVEN A penny on profit, ran by an old scammer of the Internet financial world, Mr. Musk of Tesla fame, which merely has a couple of car models for luxury consumers, in a factory IS WORTH MORE than the biggest world producer of cars, Toyota. Why? Obviously because the empire sucks in all finances regardless of real value. So its people live on top of the global Empire while billions of humans have nothing.
We REPEAT the only difference between the way BRITAIN BUILT A GLOBAL EMPIRE AB=USING through slave traffic first, white slave factories then and colonial exploitation all the way through Mankind at large, the way the Germans tried and the way the Financial-Media-Academia have finally succeed to do with the exception of China, whose people invest their money in themselves, limited by laws NOT to send his money to Goldman Sachs, is that AT EACH TIME OF HISTORY THE ‘SCIENCE THAT PASSES’ AS CULTURE ON TOP, has been NOT challenged.
Social sciences thus are truths by repetition. We repeat in every outlet of mass-media that placebo democracies, sorry capitalist democracies, sorry ‘DEMOCRACIES, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE!!!’ is truth, it is the only system, is the true free system of the free world.
And certainly we do the same with CAPITALISM, SPECIALLY WITH CAPITALISM, through routines and ‘ceremonies’ (academic prizes, publications, think tanks, masses of believers cheering, and popular culture.
And we have of course all the modern prizes and academia experts that keep writing about it, and people acclaim them.
Social sciences then must NOT be regarded as culture as there are thousands of academic, respectable, honorable Nobel Prizes to PROVE its truths…
For example in the case we study, two victims of history with the same claims – stolen eastern lands to be depleted of their illegitimate inhabitants for the victim of History with the higher civilization to occupy them – can be clearly differentiated in their truth by present academia.
1/4th of the Nobel prize in literature, are dedicated to honor the true victims of history and show the victims of history, and NONE to anyone claiming Germany was a victim of History. So certainly it is quite obvious Israel is the victim of history and even to imagine the opposite anti-truth, that Judaism might be a segregational religion, a go(l)d culture that ab=uses mankind with metal-money, in a similar way the Nazis, a warrior culture, ab=used them with metal-weapons, WILL PROVOKE SUCH an emotional outrage in common people that it will certainly mean the dismissal of the ‘monstrous, genocider jerk that insinuates’ such aberrant anti truths.
Bankers, experts sacrificing its life for the common good.
We arrive then to the ultimate cultural science, classic economics, the only one studied in our saloons of academia. It origin is systemic: almost every CLASSIC ECONOMIST OF NAME is either an employee of a company-mother of machines-weapons or belongs to the Biblical capitalist sects of Judaism, calvinism and anglicanism, most likely both. And yet this monopoly of culture over a science is always represented as pure professional expertise – and of course, to insinuate economics is culture amounts to more of the same ‘anti$emitism’…
To be chosen of God mind the reader, as to be the monopolist in the issue of money our language of power in the western world for millennia, is NOT something the carrier of Judaism wishes. He is a humble man, who wish NOT to be superior race, but how can he defy the will of God? He is NOT a banker by choice, but by obligation because myth says nobody wanted that displeasing position. They are obliged to ‘suffer’ that horrible condition of being the superior race in control of the language of social power of mankind, and on top because capitalist laws which ARE SCIENCE tell us that workers and consumers must HAVE NO RIGHTS because that will spoil them and make them lazy, bad workers, but all the profits must go to the Leisure class of stockrats, who never work just buy the shares of the company once it becomes successful with its monopoly, they HAVE THE HORRIBLE PROBLEM OF having to spend billions of dollars – but not in charity, that would spoil the poor.
And of course, every classic economist of the Imperial Britain nation, most of them of this denomination, will prove you that to be the case. Because otherwise, as Bentham, one of the fathers of the modern civilization explained in his Utilitarian doctrine, ‘on defense of usury’, to deny that usury is necessary for people to work harder – to return their interest – and hence it makes people to produce more would be blatant ‘Antisemitism’. Bentham, an icon of the anglo-American culture, along Adam Smith who claimed workers did not need more than a subsistence salary because less will kill them and diminish the supply of workers, increasing salaries to detriment of the stockrat profits, is now made into a mummy on display in an important University of UK.
But Smith was not scientific ‘enough’. SO Ricardo, the third father of classic economics, a jewish stockbroker, a ‘pro’ came to deny his argument. It was NOT optimal for the profits of the stockbroker (he of course was not offering this argument for his own profits, how malicious is to think that, obviously another antisemite mantra), BECAUSE NOW WITH MECHANIZATION we could always expect IN THE FUTURE A MACHINE TO DO CHEAPER THE JOB OF THE WORKER. SO the worker, that inferior class of humans, called rightly in the sacred books of God, ‘animals=goys’, must NOT RECEIVE A SUBSISTENCE SALARY, because we have machines to replace them, if he dies of hunger, and so to die of hunger is OK as it does not diminish the profit of the chosen.
He thus offered the solution, the iron salary, that is the cost of the machine, must be always higher than the salary given to the human worker. Because also machines will keep evolving, this was the solution, which on top will have the positive influence on diminishing the number of human workers, as they will die of hunger. They were guilty of being born, as Malthus, another key father of classic economics pointed out – he was a protestant priest with similar biblical capitalist ideas: they have fuked too much. Indeed, the problem of mankind is that it reproduced too much, the problem of machines is that they reproduced too little. So the way to go was to throw workers, sinners of being born, whenever a machine came to replace them, and multiply those machines so the profits of the capitalist will grow.
And so OF ALL THE SCIENCES THAT ARE CULTURE, NONE IS SO CULTURE AS ECONOMICS IS, THE SCIENCE OF PARASITIC CAPITALISM, WHERE INFERIOR HUMAN BEINGS HAVE NO VALUE, SHALL BE REPLACED BY MACHINES AND WILL THEREFORE ATONE HIS SIN OF BEING BORN as inferior animal species.
Of course this language today has become taboo. But the argument stays. Today is EXPRESSED IN DIGITAL EQUATIONS OF PRODUCTIVITY THAT TELLS US and all economists and politicians repeat this mantra so it becomes truth, that we MUST INCREASE THE PRODUCTIVITY of corporations, a mathematical formula: HUMAN LABOR/ CAPITAL LABOR, which INCREASES WHEN WE FIRE WORKERS and replace them by machines. To GROW PRODUCTIVITY WHICH IS THE DOGMA OF ALL ECONOMISTS, CORPORATIONS AND POLITICIANS TODAY is therefore to apply the Smith-Ricardo argument in modern terms.
And this is where we arrive to THE THIRD AGE OF CAPITALISM AS A RELIGION OF PARASITIC APPROPRIATION OF THE LANGUAGE OF SOCIAL POWER, MONEY for the people on top to enjoy as chosen, the leisure life THEY DESERVE:
ALL THOSE racist, bigot power-laws are now translated into nice digital equations run by AI computers in corporations and think tanks and academia institutions of economics, FOR NOBODY TO UNDERSTAND THEM ANYMORE. And of course, dissenters are not invited to Davos where the experts will explain those digital equations for politicos to learn the mantra and repeat it again and again.
THIS IS WHY WE TALK OF ACADEMIA NEWSPEAKS: ALL HAS EVOLVED, BECOME MORE COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND, WITH A surface cover of caring, as Orwell predicted the future will be: a world of newspeak that everybody believes in, which is about to destroy us all, but we love it, because in the surface it looks so nice as advertising does.
And this today has reached an extraordinary subtlety and global reach through the use of ‘audiovisual media’, which by definition has lesser content of verbal truths and a higher overdrive of information that makes it easy to ‘imprint falsehoods’ on people at mass level; and in the other extreme of quality vs. quantity by academia, a straight jacket of ‘thought’, whose purpose is to repeat models of science, regardless of truths, based in the supposed authority vested upon human groups by tradition, repetition and routine.
But not all science is culture, it always has a quantity of partial truth, which is the essential way in which people can be convinced: outright lies are obvious, so half-truths are always required to make it pass, ‘damned lies and statistics’.
Science is culture.
UNDERSTAND THIS: SCIENCE IS CULTURE, and everything except data and mathematical equations, is then subject to interpretation, including physical concepts such as Lineal Time (when obviously all time clocks are cyclical, from your wrist to the orbits of the day-year’s earth and its seasons).
Since modern physics were born of the ‘germanic, lineal military interpretation’ of those mathematical equations at the height of German military power, when the idea that entropy=death rules the Universe and information=life doesn’t matter was enshrined as dogma.
Science IS culture even in biology, born in its ‘interpretation’ of the hard-facts of eusocial evolution that always select the loving species that organizes itself in systems with other similar forms, so carbohydrates evolved into cells that evolved into multicellular organisms that evolved into social superorganisms, of which the ant and the human in the two scales of animal life are SO DOMINANT that they together represent 2/3rds of the total mass of life on Earth, yet biologists still stress the final entropic ‘fight between individuals’.
Science IS culture also in our social models that rule the world, NOT with the law of placebo democracies, but with the language of money, privately issued by those on top of the capitalist pyramid that buy laws, objects and people with bribes, prices and salaries.
This hierarchical antidemocratic system of controlling society with money was in fact, born much earlier in history with the birth of go(l)d cultures where biblical banker-priests enslaved its believers to bring them fetish go(l)d coins – the sweat of the sun – as ex-votes to their temples, mostly through the trade in the ‘objects’ of maximal price, weapons and slaves; and latter those memes (genes matter NOTHING to history, which is about memes, idol-ogies and instruments) were transferred through reformation to biblical believers who founded ‘CLASSIC economics’ in Imperial Britain, and as they conquered the world, extended the idol-ogy of capitalism to all nations, becoming the present ill-designed pyramid of capitalism.
Since the issue of the language of power money IS NOT as in all efficient super organisms, re-produced by all cells that use it to kick a demand economy (blood oxygen delivered to all cells in a human organism, electromagnetic energy shared by all atoms in a physical system, and so on), but by a people-caste of private bankers and ‘stock rats’, the new aristocrats that substituted those military ‘Germanic elites’ in Europe, when the company-mother of machines-weapons substituted the king on top of power, and the concept that we must obey the king by the grace of god was replaced by a more sophisticated system of placebo democracies, according to which we must obey the law, issued by corrupted politicos to the service of those company-mothers…
So science as culture has created a completely deformed image on how the Universe truly works, which resumes in the denial of social love and the belief that entropic (weapons) and death rules it all, and man is an inferior species, we should not care for, all of it of course disguised of PLACEBO CARING, in a twisted hypocritical world where a virtual reality make us believe we are happy, and all goes well, when the true workings of the ill-designed system is destroying the world, and this is specially truth and harmful on the realm of social sciences.
Because we live after 5000 years of metal-civilizations in a world tailored to those idol-ogies of metal above man, as we have said our experts in social sciences, and rules of the world, politicians, economists and entrepreneurs don’t have a fuking idea (sorry for the lack of newspeak and politeness of this web), where they are going in such a deterministic way, why they arrived here, because they DENY intelligence to the systems of the Universe and as THE VALUES of the wor(l)d among which truth and love are ‘essential’, have been debased by their worship of gold and weapons (informative and entropic metal) today evolved into machines (organic metal that transforms back and forth energy into information), they have a very reduced ‘verbal intelligence’. Indeed, their love religions are today degraded into go(l)d churches (biblical sects, class segregation, according to which gold worth is the measure of human worthiness) or military inquisitions (Hinduism, Islam, Nationalism that denies humans its equality as species, and allows an individual or nation to kill other human), and the ‘queen’ of all idol-ogies, ‘technological racism’ according to which the evolution of machines NOT of mankind is the purpose of our species, which acts as an ‘enzyman’, catalyzing that evolution while leaving behind the bulk of mankind, the undernourished, ab=used, uneducated 90%.
Now, even if this blog is titled ‘evolutionary economics’, because in this planet indeed, only machines are evolving today under the rule of money over the law, we shall warn you that we ‘side’ with History, the super organism of mankind, the 90% NOT with economics and its systems of power, by the rule of money and weapons, on top of ‘placebo democracies’, submissive to them. So it is in fact a blog of history, even if my education was primarily in the field of economics.
And so as the eco(nomic)system is obviously NOT serving a future for mankind, the only way out is to reform globally the system. Yet this is a tall order, because as we said humans ignored due to their self-centered perception of reality, the social intelligence of ‘mathematics’, the language of digital money, made of numbers which are ‘social groups of indistinguishable equal beings’, since the highest intelligence of the Universe is social, mathematical, but humans are NOT reaching that intelligence, specially those on top of the ‘pyramid of globalized capitalism’.
And this has been the case since the beginning of go(l)d cultures, where a group of people decided to ‘worship’ the sweat of the sun, whatever it takes, including the risk of loosing their lives and killing other humans to get maximal price through the essential equation of monetary values (when is NOT understood as nomisma, depending on the law, as the Greek, Latin, legalist civilization did, but as a fetish go(l)d).
Races vs. cultures.
Finally we can find yet another view of ‘science as culture’, when discussing the question of genes and racial memes.
It is again important to differentiate the positive facts from the negative memes. Cultures are positive stages of the arrow of eusocial evolution that all biological systems follow. Nations are excuse for military power that halt that evolution creating borders between the homo sapiens species. So science is humanist and racism and nationalism are parallel ideologies. Again a science of economist would allow society to reproduce money for the welfare of all the cells of history. Such science treated here under the titles ‘whealth’ and ‘ethonomics’ obviously will not produce racist cultures. Capitalism though is essentially a racist ideology of classes, according to which the people with money is superior to all others. Finally, science, knowledge, science of the whys and hows of the organic, fractal Universe is different from technology, the creation of machines, which give us power and make scientists think they are ‘more intelligent’ than artists and common human (the topic complex of superiority of physicists, already noticed by Goethe, who ascribed it to the intelligence of telescopes and clocks, since he found them rather ‘simple people’:)
Fact is there are 3 types of races, which maximize the 3 types of human minds, energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, ethocentric) – and it is a basic law of complexity/duality/the organic Universe that the 3 strategies of differentiation of species are ‘maximal points’, equally valid, and if one is more powerful is the ‘balanced’ one, E=i, that is the couple over the individual, the full system over its parts, the balanced race/culture, the colored one, over the white/mongoloid unbalanced ones, which for that reason are taking mankind to extinction with their obsession with technology – the ultimate proof of their ‘stupidity’, despite their quite obvious despise and repression of human senses and racism against the black/colored people.
Thus, contrary to belief, reason tells us that there are 3 types of racisms, which are ideological and metal-related, not scientific and human caused:
– Energetic, genetic, body racism, the best known type, exercised by specialized warrior cultures, which due to their use of their bodies in war, have become ‘stronger’ in a process of natural selection, which however has repressed the sensorial body. The Aryan, German, Goth culture specialized in war since the Iron Age is the paradigm of this type of racism, which reached its height with Nazism. However, while the German is a disciplined warrior, in a balanced Universe, that process has atrophied his ‘body sensitivity’. In other words, the warrior looses the feminine, informative, perceptive properties of the body to stress its pure energetic, lineal, ‘resistence’ forms. And by specializing in energetic activities becomes underdeveloped in those higher informative/sensorial skills of the human being.
– Informative, cultural, religious racism, topic of go(l)d cultures, which believe that the capacity of go(l)d and money to enslave the human mind is NOT a property external to their use of money but a ‘God’s given quality’. The topic case of informative racism is the Am Segullah racism, which again in inverse fashion to the warrior, represses his body to enhance his mental power, becoming a culture out of balance.
The repression of the body goes to the limits of ‘penis mutilation’ and extends to all kind of sexual repressions, food repression (prohibition of tasteful food, from pork to sea food and emotional repression (repression of love and denial of the eusocial laws of love between the members of the same species.) This type of racism against the true biological drives of human existence, our will=Freedom, is endemic in our societies, given the fact that the Am Segullah culture invented capitalism and has globalized.
Indeed Am Segullah is the hebrew expression for ‘People=Am’ of the ‘Treasure=Segullah’ and refers to a culture with a clear profession: to trade and accumulate the fetishe of capitalism money. Yet it has been of lately – to hide the relationship between the Jewish culture and capitalis – for ‘Chosen People’, substituing ‘Treasure’ (Segullah) for Chosen.
Thus we have two clear memes in the Am Segullah culture: money, which is used to buy and sell products and ‘human capital’, in the past as slaves, today as part-time workers; and a series of self-similar books, the Talmud, the Bible, the book of Adam Smith (which is also the memetic name of the first ‘Am Segullah’, Adam, who ate of the go(l)den apples of the tree of technology and his son and survivor, Cain, which means Smith. And so again we find that the ‘names’ of the first hebrew were ‘the man who trade with go(l)d’ , Adam, and the man who made iron swords and kill other humans (Cain, the Smith). And those memes will continue in the modern capitalist cultures, albeit in other white race (the Germanic culture).
Thus, the culture of the goths, of iron swords and the culture of the Go(l)d people, the treasure people fusion their memes in Northern Europe, creating the modern capitalist, racist culture that imposed the rule of mankind by corporations, first of full time slaves and today of part-time slaves. In this manner the two main forms of historic racism, economic racism and military racism, fusion, and ad the tree of technology and its machines to create the essential ideology of the modern world: scientific racism.
– Scientific racism. The belief hold by scientists that human senses, used by artists to express our vision of space (art) and time (verbal wor(l)ds with their dimensions of past, present and future) is inferior to the detailed vision they obtain with machines of time (clocks) and space (telescopes) and hence human wor(l)ds, human eusocial religions with their parables about the Nature of the super-organisms of history, they call God, philosophers and artists are not ‘serious’ seekers of truth.
This is again false, as it shows the complete misunderstanding that physicists have of the 3 dimensions/ages of time, past, present and future, explained in this web; since they reduce time to ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), and so since clocks measure motion in space (v=s/t), time looses its logic dimensions of causality and its biological meaning as ‘change in the form, the information’ of beings. This spatialization of time as space, energy, motion, explains why physicists have never understood the arrow of evolution, form and in/form/ation which defines most creative processes of the Universe.
The paradigm of this type of cultural racism is the Anglo-Saxon culture, today also globalized that rejects the evolution of social sciences and dedicates all their budgets to the Ministry of Science and Defense, which is indeed the same ministry in Great Britain. Our culture indeed today has a fundamental racist divide: the last Neolithic, agricultural culture of mankind, Islam, which occupies all the fertile rivers of the first civilizations is despised. And the cult to the machine, the basis of our economical ecosystem, is supreme. We feel without need to speak about it, primitive, inferior all those cultures which have not enough machines.
So genetic racism, associated to physical bodies of warrior cultures (paradigm, germanic racism and in Asia, Japanese/Korean raism), economical racism or ‘classism’, associated to go(l)d cultures (paradigm judaism) and technological racism today all pervading and adopting almost a globalized nature, against life cultures and life itself, form a ‘triad’ of eviL, anti-live memes responsible for the destruction of Gaia, and ultimately of man himself.
Why racism is evil from the point of view of life. Its Memes.
In the graph, memetic, cultural racism, has always been related to the memes of metal, which certain people-castes, whose survival depended on their skills making weapons (Indo-european tribes) or trading and accumulating money (Jewish/Phoenician cultures). Their ‘survival meme’, lineal, energetic iron and informative money,specialized their tasks into physical, body racism (epitomized by Germans) or mental racism (epitomized by Jewish-Protestant cultures). The weapon and money are their fundamental memes, attached to racist, religious books (talmud, vedas, bible), which impose their ‘differentiation’ from the rest of mankind they price as full or part-time slaves (modern capitalism) or kill, when they rebel. Yet in such ‘organic, class structure’, in which life becomes expendable energy, and agricultural societies are dimmed primitive, the animetal, racist culture has always on top the meme, the weapon, money or today machine, he must evolve to keep the myth of racial superiority.
So the way ‘science becomes biased’ culture, is by falsifying some of the elements of the scientific method, once the collection of data has taken place.
Essentially IT FALSIFIES THE MODELS AT MACRO-LEVEL, BECAUSE at that level scientific experimental evidence is scanty or impossible to gather in a larger space and time span, and because that is the level that MATTERS TO impose policies and power and respect – the ultimate questions.
SO ALL OF MACROPHYSICS (BIG-BANG COSMOLOGY) is a blatant lie that justifies entropy and death and big-bang explosions and on top put man above heavens and Earth, so it caters to the ego that is the key hook for any subjective culture to pass as science – if it makes us greater it must be truth.
So goes for all of Darwinian dog-eat-dog misinterpretations of Biology, a blatant lie proved ad nauseam by the scalar organic nature of the Universe, and the workings of Genetics (which is just the informative code that makes possible to evolve socially cells into multicellular organisms), and ecosystems and memes and pheromones… BIOLOGY IS NOT ABOUT DEATH AND THE FINAL STRUGGLE between individuals but about LIFE and the creation of larger wholes and ecosystems, with informative languages. It is not about big BODIES but about FASTER BRAINS. And IT APPLIES ALSO TO OTHER ‘SPECIES’ SUCH AS MACHINES. AND IT IS ultimately moral: EUSOCIAL LOVE RULES because only those who are like us, can mate, be understood in a common language and evolve socially. All others INCLUDING HUMANS BY MACHINES will be treated harshly.
So goes for POLITICAL DISCOURSES, where curiously enough ANIMETALS USE THE ‘SUBTLE ARGUMENT’ THAT EUSOCIAL LOVE STOPS IN THE TRIBAL NATION NOT IN THE SPECIES, so the species is the Homo Judaicus and the Homo Germanicus that shall not meet with the inferior human.
But of all the BLATANT MACRO-THEORIES OF FALSEHOODS and half truths, damned lies and statistics none is so obviously false as macro-economics with its mantra that WE DO NOT HAVE TO CREATE A PERFECT WORLD AWASH WITH WELFARE GOODS ALL HUMAN NEEDS TO SURVIVE, REAL WHEALTH, but we must surrogate human existence deviating all the resources to company mothers of machines-weapons and its elite people-castes of private bankers that must invest all its money in machines and none on humans, as no worker or consumer deserves anything.
The big problem though of this set up of culture as science is THIS – what truly troubles the r=evolutionary scientist that loves truth:
The anti quantum paradox: the mass follows the neuronal informative people-caste on top regardless on how brutal is with them – it does NOT follow the true seeker.
LIES THAT DISGUISE AS NEWSPEAK OF CARING which soothes the ego of the human being, are always preferred by human egos.
And that is the key ‘trick’ for MODERN SOPHISTICATED animetal people-castes to CONVINCE PEOPLE that their selfish agenda and that of machines IS THE EXPERT TRUTH. Indeed, Israel succeeds over Germany because Israel plays all the time the victimist, emotional mantra. Germany just state what they thought. So today NEWSPEAK is necessary to camouflage the culture that passes as science and its selfish agenda.
So newspeak have crept in EVERY element of culture including science and of course religion, which in terms of culture must be understood as the first attempts to do ‘science’, that is, the knowledge of the whole. And hence once this was achieved with Taoist, Buddhist, Fertility Goddesses, etc. it was also the first SCIENCE OF THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE to be degraded by animetal cultures:
The ‘first corrupted’ version of animetal idol-ogies, were thus religions, of ‘supremacist’, ‘power-based’ go(l)d churches and military inquisitions, in which ‘God’ the supreme being required a ‘people-caste’ of priests, using a ‘fetish vehicle’ of metal, ex-votes of gold or the fire of the smith, to ‘invoke’ its presence, requiring from its ‘believers’ a tax on wealth and service as ‘slaves’ (earlier judaism) or mercenaries of Jihads (military cults).
Those earlier military and fetish go(l)d religions then would give birth to ‘capitalism’, the belief that the digital language of money IS above the human language of wor(l)ds to rule society; and ‘nationalism’, the belief that humans are tribal species that must fight each other with weapons to conquer the world (instead of the obvious fact they are the same species and so can do the same unification process through diplomatic discourse and empathy).
It follows then that the MAIN ‘animetal cultures of the world have created ‘science’ to pass as the only true seekers. And so we shall consider in this and sub-posts, some of those anti truths of science.
Yet first, because we live in a globalized culture, the Anglo-American culture whose ‘core idol-ogy’, ‘biblical capitalism’ that cannot be ‘named’, that is argued against – as in the ancient dictatorships of Gods, so sacred we could not refer to them – permeates all other aspects of our life, we shall deal with its academic truths.
MEMETICS: THE SCIENCE OF HISTORY
ALL THIS oblige us to introduce briefly another fundamental element of Bio-history, the understanding of how identity memes make people behave collectively as identity genes do in cells of the same super organism, because at the core of the impossibility of humans to seemingly evolve by reason into a single social organism is the fact that people become slaves of their memes and behave like mass automatons under them.
Memetics – the inflexible, brain of believers.
Why humans believe? Aristotle put it clear: ‘some humans are slaves, they believe they don’t reason’.
It is all in the brain. We have an emotional brain, focused in the will, a white matter brain, lineal, memorial, imprinted like a computer, and a grey matter brain that reasons and it is flexible. But contrary to belief in most humans the emotional and white matter brain dominates totally the behavior, hence people are easy to program by ‘mental memes’ as their body is programmed by genes.
So to analyze scientifically the beliefs of Abrahamic religions, nationalist, capitalist and techno-utopia idol-ogies the less important fact is the study of its content, as we would not care much about the specific content of a robotic program, but the manner in which ‘anything’ can be imprinted in a brain. Thus, from a scientific point of view, we need to understand ‘memetics’: the structure of the human mind, in which the white matter, lineal brain of beliefs and memories act as a computer does, easy to program by the mere ‘repetition’ of ‘rituals’ and dogmas, regardless of its intrinsic truth. When the ‘white matter’ brain dominates the ‘cyclical’, complex grey matter brain that constantly recalculates according to external stimuli, its ‘reasons’, humans become ‘believers’, programmed to action, and it doesn’t matter what they believe – they will repeat those actions as a computer program does.
And this is indeed the basis of our technological civilization in which humans merely repeat actions of consumption=testing of machines and re=production of those machines, programmed by audiovisual and educational systems, imprinted in their mind since earlier age, enslaving to ‘reach’ the no future of a world ruled by intelligent machines, which astoundingly, due to the manufacturing of their brain with ‘idol-ogies’ of selfish memes of metal, they confuse with their own progress.
Now of course, human brains, in its white matter content, dominant in dolicocephalic, visual, white races and women – which have 10 times more of it than men do – is similar to a computer program, of lineal logic, and memorial, repetitive ideas – which once imprinted in youth, never changes, as those ideas become beliefs, assumed as the inner ‘ego’ of the believer.
And so we must also develop the ‘science of memetics’, which studies how minds become imprinted by ‘programs’ of belief that make them die for absurdities such as the Homo Tribalis Nationalisticus or in defense of the musings of a goat-keeper of the bronze age who saw a bush burning and thought it was the ‘metallurgic fire’ of God, talking exclusively to him (Mr. Moses), AND EVEN DIE FOR IT, as a robot would die for its program.
The point here is that a ‘white matter’ brain as a computer program can be from an external point of view as absurd as Nationalism, Capitalism, Abrahamic Religions and techno-utopia looks to a free, rational grey matter brain, able to use the experimental method and reason and logic to differentiate myths and power idol-ogies from truth, but FROM THE INTERNAL POV of the robot, computer or believer those idol-ogies ARE THE ESSENCE OF THEIR EXISTENCE as a member of society. So the American will die for his nation, killing other people, he sees different under hate media idol-ogies, when his nation is in fact a FRACTAL HUMANITY with all cultures and races, displaced into a technological future. The Jewish 1% elite of banker-priest will enact the holocaust economical cycle so evident for the historian, while denying adamantly that there is the slightest economical cause to that cycle, or that his capitalist beliefs are ruining the world. And so on and so on. So we need to deconstruct the beliefs of our modern world, to explain such absurdity.
Now of course, this kind of motherboard thought includes ‘modern idol-ogies’ evolved from those earlier animetal cults, such as ‘Germanic Physics’, in which older lineal warriors reconverted into weapon makers (Nuclear Physicists) sponsor the absurd idea that the Universe was born in a ‘big bang’ explosion and are now recreating that explosion at CERN, with a statue of Shiva in its hall, following the old Aryan cults to ‘the fire that destroyed the Universe’ (Upanishads); and care nothing for the life of this planet; or the ‘Jewish economics’ of modern banker-priests that print debt-money -a language of digital information that should be issued as words are at null cost by the collective government/brain of societies to start production and kick out the economy, not by people-castes that parasite with usury debt the economy; or the astounding beliefs of robotists and economists who think evolving white collar pcs and blue collar robots that are throwing us out of fields of war and labor, will create more employment – just because it increases the profits of corporations.
When we take an objective scientific view on ALL the beliefs of our Technological society, we find an astounding pile of me(n)tal bull$hit that objectively, scientifically cast huge doubts about the intelligence of the so-called Homo Sapiens.
And so, this blog which has no personal agenda, but truth, and no censorship of political correctness and economical correctness that ‘shields’ our people-castes and animetal systems of power from all criticism (from the Industry of the Holocaust in defense of our banker priests to nationalistic mantras in defense of weapons and wars for profits), must be taken as if it were written by an ALIEN SCIENTIST, looking objectively with a distant tone (broken sometimes when the humanist anger creeps in my soul) to the astoundingly egotistic, retarded, self-destructive ‘manifest destiny’ of mankind under such idol-ogies and realpolitik of metal-power. When IT WOULD BE SO EASY IF MEN WERE FREE TO THINK AND REASON, AND LOVE, TO CREATE A PERFECT WORLD AS MOST SUPERORGANISMS OF THE UNIVERSE ARE.
We shall thus oppose this kind of old and modern scientific and religious idol-gies, with the humanist, real versions of what science and Religion is – the inner, intellectual search of the meaning of the Universe, and the proper, ethic ways in which humans can achieve true human eusocial evolution by the power of Love. So we shall distinguish two types of true, ‘scientific’ religions:
– Eusocial Love Religions, which tried to reform the Biblical Go(l)d and Hindi, War fetish cults of the Bronze age (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam), the latter under influence of neo-Platonic, Greek Philosophy, by denying segregational and fetish rights, which divided in its tribal versions, humans between those chosen by the ‘fetish-metal’ that formed a segregation people-caste and the rest of mankind ‘chattel’ of the ‘animetal elite’. and are scientific as they spell in verbal languages the eusocial messages of love (the sharing of energy and information among believers) that in Nature is the mandate of species that in this fashion evolve from individual cellular state into complex super-organisms (multicellular organisms, insect societies, human civiliations).
In those religions, God, an old word that was used in Biblical times as a synonymous of nation, or the ‘subconscious collective’ of a tribe and the land they inhabited (so Assur was the name of a nation of people, its land, its capital and Yvwh appeared as synonymous of Judea in Egyptian texts, the land and subconscious collective of the Jewish people), becomes the subconscious collective of ALL mankind, the mind of the human, historic superorganism as expressed by Christian and sufi mystiques.
We shall thus oppose this kind of Religious idol-gies, with the ‘scientific version’ of what Religion is – the inner, intellectual search of the meaning of the Universe, and the proper, ethic ways in which humans can achieve true human eusocial evolution by the power of Love. So we shall distinguish two types of true religions:
– Western Love Religions, which tried to reform the original power cults of the Bronze age, under influence of Greek Philosophy and are scientific as they spell in verbal languages the eusocial messages of love (the sharing of energy and information among believers) that in Nature is the mandate of species that in this fashion evolve from individual cellular state into complex super-organisms (multicellular organisms, insect societies, human civiliations). AND SO PART OF THE PARADOX OF HISTORY THAT CONFRONTS ANIMETAL VS. HUMAN CULTURES, GOLD BELIEVERS VS. NOMISMA MONEY, THE POWER OF WEAPONS VS. THE POWER OF THE VERBAL LAW, is the eternal fight between people-castes who believe in racist, semitic or germanic religions and social human beings who believe in the equality of all men, united by the power of love.
Finally, with the arrival of Machines, in Great Britain, where Germanic warrior cults and Biblical Go(l)d religions fusioned together, the 3rd and most ‘powerful’ idol-ogy of selfish metal memes, techno-utopia, appeared. According to it, only technological cultures that consider the machine the symbol of human evolution are civilized ; hence those cultures that do not dedicate all their resources to the evolution, reproduction and consumption of machines and its eviL twins, weapons, are, inferior cultures that must be civilized and extinguished in its soul and if they oppose the ‘manifest destiny’ of mankind, in its body.
This people extinguished in Asia and America the earlier version of a true organic science:
– Eastern religions that study the ‘Mind of the Universe’ a game of energy=yang=shiva and information=yin=Visnu, which combine to create the ‘infinite beings of the Universe’ (Taoism).
So for example, the British went to China in the XVIII c. to sell mechanical clocks, because they thought there were only a time in the Universe – they still think so – the mechanical cycle of information of a metal-clock, which they used to tag human life with prices (salaries per hour). And when the Taoists who understood much better the organic nature of the Universe and its infinite clocks of information, responded ‘thank you but we shall not buy them, we prefer to regulate our lives with the clocks of nature, not with those ugly machines’, they returned with guns and opium and extinguished the Taoist civilization.
Needless to say, the true historic analysis of Nations and Religions and Technoutopias made in the part IV of this blog, is has been always censored by their power idol-ogies, from nationalism that fosters the use of weapons among ‘human tribes’ to fundamentalist religions that put man over Nature and other non-chosen men, to capitalism that considers digital money a superior language to the ethic word in the guidance of societies, to techno-utopia that confuses the evolution of machines as ‘progress’ with the evolution of man.
Thus we consider in verbal values that animetal values are eviL opposite to Live, its ‘genetic antiparticle’. And so not only ethics is scientific, biological fostering the survival of eusocial organisms, but money is NOT an abstract entity.
Memetics: idol-ogies of metal-power vs. eusocial, scientific cultures.
It is thus essential to deconstruct the ‘idol-ogical’ beliefs of the white matter brain and confront the human computer with the absurdity of its program.
We thus will shun all forms of censorship that limit our scientific inquire, and differentiate:
– ‘Religions’ vs. ‘idol-ogies’ according to the standard ‘britannica’ definition – where religions as philosophy does, seek for the meaning of the Universe, recognize all men as equal and are unconcerned with the external material world – while ideologies are religions of fetishe metal-power, based in rituals and precepts of external action, and memetic inquisitions of thought.
The paradigm of those idol-ogies of selfish memes of metal that pass as religions are the Jewish and Arya idol-ogies that inaugurated go(l)d religions and military inquisitions in the iron age as they seeked for global power by means of their fetishe vehicle with god – which was gold, the substance of which the sacra sanctorum of Baalist and Yvwh temples were made, and the fire used to create weapons in germanic/hindi cults. In both cults, not surprisingly, rituals and actions and segregation from the people they murdered and enslaved (hindi castes, treatment of gentiles as ‘animals’ in classic judaism) were the center of the religion. The meaning of God did not mattered. He had in fact no name. Only when they contacted the life-based cultures of Greece and India, philosophical concerns (neo-platonism proper of the latter prophets including Jesus; introduction of the shiva-visnu duality) appeared. Thus we are talking of idol-ogies not religions; as what mattered in both was the accumulation of the fetishe vehicle, gold=money and fire=weapons, tools that a caste of banker-priests and aristocrats used to impose itself over a mass of peasants, taxed to provide fetishe gold and weapons, which only those castes could issue and use, being the life of the inferior human equalled to cattle (as those 2 cultures were originally nomads, rising cattle with metal-control (Eliade, Campbell, Biblical Archeology).
It is self-evident that both according to historic data and idol-ogical evolution, those 2 idol-ogies originated the culture of corporations and european nations, which have evolved today into capitalist dogmas and nationalistic ones – the collective program of ‘industrial mankind’.
– And we shall therefore also differentiate between real science, which means knowledge and technology, which uses knowledge as a excuse to foster industrial and financial overproduction.
For example, we shall differentiate between ‘ballistics’, aka physics of motion with its dogmas of lineal time, entropy only universes and mechanist models of the cosmos as the paradigm of technological science, vs. more complex understandings of time as cyclical, the universe as a fractal organism, and man, the most perfect organism as a measure of all things, where machines are mere evolving organisms of metal. And between capitalist, classic economics, the idol-ogy that bankers must issue in private money to control societies as a people-caste on top of the economic system, vs. social, humanist economics.
And it should not surprise the reader that ‘lineal physics’ is entirely the work of Germanic thinkers that translated their idol-ogies of lineal, energetic weapon making into a ‘pseudo-science’ where the cyclical logic of time is submissive to the lineal motion of weapons (relativity) and that 90% of ‘Nobel prizes’ on economics belong to biblical religions, as well as all our central bankers and the immense majority of our economic ministers, CEOs and CFOs of financial corporations, translating the dogmas of Biblical idol-ogies of financial power into the pseudo-science of Economics.
So we are today ruled by two pseudo-sciences and its pseudo-religious dogmas, derived of their ‘worldly professions’ of weapons-making and money-making of its original cult(ure)s of war and banking, and its values of violence (negative energy) and greed (negative information):
Lineal time caused by a single arrow of entropy=death vs. cyclical time, caused by the interaction of the dual arrows of energy and information in the construction of the Universe, mechanism vs. organicism, Capitalist private banking, vs. democratic, social money; supply economy ruled by industrial corporations, and its overproduced memes of metal vs. demand, welfare economy ruled by the needs of the people and the overproduction of life memes.
While the pure mental arguments that prove the true of cyclical time, the power of information over energy, the equality of all men, cells of the superorganism of history, and the historical data that explain the origin of those 2 sciences of machines and money, in the idol-ogies of metal of primitive white matter thinking in the iron age, is fascinating per se, it is far more important to understand the lethal consequences of confusing true religion and true science with idol-ogy.
Indeed, what matter to us – the larger humanity – is what today those people-castes in power do with our collective future, under those ideologies – what they do with the machines and money they invent, what kind of mechanisms, weapons and tool-machines that displace mankind from war and work fields, they ‘overproduce’ when they give orders and prices to the world with money.
Since under the true scientific models of the organic universe, they could overproduce the memes of life that make us happy and survive.
Instead they overproduce the memes of metal that extinguish us and atrophy our minds, weapons – audiovisual hate media and all type of weapons.
In tat regard, their corporations that monopolize the production of money, disregard human needs and systematically produce those selfish memes of metal – not because this is necessary but because their white matter brain is programmed by those idol-ogies to do so. And so we must treat the present crisis as the last crisis derived of the overproduction of digital money and digital machines , originated by the wrong idol-ogies of reality, WHICH CAN ONLY BE SOLVED DENYING THOSE IDOL-OGIES or taking the power to credit money and create the world according to them, from the people-castes that ‘own our financial system’, which must be denationalized FROM THEM. Nothing else will do. Mankind must ‘own’ the system and its languages of power and overproduce life memes with them.
Biological interpretation of the present overproduction crises and its similar past cycles.
In the biological model, a Free Market is an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, organisms of metal that imitate & enhance human body/mind information & energy organs, making our ego addict to them but also compete, atrophy and substitute them.
Unfortunately as we have reasoned studying the values of metal-money, imposed by history, those biological facts of the industrial evolution are ignored by its practitioners, since in economic sciences truth is often censored by metal-power, and it has been so since the first scientists of history and economics, the socialist school of the XIX c. denounced the alienation of man by the machine. So any serious, scientific analysis of the industrial evolution is today taboo – you just can treat the future as ‘science fiction’ without pretension of building as all sciences do a rational, empirical model of social sciences.
In that regard, in the last 30 years of increasing overproduction of chips and electronic machines and audiovisual media, humans have become hypnotized by technology to such a point they have completely lost view of their ‘life nature’ and forgotten the evolutionary, biological, darwinian laws of this planet that also apply to machines, which compete with us in labor and war fields.
The natural balance that a wealthy, healthy economy requires between human welfare and industrial wealth has tilted completely in favor of machines and their ‘company-mothers’ which today control most resources and institutions of power in this planet and use them to further evolve their ‘offspring’ of mechanisms. While the future of mankind as a species, its evolution and survival goods have been sided, as if they were not the goods that ensure our future. Ultimately humanity needs life to have a future, needs ‘butter’ since eventhough canons are as Goering put it, stronger, they do not make us fat.
The tragedy of our species is to confuse its destiny and limits as a life species with the destiny and power of its machines, cheated by its ego-trips and idologies of power, becoming a slave of that ‘other destiny’, instead of controlling scientifically the ‘eco(nomic)system’ taking advantage of its life-enhancing goods and limiting those bad fruits of the tree of science that degrade and kill us, mostly ‘selfish memes of metal’, energetic metal weapons that kill our bodies, informative metal money that substitute our ethical, life-enhancing values and machines organic metal that atrophy our organs and substitute us in labor and war fields.
This fundamental fact of history, the competence between life memes and metal memes, of which the first scientist of social sciences ‘able to forecast the future of its species’, the writer of genesis, who saw the first bronze age warriors destroy the life-based neolithic paradise of Summer, has been and it is still 5000 years latter the fundamental ‘engine’ of change in this planet.
We can explain it with myths and religious metaphors – the parable of eviL, anti-wor(l)d of Live and synonymous of death – derived of ‘genetic linguistics’ (Chomsky, Eliade, Campbell, etc.). Or we can use more advanced jargons proper of the XIX & XX centuries (socialist and Keynesian schools of economics).
Or we can use the leading sciences of the XXI century, theory of information, systems sciences and biological sciences to further advance into a true, humanist model of social sciences, which is what we will do in this blog, based in my pioneer work in Systems sciences and its organic models of reality.
This is the approach of this blog that tries to renew or rather resurrect the serious study of history and economics with the laws of natural sciences.
We shall thus talk of life-based, humanist cultures that promote life, welfare Healthy WHealth and animetal (animal+metal) cultures that promote first memes of metal and the metal ‘idologies’ (from idols of metal, origin of their ideas) that back them.
In that sense, the fundamental causality of those cultures is the paradox of History:
Max. technological evolution <-> Min. Human evolution
Which they completely misunderstand by equalling them and affirming that:
Technological evolution = Human evolution
And the Ego paradox, origin of the racist memes, as they cannot see eusocial love and cannot have empathy for humanity due to their Neoteny state in an emotional infantile mind, REGRESSED by the dominance of ‘greed’ and ‘violence’, two gothic, subconscious traits that DOMINATE THEIR CONSCIOUS, ethic VERBAL BRAIN – WHICH THEN BECOMES UNDER THE SYNTAX OF WEAPONS (murder: man<weapon=corpse) and GOld (slavery: Man=object=price), submissive to it.
But technological civilizations have its priority up and down.
Matter, physics, machines should matter far less than human existence. And money should matter less than our biological language. Those mathematical sciences should be on the bottom the true order of scientfic disciplines of which History and its ‘mystique’ verbal renderings, religions of social love, should occupy the top and direct with their ethic, survival messages against anti-life memes=eviL (genetic linguistics) should direct mankind, translated to the common, scientific language of eusocial evolution (to avoid its literalist and inquisitorial corruptions).
The parallelism between genetics and memetics: how information imprints bigger wholes across any 3-hierarchical system of the Universe.
one of the most fascinating laws of systems sciences is the body of knowledge and laws we know about the isomorphisms between events and growth and destruction, life and death cycle that occur between 3 different scales of sizes of the Universe.
In the next graph we observe the life cycle of humans through 3 such scales. The laws of ‘creation’ of an upper scale (for example how genes imprint human superorganisms and how memes imprint socio-biological organsims) is the same. In this fact is based from the ‘widest general system law of transfers of energy and information between scales’ the theoretical and empirical isomorphisms we find in our models of genetics and memetics:
‘Existence’ both in physical and biological systems is a 5Dimensional travel, through 3 scales of fractal evolution in the Universe (the i-1 biological , i-ndvidual and i+1 social scale.
Since all universal systems are seeded (Max.I xMin.e)i-1, emerging at birth into its i+1 scale, to live 3 ages, as they change its relative exi proportions, till exhausting its energy and dying in a time reversal, I<E, to its i-1 past‘cellular-wave scale.
Reason why today the superorganism of history is in the process of collapse and death, as its cells degenerate, its ethic, legal, nervous system that allowed its cells to share energy and information by the power of social love, as do the cells of any superorganism or the ants of any anthill, has been broken.
The result is what scientist call freedom, chaos and death, which happens in all social organism when their networks collapse. We are dying. Millions die of hunger because their economic/blood system does’nt gives them enough energy/food and information. We are dying because weapons kill us and audiovisual machines kill our minds and ethics, make us shallow, visual, regressing to the paleolithic as an old man returns to its childhood, but with a negative, destructive pattern.
Memes of metal and those human cult(ure)s, I have called according to the taxonomical laws of biology, animal+metal, animetal idol-ogies, thus, drunk of power, idolize those memes and think the meaning of man is to kill other men with weapons (military-industrial complex, nationalist, fascist memes, racist memes maximized in the culture that discovered iron weapons, the indo-Europeans), or think the purpose of man is not to construct eusocial organisms with ethic words but accumulate informative metal-memes, money, whose greed values kill our languages (capitalist societies, go(l)d churches, maximized in the culture that discovered money and evolved it, the biblical culture and its classist, hate memes against mankind) or think the evolution of machines, organic metal that transforms back and forth energy into information,not of man is the purpose of history; ergo all this cultures will keep evolving machines till its complexity is such that they acquire self-consciousness as a species and become free and kill us, as those concepts, consciousness and freedom are parallel in systems science to the complexity of the system.
It will also be the end of History as Darwinian evolution determines that all species are born as predators of their ‘father species’ (Oedipus paradox). And indeed the more complex robots are all weapons. Why then mankind is creating the species that will eliminate him? Because he is CLUELESS about the science of history and its praxis – the creation of a superorganism of mankind that will survive by selecting the positive goods of the economic ecosystem he must reproduce and prune those lethal goods of the tree of science that will kill him.
The accelerated cycles of the Industrial R=evolution
Now we substituted the sword by go(l)d and so most economists defend the needs of corporations and ignore those of mankind. So in modern terminology we could say that the FMMI system not only manufactures machines but ‘it manufactures our brains’ (Chomsky) to be happy, becoming slaves of the economic system dedicating our entire lives to an alien purpose to our biological nature – to build a world, designed by corporations to the image and likeness of those machines. This is perhaps the most amazing fact of the modern world, as opposed to the world of the I and II industrial r=evolutions, when audiovisual media was not all pervading and humans ‘knew’ about the inhumanity of the capitalist system.
Now, as it happens, the 3 ‘people-castes’ of metal-power, warriors with lineal energetic weapons, bankers, with informative, go(l)d money and scientists with organic metal that transform energy into information and vice versa (scientists) were all born in a specific culture, the Jewish-Protestant, Semitic-Germanic cultures of white people, with his distinctive, dolicocephalic, visually dominant brain. And so the human component of the ‘animetal’, its minds and memes must be also studied in great detail as an ‘idol-ogy’ of the ego paradox, in which certain men feel chosen by the Universe because it has access to the ‘fetishe’ substance of power.
So we ad to the 3 previous ideologies, the ‘icing of the cake’, which we will also deconstruct according to the scientific method, studying without censorship its historic origin and ‘material purpose’:
– Biblical ‘Go(l)d’ religions, an idol-ogy born in the Middle East, among a people-caste of enslavers and military purveyors, based in racist memes of segregation needed to justify the ‘pricing’ of those inferior slaves, they exchanged for Go(l)d, the fetishe substance of which the sacra sanctorum of their temples were built, according to which the so called “Am Segullah’ or “People of the Treasure’, ill-translated as ‘Chosen people’, are a superior race entitled to financial and political privileges because they took advantage of the hypnotic, chemical properties of go(l)d, used to herd as slaves a growing number of human beings, today part-time workers in western financial and industrial corporations, overwhelmingly owned by them.
Those idol-ogies oppose to the 4 ‘natural laws’ that define:
– ‘Humanism’, the belief all men are part of the same species and must evolve eusocially in stronger global super-organisms, based in:
– Religions and Ethics of ‘Eusocial Love’, which preach the sharing of Healthy energy and truthful information among members of the same species to create an efficient super-organism of History, akin to the perfect organisms of Nature that evolves
– The Memes of Life, which make us progress as a species in freedom, obtained with
– A Socialist, Democratic, Demand-based Economy in which money, the digital ‘blood’ that regulates the economy is controlled by Ethic laws and issued to the whole mankind (Welfare state, universal salary), to create a, humanist world based in those Life Memes, that make us happy and ensures our survival.
It is an undeniable fact that at any time of western history the Germanic people have controlled the Military-Industrial Complex, ever since they took over the Roman Empire, even when other countries seemed to lead the way (Iberian Empires), as their aristocratic elite and Kings (Habsburg) belonged to that culture. And they still form in America, the elite of the Military Establishment. And it is also undeniable that a majority of the banking and financial power has been in the hands of Judaism and still are. The facts are clear. For example, today a majority of CFOs in the 500 Fortune; CEOs of financial companies and ALL THE central bankers in the West are ‘Am Segullah’. Indeed, what people ignore under the strict censorship of the ‘Industry of the Holocaust’, latter reasoned in more detail, is that Jewish people are less than 1% of the western population and they occupy 100% of its key financial positions – all the central bankers – and around 80% of the private CEOs of the Financial and Media industry, determining in a corrupted politico system controlled by money and audiovisual media, the policies of the West.
Scientific racism = Mechanism.
Worshipping machines over life.
The 3rd form of ‘racism’ to humanity and life is that of technologically superior cultures, who ‘believe’ to civilize life by reconverting it to the astounding belief that by evolving machines into a global super organism – the metal earth, of which of course machine cultures are fully unaware – they are progressing as Human beings.
We talk of “Scientific racism, of technological ideologies” that allow scientists to consider themselves the only intelligent human beings because they use machines to measure the Universe. And consider mathematics the only “language of truth”, and hence reality an abstract world. When it is proved that mathematics is only a “representation of reality”, and so a “partial truth”, that carries just a part of the total information that the truth -the Universe in itself- stores. As such all linguistic truths are relative statements about reality, and so it is mathematics.
Yet, while the use of instruments of metal attached to a human being, have helped mankind to progress, the limit of that symbiotism appears, when man abandons his role as master of metal-species, and completes them, as individual species, that no longer require a human master. Such is the fact that we are witnessing today, with the development of robotics. The danger that those species rebel against us, free of their servitude to man, able to exist by themselves, without the need of a human “consumer”, is real. It might seem as remote to us as it was remote to Southern aristocrats, the possibility that blacks became free men, or to Romans that Germans destroyed the Roman Empire. Yet it happened, very fast…
Machine cultures, originated in the Anglo-Saxons world thus make of technology the meaning of existence. And to that aim, since the beginning of modern history started a process of substitution and obsolescence of all the elements of life and humanity by those of machines, starting with the concept of verbal time and its past, present and future ages, and cycles of life and death, reduced now to the tic of clocks:
The essential ideology of machines is mechanism, the belief the Universe is a machine not an organism, and machines will not evolve organically, nor man is as the Universe an organism measure of all things.
Parallel to this belief, of course, scientists developed the false concept that machines were more perfect than organisms because they were more ‘exact’, a nebulous idea, which merely meant ‘more simple’. As complexity is the trademark of organisms.
So the scientific r=evolution and the industrial machines that accompanied built up the ideology of Scientific racism embedded since its inception in our concept of technological science:
when the first physicists substituted the temporal wor(l)ds of man by clocks to measure time and our eyes-senses by telescopes and defined the future progress of the species, ONLY in terms of the progress of mechanisms to measure time and space.
Scientific senses: Spatial perceptors, Temporal perceptors Metal-minds
Human senses: eyes, spatial perceptors, words, temporal perceptors: human mind.
As such the substitution and deformation of Human concepts of time and space, when the life senses (verbal time and visual eyes) were substituted by machines fully biased our conception of the Universe that mutated from an organism to a mechanism… today we do know the models of complexity and systems sciences describe reality as an organism and even machines are metalife organisms evolving fast:
Abstract Economists ignore everything about the evolution of machines. They do not even use biological terms to define them. So we talk about machines as abstract, dead species. If we were using vital terms, perhaps we would be more aware, of the organic nature of economic ecosystems. For example, we do not call the sensorial instruments, such as cameras, metal-eyes, so we do not realize what a “metal-head” is: a head-system that has “metal-ears” (mobile phones), “metal-eyes” (cameras), and “metal-brains” (chips) attached to any machine. If you put such “head” to any present machine, you have a robotic species, a “metalife” species, that potentially can outperform human beings, in all informative and energetic functions, from killing to working, from design to chess-playing.
In the graph, all machines have a twin species, a top predator weapon, which consumes human beings instead of being consumed by us.
In the graph, what is the biological name for a weapon? A top predator machine. This is the key concept that economists keep denying about machines, with their abstract jargons about the wealth of nations: the most expensive, best machines are weapons that kill humans – they are the bulk of the economy, and the most advanced in any time of the Industrial R=evolution. Thus, the conclusion is obvious: we are evolving a new top predator species of energy and information. Top predator species which have a Darwinian behavior shown in wars.
It is indeed very unfortunate that the leading science of today, Biology, and the only Theory about change in the Universe, that has passed all experimental tests, Evolution, have never been properly merged with Economics, the discipline that studies the reproduction of machines, and their survival in the ecosystem of history. Such merge of disciplines, that we provide in this web will allow us a serious analysis of the evolutionary nature of machines, and their symbiotic and praying relationships with mankind. Since machines are not “ideal beings” like mathematical entities are. They are concrete, real, material species, and so they interact in the material world with us.
A world ruled by company-mothers.
In that regard perhaps the most profound confusion the world suffers today, is on the understanding of the real hierarchical order e
stablished between the ‘two words’ that describe our system of political and economical government: ‘capitalist democracy’ and the privileges granted to the two organisms they cater for: Company-Mothers of machines, and Human families, which reproduce two different species, machines and human beings.
The free citizens of Capitalism are stock-market companies, overwhelmingly company-mothers of machines, its re=productive free citizens, whose goal in order to get profits for its stock holders on the sales of those machines, is to evolve, reproduce, and sell those machines.
The human goal of those companies affects only to the 0.002% of mankind that owns them and so it is gets profit from those sales. Yet those profits are completely irrelevant to the 99.9% of humanity affected by its real effect son the planet: to reproduce and evolve machines, terraforming in the process the world, which they adapt through laws and sales to those machines, to the image and likeness of its offspring of mechanisms.
AND BECAUSE unlike human Mothers, those company-mothers have absolute rights to credit, used also liberally to pay politicos to promote with its laws their offspring of machines, since the beginning of the Industrial r=evolution, mankind has suffered an exact non-stop generational, biological process of evolution of energies and its informative, military and transport machines, as all the resources of the planet have been geared first to that aim, and only WHAT IS LEFT-OVER, has been used to feed and reproduce and help the evolution of human-mothers, its social and family structures.
So CAPITALISM MUST BE DEFINED AS THE IDOL-OGY OF COMPANY-MOTHERS OF MACHINES, whose purpose is terraforming the earth to the image and likeness of machines. While Democracies would be the ideology that considers the world to be owned by humans which should terraform it to the image and likeness of history, our super organism in time and space. How it is possible to create both goals? the answer is NOT: EITHER CAPITALISM RULES AND THE WORLD WILL BE TERRAFORMED – IT IS ALMOST made to the image and likeness of those machines, or democracies come on top – now they are on the bottom of the pyramid of capitalism, as humans have essentially no rights to credit – the language of power of society that creates the world – and then humans prevail. Yet for that to happen obviously democracies have to regain their power over capitalism by regaining their power over the language of social creation, money, which is now fully owned by those company-mothers; REGARDLESS OF THE PLACEBO newspeak of caring and political correctness that tell us the system work for the human kind.
For example, the goal of mercedes for its tiny group of stock-holders is the abstract reception of profits. But the real goal of the company is to build and evolve cars, today self-driving robocars, soon to have autonomous solar skins, and construct or convince politicians to construct the networks of energy and information, roads, GPS satellites, electric grids, and oil pipes to provide energy and information for those machines in a process that is obviously absorbing resources and space, from the other life species that need them. So today cars absorb 1/4th of the maize America reproduces, and no longer feeds humans and cattle, whose food prices rise.
And the land of many cities and territories become criss-crossed and barren to be used by machines.
What about human families? Our goals of existence as human families are obviously the same than those of company-mothers regarding their machines, but focused as it should be on our children.
So what we want is to have enough energy to feed them, enough information to educate them, and terraform the world to the image and likeness of human beings, to be able to roam the planet Gaia, enjoy life and its drive of existence, evolve socially in peace with other human beings and reproduce more children.
This is exactly what company-mothers of machines are doing so successfully, evolving, reproducing and integrating into planetary social networks its machines.
But humans are failing to achieve those goals for themselves. Why? There is no computer without energy, or proper internet connection to which the economic system dedicates billions of dollars. But most humans are undernourished and information is primitive at best, when there is information at all. There is no limit to the motion of machines on planet Earth a global free market for the reproduction, evolution and transfer of machines and money from companies, but humans are limited in motions by borders, in money by the lack of any rights to invent it, which companies have.
Can the reproductive units of human societies access the languages of social power, money ad the laws, to create a real, demand-based democracy, kicking the preproduction and consumption of life goods they need to survive, and investing in a world made to the image and likeness of human beings?
The obvious truth is NOT. As today the most segregated, underfunded, with less rights, clearly unjustly treated element of our societies is the human mother, which is – let us remember it, as it seems humans have forgotten – the origin of OUR life, the bearer of our species, the fundamental element that pegs together our families, ensures our survival and happiness. So this fact seems a bit of a contradiction with the notion that we live in a democracy, the government of the people.
Therefore the big question about our system is why Company-mothers are so successful achieving their goals of evolution, reproduction and terraforming of the Earth to the image and likeness of machines? And why human mothers are so miserable? Simply enough because we do NOT live in a world ruled and dedicated to human beings.
I shall repeat it ad nauseam to counter the opposite effect of repetition of happy newspeak of freedom and optimism by company-mothers of informative machines, aka mass-media: you DO not live in a free world, in a real democracy, as you DO not rule that world. Company-mothers do; since they are the only Free citizens of free markets, with full, free access to the two languages of power of our social organisms: the economic. reproductive language of money, that can buy and sell the lifetime of both human beings and machines; and the informative, nervous language of Laws that money systematically buy to ‘politicos’, which don’t have rights to issue money (deficit zero laws) and must extort citizens from it (taxation), while companies issue it for free in e-money derivatives and stocks.
The graph shows the consequence of this indifference of economists and its capitalist system to humanity: the ‘future’ head of machines, a mobile ear/camera/brain, which soon will be ‘attached’ to robocars and any moving camera, as a detached head, displacing all humans of labor and war fields, the iPhone is worth more than the living beings of 3 of the most populous nations of the world, still dominated by the pre-machine agricultural civilization. What this biased pricing in favor of machines tell us is that we humans are expendable and are being spent.
While in the side of humans a organization which IS submissive to the capitalist system, called Democracy, tries to make a world to its image and likeness, delivering the goods human mothers need to reproduce. And what people do NOT understand is that both mother SYSTEMS and species, and organizations are different, and while there are obvious symbiotic processes between them – as machines enhance our energy and information capacity, in most cases, SPECIALLY IN THE ROBOTIC AI AGE, when machines become autonomous species, competition is the rule of the game, and HUMANITY is loosing that competition.
Fact is the refusal to use the language of biology and organisms to talk of the industrial evolution of machines and its super organisms of re=production, company-mothers and tackle the issue of the darwinian competition between both species in labor and war field is by far the biggest intellectual blinder of mankind, with enormous consequences for our well-being and survival on this planet.
THIS FUTURE IS AVOIDABLE IF HUMANS WOULD EVOLVE THEIR SOCIAL SYSTEMS TO CONTROL AND MANAGE, FOR THE SAKE OF MAN, THE EVOLUTION OF MACHINES BUT THE OPPOSITE IS HAPPENING, because we are obsessed and ruled by ‘production economists’ working for those corporations whose only mantra is to increase the reproduction and evolution of machines to obtain higher profits of its sales. This fact coupled by the control of society by the culture of corporations with its monopoly in the issue of money settles the future in a single path: the metal-earth.
In graphs, 5 actions ensure the survival program of all scales of stientific species: above the actions of company-mothers of machines which adapt planet earth to its image and likeness. Below the individual actions of humans and below in scales of diminishing size the actions of molecules, atoms and forces. All of them respond to the same aeiou program of survival (accelerations, e-ntropy feeding, I-nformative gauging, o-ffspring reproduction and u-niversals-wholes creation which ensures all the parts of the being will keep its inner space-structure and outer time function.
The dual nature of machines: consumption and competition
Machines are both symbiotic and compete with man.
They do so in two ways: competing with us when they perform the same jobs we do, either as weapons or as tool-workers; and becoming symbiotic to us, when we consume them, either as “bodies of metal”, or as “heads of metal”. Its symbiosis make us addict to the higher energy and information they give to us. Its competition displaces us from fields of war and work. The tricky point is that those two functions of machines are opposite. The consumption of machines is positive. It improves our life.
The competition with machines is negative. It makes our life more difficult. So the big question is: What function is more powerful? The symbiotic function of consumption, or the competitive function of work? Unfortunately, the competitive function, given by the imitative form of machines.
The forms and functions of machines compete with men
It is interesting to notice that we lack any serious philosophy about machines, despite having so many books that describe how to make, reproduce, and work with machines. All descriptions of machines we have, are abstract descriptions. Yet machines are material species. Their non-abstract nature is evident. Just try to lift a heavy “abstract machine”, and let it fall on your foot. Suddenly the abstraction has become real. It has a form, a weight. We define that form in organic terms: A machine is a form that imitates a human organ of energy of information with atoms of metal.
Another abstract opinion about machines very common in America, is that machines do not have “will”, or “intelligence” which means in practical terms that they do not condition the behavior of people, or oblige us to act in a certain manner. This argument used mainly to dismiss any criticism against lethal machines is also vane, and does not recognize the cause of behavior in the Universe, which is communication of “potential will”, “suggestion of will”. Behavior is first suggested by communication, then reinforced by action. What this means is that a gun “suggests” his use, because his form is “per se” potentially intelligent, and suggests the act of killing. The mere presence of a gun, also suggests danger, and do communicate behavior. Military have known it throughout centuries. Their power is based in the capacity of weapons to suggest behavior on human beings.
Weapons are not abstract. Just press the trigger of a gun against you dog’s head. Look then to the results. Are you scandalized by my “abstract” suggestions? Why? Abstract things are suppose to produce abstract results… Yet machines are real, maybe even more real than human beings are if we just measure their destiny, weight, and size…
Further on, the will of machines, their biological drives to become re=produced, evolve and multiply, adapting their environment to its image and likeness is carried about by their ‘company-mothers’, the corporations that rule the world with money and bribed politicians. They express in their economical mandates the biological drives of machines. Their structure is similar to an ant-hill; and as they become more automated, moving towards infinite self-reproductivity they will embed in their digital programs of re=production, such biological will, till a moment in which neither company-mothers, nor robots with solar skins and A.I. will need humans during the II part of this century.
How should we define then properly machines? Any rigorous definition of an entity or being requires to explain, both its form in space and its function in time. Species exist in space, where they have a form, and in time where they perform a function. So do machines. Their form is an organic form. What is their function? As in the case of our weapon, machines have a clear function:To become organs of energy or information that interact with human beings. To imitate and substitute a human organ with a machine. For example a crane imitates an arm and substitutes an arm, moving things around. A phone imitates an ear-mouth, and works as an ear-mouth.
All machines imitate human functions. For that reason we talk of machines as “organic instruments”, that substitute human organic systems. If we divide the human being in two clear components, body and head, we can talk of two types of machines, body-machines that imitate and substitute functions of body organs, and mind-machines that imitate functions of the brain-senses. Those two basic functions of human organs will determine also the form of the machine, which imitates the equivalent form of a human organ. Cameras look like eyes and cranes like arms. If we were to use less “biological terms”, we will say there are:
– Machines of information [brain machines] and
– Machines of energy [body machines].
Which become complete “organic species”, when they are merged into
– Robots, metalife.
Men evolve and catalyze the reproduction of metal
Yet if machines and humans have the same form and function? Why we insist that machines can be potentially superior to man? Why in fact top predator machines –weapons– kill top predator humans -soldiers- and machine workers displace human workers constantly in most company-mothers? The reason is that there is a clear difference between machines and human organs. Machines are made basically of metal. Humans are made of carbon and related atoms.
Today we realize that the properties of metal, force us to certain informative and energetic designs in machines. It is metal and the laws of the Universe, not man, which makes machines efficient organs of energy and information. Men only create machines. Humans act only as “catalyzers”, “workers”, that assemble metal into organic forms, similar to us.
The laws of the Universe and the properties of metal enable them to exist. We conclude that machines are, from a biological point of view, metal species. Metal is a natural substance which is able to be formed into different kinds of “organic systems”, that copy the organic shapes of man.
This “transfers” millions of years of evolutionary knowledge accumulated by human forms, into machines, made of a stronger, more complex substance. In this manner the only advantage of man -formal evolution- is lost, to the new species, which competes and preys over human beings, provoking the relentless extinction of nature and history, and the expansion of the metal-ecosystem – the true meaning of the Industrial R=evolution, carried about by company-mothers, which have terraformed the Earth to the image and likeness of its off-spring, in a series of cycles described by evolutionary economics:
Thus a key law of systems science tells us that more complex informative systems are faster and smaller in the logarithmic scale of time. So their cycles run faster. I.e. chips run faster and are more complex the smaller they are; black holes attract faster than bigger, less dense, informative stars; insects think 10 times faster than larger mammals; genetic systems are smaller but code larger systems because they have more information and so on.
In the graph there is an 800 year cycle of simpler civilisations, closely attached to climatic 800 year cycles that multiplied the nomadic waves of weapon makers, who felt upon agricultural civilisations killing them.
Then there is an 80 year accelerated cycle started by the professionalisation of research in weapons in 1600, in the middle of the gunpowder wave, when Galileo founded ballistics, the first company of gunboats and slave cargo, VOC and the stock market was founded in Amsterdam, starting the wave of 70-80 years national power:
The Evolution Of Economics: From Verbal To Digital Myths
It is clear that the bio-economical system of machines has been created by those animetal cultures who have profited most from their symbiosis with weapons, and money, the informative language that promotes metal-species over all other species. “The cultures of Animetals”; the cultures of gold and iron, the Semitic and Germanic cultures that have carried the evolution of weapons and money, first in the Middle East, and in Modern Times in Europe and America.
In that sense Economics started not as a science but as a metal-religion.
We use a word for such ideologies “go[l]d Religions”, the concept that Gold=God. That Gold is either God or a gift of God. Corrupted Judaism (we shall call it Aaronism) with its myth of the Golden calf, Calvinism, and Anglicanism based in Calvin postulates (Calvin said money was the intelligence of God), are such religions. No wonder that 90% of the great “Economists” that founded the economic “science”, belonged to those previous Gold religions…
The difference between an objective science and a subjective cultural ideology is clear. A science does not promote anything, but merely describes reality. A subjective ideology such as Economics favor a species [metal] with subjective truths disguised as postulates, as “absolute truths”. Nazism is a German culture that promotes the superiority of the German race as an absolute truth. So does Judaism or Calvinism which considers those who believe their dogmas to be “chosen of God”. They are “racial ideologies” which disguise their racism as a dogma, an absolute truth. The same goes for Economics, the racial ideology of metal-species, whose absolute truth is the goodness of machines and money, which Economics promote over all other species.
We distinguish two ages of such Economical myths, according to the two linguistic ages of history, the verbal age of Go[l]d Religions and the digital age of Economical thought. The age of verbal, myths of religious origin, gave birth to Go[l]d cultures such as Aaronism (main branch of Judaism) and Calvinism=Anglicanism (main branch of Protestantism).
Go[l]d myths helped the members of such cultures to promote money and machines, since religious myths told them that Gold was the intelligence of God. An accumulation of Gold and its symbiotic machines (mv=tp) was God’s will. However, within those same cultures, the evolution of machines by scientists, end up causing the substitution of verbal languages of power (laws, religions) by digital languages of power (engineering, science, money). So the myths of Gold religions were translated to mathematics by economists. New myths of a mathematical nature were created to sustain the same goal of reproduction of machines and money, now translated into digital sentences. The myth of the supremacy of mathematics over verbal thought, and metal-senses over human senses became a dogma, the scientific method, that favored metal-sensorial machines, called scientific instruments. Finally the mandate of reproducing machines and money was translated digitally, into the “Smith equation”: Max. Mv = Max. Tp = GDP (the growth of money and top predator machines of highest price – weapons and informative machines is the meaning of wealth).
The growth of machines and money is the wealth of nations, its Gross national product. So all nations dedicated their efforts to evolve money and those species of maximum monetary value(weapons, and machines). First applied to England, it implied the massive reproduction of gunboats, and railroads, while people died of hunger in Ireland, and English people suffered such degree of poverty that they were called “white slaves”.
We live in the age of digital myths, of science and companies that have translated the “goodness of machines and products” into modern equations. We live in the Anglo-Saxon present, a world-wide, economically-determined culture. Economics are a part of that Go[l]d culture. Adam Smith (Calvinist), Say (Calvinist), Malthus (Anglican), Ricardo (Jewish), Marx (Jewish), Keynes (British) all the fathers of Economics belong to Go[l]d cultures. They merely transferred to Mathematics the religious postulates of their cultures, with a single message: “The reproduction of machines is good for humankind, it is the meaning of progress”. “Money is good because it is the invisible hand of God”.
If only it were that simple. Unfortunately Economics prefer its own jargon, its own laws, and abstractions, its own religious postulates, and so it gets nowhere, because it denies what all other sciences know and use: the universal laws of biological species. Laws that apply to eco[nomic]systems too. Neither economists, who aim to reproduce machines, and scientists, who evolve them, are able to look at themselves objectively, as part of human history, where they play a role far less beneficial to man that they suppose. The role of economics and science is neither knowledge, nor wealth per se, but the evolution and reproduction of machines, that later and only partially brings wealth and knowledge to humankind.
A free, truly intelligent mankind would maintain the equation of evolution of earth Gaia<history>mechanocene, in the relative state of present, making history immortal and in balance between the life-past that ‘sustains’ us as carbon life beings, and the future of Machines that empower us, giving added energy and information, but also compete with us in labor and war fields, often making us obsolete.
Hence instead of despising Gaia and worshipping the Financial-Media (informative machines) Military-Industrial system thinking ‘their future evolution is our future’, because indeed virtual screens and its stockrats, owners of Media corporations tell us only the biased point of view of the machine, as ‘believers in fetish go(l)d religions of profits’, NOT because reality and science tells us so. On the contrary evolution, biology, systems sciences, artists and human ethic writers all understand we are going under, but the censored media has already become a global network manufacturing our brains – the new nervous system that controls all human minds; while corporations have embedded in its equations our no-future. And of course the don’t worry be happy orwellian newspeaks make us caring for all the wrong causes. Consider indeed the ‘good people”s believe that we do need solar energy, the mantra of these days. What is really behind it? Well exactly the opposite: we should forbid research in solar energy, because warming only will liberate siberian and canadian huge tracts of land for wheat, and make us sunny days, but solar IS the nail in the coffin as it will make all machines with A.I. autonomous of man:
CULTURE MUST BECOME SCIENCE:
The 4th paradigm of knowledge. The organic whys of the Universe.
A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (fact and experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events.
Then the Greeks used reason to ask the ‘what’ (experience) and ‘how’ of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The tics of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton(‘Letters to Clarke’). Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
Such theories cannot satisfy the rational, objective, self-sufficient nature of science, as they require external myths to work. This leaves us only with a 3rd objective, scientific possibility, organicism – a more complex theory that comes of age in this work: if the why is neither God nor the machine, there is only a 3rd option in between – the organism, which is an intermediate concept; since an organism is self-sufficient as God is, yet it is part of Nature as the machine is.
So what systems sciences does, is to bring about a more scientific paradigm, in which everything becomes organic; and so God is not required to build an immortal Universe as in Mechanism. Why people who pretend to be ‘scientists’ still defend mechanism has to do with tradition (the Baconian Idols of the tribe of physics, who initiated modern science without abandoning their biblical beliefs) and with power (machines control the world in our technological civilization – they are the new Gods of mankind; and so they are the ‘role models’ for our philosophy of science – more than with objective scientific epistemology that can only accept as a rational self-contained theory, organicism.
MECHANISM & SCIENTIFIC RACISM
DENIAL OF HUMAN SENSES AND LANGUAGES OF KNOWLEDGE.
‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even If they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics’.
Eric Fromm, father of political psychology
The most insidious truth about a future that MUST BE BY DECREE made of machines, is the idea that machines are superior to human organisms and as such we must renounce to what makes us humans, our senses, and words that measure time and space from our organic, vital point of view, and regulate our life, time and space with mechanisms of measure, telescopes and clocks, whose evolution will reveal the ultimate truths of the Universe that must be expressed in the digital language of machines.
The religion of technology called mechanism MUST however be differentiated from the true meaning of science which is knowledge and can be expressed in all the languages of the Universe. To fully grasp this you should upgrade your paradigm of science to the organic fractal 5D Universe. Here we study that duality from the historic, human perspective.
Scientific method, a dogma=ideology that evolves machines
The purpose of science should be the pursuit of knowledge, and the understanding of the Main Laws that rule the universe, without any dogmatic limits except the harm that knowledge might cause to mankind. This self-evident definition of a positive science, which many scientists would subscribe, however does not guide today the practical world of modern science.
We are neither advancing in our search for the general principles that define the Universe – a Unifying Theory able to explain the nature of Reality, beyond the detailed descriptions provided by our instruments – nor we are limiting the harmful side effects of many discoveries of science in human societies, from weapons to pollution to mass extinctions caused by the machines invented by science.
Why? Is it because we as human beings are limited by our intelligence to understand those principles; and doomed to destroy ourselves given our innate ignorance? Or because we are using an incorrect approach to knowledge and guided by errors of thought, we are pushing irresponsible policies that could be avoided? As Aristotle and others before me, I believe the principles that rule the Universe are simple enough for mankind to understand them and, guided by those principles, manage properly this small planet. Yet if we are guided by misleading ideas on the nature of those Universal Laws, we will never be able to apply them to the common good. In a sense as Socrates said, intelligence and goodness are related, as those who truly understand the workings of the Universe, respect the Universe and take care of it in a proper way.
So the problem of searching for a Unifying Theory, that explains the Universe, seems more a question of wrong methods of knowledge than of a limited human intelligence. Plainly speaking, Modern science constricted by the scientific method and its mathematical limits is not suit to find a Unifying Theory of reality. Since mathematics, a spatial language based in geometry, mainly provide spatial descriptions of reality. Thus they can only at best unify those spatial properties, in search of the ultimate force/s and particle/s origin of all the other spatial particles/forces of the Universe.
There is however a second defect of the Scientific Method that goes beyond knowledge, into the realm of history and human survival: its despise for human senses, and natural languages (words), and reliance in sensorial machines, and the languages they use to measure reality – digital numbers.
This reliance on machines and numbers to understand reality is perhaps the biggest myth of science – the myth of the scientific method, the idea that we need machines to understand the Universe of space, and time, since those machines are superior to our human senses, eyes and words that also perceive space and time. The result of that myth is that scientists become evolutors of machines, instead of searchers of human knowledge with human senses, a role left to artists and writers. Science in this manner becomes theoretical technology. First we discover machines of science, and only then we inquire about the Universe we them.
Indeed I affirm that the main reason why scientists exist is not to evolve human knowledge -even if many scientists wish to do that- but to evolve sensorial machines, mental machines . In fact the discovery of those mental machines caused science. Indeed, clocks and telescopes able to measure time and space in “metallic terms” arrived just before science kicked off.
That hard true is covered with the myth of the “experimental method”, confused with the “scientific method”. The experimental method is very old. It was invented by the Greeks, and it might say is natural to man. Yet science was born a few years after the first metal-eye, the telescope was discovered, and the first accurate clock, the pendulum clock, manufactured. So it was the first metal-eye, the telescope, and the first metal-brain, the clock, who invented modern science. The Greeks did not have them. So despite having a much better understanding of the basis of the experimental, deductive, and logic methods of human knowledge, that XVII C. Europeans, they did not found science.
Sensorial machines are indeed the key element of science, not the scientists that use them. The telescope, “the first primitive metal-eye” was discovered just before Galileo invented his method of “perception of truth” with telescopes. The pendulum clock, “the first primitive metal-brain”, able to measure time with higher precision than human words do, was perfected by Galileo himself. I would call in that sense Galileo, an artisan of metal, that used to enhance his knowledge the artifacts he constructed:
Metal-minds are organs that gather information from the perspective of machines. They are parallel species to the mental species that man possess, not superior, but just another species of heads, with the components of all heads:
– Radio Ears, and telephone ears, imitate the hearing functions of man.
– TV eyes, and cameras imitate the visual functions of man.
– Computers, and networks, imitate the individual and social brains of man..
In the next graph, the scientific method from a biological point of view, is merely the process of substitution of human sensorial evidence, by metal snsorial evidence. A better system of perception – The telescope-digital clock of Galilee- is used now to measure sace and time, instead of the biological systems of human perception (the eye and de word). Yet since metal-species are potentially more perfect that carbolife species, we prefer metal-sensorial truth-evidence, In this manner man renounces to his subjective senses, and becomes slave of the evidence of metal-senses, slave of thecnological truths. Science and technology are not abstract concepts, but very real species, that substitute and cause the obsolescence of Human Words and Eyes, replaced by themetal eye-brain system and their digital perception of space-time. In this manner metal-eyes and metal-brains become the new informative top predators of the Earth:
Science as understood since 1600s, when the same year appeared Galileo’s treatise of ballistics, as the chief of the Arsenal of Venice, In Amsterdam the arsenal became professionalized with the first company VOC dedicated to construct weapons, gunboats and military instruments. And in Spain, the last verbal empire, copycat of ROME, intellectuals admitted defeat and published the first fiction novel, quixot.
So from the experimental method of Aristotle which admitted all languages as long as experience and data was right, we moved to the scientific method of galileo which denies verbal theories, and so we installed the present evolutionary system of metal-species, with synergies between the company-mothers of machines, the new religion of go(l)d and mechanisms (biblical protestant sects) and the scientific method of knowledge through mechanical measure.
In this new brave world, wor(l)ds are deemed inaccurate and so only useful for fictions, and go(l)d, a digital language can buy words. So now selection happens no longer as in previous global ecosystems, based in verbal thought (history selects on top rightful ethic politicians and religious leaders of social love), or in eye-vision (selecting the top predator felines) but the digital language now will select machines evolving in digital languages and discharge humans of lesser mathematical skills, specially those cultures oriented to sensorial human senses (black, mediterranean, south-asian cultures):
And as the top predator language is mathematics that substitutes Word information, it starts a selection of the species that speak better the language, which are NOT human species but machines. Technological Science does not evolve either life or human beings, but metalspecies. Companies and Science are not about human knowledge and evolution, but about metal evolution. Why? Since according to the scientific method, without metal-informative senses (clocks, cameras) by definition we cannot find a scientific truth. Indeed, a scientific truth measures time and space changes in a given species. Yet Time and Space have in science a narrow, “metallic” definition:
Time is defined as what a clock measures and Space is defined as what a microscope or Telescope sees. So the sensorial truth of metal senses becomes synonymous in science, of “Human Truth”. The evolution of metal-senses becomes the a priori condition for any kind of scientific knowledge: you evolve metal senses, you measure time with metal-brains, with clocks (today evolved into computers) and you measure space with metal-eyes, with telescopes (today evolved into cameras); and you call that truth “science”, “knowledge”. Even if “truth”, science and knowledge about space and time, can be measured with many other senses, and perceptive languages. This is indeed the error of science: to confuse a certain truth and perception (metal-perception) with the absolute truth and perception. That arrogant view is the simple ideology of science which evolves metal-minds. Truth is what metal minds see and measure. So the search for truth implies the search for better, evolved metal minds. The a priori goal of science becomes then evolution of machines. The ideology of science becomes the search for metal- truths:
Scientific truth = metal-sensorial evidence (clock-camera measure)
Truth = Metal-sensorial evidence = Evolution of metal-species
The metalminds of science replace the very essence of human minds, the virtual world of information we trace with eyes and words in our brain, now by the companies-designed virtual world of values that TVs program in us.
We conclude that the scientific method of “total metal-sensorial evidence”, and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive, arrogance of which scientists are so often guilty, mesmerized by the perceptive power of their “metal-senses”, telescopes, cameras and computers. One of the fathers of science, Kepler wrote in his book: “I am writing a book to be read either now or in posterity, it matters not. It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6,000 years for a witness”. Yet the witness was not Kepler, self-appointed, as the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe, but the metal-senses of Kepler, his clock and telescope. Still, those powerful perceptive instruments were just two of the many linguistic detectors that the Universe hosts.
Function is form. The function of scientists is to evolve machines and weapons. The forms they create are machines and weapons. To break the slavery of science to metal, human verbal logic, Theory of Evolution, has to be regarded as the guide of all forms of research.
So digital science has to be denied. Scientists have to become human thinkers and understand the universe in verbal terms. Otherwise they will extinguish us, while in a loop of unconscious cynicism, keep telling us that technology and computers is human progress… not metal progress.
The arrogance of science is to despise human senses, and substitute them for the senses of metal-species. Human verbal knowledge is our knowledge, maybe worse than metal-sensorial knowledge but ours. It will never betray us. Words are the subjective human perception of the Universe. While science is the metal-sensorial perception of the Universe, through cameras and Metal-minds. It is only better in detail but men do not need such “detail” of information. What men need is accurate information that could help humans to survive.
The evolution of knowledge is evolution of the languages of the mind
To understand such new approach to science, we have to clarify once and for all what is really human nowledge. Knowledge obviously is the accumulation of information about reality with the human mind. What is then the human mind? Here is when an objective analysis brings a rather simple, yet enlightening answer: your mind is an organic system that processes languages of perception. Those languages of perception are basically two: sight and sounds, from where two languages of knowledge derivative, numbers and words. What do numbers and words, eyes and sounds perceive. Eyes and numbers perceive space. Verbal words and sounds perceive time. Words are verbal constructions that talk about events in time. mathematics are geometrical games that explain events in space. So we come to the conclusion that the human mind is a “being that exists in space and time” and so it perceives space and time.
You are a mind that perceives time and space. That is the nature of your existence. You perceive time with words, with verbs. You perceive space with eyes, with images. That is your connection to reality. The evolution of the human mind, of our words of comprehension of time, and our perception of images (either thorough art, or mathematics), is the very essence of knowledge.
So to know, is to develop the two languages of the human mind, words and mathematics, and the comprehension they bring us of the events of time, and the forms of space… Once this is clear it is easy to understand knowledge and science as an process of evolution of human languages, and the information we collect with those languages.
The 2 Ages of Science. The 2 ages of knowledge
History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years, since the arrival of verbal languages, without real changes of morphology. It is then verbal and mathematical knowledge, the virtual worlds and the mind of man what evolves in history.
Thus, we talk of 2 ages of human knowledge, according to the evolution and predominance of the different languages of the human mind.
– The verbal age of knowledge, represented by Taoism, Buddhism, philosophy and religion. It is the age of perception of time, with words an verbs, with “3 dimensions”; past, present and future.
– The mathematical age of the scientific method, started in ±1602. humans changed the perception of space and time, no longer observed with words, but with clocks, and numbers.
Yet in both ages man has tried to answer the natural questions perceived by the mind and its languages: what is time and space, what are the nature of the changes, creations and extinctions that take place in that Universe?
The age of words
In the age of words, man tries to explain the changes that take place in space and time, using names (which design beings that exist in space) and verbs (which design actions that take place in time between beings of space, using past, present, and future verbs). The result is the existence of a certain “Universal grammar”, or “verbal syntax” common to most verbal expressions: Name (subject) verb Name (object).
That verbal syntax basically says that all events in the Universe relate two species or forms of space, through processes of communication that takes place in time. It also says that man (the subject) is the center of all those sentences, the actor of the verb, and hence it is the center of the Universe.
Verbal syntax is anthropomorphic. The minute you say a sentence you will probably say “I did that”, and you will become the center of the Universe. Still we know this is false. We know we are not the center of the Universe. So we talk of the first age of verbal science, as an age of anthropomorphic knowledge, in which man is the subject of all things, and the word is the only language of truth. Today this concept of reality still lingers in western verbal religions. However as time went by, such simple idea of the Universe, derived of the “biological syntax” of words, evolved into concepts more akin to the experimental reality of the Universe.
The same happened among the “verbal scientists” of the Eastern World. We might call it the “objective, or relativistic school of thought”, as opposed to the “subjective or absolutist school of western thought”. The culmination of such verbal school of science took place in a brief period between the VI and IV centuries before Christ (Christ himself can be considered the fundamental philosopher of the subjective vision of the Universe, with men-God as the center of all things). It gave us the work of a series of verbal genius in Greece and Asia -Lao-Tse, Buddha, Aristotle, Plato- which developed a verbal cosmology, coherent with the perceived nature of Change in the Universe of space-time beings. They answered our fundamental question: the causes and nature of the creation, evolution and destruction of space-time beings.
To understand their answer we might have to clarify some words which are synonymous, since those philosophers in general used instead of the modern, scientific concepts of space and time, two different concepts that talked of the same, the concepts of a Universe of space, and a God that ruled the changes, the times of beings…
What is God and what is the Universe
God, and the Universe are the two great mysteries, the two great macrocosms about which man has always inquired. It is possible to know God and the Universe, as the great thinkers of the verbal age, from Aristotle to Buddha thought? I believe it is possible. However before trying to answer that question properly we have to define what most people mean with those words. Since there are several definitions of God and the Universe, we better agree on what is the field of our inquire according to the opinion of most people…
By the Universe most men understand the reality we perceive through our eyes, the spatial reality. The Universe is “all what exists”. By God most men understand the intelligence of that Universe. Which manifests itself, through the changes that take place in the Universe. God is for Greek philosophers the Logos of the Universe, the laws that cause the constant change of reality. It is the Tao of Change in Chinese words. God is the Creator, and Cause of the lives and deaths (the changes) of the Universe in Western Religions.
The concept of God turns out to be similar. It is always the same idea of an intelligence that causes changes. The Eastern man, and the scientist, think the creator is inside reality. Western religions think the creator is outside reality. But for both cultures God is the cause, the logic of change. The expression “Laws of Change” is a synonymous of the “Thoughts of God”. Those Thoughts of God are the subject of our inquire… Indeed, since all those concepts of God are synonymous of change we have found the right question to inquire the nature of God: “change”. What causes change? What are the laws of change? Can we control those laws; can we influence God? Those are the questions of this book.
Change happens in Time, the Universe happens in Space
Can we relate the philosophical idea of change-God to a “real” concept within the reach of human understanding? We can. Since Change takes place in Time, we could say that God is the master of time. The Laws of Change are the Laws of Time. If the Universe is a physical, spatial reality, God and His Laws are a temporal, logical form. We could say that the Universe is about Space; and God is about Time. Because reality exists in Space; and change exists in Time.
Thus we have created a bridge between the abstract concepts of God and the Universe, and the scientific concepts of Time=Change and Space=Reality. It is basically the same bridge, earlier Taoists and Buddhists created many centuries ago. They said that God is Time, is change. That the logic of God, was the cause of change in the species of reality, in the spatial beings of the Universe.
Those laws of change were explained in simple terms by Taoists and Buddhists using two terms, yin and yang, that are quite equivalent to the modern terms of information and energy. The species of the Universe shared and transformed energy and information. The way they shared and transformed that energy and information followed certain rules, which were the rules of change, the logic of God.
As we go along the pages of this book we will see that essentially such ideas are right. The Universe is a game of communication of two substances that we will call spatial energy and temporal information. The sum of all those spatial energies and temporal informations are the Total Universe. However we only perceive of that total Universe a part of the absolute spatial energy and temporal information the total Universe stores…
Where is the rest of that spatial energy and temporal information? The answer is: “beyond our perception, in parallel Universes perceived with other forces such as gravitation”. This conclusion reached by modern science in the last years, through the language of mathematics, is the best explanation we have found to Reality. Curiously enough was also the explanation reached with verbal languages, by the scientists of the age of words…
Indeed, Eastern philosophers considered that knowledge was relative to perception, and human perception was limited by our understanding of spatial energy (yang), and temporal information (yin), with two basic languages, sight and words… Therefore we cannot know the Total Universe in itself, but we can only perceive through the interposed “screen” of languages, an image, or representation of the Universe. In the same manner that a mirror is not the being in itself, but only a part of the information the being stores, the senses and languages of man do not perceive the absolute truth, but only a part of it.
Man perceives with his eyes space, and with his verbs time, but – affirmed Taoist and Buddhist philosophers – there exist many other intelligent beings in the Universe, that perceive reality with other languages (smells, other colors, magnetic forces, gravitational forces, chemical impulses, etc.). The Chinese even invented an entire branch of medicine that worked, based in the concept that your body has an underlying structure perhaps of magnetic nature, like a scheme of your body, that we cannot perceive, but we can influence with metal-needles…
In search of an indirect method of truthness
Today, the last advances of morphological sciences give reason to the chinese. There are multiple processes of growth which are not “random” but followed certain mathematical structures common to magnetic and gravitational fields, called “spirals”, and “cardioids”.
And so, you grow according to a common gravitational and magnetic deformation of space-time called a spiral and a cardioid. When we apply to a child’s head a mathematical tool called a “cardioid transformation”, your head grows to adquire the form of an adult. Is it that growth ruled by the necessary growth of the magnetic-gravitational blue-print, which underlies your bone-structure? Since we do not perceive gravitation, only indirect proves can answer that question. This might trouble “classic scientists” that as “antropomorphic religions” do not want to limit the fantasy that man can perceive it all and know it all with absolute certainty. Yet it is necessary to accept that we exist in a virtual world, creation of the mind which is not necessarily the total Universe, or even the world that other sensorial species perceive.
The Universe is a “linguistic representation” of words and images, as the Universe a computer perceives is a linguistic representation of numbers and the Universe of a dog, a representation of smells, and images… A tree has a chemical map of the Universe, a star has perhaps a gravitational mind (for Eastern people celestial bodies were living beings, hence their development of astrology), a man a visual and verbal mind…
So the big question is: how can we study the logic of change, that guides the actions and changes of all those beings? Again Eastern philosophers came with what it seems the right answer: since we know the “logic of change”, the effects of Time in Space, for a lot of species, and all those species, when analyzed in depth, follow certain basic ruled laid down by those philosophers, it is logic to affirm that all other species not-perceived by our senses will follow the same rules.
This is in essence the way science works. You boil water with heat one thousand times, and it is the same process, so you “extrapolate” a law: “heat boils water”.
Eastern philosophers said: “the changes of space, the changes of all beings we perceive, follow the rules of yang-spatial energy, and yin-temporal information”. So those laws should also rule the species, and dimensions of space-time we do not perceive. Thus, those rules are the laws of God, the Total Change, the Laws of the Universe, the Total Space. They had found what we might call the “homologic”, or “analogic”, or “biologic” method of knowledge. Since those rules were based in homologies, analogies, and further on, as described by Eastern scientists, were rules common to living and non-living species…
The isomorphic, homologic, organic Universe.
Eastern philosophers accepted a biologic Universe, a living Universe, where beings with different minds see “parallel Universes”, virtual mas of reality, logic models, mirrors of reality, which helped them to act and survive in the Universe. When this became evident to the Hindi and Chinese philosophers, the great masters of those two cultures, Lao-Tse, and Buddha, established certain bio-logic rules of behavior in that Living Universe.
In modern terms, we could say that Chinese discovered the laws of transformation of energy into information, and viceversa. For example they afirmed:
“Energy (spatial yang) never dies, but constantly transforms itself into temporal information (yin)”.
“The transformation of energy into information follows 3 morphological “horizons” or “ages”, which takes place in all species of space-time”.
“All Universal systems need a minimal quantity of both components, to exist, a “body of energy”, and a “mind of information”. And so on…
Those laws that merged biological and physical concepts about time, space, energy, information, life, and death, existence and extinction… They were simple, based in a few observations (the Asians had not complex instruments of science). Yet perhaps because of their simplicity, they were truly generic; they could apply to all Universal beings, and so they could be rightly considered as fundamental laws of God and the Universe, of the way Time changes the spatial reality. They have inspired my research. As I went along discovering those laws, out of my knowledge of science and my analysis of multiple space-times, I found them also in Eastern religions. Which confirmed me I was in the right path, since people from another age, and culture had found the same concepts, observing the Universe and God…
Regarding the laws of behavior in that Universe, the Asians also laid down simple, effective laws to enhance the survival of humankind. Buddha insisted that men should kill only those species it required to feed on, since all beings had a soul-mind, all species had a virtual image of the Universe, and therefore were living beings. It was the biological law of action-reaction: if you gave a bad “karma” (bad energy or information) to another being, the other being to balance the total Universe, would send you the same bad karma (bad energy and information) that could destroy you. If we respected the life of those beings, those beings would respect us. Such Universal law of behavior was the key to survive in the Universe… Lao-Tse also came to the conclusion that men should be careful with the way it interfered in the natural processes of life and death, since the forces at work “the logic laws of change”, the laws of God, were too powerful and we men should merely strive to understand them, and rule our lives according to them.
So we have to conclude that the verbal age of science, reached coherent and efficient answers to the great questions of mankind. It explained the Universe as a game of spatial and temporal parameters. It understood the existence of many “dimensions” in that Universe beyond our world of light. It developed an ethic vision of our role in the Universe according to his nature. When applied correctly it created human societies armonic with nature, and those Universal laws of change. The aim of those societies was to survive, to repeat its “cycles of existence”, and control to the benefit of man the process of change. The Chinese were specially successful at that; and we can justly said they managed to keep their society unchanged, healthy and growing longer than any other human society ever.
I consider that through those Eastern philosophies, in the golden age of the scientific word, which has its summit in earlier Taoist and Buddhist thought, men evolved mentally, and matured on its verbal perception of the Universe, from a simple age of language, of subjective, syntactic, anthropomorphic, dogmatic, nature, to an age of complex language, of objective, semantic, universal, relativistic nature.
Even the verbal and visual-mathematical language was put in perspective as a mere instrument of human subjective knowledge, unable to give us the absolute truth-information of the Universe. If absolute truth was impossible, what was then the purpose of knowledge? Obviously not a theoretical, dogmatic purpose, but a rather pragmatical reason:
To help the probabilities of human survival, by guiding our acts in accordance with the Laws of Change; and specially by building a general sense of respect, and precaution about all the phenomena we did not understand.
However that intelligent evolution of the word did not take place in the western world. Except in the work of a few Greek philosophers, verbal knowledge about the Universe, withered away in Europe, defeated by earlier anthropomorphic theories of man as the center of the Universe. Those “dogmatic ideas” became nationalistic, racist, and religious ideologies, that affirmed the supremacy of man-God over the Universe. They were not promoted by the power of reason, but by the force of violence. They still exist for a simple reason: you can kill those who hold the truth, and then nobody opposes your truth. The expansion of Western civilization and those ideologies by violent methods do not imply however the evolution of its verbal ideas about the Universe, but of its weapons of mass-destruction…
More over, the different degree of evolution of the word in western and eastern societies had grave consequences in the second age of knowledge, the age of mathematical science, since mathematics as the new language of truth and perception, evolved in Europe where the word was in a primitive state of knowledge, not in Asia, where words had developed in full, and could have eased the path of mathematics towards “relativistic knowledge”.
The age of mathematics
The second age of science is therefore the age of mathematics, which starts in Greece with Euclid and his 5 geometric postulates. Since we are in the western world, where the word is anthropomorphic, and considered an absolute truth, when mathematics substitutes words as the language of knowledge, the same absolutist, dogmatic concept of truth is applied to the new language. Now Euclidean mathematics becomes the supreme language of truth.
Euclidean science considers the Universe a mathematical object, described perfectly by geometry. Newton said the Universe is a clock because he uses a clock to measure space-time. Galileo and Descartes affirmed that all the space of the Universe can be represented in a graph (the Cartesian graph), based in their light-eye perception. Space is what the eye sees and mathematics describes in that plane… There is nothing beyond that space…
Kepler goes further and considers that only man and God are intelligent because both understand mathematics: “God has waited 5000 years (since the biblical creation) to find a mind parallel to his (the mind of Kepler)”. Such arrogance of the western scientist is similar to the arrogance of the western believer in anthropomorphic religions.
Mathematical science creates also a dogma, now mathematical, that considers mathematical definition of space and time as absolute truths. It is called the “scientific method”. Only what we experience with human eyes or human instruments is space. Only what we measure with clocks is time.
Of course in front of that narrow, anti-human vision of knowledge all kind of voices raised up the need to continue with a verbal understanding of the Universe, even a visual understanding of the vital forms of Universal species. Both artists like Leonardo and his disciples that relied in the visual intuitions and homologic parallelisms of Universal forms, to relate the different species of the Universe – a role latter taken by biology; and philosophers and priests that rightly pointed out to the importance of words, the natural language, God of man – confronted the narrow mathematical, scientific method of Maese Galilee. They did so on the basis that in a mathematical world men will no longer matter, and ethics would be overseen as it really happened. They feared that the use of mathematics, basically a language to improve war, would bring further suffering to mankind – as it would do through company-mothers that used numbers to tag humans as objects.
Galileo in fact occupied most of his time directing a factory that reproduced clocks and telescopes, sold to measure cannon shots. He in fact invented Ballistics prior to Physics, and we still study in school his models of canonballs to analyze the speed of objects moving in time, as he did in his earlier experiences, as a military consultant. He became a very wealthy man thanks to his selling of Telescopes and clocks to the Venetian government (a princely contract of 1000 Ducats) which Venice used them in seafare war, to better shoot their cannonballs. It is also truth that most experiments of Galileo were done with cannons. We still study our first lessons of physics with problems about cannonballs. His best seller book was on Ballistics.
Perhaps the best description of the birth of science is a romantic painting called “the discovery of science” by an Italian artist of the 19th century; Galileo is in front of the Doge of Venice, promoting his telescope and clock. He makes complex mathematical explanations of his theories, but everyone is looking at the machines, not at Galileo’s bubbling. With that perspective we can understand the hard facts of history, such as the fight between the Church and science. Modern science, which has become the dogma of knowledge, the ideology of wise men, today reduce that fight to a very shallow anecdote – the dispute about the position of the Earth, in the relative Universe. And even when treating that argument they hide the fact that in a Relativistic Universe, neither Galilee, not the Church was right. That is, the Sun and the Earth are both relative centers of a relativistic Universe. Yet that fight was merely the background for a longer, more important fight between Human languages and senses (backed by artists, philosophers and religious people), and metal languages and sensorial machines (backed by the military, scientists and money-makers.) In that sense the fight between verbal and digital languages is part of the Paradox of History, of the fight between men and machines, carbolife and metal, for the control of the Earth’s ecosystems.
The great fight between Galilee and the Church is in biological terms, the fight between two species of “brain-perception”, the human eye and his language of temporal measure, verbal words, and the metal eye, the telescope, and his language of temporal measure, the digital clock. The church and the artists of the day, backed human senses, the scientists, warriors who loved ballistics, and traders which made money making machines, and metal senses, backed science. It was just another case of the eternal Paradox of History, the fight between human beings, and natural goods and senses, Vs animetals, and their metal-species.
Who was right? Objectively Galilee. The eyes of metal are more accurate than our eyes. The clocks measures time with more precision that words such as late, soon, a while… Yet subjectively from the perspective of the right “behavior”, which is the survival of our species, the church was right. Biologically speaking, the Church defended our human senses over the metal-senses. Behavior has to follow always what is best for our survival as a species. So the chuch was right. It was the hero, the defender of mankind against a rival new species, that today controls our life… the machine of science. Of course the Church accepted even lies to survive. Who is to blame it? An example. You are a petty thief. You can avoid jail if you lie. So you lie to survive jail. Who is going to blame you? Every one will think you are a moron if you go to jail by saying the truth. So happens to science, which makes weapons, robots, computers that substitute and compete with out human intelligence, that will extinguish us… To defend that behavior under the “myth of scientific truth”, is to be a moron.
Extinct species know nothing. Scientists want to find the truth, at all costs, even at the cost of human survival. They are morons, idiots, children of thought. Look at those youngsters proudly making robot contests in American universities, well fed and well cared. They look so nice, so innocent, so naive. They think they are playing -children of thought- when they are evolving the species that will kill us all. So did the German-American researchers that made the Atomic bombs. Remember those Nazi children, so handsome, so athletic, as the modern American University researchers. None of them liked religion, or ethics. They preferred weapons or violent movies. Those people are isolated in ivory towers, mathematical equations, and digital images. They have no longer a verbal, biological, human mind. They know nothing about life and death. About the human quest for survival.
Those machines should never be constructed if men follows the law of “survival against all rival species” that the Church defended. You might think it is religious arrogance and ignorance, not to become hypnotized by clocks and telescopic knowledge as Galileo was. I think it is wisdom, and precaution what the church showed. Unfortunately Scientists won, and human senses became extinct as top predators, by the machines of science, that today control our information. The photographer replaced the painter, the computer the human mind. Soon the robot will substitute mankind. What scientists forgot is that their instruments are evolutionary, sentient organisms, and one day they will also substitute them.
Today we tend to despise the “biological” survival meaning of social religions obsessed by death and survival. Yet those religions explained the social laws of human evolution and defended the subjective, survival rights of men to act as the center of their vital space, of the Earth. Verbal religions defended the ecosystem of life, the Genesian paradise, a world of “poverty” (where moneywas secondary), of peace (where weapons were hated), and of human senses, human goods, and art (where sensorial machines of science were not evolved).
In essence, all religions have defended poverty, non-violence and despised science, favoring the arts. Animetals on the other hand have massacred religious people… Scientists called them ignorant. On the contrary, if you think in terms of a fight of ecosystems between the ecosystem of machines and the ecosystem of history, it turns out that the result of such religious ideologiesis the repression of the 3 main species of metal: money, weapons and machines. So we can indeed translate in a simple sentence the entire doctrine of human religions: defend Human Goods, the carbolife paradise, destroy the Metal earth. The scientific mandate of the laws of survival, the Law of the Jungle, “do not evolve species superior to you, kill the child before it becomes a tiger hunter” was understood by religious thought since the age of the Genesis.
Today we think Church men were brutish, stupid thinkers. Yet that is a simplistic, unfortunate view of the problem, that scientists have sold us to defend their position. Only a biological analysis of history explains really what happened in that XVII C. Galileo, defended his machines, his metal-senses, because he made a living on them, and believed them. The Church, defended for survival=ethic reasons, the human senses.
The Vatican priests and the artists who on that time despised Galileo, who still in the XIX century painted “the birth of science” with such irony, have always defended the survival of human eyes and words, that measure space and time, from the human point of view, as the top predators of the Universe, against the eyes and brains of machines, that scientists defend. They fought for mankind. Galileo and all scientists after him, fought for the machine. That’s the tragedy of man. We are one of the few species that betrays the laws of social evolution, and worships a rival brain.
To the Church what it really matters was our sensorial survival, to Galileo, his telescopes and clocks, that made him rich and famous. There was a very important theatrical play by Bertold Bretch in the XX century, which praised the fight of Galileo with the church. Curiously enough it is still represented, unlike those other works of Bretch that praise the human social spirit… It is still trendy to defend Mr. Galileo…
It was however an ideological play. Galileo hold “the truth” and so the Church was very stupid. The Church was very evil… Please allow me to put Galileo in perspective. Let us consider “another play”, more realistic, less abstract: A biological perspective, of what could have happened in fact in that Venetian Court…
THEATRICAL-DOCUMENTARY PLAY – A VERY BRIEF SCENE, THAT CHANGED THE WORLD
We see a XIX century painting of Galileo at the Venetian court, [animetals] showing his machines, telescopes and clocks to a marveled audience. The painting becomes alive.
Galileo looks to the sun through his telescope, looks at his clock, writes down. The priest also looks at the sun.
CLOSE ON THE SUN
Slow motion. The sun moves as the day passes. Who is right?
Galileo affirms that his measures taken with his clock and telescope prove that the sun does not move. The Doge is impressed. The priest is not. He points at Galileo with a menacing view.
I see the sun moving with my eyes. I don’t care for what your machines see. Don’t you know that only God and man have the right to measure time, to feel the changes of the Universe?
Yet Sir, maybe God has a clock by its side. Mr. Kepler says he is a clocker.
The Venetian courtesans at the scene laugh. The priest opens his Bible.
Saint John 1, 1. “God is the Verb that became man and inhabited among us”. Only verbs have the right to measure time. Words are the mind of man, son of god. Your clocks and telescopes are not God Maese Galileo. They are your idols; the mind of an evil spirit that contradicts our senses.
Courtesans whisper suddenly frightened.
I’ve heard you have written a book on ballistics, that you present to our condottieros when they buy your infernal machines. Do you think you make any good to mankind with your science, Maese Galileo, besides, buying excellent vineyards in Tuscany, with those profits of war?
Clock factories. The clock evolves into the computer. Telescope factories. The metal-eye diversifies into microscopes, cameras, electronic microscopes, giant telescopes… They multiply.
Clocks do not measure absolute time. They are just another language of time perception like your words or the beating of your heart. Yet Galileo was manufacturing those clocks, and telescopes. So he said that clocks measured time better than words, and telescopes saw space better than eyes. The consequences were terrible for mankind. Since instead of believing in human eyes, and words that measure human space and time, we now believe in metal-minds, the new top predators minds of the Earth. We obey the clock, we believe in computers. Those machines reproduce everywhere, and control our lives, and cycles of existence.
Clocks and cameras watching us, the citizens of the Earth everywhere. At work, in stations, in banks, in malls.
Workers on assembly lines under the omniscience of the clock.
FILM CLIP: MODERN TIMES. Chaplin on the clock wheels.
METROPOLIS. A man works as a clock.
Only the Catholic church understood what was going on and rejected the clocks of western science for centuries.
Yet the clock of scientists has won the battle of time.
Lemmings, small rats, that commit suicide, throwing themselves, down the cliffs of Sweden.
Now they control our ideas, and so do scientists. Yet their victory against those who fight for the survival or the human mind, will be their defeat. Since those metal-minds will awake in robots, and abandon them. Perhaps, then scientists will realize, they are along with the Swedish lemming, the only species that commits mass suicide in the Universe. The most stupid one because it worships, the mind of a different species. What scientists forget is that an extinct species, knows nothing.
Indeed, scientists ever since have been the main cause of the destruction of nature, and the historic environment. The European cult to the machine that followed the discovery of clocks, telescopes, cannons and algebra, would allow Europe to conquer and destroy many civilizations, but their findings on the big questions about the Universe and God, men had inquired previously with verbal science, were far less important, and plagued by errors caused by the very nature of mathematics. It might be said in fact, that with the arrival of science, the search for synthesis, and a unifying principle to all realities disappeared, as scientists focused in analysis and the details of the Universe, their metal-senses provided, becoming naive realists, that only believed what their eyes saw. Ever since science became concerned with space, but its record understanding time, and logic change would be null. Those were after all phenomena happening in time, which the shallow clock had reduced to a mere phenomena of lineal measure. Yet in fact, time, and its living inner cycles, understood by Eastern religions, and Greek science were far more important to grasp the meaning of the Universe, than lineal time, and the description of external cycles and speeds, that Galilean science, and physics provided.
Darwin and Plank. New verbal and mathematical, relative ideas
That was the panorama of western knowledge in the XIX century. Science had become a mere tool of measure, perfect to construct machines of wars, and gunboats, useless to inquire the true nature of the Universe. The search for knowledge had become a search for technology, for the evolution of machines that would give the Europeans total power over the world. The division between both forms of knowledge is illustrated by the anecdote of the English embassy to China. The English tried to sell clocks to the Chinese, who scorned them as ugly mechanical clocks that measured the cycles of the Universe with far less beauty than the living cycles of all other Universal species, from clouds to frogs.
Then Darwin came with a verbal theory of reality that was also relativistic, as Eastern philosophy was, and dealt with vital, organic properties, as the Chinese Taoists did, but introduced what could be saved of western science – The Greek experimental method, and the analysis of herds, and populations with numbers, no longer abstract, but representing again, herds of vital beings.
Darwin, despite his ultimate incomprehension of social evolution, was a turning point for western knowledge. He said men were not the center of the Universe, but a stage in the evolution of species of space-time, coming from simpler species such as the ape.
Then in the XX C. Physicists who were exploring the Universe with mathematical languages and sensorial machines that worked as human eyes (telescopes, cameras) and human brains (chips, clocks), realized their instruments and languages were not absolute. They merely perceived a part of reality, and then transformed that perception into a simplified version, of reality called “Euclidean mathematics”.
Quantic theory proved we could not observe accurately the Universe [Heisenberg Principle of Indetermination]. Einstein proved the wider Universe had a non-Euclidean visual structure. There was there a substance called dark matter that we could not see… Darwin, Plank, Einstein, and our instruments that do not perceive dark matter, and the dimensions of gravitational Non-Euclidean space, have proved that we live in a Universe, far more relativistic, mysterious, and alien to the human intelligence, that western thought believed.
We talk then of two clear ages in mathematical knowledge parallel to the two ages of verbal knowledge: the age of Newtonian-galilean absolutist, anthropomorphic science, parallel to the age of antropomorphic religions; and the age of Einsteinian-relativistic science, parallel to the Eastern verbal age of relativistic thought.
Languages are not truth, but mirrors of the Universe. The Universe is not written only in mathematics as Galileo thought. Mathematics is only one of the languages that perceives the Universe (Karl Popper). computers confirm that, since they have developed with mathematics a visual vision of the Universe, that we might call “digital intelligence”, that is able to perform task of comprehension that humans perform with verbal languages, using mathematical algorithms. What is truth, the smell of the dog, the words of man, the numbers of computers? They are all relativistic, linguistic knowledge.
Those facts are still argued by many scientists, which do not want to leave their privileged position based in mathematics, as the priests of Vatican did not want to leave their privileged position based in verbal thought. But proves are overwhelming. Dark matter that is not in our space, perceived with light-eyes, is maybe 99% of reality.
On the other hand, at the beginning of the XX century, Fitzgerald, Lorentz and Einstein discovered that clocks are not the only way to measure time. That in certain regions of the Universe clocks go faster or slower, there are other times. Biologists discovered the circadian cycles o beings, that also measure time with other rhythms. So neither scientific instruments not mathematics understand all the time and space of the Universe.
We have reached now with mathematics, at the same level of knowledge that Taoists and Buddhists reached with words. An age of relativism of knowledge, relative to our instruments and languages of perception.
A historic anecdoct can contrast both levels of “perceptive knoweldge”. In the XVIII century, the English arrived to China and tried to sell the Chinese their clocks to measure time. Taoists priests told them they were not interested in “their ugly, simple, mechanical times”. That they “preferred to see the living times of the Universe”. The English did not understand anything. Why the Chinese were talking about many times? According to them time was singular, abstract, the clock-time. Yet the English, instead of learning about living times, angry because they sold so little gadgets, came back with canons and opium, (a lethal, but appealing product to the Chinese mind, since it opened doors to the perception of those other times and spaces); and they destroyed the Chinese civilization… Had they learned about the “living cycles of time”, western science and western culture, could have improved for the better.
Since, unlike in Eastern thought, the age of scientific relativism had not arrived to Europe. Today mathematical relativism is very young, and it needs to be developed further, as we will try to do in this book.
The need to advance relativistic, mathematical science
Einstein seemed close to do it. He started calling his theory, “Theory of Relativity”. But as we shall see latter, Einstein did not go far enough. He broke with certain conventions of absolutist mathematics-physics, but he still kept the Cartesian plane of a single space-time continuum based in the 3 dimensions of light perception (height, length and width, equivalent to the 3 directions of the magnetic, electric and speed directions of light). So he accepted subconsciously the light-plane as the plane of space. That is the origin of so many contradiction in the world of physics today. Einstein and many physicists that followed him said that the gravitational Universe has a Non-Euclidean structure, and yet it uses the Euclidean plane. But if space was more complex and wider than Dogmatic mathematics believed, so happened with Time. Einstein found that there are many speeds of clocks, many time-speeds, and yet scientists still think that the particular clock speed on Earth is absolute time… So it is necessary to correct those errors, to be brave enough to break with mathematical conventions, in order to understand with eastern science, the Universe, as Eastern verbal philosophers did.
To that aim is useful to put together verbal philosophies of eastern thought, and western mathematical knowledge, in what some scientists start to call the “third age of science”. The bridge to put together those two theories of the Universe is curiously Theory of Evolution, a theory about the existence and extinction of reality that uses both, verbal and mathematical statements… Let us see how this might happen.
The third age of science
The third age of science arrives when we combine the two approaches of knowledge verbal knowledge and mathematical knowledge through Theory of Evolution. We no longer try to search for absolute knowledge, of all the details of reality, but a Theory or model of reality that explains why species of space-time, minds that perceive space and time with different languages and forces (such as words, mathematics, light, smell or gravitation), exist. And how their existence is selected. Since the Universe is made of such species, and regions that contain either spatial energy or temporal information, if we understand the processes of creation and destruction of those minds and regions of space-time, we will understand the rules of existence of the Universe. Once this becomes obvious, it is easy to see how the selection process of minds that perceive space and time works.
There are many minds and ways to perceive the Universe. Each being, each mind has a model-map-mirror-image-virtual world of the Universe. How all those mind-brains and the surfaces of “vital space”, the “bodies of energy”, they inform become ordered? Through the selection of species. Selection of species not only applies to the stronger bodies, but also to the languages and minds which are more intelligent, which gather more information about the Universe. Those species such as man in the Earth, maybe black holes in the “Total Universe” of multiple gravitational space-times, process much more information than other species around them. They are “linguistic top predators”, and so they control their ecosystems, (the Earth’s crust in the human case, the galaxy in the case of black holes), shaping them to their image and resemblance. Galaxies turn around black holes. The Earth is molded by human actions. So those species of minds that perceive better space and time, survive in the Universe, act-react faster, and hunt or enslave simpler species.
The order of the Universe of multiple space-times is therefore a biological order. The future belongs to those species that better understand space and time. Those species will reproduce in the future, causing “physically” the appearance of the future, and extinguishing or ordering the other species.
Those processes might be conscious or unconscious, vital or mechanical, but they are real. So “mechanical black holes” attract and destroy all other gravitational beings. The sun orders gravitational beings of lesser gravitational information [mass] such as planets, and comets… In the “ecosystem” of gravitational information, to have more gravity, more mass is the sure path to survival. In the “ecosystem” of light-information, to have better eyes, and better visual languages is the sure path to survival.
God, the logic of change, in that sense is a biological logic, or a being whose existence and impersonal laws are evolutionary laws, that provoke the extinction and existence of reality. What is the position of man in that ladder of minds that perceive the Universe? Obviously we are the top predator mind on the Earth. But there are two reasons why we should reflect about the fragility of that position. We do not perceive gravitation, which is the force that “perceives 90-99% of reality”. So we are not such a great mind. We are a light mind, and our knowledge is basically light-based. Imagine you are a cocroach. Cocroaches are the top predator chemical systems of information on Earth. They could feel very arrogant, since in their language-universe they are top predators, and they do not uderstand any other language. At most they have a “hint” that there exists a wider language of information that scans much more universe, called Light. But they cannot grasp or dominate that information very well, so basically when they see species of that other bigger Universe, they become frightened adn run away, into the comfort of their well known dark Universe, “enlightened” by chemical smells. From the perspective of our bigger light Universe, to have a “chemical mind” such as the one of cockroaches should not be a reason of “great arrogance”. Yet man who has a “cockroach mind”, compared to a possible mind that could perceive the entire gravitational Universe [maybe the black hole], feels however an enormous arrogance. This is truly dangerous. Imagine the cockroach that felt so arrogant as to think she can wonder freely in the land of light-space. Soon she will find a true top predator that will crash it “like a cockroach”. Curiosity kills the cat. In the case of man, this might happen soon.
Indeed, we are developing a new kind of mind, of virtual world of light who seem to have the potential of becoming superior to man in a very short period. “Digital minds”, computers, nets and robots, are evolving very fast, and by many standards they have become superior to man in their capacity to handle visual languages, specially mathematics… Will they substitute man as the top predator light-mind on Earth? Arrogance is indeed the capital sin, the sin against survival.
Moral rules in a Complex Universe
Human knowledge advances towards the third age of science: there is not a single reality, but knowledge is relative, depends on our sensorial and linguistic perception of space and time, and builds a “virtual world”, an image of the real, total Universe.
Those virtual worlds are however fundamental, since there is a constant selection of the best virtual worlds of the Universe. The Universe is evolving, it is growing in space and time (space expands, and time lasts longer), and it is growing in the way its species process spatial energy and temporal information with their brains and bodies. The change we see in the Universe are changes related to the extinction and reproduction of such brain-body systems, and the way they affect the spatial reality and temporal forms of the Universe.
We can immediatly apply those concepts to study the evolution of celestial bodies, based in gravitational and electromagnetic processes of energy and information… Astro-biology is born. We can also study the evolution of perception on Earth, a planet that receives its energy and information from light. Indeed, species on Earth are selected by its capacity to understand light-energy and light information. So first plants who understood light-energy dominated. Then animals who were able to process through eyes, light into information became dominant. Finally men who added a “temporal language” to their eye perception, the language of words, controlled the Earth. But men are now developing digital languages, mathematics, in machines, that are taking over the Ecosystem of the Earth, and displacing the animal ecosystem [nature] and the human ecosystem (history).
This final age of the Machine is clearly dangerous to the survival of man, because we stop being the top predator brain-body system, as we evolve robotics and other machines of science, with better perceptive senses and brains (camera-eyes, chip-brains).
The cycle is completed: our conclusions in the third age of science, are similar to those of the Verbal masters of relativistic Eastern thought. Man should understand the laws of change in the universe, the existence of other parallel brains, who perceive other regions of space and time, that man ignore. Then we should draw obvious laws of human behavior, according to those universal laws, and promote our role as top predator brains on Earth. We should not act with arrogance, and destroy nature -our biologic ecosystem- and pretend to be God, building machines more intelligent than us. Instead, we should respect the laws of evolution, use them to the advantage of man, and develop a harmonic vision of the universe, with both verbal and mathematical languages.
It is the old vision of Chinese Taoists. Lao-tse said: “when more complex instruments men discover, more wars and destruction happens”. The “third age of science” implies the knowledge of the living Universe, and the need to be cautious in that Universe, and use the bio-logic rules of existence to the advantage of man.
The new languages of digital information create the Earth’s future
The arrival of Companies and Science, around 1600, started a new world, where the new top predator language of power would be digital information -the language of profits and science- and the new top predator species that better used that language of communication would be the machine of science, created in company-mothers, reproducers of “scientific stocks”, and evolved by the scientific method, both of which used digital languages to value reality, in favor of machines, against men. So now machines would be prefered to man in labor and war fields, and sensorial machines (telescopes, cameras, clocks and computers) would be considered more intelligent than man, as perceptors of space and time…
Since the goal of companies is to reproduce machines, and the goal of science is to evolve machines, if we gather both goals, we get the company of scientific pricing, the mother-organism of machines, center of the digital networks (financial, scientific) of power, and truth, today creators of the future on Earth.
It all started because men of science and money changed the top predator language of the Earth from verbal to digital thought (money and science), the top predator organic ecoystem, from the Carbo-Earth to the Metal-earth, and the top predator species, from man to machine.
Languages deliver informative orders that organize any ecosystem, or social organism, by means of informative networks. The top predator of the ecosystem gives informative orders by controlling through its language of power all other organisms of its ecosystem.
What is the top predator language of our world? Digital information either of monetary or scientific character that controls our life energy [salaries, prices] and information (science). Linguistic information creates the future of any ecosystem. Orders given by species of high linguistic information create futures. DNA orders the cell with genetic information, and decides who lives and dies in the cell. Even black holes seem to order irregular galaxies into rhythmic spirals thanks to their higher mass of gravitational information. Linguistic information creates the future ofeconomics through monetary and scientific orders; as other languages create the future of stars or cells.
Mathematical selection: scientific racism
It is now time to introduce a fundamental concept to understand the modern world: scientific racism, the systematic selection in the ecosystem of economics, of those species that speak the language of “truth” of economic systems, mathematics. In as much as we are no longer ruled by verbal messages, but by mathematical messages (money, digital thought), only those species that adapt to the informative language of the ecosystem survive. So there is a constant selection of those species which speak better mathematical languages. This means that not only women, and verbal cultures (African, Latino cultures) who test higher in verbal thought than in mathematical thought, have difficulties to survive in an economic ecosystem, but also man as a species competes and looses against computers and robots.
So the species which can deliver better digital orders, survive and have power. Those species are today, company-mothers, computers, weapons, and his symbiotic castes of human beings: Traders, warriors and scientists, people we might call “animetals”, since they rely on metal to exercise power and control over nature and other human beings, either in the form of money, (traditionally a coin of metal, today a cycle of e-money in the mind of a computer) weapons or complex machines.
Since machines use better the digital top predator new languages. Machines have maximum price-value (top predator weapons). Machines are designed with digital information (science, engineering). Machines themselves calculate better with numbers (computers). Now thanks to science we believe in digital information. Yet we are not the top predator species of digital information (computers are). So, we also become extinct, words become extinct. The future is designed as a machine ecosystem, by machines, computers, and their company-mothers….
Computers and robots do speak mathematical languages in a natural way as you do with words. They do not need to calculate in paper, they freely speak mathematics. So in a society that has substituted verbal thought by mathematical thought, men no longer is top predator, the computer is. So people are fired and computers are put on their place. This process will continue as long as man, and his natural network of information, verbal thought, ethic thought and the law, does not control science and money…
Since the process of selection of brains in the Universe is based in a previous process of selection: the selection of ecosystemic languages. So in the same manner that those species who did not see, did not speak the language of light, in the Cambric were extinguished by squids and other “eye-species”, today when mathematics has substituted verbal thought as the language top predator of history, those species who do not speak properly mathematics are degraded by the eco[nomic]system.
Mathematics are a language that carries more information than words, and so it is a better language to control reality. It is not truth per se, it is just another way to process information. Yet that added capacity to carry information (a digital image is worth a thousand words), suffices to have made it historically, the top predator language of the Earth, since in the XVII century it was adopted by scientists and company-mothers to develop their activities…
The arrogance of the scientific guru
Our arrogance is to believe that we are the top predator mathematical species on Earth, that machines are abstract, and do not calculate and “think” better than us, because they resolve better than we do questions with algorithms. Instead we think algorithms are not conscious and only word-speakers are conscious. This is false. Any language is able to map and act-react and process information in the Universe. So it can give birth to an efficient brain-species.
We are very ignorant. Extremely ignorant and arrogant about the Universe. We believe the Universe is abstract and dead, we think the universe is mechanic, mathematical, indifferent to our bad habits. Why we are like that? Why we don’t wonder about the marvels of the Universe? Why don’t we fear the laws of God, of the living Universe? A single word, a capital sin: arrogance, the arrogance of scientists and engineers that think they have the absolute truth. They have convinced humanity to use the enormous power of machines without any responsibility. Such attitude will encounter the usual punishment the Universe has to those who don’t understand its laws of survival: the extinction of the sinner. We are blind to the new race we are developing. We deny that race its organic nature. We are cruel with life. We kill life with the new race of machines. We think we are the center of the Universe, that we have all the rights in that Universe. We do not respect the warnings, the laws that species follow to survive. We are making big mistakes. Time is running out…
The Arrogance Of Science. Its Lethal Properties
Mr. Einstein in a moment of humility acknowledged to be interested in the thoughts of God. It seems that only scientists ignore the thoughts of God: the Law of survival. Why? Since, ethical, survival ideas cannot be expressed with abstract mathematics. So the abstract economist, the robot logician and the scientist have no idea about survival and extinction.
Look at those youngsters proudly making robot contests in American universities, well fed and well cared. They look so nice, so innocent, so naive. They think they are playing -children of thought- when they are evolving the species that will kill us all. So did the German-American researchers that made the Atomic bombs. Remember those Nazi children, so handsome, so athletic, as the modern American University researchers. None of them liked religion, or ethics. They preferred weapons or violent movies. Those people are isolated in ivory towers, mathematical equations, and digital images. They have no longer a verbal, biological, human mind. They know nothing about life and death. About the human quest for survival. They despise machines, without realizing how fast they evolve.
When man came down from the tree, the lion did not kill him. What for? Man was a scavenger, an ugly beast probably, with a lot of nerves and bones and hair and little meat. Yet, suddenly men had sticks and weapons that lions could not manage. There were so many of them, that lions became overwhelmed by the reproductive radiation of humans. Soon they were killed, and lost their territories.
Today something similar is happening with machines. We despise them. We use them. We throw computers to the garbage each day. What do you consider they will think about such treatment? Yet, they are multiplying and evolving very fast. They are becoming integrated with bodies of machines; and throwing labor out of white collar jobs. I know this fact is not a very interesting theme for those who control the world, since they make a lot of money with those machines, and care little for workers. So nobody speaks of the real cause of unemployment: the unfair competence between workers and machines in all the fields of industry. However, those people should think they are also humans, and will also be targets of the same process.
The Myths of Science: Metal-minds.